Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ý | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
||
Check the appropriate box: |
||
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
ý |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o |
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
FedEx Corporation | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
||||
ý |
No fee required. |
|||
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
|||
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: |
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held September 23, 2013
To Our Stockholders:
We cordially invite you to attend the 2013 annual meeting of FedEx's stockholders. The meeting will take place in the auditorium at the FedEx Express World Headquarters, 3670 Hacks Cross Road, Building G, Memphis, Tennessee 38125, on Monday, September 23, 2013, at 8:00 a.m. local time. We look forward to your attendance either in person or by proxy.
The purposes of the meeting are to:
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on July 29, 2013, may vote at the meeting or any postponements or adjournments of the meeting.
By order of the Board of Directors, | ||
Christine P. Richards Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
August 12, 2013
HOW TO VOTE: Please complete, date, sign and return the accompanying proxy card or voting instruction card, or vote electronically via the Internet or by telephone. The enclosed return envelope requires no additional postage if mailed in the United States.
REDUCE MAILING COSTS: If you vote on the Internet, you may elect to have next year's proxy statement and annual report to stockholders delivered to you electronically. We strongly encourage you to enroll in electronic delivery. It is a cost-effective way for us to provide you with proxy materials and annual reports.
ANNUAL MEETING ADMISSION: If you attend the annual meeting in person, you will need to present your admission ticket, or an account statement showing your ownership of FedEx common stock as of the record date, and a valid government-issued photo identification. The indicated portion of your proxy card or voting instruction card or the ticket accompanying your voting instruction card will serve as your admission ticket. If you are a registered stockholder and receive your proxy materials electronically, you should follow the instructions provided to print a paper admission ticket.
Your vote is very important. Please vote whether or not you plan to attend the meeting.
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
iii
FedEx Corporation
942 South Shady Grove Road
Memphis, Tennessee 38120
FedEx's Board of Directors is furnishing you this proxy statement in connection with the solicitation of proxies on its behalf for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The meeting will take place in the auditorium at the FedEx Express World Headquarters, 3670 Hacks Cross Road, Building G, Memphis, Tennessee 38125, on Monday, September 23, 2013, at 8:00 a.m. local time. At the meeting, stockholders will be voting on the following items: (1) the election of the eleven nominees named in this proxy statement to the FedEx Board of Directors; (2) an advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation; (3) an amendment to FedEx's 2010 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan to increase the number of authorized shares; (4) the ratification of FedEx's independent registered public accounting firm; and (5) if properly presented at the meeting, seven stockholder proposals. Stockholders also will consider any other matters that may properly come before the meeting.
By submitting your proxy (either by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card or by voting electronically on the Internet or by telephone), you authorize Christine P. Richards, FedEx's Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, and Alan B. Graf, Jr., FedEx's Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, to represent you and vote your shares at the meeting in accordance with your instructions. They also may vote your shares to adjourn the meeting and will be authorized to vote your shares at any postponements or adjournments of the meeting.
FedEx's Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2013, which includes FedEx's fiscal 2013 audited consolidated financial statements, accompanies this proxy statement. Although the Annual Report is being distributed with this proxy statement, it does not constitute a part of the proxy solicitation materials and is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
We are first sending the proxy statement, form of proxy and accompanying materials to stockholders on or about August 12, 2013.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 23, 2013: The following materials are available on the Investor Relations page of the FedEx website at http://investors.fedex.com:
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING, PLEASE PROMPTLY VOTE YOUR SHARES EITHER BY MAIL, VIA THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE.
Effect of Not Casting Your Vote: If your shares are held in "street name" (i.e., your shares are held by a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee the "bank or broker"), in order to ensure your shares are voted in the way you would like, you must provide voting instructions to your bank or broker by the deadline provided in the materials you receive from your bank or broker. If you hold your shares in street name and you do not instruct your bank or broker as to how to vote your shares, your broker may vote your shares in its discretion on the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 4), but will not be allowed to vote your shares on any of the other proposals described in this proxy statement, including the election of directors. If you are a stockholder of record and you do not sign and return your proxy card or vote electronically on the Internet or by telephone, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any of the items of business at the meeting.
1
INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
What are the purposes of the annual meeting?
At the annual meeting, the stockholders will be asked to:
Stockholders also will transact any other business that may properly come before the meeting. Members of FedEx's management team will be present at the meeting to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.
The record date for the meeting is July 29, 2013. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on that date are entitled to vote at the meeting. The only class of stock entitled to be voted at the meeting is FedEx common stock. Each outstanding share of common stock is entitled to one vote for all matters before the meeting. At the close of business on the record date there were 316,117,338 shares of FedEx common stock outstanding.
What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner? Am I entitled to vote if my shares are held in "street name"?
If your shares are registered in your name with FedEx's transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., you are the "stockholder of record" (or "registered stockholder") of those shares, and these proxy materials have been provided directly to you by FedEx.
If your shares are held by a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee, you are considered the "beneficial owner" of shares held in "street name." If your shares are held in street name, these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee (the "bank or broker"), along with a voting instruction card. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your bank or broker how to vote your shares by using the voting instruction card or by following its instructions for voting by telephone or on the Internet (if available), and the bank or broker is required to vote your shares in accordance with your instructions.
If you do not give voting instructions, your broker will nevertheless be entitled to vote your shares in its discretion on the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 4). Absent your instructions, the broker will not be permitted, however, to vote your shares on the election of directors (Proposal 1), the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation (Proposal 2), the amendment to FedEx's 2010 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (Proposal 3) or the adoption of the seven stockholder proposals (Proposals 5 through 11), and your shares will be considered "broker non-votes" on those proposals. See "How will broker non-votes be treated?" below.
As the beneficial owner of shares, you are invited to attend the annual meeting. If you are a beneficial owner, however, you may not vote your shares in person at the meeting unless you obtain a legal proxy, executed in your favor, from your bank or broker.
What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card or voting instruction card?
If you receive more than one proxy card or voting instruction card that means your shares are registered differently and are held in more than one account. To ensure that all your shares are voted, please sign and return by mail all proxy cards and voting instruction cards or vote each account over the Internet or by telephone (if made available by the bank or broker with respect to any shares you hold in street name).
2
How many shares must be present to hold the meeting?
A quorum must be present at the meeting for any business to be conducted. The presence at the meeting, in person or represented by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding on the record date will constitute a quorum. Proxies received but marked as abstentions or treated as broker non-votes will be included in the calculation of the number of shares considered to be present at the meeting.
What if a quorum is not present at the meeting?
If a quorum is not present at the meeting, the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote at the meeting who are present, in person or represented by proxy, or the chairman of the meeting, may adjourn the meeting until a quorum is present. The time and place of the adjourned meeting will be announced at the time the adjournment is taken, and no other notice will be given.
1. YOU MAY VOTE BY MAIL. If you properly complete, sign and date the accompanying proxy card or voting instruction card and return it in the enclosed envelope, it will be voted in accordance with your instructions. The enclosed envelope requires no additional postage if mailed in the United States.
2. YOU MAY VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR ON THE INTERNET. If you are a registered stockholder, you may vote by telephone or on the Internet by following the instructions included on the proxy card. If you vote by telephone or on the Internet, you do not have to mail in your proxy card. If you wish to attend the meeting in person, however, you will need to bring your admission ticket. Internet and telephone voting are available 24 hours a day. Votes submitted through the Internet or by telephone must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on September 22, 2013.
If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you still may be able to vote your shares electronically by telephone or on the Internet. The availability of telephone and Internet voting will depend on the voting process of your bank or broker. We recommend that you follow the instructions set forth on the voting instruction card provided to you.
NOTE: If you vote on the Internet, you may elect to have next year's proxy statement and annual report to stockholders delivered to you electronically. We strongly encourage you to enroll in electronic delivery. It is a cost-effective way for us to provide you with proxy materials and annual reports.
3. YOU MAY VOTE IN PERSON AT THE MEETING. If you are a registered stockholder and attend the meeting, you may deliver your completed proxy card in person. Additionally, we will pass out ballots to registered stockholders who wish to vote in person at the meeting. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name who wishes to vote at the meeting, you will need to obtain a legal proxy from your bank or broker, bring it with you to the meeting, and hand it in with a signed ballot that will be provided to you at the meeting. Beneficial owners will not able to vote their shares at the meeting without a legal proxy.
How do I vote my shares held in the FedEx employee stock purchase plan or in any FedEx benefit plan?
If you own shares of FedEx common stock through the FedEx employee stock purchase plan or any FedEx or subsidiary benefit plan, you can direct the record holder or the plan trustee to vote the shares held in your account in accordance with your instructions by completing the proxy card and returning it in the enclosed envelope or by registering your instructions via the Internet or telephone as directed on the proxy card. If you register your voting instructions by telephone or on the Internet, you do not have to mail in the proxy card. If you wish to attend the meeting in person, however, you will need to bring the admission ticket attached to the proxy card with you. In order to instruct a record holder or plan trustee on the voting of shares held in your account, your instructions must be received by September 18, 2013. If your voting instructions are not received by that date, each plan trustee will vote your shares in the same proportion as the plan shares for which voting instructions have been received.
3
Only stockholders eligible to vote or their authorized representatives will be admitted to the meeting. If you plan to attend the meeting, detach and bring with you the stub portion of your proxy card, which is marked "Admission Ticket." You also must bring a valid government-issued photo identification, such as a driver's license or a passport. If you received your proxy materials through the Internet, you should follow the instructions provided to print a paper admission ticket.
If your shares are held in street name, you must bring the "Admission Ticket" that either accompanies or is the stub portion of your voting instruction card. Alternatively, you may bring other proof of ownership, such as a brokerage account statement, which clearly shows your ownership of FedEx common stock as of the record date. In addition, you must bring a valid government-issued photo identification, such as a driver's license or a passport.
Security measures will be in place at the meeting to help ensure the safety of attendees. Metal detectors similar to those used in airports will be located at the entrance to the meeting room, and briefcases, handbags and packages will be inspected. No cameras or recording devices of any kind, or signs, placards, banners or similar materials, may be brought into the meeting. Anyone who refuses to comply with these requirements will not be admitted.
Can I change my vote after I submit my proxy?
Yes, if you are a registered stockholder you may revoke your proxy and change your vote prior to the completion of voting at the meeting by:
Your attendance at the meeting itself will not revoke your proxy unless you give written notice of revocation to the Secretary before your proxy is voted or you vote in person at the meeting.
If your shares are held in street name, you should contact your bank or broker and follow its procedures for changing your voting instructions. You also may vote in person at the meeting if you obtain a legal proxy from your bank or broker.
Will my vote be kept confidential?
Yes, your vote will be kept confidential and not disclosed to FedEx unless:
FedEx's transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., will tabulate and certify the votes. A representative of the transfer agent will serve as the inspector of election.
4
How does the Board of Directors recommend I vote on the proposals?
Your Board recommends that you vote:
What if I am a registered stockholder and do not specify how my shares are to be voted on my proxy card?
If you properly submit a proxy but do not indicate any voting instructions, your shares will be voted:
Will any other business be conducted at the meeting?
Certain stockholders have notified us of their intent to propose a resolution at the meeting requesting that the Board of Directors review FedEx's sponsorship of FedExField, including the impact of ending that relationship, as part of a broader review of FedEx's involvement in any actions or business relationships that may defame or discriminate against people on the basis of gender, race, ethnicity, nation, religion or culture (the "Floor Proposal"). We have not received notice of, and are not aware of, any business to come before the meeting other than the agenda items referred to in this proxy statement and the possible submission of the Floor Proposal.
The Floor Proposal is not included in this proxy statement. If the Floor Proposal is presented at the meeting, the proxy holders will have discretionary voting authority under Rule 14a-4(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with respect to the Floor Proposal and intend to exercise such discretion to vote AGAINST such proposal. If any other matter properly comes before the stockholders for a vote at the meeting, the proxy holders will vote your shares in accordance with their best judgment.
How many votes are required to elect each director nominee?
A director nominee will be elected to the Board of Directors if the number of votes cast "for" such nominee's election exceeds the number of votes cast "against" such nominee's election. See "Corporate Governance Matters Majority-Voting Standard for Director Elections" below.
What happens if a director nominee does not receive the required majority vote?
Each nominee is a current director who is standing for reelection. Accordingly, each nominee has tendered an irrevocable resignation from the Board of Directors that will take effect if the nominee does not receive the required majority vote and the Board accepts the resignation. If the Board accepts the resignation, the nominee will no longer serve on the Board of Directors, and if the Board rejects the resignation, the nominee will continue to serve until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier disqualification, death, resignation or removal. See "Corporate Governance Matters Majority-Voting Standard for Director Elections" below.
5
What happens if a director nominee is unable to stand for election?
If a director nominee named in this proxy statement is unable to stand for election, the Board of Directors may either reduce the number of directors to be elected or select a substitute nominee. If a substitute nominee is selected, the proxy holders may vote your shares for the substitute nominee.
How many votes are required to approve the advisory vote on named executive officer compensation?
Approval of the advisory proposal on named executive officer compensation requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present at the meeting, in person or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote.
As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding on FedEx, the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee. Because we highly value the opinions of our stockholders, however, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee will consider the results of this advisory vote when making future executive compensation decisions.
How many votes are required to approve the amendment to FedEx's 2010 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan?
The adoption of the amendment to FedEx's 2010 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan to increase the number of authorized shares requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present at the meeting, in person or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote.
How many votes are required to ratify the appointment of FedEx's independent registered public accounting firm?
The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as FedEx's independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present at the meeting, in person or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote.
How many votes are required to approve each of the stockholder proposals?
If the stockholder proposal is properly presented at the meeting, approval of the proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present at the meeting, in person or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote. Approval of the stockholder proposal would merely serve as a recommendation to the Board to take the necessary steps to implement such proposal.
How will abstentions be treated?
Abstentions will have no effect on the election of directors (Proposal 1). For each of the other proposals, abstentions will be treated as shares present for quorum purposes and entitled to vote, so they will have the same practical effect as votes against the proposal.
How will broker non-votes be treated?
If your shares are held in street name, in order to ensure your shares are voted in the way you would like, you must provide voting instructions to your bank or broker by the deadline provided in the materials you receive from your bank or broker.
If you hold your shares in street name and you do not instruct your broker as to how to vote your shares, your broker may vote your shares in its discretion on the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 4). Your shares will be treated as broker non-votes on all the other proposals, including the election of directors (Proposal 1).
Broker non-votes will be treated as shares present for quorum purposes, but not entitled to vote. Thus, absent voting instructions from you, your broker may not vote your shares on the election of directors (Proposal 1), the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation (Proposal 2), the adoption of the amendment to FedEx's 2010 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (Proposal 3) or the adoption of the seven stockholder proposals (Proposals 5 through 11). A broker non-vote with respect to these proposals will not affect their outcome.
6
Yes, you are invited to visit the News and Events section of the Investor Relations page of our website (http://investors.fedex.com) at 8:00 a.m. Central time on September 23, 2013, to access the live webcast of the meeting. An archived copy of the webcast will be available on our website for at least one year. The information on FedEx's website, however, is not incorporated by reference in, and does not form part of, this proxy statement.
7
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth the amount of FedEx's common stock beneficially owned by each director, each named executive officer included in the Summary Compensation Table and all directors and executive officers as a group, as of July 29, 2013. Unless otherwise indicated, beneficial ownership is direct and the person shown has sole voting and investment power.
|
Common Stock Beneficially Owned | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
Number of Shares |
Number of Option Shares(1) |
Percent of Class(2) |
|||||||
Frederick W. Smith |
19,627,899 | (3) | 1,710,243 | 6.71 | % | |||||
James L. Barksdale |
46,800 | 53,330 | * | |||||||
John A. Edwardson |
18,119 | 46,330 | * | |||||||
Shirley Ann Jackson |
7,511 | 13,520 | * | |||||||
Steven R. Loranger |
7,800 | (4) | 34,930 | * | ||||||
Gary W. Loveman |
16,854 | 24,090 | * | |||||||
R. Brad Martin |
56,500 | (5) | 10,690 | * | ||||||
Joshua Cooper Ramo |
| 10,690 | * | |||||||
Susan C. Schwab |
3,170 | 26,130 | * | |||||||
Joshua I. Smith |
8,458 | 40,330 | * | |||||||
David P. Steiner |
5,000 | 21,730 | * | |||||||
Paul S. Walsh |
8,500 | 46,330 | * | |||||||
David J. Bronczek |
75,546 | (6) | 274,624 | * | ||||||
Robert B. Carter |
51,802 | (7) | 170,607 | * | ||||||
T. Michael Glenn |
221,557 | (8) | 211,788 | * | ||||||
Alan B. Graf, Jr. |
194,833 | (9) | 224,288 | * | ||||||
All directors and executive officers as a group (19 persons) |
20,478,819 | (10) | 3,199,956 | 7.42 | % |
8
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires directors and certain officers of FedEx and persons who own more than ten percent of FedEx's common stock to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") initial reports of beneficial ownership (Form 3) and reports of subsequent changes in their beneficial ownership (Form 4 or Form 5) of FedEx's common stock. Such directors, officers and greater-than-ten-percent stockholders are required to furnish FedEx with copies of the Section 16(a) reports they file. The SEC has established specific due dates for these reports, and FedEx is required to disclose in this proxy statement any late filings or failures to file.
Based solely upon a review of the copies of the Section 16(a) reports (and any amendments thereto) furnished to FedEx and written representations from FedEx's directors and reporting officers that no additional reports were required, FedEx believes that its directors and reporting officers complied with all these filing requirements for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2013.
The following table lists certain persons known by FedEx to own beneficially more than five percent of FedEx's outstanding shares of common stock as of March 31, 2013.
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership |
Percent of Class | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dodge & Cox |
17,359,875 | (1) | 5.48 | % | |||
555 California Street, 40th Floor |
|||||||
San Francisco, California 94104 |
|||||||
PRIMECAP Management Company |
19,717,422 | (2) | 6.22 | % | |||
225 South Lake Avenue, Suite 400 |
|||||||
Pasadena, California 91101 |
|||||||
Southeastern Asset Management, Inc. |
16,598,493 | (3) | 5.24 | % | |||
6410 Poplar Avenue, Suite 900 |
|||||||
Memphis, TN 38119 |
9
Corporate Governance Documents
In furtherance of its longstanding goals of providing effective governance of FedEx's business and affairs for the long-term benefit of stockholders and promoting a culture and reputation of the highest ethics, integrity and reliability, the Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, charters for each of its Board committees and a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for directors, officers and employees of FedEx. Each of these documents is available in the Corporate Governance section of the Investor Relations page of our website at http://investors.fedex.com.
The leadership structure of our Board of Directors includes (i) a combined Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, (ii) independent, active and effective directors of equal importance and rights, who all have the same opportunities and responsibilities in providing vigorous oversight of the effectiveness of management policies, and (iii) a Lead Independent Director. The Chairperson of the Nominating & Governance Committee, who is elected annually by a majority of the independent Board members, serves as the Lead Independent Director. The Board believes that FedEx has been and continues to be well served by having the company's founder, Frederick W. Smith, serve as both Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. The current Board leadership model, when combined with the composition of the Board, the strong leadership of our independent directors, Board committees and Lead Independent Director, and the highly effective corporate governance structures and processes already in place, strikes an appropriate balance between consistent leadership and independent oversight of FedEx's business and affairs.
The Board believes that FedEx's Corporate Governance Guidelines help ensure that strong and independent directors will continue to play the central oversight role necessary to maintain FedEx's commitment to the highest quality corporate governance. Pursuant to our governance principles and established practices:
10
The Board of Directors' role in risk oversight at FedEx is consistent with the company's leadership structure, with management having day-to-day responsibility for assessing and managing the company's risk exposure and the Board and its committees providing oversight in connection with those efforts, with particular focus on ensuring that FedEx's risk management practices are adequate and regularly reviewing the most significant risks facing the company. The Board performs its risk oversight role by using several different levels of review. Each Board meeting begins with a strategic overview by the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer that describes the most significant issues, including risks, affecting the company, and also includes business updates from each reporting segment CEO. In addition, at least annually, the Board reviews in detail the business and operations of each of the company's reporting segments, including the primary risks associated with that segment.
The Board reviews the risks associated with the company's financial forecasts and annual business plan. These risks are identified and managed in connection with the company's robust enterprise risk management ("ERM") process. Our ERM process provides the enterprise with a common framework and terminology to ensure consistency in identification, reporting and management of key risks. The ERM process is embedded in our strategic financial planning process, which ensures explicit consideration of risks that affect the underlying assumptions of the strategic plans and provides a platform to facilitate integration of risk information in business decision-making.
The Board has delegated to each of its committees responsibility for the oversight of specific risks that fall within the committee's areas of responsibility. For example:
In addition, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and discussing with management the guidelines and policies that govern the processes by which the company assesses and manages its exposure to all risk, including our ERM process. The ERM process culminates in an annual presentation to the Audit Committee on the key enterprise risks facing FedEx.
Executive Management Succession Planning
The Board of Directors has in place an effective planning process to select successors to the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and other members of executive management. The Nominating & Governance Committee, in consultation with the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, annually reports to the Board on executive management succession planning. The entire Board works with the Nominating & Governance Committee and the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer to evaluate potential successors to the CEO and other members of executive management. Through this process, the
11
Board receives information that includes qualitative evaluations of potential successors to the CEO and other executives. The Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer periodically provides to the Board his recommendations and evaluations of potential successors, along with a review of any development plans recommended for such individuals. Additionally, the Board periodically reviews and revises as necessary the company's emergency management succession plan, which details the actions to be taken by specific individuals in the event a member of executive management suddenly dies or becomes incapacitated.
The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating & Governance Committees and, with the exception of Frederick W. Smith, each of the Board's current members (James L. Barksdale, John A. Edwardson, Shirley Ann Jackson, Steven R. Loranger, Gary W. Loveman, R. Brad Martin, Joshua Cooper Ramo, Susan C. Schwab, Joshua I. Smith, David P. Steiner and Paul S. Walsh) is independent and meets the applicable independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange (including the additional requirements for Audit Committee members) and the Board's more stringent standards for determining director independence. Mr. F.W. Smith is FedEx's Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer.
Under the Board's standards of director independence, which are included in FedEx's Corporate Governance Guidelines, a director will be considered independent only if the Board affirmatively determines that the director has no direct or indirect material relationship with FedEx, other than as a director. The standards set forth certain categories or types of transactions, relationships or arrangements with FedEx, as follows, each of which (i) is deemed not to be a material relationship with FedEx, and thus (ii) will not, by itself, prevent a director from being considered independent:
12
The Board broadly considered all relevant facts and circumstances, including the following immaterial transactions, relationships and arrangements:
Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Board of Directors has determined that at least one member of the Audit Committee, John A. Edwardson, is an audit committee financial expert as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K, promulgated by the SEC.
A director must retire immediately before the annual meeting of FedEx's stockholders during the calendar year in which he or she attains age 72.
Stock Ownership Goal for Directors and Senior Officers
In order to encourage significant stock ownership by our directors and senior officers, and to further align their interests with the interests of FedEx's stockholders, the Board of Directors has established a goal that (i) within four years after joining the Board, each non-management director own FedEx shares valued at three times his or her annual retainer fee, and (ii) within four years after being appointed to his or her position, each member of senior management own FedEx shares valued at the following multiple of his or her annual base salary:
13
For purposes of meeting this goal, unvested restricted stock is counted, but unexercised stock options are not. The Board also recommends that each director and senior officer retain shares acquired upon stock option exercises until his or her goal is met. The stock ownership goal is included in FedEx's Corporate Governance Guidelines. As of July 29, 2013, each director (other than Mr. Ramo, who joined the Board in September 2011) and each of the seven officers who had been a FedEx executive officer for over four years owned sufficient shares to comply with this goal.
The Board of Directors has adopted a policy requiring stockholder approval for any future "poison pill" prior to or within twelve months after adoption of the poison pill. (A poison pill is a device used to deter a hostile takeover. Note that FedEx does not currently have, nor have we ever had, a poison pill.) The policy on poison pills is included in FedEx's Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Executive Sessions of Non-Management Directors
Non-management Board members meet without management present at regularly scheduled executive sessions in conjunction with each in-person meeting of the Board of Directors. At least once a year, such meetings include only the independent members of the Board. The Lead Independent Director presides over meetings of the non-employee and independent directors and may call such meetings as he or she deems necessary or appropriate.
Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate directly with any member (including the Lead Independent Director) or committee of the Board of Directors by writing to: FedEx Corporation Board of Directors, c/o Corporate Secretary, 942 South Shady Grove Road, Memphis, Tennessee 38120. Please specify to whom your letter should be directed. The Corporate Secretary of FedEx will review all such correspondence and regularly forward to the Board a summary of all such correspondence and copies of all correspondence that, in her opinion, deals with the functions of the Board or its committees or that she otherwise determines requires the attention of any member, group or committee of the Board of Directors. Board members may at any time review a log of all correspondence received by FedEx that is addressed to Board members and request copies of any such correspondence.
Nomination of Director Candidates
The Nominating & Governance Committee will consider director nominees proposed by stockholders. To recommend a prospective director candidate for the Nominating & Governance Committee's consideration, stockholders may submit the candidate's name, qualifications, including whether the candidate satisfies the requirements set forth in "Proposal 1 Election of Directors Experience, Qualifications, Attributes and Skills," and other relevant biographical information in writing to: FedEx Corporation Nominating & Governance Committee, c/o Corporate Secretary, 942 South Shady Grove Road, Memphis, Tennessee 38120. FedEx's Bylaws require stockholders to give advance notice of stockholder proposals, including nominations of director candidates. For more information, please see "Additional Information Stockholder Proposals for 2014 Annual Meeting."
The Board is responsible for recommending director candidates for election by the stockholders and for electing directors to fill vacancies or newly created directorships. The Board has delegated the screening and evaluation process for director candidates to the Nominating & Governance Committee, which identifies, evaluates and recruits highly qualified director candidates and recommends them to the Board. The Nominating & Governance Committee considers potential candidates for director that may come to the attention of the Nominating & Governance Committee through current directors, management, professional search firms, stockholders or other persons. The Nominating & Governance Committee has engaged a third-party executive search firm to assist in identifying potential director candidates. The Nominating & Governance Committee considers and evaluates a director candidate recommended by a stockholder in the same manner as a nominee recommended by a Board member, management, search firm or other sources.
14
If the Nominating & Governance Committee determines that an additional or replacement director is necessary or advisable, the Nominating & Governance Committee may take such measures that it considers appropriate in connection with its evaluation of a potential director candidate, including interviewing the candidate, engaging an outside firm to gather additional information and making inquiries of persons with knowledge of the candidate's qualifications and character. In its evaluation of potential director candidates, including the members of the Board of Directors eligible for reelection, the Nominating & Governance Committee considers the current size, composition and needs of the Board of Directors and each of its committees.
Majority-Voting Standard for Director Elections
FedEx's Bylaws require that we use a majority-voting standard in uncontested director elections and contain a resignation requirement for directors who fail to receive the required majority vote. The Bylaws also prohibit the Board from changing back to a plurality-voting standard without the approval of our stockholders. Under the majority-voting standard, a director nominee must receive more votes cast "for" than "against" his or her election in order to be elected to the Board. In accordance with the majority-voting standard and resignation requirement, each director who is standing for reelection at the annual meeting has tendered an irrevocable resignation from the Board of Directors that will take effect if (i) the director does not receive more votes cast "for" than "against" his or her election at the annual meeting, and (ii) the Board accepts the resignation. FedEx's Bylaws require the Board of Directors, within 90 days after certification of the election results, to accept the director's resignation unless there is a compelling reason not to do so and to promptly disclose its decision (including, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting the resignation) in a filing with the SEC.
Policy on Review and Preapproval of Related Person Transactions
The Board of Directors has adopted a Policy on Review and Preapproval of Related Person Transactions, which is included in FedEx's Corporate Governance Guidelines. The policy requires that all proposed related person transactions (as defined in the policy) and all proposed material changes to existing related person transactions be reviewed and preapproved by the Nominating & Governance Committee. To the extent the related person (as defined in the policy) is a director or immediate family member of a director, the transaction or change must also be reviewed and preapproved by the full Board. The policy provides that a related person transaction or a material change to an existing related person transaction may not be preapproved if it would:
The policy requires the Nominating & Governance Committee to annually (i) review each existing related person transaction that has a remaining term of at least one year or remaining payments of at least $120,000, and (ii) determine, based upon all material facts and circumstances and taking into consideration our contractual obligations, whether it is in the best interests of FedEx and our stockholders to continue, modify or terminate the transaction or relationship.
In accordance with the policy described above, the Nominating & Governance Committee has reviewed the following related person transactions and determined that they remain in the best interests of FedEx and our stockholders:
15
16
MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
During fiscal 2013, the Board of Directors held six regular meetings and one special meeting. The average attendance of all directors at Board and committee meetings was 96%. Each director attended at least 88% of the aggregate meetings of the Board and any committees on which he or she served.
The Board of Directors has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Information Technology Oversight Committee and Nominating & Governance Committee. Each committee's written charter, as adopted by the Board of Directors, is available on the FedEx website at http://investors.fedex.com in the Corporate Governance section under "Committee Charters." Committee memberships are as follows:
Audit Committee
|
Information Technology Oversight Committee |
|
---|---|---|
John A. Edwardson (Chairman) |
James L. Barksdale (Chairman) |
|
Gary W. Loveman |
Gary W. Loveman |
|
Joshua I. Smith |
Joshua Cooper Ramo |
|
David P. Steiner |
Compensation Committee
|
Nominating & Governance Committee |
|
---|---|---|
Steven R. Loranger (Chairman) |
Shirley Ann Jackson (Chairwoman) |
|
Shirley Ann Jackson |
James L. Barksdale |
|
Susan C. Schwab |
Steven R. Loranger |
|
Paul S. Walsh |
R. Brad Martin |
The Board of Directors has approved reconstituting the committees so that, immediately following the annual meeting, if all of the director nominees are elected, committee memberships will be as follows:
Audit Committee
|
Information Technology Oversight Committee |
|
---|---|---|
John A. Edwardson (Chairman) |
James L. Barksdale (Chairman) |
|
Gary W. Loveman |
R. Brad Martin |
|
R. Brad Martin |
Joshua Cooper Ramo |
|
Joshua Cooper Ramo |
Susan C. Schwab |
Compensation Committee
|
Nominating & Governance Committee |
|
---|---|---|
Steven R. Loranger (Chairman) |
David P. Steiner (Chairman) |
|
Shirley Ann Jackson |
James L. Barksdale |
|
Susan C. Schwab |
Shirley Ann Jackson |
|
Paul S. Walsh |
Paul S. Walsh |
The Audit Committee, which held nine meetings during fiscal 2013, performs the following functions:
17
The Compensation Committee, which held five meetings during fiscal 2013, performs the following functions:
The Information Technology Oversight Committee, which held four meetings during fiscal 2013, performs the following functions:
The Nominating & Governance Committee, which held five meetings during fiscal 2013, performs the following functions:
In addition, as discussed above under "Corporate Governance Matters Board Risk Oversight," each Board committee has responsibility for the oversight of specific risks that fall within the committee's areas of responsibility. Also, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and discussing with management the guidelines and policies that govern the processes by which the company assesses and manages its exposure to all risk, including our ERM process.
Attendance at Annual Meeting of Stockholders
FedEx expects all Board members to attend annual meetings of stockholders. Each member of the Board of Directors attended the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders.
18
PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
All of FedEx's directors are elected at each annual meeting of stockholders and hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. The Board of Directors currently consists of twelve members. Joshua I. Smith is retiring as director immediately before this annual meeting and is not standing for reelection. The Board proposes that each of the other current directors be reelected to the Board. Effective upon the retirement of Mr. J. Smith, the size of the Board will be decreased to eleven members. Each of the nominees elected at this annual meeting will hold office until the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2014 and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified.
Each nominee has consented to being named in this proxy statement and has agreed to serve if elected. If a nominee is unable to stand for election, the Board of Directors may either reduce the number of directors to be elected or select a substitute nominee. If a substitute nominee is selected, the proxy holders may vote your shares for the substitute nominee.
Under FedEx's majority-voting standard, each of the eleven director nominees must receive more votes cast "for" than "against" his or her election in order to be elected to the Board. For more information, please see "Corporate Governance Matters Majority-Voting Standard for Director Elections."
YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE ELEVEN NOMINEES.
Set forth below, with respect to each nominee, is the following information:
Nominees for Election to the Board
Frederick W. Smith, 69, was first elected as a director in 1971. He is the company's founder and has been Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of FedEx since 1998 and Chairman of FedEx Express since 1975. He was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of FedEx Express from 1983 to 1998, Chief Executive Officer of FedEx Express from 1977 to 1998, and President of FedEx Express from 1971 to 1975.
James L. Barksdale, 70, was first elected as a director in 1999. He is Chairman and President of Barksdale Management Corporation, an investment management company, and Managing Partner of The Barksdale Group, a venture capital firm, positions he has held since 1999. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of Netscape Communications Corporation, a provider of software, services and website resources to Internet users, from 1995 to 1999. He held various senior management positions at FedEx Express from 1979 to 1992, including Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, and was a director of FedEx Express from 1983 to 1991. He is a director of Time Warner Inc. He was previously a director of Sun Microsystems, Inc. From January 2012 to June 2012, he served as the interim Executive Director of the Mississippi Development Authority.
John A. Edwardson, 64, was first elected as a director in 2003. He is the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CDW Corporation, a provider of technology products and services, serving as Chief Executive Officer from 2001 to September 2011 and as Chairman from 2001 to December 2012. He was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Burns International Services Corporation, a provider of security services, from 1999 to 2000. He was President and Chief Operating Officer of UAL Corporation (the parent company of United Air Lines, Inc.), an airline, from 1995 to 1998. He is a director of Rockwell Collins, Inc. and a former director of CDW Corporation.
19
Shirley Ann Jackson, 67, was first elected as a director in 1999. She is President of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), a technological research university, a position she has held since 1999. She was Chairman of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) from 1995 to 1999 and served as a Commissioner of the NRC from 1995 to 1999. She has been a member of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) since 2009 and is a trustee of M.I.T. (member of the M.I.T. Corporation). She is a member of the International Security Advisory Board to the United States Secretary of State (since July 2011). She is a director of International Business Machines Corporation, Marathon Oil Corporation, Medtronic, Inc. and Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated. She was previously a director of NYSE Euronext and United States Steel Corporation.
Steven R. Loranger, 61, was first elected as a director in 2006. He is Chairman Emeritus and director of Xylem Inc., a water technology company, a position he has held since November 2011. Prior to November 2011, he was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of ITT Corporation, a diversified high-technology engineering and manufacturing company; he held the position of President and Chief Executive Officer from 2004 to October 2011 and Chairman from 2004 to October 2011. He was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Textron, Inc., a global aircraft, industrial and finance company, from 2002 to 2004. He held various executive positions at Honeywell International Inc. and its predecessor, AlliedSignal, Inc., a technology and manufacturing company, from 1981 to 2002, including President and Chief Executive Officer of its Engines, Systems and Services businesses. He is a former director of ITT Corporation and Exelis, Inc.
Gary W. Loveman, 53, was first elected as a director in 2007. He is Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of Caesars Entertainment Corporation (formerly Harrah's Entertainment, Inc.), a provider of branded gaming entertainment; he has held the position of President since 2001, Chief Executive Officer since 2003, and Chairman of the Board since 2005. He held various other executive positions at Caesars Entertainment Corporation from 1998 to 2001. He was Associate Professor of Business Administration at the Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration from 1989 to 1998. He is a director of Caesars Entertainment Corporation and Coach, Inc.
R. Brad Martin, 61, was first elected as a director in 2011. He is the Chairman of RBM Venture Company, a private investment company, a position he has held since 2007, and also the Interim President of the University of Memphis, a position he has held since July 2013. He was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Saks Incorporated from 1989 to 2006 and remained Chairman until 2007, when he retired. He is a director of Chesapeake Energy Corporation and First Horizon National Corporation. He was previously a director of Caesars Entertainment Corporation (formerly Harrah's Entertainment, Inc.), Dillards, Inc., Gaylord Entertainment Company, lululemon athletica inc. and Ruby Tuesday, Inc.
Joshua Cooper Ramo, 44, was first elected as a director in 2011. He is Vice Chairman of Kissinger Associates, Inc., a strategic advisory firm, a position he has held since 2011. He served as Managing Director of Kissinger Associates from 2006 to 2011. Prior to joining Kissinger Associates, he was Managing Partner of JL Thornton & Co., LLC., a consulting firm. Before that, he worked as a journalist and served as Senior Editor, Foreign Editor and then Assistant Managing Editor of TIME Magazine from 1995 to 2003. He is a director of Starbucks Corporation.
Susan C. Schwab, 58, was first elected as a director in 2009. She is a Professor at the University of Maryland School of Public Policy, a position she has held since January 2009. She has also served as a strategic advisor to Mayer Brown LLP, a law firm, since March 2010. She served as United States Trade Representative from 2006 to January 2009 and as Deputy United States Trade Representative from 2005 to 2006. She was Vice Chancellor of the University System of Maryland and President and Chief Executive Officer of the University System of Maryland Foundation from 2004 to 2005. She was Dean of the University of Maryland School of Public Policy from 1995 to 2003. She was Director of Corporate Business Development of Motorola, Inc., an electronics manufacturer, from 1993 to 1995. She was Assistant Secretary of Commerce for the United States and Foreign Commercial Service from 1989 to 1993. She is a director of The Boeing Company and Caterpillar Inc. She was previously a director of The Adams Express Company, Calpine Corporation and Petroleum & Resources Corporation (prior to her service as Deputy United States Trade Representative).
20
David P. Steiner, 53, was first elected as a director in 2009. He is Chief Executive Officer of Waste Management, Inc., a provider of integrated waste management services, a position he has held since 2004. He was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Waste Management, Inc. from 2003 to 2004, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Waste Management, Inc. from 2001 to 2003, and Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of Waste Management, Inc. from 2000 to 2001. He was a partner at Phelps Dunbar L.L.P., a law firm, from 1990 to 2000. He is a director of TE Connectivity Ltd. (formerly Tyco Electronics Ltd.) and Waste Management, Inc.
Paul S. Walsh, 58, was first elected as a director in 1996. He is an executive advisor to Diageo plc, a beverage company, a position he has held since his retirement as Chief Executive Officer in June 2013. He was Chief Executive Officer of Diageo plc from 2000 to June 2013. He was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Pillsbury Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Diageo plc, from 1996 to 2000, and Chief Executive Officer of The Pillsbury Company from 1992 to 1996. He was appointed as a Business Ambassador on the U.K. government's Business Ambassador Network in August 2012 and was appointed Chairman of Compass Group plc, a catering company, effective January 2014. He is a director of Avanti Communications Group plc, Diageo plc and Unilever PLC. He was previously a director of Centrica plc.
Experience, Qualifications, Attributes and Skills
Each director nominee possesses the following experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, in addition to those reflected above, as these are required of all candidates nominated for election or reelection to the Board of Directors:
In addition, the Board believes that it is desirable that the following experience, qualifications, attributes and skills be possessed by one or more of FedEx's Board members because of their particular relevance to the company's business and structure, and these were all considered by the Board in connection with this year's director nomination process:
Transportation Industry Experience: Each nominee possesses transportation industry experience by virtue of his or her service on the FedEx Board of Directors. We regard this tenure as a positive attribute, as it greatly increases the director's understanding of the company's operations and its management. Each of the below nominees has extensive additional transportation industry experience and knowledge.
21
International Experience: We continue to position our company to facilitate and capitalize on increasing globalization and the resulting unprecedented expansion of customer access to goods, services and information. This highlights the importance of having directors, such as each of the below nominees, who have specific experience with international trade and international markets.
Financial Expertise: We believe that an understanding of finance and financial reporting and internal auditing processes is beneficial for our directors, given our use of financial targets as measures of our success and the importance of accurate financial reporting and robust internal auditing. Each nominee has a considerable degree of financial literacy, and each of the below nominees has an extensive background in finance.
22
Marketing Expertise: FedEx is one of the most widely recognized brands in the world, and we place special emphasis on promoting and protecting the FedEx brand, one of our most important assets. Accordingly, we benefit greatly from having directors, such as each of the below nominees, who have substantial expertise and experience in marketing.
Technological Expertise: We rely heavily on technology to operate our transportation and business networks. Our ability to attract and retain customers and to compete effectively depends in part upon the sophistication and reliability of our technology network. Thus, having directors with technological expertise is important to us, and each of the below nominees has a thorough understanding of the applications of technology by virtue of his or her background and experiences.
Energy Expertise: We are committed to protecting the environment, and we have many initiatives underway to reduce our energy use and minimize our impact on the environment. Each of the below nominees has a significant amount of energy expertise, which is helpful as we implement these important initiatives.
23
Government Experience: Our businesses are heavily regulated and are directly affected by governmental actions, so our directors with government experience provide a useful perspective as we work constructively with governments around the world. While each of our director nominees has significant experience in working with government at various levels, each of the below nominees has ample experience in government service.
Leadership Experience: As noted above, experience at the policy-making level is one of the minimum qualifications for election to the Board, and each nominee has this experience Ambassador Schwab in government, Dr. Jackson in education and government, and the rest of the nominees in business, most as Chief Executive Officers (as noted below). The Board believes that CEOs, in particular, make excellent directors because they have the necessary experience and confidence to capably advise our executive management team on the wide range of issues that impact our business. Collectively, our directors have over 300 years of senior leadership experience, over 100 years of experience serving as CEOs, and over 85 years of experience serving as the chairpersons of public company boards of directors.
24
Diversity: The Board is committed to diversity and inclusion and is always looking for highly qualified candidates, including women (Dr. Jackson and Ambassador Schwab) and minorities (Dr. Jackson), who meet our criteria. The Board seeks, and believes it has found in this group of nominees, a diverse blend of experience and perspectives, institutional knowledge and personal chemistry, and directors who will provide sound and prudent guidance with respect to all of FedEx's operations and interests.
25
Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based on its review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board approved, that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and in FedEx's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2013.
Compensation Committee Members
Steven
R. Loranger Chairman
Shirley Ann Jackson
Susan C. Schwab
Paul S. Walsh
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
In this section we discuss and analyze the compensation of our principal executive and financial officers and our three other most highly compensated executive officers (the "named executive officers") for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2013. For additional information regarding compensation of the named executive officers, see " Summary Compensation Table" and other compensation-related tables and disclosure below.
In fiscal 2013, we experienced weaker than expected financial results, led by weakness in international air freight markets, pressure on yields due to industry overcapacity and shifts in demand to less expensive and slower-transit services. We are focusing on our strategic cost reduction programs, finding ways to improve efficiency and rationalize capacity, improving on our already high levels of service, and continuing to invest in critical, long-term projects as part of our global strategy to position the company for stronger growth.
Consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy and reflecting FedEx's financial performance during fiscal 2013, Frederick W. Smith, our Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, did not receive a payout under our annual incentive compensation ("AIC") program and the AIC payouts to the other named executive officers were below target. Maximum payouts were earned in fiscal 2013 by all participants, including the named executive officers, under our long-term incentive compensation ("LTI") program, which is tied to financial performance over a three-year period (fisca1 2011 through fiscal 2013 for the FY2011-FY2013 LTI plan). We exceeded the earnings per share ("EPS") goal required for a maximum payout by approximately 6%, as the company's performance in fiscal 2011 (EPS of $4.57) and fiscal 2012 (EPS of $6.41) offset weaker than expected results in fiscal 2013 (EPS of $4.91).
26
The following table details key compensation highlights of the last five fiscal years.
Compensation Highlights | ||||
FY2013 | ||||
No AIC plan payout to Chairman, President and CEO AIC plan paid below target to other named executive officers FY2011-FY2013 LTI plan paid at maximum |
||||
FY2012 | ||||
AIC plan paid below target FY2010-FY2012 LTI plan paid at maximum |
||||
FY2011 | ||||
AIC plan paid below target No FY2009-FY2011 LTI plan payout 401(k) match fully reinstated |
||||
FY2010 | ||||
AIC plan paid below target No FY2008-FY2010 LTI plan payout Annual base salary increases reinstated 401(k) match partially reinstated |
||||
FY2009 | ||||
No AIC plan payout No FY2007-FY2009 LTI plan payout Permanent salary reductions (including 20% reduction for CEO) Annual base salary increases suspended 401(k) match suspended |
||||
Philosophy. FedEx is consistently ranked among the world's most admired and trusted employers and respected brands. Maintaining this reputation and continuing to position FedEx for future success requires high caliber talent to protect and grow the company in support of our mission of producing superior financial returns for our shareowners. We design our executive compensation program to provide a competitive and internally equitable compensation and benefits package that reflects individual and company performance, job complexity, and strategic value of the position while ensuring long-term retention and motivation.
Each of the named executive officers is a longstanding member of our management, and our Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, Frederick W. Smith, founded the company and pioneered the express transportation industry over 40 years ago. As a result, our named executive officers are especially knowledgeable about our business and our industry and thus particularly valuable to the company and our shareowners.
As with tenure, position and level of responsibility are important factors in the compensation of any FedEx employee, including our named executive officers. There are internal salary ranges for each level, and annual target bonus percentages, long-term bonus amounts, and the number of options and restricted shares awarded are all closely tied to management level and responsibilities. For instance, all FedEx Corporation executive vice presidents have the same salary range and annual target bonus percentages and receive the same long-term bonus and the same number of options and restricted shares in the annual grant.
Our philosophy is to (i) closely align the compensation paid to our executives with the performance of the company on both a short-term and long-term basis, and (ii) set performance goals that do not promote excessive risk while supporting the company's core long-term financial goals, which include:
27
Our executive compensation is, in large measure, highly variable and linked to the above goals and the performance of the FedEx stock price over time.
2012 Say-on-Pay Advisory Vote Outcome
The Compensation Committee annually considers the results of the most recent advisory vote by shareowners to approve named executive officer compensation. In the 2012 advisory vote, 95.5% of the voted shares supported the compensation of FedEx's named executive officers, and the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors interpret this strong level of support as affirmation of the current design, purposes and direction of FedEx's executive compensation programs. In its ongoing evaluation of FedEx's executive compensation programs and practices, the Compensation Committee will continue to consider the results from future shareowner advisory votes to approve named executive officer compensation. Such shareowner advisory votes will be held annually until the next shareowner advisory vote on the frequency of future votes on named executive officer compensation.
Compensation Objectives and Design-Related Features
We design our executive compensation program to further FedEx's mission of producing superior financial returns for our shareowners by pursuing the following objectives:
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
How Pursued |
|
||||||||
|
Objective |
|
Generally |
|
Specifically |
|
||||||
Retain and attract highly qualified and effective executive officers. | Pay competitively. | Use comparison survey data as a point of reference in evaluating target levels for total direct compensation, which includes both fixed and variable, at-risk components tied to stock price appreciation and short- and long-term financial performance. | ||||||||||
Motivate executive officers to contribute to our future success and to build long-term shareowner value and reward them accordingly. | Link a significant part of compensation to FedEx's financial and stock price performance, especially long-term performance. | Weight executive compensation program in favor of incentive and equity-based compensation elements (rather than base salary), especially long-term incentive cash compensation and equity incentives in the form of stock options and restricted stock. | ||||||||||
Further align executive officer and shareowner interests. | Encourage and facilitate long-term shareowner returns and significant ownership of FedEx stock by executives. | Make annual equity-based grants; tie long-term cash compensation to growth in our EPS, which strongly correlates with long-term stock price appreciation; maintain a stock ownership goal for senior officers and encourage each officer to retain shares acquired upon stock option exercises until his or her goal is met. |
28
Commitment to Retain and Attract. FedEx is widely acknowledged as one of the world's most admired and respected companies, and it is our people our greatest asset that have earned FedEx its strong reputation. Because FedEx operates a global enterprise in a highly challenging business environment, we compete for talented management with some of the largest companies in the world in our industry and in others. Our global recognition and reputation for excellence in management and leadership make our people attractive targets for other companies, and our key employees are aggressively recruited. To prevent loss of our managerial talent, we seek to provide an overall compensation program that is competitive with all types of companies and continues to retain and attract outstanding people to conduct our business. Each element of compensation is intended to fulfill this important obligation.
Market Referencing. Because retention is so imperative and tenure and management level are determinative factors, we use external survey data solely as a market reference point to assess the competitiveness of our compensation programs. The target compensation levels of our named executive officers are not designed to correspond to a specific percentile of compensation in those surveys. Instead, our analysis considers multiple market reference points for the analyzed positions, rather than referring to a specific percentile.
For the fiscal 2013 executive compensation review, we considered survey data published by two major consulting firms engaged by the company: Towers Watson and Aon Hewitt. Each consulting firm provided target compensation data for general industry companies (excluding financial services companies) in its respective database with annual revenues between $20 billion and $70 billion. A list of these companies is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A.
General industry is the appropriate comparison category because our executives are recruited by and from businesses outside of FedEx's industry peer group. Moreover, our industry peer group does not provide a sufficient number of companies that are of a comparable size to FedEx. Using a robust data sample (122 companies for fiscal 2013) mitigates the impact of outliers, year-over-year volatility of compensation levels and the risk of selection bias, and increases the likelihood of comparing with companies with executive officer positions similar to ours. Because the annual revenues of these companies vary significantly, each consulting firm used regression analysis to allow for the inclusion of data from a large number of both larger and smaller companies. The data results provided by each firm were then averaged to arrive at blended market compensation data for general industry executives.
When we evaluate the elements of compensation of our executive officers in light of the referenced survey data, we group the elements into two categories:
The TDC formula is illustrated below:
Other elements of compensation of the named executive officers (such as perquisites and retirement benefits) are not included in our TDC formula, consistent with our referenced survey information. Accordingly, these other
29
elements are not referenced against survey data, and decisions as to these other elements do not influence decisions as to the elements of compensation that are included in the TDC formula. These other elements of compensation, however, are reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee.
While we may reference our target executive compensation levels against the survey group of companies, we do not compare our AIC and LTI financial performance goals against these companies or any other group of companies. Rather, as discussed below, our AIC and LTI financial performance goals are based upon our internal business objectives which, when set each year, represent aggressive but reasonably achievable goals. Accordingly, the relationship between our financial performance and the financial performance of the survey companies does not affect the relationship between our executive compensation and the executive compensation of that group in a given year.
Pay for Performance. Our executive compensation program is intended not only to retain and attract highly qualified and effective managers, but also to motivate them to substantially contribute to FedEx's future success for the long-term benefit of shareowners and appropriately reward them for doing so. Accordingly, we believe that there should be a strong relationship between pay and corporate performance (both financial results and stock price), and our executive compensation program reflects this belief. In particular, AIC payments, LTI payments and stock options represent a significant portion of our executive compensation program, as shown by the chart below, and this variable compensation is "at risk" and directly dependent upon the achievement of pre-established corporate goals and stock price appreciation:
The following chart illustrates for each named executive officer the allocation of fiscal 2013 target TDC between base salary and incentive and equity-oriented compensation elements (the restricted stock value includes the related tax reimbursement payment):
30
We believe that long-term performance is the most important measure of our success, as we manage FedEx's operations and business for the long-term benefit of our shareowners. Accordingly, not only is our executive compensation program weighted towards variable, at-risk pay components, but we emphasize incentives that are dependent upon long-term corporate performance and stock price appreciation. These long-term incentives include LTI cash compensation and equity awards (stock options and restricted stock), which comprise a significant portion of an executive officer's total compensation. These incentives are designed to motivate and reward our executive officers for achieving long-term corporate financial performance goals and maximizing long-term shareowner value.
The following chart illustrates for each named executive officer the allocation of fiscal 2013 target TDC between long-term incentives LTI, stock options and restricted stock, including the related tax reimbursement payment and short-term components base salary and AIC:
We include target AIC and LTI payouts (discounted to present value to be consistent with the valuation methodology used in the survey data) in the TCC and TDC formula, so the actual compensation paid out in a given year may vary widely from target levels because compensation earned under the AIC and LTI programs is variable and commensurate with the level of achievement of pre-established financial performance goals. When we fall short of our business objectives, payments under these variable programs decrease correspondingly. Conversely, when we achieve superior results, we reward our executives accordingly under the terms of these programs. As shown by the following chart, with the exception of Mr. F.W. Smith, the actual fiscal 2013 TDC of our named executive officers was above target levels because we exceeded our pre-established EPS goal for a maximum payout under the FY2011-FY2013 LTI plan. In fiscal 2012, the actual TDC of our named executive officers was above target levels because we substantially exceeded our pre-established EPS goal for a maximum payout under the FY2010-FY2012 LTI plan. However, in fiscal year 2011, the actual TDC for our named executive officers was below target levels because our financial performance fell short of our pre-established goals for the AIC and LTI plans for that year.
31
Align Management and Shareowner Interests. We award stock options and restricted stock to create and maintain a long-term economic stake in the company for the officers, thereby aligning their interests with the interests of our shareowners.
In addition, as discussed above, payout under our LTI program is dependent upon achievement of an aggregate EPS goal for a three-fiscal-year period. EPS was selected as the financial measure for the LTI plan because growth in our EPS strongly correlates to long-term stock price appreciation.
The graph on the following page illustrates the relationship between FedEx's EPS growth and stock price appreciation (based on the fiscal year-end stock price and adjusted for stock splits) from 1978 to 2013:
32
Stock Ownership Goal for Senior Officers. In order to encourage significant stock ownership by FedEx's senior management, including the named executive officers, and to further align their interests with the interests of our shareowners, the Board of Directors has adopted a stock ownership goal for senior officers, which is included in FedEx's Corporate Governance Guidelines. With respect to our executive officers, the goal is that within four years after being appointed to his or her position, each officer own FedEx shares valued at the following multiple of his or her annual base salary:
For purposes of meeting this goal, unvested restricted stock is counted, but unexercised stock options are not. Until the ownership goal is met, the officer is encouraged to retain "net profit shares" resulting from the exercise of stock options. Net profit shares are the shares remaining after payment of the option exercise price and taxes owed upon the exercise of options. As of July 29, 2013, each of the seven officers who had been a FedEx executive officer for over four years exceeded the stock ownership goal.
Policy Against Hedging and Pledging Transactions. In addition, we have adopted comprehensive and detailed policies (the FedEx Securities Manual) that regulate trading by our insiders, including the named executive officers and Board members. The Securities Manual includes information regarding quiet periods and explains when transactions in FedEx stock are permitted. The Securities Manual also sets forth certain types of transactions that are restricted. Specifically, (1) publicly traded (or exchange-traded) options, such as puts, calls and other derivative securities, (2) short sales, including "sales against the box," and (3) hedging or monetization transactions, such as zero-cost collars and forward sale contracts, are strictly prohibited. The Securities Manual also prohibits margin accounts and pledges; provided, however, that our General Counsel may grant an exception to the prohibition against holding FedEx securities in a margin account or pledging FedEx securities on a case-by-case basis for those that clearly demonstrate the financial capacity to repay the loan without resort to the pledged securities.
33
Based upon this criterion, our General Counsel has granted such an exception with respect to the shares that are disclosed in this proxy statement as having been pledged as security by Frederick W. Smith, FedEx's Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer. See "Stock Ownership Directors and Executive Officers." With respect to the shares pledged by Mr. Smith:
We have an active shareowner engagement program in which we meet regularly with our largest shareowners. During these discussions, none of our largest shareowners have raised any concerns regarding Mr. Smith's pledged shares.
No other FedEx executive officer or Board member currently holds FedEx securities that are pledged pursuant to a margin account, loan or otherwise.
Restricted Stock Program. FedEx's restricted stock program has been in place for over 20 years and has encouraged FedEx executives to own and retain company stock. Although none of our shareowners have raised any concerns to us regarding our restricted stock program, during fiscal 2013 the Compensation Committee again reviewed our restricted stock program and, for all of the following reasons, determined that it continues to be appropriate for FedEx.
By facilitating the ownership of FedEx shares by our executives, we strengthen the alignment of their interests with those of our investors. When granting restricted stock, FedEx first determines the total target value of the award and then delivers that value in two components: restricted shares and cash payment of taxes due. Therefore, the total target value of the award is the same as it would be if there were no tax payments. In particular, because the amount of the tax payment is included in the calculation of the target value of the restricted stock award, the officers receive fewer shares in each award than they would in the absence of the tax payment: fewer by an amount equal in value to the tax payment.
This methodology prevents the need for an officer to make a disposition of FedEx stock to cover the tax consequences of a restricted stock award and dilute his or her interest in FedEx. Conversely, absent the tax payment, the number of shares received in each award would be larger by an amount equal in value to the forgone tax payment, thereby having a dilutive effect on our shareowners' equity interest in FedEx. While SEC disclosure rules require that these payments be included with tax reimbursement payments and reported as "other compensation" in the Summary Compensation Table, we do not believe these payments are "tax gross-ups" in the traditional sense,
34
since their value is fully reflected in the number of shares ultimately delivered to recipients. The following chart illustrates this principle, using the target value for the fiscal year 2013 restricted stock awards granted to FedEx Corporation executive vice presidents (as in previous years, Mr. Smith did not receive a restricted stock award in fiscal 2013):
Not only is the value to the officer, as well as the cost to the company, generally the same as it would be otherwise, but this practice uses fewer shares of stock to arrive at the same benefit and has proved extremely successful in retaining executives and enabling them to retain their shares. In sum, we strongly believe that our restricted stock program is effectively designed and is aligned with the best interests of our shareowners.
Role of the Compensation Committee, its Compensation Consultant and the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Our Board of Directors is responsible for the compensation of our executive management. The purpose of the Board's Compensation Committee, which is composed solely of independent directors, is to help discharge this responsibility by, among other things:
35
The Compensation Committee may form and delegate authority to any subcommittee as it deems appropriate or advisable in accordance with the terms of its written charter. To date, however, the Committee has not formed or delegated authority to any subcommittee.
In furtherance of the Compensation Committee's responsibility, the Committee has engaged Steven Hall & Partners (the "consultant") to assist the Committee in evaluating FedEx's executive compensation, including during fiscal 2013. In connection with this engagement, the consultant reports directly and exclusively to the Committee. The consultant participates in Committee meetings, reviews Committee materials and provides advice to the Committee upon its request. For example, the consultant: updates the Committee on trends and issues in executive compensation and comments on the competitiveness and reasonableness of FedEx's executive compensation program; assists the Committee in the development and review of FedEx's AIC and LTI programs, including commenting on performance measures and the goal-setting process; and reviews and provides advice to the Committee for its consideration in reviewing compensation-related proxy statement disclosure, including this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, and on any new equity compensation plans or plan amendments proposed for adoption.
Other than services provided to the Compensation Committee, Steven Hall & Partners does not perform any services for FedEx. Additionally, Steven Hall & Partners has robust policies and procedures in place to prevent conflicts of interest; the fees received by Steven Hall & Partners from FedEx in Steven Hall & Partners' most recently completed fiscal year represented less than 5% of Steven Hall & Partners' revenues; neither Steven Hall & Partners nor any Steven Hall & Partners adviser had a business or personal relationship with any member of the Compensation Committee or any executive officer of FedEx during fiscal 2013; and no Steven Hall & Partners adviser directly owns, or directly owned during fiscal 2013, any FedEx stock. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee has determined the firm to be independent from the company and that no conflicts of interest exist related to Steven Hall & Partners' services provided to the Committee. Compensation Committee pre-approval is required for any services to be provided to the company by the Committee's independent compensation consultant. This ensures that the consultant maintains the highest level of independence from the company, in both appearance and fact.
The Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, who attends most meetings of the Compensation Committee by invitation of the Committee's chairman, assists the Committee in determining the compensation of all other executive officers by, among other things:
The other executive officers do not have a role in determining their own compensation, other than discussing their annual individual performance objectives and results achieved with the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer.
36
Compensation Elements and Fiscal 2013 Amounts
Base Salary. Our primary objective with respect to the base salary levels of our executive officers is to provide sufficient fixed cash income to retain and attract these highly marketable executives in a competitive market for executive talent. The base salaries of our executive officers are reviewed and adjusted (if appropriate) at least annually to reflect, among other things, economic conditions, base salaries for comparable positions from the executive compensation survey data discussed above, the tenure of the officers, and the base salaries of the officers relative to one another, as well as the internal salary ranges for the officer's level.
The named executive officers did not receive base salary increases for fiscal 2013 or fiscal 2014. As a result, the annual base salaries of our named executive officers remain as follows:
Name
|
Annual Base Salary ($) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
F.W. Smith |
1,266,960 | |||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
902,784 | |||
D.J. Bronczek |
942,096 | |||
T.M. Glenn |
833,364 | |||
R.B. Carter |
762,960 |
Cash Payments Under Annual Incentive Compensation Program. The primary objective of our AIC program is to motivate our people to achieve our annual financial goals and other business objectives and reward them accordingly. The program provides an annual cash bonus opportunity to our employees, including the named executive officers, at the conclusion of each fiscal year based upon the achievement of AIC objectives for company and individual performance established at the beginning of the year.
Target AIC payouts are established as a percentage of the executive officer's base salary (as of the end of the plan year). Payouts above target levels are based exclusively upon the company's performance, rather than achievement of individual objectives; accordingly, the executive officer receives above-target payouts only if the company exceeds the AIC target objective for annual financial performance. The maximum AIC payout represents three times the portion of the target payout that is based upon target annual financial performance (plus the portion of the target payout that is based upon the achievement of individual performance objectives).
As an example of our commitment to compete collectively and manage collaboratively, the AIC payout for all named executive officers, including Mr. Bronczek, the president and chief executive officer of FedEx Express, is tied to the performance of FedEx as a whole. The company performance factor is a pre-established multiplier that corresponds, on a sliding scale, to the percentage achievement of the AIC target objective for company annual financial performance. The multiplier matrix for the company performance factor is designed so that if the AIC annual financial performance threshold is achieved but is less than target, the multiplier decreases on a sliding scale based on the percentage achievement of the AIC target objective. On the other hand, if the company exceeds the AIC target objective, the multiplier increases on a sliding scale (up to the maximum, as described above) based on the percentage that the target objective is exceeded up to the AIC annual financial performance maximum.
AIC objectives for company annual financial performance are typically based upon our business plan for the fiscal year, which is reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors and which reflects, among other things, the risks and opportunities identified in connection with our enterprise risk management process. Consistent with our long-term focus and in order to discourage unnecessary and excessive risk-taking, we measure performance against our business plan, rather than a fixed growth rate or an average of growth rates from prior years, to account for short-term economic and competitive conditions and anticipated strategic investments that may have adverse short-term profit implications. We address year-over-year improvement targets through our LTI plans, as discussed below.
Ordinarily our business plan objective for the financial measure consolidated pre-tax income in fiscal 2013 becomes the target objective for company performance under our AIC program. For the fiscal 2013 AIC program, however, to further motivate management to improve the company's performance, the consolidated pre-tax income target objective for the company performance factor was higher than the fiscal 2013 business plan objective for pre-tax income. Accordingly, above-plan performance was required to achieve target payouts for the company financial performance component of the AIC program. The payout opportunity relating to individual performance was not, however, contingent upon the achievement of company financial performance objectives.
37
The fiscal 2013 AIC target payouts for the named executive officers, as a percentage of base salary, were as follows:
Name
|
Target Payout (as a percentage of base salary) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
F.W. Smith |
130% | |||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
90% | |||
D.J. Bronczek |
100% | |||
T.M. Glenn |
90% | |||
R.B. Carter |
90% |
The following table illustrates for our named executive officers the fiscal 2013 AIC formulas and total AIC payout opportunities (as a percentage of the target payout described above):
Allocation of Goals
(as a percentage of target payout)
|
Individual Objectives |
|
Consolidated Pre-Tax Income |
|
Payout Opportunity | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Target | Maximum | + |
Target | Maximum | = |
Target | Maximum | |||||||||||||||
FedEx Corporation CEO |
| | 100% | 300% | 100% | 300% | |||||||||||||||||
FedEx Corporation EVPs |
30% | 30% | 70% | 210% | 100% | 240% | |||||||||||||||||
FedEx Express CEO |
30% | 30% | 70% | 210% | 100% | 240% |
Fiscal 2014 AIC Plan Design. In order to further motivate management to improve the company's financial performance, several changes have been made to the fiscal 2014 AIC program. For fiscal 2014, the company financial performance measure will be consolidated operating income, rather than consolidated pre-tax income. Operating income was chosen as the company financial performance metric to incentivize management to improve the company's core business and to find ways to improve efficiency and rationalize capacity.
As in prior years, Mr. Smith's fiscal 2014 AIC payout opportunity will be tied to the achievement of corporate objectives for company financial performance (operating income) for the fiscal year, subject to adjustment by the independent members of the Board of Directors as described below.
In fiscal 2013 and in prior years, a portion of the AIC payout for the non-CEO named executive officers was based on the achievement of individual performance objectives (as discussed below). For fiscal 2014, however, in order to simplify the structure of the AIC program and to further motivate these officers to achieve the company's financial performance goals, the entire fiscal 2014 AIC payout opportunity for the non-CEO named executive officers will be based on the achievement of the operating income objectives. Mr. Smith may adjust each officer's fiscal 2014 AIC payout downward based on the officer's achievement of individual performance objectives established at the beginning of the fiscal year. Mr. Smith will determine the achievement level of each executive's individual objectives at the conclusion of fiscal 2014.
Finally, the operating income target objective for the company performance factor under the fiscal 2014 AIC program is higher than the fiscal 2014 business plan objective for operating income. As a result, above-plan performance will be required in fiscal 2014 in order to achieve target payouts under the fiscal 2014 AIC program. Expressed in terms of year-over-year improvement from a base amount (our fiscal 2013 adjusted consolidated operating income), the consolidated operating income threshold, target and maximum under our fiscal 2014 AIC program are as follows:
Base Year Amount - Fiscal 2013 Adjusted Consolidated Operating Income* |
Threshold | Target | Maximum | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$3.21 billion |
2.4% | 21.4% | 40.8% |
38
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Smith's AIC payout is tied to the achievement of corporate objectives for company financial performance for the fiscal year. Mr. Smith's minimum AIC payout is zero. His target AIC payout is set as a percentage of his base salary, and his maximum AIC payout is set as a multiple of the target payout. The independent members of the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approve these percentages. The actual AIC payout ranges, on a sliding scale, from the minimum to the maximum based upon the performance of the company against our company financial performance goals.
In addition, the independent Board members, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, may adjust this amount upward or downward based on their annual evaluation of Mr. Smith's performance, including the quality and effectiveness of his leadership, the execution of key strategic initiatives and the following corporate performance measures:
None of these factors is given any particular weight in determining whether to adjust Mr. Smith's bonus amount.
Non-CEO Named Executive Officers. The fiscal 2013 AIC payouts for the other named executive officers were tied to the achievement of (i) corporate objectives for company financial performance for the fiscal year (70% of the target payout), and (ii) individual objectives established at the beginning of the fiscal year for each executive (30% of the target payout). As noted above, under the fiscal 2013 AIC program, the payout opportunity relating to individual performance was not contingent upon achievement of company financial performance objectives under the plan.
The minimum AIC payout is zero. The target AIC payout is set as a percentage of the executive's base salary, and the maximum AIC payout is set as a multiple of the target payout. The actual AIC payout ranges, on a sliding scale, from the minimum to the maximum based upon the performance of the individual and the company against the objectives.
Individual performance objectives for the non-CEO named executive officers vary by management level and by operating segment and include (but are not limited to):
39
Individual performance objectives are designed to further the company's business objectives. Achievement of individual performance objectives is generally within each officer's control or scope of responsibility, and the objectives are intended to be achieved with an appropriate level of effort and effective leadership by the officer. The achievement level of each non-CEO named executive officer's individual objectives is based on Mr. Smith's evaluation at the conclusion of the fiscal year, which is reviewed by the Compensation Committee.
Fiscal 2013 AIC Performance and Payouts. The following table presents the pre-tax income threshold and target for the company performance factor under our fiscal 2013 AIC program and our actual consolidated pre-tax income for fiscal 2013 (in millions):
Company Performance Measure
|
Threshold | Target | Actual | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Consolidated Pre-Tax Income |
$ | 3,536 | $ | 3,950 | $ | 2,455 |
Based upon this below-threshold company performance and each non-CEO named executive officer's achievement of individual performance objectives, payouts to the named executive officers under the fiscal 2013 AIC program were as follows (compared to the target payout opportunities):
Name
|
Target AIC Payout ($) |
Actual AIC Payout ($) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F.W. Smith |
1,647,048 | 0 | |||||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
812,506 | 195,001 | |||||
D.J. Bronczek |
942,096 | 240,234 | |||||
T.M. Glenn |
750,028 | 180,007 | |||||
R.B. Carter |
686,664 | 189,519 |
Cash Payments Under LTI Program. The primary objective of our LTI program is to motivate management to contribute to our future success and to build long-term shareowner value and reward them accordingly. The program provides a long-term cash payment opportunity to members of management, including the named executive officers, based upon achievement of aggregate EPS goals for the preceding three-fiscal-year period. The LTI plan design provides for payouts that correspond to specific EPS goals established by the Board of Directors. The EPS goals represent total growth in EPS (over a base year) for the three-year term of the LTI plan. The following chart illustrates the relationship between EPS growth and payout:
40
As illustrated by the above chart, the LTI program provides for:
Fiscal 2013 LTI Performance and Payouts. The following table presents the aggregate EPS threshold (minimum), target and maximum under our FY2011-FY2013 LTI plan, which was established by the Board of Directors in 2010, and our actual aggregate EPS for the three-year period ended May 31, 2013:
Performance Measure
|
Threshold | Target | Maximum | Actual | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY2011-FY2013 Aggregate EPS |
$ | 12.45 | $ | 14.34 | $ | 15.01 | $ | 15.89 |
For the FY2011-FY2013 LTI plan, we used final fiscal 2010 EPS ($3.76) as the base-year number. Based upon this above-target performance, LTI participants, including the named executive officers, earned maximum payouts under the FY2011-FY2013 LTI plan as illustrated by the following table (compared to the threshold, target and maximum payout opportunities):
Name
|
Threshold LTI Payout ($) |
Target LTI Payout ($) |
Maximum LTI Payout ($) |
Actual LTI Payout ($) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F.W. Smith |
875,000 | 3,500,000 | 5,250,000 | 5,250,000 | |||||||||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
300,000 | 1,200,000 | 1,800,000 | 1,800,000 | |||||||||
D.J. Bronczek |
375,000 | 1,500,000 | 2,250,000 | 2,250,000 | |||||||||
T.M. Glenn |
300,000 | 1,200,000 | 1,800,000 | 1,800,000 | |||||||||
R.B. Carter |
300,000 | 1,200,000 | 1,800,000 | 1,800,000 |
LTI Payout Opportunities. The Board of Directors has established LTI plans for the three-fiscal-year periods 2012 through 2014 and 2013 through 2015, providing cash payment opportunities upon the conclusion of fiscal 2014 and 2015, respectively, if certain EPS goals are achieved with respect to those periods. The FY2012-FY2014 LTI plan uses final fiscal 2011 EPS ($4.57) as the base-year number, and the FY2013-FY2015 plan uses final fiscal 2012 EPS ($6.41) as the base-year number. The following table presents the aggregate EPS thresholds, targets and maximums under the FY2012-FY2014 and FY2013-FY2015 LTI plans and our progress toward these goals as of May 31, 2013:
Performance Period |
Aggregate EPS Threshold |
Aggregate EPS Target |
Aggregate EPS Maximum |
Actual Aggregate EPS as of May 31, 2013 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY2012-FY2014 |
$ | 15.13 | $ | 17.43 | $ | 18.25 | $11.32 (with one year remaining) |
||||
FY2013-FY2015 |
$ |
21.22 |
$ |
24.45 |
$ |
25.60 |
$4.91 |
41
The following table sets forth the potential threshold, target and maximum payouts for the named executive officers under these two plans:
|
|
Potential Future Payouts | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Performance Period |
Threshold ($) |
Target ($) |
Maximum ($) |
||||||||
F.W. Smith |
FY2012-FY2014 | 1,000,000 | 4,000,000 | 6,000,000 | ||||||||
|
FY2013-FY2015 | 1,000,000 | 4,000,000 | 6,000,000 | ||||||||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
FY2012-FY2014 |
300,000 |
1,200,000 |
1,800,000 |
||||||||
|
FY2013-FY2015 | 300,000 | 1,200,000 | 1,800,000 | ||||||||
D.J. Bronczek |
FY2012-FY2014 |
375,000 |
1,500,000 |
2,250,000 |
||||||||
|
FY2013-FY2015 | 375,000 | 1,500,000 | 2,250,000 | ||||||||
T.M. Glenn |
FY2012-FY2014 |
300,000 |
1,200,000 |
1,800,000 |
||||||||
|
FY2013-FY2015 | 300,000 | 1,200,000 | 1,800,000 | ||||||||
R.B. Carter |
FY2012-FY2014 |
300,000 |
1,200,000 |
1,800,000 |
||||||||
|
FY2013-FY2015 | 300,000 | 1,200,000 | 1,800,000 |
Long-Term Equity Incentives Stock Options and Restricted Stock. Our primary objective in providing long-term equity incentives to executive officers is to further align their interests with those of our shareowners by facilitating significant ownership of FedEx stock by the officers. This creates a direct link between their compensation and long-term shareowner return.
Amount. Stock options and restricted stock are generally granted to executive officers on an annual basis. As discussed above, an officer's position and level of responsibility are the primary factors that determine the number of options and shares of restricted stock awarded to the officer in the annual grant. For instance, all FedEx Corporation executive vice presidents receive the same number of options and restricted shares in the annual grant.
The number of stock options and restricted shares awarded at each management level can vary from year to year. In determining how many options and shares of restricted stock should be awarded at each level, the Compensation Committee may consider:
Other factors that the Compensation Committee may consider, especially with respect to special grants outside of the annual-grant framework, include the promotion of an officer or the desire to retain a valued executive or recognize a particular officer's contributions. None of these factors is given any particular weight and the specific factors used may vary among individual executives.
Timing. In selecting dates for awarding equity-based compensation, we do not consider, nor have we ever considered, the price of FedEx's common stock or the timing of the release of material, non-public information about the company. Stock option and restricted stock awards are generally made to executive officers on an annual basis according to a pre-established schedule.
When the Compensation Committee approves a special grant outside of the annual-grant framework, such grants are made at a regularly scheduled meeting and the grant date of the awards is the approval date or the next business day, if the meeting does not fall on a business day. If the grant is made in connection with the promotion of an
42
individual or the election of an officer, the grant date may be the effective date of the individual's promotion or the officer's election, if such effective date is after the approval date.
Pricing. The exercise price of stock options granted under our equity incentive plans is equal to the fair market value of FedEx's common stock on the date of grant. Under the terms of our equity incentive plans, the fair market value on the grant date is defined as the average of the high and low trading prices of FedEx's stock on the New York Stock Exchange on that day. We believe this methodology is the most equitable method for determining the exercise price of our stock option awards given the intra-day price volatility often shown by our stock.
Vesting. Stock options and restricted stock granted to executive officers generally vest ratably over four years beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. This four-year vesting period is intended to further encourage the retention of the executive officers, since unvested stock options are forfeited upon termination of the officer's employment for any reason other than death or permanent disability and unvested restricted stock is forfeited upon termination of the officer's employment for any reason other than death, permanent disability or retirement.
Tax Reimbursement Payments for Restricted Stock Awards. As discussed previously, FedEx pays the taxes resulting from a restricted stock award on behalf of the recipient. This prevents the need for the officer to sell a portion of a stock award to pay the corresponding tax obligation and thus encourages and facilitates FedEx stock ownership by our officers, thereby further aligning their interests with those of our shareowners. The total target value of the award is the same as it would be if there were no tax payments.
Voting and Dividend Rights on Restricted Stock. Holders of restricted shares are entitled to vote and receive any dividends on such shares. The dividend rights are included in the computation of the value of the restricted stock award for purposes of determining the recipient's target TDC.
Fiscal 2013 Awards. On June 4, 2012, the named executive officers were granted stock option and restricted stock awards as follows:
Name
|
Number of Stock Options |
Number of Shares of Restricted Stock |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F.W. Smith |
198,675 | 0 | |||||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
24,235 | 7,285 | |||||
D.J. Bronczek |
32,100 | 9,380 | |||||
T.M. Glenn |
24,235 | 7,285 | |||||
R.B. Carter |
24,235 | 7,285 |
As in previous years, at the request of Mr. Smith and in light of his significant stock ownership, the Compensation Committee did not award him any restricted stock. Instead, his equity awards were in the form of stock options, which will yield value to him only if the stock price increases from the date of grant.
The target value of stock options awarded to each named executive officer increased in fiscal 2013 by approximately 5% while the target value of restricted shares awarded remained substantially the same for each officer.
Perquisites, Tax Reimbursement Payments and Other Annual Compensation. FedEx's named executive officers receive certain other annual compensation, including:
We provide this other compensation to enhance the competitiveness of our executive compensation program and to increase the productivity (corporate aircraft travel, professional assistance with tax return preparation and financial
43
planning), safety (security services and equipment) and health (annual physical examinations) of our executives so they can focus on producing superior financial returns for our shareowners. Our tax reimbursement payments relating to restricted stock awards are a component of the total target value of the restricted stock grant. As a result, the total target value of the award is the same as it would be if there were no tax payments and there is no dilutive effect on our shareowners' equity interest in FedEx. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves each of these elements of compensation, and all of the independent directors approve each element as it relates to Mr. Smith. The Committee also reviews and approves FedEx's policies and procedures regarding perquisites and other personal benefits and tax reimbursement payments, including:
FedEx's executive security procedures, which prescribe the level of personal security to be provided to the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers, are based on bona fide business-related security concerns and are an integral part of FedEx's overall risk management and security program. These procedures have been assessed by an independent security consulting firm, and deemed necessary and appropriate for the protection of the officers and their families given the history of direct security threats against FedEx executives and the likelihood of additional threats against the officers. The security services and equipment provided to FedEx executive officers may be viewed as conveying personal benefits to the executives and, as a result, their values must be reported in the Summary Compensation Table.
With respect to Mr. Smith, consistent with FedEx's executive security procedures, the Board of Directors requires him to use FedEx corporate aircraft for all travel, including personal travel. In addition, the FedEx Corporate Security Executive Protection Unit provides certain physical and personal security services for Mr. Smith, including on-site residential security at his primary residence. The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Smith's personal safety and security are of the utmost importance to FedEx and its shareowners and, therefore, the costs associated with such security are appropriate and necessary business expenses.
Post-Employment Compensation. While none of FedEx's named executive officers has an employment agreement, they are entitled to receive certain payments and benefits upon termination of employment or a change of control of FedEx, including:
The Compensation Committee approves and recommends Board approval of all plans, agreements and arrangements that provide for these payments and benefits.
44
Risks Arising from Compensation Policies and Practices
Management has conducted an in-depth risk assessment of FedEx's compensation policies and practices and concluded that that they do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company. The Compensation Committee has reviewed and concurred with management's conclusion. The risk assessment process included, among other things, a review of (i) all key incentive compensation plans to ensure that they are aligned with our pay-for-performance philosophy and include performance metrics that meet and support corporate goals, and (ii) the overall compensation mix to ensure an appropriate balance between fixed and variable pay components and between short-term and long-term incentives. The objective of the process was to identify any compensation plans and practices that may encourage employees to take unnecessary risks that could threaten the company. No such plans or practices were identified.
Tax Deductibility of Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the income tax deduction by FedEx for compensation paid to the Chief Executive Officer and the three other highest-paid executive officers (other than the Chief Financial Officer) to $1,000,000 per year, unless the compensation is "qualified performance-based compensation" or qualifies under certain other exceptions.
We do not require all of our compensation programs to be fully deductible under Section 162(m) because doing so would restrict our discretion and flexibility in designing competitive compensation programs to promote varying corporate goals. We believe that our Board of Directors should be free to make compensation decisions to further and promote the best interests of our shareowners, rather than to qualify for corporate tax deductions. In fiscal 2013, we incurred approximately $5.9 million of additional tax expense as a result of the Section 162(m) deductibility limit for compensation paid to the Chief Executive Officer and the three other highest-paid executive officers (other than Mr. Graf).
45
In this section we provide certain tabular and narrative information regarding the compensation of our principal executive and financial officers and our three other most highly compensated executive officers for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2013, and for each of the previous two fiscal years.
Name and Principal Position
|
Year | Salary ($) |
Bonus ($) |
Stock Awards ($)(1) |
Option Awards ($)(1) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(2) |
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)(3) |
All Other Compensation ($)(4) |
Total ($) |
||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frederick W. Smith |
2013 | 1,266,960 | 0 | 0 | 5,610,542 | 5,250,000 | | 465,746 | 12,593,248 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chairman, President and |
2012 | 1,263,098 | 0 | 0 | 5,371,684 | 6,575,215 | | 470,971 | 13,680,968 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer |
2011 | 1,233,030 | 0 | 0 | 5,224,659 | 375,000 | | 428,061 | 7,260,750 | ||||||||||||||||||
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan B. Graf, Jr. |
2013 |
902,784 |
0 |
621,083 |
684,392 |
1,995,001 |
711,553 |
499,157 |
5,413,970 |
||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President |
2012 | 900,240 | 0 | 623,735 | 655,217 | 2,546,693 | 1,154,269 | 489,091 | 6,369,245 | ||||||||||||||||||
and Chief Financial Officer |
2011 | 870,831 | 0 | 625,520 | 617,338 | 259,845 | 1,016,379 | 473,022 | 3,862,935 | ||||||||||||||||||
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David J. Bronczek |
2013 |
942,096 |
0 |
799,692 |
906,498 |
2,490,234 |
792,786 |
491,077 |
6,422,383 |
||||||||||||||||||
President and |
2012 | 939,441 | 0 | 802,836 | 867,827 | 3,014,794 | 1,490,346 | 544,541 | 7,659,785 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer |
2011 | 908,749 | 0 | 804,184 | 822,450 | 290,365 | 1,250,180 | 508,597 | 4,584,525 | ||||||||||||||||||
FedEx Express |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T. Michael Glenn |
2013 |
833,364 |
0 |
621,083 |
684,392 |
1,980,007 |
522,945 |
438,002 |
5,079,793 |
||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President, |
2012 | 831,016 | 0 | 623,735 | 655,217 | 2,394,698 | 1,247,159 | 481,706 | 6,233,531 | ||||||||||||||||||
Market Development and |
2011 | 803,872 | 0 | 625,520 | 617,338 | 228,995 | 953,210 | 486,629 | 3,715,564 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate Communications |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert B. Carter |
2013 |
762,960 |
0 |
621,083 |
684,392 |
1,989,519 |
282,935 |
409,256 |
4,750,145 |
||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President, |
2012 | 760,810 | 0 | 623,735 | 655,217 | 2,425,551 | 877,959 | 430,844 | 5,774,116 | ||||||||||||||||||
FedEx Information Services |
2011 | 735,955 | 0 | 625,520 | 617,338 | 213,629 | 568,557 | 450,194 | 3,211,193 | ||||||||||||||||||
and Chief Information Officer |
The fair value of restricted stock awards is equal to the fair market value of FedEx's common stock (the average of the high and low prices of the stock on the New York Stock Exchange) on the date of grant multiplied by the number of shares awarded.
For accounting purposes, we use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the grant date fair value of stock options. Assumptions used in the calculation of the amounts in the "Option Awards" column are included in note 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2013, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2013.
See the "Grants of Plan-Based Awards During Fiscal 2013" table for information regarding restricted stock and option awards to the named executive officers during fiscal 2013.
46
Name
|
Year | AIC Payout ($) |
LTI Payout ($) |
Total Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F.W. Smith |
2013 | 0 | 5,250,000 | 5,250,000 | |||||||||
|
2012 | 1,325,215 | 5,250,000 | 6,575,215 | |||||||||
|
2011 | 375,000 | 0 | 375,000 | |||||||||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
2013 |
195,001 |
1,800,000 |
1,995,001 |
|||||||||
|
2012 | 746,693 | 1,800,000 | 2,546,693 | |||||||||
|
2011 | 259,845 | 0 | 259,845 | |||||||||
D.J. Bronczek |
2013 |
240,234 |
2,250,000 |
2,490,234 |
|||||||||
|
2012 | 764,794 | 2,250,000 | 3,014,794 | |||||||||
|
2011 | 290,365 | 0 | 290,365 | |||||||||
T.M. Glenn |
2013 |
180,007 |
1,800,000 |
1,980,007 |
|||||||||
|
2012 | 594,698 | 1,800,000 | 2,394,698 | |||||||||
|
2011 | 228,995 | 0 | 228,995 | |||||||||
R.B. Carter |
2013 |
189,519 |
1,800,000 |
1,989,519 |
|||||||||
|
2012 | 625,551 | 1,800,000 | 2,425,551 | |||||||||
|
2011 | 213,629 | 0 | 213,629 |
47
The following table shows the amounts included for each such item:
Name
|
Year | Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits ($)* |
Umbrella Insurance Premiums ($) |
Life Insurance Premiums ($) |
Company Contributions Under 401(k) Plan ($) |
Tax Reimbursement Payments ($)* |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F.W. Smith |
2013 | 452,396 | 2,294 | 2,131 | 8,925 | 0 | 465,746 | |||||||||||||||
|
2012 | 457,956 | 2,185 | 2,255 | 8,575 | 0 | 470,971 | |||||||||||||||
|
2011 | 415,023 | 2,185 | 2,278 | 8,575 | 0 | 428,061 | |||||||||||||||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
2013 |
131,115 |
2,294 |
2,934 |
6,583 |
356,231 |
499,157 |
|||||||||||||||
|
2012 | 117,555 | 2,185 | 2,844 | 8,755 | 357,752 | 489,091 | |||||||||||||||
|
2011 | 101,933 | 2,185 | 2,655 | 7,473 | 358,776 | 473,022 | |||||||||||||||
D.J. Bronczek |
2013 |
20,583 |
2,294 |
2,934 |
6,591 |
458,675 |
491,077 |
|||||||||||||||
|
2012 | 63,693 | 2,185 | 2,844 | 8,752 | 467,067 | 544,541 | |||||||||||||||
|
2011 | 31,535 | 2,185 | 2,655 | 7,333 | 464,889 | 508,597 | |||||||||||||||
T.M. Glenn |
2013 |
64,606 |
2,294 |
2,934 |
8,924 |
359,244 |
438,002 |
|||||||||||||||
|
2012 | 102,755 | 2,185 | 2,844 | 8,802 | 365,120 | 481,706 | |||||||||||||||
|
2011 | 104,921 | 2,185 | 2,655 | 8,362 | 368,506 | 486,629 | |||||||||||||||
R.B. Carter |
2013 |
32,994 |
2,294 |
2,934 |
6,525 |
364,509 |
409,256 |
|||||||||||||||
|
2012 | 53,854 | 2,185 | 2,844 | 8,750 | 363,211 | 430,844 | |||||||||||||||
|
2011 | 76,278 | 2,185 | 2,655 | 7,296 | 361,780 | 450,194 |
During fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, unless otherwise noted below, FedEx provided the following perquisites and other personal benefits to the named executive officers:
48
49
The following table shows the amounts included in the table (the aggregate incremental cost to FedEx) for each such item:
Name
|
Year | Personal Use of Corporate Aircraft ($)(a) |
Security Services and Equipment ($) |
Tax Return Preparation Services ($) |
Financial Counseling Services ($) |
Other ($)(b) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F.W. Smith |
2013 | 0 | 340,237 | 62,972 | 49,187 | 0 | 452,396 | |||||||||||||||
|
2012 | 3,260 | 336,251 | 70,325 | 48,120 | 0 | 457,956 | |||||||||||||||
|
2011 | 5,805 | 333,304 | 43,750 | 32,164 | 0 | 415,023 | |||||||||||||||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
2013 |
74,982 |
23,820 |
8,355 |
23,114 |
844 |
131,115 |
|||||||||||||||
|
2012 | 98,842 | 11,115 | 4,733 | 1,946 | 919 | 117,555 | |||||||||||||||
|
2011 | 75,731 | 8,543 | 5,690 | 11,969 | 0 | 101,933 | |||||||||||||||
D.J. Bronczek |
2013 |
0 |
13,291 |
7,100 |
0 |
192 |
20,583 |
|||||||||||||||
|
2012 | 14,724 | 7,269 | 14,200 | 27,500 | 0 | 63,693 | |||||||||||||||
|
2011 | 0 | 6,535 | 0 | 25,000 | 0 | 31,535 | |||||||||||||||
T.M. Glenn |
2013 |
16,831 |
46,264 |
0 |
700 |
811 |
64,606 |
|||||||||||||||
|
2012 | 31,187 | 40,069 | 29,150 | 1,500 | 849 | 102,755 | |||||||||||||||
|
2011 | 48,200 | 52,902 | 1,000 | 2,150 | 669 | 104,921 | |||||||||||||||
R.B. Carter |
2013 |
1,956 |
15,562 |
5,700 |
7,500 |
2,276 |
32,994 |
|||||||||||||||
|
2012 | 29,220 | 17,134 | 0 | 7,500 | 0 | 53,854 | |||||||||||||||
|
2011 | 50,529 | 15,399 | 2,850 | 7,500 | 0 | 76,278 |
50
The following table shows the tax reimbursement payments relating to the items listed, which are included in the table:
Name
|
Year | Restricted Stock ($) |
Business- Related Use of Corporate Aircraft ($) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F.W. Smith |
2013 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
|
2012 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
|
2011 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
2013 |
356,231 |
0 |
356,231 |
|||||||||
|
2012 | 357,752 | 0 | 357,752 | |||||||||
|
2011 | 358,776 | 0 | 358,776 | |||||||||
D.J. Bronczek |
2013 |
458,675 |
0 |
458,675 |
|||||||||
|
2012 | 460,478 | 6,589 | 467,067 | |||||||||
|
2011 | 461,251 | 3,638 | 464,889 | |||||||||
T.M. Glenn |
2013 |
356,231 |
3,013 |
359,244 |
|||||||||
|
2012 | 357,752 | 7,368 | 365,120 | |||||||||
|
2011 | 358,776 | 9,730 | 368,506 | |||||||||
R.B. Carter |
2013 |
356,231 |
8,278 |
364,509 |
|||||||||
|
2012 | 357,752 | 5,459 | 363,211 | |||||||||
|
2011 | 358,776 | 3,004 | 361,780 |
Grants of Plan-Based Awards During Fiscal 2013
The following table sets forth information regarding grants of plan-based awards made to the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(2) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) |
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)(1) |
Closing Price on Grant Date ($/Sh) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name
|
Type of Plan/Award |
Grant Date |
Approval Date |
Threshold ($) |
Target ($) |
Maximum ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F.W. Smith |
Stock Option(3) | 06/04/2012 | 06/03/2012 | 198,675 | 85.255 | 85.20 | 5,610,542 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FY13 AIC(4) | 0 | 1,647,048 | 4,941,144 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FY13-FY15 LTI(5) | 1,000,000 | 4,000,000 | 6,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
Restricted Stock(6) |
06/04/2012 |
06/03/2012 |
7,285 |
621,083 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock Option(3) | 06/04/2012 | 06/03/2012 | 24,235 | 85.255 | 85.20 | 684,392 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FY13 AIC(4) | 0 | 812,506 | 1,950,014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FY13-FY15 LTI(5) | 300,000 | 1,200,000 | 1,800,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D.J. Bronczek |
Restricted Stock(6) |
06/04/2012 |
06/03/2012 |
9,380 |
799,692 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock Option(3) | 06/04/2012 | 06/03/2012 | 32,100 | 85.255 | 85.20 | 906,498 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FY13 AIC(4) | 0 | 942,096 | 2,261,030 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FY13-FY15 LTI(5) | 375,000 | 1,500,000 | 2,250,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T.M. Glenn |
Restricted Stock(6) |
06/04/2012 |
06/03/2012 |
7,285 |
621,083 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock Option(3) | 06/04/2012 | 06/03/2012 | 24,235 | 85.255 | 85.20 | 684,392 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FY13 AIC(4) | 0 | 750,028 | 1,800,067 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FY13-FY15 LTI(5) | 300,000 | 1,200,000 | 1,800,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R.B. Carter |
Restricted Stock(6) |
06/04/2012 |
06/03/2012 |
7,285 |
621,083 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock Option(3) | 06/04/2012 | 06/03/2012 | 24,235 | 85.255 | 85.20 | 684,392 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FY13 AIC(4) | 0 | 686,664 | 1,647,994 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FY13-FY15 LTI(5) | 300,000 | 1,200,000 | 1,800,000 |
51
52
Outstanding Equity Awards at End of Fiscal 2013
The following table sets forth for each named executive officer certain information about unexercised stock options and unvested shares of restricted stock held at the end of the fiscal year ended May 31, 2013:
|
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(a) |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(b) |
||||||||||||||||
|
Option Exercise Price ($) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Option Expiration Date |
||||||||||||||||||
Name
|
Exercisable | Unexercisable(a) | |||||||||||||||||
F.W. Smith |
325,000 | | 72.8450 | 06/01/2014 | |||||||||||||||
|
250,000 | | 89.7000 | 06/01/2015 | |||||||||||||||
|
200,000 | | 110.0600 | 06/01/2016 | |||||||||||||||
|
175,000 | | 114.7400 | 07/09/2017 | |||||||||||||||
|
204,150 | | 90.8100 | 06/02/2018 | |||||||||||||||
|
203,812 | 67,938(1) | 56.3100 | 06/08/2019 | |||||||||||||||
|
97,750 | 97,750(2) | 78.1900 | 06/07/2020 | |||||||||||||||
|
44,025 | 132,075(3) | 89.1050 | 06/06/2021 | |||||||||||||||
|
| 198,675(4) | 85.2550 | 06/04/2022 | |||||||||||||||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
38,250 |
|
72.8450 |
06/01/2014 |
|||||||||||||||
|
34,425 | | 89.7000 | 06/01/2015 | |||||||||||||||
|
33,155 | | 110.0600 | 06/01/2016 | |||||||||||||||
|
20,655 | | 114.7400 | 07/09/2017 | |||||||||||||||
|
5,000 | | 84.6550 | 01/14/2018 | |||||||||||||||
|
24,100 | | 90.8100 | 06/02/2018 | |||||||||||||||
|
25,935 | 8,645(5) | 56.3100 | 06/08/2019 | |||||||||||||||
|
11,550 | 11,550(6) | 78.1900 | 06/07/2020 | |||||||||||||||
|
5,370 | 16,110(7) | 89.1050 | 06/06/2021 | |||||||||||||||
|
| 24,235(8) | 85.2550 | 06/04/2022 | |||||||||||||||
|
19,869 | (9) | 1,914,179 | ||||||||||||||||
D.J. Bronczek |
49,628 |
|
72.8450 |
06/01/2014 |
|||||||||||||||
|
45,900 | | 89.7000 | 06/01/2015 | |||||||||||||||
|
27,540 | | 110.0600 | 06/01/2016 | |||||||||||||||
|
27,540 | | 114.7400 | 07/09/2017 | |||||||||||||||
|
32,130 | | 90.8100 | 06/02/2018 | |||||||||||||||
|
34,916 | 11,639(10) | 56.3100 | 06/08/2019 | |||||||||||||||
|
15,387 | 15,388(11) | 78.1900 | 06/07/2020 | |||||||||||||||
|
7,112 | 21,338(12) | 89.1050 | 06/06/2021 | |||||||||||||||
|
| 32,100(13) | 85.2550 | 06/04/2022 | |||||||||||||||
|
25,565 | (14) | 2,462,932 | ||||||||||||||||
T.M. Glenn |
38,250 |
|
72.8450 |
06/01/2014 |
|||||||||||||||
|
34,425 | | 89.7000 | 06/01/2015 | |||||||||||||||
|
20,655 | | 110.0600 | 06/01/2016 | |||||||||||||||
|
20,655 | | 114.7400 | 07/09/2017 | |||||||||||||||
|
5,000 | | 103.3500 | 09/24/2017 | |||||||||||||||
|
24,100 | | 90.8100 | 06/02/2018 | |||||||||||||||
|
25,935 | 8,645(15) | 56.3100 | 06/08/2019 | |||||||||||||||
|
11,550 | 11,550(16) | 78.1900 | 06/07/2020 | |||||||||||||||
|
5,370 | 16,110(17) | 89.1050 | 06/06/2021 | |||||||||||||||
|
| 24,235(18) | 85.2550 | 06/04/2022 | |||||||||||||||
|
19,869 | (19) | 1,914,179 | ||||||||||||||||
R.B. Carter |
1,372 |
|
72.8450 |
06/01/2014 |
|||||||||||||||
|
30,122 | | 89.7000 | 06/01/2015 | |||||||||||||||
|
20,655 | | 110.0600 | 06/01/2016 | |||||||||||||||
|
20,655 | | 114.7400 | 07/09/2017 | |||||||||||||||
|
5,000 | | 103.3500 | 09/24/2017 | |||||||||||||||
|
24,100 | | 90.8100 | 06/02/2018 | |||||||||||||||
|
25,935 | 8,645(20) | 56.3100 | 06/08/2019 | |||||||||||||||
|
11,550 | 11,550(21) | 78.1900 | 06/07/2020 | |||||||||||||||
|
5,370 | 16,110(22) | 89.1050 | 06/06/2021 | |||||||||||||||
|
| 24,235(23) | 85.2550 | 06/04/2022 | |||||||||||||||
|
19,869 | (24) | 1,914,179 |
53
|
|
Date | Number | |
|
Date | Number | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F.W. Smith |
(1) | 06/08/2013 | 67,938 | A.B. Graf, Jr. |
(5) | 06/08/2013 | 8,645 | ||||||||||||
|
(2) | 06/07/2013 | 48,875 | (6) | 06/07/2013 | 5,775 | |||||||||||||
|
06/07/2014 | 48,875 | 06/07/2014 | 5,775 | |||||||||||||||
|
(3) | 06/06/2013 | 44,025 | (7) | 06/06/2013 | 5,370 | |||||||||||||
|
06/06/2014 | 44,025 | 06/06/2014 | 5,370 | |||||||||||||||
|
06/06/2015 | 44,025 | 06/06/2015 | 5,370 | |||||||||||||||
|
(4) | 06/04/2013 | 49,668 | (8) | 06/04/2013 | 6,058 | |||||||||||||
|
06/04/2014 | 49,669 | 06/04/2014 | 6,059 | |||||||||||||||
|
06/04/2015 | 49,669 | 06/04/2015 | 6,059 | |||||||||||||||
|
06/04/2016 | 49,669 | 06/04/2016 | 6,059 | |||||||||||||||
|
(9) | 06/04/2013 | 1,821 | ||||||||||||||||
|
06/06/2013 | 1,750 | |||||||||||||||||
|
06/07/2013 | 2,000 | |||||||||||||||||
|
06/08/2013 | 3,334 | |||||||||||||||||
|
06/04/2014 | 1,821 | |||||||||||||||||
|
06/06/2014 | 1,750 | |||||||||||||||||
|
06/07/2014 | 2,000 | |||||||||||||||||
|
06/04/2015 | 1,821 | |||||||||||||||||
|
06/06/2015 | 1,750 | |||||||||||||||||
|
06/04/2016 | 1,822 | |||||||||||||||||
D.J. Bronczek |
(10) |
06/08/2013 |
11,639 |
T. M. Glenn |
(15) |
06/08/2013 |
8,645 |
||||||||||||
|
(11) | 06/07/2013 | 7,694 | (16) | 06/07/2013 | 5,775 | |||||||||||||
|
06/07/2014 | 7,694 | 06/07/2014 | 5,775 | |||||||||||||||
|
(12) | 06/06/2013 | 7,113 | (17) | 06/06/2013 | 5,370 | |||||||||||||
|
06/06/2014 | 7,112 | 06/06/2014 | 5,370 | |||||||||||||||
|
06/06/2015 | 7,113 | 06/06/2015 | 5,370 | |||||||||||||||
|
(13) | 06/04/2013 | 8,025 | (18) | 06/04/2013 | 6,058 | |||||||||||||
|
06/04/2014 | 8,025 | 06/04/2014 | 6,059 | |||||||||||||||
|
06/04/2015 | 8,025 | 06/04/2015 | 6,059 | |||||||||||||||
|
06/04/2016 | 8,025 | 06/04/2016 | 6,059 | |||||||||||||||
|
(14) | 06/04/2013 | 2,345 | (19) | 06/04/2013 | 1,821 | |||||||||||||
|
06/06/2013 | 2,253 | 06/06/2013 | 1,750 | |||||||||||||||
|
06/07/2013 | 2,571 | 06/07/2013 | 2,000 | |||||||||||||||
|
06/08/2013 | 4,284 | 06/08/2013 | 3,334 | |||||||||||||||
|
06/04/2014 | 2,345 | 06/04/2014 | 1,821 | |||||||||||||||
|
06/06/2014 | 2,252 | 06/06/2014 | 1,750 | |||||||||||||||
|
06/07/2014 | 2,572 | 06/07/2014 | 2,000 | |||||||||||||||
|
06/04/2015 | 2,345 | 06/04/2015 | 1,821 | |||||||||||||||
|
06/06/2015 | 2,253 | 06/06/2015 | 1,750 | |||||||||||||||
|
06/04/2016 | 2,345 | 06/04/2016 | 1,822 | |||||||||||||||
R.B. Carter |
(20) |
06/08/2013 |
8,645 |
||||||||||||||||
|
(21) | 06/07/2013 | 5,775 | ||||||||||||||||
|
06/07/2014 | 5,775 | |||||||||||||||||
|
(22) | 06/06/2013 | 5,370 | ||||||||||||||||
|
06/06/2014 | 5,370 | |||||||||||||||||
|
06/06/2015 | 5,370 | |||||||||||||||||
|
(23) | 06/04/2013 | 6,058 | ||||||||||||||||
|
06/04/2014 | 6,059 | |||||||||||||||||
|
06/04/2015 | 6,059 | |||||||||||||||||
|
06/04/2016 | 6,059 | |||||||||||||||||
|
(24) | 06/04/2013 | 1,821 | ||||||||||||||||
|
06/06/2013 | 1,750 | |||||||||||||||||
|
06/07/2013 | 2,000 | |||||||||||||||||
|
06/08/2013 | 3,334 | |||||||||||||||||
|
06/04/2014 | 1,821 | |||||||||||||||||
|
06/06/2014 | 1,750 | |||||||||||||||||
|
06/07/2014 | 2,000 | |||||||||||||||||
|
06/04/2015 | 1,821 | |||||||||||||||||
|
06/06/2015 | 1,750 | |||||||||||||||||
|
06/04/2016 | 1,822 |
54
Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Fiscal 2013
The following table sets forth for each named executive officer certain information about stock options that were exercised and restricted stock that vested during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2013:
|
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) |
Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1) |
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) |
Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2) |
|||||||||
F.W. Smith |
250,000 | 7,955,888 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
65,000 | 1,827,241 | 8,842 | 765,824 | |||||||||
D.J. Bronczek |
83,451 | 2,311,192 | 11,366 | 984,431 | |||||||||
T.M. Glenn |
65,000 | 1,846,858 | 8,842 | 765,824 | |||||||||
R.B. Carter |
68,764 | 1,814,971 | 8,842 | 765,824 |
55
The following table sets forth for each named executive officer the present value of accumulated benefits at May 31, 2013, under FedEx's defined benefit pension plans. For information regarding benefits triggered by retirement under our stock option and restricted stock plans, see " Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control" below.
Name
|
Plan Name | Number of Years Credited Service (#) |
Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($)(1) |
Payments During Fiscal 2013 ($) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F.W. Smith |
FedEx Corporation Employees' Pension Plan | 41 | 1,374,758 | 0 | ||||||
|
FedEx Corporation Retirement Parity Pension Plan | 41 | 23,964,069 | 0 | ||||||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
FedEx Corporation Employees' Pension Plan |
33 |
1,541,189 |
0 |
||||||
|
FedEx Corporation Retirement Parity Pension Plan | 33 | 11,720,298 | 0 | ||||||
D.J. Bronczek |
FedEx Corporation Employees' Pension Plan |
37 |
1,610,090 |
0 |
||||||
|
FedEx Corporation Retirement Parity Pension Plan | 37 | 14,440,888 | 0 | ||||||
T.M. Glenn |
FedEx Corporation Employees' Pension Plan |
32 |
1,418,641 |
0 |
||||||
|
FedEx Corporation Retirement Parity Pension Plan | 32 | 9,759,589 | 0 | ||||||
R.B. Carter |
FedEx Corporation Employees' Pension Plan |
20 |
782,475 |
0 |
||||||
|
FedEx Corporation Retirement Parity Pension Plan | 20 | 4,699,633 | 0 |
FedEx maintains a tax-qualified, defined benefit pension plan called the FedEx Corporation Employees' Pension Plan (the "Pension Plan"). For fiscal 2013, the maximum compensation limit under a tax-qualified pension plan was $250,000. The Internal Revenue Code also limits the maximum annual benefits that may be accrued under a tax-qualified, defined benefit pension plan. In order to provide 100% of the benefits that would otherwise be denied certain management-level participants in the Pension Plan due to these limitations, FedEx also maintains a supplemental, non-tax-qualified plan called the FedEx Corporation Retirement Parity Pension Plan (the "Parity Plan"). Benefits under the Parity Plan are general, unsecured obligations of FedEx.
Effective May 31, 2003, FedEx amended the Pension Plan and the Parity Plan to add a cash balance feature, which is called the Portable Pension Account. Eligible employees as of May 31, 2003, had the option to make a
56
one-time election to accrue future pension benefits under either the cash balance formula or the traditional pension benefit formula. In either case, employees retained all benefits previously accrued under the traditional pension benefit formula and continued to receive the benefit of future compensation increases on benefits accrued as of May 31, 2003. Eligible employees hired after May 31, 2003, accrue benefits exclusively under the Portable Pension Account.
Beginning June 1, 2008, eligible employees who participate in the Pension Plan and the Parity Plan, including the named executive officers, accrue all future pension benefits under the Portable Pension Account. In addition, benefits previously accrued under the Pension Plan and the Parity Plan using the traditional pension benefit formula were capped as of May 31, 2008, and those benefits will be payable beginning at retirement. Effective June 1, 2008, each participant in the Pension Plan and the Parity Plan who was age 40 or older on that date and who has an accrued traditional pension benefit will receive a transition compensation credit, as described in more detail below. Employees who elected in 2003 to accrue future benefits under the Portable Pension Account will continue to accrue benefits under that formula.
The named executive officers also participate in the 401(k) Plan. Beginning January 1, 2008, the annual matching company contribution under the 401(k) Plan is a maximum of 3.5% of eligible earnings. Effective February 1, 2009, however, 401(k) company-matching contributions were suspended for all participants, including the named executive officers. We reinstated these contributions at 50% of previous levels (a maximum of 1.75% of eligible earnings) effective January 1, 2010, and fully restored these contributions effective January 1, 2011.
In order to provide 100% of the benefits that would otherwise be limited due to certain limitations imposed by United States tax laws, effective June 1, 2008, Parity Plan participants, including the named executive officers, received additional Portable Pension Account compensation credits equal to 3.5% of any eligible earnings above the maximum compensation limit for tax-qualified plans. Effective June 1, 2009, however, the additional compensation credit under the Parity Plan was suspended for all participants, including the named executive officers. We reinstated 50% of the additional Portable Pension Account compensation credit benefit effective June 1, 2010, and fully reinstated the benefit effective June 1, 2011 (such full credit was made as of May 31, 2012).
Normal retirement age for the majority of participants, including the named executive officers, under the Pension Plan and the Parity Plan is age 60. The traditional pension benefit under the Pension Plan for a participant who retires between the ages of 55 and 60 will be reduced by 3% for each year the participant receives his or her benefit prior to age 60.
Under the traditional pension benefit formula, the Pension Plan and the Parity Plan provide 2% of the average of the five calendar years (three calendar years for the Parity Plan) of highest earnings during employment multiplied by years of credited service for benefit accrual up to 25 years. Eligible compensation for the traditional pension benefit under the Pension Plan and the Parity Plan for the named executive officers includes salary and annual incentive compensation.
A named executive officer's capped accrued traditional pension benefit was calculated using his years of credited service as of either May 31, 2003 or May 31, 2008, depending on whether he chose to accrue future benefits under the cash balance formula or the traditional pension benefit formula in 2003, and his eligible earnings history as of May 31, 2008.
The benefit under the Portable Pension Account is expressed as a notional cash balance account. For each plan year in which a participant is credited with a year of service, compensation credits are added based on the participant's age and years of service as of the end of the prior plan year and the participant's eligible compensation for the prior calendar year based on the following table:
Age + Service on May 31
|
Compensation Credit | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Less than 55 |
5% | |||
55-64 |
6% | |||
65-74 |
7% | |||
75 or over |
8% |
57
On May 31, 2012, the sum of age plus years of service for the named executive officers was as follows: Mr. Smith 107; Mr. Graf 90; Mr. Bronczek 93; Mr. Glenn 87; and Mr. Carter 71. Eligible compensation under the Portable Pension Account feature for the named executive officers includes salary and annual incentive compensation. Messrs. Smith, Graf and Bronczek elected the Portable Pension Account feature on June 1, 2003. Messrs. Glenn and Carter began accruing benefits under the Portable Pension Account on June 1, 2008.
Transition compensation credits are an additional compensation credit percentage to be granted to participants in the Pension Plan and the Parity Plan who were age 40 or older on June 1, 2008, and who have an accrued benefit under the traditional pension benefit formula. For each plan year in which an eligible participant is credited with a year of service, transition compensation credits will be added based on the participant's age and years of service as of the end of the prior plan year and the participant's eligible compensation for the prior calendar year based on the following table:
Age + Service on May 31
|
Transition Compensation Credit* | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Less than 55 |
2% | |||
55-64 |
3% | |||
65-74 |
4% | |||
75 or over |
5% |
An eligible participant will receive transition compensation credits for five years (through May 31, 2013) or until he or she has 25 years of credited service, whichever is longer. For participants with 25 or more years of service, transition compensation credits are 2% per year and ceased as of May 31, 2013. An eligible participant's first transition compensation credit was added to his or her Portable Pension Account as of May 31, 2009.
Interest credits are added to a participant's Portable Pension Account benefit as of the end of each fiscal quarter (August 31, November 30, February 28 and May 31) after a participant accrues his or her first compensation credit. The May 31 interest credit is added prior to the May 31 compensation credit or transition compensation credit (or additional compensation credit under the Parity Plan). Interest credits are based on the Portable Pension Account notional balance and a quarterly interest-crediting rate, which is equal to the greater of (a) 1/4 of the one-year Treasury constant maturities rate for April of the preceding plan year plus 0.25% and (b) 1% ( 1/4 of 4%). The quarterly interest crediting rate, when compounded quarterly, cannot produce an annual rate greater than the average 30-year Treasury rate for April of the preceding plan year (or, if larger, such other rate as may be required for certain tax law purposes). In no event, however, will the quarterly interest crediting rate be less than 0.765%. Interest credits will continue to be added until the last day of the month before plan benefits are distributed. The quarterly interest-crediting rate for the plan year ended May 31, 2012, was 1%. The quarterly interest-crediting rate for the plan year ended May 31, 2013, was 1%.
Upon a participant's retirement, the vested traditional pension benefit under the Pension Plan is payable as a monthly annuity. Upon a participant's retirement or other termination of employment, an amount equal to the vested Portable Pension Account notional balance under the Pension Plan is payable to the participant in the form of a lump sum payment or an annuity.
All Parity Plan benefits are paid as a single lump sum distribution as follows:
58
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control
This section provides information regarding payments and benefits to the named executive officers that would be triggered by termination of the officer's employment (including resignation, or voluntary termination; severance, or involuntary termination; and retirement) or a change of control of FedEx.
Each of the named executive officers is an at-will employee and, as such, does not have an employment contract. In addition, if the officer's employment terminates for any reason other than retirement, death or permanent disability, any unvested stock options are automatically terminated and any unvested shares of restricted stock are automatically forfeited. Accordingly, there are no payments or benefits that are triggered by any termination event (including resignation and severance) other than retirement, death or permanent disability, or in connection with a change of control of FedEx.
Benefits Triggered by Retirement, Death or Permanent Disability Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plans
Retirement. When an employee retires:
For information regarding retirement benefits under our pension plans, see " Fiscal 2013 Pension Benefits" above.
Death or Permanent Disability. When an employee dies or becomes permanently disabled:
The following table quantifies for each named executive officer the value of his unvested restricted shares and stock options, the vesting of which would be accelerated upon death or permanent disability (assuming the officer died or became permanently disabled on May 31, 2013):
Benefits Triggered by Death or Permanent Disability
Name
|
Value of Unvested Restricted Shares ($)(1) |
Value of Unvested Stock Options ($)(2) |
Total ($) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F.W. Smith |
0 | 7,651,596 | 7,651,596 | |||||||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
1,914,179 | 940,893 | 2,855,072 | |||||||
D.J. Bronczek |
2,462,932 | 1,255,410 | 3,718,342 | |||||||
T.M. Glenn |
1,914,179 | 940,893 | 2,855,072 | |||||||
R.B. Carter |
1,914,179 | 940,893 | 2,855,072 |
59
In addition, FedEx provides each named executive officer with:
Benefits Triggered by Change of Control or Termination after Change of Control Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plans and Management Retention Agreements
Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plans. Our stock option plans provide that, in the event of a change of control (as defined in the plans), each holder of an unexpired option under any of the plans has the right to exercise such option without regard to the date such option would first be exercisable. Except with respect to stock options granted under FedEx's 2010 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, this right continues, with respect to holders whose employment with FedEx terminates following a change of control, for a period of twelve months after such termination or until the option's expiration date, whichever is sooner.
Our restricted stock plans provide that, in the event of a change of control (as defined in the plans), depending on the change of control event, either (i) the restricted shares will be canceled and FedEx shall make a cash payment to each holder in an amount equal to the product of the highest price per share received by the holders of FedEx's common stock in connection with the change of control multiplied by the number of restricted shares held or (ii) the restrictions applicable to any such shares will immediately lapse.
Under FedEx's 2010 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, our Compensation Committee may exercise its discretion to provide for a treatment different than described above with respect to any particular stock option or restricted stock award, as set forth in the related award agreement. To date, such discretion has not been exercised.
The following table quantifies for each named executive officer the value of his unvested restricted shares and stock options, the vesting of which would be accelerated upon a change of control (assuming that the change of control occurred on May 31, 2013, and that the highest price per share received by FedEx's stockholders in connection with the change of control was the closing market price on May 31, 2013, which was $96.34):
Benefits Triggered by Change of Control(1)
Name
|
Value of Unvested Restricted Shares ($)(2) |
Value of Unvested Stock Options ($)(3) |
Total ($) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F.W. Smith |
0 | 7,651,596 | 7,651,596 | |||||||
A.B. Graf, Jr. |
1,914,179 | 940,893 | 2,855,072 | |||||||
D.J. Bronczek |
2,462,932 | 1,255,410 | 3,718,342 | |||||||
T.M. Glenn |
1,914,179 | 940,893 | 2,855,072 | |||||||
R.B. Carter |
1,914,179 | 940,893 | 2,855,072 |
60
Management Retention Agreements. FedEx has entered into Management Retention Agreements ("MRAs") with each of its executive officers, including the named executive officers. The purp