Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2007
Table of Contents

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-Q

 


 

(Mark One)

 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007

 

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from                          to                         

 

001-32492

(Commission File Number)

 


 

LAZARD LTD

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Bermuda    98-0437848
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation    (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
or Organization)     

 


 

Clarendon House

2 Church Street

Hamilton HM11, Bermuda

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

Registrant’s telephone number: (441) 295-1422

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

    Large Accelerated Filer  x    Accelerated Filer  ¨    Non-Accelerated Filer  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

 

As of July 31, 2007, there were 51,554,068 shares of the registrant’s Class A common stock and one share of the registrant’s Class B common stock outstanding.

 



Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

When we use the terms “Lazard”, “we”, “us”, “our”, and “the Company”, we mean Lazard Ltd, a company incorporated under the laws of Bermuda, and its subsidiaries, including Lazard Group LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Lazard Group”), that is the current holding company for our businesses. Lazard Ltd has no material assets other than indirect ownership as of June 30, 2007 of approximately 47.9% of the common membership interests in Lazard Group and its controlling interest in Lazard Group.

 

     Page

Part I. Financial Information

    

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)

   1

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  

29

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

  

53

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

  

53

Part II. Other Information

    

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

  

54

Item 1A. Risk Factors

  

54

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

  

54

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

  

54

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

  

54

Item 5. Other Information

  

55

Item 6. Exhibits

  

55

Signatures

  

60

 

i


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)

 

    Page

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006

  2

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

  4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

  5

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficiency for the six month period ended June 30, 2007

  6

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

  7

 

1


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

JUNE 30, 2007 AND DECEMBER 31, 2006

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data)

 

     June 30,
2007


   December 31,
2006


ASSETS

             

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 1,029,036    $ 969,483

Cash segregated for regulatory purposes or deposited with clearing organizations

  

 

32,051

     16,023

Securities owned—at fair value:

             

Bonds—Corporate

  

 

469,324

     527,421

Equities

  

 

148,061

     23,185

Non-U.S. Government and agency securities

  

 

30,785

     28,729
    

  

       648,170      579,335

Receivables—net:

             

Banks

  

 

430,143

     721,002

Fees

  

 

375,817

     417,519

Customers

  

 

58,186

     77,832

Related parties

  

 

29,801

     18,543
    

  

    

 

893,947

     1,234,896

Long-term investments—at fair value

     154,467      99,057

Property (net of accumulated amortization and depreciation of $191,474 and $181,812 at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively)

  

 

169,903

     168,310

Goodwill

  

 

17,135

     16,945

Other assets

  

 

164,953

     124,616
    

  

Total assets

   $ 3,109,662    $ 3,208,665
    

  

 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

2


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION—(Continued)

JUNE 30, 2007 AND DECEMBER 31, 2006

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data)

 

    June 30,
2007


    December 31,
2006


 

LIABILITIES, MINORITY INTEREST AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY

               

Liabilities:

               

Deposits and other customer payables

  $ 802,335     $ 1,195,014  

Accrued compensation and benefits

 

 

194,229

 

    437,738  

Senior borrowings

 

 

1,590,960

 

    1,087,057  

Capital lease obligations

 

 

25,435

 

    25,445  

Related party payables

 

 

12,095

 

    9,794  

Other liabilities

 

 

430,221

 

    438,473  

Subordinated borrowings

 

 

150,000

 

    200,000  
   


 


Total liabilities

    3,205,275       3,393,521  

Commitments and contingencies

               

Minority interest

 

 

48,305

 

    55,497  

STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY

               

Common stock:

               

Class A, par value $.01 per share (500,000,000 shares authorized; 51,554,068 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006)

 

 

516

 

    516  

Class B, par value $.01 per share (1 share authorized, 1 share issued and outstanding at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006)

               

Additional paid-in-capital

 

 

(338,527

)

    (396,792 )

Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax

 

 

38,783

 

    32,494  

Retained earnings

 

 

159,487

 

    127,608  
   


 


   

 

(139,741

)

    (236,174 )

Less - Class A common stock held in treasury, at cost (114,942 and 115,000 shares at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively)

 

 

(4,177

)

    (4,179 )
   


 


Total stockholders’ deficiency

 

 

(143,918

)

    (240,353 )
   


 


Total liabilities, minority interest and stockholders’ deficiency

  $ 3,109,662     $ 3,208,665  
   


 


 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

FOR THE THREE MONTH AND SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 AND 2006

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data)

 

   

Three Months Ended
June 30,


 

Six Months Ended

June 30,


    2007

  2006

  2007

  2006

REVENUE

               

Investment banking and other advisory fees

 

$228,205

 

$252,803

  $443,288   $472,386

Money management fees

 

148,518

 

119,902

 

284,344

 

230,471

Interest income

 

18,334

 

9,828

 

40,675

 

17,838

Other

 

55,845

 

30,759

 

83,038

 

52,854

   
 
 
 

Total revenue

 

450,902

 

413,292

 

851,345

 

773,549

Interest expense

 

29,542

 

26,384

 

60,787

 

50,383

   
 
 
 

Net revenue

 

421,360

 

386,908

 

790,558

 

723,166

   
 
 
 

OPERATING EXPENSES

               

Compensation and benefits

 

249,046

 

234,148

 

469,084

 

434,287

Occupancy and equipment

 

24,285

 

19,013

 

43,974

 

37,453

Marketing and business development

 

16,964

 

14,200

 

33,366

 

27,850

Technology and information services

 

14,161

 

11,756

 

26,767

 

23,971

Professional services

 

13,711

 

13,441

 

22,529

 

20,050

Fund administration and outsourced services

 

4,459

 

4,119

 

8,968

 

7,128

Other

 

9,571

 

5,538

 

18,439

 

9,618

   
 
 
 

Total operating expenses

 

332,197

 

302,215

 

623,127

 

560,357

   
 
 
 

OPERATING INCOME

 

89,163

 

84,693

 

167,431

 

162,809

Provision for income taxes

 

20,313

 

18,734

 

37,374

 

34,674

   
 
 
 

INCOME BEFORE MINORITY INTEREST IN NET INCOME

 

68,850

 

65,959

 

130,057

 

128,135

Minority interest in net income

 

39,554

 

42,414

 

74,407

 

84,904

   
 
 
 

NET INCOME

 

$  29,296

  $  23,545  

$  55,650

  $  43,231
   
 
 
 

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK
OUTSTANDING:

               

Basic

 

51,439,125

  37,480,751  

51,439,097

  37,491,820

Diluted

 

62,737,737

  43,980,216  

90,477,035

  42,511,380

NET INCOME PER SHARE OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK:

               

Basic

  $0.57   $0.63   $1.08   $1.15
   
 
 
 

Diluted

  $0.52   $0.59   $0.98   $1.10
   
 
 
 

DIVIDENDS PAID PER SHARE OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK

  $0.09   $0.09   $0.18   $0.18
   
 
 
 

 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 AND 2006

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands)

 

   

Six Months Ended
June 30,


 
        2007    

        2006    

 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

               

Net income

  $ 55,650     $ 43,231  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

               

Noncash charges included in net income:

               

Depreciation and amortization of property

 

 

7,528

 

    6,970  

Amortization of deferred expenses, stock units and interest rate hedge

 

 

49,883

 

 

 

11,174

 

Minority interest in net income

 

 

74,407

 

    84,904  

Gain on termination of strategic alliance in Italy

            (13,695 )

(Increase) decrease in operating assets:

               

Cash segregated for regulatory purposes or deposited with clearing organizations

    (15,375 )  

 

6,359

 

Securities owned, at fair value

    (55,991 )  

 

(110,840

)

Receivables

    359,216    

 

(53,341

)

Long-term investments, at fair value

    (55,169 )  

 

6,701

 

Other assets

 

 

(32,234

)

 

 

(16,014

)

Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:

               

Deposits and other payables

 

 

(413,474

)

 

 

231,692

 

Accrued compensation and other liabilities

 

 

(270,821

)

 

 

(157,989

)

   


 


Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

    (296,380 )     39,152  
   


 


CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

               

Additions to property

 

 

(7,057

)

 

 

(3,332

)

Disposals and retirements of property

 

 

1,646

 

 

 

607

 

   


 


Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(5,411

)

 

 

(2,725

)

   


 


CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

               

Proceeds from senior borrowings, including, in 2007, issuance of $600,000 senior notes, net of original issue discount and other expenses of $6,522

    596,931       1,898  

Repayment of senior borrowings

 

 

(99,550

)

 

 

(30,869

)

Repayment of subordinated borrowings

    (50,000 )        

Repayment of capital lease obligations

 

 

(645

)

 

 

(581

)

Distributions relating to minority interest, including $56,837 and $28,751 to LAZ-MD Holdings
in 2007 and 2006, respectively

 

 

(69,504

)

 

 

(50,855

)

Class A common stock dividends

 

 

(9,259

)

 

 

(6,750

)

Repurchase of common membership interest from LAZ-MD Holdings

    (3,773 )        

Purchase of Class A common stock

            (4,179 )

Other financing activities

 

 

(2

)

    (2,677 )
   


 


Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

364,198

 

 

 

(94,013

)

   


 


EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH

 

 

(2,854

)

 

 

7,632

 

   


 


NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

 

 

59,553

 

 

 

(49,954

)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—January 1

 

 

969,483

 

 

 

492,309

 

   


 


CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—June 30

 

$

1,029,036

 

  $ 442,355  
   


 


Supplemental financing non-cash transaction:

               

Issuance of senior promissory note for the acquisition of equity interest in Lazard Italy

          $ 96,000  
           


 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY

FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2007

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands)

 

    Common Stock

  Additional
Paid-in-
Capital


    Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income,
Net of Tax


    Retained
Earnings


    Class A
Common
Stock
Held In
Treasury


    Total
Stockholders’
Deficiency


 
    Shares(*)

          $        

         

Balance, as previously reported—January 1, 2007

 

51,554,069

  $ 516   $ (396,792 )   $ 32,494     $ 127,608     $ (4,179 )   $ (240,353 )

Adjustment for the cumulative effect on prior years from the adoption of FIN 48

                           

 

(13,221

)

         

 

(13,221

)

   
 

 


 


 


 


 


Balance, as adjusted—January 1, 2007

  51,554,069     516     (396,792 )     32,494    

 

114,387

 

    (4,179 )  

 

(253,574

)

                                             


Comprehensive income:

                                                 

Net income

                           

 

55,650

 

         

 

55,650

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)—net of tax:

                                                 

Currency translation adjustments

                   

 

5,591

 

                 

 

5,591

 

Amortization of interest rate hedge

                      550                       550  

Employee benefit plans:

                                                 

Net actuarial gain

                      839                       839  

Net prior service cost (credit)

                      (691 )                     (691 )
                                             


Comprehensive income

                                           

 

61,939

 

                                             


Class A common stock dividends

                           

 

(9,259

)

         

 

(9,259

)

Amortization of stock units

           

 

48,738

 

                         

 

48,738

 

RSU dividend-equivalents

           

 

1,291

 

         

 

(1,291

)

         

 

—  

 

Issuance of treasury shares for settlement of vested RSUs

              (4 )                     2       (2 )

Repurchase of common membership interest from LAZ-MD Holdings

              (3,773 )                             (3,773 )

Adjustment to reclassify minority interest share of undistributed net income to additional paid-in-capital

           

 

12,013

 

                         

 

12,013

 

   
 

 


 


 


 


 


Balance—June 30, 2007

 

51,554,069

 

$

516

 

$

(338,527

)

 

$

38,783

 

 

$

159,487

 

 

$

(4,177

)

 

$

(143,918

)

   
 

 


 


 


 


 



(*)

Includes 51,554,068 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and 1 share of the Company’s Class B common stock at each such date.

 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

6


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)

 

1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

 

Organization

 

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of Lazard Ltd, a Bermuda holding company, and subsidiaries (collectively referred to as “Lazard Ltd”, “Lazard” or the “Company”), including Lazard Ltd’s indirect investment in Lazard Group LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (collectively referred to, together with its subsidiaries, as “Lazard Group”), have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) regarding interim financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Lazard Ltd’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Form 10-K”). The December 31, 2006 unaudited condensed consolidated statement of financial condition data was derived from audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts that are reported in the financial statements and the accompanying disclosures. Although these estimates are based on management’s knowledge of current events and actions that Lazard may undertake in the future, actual results may differ materially from the estimates. The consolidated results of operations for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period or the full fiscal year.

 

The condensed consolidated financial statements include Lazard Ltd, Lazard Group and its principal operating subsidiaries: Lazard Frères & Co. LLC (“LFNY”), a New York limited liability company, along with its subsidiaries, including Lazard Asset Management LLC and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as “LAM”); Compagnie Financière Lazard Frères SAS (“CFLF”) (formerly Lazard Frères SAS) and Maison Lazard SAS, French limited liability companies, along with their respective subsidiaries, including the Paris-based Lazard Frères Banque SA (“LFB”) and Lazard Frères Gestion SAS (“LFG”); and Lazard & Co., Limited (“LCL”), through Lazard & Co., Holdings Limited, an English private limited company (“LCH”); together with their jointly-owned affiliates and subsidiaries.

 

On May 10, 2005, Lazard Ltd consummated an equity public offering (the “equity public offering”) of its Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Class A common stock”). Lazard Ltd, through a number of newly-formed, wholly-owned subsidiaries, contributed the net proceeds from the equity public offering, along with the net proceeds it received from the financing transactions (as described in Note 2 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements), to Lazard Group in exchange for 37,500,000 Lazard Group common membership interests, representing ownership of 37.5% of Lazard Group’s total common membership interests as of May 10, 2005, and, after giving effect to (i) the repurchase and forfeiture of a portion of the Lazard Group common membership interests held by LAZ-MD Holdings LLC (“LAZ-MD Holdings”), as well as (ii) certain subsequent share issuances by Lazard Ltd (principally related to the primary and secondary offerings of Class A common stock as described in Note 2 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements), it held approximately 47.9% of all outstanding Lazard Group common membership interests as of both June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006. Lazard Ltd, through its control of the managing members of Lazard Group, controls Lazard Group.

 

7


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)

 

Lazard Group is governed by an Operating Agreement dated as of May 10, 2005, as amended (the “Operating Agreement”).

 

The Company’s sole operating asset is its indirect ownership of common membership interests of Lazard Group and its managing member interest of Lazard Group, whose current principal activities are divided into two business segments:

 

   

Financial Advisory, which includes providing advice on mergers and acquisitions, restructurings, capital raising and similar transactions, and

 

   

Asset Management, which includes the management of equity and fixed income securities and merchant banking funds.

 

In addition, Lazard Group records selected other activities in Corporate, including management of cash, certain investments and the commercial banking activities of LFB. LFB is a registered bank regulated by the Banque de France and its primary commercial banking operations include the management of the treasury positions of Lazard Group’s Paris House through its money market desk and, to a lesser extent, credit activities relating to securing loans granted to clients of LFG and custodial oversight over assets of various clients. In addition, LFB operates many support functions relating to our business in Paris. Lazard Group also allocates outstanding indebtedness to Corporate.

 

Prior to May 10, 2005, Lazard Group also had a business segment called Capital Markets and Other, which consisted of equity, fixed income and convertibles sales and trading, broking, research and underwriting services and merchant banking fund management activities outside of France as well as other specified non-operating assets and liabilities. This business segment’s assets and liabilities (referred to below as the “separated businesses”) were separated from Lazard Group on May 10, 2005. We refer to the transfer of the separated business as the “separation.”

 

Business Acquisitions and Joint Venture Investment

 

On May 22, 2007, Lazard Group entered into a Shareholders Agreement to acquire 50 percent of Merchant Bankers Asociados (“MBA”) (the parent company of MBA Banco de Inversiones), an Argentina-based financial advisory services firm with offices across Central and South America. The purchase of the 50% interest in MBA is subject to approval by the applicable regulatory authorities.

 

On July 10, 2007, Lazard Group entered into an equity purchase agreement to acquire all of the outstanding ownership interests of Goldsmith, Agio, Helms & Lynner, LLC (“GAHL”), a Minneapolis-based investment bank specializing in financial advisory services to mid-sized private companies, in exchange for a combination of cash and Class A common stock. The total number of shares issuable in connection with the GAHL acquisition will depend upon the future performance of the GAHL business and will be based upon the trading price of the Class A common stock for the 20 trading day period ending August 29, 2007. The acquisition of GAHL is subject to approval by the applicable regulatory authorities.

 

On July 31, 2007, Lazard Ltd entered into a share purchase agreement and acquired all of the outstanding shares of Carnegie, Wylie & Company (Holdings) PTY LTD (“CWC”), a Melbourne, Australia-based investment advisory firm and concurrently contributed such investment to Lazard Group. As part of the CWC transaction, Lazard Ltd issued two classes of preferred securities (Series A and Series B), which will be automatically converted into a specified dollar amount of Class A common stock on pre-determined dates not less than one year following the acquisition date. The preferred securities have no voting or dividend rights.

 

8


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)

 

The aggregate unconditional consideration relating to the MBA, GAHL and CWC transactions described above (subject to certain adjustments) consists of approximately $139,000 of cash and approximately $47,000 of stock. Payment of additional stock consideration is contingent upon the achievement by each acquired company of defined revenue and/or earnings levels. A significant portion of the aggregate purchase price will represent goodwill. The stock consideration is issuable over multi-year periods commencing not less than one year following the respective acquisition dates. The stock consideration is being issued pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (transaction not involving a public offering), and/or, in the case of the CWC transaction, Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933 (on the basis that the CWC shareholders were not U.S. persons and that the transaction satisfied the other requirements of Regulation S).

 

We account for business acquisitions using the purchase method of accounting, whereby the results of the acquired businesses are included in our consolidated financial results from the effective date of the respective transaction. We will account for the MBA joint venture using the equity method of accounting. The operating results related to the transactions described above will be included primarily in the Company’s Financial Advisory segment.

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. The Company’s policy is to consolidate (i) all majority-owned subsidiaries in which it has a controlling financial interest, (ii) variable interest entities (“VIEs”) where the Company has a variable interest and is deemed to be the primary beneficiary and (iii) limited partnerships where the Company is the general partner, unless the presumption of control is overcome. When the Company does not have a controlling interest in an entity, but exerts significant influence over the entity’s operating and financial decisions, the Company applies the equity method of accounting. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

 

The Company prepared an assessment that considered quantitative and qualitative factors that included, but was not limited to, the structure and purpose of the separation and recapitalization transactions, corporate governance and the Company’s control of Lazard Group through its control of the managing members of Lazard Group, and concluded that Lazard Ltd is the entity that is most closely associated with Lazard Group and therefore should consolidate Lazard Group. Accordingly, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Lazard Group.

 

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the manner of presentation in the current year. Effective as of June 30, 2007, Lazard implemented a revised categorization of non-compensation expenses to better reflect the manner in which the Company manages and reviews expenses.

 

2. THE SEPARATION AND RECAPITALIZATION TRANSACTIONS IN MAY, 2005, AND PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OFFERINGS IN DECEMBER, 2006

 

As more fully described in the Form 10-K, on May 10, 2005, Lazard completed the separation and recapitalization transactions, including the financing transactions, pursuant to the master separation agreement, dated as of May 10, 2005, by and among Lazard Ltd, Lazard Group, LAZ-MD Holdings and LFCM Holdings LLC (“LFCM Holdings”) (the “master separation agreement”).

 

The Separation

 

In the separation, Lazard Group transferred the separated businesses to LFCM Holdings through several steps. First, LAZ-MD Holdings was formed as the new holding company for Lazard Group. Pursuant to this formation, all of the persons who were members of Lazard Group prior to the formation became members of LAZ-MD Holdings and ceased to hold any membership interests in Lazard Group. Lazard Group then

 

9


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)

 

contributed the separated businesses to LFCM Holdings, which was then a subsidiary of Lazard Group, and distributed all of the LFCM Holdings interests to LAZ-MD Holdings. After the redemption of the historical partners described below, LAZ-MD Holdings distributed all of the LFCM Holdings interests to its members. Accordingly, after the separation, LFCM Holdings was wholly-owned by the members of LAZ-MD Holdings, including Lazard Group’s managing directors at the time of the separation.

 

In the separation, Lazard Group retained all of the Company’s Financial Advisory and Asset Management businesses. In addition, under the business alliance agreement, dated as of May 10, 2005, between Lazard Group and LFCM Holdings (the “business alliance agreement”), Lazard Group was granted the option to acquire the North American and European merchant banking fund management activities of LFCM Holdings.

 

The Recapitalization

 

On the same day as the separation, LAZ-MD Holdings and Lazard Group effected a recapitalization of their companies. The recapitalization had three principal parts—the financing transactions, the redemption of the historical partners’ interests and mandatorily redeemable preferred interests of Lazard Group and the issuance of LAZ-MD Holdings exchangeable interests to working members.

 

The Financing Transactions

 

On May 10, 2005, the Company completed the financing transactions, which consisted of:

 

   

the equity public offering,

 

   

the initial offering (the “ESU offering”) of equity security units (the “ESUs”) in an aggregate principal amount of $287,500,

 

   

the private offering of Lazard Group senior notes in an aggregate principal amount of $550,000, and

 

   

the private placement of securities to IXIS—Corporate & Investment Bank (“IXIS”), consisting of $150,000 principal amount of ESUs and $50,000 in shares of Class A common stock.

 

The Redemption of the Historical Partners’ Interests

 

As noted above, a primary purpose of the financing transactions was the redemption of the historical partners’ interests and mandatorily redeemable preferred interests of Lazard Group. As part of the recapitalization transactions, historical partner interests and preferred interests generally were redeemed for cash.

 

Exchange of Working Member Interests for LAZ-MD Holdings Interests

 

In connection with the formation of LAZ-MD Holdings, the working member interests were exchanged with LAZ-MD Holdings for limited liability company interests in LAZ-MD Holdings. Each holder of a working member interest at the time of the separation and recapitalization transactions received, in exchange for his or her working member interest, a redeemable capital interest in LAZ-MD Holdings consisting of an equivalent amount of capital of LAZ-MD Holdings, an exchangeable interest in LAZ-MD Holdings and, in certain instances, a right to receive distributions from LAZ-MD Holdings. The former holders of working member interests hold all of the limited liability company interests in LAZ-MD Holdings.

 

10


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)

 

Credit Facility—Concurrent with the equity public offering, Lazard Group entered into a five year, $125,000 senior revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with a group of lenders. On May 17, 2006, the Credit Facility was amended to provide for an increase in the aggregate commitments from $125,000 to $150,000.

 

Primary and Secondary Offerings in December, 2006—As described in more detail in the Form 10-K, on December 6, 2006, Lazard Ltd closed an underwritten public offering of additional shares of its Class A common stock. The offering was comprised of a primary offering (the “Primary Offering”) of 8,050,400 newly-issued shares by Lazard Ltd and a secondary offering (the “Secondary Offering”) of 6,000,000 shares offered to the public by certain current and former managing directors of Lazard and their permitted transferees (the “Selling Shareholders”).

 

The primary offering provided Lazard Ltd with net proceeds, after underwriters’ discounts and other estimated expenses, of $349,137. Lazard Ltd did not receive any net proceeds from the sales of common stock offered by the Selling Shareholders. Immediately following the Primary Offering, Lazard Ltd and its subsidiaries received 8,050,400 additional Lazard Group common membership interests in exchange for the net proceeds from the Primary Offering. In the Secondary Offering, Lazard Ltd and its subsidiaries received an additional 6,000,000 Lazard Group common membership interests from the exchanging LAZ-MD members in exchange for the issuance to them of 6,000,000 shares of Class A common stock. LAZ-MD members then sold those shares to the public.

 

As a result of the offerings, Lazard Ltd’s ownership interest in Lazard Group increased from 37.7% prior to the offerings to 47.9% subsequent thereto. Correspondingly, LAZ-MD’s ownership in Lazard Group decreased from 62.3% prior to the offerings to 52.1% subsequent thereto.

 

Lazard Capital Markets LLC (“LCM”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of LFCM Holdings, was a member of the underwriting group for both the Primary and Secondary Offerings, and, in such capacity, earned revenue, net of estimated underwriting expenses, of $4,118. The business alliance agreement provides for Lazard Group to receive a referral fee equal to approximately half of the net revenue obtained by LCM in respect of any underwriting or distribution opportunity referred to it by Lazard Group. In that connection, as of December 31, 2006 Lazard Group’s condensed consolidated statement of financial condition included a receivable from LFCM Holdings of $2,059, with the portion of such amount relating to the Primary Offering of $1,180 being recorded as an increase to its members’ equity in the fourth quarter of 2006 and the portion of such amount relating to the Secondary Offering of $879 being recorded in “other revenue” in such period. See Note 12 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the business alliance agreement.

 

3.    SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

The accounting policies below represent changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies occurring during the six month period ended June 30, 2007. A complete discussion of the Company’s significant accounting policies are included in the Form 10-K.

 

On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for and reporting of income tax uncertainties and requires additional disclosures related to uncertain tax positions. The Company’s accounting policy provides that interest and penalties related to income taxes be included in income tax expense. See Note 11 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information relating to the adoption of FIN 48.

 

11


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)

 

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements—In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies to other accounting pronouncements that require the use of fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for interim and annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently assessing the impact of adopting SFAS 157 on the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the Company.

 

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits an entity to elect to measure various financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. It provides entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. This Statement requires that a business entity report unrealized gains and losses, on items for which the fair value option has been elected, in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of the first annual period beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently assessing the impact of adopting SFAS 159 on the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the Company.

 

4. MINORITY INTEREST

 

The Company records a charge to minority interest in net income relating to LAZ-MD Holdings’ ownership interest in Lazard Group (which approximated 52.1% and 62.3% at June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively), with such minority interest in net income amounting to $35,829 and $68,849 for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007, respectively, and $45,136 and $82,364 for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2006, respectively. The Company classifies LAZ-MD Holdings’ ownership of Lazard Group’s common membership interests as a reduction of the Company’s stockholders’ equity rather than as minority interest, since the balance of such minority interest as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 of $93,759 and $127,863, respectively, is negative. See Note 8 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements with respect to distributions paid to LAZ-MD Holdings.

 

Minority interest also includes minority interests in LAM and in various LAM-related general partnership interests that it controls but does not wholly own. As a result of consolidating these companies, the Company recognizes the portion of income not associated with the Company’s ownership as minority interest.

 

5. TERMINATION OF STRATEGIC ALLIANCE IN ITALY

 

On May 15, 2006, Lazard Group completed the termination of its strategic alliance with Banca Intesa S.p.A (“Intesa”), which conducted selected Italian investment banking business solely through Lazard & Co. S.r.l. (“Lazard Italy”), an indirect subsidiary of Lazard Group. In accordance with the provisions of the Termination Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2006, by and among Intesa, Lazard Group and Lazard Italy, the following adjustments were made to the terms of Intesa’s investment in Lazard Italy and Lazard Funding Limited LLC (“Lazard Funding”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lazard Group:

 

   

The $150,000 Subordinated Convertible Note Intesa purchased in March 2003 from Lazard Funding was amended and restated, among other things, to provide for its convertibility into a maximum of 2,631,570 shares of Class A common stock at an effective conversion price of $57 per share. The amended $150,000 subordinated convertible note (the “Amended $150,000 Subordinated Convertible

 

12


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)

 

 

Note”) matures on September 30, 2016 and has a fixed interest rate of 3.25% per annum. One-third in principal amount will generally be convertible after July 1, 2008, an additional one-third after July 1, 2009 and the last one-third after July 1, 2010, and no principal amount will be convertible after June 30, 2011.

 

   

Intesa’s 40% equity interest in Lazard Italy and a $50,000 subordinated promissory note of Lazard Italy held by Intesa were acquired by Lazard Group in exchange for the issuance by Lazard Group to Intesa of a $96,000 senior promissory note (the “$96,000 Senior Promissory Note”) and a $50,000 subordinated promissory note (the “$50,000 Subordinated Promissory Note”), respectively, with both Notes having been scheduled to mature on February 28, 2008. The $96,000 Senior Promissory Note and the $50,000 Subordinated Promissory Note had fixed interest rates of 4.25% and 4.6% per annum, respectively, and each Note contained customary events of default for indebtedness of its type. On May 15, 2006, Intesa sold and assigned all its rights and interests relating to both Notes to a commercial bank.

 

   

Lazard Group paid Intesa an amount equal to a 3% annualized return on Intesa’s ownership interest from April 1, 2006 through the May 15, 2006 termination closing and the accrued and unpaid interest on the $50,000 Subordinated Promissory Note as of the termination closing.

 

As a result of the termination of the strategic alliance with Intesa and Lazard Group’s repurchase of Intesa’s ownership interest, the Company realized a gain in the second quarter of 2006 of $13,695 that, after transaction and other costs, resulted in an increase in operating income of $5,274.

 

On June 29, 2007, Lazard Group redeemed both the $96,000 Senior Promissory Note and the $50,000 Subordinated Promissory Note.

 

13


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)

 

6. SENIOR AND SUBORDINATED DEBT

 

Senior Debt—Senior debt is comprised of the following as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006:

 

    

Principal

Amount


 

Maturity

Date


   

Annual

Interest

Rate


   

Outstanding As Of


          

June 30,
2007


  

December 31,

2006


Lazard Group Senior Notes(a)

   $ 550,000   2015     7.125 %   $ 550,000    $ 550,000

Lazard Group Senior Note

     96,000   —   (b)   4.25 %     —        96,000

Lazard Group Notes issued in connection
with the ESUs(a)

     437,500   2008-2035 (c)   6.12 %     437,500      437,500

Lazard Group Senior Notes(d)

     600,000   2017     6.85 %     600,000      —  

Other

        

2007-2008

 

  Various    

 

3,460

  

 

3,557

                      

  

Total

                     $ 1,590,960   

$

1,087,057

                      

  


(a) See Note 2 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
(b) Redeemed in June, 2007 (see Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).
(c) Maturity date can vary based on a remarketing of the Lazard Group Notes, and will mature (i) in the event of a successful remarketing, on any date no earlier than May 15, 2010 and no later than May 15, 2035, as we may elect, (ii) in the event of a failed remarketing, on May 15, 2008 and (iii) otherwise on May 15, 2035.
(d) On June 21, 2007, Lazard Group completed a private placement of $600,000 aggregate principal amount of 6.85% senior notes due June 15, 2017. Interest on the notes is payable on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning on December 15, 2007. Lazard Group also entered into a registration rights agreement with the initial purchasers of the notes pursuant to which Lazard Group has agreed, among other things, to file with the SEC an exchange offer registration statement enabling holders to exchange their notes for substantially identical notes registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “exchange notes”). In connection therewith, Lazard Group filed a registration statement on Form S-4 on July 3, 2007 that was declared effective by the SEC on July 19, 2007, and Lazard Group commenced an exchange offer (the “exchange offer”) on that date to exchange an aggregate principal amount of up to $600,000 of the notes for an equal aggregate principal amount of the exchange notes. The exchange offer is scheduled to expire on August 16, 2007.

 

As of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 there were no amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility bears interest at either a Eurodollar or Federal Funds rate, plus an applicable margin, which varies from 125 to 200 basis points, depending on Lazard Group’s rating as determined by designated credit rating agencies. The Credit Facility contains affirmative and negative covenants. Such covenants include, among other things, limitations on the ability of Lazard Group to incur debt, grant liens, pay dividends, enter into mergers or to sell all or substantially all of its assets, as well as financial maintenance covenants.

 

The indenture and supplemental indentures relating to Lazard Group’s senior notes contain certain covenants, events of default and other customary provisions.

 

Subordinated Debt—Subordinated debt at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 amounted to $150,000 and $200,000, respectively, and consists of amounts associated with the termination of the strategic alliance transaction in Italy (see Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).

 

As of June 30, 2007, the Company is in compliance with all obligations under its various senior and subordinated borrowing arrangements.

 

14


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)

 

7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Leases—Lazard has various leases and other contractual commitments arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the fulfillment of such commitments in accordance with their terms will not have a material adverse effect on Lazard’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

With respect to abandoned leased facilities in the U.K., at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company has recognized liabilities of $31,001 and $31,910, respectively, exclusive of the indemnification described below, which are included in “other liabilities” on the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. Payments toward the liabilities continue through the remaining term of the leases. Such liabilities are based on the discounted future commitment, net of expected sublease income, and includes a charge of $4,034 recorded in the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 based on management’s current estimate of costs for abandoned leased facilities. No such charge was recorded in the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2006.

 

Under the master separation agreement and a related lease indemnity agreement, dated as of May 10, 2005, LFCM Holdings is obligated to indemnify Lazard Group for certain liabilities relating to abandoned leased space in the U.K. During the fourth quarter of 2005, Lazard Group entered into an agreement with LFCM Holdings which provided for LFCM Holdings to pay to Lazard Group $25,000 in full satisfaction of its indemnification obligations with respect to the abandoned leased space. The net present value of the balance due at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 of $8,513 and $9,989, respectively, after giving effect to payments received through the respective dates, is included in “receivables - related parties” on the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition (see Note 12 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). The balance is due based on a schedule of periodic payments through May 10, 2010.

 

Guarantees—On March 12, 2007, Lazard entered into an agreement to guarantee to a foreign tax jurisdiction the deferred payment of certain income tax obligations and potential tax penalties of certain managing directors of Lazard Group, which aggregate approximately $26,000. These managing directors have pledged their interests in LAZ-MD Holdings (which are exchangeable into shares of Class A common stock) to collateralize such guarantee, with the value of such collateral exceeding the guarantee provided by Lazard.

 

Legal—The Company’s businesses, as well as the financial services industry generally, are subject to extensive regulation throughout the world. The Company is involved in a number of judicial, regulatory and arbitration proceedings and inquiries concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of our businesses. The Company reviews such matters on a case by case basis and establishes its reserves in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting For Contingencies. Management believes, based on currently available information, that the results of such matters, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition but might be material to its operating results or cash flows for any particular period, depending upon the operating results for such period.

 

In 2004, we received a request for information from the NASD as part of an industry investigation relating to gifts and gratuities, which was focused primarily on the Company’s former Capital Markets business, which business was transferred to LFCM Holdings as a part of the separation. In addition, the Company received requests for information from the NASD, SEC and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts seeking information concerning gifts and entertainment involving an unaffiliated mutual fund company, which are also focused on that same business. In the course of an internal review of these matters, there were resignations or discipline of certain individuals associated with Lazard’s former Capital Markets business. These

 

15


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)

 

investigations are continuing and the Company cannot predict their potential outcomes. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded an accrual for losses related to any such judicial, regulatory or arbitration proceedings.

 

8. STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY

 

At June 30, 2007 and 2006, Lazard Group common membership interests held by subsidiaries of Lazard Ltd amounted to 47.9% and 37.7%, respectively, and by LAZ-MD Holdings amounted to 52.1% and 62.3%, respectively. Pursuant to provisions of its Operating Agreement, Lazard Group distributions in respect of its common membership interests are allocated to the holders of such interests on a pro rata basis. Such distributions represent amounts necessary to fund (i) any dividends the Company may declare on its Class A common stock and (ii) tax distributions in respect of income taxes that Lazard Ltd’s subsidiaries and the members of LAZ-MD Holdings incur as a result of holding Lazard Group common membership interests. During the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, Lazard Group distributed $10,098 and $11,180, respectively, to LAZ-MD Holdings and $9,259 and $6,750, respectively, to the subsidiaries of Lazard Ltd, which latter amounts were used by Lazard Ltd to pay dividends to third party stockholders of its Class A common stock. In addition, during the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, Lazard Group made tax distributions of $83,292 and $28,180, respectively, including $46,739 and $17,571, respectively, paid to LAZ-MD Holdings and $36,553 and $10,609, respectively, paid to subsidiaries of Lazard Ltd.

 

On July 31, 2007, the Board of Directors of Lazard Ltd declared a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share on its Class A common stock, totaling $4,640, payable on August 31, 2007 to stockholders of record on August 10, 2007.

 

A description of Lazard Ltd’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Incentive Plan”), and activity with respect thereto during the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, is presented below.

 

Shares Available Under the Equity Incentive Plan

 

The Equity Incentive Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 25,000,000 shares of Class A common stock pursuant to the grant or exercise of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, stock units and other equity-based awards. Each stock unit granted under the Equity Incentive Plan represents a contingent right to receive one share of Class A common stock, at no cost to the recipient. The fair value of such stock unit awards is determined based on the closing market price of Lazard Ltd’s Class A common stock at the date of grant.

 

Restricted Stock Unit Grants (“RSUs”)

 

RSUs require future service as a condition for the delivery of the underlying shares of Class A common stock and convert into Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis after the stipulated vesting periods. The fair value of the RSUs, net of an estimated forfeiture rate, is amortized over the vesting periods or requisite service periods as required under SFAS 123R, “Share Based Payments”, and, for purposes of calculating diluted net income per share, are included in the diluted weighted average shares of Class A common stock outstanding using the treasury stock method. Expense relating to RSUs is charged to “compensation and benefits” within the condensed consolidated statements of income, and amounted to $24,059 and $47,993 for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007, respectively, and $5,058 and $9,235 for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2006, respectively. RSUs issued subsequent to December 31, 2005 generally include a dividend participation right that provides that during vesting periods each RSU is attributed additional RSUs (or

 

16


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)

 

fractions thereof) equivalent to any ordinary quarterly dividends paid on Class A common stock during such period. During the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, such dividend participation rights required the issuance of 25,178 and 12,313 RSUs, respectively, and resulted in a charge to “retained earnings” and a credit to “additional paid-in-capital,” net of estimated forfeitures, of $1,291 and $474, respectively.

 

Deferred Stock Unit Grants (“DSUs”)

 

Non-executive members of the Board of Directors receive approximately 55% of their annual compensation for service on the Board of Directors and its committees in the form of DSUs, which amounted to 12,459 and 12,321 DSUs granted in the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Their remaining compensation is payable in cash. DSUs are convertible into Class A common stock at the time of cessation of service to the Board. The DSUs include a cash dividend participation right equivalent to any ordinary quarterly dividends paid on Class A common stock. DSU awards are expensed at their fair value on their date of grant, which, inclusive of amounts related to the Directors’ Fee Deferral Unit Plan described below, totaled $716 and $745 during the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007, respectively, and $439 and $503 during the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2006, respectively.

 

On May 9, 2006, the Board of Directors adopted the Directors’ Fee Deferral Unit Plan, which allows the Company’s Non-Executive Directors to elect to receive additional DSUs pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan in lieu of some or all of their cash fees. The number of DSUs that shall be granted to a Non-Executive Director pursuant to this election shall equal the value of cash fees that the applicable Non-Executive Director has elected to forego pursuant to such election, divided by the market value of a share of Class A common stock on the date on which the foregone cash fees would otherwise have been paid. During the six month period ended June 30, 2007, 1,262 DSUs were granted pursuant to the Directors’ Fee Deferral Unit Plan. As of June 30, 2006, no DSUs had been granted pursuant to such Plan.

 

17


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)

 

The following is a summary of activity relating to RSUs and DSUs during the six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2007:

 

    

RSUs


   DSUs

     Units

   

Grant Date

Weighted

Average

Fair Value


   Units

   

Grant Date

Weighted

Average

Fair Value


Balance, January 1, 2006

   1,033,733     $ 23.87    9,968     $ 25.33

Granted (including 12,313 RSU units relating to dividend participation)

  

2,832,404

 

 

$

34.84

  

12,321

 

 

$

40.83

Forfeited

  

(92,454

)

  $ 34.00             

Converted

                (3,059 )   $ 25.33
    

        

     

Balance, June 30, 2006

  

3,773,683

 

 

$

31.85

  

19,230

 

 

$

35.26

    

        

     
     RSUs

   DSUs

     Units

   

Grant Date

Weighted

Average

Fair Value


   Units

   

Grant Date

Weighted

Average

Fair Value


Balance, January 1, 2007

   4,009,382     $ 32.13    19,690       $35.71

Granted (including 25,178 RSUs relating to dividend participation)

  

5,177,279

 

 

$

50.19

  

13,721

 

 

 

$54.32

Forfeited

  

(154,790

)

 

$

41.65

            

Converted

   (95 )   $ 45.68             
    

        

     

Balance, June 30, 2007

  

9,031,776

 

 

$

42.36

  

33,411

 

 

 

$43.35

    

        

     

 

As of June 30, 2007, unrecognized RSU compensation expense, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, was approximately $250,690, with such unrecognized compensation expense expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.8 years subsequent to June 30, 2007. The ultimate amount of such expense is dependent upon the actual number of RSUs that vest. The Company periodically assesses the forfeiture rates used for such estimates. A change in estimated forfeiture rates would cause the aggregate amount of compensation expense recognized in future periods to differ from the estimated unrecognized compensation expense described herein.

 

Share Repurchase Program

 

On February 7, 2006, the Board of Directors of Lazard Ltd authorized the repurchase of up to $100,000 in aggregate cost of its Class A common stock and Lazard Group common membership interests. The Company’s intention is that the share repurchase program, with respect to the Class A common stock, will be used primarily to offset shares to be issued under the Equity Incentive Plan. Purchases may be made in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions in 2006 and 2007.

 

During the three month period ended June 30, 2006, Lazard Group purchased 115,000 shares of Class A common stock in the open market for an aggregate cost of $4,179 (an average price of $36.34 per share), which are reported, at cost, as “Class A common stock held in treasury” on the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition as of December 31, 2006. As a result of the Company’s issuance of 58 shares from treasury for the settlement of vested RSUs during the three month period ended June 30, 2007, there were 114,942 shares

 

18


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)

 

of Class A common stock held in treasury at June 30, 2007. Furthermore, pursuant to the share repurchase program, through June 30, 2007 Lazard Group purchased 105,435 common membership interests (which were exchangeable at future dates for shares of Class A common stock) from LAZ-MD Holdings in privately negotiated transactions with an aggregate cost of $3,773.

 

On August 3, 2007, Lazard Group purchased 478,464 common membership interests from LAZ-MD Holdings for an aggregate cost of $18,066. In addition, during the period July 1, 2007 through August 8, 2007, Lazard Group purchased 1,169,800 shares of Class A common stock in the open market for an aggregate cost of $48,100 (an average price of $41.12 per share).

 

As of August 8, 2007, $25,882 remained available under the February 7, 2006 Board approved stock repurchase program. On August 9, 2007, the prior share repurchase program was renewed and the Company was authorized to repurchase up to an additional $100,000 in aggregate cost of Class A common stock and Lazard Group common membership interests. The Company’s intention is that the share repurchase program, with respect to the Class A common stock, will continue to be used primarily to offset shares that have been or will be issued under the Equity Incentive Plan. Purchases may be made in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions throughout the remainder of 2007 and 2008.

 

Preference Shares

 

Lazard Ltd has 15,000,000 authorized preference shares, par value of $0.01 per share. As of June 30, 2007, no preference shares have been issued. On July 31, 2007, preference shares were issued in connection with the acquisitions described in Note 1 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

9. NET INCOME PER SHARE OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK

 

The Company’s basic and diluted net income per share calculations for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 are computed as described below.

 

Basic Net Income Per Share

 

Numerator—utilizes net income for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

 

Denominator—utilizes the weighted average shares of Class A common stock outstanding for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

 

Diluted Net Income Per Share

 

Numerator—utilizes net income for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 as in the basic net income per share calculation described above, plus, to the extent applicable and dilutive, (i) interest expense on convertible debt, (ii) changes in minority interest in net income resulting from assumed share issuances in connection with DSUs, RSUs, ESUs and convertible debt (iii) on an as-if-exchanged basis, amounts applicable to LAZ-MD Holdings exchangeable interests, and (iv) income tax related to (i) (ii) and (iii) herein.

 

Denominator—utilizes the weighted average number of shares of Class A common stock outstanding for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 as in the basic net income per share calculation described above, plus, to the extent dilutive, the incremental number of shares of Class A common stock to settle (i) DSU and RSU awards, as calculated using the treasury stock method, (ii) convertible debt, as calculated using the “if converted” method, (iii) ESU’s, using the treasury stock method and (iv) LAZ-MD Holdings exchangeable interests, on an as-if-exchanged basis.

 

19


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)

 

The calculations of the Company’s basic and diluted net income per share and weighted average shares outstanding for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 are presented below:

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,


  

Six Month Ended

June 30,


     2007

   2006

   2007

   2006

Basic Net Income Per Share of Class A Common Stock

                   

Numerator:

                   

Net income

   $29,296    $23,545    $55,650    $43,231
    
  
  
  

Denominator:

                   

Weighted average number of shares of Class A common stock outstanding

  

51,439,125

  

37,480,751

  

51,439,097

  

37,491,820

    
  
  
  

Basic net income per share of Class A common stock

   $0.57    $0.63    $1.08    $1.15
    
  
  
  

Diluted Net Income Per Share of Class A Common Stock

                   

Numerator:

                   

Net income

   $29,296    $23,545    $55,650    $43,231

Add (deduct)—dilutive effect of:

                   

Adjustments to income relating to interest expense on convertible debt and changes in minority interest in net income resulting from assumed share issuances in connection with DSUs, RSUs, ESUs, convertible debt and LAZ-MD Holdings exchangeable interests, net of tax

  

3,530

  

2,599

   33,086   

3,724

    
  
  
  

Diluted net income

   $32,826    $26,144    $88,736    $46,955
    
  
  
  

Denominator:

                   

Weighted average number of shares of Class A common stock, as above

  

51,439,125

   37,480,751    51,439,097    37,491,820

Add—dilutive effect of:

                   

Weighted average number of incremental shares issuable from DSUs, RSUs, ESUs, convertible debt and LAZ-MD Holdings exchangeable interests

  

11,298,612

  

6,499,465

  

39,037,938

  

5,019,560

    
  
  
  

Diluted weighted average number of shares of Class A common stock outstanding

  

62,737,737

  

43,980,216

   90,477,035   

42,511,380

    
  
  
  

Diluted net income per share of Class A common stock

   $0.52    $0.59    $0.98    $1.10
    
  
  
  

 

During the three month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 and the six month period ended June 30, 2006, the LAZ-MD Holdings exchangeable interests (which, as of June 30, 2007 and 2006, represented the right to receive 55,993,013 and 62,098,448 shares, respectively, of Class A common stock upon exchange) were antidilutive and consequently the effect of their conversion into shares of Class A common stock has been excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per share.

 

Prior to the issuance of the Class A common stock upon settlement of the purchase contracts, the ESUs are reflected in the Company’s diluted net income per share using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury

 

20


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)

 

stock method, as defined by SFAS No. 128, “Earning Per Share”, the number of shares of common stock included in the calculation of diluted net income per share is the excess, if any, of the number of shares expected to be issued upon settlement of the purchase contracts, less the number of shares that could be purchased by the Company with the proceeds to be received upon settlement at the average closing market price during the reporting period. The number of shares of common stock Lazard Ltd will issue upon settlement of the forward purchase contract component of the ESUs is not fixed, but instead is dependent on the closing price per share of its Class A common stock for each of the 20 trading days beginning on April 15, 2008. Because the settlement terms of the purchase contracts vary, the number of shares to be issued depends on whether the closing price of the stock for the last 20 trading days in the reporting period is less than or equal to $25 per share, greater than $25 per share and less than $30 per share or greater than or equal to $30 per share. Dilution of net income per share will occur (i) in reporting periods when the average closing price of Class A common stock is over $30 per share and (ii) in reporting periods when the average closing price of Class A common stock for a reporting period is greater than $25 and is greater than the average market price for the last 20 days of such reporting period. During the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the ESUs were dilutive.

 

10. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

 

The Company, through its subsidiaries, provides retirement and other post-employment benefits to certain of its employees through defined contribution and defined benefit pension plans and other post-retirement benefit plans. The Company has the right to amend or terminate its benefit plans at any time subject to the terms of such plans. Expenses (benefits) related to the Company’s employee benefit plans are included in “compensation and benefits” expense on the condensed consolidated statements of income. The Company uses December 31 as the measurement date for its employee benefit plans.

 

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post-Retirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)” (“SFAS 158”), which the Company adopted as of December 31, 2006. In accordance with SFAS 158, at December 31, 2006 the Company recognized, in its condensed consolidated statements of financial condition, the funded status of its defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans, measured as the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the corresponding benefit obligations. Additionally, pursuant to SFAS 158, the Company is required to recognize changes in the funded status of its defined benefit pension plans and other post-retirement benefit plans in “accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax.”

 

LFNY Defined Benefit Pension Plan and Post-Retirement Medical Plan Settlement TransactionsDuring the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2006, the Company recognized a settlement loss of $910 attributable to settlements with pension plan participants who elected lump sum payments upon their retirement or discontinuation of service to the Company. Additionally, during the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2006, the Company recognized a settlement loss of $303 as a result of the settlement of post-retirement medical plan obligations associated with employees in the separated businesses. Both of these losses described herein were included in “compensation and benefits” expense on the condensed consolidated statements of income.

 

Amendments to LCH Pension Plans—Effective March 31, 2006, the LCH pension plans were amended to cease future accruals. As a result of such amendments, future service and compensation increases will not be taken into account for purposes of future benefit accruals under the plans. Vested benefits for active participants as of March 31, 2006 were retained.

 

21


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)

 

Termination of LCH’s Post-Retirement Medical Plan—In April 2004, LCH announced a plan to terminate its post-retirement medical plan. As a result of such action, benefits available to eligible active employees and retirees ceased on February 28, 2007. In accordance with SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Post-Retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions,” the Company recognized the effect of such termination as a reduction of employee compensation and benefits expense over the period ended February, 2007. Compensation and benefits expense on the condensed consolidated statements of income was reduced for the related effect of such termination by $0 and $1,587 for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007, respectively, and by $2,222 and $4,356 for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2006, respectively.

 

Employer Contributions to Pension Plans—The Company contributed approximately $16,000 (8.2 million British pounds) in the six month period ended June 30, 2007 in full satisfaction of its obligation to fund LCH’s pension plans for the year ended December 31, 2007. No other contributions to defined benefit plans were made by the Company during the six month period ended June 30, 2007.

 

Defined Contribution Plans—LFNY and LCH also contribute to employer sponsored defined contribution plans. Contributions to these plans amounted to $1,887 and $5,213 for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007, respectively, and $1,628 and $4,093 for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2006, respectively, which are included in “compensation and benefits” expense on the condensed consolidated statements of income.

 

The following tables summarize the components of benefit costs (credits) for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:

 

    Pension Plans

    Pension Plan
Supplement


    Post-Retirement
Medical Plans


 
   

For The Three Months Ended June 30,


 
      2007  

      2006  

      2007  

    2006  

        2007    

        2006    

 

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit):

                                           

Service cost

            $ 32                        $   39       $ 14  

Interest cost

 

  $

6,993

 

    6,191              $ 14            $ 16    

107

 

    87  

Expected return on plan assets

 

 

(8,581

)

    (7,229 )                            

Amortization of:

                                           

Prior service cost

                               

(345

)

    (310 )

Net actuarial loss

 

 

92

 

    484                  

145

 

 

 

85

 

   


 


 

 


 

 


Net periodic benefit cost (credit)

 

 

(1,496

)

    (522 )  

 

14

    16    

(54

)

    (124 )

Settlements (curtailments)

         

 

910

 

          (7 )           (1,919 )
   


 


 

 


 

 


Total benefit cost (credit)

    $ (1,496 )     $ 388              $ 14            $ 9          $  (54 )     $ (2,043 )
   


 


 

 


 

 


 

22


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)

 

     Pension Plans

    Pension Plan
Supplement


    Post-Retirement
Medical Plans


 
    

For The Six Months Ended June 30,


 
       2007  

      2006  

      2007  

     2006  

        2007    

        2006    

 

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit):

                                               

Service cost

           $ 1,550                      $ 83       $ 64  

Interest cost

  

$

13,701

 

    12,115            $ 29           $ 32    

 

218

 

    198  

Expected return on plan assets

  

 

(16,810

)

    (14,195 )                               

Amortization of:

                                               

Prior service cost

                                 

 

(691

)

    (656 )

Net actuarial loss

  

 

189

 

    914                   

 

292

 

 

 

160

 

    


 


 

  


 


 


Net periodic benefit cost (credit)

  

 

(2,920

)

    384    

 

29

     32    

 

(98

)

    (234 )

Settlements (curtailments)

          

 

910

 

           (7 )  

 

(1,587

)

    (4,053 )
    


 


 

  


 


 


Total benefit cost (credit)

   $ (2,920 )   $ 1,294            $ 29           $ 25       $ (1,685 )     $ (4,287 )
    


 


 

  


 


 


 

11. INCOME TAXES

 

The Company’s provision for income taxes for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 was $20,313, $37,374, $18,734 and $34,674, respectively, representing effective tax rates on operating income of 22.8%, 22.3%, 22.1% and 21.3%, respectively. Such effective tax rates are blended rates comprised of (i) an estimated 28.0% effective rate in each period applicable to Lazard Ltd’s ownership interest in Lazard Group’s operating income (less its applicable share of LAM general partnership related revenues (losses)) and (ii) Lazard Group’s estimated effective tax rates for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 of 19.1%, 18.0%, 18.1% and 17.5%, respectively, applicable to the ownership interest in Lazard Group not held by Lazard Ltd.

 

With respect to Lazard Ltd’s ownership interest in Lazard Group, the difference between the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% and the estimated effective tax rate of 28.0% for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, principally relates to foreign source income not subject to U.S. income taxes and the amortization associated with the tax basis step-up resulting from the separation and recapitalization, partially offset by U.S. state and local taxes, which are incremental to the U.S. federal statutory tax rate.

 

With respect to the ownership interests in Lazard Group not held by Lazard Ltd, the difference between the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% and Lazard Group’s estimated effective tax rates of 19.1%, 18.0%, 18.1% and 17.5% for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2006, respectively, is principally due to Lazard Group’s U.S. limited liability company status, which is treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, Lazard Group’s income is not subject to U.S. federal income taxes because taxes associated with its income represent obligations of the individual partners. Outside the U.S., Lazard Group operates principally through subsidiary corporations that are subject to local income taxes. Additionally, Lazard Group is subject to Unincorporated Business Tax (“UBT”) attributable to Lazard Group’s operations apportioned to New York City, which are incremental to the U.S. federal statutory tax rate.

 

The cumulative effect of the Company’s adoption of FIN 48 was a charge of $13,221 to the January 1, 2007 retained earnings balance. As of the adoption date, the Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits of $37,520, including $5,132 related to interest and penalties, of which $27,352, if recognized, would favorably affect the

 

23


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)

 

effective tax rate. The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to income tax examination by foreign tax authorities for years prior to 2002 and by U.S. federal, state and local tax authorities for years prior to 2003. During the six month period ended June 30, 2007, there have been no material changes to the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits.

 

Tax Receivable Agreement

 

The redemption of historical partner interests in connection with the separation and recapitalization has resulted, and the exchanges of LAZ-MD Holdings exchangeable interests for shares of Class A common stock may result, in increases in the tax basis of the tangible and/or intangible assets of Lazard Group. The tax receivable agreement, dated as of May 10, 2005, with LFCM Holdings requires the Company to pay LFCM Holdings 85% of the cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax or franchise tax that the Company actually realizes as a result of the above-mentioned increases in tax basis. The Company calculates this provision annually once the results of operations for the full year are known. As a result, there is no provision for such payments in the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. If any provision is required pursuant to the tax receivable agreement, such amount would be fully offset by a reduction in the Company’s income tax expense.

 

12. RELATED PARTIES

 

Amounts receivable from, and payable to, related parties as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are set forth below:

 

    

June 30,
2007


   December 31,
2006


Receivables

             

LFCM Holdings

   $ 29,801    $ 18,493

LAZ-MD Holdings

            50
    

  

Total

   $ 29,801    $ 18,543
    

  

Payables

             

LFCM Holdings

   $ 9,671    $ 9,794

LAZ-MD Holdings

     2,424       
    

  

Total

   $ 12,095    $ 9,794
    

  

 

LFCM Holdings

 

LFCM Holdings owns and operates the separated businesses and is owned by the working members, including Lazard’s managing directors (which also include our executive officers) who are also members of LAZ-MD Holdings. In addition to the master separation agreement which effected the separation and recapitalization discussed in Note 2 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, LFCM Holdings entered into an insurance matters agreement and a license agreement that addressed various business matters associated with the separation, as well as several other agreements discussed below.

 

Under the employee benefits agreement, dated as of May 10, 2005, by and among Lazard Ltd, Lazard Group, LAZ-MD Holdings and LFCM Holdings, LFCM Holdings generally assumed, as of the completion of the separation and recapitalization transactions, all outstanding and future liabilities in respect of the current and

 

24


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)

 

former employees of the separated businesses. The Company retained all accrued liabilities under, and assets of, the pension plans in the U.S. and the U.K. as well as the 401(k) plan accounts of the inactive employees of LFCM Holdings and its subsidiaries.

 

Pursuant to the administrative services agreement, dated as of May 10, 2005, by and among LAZ-MD Holdings, LFCM Holdings and Lazard Group (the “administrative services agreement”), Lazard Group provides selected administrative and support services to LAZ-MD Holdings and LFCM Holdings, such as cash management and debt service administration, accounting and financing activities, tax, payroll, human resources administration, financial transaction support, information technology, public communications, data processing, procurement, real estate management, and other general administrative functions. Lazard Group charges for these services based on Lazard Group’s cost allocation methodology.

 

The services provided by Lazard Group to LFCM Holdings and by LFCM Holdings to Lazard Group under the administrative services agreement generally will be provided until December 31, 2008. LFCM Holdings and Lazard Group have a right to terminate the services earlier if there is a change of control of either party or the business alliance provided in the business alliance agreement expires or is terminated. The party receiving a service may also terminate a service earlier upon 180 days’ notice as long as the receiving party pays the service provider an additional three months of service fee for terminated service.

 

The business alliance agreement provides among other matters, that Lazard Group will refer to LFCM Holdings selected opportunities for underwriting and distribution of securities. In addition Lazard Group will provide assistance in the execution of any such referred business. In exchange for the referral obligation and assistance, Lazard Group will receive a referral fee from LFCM Holdings equal to approximately half of the revenue obtained by LFCM Holdings in respect of any underwriting or distribution opportunity. In addition, LFCM Holdings will refer opportunities in the Financial Advisory and Asset Management businesses to Lazard Group. In exchange for this referral, LFCM Holdings will be entitled to a customary finders’ fee from Lazard Group. The business alliance agreement further provides that, during the term of the business alliance, LFNY and Lazard Asset Management Securities, LLC, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of LFNY, will introduce execution and settlement transactions to newly-formed broker-dealer entities affiliated with LFCM Holdings. The term of the business alliance will expire on the fifth anniversary of the equity public offering, subject to periodic automatic renewal, unless either party elects to terminate in connection with any such renewal or elects to terminate on account of a change of control of either party.

 

For the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007, amounts recorded by Lazard Group relating to administrative and support services amounted to $852 and $1,791, respectively, and referral fees for underwriting and private placement transactions amounted to $10,035 and $14,415, respectively. For the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2006, amounts recorded by Lazard Group relating to administrative and support services amounted to $1,042 and $2,057, respectively, and referral fees for underwriting transactions amounted to $1,702 and $2,253, respectively. Such amounts are reported as reductions to operating expenses and as other revenue, respectively.

 

In connection with the separation, Lazard Group transferred to LFCM Holdings its ownership interest in Panmure Gordon & Co. plc (“PG&C”). Lazard Group and LFCM Holdings agreed to share any net cash proceeds, derived prior to May 2013, from any subsequent sale by LFCM Holdings of the shares it owns in PG&C. As a result of LFCM Holdings selling a portion of its interest in PG&C in June, 2007, the Company recorded a gain of $9,296, which is included in “revenue—other” on the unaudited condensed consolidated

 

25


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)

 

statements of income for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007. Such amount is included in the receivable from LFCM Holdings as of June 30, 2007. The above-mentioned transaction resulted in a $4,025 increase in operating income for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007.

 

The remaining receivables from LFCM Holdings and its subsidiaries as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 primarily include $8,513 and $9,989, respectively, related to the lease indemnity agreement, $1,151 and $3,061, respectively, related to administrative and support services and reimbursement of expenses incurred on behalf of LFCM Holdings and $10,445 and $4,091, respectively, related to referral fees for underwriting transactions. Payables to LFCM Holdings and its subsidiaries at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 principally relates to obligations pursuant to the tax receivable agreement described in Note 11 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

LAZ-MD Holdings

 

LAZ-MD Holdings held approximately 52.1% of the common membership interest in Lazard Group as of both June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, and Lazard Ltd held the remaining 47.9% of the common membership interest as of such dates. Additionally, LAZ-MD Holdings is the sole owner of the one issued and outstanding share of Class B common stock (the “Class B common stock”) of Lazard Ltd as of both dates. As of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Class B common stock provides LAZ-MD Holdings with approximately 52.1% of the voting power but no economic rights in Lazard Ltd. Subject to certain limitations, LAZ-MD Holdings exchangeable interests are exchangeable for Class A common stock. However, the Class B common stock will represent no less than 50.1% of the voting power until December 31, 2007.

 

Lazard Group provides selected administrative and support services to LAZ-MD Holdings through the administrative services agreement as discussed above, with such services generally to be provided until December 31, 2014 unless terminated earlier because of a change in control of either party. Lazard Group charges LAZ-MD Holdings for these services based on Lazard Group’s cost allocation methodology and, for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 such charges amounted to $50 and $100, respectively. For the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 such charges amounted to $50 and $100, respectively.

 

Payables to LAZ-MD Holdings at June 30, 2007 relate to Lazard Group’s repurchase of common membership interests from LAZ-MD Holdings.

 

13. REGULATORY AUTHORITIES

 

LFNY is a U.S. registered broker-dealer and is subject to the net capital requirements of Rule 15c3-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Under the basic method permitted by this rule, the minimum required net capital, as defined, is a specified fixed percentage of total aggregate indebtedness recorded on LFNY’s statement of financial condition, or $5, whichever is greater. At June 30, 2007, LFNY’s regulatory net capital was $162,686 which exceeded the minimum requirement by $157,072.

 

Certain U.K. subsidiaries of the Company, including LCL, Lazard Fund Managers Limited and Lazard Asset Management Limited (the “U.K. Subsidiaries”) are regulated by the Financial Services Authority (the “FSA”). At June 30, 2007, the aggregate regulatory net capital of the U.K. Subsidiaries was $238,000, which exceeded the minimum requirement by $183,648.

 

26


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)

 

CFLF, through which non-corporate finance advisory activities are carried out in France, is subject to regulation by the Commission Bancaire and the Comité des Etablissements de Crédit et des Entreprises d’Investissement for its banking activities, conducted through its subsidiary, LFB. In addition, the investment services activities of the Paris group, exercised through LFB and other subsidiaries of CFLF, primarily LFG (asset management) and Fonds Partenaires Gestion (merchant banking), are subject to regulation and supervision by the Autorité des Marchés Financiers. At June 30, 2007, the consolidated regulatory net capital of CFLF was $180,952, which exceeded the minimum requirement set for regulatory capital levels by $82,096.

 

Certain other U.S. and non-U.S. subsidiaries are subject to various other capital adequacy requirements promulgated by various regulatory and exchange authorities in the countries in which they operate. At June 30, 2007, for those subsidiaries with regulatory capital requirements, their aggregate net capital was $54,922, which exceeded the minimum required capital by $40,226.

 

At June 30, 2007, each of these subsidiaries individually was in compliance with its regulatory capital requirements.

 

14. SEGMENT OPERATING RESULTS

 

The Company’s reportable segments offer different products and services and are managed separately as different levels and types of expertise are required to effectively manage the segments’ transactions. Each segment is reviewed to determine the allocation of resources and to assess its performance. The Company has two segments: Financial Advisory which includes providing advice on mergers and acquisitions, restructurings, capital raising and similar transactions, and Asset Management which includes the management of equity and fixed income securities and merchant banking funds. In addition, the Company records selected other activities in Corporate, including management of cash, certain investments and the commercial banking activities of LFB. The Company also allocates outstanding indebtedness to Corporate.

 

The Company’s segment information for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 is prepared using the following methodology:

 

   

Revenue and expenses directly associated with each segment are included in determining operating income.

 

   

Expenses not directly associated with specific segments are allocated based on the most relevant measures applicable, including headcount, square footage and other factors.

 

   

Segment assets are based on those directly associated with each segment, and include an allocation of certain assets relating to various segments, based on the most relevant measures applicable, including headcount, square footage and other factors.

 

The Company allocates investment gains and losses, interest income and interest expense among the various segments based on the segment in which the underlying asset or liability is reported.

 

Each segment’s operating expenses include (i) compensation and benefits expenses, including amounts for certain senior advisors that are incurred directly in support of the businesses and (ii) other operating expenses, which include directly incurred expenses for occupancy and equipment, marketing and business development, technology and information services, professional services, fund administration and outsourced services and indirect

 

27


Table of Contents

LAZARD LTD

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)

 

support costs (including compensation and other operating expenses related thereto) for administrative services. Such administrative services include, but are not limited to, accounting, tax, legal, facilities management and senior management activities.

 

Management evaluates segment results based on net revenue and operating income and believes that the following information provides a reasonable representation of each segment’s contribution to operations with respect to net revenue, operating income and total assets:

 

         

Three Months Ended

June 30,


   

Six Months Ended

June 30,


 
              2007    

        2006    

    2007

        2006    

 

Financial Advisory

   Net Revenue    $ 244,958     $ 262,064     $ 467,543     $ 484,195  
     Operating Expenses   

 

191,564

 

    191,653       364,562       355,923  
         


 


 


 


     Operating Income    $ 53,394     $ 70,411     $ 102,981     $ 128,272  
         


 


 


 


Asset Management

   Net Revenue    $ 165,246     $ 127,002     $ 313,774     $ 251,404  
     Operating Expenses   

 

122,021

 

    99,002       233,033       191,432  
         


 


 


 


     Operating Income    $ 43,225     $ 28,000     $ 80,741     $ 59,972  
         


 


 


 


Corporate

   Net Revenue    $ 11,156     $ (2,158 )   $ 9,241     $ (12,433 )
     Operating Expenses   

 

18,612

 

    11,560       25,532       13,002  
         


 


 


 


     Operating Income (Loss)    $ (7,456 )   $ (13,718 )   $ (16,291 )   $ (25,435 )
         


 


 


 


Total

   Net Revenue    $ 421,360     $ 386,908     $ 790,558     $ 723,166  
     Operating Expenses   

 

332,197

 

    302,215       623,127       560,357  
         


 


 


 


     Operating Income    $ 89,163     $ 84,693     $ 167,431     $ 162,809  
         


 


 


 


                    As of

                   

June 30,

2007


  

December 31,

2006


Total Assets:

                       

Financial Advisory

   $ 415,836    $ 452,627

Asset Management

     412,363      418,538

Corporate

  

 

2,281,463

     2,337,500
                   

  

Total

   $ 3,109,662    $ 3,208,665
                   

  

 

28


Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Lazard Ltd’s condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.

 

Forward-Looking Statements and Certain Factors that May Affect Our Business

 

Management has included in Parts I and II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”), including in its Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (the “MD&A”), statements that are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may,” “might,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential” or “continue,” and the negative of these terms and other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements, which are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us, may include projections of our future financial performance based on our growth strategies and anticipated trends in our business. These statements are only predictions based on our current expectations and projections about future events. There are important factors that could cause our actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from the results, level of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, those discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Form 10-K”) under the caption “Risk Factors,” including the following:

 

   

a decline in general economic conditions or the global financial markets,

 

   

losses caused by financial or other problems experienced by third parties,

 

   

losses due to unidentified or unanticipated risks,

 

   

a lack of liquidity, i.e., ready access to funds, for use in our businesses, and

 

   

competitive pressure.

 

The Company operates in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks and uncertainties emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for our management to predict all risks and uncertainties, nor can management assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

 

Although we believe the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, level of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any of these forward-looking statements. You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. We are under no duty to update any of these forward-looking statements after the date of this Form 10-Q to conform our prior statements to actual results or revised expectations and we do not intend to do so.

 

Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about the:

 

   

business’ possible or assumed future results of operations and operating cash flows,

 

   

business’ strategies and investment policies,

 

   

business’ financing plans and the availability of short-term borrowing,

 

   

business’ competitive position,

 

   

potential growth opportunities available to our businesses,

 

   

recruitment and retention of managing directors and employees,

 

29


Table of Contents
   

target levels of compensation expense,

 

   

business’ potential operating performance, achievements, productivity improvements, efficiency and cost reduction efforts,

 

   

likelihood of success and impact of litigation,

 

   

expected tax rate,

 

   

changes in interest and tax rates,

 

   

expectation with respect to the economy, securities markets, the market for mergers and acquisitions activity, the market for asset management activity and other industry trends,

 

   

effects on our businesses resulting from the separation and recapitalization transactions, including the equity public offering and the financing transactions,

 

   

effects of competition on our business, and

 

   

impact of future legislation and regulation on our business.

 

Lazard Ltd is committed to providing timely and accurate information to the investing public, consistent with our legal and regulatory obligations. To that end, the Company uses its websites to convey information about its businesses, including the anticipated release of quarterly financial results, quarterly financial, statistical and business-related information and the posting of updates of assets under management (“AUM”) in various mutual funds, hedge funds and other investment products managed by Lazard Asset Management LLC and its subsidiaries. Monthly updates of these funds are posted to the Lazard Asset Management website (www.lazardnet.com) on the 3rd business day following the end of each month. Investors can link to Lazard and its operating company websites through www.lazard.com. Our websites and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not incorporated into this quarterly report.

 

Business Summary

 

The Company’s principal sources of revenue are derived from activities in the following business segments:

 

   

Financial Advisory, which includes providing advice on mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”), restructurings, capital raising and other transactions, and

 

   

Asset Management which includes the management of equity and fixed income securities and merchant banking funds.

 

In addition, the Company records selected other activities in Corporate, including management of cash, certain investments, and the commercial banking activities of Lazard Group’s Paris-based Lazard Frères Banque SA (“LFB”). LFB is a registered bank regulated by the Banque de France. LFB’s primary commercial banking operations include the management of the treasury positions of the Company’s Paris House through its money market desk and, to a lesser extent, credit activities relating to securing loans granted to clients of Lazard Frères Gestion SAS (“LFG”) and custodial oversight over assets of various clients. In addition, LFB also operates many support functions of the Paris House. The Company also allocates outstanding indebtedness to Corporate.

 

For the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 the Company’s consolidated net revenue was derived from the following business segments:

 

    

Three Months Ended
June 30,


   

Six months Ended

June 30,


 
         2007    

        2006    

        2007    

        2006    

 

Financial Advisory

   58 %   68 %   59 %   67 %

Asset Management

   39     33     40     35  

Corporate

   3     (1 )   1     (2 )
    

 

 

 

Total

   100 %   100 %   100 %   100 %
    

 

 

 

 

30


Table of Contents

 

Business Environment

 

Economic and market conditions, particularly global M&A activity, can significantly affect our financial performance. Lazard operates in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks and uncertainties emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for Lazard’s management to predict all risks and uncertainties, nor can Lazard assess the impact of all factors on its business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. See the section entitled “Risk Factors” in the Form 10-K. Net income and revenue in any period may not be indicative of full-year results or the results of any other period and may vary significantly from year to year and quarter to quarter.

 

Financial Advisory

 

Activity in the global M&A industry for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 increased versus the corresponding periods last year for both global and trans-atlantic completed transactions and increased more significantly for announced M&A transactions, as evidenced by the following industry statistics regarding the volume of transactions:

 

    

Three Months Ended June 30,


    Six Months Ended June 30,

 
         2007    

       2006    

  

%

    Incr /(Decr)    


   

    2007    


       2006    

   %
    Incr/(Decr)    


 
    

($ in billions)

 

Completed M&A Transactions:

                                        

Global

   $ 759    $ 617   

23

%

 

$

1,571

  

$

1,327

  

18

%

Trans-Atlantic

     70   

 

47

  

49

%

 

 

121

  

 

101

  

20

%

Announced M&A Transactions:

                                        

Global

     1,485   

 

786

  

89

%

 

 

2,532

  

 

1,687

  

50

%

Trans-Atlantic

     122   

 

69

  

77

%

 

 

206

  

 

149

  

38

%


Source: Thomson Financial as of July 16, 2007

 

Lazard believes that its Financial Advisory business should continue to benefit from any sustained increase in M&A volume.

 

Activity in financial restructuring in the first half of 2007 continued at low levels, with the amount of corporate debt defaults, according to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc, flat at $3 billion for both the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

 

Asset Management

 

As shown in the table below, global market indices at June 30, 2007 increased as compared to such indices at December 31, 2006, and increased more significantly as compared to June 30, 2006.

 

     Percentage Change June 30, 2007 vs.

 
       December 31, 2006  

      June 30, 2006  

 

MSCI World Index

  

8

%

 

21

%

CAC 40

  

9

 

 

22

 

DAX

  

21

 

 

41

 

FTSE 100

  

6

 

 

13

 

Dow Jones Industrial Average

  

8

 

 

20

 

NASDAQ

  

8

 

 

20

 

S&P 500

  

6

 

 

18

 

 

Lazard’s market-related changes in its AUM during the six month and twelve month periods ended June 30, 2007 generally correspond to the changes in global market indices.

 

31


Table of Contents

Key Financial Measures and Indicators

 

Net Revenue

 

The majority of Lazard’s Financial Advisory net revenue is earned from the successful completion of mergers, acquisitions, restructurings, capital raising and similar transactions. The main driver of Financial Advisory net revenue is overall M&A activity, the level of corporate debt defaults and the environment for capital raising activities, particularly in the industries and geographic markets in which Lazard focuses. In some client engagements, often those involving financially distressed companies, revenue is earned in the form of retainers and similar fees that are contractually agreed upon with each client for each assignment and are not necessarily linked to the completion of a transaction. In addition, Lazard also earns fees from providing strategic advice to clients, with such fees not being dependent on a specific transaction. Lazard’s Financial Advisory segment also earns revenue from public and private securities offerings in conjunction with activities of its former Capital Markets and Other segment. In general, such fees are shared equally with Lazard Capital Markets, a wholly-owned subsidiary of LFCM Holdings, LLC (“LFCM Holdings”). Subsequent to the equity public offering, Lazard has an arrangement with LFCM Holdings under which it will continue to distribute securities in public offerings originated by Lazard’s Financial Advisory business in a manner similar to its practice prior to the equity public offering.

 

Lazard’s Asset Management segment includes Lazard Asset Management LLC and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as “LAM”), LFG and merchant banking operations. Asset Management net revenue is derived from fees for investment management and advisory services provided to institutional and private clients. The main driver of Asset Management net revenue is the level of AUM, which is influenced in large part by Lazard’s investment performance and by Lazard’s ability to successfully attract and retain assets, as well as the broader performance of the global equity markets and, to a lesser extent, fixed income markets. As a result, fluctuations in financial markets and client asset inflows and outflows have a direct effect on Asset Management net revenue and operating income. In addition, as Lazard’s AUM include significant assets that are denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars, changes in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to non-U.S. currencies will impact the value of Lazard’s AUM. Fees vary with the type of assets managed, with higher fees earned on equity assets, alternative investments (such as hedge funds) and merchant banking products, and lower fees earned on fixed income and cash management products. Lazard also earns performance-based incentive fees on some investment products, such as hedge funds, merchant banking funds and other investment products. Incentive fees on hedge funds are typically calculated based on a specified percentage of a fund’s net appreciation during a fiscal period and can be subject to loss carry-forward provisions in which losses incurred in the current period are applied against future period net appreciation. Incentive fees on merchant banking funds also may be earned in the form of a carried interest if profits from merchant banking investments exceed a specified threshold. Incentive fees earned for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 of $59 million, $45 million and $27 million, respectively, demonstrate the volatility that incentive fees may have on total net revenue.

 

Corporate net revenue consists primarily of investment income generated from investments, including investments in LAM managed equity funds and principal investments in merchant banking and alternative investment funds, net interest income generated by LFB, interest income related to cash and interest expense related to outstanding indebtedness. Corporate net revenue can fluctuate due to fair value adjustments, changes in interest rates and in interest rate spreads earned by LFB and changes in the levels of cash, investments and indebtedness. Although Corporate net revenue during the six month period ended June 30, 2007 represented 1% of Lazard’s net revenue, total assets in Corporate represented 73% of Lazard’s consolidated total assets as of June 30, 2007, principally attributable to assets associated with LFB and, to a lesser extent, investments in LAM managed funds and cash.

 

Lazard expects to experience significant fluctuations in net revenue and operating income during the course of any given year. These fluctuations arise because a significant portion of Financial Advisory net revenue is earned upon the successful completion of a transaction, financial restructuring or capital raising activity, the timing of which is uncertain and is not subject to Lazard’s control. Asset Management net revenue is also subject

 

32


Table of Contents

to periodic fluctuations. Asset Management fees are generally based on AUM measured as of the end of a quarter or month, and an increase or reduction in AUM at such dates, due to market price fluctuations, currency fluctuations, net client asset flows or otherwise, will result in a corresponding increase or decrease in management fees. In addition, incentive fees earned on AUM are generally not recorded until potential uncertainties regarding the ultimate realizable amounts have been determined. For most of our funds that determination is made at year-end, and therefore such incentive fees are recorded in the fourth quarter of Lazard’s fiscal year.

 

Operating Expenses

 

The majority of Lazard’s operating expenses relate to compensation and benefits for employees and managing directors. The balance of Lazard’s operating expenses are referred to below as “non-compensation expense”, which includes costs for occupancy and equipment, marketing and business development, technology and information services, professional services, fund administration and outsourced services and other expenses. Effective as of June 30, 2007, Lazard implemented a revised categorization of non-compensation expenses to better reflect the manner in which we manage and review expenses. As such, certain expense categories were (i) eliminated and reclassified to other categories, (ii) added to enhance clarity to those expenses which may, for example, fluctuate consistent with AUM, or (iii) renamed and combined to more effectively capture related expenses previously included in other categories.

 

Provision for Income Taxes

 

Lazard Group operates in the U.S. as a limited liability company that is treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, it is not subject to U.S. federal income taxes. Taxes related to income earned by partnerships represent obligations of the individual partners. Outside the U.S., Lazard Group operates principally through corporations and is subject to local income taxes. Income taxes shown on Lazard’s condensed consolidated statements of income are attributable to taxes incurred by non-U.S. entities and by New York City Unincorporated Business Tax (“UBT”) attributable to Lazard’s operations apportioned to New York City. The Company’s provision for income taxes also includes a U.S. income tax provision attributable to Lazard Ltd’s ownership interest in Lazard Group’s operating income.

 

Minority Interest In Net Income

 

Minority interest in net income principally consists of a charge relating to LAZ-MD Holdings’ ownership interest in Lazard Group, which approximated 52.1% and 62.3% at June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, with such expense amounting to $36 million and $69 million for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007, respectively, and $45 million and $82 million for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2006, respectively. Also included in minority interest in net income are minority interests in various LAM-related general partnerships held directly by certain of our LAM managing directors.

 

See Note 4 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding minority interest.

 

Consolidated Results of Operations

 

Lazard’s consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars. Many of our non-U.S. subsidiaries have a functional currency (i.e., the currency in which operational activities are primarily conducted) that is other than the U.S. dollar, generally the currency of the country in which the subsidiaries are domiciled. Such subsidiaries’ assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates as of the respective balance sheet date while revenue and expenses are translated at average exchange rates during the respective periods based on the daily closing exchange rates. Adjustments that result from translating amounts from a subsidiary’s functional currency are reported as a component of members’ or stockholders’ equity. Foreign currency remeasurement gains and losses on transactions in non-functional currencies are included in the consolidated statements of income.

 

33


Table of Contents

A discussion of the Company’s consolidated results of operations for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 is set forth below, followed by a more detailed discussion of business segment results.

 

    

Three Months Ended
June 30,


  

Six Months Ended

June 30,


     2007

   2006

   2007

   2006

    

($ in thousands)

Revenue

                           

Investment banking and other advisory fees

   $ 228,205    $ 252,803    $ 443,288    $ 472,386

Money management fees

  

 

148,518

  

 

119,902

  

 

284,344

  

 

230,471

Interest income

  

 

18,334

  

 

9,828

  

 

40,675

  

 

17,838

Other

  

 

55,845

  

 

30,759

  

 

83,038

  

 

52,854

    

  

  

  

Total revenue

  

 

450,902

  

 

413,292

  

 

851,345

  

 

773,549

Interest expense

  

 

29,542

  

 

26,384

  

 

60,787

  

 

50,383

    

  

  

  

Net revenue

  

 

421,360

  

 

386,908

  

 

790,558

  

 

723,166

    

  

  

  

Operating Expenses

                           

Compensation and benefits

  

 

249,046

  

 

234,148

  

 

469,084

  

 

434,287

Non-compensation expense

  

 

83,151

  

 

68,067

  

 

154,043

  

 

126,070

    

  

  

  

Total operating expenses

  

 

332,197

  

 

302,215

  

 

623,127

  

 

560,357

    

  

  

  

Operating Income

  

 

89,163

  

 

84,693

  

 

167,431

  

 

162,809

Provision for income taxes

  

 

20,313

  

 

18,734

  

 

37,374

  

 

34,674

    

  

  

  

Income Before Minority Interest in Net Income

  

 

68,850

  

 

65,959

  

 

130,057

  

 

128,135

Minority interest in net income

  

 

39,554

  

 

42,414

  

 

74,407

  

 

84,904

    

  

  

  

Net Income

   $ 29,296    $ 23,545    $ 55,650    $ 43,231
    

  

  

  

 

The Company calculates operating revenue for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,


   

Six Months Ended

June 30,


 
     2007

    2006

    2007

    2006

 
     ($ in thousands)  

Total revenue

   $ 450,902     $ 413,292     $ 851,345     $ 773,549  

Deduct:

                                

LFB interest expense

  

 

(7,652

)

    (5,174 )     (18,067 )     (9,049 )

Loss (revenue) related to consolidation of LAM general partnerships

  

 

(3,724

)

    2,722       (5,555 )     (2,537 )
    


 


 


 


Operating revenue

   $ 439,526     $ 410,840     $ 827,723     $ 761,963  
    


 


 


 


 

34


Table of Contents

Certain key ratios, statistics and headcount information for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 are set forth below:

 

    

Three Months Ended
June 30,


   

Six Months Ended

June 30


 
             2007      

            2006        

            2007        

            2006        

 

As a % of Net Revenue, By Revenue Category:

                        

Investment banking and other advisory fees

   54 %   65 %   56 %   65 %

Money management fees

  

35

 

 

31

 

  36     32  

Interest income

  

5

 

  3     5     3  

Other

  

13

 

  8     11     7  

Interest expense

  

(7

)

  (7 )   (8 )   (7 )
    

 

 

 

Net Revenue

   100 %   100 %   100 %   100 %
    

 

 

 

As a % of Net Revenue:

                        

Operating Income

   21 %   22 %   21 %   23 %
    

 

 

 

    

As of June 30,


             
     2007

    2006

             

Headcount:

                        

Managing Directors:

                        

Financial Advisory

  

139

 

 

127

 

           

Asset Management

  

48

 

  43              

Corporate

  

8

 

  8              

Limited Managing Directors

  

5

 

  5              

Other Employees:

                        

Business segment professionals

  

780

 

  766              

All other professionals and support staff

  

1,253

 

 

1,217

 

           
    

 

           

Total

  

2,233

 

 

2,166

 

           
    

 

           

 

Operating Results

 

The Company’s quarterly revenue and profits can fluctuate materially depending on the number, size and timing of completed transactions on which it advised, as well as seasonality and other factors. Accordingly, the revenue and profits in any particular quarter may not be indicative of future results. Lazard management believes that annual results are the most meaningful basis for comparison among present, historical and future periods.

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 versus June 30, 2006

 

Net income for the three month period ended June 30, 2007 was $29 million, up $6 million, or 24%, versus the corresponding period in 2006.

 

Net revenue was $421 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2007, up $34 million, or 9%, versus net revenue of $387 million in the corresponding period in 2006. During the 2007 period, fees from investment banking and other advisory activities were $228 million, a decrease of $25 million, or 10%, versus fees of $253 million in the corresponding period in 2006. The decrease reflects the Company’s reduced number of completed M&A transactions over $1 billion during the three month period ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the corresponding period in 2006. Money management fees for the three month period ended June 30, 2007, were $149 million, an increase of $29 million, or 24%, versus $120 million in the corresponding period in 2006. The increase in money management fees was principally the result of a $35.6 billion, or 38%, increase in average AUM for the three month period ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the corresponding period in 2006. Interest income of $18 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2007 increased $9 million, or 87%, versus the corresponding period in 2006 principally due to interest earned on higher average cash balances in the 2007 period. The higher cash balances were principally the result of the net proceeds from the primary offering of

 

35


Table of Contents

Class A common stock in December, 2006, and from the June, 2007 issuance of the Company’s $600 million principal amount of 6.85% senior notes, as well as interest income related to the commercial banking activities in LFB. Other revenue of $56 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2007 increased by $25 million, or 82%, versus the corresponding period in 2006 principally due to increased net investment gains and dividends, as well as the net change in revenue recorded from LAM general partnerships held directly by certain of our LAM managing directors. Such LAM-related revenue was approximately $4 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2007 versus a $3 million loss in the corresponding period in 2006. Other revenue for the 2007 period also includes a $9 million gain in connection with the Company’s share in the net proceeds related to the sale of a portion of LFCM Holdings’ ownership interest in Panmure Gordon & Co. plc (“PG&C”) (see Note 12 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). The corresponding period in 2006 included a $14 million gain recognized as a result of the termination of the Intesa joint venture. Interest expense of $30 million in the 2007 period increased by $3 million primarily from higher average customer deposits in LFB and, to a lesser extent, the incremental interest expense related to the June, 2007 issuance of the senior notes described above.

 

Compensation and benefits expense was $249 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2007, or 56.7% of operating revenue of $440 million in the 2007 period, compared with $234 million, or 57.0% of operating revenue of $411 million for the corresponding period in 2006. The increase of $15 million, or 6%, is consistent with the increase in operating revenue. The increase was primarily due to increased incentive compensation relating to amortization of restricted stock units and, to a lesser extent, additional compensation associated with headcount increases in managing directors and business segment professionals.

 

Non-compensation expense was $83 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2007, or 18.9% of operating revenue in the period, compared with $68 million, or 16.6% of operating revenue for the corresponding period in 2006. The percentage of non-compensation expense to operating revenue can vary from quarter to quarter due to quarterly fluctuations in revenue, among other factors. Higher non-compensation expense primarily reflects current period increases in expenses related to (i) increased business activity, including fund administration and services associated with the growth in AUM, as well as higher costs for electronic data services, (ii) business investments, including recruitment costs, travel and other market development costs, and (iii) the impact of the strengthening of foreign currencies against the U.S. Dollar. In addition, in the 2007 period, occupancy and equipment cost includes a charge of $4 million relating to abandoned leased facilities.

 

Operating income, was $89 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2007, an increase of $4 million, or 5%, versus $85 million in the corresponding period in 2006. Operating income as a percentage of net revenue was 21% for three month period ended June 30, 2007 versus 22% for the 2006 period.

 

The provision for income taxes for the three month period ended June 30, 2007 was $20 million, an increase of $1 million, versus $19 million for the corresponding period in 2006. The increase in the 2007 period was principally due to additional entity level income taxes incurred by Lazard Ltd resulting from the increase in Lazard Ltd’s ownership interest in Lazard Group’s operating income to approximately 47.9% for the three month period ended June 30, 2007 from 37.7% for the corresponding period in 2006, with such increase being the result of the primary and secondary offerings of Lazard Ltd’s Class A common stock in December, 2006. The Company’s effective tax rate was 22.8% for the three month period ended June 30, 2007, as compared to 22.1% for the corresponding period in 2006.

 

Minority interest in net income for the three month period ended June 30, 2007 was $40 million, a decrease of $2 million, versus $42 million in the corresponding period in 2006. The decrease was principally due to the minority interest in net income related to LAZ-MD Holdings’ ownership interest of Lazard Group, which declined to approximately 52.1% for the three month period ended June 30, 2007, from 62.3% for the corresponding period in 2006, as a result of the primary and secondary offerings of Lazard Ltd’s Class A common stock in December, 2006.

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 versus June 30, 2006

 

Net income for the six month period ended June 30, 2007 was $56 million, up $12 million, or 29%, versus the corresponding period in 2006.

 

36


Table of Contents

Net revenue was $791 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2007, up $67 million, or 9%, versus net revenue of $723 million in the corresponding period in 2006. During the 2007 period, fees from investment banking and other advisory activities were $443 million, a decrease of $29 million, or 6%, versus fees of $472 million in the corresponding period in 2006. The decrease reflects the Company’s reduced number of completed M&A transactions over $1 billion during the six month period ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the corresponding period in 2006. Money management fees were $284 million, an increase of $54 million, or 23%, versus $230 million in the corresponding period in 2006. The increase in money management fees was principally the result of a $31 billion, or 34%, increase in average AUM for the six month period ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the corresponding period in 2006. Interest income of $41 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2007 increased $23 million, or 128%, versus the corresponding period in 2006 principally due to interest earned on higher average cash balances in the 2007 period. The higher cash balances were principally the result of the net proceeds from the primary offering of Class A common stock in December, 2006, and from the June, 2007 issuance of the Company’s $600 million principal amount of 6.85% senior notes, as well as interest income related to the commercial banking activities in LFB. Other revenue of $83 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2007 increased $30 million, or 57%, versus the corresponding period in 2006 principally due to increased net investment gains and dividends as well as the net change in revenue recorded from LAM general partnerships held directly by certain of our LAM managing directors. Such LAM-related revenue was approximately $6 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2007 versus $3 million in the corresponding period in 2006. Other revenue for the 2007 period also includes a $9 million gain in connection with the Company’s share in the net proceeds related to the sale of a portion of LFCM Holdings’ ownership interest in PG&C (see Note 12 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). The corresponding period in 2006 included a $14 million gain recognized as a result of the termination of the Intesa joint venture. Interest expense for the six month period ended June 30, 2007 of $61 million increased by $10 million versus the corresponding period in 2006 primarily from higher average customer deposits in LFB.

 

Compensation and benefits expense was $469 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2007, or 56.7% of operating revenue of $828 million in the 2007 period, compared with $434 million, or 57.0% of operating revenue for the corresponding period in 2006. The increase of $35 million, or 8%, is consistent with the increase in operating revenue. The increase was primarily due to increased incentive compensation relating to amortization of restricted stock units and additional compensation associated with headcount increases in managing directors and business segment professionals.

 

Non-compensation expense was $154 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2007, or 18.6% of operating revenue in the six month period ended June 30, 2007, compared with $126 million, or 16.6% of operating revenue for the corresponding period in 2006. The percentage of non-compensation expense to operating revenue can vary from period to period due to fluctuations in revenue, among other factors. The increase in non-compensation expense primarily reflects current period increases in expenses related to (i) increased business activity, including fund administration and services associated with the growth in AUM, as well as higher costs for electronic data services, (ii) business investments, including recruitment costs, travel and other market development costs, and (iii) the impact of the strengthening of foreign currencies against the U.S. Dollar, as well as one-time VAT and other cost recoveries recorded in the first half of 2006. In addition, in the 2007 period, occupancy and equipment cost includes a charge of $4 million relating to abandoned leased facilities.

 

Operating income, was $167 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2007, an increase of $4 million versus $163 million in the corresponding period in 2006. Operating income as a percentage of net revenue was 21% for six month period ended June 30, 2007 versus 23% for the 2006 period.

 

The provision for income taxes for the six month period ended June 30, 2007 was $37 million, an increase of $2 million, versus $35 million for the corresponding period in 2006. The increase in 2007 was principally due to additional entity level income taxes incurred by Lazard Ltd resulting from the increase in Lazard Ltd’s ownership interest in Lazard Group’s operating income to approximately 47.9% for the six month period ended June 30, 2007 from 37.7% for the corresponding period in 2006, with such increase being the result of the primary and secondary offerings of Lazard Ltd’s Class A common stock in December, 2006. The Company’s effective tax rate was 22.3% for the six month period ended June 30, 2007 as compared to 21.3% for the corresponding period in 2006.

 

37


Table of Contents

Minority interest in net income for the six month period ended June 30, 2007 was $74 million, a decrease of $11 million, versus $85 million in the corresponding period in 2006. The decrease was principally due to the minority interest in net income related to LAZ-MD Holdings’ ownership interest of Lazard Group, which declined to approximately 52.1% for the six month period ended June 30, 2007, from 62.3% for the corresponding period in 2006, as a result of the primary and secondary offerings of Lazard Ltd’s Class A common stock in December, 2006.

 

Business Segments

 

The following data discusses net revenue and operating income for the Company’s operations by business segment. The operating results exclude a discussion of Corporate, due to its relatively minor contribution to operating results. Each segment’s operating expenses include (i) compensation and benefits expenses that are incurred directly in support of the businesses and (ii) other operating expenses, which include directly incurred expenses for occupancy and equipment, marketing and business development, technology and information services, professional services, fund administration and outsourcing and indirect support costs (including compensation and benefits expense and other operating expenses related thereto) for administrative services. Such administrative services include, but are not limited to, accounting, tax, legal, facilities management and senior management activities. Such support costs are allocated to the relevant segments based on various statistical drivers such as, among other items, headcount, square footage and transactional volume.

 

Financial Advisory

 

The following table summarizes the operating results of the Financial Advisory segment.

 

    

Three Months Ended
June 30,


    Six Months Ended
June 30,


 
         2007    

        2006    

        2007    

        2006    

 
    

($ in thousands)

 

M&A

   $ 164,318     $197,856     $ 360,386     $ 391,839  

Financial Restructuring

  

 

29,073

 

  21,047       38,693       34,640  

Corporate Finance and Other

  

 

51,567

 

  43,161       68,464       57,716  
    


 

 


 


Net Revenue

     244,958     262,064       467,543       484,195  
    


 

 


 


Direct Compensation and Benefits

  

 

137,240

 

  147,203       257,198       266,368  

Other Operating Expenses (a)

  

 

54,324

 

  44,450       107,364       89,555  
    


 

 


 


Total Operating Expenses

     191,564     191,653       364,562       355,923  
    


 

 


 


Operating Income

   $ 53,394     $  70,411     $ 102,981     $ 128,272  
    


 

 


 


Operating Income as a Percentage of Net Revenue

     22 %   27 %     22 %     26 %
    


 

 


 


    

As of June 30,


             
     2007

        2006    

             

Headcount (b):

                              

Managing Directors

  

 

139

 

  127                  

Limited Managing Directors

  

 

2

 

  2                  

Other Employees:

                              

Business segment professionals

  

 

467

 

  475                  

All other professionals and support staff

  

 

278

 

  261                  
    


 

               

Total

  

 

886

 

  865                  
    


 

               

(a) Includes indirect support costs (including compensation and benefits expense and other operating expenses related thereto).
(b) Excludes headcount related to indirect support functions. Such headcount is included in the Corporate headcount.

 

38


Table of Contents

Net revenue trends in Financial Advisory for M&A and Financial Restructuring generally are correlated to the volume of completed industry-wide mergers and acquisitions and restructurings occurring subsequent to corporate debt defaults, respectively. However, deviations from this relationship can occur in any given year for a number of reasons. For instance, material variances in the level of mergers and acquisitions activity in a particular geography where Lazard has significant market share or the number of its advisory engagements with respect to larger-sized transactions can cause its results to diverge from industry-wide activity. Certain Lazard client statistics and global industry statistics are set forth below:

 

    

Six Months Ended
June 30,


 
         2007    

        2006    

 

Lazard Statistics:

            

Number of Clients:

            

Total

  

344

 

  290  

With Fees Greater than $1 million

  

105

 

  103  

Percentage of Total Financial Advisory Revenue from Top 10 Clients

  

25

%

  28 %

Number of M&A Transactions Completed Greater than $1 billion (a)

  

17

 

  29  

(a) Source: Thomson Financial as of July 16, 2007

 

The geographical distribution of Financial Advisory net revenue is set forth below in percentage terms. The offices that generate Financial Advisory net revenue are located in North America, Europe (principally in the U.K., France, Italy, Spain and Germany) and the rest of the world (principally in Asia).

 

    

Three Months
Ended June 30,


    Six Months
Ended June 30,


 
         2007    

        2006    

        2007    

        2006    

 

North America

   59 %  

60

%

  52 %   59 %

Europe

  

37

 

 

38

 

  45     39  

Rest of World

   4    

2

 

  3     2  
    

 

 

 

Total

   100 %   100 %   100 %   100 %
    

 

 

 

 

The change in the distribution of geographical revenues demonstrates that our revenue can fluctuate materially from quarter to quarter due to the number, size and timing of closings of completed transactions, as well as seasonality and other factors. As such, the geographical distribution of revenues in any particular quarter may not be indicative of future results.

 

The Company’s managing directors and many of its professionals have significant experience, and many of them are able to use this experience to advise on both mergers and acquisitions and financial restructuring transactions, depending on clients’ needs. This flexibility allows Lazard to better match its professional staff with the counter-cyclical business cycles of mergers and acquisitions and financial restructurings. While Lazard measures revenue by practice area, Lazard does not separately measure the separate costs or profitability of mergers and acquisitions services as compared to financial restructuring services. Accordingly, Lazard measures performance in its Financial Advisory segment based on overall segment net revenue and operating income margins.

 

Operating Results

 

The Company’s quarterly revenue and profits can fluctuate materially depending on the number, size and timing of completed transactions on which it advised, as well as seasonality and other factors. Accordingly, the revenue and profits in any particular quarter or period may not be indicative of future results. Lazard management believes that annual results are the most meaningful basis for comparison among present, historical and future periods.

 

39


Table of Contents

Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 versus June 30, 2006

 

In the 2007 period, Financial Advisory net revenue was $245 million, $17 million less than the corresponding period in 2006. M&A net revenue of $164 million decreased $34 million, or 17%, versus the 2006 period. The decline in M&A revenue reflects the reduced number of completed M&A transactions over $1 billion. In the three month period ended June 30, 2007, the Company completed five of such transactions, as compared to 15 in the corresponding period in 2006. Corporate Finance and Other net revenue of $52 million increased by approximately $9 million, or 19%, versus net revenue of $43 million in the corresponding period in 2006. Financial Restructuring net revenue increased by $8 million, or 38%, versus the 2006 period.

 

Clients which, in the aggregate, accounted for a significant portion of our M&A revenue for the three month period ended June 30, 2007 included Alcoa, Cerberus Capital Management, IBM, Icahn Associates, InTown Suites Management, ION Media Networks, L’Oreal, Stedim and Viasys Healthcare.

 

Financial Restructuring revenue in the 2007 period increased as compared to the corresponding period in 2006, principally due to the timing of certain court-approved restructuring transactions that the Company has been involved with. Restructuring assignments generating fees in the 2007 period include Damovo Creditors Committee, Eurotunnel, New Century Financial, North Atlantic Trading Company and SunCom Wireless.

 

Operating expenses were $192 million in the 2007 period, and were unchanged, versus the corresponding period in 2006. Compensation and benefits expense in the 2007 period declined by $10 million as compared to the 2006 period, consistent with levels of operating revenue. All other operating expenses increased by $10 million, or 22%, primarily due to higher business development-related activities, the impact of the strengthening of foreign currencies against the U.S. Dollar and the net impact of one-time cost recoveries in the 2006 period.

 

Financial Advisory operating income was $53 million for the 2007 period, a decrease of $17 million, or 24%, versus operating income of $70 million in the corresponding period in 2006. Operating income as a percentage of segment net revenue was 22% for the 2007 period versus 27% in the 2006 period.

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 versus June 30, 2006

 

In the 2007 period, Financial Advisory net revenue was $468 million, a decrease of $16 million as compared to the corresponding period in 2006. M&A net revenue of $360 million decreased $31 million, or 8%, versus the 2006 period. The decline in M&A revenue reflects the reduced number of completed M&A transactions over $1 billion. In the six month period ended June 30, 2007, the Company completed 17 of such transactions, as compared to 29 in the corresponding period in 2006. Corporate Finance and Other net revenue of $69 million increased by $11 million, or 19%, versus the corresponding period in 2006. Financial Restructuring net revenue increased by $4 million, or 12%, versus the 2006 period.

 

Operating expenses were $365 million in the 2007 period, an increase of approximately $9 million, or 2%, versus operating expenses of $356 million in the corresponding period in 2006. Compensation and benefits expense was $257 million, a decrease of $9 million versus the 2006 period, consistent with levels of operating revenue. All other operating expenses increased by $18 million, or 20%, primarily due to higher business development-related activities, the impact of the strengthening of foreign currencies against the U.S. Dollar and the net impact of one-time cost recoveries in the 2006 period.

 

Financial Advisory operating income was $103 million for the 2007 period, a decrease of $25 million, or 20%, versus operating income of $128 million in the corresponding period in 2006. Operating income as a percentage of segment net revenue was 22% for the 2007 period versus 26% in the 2006 period.

 

40


Table of Contents

Asset Management

 

The following table shows the composition of AUM for the Asset Management segment:

 

    

As of


     June 30,
2007


   December 31,
2006


    

($ in millions)

AUM:

             

International Equities

   $ 55,981    $ 52,033

Global Equities

  

 

36,316

     26,453

U.S. Equities

  

 

22,508

     13,708
    

  

Total Equities

  

 

114,805

     92,194
    

  

European and International Fixed Income

  

 

10,131

     8,418

Global Fixed Income

  

 

1,239

     1,095

U.S. Fixed Income

  

 

1,862

     2,310
    

  

Total Fixed Income

  

 

13,232

     11,823
    

  

Alternative Investments

  

 

3,581

     3,457

Merchant Banking

  

 

1,100

     883

Cash Management

  

 

2,632

     2,080
    

  

Total AUM

   $ 135,350    $ 110,437
    

  

 

Average AUM for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 is set forth below. Average AUM is based on an average of quarterly ending balances for the respective periods.

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,


   Six Months Ended
June 30,


         2007    

       2006    

       2007    

       2006    

    

($ in millions)

Average AUM

   $ 130,101    $ 94,517    $ 123,547    $ 92,423
    

  

  

  

 

The following is a summary of changes in AUM for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

 

    

Three Months Ended
June 30,


   

Six Months Ended
June 30,


 
         2007    

       2006    

        2007    

       2006    

 
    

($ in millions)

 

AUM—Beginning of Period

   $ 124,852    $ 95,133     $ 110,437    $ 88,234  

Net Flows

  

 

2,627

     (1,573 )  

 

14,191

     (710 )

Market Appreciation

  

 

7,680

     (212 )  

 

10,388

     5,545  

Foreign Currency Adjustments

  

 

191

     553       334      832  
    

  


 

  


AUM—End of Period

   $ 135,350    $ 93,901     $ 135,350    $ 93,901  
    

  


 

  


 

AUM as of June 30, 2007 was $135.4 billion, an increase of $25.0 billion as compared to AUM as of December 31, 2006. Merchant banking AUM as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 includes $0.7 billion and $0.6 billion at the respective dates which represents assets held by an investment company for which Lazard may earn carried interests. During the six month period ended June 30, 2007, net inflows of $14.2 billion were accompanied by market appreciation of $10.4 billion and the positive impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates of approximately $0.3 billion. Net inflows were experienced primarily in U.S. and Global Equity products.

 

41


Table of Contents

During the three month period ended June 30, 2007, average AUM was $130.1 billion, an increase of approximately $35.6 billion, or 38%, versus average AUM of $94.5 billion in the corresponding period in 2006. For the six month period, ended June 30, 2007, average AUM was $123.5 billion, an increase of approximately $31.1 billion or 34%, versus $92.4 billion in the corresponding period in 2006.

 

The following table summarizes the operating results of the Asset Management segment.

 

    

Three Months Ended
June 30,


    Six Months Ended
June 30,


 
     2007

    2006

    2007

    2006

 
    

($ in thousands)

 

Management Fees

   $ 142,230     $ 112,203     $ 272,869     $ 216,008  

Incentive Fees

  

 

5,752

 

    7,456       10,758       13,939  

Other Income

  

 

13,540

 

    10,065       24,592       18,920  
    


 


 


 


Sub-total

  

 

161,522

 

    129,724       308,219       248,867  

LAM GP-Related Revenue (Loss)

  

 

3,724

 

 

 

(2,722

)

    5,555       2,537  
    


 


 


 


Net Revenue

  

 

165,246

 

    127,002       313,774       251,404  
    


 


 


 


Direct Compensation and Benefits

  

 

73,864

 

    59,180       140,089       112,990  

Other Operating Expenses (a)

  

 

48,157

 

    39,822       92,944       78,442  
    


 


 


 


Total Operating Expenses

  

 

122,021

 

    99,002       233,033       191,432  
    


 


 


 


Operating Income

  

$

43,225

 

  $ 28,000     $ 80,741     $ 59,972  
    


 


 


 


Operating Income, excluding LAM GP-Related

Revenue (Loss) (b)

   $ 39,501     $ 30,722     $ 75,186     $ 57,435  
    


 


 


 


Operating Income as a Percentage of Net Revenue

     26 %     22 %     26 %     24 %
    


 


 


 


Operating Income, as a Percentage of Net Revenue, each excluding LAM GP-Related Revenue (Loss) (b)

     24 %     24 %     24 %     23 %
    


 


 


 


 

    

As of June 30,


     2007

   2006

Headcount (c):

         

Managing Directors

  

48

   43

Limited Managing Directors

  

3

   2

Other Employees:

         

Business segment professionals

  

305

   279

All other professionals and support staff functions

  

369

   326
    
  

Total

  

725

   650
    
  

(a) Includes indirect support costs (including compensation and benefits expense and other operating expenses related thereto).
(b) Management also evaluates the results of Asset Management based on revenue and operating income excluding the LAM GP-related revenue (loss) since such revenue (loss) is offset entirely by minority interest which is not a charge to operating income.
(c) Excludes headcount related to indirect support functions. Such headcount is included in the Corporate headcount.

 

42


Table of Contents

The geographical distribution of Asset Management net revenue is set forth below in percentage terms:

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,


   

Six Months Ended

June 30,


 
     2007

    2006

    2007

    2006

 

North America

   53 %   53 %   53 %   56 %

Europe

  

36

 

  38     38     36  

Rest of World

  

11

 

  9     9     8  
    

 

 

 

Total

   100 %   100 %   100 %   100 %
    

 

 

 

 

Operating Results

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 versus June 30, 2006

 

Asset Management net revenue was $165 million for the three month period in 2007, an increase of $38 million, or 30%, versus the corresponding period in 2006. Management fees for the 2007 period were $142 million, up $30 million, or 27%, compared to the 2006 period. The percentage increase in average AUM was greater than the percentage increase in management fees principally due to a change in mix of certain investment products. Incentive fees earned for the 2007 period were $6 million, slightly lower than the amount recorded for the 2006 period. Other income was $13 million, an increase of $3 million versus the corresponding period in 2006. In addition, during the three month period ended June 30, 2007, revenue of $4 million was recorded from LAM general partnerships held directly by certain of our LAM managing directors, with these amounts also included as “minority interest in net income”, versus a $3 million loss for the corresponding period in 2006.

 

Operating expenses were $122 million for the 2007 period, an increase of $23 million, or 23%, versus operating expenses of $99 million for the 2006 period. Compensation and benefits expense increased $15 million, or 25%, as compared to the 2006 period. The increase was principally due to increases in incentive compensation as a result of higher operating revenues, as well as additional compensation as a result of headcount increases of managing directors, business segment professionals and other staff. Other operating expenses increased $8 million, or 21%, versus for the corresponding period in 2006, principally due to higher (i) professional fees for recruiting, (ii) fund administration and servicing associated with the growth in AUM and (iii) other business development activities.

 

Asset Management operating income was approximately $43 million in the 2007 period, an increase of approximately $15 million as compared to operating income of $28 million for the 2006 period. Operating income as a percentage of segment net revenue was 26% for the 2007 period versus 22% for the 2006 period. Excluding LAM GP-related revenue (loss), operating income was approximately $40 million, or 24% of net revenue, excluding LAM GP-related revenue (loss), as compared to $31 million, or 24%, for the 2006 period.

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 versus June 30, 2006

 

Asset Management net revenue was $314 million for the six month period in 2007, an increase of $62 million, or 25%, versus the corresponding period in 2006. Management fees for the 2007 period were $273 million, up $57 million, or 26%, compared to the 2006 period. The percentage increase in average AUM was greater than the percentage increase in management fees principally due to a change in mix of certain investment products. Incentive fees earned for the 2007 period were $11 million, slightly lower than the amount recorded for the 2006 period. Other income was $25 million, an increase of $6 million versus the corresponding period in 2006. In addition, during the six month period ended June 30, 2007, revenue of $6 million was recorded from LAM general partnerships held directly by certain of our LAM managing directors, with these amounts also included as “minority interest in net income”, versus $3 million for the corresponding period in 2006.

 

Operating expenses were $233 million for the 2007 period, an increase of $42 million, or 22%, versus operating expenses of $191 million for the 2006 period. Compensation and benefits expense increased $27 million, or 24%, as compared to the 2006 period. The increase was principally due to increases in incentive compensation as a result of higher operating revenues, as well as additional compensation as a result of headcount increases of managing directors, business segment professionals and other staff. Other operating

 

43


Table of Contents

expenses increased $15 million, or 18%, versus for the corresponding period in 2006, principally due to (i) higher professional fees for recruiting, (ii) fund administration and servicing associated with the growth in AUM and (iii) other business development activities.

 

Asset Management operating income was approximately $81 million in the 2007 period, an increase of approximately $21 million as compared to operating income of $60 million for the 2006 period. Operating income as a percentage of segment net revenue was 26% for the 2007 period versus 24% for the 2006 period. Excluding LAM GP-related revenue (loss), operating income was approximately $75 million, or 24% of net revenue, excluding LAM GP-related revenue (loss), as compared to approximately $57 million, or 23%, for the 2006 period.

 

Cash Flows

 

The Company’s cash flows are influenced primarily by the timing of the receipt of Financial Advisory and Asset Management fees, the timing of distributions to shareholders and payment of incentive compensation bonuses to managing directors and employees. The M&A and Asset Management fee receivable collection periods generally are 60 days or less. However, the collection time for restructuring transactions may extend beyond 60 days, particularly those that involve bankruptcies due to issues such as court-ordered holdbacks. In addition, fee receivables from our private fund advisory activities are generally collected over a four year period.

 

Lazard Group traditionally makes payments for employee incentive compensation and distributions to members primarily in the first four months of the year with respect to the prior year’s results.

 

Summary of Cash Flows:

 

     Six Months Ended
June 30,


 
         2007    

        2006    

 
    

($ in millions)

 

Cash Provided By (Used In):

                

Operating activities:

                

Net income

   $ 55.7     $ 43.2  

Noncash charges (a)

  

 

131.8

 

 

 

89.4

 

Other operating activities (b)

  

 

(483.9

)

 

 

(93.4

)

    


 


Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

     (296.4 )  

 

39.2

 

    


 


Investing activities (c)

  

 

(5.4

)

 

 

(2.7

)

Financing activities (d)

  

 

364.2

 

 

 

(94.0

)

Effect of exchange rate changes

  

 

(2.8

)

 

 

7.6

 

    


 


Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

     59.6       (49.9 )

Cash and Cash Equivalents:

                

Beginning of Period

     969.4    

 

492.3

 

    


 


End of Period

   $ 1,029.0     $ 442.4  
    


 



(a) Consists of the following:

                

Depreciation and amortization of property

   $ 7.5     $ 7.0  

Amortization of deferred expenses, stock units and interest rate hedge

  

 

49.9

 

    11.2  

Minority interest in net income

  

 

74.4

 

 

 

84.9

 

Gain on termination of Strategic Alliance in Italy

  

 

—  

 

    (13.7 )
    


 


     $ 131.8     $ 89.4  
    


 


 

(b) Includes net changes in operating assets and liabilities.

 

(c) Relates to the net additions and disposals of property.

 

(d) Primarily includes distributions to minority interest holders, repayments of senior and subordinated borrowings and Class A common stock dividends and, in 2007, the issuance of the $600 million aggregate principal amount of 6.85% senior notes due 2017.

 

44


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Historically, the Company’s source of liquidity has been cash provided by operations, with a traditional seasonal pattern of cash flow. While employee salaries are paid throughout the year, annual incentive compensation has historically been paid to employees in the early months following year-end. The Company’s managing directors are paid a salary during the year, but a majority of their annual cash distributions with respect to the prior year have historically been paid to them in three monthly installments in February, March and April following year-end. In addition, and to a lesser extent, during the year we pay tax advances on behalf of certain of our managing directors, and these advances serve to reduce the amounts due to those managing directors in the three installments described above. As a consequence, our level of cash on hand generally decreases significantly during the first four months of the year and gradually builds up over the remainder of the year. We expect this seasonal pattern of cash flow to continue.

 

We regularly monitor our liquidity position, including cash levels, credit lines, principal investment commitments, interest and principal payments on debt, capital expenditures and matters relating to liquidity and to compliance with regulatory net capital requirements. We maintain lines of credit in excess of anticipated liquidity requirements. As of June 30, 2007, Lazard had approximately $232 million in unused lines of credit available to it, including $56 million of unused lines of credit available to LFB.

 

Lazard’s annual cash flow generated from operations historically has been sufficient to enable it to meet its annual obligations. We believe that our cash flows from operating activities, including use of our credit lines as needed, should be sufficient for us to fund our current obligations for the next 12 months and beyond. As noted above, we intend to maintain lines of credit that can be utilized should the need arise. Concurrent with the equity public offering, Lazard Group entered into a five year, $125 million senior revolving credit facility with a group of lenders, with such revolving credit facility being amended on May 17, 2006 to provide for aggregate commitments of $150 million. As of June 30, 2007 there were no amounts outstanding under this credit facility. The senior revolving credit facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants and events of default for facilities of this type. Furthermore, the senior revolving credit facility, among other things, limits the ability of the borrower to incur debt, grant liens, pay dividends, enter into mergers or to sell all or substantially all of its assets and contains financial covenants that must be maintained. We may, to the extent required and subject to restrictions contained in our financing arrangements, use other financing sources in addition to any new credit facilities. In addition, the indenture and supplemental indentures relating to Lazard Group’s senior notes contain certain covenants, events of default and other customary provisions.

 

On June 21, 2007, Lazard Group completed a private placement of $600 million aggregate principal amount of 6.85% senior notes due June 15, 2017. Interest on the notes is payable on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning on December 15, 2007. Lazard Group also entered into a registration rights agreement with the initial purchasers of the notes pursuant to which Lazard Group has agreed, among other things, to file with the SEC an exchange offer registration statement enabling holders to exchange their notes for substantially identical notes registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “exchange notes”). In connection therewith, Lazard Group filed a registration statement on Form S-4 on July 3, 2007 that was declared effective by the SEC on July 19, 2007, and Lazard Group commenced an exchange offer (the “exchange offer”) on that date to exchange an aggregate principal amount of up to $600 million of the notes for an equal aggregate principal amount of the exchange notes. The exchange offer is scheduled to expire on August 16, 2007. Lazard Group used a portion of the net proceeds from the sale of the notes for repayment of Lazard Group’s $96 million senior promissory note and $50 million subordinated promissory note, each originally scheduled to mature in February 2008, and each of which were redeemed on June 29, 2007, and intends to use the balance for (i) expansion of its Financial Advisory and Asset Management businesses, (ii) other strategic acquisitions or investments and (iii) general corporate purposes.

 

As of June 30, 2007, the Company invested a portion of the remaining net proceeds from the December, 2006 primary offering of Class A common stock in accounts managed by LAM that are primarily invested in equities. “Securities owned - equities” on the condensed consolidated statement of financial condition as of June 30, 2007 principally reflects such investments.

 

45


Table of Contents

As of June 30, 2007, Lazard was in compliance with all of its obligations under its various borrowing arrangements.

 

We actively monitor our regulatory capital base. Our principal subsidiaries are subject to regulatory requirements in their respective jurisdictions to ensure their general financial soundness and liquidity, which require, among other things, that we comply with certain minimum capital requirements, record-keeping, reporting procedures, relationships with customers, experience and training requirements for employees and certain other requirements and procedures. These regulatory requirements may restrict the flow of funds to affiliates. Regulatory approval is generally required for paying dividends in excess of certain established levels. See Note 13 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. These regulations differ in the U.S., the U.K., France, and other countries in which we operate. Our capital structure is designed to provide each of our subsidiaries with capital and liquidity consistent with its business and regulatory requirements. For a discussion of regulations relating to us, see “Item 1-Business—Regulation” included in the Form 10-K.

 

Net revenue and operating income historically have fluctuated significantly between quarters. This variability arises from the fact that transaction completion fees comprise the majority of our net revenue, with the billing and recognition of such fees being dependent upon the successful completion of client transactions, the occurrence and timing of which is irregular and not subject to Lazard’s control. In addition, incentive fees earned on AUM and compensation related thereto are generally not recorded until the end of the applicable measurement period, which is generally the fourth quarter of Lazard’s fiscal year, when potential uncertainties regarding the ultimate realizable amounts have been determined.

 

Contractual Obligations

 

The following table sets forth information relating to Lazard’s contractual obligations as of June 30, 2007:

 

    Contractual Obligations Payment Due by Period

    Total

  Less than
1 Year


  1-3 Years

  3-5 Years

  More than
5 Years


    ($ in thousands)

Operating Leases (exclusive of $70,947 of sublease income)

  $ 479,952   $ 66,781   $ 104,560   $ 79,703   $ 228,908

Capital Leases (including interest)

 

 

35,366

 

 

2,880

 

 

5,723

 

 

5,706

 

 

21,057

Senior Debt (including interest)(a)

 

 

2,334,211

 

 

546,609

 

 

160,575

 

 

160,575

 

 

1,466,452

Subordinated Loans (including interest) (b)

 

 

195,094

 

 

4,875

 

 

9,750

 

 

9,750

 

 

170,719

Merchant Banking Commitments—LAI managed funds (c)

 

 

91,452

 

 

48,919

 

 

42,533

           

Merchant Banking Commitments—company sponsored funds

 

 

3,557

 

 

3,008

       

 

511

 

 

38

Contractual Commitments to Managing Directors, Senior Advisors and Employees (d)

 

 

92,296

 

 

45,264

 

 

28,503

 

 

16,158

 

 

2,371

   

 

 

 

 

Total (e)

 

$

3,231,928

 

$

718,336

  $ 351,644   $ 272,403   $ 1,889,545
   

 

 

 

 


(a) Includes $437.5 million relating to Lazard Group Notes issued in connection with the issuance of the ESUs, for which the maturity date of the debt component can vary based on a remarketing of the Lazard Group Notes, and will mature (1) in the event of a successful remarketing, on any date no earlier than May 15, 2010 and no later than May 15, 2035, as we may elect, (2) in the event of a failed remarketing, on May 15, 2008 and (3) otherwise on May 15, 2035. While the Company currently expects a successful remarketing of the Lazard Group Notes, for purposes of the table above, a maturity in 2008, the earliest possible date, was assumed to be the maturity date of the Lazard Group Notes. See Notes 2 and 6 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

46


Table of Contents
(b) The Amended $150 million Subordinated Convertible Note matures on September 30, 2016, has a fixed interest rate of 3.25% per annum and is convertible into shares of Class A common stock at an effective conversion price of $57 per share. One-third in principal amount will generally be convertible after July 1, 2008, an additional one-third after July 1, 2009 and the last one-third after July 1, 2010, and no principal amount will be convertible after June 30, 2011. For purposes of the table above, the Amended $150 million Subordinated Convertible Note was considered to remain outstanding until its maturity date, with no assumed conversions into Class A common stock prior thereto. See Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
(c) Pursuant to the business alliance agreement, Lazard Group has commitments to fund certain investment funds managed by Lazard Alternative Investments Holdings LLC (“LAI”). Amounts in the table above relate to (1) obligations related to Corporate Partners II Limited, a private equity fund formed in February 2005, with $1 billion of institutional capital commitments and a $100 million capital commitment from Lazard Group, the principal portion of which may require funding at any time through 2010. As of June 30, 2007, Lazard Group contributed approximately $15.9 million of its capital commitment, with Lazard’s remaining commitment of approximately $84.1 million as of June 30, 2007 estimated to be funded in the amounts of $28.3 million, $30.0 million, and $25.8 million in the twelve month periods ending June 30, 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively; and (2) obligations related to Lazard Senior Housing Partners LP, a private equity fund which closed during 2006, with $201 million of capital commitments from institutional investors, including $10 million from Lazard Group, the principal portion of which will require funding at any time through 2008. As of June 30, 2007, Lazard Group contributed approximately $2.7 million of its capital commitment, with Lazard’s remaining commitment of approximately $7.3 million as of June 30, 2007 estimated to be funded in the amounts of $3.9 million and $3.4 million in the twelve month periods ending June 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
(d) The Company has agreements relating to future minimum payments to certain managing directors, senior advisors and employees incurred for the purpose of recruiting and retaining these senior professionals.
(e) The table above does not include:
  (1) any contingent obligations relating to the LAM equity rights;
  (2) any potential payment related to the IXIS cooperation arrangement (the level of this contingent payment to IXIS would depend, among other things, on the level of revenue generated by the cooperation activities, and the potential payment is limited, as of June 30, 2007, to a maximum of approximately €6 million (subject to further reduction in certain circumstances) which would only occur if the cooperation activities generate no revenue over the course of the remaining initial period of such activities, the cooperation agreement is not renewed and Lazard Ltd’s Class A common stock price fails to sustain certain price levels);
  (3) the contingent limited partner capital commitment as described in Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Form 10-K;
  (4) the lending commitments and indemnifications provided by LFB to third parties as described in Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Form 10-K;
  (5) the 2008 pension fund obligation of approximately $16.1 million as described in Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Form 10-K;
  (6) any contingent obligation related to the guarantee to a foreign tax jurisdiction as described in Note 7 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements; and
  (7) commitments related to the pending business acquisitions and joint venture investment as described in Note 1 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In addition the table above does not include any recognition of the May, 2008 settlement of the purchase contracts component of the ESUs which require the holders to purchase an aggregate of $437.5 million of the Company’s Class A common stock for cash or exchange of outstanding debt, depending on the success of the remarketing of such debt—see (a) above. This obligation is collateralized by the entire $437.5 million principal amount of Lazard Group Notes outstanding. See Note 2 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Also, the table above does not include any possible payments for uncertain tax positions. See Note 11 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

47


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Management’s discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of Lazard’s consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, Lazard evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, compensation liabilities, income taxes, investing activities and goodwill. Lazard bases these estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

Lazard believes that the critical accounting policies set forth below comprise the most significant estimates and judgments used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

Lazard generates substantially all of its net revenue from providing financial advisory and asset management services to clients. Lazard recognizes revenue when the following criteria are met:

 

   

there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement with a client,

 

   

the agreed-upon services have been provided,

 

   

fees are fixed or determinable, and

 

   

collection is probable.

 

Lazard’s clients generally enter into agreements with Lazard that vary in duration depending on the nature of the service provided. Lazard typically bills clients for the full amounts due under the applicable agreements on or after the dates on which the specified service has been provided. Generally, payments are collected within 60 days of billing (or over longer periods of time with respect to billings related to restructurings and our private fund advisory activities). The Company also earns performance-based incentive fees on some investment products, such as hedge funds and merchant banking funds. Incentive fees on hedge funds generally are recorded at the end of the year, when potential uncertainties regarding the ultimate realizable amounts have been determined, and typically are calculated based on a specified percentage of a fund’s net appreciation during the year. Incentive fees on hedge funds generally are subject to loss carry-forward provisions in which losses incurred by the funds in any year are applied against future period net appreciation before any incentive fees can be earned.

 

Lazard assesses whether collection is probable based on a number of factors, including past transaction history with the client and an assessment of the client’s current creditworthiness. If, in Lazard’s judgment, collection of a fee is not probable, Lazard will not recognize revenue until the uncertainty is removed. In rare cases, an allowance for doubtful accounts may be established, for example, if a fee is in dispute or litigation has commenced.

 

Income Taxes

 

As part of the process of preparing its consolidated financial statements, Lazard is required to estimate its income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. This process requires Lazard to estimate its actual current tax liability and to assess temporary differences resulting from differing book versus tax treatment of items, such as deferred revenue, compensation and benefits expense, unrealized gains on long-term investments and depreciation. These temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within Lazard’s consolidated statements of financial condition. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized and, when necessary, valuation allowances are established. Significant management judgment is

 

48


Table of Contents

required in determining Lazard’s provision for income taxes, its deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against its net deferred tax assets. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the level of historical taxable income, scheduled reversals of deferred taxes, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies that can be implemented by the Company in making this assessment. If actual results differ from these estimates or Lazard adjusts these estimates in future periods, Lazard may need to adjust its valuation allowance, which could materially impact Lazard’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

 

In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”), which became effective beginning in 2007 and clarifies the more likely than not criteria included in FASB Statement No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes,” that must be met prior to recognition of the financial statement benefit of a tax position taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also requires the recognition of a liability for differences between tax positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the financial statements. Management applies the more likely than not criteria included in FIN 48 when estimating its income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. See Note 11 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein regarding the adoption of FIN 48.

 

In addition, in order to determine its quarterly tax rate, Lazard is required to estimate full year pre-tax income and the related annual income tax expense in each jurisdiction. Tax exposures can involve complex issues and may require an extended period of time to resolve. Changes in the geographic mix or estimated level of annual pre-tax income can affect Lazard’s overall effective tax rate. Significant management judgment is required in determining Lazard’s provision for income taxes, its deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against its net deferred tax assets. Furthermore, Lazard’s interpretation of complex tax laws may impact its measurement of current and deferred income taxes.

 

Valuation of Investments

 

“Long-term investments” consist principally of investments in merchant banking and alternative investment funds, and other privately managed investments. These investments as well as those included in securities owned, are carried at fair value on the consolidated statements of financial condition, with unrealized gains and losses reflected net on the consolidated statements of income. Gains and losses on positions held in long-term investments and securities owned, which arise from sales or changes in the fair value of the investments, are not predictable and can cause periodic fluctuations in net income.

 

Where applicable, the fair value of a publicly traded investment is determined by quoted market prices. Most of the Company’s investments included in “long-term investments,” however, are not publicly traded and, as a result, are valued based upon management’s best estimate. The fair value of such investments is based upon an analysis of the investee’s financial results, condition, cash flows and prospects. The carrying value of such investments is adjusted when changes in the underlying fair values are readily ascertainable, generally as evidenced by third party transactions or transactions that directly affect the value of such investments. Adjustments also are made, in the absence of third-party transactions, if Lazard determines that the expected realizable value of the investment differs from its carrying value. In reaching that determination, Lazard considers many factors, including, but not limited to, the operating cash flows and financial performance of the investee, expected exit timing and strategy, and any specific rights or terms associated with the investment, such as conversion features and liquidation preferences. The Company’s investments in partnership interests, including general partnership and limited partnership interests in real estate funds, are recorded at fair value based on changes in the fair value of the partnerships’ underlying net assets.

 

Because of the inherent uncertainty in the valuation of investments that are not readily marketable, estimated values may differ significantly from the values that would have been reported had a ready market for such investments existed. Lazard seeks to maintain the necessary resources, with the appropriate experience and training, to ensure that control and independent price verification functions are adequately performed.

 

49


Table of Contents

Goodwill

 

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” goodwill is tested for impairment annually or more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. In this process, Lazard makes estimates and assumptions in order to determine the fair value of its assets and liabilities and to project future earnings using valuation techniques, including a discounted cash flow model. Lazard uses its best judgment and information available to it at the time to perform this review. Because Lazard’s assumptions and estimates are used in projecting future earnings as part of the valuation, actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Consolidation of VIEs

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Lazard Group and all other entities in which we are the primary beneficiary or control. Lazard determines whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity by first evaluating whether the entity is a voting interest entity or a variable interest entity (“VIE”) under U.S. GAAP.

 

   

Voting Interest Entities.    Voting interest entities are entities in which (i) the total equity investment at risk is sufficient to enable the entity to finance itself independently and (ii) the equity holders have the obligation to absorb losses, the right to receive residual returns and the right to make decisions about the entity’s activities. Voting interest entities are consolidated in accordance with Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” as amended by SFAS No. 94, “Consolidated Financial Statements.” ARB No. 51 states that the usual condition for a controlling financial interest in an entity is ownership of a majority voting interest. SFAS No. 94 amends ARB No. 51 to require consolidation of all majority-owned subsidiaries unless control is temporary or does not rest with the majority owner. SFAS No. 94 also requires consolidation of a majority-owned subsidiary even if it has non-homogeneous operations, a large minority interest, or a foreign location. Accordingly, Lazard consolidates voting interest entities in which it has the majority of the voting interest in accordance with ARB No. 51 and SFAS No. 94.

 

   

Variable Interest Entities.    VIEs are entities that lack one or more of the characteristics of a voting interest entity. A controlling financial interest in a VIE is present when an enterprise has a variable interest, or a combination of variable interests, that will absorb a majority of the VIE’s expected losses, receive a majority of the VIE’s expected residual returns, or both. The enterprise with a controlling financial interest, known as the primary beneficiary, consolidates the VIE.

 

Lazard determines whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE by first performing a qualitative analysis of the VIE that includes, among other factors, its capital structure, contractual terms, and related party relationships. Where qualitative analysis is not conclusive, Lazard performs a quantitative analysis. For purposes of allocating a VIE’s expected losses and expected residual returns to the VIE’s variable interest holders, Lazard calculates its share of the VIE’s expected losses and expected residual returns using a cash flows model that allocates those expected losses and residual returns to it, based on contractual arrangements and/or Lazard’s position in the capital structure of the VIE under various scenarios. Lazard would reconsider its assessment of whether it is the primary beneficiary if there are changes to any of the variables used in determining the primary beneficiary. Those variables may include changes to financial arrangements, contractual terms, capital structure and related party relationships.

 

In accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 46R the assets, liabilities and results of operations of the VIE are included in the consolidated financial statements of Lazard if it is determined that we are the primary beneficiary. Any third party interest in these consolidated entities is reflected as minority interest in our consolidated financial statements.

 

50


Table of Contents

Risk Management

 

We encounter risk as part of the normal course of our business and we design risk management processes to help manage such risks considering both the nature of our business and our operating model. The Company is subject to varying degrees of credit, market, operational and liquidity risks (see “—Liquidity and Capital Resources”) and monitors these risks on a consolidated basis. Management within each of Lazard’s operating locations are principally responsible for managing the risks within its respective businesses on a day-to day basis.

 

Market and Credit Risks

 

Lazard, in general, is not a capital-intensive organization and is not subject to significant credit or market risks. Nevertheless, Lazard has established procedures to assess both the credit and market risk, as well as specific interest rate, currency and credit limits related to various positions.

 

With respect to LFB’s operations, LFB engages in commercial banking activities that primarily include investing in securities, deposit taking and, to a lesser degree, lending. In addition, LFB may take open foreign exchange positions with a view to profit, but does not sell foreign exchange options in this context, and enters into forward foreign exchange contracts, interest rate swaps, and other derivative contracts to hedge exposures to interest rate and currency fluctuations.

 

At June 30, 2007, approximately 75% of the $648 million of securities owned, at fair value, were in LFB’s portfolio, substantially all of which were fixed-income securities, 86% of which were rated investment grade credit quality. Most of the remaining 25% of securities, at fair value, owned represent the Company’s investment in accounts managed by LAM. These funds primarily invest in marketable equity securities and are therefore subject to market risk which is monitored daily by management. At December 31, 2006, approximately 95% of the $579 million of securities owned, at fair value, were in LFB’s portfolio, substantially all of which were fixed-income securities, 88% of which were rated investment grade credit quality. The remaining 5% of securities owned, at fair value, represent the Company’s investment in accounts managed by LAM.

 

At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, derivative contracts related to LFB’s operations were recorded at fair value. Derivative assets amounted to $15 million and $7 million, respectively, with derivative liabilities amounting to $1 million and $2 million, respectively.

 

The primary market risks associated with LFB’s securities portfolio, foreign exchange, hedging and lending activities is sensitivity to changes in the general level of credit spreads and, with respect to foreign currency risk, specific exchange rate spreads. The risk management strategies that we employ use various risk sensitivity metrics to measure such risks and to examine behavior under significant adverse market conditions.

 

   

LFB’s interest rate risk as measured by a 1% +/– change in interest rates totaled $365 thousand as of June 30, 2007 and $65 thousand as of December 31, 2006.

 

   

Foreign currency risk associated with LFB’s open positions, in aggregate, as measured by a 2% +/- change against the U.S. dollar, totaled approximately $30 thousand as of June 30, 2007 and $80 thousand as of December 31, 2006.

 

LFB fully collateralizes its collateralized financing transactions with fixed income securities.

 

Risks Related to Receivables

 

We maintain an allowance for bad debts to provide coverage for probable losses from our fee and customer receivables. We determine the adequacy of the allowance by estimating the probability of loss based on management’s analysis of the client’s creditworthiness and specifically reserve against exposures where, in our judgment, the receivables are impaired. At June 30, 2007 total receivables amounted to $894 million, net of an allowance for bad debts of $13 million. As of that date, inter-bank lending, financial advisory and asset management fee, customer and related party receivables comprised 48%, 42%, 7% and 3% of total receivables,

 

51


Table of Contents

respectively. At December 31, 2006 total receivables amounted to $1,235 million, net of allowance for bad debts of $11 million. As of that date, inter-bank lending, financial advisory and asset management fee, customer and related party receivables comprised 58%, 34%, 6% and 2% of total receivables, respectively. The M&A and asset management fee receivables collection periods generally are within 60 days of invoice. However, as discussed above, the collection period for restructuring transactions may extend beyond 60 days, and fee receivables from our private fund advisory activities are generally collected over a four year period.

 

Credit Concentration

 

To reduce the exposure to concentrations of credit from banking activities within LFB, the Company has established limits for corporate counterparties and monitors the exposure against such limits. At June 30, 2007 the Company had no exposure to an individual counterparty that exceeded $43 million, in the aggregate, excluding inter-bank counterparties.

 

Risks Related to Short-Term Investments and Corporate Indebtedness

 

A significant portion of the Company’s liabilities has fixed interest rates or maximum interest rates, while its cash and short-term investments generally have floating interest rates. Lazard estimates that operating income relating to cash and short-term investments and corporate indebtedness would change by approximately $11 million, on an annual basis, in the event interest rates were to increase or decrease by 1%.

 

Operational Risks

 

Operational risk is inherent in our business and may, for example, manifest itself in the form of errors, breaches in the system of internal controls, business interruptions, fraud or legal actions due to operating deficiencies or noncompliance. The Company maintains a framework including policies and a system of internal controls designed to monitor and manage operational risk and provide management with timely and accurate information. Management within each of the operating companies is primarily responsible for its operational risk programs. The Company has in place a business continuity and disaster recovery programs that manages its capabilities to provide services in the case of a disruption. We purchase insurance programs designed to protect the Company against accidental loss and losses, which may significantly affect our financial objectives, personnel, property, or our ability to continue to meet our responsibilities to our various stakeholder groups.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

 

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies to other accounting pronouncements that require the use of fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for interim and annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently assessing the impact of adopting SFAS 157 on the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the Company.

 

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits an entity to elect to measure various financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. It provides entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. This Statement requires that a business entity report unrealized gains and losses, on items for which the fair value option has been elected, in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of the first annual period beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently assessing the impact of adopting SFAS 159 on the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the Company.

 

52


Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

Risk Management

 

Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are included under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Risk Management.”

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) are effective, in all material respects, to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

In addition, no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

53


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

 

Our businesses, as well as the financial services industry generally, are subject to extensive regulation throughout the world. We are involved in a number of judicial, regulatory and arbitration proceedings and inquiries concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of our businesses. We believe, based on currently available information, that the results of such proceedings, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition but might be material to our operating results or cash flows for any particular period, depending upon the operating results for such period.

 

In 2004, we received a request for information from the NASD as part of an industry investigation relating to gifts and gratuities, which was focused primarily on Lazard’s former Capital Markets business, which business was transferred to LFCM Holdings as a part of the separation. In addition, we received requests for information from the NASD, SEC and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts seeking information concerning gifts and entertainment involving an unaffiliated mutual fund company, which are also focused on that same business. In the course of an internal review of these matters, there were resignations or discipline of certain individuals associated with Lazard’s former Capital Markets business. These investigations are continuing and we cannot predict their potential outcomes, which outcomes, if any, could include the consequences discussed under the caption “Regulation” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 

Except as discussed below, there were no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

 

On June 14, 2007, the Chairman and the Ranking Republican Member of the United States Senate Committee on Finance introduced legislation that would tax as corporations those publicly traded partnerships that directly or indirectly derive any income from investment adviser or asset management services. This new legislation, if enacted in its proposed form, would be effective as of June 14, 2007, and, under a transition rule, it would apply to Lazard Ltd in respect of Lazard Ltd’s taxable year beginning January 1, 2013. This new legislation, if enacted in its proposed form, may impact, negatively or positively, Lazard Ltd’s U.S. tax liability. At this time we are unable to predict with any degree of certainty the impact, if any, this proposed legislation will have on our effective tax rate in 2013 and thereafter.

 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

Lazard Ltd did not issue any unregistered equity securities during the three month period ended June 30, 2007. As described in Note 1 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Lazard Ltd and/or certain of its subsidiaries have entered into agreements to acquire certain businesses since the end of such three month period, with a portion of such consideration consisting of future issuance of Class A common stock as described therein. In addition, on August 6, 2007, Lazard Ltd issued 191,757 shares of Class A common stock in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (transactions not involving a public offering) in connection with the exchange and redemption of 191,757 common membership interests of Lazard Group by one of Lazard’s retired managing directors.

 

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

None.

 

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

On May 8, 2007, Lazard Ltd held its Annual General Meeting of Shareholders at which the shareholders voted upon (i) the re-election of Ellis Jones, Anthony Orsatelli, and Hal S. Scott, to the Board of Directors as Class II directors, each for a three-year term, and (ii) the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Lazard’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2007 and authorization of Lazard’s Board of Directors, acting by its Audit Committee, to set their remuneration.

 

54


Table of Contents

The shareholders re-elected all three directors and approved the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Lazard’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2007. On each matter voted upon, the Class A common stock and Class B common stock voted together as a single class. The number of votes cast for, against or withheld and the number of abstentions with respect to each matter voted upon, as applicable, is set forth below.

 

         For

   Against/
Withheld


   Abstain

   Broker
Non-Votes


1.

 

Election of Directors:

                   
   

Ellis Jones

  

71,573,181

  

1,341,633

   *    *
   

Anthony Orsatelli

  

70,050,218

  

2,864,596

   *    *
   

Hal S. Scott

  

72,162,872

  

751,942

   *    *

2.

  Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Lazard’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2007 and authorization of Lazard’s Board of Directors, acting by its Audit Committee, to set their remuneration.    72,559,627    346,176    9,011    *

* Not applicable

 

Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes. Members of each class serve for a three-year term. Shareholders elect one class of directors at each Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. Each of the following directors’ term of office continued after the 2007 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders: Bruce Wasserstein, Ronald J. Doerfler, Steven J. Heyer, Sylvia Jay, Vernon E. Jordan, Jr., and Michael J. Turner.

 

Item 5. Other Information

 

See Item 2.

 

Item 6. Exhibits

 

2.1    Master Separation Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2005, by and among the Registrant, Lazard Group LLC, LAZ-MD Holdings LLC and LFCM Holdings LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on June 16, 2005).
2.2   

Amendment No. 1, dated as of November 6, 2006, to the Master Separation Agreement,

dated as of May 10, 2005, by and among the Registrant, Lazard Group LLC and LAZ-MD Holdings LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on November 7, 2006).

2.3    Class B-1 and Class C Members Transaction Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (File No. 333-121407) on Form S-1 filed on December 17, 2004).
3.1    Certificate of Incorporation and Memorandum of Association of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (File No. 333-121407) on Form S-1/A filed on March 21, 2005).
3.2    Certificate of Incorporation in Change of Name of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (File No. 333-121407) on Form S-1/A filed on March 21, 2005).
3.3    Amended and Restated Bye-laws of Lazard Ltd (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on June 16, 2005).
4.1    Form of Specimen Certificate for Class A common stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (File No. 333-121407) on Form S-1/A filed on April 11, 2005).
4.2    Indenture, dated as of May 10, 2005, by and between Lazard Group LLC and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Lazard Group LLC’s Registration Statement (File No. 333-126751) on Form S-4 filed on July 21, 2005).

 

55


Table of Contents
4.3    Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 19, 2005, by and among Lazard Group LLC, The Bank of New York, as trustee, and for purposes of consent, Lazard Group Finance LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.02 to the Lazard Group LLC’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission File No. 333-126751) filed on December 19, 2005).
4.4    Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 21, 2007, between Lazard Group LLC and The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32492) filed on June 22, 2007).
4.5    Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 21, 2007, among Lazard Group LLC, Goldman, Sachs & Co., Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as representatives for the Initial Purchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32492) filed on June 22, 2007).
4.6    Purchase Contract Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2005, by and between the Registrant and The Bank of New York, as Purchase Contract Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on June 16, 2005).
4.7    Pledge Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2005, by and among the Registrant, The Bank of New York, as Collateral Agent, Custodial Agent and Securities Intermediary and The Bank of New York, as Purchase Contract Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on June 16, 2005).
4.8    Pledge Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2005, by and among Lazard Group Finance LLC, The Bank of New York, as Collateral Agent, Custodial Agent and Securities Intermediary and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on June 16, 2005).
4.9    Form of Normal Equity Security Units Certificate (included in Exhibit 4.4).
4.10    Form of Stripped Equity Security Units Certificate (included in Exhibit 4.4).
4.11    Form of Senior Note (included in Exhibit 4.3).
10.1    Amended and Restated Stockholders’ Agreement, dated as of November 6, 2006, by and among LAZ-MD Holdings LLC, the Registrant and certain members of LAZ-MD Holdings LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on November 7, 2006).
10.2    Operating Agreement of Lazard Group LLC, dated as of May 10, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on June 16, 2005).
10.3    Amendment No. 1 to the Operating Agreement of Lazard Group LLC, dated as of December 19, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to the Lazard Group LLC’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 333-126751) filed on December 19, 2005).
10.4    Tax Receivable Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2005, by and among Ltd Sub A, Ltd Sub B and LFCM Holdings LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on June 16, 2005).
10.5    Employee Benefits Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2005, by and among the Registrant, Lazard Group LLC, LAZ-MD Holdings LLC and LFCM Holdings LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on June 16, 2005).

 

56


Table of Contents
10.6      Insurance Matters Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2005, by and between Lazard Group LLC and LFCM Holdings LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on June 16, 2005).
10.7      License Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2005, by and among Lazard Strategic Coordination Company, LLC, Lazard Frères & Co. LLC, Lazard Frères S.A.S., Lazard & Co. Holdings Limited and LFCM Holdings LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on June 16, 2005).
10.8      Administrative Services Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2005, by and among LAZ-MD Holdings LLC, LFCM Holdings LLC and Lazard Group LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on June 16, 2005).
10.9      Business Alliance Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2005, by and between Lazard Group LLC and LFCM Holdings LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on June 16, 2005).
10.10      First Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Lazard Asset Management LLC, dated as of January 10, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (File No. 333-121407) on Form S-1/A filed on February 11, 2005).
10.11      Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Lazard Strategic Coordination Company LLC, dated as of January 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (File No. 333-121407) on Form S-1/A filed on February 11, 2005).
10.12      Lease, dated as of January 27, 1994, by and between Rockefeller Center Properties and Lazard Frères & Co. LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (File No. 333-121407) on Form S-1/A filed on February 11, 2005).
10.13      Lease with an Option to Purchase, dated as of July 11, 1990, by and between Sicomibail and Finabail and SCI du 121 Boulevard Hausmann (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (File No. 333-121407) on Form S-1/A filed on February 11, 2005).
10.14      Occupational Lease, dated as of August 9, 2002, Burford (Stratton) Nominee 1 Limited, Burford (Stratton) Nominee 2 Limited, Burford (Stratton) Limited, Lazard & Co., Limited and Lazard LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (File No. 333-121407) on Form S-1/A filed on February 11, 2005).
10.15 *    2005 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (File No. 333-121407) on Form S-1/A filed on May 2, 2005).
10.16 *    2005 Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (File No. 333-121407) on Form S-1/A filed on March 21, 2005).
10.17 *    Agreement Relating to Retention and Noncompetition and Other Covenants, dated as of May 4, 2005, by and among Lazard Ltd, Lazard Group LLC and Bruce Wasserstein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on June 16, 2005).
10.18 *    Agreement Relating to Reorganization of Lazard, dated as of May 10, 2005, by and among Lazard LLC and Bruce Wasserstein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on June 16, 2005).

 

57


Table of Contents
10.19 *    Agreement Relating to Retention and Noncompetition and Other Covenants, dated as of May 4, 2005, by and among the Registrant, Lazard Group LLC and Steven J. Golub (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on June 16, 2005).
10.20 *    Form of Agreement Relating to Retention and Noncompetition and Other Covenants, dated as of May 4, 2005, applicable to, and related Schedule I for, each of Michael J. Castellano, Scott D. Hoffman and Charles G. Ward III (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on June 16, 2005).
10.21 *    Agreements Relating to Retention and Noncompetition and Other Covenants (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (File No. 333-121407) on Form S-1/A filed on April 11, 2005).
10.22 *    Amended and Restated Letter Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2004, between Vernon E. Jordan, Jr. and Lazard Frères & Co. LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on June 16, 2005).
10.23 *    Acknowledgement Letter, dated as of November 6, 2006 from Lazard Group LLC to certain managing directors of Lazard Group LLC modifying the terms of the retention agreements of persons party to the Amended and Restated Stockholders’ Agreement, dated as of November 6, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on November 7, 2006).
10.24      Letter Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2005, from IXIS Corporate and Investment Bank to Lazard LLC and Lazard Ltd (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (File No. 333-121407) on Form S-1/A filed on March 21, 2005).
10.25      Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2005 by and among Lazard Group Finance LLC, the Registrant, Lazard Group LLC and IXIS Corporate and Investment Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on June 16, 2005).
10.26      Letter Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2005, with Bruce Wasserstein family trusts (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on June 16, 2005).
10.27      Senior Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2005, among Lazard Group LLC, the Banks from time to time parties thereto, Citibank, N.A., The Bank of New York, New York Branch, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on June 16, 2005).
10.28      First Amendment, dated as of March 28, 2006, to the Senior Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2005, among Lazard Group LLC, the Banks from time to time parties thereto, Citibank, N.A., The Bank of New York, New York Branch, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on May 11, 2006).
10.29      Second Amendment, dated as of May 17, 2006, to the Senior Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2005, among Lazard Group LLC, the Banks from time to time parties thereto, Citibank, N.A., The Bank of New York, New York Branch, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8- K (File No. 001-32492) filed on May 17, 2006).
10.30      Third Amendment, dated as of June 18, 2007, to the Senior Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2005, among Lazard Group LLC, the Banks from time to time parties thereto, Citibank, N.A., The Bank of New York, New York Branch, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32492) filed on June 22, 2007).

 

58


Table of Contents
10.31 *    Description of Non-Executive Director Compensation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005).
10.32 *    Form of Award Letter for Annual Grant of Deferred Stock Units to Non-Executive Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32492) filed on September 8, 2005).
10.33 *    Form of Agreement evidencing a grant of Restricted Stock Units to Executive Officers under the Lazard Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32492 filed on January 26, 2006).
10.34 *   

Description of Non-Executive Director Compensation (incorporated by reference to

Exhibit 10.33 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005).

10.35 *   

Form of Award Letter for Annual Grant of Deferred Stock Units to Non-Executive Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32492) filed on September 8, 2005).

10.36 *   

Form of Agreement evidencing a grant of Restricted Stock Units to Executive Officers under the Lazard Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32492) filed on January 26, 2006).

10.37     

Termination Agreement dated as of March 31, 2006, by and among Banca Intesa S.p.A., Lazard Group LLC, and Lazard & Co. S.r.l. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32492) filed on April 4, 2006).

10.38     

Amended and Restated $150 Million Subordinated Convertible Promissory Note due 2018, issued by Lazard Funding LLC to Banca Intesa S.p.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32492) filed on May 17, 2006).

10.39     

Amended and Restated Guaranty of Lazard Group LLC to Banca Intesa S.p.A., dated as of May 15, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32492) filed on May 17, 2006).

10.40 *   

Directors’ Fee Deferral Unit Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on May 11, 2006).

10.41 *    First amended Form of Agreement evidencing a grant of Restricted Stock Units to Executive Officers under the Lazard 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 to Registrant’s Annual Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-K filed on March 1, 2007).
12.1      Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
14.1      Registrant’s Code of Conduct and Ethics (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-32492) filed on March 21, 2006).
31.1      Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Bruce Wasserstein.
31.2      Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Michael J. Castellano.
32.1      Section 1350 Certification for Bruce Wasserstein.
32.2      Section 1350 Certification for Michael J. Castellano.

* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

 

59


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

Date: August 9, 2007

 

LAZARD LTD

By:  

/s/    Bruce Wasserstein


   

Name: Bruce Wasserstein

Title:   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

By:  

/s/    Michael J. Castellano


   

Name: Michael J. Castellano

Title:   Chief Financial Officer

 

60