(1) In the second quarter of fiscal 2008, we implemented a restructuring plan. This action affects the comparability of this data.

(2) In the second quarter of fiscal 2007, we implemented a restructuring plan and received a discrete tax benefit of $46.0 million from the settlement of certain tax disputes with the U.S. and Singapore taxing authorities. These actions affect the comparability of this data.

(3) In the first half of fiscal 2008, we recorded a gain of $6.7 million on the sale of certain properties and implemented restructuring plans. These actions affect the comparability of this data.

(4) In the first half of fiscal 2007, we recorded an impairment charge of $13.2 million related to the Snap server portion of our systems business, implemented restructuring plans and received a discrete tax benefit of $46.0 million from the settlement of certain tax disputes with the U.S. and Singapore taxing authorities. These actions affect the comparability of this data.

Net Revenues.

                                                           Three-Month Period Ended       Six-Month Period Ended
                                                                September 30,                  September 30,
                                                         ----------------------------   ---------------------------
                                                                           Percentage                     Percentage
                                                          2007     2006      Change       2007     2006    Change
                                                         -------  -------  ----------   -------  -------  ---------
                                                                     (in millions, except percentages)
Segment Net Revenues:                                                                                              
DPS                                                     $  37.6  $  64.2         (41)% $  73.7  $ 121.5        (39)%
SSG                                                         6.4      6.1           5 %    12.7     13.8         (8)%
Other                                                        --      3.3        (100)%      --      7.3       (100)%
                                                         -------  -------               -------  -------
    Total Net Revenues                                     44.0     73.6         (40)%    86.4    142.6        (39)%
                                                         =======  =======               =======  =======

Revenues from our DPS segment decreased by $26.6 million and $47.8 million in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2008, respectively compared to the corresponding periods of fiscal 2007, primarily due to a decline in unit sales of our parallel SCSI products of $26.1 million and $50.6 million, respectively, which was partially offset by an increase in sales of our serial products of $0.2 million and $3.8 million, respectively. The decline in sales volumes of our parallel SCSI products was primarily attributable to the industry transition from parallel to serial products, in which we have a lower market share. We expect revenues for our parallel SCSI products to continue to decline. The DPS segment was also negatively impacted by a decline in sales of our legacy SATA products sold primarily to OEM customers, which are a part of our serial products. We expect revenues for our SATA products sold to our OEM customers to continue to decline, as certain of our customers have moved to other suppliers to obtain next generation SATA technologies. For example, in the second quarter of fiscal 2008, a significant customer notified us that we did not receive design wins for our next generation serial products, which will have a significant negative impact on our revenues beginning in approximately six months.

Revenues from our SSG segment increased by $0.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2007 primarily due to increased sales of our storage server products, which included new products that launched in the second quarter of fiscal 2008. Revenues from our SSG segment decreased by $1.1 million in the first half of fiscal 2008 compared to the first half of fiscal 2007 primarily as a result of a decline in unit sales of our legacy server products. We have invested in additional sales and marketing resources in our SSG segment in an effort to grow this business.

Revenues from our other category decreased by $3.3 million and $7.3 million in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2008, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of fiscal 2007 due to our decision to wind down our DSG business at March 31, 2007.

                                                                   Three-Month Period Ended  Six-Month Period Ended
                                                                         September 30,             September 30,
                                                                   ------------------------  ------------------------
                                                                      2007         2006         2007         2006
                                                                   -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
Geographical Revenues:                                                                                               
North America                                                              43 %         44 %         45 %         45 %
Europe                                                                     26 %         24 %         26 %         24 %
Pacific Rim                                                                31 %         32 %         29 %         31 %
                                                                   -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
    Total Geographical Revenues                                           100 %        100 %        100 %        100 %
                                                                   ===========  ===========  ===========  ===========

Our overall international revenues remained relatively flat as a percentage of our total revenues in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2008 as compared to the corresponding periods of fiscal 2007.

A small number of our customers account for a substantial portion of our net revenues, and we expect that a limited number of customers will continue to represent a substantial portion of our net revenues for the foreseeable future. In the second quarter of fiscal 2008, IBM, Tech Data and Ingram Micro accounted for 33%, 14% and 10% of our total net revenues, respectively. In the second quarter of fiscal 2007, IBM and Dell accounted for 29% and 15% of our total net revenues, respectively. In the first half of fiscal 2008, IBM, Tech Data and Ingram Micro accounted for 35%, 12% and 11%of our total net revenues, respectively. In the first half of fiscal 2007, IBM and Dell accounted for 32% and 16% of our total net revenues, respectively.

Gross Margin.

                                                           Three-Month Period Ended       Six-Month Period Ended
                                                                September 30,                  September 30,
                                                         ----------------------------   ---------------------------
                                                                           Percentage                     Percentage
                                                          2007     2006      Change       2007     2006    Change
                                                         -------  -------  ----------   -------  -------  ---------
                                                                     (in millions, except percentages)             
Gross Profit                                            $  15.4  $  26.5         (42)% $  29.4  $  48.8        (40)%
Gross Margin                                                 35 %     36 %                  34 %     34 %

The slight decline in gross margin in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2007 and the lack of change in our gross margins in the first half of fiscal 2008 compared to the first half of fiscal 2007 was primarily due to certain manufacturing-related costs that are relatively fixed being spread over a smaller revenue base. This was offset by our improved standard product contributions due to our continued focus on improving product component costs, which impacted the second quarter of fiscal 2008, and to a lesser extent, the first half of fiscal 2008, compared to the corresponding periods of fiscal 2007. Our gross margins will be impacted in the future by the mix of OEM and channel revenue as well as product mix.

Research and Development Expense.

                                                           Three-Month Period Ended       Six-Month Period Ended
                                                                September 30,                  September 30,
                                                         ----------------------------   ---------------------------
                                                                           Percentage                     Percentage
                                                          2007     2006      Change       2007     2006    Change
                                                         -------  -------  ----------   -------  -------  ---------
                                                                     (in millions, except percentages)             
Research and development                                $  10.9  $  13.6         (20)% $  22.6  $  30.9        (27)%

The decrease in research and development expense in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2008 compared to the corresponding periods of fiscal 2007 was primarily due to reduced headcount and related expenses as a result of restructuring programs implemented in the first halves of fiscal 2007 and 2008, which resulted in an 18% decrease in headcount for employees engaged in research and development. We also decreased our infrastructure spending, had fewer engineering projects outstanding and had lower stock-based compensation expense of $0.6 million and $1.2 million in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2008, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of fiscal 2007 primarily due to the reduction in headcount.

Selling, Marketing and Administrative Expense.

                                                           Three-Month Period Ended       Six-Month Period Ended
                                                                September 30,                  September 30,
                                                         ----------------------------   ---------------------------
                                                                           Percentage                     Percentage
                                                          2007     2006      Change       2007     2006    Change
                                                         -------  -------  ----------   -------  -------  ---------
                                                                     (in millions, except percentages)             
Selling, marketing and administrative                   $  14.3  $  15.7          (9)% $  29.3  $  31.1         (6)%

The decrease in selling, marketing and administrative expense in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2008 compared to the corresponding periods of fiscal 2007 was primarily a result of reductions of our workforce and infrastructure spending as a result of the restructuring plans we implemented in the first halves of fiscal 2007 and 2008, which resulted in a 14% decrease in headcount for employees engaged in the selling, marketing and administrative functions. In addition, we had lower stock- based compensation expense of $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of fiscal 2007 primarily due to the reduction in headcount. This was partially offset by $0.2 million and $0.4 million of increased spending on marketing activities related to increased investments for our SSG segment in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2008, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of fiscal 2007.

Amortization of Acquisition-Related Intangible Assets.

                                                           Three-Month Period Ended       Six-Month Period Ended
                                                                September 30,                  September 30,
                                                         ----------------------------   ---------------------------
                                                                           Percentage                     Percentage
                                                          2007     2006      Change       2007     2006    Change
                                                         -------  -------  ----------   -------  -------  ---------
                                                                     (in millions, except percentages)             
Amortization of acquisition-related
    intangible assets                                   $   0.7  $   1.5         (51)% $   1.5  $   3.1        (52)%

Acquisition-related intangible assets include patents, core and existing technologies, customer relationships and trade names. We amortize the acquisition-related intangible assets over periods which reflect the pattern in which the economic benefits of the assets are expected to be realized, which is primarily using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, ranging from three months to five years.

The decrease in amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2007 was primarily due to intangible assets that became fully amortized in fiscal 2007 associated with our acquisitions of the IBM i/p Series RAID component business and Eurologic Systems Group Limited of $0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The decrease in amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets in the first half of fiscal 2008 compared to the first half of fiscal 2007 was primarily due to intangible assets that became fully amortized in fiscal 2007 associated with our acquisitions of the IBM i/p Series RAID component business and Eurologic Systems Group Limited of $0.9 million and $0.6 million, respectively.

Restructuring Charges.

                                                           Three-Month Period Ended       Six-Month Period Ended
                                                                September 30,                  September 30,
                                                         ----------------------------   ---------------------------
                                                                           Percentage                     Percentage
                                                          2007     2006      Change       2007     2006    Change
                                                         -------  -------  ----------   -------  -------  ---------
                                                                     (in millions, except percentages)             
Restructuring charges                                   $   3.4  $   1.1         216 % $   5.0  $   4.1         21 %

All expenses, including adjustments, associated with our restructuring plans are included in "Restructuring charges" in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and are not allocated to segments but rather managed at the corporate level. For a complete discussion of all restructuring actions that were implemented prior to fiscal 2008, please refer to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2008, management approved and initiated a plan to restructure our operations to reduce our operating expenses due to a declining revenue base by eliminating duplicative resources in all functions of the organization worldwide, resulting in a restructuring charge of $1.5 million. In addition, in the second quarter of fiscal 2008, we initiated additional actions in an effort to better align our cost structure with our anticipated OEM revenue stream and to improve our results of operations and cash flows. The total cost we expect to incur for this restructuring plan is approximately $5.0 million, of which we recorded approximately $3.5 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2008. Of the $3.5 million recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2008, $3.4 million related to severance and benefits for employee reductions primarily related to our OEM engineering resources and related support and service organizations worldwide and $0.1 million related to vacating redundant facilities, and contract termination costs.

As a result of our first quarter of fiscal 2008 restructuring plan, we began to reduce our annual operating expenses by approximately $4.7 million, beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2008, of which 30%, 6% and 64% has been reflected as a reduction in cost of revenues, research and development expense, and selling, marketing and administrative expense, respectively. These savings have been fully realized by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2008. As a result of our second quarter of fiscal 2008 restructuring plan, we expect to reduce our annual operating expenses by approximately $10.0 million, beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2008, of which 2%, 61% and 37% has been reflected as a reduction in cost of revenues, research and development expense, and selling, marketing and administrative expense, respectively. We expect these savings to be fully realized by the end of fiscal 2008.

We also recorded minimal accrual adjustments in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2008 primarily related to severance and benefits as actual costs were lower than anticipated. These accrual adjustments related to the restructuring plans that we implemented in the first and second quarters of fiscal 2007 and the first quarter of fiscal 2008.

Other Charges (Gains).

                                                           Three-Month Period Ended       Six-Month Period Ended
                                                                September 30,                  September 30,
                                                         ----------------------------   ---------------------------
                                                                           Percentage                     Percentage
                                                          2007     2006      Change       2007     2006    Change
                                                         -------  -------  ----------   -------  -------  ---------
                                                                     (in millions, except percentages)             
Other charges (gains)                                   $   0.1  $    --         100 % $  (5.8) $  13.9         n/a

Other charges (gains) consisted of asset impairment charges related to certain assets and gain on sale of certain properties.

In fiscal 2007, we decided to consolidate our properties in Milpitas, California to better align our business needs with existing operations and to provide more efficient use of our facilities. In May 2007, we completed the sale of certain of these properties with proceeds aggregating $19.9 million, which exceeded our carrying value of $12.5 million. Net of selling costs, we recorded a gain on the sale of the properties of $6.7 million in the first half of fiscal 2008 to "Other charges (gains)" in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

We regularly perform reviews to determine if facts or circumstances are present, either internal or external, which would indicate that the carrying values of our long-lived assets are impaired. If an asset is determined to be impaired, the loss is measured based on the difference between the asset's fair value and its carrying value. The estimate of fair value of the assets is based on discounting estimated future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with the risks inherent in our current business model. The estimation of the impairment involves numerous assumptions that require judgment by us, including, but not limited to, future use of the assets for our operations versus sale or disposal of the assets and future selling prices for our products.

At the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2007, with the decision to retain and operate the Snap Server portion of the systems business, we performed an impairment analysis of this business that indicated that the carrying amount of the long-lived assets exceeded their estimated fair value. This was due in part to the limited cash flows of the business and a number of uncertainties, which included the significant research and development expenditures necessary to grow the revenue of the Snap Server portion of the systems business and the significant uncertainties associated with achieving such growth in revenue. This resulted in an impairment charge of $13.2 million, which was recorded in "Other charges (gains)" in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations in the first half of fiscal 2007.

Interest and Other Income, Net.

                                                           Three-Month Period Ended       Six-Month Period Ended
                                                                September 30,                  September 30,
                                                         ----------------------------   ---------------------------
                                                                           Percentage                     Percentage
                                                          2007     2006      Change       2007     2006    Change
                                                         -------  -------  ----------   -------  -------  ---------
                                                                     (in millions, except percentages)             
Interest and other income, net:
Interest income                                         $   7.0  $   5.8          21 % $  13.7  $  11.5         19 %
Realized currency transaction gains (losses)                0.7     (0.1)         n/a      0.7      0.1        406 %
Other                                                       0.1      0.1          53 %     0.1      0.1         40 %
                                                         -------  -------               -------  -------
    Total interest and other income, net                    7.8      5.8          34 %    14.5     11.7         24 %
                                                         =======  =======               =======  =======

Interest and other income, net is primarily attributable to interest income earned on our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, fluctuations in foreign currency gains or losses and realized gains and losses on marketable securities. The increase in interest and other income, net in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2008 compared to the corresponding periods of fiscal 2007 was primarily due to higher interest rates, which resulted in additional income earned on our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, combined with maintaining higher average cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balances. This was partially offset by foreign currency fluctuations, primarily related to a stronger Euro compared to the United States dollar combined with increased balances in our European foreign entities whose functional currency is the United States Dollar.

Interest Expense.

                                                           Three-Month Period Ended       Six-Month Period Ended
                                                                September 30,                  September 30,
                                                         ----------------------------   ---------------------------
                                                                           Percentage                     Percentage
                                                          2007     2006      Change       2007     2006    Change
                                                         -------  -------  ----------   -------  -------  ---------
                                                                     (in millions, except percentages)             
Interest expense                                        $  (1.0) $  (0.9)          8 % $  (2.0) $  (1.8)        12 %

Interest expense is primarily associated with our 3/4% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023, or the 3/4% Notes, and 3% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2007, or the 3% Notes, issued in December 2003 and March 2002, respectively. Interest expense remained relatively flat for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2008 compared to the corresponding periods of fiscal 2007.

Income Taxes.

                                                           Three-Month Period Ended       Six-Month Period Ended
                                                                September 30,                  September 30,
                                                         ----------------------------   ---------------------------
                                                                           Percentage                     Percentage
                                                          2007     2006      Change       2007     2006    Change
                                                         -------  -------  ----------   -------  -------  ---------
                                                                     (in millions, except percentages)             
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes               $   0.3  $ (49.1)         n/a  $   0.5  $ (48.2)        n/a

Income tax provisions for interim periods are based on our estimated annual income tax rate for entities that were profitable. Entities that had operating losses with no tax benefit were excluded. The estimated annual tax for fiscal 2008 includes foreign taxes related to our foreign subsidiaries, certain state minimum taxes and interest accrued on prior years' tax disputes. The estimated annual tax for fiscal 2007 consisted of a discrete tax benefit attributable to settling certain tax disputes, foreign taxes related to our foreign subsidiaries, certain state minimum tax, and interest accrued on prior years' tax disputes. This resulted in a tax benefit of $49.1 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2007, of which $46.0 million was attributable to the discrete tax benefit. We are in ongoing negotiations with the IRS taxing authorities with regard to our tax disputes as discussed in further detail in Note 13 to Part I of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Commitments and Contingencies." Our tax rate for the period in which a settlement is reached will be impacted if the settlement materially differs from the amounts previously accrued.

On April 1, 2007, we adopted FIN 48, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109. As a result of implementing FIN 48 on April 1, 2007, we recognized a cumulative effect adjustment of $1.3 million as a reduction to the beginning balance of "Retained earnings" on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Following the adoption of FIN 48, we elected to recognize interest and/or penalties related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. To the extent that accrued interest and penalties do not ultimately become payable, amounts accrued will be reduced and reflected as a reduction of the overall income tax provision in the period that such determination is made. The amount of interest and penalties accrued at April 1, 2007, upon the adoption of FIN 48, was immaterial. In addition, no material amount was accrued during the first half of fiscal 2008.

As of September 30, 2007, our total gross unrecognized tax benefits were $20.3 million, of which $6.2 million if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate.

We are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income taxes in many U.S. states and foreign jurisdictions. As of the date of adoption of FIN 48, tax years 1994 through 2007 remained open to examination by the U.S. taxing authorities, tax years 1998 through 2007 remained open to examination in Singapore and tax years 2001 through 2007 remained open to examination in various foreign jurisdictions. There was no material change to our unrecognized tax benefits during the first half of fiscal 2008 and we do not anticipate that our total unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change during the next twelve months.

Discontinued Operations.

                                                           Three-Month Period Ended       Six-Month Period Ended
                                                                September 30,                  September 30,
                                                         ----------------------------   ---------------------------
                                                                           Percentage                     Percentage
                                                          2007     2006      Change       2007     2006    Change
                                                         -------  -------  ----------   -------  -------  ---------
                                                                     (in millions, except percentages)             
Income (loss) from
    discontinued operations                             $  (0.1) $   2.3          n/a  $  (0.1) $   3.9         n/a

The decrease in discontinued operations in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2008 compared to the corresponding periods of fiscal 2007 was primarily driven by the receipt of royalty revenue under the terms of the nonexclusive license agreement from the disposal of the IBM i/p Series RAID Business, which ceased in March 2007.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Operating cash activities consist of income (loss) from continuing operations, net of taxes, adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities. Non-cash items primarily consist of non-cash effect of tax settlement, impairment charges, sale of long-lived assets, depreciation and amortization of intangible assets, property and equipment, marketable securities and stock-based compensation expense in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R). Cash used in operating activities from continuing operations decreased to $3.4 million in the first half of fiscal 2008 compared to $9.7 million in the first half of fiscal 2007 primarily due to the fact that we recorded income from continuing operations, net of taxes, of $23.9 million in the first half of fiscal 2007, which decreased by $35.1 million to a loss from continuing operations, net of taxes, of $11.1 million in the first half of fiscal 2008, as well as due to a non-cash charge associated with the impairment of $13.2 million related to the Snap Server intangible assets that was recorded in the first half of fiscal 2007 and a gain on the sale of long-lived assets of $6.7 million, which was recorded in the first half of fiscal 2008. This was partially offset by a non-cash effect of $46.0 million from the release of tax reserves due to the settlement of certain tax disputes with the U.S. and Singapore taxing authorities that was recorded in the first half of fiscal 2007 and changes to working capital assets and liabilities from the first half of fiscal 2008 to the first half of fiscal 2007 that improved cash used in operations by $20.0 million, primarily related to reducing our inventory levels.

Investing cash activities primarily consist of purchases, sales and maturities of restricted marketable securities and marketable securities, net proceeds from the sale of long-lived assets and purchases of property and equipment. Cash provided by investing activities increased to $80.2 million in the first half of fiscal 2008 compared to cash used in investing activities of $43.0 million in the first half of fiscal 2007 primarily due to proceeds received from the sale of long-lived assets of $19.9 million and a decrease in purchases of marketable securities of $143.2 million. This was partially offset by a decrease in the sales and maturities of marketable securities of $42.8 million.

Financing cash activities primarily consist of employee stock option exercises. Cash provided by financing activities decreased to $2.6 million in the first half of fiscal 2008 compared to $4.3 million in the first half of fiscal 2007 primarily due to a decline in stock option exercises and a decline in purchases made under our employee stock purchase plan as the 1986 Employee Stock Purchase Plan expired in April 2006.

At September 30, 2007, we had $225.2 million of aggregate principal amount plus a premium related to our 3/4% Notes that is due in December 2023. Each holder of the 3/4% Notes may require us to purchase all or a portion of our 3/4% Notes on December 22, 2008 at a price equal to 100.25% of the par value of the 3/4% Notes to be purchased plus accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, each holder of the 3/4% Notes may require us to purchase all or a portion of our 3/4% Notes on December 22, 2013, on December 22, 2018 or upon the occurrence of a change of control (as defined in the indenture governing the 3/4% Notes) at a price equal to the principal amount of 3/4% Notes being purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest. We expect holders of the 3/4% Notes to exercise their put option in December 2008.

We are required to maintain restricted investments to serve as collateral for the first ten scheduled interest payments on our 3/4% Notes. As of September 30, 2007, we had $2.5 million of restricted marketable securities, consisting of United States government securities, of which $1.7 million was classified as short-term and $0.8 million was classified as long- term.

We were subject to IRS audits for our fiscal years 1994 through 2003. During the third quarter of fiscal 2007, we reached resolution with the United States taxing authorities on all outstanding audit issues relating to those fiscal years. However, our tax provision continues to reflect judgment and estimation regarding components of the settlement such as interest calculations and the application of the settlements to state and local taxing jurisdictions. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the ultimate tax outcome may materially differ from the tax amounts recorded in our condensed consolidated financial statements and may cause a higher effective tax rate that could materially affect our income tax provision, results of operations or cash flows in the period or periods for which such determination is made. The IRS is currently auditing our Federal income tax returns for the fiscal 2004 through 2006 audit cycle. We believe that we have provided sufficient tax provisions for these years and the ultimate outcome of the IRS audits will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position or results of operations in future periods. However, we cannot predict with certainty how these matters will be resolved and whether we will be required to make additional tax payments.

We may enter into strategic alliances, partnerships or acquisitions that will enable us to better scale our operations relative to our cost basis. If we are successful in identifying strategic alliances, partnerships or acquisitions, we may be required to use a significant portion of our available cash balances.

As of September 30, 2007, we did not have any material changes to our contractual obligations that were disclosed in the Liquidity section of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, other than the impact of the adoption of FIN 48. Total liabilities associated with FIN 48 uncertain tax positions were $5.9 million, of which $0.7 million was included in "Accrued and other liabilities" on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2007, as it is expected to be paid within the next twelve months. The remainder of our liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions of $5.2 million was included in "Other long-term liabilities" on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2007. Due to the complexity and uncertainty associated with our tax controversies, we can not make a reasonably reliable estimate of the period in which cash settlement will be made for our liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions in "Other Long-term liabilities."

We believe that liquidity provided by our existing working capital, together with expected cash flows from operations and available sources of equity and equipment financing, will be sufficient to support our operations through at least the next twelve months. However, should prevailing economic conditions and/or financial, business and other factors beyond our control adversely affect our estimates of our future cash requirements; we would be required to fund our cash requirements by alternative financing. There can be no assurance that additional financing, if needed, would be available on terms acceptable to us or at all.

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, which permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation. SFAS No. 155 also clarifies and amends certain other provisions of SFAS No. 133 and SFAS No. 140. SFAS No. 155 is effective for all hybrid financial instruments held, obtained or issued by us for fiscal years beginning with our fiscal 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 155 did not have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, which defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance regarding the methods used for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective beginning with our fiscal 2009, and interim periods within that fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact that SFAS No. 157 will have on our results of operations and financial position.

In February 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 159, which permits companies to choose to measure certain financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The standard requires that unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected be reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective beginning with our fiscal 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact that SFAS No. 159 will have on our results of operations and financial position.

In June 2007, the FASB ratified EITF No. 07-3, which requires nonrefundable advance research and development payments for goods and services to be deferred and capitalized and subsequently expensed when the research and development activities are performed, subject to an assessment of recoverability. EITF No. 07-03 is effective for new contractual arrangements entered into beginning with our fiscal 2009, and interim periods within that fiscal year. We do not believe EITF No. 07-03 will have a material effect on our results of operations and financial position.

Our critical accounting policies have not changed from our fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, except for the following critical accounting policy:

Income Taxes: On April 1, 2007, we adopted FIN 48, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 requires a two-step process to determine the amount of tax benefit to be recognized. First, the tax position must be evaluated to determine the likelihood that it will be sustained upon external examination. If the tax position is deemed "more-likely-than-not" to be sustained, the tax position is then assessed to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in our financial statements. The amount of the benefit that may be recognized is the largest amount that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Prior to the adoption of FIN 48, our policy was to classify accruals for uncertain positions as a current liability unless it was highly probable that there would not be a payment or settlement for such identified risks for a period of at least a year. In addition, upon the adoption of FIN 48, we elected to recognize interest and/or penalties related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

For a complete description of what we believe to be the other critical accounting policies that affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007.

On September 30, 2005, we entered into a series of arrangements with IBM pursuant to which we sold our IBM i/p Series RAID business to IBM. Under the terms of the agreements, we granted IBM a nonexclusive license to certain intellectual property and sold to IBM substantially all of the assets dedicated to the engineering and manufacturing of RAID controllers and connectivity products for the IBM i/p Series RAID business. Under the terms of the nonexclusive license, IBM paid royalties to us for the sale of our board-level products on a quarterly basis through March 31, 2007, which were recognized as contingent consideration in discontinued operations when earned. In the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2007, we recorded royalties, net of taxes, of $2.4 million and $3.7 million, respectively, which we recorded in "Income from disposal of discontinued operations, net of taxes," in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

On January 31, 2006, we signed a definitive agreement with Sanmina-SCI Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, Sanmina-SCI USA, Inc., for the sale of our OEM block-based portion of our systems business for $14.5 million, of which $2.5 million will be received by March 2008. In addition, Sanmina-SCI USA agreed to pay us contingent consideration of up to an additional $12.0 million if certain revenue levels are achieved over a three-year period. As of September 30, 2007, we believe that it is unlikely that revenue levels to earn this contingent consideration will be achieved.

For financial market risks related to changes in interest rates, equity price and foreign currency exchange rates, reference is made to Item 7A :"Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" contained in Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007. Our exposure to market risk has not changed materially since March 31, 2007.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and our Chief Financial Officer (CFO), we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act)), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, our CEO and our CFO have concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Our management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system's objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

Our business faces significant risks. The risks described below may not be the only risks we face. Additional risks that we do not yet know of or that we currently think are immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of the events or circumstances described in the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could suffer, and the trading price of our common stock could decline.

Actions that we have taken and the actions that we are considering could adversely affect our business and financial results in the short-term, and may not have the long-term beneficial results that we intend. Our management team continuously reviews and evaluates all aspects of our business, including our product portfolio, our relationships with strategic partners and our research and development focus and sales and marketing efforts to better scale our operations relative to our cost basis.

The actions that we have taken and the actions that we are considering could adversely affect our business and financial results in the short-term, may not have the long-term beneficial results that we intend and could result in the following:

• Loss of customers;
• Loss of employees;
• Increased dependency on suppliers;
• Supply issues;
• Reduced revenue base;
• Impairment of our assets;
• Increased operating costs;
• Material restructuring charges; and
• Liquidity.

As our revenue base continues to decline from our current operations, we may choose to exit or divest some or a substantial portion of our current operations to focus on new opportunities. Our management team continuously reviews and evaluates our product portfolio, operating structure and markets to determine the future viability of our existing products and market positions. We may determine that the infrastructure and expenses necessary to sustain an existing business or product offering is greater than the potential contribution margin that will be obtainable in the future. As a result, we may determine that it is in our interest to exit or divest such existing business or product offering. For example, in fiscal 2007, we decided not to invest further in our DSG business due to OEMs incorporating other connectivity technologies directly into their products, the increased level of competition entering the market and the complexities of the retail channel. As a result, we wound down the DSG business throughout fiscal 2007 and exited it at March 31, 2007. However, we believe we may seek growth opportunities beyond those presented by our existing product lines by entering into strategic alliances, partnerships or acquisitions in order to scale our business, and we may not succeed in these efforts.

The impact of contract negotiations with our large OEM customers, industry technology transitions and market acceptance of our new products could cause our quarterly revenues to continue to decline. We depend on a small number of large OEM customers for a significant portion of our revenues, and we are engaged in contract negotiations concerning product specifications and price. These negotiations may prove to be unfavorable. We are also experiencing a significant impact on our revenues as the industry transitions from parallel to serial connectivity, as the revenue we generate from sales of our serial products has not grown at a fast enough rate to offset declines in sales of our parallel products; we expect this trend to continue in future periods. For example, in the second quarter of fiscal 2008, a significant customer notified us that we did not receive design wins for our next generation serial products, which will have a significant negative impact on our revenues beginning in approximately six months. In addition, the development of new products may not gain sufficient market acceptance or contribute significantly to revenue. These factors, individually or in the aggregate, could cause our quarterly revenues to continue to decline.

We depend on a few key customers and the loss of any of them could significantly reduce our net revenues.     Historically, a small number of our customers have accounted for a significant portion of our net revenues, and we expect that a limited number of customers will continue to represent a substantial portion of our net revenues for the foreseeable future. In addition, our largest customers have begun accounting for an increasingly greater percentage of our net revenues, which could magnify the effects if one of these customers elected to reduce or eliminate their purchases from us. For example, in the first half of fiscal 2008, IBM, Tech Data and Ingram Micro accounted for 35%, 12 % and 11% of our total net revenues, respectively, whereas in the first half of fiscal 2007, IBM and Dell accounted for 32% and 16% of our total net revenues, respectively. We believe that our major customers continually evaluate whether or not to purchase products from alternate or additional sources. Additionally, customers' economic and market conditions frequently change. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that a major customer will not reduce, delay or eliminate its purchases from us, which would likely cause our revenues to decline. For example, in the second quarter of fiscal 2008, a significant customer notified us that we did not receive design wins for our next generation serial products, which will have a significant negative impact on our revenues beginning in approximately six months. In addition, in the third quarter of fiscal 2007, we experienced a significant decrease in revenue compared to forecasts from IBM, which adversely affected our operating results. We do not carry credit insurance on our accounts receivables and any difficulty in collecting outstanding amounts due from our customers, particularly customers that place larger orders or experience financial difficulties, could adversely affect our revenues and our net income. Because our sales are made by means of standard purchase orders rather than long-term contracts, we cannot assure you that these customers will continue to purchase quantities of our products at current levels, or at all.

Our operations depend on key personnel, the loss of whom could affect the growth and success of our business.    In order to be successful, we must retain and motivate our executives, our principal engineers and other key employees, including those in managerial, technical, marketing and information technology support positions. In particular, our product generation efforts depend on hiring and retaining qualified engineers. Competition for experienced management, technical, marketing and support personnel such as these remains intense. Each of these personnel is an "at- will" employee, and, as a result, these employees could terminate their employment with us at any time without penalty and may seek employment with one or more of our competitors. Due to the general uncertainty regarding the outlook of our company, we have implemented a retention plan in efforts to retain key employees. We must also continue to motivate all other employees and keep them focused on our strategies and goals, which may be particularly difficult due to morale challenges posed by continued workforce reductions. The loss of any of our key employees could have a significant impact on our operations.

If we do not meet our restructuring objectives, we may have to continue to implement additional plans in order to reduce our operating costs. This may cause us to incur additional material restructuring charges and result in adverse effects on our employee capacities.    We have implemented several restructuring plans to reduce our operating costs and recorded related restructuring charges of $5.0 million, $3.7 million, $10.4 million and $5.9 million, in the first half of fiscal 2008, and fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The restructuring plans primarily involved the reduction of our workforce and the closure of certain facilities, which included our manufacturing operations in Singapore. The goals of our older plans were to support future growth opportunities, focus on investments that grow revenues and increase operating margins. Our recent goals involve better alignment of our cost structure with our anticipated revenue stream and improving our results of operation and cash flow. We may not realize the anticipated benefits of the restructuring plans we initiated and may be required to implement further restructuring plans, which may lead us to incur material restructuring charges. Further, our restructuring plans may not achieve the original goals we had in implementing them, which could result in a potential adverse effect on employee capabilities that could harm our efficiency and our ability to act quickly and effectively in the rapidly changing technology markets in which we sell our products.

Our dependence on new products may cause our net revenues to fluctuate or decline.    Our future success significantly depends upon our completing and introducing enhanced and new products at competitive prices and performance levels in a timely manner. The success of new product introductions depends on several factors, including the following:

• Designing products to meet customer needs;
• Product costs;
• Timely completion and introduction of new product designs;
• Quality of new products;
• Differentiation of new products from those of our competitors; and
• Market acceptance of our products.

Our product life cycles in each of our segments may be as brief as 12 months. As a result, we believe that we will continue to incur significant expenditures for research and development in the future. We may fail to identify new product opportunities and may not develop and bring new products to market in a timely manner. In addition, products or technologies developed by others may render our products or technologies obsolete or noncompetitive, or our targeted customers may not select our products for design or integration into their products. The failure of any of our new product development efforts could have an adverse effect on our business and financial results.

We have introduced RAID-enabled products based on the next generation SATA technology and delivered our products based on SAS technology to certain major customers for testing and integration. We will not succeed in generating significant revenues from our new SATA and SAS technology products if the market does not adapt to these new technologies, which would, over time, adversely affect our net revenues and operating results.

If we are unable to compete effectively, our net revenues and gross margins could be adversely affected.    The markets for all of our products are intensely competitive and are characterized by the following:

• Rapid technological advances;
• Frequent new product introductions;
• Evolving industry standards; and
• Price erosion.

Consequently, we must continue to enhance our products on a timely basis to keep pace with market demands. If we do not do so, or if our competition is more effective in developing products that meet the needs of our existing and potential customers, we may lose market share and not participate in the future growth of our target markets. For example, intense competition in the transition from products employing Ultra 160 technology to products employing Ultra 320 technology has adversely affected revenues from our SCSI products. In addition, revenues for our SATA products sold to our OEM customers has declined and we expect these revenues to continue to decline, as our products are at the end of their life cycles and certain of our customers have moved to other suppliers to obtain next generation SATA technologies.

Our future revenue growth in our DPS segment remains largely dependent on the success of our new products addressing serial technologies (for example, SAS and SATA), new OEM design wins, channel growth and our ability to develop new products in other markets. Our future revenue growth in our SSG segment remains largely dependent on the successful development and marketing of new products and our ability to expand our presence in the reseller channel. Our future operating results will also be influenced by our ability to participate in the development of the network storage market in which we face intense competition from other companies that are also focusing on networked storage products. If we experience an incremental decline in our revenues beyond the declines anticipated, and we are unable to effectively manage our inventory levels, we may be required to record additional inventory-related charges, which would adversely impact our gross margins.

We cannot assure you that we will have sufficient resources to accomplish all of the following:

• Satisfy any growth in demand for our products;
• Make timely introductions of new products;
• Compete successfully in the future against existing or potential competitors;
• Provide OEMs with design specifications in a timely manner; or
• Prevent price competition from eroding margins.

In order to execute our strategies, we may enter into strategic alliances with, partner with, invest in or acquire companies with complementary or strategic products or technologies. Costs associated with these strategic alliances, investments or acquisitions may adversely affect our results of operations. This impact could be exacerbated if we are unable to integrate the acquired companies, products or technologies.     We may pursue strategic transactions, partnerships, investments and acquisitions in order to scale our business as sales of our core parallel products continue to decline. This includes both strengthening our partnerships in silicon-based technology and broadening our silicon-based intellectual property to improve our business opportunities, primarily for OEM customers. In order to be successful in the strategic alliances, partnerships, investments or acquisitions that we may make, we must:

• Conduct strategic alliances, partnerships, investments or acquisitions that enhance our time to market with new products;
• Successfully prevail over competing bidders for target strategic alliances, partnerships, investments or acquisitions at an acceptable price;
• Invest in companies and technologies that contribute to the profitable growth of our business;
• Integrate acquired operations into our business and maintain uniform standards, controls and procedures;
• Retain the key employees of the acquired operations; and
• Develop the capabilities necessary to exploit newly acquired technologies.

The benefits of any strategic alliances, partnerships, investments or acquisitions may prove to be less than anticipated and may not outweigh the costs reported in our financial statements, and we may not obtain the operational leverage or realize the improvements we intend or desire with the actions we take.

Completing any potential future strategic alliances, partnerships, investments or acquisitions could cause significant diversions of management time and resources and divert focus from the activities of our current operations. We may encounter difficulty in integrating and assimilating the operations and personnel of the acquired companies into our operations or the acquired technology and rights into our services. We may also lack the experience or expertise in the new products and markets, which may impair the relationships with customers or suppliers of the acquired business. The acquisition of new operations may require us to develop additional internal controls to support these new operations. We may experience material deficiencies or weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as a result of the addition of new operations or due to changes to our internal controls, which could have a material impact on our results of operations when corrected. Additionally, we may not be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems encountered in connection with these or other acquisitions, strategic alliances or investments, which could result in an adverse impact on our ability to develop or sustain the acquired business.

If we acquire new businesses, products or technologies in the future, we may be required to assume warranty claims or other contingent liabilities, including liabilities unknown at the time of acquisition, and amortize significant amounts of other intangible assets and, over time, recognize significant charges for impairment of goodwill, other intangible assets or other losses.

If we consummate any potential future acquisitions in which the consideration consists of stock or other securities, our existing stockholders' ownership may be significantly diluted. If we proceed with any potential future acquisitions in which the consideration is cash, we may be required to use a substantial portion of our available cash. If we were to use a substantial portion of our available cash, we might need to repatriate cash from our subsidiaries, which may cause us to incur additional income taxes at up to the United States Federal statutory rate of 40%. In addition, we may be required to invest significant resources in order to perform under a strategic alliance or partnership, or to complete an acquisition or investment, which could adversely affect our results of operations, at least in the short-term, even if we believe the acquisition, strategic alliance or investment will benefit us in the long-term.

If we are not successful in completing a strategic alliance or partnerships with or acquisition of companies with complementary or strategic products or technologies, our future growth may be hindered. In order to scale our operations relative to our cost basis, we may need to identify attractive strategic alliance, partnership or acquisition candidates and complete a transaction with them. If we fail to identify and complete a successful strategic alliance, partnership or acquisition, we expect that our revenues will continue to decline and we may be at a competitive disadvantage or we may be adversely affected by negative market perceptions, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

We depend on the efforts of our distributors, which if reduced, could result in a loss of sales of our products in favor of competitive offerings.    We derived approximately 51% of our revenues for the first half of fiscal 2008 from independent distributor and reseller channels. Our financial results could be adversely affected if our relationships with these distributors or resellers were to deteriorate or if the financial condition of these distributors or resellers were to decline. In addition, in the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we terminated our relationship with some of our distributors, in order to improve the focus on our products and strengthen our relationship with the remaining distributors. This action may not have the intended results that we are anticipating, which could adversely affect our financial results in the short-term.

Our distributors generally offer a diverse array of products from several different manufacturers. Accordingly, we are at risk that these distributors may give higher priority to selling products from other suppliers. A reduction in sales efforts by our current distributors could adversely affect our business and financial results. For example, some of our distributors threatened to stop selling our products or make pricing of our products non-competitive if we did not agree to absorb their costs to comply with the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive with respect to our products. Our distributors build inventories in anticipation of future sales, and if such sales do not occur as rapidly as they anticipate, our distributors will decrease the size of their product orders. If we decrease our price protection or distributor-incentive programs, our distributors may also decrease their orders from us. In addition, we have from time to time taken actions to reduce levels of products at distributors and may do so in the future. These actions may affect our net revenues and negatively affect our financial results.

We depend on contract manufacturers and subcontractors, and if they fail to meet our manufacturing needs, it could delay shipments of our products and result in the loss of customers or revenue and increased manufacturing costs, which would have an adverse effect on our results.    We rely on contract manufacturers for manufacturing our products and subcontractors for the assembly and packaging of the integrated circuits included in our products. On December 23, 2005, we entered into a three-year contract manufacturing agreement with Sanmina-SCI, whereby Sanmina-SCI upon the closing of the transaction on January 9, 2006, assumed manufacturing operations for a majority of our products. The transition of the manufacturing facilities did not go as well as expected, as Sanmina-SCI experienced material shortages that impacted its ability to meet delivery commitments on a consistent basis, which negatively impacted our revenues and operating results in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. We continued to see an impact in our channel penetration in the second and third quarters of fiscal 2007 as a result of not meeting the demands in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. We must work closely with Sanmina-SCI to ensure that products are delivered on a timely basis. In addition, we must ensure that Sanmina-SCI continues to provide quality products. If Sanmina-SCI is unwilling or unable to meet our supply needs including timely delivery and adherence to standard quality, we could lose customers or revenue and incur increased manufacturing costs, which would have an adverse effect on our results. Due to the nature of this relationship, and the continuous changes in the prices of components and parts, we are in ongoing negotiations with Sanmina-SCI concerning product pricing. Any adverse outcome of future disputes concerning product pricing could adversely impact our gross margins. We have no long-term agreements with our assembly and packaging subcontractors. We also employ SMTC to manufacture certain ServeRAID products, SuperMicro and USI to manufacture certain systems products, and Amkor Technology and Advanced Semiconductor Engineering to final assemble and test operations related to our ASIC products. We cannot assure you that these subcontractors will continue to be able and willing to meet our requirements for these components or services. Any significant disruption in supplies from or degradation in the quality of components or services supplied by these contract manufacturers and subcontractors could delay shipments and result in the loss of customers or revenues, which could have an adverse effect on our financial results.

We currently purchase all of the finished production silicon wafers and other key components used in our products from suppliers, and if they fail to meet our manufacturing needs, it would delay our production and our product shipments to customers and negatively affect our operations.    Independent foundries manufacture to our specifications all of the finished silicon wafers used for our products. We currently purchase finished production silicon wafers used in our products from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, or TSMC. In addition, we purchase some of our key components used in our products from sole-source suppliers. The manufacture of semiconductor devices and other components are sensitive to a wide variety of factors, including the following:

• The availability of raw materials;
• The availability of manufacturing capacity;
• Transition to smaller geometries of semiconductor devices;
• The level of contaminants in the manufacturing environment;
• Impurities in the materials used; and
• The performance of personnel and equipment.

We cannot assure you that manufacturing problems may not occur in the future. A shortage of raw materials or production capacity could lead our suppliers to allocate available capacity to other customers. Any prolonged inability to obtain wafers and other key components with competitive performance and cost attributes, adequate yields or timely deliveries would delay our production and our product shipments, and could have an adverse effect on our business and financial results. We expect that our suppliers will continually seek to convert their processes for manufacturing wafers and key components to more advanced process technologies. Such conversions entail inherent technological risks that can affect yields and delivery times. If for any reason the suppliers we use are unable or unwilling to satisfy our wafer and other key component needs, we will be required to identify and qualify additional suppliers. Additional suppliers for wafers and other key components may be unavailable, may take significant amounts of time to qualify or may be unable to satisfy our requirements on a timely basis.

Because our sales are made by means of standard purchase orders rather than long-term contracts, if demand for our customers' products declines or if our customers do not control their inventories effectively, they may cancel or reschedule shipments previously ordered from us or reduce their levels of purchases from us.    The volume and timing of orders received during a quarter are difficult to forecast. Our customers generally order based on their forecasts and they frequently encounter uncertain and changing demand for their products. If demand falls below such forecasts or if our customers do not control their inventories effectively, they may cancel or reschedule shipments previously ordered from us. Our customers have from time to time in the past canceled or rescheduled shipments previously ordered from us, and we cannot assure you that they will not do so in the future. For example, in the third quarter of fiscal 2007, the demand for our products from certain OEM customers substantially declined from their initial forecasts, which adversely affected our operating results. As our sales are made by means of standard purchase orders rather than long-term contracts, we cannot assure you that these customers will continue to purchase quantities of our products at current levels, or at all. Historically, we have set our operating budget based on forecasts of future revenues because we do not have significant backlog. Because much of our operating budget is relatively fixed in the short-term, if revenues do not meet our expectations, then our financial results will be adversely affected.

If we fail to adequately forecast demand for our products, we may incur excess product inventory costs and our financial results will be adversely affected. We have a three-year contract manufacturing agreement with Sanmina-SCI to manufacture a majority of our products. As the sales of our products are completed through standard purchase orders rather than long- term contracts, we provide our contract manufacturer forecasts based on anticipated future demand from our customers. To the extent that our customers' demands fall below their initial forecast and we are unable to sell the product to another customer, and because our purchase commitment lead time to manufacture products with the contract manufacturer is longer than the lead time for a customer to cancel or reschedule an order, we may be exposed to excess product inventory costs and our financial results will be adversely affected. For example, in the third quarter of fiscal 2007, we incurred significant inventory-related charges of $7.8 million due to a significant decline in our revenue stream.

Our operating results have fluctuated in the past, and are likely to continue to fluctuate, and if our future results are below the expectations of investors or securities analysts, the market price of our common stock would likely decline significantly.    Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated in the past, and are likely to vary significantly in the future, based on a number of factors related to our industry and the markets for our products. Factors that are likely to cause our operating results to fluctuate include those discussed in this Risk Factors section.

Our operating expenses are largely based on anticipated revenues, and a large portion of our expenses, including facility costs and salaries, are fixed in the short term. As a result, lower than anticipated revenues for any reason could cause significant variations in our operating results from quarter to quarter.

Due to the factors summarized above, and the other risks described in this section, we believe that you should not rely on period-to-period comparisons of our financial results as an indication of our future performance. In the event that our operating results fall below the expectations of securities analysts or investors, the market price of our common stock could decline substantially.

Our operating results may be adversely affected by unfavorable economic and market conditions and the uncertain geopolitical environment.    Adverse economic conditions in some markets may impact our business, which could result in:

• Reduced demand for our products;
• Increased price competition for our products;
• Increased risk of excess and obsolete inventories; and
• Higher operating costs as a percentage of revenues.

Demand for our products would likely be negatively affected if demand in the server and network storage markets declines. It is difficult to predict future server sales growth, if any. In addition, other technologies may replace the technologies used in our existing products and the acceptance of our products using new technologies in the market may not be widespread, which could adversely affect our revenues.

We may be subject to a higher effective tax rate that could negatively affect our results of operations and financial position.    We are subject to income and other taxes in the United States and in the foreign taxing jurisdictions in which we operate. The determination of our worldwide provision for income taxes and current and deferred tax assets and liabilities requires judgment and estimation and is subject to audit and redetermination by the taxing authorities. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the following factors could cause our effective tax rate to be materially different than tax amounts recorded in our consolidated financial statements:

• The jurisdiction in which profits are determined to be earned and taxed;
• Adjustments to estimated taxes upon finalization of various tax returns;
• Changes in available tax credits;
• Changes in share-based compensation expense;
• Changes in tax laws, the interpretation of tax laws either in the United States or abroad or the issuance of new interpretative accounting guidance related to uncertain transactions and calculations where the tax treatment was previously uncertain; and
• The resolution of issues arising from tax audits with various tax authorities.

The factors noted above may cause a higher effective tax rate that could materially affect our income tax provision, results of operations or cash flows in the period or periods for which such determination is made.

We held approximately $92.2 million of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at our subsidiaries in Singapore and Cayman Islands at September 30, 2007. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, we repatriated $360.6 million of cash from Singapore to the United States in connection with the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 which provided a one-time deduction of 85% for certain dividends from controlled foreign corporations. If the amount repatriated does not qualify for the one-time deduction, we could incur additional income taxes at up to the United States Federal statutory rate of 35%, which would negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our reliance on industry standards and technological changes in the marketplace may cause our net revenues to fluctuate or decline.    The computer industry is characterized by various, evolving standards and protocols. We design our products to conform to certain industry standards and protocols such as the following:

• AFP
• ATA
• CIFS
• Fibre channel
• FTP
• HTTP
• IPsec
• iSCSI
• NFS
• PCI
• PCIe
• PCI-X
• RAID
• SAS
• SATA
• SCSI
• SMI-S
• Ultra DMA
• USB

• Linux
• Macintosh
• Netware
• OS/2
• UNIX
• Windows

If user acceptance of these standards declines, or if new standards emerge, and if we do not anticipate these changes and develop new products, these changes could adversely affect our business and financial results.

If we lose the cooperation of other hardware and software producers whose products are integral to ours, our ability to sustain or grow our revenues could be adversely affected.    We must design our products to operate effectively with a variety of hardware and software products supplied by other manufacturers, including the following:

• I/O and RAID ASICs;
• Microprocessors;
• Peripherals;
• Operating system software;
• Server motherboards; and
• Enclosures.

We depend on significant cooperation from these manufacturers to achieve our design objectives and develop products that operate successfully with their products. These companies could, from time to time, elect to make it more difficult for us to design our products for successful operability with their products. For example, if one or more of these companies were to determine that as a result of competition or other factors, our products would not be broadly accepted by the markets we target, these companies may no longer work with us to plan for new products and new generations of our products, which would make it more difficult to introduce products on a timely basis or at all. Further, some of these companies might decide not to continue to offer products that are compatible with our technology and our markets could contract. If any of these events were to occur, our revenue and financial results could be adversely affected.

We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations that could impose substantial costs upon us and may adversely affect our business.     We may from time to time be subject to various state, federal, and international laws and regulations governing the environment, including laws regulating the manufacture and distribution of chemical substances and laws restricting the presence of certain substances in electronics products. For example, the European Parliament enacted the RoHS directive, which restricts the sale of new electrical and electronic equipment containing certain hazardous substances, including lead. We recorded an excess inventory expense of $1.9 million in fiscal 2006 related to the transition of our products to comply with the RoHS directive. If any of our products that are designated to be RoHS compliant are deemed to be non- compliant, we may suffer a loss of revenue, be unable to sell affected products in certain markets or countries and be at a competitive disadvantage.

Similar legislation has been or may be enacted in other jurisdictions and countries. If our products become non- compliant with the various environmental laws and regulations, we could incur substantial costs which could negatively affect our results of operations and financial position.

If we do not provide adequate support during our customers' design and development stage, or if we are unable to provide such support in a timely manner, we may lose revenues to our competitors.    Certain of our products are designed to meet our customers' specifications and, to the extent we are not able to meet these expectations in a timely manner or provide adequate support during our customers' design and development stage, our customers may choose to buy similar products from another company. If this were to occur, we may lose revenues and market share to our competitors.

If there is a shortage of components used in our customers' products, our sales may decline, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.    If our customers are unable to purchase certain components which are embedded into their products, their demand for our products may decline. In addition, we or our customers may be impacted by component shortages if components that comply with the RoHS Directive are not available. Similar shortages of components used in our products or our customers' products could adversely affect our net revenues and financial results in future periods.

Product quality problems could lead to reduced revenues and gross margins.    We produce highly complex products that incorporate leading-edge technologies, including both hardware and software. Software often contains "bugs" which can interfere with expected operations. We cannot assure you that our pre-shipment testing programs will be adequate to detect all defects which might interfere with customer satisfaction, reduce sales opportunities, or affect our gross margins if the costs of remedying the problems exceed reserves established for that purpose. An inability to cure a product defect could result in the failure of a product line, and withdrawal, at least temporarily, from a product or market segment, damage to our reputation, inventory costs, product reengineering expenses, and a material impact on revenues and gross margins.

Our charter documents and Delaware law contain anti-takeover provisions that could prevent, discourage or delay a change in control or management, which may affect the price of our common stock. Some provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could have the effect of making it more difficult for a potential acquirer to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock. These include completing procedural requirements for stockholders holding 5% of voting shares to take action by written consent and restricting the ability of stockholders to call special meetings. In addition, the indenture relating to the 3/4% Notes provides that in the event of certain changes in control, each holder of the 3/4% Notes will have the right to require us to repurchase such holder's 3/4% Notes at a price equal to the principal amount of the 3/4% Notes being purchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest. We are also subject to provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law which prohibits us from engaging in any business combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three years from the date the person became an interested stockholder, unless certain conditions are met. These restrictions could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or management.

Some of our products contain "open source" software, and any failure to comply with the terms of one or more of these open source licenses could negatively affect our business.    Some of our products are distributed with software licensed by its authors or other third parties under so-called "open source" licenses, including, for example, the GNU General Public License, or GPL, GNU Lesser General Public License, or LGPL, the Mozilla Public License, the BSD License, and the Apache License. Some of those licenses may require as a condition of the license that we make available source code for modifications or derivative works we create based upon, incorporating, or using the open source software, that we provide notices with our products, and/or that we license such modifications or derivative works under the terms of a particular open source license or other license granting third parties certain rights of further use. If an author or other third party that distributes such open source software were to allege that we had not complied with the conditions of one or more of those open source licenses, we could be required to incur legal expenses in defending against such allegations, and if our defenses were not successful we could be enjoined from distribution of the products that contained the open source software and required to either make the source code for the open source software available, to grant third parties certain rights of further use of our software, or to remove the open source software from our products, which could disrupt our distribution and sale of some of our products. In addition, if we combine our proprietary software with open source software in a certain manner, we could under some of the open source licenses, be required to release the source code of our proprietary software. If an author or other third party that distributes open source software were to obtain a judgment against us based on allegations that we had not complied with the terms of any such open source licenses, we could also be subject to liability for copyright infringement damages and breach of contract for our past distribution of such open source software.

Our international operations involve a number of political, economic and other risks that could adversely affect our ability to sell our products in certain countries, create local economic conditions that reduce demand for our products among our target markets and expose us to potential disruption in the supply of necessary components. Our international operations and sales are subject to political and economic risks, including political instability, currency controls, and changes in import/export regulations, tariffs and freight rates. We maintain a research and development center in Bangalore, India, which we expanded in fiscal 2007. Many of our subcontractors are primarily located in Asia and we have sales offices and customers located throughout Europe, Japan and other countries.  In addition, because our primary wafer supplier, TSMC, is located in Taiwan, we may be subject to certain risks resulting from political instability in Taiwan, including conflicts between Taiwan and the People's Republic of China. These and other international risks could result in the creation of political or other non-economic barriers to our being able to sell our products in certain countries, create local economic conditions that reduce demand for our products among our target markets, expose us to potential disruption in the supply of necessary components or otherwise adversely affect our ability to generate revenue and operate effectively. In addition, the operations of our remote locations are subject to management oversight and control. If our business practices and corporate controls are not adhered to worldwide, our business and financial results could be adversely affected.

We depend on third parties to transport our products.    We rely on independent freight forwarders to move our products between manufacturing plants and our customers. Any transport or delivery problems because of their errors, or because of unforeseen interruptions in their activities due to factors such as strikes, political instability, terrorism, natural disasters and accidents, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and ultimately impact our relationship with our customers.

If the carrying value of our long-lived assets is not recoverable, an impairment loss must be recognized which would adversely affect our financial results.    Certain events or changes in circumstances would require us to assess the recoverability of the carrying amount of our long-lived assets. For example, in fiscal 2007, we recorded an impairment charge of $13.2 million on intangible assets related to our decision to retain and operate the Snap Systems portion of the systems business. In fiscal 2006, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $90.6 million related to our DPS segment and an impairment charge of $10.0 million to write-down the Snap Systems portion of the systems business' long-lived assets to fair value. In fiscal 2005, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $52.3 million related to our former Channel segment. We will continue to evaluate the recoverability of the carrying amount of our long-lived assets, and we may incur substantial impairment charges in the future which could adversely affect our financial results.

If actual results or events differ materially from those contemplated by us in making estimates and assumptions, our reported financial condition and results of operations for future periods could be materially affected.    The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. For example, we have identified key accounting estimates in our Critical Accounting Policies in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, which include revenue recognition, inventory, goodwill, stock-based compensation and income taxes. In addition, we have updated our Critical Accounting Policy in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 related to income taxes, as discussed in further detail in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies." Furthermore, Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 describes the significant accounting policies essential to preparing our consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these financial statements requires estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures. Although we believe that our judgments and estimates are appropriate and correct, actual future results may differ materially from our estimates.

If we are unable to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights, we may be unable to compete effectively.    Although we actively maintain and defend our intellectual property rights, we may be unable to adequately protect our proprietary rights. In addition, the laws of certain territories in which our products are or may be developed, manufactured or sold, including Asia and Europe, may not protect our products and intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. Because we conduct a substantial portion of our operations outside of the United States and sell to a worldwide customer base, we are more dependent on our ability to protect our intellectual property in international environments than would be the case if a larger portion of our operations were domestic.

Despite our efforts, we may be unable to prevent third parties from infringing upon or misappropriating our intellectual property, which could harm our business and ability to compete effectively. We have from time to time discovered counterfeit copies of our products being manufactured or sold by others. Although we have programs to detect and deter the counterfeiting of our products, significant availability of counterfeit products could reduce our revenues and damage our reputation and goodwill with customers.

Third parties may assert infringement claims against us, which may be expensive to defend and could divert our resources.    From time to time, third parties assert exclusive patent, copyright and other intellectual property rights to our key technologies, and we expect to continue to receive such claims in the future. For example, in fiscal 2005, we, Nevada SCSI Enterprises, Inc. and Thomas A. Gafford (jointly, "NSE") entered into a license and release agreement, pursuant to which we paid NSE $1.7 million as a one-time, fully paid-up license fee to settle NSE's claims that some of our products infringed certain patents. In addition, we entered into a patent cross-license agreement with IBM in May 2000. Under this agreement, which was amended in March 2002, we received a release from infringement claims prior to January 1, 2000 and received the right to use certain of IBM's patents through June 30, 2007. In consideration, we paid, in annual installments, an aggregate patent fee of $13.3 million. A number of the licensed patents have either expired or are no longer significant to our product portfolio. If we should determine that it is necessary to extend the term of the patent license, we believe that we will be able to reach agreement with IBM for such an extension, without interruption to our business operations. The risks of our receiving additional claims from third parties may be increased in periods such as the one that we are currently entering where we are beginning to offer product lines employing new technologies relative to our existing products.

We cannot assure you that third parties will not assert other infringement claims against us, directly or indirectly, in the future, that assertions by third parties will not result in costly litigation or that we would prevail in such litigation or be able to license any valid and infringed intellectual property from third parties on commercially reasonable terms. These claims may be asserted in respect of intellectual property that we own or that we license from others. In addition to claims brought against us by third parties, we may also bring litigation against others to protect our rights. Intellectual property litigation, regardless of the outcome, could result in substantial costs to us and diversion of our resources and management time and attention, and could adversely affect our business and financial results.

We may be required to pay additional federal income taxes which could negatively affect our results of operations and financial position.     We were subject to IRS audits for our fiscal years 1994 through 2003. During the third quarter of fiscal 2007, we reached resolution with the United States taxing authorities relating to those fiscal years. However, our tax provision continues to reflect judgment and estimation regarding components of the settlement such as interest calculations and the application of the settlements to state and local taxing jurisdictions. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the ultimate tax outcome may materially differ from the tax amounts recorded in our condensed consolidated financial statements and may cause a higher effective tax rate that could materially affect our income tax provision, results of operations or cash flows in the period or periods for which such determination is made. The IRS is currently auditing our Federal income tax returns for the fiscal 2004 through 2006 audit cycle. We believe that we have provided sufficient tax provisions for these years and the ultimate outcome of the IRS audits will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position or results of operations in future periods. However, we cannot predict with certainty how these matters will be resolved and whether we will be required to make additional tax payments.

We may be engaged in legal proceedings that could cause us to incur unforeseen expenses and could occupy a significant amount of our management's time and attention.    From time to time we are subject to litigation or claims that could negatively affect our business operations and financial position. Such disputes could cause us to incur unforeseen expenses, could occupy a significant amount of our management's time and attention, and could negatively affect our business operations and financial position.

We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.    Because a significant portion of our business is conducted outside the United States, we face exposure to adverse movements in non-United States currency exchange rates. These exposures may change over time as business practices evolve and could have an adverse impact on our financial results and cash flows. Historically, our exposures have related to non-dollar-denominated operating expenses in Europe and Asia. We began Euro-denominated sales to our distribution customers in the European Union in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003. An increase in the value of the dollar could increase the real cost to our customers of our products in markets outside the United States where we sell in dollars, and a weakened dollar could increase the cost of local operating expenses and procurement.

We hold minority interests in privately held venture funds, and if these venture funds face financial difficulties in their operations, our investments could be impaired.    We continue to hold minority interests in privately held venture funds. At September 30, 2007, the carrying value of such investments aggregated $1.7 million. These investments are inherently risky because these venture funds invest in companies that may still be in the development stage or depend on third parties for financing to support their ongoing operations. In addition, the markets for the technologies or products of these companies are typically in the early stages and may never develop. If these companies do not have adequate cash funding to support their operations, or if they encounter difficulties developing their technologies or products, the venture funds' investments in these companies may be impaired, which in turn, could result in impairment of our investment in these venture funds. For example, in fiscal 2007, we recorded a charge of $0.9 million relating to an other-than-temporary decline in value of a minority investment.

Changes in securities laws and regulations have increased and may continue to increase our costs.    Changes in the laws and regulations affecting public companies, including the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, have increased and may continue to increase our expenses as we devote resources to respond to their requirements. In particular, we incurred additional administrative expense to implement Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires management to report on, and our independent registered public accounting firm to attest to, our internal control over financial reporting.

In addition, the NASDAQ Global Market, on which our common stock is listed, has also adopted comprehensive rules and regulations relating to corporate governance. These laws, rules and regulations have increased and will continue to increase the scope, complexity and cost of our corporate governance, reporting and disclosure practices. We also expect these developments to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance in the future, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. Further, our board members, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer could face an increased risk of personal liability in connection with the performance of their duties. As a result, we may have difficultly attracting and retaining qualified board members and executive officers, which would adversely affect our business.

Internal control deficiencies or weaknesses that are not yet identified could emerge.    Over time we may identify and correct deficiencies or weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and, where and when appropriate, report on the identification and correction of these deficiencies or weaknesses. However, the internal control procedures can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that deficiencies or weaknesses are identified. Deficiencies or weaknesses that are not yet identified could emerge, and the identification and corrections of these deficiencies or weaknesses could have a material impact on our results of operations.

Internal control issues that appear minor now may later become material weaknesses.    We are required to publicly report on deficiencies or weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting that meet a materiality standard as required by law and related regulations and interpretations. Management may, at a point in time, accurately categorize a deficiency or weakness as immaterial or minor and therefore not be required to publicly report such deficiency or weakness. Such determination, however, does not preclude a change in circumstances such that the deficiency or weakness could, at a later time, become a material weakness that could have a material impact on our results of operations.

We may encounter natural disasters, which could cause disruption to our employees or interrupt the manufacturing process for our products.    Our operations could be subject to natural disasters and other business disruptions, which could seriously harm our revenues and financial condition and increase our costs and expenses. Our corporate headquarters are located in California, near major earthquake faults. Additionally, our primary wafer supplier, TSMC, is located in Taiwan, which has experienced significant earthquakes in the past. A severe earthquake could cause disruption to our employees or interrupt the manufacturing process, which could affect TSMC's ability to supply wafers to us, which would negatively affect our business and financial results. The ultimate impact on us and our general infrastructure of being located near major earthquake faults is unknown, but our net revenues and financial condition and our costs and expenses could be significantly impacted in the event of a major earthquake.

Manmade problems such as computer viruses or terrorism may disrupt our operations and harm our operating results.    Despite our implementation of network security measures, our servers are vulnerable to computer viruses, break-ins and similar disruptions from unauthorized tampering with our computer systems. Any such event could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition. In addition, the effects of war or acts of terrorism could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition. In addition, as a company with headquarters and significant operations located in the United States, we may be impacted by actions against the United States. We are predominantly uninsured for losses and interruptions caused by terrorist acts and acts of war.

We may experience significant fluctuations in our stock price, which may, in turn, significantly affect the trading price of our convertible notes.    Our stock has experienced substantial price volatility, particularly as a result of quarterly variations in our operating results, the published expectations of securities analysts and as a result of announcements by our competitors and us. In addition, the stock market has experienced price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market price of many technology companies, in particular, and that have often been unrelated to the operating performance of such companies. In addition, the price of our securities may also be affected by general global, economic and market conditions and the cost of operations in one or more of our product markets. While we cannot predict the individual effect that these factors may have on the price or our securities, these factors, either individually or in the aggregate, could result in significant variations in the price of our common stock during any given period of time. These fluctuations in our stock price also impact the price of our outstanding 3/4% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due in 2023, or the 3/4% Notes, and the likelihood of the 3/4% Notes being converted into our common stock.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

EXHIBIT INDEX