HOLX_Q3-2014
Table of Contents


 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
__________________________________________________________ 
FORM 10-Q
 
 __________________________________________________________ 
(Mark One)
ý
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 28, 2014
or 
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission File Number: 1-36214
__________________________________________________________ 
Hologic, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 __________________________________________________________
Delaware
 
04-2902449
(State of incorporation)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
35 Crosby Drive,
Bedford, Massachusetts
 
01730
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
(781) 999-7300
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 __________________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One):
Large accelerated filer
 
ý
  
Accelerated filer
 
¨
Non-accelerated filer
 
¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  
Smaller reporting company
 
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)    Yes  ¨    No  ý
As of July 28, 2014, 277,759,686 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.01 par value, were outstanding.
 

Table of Contents

HOLOGIC, INC.
INDEX
 
 
Page
 
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
 
Item 3.
 
 
Item 4.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
Item 1A.
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
 
 
Item 6.
 
 
 
 
EXHIBITS
 


2
Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1.
Financial Statements (unaudited)
HOLOGIC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In millions, except number of shares which are reflected in thousands and per share data)
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
June 28,
2014
 
June 29,
2013
 
June 28,
2014
 
June 29,
2013
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Product
$
529.3

 
$
529.9

 
$
1,562.8

 
$
1,579.3

Service and other
103.3

 
96.2

 
307.3

 
290.9

 
632.6

 
626.1

 
1,870.1

 
1,870.2

Costs of revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Product
186.7

 
187.6

 
549.3

 
617.2

Amortization of intangible assets
80.5

 
76.0

 
234.1

 
227.0

Impairment of intangible assets
—

 
1.7

 
26.6

 
1.7

Service and other
52.6

 
51.0

 
159.6

 
153.5

Gross Profit
312.8

 
309.8

 
900.5

 
870.8

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Research and development
52.5

 
47.8

 
151.1

 
148.9

Selling and marketing
83.0

 
82.9

 
245.0

 
265.4

General and administrative
64.7

 
60.5

 
194.6

 
179.7

Amortization of intangible assets
29.7

 
28.7

 
85.0

 
85.9

Impairment of intangible assets
—

 
—

 
0.5

 
—

Contingent consideration – compensation expense
—

 
21.6

 
—

 
80.5

Contingent consideration – fair value adjustments
—

 
0.5

 
—

 
11.3

Gain on sale of intellectual property
—

 
—

 
—

 
(53.9
)
Restructuring and divestiture charges
6.7

 
6.7

 
36.6

 
23.1

 
236.6

 
248.7

 
712.8

 
740.9

Income from operations
76.2

 
61.1

 
187.7

 
129.9

Interest income
0.3

 
0.3

 
0.8

 
0.8

Interest expense
(52.4
)
 
(67.2
)
 
(168.1
)
 
(215.3
)
Debt extinguishment loss
—

 
—

 
(7.4
)
 
(3.2
)
Other expense, net
(1.5
)
 
(1.2
)
 
(3.5
)
 
(0.2
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
22.6

 
(7.0
)
 
9.5

 
(88.0
)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
11.3

 
4.0

 
20.3

 
(29.1
)
Net income (loss)
$
11.3

 
$
(11.0
)
 
$
(10.8
)
 
$
(58.9
)
Net income (loss) per common share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
0.04

 
$
(0.04
)
 
$
(0.04
)
 
$
(0.22
)
Diluted
$
0.04

 
$
(0.04
)
 
$
(0.04
)
 
$
(0.22
)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
276,843

 
269,430

 
274,713

 
267,983

Diluted
279,205

 
269,430

 
274,713

 
267,983


See accompanying notes.

3
Table of Contents

HOLOGIC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)
(In millions)
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
June 28,
2014
 
June 29,
2013
 
June 28,
2014
 
June 29,
2013
Net income (loss)
$
11.3

 
$
(11.0
)
 
$
(10.8
)
 
$
(58.9
)
Changes in foreign currency translation adjustment
3.3

 
(2.9
)
 
(3.7
)
 
(9.3
)
Changes in unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities
4.2

 
0.1

 
1.9

 
2.3

Changes in pension plans, net of taxes of $0.2 for the nine months ended June 28, 2014
—

 
—

 
(0.6
)
 
—

Other comprehensive income (loss)
7.5

 
(2.8
)
 
(2.4
)
 
(7.0
)
Comprehensive income (loss)
$
18.8

 
$
(13.8
)
 
$
(13.2
)
 
$
(65.9
)
See accompanying notes.


4
Table of Contents

HOLOGIC, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In millions, except number of shares which are reflected in thousands)
 
 
June 28,
2014
 
September 28,
2013
ASSETS
 
 
 
Current assets:
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
632.5

 
$
822.5

Restricted cash
5.9

 
6.9

Accounts receivable, less reserves of $11.3 and $8.8, respectively
381.7

 
409.3

Inventories
329.8

 
289.4

Deferred income tax assets
34.4

 
—

Prepaid income taxes
10.3

 
44.7

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
37.8

 
48.4

Other current assets – assets held-for-sale
—

 
3.0

Total current assets
1,432.4

 
1,624.2

Property, plant and equipment, net
467.4

 
491.5

Intangible assets, net
3,558.7

 
3,906.7

Goodwill
2,811.1

 
2,814.5

Other assets
142.4

 
163.9

Total assets
$
8,412.0

 
$
9,000.8

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
 
 
Current liabilities:
 
 
 
Current portion of long-term debt
$
102.0

 
$
563.8

Accounts payable
82.3

 
80.5

Accrued expenses
266.5

 
272.0

Deferred revenue
147.1

 
132.3

Deferred income tax liabilities
—

 
39.8

Total current liabilities
597.9

 
1,088.4

Long-term debt, net of current portion
4,168.5

 
4,242.1

Deferred income tax liabilities
1,410.8

 
1,535.3

Deferred service obligations – long-term
21.8

 
25.5

Other long-term liabilities
181.7

 
168.0

Commitments and contingencies (Note 5)

 

Stockholders’ equity:
 
 
 
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value – 1,623 shares authorized; 0 shares issued
—

 
—

Common stock, $0.01 par value – 750,000 shares authorized; 277,450 and 272,036 shares issued, respectively
2.8

 
2.7

Additional paid-in-capital
5,639.1

 
5,536.3

Accumulated deficit
(3,628.7
)
 
(3,616.4
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income
18.1

 
20.4

Treasury stock, at cost – 219 shares at September 28, 2013
—

 
(1.5
)
Total stockholders’ equity
2,031.3

 
1,941.5

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
8,412.0

 
$
9,000.8

See accompanying notes.


5
Table of Contents

HOLOGIC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In millions)
 
Nine Months Ended
 
June 28,
2014
 
June 29,
2013
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
Net loss
$
(10.8
)
 
$
(58.9
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
Depreciation
72.7

 
70.5

Amortization
319.1

 
312.9

Non-cash interest expense
52.2

 
61.2

Stock-based compensation expense
39.1

 
41.9

Excess tax benefit related to equity awards
(5.2
)
 
(5.4
)
Deferred income taxes
(204.6
)
 
(119.4
)
Gain on sale of intellectual property
—

 
(53.9
)
Fair value adjustments to contingent consideration
—

 
11.3

Fair value write-up of inventory sold
—

 
52.4

Asset impairment charges
33.3

 
1.8

Debt extinguishment loss
7.4

 
3.2

Cost-method equity investment impairment charges
6.9

 
6.4

Gain on sale of cost-method equity investment
—

 
(2.0
)
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
5.1

 
3.7

Other
(1.4
)
 
2.6

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions:
 
 
 
Accounts receivable
28.4

 
9.3

Inventories
(42.2
)
 
12.1

Prepaid income taxes
34.4

 
37.0

Prepaid expenses and other assets
13.8

 
5.3

Accounts payable
1.7

 
(14.4
)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
16.1

 
32.0

Deferred revenue
10.7

 
6.2

Net cash provided by operating activities
376.7

 
415.8

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
Acquisition of businesses
—

 
(6.3
)
Payment of additional acquisition consideration
—

 
(16.8
)
Proceeds from sale of business, net of cash transferred
2.4

 
86.3

Purchase of property and equipment
(30.9
)
 
(41.1
)
Increase in equipment under customer usage agreements
(26.9
)
 
(31.9
)
Net sales (purchases) of insurance contracts
13.8

 
(4.0
)
Purchases of mutual funds
(29.7
)
 
—

Sales of mutual funds
22.4

 
—

Proceeds from sale of intellectual property
—

 
60.0

Purchase of cost-method equity investments
—

 
(3.6
)
Sale of a cost-method equity investment
—

 
2.1

Increase in other assets
(3.0
)
 
(4.6
)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
(51.9
)
 
40.1

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
Repayment of long-term debt
(578.8
)
 
(48.8
)
Payment of debt issuance costs
(2.4
)
 
(7.0
)
Payment of contingent consideration
—

 
(42.4
)
Payment of deferred acquisition consideration
(5.0
)
 
(1.7
)
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock pursuant to employee stock plans
75.8

 
51.2

Excess tax benefit related to equity awards
5.2

 
5.4

Payment of minimum tax withholdings on net share settlements of equity awards
(9.2
)
 
(12.0
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(514.4
)
 
(55.3
)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
(0.4
)
 
(2.6
)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(190.0
)
 
398.0

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
822.5

 
560.4

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$
632.5

 
$
958.4

See accompanying notes.


6
Table of Contents

HOLOGIC, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(all tabular amounts in millions, except number of shares which are reflected in thousands and per share data)
(1) Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements of Hologic, Inc. (“Hologic” or the “Company”) presented herein have been prepared pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and disclosures required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes for the year ended September 28, 2013 included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on November 26, 2013. In the opinion of management, the financial statements and notes contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from management’s estimates if past experience or other assumptions do not turn out to be substantially accurate. Operating results for the three and nine months ended June 28, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other interim period or the entire fiscal year ending September 27, 2014.
Subsequent Events Consideration
The Company considers events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but prior to the issuance of the financial statements to provide additional evidence for certain estimates or to identify matters that require additional disclosure. Subsequent events have been evaluated as required. There were no material recognized subsequent events recorded in the unaudited consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and nine months ended June 28, 2014.
(2) Fair Value Measurements
Assets/Liabilities Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The Company has an equity investment in a publicly-traded company and mutual funds, both of which are valued using quoted market prices, representing Level 1 assets. The Company has a payment obligation to the participants under its Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (“DCP”). This liability is recorded at fair value based on the underlying value of certain hypothetical investments under the DCP as designated by each participant for their benefit. Since the value of the DCP obligation is based on market prices, the liability is classified within Level 1. In addition, in fiscal 2013, the Company had contingent consideration liabilities related to its acquisitions that were recorded at fair value and were based on Level 3 inputs (see Note 5(a)).

7
Table of Contents

Assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis consisted of the following at June 28, 2014: 
 
 
 
Fair Value at Reporting Date Using
 
Balance as of June 28, 2014
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Market for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Marketable securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity security
$
20.0

 
$
20.0

 
$
—

 
$
—

Mutual funds
18.3

 
18.3

 
—

 
—

Total
$
38.3

 
$
38.3

 
$
—

 
$
—

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred compensation liabilities
$
36.0

 
$
36.0

 
$
—

 
$
—

Contingent consideration
3.1

 
—

 
—

 
3.1

Total
$
39.1

 
$
36.0

 
$
—

 
$
3.1


Changes in the fair value of recurring fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), which solely consisted of contingent consideration liabilities, were as follows:
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
June 28,
2014
 
June 29,
2013
 
June 28,
2014
 
June 29,
2013
Balance at beginning of period
$
3.4

 
$
3.6

 
$
3.8

 
$
86.4

Contingent consideration recorded at acquisition
—

 
0.5

 
—

 
0.5

Fair value adjustments
—

 
0.5

 
—

 
11.3

Payments
(0.3
)
 
(0.1
)
 
(0.7
)
 
(93.7
)
Balance at end of period
$
3.1

 
$
4.5

 
$
3.1

 
$
4.5

The contingent consideration liability at June 28, 2014 is related to the Company’s acquisition of Interlace Medical, Inc. (“Interlace”) and represents the remaining amounts withheld from payments made to the former stockholders of Interlace for legal indemnification provisions. As of the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2013, the Interlace contingent liability was no longer being remeasured as the final measurement period lapsed. The withheld amount is being used to pay qualifying legal expenses in connection with the Company's litigation with Smith & Nephew, Inc. (“Smith & Nephew”) (see Note 5(b)).
Assets Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
The Company remeasures the fair value of certain assets and liabilities upon the occurrence of certain events. Such assets are comprised of cost-method equity investments and long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company evaluated its MRI breast coils product line asset group, which is within its Breast Health segment, for impairment due to the Company’s expectation that it will be sold or disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. The undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by this asset group over its estimated remaining useful life were not sufficient to recover its carrying value. The Company estimated the fair value of the asset group using market participant assumptions, which were based on underlying cash flow estimates, resulting in an impairment charge of $28.6 million. Pursuant to ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment-Other, subtopic 10-35-28, the impairment charge was allocated to the long-lived assets, with $27.1 million to intangible assets and $1.5 million to property and equipment. The property and equipment charge was recorded to cost of product revenues and general and administrative expenses in the amounts of $0.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively. The estimated fair value of this asset group is subject to change and additional charges may be recorded in the future. The Company believes this adjustment falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

8
Table of Contents

In the first quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company recorded a $3.1 million impairment charge to record certain of its buildings at fair value related to the shutdown of the Hitec organic photoconductor manufacturing line (see Note 3). The Company believes this adjustment falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The Company holds certain cost-method equity investments in non-publicly traded securities aggregating $5.2 million and $12.6 million at June 28, 2014 and September 28, 2013, respectively, which are included in other long-term assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. These investments are generally carried at cost, less any write-downs for other-than-temporary impairment charges. To determine the fair value of these investments, the Company uses all available financial information related to the entities, including information based on recent or pending third-party equity investments in these entities. In certain instances, a cost method investment’s fair value is not estimated as there are no identified events or changes in circumstances that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment and to do so would be impractical. For the three and nine month periods ended June 28, 2014, the Company recorded other-than-temporary impairment charges of $3.2 million and $6.9 million, respectively, related to its cost-method equity investments. For the three and nine months ended June 29, 2013, the Company recorded other-than-temporary impairment charges of $4.7 million and $6.4 million, respectively, related to these investments.
The following chart depicts the level of inputs within the fair value hierarchy used to estimate the fair value of assets measured on a nonrecurring basis for which the Company has recorded impairment charges to date in fiscal 2014:
 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
 
 
Fair Value
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Market for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
 
Total
Losses
Fiscal 2014:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Intangible assets
$
18.3

 
—

 
—

 
$
18.3

 
$
(27.1
)
Property and equipment
1.0

 
—

 
—

 
1.0

 
(1.5
)
Buildings
1.4

 
—

 
—

 
1.4

 
(3.1
)
Cost-method equity investments
0.8

 
—

 
—

 
0.8

 
(6.9
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
(38.6
)
Refer to Note 4 for disclosure of the nonrecurring fair value measurement related to the debt extinguishment losses recorded in the second quarter of each of fiscal 2014 and 2013. Refer to Note 13 for the disclosure of the nonrecurring fair value measurement related to the intangible asset impairment charge recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2013.
Disclosure of Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company’s financial instruments mainly consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, marketable securities, cost-method equity investments, insurance contracts, DCP liability, accounts payable and debt obligations. The carrying amounts of the Company’s cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The Company’s marketable securities are recorded at fair value. The carrying amount of the insurance contracts are recorded at the cash surrender value, as required by U.S. GAAP, which approximates fair value, and the related DCP liability is recorded at fair value. The Company believes the carrying amounts of its cost-method equity investments approximate fair value.
Amounts outstanding under the Company’s Credit Agreement of $2.06 billion aggregate principal are subject to variable rates of interest based on current market rates, and as such, the Company believes the carrying amount of these obligations approximates fair value. The Company’s Senior Notes had a fair value of approximately $1.06 billion as of June 28, 2014 based on their trading price, representing a Level 1 measurement. The fair value of the Company’s Convertible Notes is based on the trading prices of the respective notes and represents a Level 1 measurement. Refer to Note 4 for the carrying amounts of the various components of the Company’s debt.

9
Table of Contents

The estimated fair values of the Company’s Convertible Notes at June 28, 2014 were as follows:
 
2010 Notes
$
566.4

2012 Notes
548.6

2013 Notes
408.9

 
$
1,523.9

(3) Restructuring and Divestiture Charges
The Company evaluates its operations for opportunities to improve operational effectiveness and efficiency, including facility and operations consolidation, and to better align expenses with revenues. As a result of these assessments, the Company has undertaken various restructuring actions which are described below. The following table displays charges taken related to restructuring actions in fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 and a rollforward of the charges to the accrued balances as of June 28, 2014:
 
Consolidation of Diagnostics Operations
 
Closure of Indianapolis Facility
 
Fiscal 2014 Actions
 
Fiscal 2013 Actions
 
Other Operating Cost Reductions
 
Total    
Restructuring and Divestiture Charges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fiscal 2012 charges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-cash impairment charge
$
0.6

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
0.6

Purchase orders and other contractual obligations
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
0.3

 
0.3

Workforce reductions
14.2

 
0.9

 
—

 
—

 
0.2

 
15.3

Facility closure costs
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
0.4

 
0.4

Other
—

 
0.9

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
0.9

Fiscal 2012 restructuring and divestiture charges
$
14.8

 
$
1.8

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
0.9

 
$
17.5

Fiscal 2013 charges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Workforce reductions
$
14.0

 
$
4.8

 
$
—

 
$
11.3

 
$
1.1

 
$
31.2

Facility closure costs
—

 
0.2

 
—

 
—

 
0.4

 
0.6

Other
—

 
0.7

 
—

 
—

 
0.2

 
0.9

Fiscal 2013 restructuring charges
$
14.0

 
$
5.7

 
$
—

 
$
11.3

 
$
1.7

 
$
32.7

Divestiture net charges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
0.1

Fiscal 2013 restructuring and divestiture charges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
32.8

Fiscal 2014 charges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Workforce reductions
$
2.3

 
$
0.2

 
$
21.0

 
$
0.9

 
$
8.3

 
$
32.7

Property impairment
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
3.1

 
3.1

Facility closure costs
—

 
0.5

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
0.5

Other
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
0.1

 
0.1

Fiscal 2014 restructuring charges
$
2.3

 
$
0.7

 
$
21.0

 
$
0.9

 
$
11.5

 
$
36.4

Divestiture net charges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
0.2

Fiscal 2014 restructuring and divestiture charges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
36.6


10
Table of Contents

 
Consolidation of Diagnostics Operations
 
Closure of Indianapolis Facility
 
Fiscal 2014 Actions
 
Fiscal 2013 Actions
 
Other Operating Cost Reductions  
 
Total    
Rollforward of Accrued Restructuring
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fiscal 2012 charges
$
14.8

 
$
1.8

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
0.9

 
$
17.5

Non-cash impairment charges
(0.6
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(0.6
)
Stock-based compensation
(3.5
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(3.5
)
Severance payments
(2.4
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(0.2
)
 
(2.6
)
Other payments
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(0.8
)
 
(0.8
)
Acquired and other
0.1

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
0.1

 
0.2

Balance as of September 29, 2012
$
8.4

 
$
1.8

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
0.0

 
$
10.2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fiscal 2013 restructuring charges
$
14.0

 
$
5.7

 
$
—

 
$
11.3

 
$
1.7

 
$
32.7

Stock-based compensation
(6.3
)
 
—

 
—

 
(1.6
)
 
—

 
(7.9
)
Severance payments
(13.1
)
 
(3.1
)
 
—

 
(4.4
)
 
(0.9
)
 
(21.5
)
Other payments
—

 
(0.6
)
 
—

 
—

 
(0.6
)
 
(1.2
)
Balance as of September 28, 2013
$
3.0

 
$
3.8

 
$
—

 
$
5.3

 
$
0.2

 
$
12.3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fiscal 2014 restructuring charges
$
2.3

 
$
0.7

 
$
21.0

 
$
0.9

 
$
11.5

 
$
36.4

Stock-based compensation
—

 
—

 
(6.5
)
 
—

 
—

 
(6.5
)
Non-cash impairment charges
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(3.1
)
 
(3.1
)
Severance payments
(0.9
)
 
(4.0
)
 
(7.7
)
 
(5.9
)
 
(5.9
)
 
(24.4
)
Other payments
—

 
(0.4
)
 
—

 
—

 
(0.1
)
 
(0.5
)
Balance as of June 28, 2014
$
4.4

 
$
0.1

 
$
6.8

 
$
0.3

 
$
2.6

 
$
14.2

Consolidation of Diagnostics Operations
In connection with its acquisition of Gen-Probe Incorporated (“Gen-Probe”), the Company implemented restructuring actions to consolidate its Diagnostics operations, including streamlining product development initiatives, reducing overlapping functional areas in sales, marketing and general and administrative functions, and consolidating manufacturing resources, field services and support. As a result, the Company terminated certain employees from Gen-Probe and its legacy diagnostics business in research and development, sales, marketing, and general and administrative functions. The Company recorded severance and benefit charges in fiscal 2012 of $13.3 million related to this action pursuant to ASC 420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations (ASC 420). The majority of these employees ceased working in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, and their full severance charge was recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. In addition, certain of the terminated Gen-Probe employees had unvested stock options, which were accelerated at termination pursuant to the stock options’ original terms. As such, the severance charges in fiscal 2012 include $3.5 million of stock-based compensation expense. In fiscal 2013, the Company recorded $10.8 million of severance charges, including $6.3 million for stock-based compensation. Included in these charges was $9.7 million recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 related to the termination of certain Gen-Probe executives, including Carl Hull, Gen-Probe’s former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. The charge was for the acceleration of certain retention payments and equity awards pursuant to the original terms of the related agreements. The Company recorded $0.3 million and $10.8 million of severance charges in the three and nine months ended June 29, 2013, respectively. No additional charges were recorded in fiscal 2014 under this portion of the action.
In addition, the Company is in the process of moving its legacy molecular diagnostics operations from Madison, Wisconsin to Gen-Probe’s facilities in San Diego, California. This transfer is expected to be finalized by the end of fiscal 2014 and, as a result, many of the employees in Madison have been terminated. The Company is recording severance and benefit charges pursuant to ASC 420 and estimates the total severance and benefits charges to be approximately $7.1 million, which is being recorded ratably over the estimated service period of the affected employees. The Company recorded $0.6 million and $2.3 million in the three and nine months ended June 28, 2014, respectively, and $0.8 million and $2.6 million in the three and nine months ended June 29, 2013, respectively. In fiscal 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded $3.2 million and $0.9 million, respectively, for severance and benefits related to this portion of the action.

11
Table of Contents

Closure of Indianapolis Facility
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company finalized its decision to transfer production of the majority of its interventional breast products, which are included within the Breast Health reporting segment, from its Indianapolis, Indiana facility to its facility in Costa Rica. The transfer was completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2014, and the termination of employees at the Indianapolis location was completed. The Company recorded total severance and benefit charges under this action of $5.9 million pursuant to ASC 420. These charges were recorded ratably over the required service period of the affected employees. The Company recorded severance and benefits charges of $0.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2014. The Company recorded severance and benefit charges of $1.4 million and $4.5 million in the three and nine months ended June 29, 2013, respectively. In fiscal 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded $4.8 million and $0.9 million, respectively, for severance and benefits related to this action. In addition, the Company recorded a charge of $0.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 related to the termination of its Indianapolis lease. The Company also recorded miscellaneous charges of $0.8 million in fiscal 2013 and $0.9 million in fiscal 2012 for amounts owed to the state of Indiana for employment credits. This action is complete and no additional charges will be recorded.
Fiscal 2014 Actions
During the first quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company implemented a cost reduction initiative comprised of reducing headcount and evaluating research projects and operating costs. In connection with this plan, the Company terminated certain employees on a worldwide basis. The Company recorded the severance and benefit charges pursuant to ASC 420 and ASC 712, Compensation-Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits (ASC 712), depending on the employee terminated. The Company recorded $6.3 million of severance and benefit charges in the first quarter of fiscal 2014, which included $0.4 million of stock-based compensation.
On December 6, 2013, Stephen P. MacMillan was appointed as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company. The employment of John W. Cumming, the Company’s prior President and Chief Executive Officer, terminated upon Mr. MacMillan’s appointment. The Company provided separation benefits to Mr. Cumming pursuant to his employment letter dated July 18, 2013 resulting in a charge of $6.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2014, which included $4.4 million of stock-based compensation related to the acceleration of all of Mr. Cumming’s outstanding equity awards in accordance with the existing terms of Mr. Cumming’s share based payment arrangements.
In the second and third quarters of fiscal 2014, the Company terminated certain executives and employees and recorded severance and benefit charges of $3.0 million and $5.0 million, respectively. These charges were recorded pursuant to ASC 712. The third quarter charge included $1.7 million of stock-based compensation for the modification of the terms of equity awards to certain employees.
Fiscal 2013 Actions
During the third quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company implemented a cost reduction initiative comprised of reducing headcount and evaluating research projects and operating costs. In connection with this plan, the Company terminated certain employees on a worldwide basis. The Company primarily recorded severance and benefit charges pursuant to ASC 420, and the total severance and benefits charge related to this plan was $5.4 million. For those employees who continued to be employed beyond the minimum retention period, charges were recorded ratably over the estimated service period of the affected employees. The Company recorded severance and benefit charges of $0.9 million in the nine months ended June 28, 2014. The Company recorded $3.6 million of severance and benefit charges in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 related to this action.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, Robert A. Cascella resigned as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company, and effective at the same time, Mr. Cumming was appointed as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer. In connection with this management change, additional headcount reductions were implemented. As a result of this action, the Company recorded $6.8 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 for severance and benefits charges. All employees were notified prior to September 28, 2013 and primarily ceased employment in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. The severance and benefit charges were recorded pursuant to ASC 712 for those employees with contractual arrangements and under ASC 420 for the remainder of the affected employees. In addition to the acceleration of stock options pursuant to the stock options’ original terms for certain employees, the Company also modified the terms of equity awards to certain employees resulting in aggregate stock-based compensation charges of $1.4 million recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.

12
Table of Contents

Other Operating Cost Reductions:
Hitec-Imaging Organic Photoconductor Manufacturing Line Shut-down
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, in connection with the Company’s cost reduction initiatives, the Company decided to shut-down its Hitec-Imaging organic photoconductor manufacturing line located in Germany. This production line is included within the Breast Health segment. As a result, the Company terminated certain employees, primarily in manufacturing, in fiscal 2014. During the first quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company completed its negotiations with the local Works Council to determine severance benefits for the approximately 95 affected employees. The Company is recording severance and benefit charges pursuant to ASC 420 and estimates the severance and related charges will be approximately $9.2 million. The Company recorded charges of $7.3 million and $1.1 million in the second and third quarters of fiscal 2014, respectively, in connection with terminating these employees. Additional charges will be recorded in fiscal 2014 and 2015 based on the terms of the benefit arrangements with certain employees.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $3.1 million to record certain buildings at this location to their estimated fair value.
Consolidation of Selenium Panel Coating Production
During the third quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company finalized its decision to consolidate its Selenium panel coating process and transfer the production line to its Newark, Delaware facility from its Hitec-Imaging German subsidiary. This production line is included within the Breast Health segment. The transfer was completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. In connection with this consolidation plan, the Company terminated certain employees, primarily manufacturing personnel. Severance charges were recorded pursuant to ASC 420. The termination communications began in January 2013 and the Company recorded severance charges of $0.4 million and $1.0 million in the three and nine months ended June 29, 2013, respectively. In connection with this action, the Company recorded severance charges of $1.1 million in fiscal 2013.
Divestitures
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company designated the assets of its Elucigene product line as assets held-for-sale, and recorded a charge of $0.7 million to record the assets at fair value. In the first quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company finalized the sale of the assets for $2.8 million, resulting in additional charges of $0.2 million for the nine months ended June 28, 2014. At September 28, 2013, assets held-for-sale consisted of inventory and certain equipment valued at $2.4 million and goodwill of $0.6 million.The Company completed the sale of its Lifecodes business and recorded a net gain of $0.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2013. For the year ended September 28, 2013, the Company recorded a charge of $0.3 million related to the disposition of certain other assets held-for-sale.

(4) Borrowings and Credit Arrangements
The Company’s borrowings consisted of the following: 
 
June 28,
2014
 
September 28,
2013
Current debt obligations, net of debt discount:

 

Term Loan A
$
87.1

 
$
49.7

Term Loan B
14.9

 
114.0

Convertible Notes
—

 
400.1

Total current debt obligations
102.0

 
563.8

Long-term debt obligations, net of debt discount:
 
 
 
Term Loan A
821.2

 
894.8

Term Loan B
1,124.3

 
1,159.3

Senior Notes
1,000.0

 
1,000.0

Convertible Notes
1,223.0

 
1,188.0

Total long-term debt obligations
4,168.5

 
4,242.1

Total debt obligations
$
4,270.5

 
$
4,805.9


13
Table of Contents

Credit Agreement
On October 31, 2013, the Company voluntarily pre-paid $100.0 million of its Term Loan B facility, which was reflected in current debt obligations as of September 28, 2013. Pursuant to ASC 470, Debt (ASC 470), the Company recorded a debt extinguishment loss of $2.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 to write-off the pro-rata amount of unamortized debt discount and deferred issuance costs related to this voluntary prepayment.
On February 26, 2014, the Company, the Guarantors, Goldman Sachs, and the Lenders entered into Refinancing Amendment No. 3 to the credit and guaranty agreement among the parties (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”). The Refinancing Amendment No. 3 refinanced the Company’s existing senior secured tranche B term loan facility (the “Existing Term Loan B”) with a new senior secured tranche B term loan facility (the “New Term Loan B”) with an issue price of 99.875% of the principal amount of the Existing Term Loan B (subject also to the prepayment referenced below). This amendment resulted in a 50 basis point reduction in the interest rate on the New Term Loan B. Amounts outstanding under the New Term Loan B bear interest, at the Company’s option: (a) at the Base Rate, with a floor of 1.75%, plus 1.50% per annum, or (b) at the Adjusted Eurodollar Rate (i.e., the Libor rate), with a floor of 0.75%, plus 2.50% per annum. In addition, the Company voluntarily prepaid $25.0 million of the New Term Loan B.
Pursuant to ASC 470, the accounting for this refinancing is required to be evaluated on a creditor-by-creditor basis to determine whether each transaction should be accounted for as a modification or extinguishment. Certain creditors under the Credit Agreement did not participate in this refinancing transaction and ceased being creditors of the Company, and certain creditors reduced their positions. As a result, the Company recorded a debt extinguishment loss of $4.4 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2014 to write-off the pro-rata amount of unamortized debt discount and deferred issuance costs related to these creditors. For the remainder of the creditors, this transaction has been accounted for as a modification because the present value of the cash flows on a creditor-by-creditor basis between the two debt instruments was less than 10%. Pursuant to ASC 470, subtopic 50-40, third-party costs of $1.0 million related to this transaction were expensed.

Borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement for the three and nine months ended June 28, 2014 had weighted-average interest rates of 2.76% and 2.93%, respectively. The interest rates on the outstanding Term Loan A and Term Loan B borrowings at June 28, 2014 were 2.15% and 3.25%, respectively. Interest expense under the Credit Agreement totaled $17.9 million and $57.5 million for the three and nine months ended June 28, 2014, respectively, which includes non-cash interest expense of $3.1 million and $9.6 million, respectively, related to the amortization of the deferred financing costs and accretion of the debt discount. Interest expense totaled $26.1 million and $84.7 million for the three and nine months ended June 29, 2013, respectively, which includes non-cash interest expense of $3.4 million and $11.2 million related to the amortization of the deferred financing costs and accretion of the debt discount.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company executed Refinancing Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement which reduced the interest rate on the Term Loan A facility. Consistent with the accounting treatment noted above for Refinancing Amendment No. 3, in connection with this transaction, the Company recorded a debt extinguishment loss of $3.2 million and expensed $2.4 million of third-party costs to interest expense.
Senior Notes
The Company’s 6.25% senior notes due 2020 (the “Senior Notes”) mature on August 1, 2020 and bear interest at the rate of 6.25% per year, payable semi-annually on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing on February 1, 2013. The Company recorded interest expense of $16.0 million and $48.0 million in both the three and nine month periods ended June 28, 2014 and June 29, 2013, respectively, which includes non-cash interest expense of $0.4 million and $1.2 million in both the three and nine month periods ended June 28, 2014 and June 29, 2013, respectively, related to the amortization of the deferred financing costs.
Convertible Notes
On November 14, 2013, the Company announced that it had issued a notice of redemption to the holders of its 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2037 (“2007 Notes”) to redeem any 2007 Notes outstanding on December 18, 2013 at a redemption price payable in cash equal to 100.00% of the principal amount of the 2007 Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, December 18, 2013. Holders of the 2007 Notes also had the option of putting the 2007 Notes to the Company as of December 13, 2013. The 2007 Notes were redeemed at their par value aggregating $405.0 million. Under ASC 470, the derecognition of the 2007 Notes did not result in a gain or loss as the fair value of the liability component of the 2007 Notes was determined to be equal to the consideration paid to redeem the 2007 Notes, and as a result, no value was allocated to the reacquisition of the conversion option.

14
Table of Contents

Interest expense under the Convertible Notes is as follows: 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
June 28,
2014
 
June 29,
2013
 
June 28,
2014
 
June 29,
2013
Amortization of debt discount
$
8.5

 
$
11.6

 
$
28.4

 
$
40.9

Amortization of deferred financing costs
0.4

 
0.7

 
1.5

 
2.4

Principal accretion
3.9

 
3.7

 
11.4

 
5.5

Non-cash interest expense
12.8

 
16.0

 
41.3

 
48.8

2.00% accrued interest
4.7

 
8.6

 
17.6

 
25.8

 
$
17.5

 
$
24.6

 
$
58.9

 
$
74.6

(5) Commitments and Contingencies
(a) Contingent Earn-Out Payments
In connection with certain of its acquisitions, the Company incurred obligations to make contingent earn-out payments tied to performance criteria, principally revenue growth of the acquired businesses over a specified period.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company made its final contingent consideration payment of $16.8 million to the former shareholders of Adiana, Inc., which was net of amounts withheld for qualifying legal costs, and its final contingent consideration payment of $3.4 million to the former shareholders of Sentinelle Medical Inc.
In connection with the Company’s acquisition of Interlace in fiscal 2011, the Company had an obligation to the former Interlace stockholders to make contingent payments over a two-year period. Pursuant to ASC 805, Business Combinations, the Company recorded its estimate of the fair value of the contingent consideration liability based on future revenue projections of the Interlace business. The final measurement period ended during the second quarter of fiscal 2013, resulting in a contingent consideration liability of $93.8 million. Of this amount, $86.9 million was paid to the former Interlace stockholders in the second quarter of fiscal 2013. The remainder was withheld for legal indemnification provisions and is being used to pay qualifying legal expenses. At June 28, 2014, the Company had accrued $3.1 million.
In connection with the Company’s acquisition of TCT International Co., Ltd. (“TCT”) in June 2011, the Company had an obligation to certain of the former TCT shareholders, based on future employment, to make contingent payments over a two year period provided certain revenue milestones were met. These earnouts were recorded as compensation expense ratably over the required service periods. The second and final earn-out period was completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2013, and the Company paid $87.4 million of this earn-out in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. The remaining $31.1 million of this earn-out was paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2014.
There was no contingent consideration expense recorded in the first nine months of fiscal 2014. A summary of amounts recorded to the Consolidated Statements of Operations is as follows:
Statement of Operations Line Item – 3 Months Ended June 29, 2013
Interlace
 
TCT  
 
Total
Contingent consideration – compensation expense
$
—

 
$
21.6

 
$
21.6

Contingent consideration – fair value adjustments
0.5

 
—

 
0.5

 
$
0.5

 
$
21.6

 
$
22.1

  
Statement of Operations Line Item – 9 Months Ended June 29, 2013
Interlace
 
TCT
 
Total
Contingent consideration – compensation expense
$
—

 
$
80.5

 
$
80.5

Contingent consideration – fair value adjustments
11.3

 
—

 
11.3

 
$
11.3

 
$
80.5

 
$
91.8

(b) Litigation and Related Matters
On June 9, 2010, Smith & Nephew filed suit against Interlace, which the Company acquired on January 6, 2011, in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The complaint alleged that the Interlace MyoSure hysteroscopic tissue removal device infringed U.S. patent 7,226,459. On November 22, 2011, Smith & Nephew filed suit against the

15
Table of Contents

Company in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The complaint alleged that use of the MyoSure hysteroscopic tissue removal system infringed U.S. patent 8,061,359. Both complaints sought permanent injunctive relief and unspecified damages. On September 4, 2012, following a two week trial, the jury returned a verdict of infringement of both the ‘459 and ‘359 patents and assessed damages of $4.0 million. A bench trial regarding the Company’s assertion of inequitable conduct on the part of Smith & Nephew with regard to the ‘359 patent was held on December 9, 2012 and oral arguments on the issue of inequitable conduct were presented on February 27, 2013. On June 27, 2013, the Court denied the Company’s motions related to inequitable conduct and allowed Smith & Nephew’s request for injunction, but ordered that enforcement of the injunction be stayed until final resolution, including appeal, of the current re-examinations of both patents at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). The Court also rejected the jury’s damage award and ordered the parties to identify a mechanism for resolving the damages issue. On September 12, 2013, a status conference was held, and the Court invited the parties to submit briefs on the relevance of recent activity in the re-examinations at the USPTO. A hearing on this topic was held on October 29, 2013, and the parties are awaiting the Court’s ruling. The Company intends to file post-trial motions seeking to reverse the jury’s verdict. On January 14, 2014, the USPTO issued a final decision that the claims of the ‘459 patent asserted as part of the litigation are not patentable. On February 13, 2014, Smith & Nephew appealed this decision to the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board. The re-examination of the ‘359 patent is on-going. It is expected that patentability decisions made by the USPTO for both patents will proceed to appeal. At this time, based on available information regarding this litigation, the Company is unable to reasonably assess the ultimate outcome of this case or determine an estimate, or a range of estimates, of potential losses.
On March 6, 2012, Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. (“Enzo”) filed suit against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The complaint alleged that certain of the Company’s molecular diagnostics products, including without limitation products based on its proprietary Invader chemistry, such as Cervista HPV HR and Cervista HPV 16/18, infringe Enzo’s U.S. patent 6,992,180. The complaint seeks permanent injunctive relief and unspecified damages. The Company was formally served with the complaint on July 3, 2012, and a trial is tentatively scheduled for the fall of 2015. In January 2012, Enzo filed suit against Gen-Probe in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The Gen-Probe complaint alleged that certain of Gen-Probe’s diagnostics products, including products that incorporate Gen-Probe’s patented hybridization protection assay technology, such as the Aptima Combo 2 and Aptima HPV assays, infringe Enzo’s U.S. patent 6,992,180. On September 30, 2013, Enzo amended its list of accused products to include Prodesse, MilliPROBE, PACE and Procleix assays. The complaint seeks permanent injunctive relief and unspecified damages. Enzo has asserted the ‘180 patent claims against six other companies. The defendant companies are jointly arguing issues related to claim construction, and the trials are tentatively scheduled to begin in the fall of 2015. At this time, based on available information regarding this litigation, the Company is unable to reasonably assess the ultimate outcome of this case or determine an estimate, or a range of estimates, of potential losses.

On October 29, 2013, the Interlace stockholder representatives filed a complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery alleging breach of contract for issues related to the payment of contingent consideration under the Interlace acquisition agreement, and are seeking $14.7 million in additional payments. The Company believes that Interlace has been paid all amounts due under the acquisition agreement and that the claims are without merit. The Company is currently undergoing discovery. At this time, the Company is unable to reasonably assess the ultimate outcome of this case or determine an estimate, or range of estimates, of potential losses.
The Company is a party to various other legal proceedings and claims arising out of the ordinary course of its business. The Company believes that except for those described above there are no other proceedings or claims pending against it of which the ultimate resolution would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations. In all cases, at each reporting period, the Company evaluates whether or not a potential loss amount or a potential range of loss is probable and reasonably estimable under ASC 450, Contingencies. Legal costs are expensed as incurred.
(6) Sale of Makena
In fiscal 2008, the Company sold the rights of its Makena (formerly Gestiva) pharmaceutical product to K-V Pharmaceutical Company (“KV”) upon FDA approval of the then pending Makena new drug application. The Company executed certain amendments to this agreement that resulted in an increase in the total sales price to $199.5 million and a change in the timing of when payments were due to the Company. On February 3, 2011, the Company received FDA approval of Makena, and all rights to Makena were transferred to KV. The Company had received scheduled payments as required under the agreement until August 2012 when KV and certain of its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court. At that time, additional payments were still owed to the Company, and in December 2012 the Company and KV executed a settlement agreement, which released KV from all claims in consideration of a $60.0 million payment. The Company recorded this amount in the first quarter of fiscal 2013, net of certain costs, resulting in a gain of $53.9 million. The Company will receive no further payments from KV.
(7) Marketable Securities
The following reconciles the cost basis to the fair market value of the Company’s equity security that is classified as available-for-sale: 
Period Ended:
Cost
 
Gross Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair Value
June 28, 2014
$
5.9

 
$
14.1

 
$
—

 
$
20.0

September 28, 2013
$
5.9

 
$
12.2

 
$
—

 
$
18.1

(8) Net Income (Loss) Per Share
A reconciliation of basic and diluted share amounts is as follows:
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
June 28,
2014
 
June 29,
2013
 
June 28,
2014
 
June 29,
2013
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
276,843

 
269,430

 
274,713

 
267,983

Weighted average common stock equivalents from assumed exercise of stock options and restricted stock units
2,130

 
—

 
—

 
—

Incremental shares from assumed conversion of the Convertible Notes premium
232

 
—

 
—

 
—

Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
279,205

 
269,430

 
274,713

 
267,983

Weighted-average anti-dilutive shares related to:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Outstanding stock options
4,727

 
7,964

 
7,007

 
8,724

Restricted stock units
21

 
1,147

 
811

 
1,089

As more fully discussed in Note 4, the Company has outstanding Convertible Notes. The Company’s policy is to net share settle its Convertible Notes, and any conversion premium, at the Company’s option, may be satisfied by issuing shares of

16
Table of Contents

common stock, cash or a combination of shares and cash. As such, dilution related to the conversion premium on the 2010 Notes is included in the calculation of diluted weighted-average shares outstanding. Except for the three months ended June 28, 2014, shares potentially issuable for the conversion premium of the Convertible Notes were excluded from the calculation of earnings per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
(9) Stock-Based Compensation
The following presents stock-based compensation expense in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations:
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
June 28,
2014
 
June 29,
2013
 
June 28,
2014
 
June 29,
2013
Cost of revenues
$
1.9

 
$
1.7

 
$
5.5

 
$
5.2

Research and development
2.2

 
1.7

 
6.3

 
5.6

Selling and marketing
2.0

 
2.2

 
6.1

 
7.0

General and administrative
5.2

 
4.7

 
14.7

 
16.4

Restructuring and divestiture
1.7

 
0.5

 
6.5

 
7.7

 
$
13.0

 
$
10.8

 
$
39.1

 
$
41.9

The Company granted approximately 2.4 million and 2.3 million stock options during the nine months ended June 28, 2014 and June 29, 2013, respectively, with weighted-average exercise prices of $21.92 and $19.95, respectively. There were 9.9 million options outstanding at June 28, 2014 with a weighted-average exercise price of $20.31.
The Company uses a binomial model to determine the fair value of its stock options. The weighted-average assumptions utilized to value these stock options are indicated in the following table:
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
June 28,
2014
 
June 29,
2013
 
June 28,
2014
 
June 29,
2013
Risk-free interest rate
1.3
%
 
0.5
%
 
1.2
%
 
0.5
%
Expected volatility
41.4
%
 
43.7
%
 
41.4
%
 
43.7
%
Expected life (in years)
4.5

 
4.4

 
4.4

 
4.4

Dividend yield
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Weighted average fair value of options granted
$
7.97

 
$
7.47

 
$
7.64

 
$
7.09

The Company granted approximately 2.4 million and 2.0 million restricted stock units (RSUs) during the nine months ended June 28, 2014 and June 29, 2013, respectively, with weighted-average grant date fair values of $21.97 and $19.86, respectively. As of June 28, 2014, there were 4.2 million unvested RSUs outstanding with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $20.61. The Company granted approximately 0.4 million performance stock units (PSUs) in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 to members of its senior management team, which have a weighted-average grant date fair value of $21.77. Each recipient of the PSUs is eligible to receive between zero and 200% of the target number of shares of the Company’s common stock at the end of three years provided the Company’s defined Return on Invested Capital metrics are achieved. The Company is recognizing compensation expense ratably over the required service period based on its estimate that it is probable the targeted number of shares will vest. If there is a change in the estimate of the number of shares that are probable of vesting, the Company will cumulatively adjust compensation expense in the period that the change in estimate is made.
In connection with appointing its new President and Chief Executive Officer in December 2013, the Company granted approximately 0.1 million market stock units (MSUs). The MSUs vest in three separate tranches in an amount of 1/3rd of the total amount of the award based on the Company’s stock price meeting certain defined average stock prices for 30 consecutive trading days. These MSUs were valued at an average of $18.65 using the Monte Carlo simulation model and each tranche has its own derived service period. The Company is recognizing compensation expense under the accelerated method as prescribed by ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation (ASC 718). In addition, per the terms of his employment agreement, the Company granted 0.2 million RSUs to match Mr. MacMillan’s purchase of 0.2 million shares of the Company’s common stock on the open market in the second quarter of fiscal 2014. The RSUs cliff vest three years from the date of grant, and the

17
Table of Contents

Company is accounting for this grant as a liability award pursuant to ASC 718 because this RSU award contains an additional vesting condition (the requirement that Mr. MacMillan retain the matching shares during the vesting period) that is not service, performance or market based.
At June 28, 2014, there was $26.9 million and $72.8 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options and stock units (comprised of RSUs, MSUs and PSUs), respectively, to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.1 years and 2.8 years, respectively.
(10) Other Balance Sheet Information

 
June 28,
2014
 
September 28,
2013
Inventories
 
 
 
Raw materials
$
121.0

 
$
115.6

Work-in-process
59.0

 
51.2

Finished goods
149.8

 
122.6

 
$
329.8

 
$
289.4

Property, plant and equipment
 
 
 
Equipment and software
$
341.6

 
$
318.5

Equipment under customer usage agreements
285.3

 
275.7

Building and improvements
175.6

 
171.5

Leasehold improvements
64.1

 
68.2

Land
51.7

 
51.6

Furniture and fixtures
16.3

 
22.5

 
934.6

 
908.0

Less – accumulated depreciation and amortization
(467.2
)
 
(416.5
)
 
$
467.4

 
$
491.5

(11) Business Segments and Geographic Information
The Company has four reportable segments: Diagnostics, Breast Health, GYN Surgical and Skeletal Health. Certain reportable segments represent an aggregation of operating units within each segment. The Company measures and evaluates its reportable segments based on segment revenues and operating income adjusted to exclude the effect of non-cash charges, such as intangible asset amortization expense, intangible asset and goodwill impairment charges, contingent consideration charges, acquisition related fair value adjustments and integration expenses, restructuring and divestiture charges and other one-time or unusual items and related tax effects.

18
Table of Contents

Identifiable assets for the four principal operating segments consist of inventories, intangible assets, goodwill, and property, plant and equipment. The Company fully allocates depreciation expense to its four reportable segments. The Company has presented all other identifiable assets as corporate assets. There were no intersegment revenues during the three and nine months ended June 28, 2014 and June 29, 2013. Segment information is as follows:
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
June 28,
2014
 
June 29,
2013
 
June 28,
2014
 
June 29,
2013
Total revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diagnostics
$
293.1

 
$
297.4

 
$
869.7

 
$
899.8

Breast Health
238.0

 
230.0

 
703.2

 
671.0

GYN Surgical
78.5

 
75.8

 
229.4

 
230.4

Skeletal Health
23.0

 
22.9

 
67.8

 
69.0

 
$
632.6


$
626.1


$
1,870.1


$
1,870.2

Operating income (loss):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diagnostics
$
4.8

 
$
(1.2
)
 
$
24.8

 
$
(33.7
)
Breast Health
58.4

 
53.2

 
128.0

 
146.0

GYN Surgical
9.1

 
6.3

 
26.8

 
9.1

Skeletal Health
3.9

 
2.8

 
8.1

 
8.5

 
$
76.2


$
61.1

 
$
187.7

 
$
129.9

Depreciation and amortization:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diagnostics
$
95.8

 
$
92.2

 
$
282.6

 
$
273.2

Breast Health
11.7

 
10.0

 
30.2

 
30.1

GYN Surgical
26.3

 
26.5

 
78.4

 
79.5

Skeletal Health
0.2

 
0.2

 
0.6

 
0.6

 
$
134.0


$
128.9


$
391.8


$
383.4

Capital expenditures:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diagnostics
$
12.8

 
$
13.4

 
$
37.9

 
$
40.6

Breast Health
2.7

 
4.2

 
6.8

 
13.7

GYN Surgical
2.0

 
2.4

 
5.9

 
7.4

Skeletal Health
—

 
0.2

 
0.2

 
0.4

Corporate
2.5

 
6.0

 
7.0

 
10.9

 
$
20.0


$
26.2


$
57.8


$
73.0

 
 
June 28,
2014
 
September 28,
2013
Identifiable assets:
 
 
 
Diagnostics
$
4,468.6

 
$
4,667.9

Breast Health
882.8

 
932.2

GYN Surgical
1,770.9

 
1,849.5

Skeletal Health
25.5

 
33.5

Corporate
1,264.2

 
1,517.7

 
$
8,412.0

 
$
9,000.8

The Company had no customers with balances greater than 10% of accounts receivable as of June 28, 2014 or September 28, 2013, or any customer that represented greater than 10% of consolidated revenues during the three and nine months ended June 28, 2014 and June 29, 2013.

19
Table of Contents

The Company operates in the following major geographic areas as noted in the below chart. Revenue data is based upon customer location. Other than the United States, no single country accounted for more than 10% of consolidated revenues. The Company’s sales in Europe are predominantly derived from France, Germany and the United Kingdom. The Company’s sales in Asia-Pacific are predominantly derived from China, Australia and Japan. The “All others” designation includes Canada, Latin America and the Middle East.
Revenues by geography as a percentage of total revenues were as follows:
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
June 28,
2014
 
June 29,
2013
 
June 28,
2014
 
June 29,
2013
United States
76
%
 
75
%
 
75
%
 
74
%
Europe
12
%
 
13
%
 
14
%
 
14
%
Asia-Pacific
8
%
 
8
%
 
7
%
 
8
%
All others
4
%
 
4
%
 
4
%
 
4
%
 
100
%
 
100
%
 
100
%
 
100
%
(12) Income Taxes
In accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes (ASC 740), each interim period is considered integral to the annual period, and tax expense is measured using an estimated annual effective tax rate. An entity is required to record income tax expense each quarter based on its annual effective tax rate estimated for the full fiscal year and use that rate to provide for income taxes on a current year-to-date basis, adjusted for discrete taxable events that occur during the interim period. If, however, the entity is unable to reliably estimate its annual effective tax rate, then the actual effective tax rate for the year-to-date may be the best annual effective tax rate estimate. For the nine months ended June 29, 2013, the Company determined that it was unable to make a reliable annual effective tax rate estimate due to the rate sensitivity as it related to its forecasted fiscal 2013 results. Therefore, the Company recorded a tax benefit for the nine months ended June 29, 2013 based on the effective rate for the nine months ended June 29, 2013.
The Company’s effective tax rate for the three and nine month periods ended June 28, 2014 was 50.0% and 214.2%, respectively, compared to a provision of 58.2% and a benefit of 33.0%, respectively, on pre-tax losses for the corresponding periods in the prior year. For the current three and nine month periods, the effective tax rate differed from the statutory rate primarily due to unbenefited foreign losses. For the three months ended June 29, 2013, the tax rate was higher than the statutory rate primarily due to non-deductible contingent consideration expense related to the TCT acquisition and unbenefited foreign losses, partially offset by the domestic production activities deduction. For the nine months ended June 29, 2013, the tax rate was lower than the statutory rate primarily due to a $19.6 million valuation allowance release related to capital losses which were utilized to offset capital gains generated during the year, partially offset by non-deductible contingent consideration expense related to the TCT and Interlace acquisitions and unbenefited losses.

(13) Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
A rollforward of goodwill activity by reportable segment from September 28, 2013 to June 28, 2014 is as follows:
 
 
Diagnostics
 
Breast Health
 
GYN Surgical
 
Skeletal Health
 
Total
Balance at September 28, 2013
$
1,153.5

 
$
636.4

 
$
1,016.4

 
$
8.2

 
$
2,814.5

Disposition of a portion of a reporting unit
(0.2
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(0.2
)
Tax adjustments
(0.6
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(0.6
)
Foreign currency and other
(0.6
)
 
(1.7
)
 
(0.3
)
 
—

 
(2.6
)
Balance at June 28, 2014
$
1,152.1


$
634.7


$
1,016.1


$
8.2


$
2,811.1


20
Table of Contents

Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consisted of the following:
 
Description
As of June 28, 2014
 
As of September 28, 2013
Gross
Carrying
Value
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross
Carrying
Value
 
Accumulated
Amortization
Developed technology
$
3,969.9

 
$
1,317.6

 
$
4,009.0

 
$
1,094.5

In-process research and development
23.0

 
—

 
24.0

 
—

Customer relationships and contracts
1,101.9

 
362.5

 
1,101.9

 
296.5

Trade names
236.8

 
98.8

 
238.1

 
81.8

Patents
14.1

 
8.8

 
13.0

 
8.5

Business licenses
2.6

 
1.9

 
2.6

 
0.6

 
$
5,348.3


$
1,789.6


$
5,388.6


$
1,481.9

The Company recorded impairment charges of $26.6 million and $0.5 million to developed technology and trade names, respectively, in the second quarter of fiscal 2014. In addition, the Company periodically re-evaluates the lives of its definite-lived intangible assets, and in the second quarter of fiscal 2014 shortened the life of certain corporate trade names, which will be phased out. Additionally, in the third quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company shortened the life of certain intangible assets associated with the MRI breast coils product line.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company determined that a developed technology asset was impaired and recorded a $1.7 million charge to cost of product revenues to record the asset at its estimated fair value.
The estimated remaining amortization expense as of June 28, 2014 for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows:

Remainder of Fiscal 2014
$
109.5

Fiscal 2015
$
414.6

Fiscal 2016
$
374.5

Fiscal 2017
$
365.4

Fiscal 2018
$
354.9

(14) Product Warranties
Product warranty activity was as follows:
 
 
Balance at
Beginning of
Period
 
Provisions
 
Settlements/
Adjustments
 
Balance at
End of Period
Nine Months Ended:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
June 28, 2014
$
9.3

 
$
5.5

 
$
(7.5
)
 
$
7.3

June 29, 2013
$
6.2

 
$
8.8

 
$
(7.2
)
 
$
7.8

(15) Stockholder Rights Plan

On June 24, 2014, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Rights Agreement (the “Rights Agreement”), dated as of November 21, 2013, by and between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as rights agent. The Amendment accelerated the expiration of the Company’s preferred share purchase rights (the “Rights”) from November 20, 2014 to June 24, 2014, and had the effect of terminating the Rights Agreement on that date. At the time of the termination of the Rights Agreement, all of the Rights distributed to holders of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Rights Agreement expired.

21
Table of Contents



(16) New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 660), which provides guidance for revenue recognition. This ASU is applicable to any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets. ASU 2014-09 will supersede the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance. The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In doing so, companies will need to use more judgment and make more estimates than under current US GAAP. These may include identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation.  ASU 2014-09 is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016, which is fiscal 2018 for the Company. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, which amends the guidance for reporting discontinued operations and disposals of components of an entity. The amended guidance requires that a disposal representing a strategic shift in operations, such as a disposal of a major line of business or geographic area, that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s financial results should be reported as discontinued operations. ASU 2014-08 also expands the disclosure requirements for discontinued operations and adds new disclosures for individually significant dispositions that do not qualify as discontinued operations. ASU 2014-08 is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014 (early adoption is permitted only for disposals that have not been previously reported). The implementation of ASU 2014-08 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exist. ASU 2013-11 amends the presentation requirements of ASC 740 and requires an unrecognized tax benefit to be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. To the extent the tax benefit is not available at the reporting date under the governing tax law or if the entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented as a liability and not combined with deferred tax assets. The ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013, which is fiscal 2015 for the Company. The amendments are to be applied to all unrecognized tax benefits that exist as of the effective date and may be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2013-11 on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

(17) Supplemental Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financials
The Company’s Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally and jointly and severally guaranteed by Hologic, Inc. (“Parent/Issuer”) and certain of its domestic subsidiaries, which are 100% owned by Hologic, Inc. The following represents the supplemental condensed financial information of Hologic, Inc. and its guarantor and non-guarantor subsidiaries, as of June 28, 2014 and September 28, 2013 and for the three and nine months ended June 28, 2014 and June 29, 2013, as applicable.

22
Table of Contents

SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Three Months Ended June 28, 2014
 
 
Parent/Issuer
 
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Product
$
128.4

 
$
386.4

 
$
125.8

 
$
(111.3
)
 
$
529.3

Service and other
88.2

 
14.4

 
13.1

 
(12.4
)
 
103.3

 
216.6

 
400.8

 
138.9

 
(123.7
)
 
632.6

Costs of revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Product
61.5

 
147.3

 
89.2

 
(111.3
)
 
186.7

Amortization of intangible assets
1.4

 
75.3

 
3.8

 
—

 
80.5

Service and other
46.8

 
5.9

 
12.3

 
(12.4
)
 
52.6

Gross Profit
106.9

 
172.3

 
33.6

 
—

 
312.8

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Research and development
7.7

 
42.9

 
1.9

 
—

 
52.5

Selling and marketing
16.8

 
43.4

 
22.8

 
—

 
83.0

General and administrative
15.8

 
37.8

 
11.1

 
—

 
64.7

Amortization of intangible assets
0.6

 
26.8

 
2.3

 
—

 
29.7

Restructuring and divestiture charges
1.0

 
2.9

 
2.8

</