UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 26, 2005
TERAYON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
| |
|
|
|
|
| Delaware
|
|
000-24647
|
|
77-0328533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
|
|
(Commission
file number)
|
|
(I.R.S. employer
identification no.) |
4988 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (408) 235-5500
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy
the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General
Instruction A.2. below):
o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.14d-2(b))
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.13e-4(c))
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item 4.01. Changes in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant.
On July 26, 2005, Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. (the “Company”), was advised
by Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”) that Ernst & Young will resign as the Company’s independent
registered public accounting firm following the earlier of the completion of services related to
the review of the Company’s interim financial statements for the quarter ending September 30, 2005
or the filing due date of that quarterly report.
The reports of Ernst & Young on the Company’s financial statements as of and for the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and
were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.
In connection with the audits of the Company’s most recent two years ended December 31, 2004
and 2003 and in the subsequent interim period, there were no disagreements (as described under Item
304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K) between Ernst & Young and the Company on any matter of accounting
principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope and procedures, that, if
not resolved to the satisfaction of Ernst & Young, would have caused Ernst & Young to make
reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its reports on the Company’s
financial statements for such years.
During the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, and through July 26, 2005, there were no
“reportable events” as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K, other than the two
material weaknesses disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2005 and as described
below:
First, management identified a material weakness due to insufficient controls related to the
identification, capture, and timely communication of financially significant information between
certain parts of the organization and the finance department to enable the finance department to
account for transactions in a complete and timely manner. As a result of this material weakness,
management recorded an adjustment in the quarter ended September 30, 2004 to record termination
benefits paid to a former executive.
Second, management also identified a material weakness for insufficient controls related to
the preparation and review of the annual consolidated financial statements and accompanying
footnote disclosures. The insufficient controls include a lack of sufficient personnel with
technical accounting expertise in the finance department and inadequate review and approval
procedures to prepare external financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP). As a result of this material weakness, management made substantial
revisions to its 2004 annual consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures before they
were issued.
Ernst & Young did not seek the Company’s consent to its resignation. As a result, the
Company’s audit committee did not recommend or approve the resignation of Ernst & Young.
2
The Company has provided Ernst &Young with a copy of the foregoing disclosures and requested
that Ernst & Young furnish a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether or
not Ernst & Young agrees with the above statements. Ernst & Young furnished such a letter, dated
August 1, 2005, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 16.1.
The Company’s audit committee has commenced the process of selecting an independent registered
public accounting firm to replace Ernst & Young.
Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits
(c) Exhibits
| |
|
|
| Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
16.1
|
|
Letter of Ernst & Young LLP, dated August 1, 2005. |
3