e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One) |
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 |
OR |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period
from to |
Commission file number 1-8198
HSBC FINANCE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
86-1052062 |
(State of Incorporation) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
2700 Sanders Road, Prospect Heights, Illinois |
|
60070 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(847) 564-5000 |
Registrants telephone number, including area code |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
At
October 31, 2005, there were 50 shares of the
registrants common stock outstanding, all of which were
owned indirectly by HSBC Holdings plc.
HSBC FINANCE CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
Signature |
|
|
66 |
|
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1. |
Consolidated Financial Statements |
HSBC Finance Corporation
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended | |
|
Nine months ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Finance and other interest income
|
|
$ |
3.402 |
|
|
$ |
2,779 |
|
|
$ |
9,491 |
|
|
$ |
7,944 |
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
Non-affiliates
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
2,898 |
|
|
|
2,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
2,163 |
|
|
|
1,969 |
|
|
|
6,086 |
|
|
|
5,719 |
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
3,233 |
|
|
|
3,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit
losses
|
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
2,853 |
|
|
|
2,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitization related revenue
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
Insurance revenue
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
Derivative income (expense)
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
Fee income
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
809 |
|
|
Taxpayer financial services revenue (expense)
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
Gain on receivable sales to HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
Servicing fees from HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other revenues
|
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
|
3,688 |
|
|
|
3,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
1,414 |
|
|
Sales incentives
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
Occupancy and equipment expenses
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
Other marketing expenses
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
Other servicing and administrative expenses
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
Support services from HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
Policyholders benefits
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,483 |
|
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
|
4,467 |
|
|
|
4,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
2,074 |
|
|
|
1,847 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
1,379 |
|
|
$ |
1,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
3
HSBC Finance Corporation
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(in millions, except share data) | |
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
744 |
|
|
$ |
392 |
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
2,651 |
|
Securities
|
|
|
3,946 |
|
|
|
3,645 |
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
126,025 |
|
|
|
104,815 |
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
2,394 |
|
|
|
2,705 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
6,799 |
|
|
|
6,856 |
|
Properties and equipment, net
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
Real estate owned
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
Derivative financial assets
|
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
4,049 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
4,506 |
|
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
146,574 |
|
|
$ |
130,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
Commercial paper, bank and other borrowings
|
|
|
11,623 |
|
|
|
9,013 |
|
|
Due to affiliates
|
|
|
17,907 |
|
|
|
13,789 |
|
|
Long term debt (with original maturities over one year)
|
|
|
93,181 |
|
|
|
85,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
122,747 |
|
|
|
108,227 |
|
Insurance policy and claim reserves
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
1,303 |
|
Derivative related liabilities
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
3,309 |
|
|
|
3,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
127,762 |
|
|
|
113,249 |
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable preferred stock, 1,501,100 shares authorized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, $0.01 par value, 1,100 shares issued,
held by HSBC Investments (North America) Inc.
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
Series B, $0.01 par value, 575,000 shares issued
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100 shares authorized,
50 shares issued
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
14,661 |
|
|
|
14,627 |
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,888 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common shareholders equity
|
|
|
17,137 |
|
|
|
15,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
146,574 |
|
|
$ |
130,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
4
HSBC Finance Corporation
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
|
Issuance of Series B preferred stock
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
1,675 |
|
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
14,627 |
|
|
$ |
14,645 |
|
|
|
Issuance costs of Series B preferred stock
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
Return of capital
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
Employee benefit plans, including transfers and other
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
14,661 |
|
|
$ |
14,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
571 |
|
|
$ |
1,303 |
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
Dividends:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(850 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
1,888 |
|
|
$ |
1,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
643 |
|
|
$ |
443 |
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives classified as cash flow hedges
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale and interest-only strip receivables
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
588 |
|
|
$ |
465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
17,137 |
|
|
$ |
16,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1,379 |
|
|
$ |
1,228 |
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
1,324 |
|
|
$ |
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
5
HSBC Finance Corporation
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1,379 |
|
|
$ |
1,228 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
3,233 |
|
|
|
3,048 |
|
|
Insurance policy and claim reserves
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
Net change in interest-only strip receivables
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
Net change in other assets
|
|
|
(1,147 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
Net change in other liabilities
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
(520 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
3,717 |
|
|
|
4,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
(656 |
) |
|
|
(1,152 |
) |
|
Matured
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
Sold
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
790 |
|
Net change in interest bearing deposits with banks
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
Net change in short-term securities available for sale
|
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
3,009 |
|
Net change in securities purchased under agreements to resell
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
(350 |
) |
Receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originations, net of collections
|
|
|
(48,566 |
) |
|
|
(42,123 |
) |
|
Purchases and related premiums
|
|
|
(959 |
) |
|
|
(597 |
) |
|
Initial and fill-up securitizations
|
|
|
7,388 |
|
|
|
24,250 |
|
|
Sales to affiliates
|
|
|
16,286 |
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
Properties and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
Sales
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(23,617 |
) |
|
|
(13,010 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in short-term debt and deposits
|
|
|
2,596 |
|
|
|
5,343 |
|
|
Net change in time certificates
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
Net change in due to affiliates
|
|
|
4,763 |
|
|
|
3,760 |
|
|
Long term debt issued
|
|
|
28,199 |
|
|
|
12,603 |
|
|
Long term debt retired
|
|
|
(15,624 |
) |
|
|
(12,581 |
) |
Redemption of company obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred
securities of subsidiary trusts
|
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Insurance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policyholders benefits paid
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
Cash received from policyholders
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
Shareholders dividends
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(850 |
) |
Issuance of Series B preferred stock
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
20,266 |
|
|
|
8,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
(189 |
) |
Cash at beginning of period
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period
|
|
$ |
744 |
|
|
$ |
274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
6
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1. |
Organization and Basis of Presentation |
HSBC Finance Corporation is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary
of HSBC North America Holdings Inc. (HNAH), which is
a wholly owned subsidiary of HSBC Holdings plc
(HSBC). The accompanying unaudited interim
consolidated financial statements of HSBC Finance Corporation
and its subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and
Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not
include all of the information and footnotes required by
generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial
statements. In the opinion of management, all normal and
recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair
presentation of financial position, results of operations and
cash flows for the interim periods have been made. HSBC Finance
Corporation may also be referred to in this Form 10-Q as
we, us or our. These
unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be
read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2004 (the 2004
Form 10-K). Certain reclassifications have been made
to prior period amounts to conform to the current period
presentation. Our accounting and reporting policies are
consistent, in all material respects, with those used to prepare
the 2004 Form 10-K.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions
that affect reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results
could differ from those estimates. Interim results should not be
considered indicative of results in future periods.
Interim financial statement disclosures required by
U.S. GAAP regarding segments are included in the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (MD&A) section of this
Form 10-Q.
On August 4, 2005, we entered into a definitive agreement
and plan of merger with Metris Companies Inc.
(Metris) to acquire Metris in an all-cash
transaction which values Metris at approximately
$1.6 billion. We currently intend to issue approximately
$1.2 billion in additional common equity to HSBC
Investments (North America) Inc. (HINO) to fund a
portion of the purchase price. This acquisition will expand our
presence in the near-prime credit card market and will
strengthen our capabilities to serve the full spectrum of credit
card customers. The acquisition is subject to certain conditions
including resolution of the potential civil enforcement action
of the Securities and Exchange Commission against Metris,
approval by the stockholders of Metris and various regulatory
consents and is anticipated to close in the fourth quarter of
2005.
7
Securities consisted of the following available-for-sale
investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
|
Amortized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
September 30, 2005 |
|
Cost | |
|
Gains | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Corporate debt securities
|
|
$ |
2,511 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
$ |
2,503 |
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
296 |
|
U.S. government sponsored
enterprises(1)
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
60 |
|
U.S. government and federal agency debt securities
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
599 |
|
Non-government mortgage backed securities
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Other
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
3,929 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
3,913 |
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available for sale
|
|
$ |
3,962 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
(43 |
) |
|
$ |
3,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
|
Amortized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
December 31, 2004 |
|
Cost | |
|
Gains | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Corporate debt securities
|
|
$ |
2,520 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
2,533 |
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
230 |
|
U.S. government sponsored
enterprises(1)
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
49 |
|
U.S. government and federal agency debt securities
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
341 |
|
Non-government mortgage backed securities
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
73 |
|
Other
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
3,602 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
3,609 |
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available for sale
|
|
$ |
3,638 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
$ |
3,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes primarily mortgage-backed securities issued by the
Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation. |
A summary of gross unrealized losses and related fair values as
of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004,
classified as to the length of time the losses have existed
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than One Year | |
|
Greater Than One Year | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Number | |
|
Gross | |
|
Aggregate | |
|
Number | |
|
Gross | |
|
Aggregate | |
|
|
of | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair Value of | |
|
of | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair Value of | |
September 30, 2005 |
|
Securities | |
|
Losses | |
|
Investments | |
|
Securities | |
|
Losses | |
|
Investments | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
873 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
612 |
|
U.S. government sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
60 |
|
U.S. government and federal agency debt securities
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
51 |
|
Other
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
93 |
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than One Year | |
|
Greater Than One Year | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Number | |
|
Gross | |
|
Aggregate | |
|
Number | |
|
Gross | |
|
Aggregate | |
|
|
of | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair Value of | |
|
of | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair Value of | |
December 31, 2004 |
|
Securities | |
|
Losses | |
|
Investments | |
|
Securities | |
|
Losses | |
|
Investments | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
636 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
647 |
|
U.S. government and federal agency debt securities
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
278 |
|
Non-government mortgage backed securities
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
Other
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
130 |
|
The gross unrealized losses on our securities available for sale
have increased due to a general increase in short- and
medium-term interest rates during the nine months ended
September 30, 2005. The contractual terms of these
securities do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at
a price less than the par value of the investment. Since
substantially all of these securities are rated A- or better,
and because we have the ability and intent to hold these
investments until maturity or a market price recovery, these
securities are not considered other than temporarily impaired.
Receivables consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Real estate secured
|
|
$ |
78,130 |
|
|
$ |
64,820 |
|
Auto finance
|
|
|
10,137 |
|
|
|
7,544 |
|
MasterCard(1)/
Visa(1)
|
|
|
18,974 |
|
|
|
14,635 |
|
Private label
|
|
|
2,777 |
|
|
|
3,411 |
|
Personal non-credit card
|
|
|
18,484 |
|
|
|
16,128 |
|
Commercial and other
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total owned receivables
|
|
|
128,722 |
|
|
|
106,855 |
|
Purchase accounting fair value adjustments
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
Accrued finance charges
|
|
|
1,665 |
|
|
|
1,394 |
|
Credit loss reserve for owned receivables
|
|
|
(4,220 |
) |
|
|
(3,625 |
) |
Unearned credit insurance premiums and claims reserves
|
|
|
(546 |
) |
|
|
(631 |
) |
Interest-only strip receivables
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
Amounts due and deferred from receivable sales
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total owned receivables, net
|
|
|
126,025 |
|
|
|
104,815 |
|
Receivables serviced with limited recourse
|
|
|
6,759 |
|
|
|
14,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total managed receivables, net
|
|
$ |
132,784 |
|
|
$ |
119,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
MasterCard is a registered trademark of MasterCard
International, Incorporated and Visa is a registered trademark
of VISA USA, Inc. |
Receivables are carried at amortized cost which represents the
principal amount outstanding, net of any unearned income,
charge-offs, unamortized deferred fees and costs on originated
loans, purchase accounting fair value adjustments as a result of
our acquisition by HSBC and premiums or discounts on purchased
loans. Receivables are further reduced by credit loss reserves
and unearned credit insurance premiums and claims reserves
applied to credit risks on consumer receivables.
9
Interest-only strip receivables are reported net of our estimate
of probable losses under the recourse provisions for receivables
serviced with limited recourse. Our estimate of the recourse
obligation totaled $351 million at September 30, 2005
and $890 million at December 31, 2004. Interest-only
strip receivables also included fair value mark-to-market
adjustments, which increased the balance by $57 million at
September 30, 2005 and $76 million at
December 31, 2004.
Receivables serviced with limited recourse consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Real estate secured
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
Auto finance
|
|
|
1,474 |
|
|
|
2,679 |
|
MasterCard/ Visa
|
|
|
3,615 |
|
|
|
7,583 |
|
Personal non-credit card
|
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
3,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
6,759 |
|
|
$ |
14,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The combination of receivables owned and receivables serviced
with limited recourse, which comprises our managed portfolio, is
shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Real estate secured
|
|
$ |
78,130 |
|
|
$ |
64,901 |
|
Auto finance
|
|
|
11,611 |
|
|
|
10,223 |
|
MasterCard/ Visa
|
|
|
22,589 |
|
|
|
22,218 |
|
Private label
|
|
|
2,777 |
|
|
|
3,411 |
|
Personal non-credit card
|
|
|
20,154 |
|
|
|
20,010 |
|
Commercial and other
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
135,481 |
|
|
$ |
121,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
An analysis of credit loss reserves was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended | |
|
Nine months ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Owned receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit loss reserves at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
3,756 |
|
|
$ |
3,795 |
|
|
$ |
3,625 |
|
|
$ |
3,793 |
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
3,233 |
|
|
|
3,048 |
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(1,020 |
) |
|
|
(1,068 |
) |
|
|
(2,934 |
) |
|
|
(3,176 |
) |
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit loss reserves for owned receivables
|
|
|
4,220 |
|
|
|
3,953 |
|
|
|
4,220 |
|
|
|
3,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables serviced with limited recourse:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit loss reserves at beginning of period
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
1,904 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
2,374 |
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
(418 |
) |
|
|
(637 |
) |
|
|
(1,343 |
) |
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit loss reserves for receivables serviced with
limited recourse
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit loss reserves for managed receivables
|
|
$ |
4,571 |
|
|
$ |
5,199 |
|
|
$ |
4,571 |
|
|
$ |
5,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for credit losses on owned receivables and overall
reserve levels in 2005 reflect the impact of the bulk sale of
our domestic private label receivables to HSBC Bank USA,
National Association (HSBC Bank USA) in December
2004 as well as the impact of receivable growth and higher
bankruptcy filings in the period leading up to the effective
date of the new bankruptcy law in the United States. The
provision for credit losses and overall reserve levels at
September 30, 2005 includes an incremental provision of
$180 million recorded in the third quarter relating to
Hurricane Katrina and an additional $100 million provision
due to the spike in bankruptcies experienced in the period
leading up to the October 17, 2005 effective date of new
bankruptcy legislation in the United States.
Reductions to the provision for credit losses and overall
reserve levels on receivables serviced with limited recourse in
2005 also reflect the impact of the bulk sale discussed above,
as well as the impact of reduced securitization levels,
including our decision to structure new collateralized funding
transactions as secured financings.
Further analysis of credit quality and credit loss reserves and
our credit loss reserve methodology are presented in
Item 2, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this
Form 10-Q under the caption Credit Quality.
11
Intangible assets consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
Carrying | |
|
|
Gross | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Value | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased credit card relationships and related programs
|
|
$ |
1,686 |
|
|
$ |
507 |
|
|
$ |
1,179 |
|
Retail services merchant relationships
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
Other loan related relationships
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
Trade names
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
Technology, customer lists and other contracts
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
3,281 |
|
|
$ |
887 |
|
|
$ |
2,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased credit card relationships and related programs
|
|
$ |
1,723 |
|
|
$ |
355 |
|
|
$ |
1,368 |
|
Retail services merchant relationships
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
Other loan related relationships
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
Trade names
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
718 |
|
Technology, customer lists and other contracts
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
3,318 |
|
|
$ |
613 |
|
|
$ |
2,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated amortization expense associated with our intangible
assets for each of the following years is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31, |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
2005
|
|
$ |
327 |
|
2006
|
|
|
265 |
|
2007
|
|
|
247 |
|
2008
|
|
|
184 |
|
2009
|
|
|
167 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
583 |
|
During the third quarter of 2005, we completed our annual
impairment test of intangible assets. As a result of our
testing, we recorded an impairment charge related to a tradename
in the U.K. For all other intangible assets, we determined that
the fair value of each intangible asset exceeded its carrying
value. Therefore, we have concluded that none of our remaining
intangible assets are impaired.
Goodwill balances associated with our foreign businesses will
change from period to period due to movements in foreign
exchange. Since the one-year anniversary in the first quarter of
2004 of our acquisition by HSBC, no further acquisition-related
adjustments to our goodwill balance will occur, except for
changes in estimates of the tax basis in our assets and
liabilities or other tax estimates recorded at the date of our
acquisition by HSBC, pursuant to Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards Number 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, and for the movements in foreign exchange rates
discussed above. We have increased our goodwill balance by
approximately $2 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2005 and reduced the goodwill balance by
$11 million for the nine month period as a result of such
changes in tax estimates.
During the third quarter of 2005, we completed our annual
impairment test of goodwill. For purposes of this test, we
assigned the goodwill to our reporting units (as defined in
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
12
Intangible Assets). The fair value of each of the
reporting units to which goodwill was assigned exceeded its
carrying value including goodwill. Therefore, we have concluded
that none of our goodwill is impaired.
Our effective tax rates were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months | |
|
Nine months | |
|
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
33.3% |
|
|
|
32.0% |
|
|
|
33.5% |
|
|
|
33.5% |
|
The increase in the effective tax rate in the third quarter of
2005 is primarily due to the acceleration of tax from sales of
leveraged leases, partially offset by lower state tax rates. The
year-to-date period reflects the leveraged lease tax increase,
offset by the lower state tax. The effective tax rate differs
from the statutory federal income tax rate primarily because of
the effects of state and local taxes and tax credits.
|
|
9. |
Redeemable Preferred Stock |
We have 1,501,100 shares of preferred stock authorized for
issuance. In June 2005, we issued 575,000 shares of
6.36 percent Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series B
(Series B Preferred Stock). Dividends on the
Series B Preferred Stock are non-cumulative and payable
quarterly at a rate of 6.36 percent commencing
September 15, 2005. The Series B Preferred Stock may
be redeemed at our option after June 23, 2010 at
$1,000 per share, plus accrued dividends. The redemption
and liquidation value is $1,000 per share plus accrued and
unpaid dividends. The holders of Series B Preferred Stock
are entitled to payment before any capital distribution is made
to the common shareholder and have no voting rights except for
the right to elect two additional members to the board of
directors in the event that dividends have not been declared and
paid for six quarters, or as otherwise provided by law.
Additionally, as long as any shares of the Series B
Preferred Stock are outstanding, the authorization, creation or
issuance of any class or series of stock which would rank prior
to the Series B Preferred Stock with respect to dividends
or amounts payable upon liquidation or dissolution of HSBC
Finance Corporation must be approved by the holders of at least
two-thirds of the shares of Series B Preferred Stock
outstanding at that time. Related issuance costs of
$16 million have been recorded as a reduction of additional
paid-in capital.
In August 2005, we declared an $8 million dividend on the
Series B Preferred Stock which was paid on
September 15, 2005.
In March 2003, we issued 1,100 shares of Series A
Cumulative Preferred Stock to HSBC, which are now held by HINO.
We currently intend to issue additional common equity to HINO in
exchange for the Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock on or
before December 31, 2005.
|
|
10. |
Related Party Transactions |
In the normal course of business, we conduct transactions with
HSBC and its subsidiaries. These transactions include funding
arrangements, purchases and sales of receivables, servicing
arrangements, information technology services, item and
statement processing services, banking and other miscellaneous
services. The
13
following tables present related party balances and the income
and (expense) generated by related party transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Assets, (Liabilities) and Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial assets, net
|
|
$ |
371 |
|
|
$ |
3,297 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
Due to affiliates
|
|
|
(17,907 |
) |
|
|
(13,789 |
) |
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
Series A preferred stock
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months | |
|
Nine months | |
|
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Income/(Expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on borrowings from HSBC and subsidiaries
|
|
$ |
(222 |
) |
|
$ |
(95 |
) |
|
$ |
(507 |
) |
|
$ |
(213 |
) |
Interest income on advances to HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
- |
|
HSBC Bank USA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate secured servicing revenues
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
Real estate secured sourcing, underwriting and pricing revenues
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Gain on daily sale of domestic private label receivable
originations
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Gain on daily sale of MasterCard/ Visa receivables
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
Gain on bulk sale of real estate secured receivables
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Taxpayer financial services loan origination fees
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
Domestic private label receivable servicing fees
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
MasterCard/ Visa receivable servicing fees
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Other processing, origination and support revenues
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Support services from HSBC affiliates, primarily HSBC Technology
and Services (USA) Inc. (HTSU)
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
(652 |
) |
|
|
(556 |
) |
HTSU:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental revenue
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
Administrative services revenue
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
Servicing revenue
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other income from HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other servicing fees from HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Stock based compensation expense with HSBC
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
The notional value of derivative contracts outstanding with HSBC
subsidiaries totaled $64.3 billion at September 30,
2005 and $62.6 billion at December 31, 2004. Affiliate
swap counterparties provide collateral in the form of securities
as required, which are not recorded on our balance sheet. At
September 30, 2005, the fair value of our agreements with
affiliate counterparties was below the level requiring payment
of collateral. As such, at September, 30, 2005, we were not
holding any swap collateral from HSBC affiliates in the form of
securities. At December 31, 2004, affiliate swap
counterparties had provided collateral in the form of
securities, which were not recorded on our balance sheet,
totaling $2.2 billion.
We have extended a line of credit of $2 billion to HSBC USA
Inc. at interest rates comparable to third-party rates for a
line of credit with similar terms. The balance outstanding under
this line was $1.0 billion at September 30, 2005 and
$.6 billion at December 31, 2004 and is included in
other assets. Interest income
14
associated with this line of credit is recorded in interest
income and reflected as interest income on advances to HSBC
affiliates in the table above.
We extended a revolving line of credit of $.5 billion to
HTSU on June 28, 2005 at interest rates comparable to
third-party rates for a line of credit with similar terms. The
balance outstanding under this line of credit was
$.4 billion at September 30, 2005 and is included in
other assets. Interest income associated with this line of
credit is recorded in interest income and reflected as other
income from HSBC affiliates in the table above.
We extended a promissory note of $.5 billion to HSBC
Securities (USA) Inc. (HSI) on June 27,
2005 at interest rates comparable to third-party rates for a
line of credit with similar terms. This promissory note was
repaid during July 2005. We extended an additional promissory
note of $.5 billion to HSI on September 29, 2005. This
promissory note, which is included in other assets at
September 30, 2005, was repaid during October 2005.
Interest income associated with this line of credit is recorded
in interest income and reflected as other income from HSBC
affiliates in the table above.
We extended a line of credit of $.4 billion to HSBC
Investments (North America) Inc. on March 31, 2005 which
was repaid during the second quarter of 2005. This line of
credit was at interest rates comparable to third-party rates for
a line of credit with similar terms. Interest income associated
with this line of credit is recorded in interest income and
reflected as other income from HSBC affiliates in the table
above.
Due to affiliates includes amounts owed to subsidiaries of HSBC
(other than preferred stock). This funding was at interest rates
(both the underlying benchmark rate and credit spreads)
comparable to third-party rates for debt with similar maturities.
At September 30, 2005, we had revolving credit facilities
of $2.5 billion from HSBC domestically and
$10.0 billion from HSBC in the U.K., of which
$6.6 billion was outstanding under the U.K. lines and no
balances were outstanding on the domestic lines. As of
December 31, 2004, $7.4 billion was outstanding under
the U.K. lines and no balances were outstanding on the domestic
lines. Annual commitment fee requirements to support
availability of these lines are paid on a quarterly basis.
Expense recognized for commitment fees totaled $.4 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, and
$1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2005 and 2004. Commitment fee expense is included as a component
of interest expense HSBC affiliates.
In the first quarter of 2004, we sold approximately
$.9 billion of real estate secured receivables from our
mortgage services business to HSBC Bank USA and recorded a
pre-tax gain of $15 million on the sale. Under a separate
servicing agreement, we have agreed to service all real estate
secured receivables sold to HSBC Bank USA including all future
business it purchases from our correspondents. As of
September 30, 2005, we were servicing $5.0 billion of
real estate secured receivables for HSBC Bank USA. We also
received fees from HSBC Bank USA pursuant to a service level
agreement under which we sourced, underwrote and priced
$.4 billion of real estate secured receivables purchased by
HSBC Bank USA during the three months ended September 30,
2005 and $.7 billion during the three months ended
September 30, 2004. We sourced, underwrote and priced
$1.5 billion of real estate secured receivables purchased
by HSBC Bank USA during the nine months ended September 30,
2005 and $2.2 billion during the nine months ended
September 30, 2004. The servicing fee revenue associated
with these receivables is recorded in servicing fees from HSBC
affiliates and are reflected as real estate secured servicing
revenues in the above table. Fees received for sourcing,
underwriting and pricing the receivables have been recorded as
other income and are reflected as real estate secured sourcing,
underwriting and pricing revenues from HSBC Bank USA in the
above table. Purchases of real estate secured receivables from
our correspondents by HSBC Bank USA were discontinued effective
September 1, 2005 given HSBC Bank USAs increasing
ability to originate similar product. We continue to service the
receivables HSBC Bank USA previously purchased from these
correspondents.
In December 2004, we sold our domestic private label receivable
portfolio, including the retained interests associated with our
securitized domestic private label receivables, to HSBC Bank
USA. We continue to service the sold private label receivables
and receive servicing fee income from HSBC Bank USA for these
services. As of September 30, 2005, we were servicing
$15.9 billion of domestic private label receivables for
HSBC Bank USA. Servicing fee income from HSBC Bank USA received
for the three month period ended
15
September 30, 2005 of $92 million and
$273 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2005 is included in the table. We continue to maintain the
related customer account relationships and, therefore, sell new
domestic private label receivable originations to HSBC Bank USA
on a daily basis. We sold $5,887 million of private label
receivables to HSBC Bank USA during the three months ended
September 30, 2005 and $14,825 million in the
year-to-date period. The gains associated with the sale of these
receivables are reflected in the table above and are recorded in
gain on receivable sales to HSBC affiliates.
Under several service level agreements, we also provide other
services to HSBC Bank USA. These services include credit card
servicing and processing activities through our credit card
services business, loan origination and servicing through our
auto finance business and other operational and administrative
support. Fees received for these services are reported as
servicing fees from HSBC affiliates and are included in the
table above.
During 2003, Household Capital Trust VIII issued
$275 million in mandatorily redeemable preferred securities
to HSBC. Interest expense recorded on the underlying junior
subordinated notes totaled $4 million during both three
month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 and
$12 million for both nine month periods ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004. The interest expense for the
Household Capital Trust VIII is included in interest
expense HSBC affiliates in the consolidated
statement of income and is reflected as interest expense on
borrowings from HSBC and subsidiaries in the table above.
During the third quarter of 2004, our Canadian business began to
originate and service auto loans for an HSBC affiliate in
Canada. Fees received for these services of $2 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2005 and
$5 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2005 are included in servicing fees from affiliates and are
reflected in other servicing fees from HSBC affiliates in the
above table.
Effective October 1, 2004, HSBC Bank USA became the
originating lender for loans initiated by our taxpayer financial
services business for clients of various third party tax
preparers. We purchase the loans originated by HSBC Bank USA
daily for a fee. Origination fees paid to HSBC Bank USA totaled
$15 million during the nine months ended September 30,
2005. These origination fees are included as an offset to
taxpayer financial services revenue and are reflected as
taxpayer financial services loan origination fees in the above
table.
On July 1, 2004, HSBC Bank Nevada, National Association
(HOBN), formerly known as Household Bank (SB), N.A.,
purchased the account relationships associated with
$970 million of MasterCard and Visa credit card receivables
from HSBC Bank USA for approximately $99 million, which are
included in intangible assets. The receivables continue to be
owned by HSBC Bank USA. Originations of new accounts and
receivables are made by HOBN and new receivables are sold daily
to HSBC Bank USA. We sold $514 million of credit card
receivables to HSBC Bank USA during the three months ended
September 30, 2005 and $1,461 million in the
year-to-date period. The gains associated with the sale of these
receivables are reflected in the table above and are recorded in
gain on receivable sales to HSBC affiliates.
Effective January 1, 2004, our technology services
employees, as well as technology services employees from other
HSBC entities in North America, were transferred to HTSU. In
addition, technology related assets and software purchased
subsequent to January 1, 2004 are generally purchased and
owned by HTSU. Technology related assets owned by HSBC Finance
Corporation prior to January 1, 2004 currently remain in
place and were not transferred to HTSU. In addition to
information technology services, HTSU also provides certain item
processing and statement processing activities to us pursuant to
a master service level agreement. Support services from HSBC
affiliates includes services provided by HTSU as well as banking
services and other miscellaneous services provided by HSBC Bank
USA and other subsidiaries of HSBC. We also receive revenue from
HTSU for rent on certain office space, which has been recorded
as a reduction of occupancy and equipment expenses, and for
certain administrative costs, which has been recorded as other
income.
In addition, we utilize a related HSBC entity to lead manage
substantially all ongoing debt issuances. Fees paid to HSBC and
its subsidiaries for such services totaled approximately
$19 million for the three months ended September 30,
2005 and $45 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005. Fees paid for such services totaled
approximately $2 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2004 and $8 million for
16
the nine months ended September 30, 2004. These fees are
amortized over the life of the related debt as a component of
interest expense in the table above.
Employees of HSBC Finance Corporation participate in one or more
stock compensation plans sponsored by HSBC. Our share of the
expense of these plans was $14 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2005 and $12 million for the prior
year quarter. Our share of the expense of these plans was
$50 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2005 and $37 million for the year-ago period. These
expenses are recorded in salary and employee benefits and are
reflected in the above table.
11. Pension and Other
Postretirement Benefits
In November 2004, sponsorship of the U.S. defined benefit
pension plan of HSBC Finance Corporation and the
U.S. defined benefit pension plan of HSBC Bank USA was
transferred to HNAH. Effective January 1, 2005, the two
separate plans were merged into a single defined benefit pension
plan which facilitates the development of a unified employee
benefit policy and unified employee benefit plan administration
for HSBC affiliates operating in the U.S. As a result, the
pension liability relating to our U.S. defined benefit plan
of $49 million, net of tax, was transferred to HNAH as a
capital transaction in the first quarter of 2005.
Components of net periodic benefit cost related to our defined
benefit pension plans and our postretirement benefits other than
pensions were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
Postretirement | |
|
|
Pension Benefits | |
|
Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Service cost benefits earned during the period
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Recognized (gains) losses
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
Postretirement | |
|
|
Pension Benefits | |
|
Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Service cost benefits earned during the period
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Recognized (gains) losses
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Business Segments
We have three reportable segments: Consumer, Credit Card
Services and International. Our Consumer segment consists of our
consumer lending, mortgage services, retail services and auto
finance businesses. Our Credit Card Services segment consists of
our domestic MasterCard and Visa credit card business. Our
International segment consists of our foreign operations in the
United Kingdom, Canada, Ireland and the remainder of Europe.
There have been no changes in the basis of our segmentation or
any changes in the measurement of segment profit as compared
with the presentation in our 2004 Form 10-K.
17
We have historically monitored our operations and evaluated
trends on a managed basis (a non-GAAP financial measure), which
assumes that securitized receivables have not been sold and are
still on our balance sheet. This is because the receivables that
we securitize are subjected to underwriting standards comparable
to our owned portfolio, are generally serviced by operating
personnel without regard to ownership and result in a similar
credit loss exposure for us. In addition, we fund our
operations, and make decisions about allocating resources such
as capital on a managed basis. When reporting on a managed
basis, net interest income, provision for credit losses and fee
income related to receivables securitized are reclassified from
securitization related revenue in our owned statement of income
into the appropriate caption.
Fair value adjustments related to purchase accounting and
related amortization have been allocated to Corporate, which is
included in the All Other caption within our segment
disclosure. Reconciliations of our managed basis segment results
to managed basis and owned basis consolidated totals are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit | |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments/ | |
|
Basis | |
|
|
|
Owned Basis | |
|
|
|
|
Card | |
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
Securitization | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Consumer | |
|
Services | |
|
International | |
|
All Other | |
|
Items | |
|
Totals | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Totals | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Three months ended September 30, 2005 |
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
1,733 |
|
|
$ |
531 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
$ |
(152 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
2,340 |
|
|
$ |
(177 |
)(3) |
|
$ |
2,163 |
|
Securitization related revenue
|
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
258 |
(3) |
|
|
41 |
|
Fee and other income
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
(35 |
)(1) |
|
|
1,119 |
|
|
|
(58 |
)(3) |
|
|
1,061 |
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
)(1) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
(5) |
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
23 |
(3) |
|
|
1,361 |
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,483 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,483 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
281 |
|
Receivables
|
|
|
102,733 |
|
|
|
19,971 |
|
|
|
12,564 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
135,481 |
|
|
|
(6,759 |
)(4) |
|
|
128,722 |
|
Assets
|
|
|
103,424 |
|
|
|
19,710 |
|
|
|
13,574 |
|
|
|
25,180 |
|
|
|
(8,555 |
)(2) |
|
|
153,333 |
|
|
|
(6,759 |
)(4) |
|
|
146,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2004 |
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
1,956 |
|
|
$ |
519 |
|
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
(110 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
2,550 |
|
|
$ |
(581 |
)(3) |
|
$ |
1,969 |
|
Securitization related revenue
|
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(742 |
) |
|
|
1,009 |
(3) |
|
|
267 |
|
Fee and other income
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
(35 |
)(1) |
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
(196 |
)(3) |
|
|
773 |
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
)(1) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
(5) |
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
232 |
(3) |
|
|
1,123 |
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,408 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
325 |
|
Receivables
|
|
|
95,946 |
|
|
|
18,509 |
|
|
|
11,833 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
126,612 |
|
|
|
(20,175 |
)(4) |
|
|
106,437 |
|
Assets
|
|
|
98,099 |
|
|
|
20,620 |
|
|
|
12,770 |
|
|
|
25,030 |
|
|
|
(8,616 |
)(2) |
|
|
147,903 |
|
|
|
(20,175 |
)(4) |
|
|
127,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2005 |
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
5,125 |
|
|
$ |
1,545 |
|
|
$ |
680 |
|
|
$ |
(506 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
6,844 |
|
|
$ |
(758 |
)(3) |
|
$ |
6,086 |
|
Securitization related revenue
|
|
|
(557 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(742 |
) |
|
|
922 |
(3) |
|
|
180 |
|
Fee and other income
|
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
|
(103 |
)(1) |
|
|
3,731 |
|
|
|
(223 |
)(3) |
|
|
3,508 |
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(103 |
)(1) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
1,698 |
|
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6 |
(5) |
|
|
3,292 |
|
|
|
(59 |
)(3) |
|
|
3,233 |
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,893 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,467 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,467 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
1,182 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit | |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments/ | |
|
Basis | |
|
|
|
Owned Basis | |
|
|
|
|
Card | |
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
Securitization | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Consumer | |
|
Services | |
|
International | |
|
All Other | |
|
Items | |
|
Totals | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Totals | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Nine months ended September 30, 2004 |
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
5,735 |
|
|
$ |
1,561 |
|
|
$ |
583 |
|
|
$ |
(173 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
7,706 |
|
|
$ |
(1,987 |
)(3) |
|
$ |
5,719 |
|
Securitization related revenue
|
|
|
(1,089 |
) |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,527 |
) |
|
|
2,408 |
(3) |
|
|
881 |
|
Fee and other income
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
(101 |
)(1) |
|
|
3,024 |
|
|
|
(590 |
)(3) |
|
|
2,434 |
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
)(1) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
(5) |
|
|
3,217 |
|
|
|
(169 |
)(3) |
|
|
3,048 |
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,892 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,139 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,139 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Eliminates intersegment revenues. |
|
(2) |
Eliminates investments in subsidiaries and intercompany
borrowings. |
|
(3) |
Reclassifies net interest income, fee income and provision for
credit losses relating to securitized receivables to other
revenues. |
|
(4) |
Represents receivables serviced with limited recourse. |
|
(5) |
Eliminates bad debt recovery sales between operating segments. |
13. New Accounting
Pronouncements
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 123
(Revised), Share-Based Payment, (SFAS No.
123R). SFAS No. 123R requires public entities to
measure the cost of stock-based compensation based on the grant
date fair value of the award as well as other additional
disclosure requirements. On March 28, 2005, the Securities
and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 107 which amended the compliance date to allow public
companies to comply with the provisions of
SFAS No. 123R at the beginning of their next fiscal
year that begins after June 15, 2005, instead of the next
reporting period as originally required by
SFAS No. 123R. Because we currently apply the fair
value method of accounting for all equity based awards, the
adoption of SFAS 123R will not have a significant effect on
the results of our operations or cash flows.
In May 2005, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections: a replacement of
APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3
(SFAS No. 154) which requires companies to
apply voluntary changes in accounting principles retrospectively
whenever it is practicable. The retrospective application
requirement replaces APB 20s requirement to recognize
most voluntary changes in accounting principle by including the
cumulative effect of the change in net income during the period
the change occurs. Retrospective application will be the
required transition method for new accounting pronouncements in
the event that a newly-issued pronouncement does not specify
transition guidance. SFAS No. 154 is effective for
accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2005.
In November 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Staff Position Nos. FAS 115-1 and
FAS 124-1 (FSP 115-1 and FSP 124-1),
The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its
Application to Certain Investments, in response to
Emerging Issues Task Force 03-1, The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain
Investments. FSP 115-1 and FSP 124-1 provide
guidance regarding the determination as to when an investment is
considered impaired, whether that impairment is
other-than-temporary, and the measurement of an impairment loss.
FSP 115-1 and FSP 124-1 also include accounting
considerations subsequent to the recognition of an
other-than-temporary impairment and require certain disclosures
about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as
other-than-temporary impairments. These requirements are
effective for annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2005. Adoption of the impairment guidance
contained in FSP 115-1 and FSP 124-1 is not expected to
have a material impact on our financial position or results of
operations.
19
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
Item 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations |
Forward-Looking Statements
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (MD&A) should be read
in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, notes
and tables included elsewhere in this report and with our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004 (the 2004 Form 10-K). MD&A may contain
certain statements that may be forward-looking in nature within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. Our results may differ materially from those noted in the
forward-looking statements. Words such as believe,
expects, estimates,
targeted, anticipates, goal
and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
statements but should not be considered as the only means
through which these statements may be made. Statements that are
not historical facts, including statements about
managements beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking
statements which involve inherent risks and uncertainties and
are based on current views and assumptions. A number of factors
could cause actual results to differ materially from those
contained in any forward-looking statements, such as the impact
of natural disasters on the collectibility of our receivables in
the affected areas. For a list of additional important factors
that may affect our actual results, see Cautionary Statement on
Forward Looking Statements in Part I, Item 1 of our
2004 Form 10-K.
Executive Overview
HSBC Finance Corporation is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary
of HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC). HSBC Finance
Corporation may also be referred to in MD&A as
we, us, or our. In addition
to owned basis reporting, we also monitor our operations and
evaluate trends on a managed basis (a non-GAAP financial
measure), which assumes that securitized receivables have not
been sold and are still on our balance sheet. See Basis of
Reporting for further discussion of the reasons we use
this non-GAAP financial measure.
Net income was $281 million for the quarter ended
September 30, 2005, a decrease of 14 percent, compared
to net income of $325 million in the prior year quarter.
The decrease was driven by an increase in the provision for
credit losses due to Hurricane Katrina and higher bankruptcy
filings in the period leading up to the effective date of new
bankruptcy legislation in the United States. The increase in the
provision for credit losses as well as higher costs and expenses
was partially offset by higher other revenues and higher net
interest income. Net income was $1,379 million for the
first nine months of 2005, an increase of 12 percent,
compared to net income of $1,228 million for the first nine
months of 2004. The increase was due to higher other revenues
and higher net interest income, partially offset by higher costs
and expenses and a higher provision for credit losses as
discussed above. The increase in other revenues during the
current quarter was primarily due to higher fee and other
income, higher gains on receivable sales to affiliates and
higher affiliate servicing fees, partially offset by lower
securitization related revenue and lower derivative income. The
increase in other revenues during the nine month period was
primarily due to higher fee and other income, higher derivative
income as well as higher gains on affiliate receivable sales and
higher affiliate servicing fees, partially offset by lower
securitization related revenue. The higher gains on affiliate
receivable sales and higher affiliate servicing revenue were
largely driven by the gains on daily sales of domestic private
label receivable originations and fees earned for servicing the
domestic private label receivable portfolio sold to HSBC Bank
USA, National Association (HSBC Bank USA) in
December 2004. Derivative income decreased in the current
quarter due to increases in interest rates. The upward shift in
the forward yield curve decreased the value of our portfolio of
interest rate swaps which do not currently qualify for hedge
accounting under SFAS No. 133. The increase in
year-to-date derivative income reflects the combined impact of
increases in interest rates and changes in the portfolio mix of
interest rate swaps which do not currently qualify for hedge
accounting under SFAS No. 133 and ineffectiveness
recorded as a result of the designation of a significant number
of our non-hedging derivative portfolio as effective hedges
under the long-haul method of accounting beginning in the second
quarter of 2005. Fee income was higher in both periods as a
result of higher credit
20
HSBC Finance Corporation
card fees due to higher volume in our MasterCard((1)) and
Visa(1)
portfolios. Other income was higher in both periods primarily
due to higher ancillary credit card revenue and, for the three
month period, higher gains on assets sales, including the
partial sale of a real estate investment. The increases in other
revenues were partially offset by lower securitization related
revenue in both periods due to reduced securitization activity.
The increases in net interest income were due to growth in
average receivables and an improvement in the overall yield on
the portfolio, partly offset by a higher cost of funds. Yields
on variable rate products increased in line with market
movements, and also reflect various repricing initiatives. In
addition, there was a net increase in yields due to a change in
receivables mix in the owned balance sheet. Increased levels of
higher yielding MasterCard/ Visa and auto finance receivables
were held on the balance sheet due to lower securitization
activity, but the effect of this on yields was largely offset by
growth in lower yielding real estate secured receivables and a
significant decline in the level of private label receivables as
discussed above. Interest expense increased due to a combination
of growth in the loan book and a significantly higher cost of
funds. Our net interest margin was 6.81 percent for the
three months ended September 30, 2005 and 6.77 percent
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to
7.29 percent for the three months ended September 30,
2004 and 7.41 percent in the nine months ended
September 30, 2004. Net interest margin decreased in both
periods as the improvement in overall yields on our receivables
discussed above, was more than offset by the higher funding
costs.
In August 2005, Hurricane Katrina (Katrina) caused
destruction and loss to individuals, businesses and public
infrastructure. As of September 30, 2005, we had
$1.4 billion, or 1.1 percent ($1.5 billion or
1.1 percent on a managed basis) of consumer receivables
outstanding with customers living in the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) designated Individual
Assistance disaster
areas(2)
with approximately $1 billion of these receivables secured
by real estate. Assessment of the impact of Katrina on the
collectibility of these receivables is continuing, but is
complicated by the number of customers that have been displaced
from their primary residence. Preliminary estimates of the
potential impact to our businesses take into account a number of
factors on which we are still gathering information, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
how the current and long-term financial impact of the disaster
on our customers will affect future payment patterns; |
|
|
|
the condition and value of any collateral supporting the amounts
outstanding; and |
|
|
|
the availability of insurance to cover losses on the underlying
collateral. |
Based on the information currently available, we have recorded
an incremental provision for credit losses of $180 million
at September 30, 2005, representing our best estimate of
Katrinas impact on our loan portfolio. As these estimates
are influenced by factors outside of our control, there is
uncertainty inherent in these estimates, making it reasonably
probable that they will change. As more information becomes
available relating to the financial condition of our affected
customers, the physical condition of the collateral for loans
which are secured by real estate and the resultant impact on
customer payment patterns, we will continue to review our
estimate of credit loss exposure relating to Katrina and any
adjustments will be reported in earnings when they become known.
In an effort to assist our customers affected by the disaster,
we have initiated various programs including extended payment
arrangements and interest and fee waivers for up to 90 days
for certain products depending upon customer circumstances.
These interest and fee waivers totaled $7 million during
the quarter. We currently anticipate additional interest and fee
waivers of approximately $14 million during the fourth
quarter of 2005.
The increase in provision for credit losses in both periods was
driven by increased loss exposure caused by Hurricane Katrina as
well as increased loss provision resulting from higher
bankruptcy filings in the period
|
|
(1) |
MasterCard is a registered trademark of MasterCard
International, Incorporated and Visa is a registered trademark
of VISA USA, Inc. |
|
|
(2) |
Customers in the Individual Assistance Counties, as defined by
FEMA on the list last updated and published on September 9,
2005. |
21
HSBC Finance Corporation
leading up to the October 17, 2005 effective date of the
new bankruptcy legislation in the United States. We have been
maintaining credit loss reserves in anticipation of the impact
this new legislation would have on net charge-offs. However, the
magnitude of the spike in bankruptcies experienced immediately
before the new legislation became effective was larger than
anticipated. As a result, we recorded an additional credit loss
provision of $100 million during the third quarter. We
currently expect that the higher levels of personal bankruptcy
filings we have been experiencing will result in significantly
higher levels of net charge-offs, predominantly in our domestic
MasterCard/Visa portfolio, during the fourth quarter of 2005 in
the region of $200 million. We believe that a portion of
this increase is an acceleration of net charge-offs that would
otherwise have been experienced in future periods. We will
continue to evaluate the impact of the spike in bankruptcy
filings on our credit loss reserves and currently believe that
this could result in a reduction in the allowance in the fourth
quarter as charge-offs occur. Excluding in the third quarter of
2005, the $180 million credit loss provision recorded
relating to Katrina as well as the additional $100 million
credit loss provision related to increased bankruptcy filings,
our provision for credit losses declined in both periods as
improved credit quality and a shift in mix to higher levels of
secured receivables, primarily as a result of the sale of our
domestic private label receivable portfolio to HSBC Bank USA in
December 2004, was partially offset by receivable growth.
Total costs and expenses increased due to receivables growth and
increases in marketing expenses, partially offset by lower other
servicing and administrative expenses.
Amortization of purchase accounting fair value adjustments
increased net income by $38 million for the quarter ended
September 30, 2005 and $59 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 compared to $43 million for
the quarter ended September 30, 2004 and $103 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2004.
As part of ongoing integration efforts with HSBC, we have been
working with HSBC to determine if management efficiencies could
be achieved by transferring all or a portion of our U.K. and
other European operations to HSBC Bank plc, a U.K. based
subsidiary of HSBC, and/or one or more unrelated third parties.
As of the date of this filing, a decision has not been made
regarding the transfer of all or a portion of the U.K. and other
European operations. We anticipate that a decision regarding
this potential transfer will be reached in the fourth quarter of
2005; however, any transfer is subject to approval by regulatory
authorities and boards of directors of the affected entities.
Return on average owned assets (ROA) was
.79 percent for the three months ended September 30,
2005 and 1.35 percent for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 compared to 1.04 percent for the
three months ended September 30, 2004 and 1.36 percent
for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. ROA remained
flat during the year-to-date period as the higher net income
discussed above kept pace with average owned basis asset growth
during the period. The decrease in the three month period ended
September 30, 2005 reflects the impact of higher provision
for credit losses during the quarter due to the impact of
Katrina and increased bankruptcy filings. Return on averaged
managed assets (ROMA) (a non-GAAP financial measure
which assumes that securitized receivables have not been sold
and are still on our balance sheet) was .75 percent for the
three months ended September 30, 2005 and 1.26 percent
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to
.89 percent for the three months ended September 30,
2004 and 1.14 percent for the nine months ended
September 30, 2004. ROMA increased during the year-to-date
period as the higher net income discussed above outpaced average
managed basis asset growth during the period. The decrease in
the current quarter reflects the impact of higher provision for
credit losses as discussed above. See Basis of
Reporting for additional discussion on the use of non-GAAP
financial matters and Reconciliations to GAAP Financial
Measures for quantitative reconciliations to the
equivalent GAAP basis financial measures.
22
HSBC Finance Corporation
The financial information set forth below summarizes selected
financial highlights of HSBC Finance Corporation as of
September 30, 2005 and 2004 and for the three and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended | |
|
Nine months ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Net income:
|
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
1,379 |
|
|
$ |
1,228 |
|
Owned Basis Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average owned assets
|
|
|
.79 |
% |
|
|
1.04 |
% |
|
|
1.35 |
% |
|
|
1.36 |
% |
|
Return on average common shareholders equity
(ROE)
|
|
|
6.03 |
|
|
|
7.07 |
|
|
|
10.58 |
|
|
|
9.18 |
|
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
6.81 |
|
|
|
7.29 |
|
|
|
6.77 |
|
|
|
7.41 |
|
|
Consumer net charge-off ratio, annualized
|
|
|
2.93 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
|
|
3.98 |
|
|
Efficiency
ratio(1)
|
|
|
43.54 |
|
|
|
45.10 |
|
|
|
43.70 |
|
|
|
43.96 |
|
Managed Basis
Ratios:(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average managed assets (ROMA)
|
|
|
.75 |
% |
|
|
.89 |
% |
|
|
1.26 |
% |
|
|
1.14 |
% |
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
6.94 |
|
|
|
7.88 |
|
|
|
7.01 |
|
|
|
8.13 |
|
|
Risk adjusted revenue
|
|
|
7.34 |
|
|
|
6.50 |
|
|
|
7.32 |
|
|
|
6.69 |
|
|
Consumer net charge-off ratio, annualized
|
|
|
3.21 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
|
3.37 |
|
|
|
4.61 |
|
|
Efficiency
ratio(1)
|
|
|
43.86 |
|
|
|
48.99 |
|
|
|
43.43 |
|
|
|
43.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis
|
|
$ |
128,722 |
|
|
$ |
106,437 |
|
|
Managed
basis(2)
|
|
|
135,481 |
|
|
|
126,612 |
|
Two-month-and-over contractual delinquency ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis
|
|
|
3.78 |
% |
|
|
4.43 |
% |
|
Managed
basis(2)
|
|
|
3.87 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Ratio of total costs and expenses less policyholders
benefits to net interest income and other revenues less
policyholders benefits. |
|
(2) |
Managed basis reporting is a non-GAAP financial measure. See
Basis of Reporting for additional discussion on the
use of this non-GAAP financial measure and Reconciliations
to GAAP Financial Measures for quantitative
reconciliations to the equivalent GAAP basis financial measure. |
Owned receivables were $128.7 billion at September 30,
2005, $118.8 billion at June 30, 2005, and
$106.4 billion at September 30, 2004. With the
exception of private label, we experienced growth in all our
receivable products compared to June 30, 2005 and
September 30, 2004, with real estate secured receivables
being the primary contributor to the growth. Real estate secured
receivables do not include purchases of correspondent
receivables directly by HSBC Bank USA of $1.5 billion in
the first eight months of 2005 and $2.1 billion since
September 30, 2004, a portion of which we otherwise would
have purchased. Purchases of real estate secured receivables
from our correspondents by HSBC Bank USA were discontinued
effective September 1, 2005 given HSBC Bank USAs
increasing ability to originate similar product. Lower
securitization levels also contributed to the increase in owned
receivables over both periods.
Our owned basis two-months-and-over-contractual delinquency
ratio increased slightly compared to the prior quarter but
decreased compared to the prior year quarter. The decrease as
compared to the prior year quarter is consistent with
improvements in the delinquency trends we experienced beginning
in 2004 as a result of improvements in the economy and better
underwriting, improved credit quality of originations as well as
higher levels of real estate secured receivables. The sale of
our domestic private label portfolio in December
23
HSBC Finance Corporation
2004 also contributed to the decrease in the delinquency ratio
compared with the prior year quarter. The increase compared to
the prior quarter is primarily due to a seasonal increase in
delinquency during the third quarter. Dollars of delinquency
increased compared to the prior quarter due to the higher levels
of owned receivables including lower securitizations, maturation
of the portfolio as well as a seasonal increase in delinquency
in the third quarter.
Owned net charge-offs as a percentage of average consumer
receivables for the quarter decreased from the prior year
quarter as the lower delinquency levels we have been
experiencing continue to have a positive impact on charge-offs.
Also contributing to the decrease in net charge-offs as a
percentage of average consumer receivables compared to the prior
year quarter were improved collections and the sale of our
domestic private label receivable portfolio in December 2004,
partially offset by an increase in bankruptcy filings due to new
bankruptcy legislation in the United States which became
effective in October 2005.
Our owned basis efficiency ratio improved compared to the prior
year periods primarily as a result of higher net interest income
and other revenues due to higher levels of owned receivables.
This was partially offset by higher costs and expenses and the
impact of the bulk sale of our domestic private label portfolio
in December 2004. Excluding the results of our domestic private
label portfolio from all periods, the improvement in our owned
basis efficiency ratio was 473 basis points for the three
month period ended September 30, 2005 and 285 basis
points for the year to date period. Excluding the results of our
domestic private label portfolio from all periods, our managed
basis efficiency ratio also showed significant improvement
compared to the prior year quarter for the reasons discussed
above.
During 2005, we supplemented unsecured debt issuances with
proceeds from the sale of our domestic private label receivable
portfolio to HSBC Bank USA in December 2004, debt issued to
affiliates, increased levels of secured financings and higher
levels of commercial paper compared to December 31, 2004.
Because we are now a subsidiary of HSBC, our credit ratings have
improved and our credit spreads relative to Treasuries have
tightened compared to those we experienced during the months
leading up to the announcement of our acquisition by HSBC.
Primarily as a result of tightened credit spreads, we recognized
cash funding expense savings in excess of approximately
$407 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 ($155 million during the three
months ended September 30, 2005) and approximately
$235 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2004 ($95 million during the three
months ended September 30, 2004) compared to the funding
costs we would have incurred using average spreads and funding
mix from the first half of 2002. It is anticipated that these
tightened credit spreads and other funding synergies including
asset transfers will eventually enable HSBC to realize annual
cash funding expense savings, including external fee savings, in
excess of $1 billion per year as our existing term debt
matures over the course of the next few years.
Securitization of consumer receivables has been a source of
funding and liquidity for us. In order to align our accounting
treatment with that of HSBC initially under U.K. GAAP and now
under International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS), starting in the third quarter of 2004 we
began to structure all new collateralized funding transactions
as secured financings. However, because existing public
MasterCard and Visa credit card transactions were structured as
sales to revolving trusts that require replenishments of
receivables to support previously issued securities, receivables
will continue to be sold to these trusts until the revolving
periods end, the last of which is currently projected to occur
in 2008. Private label trusts that publicly issued securities
are now replenished by HSBC Bank USA as a result of the daily
sale of new domestic private label credit card originations to
HSBC Bank USA. We will continue to replenish at reduced levels
certain non-public personal non-credit card and MasterCard and
Visa securities issued to conduits and record the resulting
replenishment gains for a period of time in order to manage
liquidity. Since our securitized receivables have varying lives,
it will take several years for these receivables to pay-off and
the related interest-only strip receivables to be reduced to
zero. The termination of sale treatment on new collateralized
funding activity reduced our reported net income under
U.S. GAAP. In the nine month period ended
September 30, 2005, our net interest-only strip
receivables, excluding the mark-to-market adjustment recorded in
accumu-
24
HSBC Finance Corporation
lated other comprehensive income decreased $217 million,
compared to a decrease of $410 million during the nine
month period ended September 30, 2004. There is no impact,
however, on cash received from operations.
Basis of Reporting
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States (U.S. GAAP). Unless noted, the
discussion of our financial condition and results of operations
included in MD&A is presented on an owned basis of reporting.
Managed Basis Reporting We have historically
monitored our operations and evaluated trends on a managed basis
(a non-GAAP financial measure), which assumes that securitized
receivables have not been sold and remain on our balance sheet.
This is because the receivables that we securitize are subjected
to underwriting standards comparable to our owned portfolio, are
serviced by operating personnel without regard to ownership and
result in a similar credit loss exposure for us. In addition, we
fund our operations and make decisions about allocating
resources such as capital on a managed basis.
When reporting on a managed basis, net interest income,
provision for credit losses and fee income related to
receivables securitized are reclassified from securitization
related revenue in our owned statement of income into the
appropriate caption. Additionally, charge-off and delinquency
associated with these receivables are included in our managed
basis credit quality statistics.
Debt analysts, rating agencies and fixed income investors also
evaluate our operations on a managed basis for the reasons
discussed above and have historically requested managed basis
information from us. We believe that managed basis information
enables such investors and other interested parties to better
understand the performance and quality of our entire managed
loan portfolio and is important to understanding the quality of
originations and the related credit risk inherent in our owned
and securitized portfolios. As the level of our securitized
receivables falls over time, managed basis and owned basis
results will eventually converge.
Equity Ratios Tangible shareholders equity
to tangible managed assets (TETMA), tangible
shareholders equity plus owned loss reserves to tangible
managed assets (TETMA + Owned Reserves) and tangible
common equity to tangible managed assets are non-GAAP financial
measures that are used by HSBC Finance Corporations
management and certain rating agencies to evaluate capital
adequacy. These ratios may differ from similarly named measures
presented by other companies. The most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure is common and preferred equity to owned assets.
We and certain rating agencies also monitor our equity ratios
excluding the impact of purchase accounting adjustments. We do
so because we believe that the purchase accounting adjustments
represent non-cash transactions which do not affect our business
operations, cash flows or ability to meet our debt obligations.
Preferred securities issued by certain non-consolidated trusts
are considered equity in the TETMA and TETMA + Owned Reserves
calculations because of their long-term subordinated nature and
the ability to defer dividends. Previously, our Adjustable
Conversion-Rate Equity Security Units, adjusted for purchase
accounting adjustments, were also considered equity in these
calculations. Beginning in the third quarter of 2005, and with
the agreement of certain rating agencies, we have refined our
definition of TETMA and TETMA + Owned Reserves to exclude the
Adjustable Conversion-Rate Equity Security Units as this more
accurately reflects the impact of these items on our equity.
Prior period amounts have been revised to reflect the current
period presentation.
25
HSBC Finance Corporation
International Financial Reporting Standards
Because HSBC reports results in accordance with IFRS and
IFRS results are used in measuring and rewarding performance of
employees, our management also separately monitors net income
under IFRS (a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure). The
following table reconciles our net income on a U.S. GAAP
basis to net income on an IFRS basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended | |
|
Nine months ended | |
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
September 30, 2005 | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Net income U.S. GAAP basis
|
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
$ |
1,379 |
|
Adjustments, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitizations
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
Derivatives and hedge accounting (including fair value
adjustments)
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
Loan origination
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
Loan impairment
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Pension costs
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income IFRS basis
|
|
$ |
388 |
|
|
$ |
1,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS are as follows:
Securitizations
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
The recognition of securitized assets is governed by a
three-step process. The process may be applied to the whole
asset, or a part of an asset: |
|
|
|
|
|
If the rights to the cash flows have been transferred to a third
party, those securitized assets should be derecognized. |
|
|
If the rights to the cash flows are retained but there is a
contractual obligation to pay the cash flows to another party,
the securitized assets should be derecognized if certain
conditions are met, for example, where there is no obligation to
pay amounts to the eventual recipient unless an equivalent
amount is collected from the original asset. |
|
|
If it is determined that some significant risks and rewards of
ownership have been transferred, but some significant risks and
rewards have also been retained, it must be determined whether
or not control has been retained. If it has not been retained,
the asset should be derecognized. If control has been retained,
an entity shall continue to recognize the asset to the extent of
its continuing involvement. |
US GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS 140 Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Finance Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities requires
that receivables that are sold to a special purpose entity and
securitized can only be derecognized and a gain or loss on sale
recognized if the originator has surrendered control over those
securitized assets. |
|
|
Control has been surrendered over transferred assets if and only
if all of the following conditions are met: |
|
|
|
|
|
The transferred assets have been put presumptively beyond the
reach of the transferor and its creditors, even in bankruptcy or
other receivership. |
|
|
Each holder of interests in the transferee (i.e. holder of
issued notes) has the right to pledge or exchange their
beneficial interests, and no condition constrains this right and
provides more than a trivial benefit to the transferor. |
26
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
The transferor does not maintain effective control over the
assets through either an agreement that obligates the transferor
to repurchase or to redeem them before their maturity or through
the ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return specific
assets, other than through a clean-up call. |
|
|
If these conditions are not met the securitized assets should
continue to be consolidated. |
|
|
|
|
|
Where HSBC retains an interest in the securitized assets, such
as a servicing right or the right to residual cash flows from
the special purpose entity, HSBC recognizes this interest at
fair value on sale of the assets. |
Derivatives and hedge accounting
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives are recognized initially, and are subsequently
remeasured, at fair value. Fair values are obtained from quoted
market prices in active markets, or by using valuation
techniques, including recent market transactions, where an
active market does not exist. Valuation techniques include
discounted cash flow models and option pricing models as
appropriate. All derivatives are classified as assets when their
fair value is positive, or as liabilities when their fair value
is negative. |
|
|
Certain derivatives embedded in other financial instruments,
such as the conversion option in a convertible bond, are treated
as separate derivatives when their economic characteristics and
risks are not clearly and closely related to those of the host
contract, the terms of the embedded derivative are the same as
those of a stand-alone derivative, and the combined contract is
not designated at fair value through profit and loss. These
embedded derivatives are measured at fair value with changes in
fair value recognized in the income statement. |
|
|
Derivative assets and liabilities on different transactions are
only netted if the transactions are with the same counterparty,
a legal right of set-off exists, and the cash flows are intended
to be settled on a net basis. |
|
|
The method of recognizing the resulting fair value gains or
losses depends on whether the derivative is held for trading, or
is designated as a hedging instrument, and if so, the nature of
the risk being hedged. All gains and losses from changes in the
fair value of derivatives held for trading are recognized in the
income statement. Where derivatives are designated as hedges,
HSBC classifies them as either: (i) hedges of the change in
fair value of recognized assets or liabilities or firm
commitments (fair value hedge); (ii) hedges of
the variability in highly probable future cash flows
attributable to a recognized asset or liability, or a forecast
transaction (cash flow hedge); or (iii) hedges
of net investments in a foreign operation (net investment
hedge). Hedge accounting is applied to derivatives
designated as hedging instruments in a fair value, cash flow or
net investment hedge provided certain criteria are met. |
Hedge Accounting:
|
|
|
|
|
It is HSBCs policy to document, at the inception of a
hedging relationship, the relationship between the hedging
instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management
objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge. Such policies
also require documentation of the assessment, both at hedge
inception and on an ongoing basis, of whether the derivatives
that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in
offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items
attributable to the hedged risks. Interest on designated
qualifying hedges is included in Net interest income. |
Fair value hedge:
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and
qualify as fair value hedging instruments are recorded in the
income statement, together with changes in the fair value of the
asset or liability or group thereof that are attributable to the
hedged risk. |
|
|
If the hedging relationship no longer meets the criteria for
hedge accounting, the cumulative adjustment to the carrying
amount of a hedged item for which the effective interest method
is used is amortized to the income statement over the residual
period to maturity. |
27
HSBC Finance Corporation
Cash flow hedge:
|
|
|
|
|
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of
derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges
are recognized in equity. Any gain or loss relating to an
ineffective portion is recognized immediately in the income
statement. |
|
|
Amounts accumulated in equity are recycled to the income
statement in the periods in which the hedged item will affect
profit or loss. However, when the forecast transaction that is
hedged results in the recognition of a non-financial asset or a
non-financial liability, the gains and losses previously
deferred in equity are transferred from equity and included in
the initial measurement of the cost of the asset or liability. |
|
|
When a hedging instrument expires or is sold, or when a hedge no
longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, any cumulative
gain or loss existing in equity at that time remains in equity
until the forecast transaction is ultimately recognized in the
income statement. When a forecast transaction is no longer
expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss that was reported
in equity is immediately transferred to the income statement. |
Net investment hedge:
|
|
|
|
|
Hedges of net investments in foreign operations are accounted
for similarly to cash flow hedges. Any gain or loss on the
hedging instrument relating to the effective portion of the
hedge is recognized in equity; the gain or loss relating to the
ineffective portion is recognized immediately in the income
statement. Gains and losses accumulated in equity are included
in the income statement on the disposal of the foreign operation. |
Hedge effectiveness testing:
|
|
|
|
|
To qualify for hedge accounting, IAS 39 requires that at the
inception of the hedge and throughout its life, each hedge must
be expected to be highly effective (prospective effectiveness).
Actual effectiveness (retrospective effectiveness) must also be
demonstrated on an ongoing basis. |
|
|
The documentation of each hedging relationship sets out how the
effectiveness of the hedge is assessed. The method an HSBC
entity adopts for assessing hedge effectiveness will depend on
its risk management strategy. |
|
|
For fair value hedge relationships, HSBC entities utilize the
cumulative dollar offset method or regression analysis as
effectiveness testing methodologies. For cash flow hedge
relationships, HSBC entities utilize the change in variable cash
flow method or the cumulative dollar offset method using the
hypothetical derivative approach. |
|
|
For prospective effectiveness, the hedging instrument must be
expected to be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes
in fair value or cash flows attributable to the hedged risk
during the period for which the hedge is designated. For actual
effectiveness, the changes in fair value or cash flows must
offset each other in the range of 80 per cent to
125 per cent for the hedge to be deemed effective. |
Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting:
|
|
|
|
|
All gains and losses from changes in the fair value of any
derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting are
recognized immediately in the income statement. These gains and
losses are reported in Trading income, except where
derivatives are managed in conjunction with financial
instruments designated at fair value, in which case gains and
losses are reported in Net income from financial
instruments designated at fair value. |
US GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
The accounting under SFAS No. 133 Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities is generally
consistent with that under IAS 39 as described above (from
January 1, 2005); however see below for discussion of the
designation of financial assets and liabilities at fair value. |
|
|
SFAS No. 133 permits the shortcut method
of hedge effectiveness testing for certain transactions. Under
this method, it may be assumed, at inception of the hedge, there
is no ineffectiveness in the hedging of interest rate risk with
an interest rate swap provided specific criteria are met. |
28
HSBC Finance Corporation
Designation of financial assets and liabilities at fair
value through profit and loss
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
Under IAS 39, a financial instrument, other than one held for
trading, is classified in this category if it meets the criteria
set out below, and is so designated by management. An entity may
designate financial instruments at fair value where the
designation: |
|
|
|
|
|
eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition
inconsistency that would otherwise arise from measuring
financial assets or financial liabilities or recognizing the
gains and losses on them on different bases; or |
|
|
applies to a group of financial assets, financial liabilities or
both that is managed and its performance evaluated on a fair
value basis, in accordance with a documented risk management or
investment strategy, and where information about that group of
financial instruments is provided internally on that basis to
key management personnel; or |
|
|
relates to financial instruments containing one or more embedded
derivatives that significantly modify the cash flows resulting
from those financial instruments. |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets and financial liabilities so designated are
recognized initially at fair value, with transaction costs taken
directly to the income statement, and are subsequently
remeasured at fair value. This designation, once made, is
irrevocable in respect of the financial instruments to which it
is made. Financial assets and financial liabilities are
recognized using trade date accounting. |
|
|
Gains and losses from changes in the fair value of such assets
and liabilities are recognized in the income statement as they
arise, together with related interest income and expense and
dividends, within Net income from financial instruments
designated at fair value. |
US GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
There are no provisions to make such an election in US GAAP
similar to that in IAS 39. |
|
|
|
|
|
Generally, for financial assets to be measured at fair value
with gains and losses recognized immediately in the income
statement under US GAAP, they must meet the definition of
trading securities in SFAS 115 Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. Financial
liabilities are generally reported at amortized cost under US
GAAP. |
Goodwill, Purchase Accounting and Intangibles
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
IFRS 3 Business Combinations requires that goodwill
should not be amortized but should be tested for impairment at
least annually at the reporting unit level by applying a test
based on recoverable amount. |
|
|
The book value of goodwill existing at December 31, 2003
under UK GAAP is carried forward under IFRS from January 1,
2004, subject to limited adjustments. |
|
|
Prior to 1998, goodwill under UK GAAP was written off against
equity. HSBC did not elect to reinstate this goodwill on its
balance sheet upon transition to IFRS. |
|
|
After 1998, goodwill was capitalized and amortized over its
useful life. |
|
|
Where quoted securities are issued as part of the purchase
consideration in an acquisition, the fair value of those
securities for the purpose of determining the cost of
acquisition is the market price of the securities at the date of
acquisition. |
US GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill acquired up to June 30, 2001 was capitalized and
amortized over its useful life but not more than 25 years.
The amortization of previously acquired goodwill ceased from
December 31, 2001. |
|
|
Where quoted securities are issued as part of the purchase
consideration in an acquisition, the fair value of those
securities for the purpose of determining the cost of
acquisition is the average market price of the securities for a
reasonable period before and after the date that the terms of
the acquisition are agreed and announced. |
29
HSBC Finance Corporation
Loan origination
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
Certain loan fee income and incremental directly attributable
loan origination costs are amortized to the profit and loss
account over the life of the loan as part of the effective
interest calculation under IAS 39. |
US GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
Certain loan fee income and direct but not necessarily
incremental loan origination costs, including an apportionment
of overheads, are amortized to the profit and loss account over
the life of the loan as an adjustment to interest income
(SFAS 91 Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs
Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial
Direct Costs of Leases.) |
Loan impairment
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
Where there is evidence of impairment, based on statistical
models using historic loss rates adjusted for economic
conditions, portfolios of loans are written down to their net
recoverable amount. The net recoverable amount is the present
value of the estimated future recoveries discounted at the
portfolios original effective interest rate and includes
reasonably estimable recoveries on loans individually identified
for write-off pursuant to HSBCs credit guidelines. |
US GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
Where the delinquency status of loans in a portfolio is such
that there is no realistic prospect of recovery of these
amounts, the loans are written off in full, or to recoverable
value where collateral exists. The delinquency status, for
example, the number of days payment is overdue, where write-off
occurs is applied consistently across similar loan products as
described in HSBCs credit guidelines. Where local
regulators mandate the delinquency status at which write-off
must occur for different retail products and these reasonably
reflect estimable recoveries on individual loans, this basis of
measuring impairment is reflected in US GAAP accounting. Cash
recoveries relating to pools of such written-off loans, if any,
are reported as loan recoveries upon collection. |
Pension costs
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
IAS 19, Employee Benefits requires pension
liabilities to be assessed based on current actuarial
assumptions and methods and pension assets to be measured at
fair value. The net pension surplus or deficit, representing the
difference between plan assets and liabilities, is recognized on
the balance sheet. |
|
|
As permitted by IAS 19 (revised 2004), HSBC elects to record all
actuarial gains and losses on the pension surplus or deficit in
the year they occur within the Statement of Recognized Income
and Expense. |
US GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS 87 Employers Accounting for Pensions
prescribes a similar method of actuarial valuation for pension
liabilities and measurement of plan assets at fair value as IAS
39. |
|
|
Where the accumulated benefit obligation (the value of benefits
accrued based on employee service up to the balance sheet date)
exceeds the value of plan assets, HSBC recognizes an additional
minimum pension liability equal to this excess, as long as the
excess is greater than any accrual already established for
unfunded pension costs. |
|
|
SFAS 87 does not permit recognition of all actuarial gains
and losses in a performance statement other than the primary
income statement. Under US GAAP, HSBC elects to use the
corridor method, whereby actuarial gains and losses
outside a certain range are recognized in the income statement,
in equal amounts over the remaining service lives of current
employees. That range is equal to 10% of the |
30
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
greater of plan assets and plan liabilities. The remaining
additional minimum pension liability is recognized directly in
Other Comprehensive Income. |
Quantitative Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial
Measures to GAAP Financial Measures For a reconciliation
of managed basis net interest income, fee income and provision
for credit losses to the comparable owned basis amounts, see
Note 12, Business Segments, to the accompanying
consolidated financial statements. For a reconciliation of our
owned loan portfolio by product to our managed loan portfolio,
see Note 4, Receivables, to the accompanying
consolidated financial statements. For additional quantitative
reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures presented herein
to the equivalent GAAP basis financial measures, see
Reconciliations to GAAP Financial Measures.
Receivables Review
The following table summarizes owned receivables at
September 30, 2005 and increases (decreases) over
prior periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases (decreases) from | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
June 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Real estate secured
|
|
$ |
78,130 |
|
|
$ |
6,200 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
$ |
19,404 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
% |
Auto finance
|
|
|
10,137 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
3,314 |
|
|
|
48.6 |
|
MasterCard/ Visa
|
|
|
18,974 |
|
|
|
1,553 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
7,308 |
|
|
|
62.6 |
|
Private label
|
|
|
2,777 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
(11,223 |
) |
|
|
(80.2 |
) |
Personal non-credit
card(1)
|
|
|
18,484 |
|
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
3,596 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
Commercial and other
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
(34.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total owned receivables
|
|
$ |
128,722 |
|
|
$ |
9,961 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
$ |
22,285 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Personal non-credit card receivables are comprised of the
following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases (decreases) from | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
June 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Domestic personal non-credit card
|
|
$ |
10,323 |
|
|
$ |
1,175 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
% |
|
$ |
3,182 |
|
|
|
44.6 |
% |
Union Plus personal non-credit card
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
(26.7 |
) |
Personal homeowner loans
|
|
|
3,996 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
Foreign personal non-credit card
|
|
|
3,791 |
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total personal non-credit card
|
|
$ |
18,484 |
|
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
$ |
3,596 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable increases (decreases) since
September 30, 2004 Driven by growth in our
correspondent and branch businesses, real estate secured
receivables increased over the year-ago period. Real estate
secured receivable levels do not include HSBC Bank USAs
purchase of receivables directly from correspondents totaling
$1.5 billion in the first eight months of 2005 and
$2.1 billion since September 30, 2004, a portion of
which we otherwise would have purchased. Purchases of real
estate secured receivables from our correspondents by HSBC Bank
USA were discontinued effective September 1, 2005 given
HSBC Bank USAs increasing ability to originate similar
product. Growth in real estate secured receivables was also
supplemented by purchases from a single correspondent
relationship which totaled $1.9 billion since
September 30, 2004. Real estate secured receivable levels
in our branch-based consumer lending business continue to
increase, as sales volumes remain high. Also contributing to the
increase were purchases of $2.0 billion from a portfolio
31
HSBC Finance Corporation
acquisition program since the prior year quarter. The increases
in the real estate secured receivable levels have been partially
offset by run-off of the higher yielding real estate secured
receivables, including second lien loans, largely due to
refinancing activity. Auto finance receivables increased over
the year-ago period due to newly originated loans acquired from
our dealer network, growth in the consumer direct loan program,
lower securitization levels and the introduction of an auto
finance program in Canada in the second quarter of 2004.
MasterCard and Visa receivables reflect domestic organic growth
especially in our HSBC branded prime, Union Privilege and
non-prime portfolios, growth in the U.K. over the year ago
period, as well as lower securitization levels. The decrease in
private label receivables largely reflects the sale of our
domestic private label receivable portfolio to HSBC Bank USA in
December 2004. Personal non-credit card receivables increased
from the year-ago period as we began to increase the
availability of this product domestically in the second half of
2004 as a result of the improving U.S. economy and
continued improvements in our underwriting standards. Personal
non-credit card receivables also increased due to lower
securitization levels. The rate of increase in owned receivables
was impacted by the sale of $12.2 billion in domestic
private label receivables to HSBC Bank USA in December 2004. Had
this sale not taken place, owned receivables would have
increased by $34.5 billion or 32 percent since
September 30, 2004.
Receivable increases (decreases) since June 30,
2005 Both our correspondent and branch businesses
reported growth in their real estate secured portfolios as
discussed above. Real estate secured receivable levels do not
include purchases of correspondent receivables directly by HSBC
Bank USA of $.4 billion in July and August of 2005, a
portion of which we otherwise would have purchased. Growth in
our auto finance, MasterCard and Visa and personal non-credit
card portfolios reflect lower levels of securitizations. Growth
in our MasterCard and Visa portfolio also reflects organic
growth in our HSBC branded prime, Union Privilege and non-prime
portfolios. Our foreign private label portfolio decreased due to
lower retail sales volumes in the U.K. as well as the impact of
changes in the foreign exchange rates since June 30, 2005.
Personal non-credit card receivables increased from the prior
quarter resulting from the success of several large direct mail
campaigns that occurred during the current quarter.
Results of Operations
Unless noted otherwise, the following discusses amounts reported
in our owned basis statement of income and dollars represent
pre-tax amounts.
Net interest income The following table summarizes
net interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
(1) | |
|
2004 | |
|
(1) | |
|
Amount | |
|
% | |
| |
Finance and other interest income
|
|
$ |
3,402 |
|
|
|
10.71 |
% |
|
$ |
2,779 |
|
|
|
10.30 |
% |
|
$ |
623 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
% |
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,239 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
3.01 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
53.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
2,163 |
|
|
|
6.81 |
% |
|
$ |
1,969 |
|
|
|
7.29 |
% |
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
(1) | |
|
2004 | |
|
(1) | |
|
Amount | |
|
% | |
| |
Finance and other interest income
|
|
$ |
9,491 |
|
|
|
10.56 |
% |
|
$ |
7,944 |
|
|
|
10.29 |
% |
|
$ |
1,547 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
% |
Interest expense
|
|
|
3,405 |
|
|
|
3.79 |
|
|
|
2,225 |
|
|
|
2.88 |
|
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
|
53.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
6,086 |
|
|
|
6.77 |
% |
|
$ |
5,719 |
|
|
|
7.41 |
% |
|
$ |
367 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
% Columns: comparison to average owned interest-earning assets,
annualized. |
The increases in net interest income during the quarter and
year-to-date periods were due to higher average receivables and
a higher overall yield, partially offset by higher interest
expense. Overall yields increased as increased yields on
variable rate products in line with market movements and other
repricing initiatives more
32
HSBC Finance Corporation
than offset a decline in real estate secured and auto finance
yields. Changes in receivable mix also contributed to the
increase as the impact of increased levels of higher yielding
MasterCard/ Visa and auto finance receivables due to lower
securitization levels was partially offset by growth in lower
yielding real estate secured receivables. Receivable mix was
also significantly impacted by lower levels of private label
receivables as a result of the sale of our domestic private
label portfolio in December 2004. The lower real estate and auto
finance yields during 2005 reflect strong receivable and
refinancing growth, which has occurred in an economic cycle with
historically low market rates, high liquidation of older, higher
yielding loans, product expansion into near-prime customer
segments and competitive pricing pressures due to excess market
capacity. The higher interest expense, which contributed to
lower net interest margin, was due to a larger balance sheet and
a significantly higher cost of funds due to a rising interest
rate environment. In addition, as part of our overall liquidity
management strategy, we continue to extend the maturity of our
liability profile which results in higher interest expense. Our
purchase accounting adjustments include amortization of fair
value adjustments to both our external debt obligations and
receivables. Amortization of purchase accounting fair value
adjustments increased net interest income by $132 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and
$392 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2005 compared to $174 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2004 and $549 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2004.
Net interest margin, annualized, decreased during the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to the
year-ago period as the improvement in the overall yield on our
receivable portfolio, as discussed above, was more than offset
by the higher funding costs. The following table shows the
impact of these items on owned basis net interest margin at
September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months | |
|
Nine months | |
|
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
| |
Net interest margin September 30, 2004
|
|
|
7.29 |
% |
|
|
7.41 |
% |
Impact to net interest margin resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bulk sale of domestic private label portfolio in December 2004
|
|
|
(.29 |
) |
|
|
(.27 |
) |
|
Receivable pricing
|
|
|
.25 |
|
|
|
.13 |
|
|
Receivable mix
|
|
|
.21 |
|
|
|
.14 |
|
|
Cost of funds
|
|
|
(.78 |
) |
|
|
(.78 |
) |
|
Investment securities mix
|
|
|
.05 |
|
|
|
.07 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
.08 |
|
|
|
.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin September 30, 2005
|
|
|
6.81 |
% |
|
|
6.77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our net interest income on a managed basis includes finance
income earned on our owned receivables as well as on our
securitized receivables. This finance income is offset by
interest expense on the debt recorded on our balance sheet as
well as the contractual rate of return on the instruments issued
to investors when the receivables were securitized. Managed
basis net interest income was $2.3 billion in the three
months ended September 30, 2005, a decrease of
12 percent from $2.6 billion in the three months ended
September 30, 2004. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2005, managed basis net interest income was
$6.8 billion, down 12 percent from $7.7 billion
in the nine months ended September 30, 2004. Managed basis
net interest margin, annualized, was 6.94 percent in the
current quarter and 7.01 percent in the year-to-date
period, compared to 7.88 percent and 8.13 percent in
the year-ago periods. The decrease in the current quarter was
due to a higher mix of real estate secured receivables due to
significantly lower levels of private label receivables and
higher funding costs due to a larger balance sheet and a rising
interest rate environment, partially offset by higher yields on
our receivables due to pricing increases for variable rate
products and other repricing initiatives. For the year-to-date
period, the decrease reflects lower yields on our receivables,
particularly in real estate secured and auto finance
receivables, and a higher mix of real estate secured receivables
due to significantly lower levels of private label receivables,
partially offset by the pricing increases
33
HSBC Finance Corporation
discussed above. As discussed above, the lower real estate and
auto finance yields during 2005 reflect strong receivable and
refinancing growth, which has occurred in an economic cycle with
historically low market rates, high liquidation of older, higher
yielding loans, product expansion into near-prime customer
segments and competitive pricing pressures due to excess market
capacity. The following table shows the impact of these items on
our net interest margin on a managed basis at September 30,
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months | |
|
Nine months | |
|
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
| |
Net interest margin September 30, 2004
|
|
|
7.88 |
% |
|
|
8.13 |
% |
Impact to net interest margin resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bulk sale of domestic private label portfolio in December 2004
|
|
|
(.22 |
) |
|
|
(.21 |
) |
|
Receivable pricing
|
|
|
.32 |
|
|
|
.11 |
|
|
Receivable mix
|
|
|
(.22 |
) |
|
|
(.23 |
) |
|
Cost of funds
|
|
|
(.92 |
) |
|
|
(.91 |
) |
|
Investment securities mix
|
|
|
.05 |
|
|
|
.07 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
.05 |
|
|
|
.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin September 30, 2005
|
|
|
6.94 |
% |
|
|
7.01 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin on a managed basis is greater than on an
owned basis because the managed basis portfolio includes
relatively more unsecured loans, which have higher yields.
Managed basis risk adjusted revenue (a non-GAAP financial
measure which represents net interest income, plus other
revenues, excluding securitization related revenue and the mark
to market and ineffectiveness related to our derivative
instruments, less net charge-offs as a percentage of average
interest earning assets) increased to 7.34 percent in the
current quarter from 6.50 percent in the year-ago quarter.
Managed basis risk adjusted revenue increased to
7.32 percent in the year-to-date period from
6.69 percent in the year-ago period. Managed basis risk
adjusted revenue increased due to higher other revenues as well
as the result of the positive credit and delinquency trends due
to the improving U.S. economy. Ongoing improvements in
underwriting, risk management and collections as well as product
expansion into near-prime customer segments led to lower
charge-offs which more than compensated for the decline in net
interest margin discussed above. See Basis of
Reporting for additional discussion on the use of non-GAAP
financial measures.
Provision for credit losses The following table
summarizes provision for credit losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Amount | |
|
% | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Three months ended September 30,
|
|
$ |
1,361 |
|
|
$ |
1,123 |
|
|
$ |
238 |
|
|
|
21.2% |
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
3,233 |
|
|
|
3,048 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Our provision for credit losses increased during the third
quarter of 2005 primarily due to increased credit loss exposure
as a result of Katrina and higher bankruptcy filings in the
period leading up to the October 17, 2005 effective date of
new bankruptcy legislation in the United States. We have been
maintaining credit loss reserves in anticipation of the impact
this new legislation would have on net charge-offs. However, the
magnitude of the spike in bankruptcies experienced immediately
before the new legislation became effective was larger than
anticipated. As a result, we recorded an additional credit loss
provision of $100 million during the third quarter. We
currently expect that the higher levels of personal bankruptcy
filings we have been experiencing will result in significantly
higher levels of net charge-offs, predominantly in our domestic
MasterCard/ Visa portfolio, during the fourth quarter of 2005 in
the region of $200 million. We believe that a portion of
this increase is an acceleration of net charge-offs that would
otherwise have been experienced in future periods. We will
continue to evaluate the impact of the spike in bankruptcy
filings on our credit loss reserves and currently believe that
this could result in a reduction in the allowance in the fourth
quarter as charge-offs occur.
34
HSBC Finance Corporation
Excluding the $180 million credit loss provision recorded
in the third quarter related to Katrina as well as the
additional $100 million of credit loss provision related to
increased bankruptcy filings, our provision for credit losses
declined in both periods as improved credit quality and a shift
in mix to higher levels of secured receivables primarily as a
result of the sale of our domestic private label portfolio in
December 2004 was partially offset by increased requirements due
to receivable growth, including lower securitization levels. The
provision as a percent of average owned receivables, annualized,
was 4.41 percent in the current quarter and
3.71 percent year-to-date, compared to 4.36 percent
and 4.16 percent in the year-ago periods. In 2005, credit
loss reserves increased as the provision for owned credit losses
was $459 million greater than net charge-offs in the third
quarter of 2005 and $624 million in the year-to-date
period. In 2004, provision for owned credit losses was
$154 million greater than net charge-offs in the third
quarter of 2004 and $143 million in the year-to-date
period. The provision for credit losses may vary from quarter to
quarter depending on the product mix and credit quality of loans
in our portfolio. See Credit Quality included in
this MD&A for further discussion of factors affecting the
provision for credit losses.
Other revenues The following table summarizes
other revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Amount | |
|
% | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Securitization related revenue
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
(226 |
) |
|
|
(84.6 |
)% |
Insurance revenue
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
Investment income
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
Derivative income (expense)
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
(100+ |
) |
Fee income
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
45.4 |
|
Taxpayer financial services revenue (expense)
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
66.7 |
|
Gains on receivable sales to HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
100+ |
|
Servicing fees from HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
100+ |
|
Other income
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other revenues
|
|
$ |
1,102 |
|
|
$ |
1,040 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Amount | |
|
% | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Securitization related revenue
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
881 |
|
|
$ |
(701 |
) |
|
|
(79.6 |
)% |
Insurance revenue
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
Investment income
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
Derivative income
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
Fee income
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
Taxpayer financial services revenue
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
|
Gains on receivable sales to HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
100+ |
|
Servicing fees from HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
100+ |
|
Other income
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other revenues
|
|
$ |
3,688 |
|
|
$ |
3,315 |
|
|
$ |
373 |
|
|
|
11.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
HSBC Finance Corporation
Securitization related revenue is the result of the
securitization of our receivables and includes the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Amount | |
|
% | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Net initial
gains(1)
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
% |
Net replenishment
gains(1)
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(66.1 |
) |
Servicing revenue and excess spread
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
(98.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
(226 |
) |
|
|
(84.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Amount | |
|
% | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Net initial
gains(1)
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
Net replenishment
gains(1)
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
(60.8 |
) |
Servicing revenue and excess spread
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
(467 |
) |
|
|
(91.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
881 |
|
|
$ |
(701 |
) |
|
|
(79.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Net of our estimate of probable credit losses under the recourse
provisions. |
The decreases in securitization related revenue were due to
decreases in the level and product mix of receivables
securitized and higher run-off due to shorter expected lives.
However, because existing public MasterCard and Visa credit card
transactions were structured as sales to revolving trusts that
require replenishments of receivables to support previously
issued securities, receivables will continue to be sold to these
trusts until the revolving periods end, the last of which is
currently projected to occur in 2008. Private label trusts that
publicly issued securities are now replenished by HSBC Bank USA
as a result of the daily sales of new domestic private label
receivable originations to HSBC Bank USA. We will continue to
replenish at reduced levels certain non-public personal
non-credit card and MasterCard and Visa securities issued to
conduits and record the resulting replenishment gains for a
period of time in order to manage liquidity. Since our
securitized receivables have varying lives, it will take time
for these receivables to pay-off and the related interest-only
strip receivables to be reduced to zero. While the termination
of sale treatment on new collateralized funding activity since
the third quarter of 2004 and the reduction of sales under
replenishment agreements reduced our reported net income under
U.S. GAAP, there is no impact on cash received from
operations.
Our interest-only strip receivables, net of the related loss
reserve and excluding the mark-to-market adjustment recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income, decreased
$43 million in the current quarter and $217 million
year-to-date, compared to a decrease of $122 million and
$410 million in the year-ago periods, as securitized
receivables continued to decrease.
Insurance revenue increased in both periods as we have
experienced higher sales volumes for many of our insurance
products in both our U.K. and domestic operations.
Investment income includes income on securities available
for sale in our insurance business and realized gains and losses
from the sale of securities. Investment income decreased in both
periods as a result of decreases in income due to lower average
balances and lower gains from security sales, partially offset
by higher yields.
36
HSBC Finance Corporation
Derivative income (expense), which includes realized and
unrealized gains and losses on derivatives which do not qualify
as effective hedges under SFAS No. 133 as well as the
ineffectiveness on derivatives associated with our qualifying
hedges, is summarized in the tables below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Net realized gains
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
Mark-to-market on derivatives which do not qualify as effective
hedges
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
Ineffectiveness associated with qualifying hedges
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(53 |
) |
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Net realized gains
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
Mark-to-market on derivatives which do not qualify as effective
hedges
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
Ineffectiveness associated with qualifying hedges
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
283 |
|
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative income decreased in the current quarter due to
increases in interest rates. The upward shift in the forward
yield curve decreased the value of our portfolio of interest
rate swaps which do not qualify for hedge accounting under
SFAS No. 133. This was largely the result of a
significant increase in the notional value of our pay variable
interest rate swaps entered into during the third quarter in
connection with long term debt issuances which gave rise to
income volatility during the period before hedging documentation
was put in place. The increase in year-to-date derivative income
reflects the combined impact of increases in interest rates and
changes in the portfolio mix of interest rate swaps which do not
qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133 and
recorded ineffectiveness as a result of the designation of a
significant number of our non-hedging derivative portfolio as
effective hedges under the long-haul method of accounting
beginning in the second quarter of 2005. As part of our overall
risk management strategy to reduce earnings volatility, a
significant number of our pay fixed/receive variable interest
rate swaps which had not previously qualified for hedge
accounting under SFAS No. 133, have been designated as
effective hedges using the long-haul method of accounting, and
certain other interest rate swaps were terminated. This will
significantly reduce the volatility of the mark-to-market on the
previously non-qualifying derivatives which have been designated
as effective hedges going forward, but will result in the
recording of ineffectiveness under the long-haul method of
accounting under SFAS No. 133. In order to further
reduce earnings volatility that would otherwise result from
changes in interest rates, we continue to evaluate the steps
required to regain hedge accounting treatment under
SFAS No. 133 for the remaining swaps which do not
currently qualify for hedge accounting. Additionally, we are
working to improve the process at the inception of new hedging
relationships in order to reduce the delay which currently
exists between executing the swap and establishing hedge
accounting. These derivatives remain economic hedges of the
underlying debt instruments.
Fee income increased during both periods due to higher
credit card fees, particularly relating to our non-prime credit
card portfolio, due to higher levels of MasterCard and Visa
credit card receivables and improved interchange rates,
partially offset by lower private label credit card fees and
higher reward program expenses. The lower private label credit
card fees were the result of the sale of our domestic private
label portfolio to HSBC Bank USA in December 2004. See
Segment Results Managed Basis for
additional information on fee income on a managed basis.
Taxpayer financial services (TFS) revenue,
which was essentially flat during the current quarter,
increased during the year-to-date period due to increased
loan volume during the 2005 tax season and a gain of
$24 million on the sale of certain bad debt recovery rights
to a third party in the first quarter of 2005.
37
HSBC Finance Corporation
Gains on receivable sales to HSBC affiliates relate to
the daily sales of domestic private label receivable
originations and certain MasterCard/ Visa account originations
and the bulk sales of real estate secured receivables to HSBC
Bank, USA. The increases primarily relate to our agreement with
HSBC Bank USA in December 2004 to sell all new domestic private
label receivable originations on a daily basis.
Servicing fees from HSBC affiliates represents revenue
received under service level agreements under which we service
MasterCard/ Visa credit card and domestic private label
receivables as well as real estate secured and auto finance
receivables for HSBC affiliates. The increases primarily relate
to the servicing fees we receive from HSBC Bank USA for
servicing the domestic private label receivables beginning in
December 2004.
Other income increased during both the three and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2005 primarily due to
higher ancillary credit card revenue and, for the three month
period, higher gains on asset sales, including the partial sale
of a real estate investment.
Costs and expenses The following table summarizes
total costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Amount | |
|
% | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
$ |
513 |
|
|
$ |
472 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
% |
Sales incentives
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
28.6 |
|
Occupancy and equipment expenses
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
Other marketing expenses
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
Other servicing and administrative expenses
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(36.6 |
) |
Support services from HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
Policyholders benefits
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
$ |
1,483 |
|
|
$ |
1,408 |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Amount | |
|
% | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
$ |
1,536 |
|
|
$ |
1,414 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
Sales incentives
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
Occupancy and equipment expenses
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Other marketing expenses
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
Other servicing and administrative expenses
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
Support services from HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
.7 |
|
Policyholders benefits
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
$ |
4,467 |
|
|
$ |
4,139 |
|
|
$ |
328 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits increased during both the
three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 as a
result of additional staffing, primarily in our consumer
lending, mortgage services and international businesses to
support growth.
Sales incentives increased during both the three and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2005 due to higher sales
volumes during the quarter in our consumer lending and mortgage
services businesses.
Occupancy and equipment expenses increased during both
periods as higher occupancy expense and higher repairs and
maintenance costs were partially offset by lower depreciation.
38
HSBC Finance Corporation
Other marketing expenses includes payments for
advertising, direct mail programs and other marketing
expenditures. The increase in both the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2005 was primarily due to
increased domestic credit card marketing expenses due to higher
non-prime marketing expense and investments in new marketing
initiatives and for the year-to-date period, changes in
contractual marketing responsibilities in July 2004 associated
with the General Motors (GM) co-branded credit card.
Other servicing and administrative expenses decreased in
both the three and nine month periods ended September 30,
2005 due to lower legal and other professional expenses.
Additionally, during the year-to-date period we experienced
lower REO expenses as well as a lower estimate of exposure
relating to accrued finance charges associated with certain loan
restructures which were partially offset by higher systems costs.
Support services from HSBC affiliates, which includes
technology and other services charged to us by HSBC Technology
and Services (USA) Inc. (HTSU), increased
primarily due to growth.
Amortization of intangibles increased during the three
month period ended September 30, 2005 due to the impairment
related to a tradename in the U.K., partially offset by lower
intangible amortization related to our purchased credit card
relationships in the quarter due to a contract renegotiation
related to one of our co-branded credit card partners.
Amortization of intangibles was higher in the year-to-date
period as higher intangible amortization related to our
purchased credit card relationships and the write off related to
a tradename in the U.K. were partially offset by lower
intangible amortization related to our TFS business.
Policyholders benefits increased during both
periods due to a continuing increase in insurance sales volume
in both our U.K. and domestic operations, partially offset by
lower amortization of fair value adjustments relating to our
insurance business. The increase over the year-ago periods for
our domestic operations is also attributable to the termination
of a reinsurance contract in the third quarter of 2004.
The following table summarizes our owned basis efficiency ratio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
Three months ended September 30
|
|
|
43.54 |
% |
|
|
45.10 |
% |
Nine months ended September 30
|
|
|
43.70 |
|
|
|
43.96 |
|
Our owned basis efficiency ratio improved during both the three
and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 primarily
as a result of higher net interest income and other revenues due
to higher levels of owned receivables. This was partially offset
by higher costs and expenses and the impact of the bulk sale of
our domestic private label portfolio in December 2004. Excluding
the results of our domestic private label portfolio from all
periods, the improvement in our owned basis efficiency ratio was
473 basis points for the three month period ended
September 30, 2005 and 285 basis points for the year
to date period.
Segment Results Managed Basis
We have three reportable segments: Consumer, Credit Card
Services and International. Our Consumer segment consists of our
consumer lending, mortgage services, retail services and auto
finance businesses. Our Credit Card Services segment consists of
our domestic MasterCard and Visa credit card business. Our
International segment consists of our foreign operations in the
United Kingdom, Canada, Ireland and the remainder of Europe.
There have been no changes in the basis of our segmentation or
any changes in the measurement of segment profit as compared
with the presentation in our 2004 Form 10-K.
We have historically monitored our operations and evaluated
trends on a managed basis (a non-GAAP financial measure), which
assumes that securitized receivables have not been sold and are
still on our balance sheet. This is because the receivables that
we securitize are subjected to underwriting standards comparable
to our owned portfolio, are generally serviced by operating
personnel without regard to ownership and result in a
39
HSBC Finance Corporation
similar credit loss exposure for us. In addition, we fund our
operations and make decisions about allocating resources such as
capital on a managed basis. When reporting on a managed basis,
net interest income, provision for credit losses and fee income
related to receivables securitized are reclassified from
securitization related revenue in our owned statement of income
into the appropriate caption.
Consumer Segment The following table summarizes
results for our Consumer segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Amount | |
|
% | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Net income
|
|
$ |
308 |
|
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Net interest income
|
|
|
1,733 |
|
|
|
1,956 |
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(11.4 |
) |
Securitization related revenue
|
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
68.7 |
|
Fee and other income
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
64.2 |
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
45.3 |
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Receivables
|
|
|
102,733 |
|
|
|
95,946 |
|
|
|
6,787 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
Assets
|
|
|
103,424 |
|
|
|
98,099 |
|
|
|
5,325 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Net interest margin, annualized
|
|
|
7.02 |
% |
|
|
8.20 |
% |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Return on average managed assets
|
|
|
1.24 |
|
|
|
1.22 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Amount | |
|
% | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Net income
|
|
$ |
1,182 |
|
|
$ |
855 |
|
|
$ |
327 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
% |
Net interest income
|
|
|
5,125 |
|
|
|
5,735 |
|
|
|
(610 |
) |
|
|
(10.6 |
) |
Securitization related revenue
|
|
|
(557 |
) |
|
|
(1,089 |
) |
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
48.9 |
|
Fee and other income
|
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
71.3 |
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
1,698 |
|
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,893 |
|
|
|
1,892 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
.1 |
|
Net interest margin, annualized
|
|
|
7.27 |
% |
|
|
8.33 |
% |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Return on average managed assets
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
|
1.22 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Our Consumer segment reported higher net income during both the
three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005. The
increase in net income was primarily due to higher fee and other
income and improved securitization related revenue, partially
offset by lower net interest income and, for the three month
period, higher provision for credit losses and higher costs and
expenses. The increase in fee and other income is due to gains
on the daily sales of domestic private label receivable
originations to HSBC Bank USA and receipt of servicing revenue
for servicing this portfolio, partially offset by lower fee
income related to the sold receivables. Securitization related
revenue improved due to lower amortization of prior period gains
as a result of reduced securitization levels. Costs and expenses
were higher in the quarter due to higher salary expense,
increased REO expense and higher support services from
affiliates, partially offset by a lower estimate of exposure
relating to accrued finance charges associated with certain loan
restructures. On a year-to-date basis, costs and expenses were
flat as higher salary expense and higher support services from
affiliates were offset by lower REO expenses as well as a lower
estimate of exposure relating to accrued finance charges
associated with certain loan restructures.
Net interest income and net interest margin, annualized,
decreased during both the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2005 compared to the year-ago periods
primarily due to a shift in mix to lower
40
HSBC Finance Corporation
yielding real estate secured receivables resulting from
significantly lower levels of private label receivables
primarily resulting from the sale of our private label portfolio
in December 2004 as well as organic growth of real estate
secured receivables. Also contributing to the decrease were
lower yields on real estate secured and auto finance receivables
as a result of competitive pressure on pricing and product
expansion into near-prime consumer segments, as well as the
run-off of higher yielding real estate secured receivables,
including second lien loans, largely due to refinance activity.
Our auto finance business experienced lower yields as we have
targeted higher credit quality customers. Although higher credit
quality receivables generate lower yields, such receivables are
expected to result in lower operating costs, delinquency ratios
and charge-off. The decreases in yield for our consumer segment
receivable portfolio were partially offset by higher pricing on
our variable rate products. A higher cost of funds due to a
rising interest rate environment also contributed to the
decrease in net interest margin.
Our managed basis provision for credit losses, which includes
both provision for owned basis receivables and over-the-life
provision for receivables serviced with limited recourse,
decreased during the year-to-date period due to lower net
charge-off levels as a result of improved credit quality and the
impact of the sale of the domestic private label receivable
portfolio in December 2004, as well as lower securitization
levels. We have experienced lower dollars of net charge-offs in
our owned portfolio during the three and nine month periods
ended September 30, 2005 due to the sale of
$12.2 billion of owned domestic private label receivables
in December 2004 and as a result of improved credit quality.
These factors more than offset increased requirements associated
with receivable growth and the impact from Katrina, as discussed
more fully below, and has resulted in a decrease to our owned
provision for credit losses in the year-to-date period and,
excluding the increase associated with Katrina, in the three
month period. Over-the-life provision for credit losses for
securitized receivables recorded in any given period reflect the
level and product mix of securitizations in that period.
Subsequent charge-offs of securitized receivables result in a
decrease in the over-the-life reserves without any corresponding
increase to managed loss provision. The combination of these
factors resulted in a decrease in managed loss reserves and
managed loss provision during the year. Managed loss provision
was higher, however, in the quarter as the prior year
quarters provision for receivables serviced with limited
recourse reflects a higher benefit from the release of
over-the-live reserves due to lower securitization levels which
was offset by higher amortization of prior period gains. In the
three months ended September 30, 2005, the provision for
credit losses was greater than net charge-offs by
$129 million while net charge-offs were greater than the
provision for credit losses by $137 million for the
year-to-date period. For 2004, we decreased managed loss
reserves as net charge-offs were greater than the provision for
credit losses by $414 million and $895 million in the
year-ago periods.
Our managed basis provision for credit losses also reflects an
estimate of incremental credit loss exposure relating to
Katrina. Based on the information currently available, we have
recorded an incremental provision for credit losses of
$125 million at the Consumer Segment. As more information
becomes available relating to the financial condition of our
affected customers, the physical condition of the collateral for
loans which are secured by real estate and the resultant impact
on customer payment patterns, we will continue to review our
estimate of credit loss exposure relating to Katrina and any
adjustments will be reported in earnings when they become known.
In an effort to assist our customers affected by the disaster,
we have initiated various programs including extended payment
arrangements and interest and fee waivers for up to 90 days
depending upon customer circumstances. These interest and fee
waivers were not material during the quarter for the Consumer
Segment.
Managed receivables increased 8 percent to
$102.7 billion at September 30, 2005 as compared to
$95.3 billion at June 30, 2005. Growth during the
quarter was driven by higher real estate secured receivables in
both our correspondent and branch-based consumer lending
businesses. Real estate secured receivable levels do not include
direct purchases of receivables by HSBC Bank USA from
correspondents totaling $.4 billion, a portion of which we
otherwise would have purchased. Also contributing to the
increase was $.3 billion from a portfolio acquisition
program during the third quarter of 2005. We also experienced
growth in auto finance receivables as a result of newly
originated loans acquired from our dealer network as well as
through the
41
HSBC Finance Corporation
consumer direct loan program. Personal non-credit card
receivables also increased resulting from the success of several
large direct mail campaigns that occurred during the quarter.
Compared to September 30, 2004, managed receivables
increased 7 percent. The rate of increase in managed
receivables was impacted by the sale of $15.6 billion in
domestic private label receivables to HSBC Bank USA in December
2004. Had this sale not taken place, managed receivables would
have increased by $22.4 billion or 23 percent at
September 30, 2005. We continued to experience strong
growth in our real estate secured portfolio in the third quarter
of 2005. Real estate secured receivable levels do not include
$2.1 billion of correspondent receivables purchased
directly by HSBC Bank USA since September 30, 2004, a
portion of which we otherwise would have purchased. Growth in
real estate secured receivables was also supplemented by
purchases from a single correspondent relationship which totaled
$1.9 billion since September 30, 2004. Also
contributing to the increase were purchases of $2.0 billion
from a portfolio acquisition program since the prior year
quarter. Our auto finance portfolio also reported strong growth
as a result of newly originated loans acquired from our dealer
network as well as increases through the consumer direct loan
program. Personal non-credit card receivables increased from the
year-ago period as we began to increase the availability of this
product domestically in the second half of 2004 as a result of
the improving U.S. economy.
The increase in return on average managed assets reflects the
higher net income discussed above. Additionally, for both the
three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005, ROMA
reflects higher average managed assets.
In accordance with Federal Financial Institutions Examination
Council (FFIEC) guidance, in the first quarter of
2006, the required minimum monthly payment amounts for domestic
private label credit card accounts will change. As previously
discussed, we sell new domestic private label receivable
originations to HSBC Bank USA on a daily basis. Estimates of the
potential impact to the business are based on numerous
assumptions and take into account a number of factors which are
difficult to predict, such as changes in customer behavior,
which will not be fully known or understood until the changes
are implemented. Based on current estimates, we anticipate that
these changes will reduce the premium associated with these
daily sales beginning in 2006. It is not expected this reduction
will have a material impact on either the results of the
Consumer Segment or our consolidated results.
Credit Card Services Segment The following table
summarizes results for our Credit Card Services segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Amount | |
|
% | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Net income
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Net interest income
|
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Securitization related revenue
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
45.5 |
|
Fee and other income
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(16.7 |
) |
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
Receivables
|
|
|
19,971 |
|
|
|
18,509 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Assets
|
|
|
19,710 |
|
|
|
20,620 |
|
|
|
(910 |
) |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
Net interest margin, annualized
|
|
|
10.27 |
% |
|
|
10.24 |
% |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Return on average managed assets
|
|
|
2.80 |
|
|
|
2.60 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
42
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Amount | |
|
% | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Net income
|
|
$ |
452 |
|
|
$ |
391 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
% |
Net interest income
|
|
|
1,545 |
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Securitization related revenue
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
Fee and other income
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
Net interest margin, annualized
|
|
|
10.27 |
% |
|
|
10.10 |
% |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Return on average managed assets
|
|
|
3.10 |
|
|
|
2.50 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Our Credit Card Services segment reported higher net income
during both the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2005. The increase in net income during both
periods was primarily due to higher fee and other income
partially offset by higher provision for credit losses and
higher costs and expenses. Increases in fee and other income
resulted from portfolio growth and higher interchange fees, as
well as increased gains from the daily sales of new volume
related to the MasterCard/ Visa account relationships purchased
from HSBC Bank USA in July 2004. Higher costs and expenses were
to support receivable growth and increases in marketing
expenses. The increase in marketing expenses was due to higher
non-prime marketing expense and investments in new marketing
initiatives and for the year-to-date period, changes in
contractual marketing responsibilities in July 2004 associated
with the domestic GM co-branded credit card.
The managed basis provision for credit losses increased in both
periods. Excluding, in the third quarter of 2005, the credit
loss provision recorded relating to Katrina and the additional
provision related to the increased bankruptcy filings, our
provision for credit losses declined in both periods due to
improved credit quality, partially offset by receivable growth.
We increased managed loss reserves by recording loss provision
greater than net charge-off of $154 million in the third
quarter of 2005 and $127 million year-to-date, compared to
increasing managed loss reserves by recording loss provision
greater than net charge-off of $15 million in the third
quarter of 2004 and decreasing managed loss reserves
year-to-date September 30, 2004 by recording loss provision
less than net charge-off of $6 million. We have been
maintaining credit loss reserves in anticipation of the impact
the new bankruptcy legislation would have on net charge-offs.
However, the magnitude of the spike in bankruptcies experienced
immediately before the new legislation became effective was
larger than anticipated. As a result, we recorded an additional
$100 million credit loss provision relating to these
filings in the third quarter. We currently expect that the
higher levels of personal bankruptcy filings we have been
experiencing will result in significantly higher levels of net
charge-offs in our domestic MasterCard/Visa portfolio during the
fourth quarter of 2005. We believe that a portion of this
increase is an acceleration of net charge-offs that would
otherwise have been experienced in future periods. We will
continue to evaluate the impact of the spike in bankruptcy
filings on our credit loss reserves and currently believe that
this could result in a reduction in the allowance in the fourth
quarter as charge-offs occur.
Our managed basis provision for credit losses also reflects an
estimate of incremental credit loss exposure relating to
Katrina. Based on the information currently available, we have
recorded an incremental provision for credit losses of
$55 million at the Credit Card Services Segment. As more
information becomes available relating to the financial
condition of our affected customers and the resultant impact on
customer payment patterns, we will continue to review our
estimate of credit loss exposure relating to Katrina and any
adjustments will be reported in earnings when they become known.
In an effort to assist our customers affected by the disaster,
we have initiated various programs including extended payment
arrangements and interest and fee waivers for up to 90 days
or longer depending upon customer circumstances. These interest
and fee waivers were not material during the quarter for the
Credit Card Services Segment.
Net interest income, which increased during the current quarter,
decreased in the year-to-date period. The decrease reflects
higher interest expense as a result of a rising interest rate
environment and lower investment
43
HSBC Finance Corporation
income due to lower investment levels, partially offset by
higher finance and other interest income on our receivables. The
increase in finance and other interest income on our receivables
during the current quarter reflects increased pricing on
variable yield products and higher receivable balances partially
offset by higher interest expense. Net interest margin increased
compared to the year-ago periods primarily due to increases in
subprime receivable levels, higher pricing on variable rate
products as well as other repricing initiatives, lower average
interest earning assets due to lower levels of low yielding
investment securities and the impact of lower amortization from
receivable origination costs resulting from changes in the
contractual marketing responsibilities in July 2004 associated
with the GM co-branded credit card, partially offset by higher
interest expense. Although our subprime receivables tend to have
smaller balances, they generate higher returns both in terms of
net interest margin and fee income. Net interest margin for both
periods was positively impacted by the disposal of certain low
yielding investment securities as a result of the elimination of
investments dedicated to our credit card bank resulting from our
acquisition by HSBC.
Managed receivables of $20.0 billion increased
2 percent compared to $19.6 billion at June 30,
2005. Compared to September 30, 2004, managed receivables
increased 8 percent. The increase during both periods
reflects organic growth in our HSBC branded prime, Union
Privilege and non-prime portfolios, which was partially offset
by the continued decline in certain older acquired portfolios.
The increase in ROMA in both periods reflects lower average
managed assets as well as the higher net income discussed above.
The decrease in average managed assets is due to lower
investment securities during 2005 as a result of the elimination
of investments dedicated to our credit card bank resulting from
our acquisition by HSBC.
In accordance with FFIEC guidance, our credit card services
business has adopted a plan to phase in changes to the required
minimum monthly payment amount and limit certain fee billings
for non-prime credit card accounts. The implementation of these
new requirements began in July 2005 with the requirements to be
fully phased in by December 31, 2005. Estimates of the
potential impact to the business are based on numerous
assumptions and take into account a number of factors which are
difficult to predict, such as changes in customer behavior,
which will not be fully known or understood until the changes
have been in place for a period of time. It is anticipated that
the changes will result in decreased fee income and fluctuations
in the provision for credit losses beginning in 2006. Although
we do not expect this will have a material impact on our
consolidated results, the impact will be material to the Credit
Card Services Segment in 2006.
As previously disclosed, we sold our domestic private label
portfolio to HSBC Bank USA in December 2004. We and HSBC Bank
USA will consider potential transfers of some of our MasterCard
and Visa receivables to HSBC Bank USA in the future based upon
continuing evaluation of capital and liquidity at each entity.
International Segment The following table
summarizes results for our International segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Amount | |
|
% | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Net income
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
|
(33.3 |
)% |
Net interest income
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
Securitization related revenue
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
100+ |
|
Fee and other income
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
100+ |
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
Receivables
|
|
|
12,564 |
|
|
|
11,833 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Assets
|
|
|
13,574 |
|
|
|
12,770 |
|
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Net interest margin annualized
|
|
|
7.22 |
% |
|
|
6.29 |
% |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Return on average managed assets
|
|
|
.36 |
|
|
|
.57 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
44
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Amount | |
|
% | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
(91 |
) |
|
|
(100+ |
)% |
Net interest income
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
Securitization related revenue
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
100+ |
|
Fee and other income
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
100+ |
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
Net interest margin annualized
|
|
|
7.05 |
% |
|
|
6.76 |
% |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Return on average managed assets
|
|
|
(.10 |
) |
|
|
.86 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Our International segment reported lower net income for the
three months ended September 30, 2005 and a net loss for
the year-to-date period. The lower net income and year-to-date
net loss reflect higher provision for credit losses and higher
costs and expenses, partially offset by higher net interest
income and increased fee and other income. Applying constant
currency rates, which uses the average rate of exchange for the
three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2004 to
translate current period net income, net income as reported for
the current quarter would not have been materially different and
the net loss higher by $2 million year-to-date.
Net interest income increased during both periods due to higher
receivable levels, partially offset by higher cost of funds in
the U.K. for the year-to-date period due to a rising interest
rate environment. Net interest margin, annualized, increased
during both the three and nine month periods due to increased
yields on credit cards due to repricing initiatives during the
current quarter and interest-free balances not being promoted as
strongly as in the past, partially offset by run-off of higher
yielding receivables, competitive pricing pressures holding down
yields on our personal loans in the U.K. and, for the
year-to-date period, increased cost of funds. Securitization
related revenue increased during the quarter and year-to-date
period due to lower amortization of prior period gains as a
result of reduced securitization levels and, for the
year-to-date period, higher levels of receivable replenishments
to support previously issued securities in the U.K. as well as
the recognition of residual balances associated with certain
expired securitization transactions. Fee and other income
increased primarily due to higher insurance revenues. Managed
basis provision for credit losses increased primarily due to
higher delinquency and charge-off levels in the U.K. due to a
general increase in consumer bad debts in the U.K. market,
including increased bankruptcies. We increased managed loss
reserves by recording loss provision greater than net
charge-offs of $3 million for the current quarter and
$111 million year-to-date. We decreased managed loss
reserves by recording loss provision less than net charge-off of
$74 million during the third quarter of 2004 and
$52 million for that year-to-date period. Total costs and
expenses increased primarily due to higher expenses to support
receivable growth and collection activities, higher policyholder
benefits because of increased insurance sales volumes, and, for
the nine month period, costs associated with branch closures in
the U.K.
Compared to June 30, 2005, managed receivables were
unchanged due to lower retail sales volume following a slow down
in retail consumer spending in the U.K. Compared to
September 30, 2004, managed receivables increased 6 percent
due to strong growth in our real estate secured, personal
non-credit card and MasterCard/ Visa portfolios as well as
growth from the introduction of an auto finance program in
Canada in the third quarter of 2004. Applying constant currency
rates, managed receivables at September 30, 2005 would not
have been materially different using June 30, 2005 or
September 30, 2004 exchange rates.
The decrease in ROMA in both the three and nine month periods
ended September 30, 2005 reflects higher provision for
credit losses due to higher delinquency and charge-off levels in
the U.K. and higher costs and expenses, as well as higher
average managed assets primarily due to receivable growth since
September 30, 2004.
45
HSBC Finance Corporation
As part of ongoing integration efforts with HSBC, we have been
working with HSBC to determine if management efficiencies could
be achieved by transferring all or a portion of our U.K. and
other European operations to HSBC Bank plc, a U.K. based
subsidiary of HSBC, and/or one or more unrelated third parties.
As of the date of this filing, a decision has not been made
regarding the transfer of all or a portion of our U.K. and other
European operations. We anticipate that a decision regarding
this potential transfer will be reached in the fourth quarter of
2005; however, any transfer is subject to approval by regulatory
authorities and boards of directors of the affected entities.
Reconciliation of Managed Basis Segment Results As
discussed above, we monitor our operations on a managed basis.
Therefore, an adjustment is required to reconcile the managed
financial information to our reported financial information in
our consolidated financial statements. This adjustment
reclassifies net interest income, fee income and loss provision
into securitization related revenue. See Note 12,
Business Segments, in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements for a reconciliation of our managed basis
segment results to managed basis and owned basis consolidated
totals.
Credit Quality
Credit Loss Reserves
We maintain credit loss reserves to cover probable losses of
principal, interest and fees, including late, overlimit and
annual fees. Credit loss reserves are based on a range of
estimates and are intended to be adequate but not excessive. We
estimate probable losses for owned consumer receivables using a
roll rate migration analysis that estimates the likelihood that
a loan will progress through the various stages of delinquency,
or buckets, and ultimately charge-off. This analysis considers
delinquency status, loss experience and severity and takes into
account whether loans are in bankruptcy, have been restructured
or rewritten, or are subject to forbearance, an external debt
management plan, hardship, modification, extension or deferment.
Our credit loss reserves also take into consideration the loss
severity expected based on the underlying collateral, if any,
for the loan in the event of default. Delinquency status may be
affected by customer account management policies and practices,
such as the restructure of accounts, forbearance agreements,
extended payment plans, modification arrangements, external debt
management programs, loan rewrites and deferments. If customer
account management policies, or changes thereto, shift loans
from a higher delinquency bucket to a
lower delinquency bucket, this will be reflected in
our roll rate statistics. To the extent that restructured
accounts have a greater propensity to roll to higher delinquency
buckets, this will be captured in the roll rates. Since the loss
reserve is computed based on the composite of all of these
calculations, this increase in roll rate will be applied to
receivables in all respective delinquency buckets, which will
increase the overall reserve level. In addition, loss reserves
on consumer receivables are maintained to reflect our judgment
of portfolio risk factors that may not be fully reflected in the
statistical roll rate calculation. Risk factors considered in
establishing loss reserves on consumer receivables include
recent growth, product mix, bankruptcy trends, geographic
concentrations, economic conditions, portfolio seasoning,
account management policies and practices, current levels of
charge-offs and delinquencies and other items which can affect
consumer payment patterns on outstanding receivables, such as
the impact of Katrina.
While our credit loss reserves are available to absorb losses in
the entire portfolio, we specifically consider the credit
quality and other risk factors for each of our products. We
recognize the different inherent loss characteristics in each of
our products as well as customer account management policies and
practices and risk management/collection practices. Charge-off
policies are also considered when establishing loss reserve
requirements to ensure the appropriate reserves exist for
products with longer charge-off periods. We also consider key
ratios such as reserves to nonperforming loans and reserves as a
percent of net annualized charge-offs in developing our loss
reserve estimates. Loss reserve estimates are reviewed
periodically and adjustments are reported in earnings when they
become known. As these estimates are influenced by factors
outside of our control, such as consumer payment patterns and
economic conditions, there is uncertainty inherent in these
estimates, making it reasonably possible that they could change.
See Note 4, Receivables, in the
46
HSBC Finance Corporation
accompanying consolidated financial statements for receivables
by product type and Note 5, Credit Loss
Reserves, for an analysis of changes in the credit loss
reserves.
The following table summarizes owned basis credit loss reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Owned credit loss reserves
|
|
$ |
4,220 |
|
|
$ |
3,756 |
|
|
$ |
3,953 |
|
Reserves as a percent of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
3.28 |
% |
|
|
3.16 |
% |
|
|
3.71 |
% |
|
Net
charge-offs(1)
|
|
|
117.0 |
|
|
|
111.3 |
|
|
|
102.0 |
|
|
Nonperforming loans
|
|
|
110.0 |
|
|
|
107.6 |
|
|
|
104.1 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Quarter-to-date, annualized. |
Owned credit loss reserves at September 30, 2005 increased
as compared to June 30, 2005 and September 30, 2004 as
the provision for owned credit losses during the current quarter
was $459 million greater than net charge-offs reflecting
higher levels of owned receivables and, as previously discussed,
additional provision due to increases in bankruptcy filings in
both our domestic and foreign operations, which largely impacts
our unsecured consumer products, and the additional credit loss
reserves resulting from Katrina. These increases were partially
offset by the impact of stable credit quality, the release of
$505 million of owned credit loss reserves in December 2004
associated with the sold domestic private label portfolio as
well as a shift in mix to higher levels of secured receivables.
During the three months ended September 30, 2004, provision
for owned credit losses was $154 million greater than net
charge-offs. Reserve levels at September 30, 2005 reflect
the factors discussed above. The trends in the reserve ratios
reflect the fact that we are experiencing a shift in our loan
portfolio to higher credit quality receivables, particularly
real estate secured and auto finance receivables, partially
offset by the impact of additional credit loss reserves for
Katrina and increased bankruptcy filings.
For securitized receivables, we also record a provision for
estimated probable losses that we expect to incur under the
recourse provisions. The following table summarizes managed
credit loss reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Managed credit loss reserves
|
|
$ |
4,571 |
|
|
$ |
4,281 |
|
|
$ |
5,199 |
|
Reserves as a percent of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
3.35 |
% |
|
|
4.11 |
% |
|
Net
charge-offs(1)
|
|
|
108.6 |
|
|
|
104.1 |
|
|
|
95.4 |
|
|
Nonperforming loans
|
|
|
110.3 |
|
|
|
110.2 |
|
|
|
111.1 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Quarter-to-date, annualized. |
Managed credit loss reserves at September 30, 2005 also
increased compared to June 30, 2005 as the increases in our
owned credit loss reserves as discussed above were offset by
lower reserves on securitized receivables due to run-off.
Managed credit loss reserves at September 30, 2005
decreased as compared to September 30, 2004 as a result of
improvements in credit quality, changes in securitization levels
and the sale of our domestic private label receivable portfolio
in December 2004 as previously discussed, partially offset by
additional reserves resulting from receivable growth and Katrina
and increased bankruptcy filings.
See Basis of Reporting for additional discussion on
the use of non-GAAP financial measures and Reconciliations
to GAAP Financial Measures for quantitative
reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures to the
comparable GAAP basis financial measure.
47
HSBC Finance Corporation
Delinquency Owned Basis
The following table summarizes two-months-and-over contractual
delinquency (as a percent of consumer receivables):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
Real estate secured
|
|
|
2.51 |
% |
|
|
2.56 |
% |
|
|
3.27 |
% |
Auto finance
|
|
|
2.09 |
|
|
|
2.08 |
|
|
|
1.81 |
|
MasterCard/ Visa
|
|
|
4.46 |
|
|
|
4.14 |
|
|
|
5.84 |
|
Private label
|
|
|
5.22 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
|
|
|
4.72 |
|
Personal non-credit card
|
|
|
9.18 |
|
|
|
8.84 |
|
|
|
8.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3.78 |
% |
|
|
3.73 |
% |
|
|
4.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total owned delinquency as a percentage of consumer receivables
increased 5 basis points compared to the prior quarter. The
increase in the delinquency ratio is primarily due to seasonal
increases in delinquency in the third quarter, partially offset
by the continuing strong economy, better underwriting and
improved quality of originations. The overall decrease in the
delinquency ratio of our real estate secured portfolio reflects
receivable growth, the recent trend of better quality in new
originations and a continuing strong economy. The increase in
the MasterCard/ Visa delinquency ratio reflects a seasonal
increase in delinquencies during the third quarter, partially
offset by changes in receivable mix resulting from lower
securitization levels. The increases in the delinquency ratio in
our private label receivables (which includes our foreign
private label portfolio that was not sold to HSBC Bank USA in
December 2004) and our personal non-credit card portfolio also
reflects the increased bankruptcy filings in both the United
States and the U.K. The increase in personal non-credit card
delinquencies was partially offset by improved collection
efforts and strong economic conditions in the U.S.
Compared to a year ago, total delinquency decreased
65 basis points generally as a result of improvements in
the U.S. economy, better underwriting, improved credit
quality as well as higher levels of real estate secured
receivables. As discussed above, the increase in delinquency in
our private label receivables (which includes our foreign
private label portfolio that was not sold to HSBC Bank USA in
December 2004) and our personal non-credit card portfolio
reflects the general increase in consumer bad debts in the U.K.
market, including increased bankruptcies. The increase in the
personal non-credit card portfolio also reflects the increase in
bankruptcy filings in the United States due to new bankruptcy
legislation in the United States which became effective in
October 2005. Delinquency levels at September 30, 2004
include the domestic private label portfolio which contributed
approximately 5 basis points to total delinquency.
48
HSBC Finance Corporation
Net Charge-offs of Consumer Receivables Owned
Basis
The following table summarizes net charge-offs of consumer
receivables (as a percent, annualized, of average consumer
receivables):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
Real estate secured
|
|
|
.75 |
% |
|
|
.78 |
% |
|
|
1.19 |
% |
Auto finance
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
2.61 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
MasterCard/ Visa
|
|
|
6.24 |
|
|
|
6.93 |
|
|
|
8.50 |
|
Private label
|
|
|
5.35 |
|
|
|
4.36 |
|
|
|
4.79 |
|
Personal non-credit card
|
|
|
8.01 |
|
|
|
7.77 |
|
|
|
9.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2.93 |
% |
|
|
2.93 |
% |
|
|
3.77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate secured net charge-offs and REO expense as a percent
of average real estate secured receivables
|
|
|
.88 |
% |
|
|
.84 |
% |
|
|
1.31 |
% |
Total net charge-offs as a percent, annualized, of average
consumer receivables has remained flat during the quarter ended
September 30, 2005 compared to the quarter ended
June 30, 2005 as the lower delinquency levels we have been
experiencing due to an improving economy and which had a
positive impact on charge-offs, were offset by an increase in
bankruptcy filings due to new bankruptcy legislation in the
United States as well as increased bankruptcy filings in the
U.K. Our real estate secured portfolio experienced a decrease in
net charge-offs reflecting the recent trend of better quality in
new originations and continuing strong economic conditions. The
increase in auto finance net charge-offs reflects a seasonal
pattern of higher charge-offs in the third quarter. The decrease
in MasterCard/ Visa charge-offs reflects changes in receivable
mix resulting from lower securitization levels and continued
improved credit quality. The increase in net charge-offs for the
private label portfolio reflects the general increase in
consumer bad debts in the U.K. markets, including increased
bankruptcies. The increase in net charge-offs in the personal
non-credit card portfolio reflects the increase in bankruptcy
filings, as discussed above.
Total net charge-offs as a percentage, annualized, of average
consumer receivables for the current quarter decreased from the
September 2004 net charge-off levels. Principal factors
behind the decrease were improved collections and better
underwriting, including both improved modeling and improved
credit quality of new originations, stable economic conditions,
as well as the sale of our domestic private label portfolio in
December 2004. These were partially offset by the increased
bankruptcy filings discussed above. The September 2004 net
charge-off ratio includes the domestic private label portfolio
which contributed 14 basis points to the ratio. The
decrease in auto finance net charge-offs also reflects improved
used auto prices which resulted in lower loss severities.
Owned Nonperforming Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Nonaccrual receivables
|
|
$ |
3,273 |
|
|
$ |
3,008 |
|
|
$ |
2,891 |
|
Accruing consumer receivables 90 or more days delinquent
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
905 |
|
Renegotiated commercial loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming receivables
|
|
|
3,836 |
|
|
|
3,491 |
|
|
|
3,797 |
|
Real estate owned
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets
|
|
$ |
4,298 |
|
|
$ |
3,950 |
|
|
$ |
4,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit loss reserves as a percent of nonperforming receivables
|
|
|
110.0 |
% |
|
|
107.6 |
% |
|
|
104.1 |
% |
49
HSBC Finance Corporation
Compared to June 30, 2005, the increase in total
nonperforming receivables is primarily attributable to seasonal
trends in delinquency as well as increased bankruptcy filings
experienced in both our domestic and foreign operations.
Compared to September 30, 2004, the decrease in total
nonperforming assets is due to improved credit quality,
continued improvement in the economy, collection efforts as well
as the impact of the bulk sale of our domestic private label
receivable portfolio in December 2004. Consistent with industry
practice, accruing consumer receivables 90 or more days
delinquent includes domestic MasterCard and Visa and for
September 30, 2004, our domestic private label credit card
receivables.
Account Management Policies and Practices
Our policies and practices for the collection of consumer
receivables, including our customer account management policies
and practices, permit us to reset the contractual delinquency
status of an account to current, based on indicia or criteria
which, in our judgment, evidence continued payment probability.
Such policies and practices vary by product and are designed to
manage customer relationships, maximize collection opportunities
and avoid foreclosure or repossession if reasonably possible. If
the account subsequently experiences payment defaults, it will
again become contractually delinquent.
The tables below summarize approximate restructuring statistics
in our managed basis domestic portfolio. We report our
restructuring statistics on a managed basis only because the
receivables that we securitize are subject to underwriting
standards comparable to our owned portfolio, are generally
serviced and collected without regard to ownership and result in
a similar credit loss exposure for us. As previously reported,
we use certain assumptions and estimates to compile our
restructure statistics. We continue to enhance our ability to
capture and segment restructure data across all business units.
When comparing restructuring statistics from different periods,
the fact that our restructure policies and practices will change
over time, that exceptions are made to those policies and
practices, and that our data capture methodologies have been
enhanced, should be taken into account.
50
HSBC Finance Corporation
Total Restructured by Restructure Period Domestic
Portfolio(1)
(Managed Basis)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005(3) | |
|
2005(3) | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Never restructured
|
|
|
88.9 |
% |
|
|
88.0 |
% |
|
|
86.5 |
% |
Restructured:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructured in the last 6 months
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
Restructured in the last 7-12 months
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
Previously restructured beyond 12 months
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ever
restructured(2)
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Restructured by Product Domestic
Portfolio(1)
(Managed Basis) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate secured
|
|
$ |
8,205 |
|
|
$ |
8,277 |
|
|
$ |
8,895 |
|
Auto finance
|
|
|
1,593 |
|
|
|
1,585 |
|
|
|
1,420 |
|
MasterCard/ Visa
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
Private
label(3)
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
Personal non-credit card
|
|
|
3,353 |
|
|
|
3,396 |
|
|
|
3,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
13,659 |
|
|
$ |
13,808 |
|
|
$ |
15,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As a percent of managed receivables)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate secured
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
15.8 |
% |
Auto finance
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
MasterCard/ Visa
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Private
label(3)
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Personal non-credit card
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(2)
|
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Excludes foreign businesses, commercial and other. |
|
(2) |
Total including foreign businesses was 10.5 percent at
September 30, 2005, 11.3 percent at June 30,
2005, and 12.6 percent at September 30, 2004. |
|
(3) |
Reflects consumer lending retail sales contracts which have
historically been classified as private label. |
See Credit Quality Statistics for further
information regarding owned basis and managed basis delinquency,
charge-offs and nonperforming loans.
The amount of domestic and foreign managed receivables in
forbearance, modification, credit card services approved
consumer credit counseling accommodations, rewrites or other
customer account management techniques for which we have reset
delinquency and that is not included in the restructured or
delinquency statistics was approximately $.4 billion or
.3 percent of managed receivables at September 30,
2005, $.4 billion or .3 percent of managed receivables
at June 30, 2005 and $.5 billion or .4 percent of
managed assets at September 30, 2004.
In addition to the above, we have granted an initial 30 or
60 day payment deferral (based on product) to customers
living in the FEMA designated Individual Assistance disaster
areas. This deferral may be extended for a period of up to
90 days or longer based on a customers specific
circumstances, consistent with our natural disaster policies. In
certain cases these arrangements have resulted in a
customers delinquency status
51
HSBC Finance Corporation
being reset by 30 days. These extended payment arrangements
totaled $.7 billion or .4% of managed receivables at
September 30, 2005 and are not reflected as restructures in
the table above or included in the other customer account
management techniques described in the paragraph above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We continue to focus on balancing our use of affiliate and
third-party funding sources to minimize funding expense while
maximizing liquidity. As discussed below, we supplemented
unsecured debt issuance during the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 with proceeds from the sale of our
domestic private label receivable portfolio to HSBC Bank USA in
December 2004, debt issued to affiliates, higher levels of
commercial paper and the issuance of Series B preferred
stock.
Because we are now a subsidiary of HSBC, our credit spreads
relative to Treasuries have tightened compared to those we
experienced during the months leading up to the announcement of
our acquisition by HSBC. Primarily as a result of these
tightened credit spreads, we recognized cash funding expense
savings of approximately $407 million in the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 ($155 million in the three
months ended September 30, 2005) and approximately
$235 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2004 ($95 million in the three months ended
September 30, 2004) compared to the funding costs we would
have incurred using average spreads and funding mix from the
first half of 2002. It is anticipated that these tightened
credit spreads and other funding synergies including asset
transfers will eventually enable HSBC to realize annual cash
funding expense savings, including external fee savings, in
excess of $1 billion per year as our existing term debt
matures over the course of the next few years. The portion of
these savings to be realized by HSBC Finance Corporation will
depend in large part upon the amount and timing of various
initiatives between HSBC Finance Corporation and other HSBC
subsidiaries.
Debt due to affiliates and other HSBC related funding are
summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(in billions) | |
Debt issued to HSBC subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drawings on bank lines in the U.K
|
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
|
Term debt
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
Preferred securities issued by Household Capital Trust VIII
|
|
|
.3 |
|
|
|
.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt issued to HSBC subsidiaries
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issued to HSBC clients:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro commercial paper
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
Term debt
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt issued to HSBC clients
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Preferred stock held by HSBC Investments (North America)
Inc.
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Cash received on bulk and subsequent sales of domestic private
label receivables to HSBC Bank USA, net (cumulative)
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
Real estate secured receivable activity with HSBC Bank USA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received on sales (cumulative)
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
Direct purchases from correspondents (cumulative)
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
Run-off of real estate secured receivable activity with HSBC
Bank USA
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate secured receivable activity with HSBC Bank USA
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total HSBC related funding
|
|
$ |
43.1 |
|
|
$ |
35.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
HSBC Finance Corporation
At September 30, 2005, funding from HSBC, including debt
issues to HSBC subsidiaries and clients and preferred stock held
by HSBC Investments (North America) Inc. (HINO) but
excluding cash received on asset sales to HSBC subsidiaries,
represented 18 percent of our total managed debt and
preferred stock funding. At December 31, 2004, funding from
HSBC, including debt issues to HSBC subsidiaries and clients and
preferred stock held by HINO but excluding cash received on
asset sales to HSBC subsidiaries, represented 15 percent of
our total managed debt and preferred stock funding.
In addition to the HSBC related funding received, we have
extended lines of credit and promissory notes to other HSBC
subsidiaries at interest rates comparable to third-party rates
for notes with similar terms. At September 30, 2005,
$1.9 billion was outstanding under these agreements
compared to $.6 billion outstanding at December 31,
2004.
Proceeds from the December 2004 domestic private label bulk
receivable sale to HSBC Bank USA of $12.4 billion were used
to pay down short-term domestic borrowings, including
outstanding commercial paper balances, and to fund operations.
Excess liquidity from the sale was used to temporarily fund
available for sale investments at December 31, 2004.
As of September 30, 2005, we had revolving credit
facilities of $2.5 billion from HSBC domestically and
$10 billion from HSBC subsidiaries in the U.K. There have
been no draws on the domestic line. At September 30, 2005,
$6.6 billion was outstanding under the U.K. lines. We had
derivative contracts with a notional value of
$64.3 billion, or approximately 96 percent of total
derivative contracts, outstanding with HSBC affiliates at
September 30, 2005. We had derivative contracts with a
notional value of $62.6 billion, or approximately
87 percent of total derivative contracts, outstanding with
HSBC affiliates at December 31, 2004.
Securities totaled $3.9 billion at
September 30, 2005 and $3.6 billion at
December 31, 2004. Securities purchased under agreements to
resell totaled $181 million at September 30, 2005 and
$2.7 billion at December 31, 2004. Interest bearing
deposits with banks totaled $398 million at
September 30, 2005 and $603 million at
December 31, 2004. Our total investment balances at
December 31, 2004 were high as a result of the timing of
the bulk sale of the domestic private label receivable portfolio
to HSBC Bank USA on December 29, 2004.
Commercial paper, bank and other borrowings
totaled $11.6 billion at September 30, 2005
and $9.0 billion at December 31, 2004. The increase at
September 30, 2005 was a result of a plan to increase our
commercial paper issuances as a result of lowering the coverage
ratio of bank credit facilities to outstanding commercial paper
from 100% to 80%. This plan also assumes that the combination of
bank credit facilities and undrawn committed conduit facilities
will, at all times, exceed 115% of outstanding commercial paper.
This plan, which was reviewed with the relevant rating agencies,
resulted in an increase in our maximum outstanding commercial
paper balance to in excess of $12.0 billion. Additionally,
at December 31, 2004, we were carrying lower levels of
commercial paper as the proceeds from the sale of the domestic
private label loan portfolio to HSBC Bank USA were used to
reduce the outstanding balances. Included in this total was
outstanding Euro commercial paper sold to customers of HSBC of
$3.4 billion at September 30, 2005 and
$2.6 billion at December 31, 2004.
Long term debt (with original maturities over one
year) increased to $93.2 billion at September 30, 2005
from $85.4 billion at December 31, 2004. Significant
third party issuance during the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
$7.6 billion of domestic and foreign medium-term notes |
|
|
$4.4 billion of foreign currency-denominated bonds |
|
|
$1.3 billion of
InterNotessm
(retail-oriented medium-term notes) |
|
|
$9.6 billion of global debt |
|
|
$5.4 billion of securities backed by real estate secured,
auto finance, and MasterCard/ Visa receivables. For accounting
purposes, these transactions were structured as secured
financings. |
53
HSBC Finance Corporation
In June 2005, we redeemed the junior subordinated notes issued
to the Household Capital Trust V with an outstanding
principal balance of $309 million.
Preferred Shares In June 2005, we issued
575,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock for
$575 million. Dividends on the Series B Preferred
Stock are non-cumulative and payable quarterly at a rate of
6.36 percent commencing September 15, 2005. The
Series B Preferred Stock may be redeemed at our option
after June 23, 2010. In August 2005, we declared an
$8 million dividend on the Series B Preferred Stock
which was paid on September 15, 2005.
In March 2003, we issued 1,100 shares of Series A
Cumulative Preferred Stock to HSBC, which are now held by HINO.
Common Equity We currently intend to issue
additional common equity to HINO in exchange for the
Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock on or before
December 15, 2005. In addition, in connection with our
pending purchase of Metris, we currently intend to issue
approximately $1.2 billion in additional common equity to
HINO to fund a portion of the $1.6 billion purchase price.
The acquisition of Metris is subject to certain conditions and
is anticipated to close in the fourth quarter of 2005.
Selected capital ratios are summarized in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
TETMA(1),(2)
|
|
|
6.97 |
% |
|
|
6.27 |
% |
TETMA + Owned
Reserves(1),(2)
|
|
|
9.91 |
|
|
|
9.04 |
|
Tangible common equity to tangible managed
assets(1)
|
|
|
5.33 |
|
|
|
4.67 |
|
Common and preferred equity to owned assets
|
|
|
12.83 |
|
|
|
13.01 |
|
Excluding purchase accounting adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TETMA(1),(2)
|
|
|
8.10 |
|
|
|
7.97 |
|
|
TETMA + Owned
Reserves(1),(2)
|
|
|
11.04 |
|
|
|
10.75 |
|
|
Tangible common equity to tangible managed
assets(1)
|
|
|
6.46 |
|
|
|
6.38 |
|
|
|
(1) |
TETMA, TETMA + Owned Reserves and tangible common equity to
tangible managed assets represent non-GAAP financial ratios that
are used by HSBC Finance Corporation management and certain
rating agencies to evaluate capital adequacy and may differ from
similarly named measures presented by other companies. See
Basis of Reporting for additional discussion on the
use of non-GAAP financial measures and Reconciliations to
GAAP Financial Measures for quantitative reconciliations
to the equivalent GAAP basis financial measure. |
|
(2) |
Beginning in the third quarter of 2005, and with the agreement
of certain rating agencies, we have refined our definition of
TETMA and TETMA + Owned Reserves to exclude the Adjustable
Conversion-Rate Equity Security Units as this more accurately
reflects the impact of these items on our equity. Prior period
amounts have been revised to reflect the current period
presentation. |
Securitizations and secured financings
Securitizations (collateralized funding transactions
structured to receive sale treatment under Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, Accounting
for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and
Extinguishments of Liabilities, a Replacement of FASB Statement
No. 125, (SFAS No. 140) and
secured financings (collateralized funding transactions which do
not receive sale treatment under SFAS No. 140) of
consumer receivables have been used to limit our reliance on the
unsecured debt markets.
In a securitization, a designated pool of non-real estate
consumer receivables is removed from the balance sheet and
transferred through a limited purpose financing subsidiary to an
unaffiliated trust. This unaffiliated trust is a qualifying
special purpose entity (QSPE) as defined by
SFAS No. 140 and, therefore, is not consolidated. The
QSPE funds its receivable purchase through the issuance of
securities to investors, entitling them to receive specified
cash flows during the life of the securities. The receivables
transferred to the QSPE serve as collateral for the securities.
At the time of sale, an interest-only strip receivable is
recorded, representing the present value of the cash flows we
expect to receive over the life of the securitized receivables,
net of estimated credit losses and debt service. Under the terms
of the securitizations, we receive annual
54
HSBC Finance Corporation
servicing fees on the outstanding balance of the securitized
receivables and the rights to future residual cash flows on the
sold receivables after the investors receive their contractual
return. Cash flows related to the interest-only strip
receivables and servicing the receivables are collected over the
life of the underlying securitized receivables.
In a secured financing, a designated pool of receivables are
conveyed to a wholly owned limited purpose subsidiary, which in
turn transfers the receivables to a trust that sells interests
to investors. Repayment of the debt issued by the trust is
secured by the receivables transferred. The transactions are
structured as secured financings under SFAS No. 140.
Therefore, the receivables and the underlying debt of the trust
remain on our balance sheet. We do not recognize a gain in a
secured financing transaction. Because the receivables and the
debt remain on our balance sheet, revenues and expenses are
reported consistent with our owned balance sheet portfolio.
Using this source of funding results in similar cash flows as
issuing debt through alternative funding sources.
Under IFRS and prior to 2005 under U.K. GAAP, our
securitizations are treated as secured financings. In order to
align our accounting treatment with that of HSBC, starting in
the third quarter of 2004 we began to structure all new
collateralized funding transactions as secured financings.
However, because existing public MasterCard and Visa credit card
transactions were structured as sales to revolving trusts that
require replenishments of receivables to support previously
issued securities, receivables will continue to be sold to these
trusts until the revolving periods end, the last of which is
currently projected to occur in 2008. Private label trusts that
publicly issued securities are now replenished by HSBC Bank USA
as a result of the daily sale of new domestic private label
credit card originations to HSBC Bank USA. We will continue to
replenish at reduced levels certain non-public personal
non-credit card and MasterCard and Visa securities issued to
conduits and record the resulting replenishment gains for a
period of time in order to manage liquidity. Since our
securitized receivables have varying lives, it will take time
for these receivables to pay-off and the related interest-only
strip receivables to be reduced to zero. The termination of sale
treatment on new collateralized funding activity reduced our
reported net income under U.S. GAAP. There is no impact,
however, on cash received from operations. Because we believe
the market for securities backed by receivables is a reliable,
efficient and cost-effective source of funds, we will continue
to use secured financings of consumer receivables as a source of
our funding and liquidity.
As previously discussed, securitization levels were much lower
in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 as a result of
the use of alternate funding sources, including funding from
HSBC subsidiaries, and our decision to structure all new
collateralized funding transactions as secured financings
beginning in the third quarter of 2004.
55
HSBC Finance Corporation
Securitizations (excluding replenishments of certificateholder
interests) and secured financings are summarized in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Initial securitizations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto finance
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
MasterCard/ Visa
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Private label
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Personal non-credit card
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured financings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate secured
|
|
$ |
1,321 |
|
|
$ |
1,549 |
|
Auto finance
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
MasterCard/ Visa
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
3,016 |
|
|
$ |
2,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Initial securitizations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto finance
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
MasterCard/ Visa
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
550 |
|
Private label
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
190 |
|
Personal non-credit card
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured financings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate secured
|
|
$ |
2,240 |
|
|
$ |
3,299 |
|
Auto finance
|
|
|
1,943 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
MasterCard/ Visa
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
5,433 |
|
|
$ |
4,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our securitized receivables totaled $6.8 billion at
September 30, 2005 compared to $14.2 billion at
December 31, 2004. As of September 30, 2005, secured
financings of $7.7 billion were secured by
$13.0 billion of real estate secured, auto finance and
MasterCard/ Visa receivables. Secured financings of
$7.3 billion at December 31, 2004 were secured by
$10.3 billion of real estate secured and auto finance
receivables. At September 30, 2005, securitizations
structured as sales represented 5 percent and secured
financings represented 6 percent of the funding associated
with our managed funding portfolio. At December 31, 2004,
securitizations structured as sales represented 12 percent
and secured financings represented 6 percent of the funding
associated with our managed funding portfolio.
56
HSBC Finance Corporation
2005 funding strategy As discussed previously, the
acquisition by HSBC has improved our access to the capital
markets as well as expanded our access to a worldwide pool of
potential investors. Our current estimated domestic funding
needs and sources for 2005 are summarized in the table that
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
|
|
January 1 | |
|
October 1 | |
|
|
|
|
through | |
|
through | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
Full Year | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
| |
|
|
(in billions) | |
Funding needs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset growth
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
3 - 6 |
(1) |
|
$ |
19 - 22 |
|
|
Commercial paper, term debt and securitization maturities
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
2 - 12 |
|
|
|
28 - 38 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 - 3 |
(1) |
|
|
2 - 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total funding needs, including growth
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
6 - 21 |
|
|
$ |
49 - 64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funding sources:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External funding, including HSBC clients
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
6 - 20 |
|
|
$ |
44 - 58 |
|
|
HSBC and HSBC subsidiaries
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
0 - 1 |
|
|
|
5 - 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total funding sources
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
6 - 21 |
|
|
$ |
49 - 64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Capital requirements resulting from the acquisition of Metris
are included in Other. |
Risk Management
Credit Risk There have been no significant changes
in our approach to credit risk management since
December 31, 2004.
At September 30, 2005, we had derivative contracts with a
notional value of approximately $67.1 billion, including
$64.3 billion outstanding with HSBC affiliates. Most swap
agreements, both with unaffiliated and affiliated third parties,
require that payments be made to, or received from, the
counterparty when the fair value of the agreement reaches a
certain level. Generally, third-party swap counterparties
provide collateral in the form of cash which is recorded in our
balance sheet as other assets or derivative related liabilities
and totaled $343 million at September 30, 2005.
Affiliate swap counterparties provide collateral in the form of
securities as required, which are not recorded on our balance
sheet. At September 30, 2005, the fair value of our
agreements with affiliate counterparties was below the level
requiring payment of collateral. As such at September, 30,
2005, we were not holding any swap collateral from HSBC
affiliates in the form of securities.
Liquidity Risk There have been no significant
changes in our approach to liquidity risk since
December 31, 2004.
Market Risk HSBC has certain limits and benchmarks
that serve as guidelines in determining appropriate levels of
interest rate risk. One such limit is expressed in terms of the
Present Value of a Basis Point (PVBP), which
reflects the change in value of the balance sheet for a one
basis point movement in all interest rates. Our total PVBP limit
as of September 30, 2005 was $2 million, which
includes risk associated with hedging instruments. Thus, for a
one basis point change in interest rates, the policy dictates
that the value of the balance sheet shall not increase or
decrease by more than $2 million. Our PVBP position at both
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 was less than
$1 million.
While the total PVBP position was not impacted by the loss of
hedge accounting for certain derivative financial instruments at
the time of our acquisition by HSBC, the portfolio of
ineffective hedges remaining at September 30, 2005
represent PVBP risk of $($1.7) million. The interest rate
risk remaining for all other assets and liabilities, including
effective hedges, results in an offsetting PVBP risk of
$2.3 million. Therefore,
57
HSBC Finance Corporation
at September 30, 2005 we had a net PVBP position of less
than $1 million, which is within our PVBP limit of
$2 million.
We also monitor the impact that a hypothetical increase or
decrease in interest rates of 25 basis points applied at
the beginning of each quarter over a 12 month period would
have on our net interest income. The following table summarizes
such estimated impact:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(in millions) | |
Decrease in net interest income following a hypothetical
25 basis points rise in interest rates applied on a
quarterly basis over the next 12 months
|
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
Increase in net interest income following a hypothetical
25 basis points fall in interest rates applied on a
quarterly basis over the next 12 months
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
169 |
|
These estimates include both the net interest income impact of
the derivative positions we have entered into which are
considered to be effective hedges under SFAS No. 133
and the impact of economic hedges of certain underlying debt
instruments which do not qualify for hedge accounting as if they
were effective hedges under SFAS No. 133. These
estimates also assume we would not take any corrective actions
in response to interest rate movements and, therefore, exceed
what most likely would occur if rates were to change by the
amount indicated.
Net interest income at risk has changed as a result of the loss
of hedge accounting on our portfolio of economic hedges. At
September 30, 2005, our net interest income sensitivity to
a hypothetical 25 basis point rise in rates applied on a
quarterly basis over the next 12 months is a decrease of
$188 million as opposed to the amount reported above, and
the sensitivity to a hypothetical 25 basis point fall in
rates applied on a quarterly basis over the next 12 months
is an increase of $128 million as opposed to the amount
reported above. At December 31, 2004, our net interest
income sensitivity to a hypothetical 25 basis point rise in
rates applied on a quarterly basis over the next 12 months
is a decrease of $190 million as opposed to the amount
reported above, and the sensitivity to a hypothetical
25 basis point fall in rates applied on a quarterly basis
over the next 12 months is an increase of $186 million
as opposed to the amount reported above. This sensitivity only
considers changes in interest rates and does not consider
changes from other variables, such as exchange rates that may
impact margin. The decrease in exposure to rising interest rates
results primarily from the reclassification of the pay fixed/
receive floating interest rate swaps, which do not qualify for
hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133. As part of our
overall risk management strategy to reduce earnings volatility,
in the second and third quarters of 2005, a significant number
of our pay fixed/ receive variable interest rate swaps which had
not previously qualified for hedge accounting under
SFAS No. 133, have been designated as effective hedges
using the long-haul method of accounting, and certain other
interest rate swaps were terminated. This will significantly
reduce the volatility of the mark-to-market on the previously
non-qualifying derivatives which have been designated as
effective hedges going forward, but will result in the recording
of ineffectiveness under the long-haul method of accounting
under SFAS No. 133. In order to further reduce
earnings volatility that would otherwise result from changes in
interest rates, we continue to evaluate the steps required to
regain hedge accounting treatment under SFAS No. 133
for the remaining swaps which do not currently qualify for hedge
accounting. These derivatives remain economic hedges of the
underlying debt instruments. We will continue to manage our
total interest rate risk on a basis consistent with the risk
management process employed since the acquisition.
Operational Risk There has been no significant
change in our approach to operational risk management since
December 31, 2004.
58
HSBC FINANCE CORPORATION
RECONCILIATIONS TO GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended | |
|
Nine months ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Return on Average Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
1,379 |
|
|
$ |
1,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis
|
|
$ |
141,765 |
|
|
$ |
124,512 |
|
|
$ |
136,185 |
|
|
$ |
120,456 |
|
|
Serviced with limited recourse
|
|
|
7,779 |
|
|
|
21,542 |
|
|
|
10,288 |
|
|
|
23,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed basis
|
|
$ |
149,544 |
|
|
$ |
146,054 |
|
|
$ |
146,473 |
|
|
$ |
143,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average owned assets
|
|
|
.79 |
% |
|
|
1.04 |
% |
|
|
1.35 |
% |
|
|
1.36 |
% |
Return on average managed assets
|
|
|
.75 |
|
|
|
.89 |
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
|
1.14 |
|
Return on Average Common Shareholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
1,379 |
|
|
$ |
1,228 |
|
Dividends on preferred stock
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
307 |
|
|
$ |
1,317 |
|
|
$ |
1,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
16,973 |
|
|
$ |
17,367 |
|
|
$ |
16,605 |
|
|
$ |
17,057 |
|
Return on average common shareholders equity
|
|
|
6.03 |
% |
|
|
7.07 |
% |
|
|
10.58 |
% |
|
|
9.18 |
% |
Net Interest Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis
|
|
$ |
2,163 |
|
|
$ |
1,969 |
|
|
$ |
6,086 |
|
|
$ |
5,719 |
|
|
Serviced with limited recourse
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed basis
|
|
$ |
2,340 |
|
|
$ |
2,550 |
|
|
$ |
6,844 |
|
|
$ |
7,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis
|
|
$ |
127,038 |
|
|
$ |
107,955 |
|
|
$ |
119,848 |
|
|
$ |
102,957 |
|
|
Serviced with limited recourse
|
|
|
7,779 |
|
|
|
21,542 |
|
|
|
10,288 |
|
|
|
23,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed basis
|
|
$ |
134,817 |
|
|
$ |
129,497 |
|
|
$ |
130,136 |
|
|
$ |
126,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis net interest margin
|
|
|
6.81 |
% |
|
|
7.29 |
% |
|
|
6.77 |
% |
|
|
7.41 |
% |
Managed basis net interest margin
|
|
|
6.94 |
|
|
|
7.88 |
|
|
|
7.01 |
|
|
|
8.13 |
|
Managed Basis Risk Adjusted Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
2,340 |
|
|
$ |
2,550 |
|
|
$ |
6,844 |
|
|
$ |
7,706 |
|
Other revenues, excluding securitization related revenue and the
mark-to-market on derivatives which do not qualify as effective
hedges and ineffectiveness associated with qualifying hedges
under SFAS No. 133
|
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
3,494 |
|
|
|
2,812 |
|
Less: Net charge-offs
|
|
|
(1,052 |
) |
|
|
(1,363 |
) |
|
|
(3,198 |
) |
|
|
(4,172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk adjusted revenue
|
|
$ |
2,473 |
|
|
$ |
2,103 |
|
|
$ |
7,140 |
|
|
$ |
6,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$ |
134,817 |
|
|
$ |
129,497 |
|
|
$ |
130,136 |
|
|
$ |
126,419 |
|
Managed basis risk adjusted revenue
|
|
|
7.34 |
% |
|
|
6.50 |
% |
|
|
7.32 |
% |
|
|
6.69 |
% |
59
HSBC FINANCE CORPORATION
RECONCILIATIONS TO GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended | |
|
Nine months ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Consumer Net Charge-off Ratio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer net charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis
|
|
$ |
902 |
|
|
$ |
844 |
|
|
$ |
969 |
|
|
$ |
2,602 |
|
|
$ |
2,905 |
|
|
Serviced with limited recourse
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
1,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed basis
|
|
$ |
1,052 |
|
|
$ |
1,028 |
|
|
$ |
1,363 |
|
|
$ |
3,191 |
|
|
$ |
4,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average consumer receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis
|
|
$ |
123,163 |
|
|
$ |
115,354 |
|
|
$ |
102,821 |
|
|
$ |
115,815 |
|
|
$ |
97,328 |
|
|
Serviced with limited recourse
|
|
|
7,779 |
|
|
|
10,203 |
|
|
|
21,542 |
|
|
|
10,288 |
|
|
|
23,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed basis
|
|
$ |
130,942 |
|
|
$ |
125,557 |
|
|
$ |
124,363 |
|
|
$ |
126,103 |
|
|
$ |
120,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis consumer net charge-off ratio
|
|
|
2.93 |
% |
|
|
2.93 |
% |
|
|
3.77 |
% |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
3.98 |
% |
Managed basis consumer net charge-off ratio
|
|
|
3.21 |
|
|
|
3.28 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
|
3.37 |
|
|
|
4.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves as a Percent of Net Charge-offs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis
|
|
$ |
4,220 |
|
|
$ |
3,756 |
|
|
$ |
3,953 |
|
|
$ |
4,220 |
|
|
$ |
3,953 |
|
|
Serviced with limited recourse
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed basis
|
|
$ |
4,571 |
|
|
$ |
4,281 |
|
|
$ |
5,199 |
|
|
$ |
4,571 |
|
|
$ |
5,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis
|
|
$ |
902 |
|
|
$ |
844 |
|
|
$ |
969 |
|
|
$ |
2,609 |
|
|
$ |
2,905 |
|
|
Serviced with limited recourse
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
1,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed basis
|
|
$ |
1,052 |
|
|
$ |
1,028 |
|
|
$ |
1,363 |
|
|
$ |
3,198 |
|
|
$ |
4,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis reserves as a percent of net charge-offs
|
|
|
117.0 |
% |
|
|
111.3 |
% |
|
|
102.0 |
% |
|
|
121.3 |
% |
|
|
102.1 |
% |
Managed basis reserves as a percent of net charge-offs
|
|
|
108.6 |
|
|
|
104.1 |
|
|
|
95.4 |
|
|
|
107.2 |
|
|
|
93.5 |
|
Efficiency Ratio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses less policyholders benefits
|
|
$ |
1,374 |
|
|
$ |
1,326 |
|
|
$ |
1,315 |
|
|
$ |
4,120 |
|
|
$ |
3,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income and other revenues less policyholders
benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis
|
|
$ |
3,156 |
|
|
$ |
3,043 |
|
|
$ |
2,916 |
|
|
$ |
9,427 |
|
|
$ |
8,735 |
|
|
Serviced with limited recourse
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed basis
|
|
$ |
3,133 |
|
|
$ |
3,095 |
|
|
$ |
2,684 |
|
|
$ |
9,486 |
|
|
$ |
8,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis efficiency ratio
|
|
|
43.54 |
% |
|
|
43.58 |
% |
|
|
45.10 |
% |
|
|
43.70 |
% |
|
|
43.96 |
% |
Managed basis efficiency ratio
|
|
|
43.86 |
|
|
|
42.84 |
|
|
|
48.99 |
|
|
|
43.43 |
|
|
|
43.13 |
|
60
HSBC FINANCE CORPORATION
RECONCILIATIONS TO GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Two-Months-and-Over-Contractual Delinquency:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer two-months-and-over-contractual delinquency:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis
|
|
$ |
4,861 |
|
|
$ |
4,419 |
|
|
$ |
4,702 |
|
|
Serviced with limited recourse
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed basis
|
|
$ |
5,237 |
|
|
$ |
4,903 |
|
|
$ |
5,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis
|
|
$ |
128,524 |
|
|
$ |
118,532 |
|
|
$ |
106,130 |
|
|
Serviced with limited recourse
|
|
|
6,759 |
|
|
|
8,980 |
|
|
|
20,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed basis
|
|
$ |
135,283 |
|
|
$ |
127,512 |
|
|
$ |
126,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer two-months-and-over-contractual delinquency:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis
|
|
|
3.78 |
% |
|
|
3.73 |
% |
|
|
4.43 |
% |
|
Managed basis
|
|
|
3.87 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
Reserves as a Percent of Receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis
|
|
$ |
4,220 |
|
|
$ |
3,756 |
|
|
$ |
3,953 |
|
|
Serviced with limited recourse
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed basis
|
|
$ |
4,571 |
|
|
$ |
4,281 |
|
|
$ |
5,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis
|
|
$ |
128,722 |
|
|
$ |
118,761 |
|
|
$ |
106,437 |
|
|
Serviced with limited recourse
|
|
|
6,759 |
|
|
|
8,980 |
|
|
|
20,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed basis
|
|
$ |
135,481 |
|
|
$ |
127,741 |
|
|
$ |
126,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves as a percent of receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis
|
|
|
3.28 |
% |
|
|
3.16 |
% |
|
|
3.71 |
% |
|
Managed basis
|
|
|
3.37 |
|
|
|
3.35 |
|
|
|
4.11 |
|
Reserves as a Percent of Nonperforming Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis
|
|
$ |
4,220 |
|
|
$ |
3,756 |
|
|
$ |
3,953 |
|
|
Serviced with limited recourse
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed basis
|
|
$ |
4,571 |
|
|
$ |
4,281 |
|
|
$ |
5,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis
|
|
$ |
3,836 |
|
|
$ |
3,491 |
|
|
$ |
3,797 |
|
|
Serviced with limited recourse
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed basis
|
|
$ |
4,145 |
|
|
$ |
3,886 |
|
|
$ |
4,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves as a percent of nonperforming loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned basis
|
|
|
110.0 |
% |
|
|
107.6 |
% |
|
|
104.1 |
% |
|
Managed basis
|
|
|
110.3 |
|
|
|
110.2 |
|
|
|
111.1 |
|
61
HSBC FINANCE CORPORATION
RECONCILIATIONS TO GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(dollars are in millions) | |
Tangible common equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
17,137 |
|
|
$ |
15,841 |
|
Exclude:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (gains) losses on cash flow hedging instruments
|
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Unrealized gains on investments and interest-only strip
receivables
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(2,394 |
) |
|
|
(2,705 |
) |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(6,799 |
) |
|
|
(6,856 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity
|
|
|
7,641 |
|
|
|
6,112 |
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
1,617 |
|
|
|
2,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity, excluding purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
$ |
9,258 |
|
|
$ |
8,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity
|
|
$ |
7,641 |
|
|
$ |
6,112 |
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
Mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of Household Capital
Trusts
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible shareholders equity
|
|
|
9,997 |
|
|
|
8,206 |
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
1,611 |
|
|
|
2,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible shareholders equity, excluding purchase
accounting adjustments
|
|
$ |
11,608 |
|
|
$ |
10,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible shareholders equity plus owned loss
reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
9,997 |
|
|
$ |
8,206 |
|
Owned loss reserves
|
|
|
4,220 |
|
|
|
3,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible shareholders equity plus owned loss reserves
|
|
|
14,217 |
|
|
|
11,831 |
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
1,611 |
|
|
|
2,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible shareholders equity plus owned loss reserves,
excluding purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
$ |
15,828 |
|
|
$ |
14,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible managed assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned assets
|
|
$ |
146,574 |
|
|
$ |
130,190 |
|
Receivables serviced with limited recourse
|
|
|
6,759 |
|
|
|
14,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed assets
|
|
|
153,333 |
|
|
|
144,415 |
|
Exclude:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(2,394 |
) |
|
|
(2,705 |
) |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(6,799 |
) |
|
|
(6,856 |
) |
|
Derivative financial assets
|
|
|
(662 |
) |
|
|
(4,049 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible managed assets
|
|
|
143,478 |
|
|
|
130,805 |
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible managed assets, excluding purchase accounting
adjustments
|
|
$ |
143,387 |
|
|
$ |
130,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common and preferred equity to owned assets
|
|
|
12.83 |
% |
|
|
13.01 |
% |
Tangible common equity to tangible managed assets
|
|
|
5.33 |
|
|
|
4.67 |
|
Tangible shareholders equity to tangible managed assets
(TETMA)
|
|
|
6.97 |
|
|
|
6.27 |
|
Tangible shareholders equity plus owned loss reserves to
tangible managed assets (TETMA + Owned Reserves)
|
|
|
9.91 |
|
|
|
9.04 |
|
Excluding purchase accounting adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity to tangible managed assets
|
|
|
6.46 |
|
|
|
6.38 |
|
|
TETMA
|
|
|
8.10 |
|
|
|
7.97 |
|
|
TETMA + Owned Reserves
|
|
|
11.04 |
|
|
|
10.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures |
Disclosure Controls We conducted an evaluation,
with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed by HSBC
Finance Corporation in the reports we file under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act),
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely
basis. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the
period covered by this report so as to alert them in a timely
fashion to material information required to be disclosed in
reports we file under the Exchange Act.
Internal Controls There have not been any changes
in our internal control over financial reporting during the
fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal controls over financial reporting.
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings |
GENERAL
We are parties to various legal proceedings resulting from
ordinary business activities relating to our current and/or
former operations. Certain of these actions are or purport to be
class actions seeking damages in very large amounts. These
actions assert violations of laws and/or unfair treatment of
consumers. Due to the uncertainties in litigation and other
factors, we cannot be certain that we will ultimately prevail in
each instance. We believe that our defenses to these actions
have merit and any adverse decision should not materially affect
our consolidated financial condition.
CONSUMER LENDING LITIGATION
During the past several years, the press has widely reported
certain industry related concerns that may impact us. Some of
these involve the amount of litigation instituted against
finance and insurance companies operating in certain states and
the large awards obtained from juries in those states. Like
other companies in this industry, some of our subsidiaries are
involved in a number of lawsuits pending against them in these
states. The cases, in particular, generally allege inadequate
disclosure or misrepresentation of financing terms. In some
suits, other parties are also named as defendants. Unspecified
compensatory and punitive damages are sought. Several of these
suits purport to be class actions or have multiple plaintiffs.
The judicial climate in these states is such that the outcome of
all of these cases is unpredictable. Although our subsidiaries
believe they have substantive legal defenses to these claims and
are prepared to defend each case vigorously, a number of such
cases have been settled or otherwise resolved for amounts that
in the aggregate are not material to our operations. Appropriate
insurance carriers have been notified of each claim, and a
number of reservations of rights letters have been received.
Certain of the financing of merchandise claims have been
partially covered by insurance.
CREDIT CARD LITIGATION
On November 15, 2004, a matter entitled American Express
Travel Related Services Company, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A. Inc.,
et al. was filed in the U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of New York. This case alleges that HSBC
Finance Corporation, Household Bank (SB), N.A. and others
violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act by conspiring
to monopolize and unreasonably restrain trade by allegedly
implementing and enforcing an agreement requiring any United
States bank that issues Visa or MasterCard general cards to
refuse to issue such cards from competitors, such as American
Express and Discover. Plaintiff seeks a declaration that
defendants in this action (including Visa, MasterCard and other
banks belonging to those associations), have violated the
antitrust laws, and requests an injunction restraining the
defendants, their directors, officers, employees, agents,
successors, owners and members from continuing or
maintaining in any
63
manner, directly or indirectly, the rules, policies, and
agreements at issue, and seeks full compensation for
damages it has sustained, from each Defendant, jointly,
severally, for each of plaintiffs claims, in an
amount to be trebled according to law, plus interest,
attorneys fees and costs of suit. On
February 18, 2005, the Defendants filed a motion to dismiss
the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. At this
time, we are unable to quantify the potential impact from this
action, if any.
On June 22, 2005, a matter entitled Photos Etc.
Corporation, et al. v. VISA U.S.A. Inc.,
et al. was filed in the U.S. District Court for
the District of Connecticut as case number 305CV1007. This
purported class action named as defendants VISA, MasterCard and
a number of alleged members of those associations, including
HSBC Finance Corporation and two other HSBC entities. The case
seeks certification of a class of retail merchants that operate
commercial businesses throughout the United States and alleges
the defendants engage in an anti-competitive conspiracy to fix
the level of interchange fees charged by the
associations. This and other similar suits filed in various
federal courts have been consolidated for pre-trial matters in
the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New
York. At this time, we are unable to quantify the potential
impact from this action, if any.
SECURITIES LITIGATION
In August 2002, we restated previously reported consolidated
financial statements. The restatement related to certain
MasterCard and Visa co-branding and affinity credit card
relationships and a third party marketing agreement, which were
entered into between 1992 and 1999. All were part of our Credit
Card Services segment. In consultation with our prior auditors,
Arthur Andersen LLP, we treated payments made in connection with
these agreements as prepaid assets and amortized them in
accordance with the underlying economics of the agreements. Our
current auditor, KPMG LLP, advised us that, in its view, these
payments should have either been charged against earnings at the
time they were made or amortized over a shorter period of time.
The restatement resulted in a $155.8 million, after-tax,
retroactive reduction to retained earnings at December 31,
1998. As a result of the restatement, and other corporate
events, including, e.g., the 2002 settlement with 50 states
and the District of Columbia relating to real estate lending
practices, HSBC Finance Corporation, and its directors, certain
officers and former auditors, have been involved in various
legal proceedings, some of which purport to be class actions. A
number of these actions allege violations of federal securities
laws, were filed between August and October 2002, and seek to
recover damages in respect of allegedly false and misleading
statements about our common stock. These legal actions have been
consolidated into a single purported class action,
Jaffe v. Household International, Inc., et al.,
No. 02 C 5893 (N.D. Ill., filed August 19, 2002), and
a consolidated and amended complaint was filed on March 7,
2003. On December 3, 2004, the court signed the
parties stipulation to certify a class with respect to the
claims brought under §10 and §20 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. The parties stipulated that plaintiffs
will not seek to certify a class with respect to the claims
brought under §11 and §15 of the Securities Act of
1933 in this action or otherwise.
The amended complaint purports to assert claims under the
federal securities laws, on behalf of all persons who purchased
or otherwise acquired our securities between October 23,
1997 and October 11, 2002, arising out of alleged false and
misleading statements in connection with our sales and lending
practices, the 2002 state settlement agreement referred to
above, the restatement and the HSBC merger. The amended
complaint, which also names as defendants Arthur Andersen LLP,
Goldman, Sachs & Co., and Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith, Inc., fails to specify the amount of
damages sought. In May 2003, we, and other defendants, filed a
motion to dismiss the complaint. On March 19, 2004, the
Court granted in part, and denied in part the defendants
motion to dismiss the complaint. The Court dismissed all claims
against Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. and
Goldman Sachs & Co. The Court also dismissed certain
claims alleging strict liability for alleged misrepresentation
of material facts based on statute of limitations grounds. The
claims that remain against some or all of the defendants
essentially allege the defendants knowingly made a false
statement of a material fact in conjunction with the purchase or
sale of securities, that the plaintiffs justifiably relied on
such statement, the false statement(s) caused the
plaintiffs damages, and that some or all of the defendants
should be liable for those alleged statements. All factual
discovery must be completed by May 12, 2006 and expert
witness discovery must be completed by July 24, 2006.
64
On June 27, 2003, a case entitled, West Virginia
Laborers Pension Trust Fund v. Caspersen, et al.,
was filed in the Chancery Division of the Circuit Court of Cook
County, Illinois as case number 03CH10808. This purported class
action named as defendants the directors of Beneficial
Corporation at the time of the 1998 merger of Beneficial
Corporation into a subsidiary of HSBC Finance Corporation, and
claimed that those directors due diligence of HSBC Finance
Corporation at the time they considered the merger was
inadequate. The Complaint claimed that as a result of some of
the securities law and other violations alleged in the Jaffe
case, HSBC Finance Corporation common shares lost value.
Pursuant to the merger agreement with Beneficial Corporation, we
assumed the defense of this litigation. In September of 2003,
the defendants filed a motion to dismiss which was granted on
June 15, 2004 based upon a lack of personal jurisdiction
over the defendants. The plaintiffs appealed that decision. On
May 11, 2005, the appellate court affirmed the trial
courts ruling. The time for any further appeals has
expired. In addition, on June 30, 2004, a case entitled,
Employer-Teamsters Local Nos. 175 & 505 Pension
Trust Fund v. Caspersen, et al., was filed in the
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Somerset County as
Case Number L9479-04. Other than the change in plaintiff, the
suit is substantially identical to the foregoing West
Virginia Laborers Pension Trust Fund case, and is
brought by the same principal law firm that brought that suit.
The defendants motion to dismiss was granted on
February 10, 2005 and the plaintiffs have appealed that
ruling.
With respect to these securities litigation matters, we believe
that we have not, and our officers and directors have not,
committed any wrongdoing and in each instance there will be no
finding of improper activities that may result in a material
liability to us or any of our officers or directors.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits included in this Report:
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of HSBC
Finance Corporation and amendments thereto, including Amended
Certificate of Designations of Series A Cumulative Preferred
Stock of HSBC Finance Corporation and Certificate of
Designations of Series B Cumulative Preferred Stock
(previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to HSBC Finance
Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
June 16, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on June 22, 2005). |
|
|
12 |
|
|
Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
and to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends. |
|
|
31 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
32 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
99 |
.1 |
|
Debt and Preferred Stock Securities Ratings. |
65
Signature
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
/s/ Beverley A. Sibblies |
|
|
|
Beverley A. Sibblies |
|
Senior Vice President and |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Date: November 14, 2005
66
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of HSBC
Finance Corporation and amendments thereto, including Amended
Certificate of Designations of Series A Cumulative Preferred
Stock of HSBC Finance Corporation and Certificate of
Designations of Series B Cumulative Preferred Stock
(previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to HSBC Finance
Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
June 16, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on June 22, 2005). |
|
|
12 |
|
|
Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
and to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends. |
|
|
31 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
32 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
99.1 |
|
|
Debt and Preferred Stock Securities Ratings. |