ROCK-TENN COMPANY
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2006
or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the transition period from
to |
Commission File Number 0-23340
Rock-Tenn Company
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Georgia
|
|
62-0342590 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
504 Thrasher Street, Norcross, Georgia
|
|
30071 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (770) 448-2193
N/A
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or
a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date:
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding as of January 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value
|
|
39,493,570 |
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
ROCK-TENN COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In Millions, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
533.9 |
|
|
$ |
490.4 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
436.3 |
|
|
|
430.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
97.6 |
|
|
|
59.6 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
61.3 |
|
|
|
57.1 |
|
Restructuring and other costs, net |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
Interest and other income |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of affiliated companies |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Minority interest in income of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
|
$ |
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding |
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
(0.25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
(0.25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid per common share |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1
ROCK-TENN COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In Millions, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowances of $5.0 and $5.2) |
|
|
207.9 |
|
|
|
230.8 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
228.9 |
|
|
|
218.9 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
478.4 |
|
|
|
485.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings |
|
|
266.0 |
|
|
|
266.0 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
1,306.0 |
|
|
|
1,299.7 |
|
Transportation equipment |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,588.9 |
|
|
|
1,582.7 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(750.5 |
) |
|
|
(732.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
838.4 |
|
|
|
850.6 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
355.0 |
|
|
|
356.6 |
|
Intangibles, net |
|
|
53.4 |
|
|
|
55.1 |
|
Investment in affiliated companies |
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,769.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,784.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of debt |
|
$ |
125.5 |
|
|
$ |
40.8 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
129.4 |
|
|
|
141.8 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
50.9 |
|
|
|
65.7 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
60.3 |
|
|
|
57.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
366.1 |
|
|
|
306.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt due after one year |
|
|
642.7 |
|
|
|
754.9 |
|
Hedge adjustments resulting from terminated fair value
interest rate derivatives or swaps |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
|
652.7 |
|
|
|
765.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued pension and other long-term benefits |
|
|
79.2 |
|
|
|
75.9 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
104.4 |
|
|
|
99.8 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares
authorized; no shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value; 175,000,000
shares authorized; 39,024,370 and 37,688,522 shares
outstanding at December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006,
respectively |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
202.8 |
|
|
|
179.6 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
352.9 |
|
|
|
341.2 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(17.8 |
) |
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
538.3 |
|
|
|
508.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,769.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,784.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
2
ROCK-TENN COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
|
$ |
(9.0 |
) |
Items in income not affecting cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
Deferred income tax expense |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Loss on disposal of plant, equipment and other, net |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Minority interest in income of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Equity in earnings of affiliated companies |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
Payment on termination of cash flow interest rate hedges |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pension funding less than expense |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Impairment adjustments and other non-cash items |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(11.2 |
) |
|
|
5.4 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(17.3 |
) |
|
|
(13.5 |
) |
Investment in affiliated company |
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash contributed to affiliated company |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Return of capital from affiliated company |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Proceeds from property, plant and equipment insurance settlement |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(20.7 |
) |
|
|
(13.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to revolving credit facilities |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
58.2 |
|
Repayments of revolving credit facilities |
|
|
(29.1 |
) |
|
|
(91.9 |
) |
Additions to debt |
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
|
Repayments of debt |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Issuances of common stock |
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Advances from (repayments to) affiliated company |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
2.4 |
|
Cash dividends paid to shareholders |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
Cash distributions to minority interest |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing activities |
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
$ |
16.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes, net of refunds |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
Interest, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
ROCK-TENN COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Three Month Period Ended December 31, 2006
(Unaudited)
Unless the context otherwise requires, we, us, our, Rock-Tenn and the Company refer
to the business of Rock-Tenn Company and its consolidated subsidiaries, including RTS Packaging,
LLC (RTS) and GSD Packaging, LLC , (GSD). We own 65% of RTS and conduct our interior packaging
products business through RTS. At December 31, 2006 we owned 60% of GSD and conducted some of our
folding carton operations through GSD. In January 2007, we acquired the other 40% of GSD. These
terms do not include Seven Hills Paperboard, LLC (Seven Hills) or Quality Packaging Specialists
International, LLC (QPSI). We own 49% of Seven Hills, a manufacturer of gypsum paperboard liner,
and 23.96% of QPSI, a business providing merchandising displays, contract packing, logistics and
distribution solutions, neither of which we consolidate. All references in the accompanying
condensed consolidated financial statements and this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to data
regarding sales price per ton and fiber, energy, chemical and freight costs with respect to our
recycled paperboard mills excludes that data with respect to our Aurora, Illinois, recycled
paperboard mill, which sells only converted products which would not be material. All other
references herein to operating data with respect to our recycled paperboard mills, including tons
data and capacity utilization rates, includes operating data from our Aurora mill.
Note 1. Interim Financial Statements
Our independent registered public accounting firm has not audited our accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements. We derived the condensed consolidated balance sheet at
September 30, 2006 from the audited consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of our
management, the condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are of a
normal recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of our results of operations for the
three months ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, our financial position at December 31, 2006 and
September 30, 2006, and our cash flows for the three months ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.
We have condensed or omitted certain notes and other information from the interim financial
statements presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Therefore, these condensed
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 (the Fiscal 2006 Form 10-K).
The results for the three months ended December 31, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of
results that may be expected for the full year.
We have made certain reclassifications to prior year amounts to conform such amounts to the
current year presentation.
Note 2. New Accounting Standards
Recently Issued Standards
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109
(FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for how a company should recognize, measure,
present, and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that the company has
taken or expects to take on a tax return (including a decision whether to file or not to file a
return in a particular jurisdiction). Under FIN 48, the consolidated financial statements will
reflect expected future tax consequences of such positions presuming the taxing authorities full
knowledge of the position and all relevant facts, but without considering time values. FIN 48 is
likely to cause greater volatility in earnings as more items are recognized discretely within
income tax expense. FIN 48 also revises disclosure requirements and introduces a prescriptive,
annual, tabular roll-forward of the unrecognized tax benefits. FIN 48 is effective as of the
beginning of fiscal years that start after December 15, 2006 (October 1, 2007 for us). Management
is currently evaluating the impact that FIN 48 will have on our financial position and results of
operations upon adoption.
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
In September 2006, the FASB released Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement,
not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement would be determined based
on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. SFAS 157
is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 (October 1, 2008 for us).
Management is presently evaluating the impact, if any, upon adoption.
In September 2006, the FASB released SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and
132(R) (SFAS 158). SFAS 158 requires companies to:
|
|
|
Recognize the funded status of a benefit plan in its statement of financial position. |
|
|
|
|
Recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses
and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as
components of net periodic benefit cost. |
|
|
|
|
Measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the date of the employers
fiscal year-end statement of financial position (with limited exceptions). |
|
|
|
|
Provide additional disclosure in the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
SFAS 158 does not impact the determination of net periodic benefit cost recognized in the
income statement. We must adopt SFAS 158 as of the end of our fiscal year ending September 30,
2007. Had we adopted SFAS 158 at September 30, 2006, the impact would have been as follows: total
assets would have been approximately $3 million lower, total liabilities would have been
approximately $9 million higher and shareholders equity would have been approximately $12 million
lower. Because our net pension liabilities are dependent upon future events and circumstances, the
impact at the time of adoption of SFAS 158 may differ from these amounts.
Note 3. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The following are the components of comprehensive income (loss) (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
|
$ |
(9.0 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Reclassification of previously terminated hedges to earnings, net of tax |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain on derivative instruments, net of tax |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
9.8 |
|
|
$ |
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in other comprehensive income (loss) due to foreign currency translation was
primarily due to the change in the Canadian/U.S. dollar exchange rates.
5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
Note 4. Earnings (Loss) per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share
(in millions, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
|
$ |
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per share weighted average shares |
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted stock awards |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings (loss) per share weighted
average shares and assumed conversions |
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share basic |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
(0.25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
(0.25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All outstanding options to purchase common shares were dilutive at December 31, 2006 and were
included in the effect of dilutive securities. Due to the net loss for the three months ended
December 31, 2005, the assumed net exercise of stock options and restricted stock awards was
excluded, as the effect would have been anti-dilutive. Options and restricted stock awards for 3.9
million and 0.5 million shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded from the 2005
calculation because their effect was anti-dilutive. If we had not had a loss, approximately 0.6
million shares of dilutive stock options and restricted stock awards would have been included in
the denominator for the three months ended December 31, 2005. During the three months ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005, 1.3 million and 0.1 million shares of common stock, respectively, were
issued primarily from the exercise of stock options.
The table below summarizes the changes in all stock options during the three months ended December
31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Term |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2006 |
|
|
3,211,369 |
|
|
$ |
13.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,149,334 |
) |
|
|
13.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(8,600 |
) |
|
|
18.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
2,053,435 |
|
|
$ |
14.08 |
|
|
5.6 years |
|
$ |
26.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,967,444 |
|
|
$ |
14.01 |
|
|
5.5 years |
|
$ |
25.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the three months ended December 31,
2006 and 2005 was $13.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively.
6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
Note 5. Restructuring and Other Costs, Net
Summary of Restructuring and Other Initiatives
We recorded pre-tax restructuring and other costs, net, of $0.5 million and $1.0 million for
the three months ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. These amounts are not comparable
since the timing and scope of the individual actions associated with a restructuring can vary. We
discuss these charges in more detail below.
The following table represents a summary of restructuring and other charges, net, related to
our active restructuring initiatives that we incurred during the three months ended December 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively, cumulatively since we announced each initiative, and the total we
expect to incur (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initiative |
|
|
|
Net Property, |
|
|
Employee |
|
|
and |
|
|
Facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
Plant and |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
Period |
|
Equipment (a) |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Relocation |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Kerman, |
|
Current Qtr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Packaging |
|
Prior Year Qtr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products (b) |
|
Cumulative |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
Expected Total |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
|
Marshville, |
|
Current Qtr. |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Packaging |
|
Prior Year Qtr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Products (c) |
|
Cumulative |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
Expected Total |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
Waco, |
|
Current Qtr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Packaging |
|
Prior Year Qtr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Products (d
) |
|
Cumulative |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
Expected Total |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
Current Qtr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
Prior Year Qtr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Current Qtr. |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior Year Qtr. |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative |
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Total |
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
10.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Net property, plant and equipment is defined for Note 5 as: property, plant
and equipment impairment losses, and subsequent adjustments to fair value for assets
classified as held for sale, subsequent (gains) or losses on sales of property, plant and
equipment, and property, plant and equipment related parts and supplies. |
|
(b) |
|
In fiscal 2006 we announced the closure and ceased operations at our Kerman,
California folding carton plant. We transferred a substantial portion of the facilitys
assets and production to our other folding carton facilities. We recognized an impairment
charge to reduce the carrying value of certain equipment to its estimated fair value, recorded
a charge for severance and other employee related costs, recorded a liability for future lease
payments when we ceased operations at the facility of $1.0 million, and recorded charges
aggregating $1.3 million for the impairment of the customer relationship intangible asset. |
|
(c) |
|
On October 4, 2005, we announced the closure of our Marshville, North Carolina
folding carton plant. We transferred the majority of the facilitys production to our other
folding carton facilities. We recognized an impairment charge in fiscal 2005 to reduce the
carrying value of the impaired equipment. In fiscal 2006, we closed the facility and certain
equipment and the facility was classified as held for sale. The facility was sold in October
2006 at a loss of $0.1 million. |
|
(d) |
|
In fiscal 2005, we announced the closure of our Waco, Texas folding carton plant
that we acquired as part of our acquisition of certain assets and operations of the former
Gulf States Paper Corporation (the Gulf States Acquisition). We transferred the majority of
the facilitys production to other plants. The land and building is
classified as held for sale and we recorded a liability of $1.5 million primarily for severance
and other employee related costs as part of the purchase. |
7
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
The following table represents a summary of the restructuring accrual, which is primarily
composed of accrued severance and other employee costs, and a reconciliation of the restructuring
accrual to the line item Restructuring and other costs, net on our condensed consolidated
statements of income for the three months ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Accrual at beginning of fiscal year |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
Additional accruals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual at December 31, |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of accruals and charges to restructuring and other costs, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional accruals and adjustment to accruals (see table above) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
Severance and other employee costs |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment relocation |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Facility carrying costs |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring and other costs, net |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table represents a summary of the incremental restructuring accruals related to
the costs to exit an activity of an acquired company that were established in accounting for the
acquisition. The reserves are for the Waco plant consolidation acquired as part of the Gulf States
Acquisition, as of December 31, 2005 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual at |
|
|
September 30, |
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
Accruals |
|
Payments |
|
to Accruals |
|
2005 |
Severance and
other employee
costs |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
Note 6. Tax Provision
The effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 was 29.4%, which was lower than
the 35% effective rate we expect for the full fiscal year. This is primarily due to the inclusion
of a tax benefit of $1.4 million primarily due to research and development credits arising from the
resolution of a review by the Canadian taxing authority, the extension of the Federal research and
development tax credits by the U.S. Government, and changes in estimates. Our effective rate for
the first quarter of fiscal 2006 of 25.6%, which was a tax benefit, included deferred income tax
expense of $1.4 million from a tax law change in Quebec.
8
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
Note 7. Inventories
We value substantially all of our U.S. inventories at the lower of cost or market, with cost
determined on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) basis. We value all other inventories at the lower
of cost or market, with cost determined using methods which approximate cost computed on a
first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis. Because LIFO is designed for annual determinations, it is
possible to make an actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method only at the end of each
fiscal year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, we base interim
LIFO estimates on managements projection of expected year-end inventory levels and costs.
Inventories were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Finished goods and work in process |
|
$ |
144.2 |
|
|
$ |
140.0 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
77.3 |
|
|
|
70.6 |
|
Supplies and spare parts |
|
|
34.7 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories at FIFO cost |
|
|
256.2 |
|
|
|
246.0 |
|
LIFO reserve |
|
|
(27.3 |
) |
|
|
(27.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net inventories |
|
$ |
228.9 |
|
|
$ |
218.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8. Debt
The following were individual components of debt (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Face value of 5.625% notes due March 2013, net of
unamortized discount of $0.2 and $0.2 |
|
$ |
99.8 |
|
|
$ |
99.8 |
|
Hedge adjustments resulting from terminated
interest rate derivatives or swaps |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.8 |
|
|
|
101.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Face value of 8.20% notes due August 2011, net of
unamortized discount of $0.3 and $0.3 |
|
|
249.7 |
|
|
|
249.7 |
|
Hedge adjustments resulting from terminated
interest rate derivatives or swaps |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257.7 |
|
|
|
258.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan facility (a) |
|
|
237.5 |
|
|
|
243.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit and swing facilities (a) |
|
|
56.1 |
|
|
|
86.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables-backed financing facility (b) |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
90.0 |
|
Industrial development revenue bonds, bearing
interest at variable rates (5.48% at December 31,
2006, and 5.55% at September 30, 2006), due through
October 2036 |
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
Other notes |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt |
|
|
778.2 |
|
|
|
806.1 |
|
Less current portion of debt |
|
|
125.5 |
|
|
|
40.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt due after one year |
|
$ |
652.7 |
|
|
$ |
765.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following were the aggregate components of debt (in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Face value of debt instruments, net of unamortized discounts |
|
$ |
768.2 |
|
|
$ |
795.7 |
|
Hedge adjustments resulting from terminated interest
rate derivatives or swaps |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt |
|
$ |
778.2 |
|
|
$ |
806.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A portion of the debt classified as long-term, which includes the revolving and swing
facilities, may be paid down earlier than scheduled at our discretion without penalty if our cash
balances and expected future cash flows support such action. Included in the current portion of
debt at September 30, 2006 is an amount of $15.0 million to reflect amounts required to support
normal working capital needs.
9
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
For a discussion of certain of our debt characteristics, see Note 10. Debt of the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements section of the Fiscal 2006 Form 10-K. Other than the items
noted below, there have been no significant developments.
|
(a) |
|
The Senior Credit Facility includes term loan, revolving credit, swing, and letters of
credit facilities with an aggregate original maximum principal amount of $700 million. The
Senior Credit Facility is pre-payable at any time and is scheduled to expire on June 6,
2010. The Senior Credit Facility provides for up to $100.0 million in revolving credit to a
Canadian subsidiary. At December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006, there were $47.8 million
and $49.8 million, respectively, of the total revolving borrowings were to this Canadian
subsidiary. As scheduled term loan payments are made, the facility size is reduced by those
notional amounts. As of December 31, 2006 the facility has cumulatively been reduced by
$12.5 million. At December 31, 2006, we had issued aggregate outstanding letters of credit
under this facility of approximately $38.1 million, none of which had been drawn upon. At
December 31, 2006, due to the restrictive covenants on the revolving credit facility,
maximum additional available borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility were approximately
$280.7 million. Borrowings in the United States under the Senior Credit Facility bear
interest based either upon (1) LIBOR plus an applicable margin (U.S. LIBOR Loans) or (2)
the alternative base rate plus an applicable margin (U.S. Base Rate Loans). Borrowings in
Canada under the Senior Credit Facility bear interest based either upon: (1) Canadian
Deposit Offering Rate plus an applicable margin for Canadian dollar loans (Bankers
Acceptance Loans); (2) LIBOR plus an applicable margin for U.S. Dollar loans (Canadian
LIBOR Loans); or (3) the Canadian or U.S. Dollar base rate plus an applicable margin
(Canadian Base Rate Loans.) The following table summarizes the applicable margins and
percentages related to the Senior Credit Facility: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range |
|
December
31, 2006 |
|
September
30, 2006 |
Applicable
margin/percentage for
determining: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. and Canadian Base
Rate Loans interest rate
(1) |
|
|
0.00%-0.75 |
% |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
|
|
0.75 |
% |
Bankers Acceptance and
U.S. and Canadian LIBOR
Loans interest rate (1) |
|
|
0.875%-1.75 |
% |
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
|
1.75 |
% |
Facility commitment fee (2) |
|
|
0.175%-0.40 |
% |
|
|
0.325 |
% |
|
|
0.40 |
% |
|
(1) |
|
Based on the ratio of our total funded debt to EBITDA as defined in the
credit agreement (Leverage Ratio). |
|
|
(2) |
|
Applied to the aggregate borrowing availability based on the Leverage Ratio. |
|
(b) |
|
On November 17, 2006, we amended the 364-day receivables-backed financing facility
(Receivables Facility). The new facility is scheduled to expire on November 16, 2007.
Accordingly, such borrowings are classified as current at December 31, 2006 and non-current
at September 30, 2006. Borrowing availability under this facility is based on the eligible
underlying receivables. At December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006, maximum available
borrowings under this facility were approximately $100.0 million. The borrowing rate, which
consists of the market rate for asset-backed commercial paper plus a utilization fee, was
5.62% as of December 31, 2006. The borrowing rate at September 30, 2006 was 5.61%. |
Interest on our 8.20% notes due August 2011 is payable in arrears each February and August.
Interest on our 5.625% notes due March 2013 is payable in arrears each September and March. These
notes are unsecured facilities. The indenture related to these notes restricts us and our
subsidiaries from incurring certain liens and entering into certain sale and leaseback
transactions, subject to a number of exceptions.
Interest Rate Swaps
We are exposed to changes in interest rates as a result of our short-term and long-term debt.
We use interest rate swap instruments to varying degrees from time to time to manage the interest
rate characteristics of a portion of our outstanding debt. We have designated our existing swaps as
cash flow hedges of the interest rate exposure on an equivalent amount of our floating rate debt.
Periodically we may terminate or sell our interest rate swaps. Upon termination or sale of any cash
flow swaps, any amounts received (or paid) are generally not immediately recognized as income but
remain in Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) and are amortized to earnings, as interest income (or
expense), over the remaining term of the originally hedged item. The cash received (or paid) as a
result of terminating the hedges is classified, in the statement of cash flows, in the same
category as the cash flows relating to the items being hedged. During the first quarter of fiscal
2007, we terminated one of our swaps, with a
10
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
notional amount of $100.0 million, at a cost of $0.2 million and had a notional amount of $5.0
million expire. As of December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006, we had swaps in place amounting to
a notional amount of $245.0 million and $350.0 million, respectively. The fair value of these swaps
was a liability of $3.5 million and $4.4 million at December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006,
respectively. The amount of ineffectiveness recorded in the results of operations for the three
months ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 was minimal.
Note 9. Retirement Plans
The following table represents a summary of the components of net pension cost (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company defined benefit plan expense |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Multi-employer plans for collective bargaining employees |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pension cost |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, we made no voluntary
contributions to our five defined benefit pension plans (U.S. Qualified Plans). Based on current
assumptions, we anticipate contributing the projected required minimum funding of approximately $13
million and approximately $30 million in fiscal 2007 and 2008, respectively, to the U.S. Qualified
Plans. However, it is possible that we may decide to contribute an amount greater than the minimum
required funding in either of those years.
Note 10. Commitments and Contingencies
Environmental and Other Matters
We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and
regulations, including, among others, CERCLA, the Clean Air Act (as amended in 1990), the Clean
Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and the Toxic Substances Control Act. These
environmental regulatory programs are primarily administered by the US Environmental Protection
Agency. In addition, some states in which we operate have adopted equivalent or more stringent
environmental laws and regulations or have enacted their own parallel environmental programs, which
are enforced through various state administrative agencies.
We believe that future compliance with these environmental laws and regulations will not have
a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
However, our compliance and remediation costs could increase materially. In addition, we cannot
currently assess with certainty the impact that the future emissions standards and enforcement
practices associated with changes to regulations promulgated under the Clean Air Act will have on
our operations or capital expenditure requirements. However, we believe that any impact or capital
expenditures will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial
condition or cash flows.
We have been identified as a potentially responsible party (PRP) at nine active superfund
sites pursuant to Superfund legislation. Based upon currently available information and the
opinions of our environmental compliance managers and general counsel, although there can be no
assurance, we have reached the following conclusions with respect to these nine sites:
|
|
|
With respect to one site, while we have been identified as a PRP, our records
reflect no evidence that we are associated with the site. Accordingly, if we are
considered to be a PRP, we believe that we should be categorized as an unproven PRP. |
|
|
|
|
With respect to each of eight sites, we preliminarily determined that, while we may be
associated with the site and while it is probable that we have incurred a liability with
respect to the site, one of the following conclusions was applicable: |
11
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
With respect to each of six sites, we determined while it was not estimable, the
potential liability was reasonably likely to be a de minimis amount and immaterial. |
|
|
|
|
With respect to one site, we have preliminarily determined the potential liability
was best reflected by a range of reasonably possible liabilities, all of which we
expect to be de minimis and immaterial. |
|
|
|
|
With respect to one site, we have preliminarily determined that it is probable that
we have incurred a liability with respect to this site. The status of the site is
unknown, pending further investigation. |
In addition to the above mentioned sites, four of our current or former locations are being
investigated under various state regulations. These investigations may lead to remediation costs;
however, we believe any such costs, if any, would be insignificant. Additional information on the
four sites follows:
|
|
|
Contamination was discovered at the time of the Gulf States Acquisition at two
sites we acquired. We did not assume any environmental liabilities as part of the
acquisition and we believe that we have strong defenses under applicable laws with respect
to any pre-closing environmental contamination. |
|
|
|
|
One of these sites is one of our former locations that is involved in a clean-up under
the state hazardous waste sites program. Investigations of a few areas of concern are
continuing. |
|
|
|
|
It is believed that the contamination discovered at one of the sites was due to an oil
release by a previous owner. The previous owner is obligated to indemnify us for any
contamination caused by the oil release. |
Except as stated above, we can make no assessment of our potential liability, if any, with
respect to any site. Further, there can be no assurance that we will not be required to conduct
some remediation in the future at any of these sites and that the remediation will not have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. We
believe that we can assert claims for indemnification pursuant to existing rights we have under
settlement and purchase agreements in connection with certain of these sites. There can be no
assurance that we will be successful with respect to any claim regarding these indemnification
rights or that, if we are successful, any amounts paid pursuant to the indemnification rights will
be sufficient to cover all costs and expenses.
Guarantees
We have made the following guarantees as of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
We have a 49% ownership interest in Seven Hills. The partners guarantee funding of net
losses in proportion to their share of ownership. |
|
|
|
|
We lease certain manufacturing and warehousing facilities and equipment under various
operating leases. A substantial number of these leases require us to indemnify the lessor
in the event that additional taxes are assessed due to a change in the tax law. We are
unable to estimate our maximum exposure under these leases because it is dependent on
changes in the tax law. |
Over the past several years, we have disposed of assets and/or subsidiaries and have
assumed liabilities pursuant to asset and stock purchase and sale agreements. These agreements
contain various representations and warranties relating to matters such as title to assets;
accuracy of financial statements; legal proceedings; contracts; employee benefit plans; compliance
with environmental law; patent and trademark infringement; taxes; and products, as well as various
covenants. These agreements may also provide specific indemnities for breaches of representations,
warranties, or covenants and may contain specific indemnification provisions. These
indemnification provisions address a variety of potential losses, including, among others, losses
related to liabilities other than those assumed by the buyer and liabilities under environmental laws. These indemnification provisions may
be affected by various conditions and external factors. Many of the indemnification provisions
issued or modified have expired either by operation of law or as a result of the terms of the
agreement. Our specified maximum aggregate potential liability (on an undiscounted basis) is
approximately $7.8 million, other than with respect to certain specified liabilities, including
liabilities relating to title, taxes, and certain environmental matters, with respect to which
there may be no limitation. We estimate the fair value of our aggregate liability for outstanding
indemnities, including the indemnities described above with respect to which there are no
limitations, to be approximately $0.1 million. Accordingly, we have recorded a liability for that
amount.
12
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
Insurance Placed with Kemper
During fiscal 1985 through 2002, Kemper Insurance Companies/Lumbermens Mutual provided us with
workers compensation insurance, auto liability insurance and general liability insurance. Kemper
has made public statements that they are uncertain that they will be able to pay all of their
claims liabilities in the future. At present, based on public comments made by Kemper, we believe
it is reasonably possible they will not be able to pay some or all of the future liabilities
associated with our open and reopened claims. However, we cannot reasonably estimate the amount
that Kemper may be unable to pay. Additionally, we cannot reasonably estimate the impact of state
guarantee funds and any facultative and treaty reinsurance that may be available to pay such
liabilities. If Kemper is ultimately unable to pay such liabilities, we believe the range of our
liability is between approximately $0 and $3 million, and we are unable to estimate the liability
more specifically because of the factors described above. There can be no assurance that any
associated liabilities we may ultimately incur will not be material to our results of operations,
financial condition or cash flows.
Note Receivable
We have a note payable to and a note receivable from an obligor who has filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection. We have offset these notes on our condensed consolidated balance sheets for
the periods ending December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006. Based on the terms of the notes, we
do not believe that it is probable a loss will be incurred. If we ultimately do suffer a loss, we
believe the loss could range from $0 to $3 million.
Seven Hills Option
Seven Hills commenced operations on March 29, 2001. Our partner has the option to put its
interest in Seven Hills to us, at a formula price, effective on the sixth or any subsequent
anniversary of the commencement date by providing notice to purchase its interest no later than two
years prior to the anniversary of the commencement date on which such transaction is to occur. No
notification has been received from our partner to date. Therefore, the earliest date at which a
put could be completed would be March 29, 2009. We currently project this contingent obligation to
purchase our partners interest (based on the formula) to be approximately $16 million which would
result in a purchase price of less than 55% of our partners net equity as reflected on Seven
Hills December 31, 2006 balance sheet as adjusted for our partners expected capital investment.
13
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
Note 11. Segment Information
The following table shows certain operating data for our four segments (in millions). We do
not allocate certain of our income and expenses to our segments and, thus, the information that
management uses to make operating decisions and assess performance does not reflect such amounts.
We report these items as non-allocated expenses or in other line items in the table below after
Total segment income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net sales (aggregate): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Packaging Products |
|
$ |
303.1 |
|
|
$ |
301.1 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
210.8 |
|
|
|
187.7 |
|
Merchandising Displays |
|
|
60.9 |
|
|
|
49.2 |
|
Corrugated |
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
611.4 |
|
|
$ |
566.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less net sales (intersegment): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Packaging Products |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
72.4 |
|
|
|
71.9 |
|
Merchandising Displays |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corrugated |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
77.5 |
|
|
$ |
76.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales (unaffiliated customers): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Packaging Products |
|
$ |
302.4 |
|
|
$ |
300.6 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
138.4 |
|
|
|
115.8 |
|
Merchandising Displays |
|
|
60.9 |
|
|
|
49.2 |
|
Corrugated |
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
533.9 |
|
|
$ |
490.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Packaging Products |
|
$ |
11.7 |
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
Paperboard |
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Merchandising Displays |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Corrugated |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment income |
|
|
42.5 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and other costs, net |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Non-allocated expenses |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
Interest and other income |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in income of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
|
$ |
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 12. Subsequent Event
On
January 24, 2007, we acquired for $32 million the remaining 40% minority interest in GSD Packaging, LLC
that we did not previously own, giving us sole ownership of the company. We
acquired our initial 60% interest in GSD in connection with our acquisition of the Gulf States
Acquisition in June 2005. GSD is an important customer of our bleached paperboard mill and makes
versatile paperboard based food containers serving a very broad customer base. The allocation of
the purchase price is subject to completion.
14
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto, included herein and our audited consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, as well as the
information under the heading Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations, that are part of our Fiscal 2006 Form 10-K, which we filed with the SEC on
November 22, 2006. The table in Note 11. Segment Information of the Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements section of the Financial Statements included herein shows certain
operating data for our four segments.
Overview
Operating profit increased $34.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 as compared to
the first quarter of fiscal 2006 based on improved performance across all of our business segments,
primarily our Paperboard segment. Due to capacity closures of competing coated recycled paperboard
mills in fiscal 2006, our paperboard segment results reflect much better industry conditions
producing higher margins and increased operating rates for our coated recycled paperboard mills.
We also experienced much better performance of our bleached paperboard mill in the quarter that
includes its annual maintenance outage. The steps we have taken to consolidate folding carton
plants following the Gulf States Acquisition and to optimize operations across our network of
plants resulted in much better performance in our Packaging Products segment.
Our Net Debt (as hereinafter defined) was $761.9 million at December 31, 2006 compared to
$788.8 at September 30, 2006. Net debt was reduced by $26.9 million in the three months ended
December 31, 2006. During the three months ended December 31, 2006 we paid $8.5 million for our
QPSI investment. We expect QPSI to serve as a significant growth vehicle for our display business.
Results of Operations (Consolidated)
Net Sales (Unaffiliated Customers)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
Fiscal |
($ In Millions) |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Year |
2006 |
|
$ |
490.4 |
|
|
$ |
529.7 |
|
|
$ |
548.3 |
|
|
$ |
569.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,138.1 |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
533.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 increased compared to the first quarter of
fiscal 2006 primarily due to increased volume and pricing, primarily in our Paperboard segment.
Cost of Goods Sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
Fiscal |
($ In Millions) |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Year |
2006 |
|
$ |
430.8 |
|
|
$ |
440.5 |
|
|
$ |
456.3 |
|
|
$ |
461.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,789.0 |
|
(% of Net Sales) |
|
|
87.8 |
% |
|
|
83.2 |
% |
|
|
83.2 |
% |
|
|
81.0 |
% |
|
|
83.7 |
% |
2007 |
|
$ |
436.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(% of Net Sales) |
|
|
81.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales decreased in the first quarter of fiscal 2007
compared to the prior year first quarter primarily due to sales price increases which reflect
changing market conditions and the recovery of previous cost increases. Additionally, we
experienced reduced energy costs of approximately $8.8 million, reduced freight costs of $1.2
million due to our focus on reducing freight expense and more favorable transportation conditions,
better performance of our bleached paperboard mill of $5.7 million in the quarter that includes its
annual maintenance outage, and better leveraging of fixed costs due to higher net sales.
15
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
Fiscal |
($ In Millions) |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Year |
2006 |
|
$ |
57.1 |
|
|
$ |
62.0 |
|
|
$ |
62.0 |
|
|
$ |
63.1 |
|
|
$ |
244.2 |
|
(% of Net Sales) |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
2007 |
|
$ |
61.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(% of Net Sales) |
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses decreased as a percentage of net sales
in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2006. SG&A expenses
were $4.2 million higher than in the prior year, including the increase associated with the
partition locations acquired in the second quarter of fiscal 2006. Bonus expense increased $1.2
million, stock based compensation expense increased $1.0 million primarily due to the acceleration
of expense recognition for a portion of our restricted stock where early vesting is probable, and
SG&A salaries increased $0.8 million.
Restructuring and Other Costs, Net
We recorded aggregate pre-tax restructuring and other costs of $0.5 million and $1.0 million
in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively. We discuss these charges in more
detail in Note 5. Restructuring and Other Costs, Net of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements section of the Financial Statements included herein and incorporated herein by
reference.
Equity in Earnings of Affiliated Companies
Equity in earnings of affiliated companies in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 was $0.3
million compared to $1.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. The first quarter of fiscal
2007 includes our share of one month of our newly formed QPSI investment. During the first quarter
of fiscal 2006, our share of the results of the Seven Hills was income of $1.6 million. The income
in the prior year quarter included a positive adjustment of $1.2 million for the settlement of
arbitration between us and our Seven Hills partner.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 decreased $0.9 million to $13.0 million
from $13.9 million for the same quarter last year. The decrease in our average outstanding
borrowings decreased interest expense by approximately $1.7 million and higher interest rates, net
of swaps, increased interest expense by approximately $0.8 million.
Interest and Other Income
Interest and other income for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 was $0.2 million compared to
breakeven in the same quarter last year.
Minority Interest in Income of Consolidated Subsidiaries
Minority interest in income of our consolidated subsidiaries for the first quarter of fiscal
2007 increased 46.2% to $1.9 million from $1.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. The
increase was primarily due to the improved earnings at both our GSD and RTS subsidiaries.
Provision for Income Taxes
We recorded income tax expense of $6.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 compared to
an income tax benefit of $3.1 million in the first quarter of last year. The effective tax rate
for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 was 29.4%, which was lower than the 35% effective rate we
expect for the full year. This is primarily due to the inclusion of a tax benefit of $1.4 million
primarily due to research and development credits arising from the resolution of a review by the
Canadian taxing authority, the extension of the Federal research and development tax credits by the
U.S. Government, and changes in estimates. Our effective rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2006
of 25.6%, which was a tax benefit, included deferred income tax expense of $1.4 million from a
tax law change in Quebec.
16
Results of Operations (Segment Data)
Packaging Products Segment (Aggregate Before Intersegment Eliminations)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Return |
|
|
|
(Aggregate) |
|
|
Income |
|
|
on Sales |
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
301.1 |
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
Second Quarter |
|
|
319.7 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
326.2 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
320.8 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006 |
|
$ |
1,267.8 |
|
|
$ |
45.0 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Fiscal 2007 |
|
$ |
303.1 |
|
|
$ |
11.7 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Net Sales (Packaging Products Segment)
The 0.7% increase in net sales for the Packaging Products segment for the first quarter of
fiscal 2006 compared to the prior year first quarter was due to higher sales of interior packaging
products due to the second quarter of fiscal 2006 partition acquisition and increases in volume and
prices.
Segment Income (Packaging Products Segment)
Segment income of the Packaging Products segment for the quarter ended December 31, 2006
increased 72.1% compared to the prior year first quarter primarily due to productivity improvements
and operating efficiencies, and sales price increases to recover previous cost increases.
Paperboard Segment (Aggregate Before Intersegment Eliminations)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coated and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recycled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bleached |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paperboard |
|
|
Corrugated |
|
|
Paperboard |
|
|
Market Pulp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tons |
|
|
Medium Tons |
|
|
Tons |
|
|
Tons |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
(Aggregate) |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Return |
|
|
Shipped (a) |
|
|
Shipped |
|
|
Shipped |
|
|
Shipped |
|
|
Price |
|
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
|
On Sales |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
|
(Per Ton) |
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
187.7 |
|
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
|
|
208.3 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
79.2 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
$ |
524 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
205.7 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
223.5 |
|
|
|
45.4 |
|
|
|
80.7 |
|
|
|
27.9 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
204.1 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
220.6 |
|
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
76.6 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
222.2 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
229.1 |
|
|
|
47.0 |
|
|
|
83.7 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006 |
|
$ |
819.7 |
|
|
$ |
62.2 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
881.5 |
|
|
|
181.6 |
|
|
|
320.2 |
|
|
|
86.6 |
|
|
$ |
538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
Fiscal 2007 |
|
$ |
210.8 |
|
|
$ |
23.9 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
221.5 |
|
|
|
44.6 |
|
|
|
74.0 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
$ |
558 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Recycled Paperboard Tons Shipped and Average Price Per Ton include tons shipped by Seven
Hills. |
Net Sales (Paperboard Segment)
Our Paperboard segment net sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 increased 12.3% compared
to the first quarter of fiscal 2006 due to higher pricing across all paperboard grades. Recycled
paperboard tons shipped increased 5.1% compared to the same period last year primarily due to
higher operating rates in our coated recycled mills.
Segment Income (Paperboard Segment)
Segment income attributable to the Paperboard segment for the first quarter of fiscal 2007
increased $24.9 million compared to the prior year first quarter due to sales price increases,
reduced energy costs, better performance of our bleached paperboard mill in the quarter that
includes its annual maintenance outage, reduced freight costs, and higher operating rates. Our
recycled paperboard mills operated at 94% of capacity in the first
17
quarter of fiscal 2007 compared
to 91% in the prior year quarter. The segments $8.0 million decrease in energy costs and $1.3
million decrease in freight costs more than offset the $1.1 million increase in fiber costs at our
recycled paperboard mills.
Merchandising Displays Segment (Aggregate Before Intersegment Eliminations)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Return |
|
|
|
(Aggregate) |
|
|
Income |
|
|
on Sales |
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
49.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
Second Quarter |
|
|
55.8 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
58.8 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
69.4 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006 |
|
$ |
233.2 |
|
|
$ |
16.4 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Fiscal 2007 |
|
$ |
60.9 |
|
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
Net Sales (Merchandising Displays Segment)
Net sales for the Merchandising Displays segment increased $11.7 million in the first quarter
of fiscal 2007 compared to the prior year first quarter. The increase was primarily due to higher
volumes.
Segment Income (Merchandising Displays Segment)
Segment income attributable to the Merchandising Displays segment for the first quarter of
fiscal 2007 increased $2.3 million or 82.1% compared to the prior year first quarter primarily due
to increased display sales and the better ability to leverage fixed costs.
Corrugated Segment (Aggregate Before Intersegment Eliminations)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Return |
|
|
|
(Aggregate) |
|
|
Income |
|
|
on Sales |
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
28.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Second Quarter |
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006 |
|
$ |
135.7 |
|
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Fiscal 2007 |
|
$ |
36.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
Net Sales (Corrugated Segment)
Net sales for the Corrugated segment increased $8.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal
2007 compared to the prior year first quarter. The increase was primarily due to higher sales
prices.
Segment Income (Corrugated Segment)
Segment income attributable to the Corrugated segment for the first quarter of fiscal 2007
increased $1.4 million compared to the prior year first quarter primarily due to higher sales
prices and improved customer mix.
18
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Working Capital and Capital Expenditures
We fund our working capital requirements, capital expenditures and acquisitions from net cash
provided by operating activities, borrowings under term notes, our receivables-backed financing
facility and bank credit facilities, proceeds from the sale of discontinued assets, and
proceeds received in connection with the issuance of industrial development revenue bonds as well
as other debt and equity securities.
Cash and cash equivalents was $6.3 million at December 31, 2006, compared to $6.9 million at
September 30, 2006. Our debt balance at December 31, 2006 was $778.2 million compared to $806.1
million on September 30, 2006, a decrease of $27.9 million. We are exposed to changes in interest
rates as a result of our short-term and long-term debt. We use interest rate swap instruments to
varying degrees from time to time to manage the interest rate characteristics of a portion of our
outstanding debt. We previously designated our existing swaps as cash flow hedges of the interest
rate exposure on an equivalent amount of our floating rate debt. During the first quarter of fiscal
2007, we terminated one of our swaps, with a notional amount of $100.0 million, at a cost of $0.2
million and we had a notional amount of $5.0 million expire. As of December 31, 2006 and September
30, 2006, we had swaps in place amounting to a notional amount of $245.0 million and $350.0
million, respectively.
At the time of the Gulf States Acquisition, we established a goal to reduce our Net Debt (as
hereinafter defined) by $180 million by September 2007. For this goal, we assumed our beginning Net
Debt would equal our March 31, 2005 Net Debt of $396.3 million plus the purchase price of $552.4
million, including $2.8 million of fees, and that we would reduce our Net Debt to $768.7 million by
September 2007. Our actual Net Debt at the end of December 31, 2006 was $761.9 million, which
indicates that we reduced Net Debt by $186.8 million, i.e. exceeding our goal nine months ahead of
schedule.
The Senior Credit Facility includes term loan, revolving credit, swing, and letters of credit
facilities with an aggregate original principal amount of $700.0 million. The Senior Credit
Facility is pre-payable at any time and is scheduled to expire on June 6, 2010. Certain restrictive
covenants govern our maximum borrowing availability under this facility, including: Minimum
Consolidated Interest Ratio Coverage; Maximum Leverage Ratio; and Minimum Consolidated Net Worth;
as those terms are defined by the Senior Credit Facility. We test and report our compliance with
these covenants each quarter. We are well within compliance at December 31, 2006. At December 31,
2006, due to the covenants in the Senior Credit Facility, maximum additional available borrowings
under this facility were approximately $280.7 million. We have aggregate outstanding letters of
credit under this facility of approximately $38.1 million, none of which had been drawn upon. In
addition, we have a $100.0 million 364-day receivables-backed financing facility (Receivables
Facility). This facility expired on October 25, 2006. We amended the facility, and the facility is
scheduled to expire on November 16, 2007. Borrowing availability under this facility is based on
the eligible underlying receivables. At December 31, 2006, maximum available borrowings under this
facility were approximately $100 million. For additional information regarding our outstanding
debt, our credit facilities and their securitization, see Note 8. Debt of the Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Net cash provided by operating activities during the three months ended December 31, 2006 and
2005 was $32.3 million and $14.9 million, respectively. The increase was primarily due to the
increase in net income which was partially offset by the use of cash to support the increase in
working capital including changes in the timing of vendor payments.
Net cash used for investing activities was $20.7 million during the three months ended
December 31, 2006 compared to $13.2 million for the comparable period of the prior year. Net cash
used for investing activities in fiscal 2007 consisted primarily of $17.3 million of capital
expenditures. Additionally, we invested $8.5 million, including fees, for our investment in QPSI
in our Merchandising Displays segment. Partially offsetting these amounts was the return of capital
of $3.9 million from our Seven Hills investment. Net cash used for investing activities in the
first quarter of fiscal 2006 consisted primarily of $13.5 million of capital expenditures.
Net cash used for financing activities was $12.5 million during the three months ended
December 31, 2006 and cash used for financing activities was $11.6 million in the same period last
year. In fiscal 2007 net cash used consisted primarily of net repayments of debt, repayments to
affiliated company, cash dividends paid to shareholders, and distributions to minority interest
partners, which were partially offset by issuances of common
stock. In fiscal 2007, the source of cash from the issuance of common stock increased
primarily due to the exercising of 1.1 million shares of stock options resulting from the increase
in our stock price. In the comparable
19
period of fiscal 2006 net cash used consisted primarily of
net repayments of debt, cash dividends paid to shareholders, and distributions to minority interest
partners, which were partially offset by issuances of common stock. For additional information
regarding our option exercises, see Note 4. Earnings (Loss) per Share of the Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our capital expenditures aggregated $17.3 million during the three months ended December 31,
2006. We used these expenditures primarily for the purchase and upgrading of machinery and
equipment. We estimate that our capital expenditures will aggregate approximately $70 million in
fiscal 2007. We intend to use these expenditures for the purchase and upgrading of machinery and
equipment, including growth and efficiency capital focused on our folding carton business, and
maintenance capital. We estimate that we will spend approximately $3.0 million for capital
expenditures during fiscal 2007 in connection with matters relating to environmental compliance.
Additionally, to comply with emissions regulations under the Clean Air Act, we may be required to
modify or replace a coal-fired boiler at one of our facilities, the cost of which we estimate would
be approximately $2.0 to $3.0 million. If necessary, we anticipate that we will incur those costs
during fiscal 2007 and 2008.
Except for the $2.5 million in taxes we paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 resulting
from the Homeland Investment Act dividend, we do not anticipate paying any Federal income taxes
related to fiscal 2006 in fiscal 2007. We do not expect cash tax payments to exceed income tax
expense in fiscal 2007. We do, however, expect cash tax payments to exceed income tax expense in
fiscal 2008 and 2009, primarily because taxable income will exceed book income. Based on current
facts and assumptions, we do not anticipate these excess amounts to be material.
In connection with prior dispositions of assets and/or subsidiaries, we have made certain
guarantees to third parties as of December 31, 2006. Our specified maximum aggregate potential
liability (on an undiscounted basis) is approximately $7.8 million, other than with respect to
certain specified liabilities, including liabilities relating to title, taxes, and certain
environmental matters, with respect to which there may be no limitation. We estimate the fair
value of our aggregate liability for outstanding indemnities, including the indemnities described
above with respect to which there are no limitations, to be approximately $0.1 million.
Accordingly, we have recorded a liability for that amount. For additional information regarding our
guarantees, see Note 10. Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
We anticipate that we will be able to fund our capital expenditures, interest payments, stock
repurchases, dividends, pension payments, working capital needs, and repayments of current portion
of long term debt for the foreseeable future from cash generated from operations, borrowings under
our Senior Credit Facility and Receivables Facility, proceeds from the issuance of debt or equity
securities or other additional long-term debt financing.
Based on current assumptions, we anticipate contributing the projected required minimum
pension funding of approximately $13 million and approximately $30 million in fiscal 2007 and 2008,
respectively, to the U.S. Qualified Plans. However, it is possible that we may decide to
contribute an amount greater than the minimum required funding in either of those years.
In January 2007, our board of directors approved a resolution to pay our quarterly dividend of
$0.10 per share and in November 2006 they approved a resolution to pay a quarterly dividend of
$0.09 per share, indicating an annualized dividend of $0.39 in fiscal 2007 on our common stock.
Contractual Obligations
For a discussion of contractual obligations, see the Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources Contractual
Obligations section in our Fiscal 2006 Form 10-K. There have been no material developments with
respect to contractual obligations.
New Accounting Standards
See Note 2. New Accounting Standards of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements included herein for a full description of recent accounting pronouncements including the
respective expected dates of adoption and expected effects on results of operations and financial
condition.
20
Non-GAAP Measures
We have included in the discussion under the caption Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations above a financial measure that was not prepared in
accordance with GAAP. Any analysis of non-GAAP financial measures should be used only in
conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP. Below, we define the non-GAAP
financial measure, provide a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly
comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, and discuss the reasons that we
believe this information is useful to management and may be useful to investors.
Net Debt
We have defined the non-GAAP measure Net Debt to include the aggregate debt obligations
reflected in our balance sheet, less the hedge adjustments resulting from terminated and existing
fair value interest rate derivatives or swaps, the balance of our cash and cash equivalents and
certain other investments that we consider to be readily available to satisfy such debt
obligations.
Our management uses Net Debt, along with other factors, to evaluate our financial condition.
We believe that Net Debt is an appropriate supplemental measure of financial condition and may be
useful to investors because it provides a more complete understanding of our financial condition
before the impact of our decisions regarding the appropriate use of cash and liquid investments.
Net Debt is not intended to be a substitute for GAAP financial measures and should not be used as
such.
Set forth below is a reconciliation of Net Debt to the most directly comparable GAAP measures,
Total Current Portion of Debt and Total Long-Term Debt (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Current Portion of Debt |
|
$ |
125.5 |
|
|
$ |
40.8 |
|
|
$ |
75.1 |
|
Total Long-Term Debt |
|
|
652.7 |
|
|
|
765.3 |
|
|
|
390.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
778.2 |
|
|
|
806.1 |
|
|
|
465.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Hedge Adjustments Resulting From Terminated
Fair Value Interest Rate Derivatives or Swaps |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
(18.7 |
) |
Less: Hedge Adjustments Resulting From Existing
Fair Value Interest Rate Derivatives or Swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
768.2 |
|
|
|
795.7 |
|
|
|
456.0 |
|
Less: Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
(28.5 |
) |
Less: Investment in Marketable Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Debt |
|
$ |
761.9 |
|
|
$ |
788.8 |
|
|
$ |
396.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements made in this report constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
federal securities laws, including statements regarding, among other things, the impact of
operational restructuring activities, including the cost and timing of such activities, the size
and cost of employment terminations, operational consolidation, capacity utilization, cost
reductions and production efficiencies, estimated fair values of assets, and returns from planned
asset transactions, and the impact of such factors on earnings; the ability of insurance carriers
to pay potential claims under our insurance policies and our potential liability with respect
thereto; potential liability for outstanding guarantees and indemnities and the potential impact of
such liabilities; the impact of economic conditions, including the nature of the current market
environment, raw material and energy costs and market trends or factors that affect such trends,
such as expected price increases, competitive pricing pressures, cost increases, as well as the
impact and continuation of such factors; our results of operations, including our ability to
address operational inefficiencies, costs, sales growth or declines, the timing and impact of
customer transitioning, the impact of announced price increases and the impact of the gain and loss
of customers; pension plan contributions and expense, funding requirements and earnings;
environmental law liability as well as the impact of related compliance efforts, including the cost
of required improvements and the availability of certain indemnification claims; capital
expenditures for fiscal 2007; the cost and other effects of complying with
governmental laws and regulations and the timing of such costs; income tax rates; our ability
to fund capital expenditures, interest
21
payments, stock repurchases, dividends, working capital
needs and debt for the foreseeable future from available cash and the proceeds from borrowings and
security issuances; our estimates and assumptions regarding our acquisition of the Gulf States
business and our ability to realize expected synergies from the Gulf States Acquisition; our
estimates and assumptions regarding our contractual obligations and the impact of our contractual
obligations on our liquidity and cash flow; the impact of changes in assumptions and estimates
underlying accounting policies; the expected impact of implementing new accounting standards; and
the impact of changes in assumptions and estimates on which we based the design of our system of
disclosure controls and procedures. Such statements are based on our current expectations and
beliefs and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward looking statement. With respect
to these statements, we have made assumptions regarding, among other things, economic, competitive
and market conditions; volumes and price levels of purchases by customers; competitive conditions
in our businesses; possible adverse actions of our customers, our competitors and suppliers; labor
costs; the amount and timing of capital expenditures, including installation costs, project
development and implementation costs, severance and other shutdown costs; restructuring costs;
utilization of real property that is subject to the restructurings due to realizable values from
the sale of such property; credit availability; volumes and price levels of purchases by customers;
raw material and energy costs; and competitive conditions in our businesses. Management believes
its assumptions are reasonable; however, undue reliance should not be placed on such estimates,
which are based on current expectations. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain
risks including, among others, that our assumptions will prove to be inaccurate. There are many
factors that impact these forward-looking statements that we cannot predict accurately. Actual
results may vary materially from current expectations, in part because we manufacture most of our
products against customer orders with short lead times and small backlogs. Our earnings are
dependent on volume due to price levels and fixed operating costs. Further, our business is
subject to a number of general risks that would affect any such forward-looking statements
including, among others, decreases in demand for our products; increases in energy, raw material,
shipping and capital equipment costs; reduced supplies of raw materials; fluctuations in selling
prices and volumes; intense competition; our ability to identify, complete, integrate or finance
acquisitions; the potential loss of certain customers; adverse changes in and the cost of complying
with extensive governmental regulations; and adverse changes in general market and industry
conditions. Such risks are more particularly described in our filings with the SEC, including under
the caption Business Forward-Looking Information and Risk Factors in our Fiscal 2006 Form
10-K. Further, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we do not
have or undertake any obligation to update any such information as future events unfold.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
For a discussion of certain of the market risks to which we are exposed, see the Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk section in our Fiscal 2006 Form 10-K.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective based on their evaluation of these controls and
procedures required by paragraph (b) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in
connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15
that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are a party to litigation incidental to our business from time to time. We are not
currently a party to any litigation that management believes, if determined adversely to us, would
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
22
Item 6. EXHIBITS
See separate Exhibit Index attached hereto and hereby incorporated herein.
23
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROCK-TENN COMPANY |
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: February 7, 2007
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Steven C. Voorhees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven C. Voorhees |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer and duly authorized officer) |
24
ROCK-TENN COMPANY
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit 3.1
|
|
Restated and Amended Articles of Incorporation of the
Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No
33-73312). |
|
|
|
Exhibit 3.2
|
|
Articles of Amendment to the Registrants Restated and
Amended Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.2 of the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2000). |
|
|
|
Exhibit 3.3
|
|
Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.3 of the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2003). |
|
|
|
Exhibit 4.1
|
|
The rights of the Registrants equity security holders are
defined in Article II of the Restated and Amended Articles of
Incorporation of the Registrant and Article II of the
Articles of Amendment to the Registrants Restated and
Amended Articles of Incorporation. See Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2. |
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.1
|
|
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit and Security
Agreement dated as of November 17, 2006 among Rock-Tenn
Financial, Inc., as Borrower, Rock-Tenn Converting Company,
as Servicer, Variable Funding Capital Company LLC, as
assignee of Blue Ridge Asset Funding Corporation, Three
Pillars Funding LLC and SunTrust Bank as liquidity provider
to TPF, SunTrust Capital Markets, Inc., as agent for the TPF
Group, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as liquidity
provider to VFCC, agent for the VFCC Group and Administrative
Agent. |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.1
|
|
Certification Accompanying Periodic Report Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, executed by
James A. Rubright, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of Rock-Tenn Company. |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.2
|
|
Certification Accompanying Periodic Report Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, executed by
Steven C. Voorhees, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Rock-Tenn Company. |
Additional Exhibits
In accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238, Exhibit 32.1 is to be treated as accompanying
this report rather than filed as part of the report.
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, executed by James A. Rubright, Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Rock-Tenn Company, and by Steven C.
Voorhees, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Rock-Tenn Company. |
25