UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

þ		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006

Commission file number 0-10792

Horizon Bancorp

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indiana		35-1562417
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
515 Franklin Square, Michigan City		46360
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 219-879-0211

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, no par value		The NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 of Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act Yes o No þ

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to the Form 10-K þ

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definitions of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

Large accelerated filer o     Accelerated filer o     Non-Accelerated Filer þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant, based on the average bid price of such stock as of June 30, 2005, the last day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $60,671,760.

As of March 15, 2007, the registrant had 3,228,382 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

		Part of Form 10-K into which
Document		portion of document is incorporated
Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement to be filed for its May 3, 2007 annual meeting of shareholders		III

 

 

Horizon Bancorp
2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K
Table of Contents

				Page
PART I
Item 1.		Business			3
Item 1A		Risk Factors			12
Item 1B		Unresolved Staff Comments			15
Item 2.		Properties			15
Item 3.		Legal Proceedings			16
Item 4.		Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders			16
Special Item: Executive Officers of Registrant					17
PART II
Item 5.		Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities			18
Item 6.		Selected Financial Data			19
Item 7.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation			19
Item 7A.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk			36
Item 8.		Financial Statements and Supplementary Data			37
Item 9.		Changes in and Disagreement with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure			76
Item 9A.		Controls and Procedures			76
Item 9B.		Other Information			76
PART III
Item 10.		Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance			76
Item 11.		Executive Compensation			77
Item 12.		Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management			77
Item 13.		Certain Relationships and Related Transactions; and Director Independence			77
Item 14.		Principal Accountant Fees and Services			77
PART IV
Item 15.		Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules			78
SIGNATURES					79
EXHIBIT INDEX					81
Exhibit 10.14
Exhibit 21
Exhibit 23
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.2

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

General

Horizon Bancorp (“Horizon” or the “Company”) is a registered bank holding company incorporated in Indiana and headquartered in Michigan City, Indiana. Horizon provides a broad range of banking services in Northwestern Indiana and Southwestern Michigan through its bank subsidiary, Horizon Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”) and other affiliated entities. Horizon operates as a single segment which is commercial banking. Horizon’s Common Stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol HBNC. The Bank was chartered as a national banking association in 1873 and has operated continuously since that time. The Bank is a full-service commercial bank offering commercial and retail banking services, corporate and individual trust and agency services and other services incident to banking.

On June 10, 2005, Horizon acquired Alliance Financial Corporation and its wholly owned bank subsidiary, Alliance Banking Company (collectively referred to as Alliance). Alliance had three offices in southwest Michigan, and one office in Michigan City, Indiana, $141 million of assets and $117 million of deposits at the date of the acquisition. See Note 2 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion regarding the acquisition.

On June 1, 2006, the Bank opened a full service branch in Elkhart, Indiana. The Bank maintains thirteen other full service facilities in Northwest Indiana and Southwest Michigan. The Bank also maintains a loan production office in Lake County Indiana. At December 31, 2006, the Bank had total assets of $1,222 million and total deposits of $914 million. The Bank has three wholly-owned subsidiaries: Horizon Trust & Investment Management, N.A. (“Horizon Trust”), Horizon Investments, Inc. (“Horizon Investments”) and Horizon Insurance Services, Inc. (“Horizon Insurance”). Horizon Trust offers corporate and individual trust and agency services and investment management services. Horizon Investments manages the investment portfolio of the Bank. Horizon Insurance offered a full line of personal insurance products until March 2005, at which time the majority of its assets were sold to a third party.

Horizon formed Horizon Statutory Trust I in 2002 (“Trust I”), Horizon Bancorp Capital Trust II in 2004 (“Trust II”) and Horizon Bancorp Capital Trust III in 2006 (“Trust III”) for the purpose of participating in pooled trust preferred securities offerings. The Company assumed additional debentures as the result of the acquisition of Alliance in 2005 which formed Alliance Financial Statutory Trust I (“Alliance Trust”) . See Note 11 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion regarding these previously consolidated entities that are now reported separately. The business of Horizon is not seasonal to any material degree.

No material part of Horizon’s business is dependent upon a single or small group of customers, the loss of any one or more of whom would have a materially adverse effect on the business of Horizon. In 2006, revenues from loans accounted for 73% of the total consolidated revenue and revenues from investment securities accounted for 14% of total consolidated revenue.

Employees

The Bank, Horizon Trust and Horizon Investments employed approximately 277 full and part-time people as of December 31, 2006. Horizon does not have any employees.

Competition

A high degree of competition exists in all major areas where Horizon engages in business. The Bank’s primary market consists of Porter, LaPorte St. Joseph and Elkhart Counties, Indiana, and Berrien County, Michigan. The Bank competes with commercial banks located in LaPorte County and contiguous counties in Indiana and Michigan, as well as with savings and loan associations, consumer finance companies, and credit unions. To a more moderate extent, the Bank competes with Chicago money center banks, mortgage banking companies, insurance companies, brokerage houses, other institutions engaged in money market financial services and certain government agencies.

Based on deposits as of June 30, 2006, Horizon was the largest of the 11 bank and thrift institutions in LaPorte County with a 39.12% market share and the fifth largest of the 15 such institutions in Porter County with a 7.50% market share. In Berrien County, Michigan, Horizon was the fourth largest of the 10 bank and thrift institutions with a 7.38% market share. In 2005, Horizon opened new offices in St. Joseph and Elkhart Counties, Indiana. Horizon’s market share of deposits was less than 1.00% in each of these counties. (Source: FDIC Summary of Deposits Market Share Reports, available at www.fdic.gov).

Supervision and Regulation

Horizon is registered as a bank holding company and is subject to the supervision of, and regulation by, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”) under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (“BHC Act”). The Federal Reserve has issued regulations under the BHC Act requiring a bank holding company to serve as a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary banks. It is the policy of the Federal Reserve that, pursuant to this requirement, a bank holding company should stand ready to use its resources to provide adequate capital funds to its subsidiary banks during periods of financial stress or adversity.

The BHC Act requires the prior approval of the Federal Reserve to acquire more than a 5% voting interest of any bank or bank holding company. Additionally, the BHC Act restricts Horizon’s nonbanking activities to those which are determined by the Federal Reserve to be closely related to banking and a proper incident thereto.

Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (the “FDICIA”), a bank holding company is required to guarantee the compliance of any insured depository institution subsidiary that may become “undercapitalized” (as defined in FDICIA) with the terms of any capital restoration plan filed by such subsidiary with its appropriate federal bank regulatory agency.

Bank holding companies are required to comply with the Federal Reserve’s risk-based capital guidelines. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”) have adopted risk-based capital ratio guidelines to which depository institutions under their respective supervision are subject. The guidelines establish a systematic analytical framework that makes regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profiles among banking organizations. Risk-based capital ratios are determined by allocating assets and specified off-balance sheet commitments to four risk weighted categories, with higher levels of capital being required for the categories perceived as representing greater risk. As a condition of approval for the Alliance acquisition, the OCC required the Bank to maintain regulatory capital ratios at 100 basis points above the well capitalized minimums. The Bank exceeded the risk-based capital requirements of the FDIC and OCC as of December 31, 2006. For Horizon’s regulatory capital ratios and regulatory requirements as of December 31, 2006, see the information in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation in Item 7 below, which is incorporated herein by reference.

The Bank is (i) subject to the provisions of the National Bank Act; (ii) supervised, regulated, and examined by the OCC; and (iii) subject to the rules and regulations of the OCC, Federal Reserve, and the FDIC.

The Bank’s deposits are insured to applicable limits by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 (the “Reform Act”), which was signed into law in February 2006, has resulted in significant changes to the federal deposit insurance program:

	•		Effective March 31, 2006, the Bank Insurance Fund (“BIF”) and the Savings Association Insurance Fund (“SAIF”) were merged to create a new fund, called the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”)
	•		The current $100,000 deposit insurance coverage is subject to adjustment for inflation beginning in 2010 and every succeeding five years

•

Deposit insurance coverage for individual retirement accounts and certain other retirement accounts has been increased from $100,000 to $250,000 and also will subject to adjustment for inflation

Pursuant to the Reform Act, the FDIC is authorized to set the reserve ratio for the DIF annually at between 1.15% and 1.5% of estimated insured deposits and the FDIC has been given discretion to set assessment rates according to risk regardless of the level of the fund reserve ratio. On November 2, 2006, the FDIC adopted final regulations that set the designated reserve ratio for the DIF at 1.25% beginning January 1, 2007.

Insured depository institutions that were in existence on December 31, 1996, and paid assessments prior to that date (or their successors) are entitled to a one-time credit against future assessments based on their past contributions to the BIF or SAIF. In 2006, the Bank received a one-time credit of $458,184 against future assessments.

Also on November 2, 2006, the FDIC adopted final regulations that establish a new risk-based premium system. Under the new system, the FDIC will evaluate each institution’s risk based on three primary sources of information: supervisory ratings for all insured institutions, financial ratios for most institutions, and long-term debt issuer ratings for large institutions that have such ratings. An institution’s assessments will be based on the insured institution’s ranking in one of four risk categories. Effective January 1, 2007, well-capitalized institutions with the CAMELS ratings of 1 or 2 are grouped in Risk Category I and will be assessed for deposit insurance at an annual rate of between five and seven cents for every $100 of domestic deposits. Institutions in Risk Categories II, III and IV will be assessed at annual rates of 10, 28 and 43 cents, respectively. An increase in assessments could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s earnings.

FDIC-insured institutions remain subject to the requirement to pay assessments to the FDIC to fund interest payments on bonds issued by the Financing Corporation (“FICO”), an agency of the Federal government established to recapitalize the predecessor to the SAIF. These assessments will continue until the FICO bonds mature in 2017. For the quarter ended December 31, 2006, the FICO assessment rate was equal to 1.24 cents for each $100 in domestic deposits maintained at an institution.

Both federal and state law extensively regulates various aspects of the banking business, such as reserve requirements, truth-in-lending and truth-in-savings disclosures, equal credit opportunity, fair credit reporting, trading in securities and other aspects of banking operations. Branching by the Bank is subject to the jurisdiction and requires notice to or the prior approval of the OCC.

Horizon and the Bank are subject to the Federal Reserve Act, which restricts financial transactions between banks and affiliated companies. The statute limits credit transactions between banks, affiliated companies and its executive officers and its affiliates. The statute prescribes terms and conditions for bank affiliate transactions deemed to be consistent with safe and sound banking practices, and restricts the types of collateral security permitted in connection with a bank’s extension of credit to an affiliate.

The FDICIA accomplished a number of sweeping changes in the regulation of depository institutions and their holding companies. The FDICIA requires, among other things, federal bank regulatory authorities to take “prompt corrective action” with respect to banks that do not meet minimum capital requirements. The FDICIA further directs that each federal banking agency prescribe standards for depository institutions and depository institution holding companies relating to internal controls, information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, management compensation, a maximum ratio of classified assets to capital, minimum earnings sufficient to absorb losses, a minimum ratio of market value to book value of publicly traded shares and such other standards as the agency deems appropriate.

On November 12, 1999, the President signed into law comprehensive legislation that modernizes the financial services industry for the first time in decades. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLBA”) permits

bank holding companies to conduct essentially unlimited securities and insurance activities, in addition to other activities determined by the Federal Reserve to be related to financial services. As a result of the GLBA, Horizon may underwrite and sell securities and insurance. It may acquire, or be acquired by, brokerage firms and insurance underwriters. Horizon does not anticipate significant changes in its products or services as a result of the GLBA.

The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 (the “PATRIOT Act”) is intended to strengthen the ability of U.S. Law Enforcement to combat terrorism on a variety of fronts. The PATRIOT Act contains sweeping anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws and requires financial institutions to implement additional policies and procedures with respect to, or additional measures designed to address, any or all the following matters, among others: money laundering, suspicious activities and currency transaction reporting, and currency crimes. Many of the provisions in the PATRIOT Act were to have expired December 31, 2005, but the U.S. Congress authorized renewals that extended the provisions until March 10, 2006. In early March 2006, the U.S. Congress approved the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (the “Reauthorization Act”) and the USA PATRIOT Act Additional Reauthorizing Amendments Act of 2006 (the “PATRIOT Act Amendments”), and they were signed into law by President Bush on March 9, 2006. The Reauthorization Act makes permanent all but two of the provisions that had been set to expire and provides that the remaining two provisions, which relate to surveillance and the production of business records under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, will expire in three years. The PATRIOT Act Amendments include provisions allowing recipients of certain subpoenas to obtain judicial review of nondisclosure orders and clarifying the use of certain subpoenas to obtain information from libraries. Horizon does not anticipate that these changes will materially affect its operations.

On July 30, 2002, President Bush signed into law the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”). The Sarbanes-Oxley Act represents a comprehensive revision of laws affecting corporate governance, accounting obligations and corporate reporting. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act is applicable to all companies with equity or debt securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”). In particular, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act establishes: (i) new requirements for audit committees, including independence, expertise and responsibilities; (ii) additional responsibilities regarding financial statements for the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the reporting company; (iii) new standards for auditors and regulation of audits; (iv) increased disclosure and reporting obligations for the reporting company and their directors and executive officers; and (v) new and increased civil and criminal penalties for violation of the securities laws. Management expects that significant additional efforts and expense will continue to be required to comply with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (the “FACT Act”) amended the Fair Credit Reporting Act and made permanent certain federal preemptions that form the basis for a national credit reporting system. The FACT Act was also intended to (i) address identity theft, (ii) increase access to credit information, (iii) enhance the accuracy of credit reporting, (iv) facilitate the opt-out by consumers from certain marketing solicitations, (v) protect medical information, and (vi) promote financial literacy. The statute applies to credit reporting agencies (commonly referred to as “credit bureaus”), financial institutions, other users of credit reports and those who furnish information to credit bureaus.

In addition to the matters discussed above, Horizon Bank is subject to additional regulation of its activities, including a variety of consumer protection regulations affecting its lending, deposit, and collection activities and regulations affecting secondary mortgage market activities. The earnings of financial institutions are also affected by general economic conditions and prevailing interest rates, both domestic and foreign, and by the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States Government and its various agencies, particularly the Federal Reserve.

Additional legislative and administrative actions affecting the banking industry may be considered by the United States Congress, state legislatures and various regulatory agencies, including those referred to above. It cannot be predicted with certainty whether such legislative or administrative action will be enacted or the extent to which the banking industry in general or Horizon and its affiliates will be affected.

BANK HOLDING COMPANY STATISTICAL DISCLOSURES

	I.		DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY; INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL
			Information required by this section of Securities Act Industry Guide 3 is presented in Management’s Discussion and Analysis as set forth in Item 7 below, herein incorporated by reference.
	II.		INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO

A.

The following is a schedule of the amortized cost and fair value of investment securities available for sale at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004:

		2006								2005								2004
(In thousands)		Cost				Fair Value				Cost				Fair Value				Cost				Fair Value
Available for Sale
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agencies and corporations		$	58,595			$	58,445			$	72,153			$	70,367			$	86,348			$	85,626
State and municipal			81,363				81,800				64,608				65,972				54,881				57,327
Mortgage-backed securities			93,591				91,174				119,392				116,020				124,666				124,308
Collateralized mortgage obligations			11,215				11,010				22,781				22,153				13,380				13,338
Corporate notes			632				649				632				665				632				683
Total investment securities		$	245,396			$	243,078			$	279,566			$	275,177			$	279,907			$	281,282

B.

The following is a schedule of maturities of each category of debt securities and the related weighted-average yield of such securities as of December 31, 2006:

										After One Year								After Five Years
		One Year or								Through Five								Through Ten
		Less								Years								Years								After Ten Years
(In Thousands)		Amount				Yield				Amount				Yield				Amount				Yield				Amount				Yield
Available for Sale
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agency securities (1)		$	14,979				4.64	%		$	9,504				4.31	%		$	10,250				5.01	%		$	23,712				5.91	%
Obligations of states and political subdivisions			1,086				4.04				5,126				4.65				19,000				4.27				56,588				4.24
Mortgage-backed securities (2)			1				7.50				26,301				3.96				15,169				4.42				49,703				4.70
Collateralized mortgage obligations (2)			—								1,782				4.75				716				4.50				8,512				4.68
Other securities			—								—								—								649				7.58
Total		$	16,066				4.60			$	42,713				4.16			$	45,135				4.49			$	139,164				4.73

			The weighted-average interest rates are based on coupon rates for securities purchased at par value and on effective interest rates considering amortization or accretion if the securities were purchased at a premium or discount. Yields are not presented on a tax-equivalent basis.
			Excluding those holdings of the investment portfolio in U.S. Treasury securities and other agencies and corporations of the U.S. Government, there were no investments in securities of any one issuer that exceeded 10% of the consolidated stockholders’ equity of Horizon at December 31, 2006.

LOAN PORTFOLIO (continued)

The increase in nonaccrual loans in 2006 is primarily due to an increase in commercial real estate loans of $761 thousand. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in mortgage loans and consumer loans of $67 thousand and $36 thousand, respectively. The increase in nonaccrual loans in 2005 is primarily due to nonaccrual loans acquired from Alliance of $389 thousand, an increase in consumer and commercial loans of $44 thousand and $189 thousand, respectively. The decrease in nonaccrual loans in 2004 is primarily due to decreases in consumer loans of $125 thousand and mortgage loans of $337 thousand partially offset by an increase in commercial loans of $112 thousand. The increase in nonaccrual loans in 2003 is primarily due to increases in consumer loans of $89 thousand, mortgage loans of $254 thousand and commercial loans of $146 thousand. The decrease in nonaccrual loans in 2002 is primarily due to a decrease in commercial loans of $868 thousand partially offset by an increase in mortgage loans of $340 thousand.

(In thousands)
Gross interest income that would have been recorded on nonaccrual loans outstanding as of December 31, 2006, in the period if the loans had been current, in accordance with their original terms and had been outstanding throughout the period or since origination if held for part of the period.		$	194
Interest income actually recorded on nonaccrual loans outstanding as of December 31, 2006, and included in net income for the period.			117
Interest income not recognized during the period on nonaccrual loans outstanding as of December 31, 2006.		$	77

Discussion of Nonaccrual Policy

	1.		From time to time, the Bank obtains information, which may lead management to believe that the collection of payments may be doubtful on a particular loan. In recognition of such, it is management’s policy to convert the loan from an “earning asset” to a nonaccruing loan. Further, it is management’s policy to place a commercial loan on a nonaccrual status when delinquent in excess of 90 days, unless the Loan Committee approves otherwise. The officer responsible for the loan, the senior lending officer and the senior collections officer must review all loans placed on nonaccrual status. The senior collections officer monitors the loan portfolio for any potential problem loans.
	2.		Potential Problem Loans
			Impaired loans for which the discounted cash flows or collateral value exceeded the carrying value of the loan totaled $1,768,000 and $583,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The allowance for impaired loans, included in the Bank’s allowance for loan losses totaled $406,000 and $492,000 at those respective dates. The average balance of impaired loans during 2006 and 2005 was $942,000 and $150,000, respectively.
	3.		Foreign outstandings
			None
	4.		Loan Concentrations
			As of December 31, 2006, there are no significant concentrations of loans exceeding 10% of total loans. See Item III A above for a listing of the types of loans by concentration.

D. Other Interest-Bearing Assets

There are no other interest-bearing assets as of December 31, 2006, which would be required to be disclosed under Item III C.1 or 2 if such assets were loans.

IV. SUMMARY OF LOAN LOSS EXPERIENCE

A.

The following is an analysis of the activity in the allowance for loan losses account:

(In thousands)		2006				2005				2004				2003				2002
LOANS
Loans outstanding at the end of the period (1)		$	843,834			$	732,734			$	564,042			$	447,718			$	535,793
Average loans outstanding during the period (1)			780,555				640,758				514,916				512,441				478,311

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES		2006				2005				2004				2003				2002
Balance at beginning of the period		$	8,368			$	7,193			$	6,909			$	6,255			$	5,410
Loans charged-off
Commercial and agricultural loans			(23	)			(305	)			(161	)			—				(244	)
Real estate mortgage loans							(29	)			(41	)			(226	)			(112	)
Installment loans			(1,120	)			(1,096	)			(863	)			(758	)			(841	)
Total loans charged-off			(1,143	)			(1,430	)			(1,065	)			(984	)			(1,197	)
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off
Commercial and agricultural loans			201				161				79				20				90
Real estate mortgage loans			—				2				2				23				24
Installment loans			407				364				278				245				303
Total loan recoveries			608				527				359				288				417
Net loans charged-off			(535	)			(903	)			(706	)			(696	)			(780	)
Provision charged to operating expense			905				1,521				990				1,350				1,625
Acquired through acquisition			—				557				—				—				—
Balance at the end of the period		$	8,738			$	8,368			$	7,193			$	6,909			$	6,255
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding for the period			(.07	)%			(.14	)%			(.14	)%			(.14	)%			(.16	)%

	B.		The following schedule is a breakdown of the allowance for loan losses allocated by type of loan and the percentage of loans in each category to total loans.
			Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses at December 31 (thousands)

		2006								2005								2004								2003								2002
						% of								% of								% of								% of								% of
						Loans								Loans to								Loans								Loans to								Loans to
		Allowance				to Total				Allowance				Total				Allowance				to Total				Allowance				Total				Allowance				Total
		Amount				Loans				Amount				Loans				Amount				Loans				Amount				Loan				Amount				Loans
Commercial, financial and agricultural		$	2,987				32	%		$	2,733				37	%		$	2,469				36	%		$	1,829				28	%		$	1,732				21	%
Real estate mortgage			768				27				585				22				808				16				834				12				712				14
Mortgage warehousing			1,762				13				1,958				13				2,029				23				2,445				37				2,007				50
Installment			3,181				28				2,958				28				1,860				25				1,524				23				1,574				15
Unallocated			40				—				134				—				27				—				277				—				230				—
Total		$	8,738				100	%		$	8,368				100	%		$	7,193				100	%		$	6,909				100	%		$	6,255				100	%

In 1999, Horizon began a mortgage warehousing program. This program is described in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation in Item 7 below and in the Notes to the Financial Statements in Item 8 below, which are incorporated herein by reference. The greatest risk related to these loans is transaction and fraud risk. During 2006, Horizon processed over $2.3 billion in mortgage warehouse loans.

	V.		DEPOSITS
			Information required by this section is found in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation in Item 7 below and in the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes in Item 8 below, which are incorporated herein by reference.
	VI.		RETURN ON EQUITY AND ASSETS
			Information required by this section is found in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation in Item 7 below and in the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes in Item 8 below, which are incorporated herein by reference.
	VII.		SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
			The following is a schedule of statistical information relative to securities sold under agreements to repurchase which are secured by U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agency securities and mature within one year. There were no other categories of short-term borrowings for which the average balance outstanding during the period was 30 percent or more of stockholders’ equity at the end of the period.

December 31 (thousands)		2006				2005
Outstanding at year end		$	38,642			$	35,824
Approximate weighted-average interest rate at year-end			3.09	%			2.54	%
Highest amount outstanding as of any month-end during the year		$	40,179			$	35,868
Approximate average outstanding during the year		$	35,334			$	26,430
Approximate weighted-average interest during the year			2.91	%			1.97	%

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND RISK FACTORS

A cautionary note about forward-looking statements: In its oral and written statements, Horizon from time to time includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements can include statements about estimated cost savings, plans and objectives for future operations and expectations about Horizon’s financial and business performance as well as economic and market conditions. They often can be identified by the use of words like “expect,” “may,” “could,” “intend,” “project,” “estimate,” “believe” or “anticipate.”

Horizon may include forward-looking statements in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), such as this Form 10-K, in other written materials, and in oral statements made by senior management to analysts, investors, representatives of the media, and others. It is intended that these forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Horizon undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the forward-looking statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

By their nature, forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors. You are cautioned that actual results may differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statement. The discussion in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation in Item 7 of this Form 10-K lists some of the factors that could cause Horizon’s actual results to vary materially from those expressed in or implied by any forward-looking statements. Your attention is directed to this discussion.

Other risks and uncertainties that could affect Horizon’s future performance are set forth immediately below in Item 1A — Risk Factors

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

As a financial institution, we are subject to a number of types of risks. Although we undertake a variety of efforts to manage and control those risks, many of the risks are outside of our control. Among the risks we face are the following:

	•		credit risk: the risk that loan customers or other parties will be unable to perform their contractual obligations;
	•		market risk: the risk that changes in market rates and prices will adversely affect our financial condition or results of operation;
	•		liquidity risk: the risk that Horizon or the Bank will have insufficient cash or access to cash to meet its operating needs; and
	•		operational risk: the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or external events.

Investors should consider carefully these risks and the other risks and uncertainties described below. Any of the following risks could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results which could cause our stock price to decline. The risks and uncertainties described below are not, however, the only ones that we may face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us, or that we currently believe are not material, could also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results.

Our financial performance may be adversely impacted if we are unable to continue to grow our commercial and consumer loan portfolios, obtain low-cost funds and compete with other providers of financial services.

Our ability to maintain our history of record earnings year after year will depend, in large part, on our ability to continue to grow our commercial and consumer loan portfolios and obtain low-cost funds. During 2005 and 2006, we focused on increasing consumer loans, and we intend to continue to emphasize and grow consumer, as well as commercial types of loans in the foreseeable future. This represented a shift in our emphasis from 2002 and 2003 when we focused on mortgage banking services, which generated a large portion of our income during those years.

We have also funded our growth with low-cost consumer deposits, and our ability to sustain our growth will depend in part on our continued success in attracting such deposits or finding other sources of low-cost funds.

Another factor in maintaining our history of record earnings will be our ability to expand our scope of available financial services to our customers in an increasingly competitive environment. In addition to other banks, our competitors include credit unions, securities dealers, brokers, mortgage bankers, investment advisors, and finance and insurance companies. Competition is intense in most of our markets. We compete on price and service with our competitors. Competition could intensify in the future as a result of industry consolidation, the increasing availability of products and services from nonbanks, greater technological developments in the industry, and banking reform.

Our commercial and consumer loans expose us to increased credit risks.

We have a large percentage of commercial and consumer loans. Commercial loans generally have greater credit risk than residential mortgage loans because repayment of these loans often depends on the successful business operations of the borrowers. These loans also typically have much larger loan balances than residential mortgage loans. Consumer loans generally involve greater risk than residential mortgage loans because they are unsecured or secured by assets that depreciate in value. Although we undertake a variety of underwriting, monitoring and reserving protections with respect to these types of loans, there can be no guarantee that we will not suffer unexpected losses.

Changes in market interest rates could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our financial condition and results of operations are significantly affected by changes in market interest rates. Our results of operations depend substantially on our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income that we earn on our interest-earning assets and the interest expense that we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities. Our profitability depends on our ability to manage our assets and liabilities during periods of changing market interest rates. If rates increase rapidly as a result of an improving economy, we may have to increase the rates paid on our deposits and borrowed funds more quickly than loans and investments reprice, resulting in a negative impact on interest spreads and net interest income. The impact of rising rates could be compounded if deposit customers move funds from savings accounts to higher rate certificate of deposit accounts. Conversely, should market interest rates fall below current levels, our net interest margin could also be negatively affected, as competitive pressures could keep us from further reducing rates on our deposits, and prepayments and curtailments on assets may continue. Such movements may cause a decrease in our interest rate spread and net interest margin, and therefore, decrease our profitability.

We also are subject to reinvestment risk associated with changes in interest rates. Changes in interest rates may affect the average life of loans and mortgage-related securities. Increases in interest rates may decrease loan demand and/or may make it more difficult for borrowers to repay adjustable rate loans. Decreases in interest rates often result in increased prepayments of loans and mortgage-related securities, as borrowers refinance their loans to reduce borrowing costs. Under these circumstances, we are subject to reinvestment risk to the extent that we are unable to reinvest the cash received from such prepayments in loans or other investments that have interest rates that are comparable to the interest rates on existing loans and securities.

An economic slowdown in Northwestern Indiana and Southwestern Michigan could affect our business.

Our primary market area for deposits and loans consists of LaPorte and Porter Counties in Northwestern Indiana and Berrien County in Southwestern Michigan. An economic slowdown in these areas could hurt our business. Possible consequences of such a downturn could include the following:

	•		increases in loan delinquencies and foreclosures;
	•		declines in the value of real estate and other collateral for loans; and
	•		a decline in the demand for our products and services.

We are subject to increased regulatory capital requirements.

As a condition to the approval of our acquisition of Alliance Financial Corporation in 2005, the OCC, our primary regulator, required us to maintain regulatory capital ratios at 100 basis points above the well capitalized minimums. This could affect our ability to compete with other financial institutions not required to maintain these higher capital levels by limiting our ability to grow assets. The OCC has not told us when these increased capital requirements will be lifted, but as of December 31, 2006, we exceeded these heightened capital requirements.

If we are required to change the classification of our mortgage warehouse loans for capital purposes, this could restrict the capital we have available for further growth.

We purchase home mortgages from mortgage companies under warehouse agreements whereby the mortgage company has the right to repurchase the loan. We have historically classified these loans as “home mortgage loans” for call report and regulatory capital purposes as opposed to treating them as “other loans.” During the course of a routine, periodic examination by bank regulatory authorities commenced in February 2003, the examination personnel raised the issue of whether our mortgage warehouse loans should be treated as “other loans” for call report purposes. We submitted a position statement to the regulators in 2003 substantiating our classification of these loans and had various follow-up conversations with them thereafter. The regulatory authorities have never required us to change the classification of these loans, and we believe the matter is resolved; although the regulatory authorities have never told us this matter is settled and recently informed us that they are still considering the issue. If we are required to change our treatment of these loans, it will change our calculations for risk-based capital and reduce our risk-based capital ratios which may restrict our ability to grow our assets.

Because our stock is thinly traded, it may be more difficult for you to sell your shares or buy additional shares when you desire to do so and the price may be volatile.

Although our common stock has been listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market since December 2001 and since February 1, 2007, has been listed on NASDAQ Global Market, our common stock is thinly traded. Average daily trading volume during 2006 was only 3,476 shares. The prices of thinly traded stocks, such as ours, are typically more volatile than stocks traded in a large, active public market and can be more easily impacted by sales or purchases of large blocks of stock. Thinly traded stocks are also less liquid, and because of the low volume of trades, you may be unable to sell your shares when you desire to do so.

The preparation of our financial statements requires the use of estimates that may vary from actual results.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make significant estimates that affect the financial statements. One of our most critical estimates is the level of the allowance for loan losses. Due to the inherent nature of these estimates, we cannot provide absolute assurance that we will not have to increase the allowance for loan losses and/or sustain loan losses that are significantly higher than the provided allowance.

Our mortgage warehouse and indirect lending operations are subject to a higher fraud risk than our other lending operations.

We buy loans originated by mortgage bankers and automobile dealers. Because we must rely on the mortgage bankers and automobile dealers in making and documenting these loans, there is an increased risk of fraud to us on the part of the third-party originators and the underlying borrowers. In order to guard against this increased risk, we perform investigations on the loan originators we do business with, and we review the loan files and loan documents we purchase to attempt to detect any irregularities or legal noncompliance. However, there is no guarantee that our procedures will detect all cases of fraud or legal noncompliance.

We are subject to extensive regulation and changes in laws, regulations and policies could adversely affect our business.

Our operations are subject to extensive regulation by federal agencies. See “Supervision and Regulation” in the description of our Business in Item 1 above for detailed information on the laws and regulations to which we are subject. Changes in applicable laws, regulations or regulator policies could materially affect our business. The likelihood of any major changes in the future and their effects are impossible to determine.

Our inability to continue to accurately process large volumes of transactions could adversely impact our business and financial results.

In the normal course of business, we process large volumes of transactions. If systems of internal control should fail to work as expected, if systems are used in an unauthorized manner, or if employees subvert the system of internal controls, significant losses could result.

We process large volumes of transactions on a daily basis and are exposed to numerous types of operational risk. Operational risk resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems includes the risk of fraud by persons inside or outside the company, the execution of unauthorized transactions by employees, errors relating to transaction processing and systems, and breaches of the internal control system and compliance requirements. This risk of loss also includes the potential legal actions that could arise as a result of the operational deficiency or as a result of noncompliance with applicable regulatory standards.

We establish and maintain systems of internal operational controls that provide us with timely and accurate information about our level of operational risk. While not foolproof, these systems have been designed to manage operational risk at appropriate, cost-effective levels. Procedures exist that are designed to ensure that policies relating to conduct, ethics, and business practices are followed. From time to time, losses from operational risk may occur, including the effects of operational errors.

While we continually monitor and improve the system of internal controls, data processing systems, and corporate-wide processes and procedures, there can be no assurance that future losses will not occur.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The main office of Horizon and the Bank is located at 515 Franklin Square, Michigan City, Indiana. The building located across the street from the main office of Horizon and the Bank, at 502 Franklin Square, houses the credit administration, operations, facilities and purchasing and information technology departments of the Bank. In addition to these principal facilities, the Bank has 14 sales offices located at:

3631 South Franklin Street, Michigan City, Indiana
113 W. First St., Wanatah, Indiana
1500 W. Lincolnway, LaPorte, Indiana
423 South Roosevelt Street, Chesterton, Indiana
4208 N. Calumet, Valparaiso, Indiana
2650 Willowcreek Road, Portage, Indiana
233 East 84^th Drive, Merrillville, Indiana
811 Ship Street, St. Joseph, Michigan
2608 Niles Road, St. Joseph, Michigan
233 South Main Street, South Bend, Indiana
1909 East Bristol Street, Elkhart, Indiana

500 West Buffalo Street, New Buffalo, Michigan
13696 Redarrow Highway, Harbert, Michigan
6801 West U.S. 12 Three Oaks, Michigan

Horizon owns all of the facilities, except for the South Bend and Merrillville, Indiana offices, which are leased from third parties.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

No material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business to which Horizon or any of its subsidiaries is a party or of which any of their property is subject.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of Horizon’s stockholders during the fourth quarter of the 2006 fiscal year.

SPECIAL ITEM: EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF REGISTRANT

Robert C. Dabagia			68			Chairman of Horizon since 1998; Chief Executive Officer of Horizon and the Bank until July 1, 2001.
Craig M. Dwight			50			Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank since January 2003; President and Chief Executive Officer of Horizon and the Bank since July 1, 2001; President and Chief Administrative Officer of Horizon and President of the Bank since 1998.
Thomas H. Edwards			54			President and Chief Operating Officer of the Bank since January 2003; Executive Vice President and Senior Lender of Horizon and the Bank since 1999.
James H. Foglesong			61			Chief Financial Officer of Horizon and the Bank since January 2001; Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Security Financial Bancorp since 1995.
James D. Neff			47			Executive Vice President-Mortgage Banking of Horizon Bank since January 2004; Senior Vice President, Horizon Bank since October 1999.

PART II

There were no purchases by the Company of its common stock during the fourth quarter.

The Securities and Exchange Commission requires Horizon to include a line graph comparing Horizon’s cumulative five-year total shareholder returns on the Common Shares with market and industry returns over the past five years. SNL Financial LC prepared the following graph. The return represented in the graph assumes the investment of $100 on January 1, 2002, and further assumes reinvestment of all dividends. The Common Shares began trading on the NASDAQ Global Market February 1, 2007. Prior to that date, the Common Shares were traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market.

Horizon Bancorp

Total Return Performance

				Period Ending
	Index			12/31/01					12/31/02					12/31/03					12/31/04					12/30/05					12/31/06
	Horizon Bancorp				100.00					118.43					188.36					187.86					186.27					198.01
	Russell 2000				100.00					79.52					117.09					138.55					144.86					171.47
	SNL Bank $1B-$5B				100.00					115.44					156.98					193.74					190.43					220.36

The SNL $500 million to $1 billion index was dropped this year as Horizon no longer falls within this size range. The index value for this index at December 31, 2006 was 247.44.

The other information regarding Horizon’s common stock is included under the caption “Horizon’s Common Stock and Related Stockholders’ Matters” in Item 8 below, which is incorporated by reference.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The information required under this item is incorporated by reference to the information appearing under the caption “Summary of Selected Financial Data” in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

Horizon Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands)

Overview

Throughout 2006, Horizon’s net interest margin declined as the cost of funds increased faster than the yield on earning assets. Cost of funds was impacted by competitive rate pressure for deposits and certificates of deposit renewing at higher rates. The yield on earning assets was hampered by a lack of commercial loan growth. Commercial loans carry higher yields than mortgage and consumer loans. Commercial loan growth was negatively impacted by the pay off of approximately $30 million of loans. The net interest margin declined from 3.27% in 2005 to 3.05% in 2006. This 22 basis point decline had the impact of reducing net interest income by approximately $2.3 million.

Mortgage loans outstanding grew $63 million and mortgage loans originated and sold totaled $96 million, which is comparable to the prior year. Mortgage activity at Horizon continued strong despite the general slow down in residential mortgage activity nationwide. Indirect consumer loan activity continued strong as well, pushing total consumer loans to $238 million, an increase of $36 million from the prior year. Restructuring was completed in the investment portfolio. Throughout the year $764 thousand of losses were taken and the investment portfolio yield was improved by 60 basis points.

Asset growth was funded by an increase of $58 million in deposits and a $28 million increase in borrowed funds.

Critical Accounting Policies

Horizon has established various accounting policies, which govern the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States in the preparation the Company’s financial statements. The significant accounting policies of the Company are described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 on Form 10-K. Certain of these policies are important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Management has identified the following as critical accounting policies:

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses, which is established through the provision for loan losses, is based on management’s evaluation of the level of allowance required in relation to the estimated loss exposure in the loan portfolio. Management believes the allowance for loan losses is a significant estimate and therefore evaluates it for adequacy each quarter. Management considers factors such as previous loss experience, the size and composition of the loan portfolio, current economic and real estate market conditions, the performance of individual loans in relation to contract terms, and estimated fair value of collateral that secures the loans. The use of different estimates or assumptions could produce a different allowance for loan losses. Additional discussion regarding the allowance for loan losses is included in the commentary on “Loans” in the following Analysis of Financial Condition.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Management believes that the accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets also involves a higher degree of judgment than most other significant accounting policies. Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 142, “Accounting for Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” establishes standards for the amortization of acquired intangible assets and impairment assessment of goodwill. At December 31, 2006, Horizon had core deposit intangibles of $2.412 million subject to amortization and $5.787 million of goodwill, which was not subject to amortization. Goodwill arising from business combinations represents the value attributable to unidentifiable intangible assets in the business acquired. Horizon’s goodwill relates to the value inherent in the banking industry and that value is dependent upon the ability of Horizon to provide quality, cost effective banking services in a competitive marketplace. The goodwill value is supported by revenue that is in part driven by the volume of business transacted. A decrease in earnings resulting from a decline in the customer base or the inability to deliver cost effective services over sustained periods can lead to impairment of goodwill that could adversely impact earnings in future periods. SFAS No. 142 requires an annual evaluation of goodwill for impairment. The evaluation of goodwill for impairment requires the use of estimates and assumptions. Horizon has concluded that the recorded value of goodwill is not impaired.

Mortgage Servicing Rights

Servicing assets are recognized as separate assets when rights are acquired through purchase or through the sale of financial assets on a servicing-retained basis. Capitalized servicing rights are amortized into noninterest income in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income of the underlying financial assets. Servicing assets are evaluated regularly for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to amortized cost. Impairment is determined by stratifying servicing rights by predominant characteristics, such as interest rates, original loan terms and whether the loans are fixed or adjustable rate mortgages. Fair value is determined using prices for similar assets with similar characteristics, when available, or based upon discounted cash flows using market-based assumptions. When the book value of an individual stratum exceeds its fair value, an impairment reserve is recognized so that each individual stratum is carried at the lower of its amortized book value or fair value. In periods of falling market interest rates, accelerated loan prepayment speeds can adversely impact the fair value of these mortgage-servicing rights relative to their book value. In the event that the fair value of these assets was to increase in the future, Horizon can recognize the increased fair value to the extent of the impairment allowance but cannot recognize an asset in excess of its amortized book value. Future changes in management’s assessment of the impairment of these servicing assets, as a result of changes in observable market data relating to market interest rates, loan prepayment speeds, and other factors, could impact Horizon’s financial condition and results of operations either positively or adversely.

Analysis of Financial Condition

Horizon maintains a high quality investment portfolio with low credit risk. Investment securities totaled $243.078 million at December 31, 2006, and consisted of U S. Treasury and Government Agency securities of $58.445 million (24.0)%; Municipal securities of $81.800 million (33.7)%; Mortgage-backed securities of $91.174 million (37.5)%; collateralized mortgage obligations of $11.010 million (4.5)%; and corporate securities of $649 thousand (.3)%.

As indicated above, 42.0% of the investment portfolio consists of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. These instruments are secured by residential mortgages of varying maturities. Principal and interest payments are received monthly as the underlying mortgages are repaid. These payments also include prepayments of mortgage balances as borrowers either sell their homes or refinance their mortgages. Therefore, mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations have maturities that are stated in terms of average life. The average life is the average amount of time that each dollar of principal is expected to be outstanding. As of December 31, 2006, the mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations in the investment portfolio had an average life of 4.05 years. Securities that have interest rates above current market rates are purchased at a premium. These securities may experience a significant increase in prepayments when lower market interest rates create an incentive for the borrower to refinance the underlying mortgage. This may result in a decrease of current income, however, this risk is mitigated by a shorter average life. Management currently believes that prepayment risk on these securities is nominal.

At December 31, 2006 and 2005, all investment securities were classified as available for sale. Securities classified as available for sale are carried at their fair value, with both unrealized gains and losses added or subtracted, net of tax, directly to stockholders’ equity. This accounting method adds potential volatility to stockholders’ equity, but net income is not affected unless securities are sold. Net depreciation on these securities totaled $2.318 million, which resulted in a $1.507 million reduction, net of tax, to stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2006. This compared to a $2.853 million, net of tax, addition in stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2005.

As a member of the Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank system, Horizon is required to maintain an investment in the common stock of each entity. The investment in common stock is based on a predetermined formula. At December 31, 2006, Horizon has investments in the common stock of the Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank totaling $12.136 million compared to $12.983 million at December 31, 2005.

At December 31, 2006, Horizon does not maintain a trading account and is not using any derivative products for hedging or other purposes.

Total loans, the principal earning asset of the Bank, were $843.834 million at December 31, 2006. The current level of loans is an increase of 15.2% from the December 31, 2005, level of $732.734 million. As the table below indicates, the increase is related to growth in all lending areas except for commercial loans, which declined during 2006.

										Dollar				Percent
December 31		2006				2005				Change				Change
Real estate loans
1 – 4 family		$	214,031			$	152,818			$	61,213				40.06	%
Other			8,204				6,494				1,710				26.33
Total			222,235				159,312				62,923				39.50
Commercial loans
Working capital and equipment			128,500				130,410				(1,910	)			(1.46	)
Real estate, including agriculture			131,103				128,240				2,863				2.23
Tax exempt			3,861				2,529				1,332				52.67
Other			7,993				12,131				(4,138	)			(34.11	)
Total			271,457				273,310				(1,853	)			(0.68	)
Consumer loans
Auto			125,542				96,421				29,121				30.20
Recreation			8,862				7,708				1,154				14.97
Real estate/home improvement			43,590				40,968				2,622				6.40
Home equity			54,527				52,129				2,398				4.60
Unsecured			1,979				1,918				61				3.18
Other			3,375				3,239				136				4.20
Total			237,875				202,383				35,492				17.53
Mortgage warehouse loans
Prime			53,547				48,571				9,460				19.48
Sub-Prime			58,720				49,158				5,078				10.33
Total			112,267				97,729				14,538				14.88
Grand total		$	843,834			$	732,734			$	111,100				15.16	%

The acceptance and management of credit risk is an integral part of the Bank’s business as a financial intermediary. The Bank has established underwriting standards including a policy that monitors the lending function through strict administrative and reporting requirements as well as an internal loan review of consumer and small business loans. The Bank also uses an independent third-party loan review function that regularly reviews asset quality.

Real estate loans totaled $222.235 million or 26.3% of total loans as of December 31, 2006, compared to $159.312 million or 21.7% of total loans as of December 31, 2005. This category consists of home mortgages that generally require a loan to value of no more than 80%. Some special guaranteed or insured real estate loan programs do permit a higher loan to collateral value ratio.

In addition to the customary real estate loans described above, the Bank also has outstanding on December 31, 2006, $54.527 million in home equity lines of credit compared to $52.129 million at December 31, 2005. Credit lines normally limit the loan to collateral value to no more than 89%. These loans are classified as consumer loans in the table above and in Note 4 of the consolidated financial statements.

Residential real estate lending is a highly competitive business. As of December 31, 2006, the real estate loan portfolio reflected a wide range of interest rates and repayment patterns, but could generally be categorized as follows:

		2006												2005
						Percent of												Percent of
		Amount				Portfolio				Yield				Amount				Portfolio				Yield
Fixed rate
Monthly payment		$	46,301				20.84	%			6.35	%		$	43,752				27.46	%			6.13	%
Biweekly payment			3,047				1.37				6.45				3,275				2.06				6.43
Adjustable rate
Monthly payment			172,860				77.78				5.72				112,240				70.45				5.29
Biweekly payment			27				.01				7.5				45				.03				6.12
Total		$	222,235				100.00	%			5.88	%		$	159,312				100.00	%			5.54	%

During 2006 and 2005, approximately $96 million and $98 million, respectively, of residential mortgages were sold into the secondary market.

In addition to the real estate loan portfolio, the Bank sells real estate loans and retains the servicing rights. Loans serviced for others are not included in the consolidated balance sheets. During 2006 Horizon sold a large portion of its mortgage servicing business. The unpaid principal balances and number of loans serviced for others totaled approximately $23,988,000 and 279 and $164,885,000 and 1,971 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

The Bank began capitalizing mortgage servicing rights during 2000 and the aggregate fair value of capitalized mortgage servicing rights at December 31, 2006, totaled approximately $245,000. Comparable market values and a valuation model that calculates the present value of future cash flows were used to estimate fair value. For purposes of measuring impairment, risk characteristics including product type, investor type and interest rates, were used to stratify the originated mortgage servicing rights.

		2006				2005				2004
Mortgage Servicing Rights
Balances, January 1		$	1,278			$	1,473			$	1,429
Servicing rights capitalized			83				239				482
Amortization of servicing rights			(251	)			(434	)			(438	)
Servicing rights sold			(862	)			—				—
			248				1,278				1,473
Impairment allowance			(3	)			(44	)			(141	)
Balances, December 31		$	245			$	1,234			$	1,332

Commercial Loans

Commercial loans totaled $271.457 million, or 32.1% of total loans as of December 31, 2006, compared to $273.310 million, or 36.2% as of December 31, 2005. During the course of the year, Horizon had $30.944 million in commercial real estate and $500 thousand of agricultural loans pay off prematurely. Of this dollar amount, approximately 14% were loans that were acquired by Horizon in the Alliance Bank acquisition that had credit issues. Another 43% were commercial real estate loans that either refinanced elsewhere for more favorable terms or the properties were sold. New loan production essentially offset the losses in commercial loan balances arising from the aforementioned early payoffs.

Commercial loans consisted of the following types of loans at December 31:

		2006												2005
										Percent of												Percent of
		Number				Amount				Portfolio				Number				Amount				Portfolio
SBA guaranteed loans			20			$	4,321				1.60	%			26			$	4,782				1.75	%
Municipal government			42				3,861				1.42				44				2,529				.93
Lines of credit			395				49,549				18.25				406				46,999				17.20
Real estate and equipment term loans			997				213,726				78.73				998				219,000				80.12
Total			1,454			$	271,457				100.00	%			1,474			$	273,310				100.00	%

Consumer Loans

Consumer loans totaled $237.875 million, or 28.2% of total loans as of December 31, 2006, compared to $202.383 million, or 27.6% as of December 31, 2005. The total consumer loan portfolio increased 17.5% in 2006. The growth in consumer loans came from the indirect automobile segment of the portfolio as Horizon expanded its dealer network in southwest Michigan and north central Indiana. Direct consumer loans, mostly consisting of home equity term and revolving loans, were relatively stable in 2006.

Mortgage Warehouse Loans

In November 1999, Horizon began a mortgage-warehousing program. Horizon enters into agreements with mortgage companies and purchases, at its discretion, mortgage loans from mortgage companies at par, net of certain fees, and later sells them back to the mortgage companies at the same amount and without recourse provisions. Interest income is recorded based upon a rate of interest tied to the prime rate during the funding period, not the rates on the individual note. Such loans are made to individuals and reviewed, prior to purchase, for evidence that the loans are of secondary market quality and meet Horizon’s internal underwriting guidelines. An assignment of the mortgage to Horizon is required. In addition, Horizon takes possession of the original note and forwards such note to the end investor. In the event that the end investor would not honor this commitment and the mortgage companies would not be able to honor their repurchase obligations, Horizon would then need to sell these loans in the secondary market at the fair value of these loans. Loans are typically resold within 30 days and are seldom held more than 90 days.

Allowance and Provision for Loan Losses/Critical Accounting Policy

An allowance for loan losses is maintained to absorb loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The determination of the allowance for loan losses is a critical accounting policy that involves management’s ongoing quarterly assessments of the probable estimated losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The identification of loans that may have potential losses is subjective, therefore, a general reserve is maintained to cover all potential losses within the entire loan portfolio. Horizon utilizes a loan grading system that helps identify, monitor and address asset quality problems, in an adequate and timely manner. Each quarter, various factors affecting the quality of the loan portfolio are reviewed.

Large credits are reviewed on an individual basis for loss potential. Other loans are reviewed as a group based upon previous trends of loss experience. Horizon also reviews the current and anticipated economic conditions of its lending market as well as transaction risk to determine the effect they may have on the loss experience of the loan portfolio.

At December 31, 2006, the allowance for loan losses was $8.738 million, or 1.03% of total loans outstanding, compared to $8.368 million, or 1.14% at December 31, 2005. During 2006, the provision for loan losses totaled $905 thousand compared to $1.521 million in 2005. The allowance as a percent of total loans decreased due to strong credit quality and loan loss ratios that are better than those of Horizon’s peers. In addition, the lack of growth in commercial and mortgage warehouse loans resulted in no appreciable increase to reserve allocations for these portfolios. However, no assurance can be given that Horizon will not, in any particular period, sustain loan losses that are significant in relation to the amount reserved, or that subsequent evaluations of the loan portfolio, in light of factors then prevailing, including economic conditions and management’s ongoing quarterly assessments of the portfolio, will not require increases in the allowance for loan losses. Horizon considers the allowance for loan losses to be adequate to cover losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of December 31, 2006.

Nonperforming Loans

Nonperforming loans are defined as loans that are greater than 90 days delinquent or have had the accrual of interest discontinued by management. Management continues to work diligently toward returning nonperforming loans to an earning asset basis. Nonperforming loans for the previous three years ending December 31 are as follows:

		2006				2005				2004
Nonperforming loans		$	2,625			$	1,822			$	1,358

Nonperforming loans total 30% of the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2006, compared to 22% and 19% of the allowance for loan losses on December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

A loan becomes impaired when, based on current information, it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. When a loan is classified as impaired, the degree of impairment must be recognized by estimating future cash flows from the debtor. The present value of these cash flows is computed at a discount rate based on the interest rate contained in the loan agreement. However, if a particular loan has a determinable market value, the creditor may use that value. Also, if the loan is secured and considered collateral dependent, the creditor may use the fair value of the collateral.

Smaller-balance, homogeneous loans are evaluated for impairment in total. Such loans include residential first mortgage loans secured by 1 – 4 family residences, residential construction loans, automobile, home equity, second mortgage loans and mortgage warehouse loans. Commercial loans and mortgage loans secured by other properties are evaluated individually for impairment. When analysis of borrower operating results and financial condition indicate that underlying cash flows of a borrower’s business are not adequate to meet its debt service requirements, the loan is evaluated for impairment. Often this is associated with a delay or shortfall in payments of 30 days or more. Loans are generally moved to nonaccrual status when 90 days or more past due. These loans are often considered impaired. Impaired loans, or portions thereof, are charged off when deemed uncollectible.

Other real estate owned (OREO) net of any related allowance for OREO losses for the previous three years ending December 31 are as follows:

		2006				2005				2004
Other real estate owned		$	75			$	23			$	276

The primary source of funds for the Bank comes from the acceptance of demand and time deposits. However, at times the Bank will use its ability to borrow funds from the Federal Home Loan Bank and other sources when it can do so at interest rates and terms that are superior to those required for deposited funds. Total deposits were $913.973 million at December 31, 2006, compared to $855.566 million at December 31, 2005, or an increase of 6.8%. Average deposits and rates by category for the pervious three years ended December 31 are as follows:

		Average Balance Outstanding for the												Average Rate Paid for the Year
		Year Ended December 31												Ended December 31
		2006				2005				2004				2006				2005				2004
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		$	78,654			$	73,501			$	62,634
Interest-bearing demand deposits			178,773				165,767				104,909				2.43	%			1.44	%			.46	%
Savings deposits			34,637				38,231				36,265				.28				.36				.20
Money market			139,177				143,652				123,013				3.28				2.37				1.27
Time deposits			387,365				320,014				266,201				4.37				3.42				3.22
Total deposits		$	818,606			$	741,165			$	593,022

Horizon continually revises and enhances its interest-bearing consumer and commercial demand deposit products based on local market conditions and its need for funding to support various types of assets. These product changes caused the changes in the average balances and rates paid as displayed in the table above.

Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more, which are considered to be rate sensitive and are not considered a part of core deposits, mature as follows as of December 31, 2006:

Due in three months or less		$	53,053
Due after three months through six months			5,984
Due after six months through one year			7,772
Due after one year			987

Interest expense on time certificates of $100,000 or more was approximately $5.533 million, $2.059 million and $1.762 million for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

As of December 31, 2006, Horizon does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Company’s financial condition, change in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors. The term “off-balance sheet arrangement” generally means any transaction, agreement, or other contractual arrangement to which an entity unconsolidated with the Company is a party under which the Company has (i) any obligation arising under a guarantee contract, derivative instrument or variable interest; or (ii) a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to such entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support for such assets.

Contractual Obligations

		Within One				One to Three				Three to				After Five
		Year				Years				Five Years				Years
Deposits		$	867,754			$	45,435			$	276			$	508
Long-term debt obligations (1)			23,195				15,411				30,275				47,070
Subordinated debentures (2)															40,209

		Expiration by Period
						Greater
		Within				Than One
		One Year				Year
Letters of credit		$	1,744			$	1,256
Unfunded loan commitments			94,140				60,546

During 2001, Horizon initiated a Shareholder Value Plan. The Plan is a comprehensive strategic plan to broaden and improve the market for Horizon’s common stock with local community investors who have a long-term, personal interest in helping Horizon remain an independent community bank. It includes improved communications with stockholders and customers as well as efforts to improve the marketability of its common stock. During the fourth quarter of 2001, two important components of the Shareholder Value Plan were completed. These included a 3-for-1 stock split and the listing of Horizon’s stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market (formerly named the NASDAQ SmallCap Market) and effective February 1, 2007, Horizon is listed on Nasdaq Global Market. Before this, Horizon’s stock was traded on the Bulletin Board. A dividend reinvestment plan was implemented in early 2002 and the quarterly per share dividend was increased to $.10 2/3 in the fourth quarter of 2002. In October of 2003, Horizon’s Board of Director’s declared a 3-for-2 stock split and in December of 2003 increased the dividend to $.12. In December 2004, the Board of Director’s increased the quarterly dividend to $.13 per share and in December 2005, the Board of Director’s increased the quarterly dividend to $.14 per share.

The capital resources of Horizon and the Bank exceed regulatory capital ratios for “well capitalized” banks at December 31, 2006. Stockholders’ equity totaled $61.877 million as of December 31, 2006, compared to $53.530 million as of December 31, 2005. At year-end 2006, the ratio of stockholders’ equity to assets was 5.06% compared to 4.75% for 2005. Horizon’s capital increased during the year 2006 as a result of increased earnings, net of dividends declared, exercise of stock options and net of tax, decrease in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale and the amortization of unearned compensation. Due to the acquisition of Alliance for cash, the percentage growth in assets was greater than the percentage growth in equity, causing the equity to asset ratio from 2004 to 2005 to decrease.

Horizon declared dividends in the amount of $.56 per share in 2006, and $.53 per share in 2005 and $.49 per share in 2004. The dividend payout ratio (dividends as a percent of net income) was 24% during 2006, 23% during 2005 and 21% during 2004. For additional information regarding dividend conditions, see Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In March 2002, Horizon formed Horizon Statutory Trust I (Trust I), a statutory business trust. Trust I issued $12 million of Trust Preferred Capital Securities as a participant in a pooled trust preferred securities offering. Horizon issued subordinated debentures aggregating $12 million to Trust I. The junior subordinated debentures are the sole assets of Trust I. The junior subordinated debentures and the trust preferred securities pay interest and dividends, respectively, on a quarterly basis. The junior subordinated debentures and the securities bear interest at a rate of 90 day LIBOR plus 3.60% and mature on March 26, 2032, and are noncallable for five years. After that period, the securities may be called at any quarterly interest payment date at par. These securities have been called and will be redeemed on March 26, 2007. Costs associated with the issuance of the securities totaling $362 thousand were capitalized and are being amortized to the first call date of the securities.

In October of 2004, Horizon formed Horizon Bancorp Capital Trust II (Trust II), a statutory business trust. Trust II issued $10 million of Trust Preferred Capital Securities as a participant in a pooled trust preferred securities offering. Horizon issued junior subordinated debentures aggregating $10 million to Trust II. The junior subordinated debentures are the sole assets of Trust II. The junior subordinated debentures and the trust preferred securities pay interest and dividends, respectively, on a quarterly basis. The junior subordinated debentures and the securities bear interest at a rate of 90 day LIBOR plus 1.95% and mature on October 21, 2034, and are noncallable for five years. After that period, the securities may be called at any quarterly interest payment date at par. Costs associated with the issuance of the securities totaling $17,500 were capitalized and are being amortized to the first call date of the securities.

The Company assumed additional debentures as the result of the acquisition of Alliance in 2005. In June 2004, Alliance formed Alliance Financial Statutory Trust I (Alliance Trust) to issue the $5 million in trust preferred securities. Alliance had issued junior subordinated debentures aggregating $5 million to Alliance Trust. The junior subordinated debentures are the sole assets of Alliance Trust. The junior subordinated debentures and the trust preferred securities pay interest and dividends, respectively, on a quarterly basis. The junior subordinated debentures and the securities bear interest at a rate of 90 day LIBOR plus 2.65%, mature in June 2034, and are noncallable for five years. After that period, the securities may be called at any quarterly interest payment date at par.

In December of 2006, Horizon formed Horizon Bancorp Capital Trust III (Trust III), a statutory business trust. Trust III issued $12 million of Trust Preferred Capital Securities as a participant in a pooled trust preferred securities offering. Horizon issued junior subordinated debentures aggregating $12 million to Trust III. The junior subordinated debentures are the sole assets of Trust III. The junior subordinated debentures and the trust preferred securities pay interest and dividends, respectively, on a quarterly basis. The junior subordinated debentures and the securities bear interest at a rate of 90 day LIBOR plus 1.65% and mature on January 30, 2037, and are noncallable for five years. After that period, the securities may be called at any quarterly interest payment date at par. Costs associated with the issuance of the securities totaling $12,647 were capitalized and are being amortized to the first call date of the securities. The proceeds of this issue will be used to redeem the securities issued by Trust I on March 26, 2007.

The Trust Preferred Capital Securities, subject to certain limitations, are included in Tier 1 Capital for regulatory purposes. At December 31, 2006, $20.605 million of the $39 million in securities were not included in Tier 1 Capital for regulatory purposes. Dividends on the Trust Preferred Capital Securities are recorded as interest expense.

The Bank purchases home mortgages from mortgage companies under warehouse agreements whereby the mortgage company has the right to repurchase the loan. Because these transactions are sales of the loans to the Bank and the Bank is the owner of the purchased loans, the Bank has historically treated these loans as home mortgage loans for call report and regulatory capital purposes. During the course of the routine, periodic examination by bank regulatory authorities commenced in February 2003, the examination personnel raised the issue of whether the Bank’s mortgage warehouse loans should be treated as other loans rather than as home mortgage loans for call report purposes. If these mortgage loans were treated as other loans, it would change the calculations for risk-based capital and reduce the Bank’s risk-based capital ratios. The following table shows, for year-ends in

2006, 2005 and 2004 the amount of the Bank’s risk-based and Tier 1 capital ratios as reported and as they would be under this alternative treatment:

Horizon Bank and						Alternative				Minimum Required To
Horizon Bancorp as of:		Reported				Treatment				Be Well Capitalized
December 31, 2006
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Consolidated			12.92	%			12.06	%			N/A
Bank			11.26	%			10.52	%			10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Consolidated			9.23	%			8.62	%			N/A
Bank			10.16	%			9.49	%			6.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets)
Consolidated			6.25	%			6.25	%			N/A
Bank			6.89	%			6.89	%			5.00	%
December 31, 2005
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Consolidated			11.54	%			10.81	%			N/A
Bank			11.82	%			11.06	%			10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Consolidated			8.84	%			8.28	%			N/A
Bank			10.66	%			9.97	%			6.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets)
Consolidated			5.83	%			5.83	%			N/A
Bank			7.02	%			7.03	%			5.00	%
December 31, 2004
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Consolidated			13.95	%			12.52	%			N/A
Bank			13.62	%			12.11	%			10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Consolidated			11.71	%			10.51	%			N/A
Bank			12.37	%			10.97	%			6.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets)
Consolidated			7.37	%			7.37	%			N/A
Bank			7.78	%			7.78	%			5.00	%

If the Bank is required to reclassify such loans, the Bank still meets the regulatory ”well capitalized” standards for all of 2006, 2005 and 2004. Bank regulators have not issued a final opinion on this matter but management continues to believe that these loans are properly characterized for risk-based capital purposes. However, there is no assurance that the regulators will concur with that determination. If required to treat mortgage warehouse loans as commercial loans, the Bank will consider increasing the amount of its capital through the issuance of subordinated debt, trust preferred securities or equity securities; or consider other alternatives.

As a condition of approval for the Alliance acquisition, the OCC required Horizon Bank to maintain regulatory capital ratios at 100 basis points above the well capitalized minimums shown above.

As of December 31, 2006, management is not aware of any other recommendations by banking regulatory authorities, which, if they were to be implemented, would have or are reasonably likely to have a material effect on Horizon’s liquidity, capital resources or operations.

Results of Operations

Net Income

Consolidated net income was $7.484 million or $2.33 per diluted share in 2006, $7.091 million or $2.24 per diluted share in 2005 and $6.935 million or $2.22 per share in 2004.

Net Interest Income

The primary source of earnings for Horizon is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between what Horizon has earned on assets it has invested and the interest paid on deposits and other funding sources. The net interest margin is net interest income expressed as a percentage of average earning assets. Horizon’s earning assets consist of loans, investment securities and interest-bearing balances in banks.

		2006												2005												2004
		Average								Yield/				Average								Yield/				Average								Yield/
		Balance				Interest				Rate				Balance				Interest				Rate				Balance				Interest				Rate
Assets
Interest-bearing assets Loans – total (1) (3)		$	785,448			$	57,282				7.29	%		$	640,758			$	44,749				6.98	%		$	514,916			$	33,386				6.48	%
Taxable investment securities, including FRB and FHLB stock			190,670				8,348				4.38				244,495				9,610				3.93				192,419				7,211				3.75
Nontaxable investment securities (2)			65,773				2,796				4.25				54,806				2,372				4.32				52,722				2,264				4.29
Interest-bearing balances and money market investments (4)			4,469				153				3.42				1,177				38				3.23				4,924				69				1.40
Federal funds sold			1,890				101				5.34				755				24				3.18				4,560				58				1.28
Total interest-earning assets			1,048,250				68,680				6.55				941,991				56,793				6.03				769,541				42,988				5.59
Noninterest-earning assets Cash and due from banks			21,525												19,610												16,822
Allowance for loan losses			(8,723	)											(7,615	)											(6,985	)
Other assets			57,053												46,127												39,547
Total assets		$	1,118,105											$	1,000,113											$	818,925
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities Savings deposits		$	34,637				96				.28	%		$	38,231				139				.36			$	36,265				74				.20
Money market			139,177				4,559				3.28				143,652				3,414				2.37				123,013				1,558				1.27
Interest-bearing demand deposits			178,773				4,164				2.33				165,767				2,385				1.44				104,909				482				.46
Time deposits			387,365				16,915				4.37				320,014				10,934				3.42				266,200				8,579				3.22
Short-term borrowings			78,747				2,035				2.58				45,517				1,573				3.46				37,205				600				1.61
Long-term debt			157,179				9,366				5.95				155,393				7,475				4.81				135,362				6,273				4.63
Total interest-bearing liabilities			975,878				37,135				3.81				868,574				25,920				2.98				702,954				17,566				2.50
Noninterest-bearing liabilities Demand deposits			78,654												73,501												62,634
Other liabilities			6,138												6,153												5,013
Stockholders’ equity			57,435												51,885												48,324
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	1,118,105											$	1,000,113											$	818,925
Net interest income						$	31,545											$	30,873											$	25,422
Net interest income as a percent of interest earning assets											3.01	%											3.28	%											3.31	%