QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Filed by the Registrant ý

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

o

 

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

 

COGENT COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

 

No fee required.

o

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
    (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
        
 
    (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
        
 
    (5)   Total fee paid:
        
 

o

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        
 
    (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
        
 
    (3)   Filing Party:
        
 
    (4)   Date Filed:
        
 

LOGO

2450 N Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20037
(202) 295-4200

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 3, 2017

        The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), will be held on May 3, 2017, at 9:00 a.m., local time, at the Company's offices at 2450 N Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20037, for the following purposes:

        The foregoing matters are described in more detail in the enclosed Proxy Statement.

        The Board of Directors has fixed March 10, 2017 as the record date for determining stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

        The Company's Proxy Statement is attached hereto. Financial and other information about the Company is contained in the enclosed 2016 Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

        You are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person. Your participation in these matters is important, regardless of the number of shares you own. Whether or not you expect to attend in person, we urge you to complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card as promptly as possible in the enclosed envelope. If you choose to attend the meeting you may then vote in person if you so desire, even though you may have executed and returned the proxy. Any stockholder who executes such a proxy may revoke it at any time before it is exercised. A proxy may be revoked at any time before it is exercised by delivering written notice of revocation to the Company, Attention: Ried Zulager; by delivering a duly executed proxy bearing a later date to the Company; or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

    By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

 

GRAPHIC
    Ried Zulager, Secretary

Washington, D.C.
March 23, 2017


COGENT COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
Stockholder Meeting to Be Held at 9:00 a.m., May 3, 2017

        The proxy statement and annual report to stockholders (Form 10-K) are available at: http://www.cogentco.com/en/about-cogent/investor-relations/reports.

        The materials available at the website are the proxy statement and annual report to stockholders (Form 10-K).

        The annual stockholder meeting of the stockholders of Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") will be held at 9:00 a.m. on May 3, 2017 at Cogent's offices at 2450 N Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20037. The matters to be covered are noted below:

        The Board of Directors of Cogent recommends voting FOR Proposal 1—Election of Directors, FOR Proposal 2—Ratification of Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, FOR Proposal 3—Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation, FOR "Every Year" on Proposal 4—Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation, and FOR Proposal 5—Approval of the 2017 Incentive Award Plan.

        You are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person. Your participation in these matters is important, regardless of the number of shares you own. Whether or not you expect to attend in person, we urge you to complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card as promptly as possible in the enclosed envelope. If you choose to attend the meeting you may then vote in person if you so desire, even though you may have executed and returned the proxy. Any stockholder who executes such a proxy may revoke it at any time before it is exercised. A proxy may be revoked at any time before it is exercised by delivering written notice of revocation to the Company, Attention: Ried Zulager; by delivering a duly executed proxy bearing a later date to the Company; or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

i


LOGO

2450 N Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20037
(202) 295-4200

PROXY STATEMENT

        The Board of Directors (the "Board") of Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (referred to herein as the "Company," "Cogent," "we," "us," or "our"), a Delaware corporation, is soliciting your proxy on the proxy card enclosed with this Proxy Statement. Your proxy will be voted at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Annual Meeting") to be held on May 3, 2017, at 9:00 a.m., local time, at the Company's offices at 2450 N Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20037, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. This Proxy Statement, the accompanying proxy card and the 2016 Annual Report to Stockholders are first being mailed to stockholders on or about March 23, 2017.


VOTING SECURITIES

Voting Rights and Outstanding Shares

        Only stockholders of record on the books of the Company as of 5:00 p.m., March 10, 2017 (the "Record Date"), will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on the Record Date, the outstanding voting securities of the Company consisted of 45,548,174 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share.

        Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders. Votes cast by proxy or in person at the Annual Meeting will be tabulated by the Inspector of Elections with the assistance of the Company's transfer agent. The Inspector will also determine whether or not a quorum is present. In general, our bylaws (the "Bylaws") provide that a quorum consists of a majority of the shares issued and outstanding and entitled to vote, the holders of which are present in person or represented by proxy. Broker non-votes (which occur when a brokerage firm has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner on a non-routine matter, as defined under applicable rules and as discussed in greater detail below) and abstentions are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present.

        Except in very limited circumstances, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares having voting power present in person or represented by proxy at a duly held meeting at which a quorum is present is required under the Bylaws for approval of proposals presented to stockholders, including Proposals 1, 2, 3 and 5. The outcome of Proposal 4 will be determined based on which option receives the affirmative vote of a plurality of the shares having voting power present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting.

        The shares represented by the proxies received, properly dated and executed and not revoked will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions of the stockholders. A proxy may be revoked at any time before it is exercised by:


        Any proxy that is returned using the form of proxy enclosed and which is not marked as to a particular item will be voted "FOR" the election of directors, "FOR" the ratification of the selection by the Audit Committee of the Board (the "Audit Committee") of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accountants, "FOR" the non-binding approval of the compensation of the named executive officers, "FOR" annual votes on the approval of the compensation of the named executive officers, and "FOR" the approval of the 2017 Incentive Award Plan.

        Proposals 1, 3, 4, and 5 are matters considered non-routine under applicable rules. A broker or other nominee cannot vote on these non-routine matters without specific voting instructions and therefore there may be broker non-votes on these proposals.

        Proposal 2 is a matter considered routine under applicable rules. A broker or other nominee may generally vote on routine matters without specific voting instructions, and therefore no broker non-votes are expected to exist in connection with Proposal 2.

        Broker non-votes will not be deemed to have voting power and thus will have no effect on voting. However, abstentions will be treated as present and having voting power, and accordingly will have the effect of a negative vote for purposes of determining the approval of Proposals 1, 2, 3, and 5.

        The Company believes that the tabulation procedures to be followed by the Inspector are consistent with the general statutory requirements in Delaware concerning voting of shares and determination of a quorum.

        The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. In addition, the Company may reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares for their expenses in forwarding solicitation materials to such beneficial owners. Proxies may also be solicited by certain of the Company's directors, officers and regular employees, without additional compensation, personally or by telephone or email.

2



PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

        Six directors are to be elected at the Annual Meeting to serve until their respective successors are elected and qualified. Nominees for election to the Board shall be approved by a majority of the votes cast by holders of our common stock present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting, each share being entitled to one vote.

        In the event any nominee is unable or unwilling to serve as a nominee, the proxies may be voted for the balance of those nominees named and for any substitute nominee designated by the present Board or the proxy holders to fill such vacancy, or for the balance of those nominees named without nomination of a substitute, or the Board may be reduced in accordance with the Bylaws. The Board has no reason to believe that any of the persons named will be unable or unwilling to serve as a nominee or as a director if elected.

        Set forth below is certain information concerning the six directors of the Company nominated to be elected at the Annual Meeting:

        Dave Schaeffer, age 60, founded our Company in August 1999 and is our Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President. Prior to founding the Company, Mr. Schaeffer was the founder of Pathnet, Inc., a broadband telecommunications provider, where he served as Chief Executive Officer from 1995 until 1997 and as Chairman from 1997 until 1999. Mr. Schaeffer has been a director since 1999. Mr. Schaeffer serves as both Chairman and Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") because he is the founder of the Company and has successfully led the Company and the board since the Company was founded. For this reason he has been nominated to continue serving on the Board. Since 2014 Mr. Schaeffer has been a director of CyberArk Software Ltd., (NASDAQ: CYBR) a publicly traded Israeli company.

        Steven D. Brooks, age 65, has served on our Board since October 2003. Mr. Brooks is a private investor. He was Managing Partner of BCP Capital Management from 1999 to 2009. From 1997 until 1999, Mr. Brooks headed the technology industry mergers and acquisition practice at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette. Previously, Mr. Brooks held a variety of positions in the investment banking and private equity fields, including: Head of Global Technology Banking at Union Bank of Switzerland, Managing Partner of Corporate Finance at Robertson Stephens, founder and Managing Partner of West Coast technology investment banking at Alex Brown & Sons, and Principal at Rainwater, Inc., a private equity firm in Fort Worth, Texas. Mr. Brooks has been nominated to continue serving on the Board because of his extensive experience with firms such as Cogent and with public market activities of such companies. Having been involved with the Company since its early days he also brings extensive historical perspective to the Board.

        Timothy Weingarten, age 41, has served on our Board since October 2003. Mr. Weingarten is currently a Product Manager at Pinterest. Prior to Pinterest, he was the co-founder & CEO of ShopTAP Inc. Prior to founding ShopTAP Inc., he was the Chairman and CEO of Visage Mobile. He is also a former General Partner of Worldview Technology Partners—an early stage venture capital fund. From 1996 to 2000, Mr. Weingarten was a member of the telecom equipment research group at Robertson Stephens and Company. Mr. Weingarten has been nominated to continue serving on the Board because of his extensive knowledge of the U.S. venture capital backed companies making use of the Internet. The Board values this insight because Cogent's future growth depends to a great extent on the uses made of the Internet.

        Richard T. Liebhaber, age 81, has served on our Board since March 2006. Mr. Liebhaber was with IBM from 1954 to 1985, where he held a variety of positions. Subsequently, he served as executive vice president and member of the management committee at MCI Communications, and served on the board of directors of MCI from 1992 to 1995. From 1995 to 2001, Mr. Liebhaber served as managing

3


director at Veronis, Suhler & Associates, a New York media merchant banking firm. Mr. Liebhaber has been nominated to continue serving on the Board because of his extensive operational experience with telecommunications companies.

        D. Blake Bath, age 54, has served on our Board since November 2006. He is currently engaged in philanthropic concerns. He is a board member of the Protestant Episcopal Cathedral Foundation in Washington DC, and a board member and the treasurer of the Bethesda-Chevy Chase Educational Foundation. From 2006 to 2016 he was the Chief Executive Officer of Bay Bridge Capital Management, LLC, an investment firm in Bethesda, MD. From 1996 until 2006, Mr. Bath was Managing Director at Lehman Brothers and, as a senior equity research analyst for Lehman Brothers, was Lehman's lead analyst covering wireline and wireless telecommunications services. Prior to joining Lehman Brothers he was the primary telecommunications analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein from 1992 to 1996. From 1989 to 1992 he was an analyst in the Strategic Planning and Corporate Finance organizations at MCI Communications. Mr. Bath has been nominated to continue serving on the Board because of his wide experience with the telecommunications industry which allows him to contribute a broad perspective to discussions about the Company's future activities and its place in the current competitive landscape.

        Marc Montagner, age 55, has served on our Board since April 2010. He is currently Chief Financial Officer at Endurance International Group Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: EIGI), which position he has held since September of 2015. He was previously Chief Financial Officer at LightSquared from 2012 until August 2015. Previously, he had been Executive Vice President of Strategy, Development and Distribution at LightSquared. On May 14, 2012, LightSquared filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Prior to joining LightSquared in February of 2009, Mr. Montagner was Managing Director and Co-Head of the Global Telecom, Media and Technology Merger and Acquisition Group at Banc of America Securities. Until August of 2006, he was Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and M&A with the Sprint Nextel Corporation. Prior to this, Mr. Montagner had the same responsibilities with Nextel Communications. Prior to 2002, Mr. Montagner was a Managing Director in the Media and Telecom Group at Morgan Stanley. Prior to joining Morgan Stanley, Mr. Montagner worked for France Télécom in New York where he was Head of Corporate Development for North America. He holds an M.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from the École Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications, in Paris, and an M.B.A. from Columbia University. Mr. Montagner has been nominated to the Board due to his extensive experience in the telecommunications industry, specifically with respect to operational, financial and strategic matters.

        Unless marked otherwise, proxies received will be voted "FOR" the election of each of the nominees named above.

Recommendation of the Board of Directors:

        The Board recommends a vote "FOR" the election of all nominees named above.


PROPOSAL NO. 2
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

        The Audit Committee of the Board has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. Services provided to the Company and its subsidiaries by Ernst & Young LLP in fiscal years 2015 and 2016 are described under "Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accountants—Fees and Services of Ernst & Young LLP," below.

        We are asking our stockholders to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accountants. Although ratification is not required by the Bylaws or otherwise, the

4


Board is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to our stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice.

        Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be available by telephone at the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so.

        The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on this item will be required for ratification. The Board recommends that stockholders vote "FOR" ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accountants for fiscal year 2017. Unless marked otherwise, proxies received will be voted "FOR" the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accountants for 2017.

        In the event stockholders do not ratify the appointment, the appointment may be reconsidered by the Audit Committee and the Board. The Company believes that neither the Audit Committee nor the Board is obliged to make any such reconsideration under Delaware law, the rules of the stock exchange on which the Company is listed, or the rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") that frame certain specific obligations of the members of all public company audit committees with respect to the selection of independent registered public accountants. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Recommendation of the Board of Directors:

        The Board recommends a vote "FOR" the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accountants for 2017.


PROPOSAL NO. 3
ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

        In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), we are asking stockholders to approve the following non-binding advisory resolution at the Annual Meeting:

        The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our shares of common stock represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on this item will be required for approval.

        Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board. However, the Board values stockholders' opinions and the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the advisory vote when considering future executive compensation decisions. The Board has adopted a policy of providing for annual advisory votes from stockholders to approve named executive officer compensation. The next such vote will occur at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, subject to the outcome of Proposal No. 4, the advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes to approve named executive officer compensation.

        As described in the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this Proxy Statement, our executive compensation program is designed to attract, reward, and retain highly talented executives to achieve our corporate goals and to align the interests of our executive officers with the long-term interests of our stockholders.

5


        In 2016, 54% of the votes cast were voted to approve the compensation of the named executive officers. As further discussed in the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this Proxy Statement, our Board of Directors believes that our CEO's compensation is reasonable and appropriate in light of the following factors:

        Our executive compensation program is designed to be simple, effective, and link the compensation of our executive officers to our performance. It reflects the size, scope, and success of our business, as well as the responsibilities of our executive officers. Our Board of Directors believes our executive compensation program appropriately rewards performance and is aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders.

        Our Board of Directors urges stockholders to carefully read the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this Proxy Statement, which describes in more detail our executive compensation philosophy, policies, and practices, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables and the accompanying narrative discussion.

Recommendation of the Board of Directors:

        Our Board of Directors recommends a vote "FOR" the resolution set forth above thereby approving the compensation of the named executive officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Summary Compensation Table and related tables, and the accompanying narrative discussion as set forth in this Proxy Statement.


PROPOSAL NO. 4
ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

        In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are asking stockholders to vote on the following advisory resolution at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders:

        Our stockholders voted on a similar proposal in 2011 with the majority voting to hold the stockholder advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation every year. After careful

6


consideration of both the advantages and disadvantages of each frequency option, our Board of Directors continues to believe that the most appropriate policy for the Company is to hold stockholders advisory votes to approve named executive officer compensation every year. Such annual votes will allow our stockholders to express their views and concerns without delay and thus provide our Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee with direct feedback regarding its annual decisions on our executive compensation philosophy, policies, and practices.

        It is expected that the next vote on the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes to approve named executive officer compensation will occur at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

        Although your vote is advisory and non-binding upon our Board of Directors, our Board of Directors will carefully review the voting results and take it into consideration when determining the frequency of future stockholders advisory votes to approve named executive officer compensation. In this proposal you are not voting to approve or disapprove any proposal or recommendation of our Board of Directors, but rather for the option you believe is the most appropriate (every one, two, or three years) for holding stockholders advisory votes to approve named executive officer compensation.

        The outcome of this Proposal will be determined based on which option receives the affirmative vote of a plurality of the shares having voting power present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting.

Recommendation of the Board of Directors:

        Our Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR "Every Year" for the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on named executive officer compensation.


PROPOSAL NO. 5
APPROVAL OF THE 2017 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN

        On February 22, 2017, the Board of Directors approved, subject to stockholder approval, the 2017 Incentive Award Plan which provides 1.2 million (1,200,000) shares for grant under its terms, plus any shares forfeited or not issued under grants outstanding under our Amended and Restated 2004 Incentive Award Plan. As of December 31, 2016, there were only 36,656 shares remaining available for issuance under the Amended and Restated 2004 Incentive Award Plan. As noted in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis below, we use equity compensation as an integral part of our compensation program by linking the personal interests of our employees, non-employee directors and consultants to the Company's success. Without the share increase provided by the new plan the Company will be limited in its ability and to attract, motivate and retain talented employees, non-employee directors and consultants, align employee and stockholder interests, link employee compensation with company performance and maintain a culture based on employee stock ownership.

7



Burn Rate

        The "burn rate" at which the Company has awarded stock and options to employees, including our named executive officers, in the last three years is set out below. The "burn rate" is the sum of the stock and option awards granted, divided by the number of weighted average common shares used in our basic earnings per share calculation.

(shares and options in thousands)
  2016   2015   2014   TOTAL   AVERAGE  

Options granted

    73     84     84     241     80  

Shares granted

    358     63     793     1,214     405  

TOTAL

    431     147     877     1,455     485  

Weighted average shares—basic EPS

    44,642                          

Burn rate—1 year

    0.97 %                        

Burn rate—3 year average

    1.09 %                        

        The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on this item will be required for approval of the 2017 Incentive Award Plan. If this proposal is not approved by our stockholders, the 2017 Incentive Plan will not become effective and the 1,200,000 shares provided for future grant will not be available.

        The principal features of the 2017 Incentive Award Plan are summarized below. The summary below is qualified by reference to the full text of the 2017 Incentive Award Plan which is included as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement.

Key Features of the 2017 Incentive Award Plan

8


Summary of the 2017 Incentive Award Plan

        General.    The purpose of the plan is to promote the success of the business and enhance the Company's value by linking the personal interests of employees, consultants and non-employee directors to its success and by providing these individuals with an incentive for outstanding performance. The plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, dividend equivalent rights, performance-based awards, deferred stock, stock payments and other stock-based awards (collectively, the "Awards").

        Shares Subject to the 2017 Incentive Award Plan.    The aggregate number of shares of our common stock that are available for issuance under the 2017 Incentive Award Plan are those that are approved by stockholders from time to time. The 2017 Incentive Award Plan authorizes 1,200,000 shares of stock for grants. In addition, shares granted under prior plans that are forfeited, lapse unexercised, are settled in cash or are not issued will be added to that amount.

        On February 28, 2017 the closing price of a share of our common stock as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market was $41.45.

        Administration.    Our Compensation Committee (the "Administrator") administers the 2017 Incentive Award Plan. The Administrator is authorized to determine the individuals who will receive Awards (the "participants"), the terms and conditions of such Awards, the types of Awards to be granted, the number of shares to be subject to each Award, the price of the Awards granted, payment terms and payment methods applicable to each Award. The Administrator is also authorized to establish, adopt or revise rules relating to the administration of the 2017 Incentive Award Plan. The Administrator may delegate its authority to grant or amend Awards with respect to participants other than senior executive officers subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, employees covered by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code or the officers to whom the authority to grant or amend Awards has been delegated.

        Eligibility.    Awards may be granted to individuals who are then employees, consultants or non-employee directors of our company or one of our subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated. As of February 28, 2017 we had 909 employees and six directors, five of whom were non-employee directors.

        Awards.    Each Award is set forth in a separate award agreement with the person receiving the Award. The award agreement indicates the type, terms and conditions of the Award.

9


10


        Performance Criteria.    Awards may be made subject to our achievement of the level specified by the Administrator for one or more of the following performance goals: net earnings or losses (either before or after one or more of the following: (i) interest, (ii) taxes, (iii) depreciation, (iv) amortization and (v) non-cash equity-based compensation expense), gross or net sales or revenue or sales or revenue growth, net income (either before or after taxes), adjusted net income, operating earnings or profit (either before or after taxes), cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow and free cash flow), return on assets, return on capital (or invested capital) and cost of capital, return on stockholders' equity, total stockholder return, return on sales, gross or net profit or operating margin, costs, reductions in costs and cost control measures, expenses, working capital, earnings or loss per share, adjusted earnings or loss per share, price per share or dividends per share (or appreciation in and/or maintenance of such price or dividends), regulatory achievements or compliance (including, without limitation, regulatory body approval for commercialization of a product), implementation or completion of critical projects, market share, economic value, productivity, expense margins, operating efficiency and customer satisfaction, any of which may be measured either in absolute terms or as compared to any incremental increase or decrease or as compared to results of a peer group or to market performance indicators or indices. The Administrator may provide that one or more objectively determinable adjustments be made to these performance goals.

        Limitations on Terms of Grants.    Absent approval of the stockholders, no option or stock appreciation right may be amended to reduce the per share exercise price of shares subject to such option or stock appreciation right below the per share exercise price as of the date the option or stock appreciation right is granted, and except as permitted by the 2017 Incentive Award Plan with respect to changes in capital structure, no option or stock appreciation right may be granted in exchange for, or in connection with, the cancellation or surrender of an option or stock appreciation right having a higher per share exercise price, nor may an option or stock appreciation right be exchanged for restricted stock. Restricted Stock and restricted stock units that do not vest on the basis of meeting performance targets shall not vest at a rate that would cause the following vesting schedule to be exceeded: no vesting prior to the first anniversary of the grant; no more than 1/3 vested on the first anniversary of

11


the grant; no more than 2/3 vested on the second anniversary of the grant; and full vesting not occurring prior to the end of the third year. All other Awards shall not vest prior to the first anniversary of the date the Award is granted. In addition, no individual participant may receive Awards under the 2017 Incentive Award Plan in excess of 750,000 shares or $10,000,000 in cash-based awards during any calendar year, and no non-employee director may receive Awards under the 2017 Incentive Award Plan in excess of $500,000 in total value (cash plus grant date fair value of equity awards), as adjusted for inflation, in any one calendar year.

        Certain Transactions.    In the event of certain transactions and events affecting our common stock or the share price of our common stock, such as stock dividends, stock splits, mergers, acquisitions, spin-offs, recapitalizations, consolidations and other corporate transactions, or changes in applicable law, the Administrator has broad discretion to make proportionate adjustments to reflect changes with respect to: (i) the terms and conditions of any outstanding Awards, (ii) the aggregate number and type of shares subject to the 2017 Incentive Award Plan and (iii) the grant and exercise price per share for any outstanding Awards granted pursuant to the 2017 Incentive Award Plan, to prevent the dilution or enlargement of intended benefits and/or facilitate such transactions or events or give effect to such changes in applicable law. In the event of a change in control where the acquirer does not assume or replace Awards granted under the 2017 Incentive Award Plan, such Awards will be subject to accelerated vesting so that 100% of such Awards will become vested and exercisable or payable and all forfeiture restrictions will lapse, as applicable. Award agreements may also provide for accelerated vesting or payment, as applicable, upon certain events.

        Awards Not Transferable.    Generally the Awards may not be assigned, transferred or otherwise disposed other than by will or by laws of descent and distribution. The Administrator may allow Awards other than incentive stock options to be transferred for estate or tax planning purposes to members of the holder's family, charitable institutions or trusts for the benefit of family members.

        Amendment and Termination of the 2017 Incentive Award Plan.    The Administrator may terminate, amend or modify the plan. However, stockholder approval of any amendment to the plan will be obtained (i) to the extent necessary and desirable to comply with any applicable law, regulation or stock exchange rule, (ii) for any amendment to the plan that increases the number of shares available under the plan (other than any adjustment as provided by the plan with respect to changes in capital structure), or (iii) for any amendment to the plan that permits the Administrator to extend the exercise period of an option or stock appreciation right beyond ten years from the date of grant. Absent approval of the stockholders, no option or stock appreciation right may be amended to reduce the per share exercise price of shares subject to such option or stock appreciation right below the per share exercise price as of the date the option or stock appreciation right is granted, and except as permitted by the plan with respect to changes in capital structure, no option or stock appreciation right may be granted in exchange for, or in connection with, the cancellation or surrender of an option or stock appreciation right having a higher per share exercise price, nor may an option or stock appreciation right be exchanged for restricted stock. If not terminated earlier by the Administrator, the plan expires ten years after the most recent date the plan was approved by our stockholders.

        U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences.    The tax consequences of the 2017 Incentive Award Plan under current federal law are summarized in the following discussion. This discussion is limited to the general tax principles applicable to the plan, and is intended for general information only. Non-U.S., state, and local income taxes are not discussed. Tax laws are complex and subject to change and may vary depending on individual circumstances and from locality to locality. The tax information summarized is not tax advice.

        Nonqualified Stock Options.    For federal income tax purposes, an optionee generally will not recognize taxable income at the time a non-qualified stock option is granted under the plan. The optionee will recognize ordinary income, and the Company generally will be entitled to a deduction,

12


upon the exercise of a non-qualified stock option. The amount of income recognized (and the amount generally deductible by the Company) generally will be equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise over the aggregate exercise price paid for the shares, regardless of whether the exercise price is paid in cash, shares or other property. An optionee's basis for the stock for purposes of determining his or her gain or loss upon a subsequent disposition of the shares generally will be the fair market value of the stock on the date of exercise of the non-qualified stock option, and any subsequent gain or loss will generally be taxable as capital gain or loss.

        Incentive Stock Options.    An optionee generally will not recognize taxable income either at the time an incentive stock option is granted or when it is exercised. However, the amount by which the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise exceeds the exercise price will be an "item of tax preference" to the optionee for purposes of alternative minimum tax. Generally, upon the sale or other taxable disposition of the shares acquired upon exercise of an incentive stock option, the optionee will recognize taxable income. If shares acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option are held for the longer of two years from the date of grant or one year from the date of exercise, the gain or loss (in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value on the date of sale and the exercise price) upon disposition will be treated as a long-term capital gain or loss, and the company will not be entitled to any deduction. If this holding period is not met and the stock is sold for a gain, then the difference between the option price and the fair market value of the stock on the date of exercise will be taxed as ordinary income and any gain over that will be eligible for long or short term capital gain treatment. If the holding period is not met and the shares are disposed of for less than the fair market value on the date of exercise, then the amount of ordinary income is limited to the excess, if any, of the amount realized over the exercise price paid. The Company generally will be entitled to a deduction in the amount of any ordinary income recognized by the optionee.

        Stock Appreciation Rights.    No taxable income is generally recognized upon the receipt of a stock appreciation right. Upon exercise of a stock appreciation right, the cash or the fair market value of the shares received generally will be taxable as ordinary income in the year of such exercise. The Company generally will be entitled to a compensation deduction for the same amount which the recipient recognizes as ordinary income.

        Restricted Stock.    A participant to whom restricted stock is issued generally will not recognize taxable income upon such issuance and the Company generally will not then be entitled to a deduction, unless an election is made by the participant under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code. However, when restrictions on shares of restricted stock lapse, such that the shares are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the participant generally will recognize ordinary income and the Company generally will be entitled to a deduction for an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date such restrictions lapse over the purchase price thereof. If an election is made under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, then the participant generally will recognize ordinary income on the date of issuance equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares on that date over the purchase price therefor and the Company will be entitled to a deduction for the same amount.

        Restricted Stock Unit.    A participant will generally not recognize taxable income upon the grant of a restricted stock unit. However, when the shares are delivered to the participant, the value of such shares at that time will be taxable to the participant as ordinary income. Generally the Company will be entitled to a deduction for an amount equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the participant.

        Deferred Stock.    A participant will generally not recognize taxable income upon the grant of deferred stock. However, when the shares are delivered to the participant, the value of such shares at that time will be taxable to the participant as ordinary income. Generally, the Company will be entitled to a deduction for an amount equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the participant.

13


        Stock Payments.    A participant will recognize taxable ordinary income on the fair market value of the stock delivered as payment of bonuses or other compensation under the Plan and generally the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction.

        Performance Awards.    A participant who has been granted a performance award (either performance unit or stock) generally will not recognize taxable income at the time of grant, and the Company will not be entitled to a deduction at that time. When an award is paid, whether in cash or shares, the Participant generally will recognize ordinary income, and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction.

        Section 162(m) Limitation.    In general, under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, income tax deductions of publicly-held corporations may be limited to the extent total compensation (including base salary, annual bonus, stock option exercises and non-qualified benefits paid) for certain executive officers exceeds $1,000,000 (less the amount of any "excess parachute payments" as defined in Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code) in any one year. However, under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, the deduction limit does not apply to certain "performance-based compensation" established by an independent compensation committee which is adequately disclosed to, and approved by, stockholders. In particular, stock options and stock appreciation rights will satisfy the "performance-based compensation" exception if the awards are made by a qualifying compensation committee, the 2017 Incentive Award Plan sets the maximum number of shares that can be granted to any person within a specified period and the compensation is based solely on an increase in the stock price after the grant date (i.e., the option exercise price is equal to or greater than the fair market value of the stock subject to the award on the grant date). Restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance unit/share Awards granted under the 2017 Incentive Award Plan may qualify as "qualified performance-based compensation" for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code if such awards are granted or vest upon pre-established objective performance measures based on the performance goals described above under the section entitled "Performance Awards," and the other technical requirements for granting such Awards are met at the time the performance based awards are granted.

New Plan Benefits

        There are currently approximately 909 employees and 5 non-employee directors who would be eligible to receive awards under the 2017 Incentive Award Plan. The number of Awards that an employee may receive under the 2017 Incentive Award Plan is in the discretion of the Compensation Committee, and no final determination has been made as to the type or amount of awards that will be granted in the future to specific individuals. However, based on planned awards the use of shares from the 2017 Incentive Plan is shown in the table below. The awards shown in the table are those for 2017. No estimate of awards in subsequent years can be provided. Additionally, please refer to the 2016 Summary Compensation Table, the 2016 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table and the Director Compensation Table in this proxy statement that provide information regarding awards granted to our Named Executive Officers and non-employee directors during fiscal year 2016.

14



Planned 2017 Awards

Name and Position
  Compensation
Value ($)(1)
  Number of
Shares of
Restricted
Stock
 

Dave Schaeffer(2) 

  $ 6,963,600     168,000  

Founder and Chief Executive Officer

             

Thaddeus G. Weed(3)

  $ 1,005,163     24,250  

Chief Financial Officer

             

Robert N. Beury, Jr.(3)

  $ 497,400     12,000  

Chief Legal Officer

             

Timothy G. O'Neill(3)

  $ 497,400     12,000  

Vice President of Field Engineering, Construction and Network Operations

             

James Bubeck(3)

  $ 497,400     12,000  

Chief Revenue Officer and Vice President of Global Sales

             

Executive Officer Group(4)

  $ 10,455,763     252,250  

Non-Executive Officer Director Group(5)

  $ 1,450,750     35,000  

Non-Executive Officer Employee Group

    ND     ND  

ND means not determined at this time.

(1)
The compensation value is based on the closing price of our stock on February 28, 2017—$41.45.

(2)
One half of the shares are to be time based and one-half are to be performance based. The number of performance based shares in the table is the target amount. See the section "Expected Compensation in 2017" for a fuller description.

(3)
80% of the shares are to be time based and 20% are to be performance based.

(4)
Consists of Dave Schaeffer, Robert Beury, James Bubeck, Thaddeus Weed, R. Brad Kummer, Timothy O'Neill and Henry Kilmer.

(5)
Represents the aggregate annual grants of restricted stock to currently eligible non-employee directors equal to 7,000 shares of our common stock, expected to occur under the 2017 Incentive Award Plan in 2017 in respect of their services as a non-employee director. For further discussion regarding our current director compensation program (including equity grants made to our non-employee directors in 2016), see the section entitled "Director Compensation."

15


Equity Compensation Plan

        The following table provides certain information as of December 31, 2016 about our common stock that may be issued under our existing Amended and Restated 2004 Incentive Award Plan:


Equity Compensation Plan Information

Plan Category
  Number of
Securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
  Weighted-
average exercise
price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
  Number of Securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column(a))
 
 
  (a)
  (b)
  (c)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

    175,981   $ 32.41     36,656  

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

    0     0      

Total

    175,981   $ 32.41     36,656  

Recommendation of the Board of Directors:

The Board recommends a vote "FOR" the approval of the 2017 Incentive Award Plan.

16



THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES

        The Board of Directors met five times during 2016. Each director attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board. Each director attended at least 75% of the meetings of the committees of the Board of which he was a member. The independent directors met four times. All of the directors attended the annual meeting of stockholders. During 2016, the Board had a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

        Mr. Schaeffer serves as CEO and Chairman of the Board. He is the founder of the Company and owns approximately 8.45% of the Company's stock. His dual role was established more than 17 years ago when he founded the Company. The Board believes that at the Company's current stage of growth the Board is best served by a chairman who is involved with the Company on a full-time basis, fully knowledgeable of both the Company's financial and operational workings, and is therefore able to bring great depth of knowledge about the Company to this role. The Board does not have a designated lead independent director.

        The Board's role in the Company is to provide general oversight of strategy and operations. As part of its oversight of operations it reviews the performance of the Company and the risks involved in the operations of the Company. The Board and the Audit Committee receive regular reports on the status of the Company's internal controls and each has reviewed key operational risks. The Board's risk oversight role has no effect on its leadership structure as all directors other than Mr. Schaeffer are independent directors and therefore have no conflict that might discourage critical review.

        We established our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board (the "Nominating and Governance Committee") in April 2005. During all of 2016 the members of this committee were Messrs. Brooks (Chairman) and Montagner, each of whom are independent members of our Board. Our Board has adopted a charter governing the activities of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may be found on the Company's website under the tab "About Cogent; Investor Relations; Corporate Governance" at www.cogentco.com. Pursuant to its charter, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee's tasks include assisting the Board in identifying individuals qualified to become Board members, recommending to the Board director nominees to fill vacancies in the membership of the Board as they occur and, prior to each annual meeting of stockholders, recommending director nominees for election at such meeting.

        The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks diversity of perspective in considering the membership of the Board. It does not have precise measures for the optimal range and type of diversity desirable. Instead it and the Board seek candidates with a range of experience. Board candidates are considered based upon various criteria, such as skills, knowledge, perspective, broad business judgment and leadership, relevant specific industry or regulatory affairs knowledge, business creativity and vision, experience, and any other factors appropriate in the context of an assessment of the committee's understood needs of the Board at that time. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers whether the individual satisfies criteria for independence as may be required by applicable regulations and personal integrity and judgment. Accordingly, the Company seeks to attract and retain highly qualified directors who have sufficient time to attend to their substantial duties and responsibilities to the Company.

        The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has the sole authority to retain, compensate, and terminate any search firm or firms to be used in connection with the identification, assessment, and/or engagement of directors and director candidates. No such firm has been retained by the Company in the past.

17


        The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers proposed nominees whose names are submitted to it by stockholders; however, it does not have a formal process for that consideration. The Company has not to date adopted a formal process because it believes that the informal consideration process has been adequate. The committee intends to review periodically whether a more formal policy should be adopted. If a stockholder wishes to suggest a proposed name for committee consideration, the stockholder should comply with the provisions of the Company's Bylaws, including without limitation, sending the name of that nominee and related personal information to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, in care of our Secretary, at least three months before the next annual meeting to ensure meaningful consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. See "Stockholder Proposals" for Bylaw requirements for nominations.

        The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee had one formal meeting in 2016. All meetings and activities of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee were held in conjunction with a meeting of the full board to accommodate the views of all members of the Board concerning its membership and constitution.

        The Audit Committee is established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. During all of 2016 the members of this committee were Messrs. Liebhaber (Chairman), Bath and Montagner, each of whom is independent as the term "independence" is defined in the applicable listing standards of Nasdaq Marketplace Rules and Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Liebhaber, Bath and Montagner qualifies as a financial expert, as that term is defined in the Exchange Act. The responsibilities of this Audit Committee include:

        The Audit Committee met four times during 2016. The charter of the Audit Committee may be found under the tab "About Cogent; Investor Relations; Corporate Governance" at www.cogentco.com.


Audit Committee Report

To the Board of Directors:

        We have reviewed and discussed with management the Company's audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016.

        We have discussed with the independent registered public accountants, Ernst & Young LLP, the matters required to be discussed with us by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Nasdaq Stock Market and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, including those required by the Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended.

18


        We have received and reviewed the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and have discussed with Ernst & Young LLP their independence, including the written disclosures and letter required by Rule 3526 of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

        Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, we recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements referred to above be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Board of Directors caused the Form 10-K to be so filed.

Audit Committee:
Richard T. Liebhaber
Marc Montagner
D. Blake Bath

        Through May 2016, the Compensation Committee of the Board ("Compensation Committee") consisted of Messrs. Brooks and Weingarten. In May 2016, the Board reconstituted the Compensation Committee and made each independent director a member of the committee. Accordingly, the membership of the Compensation Committee became Messrs. Brooks, Weingarten, Liebhaber, Bath, and Montagner, each of whom is independent as the term "independence" is defined in the applicable listing standards of the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules. The Compensation Committee does not have a chairman. The Compensation Committee is responsible for determining the compensation for our executive officers and other employees, and administering our compensation programs. The Compensation Committee had three formal meetings in 2016 and took one written action. Salary and equity compensation awards for all of the executive officers and key employees of the Company were considered during these meetings and Mr. Schaeffer was absent from any discussions concerning his compensation. The charter of the Compensation Committee is available under the tab "About Cogent; Investor Relations; Corporate Governance" at www.cogentco.com.

        The Company has not to date developed formal processes by which stockholders may communicate directly to directors (other than at the annual meeting). It believes that an informal process has served it well, especially given the very substantial amount of its stock held by institutional investors. In the past several institutional investors communicated with the Board and CEO. The investor communications were addressed by direct communications with representatives of the investors. Accordingly, the Board considers that an effective and well established traditional means of receiving communications from stockholders currently exists. In view of the SEC disclosure requirements relating to this issue, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may consider development of more specific procedures. Until any other procedures are developed and posted on the Company's corporate website at www.cogentco.com, any communications to the Board should be sent to it in care of our Secretary.

        The Company's Code of Conduct may be found on the Company's website under the tab "About Cogent; Investor Relations; Corporate Governance" at www.cogentco.com.

19


        The Company encourages all of its directors to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All of the directors attended the 2016 Annual Meeting. The Company generally holds a Board meeting coincident with the Annual Meeting to minimize director travel obligations and facilitate their attendance at the Annual Meeting.

        Nasdaq Marketplace Rules require that a majority of the Board be independent. No director qualifies as independent unless the Board determines that the director has no direct or indirect relationship with the Company that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. In assessing the independence of its members, the Board examined the commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and familial relationships of each member. The Board's inquiry extended to both direct and indirect relationships with the Company. Based upon both detailed written submissions by its members and discussions regarding the facts and circumstances pertaining to each member, considered in the context of applicable Nasdaq Marketplace Rules, the Board has determined that all of the directors nominated for election, other than Mr. Schaeffer, are independent.


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND SIGNIFICANT EMPLOYEES

        Set forth below is certain information concerning the executive officers and significant employees of the Company. Biographical information on Mr. Schaeffer is included under "Proposal 1—Election of Directors."

        Thaddeus G. Weed, age 55, joined us in 2000 and served as Vice President and Controller until May 2004 when he became our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Weed served as Senior Vice President of Finance and Treasurer at Transaction Network Services, Inc. where Mr. Weed undertook a broad range of financial management responsibilities. From 1987 to 1997, Mr. Weed was employed at Arthur Andersen LLP where he served as Senior Audit Manager.

        Robert N. Beury, Jr., age 63, joined us in 2000 and serves as Chief Legal Officer (Vice President and General Counsel) and Assistant Secretary. Prior to joining us, Mr. Beury served as Deputy General Counsel of Iridium LLC, a mobile satellite service provider, from 1994 to 2000. From 1987 to 1994, Mr. Beury was General Counsel of Virginia's Center for Innovative Technology, a non-profit corporation set up to develop the high tech industry in Virginia.

        R. Brad Kummer, age 68, joined us in 2000 and serves as Vice President of Optical Transport Engineering and Chief Technology Officer. Mr. Kummer spent the 25 years prior to joining us at Lucent Technologies (formerly Bell Laboratories), where he served in a variety of research and development and business development roles relating to optical fibers and systems. In his most recent work at Lucent, he was responsible for optical fiber systems engineering for long haul and metropolitan dense wavelength division multiplexing systems.

        Timothy G. O'Neill, age 61, joined us in 2001 and serves as the Vice President of Field Engineering, Construction and Network Operations. He is responsible for network operation, construction and maintenance. From 1999 to 2001, Mr. O'Neill was employed at @Link Networks, Inc. where he served as Chief Network Officer. While at @Link Networks, Inc., Mr. O'Neill was responsible for engineering, implementing and operating a network for Internet access and layer 2 services.

        Bryant Hird "Guy" Banks, age 52, joined us in 2000 and serves as Vice President of Real Estate. Prior to joining us Mr. Banks held positions with various affiliates of Security Capital Group Incorporated, including the positions of Vice President of Land Acquisition and Vice President of Development for CWS Communities Trust.

20


        Henry W. Kilmer, age 48, joined us in 2011 and serves as Vice President of IP Engineering. Prior to joining us, Mr. Kilmer held positions with UUNET (now Verizon), Sprint, Digex/Intermedia and Metromedia Fiber Networks/Abovenet where he was Senior Vice President of Engineering and Operations. Most recently, Mr. Kilmer was President of Terrapin Communications, Inc., a small consulting firm which focused on network consulting and technical strategy development for companies like GPX, Airband, and Switch and Data (now part of Equinix).

        James Bubeck, age 50, was appointed as our Chief Revenue Officer and Vice President of Global Sales effective October 1, 2015. Mr. Bubeck has served in the sales organization of Cogent in various capacities since May of 2000, most recently, since 2007, as Vice President of Central Region Sales, based in Chicago. From 1996 to 2000 he was a sales manager for MCI's internet network business, which was subsequently divested to Cable and Wireless due to the merger of MCI and Worldcom.


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

        This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the compensation program for our Principal Executive Officer, our Principal Financial Officer, and the next three most highly-compensated Executive Officers of the Company during 2016 (the "Named Executive Officers"). During 2016, these individuals were:

        This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the material elements of our executive compensation program during 2016. It also provides an overview of our executive compensation philosophy and objectives. Finally, it analyzes how and why we arrived at the specific compensation decisions for our executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers, for 2016, including the key factors that the Compensation Committee considered in determining their compensation. We note that, at this time as well as during all of 2016, the functions of the Compensation Committee were largely undertaken by the independent members of our Board of Directors (the "Board").

Response to 2016 Stockholder Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

        At our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, approximately 54% of the votes cast on the stockholder advisory proposal to approve the compensation of the named executive officers (commonly known as a "Say-on-Pay" vote) were voted in favor of their 2015 compensation. While this represented majority support of the proposal, the Board recognized that these results were less than what it considered to be satisfactory, particularly in light of the fact that only 41% of the votes cast on our 2015 Say-on-Pay proposal were voted in favor of the named executive officer's compensation.

        As a result of our Board of Directors' disappointment in the vote result and in recognition of the need to better understand the views of our stockholders on our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee directed our CEO to contact our major stockholders to gather feedback on their views and concerns. Subsequently, he did so as part of his regular meetings with our institutional stockholders. While he learned from the representatives of these institutional stockholders with whom he spoke that they were generally supportive of our executive compensation program, he also learned

21


that, in the case of many of them, their voting decisions on the matters subject to stockholder action at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders were often determined based on the recommendations of the major proxy advisory firms. Consequently, our Board of Directors determined to address the feedback we received from our institutional stockholders so as to improve the outcome of future Say-on-Pay votes.

        The Compensation Committee engaged Compensia, a nationally recognized compensation consulting firm, to assist with a comprehensive review our executive compensation program and to help it better understand the expectations of the major proxy advisory firms as well as current executive compensation "best practices." The Compensation Committee carefully considered the reasons for the unfavorable vote recommendations of the major proxy advisory firm with respect to our 2016

22


Say-on-Pay proposal. As a result of this review, as well as its assessment of the recommendations of Compensia, in October 2016 the Compensation Committee took the following actions:

Compensation Practice
  Issue   Our Response   Effective
Date of
Response
 

Timing of equity award grants

  Size of equity awards given historical practice of granting awards every other year   Adopted policy of granting equity awards (if appropriate) to executive officers annually as part of each executive officer's compensation review     2016  

Type of equity awards granted

 

Exclusive use of time-based equity awards

 

Introduced performance-based equity awards for CEO and other executive officers (see below)

   
2016
 

     

At least half of value of all future equity awards granted to CEO to be performance-based

   
2017
 

"Single trigger" equity acceleration upon change in control of Company

 

Absence of "double trigger" requirement for equity acceleration upon change in control of Company

 

All future equity awards granted to CEO will be eligible for accelerated vesting only in event of change in control of the Company and subsequent involuntary termination of employment

   
2017
 

Stock ownership policy

 

Absence of formal stock ownership policy

 

Adopted stock ownership policy for CEO and members of Board of Directors, including requirement that they hold shares acquired pursuant to equity awards, except for those shares necessary to pay taxes, until such time as they satisfy applicable stock ownership level

   
2016
 

Compensation recovery ("clawback") policy

 

Absence of formal compensation recovery ("clawback") policy

 

Adopted a formal compensation recovery ("clawback") policy for executive officers

   
2016
 

Hedging of equity securities

 

Absence of formal policy prohibiting executive officers from hedging Company's equity securities

 

Adopted a formal policy prohibiting employees, including executive officers and members of Board of Directors from hedging Company's equity securities

   
2016
 

Pledging of equity securities

 

Absence of formal policy prohibiting executive officers from pledging Company's equity securities

 

Adopted a formal policy prohibiting employees, including executive officers, and members of Board of Directors from pledging Company's equity securities on a non-recourse basis

   
2016
 

23


2016 Performance-Based Restricted Stock Awards

        In May 2016, we granted performance-based equity awards to our executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers, as the initial phase in integrating performance-based equity awards, as appropriate, into our long-term incentive compensation program.

        Our Board intends to include performance-based equity awards (as well as time based awards) in restricted stock awards expected to be granted in 2017 (assuming that the 2017 Incentive Award Plan in Proposal 5 in this proxy statement is approved by stockholders).

        Going forward, our Board intends to carefully consider feedback from our stockholders regarding our executive compensation program. Our stockholders are invited to express their views to the Compensation Committee as described under "Stockholder Communication with Board Members" in this proxy statement.

Executive Compensation Program Overview

        We sell high speed Internet and related services to business. That has been our business plan since Cogent was organized in 1999. We continued to focus on that plan in 2016 and on maximizing shareholder return. In 2016 service revenue increased to $446.9 million, an increase of 10.6% from 2015. Dividends in 2016 totaled $68.2 million, or $1.51 per share. Our financial results are discussed in greater detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 that accompanies this proxy.

2016 Executive Compensation Highlights

        The following key compensation actions were taken by the Board with respect to the Named Executive Officers for 2016:

Expected Compensation in 2017

        In 2017, the Board intends to continue its established programs, the major element of which will be restricted stock awards that are vest on the basis of achieving performance objectives and over time.

24


        If our stockholders approve the 2017 Incentive Award Plan as proposed in this Proxy Statement, the Board intends to award to our CEO restricted stock that vests in 2020 based on two criteria. The first, a time-based restricted stock award for 84,000 shares of our common stock, will vest monthly in 2020. The second, a performance-based restricted stock award with a target of 84,000 shares of our common stock will be earned (if at all) at the end of 2020 based on our total stockholder return ("TSR") for the four-year period from 2017 through 2020 compared to the TSR of the Nasdaq Telecommunications Index, with a target of equaling the Nasdaq Telecommunications Index TSR. Our CEO will earn none of the shares of common stock subject to this award if our TSR is zero or negative. The maximum number of shares subject to this award if our performance exceeds the target will be 105,000 shares, which he would receive if the Cogent's TSR exceeded the Nasdaq Telecommunications Index TSR by 25%. Both of these restricted stock awards will be subject to a "double trigger" provision, pursuant to which vesting in the event of a change in control of the Company will accelerate only if his employment is terminated and there is also a change in control.

        Our Board also intends to grant our other executive officers time-based restricted stock awards that will vest in 2020, and performance-based restricted stock awards that will vest based on the achievement of performance goals. Approximately 80% of the aggregate value of these awards will be allocated to the time-based restricted stock awards and 20% to the performance-based restricted stock awards.

        The Board intends to continue the cash incentive plans for our CEO and Chief Revenue Officer on the same basis as described in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

Pay-for-Performance Discussion

        We view our executive compensation practices as an avenue to communicate our goals and standards of conduct and a means to reward our executive officers for their achievements. We believe our executive compensation program is reasonable, competitive, and appropriately balances the goals of attracting, motivating, rewarding, and retaining our executive officers and, therefore, that it promotes stabile leadership.

        To ensure that our executive officers' interests are aligned with those of our stockholders and to motivate and reward individual initiative and effort, currently a substantial portion of their target annual total direct compensation opportunity is delivered in the form of equity awards and, therefore, "at-risk." Further, in the case of our CEO, all of his cash compensation opportunity for 2016 was performance-based.

25


        The compensation of our CEO and other Named Executive Officers during 2016 is shown the following graph:

(amounts in thousands)

GRAPHIC

        As reflected in the foregoing graphic, we believe that long-term incentive compensation opportunities in the form of equity awards are a key incentive for our CEO, as well as our other executive officers, to drive long-term growth in shareholder value. To ensure that we maintain faithful to our compensation philosophy, the Board evaluates the relationship between the reported values of the equity awards granted to our executive officers, the amount of compensation realizable (and, ultimately, realized) from such awards in subsequent years, and our total stockholder return over this period.

        We believe that our focused emphasis on the use of long-term incentive compensation as the key element of our executive officers' target total direct compensation opportunities has enabled us to maintain a strong alignment of our executive officers' and stockholders' interests and resulted in the above-market performance of our common stock as illustrated below.

        The following graph compares the cumulative five-year total stockholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total returns of the Standard & Poor's 500 Index and the NASDAQ Telecommunications Index. The graph tracks the performance of a $100 investment in our common stock and in each index (with the reinvestment of all dividends) from December 31, 2011 through December 31, 2016.

26



COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL
RETURN*
Among Cogent Communications Holdings, the S&P 500 Index
and the NASDAQ Telecommunications Index

GRAPHIC

Executive Compensation Policies and Practices

        We endeavor to maintain sound executive compensation policies and practices, including compensation-related corporate governance standards, consistent with our executive compensation philosophy. During 2016, we maintained the following executive compensation policies and practices, including both policies and practices we have implemented to drive performance and policies and practices that either prohibit or minimize behaviors that we do not believe serve our stockholders' long-term interests:

What We Do

27


What We Do Not Do

28


Executive Compensation Philosophy and Program Design

        Our philosophy is to compensate all of our employees, including our executive officers, in a manner which reflects the competitive value of their skills and experience in the marketplace, to pay our sales force and sales management cash commissions based upon revenue generated, and to tie the compensation of our senior executive officers to the value of our common stock through the grant of restricted stock awards that vest over a multi-year period.

        We believe that the success of our philosophy is demonstrated by our record of revenue growth and increased profitability and operating cash flow, our stable and capable leadership, and our equity appreciation.

        We structure the annual compensation of our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers, using two principal elements: base salary and long-term incentive compensation opportunities in the form of equity awards. In addition, the two executive officers who are most directly responsible for driving our revenue growth—our CEO and Chief Revenue Officer—are also eligible to receive annual cash incentive awards based on our performance against pre-established financial objectives.

Executive Compensation Program Governance

        The Compensation Committee, which is composed entirely of independent directors, is responsible for determining compensation for our executive officers and other employees, and administering our compensation programs. In 2016, the functions of the Compensation Committee were undertaken by the independent members of our Board of Directors (the "Board").

        Accordingly, in 2016 our Board had overall responsibility for overseeing our compensation and benefits policies and overseeing, evaluating, and approving the compensation plans, policies, and programs applicable to our CEO as well as our other executive officers, determining and overseeing the process of evaluating our CEO's performance, and overseeing the preparation of, reviewing, and approving this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

        Our Board's practice of developing and maintaining compensation arrangements that are competitive includes a balance between retaining the best possible talent and maintaining a reasonable and responsible cost structure.

        When selecting and setting the amount of each compensation element, our Board considers the following factors:

29


These factors provide the framework for compensation decision-making and final decisions regarding the compensation opportunity for each executive officer. No single factor is determinative in setting pay levels, nor was the impact of any factor on the determination of pay levels quantifiable.

Review of Market Competitors

        Prior to the Compensation Committee's retention of a compensation consultant as described below, we did not conduct a formal comparison of our executive compensation program against the competitive market for executive talent. Nonetheless, the Board, when evaluating the performance of our executive officers, would compare our corporate results each fiscal quarter against those of the following companies in terms of revenue growth, EBITDA margin, EBITDA growth, free cash flow, and balance sheet efficiency:

Akamai Technologies, Inc.

  Internap Corporation   Sprint Corporation

AT&T, Inc.

  Level 3 Communications, Inc.   Verizon Communications, Inc.

Equinix, Inc.

  Limelight Networks, Inc.   Zayo Group Holdings, Inc.

GTT Communications, Inc.

  Rackspace Hosting, Inc.    

        This comparison was conducted by our Board to better understand how our financial performance compared against the companies with which we compete in our primary lines of business and to ascertain the quality and sources of our growth (organic versus acquisitions) in a highly competitive and rapidly evolving and changing market sector. This comparison was made to assist the Board in assessing the decisions and effectiveness of our executive officers rather than to arrive at specific compensation decisions.

Role of Management

        In discharging its responsibilities, our Board works with members of our management, including our CEO. Management assists the Board by providing information on Company and individual performance, market data, and management's perspective and recommendations on compensation matters. The Board solicits and reviews our CEO's recommendations and proposals with respect to adjustments to annual cash compensation, long-term incentive compensation opportunities, program structures, and other compensation-related matters for our executive officers. The Board reviews and discusses these recommendations and proposals with our CEO and uses them as one factor in determining and approving the compensation for our executive officers. In setting the compensation of our CEO, he recuses himself from all discussions regarding his own compensation.

Role of Compensation Consultant

        In May 2016, the Compensation Committee engaged Compensia, a national compensation consulting firm, to serve as its compensation advisor. During 2016, Compensia provided the following services:

30


        In 2016, Compensia provided no services to us other than consulting services to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has reviewed the objectivity and independence of the advice provided by Compensia to the Compensation Committee on executive compensation matters and determined that Compensia is independent and that its work did not raise any conflicts of interest.

Competitive Positioning

        In June 2016, the Board directed Compensia to develop and recommend a compensation peer group to be used as a reference for understanding the market for executive talent when making future compensation decisions for our executive officers. Compensia undertook a detailed review of the pool of U.S.-based publicly-traded companies, focusing on companies in the following technology industry sectors—telecommunications, Internet, and software. Compensia then selected companies that are similar to us relative to our size, as determined using the following criteria:

        Following this review, Compensia recommended to our Board a peer group of 15 communications and technology companies for purposes of comparing our executive compensation levels and practices against the competitive market, which the Board subsequently approved. The companies comprising the updated compensation peer group are as follows:

8x8   FireEye   Iridium Communications
ATN International   General Communications   J2 Global
Consolidated Communications   GTT Communications   RingCentral
Demandware   inContact   Shenandoah Telecommunications
Earthlink Holdings   InterDigital   TrueCar
        Vonage Holdings

        Our Board does not believe that it is appropriate to make compensation decisions, whether regarding base salaries or long-term incentive compensation, upon any type of benchmarking. However, the Board believes that information regarding the compensation practices at other companies is useful in at least two respects. First, the Board recognizes that our compensation policies and practices must be competitive in the marketplace. Second, this information is useful in assessing the reasonableness and appropriateness of individual executive compensation elements and of our overall executive compensation packages. This information is only one of several factors that the Board considers, however, in making its decisions with respect to the compensation of our executive officers.

        Our Board intends to review our compensation peer group at least annually and make adjustments to its composition, taking into account changes in both our business and the businesses of the companies in the peer group.

Individual Compensation Elements

        For 2016, our executive compensation program consisted of the following three principal elements:

31


        Other than the annual cash incentive compensation opportunity for our CEO and the sales commission opportunity for our Chief Revenue Officer and Vice President of Global Sales, we did not provide our executive officers with an annual cash incentive opportunity in 2016.

Base Salary

        Base salary represents the fixed portion of the compensation of our executive officers and is an important element of compensation intended to attract and retain highly-talented individuals.

        Generally, we establish the initial base salaries of our executive officers through arm's-length negotiation at the time we hire the individual executive officer, taking into account his or her position, qualifications, experience, prior salary level, and the base salaries of our other executive officers. Thereafter, the Board reviews the base salaries of our executive officers from time to time and makes adjustments to base salaries as it determines to be necessary or appropriate.

        It is the general policy of our Board to provide our executive officers with the same general salary increase granted to all employees each year. Consistent with this policy, in 2016 our executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers (other than our CEO), received the same 2.0% base salary increase as our other employees. Our CEO did not receive a base salary.

        Except for our CEO and Chief Revenue Officer, annual incentive compensation in the form of cash bonuses has not been a part of our executive compensation program. This policy continued to be in effect in 2016.

Incentive Compensation Opportunity for CEO

        As in 2015, our CEO was eligible to receive an annual cash incentive award based on our ability to improve our financial performance year-over-year as measured by two equally-weighted metrics: increases in revenue and increases in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, as adjusted ("Adjusted EBITDA").

        For purposes of his 2016 incentive compensation opportunity, our CEO was to receive a cash award in the amount of $250,000 if our revenue growth for the year equaled or exceeded 15.0% of its prior year total and, separately, an additional cash award in the amount of $250,000 if our Adjusted EBITDA growth for the year equaled or exceeded 20.0% of its prior year total. If the growth of these performance metrics was less than the target level specified, he would receive a proportionally smaller amount. For example, if our revenue growth equaled 7.5% and Adjusted EBITDA growth equaled 15.0%, he would be paid 50.0% of $250,000, or $125,000, of the revenue growth target and 75.0% of $250,000, or $187,500, of the EBITDA growth target.

        Our revenue grew 10.6% from 2015 to 2016 and our Adjusted EBITDA grew 12.8% from 2015 to 2016. Based on the framework our Board had established for determining his annual cash incentive award, this translated to a cash award in the amount of approximately $176,000 for the revenue metric and a cash award in the amount of approximately $160,000 for the Adjusted EBITDA metric, or an aggregate annual cash incentive award in the amount of approximately $335,660.

32


Incentive Compensation Opportunity for Chief Revenue Officer

        In addition, due to the importance of his position in driving revenue and, therefore, stockholder value, Mr. Bubeck was eligible to receive monthly commissions based our revenue for each month of 2016. Since revenue growth is critical to our success, the Board believes that it is important to directly link a significant portion of Mr. Bubeck's target total direct compensation opportunity to achieving our monthly revenue targets. In 2016, approximately one third of his target total cash compensation opportunity was tied to the achievement of these revenue targets.

        At the beginning of 2016, monthly revenue targets for Mr. Bubeck for the year and his target commission opportunity for the year were established. Mr. Bubeck's monthly commissions were determined by measuring our actual revenue for each month against the pre-established revenue target for that month, with the resulting percentage multiplied by his target commission opportunity.

        For 2016, Mr. Bubeck achieved 98.5% of his revenue target for the year. Accordingly, he received approximately $99,200 of his target commission opportunity of $100,000 based on his monthly performance against his targets.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

        We believe that the strongest alignment of executive and stockholder interests arises from their common ownership of our equity securities. Accordingly, the Board allocates the largest portion of our executive officer's target total direct compensation opportunity to long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards. The Board believes that equity awards provide an effective means for focusing our executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers, on driving increased stockholder value over a multi-year period, provides a meaningful reward for appreciation in our stock price and long-term value creation, and motivates them to remain employed with us.

        Over the last several years, the long-term incentive compensation opportunities of our executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers, have been delivered in the form of restricted stock awards. As noted above, these awards have represented approximately 97% of our CEO's target total direct compensation opportunity, and, on average, approximately 65% of the target total direct compensation opportunity of our other executive officers.

        As with their other compensation elements, the Board determines the amount of long-term incentive compensation for our executive officers as part of its annual compensation review and after taking into consideration the competitive market environment, the recommendations of our CEO, the proportion of our total shares outstanding used for annual employee long-term incentive compensation awards (our "burn rate"), and the other factors described above.

        In May 2016, the Board granted a combination of time-based restricted stock awards and performance-based restricted stock awards to our executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers. The equity awards granted to the Named Executive Officers for 2016 were as follows:

Named Executive Officer
  Time-Based
Restricted Stock
Awards
(# of shares)
  Time-Based
Restricted
Stock Awards
(grant date fair
value)
  Performance-
Based
Restricted Stock
Awards
(# of shares)
  Performance-
Based
Restricted
Stock Awards
(grant date fair
value)
  Aggregate
Grant Date
Fair Value
 

Mr. Schaeffer

    120,000   $ 4,678,000     50,000   $ 1,949,000   $ 6,627,000  

Mr. Weed

    20,000   $ 780,000     4,250   $ 166,000   $ 946,000  

Mr. Beury

    9,600   $ 374,000     2,400   $ 94,000   $ 468,000  

Mr. O'Neill

    9,600   $ 374,000     2,400   $ 94,000   $ 468,000  

Mr. Bubeck

    9,600   $ 374,000     2,400   $ 94,000   $ 468,000  

33


        The shares of our common stock subject to the time-based restricted stock award granted in 2016 to our CEO vest in equal monthly increments of 10,000 shares each commencing on January 1, 2019 and ending on December 1, 2019. The shares of our common stock subject to the time-based restricted stock awards granted to the other Named Executive Officers vest in equal quarterly increments of shares on each of March 1, June 1, September 1, and December 1, 2019. In addition, the shares of our common stock subject to these awards will vest in full if a change in control of the Company occurs prior to the end of 2019.

        The shares of our common stock subject to the performance-based restricted stock award granted to our CEO are to be earned (if at all) as follows: 25,000 shares will be earned if our revenue growth from the end of 2018 through the end of 2019 equals or exceeds 15.0% and 25,000 shares will be earned if our adjusted EBITDA growth for the same period equals or exceeds 20.0% (50,000 shares is the maximum number of shares that may be earned). In the event that our actual performance for 2019 with respect to either performance measure is less than the pre-established target level, the number of shares of our common stock earned with respect to that measure will be pro-rated for such actual performance in relation to the applicable target performance level.

        The shares of our common stock subject to the performance-based restricted stock awards granted to the other Named Executive Officers are to be earned (if at all) at the conclusion of 2019, based on the attainment of customer satisfaction goals as determined and evaluated in the discretion of our Compensation Committee. In addition, the shares of our common stock subject to these awards will vest in full if a change in control of the Company occurs prior to the end of 2019.

Welfare and Health Benefits

        We have established a tax-qualified Section 401(k) retirement plan for all employees. Currently, we match contributions made to the plan by our employees, including our executive officers, up to 2.0% of their compensation. We intend for the plan to qualify under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") so that contributions by employees to the plan, and income earned on plan contributions, are not taxable to employees until withdrawn from the plan.

        In addition, we provide other benefits to our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers, on the same basis as all of our full-time employees. These benefits include medical, dental and vision benefits, medical and dependent care flexible spending accounts, health savings accounts, short-term and long-term disability insurance, and basic life insurance coverage.

        We design our employee benefits programs to be affordable and competitive in relation to the market, as well as compliant with applicable laws and practices. We adjust our employee benefits programs as needed based upon regular monitoring of applicable laws and practices and the competitive market.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

        Perquisites or other personal benefits are not a component of our executive compensation program. Accordingly, we do not provide perquisites or other personal benefits to our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers.

        In the future, we may provide perquisites or other personal benefits in limited circumstances. All future practices with respect to perquisites or other personal benefits will be approved and subject to periodic review by the Board.

Employment Agreements

        We have entered into written employment agreements with each of our Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Bubeck).

34


        Each of these employment agreements provides for "at will" employment. These agreements also set forth the rights and responsibilities of each party and protect both parties' interests in the event of a termination of employment by providing the executive officer with the opportunity to receive certain post-employment payments and benefits in the event of certain terminations of employment, including following a change in control of the Company. Finally, these employment agreements prohibit the executive officer from engaging directly or indirectly in competition with us or disclosing our confidential information or business practices. These post-employment compensation arrangements are described in more detail in the discussion below entitled "Post-Employment Compensation".

        For information on the specific terms and conditions of the employment agreements entered into with the Named Executive Officers, see the discussion of "Employment Agreements and Potential Post Employment Compensation Arrangements" in this proxy statement.

Post-Employment Compensation

        We believe that having in place reasonable and competitive post-employment compensation arrangements are essential to attracting and retaining highly-qualified executive officers. Our post-employment compensation arrangements are designed to provide reasonable compensation to executive officers who leave the Company under certain circumstances to facilitate their transition to new employment.

        In determining payment and benefit levels under the various circumstances triggering the post-employment compensation provisions of our executive officer employment agreements, the Board has drawn a distinction between voluntary terminations of employment and terminations of employment for cause, and terminations of employment without cause or as a result of a change in control of the Company. Payment in the latter circumstances has been deemed appropriate in light of the benefits to us described above, as well as the likelihood that the executive officer's departure is due, at least in part, to circumstances not within his or her control. In contrast, we believe that payments are not appropriate in the event of a termination of employment for cause or a voluntary resignation.

        In addition, the written agreements for the equity awards granted to our Named Executive Officers contain provisions covering a change in control of the Company. We believe that these arrangements are designed to align the interests of management and stockholders when considering the long-term future for the Company. The primary purpose of these arrangements is to keep our most senior executive officers focused on pursuing all corporate transaction activity that is in the best interests of our stockholders. Specifically, these agreements provide that:

        The written agreements for the equity awards granted to our Named Executive Officers also provide for accelerated vesting upon their death, disability, or retirement.

        We have no arrangements with our Named Executive Officers providing for excise tax payments (or "gross-ups") relating to a change in control of the Company.

        For information on the post-employment compensation arrangements for our Named Executive Officers, as well as an estimate of the potential payments and benefits payable under these

35


arrangements as of the end of 2016, see "Employment Agreements and Potential Post Employment Compensation Arrangements" in this proxy statement.

Other Compensation Policies and Practices

Stock Ownership Policy

        We have adopted a stock ownership policy for our CEO and the members of our Board of Directors to align their interests with the interests of our stockholders. This policy provides that:

        Until such time as our CEO and the members of our Board of Directors have satisfied their specified ownership level, they are required to hold all shares of our common stock earned pursuant to the equity awards granted to them in connection with their employment or service, as applicable.

        As of December 31, 2016, each of the individuals subject to our stock ownership policy satisfied his or her stock ownership requirement.

Compensation Recovery ("Clawback") Policy

        To further align the interests of our executive officers and stockholders and promote good governance practices, we have adopted a compensation recovery ('clawback") policy providing that, in the event of a financial restatement resulting from misconduct, our Board of Directors will seek repayment of all cash-based incentive compensation or performance-based equity awards erroneously paid or granted to our CEO and any of such executive officer based on the original financial statements if the amount paid or awarded would have been lower had they been based on the restated financial statements.

Hedging, Derivatives, and Pledging Policies

        Our Hedging and Derivatives Policy prohibits our employees, including our executive officers, and the members of our Board of Directors from hedging our securities and from entering into a derivative contract involving our securities (except for ownership of options to purchase shares of our common stock granted in connection with employment). Among the investment vehicles that are subject to this prohibition are:

        In addition, our Hedging and Derivatives Policy prohibits our employees, including our executive officers, and the members of our Board of Directors from pledging our securities to secure a non-recourse loan or holding such securities in a margin account.

36


Tax and Accounting Considerations

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

        Generally, Section 162(m) of the Code disallows public companies a tax deduction for federal income tax purposes of remuneration in excess of $1 million paid to their chief executive officer and each of the three other most highly-compensated executive officers (other than the chief executive officer and chief financial officer) whose compensation is required to be disclosed to our stockholders under the Exchange Act in any taxable year. Remuneration in excess of $1 million may only be deducted if it is "performance-based compensation" within the meaning of Section 162(m) or qualifies for one of the other exemptions from the deductibility limit.

        While in making its compensation decisions, the Board considers the potential effects of Section 162(m) on the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers, it believes that it is important to retain the flexibility to motivate superior performance through plans and awards that do not satisfy all of the conditions of an exemption from Section 162(m). Thus, some forms of compensation used by the Board, such as time-based stock awards, may not be designed to qualify for deductibility under Section 162(m). Further, the Board has not adopted a policy that all compensation payable to our Named Executive Officers that is subject to Section 162(m) must be deductible for federal income tax purposes. From time to time, the Board may, in its judgment, approve compensation for our Named Executive Officers that does not comply with an exemption from the deductibility limit when it believes that such compensation is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

        We follow the Financial Accounting Standard Board's Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 ("FASB ASC Topic 718") for our stock-based compensation awards. FASB ASC Topic 718 requires us to measure the compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to our employees and members of our Board of Directors, including restricted stock awards, based on the grant date "fair value" of these awards. This calculation is performed for accounting purposes and reported in the executive compensation tables required by the federal securities laws, even though the recipient of the awards may never realize any value from their awards.

37



2016 Summary Compensation Table

        The following table sets forth the cash and non-cash compensation paid or incurred on our behalf to our Chief Executive Officer, our principal financial officer, and each of our three other most highly compensated executive officers, or our Named Executive Officers, whose annual compensation equaled or exceeded $100,000 for the three years ended December 31, 2016.

Name
  Principal Position   Year   Salary   Bonus   GRANT DATE
VALUE
Stock
Awards(a)
   
  Non Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(c)
  All other
Compensation(b)
  TOTAL  

Dave Schaeffer

  CEO     2016   $ 0   $ 0   $ 6,626,600   (d)   $ 335,660   $ 4,840   $ 6,967,100  

        2015   $ 0   $ 0   $ 0       $ 112,170   $ 5,236   $ 117,406  

        2014   $ 343,000   $ 0   $ 16,086,000   (e)         $ 7,000   $ 16,436,000  

Thaddeus Weed

 

CFO

   
2016
 
$

275,000
 
$

0
 
$

945,265
 

(f)

       
$

5,300
 
$

1,225,565
 

        2015   $ 269,000   $ 0   $ 0             $ 5,300   $ 274,300  

        2014   $ 265,000   $ 0   $ 1,204,000   (g)         $ 6,000   $ 1,475,000  

Robert Beury

 

Chief Legal Officer

   
2016
 
$

272,000
 
$

0
 
$

467,760
 

(h)

       
$

5,300
 
$

745,060
 

        2015   $ 267,000   $ 0   $ 0             $ 5,300   $ 272,300  

        2014   $ 263,000   $ 0   $ 803,000   (i)         $ 6,000   $ 1,072,000  

Timothy O'Neill

 

VP

   
2016
 
$

267,000
 
$

0
 
$

467,760
 

(h)

       
$

5,300
 
$

740,060
 

        2015   $ 261,000   $ 0   $ 0             $ 5,300   $ 266,300  

        2014   $ 257,000   $ 0   $ 803,000   (i)         $ 6,000   $ 1,066,000  

James Bubeck

 

Chief Revenue Officer

   
2016
 
$

204,000
 
$

0
 
$

467,760
 

(h)

 
$

99,220
 
$

5,300
 
$

776,280
 

        2015   $ 186,000   $ 0   $ 133,000   (j)   $ 77,700   $ 5,260   $ 401,960  

(a)
Amounts represent the grant date fair value of stock awards computed in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification 718. For additional information regarding the assumptions used in determining these values, see Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

(b)
Consists of employer matching amounts contributed to the Company's 401(k) defined contribution plan.

(c)
Consists of cash compensation earned for performance against financial targets. See text above for a description of the criteria.

(d)
Consist of a restricted stock award of 170,000 shares made on May 4, 2016 valued at $38.98 per share of which 50,000 shares vest on March 1, 2020 subject to certain performance conditions as described in the text above and 120,000 shares vest monthly at 10,000 per month in 2019.

(e)
Consists of a restricted stock award of 460,000 shares made on August 6, 2014 valued at $34.97 per share of which 10,000 shares vest monthly from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018 and 100,000 shares vest on December 31, 2018.

(f)
Consist of a restricted stock award of 24,250 shares made on May 4, 2016 valued at $38.98 per share of which 4,250 shares vest on December 31, 2019 subject to certain performance conditions as described in the text above and 5,000 shares vest quarterly beginning on March 1, 2019 to December 1, 2019.

(g)
Consists of a restricted stock award of 36,000 shares made on November 3, 2014 valued at $33.45 per share of which 4,500 shares vest quarterly from March 1, 2017 to December 1, 2018.

(h)
Consist of a restricted stock award of 12,000 shares made on May 4, 2016 valued at $38.98 per share of which 2,400 shares vest on December 31, 2019 subject to certain performance conditions as described in the text above and 2,400 shares vest quarterly beginning on March 1, 2019 to December 1, 2019.

(i)
Consists of a restricted stock award of 24,000 shares made on November 3, 2014 valued at $33.45 per share of which 3,000 shares vest quarterly from March 1, 2017 to December 1, 2018.

(j)
Consists of a restricted stock award of 5,000 shares made on September 28, 2015 valued at $26.50 per share, of which 1,250 shares vest on October 1, 2016, 313 shares vest quarterly until October 1, 2019.

        On January 1, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017, our executive officers received a salary increase of 1.5%, 1.5%, 2.0% and 2.0%, respectively, which was the same percentage increase that was granted to all employees (who had been with the Company for at least one year). These increases were intended to compensate (partially) for inflation.


2016 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

        The following table provides information with regard to the grants of plan-based awards to each Named Executive Officer during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

38


        Mr. Bubeck's commission is based on sales as measured by revenue. Mr. Bubeck's revenue quota is based on the sum of the quotas for all sales representatives. If the revenue generated by the entire sales organization for the month is 100% of Mr. Bubeck's revenue quota, he will receive 100% of $8,333 for the month. If the percentage is more or less he receives a proportionally lesser or greater amount. For example if revenue were at 50% of his quota for the month, then he would be paid 50% of $8,333 or $4,167 for the month. If revenue were 200% of his quota he would receive $16,667 for the month. (Prior to becoming Chief Revenue Officer Mr. Bubeck received a commission based on revenue from the central region of the U.S., which he managed.)

        Mr. Schaeffer's performance-based cash bonus began in 2015 and is based on the growth of the Company's revenue and EBITDA, as adjusted. If the revenue growth equals or exceeds 15%, he will receive $250,000 and, separately, if EBITDA, as adjusted, growth equals or exceeds 20%, he will received $250,000. If the growth of the performance measures is less than the amount specified, he would receive a proportionally lesser amount. For example, if revenue growth equaled 7.5% and EBITDA growth equaled 15%, he would be paid 50% of $250,000 or $125,000 of the revenue growth bonus and 75% of $250,000 or $187,500 of the EBITDA growth bonus.

 
   
   
  Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
   
 
 
   
   
  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards(a)
 
Name
  Grant Date   NOTES   Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
 

Dave Schaeffer

    5/4/2016   (b)(e)       $ 500,000   $500,000     170,000   $ 6,626,600  

Thaddeus Weed

    5/4/2016   (c)                     24,250   $ 945,265  

Robert Beury

    5/4/2016   (d)                     12,000   $ 467,760  

Timothy O'Neil

    5/4/2016   (d)                     12,000   $ 467,760  

James Bubeck

    9/28/2015   (d)(f)       $ 100,000   unlimited     12,000   $ 467,760  

FOOTNOTES

(a)
Except as otherwise noted, amounts represent the grant date fair value of stock awards computed in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification 718. For additional information regarding the assumptions used in determining these values, see Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

(b)
Consist of a restricted stock award of 170,000 shares made on May 4, 2016 valued at $38.98 per share of which 50,000 shares vest on March 1, 2020 subject to certain performance conditions as described in the text above and 120,000 shares vest monthly at 10,000 per month in 2019.

(c)
Consist of a restricted stock award of 24,250 shares made on May 4, 2016 valued at $38.98 per share of which 4,250 shares vest on December 31, 2019 subject to certain performance conditions as described in the text above and 5,000 shares vest quarterly beginning on March 1, 2019 to December 1, 2019.

(d)
Consist of a restricted stock award of 12,000 shares made on May 4, 2016 valued at $38.98 per share of which 2,400 shares vest on December 31, 2019 subject to certain performance conditions as described in the text above and 2,400 shares vest quarterly beginning on March 1, 2019 to December 1, 2019.

(e)
Mr. Schaeffer's annual cash award is based on achieving revenue and EBITDA, as adjusted, targets as described in the text above.

39


(f)
While in theory Mr. Bubeck's commission is unlimited it is in practice limited by the Company's ability to accept and install service for new customers. The performance measures of this annual commission are described in the text above.


2016 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End Table

        The following table shows the information regarding the stock options and stock awards held by our named executive officers on December 31, 2016.

 
   
  OPTION AWARDS   STOCK AWARDS  
Name
   
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Un-exercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
  Market Value
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
($)(a)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
  Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($)(i)
 

Dave Schaeffer

  (b)                             100,000   $ 4,135,000              

  (c)                             240,000   $ 9,924,000              

  (d)                             170,000   $ 7,029,500              

Thaddeus Weed

 

(e)

                           
36,000
 
$

1,488,600
             

  (f)                             24,250   $ 1,002,738              

James Bubeck

 

(g)

                           
554
 
$

22,908
             

  (h)                             3,750   $ 155,063              

  (i)                             12,000   $ 496,200              

Robert Beury

 

(j)

                           
24,000
 
$

992,400
             

  (i)                             12,000   $ 496,200              

Timothy O'Neill

 

(j)

                           
24,000
 
$

992,400
             

  (i)                             12,000   $ 496,200              

FOOTNOTES

(a)
Valued using the closing market price of our common stock on December 30, 2016—$41.35

(b)
Shares vest on December 31, 2018.

(c)
Shares vest 10,000 shares monthly from January 1, 2017 until fully vested on December 1, 2018.

(d)
Shares vest 50,000 on March 1, 2020 subject to certain performance conditions and 120,000 shares vest monthly at 10,000 per month in 2019.

(e)
Shares vest 4,500 shares quarterly from March 1, 2017 until fully vested on December 1, 2018.

(f)
Shares vest 4,250 on December 31, 2019 subject to certain performance conditions and 5,000 shares vest quarterly beginning on March 1, 2019 to December 1, 2019.

(g)
Shares vest quarterly from March 1, 2017 to December 1, 2018.

(h)
Shares vest 313 quarterly from April 1, 2017 until October 1, 2019.

(i)
Shares vest 2,400 on December 31, 2019 subject to certain performance conditions and 2,400 shares vest quarterly beginning on March 1, 2019 to December 1, 2019.

(j)
Shares vest 3,000 shares quarterly from March 1, 2017 until fully vested on December 1, 2018.

40



2016 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

        The following table shows information regarding option exercises by our named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, and the value of stock awards at the time of vesting for stock awards that vested during the year.

 
  Option Awards   Stock Awards  
Name
  Number
of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
  Value
Realized
On Exercise
  Number
of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
  Value
Realized
On Vesting
 

Dave Schaeffer

                                      120,000   $ 4,529,100  

Thaddeus Weed

                37,000   $ 1,486,660  

James Bubeck

                1,526   $ 56,298  

Robert Beury

                12,000   $ 452,910  

Timothy O'Neill

                12,000   $ 452,910  


Employment Agreements and Potential Post-Employment Compensation Arrangements

        Dave Schaeffer Employment Agreement.    Dave Schaeffer has an employment agreement that provides for his services as our Chief Executive Officer. He also receives all of our standard employee benefits. If he is discharged without cause or resigns for "good reason" he is entitled to a lump sum amount equal to his annual salary at the time and continuation of his benefits for one year. Under the terms of the restricted stock awards that have been granted to him in the event of death, disability, retirement or a change in control of the Company, 100% of his then unvested restricted stock awards will vest immediately; provided that, in the event of a change in control, the total dollar value of the restricted stock that immediately vests will not exceed three times his annual compensation. Had his employment been terminated without cause or had he resigned for "good reason" on December 31, 2016, he would have received no cash payment because he is not currently receiving a salary. He would have continued to vest in his restricted stock awards during his one year severance period and would have vested in certain other awards after the end of that severance period. "Good reason" for resignation includes removal from his position as CEO or failure to elect him as chairman of the Board of Directors. The value of his post-employment compensation is shown in the table below.

        Thaddeus G. Weed Employment Agreement.    Thaddeus Weed has an employment agreement under which he serves as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. In the event that his employment with us is terminated without cause or he resigns for good reason, the agreement entitles him to twelve months of salary and continuation of benefits for twelve months. Under the terms of the grants of restricted stock he is also entitled to continued vesting of his restricted stock during his severance period. In the event of death, disability, retirement, or a change of control he becomes fully vested in his restricted stock; provided that, in the event of a change of control, the total dollar value of the restricted stock that immediately vests shall not exceed three times his annual compensation. In the event of a change of control resulting in his termination without cause or resignation for good reason, 100% of his then restricted stock will vest immediately and he will receive his severance payment as a lump sum. The value of his post-employment compensation is shown in the table below.

        Robert N. Beury, Jr. Employment Agreement.    Robert Beury's employment agreement entitles him to twelve months of salary and twelve months of benefits in the event that his employment with us is terminated without cause or he resigns for good reason. Under the terms of the grants of restricted stock he is also entitled to continued vesting of his restricted stock during his severance period. In the event of death, disability, retirement, or a change of control the vesting of his restricted stock accelerates so that he will be 100% vested; provided that, in the event of a change of control, the total dollar value of the restricted stock that immediately vests shall not exceed three times his annual

41


compensation. In the event of a change of control resulting in his termination without cause or resignation for good reason, 100% of his then restricted stock will vest immediately and he will receive his severance payment as a lump sum. The value of his post-employment compensation is shown in the table below.

        James Bubeck.    James Bubeck does not have an employment agreement with us that provides for severance. In the event of death, disability, retirement, or a change of control the vesting of his restricted stock accelerates so that he will be 100% vested; provided that, in the event of a change of control, the total dollar value of the restricted stock that immediately vests shall not exceed three times his annual compensation. The value of his post-employment compensation is shown in the table below.

        Timothy G. O'Neill Employment Agreement.    Timothy O'Neill's employment agreement provides that in the event his employment with us is terminated without cause or he resigns for good reason he will receive six months' salary and continuation of benefits for six months. Under the terms of the grants of restricted stock he is also entitled to continued vesting of his restricted stock during his severance period. In the event of death, disability, retirement, or a change of control the vesting of his restricted stock accelerates so that he will be 100% vested; provided that, in the event of a change of control, the total dollar value of the restricted stock that immediately vests shall not exceed three times his annual compensation. In the event of a change of control resulting in his termination without cause or resignation for good reason, 100% of his then restricted stock will vest immediately and he will receive his severance payment as a lump sum. The value of his post-employment compensation is shown in the table below.

        The table below shows the compensation that would have been received by each named executive officer in the event of termination without cause, change of control, and termination without cause upon a change of control as of December 31, 2016. Stock is valued at the closing price on December 30, 2016—$41.35.

 
   
  Termination
without cause
  Change of
control
  Termination
without cause
upon a change of
control
 

Dave Schaeffer

  Cash   $   $   $  

  Stock vesting   $ 9,097,000   $ 19,021,000   $ 19,021,000  

  Total   $ 9,097,000   $ 19,021,000   $ 19,021,000  

Thaddeus Weed

 

Cash

 
$

275,000
 
$

 
$

275,000
 

  Stock vesting   $ 744,300   $ 2,491,338   $ 2,491,338  

  Total   $ 1,019,300   $ 2,491,338   $ 2,766,338  

Robert Beury

 

Cash

 
$

272,000
       
$

272,000
 

  Stock vesting   $ 496,200   $ 1,488,600   $ 1,488,600  

  Total   $ 768,200   $ 1,488,600   $ 1,760,600  

Timothy O'Neill

 

Cash

 
$

133,500
       
$

133,500
 

  Stock vesting   $ 248,100   $ 1,488,600   $ 1,488,600  

  Total   $ 381,600   $ 1,488,600   $ 1,622,100  

James Bubeck

 

Cash

 
$

 
$

 
$

 

  Stock vesting   $   $ 674,170   $ 674,170  

  Total   $   $ 674,170   $ 674,170  

42


Director Compensation

        Our non-employee Board members were compensated in 2016 as follows for their services:

        For 2017 the Board reduced its stock compensation to 7,000 shares issued in increments of 1,750 shares per quarter.

        The following table shows the amounts earned or paid in 2016.


2016 Director Compensation Table

 
  Fees Earned
in Cash
  Stock
Awards(a)
  TOTAL  

Blake Bath

  $ 3,000   $ 284,250   $ 287,250  

Steven Brooks

  $ 2,000   $ 284,250   $ 286,250  

Richard Liebhaber

  $ 4,000   $ 284,250   $ 288,250  

Marc Montagner

  $ 3,000   $ 284,250   $ 287,250  

Timothy Weingarten

  $ 1,000   $ 284,250   $ 285,250  

The compensation of Mr. Schaeffer, who is a member of the Board of Director and our Chief Executive Officer is disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table, above, and is therefore not shown in the Director Compensation Table. He does not receive compensation for serving as a director.

(a)
Amounts represent the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards computed in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic No. 718. For additional information regarding the assumptions used in determining these values, see Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

        The Compensation Committee of the Board is responsible for determining compensation for the Company's executive officers and other employees, and administering the Amended and Restated 2004 Incentive Award Plan and, if approved by the stockholders, the 2017 Incentive Award Plan, the Company's management bonus plan and other compensation programs. The committee reviewed and discussed the Compensation, Discussion and Analysis with management and based on that review and discussion, recommended its inclusion in this Proxy Statement.

Compensation Committee:        
Steven Brooks   Blake Bath   Marc Montagner
Timothy Weingarten   Richard Liebhaber    


RISK ASSESSMENT IN COMPENSATION PROGRAMS

        The Board and the Compensation Committee have reviewed and considered all of its compensation policies and practices and does not believe that its compensation policies and practices create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

43



COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

        During 2016:


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

        The following table provides summary information regarding beneficial ownership of our outstanding capital stock based on information available to the Company as of February 28, 2017, for:

        Beneficial ownership of shares is determined under the rules of the SEC and generally includes any shares over which a person exercises sole or shared voting or investment power. Except as indicated by footnote, and subject to applicable community property laws, each person identified in the table possesses sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock held by them. The information has been compiled by the Company from reports filed with the SEC and other information available to the Company. Shares of common stock that will vest or are subject to options currently exercisable or exercisable within the period 60 days after February 28, 2017, are deemed outstanding for calculating the percentage of outstanding shares of the person holding these options, but are not deemed outstanding for calculating the percentage of any other person.

44


        Unless otherwise noted, the address for each director and executive officer is c/o Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc., 2450 N Street, NW, 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20037. The shares of stock to which this table applies are shares of common stock. The Company has no other class of stock.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
  Amount
Owned
  Percent of
Class
 

BlackRock, Inc.(1)

    4,703,620     10.34 %

55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055

             

Frontier Capital Management Co., LLC(2)

    2,855,908     6.28 %

99 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02110

             

The Vanguard Group, Inc.(3)

    4,697,638     10.33 %

100 Vanguard Blvd, Malvern, PA 19355

             

FMR LLC(4)

    2,945,278     6.47 %

245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210

             

Directors and Officers:

             

Dave Schaeffer(5)

    3,842,340     8.45 %

Timothy Weingarten

    24,404     *  

Steven Brooks

    37,650     *  

Richard Liebhaber

    70,845     *  

Blake Bath

    36,425     *  

Marc Montagner

    41,500     *  

Thaddeus Weed(6)

    62,250     *  

Robert Beury(6)

    49,640     *  

James Bubeck(6)

    18,092     *  

Timothy O'Neill(6)

    38,452     *  

          *  

Directors and executive officers as a group (12 persons)(7)

    4,314,338     9.48 %

*
Denotes less than 1% ownership.

(1)
BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power over 4,596,702 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power over 4,703,620 shares of our common stock. The information herein regarding this stockholder is derived from such stockholder's Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 12, 2017.

(2)
Frontier Capital Management Co., LLC reports sole voting power over 1,815,282 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power over 2,855,908 shares of our common stock. The information herein regarding this stockholder is derived from such stockholder's Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2017.

(3)
The Vanguard Group, Inc. reports sole voting power over 82,174 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power over 4,611,664 shares of common stock and shared voting power over 5,900 shares of our common stock and shared dispositive power over 85,974 shares of our common stock. Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company ("VFTC"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the beneficial owner of 80,074 shares or 0.17% of our common stock outstanding as a result of serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts. Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd. ("VIA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner of 8,000 shares or 0.01% of our common stock outstanding as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings. The information herein regarding this stockholder is derived from such stockholder's Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2017.

45


(4)
FMR LLC reports sole voting power over 1,307,063 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power over 2,945,278 shares of our common stock. Abigail P. Johnson is a Director, the Chairman, and the Chief Executive Officer of FMR LLC. Members of the Johnson family, including Abigail P. Johnson, are the predominant owners, directly or through trusts, of Series B voting common shares of FMR LLC, representing 49% of the voting power of FMR LLC. The Johnson family group and all other Series B shareholders have entered into a shareholders' voting agreement under which all Series B voting common shares will be voted in accordance with the majority vote of Series B voting common shares. Accordingly, through their ownership of voting common shares and the execution of the shareholders' voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may be deemed, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, to form a controlling group with respect to FMR LLC. Neither FMR LLC nor Abigail P. Johnson has the sole power to vote or direct the voting of the shares owned directly by the various investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act ("Fidelity Funds") advised by Fidelity Management & Research Company ("FMR Co"), a wholly owned subsidiary of FMR LLC, which power resides with the Fidelity Funds' Boards of Trustees. Fidelity Management & Research Company carries out the voting of the shares under written guidelines established by the Fidelity Funds' Boards of Trustees. The information herein regarding this stockholder is derived from such stockholder's Schedule 13 G/A filed on February 14, 2017.

(5)
Includes 3,842,340 shares of common stock. Includes 490,000 shares of restricted stock that may be voted but remain subject to certain vesting provisions. Of the shares owned 3,215,477 shares remain pledged as security for full recourse loans.

(6)
Consists of common stock (not all of which is vested). As of February 28, 2017, of the shares shown in the table for Mr. Beury, 36,000 shares are not yet vested. As of February 28, 2017, of the shares shown in the table for Mr. Weed, 60,250 shares are not yet vested. As of February 28, 2017, of the shares shown in the table for Mr. O'Neill, 36,000 shares are not yet vested. As of February 28, 2017, of the shares shown in the table for Mr. Bubeck, 15,992 shares are not yet vested.

(7)
Consists of Dave Schaeffer, Timothy Weingarten, Steven Brooks, Richard T. Liebhaber, D. Blake Bath, Marc Montagner, Robert Beury, James Bubeck, Thaddeus Weed, R. Brad Kummer, Timothy O'Neill and Henry Kilmer. As of February 28, 2017, of the shares owned in the table for Mr. Weingarten, 1,750 shares are not yet vested. As of February 28, 2017, of the shares owned in the table for Mr. Brooks, 1,750 shares are not yet vested. As of February 28, 2017, of the shares owned in the table for Mr. Liebhaber, 1,750 shares are not yet vested. As of February 28, 2017, of the shares owned in the table for Mr. Bath, 1,750 shares are not yet vested. As of February 28, 2017, of the shares owned in the table for Mr. Montagner, 1,750 shares are not yet vested and all shares are pledged pursuant to a credit line with his broker. As of February 28, 2017, of the shares shown in the table, Mr. Kummer owns 56,740 shares of the Company's common stock; 36,000 of the shares are not yet vested. As of February 28, 2017, of the shares shown in the table, Mr. Kilmer owns 36,000 shares of Company's common stock, which are not yet vested.

46



CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Employment Agreements

        We have employment agreements with most of our named executive officers as described in "Employment Agreements and Potential Post Employment Compensation Arrangements."

Our Headquarters Lease

        In April 2015, the Company entered into a lease agreement for its headquarters building with Sodium LLC whose two owners are the Company's Chief Executive Officer, who has a 51% interest in Sodium LLC and his wife, Ruth Schaeffer, who has a 49% interest. The Company moved into the headquarters building in May 2015. The fixed annual rent for the new headquarters building is $1.0 million per year plus an allocation of taxes and utilities. The lease term is for five years and is cancellable by the Company upon 60 days' notice. The Company's audit committee reviewed and approved the lease as a related party transaction. We believe that the lease is on the terms at least as favorable to us as could have been obtained from an unaffiliated third party. The Company paid $1.7 million in 2016, $1.2 million in 2015, and $0.5 million in 2014, respectively for rent and related costs (including taxes and utilities) to these lessors for this lease and the prior lease. David Schaeffer's interest in those amounts is 51%; Ruth Schaeffer's is 49%.

Mr. Montagner is a Named Executive Officer of a Customer

        In August of 2015 Mr. Montagner, a director of the Company and a member of our Audit Committee and Compensation Committee, became the Chief Financial Officer at Endurance International Group Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: EIGI). Endurance International was a customer of Cogent prior to August of 2015. The total amount paid to Cogent by Endurance International in 2016 was $118,000. The services provided to Endurance International are standard services that the Company provides to other customers.

Approval of Related Party Transactions

        The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing, approving or ratifying any transaction in which the Company and any of our directors, director nominees, executive officers, 5% stockholders and their immediate family members are participants and in which such persons have a direct or indirect material interest as provided under SEC rules. The company does not have a written policy for reviewing these transactions. However, in the course of reviewing potential related person transactions, the Audit Committee considers the nature of the related person's interest in the transaction; the presence of standard prices, rates or charges or terms otherwise consistent with arm's length dealings with unrelated third parties; the materiality of the transaction to each party; the reasons for the Company entering into the transaction with the related person; the potential effect of the transaction on the status of a director as an independent, outside or disinterested director or committee member; and any other factors the Audit Committee may deem relevant. In the case of the headquarters lease described above the Audit Committee reviewed information on comparable leases in making its determination to approve the lease.


SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

        Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company's officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company's stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based on its records and other information, the Company believes that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its directors and executive officers for 2016 were timely met.

47



RELATIONSHIP WITH INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

        The Audit Committee reappointed Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016. In making this appointment, the Audit Committee considered whether the audit and non-audit services Ernst & Young LLP provides are compatible with maintaining the independence of our outside auditors. The Audit Committee has adopted a policy that sets forth the manner in which the Audit Committee will review and approve all services to be provided by Ernst & Young LLP before the firm is retained.

        Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will not be present at the Annual Meeting but are expected to be available by telephone to respond to appropriate questions and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so.

Fees and Services of Ernst & Young LLP

        The following table summarizes fees billed to us by Ernst & Young LLP for fiscal years 2015 and 2016; all services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee:


(in thousands)

Service
  2015   2016  

Audit fees(1)

  $ 1,725   $ 1,861  

Tax fees(2)

  $ 160   $ 54  

TOTAL

  $ 1,885   $ 1,915  

(1)
Fees for audit services include fees associated with the annual audit, the review of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, professional services associated with the Company's issuance of debt, and statutory audits (in jurisdictions where required).

(2)
Tax fees include professional services related to tax compliance and tax planning.

        All services performed by Ernst & Young LLP were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with its pre-approval policy. The policy describes the audit, audit-related, tax and other services permitted to be performed by the independent registered public accountants, subject to the Audit Committee's prior approval of the services and fees. On an annual basis, the Audit Committee will review and provide pre-approval for certain types of services that may be provided by the independent registered public accountants without obtaining specific pre-approval from the Audit Committee. If a type of service to be provided has not received pre-approval during this annual process, it will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. Any proposed services exceeding pre-approved cost levels or budgeted amounts will also require separate pre-approval by the Audit Committee.


STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

        No stockholder proposals intended for inclusion in the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2016 were received by the Company.

        Stockholders who wish to submit a proposal to be included in the Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must submit their proposal by November 23, 2017 to Ried Zulager, Secretary, Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc., 2450 N Street NW, 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20037. The proposal must comply with the SEC's proxy rules.

48


        Additionally, the Company's Bylaws provide that stockholders desiring to nominate a director or bring any other business before the stockholders at an annual meeting must notify the Secretary of the Company thereof in writing during the period 120 to 90 days before the first anniversary of the date of the preceding year's annual meeting or, if the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so delivered during the period 120 to 90 days before such annual meeting or 10 days following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the Company. These stockholder notices must set forth certain information specified in the Bylaws. For information about the required information, see "Annual Meeting of Stockholders" in the Meetings of Stockholders section of the Bylaws.


OTHER MATTERS

        The Board knows of no other business that will be presented to the Annual Meeting. If any other business is properly brought before the Annual Meeting, proxies in the enclosed form will be voted in respect thereof in accordance with the judgments of the persons voting the proxies.

        It is important that the proxies be returned promptly and that your shares are represented. Stockholders are urged to sign, date and promptly return the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed envelope.

        A copy of the Company's 2016 Annual Report to Stockholders accompanies this Proxy Statement. The Company has filed an Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the "Form 10-K") with the SEC. Stockholders may obtain, free of charge, a copy of the Form 10-K by writing to Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc., 2450 N Street, NW, 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20037, Attn: Investor Relations. Stockholders may also obtain a copy of the Form 10-K by accessing the Company's website at www.cogentco.com under the tab "About Cogent; Investor Relations; Reports."

Householding of Proxies

        The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy delivery requirements for annual reports and proxy statements with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single annual report and/or proxy statement addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as "householding," potentially provides extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies. We and some brokers household annual reports and proxy materials, delivering a single annual report and/or proxy materials to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders.

        To request individual copies for each stockholder in your household, please contact our Investor Relations department by e-mail at investor.relations@cogentco.com, or by mail to Cogent Communication, Inc., 2450 N Street, NW, 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20037, Attn: Investor Relations. To ask that only one set of the documents be mailed to your household, please contact your bank, broker or other nominee or, if you are a stockholder of record, please call our transfer agent, Computershare Shareholder Services at (800)-368-5948 from within in the United States and Canada or +1 (781) 575 4223 outside the United States and Canada, or by mail to P.O. Box 30170, College

49


Station, TX 77842-3170. The transfer agent also has the following website: www.computershare.com/investor.

    By Order of the Board of Directors

 

 

GRAPHIC

 

 

Ried Zulager, Secretary

Washington, D.C.
March 23, 2017

50



Appendix A

COGENT COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
2017 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN

ARTICLE 1.

PURPOSE

        The purpose of the Cogent Communications 2017 Incentive Award Plan (as it may be amended or restated from time to time, the "Plan") is to promote the success and enhance the value of Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") by linking the individual interests of the members of the Board, Employees, and Consultants to those of Company stockholders and by providing such individuals with an incentive for outstanding performance to generate superior returns to Company stockholders. The Plan is further intended to provide flexibility to the Company in its ability to motivate, attract, and retain the services of members of the Board, Employees, and Consultants upon whose judgment, interest, and special effort the successful conduct of the Company's operation is largely dependent.


ARTICLE 2.

DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION

        Wherever the following terms are used in the Plan they shall have the meanings specified below, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The singular pronoun shall include the plural where the context so indicates.

51


        Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a Change in Control constitutes a payment event with respect to any Award (or any portion of an Award) that provides for the deferral of compensation that is subject to Section 409A, to the extent required to avoid the imposition of additional taxes under Section 409A, the transaction or event described in subsection (a), (b) or (c) with respect to such Award (or portion thereof) shall only constitute a Change in Control for purposes of the payment timing of such Award if such transaction also constitutes a "change in control event," as defined in Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(i)(5).

52


        The Administrator shall have full and final authority, which shall be exercised in its sole discretion, to determine conclusively whether a Change in Control has occurred pursuant to the above definition, the date of the occurrence of such Change in Control and any incidental matters relating thereto; provided that any exercise of authority in conjunction with a determination of whether a Change in Control is a "change in control event" as defined in Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(i)(5) shall be consistent with such regulation.

53


54


55


56


        The Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall determine the effect of all matters and questions relating to any Termination of Service, including, without limitation, whether a Termination of Service has occurred, whether a Termination of Service resulted from a discharge for cause and all questions of whether particular leaves of absence constitute a Termination of Service; provided, however, that, with respect to Incentive Stock Options, unless the Administrator otherwise provides in the terms of any Program, Award Agreement or otherwise, or as otherwise required by Applicable Law, a leave of absence, change in status from an employee to an independent contractor or other change in the employee-employer relationship shall constitute a Termination of Service only if, and to the extent that, such leave of absence, change in status or other change interrupts employment for the purposes of Section 422(a)(2) of the Code and the then-applicable regulations and revenue rulings under said Section. For purposes of the Plan, a Holder's employee-employer relationship or consultancy relations shall be deemed to be terminated in the event that the Subsidiary employing or contracting with such Holder ceases to remain an Subsidiary following any merger, sale of stock or other corporate transaction or event (including, without limitation, a spin-off).

57



ARTICLE 3.

SHARES SUBJECT TO THE PLAN

        3.2    Limitation on Number of Shares Subject to Awards.    Notwithstanding any provision in the Plan to the contrary, and subject to Section 13.2, the maximum aggregate number of Shares with respect to one or more Awards that may be granted to any one person during any calendar year shall be 750,000

58


and the maximum aggregate amount of cash that may be paid in cash to any one person during any calendar year with respect to one or more Awards payable in cash shall be $10,000,000. To the extent required by Section 162(m) of the Code, Shares subject to Awards which are canceled shall continue to be counted against the Award Limit.

        3.3    Award Vesting Limitations.    Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, but subject to this Section 3.3 and Section 13.2 of the Plan, Awards granted under the Plan shall vest no earlier than the first anniversary of the date the Award is granted; provided, however, that, notwithstanding the foregoing, Awards that result in the issuance of an aggregate of up to 5% of the shares of Common Stock available pursuant to Section 3.1(a) may be granted to any one or more Eligible Individuals without respect to such minimum vesting provisions; and provided, further, that, notwithstanding the foregoing, Full Value Awards (other than those that vest based on achievement of performance targets) shall vest at a rate that would not exceed the following vesting schedule: (a) no vesting prior to the first anniversary of the date of grant, (b) no more than 1/3 vested on the first anniversary of the date of grant, (c) no more than 2/3 vested on the second anniversary of the date of grant and (d) full vesting not occurring prior to the end of the third anniversary of the date of grant. Nothing in this Section 3.3 shall preclude the Administrator from taking action, in its sole discretion, to accelerate the vesting of any Award in connection with or following a Holder's death, disability, retirement or the consummation of a Change in Control.


ARTICLE 4.

GRANTING OF AWARDS

        4.1    Participation.    The Administrator may, from time to time, select from among all Eligible Individuals, those to whom an Award shall be granted and shall determine the nature and amount of each Award, which shall not be inconsistent with the requirements of the Plan. No Eligible Individual or other Person shall have any right to be granted an Award pursuant to the Plan and neither the Company nor the Administrator is obligated to treat Eligible Individuals, Holders or any other persons uniformly. Participation by each Holder in the Plan shall be voluntary and nothing in the Plan or any Program shall be construed as mandating that any Eligible Individual or other Person shall participate in the Plan.

        4.2    Award Agreement.    Each Award shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that sets forth the terms, conditions and limitations for such Award as determined by the Administrator in its sole discretion (consistent with the requirements of the Plan and any applicable Program). Award Agreements evidencing Awards intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation shall contain such terms and conditions as may be necessary to meet the applicable provisions of Section 162(m) of the Code. Award Agreements evidencing Incentive Stock Options shall contain such terms and conditions as may be necessary to meet the applicable provisions of Section 422 of the Code.

        4.3    Limitations Applicable to Section 16 Persons.    Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, the Plan, and any Award granted or awarded to any individual who is then subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, shall be subject to any additional limitations set forth in any applicable exemptive rule under Section 16 of the Exchange Act (including Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act and any amendments thereto) that are requirements for the application of such exemptive rule. To the extent permitted by Applicable Law, the Plan and Awards granted or awarded hereunder shall be deemed amended to the extent necessary to conform to such applicable exemptive rule.

        4.4    At-Will Service.    Nothing in the Plan or in any Program or Award Agreement hereunder shall confer upon any Holder any right to continue in the employ of, or as a Director or Consultant for, the Company or any Subsidiary, or shall interfere with or restrict in any way the rights of the Company and any Subsidiary, which rights are hereby expressly reserved, to discharge any Holder at any time for any reason whatsoever, with or without cause, and with or without notice, or to terminate or change all other terms and conditions of employment or engagement, except to the extent expressly provided otherwise in a written agreement between the Holder and the Company or any Subsidiary.

59


        4.5    Foreign Holders.    Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan or applicable Program to the contrary, in order to comply with the laws in countries other than the United States in which the Company and its Subsidiaries operate or have Employees, Non-Employee Directors or Consultants, or in order to comply with the requirements of any foreign securities exchange or other Applicable Law, the Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall have the power and authority to: (a) determine which Subsidiaries shall be covered by the Plan; (b) determine which Eligible Individuals outside the United States are eligible to participate in the Plan; (c) modify the terms and conditions of any Award granted to Eligible Individuals outside the United States to comply with Applicable Law (including, without limitation, applicable foreign laws or listing requirements of any foreign securities exchange); (d) establish subplans and modify exercise procedures and other terms and procedures, to the extent such actions may be necessary or advisable; provided, however, that no such subplans and/or modifications shall increase the share limitation contained in Section 3.1, the Award Limit or the Director Limit; and (e) take any action, before or after an Award is made, that it deems advisable to obtain approval or comply with any necessary local governmental regulatory exemptions or approvals or listing requirements of any foreign securities exchange.

        4.6    Non-Employee Director Awards.    Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in the Plan, the sum of the grant date fair value of equity-based Awards and the amount of any cash-based Awards granted or fees otherwise payable to a Non-Employee Director during any calendar year shall not exceed $500,000 (which amount will be increased (or decreased) cumulative each year by the annual inflation rate as reported by the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers) (the "Director Limit").


ARTICLE 5.

PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO AWARDS INTENDED TO QUALIFY AS PERFORMANCE-BASED COMPENSATION

        5.1    Purpose.    The Administrator may, in its sole discretion, (a) determine whether an Award is intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation and (b) at any time after any such determination, alter such intent for any or no reason. If the Administrator, in its sole discretion, decides to grant an Award that is intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation (other than an Option or Stock Appreciation Right), then the provisions of this Article 5 shall control over any contrary provision contained in the Plan or any applicable Program; provided that, if after such decision the Administrator alters such intention for any reason, the provisions of this Article 5 shall no longer control over any other provision contained in the Plan or any applicable Program. The Administrator, in its sole discretion, may (i) grant Awards to Eligible Individuals that are based on Performance Criteria or Performance Goals or any such other criteria and goals as the Administrator shall establish, but that do not satisfy the requirements of this Article 5 and that are not intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation and (ii) subject any Awards intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation to additional conditions and restrictions unrelated to any Performance Criteria or Performance Goals (including, without limitation, continued employment or service requirements) to the extent such Awards otherwise satisfy the requirements of this Article 5 with respect to the Performance Criteria and Performance Goals applicable thereto. Unless otherwise specified by the Administrator at the time of grant, the Performance Criteria with respect to an Award intended to be Performance-Based Compensation payable to a Covered Employee shall be determined on the basis of Applicable Accounting Standards.

        5.2    Procedures with Respect to Performance-Based Awards.    To the extent necessary to comply with the requirements of Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code, with respect to any Award which is intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, no later than 90 days following the commencement of any Performance Period or any designated fiscal period or period of service (or such earlier time as may be required under Section 162(m) of the Code), the Administrator shall, in writing, (a) designate one or

60


more Eligible Individuals, (b) select the Performance Criteria applicable to the Performance Period, (c) establish the Performance Goals, and amounts of such Awards, as applicable, which may be earned for such Performance Period based on the Performance Criteria, and (d) specify the relationship between Performance Criteria and the Performance Goals and the amounts of such Awards, as applicable, to be earned by each Covered Employee for such Performance Period. Following the completion of each Performance Period, the Administrator shall certify in writing whether and the extent to which the applicable Performance Goals have been achieved for such Performance Period. In determining the amount earned under such Awards, the Administrator (i) shall, unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, have the right to reduce or eliminate the amount payable at a given level of performance to take into account additional factors that the Administrator may deem relevant, including the assessment of individual or corporate performance for the Performance Period, but (ii) shall in no event have the right to increase the amount payable for any reason.

        5.3    Payment of Performance-Based Awards.    Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Program or Award Agreement and only to the extent otherwise permitted by Section 162(m) of the Code, as to an Award that is intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, the Holder must be employed by the Company or a Subsidiary throughout the Performance Period. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Program or Award Agreement, a Holder shall be eligible to receive payment pursuant to such Awards for a Performance Period only if and to the extent the Performance Goals for such Performance Period are achieved.

        5.4    Additional Limitations.    Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan and except as otherwise determined by the Administrator, any Award which is granted to an Eligible Individual and is intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation shall be subject to any additional limitations set forth in Section 162(m) of the Code or any regulations or rulings issued thereunder that are requirements for qualification as Performance-Based Compensation, and the Plan and the applicable Program and Award Agreement shall be deemed amended to the extent necessary to conform to such requirements.


ARTICLE 6.

GRANTING OF OPTIONS AND STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS

        6.1    Granting of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights to Eligible Individuals.    The Administrator is authorized to grant Options and Stock Appreciation Rights to Eligible Individuals from time to time, in its sole discretion, on such terms and conditions as it may determine, which shall not be inconsistent with the Plan.

        6.2    Qualification of Incentive Stock Options.    The Administrator may grant Options intended to qualify as Incentive Stock Options only to employees of the Company, any of the Company's present or future "parent corporations" or "subsidiary corporations" as defined in Sections 424(e) or (f) of the Code, respectively, and any other entities the employees of which are eligible to receive Incentive Stock Options under the Code. No person who qualifies as a Greater Than 10% Stockholder may be granted an Incentive Stock Option unless such Incentive Stock Option conforms to the applicable provisions of Section 422 of the Code. To the extent that the aggregate fair market value of stock with respect to which "incentive stock options" (within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code, but without regard to Section 422(d) of the Code) are exercisable for the first time by a Holder during any calendar year under the Plan, and all other plans of the Company and any parent corporation or subsidiary corporation thereof (as defined in Section 424(e) and 424(f) of the Code, respectively), exceeds $100,000, the Options shall be treated as Non-Qualified Stock Options to the extent required by Section 422 of the Code. The rule set forth in the immediately preceding sentence shall be applied by taking Options and other "incentive stock options" into account in the order in which they were granted and the fair market value of stock shall be determined as of the time the respective options

61


were granted. Any interpretations and rules under the Plan with respect to Incentive Stock Options shall be consistent with the provisions of Section 422 of the Code. Neither the Company nor the Administrator shall have any liability to a Holder, or any other Person, (a) if an Option (or any part thereof) which is intended to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option fails to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option or (b) for any action or omission by the Company or the Administrator that causes an Option not to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option, including without limitation, the conversion of an Incentive Stock Option to a Non-Qualified Stock Option or the grant of an Option intended as an Incentive Stock Option that fails to satisfy the requirements under the Code applicable to an Incentive Stock Option.

        6.3    Option and Stock Appreciation Right Exercise Price.    The exercise price per Share subject to each Option and Stock Appreciation Right shall be set by the Administrator, but shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date the Option or Stock Appreciation Right, as applicable, is granted (or, as to Incentive Stock Options, on the date the Option is modified, extended or renewed for purposes of Section 424(h) of the Code). In addition, in the case of Incentive Stock Options granted to a Greater Than 10% Stockholder, such price shall not be less than 110% of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date the Option is granted (or the date the Option is modified, extended or renewed for purposes of Section 424(h) of the Code). Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of an Option or Stock Appreciation Right that is a Substitute Award, the exercise price per share of the Shares subject to such Option or Stock Appreciation Right, as applicable, may be less than the Fair Market Value per share on the date of grant; provided that the exercise price of any Substitute Award shall be determined in accordance with the applicable requirements of Section 424 and 409A of the Code.

        6.4    Option and SAR Term.    The term of each Option (the "Option Term") and the term of each Stock Appreciation Right (the "SAR Term") shall be set by the Administrator in its sole discretion; provided, however, that the Option Term or SAR Term, as applicable, shall not be more than (a) ten (10) years from the date the Option or Stock Appreciation Right, as applicable, is granted to an Eligible Individual (other than a Greater Than 10% Stockholder), or (b) five (5) years from the date an Incentive Stock Option is granted to a Greater Than 10% Stockholder. Except as limited by the requirements of Section 409A or Section 422 of the Code and regulations and rulings thereunder or the first sentence of this Section 6.4 and without limiting the Company's rights under Section 11.7, the Administrator may extend the Option Term of any outstanding Option or the SAR Term of any outstanding Stock Appreciation Right, and may extend the time period during which vested Options or Stock Appreciation Rights may be exercised, in connection with any Termination of Service of the Holder or otherwise, and may amend, subject to Section 11.7 and 13.1, any other term or condition of such Option or Stock Appreciation Right relating to such Termination of Service of the Holder or otherwise.

        6.5    Option and SAR Vesting.    The period during which the right to exercise, in whole or in part, an Option or Stock Appreciation Right vests in the Holder shall be set by the Administrator and set forth in the applicable Award Agreement, subject to Section 3.3. Unless otherwise determined by the Administrator in the Award Agreement, the applicable Program or by action of the Administrator following the grant of the Option or Stock Appreciation Right, (a) no portion of an Option or Stock Appreciation Right which is unexercisable at a Holder's Termination of Service shall thereafter become exercisable and (b) the portion of an Option or Stock Appreciation Right that is unexercisable at a Holder's Termination of Service shall automatically expire thirty (30) days following such Termination of Service.

        6.6    Substitution of Stock Appreciation Rights.    The Administrator may provide in the applicable Program or Award Agreement evidencing the grant of an Option that the Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall have the right to substitute a Stock Appreciation Right for such Option at any time prior to or upon exercise of such Option; provided that such Stock Appreciation Right shall be

62


exercisable with respect to the same number of Shares for which such substituted Option would have been exercisable, and shall also have the same exercise price, vesting schedule and remaining term as the substituted Option.


ARTICLE 7.

EXERCISE OF OPTIONS AND STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS

        7.1    Exercise and Payment.    An exercisable Option or Stock Appreciation Right may be exercised in whole or in part. However, an Option or Stock Appreciation Right shall not be exercisable with respect to fractional Shares and the Administrator may require that, by the terms of the Option or Stock Appreciation Right, a partial exercise must be with respect to a minimum number of Shares. Payment of the amounts payable with respect to Stock Appreciation Rights pursuant to this Article 7 shall be in cash, Shares (based on its Fair Market Value as of the date the Stock Appreciation Right is exercised), or a combination of both, as determined by the Administrator.

        7.2    Manner of Exercise.    All or a portion of an exercisable Option or Stock Appreciation Right shall be deemed exercised upon delivery of all of the following to the Secretary of the Company, the stock plan administrator of the Company or such other person or entity designated by the Administrator, or his, her or its office, as applicable:

        7.3    Notification Regarding Disposition.    The Holder shall give the Company prompt written or electronic notice of any disposition of Shares acquired by exercise of an Incentive Stock Option which occurs within (a) two years from the date of granting (including the date the Option is modified, extended or renewed for purposes of Section 424(h) of the Code) such Option to such Holder, or (b) one year after the date of transfer of such Shares to such Holder. Such notice shall specify the date of such disposition or other transfer and the amount realized, in cash, other property, assumption of indebtedness or other consideration, by the Holder in such disposition or other transfer.

63



ARTICLE 8.

AWARD OF RESTRICTED STOCK

        8.1    Award of Restricted Stock.    The Administrator is authorized to grant Restricted Stock to Eligible Individuals, and shall determine the terms and conditions, including the restrictions applicable to each award of Restricted Stock, which terms and conditions shall not be inconsistent with the Plan or any applicable Program, and may impose such conditions on the issuance of such Restricted Stock as it deems appropriate. The Administrator shall establish the purchase price, if any, and form of payment for Restricted Stock; provided, however, that if a purchase price is charged, such purchase price shall be no less than the par value, if any, of the Shares to be purchased, unless otherwise permitted by Applicable Law. In all cases, legal consideration shall be required for each issuance of Restricted Stock to the extent required by Applicable Law.

        8.2    Rights as Stockholders.    Subject to Section 8.4, upon issuance of Restricted Stock, the Holder shall have, unless otherwise provided by the Administrator, all the rights of a stockholder with respect to said Shares, subject to the restrictions in the Plan, any applicable Program and/or the applicable Award Agreement, including the right to receive all dividends and other distributions paid or made with respect to the Shares to the extent such dividends and other distributions have a record date that is on or after the date on which the Holder to whom such Restricted Stock are granted becomes the record holder of such Restricted Stock; provided, however, that, in the sole discretion of the Administrator, any extraordinary distributions with respect to the Shares may be subject to the restrictions set forth in Section 8.3. In addition, with respect to a share of Restricted Stock subject to vesting conditions, dividends which are paid prior to vesting shall be paid out to the Holder only if, when and to the extent that the vesting conditions are subsequently satisfied and the share of Restricted Stock vests.

        8.3    Restrictions.    All shares of Restricted Stock (including any shares received by Holders thereof with respect to shares of Restricted Stock as a result of stock dividends, stock splits or any other form of recapitalization) shall be subject to such restrictions and vesting requirements as the Administrator shall provide in the applicable Program or Award Agreement, subject to Section 3.3. By action taken after the Restricted Stock is issued, the Administrator may, on such terms and conditions as it may determine to be appropriate, accelerate the vesting of such Restricted Stock by removing any or all of the restrictions imposed by the terms of the applicable Program or Award Agreement.

        8.4    Repurchase or Forfeiture of Restricted Stock.    Except as otherwise determined by the Administrator, if no price was paid by the Holder for the Restricted Stock, upon a Termination of Service during the applicable restriction period, the Holder's rights in unvested Restricted Stock then subject to restrictions shall lapse, and such Restricted Stock shall be surrendered to the Company and cancelled without consideration on the date of such Termination of Service. If a price was paid by the Holder for the Restricted Stock, upon a Termination of Service during the applicable restriction period, the Company shall have the right to repurchase from the Holder the unvested Restricted Stock then subject to restrictions at a cash price per share equal to the price paid by the Holder for such Restricted Stock or such other amount as may be specified in the applicable Program or Award Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, except as otherwise provided by Section 3.3, the Administrator, in its sole discretion, may provide that upon certain events, including, without limitation, a Change in Control, the Holder's death, retirement or disability or any other specified Termination of Service or any other event, the Holder's rights in unvested Restricted Stock then subject to restrictions shall not lapse, such Restricted Stock shall vest and cease to be forfeitable and, if applicable, the Company shall cease to have a right of repurchase.

        8.5    Section 83(b) Election.    If a Holder makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Code to be taxed with respect to the Restricted Stock as of the date of transfer of the Restricted Stock rather than as of the date or dates upon which the Holder would otherwise be taxable under Section 83(a) of the

64


Code, the Holder shall be required to deliver a copy of such election to the Company promptly after filing such election with the Internal Revenue Service along with proof of the timely filing thereof with the Internal Revenue Service.


ARTICLE 9.

AWARD OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

        9.1    Grant of Restricted Stock Units.    The Administrator is authorized to grant Awards of Restricted Stock Units to any Eligible Individual selected by the Administrator in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as determined by the Administrator.

        9.2    Term.    Except as otherwise provided herein, the term of a Restricted Stock Unit award shall be set by the Administrator in its sole discretion.

        9.3    Purchase Price.    The Administrator shall specify the purchase price, if any, to be paid by the Holder to the Company with respect to any Restricted Stock Unit award; provided, however, that value of the consideration shall not be less than the par value of a Share, unless otherwise permitted by Applicable Law.

        9.4    Vesting of Restricted Stock Units.    At the time of grant, the Administrator shall specify the date or dates on which the Restricted Stock Units shall become fully vested and nonforfeitable, and may specify such conditions to vesting as it deems appropriate, including, without limitation, vesting based upon the Holder's duration of service to the Company or any Subsidiary, one or more Performance Criteria, Company performance, individual performance or other specific criteria, in each case on a specified date or dates or over any period or periods, as determined by the Administrator, subject to Section 3.3.

        9.5    Maturity and Payment.    At the time of grant, the Administrator shall specify the maturity date applicable to each grant of Restricted Stock Units, which shall be no earlier than the vesting date or dates of the Award and may be determined at the election of the Holder (if permitted by the applicable Award Agreement); provided that, except as otherwise determined by the Administrator, and subject to compliance with Section 409A, in no event shall the maturity date relating to each Restricted Stock Unit occur following the later of (a) the 15th day of the third month following the end of calendar year in which the applicable portion of the Restricted Stock Unit vests; or (b) the 15th day of the third month following the end of the Company's fiscal year in which the applicable portion of the Restricted Stock Unit vests. On the maturity date, the Company shall, in accordance with the applicable Award Agreement and subject to Section 11.4(f), transfer to the Holder one unrestricted, fully transferable Share for each Restricted Stock Unit scheduled to be paid out on such date and not previously forfeited, or in the sole discretion of the Administrator, an amount in cash equal to the Fair Market Value of such Shares on the maturity date or a combination of cash and Common Stock as determined by the Administrator.

        9.6    Payment upon Termination of Service.    An Award of Restricted Stock Units shall only be payable while the Holder is an Employee, a Consultant or a member of the Board, as applicable; provided, however, that the Administrator, in its sole discretion, may provide (in an Award Agreement or otherwise) that a Restricted Stock Unit award may be paid subsequent to a Termination of Service in certain events, including a Change in Control, the Holder's death, retirement or disability or any other specified Termination of Service.

65



ARTICLE 10.

AWARD OF OTHER STOCK OR CASH BASED AWARDS AND DIVIDEND EQUIVALENTS

        10.1    Other Stock or Cash Based Awards.    The Administrator is authorized to (a) grant Other Stock or Cash Based Awards, including awards entitling a Holder to receive Shares or cash to be delivered immediately or in the future, to any Eligible Individual and (b) determine whether such Other Stock or Cash Based Awards shall be Performance-Based Compensation. Subject to the provisions of the Plan and any applicable Program, the Administrator shall determine the terms and conditions of each Other Stock or Cash Based Award, including the term of the Award, any exercise or purchase price, performance goals, including the Performance Criteria, transfer restrictions, vesting conditions and other terms and conditions applicable thereto, which shall be set forth in the applicable Award Agreement, subject to Section 3.3. Other Stock or Cash Based Awards may be paid in cash, Shares, or a combination of cash and Shares, as determined by the Administrator, and may be available as a form of payment in the settlement of other Awards granted under the Plan, as stand-alone payments, as a part of a bonus, deferred bonus, deferred compensation or other arrangement, and/or as payment in lieu of compensation to which an Eligible Individual is otherwise entitled.

        10.2    Dividend Equivalents.    Dividend Equivalents may be granted by the Administrator, either alone or in tandem with another Award, based on dividends declared on the Common Stock, to be credited as of dividend payment dates during the period between the date the Dividend Equivalents are granted to a Holder and the date such Dividend Equivalents terminate or expire, as determined by the Administrator. Such Dividend Equivalents shall be converted to cash or additional Shares by such formula and at such time and subject to such restrictions and limitations as may be determined by the Administrator. In addition, Dividend Equivalents shall be paid out to the Holder only if, when and to the extent that such Awards vest. The value of dividends and other distributions payable with respect to Awards that do not vest shall be forfeited.


ARTICLE 11.

ADDITIONAL TERMS OF AWARDS

        11.1    Payment.    The Administrator shall determine the method or methods by which payments by any Holder with respect to any Awards granted under the Plan shall be made, including, without limitation: (a) cash or check, (b) Shares (including, in the case of payment of the exercise price of an Award, Shares issuable pursuant to the exercise of the Award) or Shares held for such minimum period of time as may be established by the Administrator, in each case, having a Fair Market Value on the date of delivery equal to the aggregate payments required, (c) delivery of a written or electronic notice that the Holder has placed a market sell order with a broker acceptable to the Company with respect to Shares then issuable upon exercise or vesting of an Award, and that the broker has been directed to pay a sufficient portion of the net proceeds of the sale to the Company in satisfaction of the aggregate payments required; provided that payment of such proceeds is then made to the Company upon settlement of such sale, (d) other form of legal consideration acceptable to the Administrator in its sole discretion, or (e) any combination of the above permitted forms of payment. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, no Holder who is a Director or an "executive officer" of the Company within the meaning of Section 13(k) of the Exchange Act shall be permitted to make payment with respect to any Awards granted under the Plan, or continue any extension of credit with respect to such payment, with a loan from the Company or a loan arranged by the Company in violation of Section 13(k) of the Exchange Act.

        11.2    Tax Withholding.    The Company or any Subsidiary shall have the authority and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a Holder to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy federal, state, local and foreign taxes (including the Holder's FICA, employment tax or other social security contribution obligation) required by law to be withheld with respect to any taxable event

66


concerning a Holder arising as a result of the Plan or any Award. The Administrator may, in its sole discretion and in satisfaction of the foregoing requirement, allow a Holder to satisfy such obligations by any payment means described in Section 11.1 hereof, including without limitation, by allowing such Holder to have the Company or any Subsidiary withhold Shares otherwise issuable under an Award (or allow the surrender of Shares). The number of Shares which may be so withheld or surrendered shall be no greater than the number of Shares which have a fair market value on the date of withholding or repurchase equal to the aggregate amount of such liabilities based on the maximum statutory withholding rates in such Holder's applicable jurisdiction for federal, state, local and foreign income tax and payroll tax purposes that are applicable to such supplemental taxable income. The Administrator shall determine the fair market value of the Shares, consistent with applicable provisions of the Code, for tax withholding obligations due in connection with a broker-assisted cashless Option or Stock Appreciation Right exercise involving the sale of Shares to pay the Option or Stock Appreciation Right exercise price or any tax withholding obligation.

        11.3    Transferability of Awards.    

67


        11.4    Conditions to Issuance of Shares.    

68


        11.5    Forfeiture and Claw-Back Provisions.    All Awards (including any proceeds, gains or other economic benefit actually or constructively received by a Holder upon any receipt or exercise of any Award or upon the receipt or resale of any Shares underlying the Award and any payments of a portion of an incentive-based bonus pool allocated to a Holder) shall be subject to the provisions of any claw-back policy implemented by the Company, including, without limitation, any claw-back policy adopted to comply with the requirements of Applicable Law, including, without limitation, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and any rules or regulations promulgated thereunder, whether or not such claw-back policy was in place at the time of grant of an Award, to the extent set forth in such claw-back policy and/or in the applicable Award Agreement.

        11.6    Prohibition on Repricing.    Subject to Section 13.2, the Administrator shall not, without the approval of the stockholders of the Company, (a) authorize the amendment of any outstanding Option or Stock Appreciation Right to reduce its price per Share, or (b) cancel any Option or Stock Appreciation Right in exchange for cash or another Award when the Option or Stock Appreciation Right price per Share exceeds the Fair Market Value of the underlying Shares.

        11.7    Amendment of Awards.    Subject to Applicable Law, the Administrator may amend, modify or terminate any outstanding Award, including but not limited to, substituting therefor another Award of the same or a different type, changing the date of exercise or settlement, and converting an Incentive Stock Option to a Non-Qualified Stock Option. The Holder's consent to such action shall be required unless (a) the Administrator determines that the action, taking into account any related action, would not materially and adversely affect the Holder, or (b) the change is otherwise permitted under the Plan (including, without limitation, under Section 13.2 or 13.10).

        11.8    Data Privacy.    As a condition of receipt of any Award, each Holder explicitly and unambiguously consents to the collection, use and transfer, in electronic or other form, of personal data as described in this Section 11.8 by and among, as applicable, the Company and its Subsidiaries for the exclusive purpose of implementing, administering and managing the Holder's participation in the Plan. The Company and its Subsidiaries may hold certain personal information about a Holder, including but not limited to, the Holder's name, home address and telephone number, date of birth, social security or insurance number or other identification number, salary, nationality, job title(s), any shares of stock held in the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, details of all Awards, in each case, for the purpose of implementing, managing and administering the Plan and Awards (the "Data"). The Company and its Subsidiaries may transfer the Data amongst themselves as necessary for the purpose of implementation, administration and management of a Holder's participation in the Plan, and the Company and its Subsidiaries may each further transfer the Data to any third parties assisting the Company and its Subsidiaries in the implementation, administration and management of the Plan. These recipients may be located in the Holder's country, or elsewhere, and the Holder's country may have different data privacy laws and protections than the recipients' country. Through acceptance of an Award, each Holder authorizes such recipients to receive, possess, use, retain and transfer the Data, in electronic or other form, for the purposes of implementing, administering and managing the Holder's participation in the Plan, including any requisite transfer of such Data as may be required to a broker or other third party with whom the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or the Holder may elect to deposit any Shares. The Data related to a Holder will be held only as long as is necessary to implement, administer, and

69


manage the Holder's participation in the Plan. A Holder may, at any time, view the Data held by the Company with respect to such Holder, request additional information about the storage and processing of the Data with respect to such Holder, recommend any necessary corrections to the Data with respect to the Holder or refuse or withdraw the consents herein in writing, in any case without cost, by contacting his or her local human resources representative. The Company may cancel Holder's ability to participate in the Plan and, in the Administrator's discretion, the Holder may forfeit any outstanding Awards if the Holder refuses or withdraws his or her consents as described herein. For more information on the consequences of refusal to consent or withdrawal of consent, Holders may contact their local human resources representative.


ARTICLE 12.

ADMINISTRATION

        12.1    Administrator.    The Committee shall administer the Plan (except as otherwise permitted herein). To the extent necessary to comply with Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act, and with respect to Awards that are intended to be Performance-Based Compensation, including Options and Stock Appreciation Rights, then the Committee shall take all action with respect to such Awards, and the individuals taking such action shall consist solely of two or more Non-Employee Directors, each of whom is intended to qualify as both a "non-employee director" as defined by Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act or any successor rule and an "outside director" for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code. Additionally, to the extent required by Applicable Law, each of the individuals constituting the Committee shall be an "independent director" under the rules of any securities exchange or automated quotation system on which the Shares are listed, quoted or traded. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any action taken by the Committee shall be valid and effective, whether or not members of the Committee at the time of such action are later determined not to have satisfied the requirements for membership set forth in this Section 12.1 or the Organizational Documents. Except as may otherwise be provided in the Organizational Documents or as otherwise required by Applicable Law, (a) appointment of Committee members shall be effective upon acceptance of appointment, (b) Committee members may resign at any time by delivering written or electronic notice to the Board and (c) vacancies in the Committee may only be filled by the Board. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) the full Board, acting by a majority of its members in office, shall conduct the general administration of the Plan with respect to Awards granted to Non-Employee Directors and, with respect to such Awards, the terms "Administrator" as used in the Plan shall be deemed to refer to the Board and (ii) the Board or Committee may delegate its authority hereunder to the extent permitted by Section 12.6.

        12.2    Duties and Powers of Administrator.    It shall be the duty of the Administrator to conduct the general administration of the Plan in accordance with its provisions. The Administrator shall have the power to interpret the Plan, all Programs and Award Agreements, and to adopt such rules for the administration, interpretation and application of the Plan and any Program as are not inconsistent with the Plan, to interpret, amend or revoke any such rules and to amend the Plan or any Program or Award Agreement; provided that the rights or obligations of the Holder of the Award that is the subject of any such Program or Award Agreement are not materially and adversely affected by such amendment, unless the consent of the Holder is obtained or such amendment is otherwise permitted under Section 11.5 or Section 13.10. In its sole discretion, the Board may at any time and from time to time exercise any and all rights and duties of the Committee in its capacity as the Administrator under the Plan except with respect to matters which under Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act or any successor rule, or Section 162(m) of the Code, or any regulations or rules issued thereunder, or the rules of any securities exchange or automated quotation system on which the Shares are listed, quoted or traded are required to be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee.

70


        12.3    Action by the Administrator.    Unless otherwise established by the Board, set forth in any Organizational Documents or as required by Applicable Law, a majority of the Administrator shall constitute a quorum and the acts of a majority of the members present at any meeting at which a quorum is present, and acts approved in writing by all members of the Administrator in lieu of a meeting, shall be deemed the acts of the Administrator. Each member of the Administrator is entitled to, in good faith, rely or act upon any report or other information furnished to that member by any officer or other employee of the Company or any Subsidiary, the Company's independent certified public accountants, or any executive compensation consultant or other professional retained by the Company to assist in the administration of the Plan.

        12.4    Authority of Administrator.    Subject to the Organizational Documents, any specific designation in the Plan and Applicable Law, the Administrator has the exclusive power, authority and sole discretion to:

        12.5    Decisions Binding.    The Administrator's interpretation of the Plan, any Awards granted pursuant to the Plan, any Program or any Award Agreement and all decisions and determinations by the Administrator with respect to the Plan are final, binding and conclusive on all Persons.

71


        12.6    Delegation of Authority.    The Board or Committee may from time to time delegate to a committee of one or more members of the Board or one or more officers of the Company the authority to grant or amend Awards or to take other administrative actions pursuant to this Article 12; provided, however, that in no event shall an officer of the Company be delegated the authority to grant Awards to, or amend Awards held by, the following individuals: (a) individuals who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, (b) Covered Employees with respect to Awards intended to constitute Performance Based Compensation, or (c) officers of the Company (or Directors) to whom authority to grant or amend Awards has been delegated hereunder; provided, further, that any delegation of administrative authority shall only be permitted to the extent it is permissible under any Organizational Documents and Applicable Law (including, without limitation, Section 162(m) of the Code). Any delegation hereunder shall be subject to the restrictions and limits that the Board or Committee specifies at the time of such delegation or that are otherwise included in the applicable Organizational Documents, and the Board or Committee, as applicable, may at any time rescind the authority so delegated or appoint a new delegatee. At all times, the delegatee appointed under this Section 12.6 shall serve in such capacity at the pleasure of the Board or the Committee, as applicable, and the Board or the Committee may abolish any committee at any time and re-vest in itself any previously delegated authority.


ARTICLE 13.

MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

        13.1    Amendment, Suspension or Termination of the Plan.    

        13.2    Changes in Common Stock or Assets of the Company, Acquisition or Liquidation of the Company and Other Corporate Events.    

72


73


        13.3    Approval of Plan by Stockholders.    The Plan shall be submitted for the approval of the Company's stockholders within twelve (12) months after the date of the Board's initial adoption of the Plan. Awards may be granted or awarded prior to such stockholder approval; provided that such Awards shall not be exercisable, shall not vest and the restrictions thereon shall not lapse and no Shares shall be issued pursuant thereto prior to the time when the Plan is approved by the Company's stockholders; and provided, further, that if such approval has not been obtained at the end of said twelve (12) month period, all Awards previously granted or awarded under the Plan shall thereupon be canceled and become null and void. If the Plan is not approved by the Company's stockholders, (i) it will not become effective, (ii) no Awards shall be granted thereunder, and (iii) the Amended 2004 Plan will continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. Upon the approval of the Plan by the Company's stockholders, any awards outstanding under the Amended 2004 Plan as of the date of such approval shall remain outstanding and, if applicable, exercisable pursuant to the terms of such individual grants.

74


        13.4    No Stockholders Rights.    Except as otherwise provided herein or in an applicable Program or Award Agreement, a Holder shall have none of the rights of a stockholder with respect to Shares covered by any Award until the Holder becomes the record owner of such Shares.

        13.5    Paperless Administration.    In the event that the Company establishes, for itself or using the services of a third party, an automated system for the documentation, granting or exercise of Awards, such as a system using an internet website or interactive voice response, then the paperless documentation, granting or exercise of Awards by a Holder may be permitted through the use of such an automated system.

        13.6    Effect of Plan upon Other Compensation Plans.    The adoption of the Plan shall not affect any other compensation or incentive plans in effect for the Company or any Subsidiary. Nothing in the Plan shall be construed to limit the right of the Company or any Subsidiary: (a) to establish any other forms of incentives or compensation for Employees, Directors or Consultants of the Company or any Subsidiary, or (b) to grant or assume options or other rights or awards otherwise than under the Plan in connection with any proper corporate purpose including without limitation, the grant or assumption of options in connection with the acquisition by purchase, lease, merger, consolidation or otherwise, of the business, stock or assets of any corporation, partnership, limited liability company, firm or association.

        13.7    Compliance with Laws.    The Plan, the granting and vesting of Awards under the Plan and the issuance and delivery of Shares and the payment of money under the Plan or under Awards granted or awarded hereunder are subject to compliance with all Applicable Law (including but not limited to state, federal and foreign securities law and margin requirements), and to such approvals by any listing, regulatory or governmental authority as may, in the opinion of counsel for the Company, be necessary or advisable in connection therewith. Any securities delivered under the Plan shall be subject to such restrictions, and the person acquiring such securities shall, if requested by the Company, provide such assurances and representations to the Company as the Company may deem necessary or desirable to assure compliance with all Applicable Law. The Administrator, in its sole discretion, may take whatever actions it deems necessary or appropriate to effect compliance with Applicable Law, including, without limitation, placing legends on share certificates and issuing stop-transfer notices to agents and registrars. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the Administrator may not take any actions hereunder, and no Awards shall be granted, that would violate Applicable Law. To the extent permitted by Applicable Law, the Plan and Awards granted or awarded hereunder shall be deemed amended to the extent necessary to conform to Applicable Law.

        13.8    Titles and Headings, References to Sections of the Code or Exchange Act.    The titles and headings of the Sections in the Plan are for convenience of reference only and, in the event of any conflict, the text of the Plan, rather than such titles or headings, shall control. References to sections of the Code or the Exchange Act shall include any amendment or successor thereto.

        13.9    Governing Law.    The Plan and any Programs and Award Agreements hereunder shall be administered, interpreted and enforced under the internal laws of the State of Delaware without regard to conflicts of laws thereof or of any other jurisdiction.

        13.10    Section 409A.    To the extent that the Administrator determines that any Award granted under the Plan is subject to Section 409A, the Plan, the Program pursuant to which such Award is granted and the Award Agreement evidencing such Award shall incorporate the terms and conditions required by Section 409A. In that regard, to the extent any Award under the Plan or any other compensatory plan or arrangement of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is subject to Section 409A, and such Award or other amount is payable on account of a Participant's Termination of Service (or any similarly defined term), then (a) such Award or amount shall only be paid to the extent such Termination of Service qualifies as a "separation from service" as defined in Section 409A, and (b) if such Award or amount is payable to a "specified employee" as defined in Section 409A then to

75


the extent required in order to avoid a prohibited distribution under Section 409A, such Award or other compensatory payment shall not be payable prior to the earlier of (i) the expiration of the six-month period measured from the date of the Participant's Termination of Service, or (ii) the date of the Participant's death. To the extent applicable, the Plan, the Program and any Award Agreements shall be interpreted in accordance with Section 409A. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, in the event that following the Effective Date the Administrator determines that any Award may be subject to Section 409A, the Administrator may (but is not obligated to), without a Holder's consent, adopt such amendments to the Plan and the applicable Program and Award Agreement or adopt other policies and procedures (including amendments, policies and procedures with retroactive effect), or take any other actions, that the Administrator determines are necessary or appropriate to (A) exempt the Award from Section 409A and/or preserve the intended tax treatment of the benefits provided with respect to the Award, or (B) comply with the requirements of Section 409A and thereby avoid the application of any penalty taxes under Section 409A. The Company makes no representations or warranties as to the tax treatment of any Award under Section 409A or otherwise. The Company shall have no obligation under this Section 13.10 or otherwise to take any action (whether or not described herein) to avoid the imposition of taxes, penalties or interest under Section 409A with respect to any Award and shall have no liability to any Holder or any other person if any Award, compensation or other benefits under the Plan are determined to constitute non-compliant, "nonqualified deferred compensation" subject to the imposition of taxes, penalties and/or interest under Section 409A.

        13.11    Unfunded Status of Awards.    The Plan is intended to be an "unfunded" plan for incentive compensation. With respect to any payments not yet made to a Holder pursuant to an Award, nothing contained in the Plan or any Program or Award Agreement shall give the Holder any rights that are greater than those of a general creditor of the Company or any Subsidiary.

        13.12    Indemnification.    To the extent permitted under Applicable Law and the Organizational Documents, each member of the Administrator shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company from any loss, cost, liability, or expense that may be imposed upon or reasonably incurred by such member in connection with or resulting from any claim, action, suit, or proceeding to which he or she may be a party or in which he or she may be involved by reason of any action or failure to act pursuant to the Plan and against and from any and all amounts paid by him or her in satisfaction of judgment in such action, suit, or proceeding against him or her; provided he or she gives the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the same before he or she undertakes to handle and defend it on his or her own behalf. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to which such persons may be entitled pursuant to the Organizational Documents, as a matter of law, or otherwise, or any power that the Company may have to indemnify them or hold them harmless.

        13.13    Relationship to other Benefits.    No payment pursuant to the Plan shall be taken into account in determining any benefits under any pension, retirement, savings, profit sharing, group insurance, welfare or other benefit plan of the Company or any Subsidiary except to the extent otherwise expressly provided in writing in such other plan or an agreement thereunder.

        13.14    Expenses.    The expenses of administering the Plan shall be borne by the Company and its Subsidiaries.

* * * * *

76


 

MMMMMMMMMMMM . MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM C123456789 000004 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext ENDORSEMENT_LINE______________ SACKPACK_____________ MR A SAMPLE DESIGNATION (IF ANY) ADD 1 ADD 2 ADD 3 ADD 4 ADD 5 ADD 6 THE PROXY STATEMENT AND ANNUAL REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS (FORM 10-K) ARE AVAILABLE AT: http://www.cogentco.com/en/about-cogent/investor-relations/reports Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. q PLEASE FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q Proposals — THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” ALL PROPOSALS. 1. PROPOSAL - Election of Directors: + For Withhold ForAgainst Abstain 2. PROPOSAL - To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young, LLP as independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. 3. PROPOSAL - Non-binding advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation. Every 01 - Dave Schaeffer 02 - Steven D. Brooks Every Every 2 Years 3 Years Abstain 03 - Timothy Weingarten 4. PROPOSAL - Non-binding advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. 5. PROPOSAL - Approval of the 2017 Incentive Award Plan, which authorizes 1.2 million shares for potential grants. Year 04 - Richard T. Liebhaber ForAgainst Abstain 05 - D. Blake Bath 06 - Marc Montagner 6. In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof. Non-Voting Items Change of Address — Please print your new address below. Comments — Please print your comments below. Meeting Attendance Mark the box to the right if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. Executors, administrators, trustees, etc. should give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. MMMMMMMC 1234567890 J N T MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE 140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND + 1 U P X3 1 9 8 4 6 1 02JRLD MMMMMMMMM C B A Annual Meeting Proxy Card X IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION

 


. IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 3, 2017. THE PROXY STATEMENT AND ANNUAL REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS (FORM 10-K) ARE AVAILABLE AT: http://www.cogentco.com/en/about-cogent/investor-relations/reports q PLEASE FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q REVOCABLE PROXY — COGENT COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC. THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 3, 2017 AT 9:00 A.M. The undersigned holder of common stock, par value $0.001, of Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby appoints Robert N. Beury and Ried Zulager, or either of them, as proxies for the undersigned, each with full power of substitution, to represent and to vote as specified in this proxy all common stock of the Company that the undersigned stockholder would be entitled to vote if present in person at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on May 3, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. local time, at the Company’s offices at 2450 N Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20037, and at any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting. The undersigned stockholder hereby revokes any proxy or proxies heretofore executed for such matters. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned stockholder. If no direction is given, this proxy will be voted “FOR” each of the proposals and “FOR” annual votes on the approval of the compensation of the named executive officers, and in the discretion of the proxies as to any other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting. The undersigned stockholder may revoke this proxy at any time before it is voted by delivering to the Secretary of the Company either a written revocation of the proxy or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or by appearing at the Annual Meeting and voting in person. The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement in which the proposals are fully explained. The Board of Directors of Cogent recommends voting FOR Proposal 1 — Election of Directors, FOR Proposal 2 — Ratification of Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, FOR Proposal 3 — Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of Named Executive Officers, FOR “Every Year” on Proposal 4 — Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on the Compensation of the Named Executive Officers, and FOR Proposal 5 — Approval of the 2017 Inventive Award Plan. You are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person. Your participation in these matters is important, regardless of the number of shares you own. Whether or not you expect to attend in person, we urge you to complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card as promptly as possible in the enclosed envelope. If you choose to attend the meeting you may then vote in person if you so desire, even though you may have executed and returned this proxy. Any stockholder of record who executes such a proxy may revoke it at any time before it is exercised. A proxy may be revoked at any time before it is exercised by delivering written notice of revocation to the Company, Attention: Ried Zulager; by delivering a duly executed proxy bearing a later date to the Company; or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Stockholders who are not of record should vote through their holder of record.

 



QuickLinks

VOTING SECURITIES
PROPOSAL NO. 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
PROPOSAL NO. 2 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
PROPOSAL NO. 3 ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
PROPOSAL NO. 4 ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
PROPOSAL NO. 5 APPROVAL OF THE 2017 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN
Burn Rate
Planned 2017 Awards
Equity Compensation Plan Information
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES
Audit Committee Report
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND SIGNIFICANT EMPLOYEES
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN* Among Cogent Communications Holdings, the S&P 500 Index and the NASDAQ Telecommunications Index
2016 Summary Compensation Table
2016 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
2016 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End Table
2016 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table
Employment Agreements and Potential Post-Employment Compensation Arrangements
2016 Director Compensation Table
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
RISK ASSESSMENT IN COMPENSATION PROGRAMS
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
RELATIONSHIP WITH INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
(in thousands)
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
OTHER MATTERS
Appendix A COGENT COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC. 2017 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN ARTICLE 1. PURPOSE
ARTICLE 2. DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION
ARTICLE 3. SHARES SUBJECT TO THE PLAN
ARTICLE 4. GRANTING OF AWARDS
ARTICLE 5. PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO AWARDS INTENDED TO QUALIFY AS PERFORMANCE-BASED COMPENSATION
ARTICLE 6. GRANTING OF OPTIONS AND STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS
ARTICLE 7. EXERCISE OF OPTIONS AND STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS
ARTICLE 8. AWARD OF RESTRICTED STOCK
ARTICLE 9. AWARD OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS
ARTICLE 10. AWARD OF OTHER STOCK OR CASH BASED AWARDS AND DIVIDEND EQUIVALENTS
ARTICLE 11. ADDITIONAL TERMS OF AWARDS
ARTICLE 12. ADMINISTRATION
ARTICLE 13. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS