BTU_2015.06.30.10Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
(Mark One)
|
|
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015 |
or
|
|
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________ |
Commission File Number: 1-16463
____________________________________________
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
Delaware | | 13-4004153 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
| | |
701 Market Street, St. Louis, Missouri | | 63101-1826 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(314) 342-3400
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Large accelerated filer þ | | | | | | Accelerated filer ¨ | |
| Non-accelerated filer ¨ | | | | | | Smaller reporting company ¨ | |
| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | | | | | | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ
There were 278,253,863 shares of the registrant's common stock (par value of $0.01 per share) outstanding at July 31, 2015.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| |
| Page |
| |
| |
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
| |
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
| |
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2015 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2014 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, | | June 30, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (Dollars in millions, except per share data) |
Revenues | | |
| | | | | | |
Sales | | $ | 1,226.8 |
| | $ | 1,598.6 |
| | $ | 2,645.5 |
| | $ | 3,068.8 |
|
Other revenues | | 112.5 |
| | 159.4 |
| | 231.7 |
| | 316.0 |
|
Total revenues | | 1,339.3 |
| | 1,758.0 |
| | 2,877.2 |
| | 3,384.8 |
|
Costs and expenses | | | | | |
| | |
Operating costs and expenses (exclusive of items shown separately below) | | 1,198.8 |
| | 1,467.6 |
| | 2,520.4 |
| | 2,862.4 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | | 147.1 |
| | 163.1 |
| | 294.6 |
| | 320.3 |
|
Asset retirement obligation expenses | | 13.9 |
| | 15.9 |
| | 28.1 |
| | 31.5 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses | | 41.6 |
| | 59.2 |
| | 91.0 |
| | 118.7 |
|
Restructuring charges | | 21.2 |
| | — |
| | 21.2 |
| | — |
|
Other operating (income) loss: | | | | | | | | |
Net gain on disposal of assets | | (12.2 | ) | | (2.2 | ) | | (12.3 | ) | | (12.0 | ) |
Asset impairment | | 900.8 |
| | — |
| | 900.8 |
| | — |
|
Loss from equity affiliates | | 3.9 |
| | 21.6 |
| | 7.0 |
| | 28.2 |
|
Operating (loss) profit |
| (975.8 | ) | | 32.8 |
|
| (973.6 | ) | | 35.7 |
|
Interest expense | | 118.9 |
| | 103.6 |
| | 225.5 |
| | 206.9 |
|
Loss on early debt extinguishment | | 8.3 |
| | 1.6 |
| | 67.8 |
| | 1.6 |
|
Interest income | | (2.7 | ) | | (4.4 | ) | | (5.2 | ) | | (8.0 | ) |
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes | | (1,100.3 | ) | | (68.0 | ) | | (1,261.7 | ) | | (164.8 | ) |
Income tax (benefit) provision | | (93.1 | ) | | 4.0 |
| | (90.1 | ) | | (48.5 | ) |
Loss from continuing operations, net of income taxes | | (1,007.2 | ) | | (72.0 | ) | | (1,171.6 | ) | | (116.3 | ) |
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | | (36.3 | ) | | 0.8 |
| | (45.2 | ) | | 1.0 |
|
Net loss | | (1,043.5 | ) | | (71.2 | ) | | (1,216.8 | ) | | (115.3 | ) |
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | 1.8 |
| | 2.1 |
| | 5.1 |
| | 6.5 |
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | | $ | (1,045.3 | ) | | $ | (73.3 | ) | | $ | (1,221.9 | ) | | $ | (121.8 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Loss from continuing operations: | | | | | | | | |
Basic loss per share | | $ | (3.71 | ) | | $ | (0.28 | ) | | $ | (4.34 | ) | | $ | (0.46 | ) |
Diluted loss per share | | $ | (3.71 | ) | | $ | (0.28 | ) | | $ | (4.34 | ) | | $ | (0.46 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net loss attributable to common stockholders: | | | | | | | | |
Basic loss per share | | $ | (3.84 | ) | | $ | (0.27 | ) | | $ | (4.51 | ) | | $ | (0.46 | ) |
Diluted loss per share | | $ | (3.84 | ) | | $ | (0.27 | ) | | $ | (4.51 | ) | | $ | (0.46 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Dividends declared per share | | $ | 0.0025 |
| | $ | 0.085 |
| | $ | 0.0050 |
| | $ | 0.170 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| June 30, | | June 30, |
| 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| (Dollars in millions) |
Net loss | $ | (1,043.5 | ) | | $ | (71.2 | ) | | $ | (1,216.8 | ) | | $ | (115.3 | ) |
Other comprehensive income, net of income taxes: | | | | | | | |
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities (net of respective net tax provision (benefit) of $0.0, $0.3, ($0.1) and ($0.8)) | 0.2 |
| | 0.5 |
| | — |
| | (1.3 | ) |
Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedges (net of respective net tax provision of $81.0, $37.2, $79.8 and $106.1) | | | | | | | |
Increase in fair value of cash flow hedges | 164.9 |
| | 67.9 |
| | 15.2 |
| | 184.1 |
|
Reclassification for realized losses (gains) included in net loss | 21.0 |
| | (10.6 | ) | | 115.0 |
| | (5.0 | ) |
Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedges | 185.9 |
| | 57.3 |
| | 130.2 |
| | 179.1 |
|
Postretirement plans and workers' compensation obligations (net of respective net tax provision (benefit) of $9.4, $4.0, $9.4 and ($2.2)) | | | | | | | |
Prior service cost for the period | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (17.4 | ) |
Amortization of actuarial loss and prior service cost included in net loss | 3.4 |
| | 6.8 |
| | 16.0 |
| | 13.6 |
|
Postretirement plans and workers' compensation obligations | 3.4 |
| | 6.8 |
| | 16.0 |
| | (3.8 | ) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | 1.2 |
| | 9.9 |
| | (26.2 | ) | | 26.4 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of income taxes | 190.7 |
| | 74.5 |
| | 120.0 |
| | 200.4 |
|
Comprehensive (loss) income | (852.8 | ) | | 3.3 |
| | (1,096.8 | ) | | 85.1 |
|
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 1.8 |
| | 2.1 |
| | 5.1 |
| | 6.5 |
|
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to common stockholders | $ | (854.6 | ) | | $ | 1.2 |
| | $ | (1,101.9 | ) | | $ | 78.6 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | |
| | June 30, 2015 | | December 31, 2014 |
| | (Amounts in millions, except per share data) |
ASSETS | | | | |
Current assets | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 487.1 |
| | $ | 298.0 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $11.6 at June 30, 2015 and $5.8 at December 31, 2014 | | 301.7 |
| | 563.1 |
|
Inventories | | 395.6 |
| | 406.5 |
|
Assets from coal trading activities, net | | 44.1 |
| | 57.6 |
|
Deferred income taxes | | 78.4 |
| | 80.0 |
|
Other current assets | | 387.1 |
| | 305.8 |
|
Total current assets | | 1,694.0 |
| | 1,711.0 |
|
Property, plant, equipment and mine development, net | | 9,494.0 |
| | 10,577.3 |
|
Deferred income taxes | | 1.5 |
| | 0.7 |
|
Investments and other assets | | 671.9 |
| | 902.1 |
|
Total assets | | $ | 11,861.4 |
| | $ | 13,191.1 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | | |
Current portion of long-term debt | | $ | 20.4 |
| | $ | 21.2 |
|
Liabilities from coal trading activities, net | | 21.3 |
| | 32.7 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | 1,486.7 |
| | 1,809.2 |
|
Total current liabilities | | 1,528.4 |
| | 1,863.1 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion | | 6,284.8 |
| | 5,965.6 |
|
Deferred income taxes | | 87.9 |
| | 89.1 |
|
Asset retirement obligations | | 736.3 |
| | 722.3 |
|
Accrued postretirement benefit costs | | 783.4 |
| | 781.9 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities | | 784.6 |
| | 1,042.6 |
|
Total liabilities | | 10,205.4 |
| | 10,464.6 |
|
Stockholders’ equity | | | | |
Preferred Stock — $0.01 per share par value; 10.0 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding as of June 30, 2015 or December 31, 2014 | | — |
| | — |
|
Perpetual Preferred Stock — 0.8 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding as of June 30, 2015 or December 31, 2014 | | — |
| | — |
|
Series Common Stock — $0.01 per share par value; 40.0 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding as of June 30, 2015 or December 31, 2014 | | — |
| | — |
|
Common Stock — $0.01 per share par value; 800.0 shares authorized; 289.7 shares issued and 278.4 shares outstanding as of June 30, 2015 and 285.7 shares issued and 271.7 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2014 | | 2.9 |
| | 2.9 |
|
Additional paid-in capital | | 2,396.5 |
| | 2,383.3 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost — 11.3 shares as of June 30, 2015 and 14.0 shares as of December 31, 2014 | | (371.5 | ) | | (467.1 | ) |
Retained earnings | | 270.7 |
| | 1,570.5 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | (644.8 | ) | | (764.8 | ) |
Peabody Energy Corporation stockholders’ equity | | 1,653.8 |
| | 2,724.8 |
|
Noncontrolling interests | | 2.2 |
| | 1.7 |
|
Total stockholders’ equity | | 1,656.0 |
| | 2,726.5 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 11,861.4 |
| | $ | 13,191.1 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (Dollars in millions) |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (1,216.8 | ) | | $ | (115.3 | ) |
Loss (income) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | | 45.2 |
| | (1.0 | ) |
Loss from continuing operations, net of income taxes | | (1,171.6 | ) | | (116.3 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile loss from continuing operations, net of income taxes to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: | | | | |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | | 294.6 |
| | 320.3 |
|
Noncash interest expense | | 15.2 |
| | 11.7 |
|
Deferred income taxes | | (89.6 | ) | | (113.9 | ) |
Share-based compensation for equity- and liability-classified awards | | 13.6 |
| | 24.0 |
|
Asset impairment | | 900.8 |
| | — |
|
Net gain on disposal of assets | | (12.3 | ) | | (12.0 | ) |
Loss from equity affiliates | | 7.0 |
| | 28.2 |
|
Gains on previously monetized foreign currency hedge positions | | (14.8 | ) | | (74.8 | ) |
Changes in current assets and liabilities: | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | 178.1 |
| | 99.8 |
|
Change in receivable from accounts receivable securitization program | | 80.0 |
| | 10.0 |
|
Inventories | | 7.5 |
| | (41.7 | ) |
Net assets from coal trading activities | | (12.9 | ) | | (19.1 | ) |
Other current assets | | (3.6 | ) | | (1.7 | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | (277.9 | ) | | 13.2 |
|
Asset retirement obligations | | 20.5 |
| | 19.5 |
|
Accrued postretirement benefit costs | | 11.1 |
| | 9.3 |
|
Accrued pension costs | | 14.9 |
| | 9.9 |
|
Other, net | | (13.0 | ) | | (9.3 | ) |
Net cash (used in) provided by continuing operations | | (52.4 | ) | | 157.1 |
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations | | (4.0 | ) | | (76.8 | ) |
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | | (56.4 | ) | | 80.3 |
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities | | | | |
Additions to property, plant, equipment and mine development | | (50.9 | ) | | (64.7 | ) |
Changes in accrued expenses related to capital expenditures | | (13.2 | ) | | (17.5 | ) |
Proceeds from disposal of assets, net of notes receivable | | 23.9 |
| | 139.2 |
|
Purchases of debt and equity securities | | (17.9 | ) | | (4.2 | ) |
Proceeds from sales and maturities of debt and equity securities | | 27.1 |
| | 5.0 |
|
Contributions to joint ventures | | (239.8 | ) | | (271.3 | ) |
Distributions from joint ventures | | 236.7 |
| | 269.0 |
|
Other, net | | (2.0 | ) | | (12.1 | ) |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | | (36.1 | ) | | 43.4 |
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities | | | | |
Proceeds from long-term debt | | 975.7 |
| | — |
|
Repayments of long-term debt | | (660.7 | ) | | (10.4 | ) |
Payment of deferred financing costs | | (28.7 | ) | | (10.1 | ) |
Dividends paid | | (1.4 | ) | | (46.1 | ) |
Other, net | | (3.3 | ) | | (2.7 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | 281.6 |
| | (69.3 | ) |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | | 189.1 |
| | 54.4 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | 298.0 |
| | 444.0 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 487.1 |
| | $ | 498.4 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Peabody Energy Corporation Stockholders’ Equity | | | | |
| Common Stock | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | Treasury Stock | | Retained Earnings | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Noncontrolling Interests | | Total Stockholders’ Equity |
| (Dollars in millions) |
December 31, 2014 | $ | 2.9 |
| | $ | 2,383.3 |
| | $ | (467.1 | ) | | $ | 1,570.5 |
| | $ | (764.8 | ) | | $ | 1.7 |
| | $ | 2,726.5 |
|
Net (loss) income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,221.9 | ) | | — |
| | 5.1 |
| | (1,216.8 | ) |
Net change in unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities (net of $0.1 net tax benefit) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedges (net of $79.8 net tax provision) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 130.2 |
| | — |
| | 130.2 |
|
Postretirement plans and workers’ compensation obligations (net of $9.4 net tax provision) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 16.0 |
| | — |
| | 16.0 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (26.2 | ) | | — |
| | (26.2 | ) |
Dividends paid | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1.4 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (1.4 | ) |
Share-based compensation for equity-classified awards | — |
| | 12.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 12.6 |
|
Employee stock purchases | — |
| | 2.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2.0 |
|
Repurchase of employee common stock relinquished for tax withholding | — |
| | — |
| | (1.9 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1.9 | ) |
Defined contribution plan share contribution | — |
| | (1.4 | ) | | 97.5 |
| | (76.5 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 19.6 |
|
Consolidation of noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1.6 |
| | 1.6 |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1.8 | ) | | (1.8 | ) |
Dividend payable to noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (4.4 | ) | | (4.4 | ) |
June 30, 2015 | $ | 2.9 |
| | $ | 2,396.5 |
| | $ | (371.5 | ) | | $ | 270.7 |
| | $ | (644.8 | ) | | $ | 2.2 |
| | $ | 1,656.0 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Peabody Energy Corporation (the Company) and its affiliates. Interests in subsidiaries controlled by the Company are consolidated and any outside shareholder interests are reflected as noncontrolling interests, except when the Company has an undivided interest in an unincorporated joint venture. In those cases, the Company includes its proportionate share in the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the jointly controlled entities within each applicable line item of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. All intercompany transactions, profits and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the 2015 presentation.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. In the opinion of management, these financial statements reflect all normal, recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation. Balance sheet information presented herein as of December 31, 2014 has been derived from the Company’s audited consolidated balance sheet at that date. The Company's results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for future quarters or for the year ending December 31, 2015.
The Company has classified items within discontinued operations in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for disposals (by sale or otherwise) that have occurred prior to January 1, 2015 when the operations and cash flows of a disposed component of the Company were eliminated from the ongoing operations of the Company as a result of the disposal and the Company no longer had any significant continuing involvement in the operation of that component.
(2) Newly Adopted Accounting Standards and Accounting Standards Not Yet Implemented
Newly Adopted Accounting Standards
Discontinued Operations. In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued accounting guidance that raised the threshold for disposals to qualify as discontinued operations to a disposal of a component or group of components that is disposed of or is classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity's operations and financial results. Such a strategic shift may include the disposal of (1) a major geographical area of operations, (2) a major line of business, (3) a major equity method investment or (4) other major parts of an entity. Provided that the major strategic shift criterion is met, the new guidance does allow entities to have significant continuing involvement and continuing cash flows with the discontinued operation, unlike prior U.S. GAAP. The new standard also requires additional disclosures for discontinued operations and new disclosures for individually material disposal transactions that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation. The new guidance became effective prospectively for disposals that occur in interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 31, 2014 (January 1, 2015 for the Company). The adoption of the guidance beginning January 1, 2015 had no material effect on the Company's results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or financial statement presentation at that time. The ultimate impact on the Company's financial statements will depend on any prospective disposal activity.
Accounting Standards Not Yet Implemented
Deferred Financing Costs. On April 7, 2015, the FASB issued accounting guidance that requires deferred financing costs to be presented as a direct reduction from the related debt liability in the financial statements rather than as a separately recognized asset, as is the current requirement under U.S. GAAP. Under the new guidance, amortization of such costs will continue to be reported as interest expense. The new guidance will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 (January 1, 2016 for the Company) and must be adopted on a retrospective basis. While the Company does not anticipate an impact to its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows in connection with the adoption of the guidance, there will be an impact on the presentation of the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets. More specifically, the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 included aggregate deferred financing cost assets of $101.0 million and $78.7 million, respectively, that would instead be presented as a direct reduction to liabilities under the new guidance.
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Revenue Recognition. In May 2014, the FASB issued a comprehensive revenue recognition standard that will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The new standard provides a single principles-based, five-step model to be applied to all contracts with customers, which steps are to (1) identify the contract(s) with the customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and (5) recognize revenue when each performance obligation is satisfied. More specifically, revenue will be recognized when promised goods or services are transferred to the customer in an amount that reflects the consideration expected in exchange for those goods or services. The standard also requires entities to disclose sufficient qualitative and quantitative information to enable financial statement users to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenues and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.
Under the originally issued standard, the new guidance will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 (January 1, 2017 for the Company). On July 9, 2015, the FASB decided to delay the effective date of the new revenue recognition standard by one year with early adoption permitted, but not before the original effective date. The standard allows for either a full retrospective adoption or a modified retrospective adoption. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact that the adoption of this guidance will have on its results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and financial statement presentation.
Going Concern. In August 2014, the FASB issued disclosure guidance that requires management to evaluate, at each annual and interim reporting period, whether substantial doubt exists about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and, if applicable, to provide related disclosures. As outlined by that guidance, substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that an entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or are available to be issued). The new guidance will be effective for annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2016 (the year ending December 31, 2016 for the Company) and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted.
(3) Asset Impairment
The following costs are reflected in "Asset impairment" in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | Australian Metallurgical Mining | | Australian Thermal Mining | | Corporate and Other | | Consolidated |
| | (Dollars in millions) |
Asset impairment charges: | | | | | | | | |
Long-lived assets | | $ | 527.0 |
| | $ | 8.2 |
| | $ | 182.2 |
| | $ | 717.4 |
|
Equity method investments | | — |
| | — |
| | 183.4 |
| | 183.4 |
|
Total | | $ | 527.0 |
| | $ | 8.2 |
| | $ | 365.6 |
| | $ | 900.8 |
|
Australian Metallurgical and Thermal Mining
The Company generally does not view short-term declines in metallurgical and thermal coal prices in the markets in which it sells its products as an indicator of impairment. However, due to the severity of the decline in seaborne metallurgical and thermal coal pricing observed during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and other adverse market conditions noted during that period that drove an unfavorable change in the expected timing of eventual seaborne market rebalancing, the Company concluded that indicators of impairment existed surrounding its Australian mining platform as of June 30, 2015. Accordingly, the Company reviewed its Australian mining assets for recoverability as of June 30, 2015. Based on that review, the Company determined that the carrying values of the assets at three of its active mines that produce metallurgical coal were not recoverable and correspondingly recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $230.5 million to write those assets down from their carrying value to their estimated fair value.
Also during the three months ended June 30, 2015, the Company reviewed its portfolio of mining tenements and surface lands to identify non-strategic assets that could be monetized. As a result of that review, certain of such assets were deemed to meet held-for-sale accounting criteria as of June 30, 2015 or are now otherwise considered more likely to generate cash flows through divestiture rather than development, with the long-term plans for certain adjacent assets also consequently affected. Accordingly, the Company recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $304.7 million to write down the targeted divestiture assets and abandoned assets from their carrying value to their estimated fair value.
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Corporate and Other
Long-lived Assets. In connection with a similar review of the Company's asset portfolio conducted during the three months ended June 30, 2015 to identify non-strategic domestic assets that could be monetized, the Company identified non-strategic, non-coal-supplying assets as held-for-sale rather than held-for-use as of June 30, 2015. Accordingly, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $182.2 million to write the assets down from their carrying value to estimated fair value.
Equity Method Investments. Due to the impairment indicators noted above surrounding the Company's Australian platform, the Company reviewed its total investment in Middlemount Coal Pty Ltd. (Middlemount), which owns the Middlemount Mine in Queensland, Australia. As a result of that review, the Company determined that the carrying value of its equity investment in Middlemount was other-than-temporarily impaired and recorded a charge of $46.6 million to write-off the investment. The Company, along with the other equity interest holder, also periodically makes loans to Middlemount pursuant to the related shareholders’ agreement for purposes of funding capital expenditures and working capital requirements. Prior to an impairment adjustment, the aggregate carrying value of such loans totaled $299.3 million. Of that amount, a total of $65.5 million (the Priority Loans) have seniority over the remainder (the Subordinated Loans). The Subordinated Loans are provided on an equal and shared basis with the other equity interest holder, and the Company's and the other equity interest holder's claims under the Subordinated Loans are on equal footing. The Company also reviewed the loans for impairment and recorded a charge of $136.8 million to write down the carrying value of the Subordinated Loans.
The fair value estimates made during the Company's impairment assessments were determined in accordance with the methods outlined in Note 1. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, except in certain instances where indicative bids were received related to non-strategic assets being marketed for divestiture. In those instances, the indicative bids were also considered in estimating fair value.
The Company believes the impairment charges recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2015 adequately address the realization risks disclosed in Note 3. "Asset Realization" to its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2015.
(4) Discontinued Operations
Discontinued operations include certain former Australian Thermal Mining and Midwestern U.S. Mining segment assets that have ceased production and other previously divested legacy operations.
Summarized Results of Discontinued Operations
Results from discontinued operations were as follows during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, | | June 30, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (Dollars in millions) |
(Loss) income from discontinued operations before income taxes | | $ | (36.3 | ) | | $ | 1.2 |
| | $ | (45.2 | ) | | $ | 1.1 |
|
Income tax provision | | — |
| | 0.4 |
| | — |
| | 0.1 |
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | | $ | (36.3 | ) | | $ | 0.8 |
| | $ | (45.2 | ) | | $ | 1.0 |
|
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Assets and Liabilities of Discontinued Operations
The carrying amounts of assets and liabilities classified as discontinued operations included in the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2015 | | December 31, 2014 |
| | (Dollars in millions) |
Assets: | | | | |
Other current assets | | $ | 0.3 |
| | $ | 0.3 |
|
Investments and other assets | | 15.9 |
| | 16.3 |
|
Total assets classified as discontinued operations | | $ | 16.2 |
| | $ | 16.6 |
|
| | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | $ | 97.9 |
| | $ | 12.5 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities | | 65.2 |
| | 109.8 |
|
Total liabilities classified as discontinued operations | | $ | 163.1 |
| | $ | 122.3 |
|
Patriot-Related Matters. Due to the May 2015 bankruptcy filing of Patriot Coal Corporation and certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries (Patriot), the Company recorded a net charge of $34.7 million during the three and six months ended, June 30, 2105 to increase its liability related to the credit support it provides to Patriot. Additional information surrounding that charge is included in Note 17. "Financial Instruments, Guarantees with Off-Balance Sheet Risk and Other Guarantees."
In connection with the settlement agreement with Patriot and the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA) to resolve all disputed issues related to Patriot's prior bankruptcy, which became effective on December 18, 2013, the Company is required to provide total payments of $310.0 million, payable over four years through 2017, to partially fund the newly established voluntary employee beneficiary association (VEBA) and settle all Patriot and UMWA claims involving the Patriot bankruptcy. Those payments included an initial payment of $90.0 million made in January 2014, comprised of $70.0 million paid to Patriot and $20.0 million paid to the VEBA, and a payment of $75.0 million made in January 2015 to the VEBA. The settlement agreement also contemplates subsequent payments that will be made to the VEBA of $75.0 million in 2016 and $70.0 million in 2017.
Wilkie Creek Mine. In December 2013, the Company ceased production and started reclamation of the Wilkie Creek Mine in Queensland, Australia. On June 30, 2014, Queensland Bulk Handling Pty Ltd (QBH) commenced litigation against Peabody (Wilkie Creek) Pty Limited, the indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company that owns the Wilkie Creek Mine, alleging breach of a Coal Port Services Agreement (CPSA) between the parties. Included in "(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes" for the six months ended June 30, 2015 is a $7.6 million charge related to that litigation. Refer to Note 18. "Commitments and Contingencies" for additional information surrounding the QBH matter.
In June 2015, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Wilkie Creek Mine in exchange for potential cash proceeds of up to $20 million and the assumption of certain liabilities, including asset retirement obligations. The closing of the sale remains subject to certain conditions.
(5) Investments
Investments in available-for-sale securities at June 30, 2015 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Available-for-sale securities | | Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value |
| | (Dollars in millions) |
Current: | | | | | | | | |
Federal government securities | | $ | 2.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2.2 |
|
Noncurrent: | | | | | | | | |
Federal government securities | | 31.0 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | 31.1 |
|
U.S. corporate bonds | | 19.3 |
| | 0.1 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | 19.3 |
|
Total | | $ | 52.5 |
| | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | 52.6 |
|
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Investments in available-for-sale securities at December 31, 2014 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Available-for-sale securities | | Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value |
| | | | (Dollars in millions) | | |
Current: | | | | | | | | |
U.S. corporate bonds | | $ | 11.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 11.2 |
|
Noncurrent: | | | | | | | | |
Marketable equity securities | | 6.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6.2 |
|
Federal government securities | | 32.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 32.0 |
|
U.S. corporate bonds | | 12.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 12.4 |
|
Total | | $ | 61.8 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 61.8 |
|
The Company classifies its investments as short-term if, at the time of purchase, remaining maturities are greater than three months and up to one year. Such investments are included in "Other current assets" in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Investments with remaining maturities of greater than one year are classified as long-term and are included in "Investments and other assets" in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s previous investments in marketable equity securities consisted of an investment in Winsway Enterprises Holdings Limited. That investment was disposed of during the three months ended June 30, 2015, resulting in an immaterial gain compared to the adjusted cost basis of the securities.
Contractual maturities for available-for-sale investments in debt securities at June 30, 2015 were as shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
| | | | | | | | |
Contractual maturities for available-for-sale debt securities | | Cost | | Fair Value |
| | (Dollars in millions) |
Due in one year or less | | $ | 2.2 |
| | $ | 2.2 |
|
Due in one to five years | | 50.3 |
| | 50.4 |
|
Total | | $ | 52.5 |
| | $ | 52.6 |
|
(6) Inventories
Inventories as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 consisted of the following:
|
| | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2015 | | December 31, 2014 |
| (Dollars in millions) |
Materials and supplies | $ | 131.4 |
| | $ | 143.6 |
|
Raw coal | 84.4 |
| | 115.0 |
|
Saleable coal | 179.8 |
| | 147.9 |
|
Total | $ | 395.6 |
| | $ | 406.5 |
|
Materials and supplies inventories presented above have been shown net of reserves of $4.9 million and $4.6 million as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(7) Derivatives and Fair Value Measurements
Risk Management — Non-Coal Trading Activities
The Company is exposed to several risks in the normal course of business, including (1) foreign currency exchange rate risk for non-U.S. dollar expenditures and balances, (2) price risk on commodities produced by and utilized in the Company's mining operations and (3) interest rate risk that has been partially mitigated by fixed rates on long-term debt. The Company manages a portion of its commodity price risk related to the sale of coal (excluding coal trading activities) using long-term coal supply agreements (those with terms longer than one year), rather than using derivative instruments. Derivative financial instruments are used to manage the Company's risk exposure to prices of certain commodities used in production, foreign currency exchange rates and, from time to time, interest rates (collectively referred to as "Corporate Hedging"). These risks are actively monitored for compliance with the Company's risk management policies.
Foreign Currency Hedges. The Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk, primarily on Australian dollar expenditures made in its Australian mining platform. This risk has historically been managed using forward contracts and options designated as cash flow hedges, with the objective of reducing the variability of cash flows associated with forecasted foreign currency expenditures. The Company intends to allow a substantial portion of its positions to settle without adding further positions of a comparable notional amount, but may, from time to time, continue to use forward contracts and options to hedge its foreign currency exchange rate risk on a selective basis.
Diesel Fuel Hedges. The Company is exposed to commodity price risk associated with diesel fuel utilized in production in the U.S. and Australia. This risk is managed using derivatives, primarily swaps, and to a lesser extent using cost pass-through contracts. The Company generally designates the swap contracts as cash flow hedges, with the objective of reducing the variability of cash flows associated with forecasted diesel fuel purchases.
Notional Amounts and Fair Value. The following summarizes the Company’s foreign currency and commodity positions at June 30, 2015:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Notional Amount by Year of Maturity |
| Total | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2017 |
Foreign Currency | | | |
| | |
| | |
|
A$:US$ hedge contracts (A$ millions) | $ | 2,231.4 |
| | $ | 701.4 |
| | $ | 1,007.0 |
| | $ | 523.0 |
|
Commodity Contracts | | | | | | | |
Diesel fuel hedge contracts (million gallons) | 212.3 |
| | 63.5 |
| | 89.5 |
| | 59.3 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Instrument Classification by | | | |
| Cash Flow Hedge | | Fair Value Hedge | | Economic Hedge | | | Fair Value of Net Liability |
| | | | | | | | (Dollars in millions) |
Foreign Currency | | | | | | | | |
A$:US$ hedge contracts (A$ millions) | $ | 2,231.4 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | | $ | (259.8 | ) |
Commodity Contracts | | | | | | | | |
Diesel fuel hedge contracts (million gallons) | 212.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | (76.0 | ) |
Based on the net fair value of the Company’s non-coal trading commodity contract hedge positions held in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” at June 30, 2015, the Company expects to reclassify net unrealized losses associated with the Company's diesel fuel hedge programs of approximately $49 million from comprehensive income into earnings over the next 12 months. Based on net unrealized losses associated with the Company's foreign currency hedge contract portfolio, as partially offset by unrecognized realized gains related to foreign currency cash flow hedge contracts monetized in the fourth quarter of 2012 held in "Accumulated other comprehensive loss" at June 30, 2015, the net loss expected to be reclassified from comprehensive income to earnings over the next twelve months associated with that hedge program is approximately $179 million. As these realized and unrealized gains and losses are associated with derivative instruments that represent hedges of forecasted transactions, the amounts reclassified to earnings are expected to partially offset the effect of any changes in the hedged exposure related to the underlying transactions, when realized.
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Hedge Ineffectiveness. A measure of ineffectiveness is inherent in hedging future diesel fuel purchases with derivative positions based on refined petroleum products as a result of location and/or product differences. Transportation surcharges, which may vary over time, for purchased diesel fuel in certain regions can also result in ineffectiveness, though such surcharges have historically changed infrequently and comprise a small portion of the total cost of delivered diesel.
The Company’s derivative positions for the hedging of forecasted foreign currency expenditures contain a small measure of ineffectiveness due to timing differences between the hedge settlement and the purchase transaction, which could differ by less than a day and up to a maximum of 30 days.
The tables below show the classification and amounts of pre-tax gains and losses related to the Company’s Corporate Hedging derivatives during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 |
Financial Instrument | | Income Statement Classification Gains (Losses) - Realized | | Gain recognized in income on non-designated derivatives | | Gain recognized in other comprehensive income on derivatives (effective portion) | | Loss reclassified from other comprehensive income into income (effective portion)(1) | | Gain reclassified from other comprehensive income into income (ineffective portion) |
| | | | (Dollars in millions) |
Commodity swap contracts | | Operating costs and expenses | | $ | — |
| | $ | 54.1 |
| | $ | (25.4 | ) | | $ | 0.3 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts | | Operating costs and expenses | | — |
| | 117.1 |
| | (80.8 | ) | | — |
|
Total | | | | $ | — |
| | $ | 171.2 |
| | $ | (106.2 | ) | | $ | 0.3 |
|
| |
(1) | Includes the reclassification from "Accumulated other comprehensive loss" into earnings of $4.1 million of previously unrecognized gains on foreign currency cash flow hedge contracts monetized in the fourth quarter of 2012. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 |
Financial Instrument | | Income Statement Classification Gains (Losses) - Realized | | Gain recognized in income on non-designated derivatives | | Gain recognized in other comprehensive income on derivatives (effective portion) | | (Loss) gain reclassified from other comprehensive income into income (effective portion)(1) | | Gain reclassified from other comprehensive income into income (ineffective portion) |
| | | | (Dollars in millions) |
Commodity swap contracts | | Operating costs and expenses | | $ | — |
| | $ | 17.7 |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | 1.0 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts | | Operating costs and expenses | | — |
| | 100.8 |
| | 6.3 |
| | — |
|
Total | | | | $ | — |
|
| $ | 118.5 |
|
| $ | 6.2 |
|
| $ | 1.0 |
|
| |
(1) | Includes the reclassification from "Accumulated other comprehensive loss" into earnings of $33.9 million of previously unrecognized gains on foreign currency cash flow hedge contracts monetized in the fourth quarter of 2012. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 |
Financial Instrument | | Income Statement Classification Gains (Losses) - Realized | | Gain recognized in income on non-designated derivatives | | Gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income on derivatives (effective portion) | | Loss reclassified from other comprehensive income into income (effective portion)(1) | | Gain reclassified from other comprehensive income into income (ineffective portion) |
| | | | (Dollars in millions) |
Commodity swap contracts | | Operating costs and expenses | | $ | — |
| | $ | 35.8 |
| | $ | (57.1 | ) | | $ | 1.8 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts | | Operating costs and expenses | | — |
| | (19.0 | ) | | (154.4 | ) | | — |
|
Total | | | | $ | — |
| | $ | 16.8 |
| | $ | (211.5 | ) | | $ | 1.8 |
|
| |
(1) | Includes the reclassification from "Accumulated other comprehensive loss" into earnings of $14.8 million of previously unrecognized gains on foreign currency cash flow hedge contracts monetized in the fourth quarter of 2012. |
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 |
Financial Instrument | | Income Statement Classification Gains (Losses) - Realized | | Gain recognized in income on non-designated derivatives | | Gain recognized in other comprehensive income on derivatives (effective portion) | | Loss reclassified from other comprehensive income into income (effective portion)(1) | | Gain reclassified from other comprehensive income into income (ineffective portion) |
| | | | (Dollars in millions) |
Commodity swap contracts | | Operating costs and expenses | | $ | — |
| | $ | 9.2 |
| | $ | (2.3 | ) | | $ | 0.8 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts | | Operating costs and expenses | | — |
| | 276.4 |
| | (12.5 | ) | | — |
|
Total | | | | $ | — |
| | $ | 285.6 |
| | $ | (14.8 | ) | | $ | 0.8 |
|
| |
(1) | Includes the reclassification from "Accumulated other comprehensive loss" into earnings of $74.8 million of previously unrecognized gains on foreign currency cash flow hedge contracts monetized in the fourth quarter of 2012. |
Cash Flow Presentation. The Company classifies the cash effects of its Corporate Hedging derivatives within the "Cash Flows From Operating Activities" section of the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
Offsetting and Balance Sheet Presentation
The Company's Corporate Hedging derivative financial instruments are transacted in over-the-counter (OTC) markets with financial institutions under International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreements. Those agreements contain symmetrical default provisions which allow for the net settlement of amounts owed by either counterparty in the event of default or contract termination. The Company offsets its Corporate Hedging asset and liability derivative positions on a counterparty-by-counterparty basis in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, with the fair values of those respective derivatives reflected in “Other current assets,” “Investments and other assets,” “Accounts payable and accrued expenses” and “Other noncurrent liabilities." Though the symmetrical default provisions associated with the Company's Corporate Hedging derivatives exist at the overall counterparty level across its foreign currency and diesel fuel hedging strategy derivative contract portfolios, the Company's accounting policy is to apply counterparty offsetting separately within those derivative contract portfolios for presentation in the condensed consolidated balance sheets because that application is more consistent with the fact that the Company generally net settles its Corporate Hedging derivatives with each counterparty by derivative contract portfolio on a routine basis.
The classification and amount of Corporate Hedging derivative financial instruments presented on a gross and net basis as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are presented in the tables that follow.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value of Assets as of June 30, 2015
|
Financial Instrument | | Gross Amounts Recognized | | Gross Amounts Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet | | Net Amounts Presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet |
| | (Dollars in millions) |
Current Assets: | | | | | | |
Commodity swap contracts | | $ | 2.8 |
| | $ | (2.7 | ) | | $ | 0.1 |
|
Total | | $ | 2.8 |
| | $ | (2.7 | ) | | $ | 0.1 |
|
| | | | | | |
Noncurrent Assets: | | | | | | |
Commodity swap contracts | | $ | 0.5 |
| | $ | (0.5 | ) | | $ | — |
|
Total | | $ | 0.5 |
| | $ | (0.5 | ) | | $ | — |
|
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value of Liabilities as of June 30, 2015 |
Financial Instrument | | Gross Amounts Recognized | | Gross Amounts Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet | | Net Amounts Presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet |
| | (Dollars in millions) |
Current Liabilities: | | | | | | |
Commodity swap contracts | | $ | 51.3 |
| | $ | (2.5 | ) | | $ | 48.8 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts | | 179.0 |
| | — |
| | 179.0 |
|
Total | | $ | 230.3 |
| | $ | (2.5 | ) | | $ | 227.8 |
|
| | | | | | |
Noncurrent Liabilities: | | | | | | |
Commodity swap contracts | | $ | 28.0 |
| | $ | (0.7 | ) | | $ | 27.3 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts | | 80.8 |
| | — |
| | 80.8 |
|
Total | | $ | 108.8 |
| | $ | (0.7 | ) | | $ | 108.1 |
|
|
| | | | |
Financial Instrument | | Fair Value of Liabilities Presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2014 (1) |
| | (Dollars in millions) |
Current Liabilities: | | |
Commodity swap contracts | | $ | 100.1 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts | | 241.0 |
|
Total | | $ | 341.1 |
|
| | |
Noncurrent Liabilities: | | |
Commodity swap contracts | | $ | 67.0 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts | | 169.0 |
|
Total | | $ | 236.0 |
|
| |
(1) | All commodity swap contracts and foreign currency forward contracts were in a liability position as of December 31, 2014. |
See Note 8. "Coal Trading" for information on balance sheet offsetting related to the Company’s coal trading activities.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company uses a three-level fair value hierarchy that categorizes assets and liabilities measured at fair value based on the observability of the inputs utilized in the valuation. These levels include: Level 1 - inputs are quoted prices in active markets for the identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 - inputs are other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are directly or indirectly observable through market-corroborated inputs; and Level 3 - inputs are unobservable, or observable but cannot be market-corroborated, requiring the Company to make assumptions about pricing by market participants.
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Financial Instruments Measured on a Recurring Basis. The following tables set forth the hierarchy of the Company’s net financial asset (liability) positions for which fair value is measured on a recurring basis:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2015 |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| (Dollars in millions) |
Investments in debt and equity securities | $ | 21.6 |
| | $ | 31.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 52.6 |
|
Commodity swap contracts | — |
| | (76.0 | ) | | — |
| | (76.0 | ) |
Foreign currency contracts | — |
| | (259.8 | ) | | — |
| | (259.8 | ) |
Total net financial assets (liabilities) | $ | 21.6 |
| | $ | (304.8 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (283.2 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2014 |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| (Dollars in millions) |
Investments in debt and equity securities | $ | 26.1 |
| | $ | 35.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 61.8 |
|
Commodity swap contracts | — |
| | (167.1 | ) | | — |
| | (167.1 | ) |
Foreign currency contracts | — |
| | (410.0 | ) | | — |
| | (410.0 | ) |
Total net financial assets (liabilities) | $ | 26.1 |
| | $ | (541.4 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (515.3 | ) |
For Level 1 and 2 financial assets and liabilities, the Company utilizes both direct and indirect observable price quotes, including interest rate yield curves, exchange indices, broker/dealer quotes, published indices, issuer spreads, benchmark securities and other market quotes. In the case of certain debt securities, fair value is provided by a third-party pricing service. Below is a summary of the Company’s valuation techniques for Level 1 and 2 financial assets and liabilities:
| |
• | Investments in debt and equity securities: U.S. government securities and marketable equity securities are valued based on quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) and investment-grade corporate bonds and U.S. government agency securities are valued based on the various inputs listed above that may preclude the security from being measured using an identical asset in an active market (Level 2). |
| |
• | Commodity swap contracts — diesel fuel and explosives: valued based on a valuation that is corroborated by the use of market-based pricing (Level 2). |
| |
• | Foreign currency forward and option contracts: valued utilizing inputs obtained in quoted public markets (Level 2). |
The Company did not have any transfers between levels during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 or 2014 for its Corporate Hedging positions. The Company’s policy is to value transfers between levels using the beginning of period valuation.
Other Financial Instruments. The Company used the following methods and assumptions in estimating fair values for other financial instruments as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
| |
• | Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, including those within the Company’s accounts receivable securitization program, notes receivable and accounts payable have carrying values which approximate fair value due to the short maturity or the liquid nature of these instruments. |
| |
• | Long-term debt fair value estimates are based on observed prices for securities with an active trading market when available (Level 2), and otherwise on estimated borrowing rates to discount the cash flows to their present value (Level 3). |
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s long-term debt are summarized as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2015 | | December 31, 2014 |
| Carrying Amount | | Estimated Fair Value | | Carrying Amount | | Estimated Fair Value |
| (Dollars in millions) |
Long-term debt | $ | 6,305.2 |
| | $ | 3,000.3 |
| | $ | 5,986.8 |
| | $ | 5,227.9 |
|
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Credit and Nonperformance Risk
The fair value of the Company’s Corporate Hedging derivative assets and liabilities reflects adjustments for credit risk. The Company manages its counterparty risk through established credit standards, diversification of counterparties, utilization of investment grade commercial banks, adherence to established tenor limits based on counterparty creditworthiness and continuous monitoring of that creditworthiness. To reduce its credit exposure for these hedging activities, the Company seeks to enter into netting agreements with counterparties that permit the Company to offset asset and liability positions with such counterparties in the event of default. The Company also continually monitors counterparties for nonperformance risk, if present, on a case-by-case basis.
(8) Coal Trading
The Company engages in the direct and brokered trading of coal and freight-related contracts (coal trading). Except those for which the Company has elected to apply a normal purchases and normal sales exception, all derivative coal trading contracts are accounted for at fair value.
The Company includes instruments associated with coal trading transactions as a part of its trading book. Trading revenues from such transactions are recorded in “Other revenues” in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and include realized and unrealized gains and losses on derivative instruments, including those that arise from coal deliveries related to contracts accounted for on an accrual basis under the normal purchases and normal sales exception. Therefore, the Company has elected the trading exemption surrounding disclosure of its coal trading activities.
Trading revenues recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, | | June 30, |
Trading Revenues by Type of Instrument | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (Dollars in millions) |
Commodity futures, swaps and options | | $ | 3.0 |
| | $ | 22.7 |
| | $ | 41.6 |
| | $ | 58.3 |
|
Physical commodity purchase/sale contracts | | (1.6 | ) | | (12.4 | ) | | (23.5 | ) | | (27.0 | ) |
Total trading revenues | | $ | 1.4 |
| | $ | 10.3 |
| | $ | 18.1 |
| | $ | 31.3 |
|
Risk Management
Hedge Ineffectiveness. In some instances, the Company has designated an existing coal trading derivative as a hedge and, thus, the derivative has a non-zero fair value at hedge inception. The “off-market” nature of these derivatives, which is best described as an embedded financing element within the derivative, is a source of ineffectiveness. In other instances, the Company uses a coal trading derivative that settles at a different time, has different quality specifications or has a different location basis than the occurrence of the cash flow being hedged. These collectively yield ineffectiveness to the extent that the derivative hedge contract does not exactly offset changes in the fair value or expected cash flows of the hedged item.
The gross fair value of coal trading positions designated as cash flow hedges of forecasted sales was an asset of $29.4 million and $44.3 million as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Based on the net fair value of the Company’s coal trading positions held in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” at June 30, 2015, unrealized gains to be reclassified from comprehensive income to earnings through the end of the year are expected to be approximately $30 million, at which point, all unrealized gains will have been reclassified. As these unrealized gains are associated with derivative instruments that represent hedges of forecasted transactions, the amounts reclassified to earnings may partially offset the effect of the realized underlying transactions in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Offsetting and Balance Sheet Presentation
The Company's coal trading assets and liabilities include financial instruments, such as swaps, futures and options, cleared through various commodities exchanges, which involve the daily net settlement of closed positions. The Company must post cash collateral, known as variation margin, on exchange-cleared positions that are in a net liability position and receives variation margin when in a net asset position. The Company also transacts in coal trading financial swaps and options through OTC markets with financial institutions and other non-financial trading entities under ISDA Master Agreements, which contain symmetrical default provisions. Certain of the Company's coal trading agreements with OTC counterparties also contain credit support provisions that may periodically require the Company to post, or entitle the Company to receive, initial and variation margin. Physical coal and freight-related purchase and sale contracts included in the Company's coal trading assets and liabilities are executed pursuant to master purchase and sale agreements that also contain symmetrical default provisions and allow for the netting and setoff of receivables and payables that arise during the same time period. The Company offsets its coal trading asset and liability derivative positions, and variation margin related to those positions, on a counterparty-by-counterparty basis in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, with the fair values of those respective derivatives reflected in “Assets from coal trading activities, net” and “Liabilities from coal trading activities, net."
The fair value of assets and liabilities from coal trading activities presented on a gross and net basis as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 is set forth below:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Affected line item in the condensed consolidated balance sheets | | Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets (Liabilities) | | Gross Amounts Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets | | Variation margin (held) posted (1) | | Net Amounts of Assets (Liabilities) Presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets |
| | (Dollars in millions) |
| | Fair Value as of June 30, 2015 |
Assets from coal trading activities, net | | $ | 214.7 |
| | $ | (136.4 | ) | | $ | (34.2 | ) | | $ | 44.1 |
|
Liabilities from coal trading activities, net | | (162.9 | ) | | 136.4 |
| | 5.2 |
| | (21.3 | ) |
Total, net | | $ | 51.8 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (29.0 | ) | | $ | 22.8 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value as of December 31, 2014 |
Assets from coal trading activities, net | | $ | 342.5 |
| | $ | (248.3 | ) | | $ | (36.6 | ) | | $ | 57.6 |
|
Liabilities from coal trading activities, net | | (285.0 | ) | | 248.3 |
| | 4.0 |
| | (32.7 | ) |
Total, net | | $ | 57.5 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (32.6 | ) | | $ | 24.9 |
|
| |
(1) | A total of $0.9 million of the net variation margin held at June 30, 2015 related to cash flow hedges. |
See Note 7. "Derivatives and Fair Value Measurements" for information on balance sheet offsetting related to the Company’s Corporate Hedging activities.
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fair Value Measurements
The following tables set forth the hierarchy of the Company’s net financial asset (liability) coal trading positions for which fair value is measured on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2015 |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| (Dollars in millions) |
Commodity futures, swaps and options | $ | 15.0 |
| | $ | 7.4 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 22.4 |
|
Physical commodity purchase/sale contracts | — |
| | (1.4 | ) | | 1.8 |
| | 0.4 |
|
Total net financial assets | $ | 15.0 |
| | $ | 6.0 |
| | $ | 1.8 |
| | $ | 22.8 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2014 |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| (Dollars in millions) |
Commodity futures, swaps and options | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | 32.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 32.4 |
|
Physical commodity purchase/sale contracts | — |
| | (9.6 | ) | | 2.1 |
| | (7.5 | ) |
Total net financial (liabilities) assets | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | 23.0 |
| | $ | 2.1 |
| | $ | 24.9 |
|
For Level 1 and 2 financial assets and liabilities, the Company utilizes both direct and indirect observable price quotes, including U.S. interest rate curves; LIBOR yield curves; Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) Group, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), LCH.Clearnet (formerly known as the London Clearing House), NOS Clearing ASA and Singapore Exchange (SGX) contract prices; broker quotes; published indices and other market quotes. Below is a summary of the Company’s valuation techniques for Level 1 and 2 financial assets and liabilities:
| |
• | Commodity futures, swaps and options: generally valued based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) or a valuation that is corroborated by the use of market-based pricing (Level 2). |
| |
• | Physical commodity purchase/sale contracts: purchases and sales at locations with significant market activity corroborated by market-based information (Level 2). |
Physical commodity purchase/sale contracts transacted in less liquid markets or contracts, such as long-term arrangements with limited price availability, are classified in Level 3. Indicators of less liquid markets are those with periods of low trade activity or wide pricing spreads between broker quotes.
The Company's risk management function, which is independent of the Company's commercial trading function, is responsible for valuation policies and procedures, with oversight from executive management. Generally, the Company's Level 3 instruments or contracts are valued using bid/ask price quotations and other market assessments obtained from multiple, independent third-party brokers or other transactional data incorporated into internally-generated discounted cash flow models. While the Company does not anticipate any decrease in the number of third-party brokers or market liquidity, the occurrence of such events could erode the quality of market information and therefore the valuation of its market positions. The Company's valuation techniques include basis adjustments to the foregoing price inputs for quality, such as heat rate and sulfur and ash content; location differentials, expressed as port and freight costs, and credit risk. The Company's risk management function independently validates the Company's valuation inputs, including unobservable inputs, with third-party information and settlement prices from other sources where available. A daily process is performed to analyze market price changes and changes to the portfolio. Further periodic validation occurs at the time contracts are settled with the counterparty. These valuation techniques have been consistently applied in all periods presented, and the Company believes it has obtained the most accurate information available for the types of derivative contracts held.
The fair value of the Company's coal trading positions classified in Level 3, and changes thereto, was not material to the periods presented. Additionally, the Company did not have any significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 or 2014, nor were there any transfers in or out of Level 3 during those periods. The Company’s policy is to value all transfers between levels using the beginning of period valuation.
As of June 30, 2015, the Company's trading portfolio was expected to have a negative net cash realization in 2015, followed by a positive net cash realization in 2016.
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Credit and Nonperformance Risk. The fair value of the Company’s coal derivative assets and liabilities reflects adjustments for credit risk. The Company’s exposure is substantially with electric utilities, energy marketers, steel producers and nonfinancial trading houses. The Company’s policy is to independently evaluate each customer’s creditworthiness prior to entering into transactions and to regularly monitor the credit extended. If the Company engages in a transaction with a counterparty that does not meet its credit standards, the Company seeks to protect its position by requiring the counterparty to provide an appropriate credit enhancement. Also, when appropriate (as determined by its credit management function), the Company has taken steps to reduce its exposure to customers or counterparties whose credit has deteriorated and who may pose a higher risk of failure to perform under their contractual obligations. These steps include obtaining letters of credit or cash collateral (margin), requiring prepayments for shipments or the creation of customer trust accounts held for the Company’s benefit to serve as collateral in the event of a failure to pay or perform. To reduce its credit exposure related to trading and brokerage activities, the Company seeks to enter into netting agreements with counterparties that permit the Company to offset asset and liability positions with such counterparties and, to the extent required, the Company will post or receive margin amounts associated with exchange-cleared and certain OTC positions. The Company also continually monitors counterparty and contract nonperformance risk, if present, on a case-by-case basis.
At June 30, 2015, 75% of the Company’s credit exposure related to coal trading activities with investment grade counterparties, while 6% was with non-investment grade counterparties and 19% was with counterparties that are not rated.
Performance Assurances and Collateral
Certain of the Company’s derivative trading instruments require the parties to provide additional performance assurances whenever a material adverse event jeopardizes one party’s ability to perform under the instrument. If the Company was to sustain a material adverse event (using commercially reasonable standards), its counterparties could request collateralization on derivative trading instruments in net liability positions which, based on an aggregate fair value at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, would have amounted to collateral postings to counterparties of approximately $25 million and $31 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, no collateral was posted to counterparties for such positions.
Certain of the Company’s other derivative trading instruments require the parties to provide additional performance assurances whenever a credit downgrade occurs below a certain level, as specified in each underlying contract. The terms of such derivative trading instruments typically require additional collateralization, which is commensurate with the severity of the credit downgrade. In 2015, each of the three major credit rating agencies downgraded the Company's corporate credit rating. The Company was not required to post additional collateral as a direct result of these downgrades for its derivative trading instruments. Even if a credit downgrade were to have occurred below contractually specified levels, the Company’s additional collateral requirement owed to its counterparties for these derivative trading instruments would have been zero at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 based on the aggregate fair value of all derivative trading instruments with such features. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, no collateral was posted to counterparties to support such derivative trading instruments.
The Company is required to post variation margin on positions that are in a net liability position and is entitled to receive and hold variation margin on positions that are in a net asset position with an exchange and certain of its OTC derivative contract counterparties. At June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company held net variation margin of $29.0 million and $32.6 million, respectively.
In addition to the requirements surrounding variation margin, the Company is required by the exchanges upon which it transacts and by certain of its OTC arrangements to post certain additional collateral, known as initial margin, which represents an estimate of potential future adverse price movements across the Company’s portfolio under normal market conditions. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had posted initial margin of $14.2 million and $15.2 million, respectively, which is reflected in “Other current assets” in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company was in receipt of $0.8 million of margin in excess of the required variation and initial margin as of June 30, 2015, while it had posted $6.1 million of excess margin as of December 31, 2014.
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(9) Financing Receivables
The Company's total financing receivables as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 consisted of the following:
|
| | | | | | | | |
Balance Sheet Classification | | June 30, 2015 | | December 31, 2014 |
| (Dollars in millions) |
Other current assets | $ | 26.6 |
| | $ | — |
|
Investments and other assets | 162.5 |
| | 347.2 |
|
Total financing receivables | $ | 189.1 |
| | $ | 347.2 |
|
The Company periodically assesses the collectability of accounts and loans receivable by considering factors such as specific evaluation of collectability, historical collection experience, the age of the receivable and other available evidence. Below is a description of the Company's financing receivables outstanding as of June 30, 2015.
Codrilla Mine Project. In 2011, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PEA-PCI, then Macarthur Coal Limited, completed the sale of a portion of its 85% interest in the Codrilla Mine Project to the other participants of the Coppabella Moorvale Joint Venture, afterward retaining 73.3% ownership.The final outstanding installment payment of 40% of the sale price is due upon the earlier of the mine's first coal shipment or a specified date. The sales agreement was amended in the second quarter of 2013 to delay the specified date from March 31, 2015 to June 30, 2016. There are currently no indications of impairment on the remaining installment and the Company expects to receive full payment by June 30, 2016. The remaining balance associated with these receivables totaled $26.6 million and $27.6 million at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, and was recorded in "Other current assets" and "Investments and other assets" in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, respectively.
Middlemount. The Company periodically makes loans to Middlemount, in which the Company owns a 50% equity interest, pursuant to the related shareholders’ agreement for purposes of funding capital expenditures and working capital requirements. Middlemount is required to pay down the loans as excess cash is generated pursuant to its shareholders’ agreement. The Priority Loans bear interest at a rate equal to the monthly average 30-day Australian Bank Bill Swap Reference Rate plus 3.5%, while the Subordinated Loans presently do not bear interest. The loans expire on December 31, 2016. Based on the expected timing of repayment of these loans, which is projected to extend beyond the stated expiration date, the Company considers these loans to be of a long-term nature. As a result, (1) the foreign currency impact related to the shareholder loans is included in foreign currency translation adjustment in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income and (2) interest income on the Priority Loans is recognized when cash is received. Refer to Note 3. "Asset Impairment" for background surrounding an impairment charge of $136.8 million recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. The carrying value of these loans of $162.5 million and $319.6 million was reflected in "Investments and other assets" in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
| |
(10) | Property, Plant, Equipment and Mine Development |
Property, plant, equipment and mine development, net, as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 consisted of the following:
|
| | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2015 | | December 31, 2014 |
| (Dollars in millions) |
Land and coal interests | $ | 10,540.9 |
| | $ | 11,021.1 |
|
Buildings and improvements | 1,491.8 |
| | 1,569.1 |
|
Machinery and equipment | 2,363.1 |
| | 2,685.7 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization | (4,901.8 | ) | | (4,698.6 | ) |
Total, net | $ | 9,494.0 |
| | $ | 10,577.3 |
|
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(11) Income Taxes
The Company’s income tax benefits of $90.1 million and $48.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, included tax benefits of $0.2 million and $2.7 million related to the remeasurement of foreign income tax accounts, respectively. The Company’s income tax provision of $4.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 included a tax benefit of $1.3 million related to the remeasurement of foreign income tax accounts for the same period. The Company's effective tax rate before remeasurement for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 is based on the Company’s estimated full year effective tax rate, comprised of expected statutory tax expense more than offset by reductions from percentage depletion, foreign rate differential and changes in valuation allowance.
The income tax benefits recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 are primarily comprised of a tax benefit that was allocated to results from continuing operations related to the tax effects of items credited directly to "Other comprehensive income." There was no similar benefit recorded for the three or six months ended June 30, 2014. Generally, the amount of tax provision or benefit allocated to continuing operations is determined without regard to the tax effects of other categories of income or loss, such as "Other comprehensive income." However, an exception applies in periods in which there is a year-to-date loss from continuing operations before taxes and income in other categories of earnings before taxes. Under this exception, and notwithstanding the continuing valuation allowance on the Company's net deferred tax assets in the U.S. and Australia, the tax provision is first allocated to the other categories of earnings and a related tax benefit is recorded in results from continuing operations.
(12) Long-term Debt
The Company’s total indebtedness as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 consisted of the following:
|
| | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2015 | | December 31, 2014 |
| (Dollars in millions) |
2013 Term Loan Facility due September 2020 | $ | 1,170.0 |
| | $ | 1,175.1 |
|
7.375% Senior Notes due November 2016 | — |
| | 650.0 |
|
6.00% Senior Notes due November 2018 | 1,518.8 |
| | 1,518.8 |
|
6.50% Senior Notes due September 2020 | 650.0 |
| | 650.0 |
|
6.25% Senior Notes due November 2021 | 1,339.6 |
| | 1,339.6 |
|
10.00% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due March 2022 | 976.7 |
| | — |
|
7.875% Senior Notes due November 2026 | 247.7 |
| | 247.6 |
|
Convertible Junior Subordinated Debentures due December 2066 | 383.7 |
| | 382.3 |
|
Capital lease obligations | 17.8 |
| | 22.2 |
|
Other | 0.9 |
| | 1.2 |
|
Total | $ | 6,305.2 |
| | $ | 5,986.8 |
|
The carrying amounts of the 2013 Term Loan Facility due September 2020, the 10.00% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due March 2022 (the Senior Secured Second Lien Notes), the 7.875% Senior Notes due November 2026 and the Convertible Junior Subordinated Debentures due December 2066 have been presented above net of the respective unamortized original issue discounts.
Other than as described in the following section, there were no significant changes to the Company's long-term debt subsequent to December 31, 2014. Information regarding the Company's long-term debt is outlined in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.
2013 Credit Facility Amendment
On February 5, 2015, the Company entered into the Omnibus Amendment Agreement (the First Amendment) related to its secured credit agreement dated September 24, 2013 (as amended, the 2013 Credit Facility). The 2013 Credit Facility provides for a $1.65 billion revolving credit facility (the 2013 Revolver) and a $1.20 billion term loan facility (the 2013 Term Loan Facility).
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company's obligations under the 2013 Credit Facility are guaranteed by the Company and substantially all of its domestic subsidiaries and are secured by (1) a pledge of 65% of the stock of Peabody Investments (Gibraltar) Limited, a holding company for the Company's Australian operations, (2) a pledge of the stock of Peabody IC Funding Corp., whose assets are substantially comprised of intercompany debt owed to it by Peabody IC Holdings LLC, a holding company whose sole asset is intercompany debt owed to it by the top-level Gibraltar subsidiary of the Company’s Australian platform, an entity which previously owed such debt directly to Peabody IC Funding Corp. and (3) after the effectiveness of the First Amendment, substantially all of the Company’s U.S. assets and 65% of the equity interests of its first-tier foreign subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions. Under the 2013 Credit Facility, the amount of such obligations that are secured by Principal Property and Capital Stock (each as is defined in the indentures for the Company's 6.00%, 6.25%, 6.50% and 7.875% Senior Notes (collectively, the Senior Notes)) is limited in order for the Company to utilize the general liens basket in the Company's Senior Notes indentures.
In addition to the pledge of certain collateral, among other things, the First Amendment:
| |
• | amended the financial maintenance covenants to provide the Company with greater financial flexibility by lowering the minimum interest coverage ratio and increasing the maximum net first lien secured leverage ratio for the term of the 2013 Credit Facility; |
| |
• | amended the liens covenant to allow for second lien debt issuances, so long as the Company remains in compliance with the 2013 Credit Facility; |
| |
• | amended certain other negative covenants to (1) reduce the annual cash dividend payments basket to a maximum of $27.5 million (with carryforward permitted), (2) reduce the additional general restricted payments basket, which includes dividends, stock repurchases and certain investments, to a maximum of $100.0 million (though the Company may also make restricted payments using another basket whose size is based on, among other things, positive earnings during the term of the agreement) and (3) further limit the Company’s ability to incur liens, incur debt and make investments; and |
| |
• | provided for certain additional mandatory prepayments including with the net cash proceeds of certain asset sales, subject to customary reinvestment rights. |
The Company paid aggregate modification costs of $11.8 million related to the First Amendment during the six months ended June 30, 2015, which will be amortized over the remaining terms of the 2013 Revolver and the 2013 Term Loan Facility.
Senior Secured Second Lien Notes Offering
On March 16, 2015, the Company completed the offering of $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of the Senior Secured Second Lien Notes. The notes were offered to qualified institutional buyers under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and to non-U.S. persons in transactions outside the U.S. under Regulation S of the Securities Act.
The Senior Secured Second Lien Notes are secured by a second-priority lien on all of the assets that secure the Company's obligations under the 2013 Credit Facility on a first-lien basis, subject to permitted liens and other limitations. The Company's Senior Secured Second Lien Notes indenture contains a limit, consistent with the 2013 Credit Facility, on the amount of debt that may be secured by Principal Property and Capital Stock. For purposes of calculating the Principal Property limit, 15% of Specified Consolidated Net Tangible Assets (as that term is used in the related indenture) was approximately $1.6 billion as of June 30, 2015. Additionally, as of June 30, 2015, the book value of Principal Property was approximately $3.0 billion, the book value of property that did not constitute Principal Property was approximately $2.6 billion and the book value of 65% of the capital stock in the Company's first-tier foreign subsidiaries and 65% of the capital stock in Peabody Investments (Gibraltar) Limited was approximately $3.0 billion.
The Company used the net proceeds from the sale of the notes, in part, to fund the tender offer to purchase its 7.375% Senior Notes due November 2016 (the 2016 Senior Notes) and to redeem the aggregate principal amount that was not tendered in the tender offer. Additionally, the Company intends to use the remaining proceeds for general corporate purposes, which may include the payment of federal coal lease expenditures.
The Company must pay interest on the notes semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year until maturity on March 15, 2022. The Company may redeem the Senior Secured Second Lien Notes at any time on or after March 15, 2018 at the redemption prices specified in the related indenture and, prior to that date, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus a make whole premium, in addition to any accrued and unpaid interest. Prior to March 15, 2018, the Company may also redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Secured Second Lien Notes with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings.
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The notes were issued at an issue price of 97.566% of principal amount, resulting in an original issue discount of $24.3 million that will be amortized through maturity. The Company also paid aggregate debt issuance costs of $16.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015 related to the offering, which will also be amortized over the life of the Senior Secured Second Lien Notes.
2016 Senior Notes Tender Offer and Redemption
Concurrently with the offering of the Senior Secured Second Lien Notes, the Company commenced a tender offer to repurchase the $650.0 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of the 2016 Senior Notes. Consequently, the Company repurchased $566.9 million aggregate principal amount of the notes that were validly tendered and not validly withdrawn during March 2015. The Company redeemed the remaining $83.1 million aggregate principal amount of the 2016 Senior Notes on April 15, 2015. In connection with those repurchases, the Company recognized an aggregate loss on early debt extinguishment of $8.3 million and $67.8 million in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively. The year-to-date charge was comprised of aggregate tender offer and make-whole premiums paid of $66.4 million and the non-cash write-off of associated unamortized debt issuance costs of $1.4 million.
(13) Pension and Postretirement Benefit Costs
Net periodic pension cost included the following components:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, | | June 30, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (Dollars in millions) |
Service cost for benefits earned | | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 0.5 |
| | $ | 1.3 |
| | $ | 1.0 |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation | | 10.1 |
| | 11.3 |
| | 20.2 |
| | 22.7 |
|
Expected return on plan assets | | (12.1 | ) | | (13.5 | ) | | (24.1 | ) | | (27.1 | ) |
Amortization of prior service cost and net actuarial loss | |