PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

COMPANY OVERVIEW

The Aristotle Corporation (“Aristotle”) and its subsidiaries (together with Aristotle, the “Company”), founded in 1986, and headquartered in Stamford, CT, is a leading manufacturer and global distributor of educational, health, medical technology and agricultural products. A selection of over 80,000 items is offered, primarily through more than 45 separate catalogs carrying the brand of Nasco (founded in 1941), as well as those bearing the brands of Life/Form®, Whirl-Pak®, Simulaids, Triarco, Spectrum Educational Supplies, Hubbard Scientific, Scott Resources, Haan Crafts, To-Sew, CPR Prompt®, Ginsberg Scientific and Summit Learning. Products include educational materials and supplies for substantially all K-12 curricula, molded plastics, biological materials and items for the agricultural, senior care and food industries. In addition, the Company offers medical simulators and manikins used for training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the fire and emergency rescue and patient care fields. The Company also markets proprietary product lines that provide exclusive distribution rights throughout all of its catalogs. The proprietary product lines are developed internally through the Company’s research and development efforts and acquired externally by licensing rights from third parties.

Prior to June 17, 2002, Aristotle was a holding company which, through its subsidiaries, Simulaids, Inc. (“Simulaids”) and Safe Passage International, Inc. (“Safe Passage”), conducted business in two segments, the medical education and training products market and the computer-based training market. On June 17, 2002, Aristotle merged (the “Merger”) with Nasco International, Inc. (“Nasco”), an indirect subsidiary of Geneve Corporation (“Geneve”), a privately-held diversified financial holding company. Pursuant to the Merger, the separate corporate existence of Nasco ceased and Aristotle was the surviving entity. Immediately following the Merger, Aristotle’s business was comprised of the operations of the Nasco group of companies, Simulaids and Safe Passage. Due to the relative sizes of the parties and conditions to the Merger, the transaction was accounted for as a reverse acquisition using the purchase method of accounting under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Accordingly, for accounting and reporting purposes, Nasco was deemed to be the acquiring company, and financial information reported for periods prior to the Merger is that of Nasco. In applying purchase accounting to the Merger, the assets and liabilities of Aristotle were adjusted to their fair market values at June 17, 2002. This accounting method included recognition of a significant deferred tax asset of approximately $30.7 million, which was principally attributable to Aristotle’s Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards (“NOLs”). As a result of such recognition, Aristotle’s pre-merger goodwill and long-term assets of $8.3 million were reduced to zero and negative goodwill of $20.2 million was recognized as an extraordinary gain at the Merger date.

ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES

On March 1, 2006, Aristotle purchased certain assets of Large Print Publishing Company for $150. The purchased assets were comprised of inventory, printing equipment, trade name and license rights to products printed and distributed as Large Print products. The Large Print product line complements product lines manufactured and distributed by the Company in the educational segment. The results of Large Print operations have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements since the date of such acquisition. The purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill of $63 attributable to the commercial segment. The sales and income from this acquisition were not material to the Company’s 2006 results from operations.

On September 17, 2004, Aristotle purchased certain assets of the science product line of Ginsberg Scientific Company and GSC International, Inc. (collectively referred to as “Ginsberg”) for $1.8 million. Ginsberg is a manufacturer and distributor of products and kits designed to demonstrate certain science concepts for students in grades 5-12. The Ginsberg offerings complement the science product lines manufactured and distributed by the Company in the educational segment. The results of Ginsberg’s operations have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements since the date of such acquisition. The purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill of $1.0 million attributable to the educational segment.

1

On August 11, 2004, Aristotle purchased certain assets of the CPR Prompt product line for $1.9 million. The CPR Prompt product line is comprised of a number of products, primarily training manikins, used in the instruction of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The CPR Prompt product line complements product lines manufactured and distributed by the Company in the educational segment. The results of CPR Prompt’s operations have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements since the date of such acquisition. The purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill of $1.0 million attributable to the educational segment.

DESCRIPTION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF BUSINESS SEGMENTS

The Company operates in two business segments: educational and commercial. The contribution of each business segment to net sales and gross profit, and the identifiable assets attributable to each business segment, are set forth in Note 16 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Educational Segment

The Company’s educational segment consists primarily of the sale of supplemental educational supplies and equipment to school districts, individual schools, teachers and curriculum specialists, who purchase products primarily for classroom use.

In addition to its business in the school supply market, the Company, through its Nasco Life/Form, Simulaids and CPR Prompt product lines, sells medical technology training products including manikins and medical simulators used for training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the emergency rescue and patient care fields. The Company’s primary users of its health care training products are fire and emergency medical departments, and nursing and medical schools.

Commercial Segment

The Company markets agricultural supplies, including small hand tools and equipment, to farmers and ranchers to assist in livestock and crop production.

In addition, the Company provides sterile sampling bags and containers worldwide under the Whirl-Pak trademark. The product line is primarily sold in the food and water treatment industries. The product line provides a stable vehicle for the containment and transporting of food and water samples to laboratories without threat of sample contamination.

In the senior care industry, the Company offers a broad selection of products used by nursing home and senior care facilities to support therapy programs.

INDUSTRY OVERVIEW

Educational Segment

According to the U.S. Department of Education, over $500 billion is estimated to be spent nationwide on education at the elementary and secondary levels. As the market is affected by prevailing political and social trends, the attitude of the government towards education determines, to some extent, total expenditures on education. In 2002, President Bush signed into law the “No Child Left Behind Act of 2001,” designed to improve student achievement and change the culture of America’s schools. States and local school districts are now receiving more Federal funding, approximately $56 billion, than ever before for all programs under the “No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.” Notwithstanding the Federal funding available to support education, state governments are the major source of funding for the educational segment. State governments had been affected by the weak U.S. economy of recent years, resulting in significant state budget deficits in fiscal years 2003-2004. However, improvements in state tax collections and other revenue sources during fiscal years 2005 and 2006 have led to improved state budget conditions and improved educational funding environments.

Factors that contribute to the expansion of the education sector include:

2

The traditional school model of lectures, workbooks, written assignments and text memorization has been criticized for failing to engage students, as opposed to methods that emphasize active learning techniques. The prevailing inclination among educators to use manipulatives, models, or other hands-on tools places the Company within a particularly favorable segment of the already well-positioned education industry.

According to the U.S. Department of Education, there are approximately 15,000 public and private school districts, 113,000 elementary and secondary schools, 3.3 million teachers and 55 million students in the United States. The Company believes that American school systems have shown a clear trend toward decentralization, which enables school teachers and administrators at the school to make many of the key decisions regarding instruction methods and school purchases. Administrators for both school districts and individual schools usually make the decision to purchase the general school supplies needed to operate the school. Teachers and curriculum specialists generally decide on curriculum-specific products for use in their classrooms and individual disciplines. Increasingly, teachers and curriculum specialists have the ability to choose the curricular materials that the teachers need to teach effectively. Site-based management is forcing the industry to rethink its sales and marketing strategies in order to address the added challenge and added cost of delivering goods and services to an increasingly decentralized marketplace. In terms of purchasing methods, direct mail ordering by catalog, as well as the internet, are on the rise as purchasing mechanisms among administrators in charge of budgets.

Canada’s commitment to its kindergarten to grade 12 curriculum is projected to be $70 billion in the 2006-2007 year, comprising approximately 60% of the Canadian national education budget. The Canadian market includes approximately 10,000 English-speaking schools, with more than half the schools located in the province of Ontario. The Canadian provincial government is responsible for the funding, curriculum development and other standards of elementary and secondary educational programs. The Canadian economy, and therefore Canadian educational budgets, are generally impacted by the overall conditions of the U.S. economy.

The North American education industry is highly fragmented with a substantial number of direct marketers of supplemental educational supplies, many of which are family or employee owned businesses that operate in a single geographic region. The Company believes that the increasing demand for single-source suppliers, prompt order fulfillment and competitive pricing, along with the related need for suppliers to invest in automated inventory and electronic ordering systems, are fostering consolidation within the industry. Increased purchasing at the school and classroom levels, which increases individual schools’ and teachers’ roles in educational supply procurement decisions, is also driving this trend. The Company’s

selection of products and vendors allows it to offer an extensive selection of products for each product line. The Company believes that by having available to school teachers and administrators all of the items they need in one place, the inclination to search other sources is reduced. This “one stop shopping” approach is the Company’s hallmark.

Moreover, the Company seeks to be competitive with its catalog prices rather than offering large discounts to single customers. With many products, two or more choices are offered in order to give customers a lower price point with a product that will meet their budget yet perform to required standards.

The health and medical education teaching aids industry is highly competitive. The Company competes for customers with numerous manufacturers of well-known brands of teaching products. The principal competitive factors in the health and medical education teaching aids market are quality, price, design of products and customer service. Although some of the Company’s competitors have greater financial and other resources, and are, therefore, able to expend more resources than the Company in areas such as marketing and business development, the Company believes that it is aggressively marketing its products and competing in an effective manner.

3

Commercial Segment

The United States Department of Agriculture indicates that there are approximately two million farms in the U.S. The Company not only markets to various groups within this total but its catalog is also directed to the “hobby farmer.” As the number of farms declines, which is a national trend, the remaining farms are becoming larger. With its extensive offerings in the farm catalog, the Company is well positioned to supply the market with the types of supplies and small hand tools and equipment needed.

Commercial distribution of sterile sampling bags and containers experienced growth in recent years as food and water quality standards gained emphasis in global markets. Product lines offered by the Company in this segment are key tools in measuring and enforcing government standards for food and water quality, and have gained a role in meat and other food-related industries. International sales growth for these product lines is driven by a developing consciousness of food and water quality standards in third-world countries. Domestically, the food industry is challenged with additional testing requirements for meat, poultry and fruit products in reaction to biosecurity risks. These increasing government regulations and growing product liability exposures should continue expansion in the amount and frequency of product sampling.

In the senior care market, the uncertainty surrounding government funding in the Medicare and Medicaid budgets for nursing home payments has resulted in the Company currently targeting its product offering to service the more basic fundamental activity needs of these customers.

Market growth in the commercial segment is principally impacted by the general economic conditions of world agriculture, the increasing size of the aged population, as well as increasing global awareness of food and water quality standards.

GROWTH STRATEGY

Key members of the Company’s management team develop and execute multiple action plans in an effort to continue the Company’s historically steady growth in sales and earnings. These action plans are continuously monitored by senior management to assess the progress in achieving the planned goals. The principal action plans are as follows:

4

PRODUCT LINES

The Company markets the following product lines through its various catalogs and websites, including www.eNasco.com, www.summitlearning.com, www.to-sew.com, www.triarcoarts.com, www.bentonkirby.com, www.goodtimeattractions.com, www.shnta.com, www.spectrumed.com, www.haan.com, www.simulaids.com and www.cprprompt.com.

Educational Offerings

Commercial Offerings

5

SALES AND MARKETING

The Company offers a wide variety of products, both proprietary products and products manufactured by others, primarily through catalogs distributed to customers throughout the United States and internationally. The Company also sells products through distributors. Additionally, the Company’s products are available for sale on its websites. Within the Company’s current markets served, research is conducted by sales and marketing personnel to identify needed products. The Company often hires consultants or sales directors from the niche served. The Company’s catalog teams continually search for new,

improved and unique products. Catalog teams pursue sales growth goals through efforts to present more than 7,000 catalog pages with broad selections of popular and new products at competitive catalog prices, and with choices of similar types of products with different price points, qualities, or features. If the Company is unable to find products to meet a specified demand, it has the option of attempting to manufacture the product in its own plants or contract manufacturing under a private label.

The Company attempts to time the distribution of catalogs to meet the peak buying periods and mails the catalogs to the individuals whom the Company believes make the buying decision. In the school market, the Company’s experience indicates that the actual user of the materials usually makes the buying decision, except for those items that are a part of school bid requests. The Company’s mailings concentrate on putting the catalogs in the hands of these decision makers. All catalogs are annually reviewed for revision. The Company’s bid request goal is to be competitively priced. The Company issues most major catalogs annually to over three million potential customers. The Company relies mainly on its more than 45 separate catalogs as its “sales staff,” which relieves the need for expensive sales calls on customers.

In recent years, the Company has expanded its efforts in international markets outside of North America, primarily in the health care, sterile sampling bags and containers and agricultural product lines. While international sales represent less than 15% of 2006 total net sales, the acceptance of product lines by international markets has been a significant growth contributor for these particular product lines.

Orders are received via mail, phone, facsimile, or internet. The Company aims to exceed customer expectations based on customers’ directions. The Company’s business is transacted by open order and purchase orders. The Company ships many orders the same day received and most orders are shipped within three days. Sale terms are typically net 30 days.

The Company is not dependent upon a single customer, or a few customers. Therefore, the loss thereof would not have a material adverse effect on the Company or either of its business segments.

PURCHASING

Substantial portions of the products distributed by the Company are purchased from manufacturers and distributors worldwide. The Company’s purchasing staff is in contact with vendors to insure awareness of new products, timely delivery and competitive pricing. With its broad range of vendors, including alternative product sources, the Company does not generally maintain contractual fulfillment agreements for purchase quantity commitments. Vendors often review catalog pages and make suggestions for the following year’s offering. Alternate vendors are reviewed on a continuous basis. To broaden its product mix to meet specific customer needs, the Company operates manufacturing facilities that produce proprietary items. Sales of proprietary products generally result in a higher profit margin and enable the Company to sell such products at wholesale in the U.S. and foreign markets where the Company often develops distribution relationships. The Company has historically been able to obtain sufficient quantities of the raw materials necessary for the manufacture of proprietary products.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

The Company owns or has the exclusive right to use a number of trademarks and trade names that it applies to various product lines such as Nasco, Life/Form, Whirl-Pak and CPR Prompt. To protect the unique product lines developed, the Company has applied for and received patents for various products in the U.S. and Canada.

COMPETITION

Although there are several large general school suppliers and wholesale and retail stores which compete with the Company, the Company believes that it offers more specialty items in more disciplines in the educational, health, medical technology and agricultural markets than any competitor. Although the Company faces competition with regard to each of its catalogs from businesses that specialize in limited numbers of curriculum subjects or markets, few, if any, of the Company’s competitors have as broad a range of products that serve as many market areas.

6

BACKLOG

The Company’s customers typically purchase products on an as-needed basis. The Company believes that, as of December 31, 2006, backlog was not a meaningful indicator of future business prospects due to the large volume of products delivered from inventories on hand.

INFORMATION SYSTEMS

The Company’s main computer system, housed in Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin, is an IBM AS 400 computer. The Company’s business is highly computerized, with almost all functions including accounting, order processing, purchasing, quotes, phone orders, billing, receivables, payables and warehousing running on this system. The system is routinely

upgraded, increasing capacity to handle the Company’s needs. To facilitate and continuously improve the software system, a staff of programmers responds to suggestions from all departments and management.

CATALOG PREPARATION

Catalog preparation is primarily handled in Fort Atkinson. A staff of graphic artists and editors works with Macintosh desktop publishing systems to complete all production work in-house, with the exception of printing.

EMPLOYEES

At December 31, 2006, the Company had approximately 850 employees. In addition, the Company engages approximately 200 temporary employees to accommodate the peak business season during the summer months. All employees at all locations are employed at-will and none are represented by a labor union.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The Company believes that this Annual Report on Form 10-K may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe-harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward looking statements include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, expectations, predictions, and assumptions and other statements which are other than statements of historical facts. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to, and are qualified by, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or business conditions to differ materially from those projected or suggested in such forward-looking statements.

The Company cautions investors that there can be no assurance that actual results or business conditions will not differ materially from those projected or suggested in such forward-looking statements as a result of various factors including, but not limited to, the risk factors set forth below. As a result, the Company’s future development efforts involve a high degree of risk. For further information, please see the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including its Forms 10-K, 10-K/A, 10-Q and 8-K.

RISK FACTORS

If the Company’s competitors are successful in developing, manufacturing and selling competitive products, the Company’s operating results could suffer.

The Company operates in highly competitive and fragmented markets. Businesses that compete with the Company are likely to continue expansion of their product offerings that may erode the Company’s gross margins. The broad range of product lines offered by the Company is unique to the market as few competitors offer the depth of subject matter in their product mix. However, each of the Company’s catalogs competes against a unique list of businesses that specialize in limited numbers of curriculum subjects or markets. Some competitors may be able to commit greater resources to product development, invest greater amounts on capital equipment and marketing plans, or offer more aggressive discounts for its products or services. In fragmented markets, competitors may further merge and consolidate, increasing market competition. Any of these competitive pressures could have a negative effect on the Company’s operating results.

7

If the Company is unable, for technical, legal, financial or other reasons, to adapt in a timely manner in response to changing market conditions or customer requirements, the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.

The Company’s success depends on its ability to enhance existing products and services, develop new products, services and technologies that address the increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of customers and respond to technological advances and emerging industry standards and practices on a cost-effective and timely basis. If the Company is unable, for technical, legal, financial or other reasons, to adapt in a timely manner in response to changing market conditions or customer requirements, the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.

The Company is dependent upon the levels of student enrollment in elementary and secondary schools and expenditures per student.

The Company’s ability to grow the business depends in part on the levels of student enrollment in elementary and secondary schools and expenditures per student. The level of student enrollment in elementary and secondary schools is largely a function of demographics. Expenditures per student are a function of prevailing political and social attitudes toward education, as well as government budgets. Any significant and sustained decline in the size of the levels of student enrollment and/or expenditures per student could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

If the Company fails to retain key personnel and hire, train and retain qualified employees, the Company may not be able to compete effectively, which could result in reduced sales.

The performance of the Company is substantially dependent on the services and performance of its senior management and other key personnel. The loss of the services of, and the failure to promptly replace, any of the Company’s executive officers or other key personnel, as well as the Company’s inability to attract and retain qualified personnel, could have a negative effect on the business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Competition for qualified personnel is intense, and there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully attract, integrate or retain sufficiently qualified personnel.

The Company expects its results of operations to fluctuate from quarter to quarter, and the price of its Common Stock and Series I Preferred Stock could fall if quarterly results are lower than the expectations of the market.

The Company’s results of operations have fluctuated in the past, and the Company’s results of operations may vary from quarter to quarter in the future. If quarterly results fall below market expectations, the price of the Company’s Common Stock and/or Series I Preferred Stock could fall. A number of factors, many of which are outside of the Company’s control, may cause variations in its results of operations including:

A substantial portion of the Company’s operating expenses are and will be related to sales and marketing, product development, technology and infrastructure, which expenses cannot be adjusted quickly and are therefore relatively fixed in the short term. The Company’s operating expense levels are based in significant part on its expectations of future sales on a quarterly basis. As a result, if sales for a particular quarter are below expectations, the Company may not be able to reduce operating expenses proportionately for that quarter; this sales shortfall would have a negative effect on the Company’s operating results and cash flow for that quarter, which could have a negative impact on the price of the Company’s Common Stock and/or Series I Preferred Stock.

The Company’s stock price may fluctuate based on factors beyond its control.

Market prices for securities of companies comparable to the Company are highly volatile. The market for the Company’s Common Stock and Series I Preferred Stock has from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the Company’s operating performance.

8

Geneve beneficially owns more than 90% of the aggregate voting power of the Company.

Geneve currently owns more than 90% of the aggregate voting power of the Company, comprised of approximately 16,100,000 shares of Common Stock and 29,000 shares of Series I Preferred Stock. Accordingly, in many circumstances, stockholders of the Company other than Geneve have no ability to determine the outcome of corporate actions requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and certain amendments to the Company’s charter.

Concentration of common share ownership and limited number of shares outstanding could prevent an active market for the Company’s Common Stock and Series I Preferred Stock.

Although the Company’s Common Stock and Series I Preferred Stock are publicly traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market, the concentration of Common Stock ownership amongst Geneve and the Company’s management and directors, and the small number of its outstanding shares of Common Stock and Series I Preferred Stock that are publicly traded, could prevent an active market for those securities. If there is not an active market for the Common Stock and/or Series I Preferred Stock, it may be difficult to sell shares of either of those securities, which could lower their respective market prices.

Geneve owns 100% of the Company’s Series J Preferred Stock.

In connection with the merger of Nasco and the Company in June 2002, Geneve acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s Series J Preferred Stock. The Series J Preferred Stock is perpetual, non-callable and not convertible into or exchangeable for any other of the Company’s property or securities. The Series J Preferred Stock is non-voting and accrues cumulative dividends at the rate of 12% per annum, based on its stated value of $6.00 per share, if and when declared by the Company’s board of directors. There are 11,200,000 shares of Series J Preferred Stock authorized; approximately 11,000,000 shares are issued, outstanding and owned by Geneve.

Geneve has indicated in public filings that (i) it does not intend to dispose of its Series J Preferred Stock, and (ii) it can transfer control of the Company through the disposition of its Common Stock, but will not do so unless the value of any outstanding shares of Series J Preferred Stock will be maintained.

The Company may not pay dividends on the Series I Preferred Stock.

Each share of Series I Preferred Stock accrues cumulative dividends at the rate of 11% per annum, based on the $6.00 stated value of the Series I Preferred Stock, and it is the current intent of the Company’s board of directors to declare such dividends. However, the payment of this dividend will be subject to the discretion of the Company’s board of directors, which has no obligation to declare or pay the dividend. No dividends may be declared or paid with respect to the Company’s Common Stock or Series J Preferred Stock until dividends are paid with respect to the Series I Preferred Stock; there can be no assurance that any dividends will be paid to holders of Series I Preferred Stock.

Conversion of the Series I Preferred Stock into Common Stock may not compensate for non-payment of dividends or lack of liquidity.

Although each share of Series I Preferred Stock and any accrued but unpaid dividends may be converted into shares of the Company’s Common Stock during the 90-day period beginning on June 17, 2007, the market price of the Company’s Common Stock when the Series I Preferred Stock becomes convertible may not be sufficient for such conversion to adequately compensate for the Company’s failure to pay accrued dividends on its Series I Preferred Stock. Moreover, there can be no assurance that the market for the Company’s Common Stock at the time of conversion will have sufficient trading volume so as to provide liquidity for holders of Series I Preferred Stock.

Certain factors may affect the Company’s ability to fully utilize its NOLs.

The Company believes that its NOLs are available to offset taxable income through the first quarter of 2007. The realizability of the NOLs is dependent upon the Company’s ability to maintain its Federal net operating tax loss carryforward position. However, events may limit the use of all or a portion of these NOLs.

9

The Company may not be able to obtain financing and additional capital to fund its business strategy on acceptable terms.

From time to time, the Company accesses the capital markets to obtain financing. Although the Company believes that it can continue to access the capital markets in the future on acceptable terms and conditions, the Company’s flexibility could be limited by the Company’s operating results and financial position, including such factors as current levels of outstanding debt and working capital. In addition, many of the factors that affect the Company’s ability to access the capital markets, such as the current state of the economy, are outside of the Company’s control. There can be no assurances that the Company will continue to have access to the capital markets on acceptable terms.

The Company views its existing $45.0 million Revolving Credit Facility as a source of available liquidity. This facility contains various covenants with which the Company must be in compliance in order to borrow funds. If the Company wishes to borrow under this facility in the future, there can be no assurance that the Company will be in compliance with these covenants. By its terms, the Revolving Credit Facility expires in October 2008. The Company anticipates renewing the facility on terms at least as favorable as the existing facility, but there can be no assurances of renewal or the terms on which the Company renews. Other than a possible renewal of the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility, the Company does not anticipate adding appreciable indebtedness.

The Company may expand its business through acquisitions.

The Company reviews many acquisition candidates and, in addition to acquisitions which the Company has already made, the Company is continually evaluating new acquisition opportunities. Factors which may affect the Company’s ability to grow successfully through acquisitions include:

The Company may be required to expend significant resources to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and may not be able to comply on a timely basis, if at all.

The Company is not an accelerated filer as defined under relevant SEC regulations, and therefore is not required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act until the filing of its 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which will be filed by the Company in 2009. Complying with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may require the Company to expend significant resources, which could increase selling and administrative expenses and divert management time and attention from sales-generating activities.

10

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Company leases 1,000 square feet of executive office space in Stamford, Connecticut from Geneve.

The Company’s primary distribution center is located in Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin. The 220,000 square foot owned distribution center is the headquarters for all Nasco marketing efforts. In January 2007, the Company relocated its plastics business operations from a 45,000 square foot leased facility to a newly constructed manufacturing facility located on its existing property in Fort Atkinson. The Company also owns 300,000 square feet of adjacent warehouse space and 40,000 square feet of adjacent office space. The Company currently occupies 230,000 square feet of the warehouse space, and leases the office space and remaining warehouse space to third parties under lease agreements expiring on various dates over the next five years. These Fort Atkinson facilities afford the Company the necessary expansion capacity for the foreseeable future.

To service the western United States, the Company owns and operates a 68,000 square foot distribution center in Modesto, California. This distribution center services all Nasco catalogs for customers in the 12 western states.

The Company operates its Triarco arts and crafts catalog operation, along with three other independent catalogs, from a 4,000 square foot leased office facility in Plymouth, Minnesota. The distribution center in Fort Atkinson services these catalogs.

The Company maintains an educational materials catalog distribution center in Fort Collins, Colorado from an 18,000 square foot owned facility. From this location and 39,000 square feet of leased facilities in Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin, the Company’s AMEP and Ginsberg product lines service math and science teachers and distributors worldwide. Light manufacturing operations are situated at both of these locations, producing mainly proprietary items.

An 83,000 square foot owned facility located in Newmarket, Ontario, Canada, currently operates as a distribution center of educational and commercial supplies sold by Spectrum via catalog mailings to schools and businesses throughout Canada.

In the first quarter of 2006, the Company began operations in a new 80,000 square foot office and manufacturing facility in Saugerties, New York, which it finished constructing at the end of 2005. The Company produces manikins and medical simulators used for training in the health care field at this location for its Simulaids operations. In December 2006, the Company executed various transactions related to its former facilities (see Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8).

The Company owns a 43,000 square foot light manufacturing and distribution facility in Otterbein, Indiana. The Company produces sewing kits used in middle school and junior high school family and consumer science classrooms at this location for its Haan Crafts operations.

The locations in Fort Atkinson, Modesto, Plymouth and Newmarket service both of the Company’s business segments. The locations in Fort Collins, Chippewa Falls, Saugerties and Otterbein service the Company’s educational segment.

Certain of the Company’s owned properties, including the primary distribution center in Fort Atkinson and owned properties located in Modesto, Fort Collins and Otterbein are each subject to a mortgage in favor of the Company’s principal lender, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (formerly Bank One, NA), as additional security pursuant to a Revolving Credit Facility entered into by the Company on October 15, 2003. For more information regarding this Revolving Credit Facility, please refer to Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is not a party to any material legal proceedings.

11

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

Ira R. Harkavy

John L. Lahey

Steven B. Lapin

Donald T. Netter

Edward Netter

James G. Tatum

Roy T.K. Thung

John A Whritner

12

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

MARKET INFORMATION

The Company’s Common Stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “ARTL.” The high and low sale prices per share of Common Stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market (as reported by NASDAQ) during the fiscal quarters indicated are set forth below.

The Company’s Series I Preferred Stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “ARTLP.” The high and low sale prices per share of Series I Preferred Stock (as reported by NASDAQ) during the fiscal quarters indicated are set forth below.

The Series J $6.00 non-convertible, non-voting cumulative 12% preferred stock, par value $.01 per share (“Series J Preferred Stock”), is privately-held and no trading market exists for such shares.

HOLDERS OF RECORD

As of March 7, 2007, there were approximately 2,000 holders of record of the Company’s Common Stock and approximately 1,800 holders of record of the Company’s Series I Preferred Stock.

DIVIDENDS

The Company has not paid any cash dividends on its Common Stock since its inception.

Dividends on the Company’s Series I Preferred Stock and Series J Preferred Stock are payable on March 31 and September 30, if and when declared by the Company’s Board of Directors. For each of 2006 and 2005, the Company paid semi-annual dividends of $.33 and $.36 per share on its outstanding shares of Series I Preferred Stock and Series J Preferred Stock, respectively.

13

On March 9, 2007, the Company declared cash dividends of $.33 and $.36 per share its outstanding shares of Series I Preferred Stock and Series J Preferred Stock, respectively. The dividends are payable on March 31, 2007, to holders of record on March 19, 2007.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table summarizes the Company’s Equity Compensation Plans as of December 31, 2006:

(1)    Includes 2,500 shares of the Company’s Common Stock and 2,500 shares of the Company’s Series I Preferred Stock to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options granted pursuant to the Company’s 1997 Employee and Director Stock Plan (“1997 Plan”). Options granted under the 1997 Plan are exercisable for one share of Common Stock and one share of Series I Preferred Stock. The Company does not currently intend to grant any additional options under the 1997 Plan.

(2)    Options granted under the 2002 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Plan are exercisable for one share of the Company’s Common Stock.

PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The Company and an affiliate completed purchases during the calendar quarter ended December 31, 2006, in private and open market transactions, of the Company’s Common Stock and Series I Preferred Stock as set forth below. None of such purchases was made pursuant to a publicly announced stock repurchase plan or program.

14

PERFORMANCE GRAPH

The following graph shows the change in value over the five years ending December 31, 2006 of an assumed investment of $100 in: (i) the Common Stock; (ii) the stocks that comprise The NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.) Index; and (iii) a peer group constructed by the Company (the “Peer Group”). The Peer Group is comprised of: Plato Learning, Inc. (TUTR), Renaissance Learning, Inc. (RLRN), Scholastic Corporation (SCHL), and School Specialty, Inc. (SCHS). The value for assumed investments depicted on the graph has been calculated assuming that cash dividends are reinvested. The Series I Preferred Stock dividend distributed on the date of the Merger is treated as a cash dividend and as reinvested. The stock price performance shown in the graph below should not be considered indicative of future stock price performance.

OTHER INFORMATION

Copies of all of the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission can be found on the Company’s website: www.aristotlecorp.net.

15

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected consolidated financial data presented below should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company, together with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this report.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA (1) (2)

(AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

(1)    As a result of the accounting for the Merger, the selected consolidated financial data set forth above for periods prior to June 17, 2002 (the date of the Merger) represent the historical information for Nasco. For periods following the Merger, the financial data set forth above represents the results for the Company as a consolidated entity. For more information regarding the Merger and acquisitions and divestitures made by the Company during the years 2002-2006, please refer to the “Company Overview” and “Acquisitions and Divestitures” sections above, respectively.

(2)    The consolidated financial data includes the operating results of the following acquired and divested businesses:

16

(3)    Deferred income taxes for 2006, 2005 and 2004 include a tax benefit of $5.5 million ($.31 per basic and diluted common share), $1.2 million ($.07 per basic and diluted common share) and $2.6 million ($.15 per basic and diluted common share), respectively, due to reductions in the net deferred tax asset valuation allowance related primarily to increased estimates of projected Federal taxable income.

(4)    “EBITDA,” which is considered a non-GAAP financial measure, is defined as earnings before income taxes, interest expense, other income and expense (including minority interest and extraordinary gain), depreciation and amortization. A non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of a company’s historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are normally included or excluded in a comparable measure calculated and presented under GAAP. EBITDA is not presented as an alternative measure of operating results (such as earnings from operations or net earnings) or cash flow from operations, as determined in accordance with GAAP, but is presented because the Company’s management believes it is a widely accepted indicator of the Company’s current financial performance and ability to incur and service debt. EBITDA does not give effect to cash used for debt service requirements or capital expenditures and thus does not reflect funds available for dividends, reinvestment or other discretionary uses. In addition, EBITDA as presented herein may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. The following table provides a reconciliation of net earnings to EBITDA for the years ended December 31 (in millions):

17

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

GENERAL

This discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations reviews and compares the results of operations of the Company, on a consolidated basis, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004. This discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations has been derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

The Company is a leading manufacturer and global distributor of educational, health, medical technology and agricultural products, primarily offered through more than 45 catalogs.

The following is a summary of key events for 2006:

A key strength of the Company’s business is its ability to generate cash consistently. The Board of Directors and management use cash generated as a measure of the Company’s performance. The Company uses the cash generated from operations to strengthen the balance sheet, including making investments and reducing liabilities such as pension and debt obligations, paying dividends on its preferred stocks and completing prudent acquisition opportunities. The Company’s management believes that examining the ability to generate cash provides investors with additional insight into the Company’s performance.

18

The following table sets forth selected financial data (i) as a percentage of net sales for the fiscal years ended December 31 and (ii) the percentage change in dollars in those reported items from the prior fiscal year:

FLUCTUATIONS IN QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The Company is subject to seasonal influences with peak levels occurring in the second and third quarters of the fiscal year primarily due to increased educational shipments coinciding with the start of new school years in the Fall. As a result, the Company typically recognizes approximately 75% of its annual net earnings in the second and third quarters of its fiscal year. Inventory levels increase in March through June in anticipation of the peak shipping season. The majority of shipments are made between June and August and the majority of cash receipts are collected from August through October.

Quarterly results may also be materially affected by the timing of acquisitions, the timing and magnitude of costs related to such acquisitions, variations in costs of products sold, the mix of products sold and general economic conditions. Results for any quarter are not indicative of the results for any subsequent fiscal quarter or for a full fiscal year.

See Note 17 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for certain unaudited consolidated quarterly financial data for 2006 and 2005.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - FISCAL YEAR 2006 AS COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR 2005

Net sales increased 7.5% to $203.0 million from $188.8 million in 2005. The growth in net sales for 2006 is attributed to organic growth within the educational and commercial segments, as no material acquisitions or divestitures occurred in the respective periods. Shipments to destinations beyond North America exceeded 10% of net sales in 2006, growing 27% compared to 2005.

Net sales in the educational segment, totaling $170.9 million, increased 8.4% in 2006 from $157.7 million in 2005. The commercial segment recorded net sales of $32.1 million in 2006, increasing 3.3% as compared to 2005.

19

Gross Profit

Gross profit for 2006 increased 7.7% to $77.1 million from $71.6 million in 2005. The increase in gross profit for 2006 is primarily attributable to the 7.5% increase in net sales, and proportionate increases in higher-margin proprietary items within the sales mix. The gross profit margin increased to 38.0% in 2006 from 37.9% in 2005.

The educational segment gross profit for 2006 increased 8.9% to $68.2 million from $62.6 million in 2005. The educational segment gross profit margin increased to 39.9% in 2006 from 39.7% in 2005. The commercial segment gross

profit for 2006 increased 5.9% to $12.9 million from $12.2 million in 2005. The commercial segment yielded a gross profit margin of 40.1% in 2006 compared to 39.1% in 2005.

Selling and Administrative Expense

Selling and administrative expense for 2006 increased 6.4% to $46.4 million from $43.6 million in 2005. As a percent of net sales, selling and administrative expense decreased to 22.9% in 2006 from 23.1% in 2005. Expenses included in this total are advertising and catalog costs, warehouse and shipping activities, customer service and general administrative functions. Selling and administrative expenses for 2006 were impacted by the following: (i) increase in salaries and wages of $1.8 million, or 7.0%, as a result of increases in annual employee compensation, employee performance incentives and the number of employees; (ii) professional fees related to consideration of a merger proposal from Geneve totaling $.5 million; (iii) increase in group health costs of $.5 million; and (iv) recognition of deferred expenses related to the curtailment of certain retirement benefits and the partial settlement of certain retirement obligations of the Company’s defined benefit plan of $1.0 million.

The Company recorded $.1 million and $.4 million in compensation expense for 2006 and 2005, respectively, related to grants of stock options to certain employees and directors.

The Company incurred and paid expenses of $.9 million per year to Geneve for certain administrative services for 2006 and 2005.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased 20.4% to $1.6 million in 2006, compared to $1.4 million in 2005. The increase in interest expense is primarily due to the increase in the weighted average interest rates on the Company’s debt to 6.6% in 2006, compared to 4.9% in 2005.

The Company’s weighted average interest rates under the credit agreements were 6.9% and 5.8% at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Other, Net

Other, Net for 2006 increased to $1.7 million from $.6 million in 2005, related to investment income. In 2006, an average monthly balance in investments of $13.8 million yielded a 13.5% average rate of return. In 2005, an average monthly balance in investments of $7.3 million yielded a 10.4% average rate of return.

Income Tax Provision

Aristotle and its qualifying domestic subsidiaries are included in the Federal income tax return and certain state income tax returns of Geneve. The provision for income taxes for the Company is determined on a separate return basis in accordance with the terms of a tax sharing agreement with Geneve, and payments for current Federal and certain state income taxes are made to Geneve.

The income tax provision for 2006 was $7.0 million compared to $9.3 million in 2005. These tax provisions reflect effective tax rates of 22.8% and 34.3% for 2006 and 2005, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate from 2005 to 2006 is primarily due to a $5.5 million decrease in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets related to NOLs utilized in 2006 as compared to a decrease in the valuation allowance of $1.2 million in 2005. The reduction in the valuation

20

allowance in 2006 amounting to $5.5 million primarily related to increased Federal taxable income related to certain transactions consummated in December 2006 (see Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8). Although the reported earnings for 2006 and 2005 are shown after-tax, approximately $14.2 million and $8.0 million, respectively, of cash from operations was retained in the Company primarily as a result of the current utilization of these NOLs. Except for Federal alternative minimum tax obligations arising from limitations on the utilization of NOLs in 2006 and future years, the Company anticipates that the utilization of the available NOLs to offset future Federal taxable income will partially reduce the amount of cash resources the Company will use to pay Federal income taxes in 2007. Other items causing differences between the statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate relate to foreign and state income taxes.

At December 31, 2006, the Consolidated Balance Sheet contains a net deferred tax asset of $12.2 million. A portion of the net deferred tax assets relate to NOLs, which were recognized in applying purchase accounting to the Merger. The majority of the NOLs were utilized by December 31, 2006, with approximately $2.9 million of NOLs expiring on such date without benefit to the Company. The valuation allowance related to NOLs decreased $6.5 million in 2006 ($1.0 million of which related to the NOLs that expired unutilized) as compared to $1.2 million in 2005. For 2006, the $5.5 million or $.31 per diluted common share decrease in the valuation allowance was primarily related to increases in 2006 taxable income. For 2005, the $1.2 million or $.07 per diluted common share decrease in the valuation allowance related primarily to increased estimates of projected Federal taxable income.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - FISCAL YEAR 2005 AS COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR 2004

Net sales increased 7.8% to $188.8 million from $175.1 million in 2004. The growth in net sales for 2005 is primarily attributable to organic growth of approximately 5.7% and the inclusion of an additional $3.8 million of net sales from the CPR Prompt and Ginsberg acquisitions, which were completed in the third quarter of 2004.

Net sales in the educational segment, totaling $157.7 million, increased 8.9% in 2005 from $144.8 million in 2004. Excluding the net sales from CPR Prompt and Ginsberg, educational net sales increased 6.4% from 2004. The commercial segment recorded net sales of $31.1 million in 2005, increasing 2.5% as compared to 2004.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for 2005 increased 9.2% to $71.6 million from $65.5 million in 2004. The increase in gross profit for 2005 is primarily attributable to the 7.8% increase in net sales including the additional gross profit of $1.5 million contributed by CPR Prompt and Ginsberg. The gross profit margin increased to 37.9% in 2005 from 37.4% in 2004.

The educational segment gross profit for 2005 increased 8.4% to $62.6 million from $57.8 million in 2004. The educational segment gross profit margin decreased to 39.7% in 2005 from 39.9% in 2004. The commercial segment gross profit for 2005 increased 4.7% to $12.2 million from $11.6 million in 2004. The commercial segment yielded a gross profit margin of 39.1% in 2005, as compared to 38.2% in 2004.

Selling and Administrative Expenses

Selling and administrative expenses for 2005 increased 5.8% to $43.6 million from $41.2 million in 2004. As a percent of net sales, selling and administrative expenses decreased to 23.1% in 2005 from 23.6% in 2004. Expenses included in this total are advertising and catalog costs, warehouse and shipping activities, customer service and general administrative functions. Selling and administrative expenses for 2005 were impacted by the following: (i) increase in salaries and wages of $1.4 million, or 6.0%, as a result of increases in annual employee compensation, employee performance incentives and the number of employees; (ii) increase in advertising expenses of $.5 million; and (iii) increase in group health costs by 23.7% to $4.0 million.

The Company recorded $.4 million and $.5 million in compensation expense for 2005 and 2004, respectively, related to grants of stock options to certain employees and directors.

The Company incurred and paid expenses of $.9 million and $.8 million to Geneve for certain administrative services for 2005 and 2004, respectively.

21

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased 17.0% to $1.4 million in 2005, compared to $1.2 million in 2004. The increase in interest expense is primarily due to the increase in the weighted average interest rates on the Company’s debt to 4.9% in 2005, compared to 3.5% in 2004.

The Company’s credit agreements assessed interest at a weighted average rate of 5.8% and 4.1% at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Income Tax Provision

Aristotle and its qualifying domestic subsidiaries are included in the Federal income tax return and certain state income tax returns of Geneve. The provision for income taxes for the Company is determined on a separate return basis in accordance with the terms of a tax sharing agreement with Geneve, and payments for current Federal and certain state income taxes are made to Geneve.

The income tax provision for 2005 was $9.3 million compared to $5.6 million in 2004. These tax provisions reflect effective tax rates of 34.3% and 24.0% for 2005 and 2004, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate from 2004 to 2005 is primarily due to the following: (i) an additional $1.4 million decrease in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets in 2004 as compared to 2005; and (ii) revisions made by management to other net deferred tax assets in 2004. The difference between the Federal statutory income tax rate of 35% and the effective income tax rate of 34.3% for 2005 results principally from a reduction in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets amounting to $1.2 million primarily related to increased estimates of projected taxable income and foreign and state income taxes. Approximately $8.0 million of the income tax provision for 2005 relates to the current utilization of the Company’s NOLs, compared to approximately $7.4 million in 2004. Although the reported earnings for 2005 and 2004 are shown after-tax, approximately $8.0 million and $7.4 million, respectively, of cash from operations was retained in the Company primarily as a result of the current utilization of these NOLs.

At December 31, 2005, the Consolidated Balance Sheet contains a net deferred tax asset of $14.0 million, net of a valuation allowance of $6.5 million. Substantially all of the net deferred tax assets relate to NOLs, which were recognized in applying purchase accounting to the Merger. The valuation allowance has been established primarily to reflect the estimate of NOLs that are expected to expire unutilized. The valuation allowance decreased $1.2 million in 2005 as compared to $3.3 million in 2004. For 2005, the $1.2 million or $.07 per diluted common share decrease in the valuation allowance related primarily to increased estimates of projected Federal taxable income. For 2004, the $2.6 million or $.15 per diluted common share decrease in the valuation allowance was primarily related to the following: (i) $2.8 million decrease in the valuation allowance due to increased estimates of projected Federal taxable income; and (ii) $.2 million increase in the valuation allowance related to the ability to realize certain other deferred tax assets. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (“SFAS 109”), the remaining $.7 million decrease in the valuation allowance in 2004 was recognized as a reduction to goodwill in connection with the CPR Prompt and Ginsberg acquisitions as a result of the increased projected Federal taxable income provided by these acquisitions.

22

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

At December 31, 2006, the Company had working capital of $65.4 million, decreasing from $66.4 million at December 31, 2005. Cash and cash equivalents increased $4.0 million in 2006, ending the year at $5.8 million. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $.3 million in 2005, ending the year at $1.8 million. The change in cash and cash equivalents during 2006 as compared to 2005 is primarily due to the following activities:

The increase in cash generated from operations in 2005 compared to 2004 was principally the result of the following: (i) a $.3 million increase in net earnings, offset by working capital changes; and (ii) a $3.6 million increase in deferred income taxes, primarily the result of an additional $1.4 million decrease in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets in 2004 as compared to 2005 and increases to other net deferred tax assets amounting to $.8 million in 2004.

In 2005, the Company used cash of approximately $5.3 million to purchase land and fund a portion of the construction of an 80,000 square foot office and manufacturing facility for the Company’s Simulaids operations. No significant activities of this nature occurred in 2004. The Company began operations at the new facility in the first quarter of 2006. Final construction costs of the new facility were approximately $5.0 million. The Company funded the construction costs through a one year, $4.3 million construction loan, with interest payable monthly at the mortgage lender’s prime rate. Subsequent to the completion of the facility, the construction loan converted to a 10-year mortgage on the new facility, with interest payable at the one month LIBOR rate plus a margin of 175 basis points.

Capital expenditures to replace and upgrade existing capital equipment and install new equipment and fixtures to provide additional operating efficiencies totaled $2.4 million and $1.4 million in 2006 and 2005, respectively.

The Company invested $8.2 million in an investment limited partnership in 2005, compared to $4.0 million in 2004. The Company made no additional investment in the limited partnership in 2006. The general partner of the limited partnership is an affiliate of the Company.

In 2006, the Company entered into an agreement to transfer ownership of the land and buildings that comprised the former Simulaids office and manufacturing facility for cash of $.4 million and a $1.6 million, 5-year note receivable bearing an interest rate of 6%. The transaction does not currently meet sale recognition criteria for sale/leaseback transactions, and as such the $.4 million of proceeds received in 2006 are reflected in cash, and as a component of other long-term accruals, at December 31, 2006 (see Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8).

23

In 2006, the Company entered into an agreement to transfer ownership of certain intangible assets for cash of $2.0 million and an $8.0 million, 15-year note receivable bearing an interest rate of 5%, with principal amortizing over the term of the note. The transaction does not meet sale recognition criteria for U.S. GAAP purposes, and as such the $2.0 of proceeds received in 2006 are reflected in cash, and as a component of other long-term accruals, at December 31, 2006 (see Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8).

In 2005, the net principal payments on debt of $.1 million were due to the following: (i) a decrease of $3.0 million in the amounts outstanding on the Company’s primary credit facility; and (ii) cash proceeds of $2.9 million from the borrowings made under the construction loan related to the new Simulaids facility.

In 2006, the Company used $.4 million to repurchase and retire approximately 43,000 shares of its common stock at an average price of $8.06 per common share.

In each of 2006 and 2005, the Company paid aggregate dividends of $8.6 million on its Series I Preferred Stock and Series J Preferred Stock.

On October 15, 2003, the Company entered into a five-year, non-amortizing, $45.0 million Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility provides the Company with seasonal working capital, letters of credit and funds for appropriate acquisitions of businesses similar in nature to the Company’s current business segments. This debt carries a variable rate of interest that is based on Prime or LIBOR rates plus applicable margins. At December 31, 2006, the weighted average interest rate on this debt was 6.7%. The Revolving Credit Facility currently has a committed weighted average rate of interest (including applicable margins) of approximately 6.7%. Such rate commitments expire on various dates through April 12, 2007.

The Company’s Revolving Credit Facility is collateralized by certain accounts receivable, inventories and property, plant and equipment, and shares of a certain subsidiary’s outstanding capital stock and ownership interests of certain of the Company’s limited liability subsidiaries. The Revolving Credit Facility contains various financial and operating covenants, including, among other things, requirements to maintain certain financial ratios and restrictions on additional indebtedness, common stock dividend payments, capital disposals and intercompany management fees. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants as of December 31, 2006.

Other than a possible renewal of the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility, the Company does not anticipate adding appreciable indebtedness in 2007.

Minimum contractual obligations at December 31, 2006 are as follows (in millions):

In 2007, capital expenditures to replace and upgrade existing equipment and install new equipment and fixtures to provide additional operating efficiencies are expected to approximate $1.7 million.

In the first quarter of 2007, the Company completed construction of a 60,000 square foot manufacturing facility on its existing land in Fort Atkinson for Nasco’s plastics operations. It is estimated that the construction cost of the facility will be approximately $3.8 million. The Company funded the capital expenditures through cash and its primary debt facility. The new facility replaces an existing 45,000 square feet of manufacturing space under a lease that expired at the end of 2006.

Capital resources in the future are expected to be used for the development of catalogs and product lines, to acquire additional businesses and for other investing activities. The Company anticipates that there will be sufficient financial resources to meet projected working capital and other cash requirements for at least the next twelve months. Management of the Company believes it has sufficient capacity to maintain current operations and support a sustained level of future growth.

24

INFLATION

Inflation has had and is expected to have only a minor effect on the Company’s operating results and its sources of liquidity. Inflation, including as it related to the increased cost of fuel and plastic materials, did not significantly impact the Company’s operating results and its sources of liquidity in 2006, 2005 and 2004.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to GAAP. The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto. Actual results could differ from those estimates. A summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies can be found in Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The Company believes the following accounting policies affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements:

Prepaid Catalog Costs and Amortization - The Company accumulates all direct costs, less applicable vendor rebates, incurred in the development, production and circulation of catalogs on the Consolidated Balance Sheets until the related catalog is mailed, at which time such catalog costs are amortized into selling and administrative expense over the estimated sales realization cycle of one year, using the straight-line method.

Deferred Income Taxes - At December 31, 2006, the Consolidated Balance Sheet contains a net deferred tax asset of approximately $1.3 million related primarily to NOLs. The realizability of this asset is dependent upon the Company’s generation of sufficient levels of future taxable income and the ability to retain its Federal net operating tax loss carryforward position. As of December 31, 2006, the Company had NOLs of approximately $3.6 million. Based upon projected future operating results, the NOLs of $3.6 million are expected to be fully utilized to offset future Federal taxable income in 2007. At December 31, 2006, approximately $2.9 million of NOLs expired unused. Events may limit the use of all or a portion of these Federal net operating tax loss carryforwards, thus potentially resulting in a higher tax liability for the Company in the future. The net deferred tax asset at December 31, 2006 is subject to future adjustment based upon changes in management’s evaluation of the realizability of the deferred tax asset.

Goodwill - The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired, by applying a fair value based test and, if impairment occurs, the amount of impaired goodwill is written off immediately. The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment based on the expected future cash flows or earnings projections. Goodwill is deemed impaired if the estimated discounted cash flows or earnings projections do not substantiate the carrying value. The estimation of such amounts requires significant management judgment with respect to revenue and expense growth rates, changes in working capital and selection of an appropriate discount rate, as applicable. The use of different assumptions would increase or decrease discounted future operating cash flows or earnings projections and could, therefore, change impairment determination. The Company evaluated its goodwill at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and determined that there was no impairment of goodwill.

Defined Benefit Plans - The Company accounts for the benefits under its defined benefit pension plan using actuarial models required by SFAS No. 87, Employers’ Accounting for Pensions (“SFAS 87”). These models use an attribution approach that generally spreads individual events over the service lives of the employees in the plan. Examples of “events” are plan amendments and changes in actuarial assumptions such as discount rate, expected return on plan assets and rate of compensation increases. The principle underlying the required attribution approach is that employees render service over their service lives on a relatively consistent basis and, therefore, the statement of earnings effects of pension benefits are earned in, and should be expensed in, the same pattern.

In calculating the net periodic benefit cost and the related benefit obligation, the Company is required to select certain actuarial assumptions. These assumptions include discount rate, expected return on plan assets and rate of compensation increase. The discount rate assumptions reflect the prevailing market rates for long-term, high-quality, fixed-income debt instruments that, if the obligation was settled at the measurement date, would provide the necessary future cash flows to pay the benefit obligation when due. The Company uses long-term historical actual return experience with consideration of the expected investment mix of the plan’s assets, as well as future estimates of long-term investment returns, to develop its assumptions of the expected return on plan assets. The rate of compensation increase is based on historical experience and the Company’s long-term plans for such increases.

25

In 2006, the Company increased its pension liability liability by $1.1 million relating to the funded status of the defined benefit pension plan as required by SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (“SFAS 158”).

In each of 2005 and 2004, a 25 basis point decline in the discount rate assumptions caused a decrease in the funded status of the Company’s pension plan. No change in the discount rate assumption was made in 2006. Consequently, the accumulated benefit obligation of the Company’s pension plan exceeded the fair market value of the plan assets at December 31, 2006 and 2005. As required by SFAS 87, the Company recorded a minimum pension liability and recognized related non-cash, after-tax, net charges of $.5 million and $.6 million to the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Earnings in the fourth quarters of 2006 and 2005, respectively. These charges did not impact the Company’s pension expense, earnings or cash contribution requirements in 2006 or 2005.

On December 31, 2005, the Company froze the plan benefits for all hourly employees and certain salaried employees. See Note 12(a) of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a more complete discussion of the Company’s defined benefit pension plan.

Revenues - Customarily applying FOB-shipping point terms, the Company recognizes revenue upon shipment of products to its customers, which corresponds to the time when risk of ownership transfers. The point of shipment is typically from one of the Company’s distribution centers or, on occasion, a vendor’s location as a drop shipment. All drop shipment sales are recorded at gross selling price.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 123(R) (“SFAS No. 158”). This statement requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability on its balance sheet and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. This statement also requires an employer to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end balance sheet. This statement amends SFAS No. 87, Employers’ Accounting for Pensions, SFAS No. 88, Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits, SFAS No. 106, Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions, and SFAS No. 132, Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits, and other related accounting literature. Upon initial application of this statement and subsequently, an employer should continue to apply the provisions in SFAS No. 87, SFAS No. 88, and SFAS No. 106 in measuring plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of its statement of financial position and in determining the amount of net periodic benefit cost. The Company was required to adopt SFAS No. 158 as of December 31, 2006. As a result of adoption, the Company recognized an increase in accrued pension liabilities of $1.1 million, an increase in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss of $.7 million, and an increase in deferred tax assets of $.4 million.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements (“SAB 108”). SAB 108 expresses the SEC Staff’s views regarding the process of quantifying financial statement misstatements. SAB 108 addresses the diversity in practice in quantifying financial statement misstatements and the potential under current practice for the build up of improper amounts on the balance sheet. The Company adopted the provisions of SAB 108 as of December 31, 2006. The adoption of SAB 108 did not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In June 2006, FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“Interpretation No. 48”), which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Interpretation 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The adoption of Interpretation No. 48 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

26

In December 2004, FASB issued a revised SFAS No. 123, Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123R”), which establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services and incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services. SFAS 123R requires a company to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments, such as stock options, based on the grant-date fair value of the award and to recognize these awards as an expense in the statement of earnings over the requisite service period. The grant-date fair value of employee stock options and similar instruments will be estimated using option-pricing models adjusted for unique characteristics of those instruments unless observable market prices for the same or similar instruments are available. SFAS 123R replaces SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, which was issued in October 1995. SFAS 123R is effective for all awards granted, modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2005. SFAS 123R provides for methods of applying this statement to existing awards during the transitional period. The adoption of SFAS 123R did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In November 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs: an amendment of ARB No. 43 (“SFAS 151”), which clarifies that abnormal costs of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted material should be recognized as current period expenses. SFAS 151 also requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS 151 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and debt. As described below, credit risk, market risk and interest rate risk are the primary sources of risk in the Company’s accounts receivable, investments and debt.

QUALITATIVE

Credit Risk: The Company provides credit in the normal course of business to its customers, which are primarily educational institutions or distributors. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s sales in 2006, 2005 or 2004. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers, maintains allowances for potential credit losses and generally does not require collateral to support its accounts receivable balances.

Market Risk: The Company’s exposure to market risk relates to the quality of holdings of its limited partnership investment. The fair market value of the limited partnership’s investments is subject to increases or decreases in value resulting from the performance of the securities issuers, from upgrades or downgrades in the credit worthiness of the securities issuers and from changes in general market conditions. The Company seeks to manage its exposure to market risk by investing in accordance with standards established by the Investment Committee of the Board of Directors. The standards of the Investment Committee are: (i) preservation of capital; (ii) provision of adequate liquidity to meet projected cash requirements; (iii) minimization of risk of principal loss through diversified short and medium term investments; and (iv) maximization of yields in relationship to the guidelines, risk, market conditions and tax considerations.

Interest Rate Risk: Changes in interest rates can potentially impact the Company’s profitability and its ability to realize assets and satisfy liabilities. Interest rate risk is resident primarily in debt, which typically has variable interest rates based on Prime or LIBOR rates. Assuming no other change in financial structure, an increase of 1% in the Company’s variable interest rate for debt would decrease pre-tax earnings for 2007 by approximately $.1 million. This amount is determined by considering the impact of a 1% increase in interest rates on the average debt estimated to be outstanding in 2007.

27

QUANTITATIVE

The Company’s debt as of December 31, 2006 is as follows (in millions, except percentage data):

The fair market value of debt equals the face amount of debt outstanding because the underlying rate of interest on substantially all of the Company’s debt is variable based upon Prime or LIBOR rates.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company, together with the related Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and report of the independent registered public accounting firm, are set forth below.

28

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

The Aristotle Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Aristotle Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive earnings, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Aristotle Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, as of December 31, 2006.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin

March 30, 2007

29