Unassociated Document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. 1)

Filed by the Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the appropriate box:
x
Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
¨
Definitive Proxy Statement
¨
Definitive Additional Materials
¨
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12


Xcorporeal, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
 
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
¨
No fee required.
   
¨
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
   
 
1)
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
     
 
 
2)
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
     
 
 
3)
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
     
     
 
4)
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
     
 
 
5)
Total fee paid:
     
   
x
Fee previously paid with preliminary materials.
   
¨
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
   
 
1)
Amount Previously Paid:
   
 
 
2)
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.
   
     
 
3)
Filing Party:
   
 
 
4)
Date Filed:
   

 

 

 
Xcorporeal, Inc.
80 Empire Drive
Lake Forest, CA 92630

February ___, 2010
 
Dear Stockholders:

You are cordially invited to attend a special meeting of stockholders (the “Special Meeting”) of Xcorporeal, Inc., a Delaware corporation, on February ___, 2010 at 10:00 a.m., local time. The Special Meeting will be held at the offices of Kaye Scholer LLP, 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1700, Los Angeles, California 90067-6048. The Special Meeting will consist of a discussion and voting on matters set forth in the accompanying Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders.
 
The Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders and a Proxy Statement, which more fully describe the formal business to be conducted at the Special Meeting, follow this letter.
 
Regardless of whether or not you plan to attend the Special Meeting, your vote is important and we encourage you to vote promptly. After reading the Proxy Statement, please promptly mark, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and return it in the prepaid envelope provided. The Proxy Statement and accompanying proxy card are first being mailed to you on or about February ___, 2010.
 
We look forward to seeing you at the Special Meeting.
 
Sincerely yours,
 
/s/ Kelly J. McCrann
Kelly J. McCrann
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

 
2

 


Xcorporeal, Inc.
80 Empire Drive
Lake Forest, CA 92630
 

 
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON FEBRUARY ___, 2010
 

  
          To the Stockholders of Xcorporeal, Inc.:

          NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting of stockholders (the “Special Meeting”) of Xcorporeal, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Xcorporeal” or the “Company”), will be held at the offices of Kaye Scholer LLP, 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1700, Los Angeles, California 90067-6048, on February ___, 2010, at 10:00 a.m., local time. At the Special Meeting, you will be asked:

 
1.
to approve the sale of substantially all of the assets (the “Assets”) of Xcorporeal (the “Asset Sale”) pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among Fresenius USA, Inc. (“FUSA”), a Massachusetts corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., Xcorporeal, Xcorporeal Operations, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Xcorporeal, and National Quality Care, Inc., a Delaware corporation, dated as of December 14, 2009, in the form attached to the accompanying Proxy Statement as Annex A (the “Asset Sale Proposal”);
 
 
2.
to approve the voluntary liquidation and dissolution of Xcorporeal pursuant to a Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution (the “Plan of Liquidation”), attached to the accompanying Proxy Statement as Annex B (the “Plan of Liquidation Proposal”);
 
3.
to approve the adoption of the Liquidating Trust Agreement (the “Liquidating Trust Agreement”), attached to the accompanying Proxy Statement as Annex C, providing for, among other things, in the event that the Asset Sale Proposal and the Plan of Liquidation Proposal are approved by our stockholders and the Asset Sale is subsequently consummated, the transfer of all of our assets remaining after the consummation of the Asset Sale, including rights to certain payments under the Asset Purchase Agreement (collectively, the “Remaining Assets”), together with all of our liabilities and obligations not satisfied prior to our dissolution (collectively, the “Remaining Liabilities”), to the Liquidating Trust (as defined in the Proxy Statement) (the “Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal”);
 
4.
to approve any proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting to a later date to solicit additional proxies in favor of the approval of the Asset Sale Proposal, the Plan of Liquidation Proposal or the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal, if there are insufficient votes for approval of any of such proposals at the time of the Special Meeting (the “Adjournment Proposal”); and
 
5.
to transact such other business as may properly come before the Special Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
 
The foregoing matters are described in more detail in the enclosed Proxy Statement.
 
Our Board of Directors has carefully reviewed and considered each of the foregoing proposals and the terms and conditions of the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement and has concluded that the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Asset Sale, the transfer of all of the Remaining Assets and Remaining Liabilities to the Liquidating Trust pursuant to the terms of the Liquidating Trust Agreement, subject to the approval by our stockholders of the Asset Sale and the Plan of Liquidation and subsequent consummation of the Asset Sale, and, if the Asset Sale is not approved or consummated, the disposition of all of our Assets, and, in either case, the complete liquidation and dissolution of the Company pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation, are all in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

       The Board of Directors recommends that you vote: (1) “FOR” the approval of the Asset Sale Proposal, (2) “FOR” the approval of the Plan of Liquidation Proposal, (3) “FOR” the approval of the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal and (4) “FOR ” the approval of the Adjournment Proposal.

 
3

 
 
The enclosed Proxy Statement is issued in connection with the solicitation of a proxy on the enclosed form by our Board of Directors for use at the Special Meeting. The Proxy Statement not only describes the items that our stockholders are being asked to consider and vote on at the Special Meeting, but also provides you with important information about us. Financial and other important information concerning us is also contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, attached to the accompanying Proxy Statement as Annex E and Annex F, respectively, and our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and any amendments thereto that we may file with the SEC.

The Board of Directors believes that the approval of all three proposals (the Asset Sale Proposal, the Plan of Liquidation Proposal and the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal) would maximize stockholder value by increasing the possibility that we will be able to distribute liquidation proceeds, if any, from the Liquidating Trust to our stockholders in the future, including our share of any Royalty Payments and any value we may realize from our rights to the Option (each capitalized term as defined in the Proxy Statement) . To the extent such amounts may become available for distribution in the future, they will be distributed pro-rata from the Liquidating Trust.

NONE OF THE CASH PROCEEDS FROM THE ASSET SALE WILL BE DISTRIBUTED TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS IN LIGHT OF THE FACT THAT CURRENTLY OUR TOTAL LIABILITES AND OBLIGATIONS SIGNIFICANTLY EXCEED OUR TOTAL ASSETS. However, our Board of Directors believes that the approval of all three proposals, increases the possibility that we will be able to distribute some liquidation proceeds from the Liquidating Trust to our stockholders, including our share of any Royalty Payments and any value we may realize from our rights to the Option.

If the Plan of Liquidation is not approved, we will not present the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal for a vote of our stockholders at the Special Meeting and will proceed with the Asset Sale, and we will use the cash received from the Asset Sale and the Remaining Assets to pay off our liabilities and ongoing operating expenses, to the extent we have available cash and assets to do so.  Our Board of Directors believes that if all three proposals are not approved, including the Plan of Liquidation Proposal, we will be forced to discontinue our operations and proceed with a liquidation in bankruptcy and that there will not be any funds or other assets available for distribution to our stockholders. See “Proposal No. 2: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.”

If our stockholders approve the Plan of Liquidation, but the Asset Sale is not approved or is not consummated, we will not present the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal for a vote of our stockholders at the Special Meeting and will move forward with our dissolution. If this occurs, our Board of Directors will be authorized to sell and liquidate our Assets, on such terms and to such parties as the Board of Directors determines in its sole discretion without requiring further stockholder approval. We do not have any agreement or understanding with any party with respect to the sale of any or all of our assets if the Asset Sale is not approved or if the Asset Sale is not consummated. After an extensive review of a range of strategic alternatives for the Company, including continuing the Company as an independent entity, exploring potential merger and acquisition transactions and any possible financing arrangements and exerting considerable efforts to maximize the value of our assets, the Board of Directors believes that the Asset Purchase Agreement presents the best offer for the sale of the Assets and that the consummation of the Asset Sale and the liquidation of the Company pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement would maximize stockholder value by increasing the possibility that we will be able to distribute liquidation proceeds. Our Board of Directors believes that if all three proposals are not approved, including the Asset Sale Proposal, we will be forced to discontinue our operations and proceed with a liquidation in bankruptcy and that there will not be any funds or other assets available for distribution to our stockholders. See “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Sale of Substantially All of the Assets of Xcorporeal”, “Proposal No. 2: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution” and “Proposal No. 3: Approval of the Liquidating Trust Agreement.”

If the Asset Sale is not consummated and the Plan of Liquidation is not approved, whether due to lack of stockholder approval or other reasons, we will not present the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal for a vote of our stockholders at the Special Meeting and our Board of Directors believes that we will then be forced to discontinue operations and proceed with a liquidation in bankruptcy, such that there will not be any funds or other assets available for a distribution to our stockholders. See “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Sale of Substantially All of the Assets of Xcorporeal”, “Proposal No. 2: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution” and “Proposal No. 3: Approval of the Liquidating Trust Agreement.”

If the Asset Sale and the Plan of Liquidation are approved, but the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal is not approved, we will move forward with the consummation of the Asset Sale and will use the cash proceeds received from the Asset Sale and the Remaining Assets to pay off our liabilities and ongoing operating expenses, to the extent we have available cash and assets to do so.  Our Board of Directors believes that if all three proposals are not approved, including the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal, we will be forced to discontinue operations and proceed with a liquidation in bankruptcy and that there will not be any funds or other assets available for distribution to our stockholders. See “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Sale of Substantially All of the Assets of Xcorporeal” and “Proposal No. 2: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.”

 
4

 

We urge you to read the accompanying Proxy Statement in its entirety and consider it carefully.  Please pay particular attention to (1) the “Risk Factors” beginning on page 61 for a discussion of the risks related to the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation, the Liquidating Trust Agreement and the risks related to our business, in the event any or all of the first three proposals (the Asset Sale Proposal, the Plan of Liquidation Proposal and the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal) are not approved by our stockholders, and (2) “Proposal No. 3: Approval of the Liquidating Trust Agreement — Liquidating Distributions; Nature; Amount; Timing”, which reflects our current estimate of the timing of and the amounts that may be ultimately available for liquidating distributions to our stockholders.

Our Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on January 4, 2010 as the record date (the “Record Date”) for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Special Meeting and any adjournment thereof. Only our stockholders of record at the close of business on Record Date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Special Meeting.

You can vote in one of three ways:

               (1)  Use the toll-free telephone number on your proxy card to vote by phone;

               (2)  Visit the website noted on your proxy card to vote via the Internet; or

               (3)  Sign, date and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope to vote by mail.

Pursuant to the rules promulgated by the SEC, we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials by sending you this Proxy Statement and a form of the proxy card and notifying you of the availability of such proxy materials on the Internet. This Proxy Statement, a form of a proxy card and the other material accompanying this Proxy Statement are available under “Investors”, sub-category “Proxy Statement Materials”, section of our web site at www.xcorporeal.com. We began distributing this Proxy Statement and a form of the proxy card on or about February ___, 2010.

The Company hopes you can attend the Special Meeting. However, whether or not you plan to attend, please vote either by Internet or by telephone or complete, sign, date and return the accompanying proxy card as soon as possible in the enclosed envelope. If you attend the Special Meeting, you may revoke your earlier vote if you wish and vote personally. Each of the Asset Sale Proposal, the Plan of Liquidation Proposal and the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal requires the approval of the holders of at least a majority of shares of our common stock outstanding as of the Record Date and entitled to vote thereon and the Adjournment Proposal requires the approval of the holders of at least a majority of the shares of our common stock represented in person or by proxy at the Special Meeting and entitled to vote thereon. Therefore, it is very important that your shares be represented.

By order of the Board of Directors
 
/s/ Robert Weinstein
Robert Weinstein
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
 
Lake Forest, California
January 27, 2010

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!

ALL STOCKHOLDERS ARE INVITED TO ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING IN PERSON. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING, YOU SHOULD READ THE ATTACHED PROXY STATEMENT CAREFULLY, AND VOTE YOUR SHARES BY INTERNET, BY TELEPHONE OR BY COMPLETING, DATING AND SIGNING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE AND RETURNING IT IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE PREPAID ENVELOPE. PLEASE NOTE, HOWEVER, THAT IF YOUR SHARES ARE HELD OF RECORD BY A BROKER, BANK OR OTHER NOMINEE AND YOU WISH TO VOTE AT THE SPECIAL MEETING, YOU MUST OBTAIN FROM THE RECORD HOLDER A PROXY ISSUED IN YOUR NAME OR BRING AN ACCOUNT STATEMENT OR LETTER FROM THE NOMINEE INDICATING YOUR BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP AS OF THE RECORD DATE.
 


 
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for Xcorporeal, Inc.’s
Special Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on February ___, 2010
 
The Proxy Statement and a form of a proxy card are available at
http://www.xcorporeal.com/htmls/proxy_statement_materials.html. Information on Xcorporeal’s
website does not constitute a part of this Proxy Statement.


 
 
5

 
 
Neither the SEC nor any state securities regulatory agency has approved or disapproved the Asset Sale Proposal, the Plan of Liquidation Proposal, the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal or the Adjournment Proposal, passed upon the merits or fairness of the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation or the Liquidating Trust Agreement nor passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of the disclosure in this document.  Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 
6

 

XCORPOREAL, INC.

80 Empire Drive
Lake Forest, CA 92630

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD FEBRUARY ___, 2010

       This proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) is being furnished to the stockholders of Xcorporeal, Inc., a Delaware corporation, in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of Xcorporeal’s board of directors to be used at a special meeting of its stockholders (the “Special Meeting”) to be held on February ___, 2010 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at the offices of Kaye Scholer LLP, 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1700, Los Angeles, California 90067-6048, and any adjournments thereof, for the purposes set forth herein and in the accompanying Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders.

       As used in this Proxy Statement, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” and “Xcorporeal” refer to Xcorporeal, Inc., including all of its subsidiaries, and prior to October 12, 2007, the company which is now our wholly-owned subsidiary and known as Xcorporeal Operations, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and the term “Operations” refers solely to Xcorporeal Operations, Inc.

This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy card are first being mailed to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Special Meeting on or about February ___, 2010 (the “Mailing Date”).

Only stockholders of record as of the close of business on January 4, 2010 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Special Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. At the close of business on the Record Date, there were 15,354,687 shares of our common stock and no shares of our preferred stock outstanding.  Each share of our common stock is entitled to one vote. Shares cannot be voted at the Special Meeting unless the holder thereof is present or represented by proxy.

YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT, REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF SHARES YOU OWN. PLEASE VOTE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO MAKE SURE THAT YOUR SHARES ARE REPRESENTED AT THE SPECIAL MEETING. TO VOTE YOUR SHARES, PLEASE EITHER VOTE BY INTERNET, BY TELEPHONE OR COMPLETE, DATE, AND SIGN THE ENCLOSED PROXY AND MAIL IT PROMPTLY IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED, WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING. VOTING BY INTERNET, BY TELEPHONE OR BY SENDING IN YOUR PROXY CARD WILL NOT PREVENT YOU FROM VOTING YOUR SHARES AT THE SPECIAL MEETING, IF YOU DESIRE TO DO SO, AS YOU MAY REVOKE YOUR EARLIER VOTE.

 
7

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY TERM SHEET
 
10
Summary of Terms of the Asset Sale
 
13
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MEETING AND THE PROPOSALS
 
17
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
30
PROPOSAL NO. 1: Approval of the Sale of Substantially All of the Assets of Xcorporeal
 
31
General Overview
 
31
Background of the Asset Sale
 
31
Description of the Asset Purchase Agreement
 
33
Purchase and Sale of Assets
 
34
Purchase Price
 
34
Assets to be Retained by the Company
 
35
Representations and Warranties of the Company
 
35
Representations and Warranties of FUSA
 
36
Conduct Prior to Closing
 
36
Conditions to Each Party’s Obligations
 
36
Conditions Precedent to FUSA’s Obligations
 
36
Conditions Precedent to Xcorporeal’s Obligations
 
37
The Closing
 
37
Survival of Representations and Warranties and Indemnification
 
37
Exclusivity
 
38
Termination
 
38
Side Agreement
 
38
Voting Agreement
 
39
Description of the Arbitration Proceeding and Other Agreements Entered into with NQCI
 
39
Payments of a Portion of the Aggregate Consideration to NQCI
 
40
No Opinion of Financial Advisor
 
44
Interests of Our Executive Officers and/or Directors in the Asset Sale, Plan of Liquidation and Liquidating Trust Agreement
 
44
Accounting Treatment
 
45
Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences to the Company
 
45
Votes Required for the Approval of the Sale of Substantially All of the Assets of Xcorporeal
 
45
Recommendation of Our Board of Directors
 
45
PROPOSAL NO. 2: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution
 
46
General
 
46
Background and Reasons for the Proposed Liquidation and Dissolution
 
46
Nature, Amount and Timing of Liquidating Distributions
 
  
The Plan of Liquidation is Contingent Upon the Approval and Consummation of the Asset Sale
 
48
Estimated Distributions to Stockholders
 
48
Sale of Our Assets
 
49
Principal Provisions of the Plan of Liquidation
 
50
Conduct Following Adoption of the Plan of Liquidation and Establishment of the Liquidating Trust
 
52
Contingent Liabilities; Contingent Reserves
 
52
Abandonment and Amendment
 
53
Plan of Liquidation Expenses and Indemnification
 
53
Trading of Our Common Stock
 
53
Interests of Our Executive Officers and/or Directors in the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement
 
53
Regulatory Approvals
 
53
Absence of Appraisal Rights
 
53
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
 
54
Votes Required for the Approval of the Plan of Liquidation
 
55
Recommendation of Our Board of Directors
 
55
PROPOSAL NO. 3: Approval of the Liquidating Trust Agreement
 
56
General
 
56
Background and Reasons for the Proposed Liquidation and Dissolution and Establishment of the Liquidating Trust
 
56
Transfers to the Liquidating Trust; Nature; Amount; Timing
 
56
Terms of the Liquidating Trust
 
57

 
8

 

Trading of Interests in the Liquidating Trust
 
57
Nature, Amount and Timing of Liquidating Distributions
 
58
The Establishment of the Liquidating Trust is Contingent Upon the Approval of the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement and the Consummation of the Asset Sale
 
58
Estimated Distributions to Stockholders
 
58
Conduct Following Adoption of the Plan of Liquidation and Establishment of the Liquidating Trust
 
59
Trading of Our Common Stock
 
59
Interests of Our Executive Officers and/or in the Liquidating Trust
 
59
Regulatory Approvals
 
59
Absence of Appraisal Rights
 
59
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
 
59
Votes Required for the Approval of the Liquidating Trust Agreement
 
59
Recommendation of Our Board of Directors
 
59
PROPOSAL NO. 4: Approval of Any Proposal to Adjourn the Special Meeting to Solicit Additional Proxies
   
In Favor of the Approval of any or all of Proposals No. 1, No. 2 and No. 3
 
60
RISK FACTORS
 
61
Risks Related to Proposals No. 1, No. 2 and No. 3
 
61
Risks Related to the Asset Sale
 
62
Risks Related to the Plan of Liquidation
 
63
Risks Related to Our Continuing Business Operations
 
65
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
 
65
IMPORTANT INFORMATION CONCERNG US
 
67
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP
 
69
Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
 
69
Market Information
 
68
Dividend Policy
 
68
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
 
69
HOUSEHOLDING
 
70
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
 
70
WHO CAN HELP ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS
 
70
OTHER MATTERS
 
70
IMPORTANT
 
70
     
Annex A – Asset Purchase Agreement
 
A-1
Annex B – Form of Liquidating Trust Agreement
 
B-1
Annex C – Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution
 
C-1
Annex D – Side Agreement
 
D-1
Annex E – Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
 
E-1
Annex F – Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009
 
F-1

 
9

 

SUMMARY TERM SHEET

This summary highlights selected information from this Proxy Statement and may not contain all of the information that is important to you. To fully understand the proposed Asset Sale transaction and subsequent liquidation of the Company, you should carefully read this entire Proxy Statement and the materials attached to this Proxy Statement.

Asset Sale

Asset Purchase Agreement

On December 14, 2009, we, Operations and National Quality Care, Inc. (“NQCI”, and collectively with the Company and Operations, the “Sellers”) entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with Fresenius USA, Inc. (“FUSA”), a Massachusetts corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., in the form attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex A, which provides for the sale of substantially all of each Sellers’ assets (the “Asset Sale”) to FUSA for an aggregate cash purchase price of $8,000,000 (the “Cash Purchase Price”) and certain other royalty payment rights (as more fully discussed below). Subject to the terms and conditions of the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Cash Purchase Price will be paid to the Sellers as follows: (a) an exclusivity fee in the amount of $200,000 previously paid by FUSA to the Company, (b) $3,800,000 on the date of closing (the “Closing Date”) of the transactions (the “Transactions”) contemplated under the Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Closing”), of which the Company and NQCI will receive $1,650,000 and $2,150,000, respectively, (c) $2,000,000 on April 1, 2010, of which the Company and NQCI will receive $375,000 and $1,625,000, respectively, and (d) $2,000,000 on April 1, 2011, of which the Company and NQCI will receive $75,000 and $1,925,000, respectively.  Of the Cash Purchase Price being paid to NQCI, $1,871,430 is being paid to satisfy the Company’s liability to NQCI for NQCI’s attorneys’ fees and costs awarded by the arbitrator pursuant to the terms of the Partial Final Award issued on April 13, 2009.

In addition, during the life of the patents included in the HD WAK Technology (as defined below) (the “HD WAK Patents”), which expire between November 11, 2021 and September 9, 2024, the Company will be entitled to certain royalty payments from the sale of wearable hemodialysis (“HD WAK”) devices in each country where such sales infringe valid and issued claims of the Sellers’ HD WAK Patents issued in such country (“HD WAK Devices Royalty”) and the attendant disposables that incorporate the HD WAK Technology (as defined below) (“Attendant Disposables”), not to exceed a certain maximum amount per patient per week in a country where such sales infringe valid and issued claims of the HD WAK Patents issued in such country (the “Attendant Disposables Royalty”, and together with the HD WAK Devices Royalty, the “HD WAK Royalty”).  Such payment for Attendant Disposables will not be payable with regard to Attendant Disposables that incorporate any technology for which a Supersorbent Royalty (as defined below) is paid by FUSA to any Seller or any of their affiliates. NQCI will be entitled to certain amounts in respect of the HD WAK Royalty.

Additionally, during the life of any patents included in the Supersorbent Technology (as defined below) (the “Supersorbent Patents”), the Company will be entitled to certain royalty payments on each supersorbent cartridge sold per patient in each country where such sales infringe valid and issued claims of the Supersorbent Patents issued in such country less any and all royalties payable to The Technion Research and Development Foundation Ltd. (“TRDF”) pursuant to the Research Agreement and Option for License, dated June 16, 2005 (the “Research Agreement”), or any subsequently executed license agreement between TRDF and FUSA. Such payment for supersorbent cartridges will not be payable with regard to supersorbent cartridges that incorporate any HD WAK Technology for which a HD WAK Royalty is paid by FUSA to any Seller or any of their affiliates (the “Supersorbent Royalty,” and together with the HD WAK Royalty, the “Royalty Payments”). NQCI will be entitled to certain amounts in respect of the Supersorbent Royalty. While several applications for patents are pending, no patent incorporating the Supersorbent Technology has yet been issued. For a more detailed discussion of the consideration to be provided under the Asset Purchase Agreement, see “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Sale of Substantially All of the Assets of Xcorporeal — Description of the Asset Purchase Agreement —  Purchase Price ..”

FUSA also granted to the Sellers an option to obtain a perpetual, worldwide license to the Supersorbent Technology for use in healthcare fields other than renal (the “Option”). The Option will be exercisable during the twelve-month period following FUSA’s receipt of regulatory approval for the sale of a supersorbent product in the United States or European Union, which we expect will require further development of the supersorbent technology with TRDF and successful completion of clinical trials by FUSA. In the event that the Option becomes exercisable and a Seller exercises the Option, the consideration payable to FUSA by such Seller(s) for the exercise of the Option will consist of a payment in the amount of $7,500,000, payable in immediately available funds, and a payment of an ongoing royalty in an amount equal to the lesser of $0.75 per supersorbent cartridge and $1.50 per patient per week in each country where such sales infringe valid and issued claims of the Supersorbent Patents issued in such country.

FUSA will purchase our only business segment, which consists of the business related to our extra-corporeal platform and development of any products to be derived therefrom.

 
10

 
 
Side Agreement

In connection with the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company entered into a side agreement, dated December 14, 2009 (the “Side Agreement”), with FUSA pursuant to which (i) subject to the approval of the lessor, FUSA agreed on the Closing Date to assume the lease agreement of our operating facility located at 80 Empire Drive, Lake Forest, California 92630 (the “Lease”) and in consideration of such assumption, we agreed to pay to FUSA on the Closing Date the amount of $175,000, representing approximately six months of rent and common area expenses that are expected to be incurred by FUSA under the Lease following the Closing Date, (ii) FUSA engaged us to perform such consulting, advisory and related services through three employees of the Company, including Dr. Victor Gura, our Chief Scientific and Medical Officer (collectively, the “Employees”), to and for FUSA as may be reasonably requested from time to time by FUSA and its affiliates (the “Services”), for the period beginning on November 16, 2009 and ending on the Closing Date, unless sooner terminated in accordance with the terms of the Side Agreement, and in consideration for the Services rendered by us during such term, FUSA agreed to pay to us a cash fee, payable in semi-monthly installments, at the annual rate for the full-time services of each of the Employees, as more fully described in the Side Agreement, and (iii) in consideration of FUSA having incurred and continuing to incur certain expenses on our behalf, we agreed to reimburse FUSA for certain of its expenses reasonably incurred on our behalf, including, tooling, prototyping and intellectual property maintenance expenses, all reasonably documented third party expenses incurred by FUSA in negotiating and documenting the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement and the Side Agreement (including FUSA’s reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses), consulting fees and certain other miscellaneous consulting expenses, in the event the closing under the Asset Purchase Agreement does not take place as a result of the Company consummating a Superior Proposal.  Pursuant to the Side Agreement, the Company has received payments in an aggregate amount of $197,291.64 for the Services of the Employees to FUSA and the Employees continued to receive their normal compensation from the Company in approximately the same aggregate amount.

The material terms of the Side Agreement are summarized above and a copy of the Side Agreement is attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex D. Stockholders are urged to carefully review the Side Agreement in its entirety.

Voting Agreement

In connection with the execution of the Asset Purchase Agreement, certain of the Sellers’ executive officers and/or directors executed a Stockholder Voting Agreement (the “Voting Agreement”).  Under the Voting Agreement, such directors and/or executive officers of the Company have committed (i) to vote all of the shares of the Company’s common stock owned by them as of December 14, 2009, together with all shares of our common stock acquired by them as a result of the exercise of any options owned by them as of such date, in favor of the adoption of the Asset Purchase Agreement and the approval of the Asset Sale, and (ii) subject to certain exceptions, not to enter into discussions concerning or provide confidential information in connection with alternative business combination transactions.  The shares subject to the Voting Agreement constitute approximately 41.4% of our outstanding common stock as of the Record Date, and more than 50% of NQCI’s outstanding voting securities. 

The material terms of the Voting Agreement are summarized above and a copy of the Voting Agreement is annexed as Exhibit B to the Asset Purchase Agreement, which is attached hereto as Annex A. Stockholders are urged to carefully review the Voting Agreement in its entirety.
 
Our Board of Directors approved, subject to stockholder approval, the Asset Purchase Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereunder, including the sale of substantially all of our assets to FUSA, and voted to recommend that our stockholders approve the Asset Purchase Agreement and the Asset Sale. We are now seeking stockholder approval of the Asset Purchase Agreement and the Asset Sale. For a more detailed discussion of the principal provisions of the Asset Purchase Agreement, see “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Asset Sale—Principal Provisions of the Asset Purchase Agreement.”

Plan of Liquidation

Prior to the mailing of this Proxy Statement, our Board of Directors approved, subject to stockholder approval, a Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution (the “Plan of Liquidation”), attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex B, providing for our complete liquidation and dissolution, and voted to recommend that our stockholders approve the Plan of Liquidation. We are now seeking stockholder approval for this Plan of Liquidation. See “Proposal No. 2: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution — Principal Provisions of the Plan of Liquidation.”
 
If our stockholders approve the Plan of Liquidation, but the Asset Sale is not approved or is not consummated, we will not present the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal for a vote of our stockholders at the Special Meeting and will move forward with our dissolution. If this occurs, our Board of Directors will be authorized to sell and liquidate our Assets, on such terms and to such parties as the Board of Directors determines in its sole discretion without requiring further stockholder approval. We do not have any agreement or understanding with any party with respect to the sale of any or all of our assets if the Asset Sale is not approved or if the Asset Sale is not consummated.

Liquidating Trust Agreement

Prior to the mailing of this Proxy Statement, our Board of Directors approved, subject to stockholder approval, the Liquidating Trust Agreement (the “Liquidating Trust Agreement”), attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex C, providing for, among other things, in the event that the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidating and the Liquidating Trust Agreement are approved by our stockholders and the Asset Sale is subsequently consummated, the transfer of all of our assets remaining after the consummation of the Asset Sale, including rights to certain payments under the Asset Purchase Agreement (collectively, the “Remaining Assets”), together with all of our liabilities and obligations not satisfied prior to our dissolution (the “Remaining Liabilities”), to the Liquidating Trust (as defined below), resulting in our complete liquidation and dissolution, and voted to recommend that our stockholders approve the Liquidating Trust Agreement. We are now seeking stockholder approval for this Liquidating Trust Agreement. The transfer of our Remaining Assets and Remaining Liabilities to the Liquidating Trust pursuant to the Liquidating Trust Agreement will be contingent upon approval by our stockholders of the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement and the subsequent consummation of the Asset Sale. For a more detailed discussion of the Liquidating Trust Agreement, see “Proposal No. 3: Approval of the Liquidating Trust Agreement.”

 
11

 

Proposal to Adjourn the Special Meeting

As described above, our Board of Directors has determined that the foregoing proposals are in the best interests of our stockholders. Because approval of these proposals is a necessary step to completing the Asset Sale and the dissolution and liquidation of the Company, we are seeking stockholder approval to give us the right to elect to adjourn the Special Meeting to solicit additional proxies in favor of any of these proposals if it appears at the time of the Special Meeting that an insufficient number of votes will be cast to approve any of these proposals.

Required Vote

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock issued and outstanding on the Record Date is required for the approval of the Asset Sale and the Plan of Liquidation. The approval of the Adjournment Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote thereon at the Special Meeting.

 
12

 

SUMMARY OF TERMS OF THE ASSET SALE

The Parties
 
Xcorporeal, Inc.
 
We are a medical device company that has been engaged in developing an innovative  extra-corporeal  platform technology to be used in devices to replace the function of various human organs (the “Xcorporeal Business”).
 
Xcorporeal Operations, Inc.
 
Operations is our wholly-owned subsidiary.
 
National Quality Care, Inc.
 
NQCI is a research and development company. NQCI’s platform technology is a wearable artificial kidney for dialysis and other medical applications. This device treats the blood of patients through a pulsating, dual-chambered pump. NQCI has also been engaged in developing the Supersorbent Technology jointly with the efforts of TRDF (collectively, the “NQCI Business”, and together with the Xcorporeal Business, the “Business”).
 
Fresenius USA, Inc.
 
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. (“Fresenius Medical Care”) is the world's largest integrated provider of products and services for individuals undergoing dialysis because of chronic kidney failure, a condition that affects more than 1,770,000 individuals worldwide. Fresenius USA, Inc. (“FUSA”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fresenius Medical Care and a part of Fresenius SE, a global health care group with products and services for dialysis, the hospital and the medical care of patients at home.
     
Assets Proposed to be Sold to FUSA
 
We are proposing to sell to FUSA substantially all of our assets, properties and intellectual property rights used in connection with the operation of our business, excluding (i) our cash, restricted cash and cash equivalents, (ii) our accounts receivable, (iii) our marketable securities, (iv) our website and (v) our insurance policies.
 
As consideration for the sale of substantially all of our assets to FUSA, on the closing date of the Asset Sale (the “Closing Date”) we will receive (a) $2,100,000, which is our portion of the Cash Purchase Price, in addition to $200,000 which was previously paid to us as the exclusivity fee, of which $1,650,000 will be paid to us on the Closing Date, $375,000 will be paid to us on April 1, 2010 and $75,000 will be paid to us on April 1, 2011, and (b) our share of the Royalty Payments (as defined below). In addition, of the portion of the Cash Purchase Price being paid to NQCI, per the agreement of the Sellers, $1,871,430 is being paid to satisfy our liability to NQCI for NQCI’s attorneys’ fees and costs awarded by the arbitrator pursuant to the terms of the Partial Final Award issued on April 13, 2009.
 
FUSA will purchase our only business segment, which consists of the business related to our  extra-corporeal  platform and development of any products to be derived therefrom.
     
Liabilities Assumed by FUSA
 
FUSA will not assume any of the Sellers’ liabilities incurred prior to the closing date of the transactions contemplated under the Asset Purchase Agreement.
     
Restrictions on Our Ability to Solicit Third Party Proposals; Ability to enter into a Superior Proposal
 
Subject to certain fiduciary out exceptions, the Asset Purchase Agreement contains restrictions on our ability to solicit third party proposals and on our ability to provide information and engage in discussions and negotiations with unsolicited third parties.
     
Conditions to the Closing of the Asset Sale
 
The obligations of the parties to complete the Asset Sale are subject to certain conditions, including: 

 
13

 

 
·
that the representations and warranties of the Sellers contained in the Asset Purchase Agreement are true and correct in all respects as of the date of the Asset Purchase Agreement and as of the Closing Date,
     
 
·
the approval of the Asset Sale by each of the Seller’s stockholders holding the majority of the outstanding voting securities of such Seller (the “Stockholder Approvals”);
     
 
·
that certain third party consents are obtained by the Sellers;
     
 
·
that no Material Adverse Effect (as defined below) shall have occurred with respect to the Assets or, recognizing the constraints of the Sellers’ financial situation, the Business since the date of the Asset Purchase Agreement and no fact or circumstance shall have occurred or arisen since the date of the Asset Purchase Agreement that would reasonably be expected to have such a Material Adverse Effect;
     
 
·
that the Research Agreement shall have been validly assigned to FUSA and the exclusive license for use of the Supersorbent Technology in any and all medical applications, as contemplated by the Research Agreement, shall have been executed and delivered to FUSA; and
     
 
·
certain other customary conditions.
     
Termination of the Asset Purchase Agreement
The Asset Purchase Agreement may be terminated under certain circumstances, including:
     
 
·
by the mutual agreement of FUSA and the Sellers;
 
·
by the Sellers or FUSA if any governmental authority shall have issued a final order, decree or ruling or taken any other action, which has the effect of permanently restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the transactions contemplated under the Asset Purchase Agreement;
 
·
by the Sellers if the board of directors of any Seller determines in good faith that it has received a Superior Proposal (as defined below) and that it is required to terminate the Asset Purchase Agreement in order to comply with its fiduciary duties, and otherwise complies with certain terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement;
 
·
by FUSA if the Stockholder Approvals have not been obtained on or before February 28, 2010; and
 
·
subject to certain limitations, by FUSA or any Seller, if the closing has not occurred on or before February 28, 2010 and the Asset Purchase Agreement has not previously been terminated.
     
 
In connection with the termination as a result of any Seller proceeding with a Superior Proposal, contemporaneously with the closing of a transaction contemplated by a Superior Proposal, such terminating Seller shall be obligated to pay a termination fee of $2,500,000 to FUSA. In the event such terminating Seller is the Company, the Company also agreed to reimburse FUSA for, among other things, all of its reasonably incurred development expenses in connection with the provision of the Services (as defined below) by certain personnel of the Company to FUSA.
   
Payment of Expenses
All costs and expenses incurred in connection with the Asset Sale shall be paid by the party incurring such expenses.
   
Material Income Tax Consequences of the Asset Sale
We believe that we will not incur any material federal or state income taxes as a result of the Asset Sale because of our net operating loss carry forwards and our basis in the assets being sold exceeds the sale proceeds that will be received from FUSA.

 
14

 

Payment of a Portion of the Transaction Proceeds to NQCI
 
Pursuant to the terms of the Binding Memorandum of Understanding, dated as of August 7, 2009 (the “Memorandum”), the Sellers agreed to mutually cooperate in order for us to consummate a transaction involving an exclusive license and/or sale to a third party (the “Proposed Transaction”) of a part, substantially all or all of our technology and other intellectual property rights licensed to us by NQCI under the License Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2006, and which transaction also contemplated an arrangement with respect to the Polymer Technology (herein referred to as “supersorbent”) (the “Licensed Technology”), or any other transaction (a “Transaction”) involving the sale, license or other disposition by us of a part, substantially all or all of the Licensed Technology. The Sellers further agreed that upon the consummation of a Proposed Transaction, they will allocate any license fees and any other additional consideration received in such transaction between the Sellers under the terms of the Partial Final Award (as defined below).
 
Pursuant to the terms of the Memorandum and subject to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, NQCI was entitled to receive (i) 36.96% of the cash proceeds to be received by us in a Proposed Transaction (which amount is intended to represent an amount equal to 39% of the net royalty payments provided for by the terms of the Partial Final Award issued on April 13, 2009 by the arbitrator in the arbitration proceeding between the Sellers and NQCI (the “Partial Final Award”)), following the deduction therefrom of our expenses incurred in connection with the Proposed Transaction, plus $1,871,430 in attorneys’ fees and costs payable by us to NQCI pursuant to the terms of the Partial Final Award, and (ii) 39% of any other consideration to be received by us in connection with a Proposed Transaction.
 
Therefore, pursuant to the terms of the Memorandum, pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, NQCI will receive $5,700,000 of the Cash Purchase Price, $1,871,430 is being paid to satisfy our liability to NQCI for NQCI’s attorneys’ fees and costs awarded by the arbitrator pursuant to the terms of the Partial Final Award, and shall be entitled to receive 40% of any HD WAK Royalty and 60% of any Supersorbent Royalty payments. For a more detailed discussion of the payment arrangements between the Sellers in connection with the Asset Purchase Agreement, see “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Asset Sale — Description of the Arbitration Proceeding and Other Transactions Entered Into With NQCI; Payment of a Portion of the Aggregate Consideration Under the Asset Purchase Agreement to NQCI.”

Summary of Terms of the Plan of Liquidation and Complete Dissolution
 
Plan of Liquidation
 
The consummation of the Plan of Liquidation is contingent upon our stockholders approving the Plan of Liquidation. For detailed information regarding the Plan of Liquidation, see “Proposal No. 2: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution.” A copy of the Plan of Liquidation is attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex C.
     
    If our stockholders approve the Plan of Liquidation, but the Asset Sale is not approved or is not consummated, we will not present the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal for a vote of our stockholders at the Special Meeting and will move forward with our dissolution. If this occurs, our Board of Directors will be authorized to sell and liquidate our Assets, on such terms and to such parties as the Board of Directors determines in its sole discretion without requiring further stockholder approval. We do not have any agreement or understanding with any party with respect to the sale of any or all of our assets if the Asset Sale is not approved or if the Asset Sale is not consummated.  
     
Modification or Abandonment of the Plan of Liquidation
 
Our Board of Directors may modify, amend or abandon the Plan of Liquidation, notwithstanding stockholder approval, to the extent permitted by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”). We will not amend the Plan of Liquidation under circumstances that would require additional stockholder solicitations without complying with applicable law.

Summary of Terms of the Liquidating Trust Agreement

Liquidating Trust
 
Subject to stockholder approval of the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement, the consummation of the Asset Sale and our Board of Directors not amending or abandoning our Plan of Liquidation, we anticipate transferring to the Liquidating Trust all of our Remaining Assets, including our share of any Royalty Payments and our rights to the Option, and Remaining Liabilities. Prior to the mailing of this Proxy Statement, our Board of Directors approved the terms of the Liquidating Trust Agreement, in the form attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex C.

 
15

 

   
We anticipate establishing the Liquidating Trust contemporaneously with the closing of the Asset Sale. The term of the Liquidating Trust will be 3 years (subject to extension under certain circumstances) and the interests in the trust will be non-transferable, subject to certain exceptions as required by law. Kelly J. McCrann, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, or his affiliate will be the trustee of the Liquidating Trust (the “Trustee”) and will receive certain compensation for such services, as more fully discussed under Proposal No. 3. We anticipate that such transfer to the Liquidating Trust will be made as soon as practicable after the closing of the Asset Sale. For detailed information regarding the terms of the Liquidating Trust, see “Proposal No. 3: Approval of the Liquidating Trust Agreement.”
     
Anticipated Timing and Projected Amount of Transfer to the Liquidating Trust
 
Subject to stockholder approval of the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement, the consummation of the Asset Sale, our Board of Directors not amending or abandoning our Plan of Liquidation and satisfaction of our and the Liquidating Trust’s liabilities and expenses, we anticipate that the Trustee will make distribution(s) of the liquidation proceeds from the Liquidating Trust, if any, upon the receipt of any Royalty Payments to be paid to us by FUSA.
 
As of the date hereof, we are unable to estimate what the value of the liquidation proceeds from  the Royalty Payments per share of our common stock outstanding as of the Record Date would be. The actual distribution amount(s), if any, will be determined and the final distribution, if any, will be made by the Trustee in his sole discretion after the realization over-time of the cash value of our share of any Royalty Payments and any value we may realize from our rights to the Option, and settlement and satisfaction of all of our and the Liquidating Trust’s liabilities and expenses. NONE OF THE CASH PROCEEDS FROM THE ASSET SALE WILL BE DISTRIBUTED TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS IN LIGHT OF THE FACT THAT CURRENTLY OUR TOTAL LIABILITES AND OBLIGATIONS SIGNIFICANTLY EXCEED OUR TOTAL ASSETS. However, our Board of Directors believes that the approval of all three proposals, increases the possibility that we will be able to distribute some liquidation proceeds from the Liquidating Trust to our stockholders, including our share of any Royalty Payments and our rights to the Option. 

 
16

 

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MEETING AND THE PROPOSALS

Q:
What is the purpose of the Special Meeting?

A:
At the Special Meeting, our stockholders will consider and vote on the following proposals:

  
1.
to approve the sale (the “Asset Sale”) of substantially all of our assets (the “Assets”) pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 14, 2009, entered into by and among FUSA, Xcorporeal, Operations and NQCI, in the form attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex A (the “Asset Sale Proposal”);
       
  
2.
to approve our voluntary dissolution and liquidation pursuant to a Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution (the “Plan of Liquidation”), attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex B (the “Plan of Liquidation Proposal”). For a detailed discussion of the Plan of Liquidation, see “Proposal No. 2: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution — Principal Provisions of the Plan of Liquidation”;
       
  
3.
to approve the Liquidating Trust Agreement (the “Liquidating Trust Agreement”), attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex C, providing for, among other things, in the event that the Asset Sale and the Plan of Liquidation are approved by our stockholders and the Asset Sale is subsequently consummated, the transfer of all of our assets remaining after the Asset Sale, including rights to certain payments and the Option under the Asset Purchase Agreement (collectively, the “Remaining Assets”), together with all of our liabilities and obligations remaining prior to such transfer (the “Remaining Liabilities”), to the Liquidating Trust and our resulting complete liquidation and dissolution contemplated by the Plan of Liquidation (the “Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal”). The transfer of all of our Remaining Assets and Remaining Liabilities to the Liquidating Trust pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation will be contingent upon approval by our stockholders of the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation, the Liquidating Trust Agreement and the subsequent consummation of the Asset Sale. For a more detailed discussion of the Plan of Liquidation, see “Proposal No. 2: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution — Principal Provisions of the Plan of Liquidation” and Proposal No. 3: Approval of the Liquidating Trust Agreement”;
       
  
4.
to approve any proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting to a later date to solicit additional proxies in favor of the approval of the Asset Sale Proposal, the Plan of Liquidation Proposal or the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal, if there are insufficient votes for approval of any such proposals at the time of the Special Meeting (the “Adjournment Proposal”); and
       
  
5.
to transact such other business as may properly come before the Special Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Q:
What is our Board of Directors’ recommendation with respect to the Asset Sale Proposal, the Plan of Liquidation Proposal, the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal?

A:
Our Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors”):

 
·
determined that the Asset Sale and other transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement, are fair to, advisable and in the best interests of us and our stockholders;
 
 
·
approved in all respects the Asset Sale and the other transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement;
 
  
·
approved and adopted that the Plan of Liquidation and the other transactions contemplated thereby;
 
 
·
approved and adopted in all respects the Plan of Liquidation and the transactions contemplated thereby;
 
  
·
approved and adopted in all respects the Liquidating Trust Agreement, including the transfer of all our Remaining Assets to the Liquidating Trust, subject to the approval of the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and Liquidating Trust Agreement by our stockholders and the subsequent consummation of the Asset Sale, and the other transactions contemplated by the Plan of Liquidation;
 
  
·
determined that the adoption of the Adjournment Proposal is advisable and in the best interests of us and our stockholders.
 
Accordingly, our Board of Directors recommends that you vote: (1) “FOR” the approval of the Asset Sale Proposal, (2) “FOR” the approval of the Plan of Liquidation Proposal, (3) “FOR” the approval of the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal and (4) “FOR” the approval of the Adjournment Proposal.

Q: 
Are there risks I should consider before deciding on the proposals?

A:
Yes. You should carefully consider the risk factors set forth under the caption “Risk Factors” beginning on page 61 of this Proxy Statement in evaluating whether to approve the Asset Sale Proposal, the Plan of Liquidation Proposal, the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal. These risk factors should be considered along with any other information included herein, including any forward-looking statements made herein. See “Where You Can Find More Information.”

 
17

 
Q:
What is Xcorporeal’s current business?
 
A:
We are a medical device company that has been engaged in developing an innovative extra-corporeal platform technology to be used in devices to replace the function of various human organs. These devices will seek to provide patients with improved, efficient and cost effective therapy. We hope that the platform will lead to the following three products:

 
·
A Portable Artificial Kidney, or “PAK”, for attended care Renal Replacement Therapy, or “RRT”, for patients suffering from Acute Renal Failure, or “ARF”;
 
 
·
A PAK for home hemodialysis for patients suffering from End Stage Renal Disease, or “ESRD”; and
 
 
·
A Wearable Artificial Kidney, or “WAK”, for continuous ambulatory hemodialysis for treatment of ESRD

We are a development stage company and we have previously focused much of our efforts on development of the PAK. We have generated no revenues to date and have been unprofitable since our inception. Because of our lack of resources and difficulty in obtaining financing, our existing cash reserves will not be sufficient to satisfy our liabilities and other obligations and we will not be able to develop any of our products, submit 510(k) notifications or PMA applications to the FDA, conduct clinical trials or otherwise commercialize any of our products, and therefore, are proposing to sell substantially all of our assets to FUSA as described herein. If the Asset Sale is not consummated or if the Plan of Liquidation is not approved by our stockholders for any reason, we will discontinue our operations and liquidate our assets and will be forced to seek protection under bankruptcy laws.

The Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation, the Liquidating Trust Agreement and Possible Distribution(s) to Stockholders

Q: 
What assets are we proposing to sell?
 
A:
We are proposing to sell to FUSA substantially all of our assets consisting of our assets, properties, intellectual property and intellectual property rights used in connection with the operation of our business, excluding the Remaining Assets, which consist of our (i) cash, restricted cash and cash equivalents, (ii) accounts receivable, (iii) marketable securities and (iv) website.
 
FUSA will purchase our only business segment, which consists of the business related to our extra-corporeal platform and development of any products to be derived therefrom. For more information about the Remaining Assets we will retain and payment terms under the Asset Purchase Agreement, please see “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Sale of Substantially All of the Assets of Xcorporeal ─ Description of the Asset Purchase Agreement ─  Assets to be Retained by the Company ” and “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Sale of Substantially All of the Assets of Xcorporeal ─ Description of the Asset Purchase Agreement ─  Purchase Price ”, respectively.
 
18

 
Q:
Why has the Board of Directors recommended the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement?

A:
The deterioration of the economy over the last 18 months and the economic conditions particularly affecting development-stage health care related companies, coupled with the prolonged delay in reaching a resolution with respect to the arbitration proceeding with NQCI commenced in December 2006 (the “Arbitration”) and the consummation of the Technology Transaction (as defined below) has significantly adversely affected us. Many of the expectations on which we had based our 2008 and 2009 business development plans slowly eroded as a result of the lengthy Arbitration which continued into the second quarter of 2009. The possibility of an adverse decision in the Arbitration with respect to our ownership right to the Technology (as defined below) was a major factor in our inability to secure debt or equity financing. Accordingly, we have had to modify or curtail our activities and business operations. In addition, in response to the general economic downturn affecting the development of our products and liquidity condition, we instituted a variety of measures in an attempt to conserve cash and reduce our operating expenses. As a result and after making several attempts to identify and implement a business plan that could be successful over the long term and an exhaustive search for a strategic and product development partner, our Board of Directors determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders to (i) enter into the Asset Purchase Agreement with FUSA and consummate the Asset Sale, (ii) dissolve and liquidate the Company pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation, including subject to the approval by our stockholders of the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement and the consummation of the Asset Sale, transfer all of our Remaining Assets and Remaining Liabilities to the Liquidating Trust. After an extensive review of a range of strategic alternatives for the Company, including our continuing the Company as an independent entity, exploring potential mergers and acquisitions and any possible financing arrangements and expending considerable efforts to maximize the value of our assets, the Board of Directors believes that the Asset Purchase Agreement presents the best offer for the sale of the Assets and maximizes stockholder value and our Board of Directors recommends the Asset Sale to our stockholders. Our Board of Directors also determined that the Plan of Liquidation was the most advantageous plan for the dissolution and liquidation of the Company and that the establishment of the Liquidating Trust provides the best vehicle to carry out our liquidation after the consummation of the Asset Sale, and therefore, approved and recommends the Plan of Liquidation and Liquidating Trust Agreement to our stockholders. See “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Sale of Substantially All of the Assets of the Company – History of the Asset Sale”, “Proposal No. 2: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution ─ Background and Reasons for the Proposed Liquidation and Dissolution” and “Proposal No. 3: Approval of the Liquidating Trust Agreement.”
 
 Q: 
Who is the buyer in the Asset Sale?
 
A: 
The buyer is Fresenius USA, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. Fresenius Medical Care is the world's largest integrated provider of products and services for individuals undergoing dialysis because of chronic kidney failure, a condition that affects more than 1,770,000 individuals worldwide. Fresenius Medical Care is a part of Fresenius SE, a global health care group with products and services for dialysis, the hospital and the medical care of patients at home. The principal offices of Fresenius Medical Care North America are located at 920 Winter Street, Waltham, MA 02451-1457. The telephone number of Fresenius North America is (781) 699-9000.
 
 Q: 
What are the expected proceeds and other consideration to be received from the Asset Sale?
 
A: 
Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, the aggregate cash consideration (the “Cash Purchase Price”) that will be paid by FUSA to the Sellers on the Closing Date is $8,000,000, $200,000 which was previously paid to us as an exclusivity fee, $3,800,000 of which will be paid on the closing date of the Asset Sale (the “Closing Date”), $2,000,000 will be paid on April 1, 2010 and $2,000,000 will be paid on April 1, 2011. $2,300,000 is our portion of the Cash Purchase Price, of which $200,000 was previously paid to us as the exclusivity fee, $1,650,000 will be paid to us on the Closing Date, $375,000 will be payable to us on April 1, 2010 and $75,000 will be payable to us on April 1, 2011. Of the Cash Purchase Price being paid to NQCI, per the agreement of the Sellers, $1,871,430 will be paid to satisfy our liability to NQCI for NQCI’s attorneys’ fees and costs awarded by the arbitrator pursuant to the terms of the Partial Final Award issued on April 13, 2009.

In addition, during the life of the patents included in the HD WAK Technology (as defined below) (the “HD WAK Patents”), which expire between November 11, 2021 and September 9, 2024, the Company will be entitled to certain royalty payments from the sale of wearable hemodialysis (“HD WAK”) devices in each country where such sales infringe valid and issued claims of the Sellers’ HD WAK Patents issued in such country (“HD WAK Devices Royalty”) and the attendant disposables that incorporate the HD WAK Technology (as defined below) (“Attendant Disposables”), not to exceed a certain maximum amount per patient per week in a country where such sales infringe valid and issued claims of the HD WAK Patents issued in such country (the “Attendant Disposables Royalty”, and together with the HD WAK Devices Royalty, the “HD WAK Royalty”).  Such payment for Attendant Disposables will not be payable with regard to Attendant Disposables that incorporate any technology for which a Supersorbent Royalty (as defined below) is paid by FUSA to any Seller or any of their affiliates. NQCI will be entitled to certain amounts in respect of the HD WAK Royalty.

 
19

 

Additionally, during the life of any patents included in the Supersorbent Technology (as defined below) (the “Supersorbent Patents”), the Company will be entitled to certain royalty payments on each supersorbent cartridge sold per patient in each country where such sales infringe valid and issued claims of the Supersorbent Patents issued in such country less any and all royalties payable to The Technion Research and Development Foundation Ltd. (“TRDF”) pursuant to the Research Agreement and Option for License, dated June 16, 2005 (the “Research Agreement”), or any subsequently executed license agreement between TRDF and FUSA. Such payment for supersorbent cartridges will not be payable with regard to supersorbent cartridges that incorporate any HD WAK Technology for which a HD WAK Royalty is paid by FUSA to any Seller or any of their affiliates (the “Supersorbent Royalty,” and together with the HD WAK Royalty, the “Royalty Payments”). NQCI will be entitled to certain amounts in respect of the Supersorbent Royalty. While several applications for patents are pending, no patent incorporating the Supersorbent Technology has yet been issued. For a more detailed discussion of the principal provisions of the Asset Purchase Agreement, see “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Sale of Substantially All of the Assets of Xcorporeal — Description of the Asset Purchase Agreement” and for a more detailed discussion of the aggregate consideration to be provided under the Asset Purchase Agreement, see “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Sale of Substantially all of the Assets of Xcorporeal — Description of the Asset Purchase Agreement -  Purchase Price ..”

FUSA also granted to the Sellers an option to obtain a perpetual, worldwide license to the Supersorbent Technology for use in healthcare fields other than renal (the “Option”). The Option will be exercisable during the twelve-month period following FUSA’s receipt of regulatory approval for the sale of a supersorbent product in the United States or European Union, which we expect will require further development of the supersorbent technology with TRDF and successful completion of clinical trials by FUSA. In the event that the Option becomes exercisable and a Seller exercises the Option, the consideration payable to FUSA by such Seller(s) for the exercise of the Option will consist of a payment in the amount of $7,500,000, payable in immediately available funds, and a payment of an ongoing royalty in an amount equal to the lesser of $0.75 per supersorbent cartridge and $1.50 per patient per week in each country where such sales infringe valid and issued claims of the Supersorbent Patents issued in such country.

NONE OF THE CASH PURCHASE PRICE WILL BE DISTRIBUTED TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS IN LIGHT OF THE FACT THAT CURRENTLY OUR TOTAL LIABILITES AND OBLIGATIONS SIGNIFICANTLY EXCEED OUR TOTAL ASSETS. However, our Board of Directors believes that the approval of all three proposals, increases the possibility that we will be able to distribute some liquidation proceeds from the Liquidating Trust to our stockholders, including our share of any Royalty Payments and the value we may realize from our rights to the Option. See “Proposal No. 2: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution — Estimated Distribution to Stockholders” and “Proposal No. 3: Approval of the Liquidating Trust Agreement — Estimated Distribution to Stockholders.”

Q:
How was the amount of the aggregate consideration to be received in the Asset Sale determined?

A: 
The Board of Directors organized a process in connection with the sale of the Company or the Assets in order to maximize the net proceeds of any sale transaction. The Board of Directors hired William Blair & Company, a nationally-recognized investment bank and financial advisor (“William Blair”), to broadly canvass the market with a view towards identifying all possible acquirers of the Company or the Assets. William Blair and Synergy Partners (a Pacific Rim investment banker and agent) approached approximately 65 potential investors, partners and/or acquirers, worldwide, to determine their level of interest in the Company’s operations and technology. Once we and William Blair had identified those parties with an interest in discussing a possible transaction, we engaged in concurrent discussions with all such parties as a way of validating and maximizing the purchase price, or potential economics of partnering to further develop the Company’s technology and bringing related products to market. In order to create an informal “auction” environment, we let each prospective acquirer know that discussions with other parties were taking place. In connection with these discussions, we made available to the prospective acquirers information related to us necessary for the conduct of their due diligence including, without limitation, publicly available information, analyst reports, market data and relevant publications highlighting the Company’s activities and accomplishments. In addition, we evaluated partnering with certain strategic parties while potentially selling certain of our assets to other parties worldwide. In the case of FUSA, the negotiations involved considerable focus on the sale of substantially all of the Assets.  FUSA did not express any interest in acquiring the equity of the Company. As the Company’s product development has been focused on ultimately commercializing a hemodialyis device for chronically ill patients to treat themselves at home, based upon FUSA’s expertise in hemodialysis and its desire to develop a device that can be marketed for home use for chronically ill dialysis patients, FUSA recognized the potential value in the Company’s technology.

Q:
When will the Asset Sale be completed?

A:
The Asset Purchase Agreement provides that we must satisfy certain conditions before the Asset Sale will close including, without limitation, (i) that the representations and warranties of the Sellers contained in the Asset Purchase Agreement are true and correct in all respects as of the date of the Asset Purchase Agreement and as of the Closing Date, (ii) the requirement to obtain the approval of the Asset Sale by each of the Seller’s stockholders holding the majority of the outstanding voting securities of such Seller (the “Stockholder Approvals”), (iii) that certain third party consents are obtained by the Sellers, (iv) that no Material Adverse Effect (as defined below) shall have occurred with respect to the Assets or, recognizing the constraints of the Sellers’ financial situation, the Business since the date of the Asset Purchase Agreement and no fact or circumstance shall have occurred or arisen since the date of the Asset Purchase Agreement that would reasonably be expected to have such a Material Adverse Effect, (v) that the Research Agreement shall have been validly assigned to FUSA and the exclusive license for use of the Supersorbent Technology in any and all medical applications, as contemplated by the Research Agreement, shall have been executed and delivered to FUSA, and (vi) certain other customary conditions. Subject to the satisfaction of the closing conditions, we expect to consummate the Asset Sale on or before February 28, 2010. We anticipate that the Asset Sale will close soon after our stockholders approve the Asset Sale, if they do.

 
20

 

Q:
What will happen if the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreements are approved?

If the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement are approved and the Asset Sale is consummated, we will move forward with the complete liquidation and dissolution of the Company and will transfer all of our Remaining Assets and Remaining Liabilities to the Liquidating Trust. The Plan of Liquidation gives the trustee of the Liquidating Trust (the “Trustee”) the authority to sell the Remaining Assets. Stockholder approval of the Plan of Liquidation also will constitute approval of any and all such future Remaining Asset sales. Pursuant to the terms of the Liquidating Trust, the Trustee will pay or adequately provide for the payment of all of our known obligations and liabilities prior to any distributions to our stockholders. The Trustee then will be authorized to convert all of the Remaining Assets into cash, on such terms and to such parties, as the Trustee determines in his sole discretion without requiring further stockholder approval, in order to pay off all of our liabilities and distribute any remaining cash proceeds from the Liquidating Trust to our stockholders. We are unable to determine at this point the amount(s) that will be distributed to our stockholders, if any, from the Liquidating Trust. If any amounts become available for distribution in the future, they will be distributed from the Liquidating Trust.  See “Proposal No.3: Approval of the Liquidating Trust Agreement ─ Nature, Amount and Timing of Liquidating Distributions.”

Q: 
What will happen if the Asset Sale is not approved but the Plan of Liquidation is approved?

A:
If our stockholders approve the Plan of Liquidation, but the Asset Sale is not approved or is not consummated, we will not present the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal for a vote of our stockholders at the Special Meeting and will move forward with the complete liquidation and dissolution of the Company without establishment of the Liquidating Trust. The Plan of Liquidation gives our Board of Directors the authority to sell all of our assets. Stockholder approval of the Plan of Liquidation also will constitute approval of any and all such future asset sales. If this happens, our Board of Directors will be authorized to sell and liquidate our assets, including the Assets, on such terms and to such parties as the Board of Directors determines in its sole discretion without requiring further stockholder approval. We do not have any agreement or understanding with any party with respect to the sale of any or all of our assets if the Asset Sale is not approved or if the Asset Sale is not consummated. Because the Board of Directors believes that the Asset Purchase Agreement presents the best offer for the sale of the Assets and because of our already extremely limited resources, if the Asset Sale is not consummated for whatever reason, we will be forced to discontinue our operations and proceed with a liquidation in bankruptcy. Under such circumstances, it is highly doubtful that there would be any assets to distribute to our stockholders.

Q:     
What will happen if both the Asset Sale and the Plan of Liquidation are not approved?

A:
If the Asset Sale is not consummated and the Plan of Liquidation is not approved, whether due to lack of stockholder approval or other reasons, we will not present the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal for a vote of our stockholders at the Special Meeting. All of our remaining assets most likely would then be used to maintain our curtailed operations until such time that we would have little or no assets and we will be forced to discontinue operations and proceed with a liquidation in bankruptcy. Our Board of Directors believes that if all three proposals are not approved, we will be forced to discontinue our operations and proceed with a liquidation in bankruptcy. Under such circumstances, it is highly doubtful that there would be any assets to distribute to our stockholders.

Q:
What will happen if the Asset Sale is approved, but the Plan of Liquidation is not approved?

A:
If the Asset Sale is approved, but the Plan of Liquidation is not approved by our stockholders, we will not present the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal for a vote of our stockholders at the Special Meeting and we would then move forward to complete the Asset Sale under the Asset Purchase Agreement. We would not make any liquidating distributions to our stockholders and will attempt to maximize cash remaining after satisfying our liabilities by negotiating possible reduced payments for our remaining obligations. We would continue to manage the Company as a publicly-owned entity, would  expect to continue to incur the substantial costs of being a public company and will explore what, if any, alternatives are then available for the future of our business, including “going dark.” However, our already substantially depleted resources and proceeds of the Asset Sale would then be further diminished, which would most likely result in the curtailment of our operations and require us to file for bankruptcy. In such event, our Board of Directors believes that if all three proposals are not approved, we will be forced to discontinue our operations and proceed with a liquidation in bankruptcy. Under such circumstances, it is highly doubtful that there would be any assets to distribute to our stockholders.

 
21

 

Q:
How will the Company use the Transaction Proceeds of the Asset Sale?
 
A:
We intend to use all of our share of the Cash Purchase Price to pay our outstanding liabilities and obligations. None of the Cash Purchase Price will be available for distribution to our stockholders in light of the fact that currently our total liabilities and obligations significantly exceed our total assets. We will attempt to maximize cash remaining after the Asset Sale by negotiating possible reduced payments for our remaining obligations. A portion of our share of the Cash Purchase Price may also be used by to fund our day-to-day operations prior to our dissolution. We intend to retain as much of the non-cash Remaining Assets as possible for conversion into cash and eventual distribution, if any, to our stockholders pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement. Cash distributions, if any, to our former stockholders will be made from the Liquidating Trust to the extent that our share of any Royalty Payments and any value realized from our rights to the Option exceed the Remaining Liabilities transferred to and the expenses of the Liquidating Trust. If the Plan of Liquidation or the Liquidating Trust Agreement are not approved by our stockholders, our share of the Cash Purchase Price and our Remaining Assets will be used by us to satisfy our liabilities and obligations. Our Board of Directors believes that if all three proposals are not approved, we will be forced to discontinue our operations and proceed with a liquidation in bankruptcy. Under such circumstances, it is highly doubtful that there would be any assets to distribute to our stockholders.
 
Q:
What will our business be after the Asset Sale?
 
A:
After the closing of the Asset Sale, if the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement are approved by our stockholders, we and Operations will file a certificate of dissolution with the State of Delaware. Thereafter, our sole activities will relate to the liquidation and winding up of the Company and Operations pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement. If the Plan of Liquidation is not approved by our stockholders, we will not present the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal for a vote of our stockholders at the Special Meeting and we will attempt to obtain financing and/or identify and establish a successful business model. Considering our recent financial performance, it is unlikely that we would be able to obtain additional equity or debt financing. If we were unable to obtain sufficient capital, we would deplete our available limited resources and may be required to discontinue operations and/or proceed with a liquidation in bankruptcy. Our Board of Directors believes that if all three proposals are not approved, we will be forced to discontinue our operations and proceed with a liquidation in bankruptcy. Under such circumstances, it is highly doubtful that there would be any assets to distribute to our stockholders.
 
 Q:
What actions will our Board of Directors take if the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement are approved?
 
A:
(i)  If the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement are approved by our stockholders, we will take the following actions:

 
·
complete the Asset Sale and the consummation of the transactions contemplated under the Asset Purchase Agreement;
 
 
·
file a certificate of dissolution for each of Xcorporeal and Operations with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware;
 
 
·
establish the Liquidating Trust and transfer to the Liquidating Trust all of our Remaining Assets and the Remaining Liabilities;
 
 
·
pursuant to the terms of the Liquidating Trust, the Trustee will pay or adequately provide for the payment of all of our known obligations and liabilities prior to any distributions to our stockholders;
 
 
·
attempt to maximize cash remaining after satisfying our liabilities by negotiating possible reduced payments for our remaining obligations; and
 
 
·
the trustee of the Liquidating Trust will distribute in accordance with the Liquidating Trust’s governance documents pro rata in one or more liquidating distributions over time to or for the benefit of our former stockholders and beneficiaries of the Liquidating Trust any available cash or cash equivalents obtained from the conversion into cash of all of the rights and assets transferred to the Liquidating Trust.

 
22

 

(ii)  If the Asset Sale is not approved by our stockholders, but the Plan of Liquidation is approved by our stockholders, we will not present the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal for a vote of our stockholders at the Special Meeting and we will take the following actions:
 
 
·
attempt to sell all of our Assets on available terms most favorable to us;
 
·
discontinue our operations and liquidate our assets and conduct our business operations only to the extent necessary to wind up our business affairs;
 
·
file a certificate of dissolution for each of Xcorporeal and Operations with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware;
 
·
attempt to maximize cash remaining after satisfying our liabilities by negotiating possible reduced payments for our remaining obligations;
 
·
attempt to pay or adequately provide for the payment of all of our known obligations and liabilities, to the extent of our then available resources;
 
·
to the extent of our then available resources, establish a contingency reserve designed to satisfy any additional unknown or contingent liabilities or acquire insurance to protect us against such liabilities; and/or
 
·
seek protection under bankruptcy laws. Due to the fact that our liabilities and obligations significantly exceed our assets, it is highly doubtful that there would be any cash or cash equivalents to distribute to our stockholders.
 
(iii) If the Asset Sale and the Plan of Liquidation are approved by our stockholders, but the Liquidating Trust Agreement is not approved by our stockholders, we will take the following actions:
 
 
·
complete the Asset Sale and the consummation of the transactions contemplated under the Asset Purchase Agreement;
 
·
file a certificate of dissolution for each of Xcorporeal and Operations with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware;
 
·
attempt to maximize cash remaining after satisfying our liabilities by negotiating possible reduced payments for our remaining obligations;
 
·
attempt to pay or adequately provide for the payment of all of our known obligations and liabilities, to the extent of our then available resources;
 
·
to the extent of our then available resources, establish a contingency reserve designed to satisfy any additional unknown or contingent liabilities or acquire insurance to protect us against such liabilities; and/or
·
discontinue our operations and liquidate our Remaining Assets, conduct our business operations only to the extent necessary to wind up our business affairs and seek protection under bankruptcy laws. Due to the fact that our liabilities and obligations significantly exceed our assets, it is highly doubtful that there would be any cash or cash equivalents to distribute to our stockholders.
           
Q:
What is the Liquidating Trust?

A:
No third party is entitled to rely on no-action positions taken by the staff of the SEC. However, in order to have facts similar to those presented in several no-action letters in which the staff took such no-action positions allowing registrants whose securities are registered under Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and who are otherwise not eligible to deregister under applicable rules of the Exchange Act, to deregister from their Section 13(a) and Section 15 reporting obligations, we plan to establish a Liquidating Trust which will exist only for the limited purpose of effecting liquidation of all of our assets and liabilities within the 3-year period from the establishment date of the Liquidating Trust. In connection therewith and pursuant to our Plan of Liquidation, if the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement are approved by our stockholders and we subsequently consummate the Asset Sale, we intend to transfer to the Liquidating Trust all of our Remaining Assets and all of our Remaining Liabilities.
 
 
23

 

 
Q:
What are the terms of the Liquidating Trust?
 
A;
If the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement are approved by our stockholders and we subsequently consummate the Asset Sale, our Board of Directors intends to transfer our share of any Royalty Payments and our rights to the Option and the other Remaining Assets, if any, together with all of the Remaining Liabilities, to the Liquidating Trust established for the benefit of our stockholders, which rights and assets would thereafter be sold or distributed on terms approved by the Trustee of such trust. The purpose of the Liquidating Trust would be to serve as a temporary repository for the trust property prior to its disposition or distribution to our stockholders, to distribute or sell such property on terms satisfactory to the Trustee, and to distribute to our stockholders any net proceeds of such sale after paying any liabilities assumed by the Liquidating Trust. The Liquidating Trust will also assume all of our Remaining Liabilities and will be obligated to pay any expenses and Remaining Liabilities that remain unsatisfied.
 
The Liquidating Trust will be established pursuant to a Liquidating Trust Agreement to be entered into with an affiliate of Kelly J. McCrann, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, to act as trustee thereunder, as approved by our Board of Directors (the “Trustee”), substantially in the form attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex C. The Liquidating Trust will assume all of our obligations and liabilities with respect to the assets transferred to the Liquidating Trust, including, without limitation, any unsatisfied claims and unascertained or contingent liabilities relating to these transferred assets, and any such conveyances to the Liquidating Trust will be in trust for our stockholders. The transfer to the Liquidating Trust and distribution of interests therein to our stockholders, if any, will enable us to divest ourselves of the trust property and permit our stockholders to enjoy the economic benefits of ownership of such property and the Royalty Payments whose fair value on the date of this Proxy Statement is uncertain.
 
Upon the determination by the Trustee that all of the Liquidating Trust’s liabilities have been satisfied, but in any event, not more than 3 years from the date of the transfer of our Remaining Assets to it (subject to an extension only under certain circumstances), the Liquidating Trust will, to the fullest extent permitted by law, make a final distribution of any remaining assets to the holders of the beneficial interests of the trust.
 
The adoption of the Plan of Liquidating and the Liquidating Trust Agreement by our stockholders constitutes full and complete stockholder approval of the appointment of the liquidating trustee of the Liquidating Trust, the execution of Liquidating Trust Agreement and the transfer of our assets to the Liquidating Trusts.
           
Q:
What will stockholders receive in the liquidation?
 
A:
As of the date hereof, we cannot determine what amount(s), if any, will be available to distribute to our stockholders. If we receive our share of any Royalty Payments and are able to realize any value from our rights to the Option, if the products underlying the technology being sold to FUSA as part of the Assets are successfully developed and if we incur no additional liabilities, amounts may become available for distribution to our stockholders in the future, and if so, will be distrusted from the Liquidating Trust. However, our Board of Directors has determined that approving the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidating and the Liquidating Trust Agreement would increase the possibility that the Trustee will be able to distribute liquidation proceeds from the Liquidating Trust to our stockholders. See “Proposal No. 2: Approval of the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution” and “Proposal No. 3: Approval of the Liquidating Trust Agreement — Nature, Amount and Timing of Liquidating Distributions.”
 
Q:
When will stockholders receive payment of any available liquidation proceeds?
 
A:
We presently expect to transfer the Remaining Assets and the Remaining Liabilities to the Liquidating Trust, as soon as practicable after the Special Meeting and in connection with the filing of a certificate of dissolution for each of Xcorporeal and Operations with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. Upon our receipt of our share of the Royalty Payments, if any, and/or conversion into cash of the value of the stream of Royalty Payments due to us under the Asset Purchase Agreement, if any, and after satisfaction of all of our liabilities and obligations and the costs and liabilities associated with the establishment and maintenance of the Liquidating Trust, the remaining cash amounts, if any, will be distributed by the Trustee to our stockholders as the Trustee determines in his sole discretion in accordance with the terms of the Liquidating Trust. As of the date hereof, however, we are not able to predict the precise nature, amount or timing of any distributions, due primarily to our inability to predict the amount of our remaining liabilities or the amount that we will expend during the course of the liquidation and the amount, if any, of the Royalty Payments due to us or the value that the Trustee would be able to realize upon conversion of the stream of Royalty Payments due to us under the Asset Purchase Agreement into cash. If the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement are approved by our stockholders, once the Remaining Assets and Remaining Liabilities have been transferred to the Liquidating Trust, the Trustee, in his sole discretion, will determine the actual amount and timing of all distributions to our stockholders. See, “Proposal No. 3: Approval of the Liquidating Trust Agreement — Liquidation Distributions” and “Risk Factors — Risks Related to the Plan of Liquidation.”

 
24

 

Q:
Do our executive officers and/or directors have any interest in the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation or Liquidating Trust Agreement?

A:
Certain of our executive officers have employment, change in control and other agreements that provide for severance payments full vesting of all unvested equity awards if any such executive officer's employment is terminated for any reason in connection with a change in control or if we terminate their employment at any time without cause or if they are constructively terminated and/or certain other payments in the event we successfully consummate the Asset Sale.

The consummation of the Asset Sale will constitute a change of control under these agreements and will trigger certain severance payments to our executive officers. The employment of each of these executive officers will be terminated by us either prior to or during the wind down of our activities. In either case, such terminations will be deemed terminations in connection with a change in control and/or require such other severance payments. The change of control, severance payments and/or certain other payments that will be due by the Company to our executive officers will be in the amount up to $1,924,300, if our executive officers are terminated as a result of the Asset Sale or if the Asset Sale is successfully consummated, assuming no excise tax gross-up payments are due. In particular, Kelly J. McCrann, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Robert Weinstein, our Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, and Dr. Victor Gura, our Chief Medical and Scientific Officer, may be entitled to severance payments in the amount up to $325,000, $286,500 and $1,312,800, respectively, under their employment agreements. In addition, if the Asset Sale is consummated, Mr. McCrann will be entitled to a payment of $432,500 as a sale transaction success fee. Furthermore, in connection with certain restructuring efforts previously undertaken by us to reduce our operating expenses, Messrs. McCrann and Weinstein and Dr. Gura, may be entitled to receive deferred compensation in the amount of approximately $95,563, $83,531 and $82,050, respectively, our other employees may be entitled to receive deferred compensation, in the aggregate, of approximately $60,000, and a member of our Board of Directors may be entitled to receive deferred compensation in the amount of approximately $70,000. Additionally, as of February 15, 2010, we estimate that certain of our employees would be entitled to receive accrued vacation pay, in the aggregate, of approximately $150,000.

In addition, Mr. McCrann (or an entity affiliated with Mr. McCrann) will also serve as the Trustee of the Liquidating Trust and under the terms of the Liquidating Trust Agreement, in the form attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex C, will receive the following compensation for his services as the Trustee: 10% of the aggregate Royalty Payments received by the Liquidating Trust up to $10 million and 5% of any Royalty Payments in excess thereof. Mr. McCrann will also be entitled to reimbursement of his expenses incurred as Trustee on behalf of the Liquidating Trust.

As of December 31, 2009, there were 1.16 million shares of common stock underlying unvested stock options held by our executive officers that will vest as a result of the Asset Sale. The weighted-average exercise price of those stock options is $3.25 per share. None of these stock options have an exercise price at or below $0.07, the last reported sale price of our common stock as quoted on the Pink Sheets Electronic OTC Market (the “Pink Sheets”) on the Record Date. Since we do not anticipate that any substantial amount of our share of the Cash Purchase Price will be available for distribution to our stockholders, we anticipate that none of these stock options will be exercised. In addition, as of the Record Date, our executive officers and/or directors also held 6,352,596 shares of common stock that will be entitled to the same per share liquidating distributions from the Liquidating Trust, if any, that will be made to the other shares of common stock outstanding. See “Proposal No. 1: Approval of the Asset Sale — Interests of Our Executive Officers and/or Directors in the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement.”

Additionally, on the Closing Date a joint venture to be formed by FUSA and Dr. Gura may enter into an employment agreement with Dr. Gura, pursuant to which Dr. Gura would assist FUSA in the further development of the Assets for a certain period after Closing Date, at a set salary to be determined by FUSA and Dr. Gura. In addition, Dr. Gura may receive an ownership stake in such joint venture. On the Closing Date, FUSA will not enter into any other employment or consulting arrangements with any of our executive officers or employees. Other than described herein, we do not know whether FUSA will enter into any employee or consulting arrangements thereafter with any of our executive officers or employees and FUSA has not notified us of any intention to do so to date.

 
25

 

Q:
What happens to my shares of common stock after the dissolution of the Company?

A:
If the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement are approved by our stockholders and the Asset Sale is consummated, the transfer of the Remaining Assets and Remaining Liabilities to the Liquidating Trust under the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement or the wind up of our affairs under the Plan of Liquidation will be in complete cancellation of all of the outstanding shares of our common stock. From and after the effective date of the certificate of dissolution to be filed by the Company with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware (the “Final Record Date”), and subject to applicable law, our common stock will be treated as no longer being outstanding and each holder of our common stock shall cease to have any rights in respect thereof, except the right to receive distributions, if any, pursuant to and in accordance with the Plan of Liquidation or the trust agreement governing the Liquidating Trust, as applicable. To the extent any amounts become available for distribution in the future as a result of the Liquidating Trust receiving any Royalty Payments and realizing any value from our rights to the Option, to the extent such exceed the Remaining Liabilities and expenses of the Liquidating Trust, they will also be distributed pro-rata from the Liquidating Trust. The actual distribution amount will be determined and the final distribution will be made by the Trustee in his sole discretion after the realization over-time of the cash value, if any, of the Royalty Payments and our rights to the Option, and settlement and satisfaction of all our liabilities and expenses.

Q:
Should I send in my stock certificates now?

A:
No. You should not forward your stock certificates before receiving instructions to do so. As a condition to being a beneficiary of the Liquidating Trust and receipt of any distribution to the stockholders as beneficiaries thereof or receipt of any distribution pursuant to our Plan of Liquidation, if the Asset Sale is not consummated for whatever reason, our Board of Directors, in its absolute discretion, may require the stockholders to (i) surrender their certificates evidencing their shares of common stock to us or (ii) furnish us with evidence satisfactory to the Board of Directors of the loss, theft or destruction of such certificates, together with such surety bond or other security or indemnity as may be required by and satisfactory to the Board of Directors. If surrender of stock certificates should be required following the dissolution, we will send you written instructions regarding such surrender. Any distributions otherwise payable by us to our stockholders who have not surrendered their stock certificates, if requested to do so, will be held in trust for such stockholders, without interest, pending the surrender of such certificates (subject to escheat pursuant to the laws relating to unclaimed property).

Q:
Can I still sell my shares?

A:
You may sell your shares at this time in accordance with the federal and state securities rules and regulations. If the Plan of Liquidation is approved by our stockholders, the Board of Directors, in its absolute discretion, may direct that our stock cease being traded on the Pink Sheets and that our stock transfer books be closed and recording of transfers of common stock discontinued. From and after the Final Record Date, and subject to applicable law, our common stock will be treated as no longer being outstanding and each holder of our common stock shall cease to have any rights in respect thereof, except the right to receive distributions pursuant to and in accordance with the Plan of Liquidation and/or the trust agreement governing the Liquidating Trust, as applicable. Thereafter, certificates representing shares of our common stock will not be assignable or transferable on the books of the Company except by will, intestate succession or operation of law. See “Proposal No. 3: Approval of the Liquidating Trust Agreement — Trading of Interests in any Liquidating Trust” and “Proposal No. 3: Approval of the Liquidating Trust Agreement — Trading of Our Common Stock.”

Q:
Does the Asset Sale or the dissolution and liquidation of the Company require any regulatory approvals?

A:
We are not aware of any United States federal or state regulatory requirements or governmental approvals or actions that may be required to consummate the Asset Sale or the dissolution and liquidation of the Company, except for compliance with the applicable regulations of the SEC in connection with this Proxy Statement and compliance with the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”). Additionally, the dissolution of the Company requires that we obtain a certificate from the department of revenue for the State of Delaware certifying that every license fee, tax, increase, or penalty of the Company has been paid or provided for.

Q:
Does the Plan of Liquidation involve any risk of liability to stockholders?

A:
As of the date of this Proxy Statement, no distributions have been made to our stockholders. However, as part of our Plan of Liquidation, we are obligated to pay, or make provision for the payment of, our expenses and our fixed and contingent liabilities. Under the DGCL, a stockholder could be held personally liable to our creditors for any deficiency, to the extent of such stockholder’s previous distributions from us in liquidation, if we fail to make adequate provision for the payment of our expenses and liabilities.  Moreover, if a stockholder has paid taxes on distributions previously received by the stockholder, a repayment of all or a portion of the prior distribution could result in a stockholder incurring a net tax cost if the stockholder’s repayment of an amount previously distributed does not cause a commensurate reduction in taxes payable by that stockholder. If we fail to create an adequate contingency reserve for payment of our expenses and liabilities, each of our stockholders could be held liable for payment to our creditors for amounts owed to creditors in excess of the contingency reserve, up to the amount actually distributed to such stockholder. Because no distributions have been made to our stockholders as of the date hereof, we do not believe there is any material risk of liability to our stockholders resulting from our fixed and contingent liabilities.

 
26

 

General Information About Voting

Q:
Who is entitled to vote?

A:
The Record Date for the Special Meeting is January 4, 2010. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Special Meeting. At the close of business on the Record Date there were 15,354,687 shares of our common stock and no shares of our preferred stock outstanding. Except as otherwise required by law, the holders of shares of our common stock vote together as a single class on all matters presented to the stockholders.

Q:
How many votes are required to authorize and approve the Asset Sale Proposal, the Plan of Liquidation Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal?

A:
At the Special Meeting, our stockholders will consider and vote on the Asset Sale Proposal, the Plan of Liquidation Proposal, the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal as separate proposals, however, we will not present the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal at the Special Meeting unless both the Asset Sale Proposal and the Plan of Liquidating Proposal are approved by our stockholders. The approval of each of the Asset Sale Proposal, the Plan of Liquidation Proposal and the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares of our common stock outstanding as of the Record Date and entitled to vote thereon. The approval of the Adjournment Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote thereon. Members of our Board of Directors and our executive officers who hold (or are deemed to hold) as of the Record Date an aggregate of 6,352,596 shares of our common stock (approximately 41.4% of the outstanding shares of our common stock as of the Record Date) have agreed to vote for the approval of each of the proposals at the Special Meeting.

Q:
Do I have dissenters’ rights?

A:
No. Under the DGCL, stockholders will not have dissenters’ rights in connection with the Asset Sale or the Plan of Liquidation. Section 262 of the DGCL provides that appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation in a merger or consolidation to be effected pursuant to Section 251 of the DGCL. Because the transactions contemplated under the Asset Purchase Agreement or by the Plan of Liquidation will not involve a merger or consolidation of the Company, our stockholders will not have appraisal rights in connection with the Asset Sale or the Plan of Liquidation.

Q:
What if my shares are held in “street name” by a broker?

A:
If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” by a broker (or banker or other nominee), your broker, as the record holder of the shares, is required to vote those shares in accordance with your instructions. Stockholders should follow the directions provided by brokers regarding how to instruct brokers to vote the shares.

Q:
How many shares must be present to hold the Special Meeting and how are votes counted?

A:
A quorum must be present at the Special Meeting for any business to be conducted. The presence at the Special Meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock outstanding on the Record Date will constitute a quorum. Your shares will be considered part of the quorum if you return a signed and dated proxy card, if you vote by telephone or by the Internet, or if you vote at the Special Meeting. Proxies received but marked as abstentions or broker non-votes will be included in the calculation of the number of shares considered to be present at the Special Meeting.

Under the rules of various national and regional securities exchanges, an abstaining vote and a broker non-vote are counted as present and are, therefore, included for purposes of determining whether a quorum of shares is present at the Special Meeting. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker submits a proxy card with respect to shares held in a fiduciary capacity (generally referred to as being held in “street name”) but declines to vote on a particular matter because the broker has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner. Under the rules that govern brokers who are voting with respect to shares held in street name, brokers have the discretion to vote such shares on routine matters, but not on non-routine matters such as the approval of the Asset Sale Proposal, the Plan of Liquidation Proposal and the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal. If you do not vote or do not instruct your broker or bank how to vote, it will have the same effect as voting “AGAINST” the Asset Sale Proposal, the Plan of Liquidation Proposal and the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal and will have no effect on the Adjournment Proposal.

 
27

 

Q:
What if a quorum is not present at the Special Meeting?

A:
If we do not have a quorum at the Special Meeting or if we do not have sufficient affirmative votes in favor of the foregoing proposals, we may, subject to stockholder approval of the Adjournment Proposal, adjourn the Special Meeting to a later time to permit further solicitation of proxies, if necessary, to obtain additional votes in favor of the foregoing proposals. In addition, we may adjourn the Special Meeting without notice, other than by the announcement made at the Special Meeting. Under our Bylaws, we can adjourn the Special Meeting by approval of the holders of a majority of our common stock having voting power present in person or represented by proxy thereat. We are soliciting proxies to vote in favor of adjournment of the Special Meeting, regardless of whether a quorum is present, if necessary to provide additional time to solicit votes in favor of approval of the Asset Sale Proposal, the Plan of Liquidation Proposal or the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal.
 
Q:
Who is bearing the costs of the solicitation of proxies in connection with the Special Meeting?
 
A:
We will bear the cost of the solicitation of proxies from its stockholders. In addition to solicitation by mail, our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies from our stockholders by telephone, facsimile or other electronic means or in person. Following the original mailing of the Proxy Statement and other soliciting materials, we will request brokers, custodians, nominees and other record holders to forward copies of the Proxy Statement and other soliciting materials to persons for whom they hold shares of our common stock and to request authority for the exercise of proxies. We will reimburse any of these custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in doing so. We may engage an agent to assist us in the solicitation of proxies. If we do so, such agent’s fee and services will be consistent with our past arrangements and within the range of what is common for companies with similar operations and a number of stockholders similar to us.
 
Q:
How do I vote?
 
All stockholders may vote by mail. Registered stockholders (who own their shares in their own name) and most beneficial stockholders (who own shares through a bank, broker or other nominee) also may vote by telephone or the Internet. If one of these options is available to you, we strongly encourage you to use it because it is faster and less costly. Registered stockholders can vote by telephone by calling 1-800-_________ or on the Internet at www.___________.com. Please have your proxy card in hand when calling or going online. To vote by mail, please sign, date and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided.

If you own your shares through a bank, broker or other nominee you should follow the separate instructions that the record stockholder provides to you. Although most banks and brokers now offer telephone and Internet voting, availability and specific processes will depend on their voting arrangements.

If you attend the Special Meeting in person, you may request a ballot when you arrive. If your shares are held in the name of your bank, broker or other nominee, you need to bring an account statement or letter from the nominee indicating that you were the beneficial owner of the shares on the Record Date for voting.
 
Q:
Can I change my vote after I submit my proxy?
 
A:
Yes, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the polls close at the meeting by:

voting again by Internet or by telephone;
signing another proxy with a later date;
giving written notice of the revocation of your proxy to our Secretary prior to the Special Meeting; or
voting in person at the Special Meeting.

 
28

 

Q:
What happens if I do not give specific voting instructions?
 
A:
Stockholders of Record. If you are a stockholder of record and you:

 
Indicate when voting on the Internet or telephone that you wish to vote as recommended by our Board of Directors or
 
if you sign and return a proxy card without giving specific voting instructions,

then the proxy holders will vote your shares in the manner recommended by our Board of Directors on all matters presented in this Proxy Statement and as the proxy holders may determine in their discretion with respect to any other matters properly presented for a vote at the Special Meeting.

Beneficial Owners of Shares Held in Street Name. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name and do not provide the nominee who holds your shares with specific voting instructions, the nominee will inform our inspector of election that it does not have the authority to vote on this matter with respect to your shares. This is generally referred to as a “broker non-vote.” When our inspector of election tabulates the votes for any particular matter, broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present, but will not otherwise be counted. ABSTENTIONS AND BROKER NON-VOTES WILL HAVE THE EFFECT OF A VOTE “AGAINST” THE APPROVAL OF THE ASSET SALE PROPOSAL, THE PLAN OF LIQUIDATION PROPOSAL AND THE LIQUIDATING TRUST AGREEMENT PROPOSAL.  Please provide voting instructions to the nominee that holds your shares by carefully following their instructions.

Q:
How do I access proxy materials on the Internet?
 
A:
Stockholders can access our Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement and a form of a proxy card on the Internet on the “Investors”, sub-category “Proxy Statement Materials”, section of our website at www.xcorporeal.com. Our public filings can also be accessed at the SEC’s web site at www.sec.gov. See “Where You Can Find More Information.”
 
 Q:
What if other matters come up at the Special Meeting?
 
A:
The matters described in this Proxy Statement are the only matters we know of that will be voted on at the Special Meeting. If any other matter or matters are properly brought before the Special Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Special Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy to vote the proxy on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.
 
Q:
What do stockholders need to do now?
 
A:
After carefully reading and considering the information contained in this Proxy Statement, each stockholder should vote by Internet or by telephone or complete and sign his or her proxy card and return it in the enclosed return envelope as soon as possible so that his or her shares may be represented at the meeting. A majority of shares entitled to vote must be represented at the meeting to enable us to conduct business at the meeting.
 
Q:
Who should I contact with questions?
 
A:
If you have any additional questions about the Asset Sale Proposal, the Plan of Liquidation Proposal, the Adjournment Proposal or if you need additional copies of this Proxy Statement or any public filings referred to in this Proxy Statement, you should contact our Investor Relations Department at Xcorporeal, Inc., 80 Empire Drive, Lake Forest, CA 92630 or (949) 600-4640. Our public filings can also be accessed at the SEC’s web site at www.sec.gov. See “Where You Can Find More Information.”

 
29

 

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Proxy Statement and the annexes and exhibits attached hereto contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, business strategies, operating efficiencies or synergies, competitive positions, growth opportunities for existing products, plans and objectives of management, markets for our stock and other matters. Statements in this Proxy Statement that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements” for the purpose of the safe harbor provided by Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). These forward-looking statements are only predictions and reflect our current expectations or forecasts of future events. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “believe,” “project,” “continue,” “plan,” “forecast,” or other similar words. Such forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, those relating to our future business prospects, revenues and income, wherever they occur, are necessarily estimates reflecting the best judgment of our senior management on the date on which they were made, or if no date is stated, as of the date of this Proxy Statement. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those described below under the caption “Risk Factors”, in the section captioned “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”) filed with the SEC on March 31, 2009, and in the sections captioned “Risk Factors” of our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q (each, a “Quarterly Report”), filed with the SEC on May 15, 2009, August 13, 2009 and November 16, 2009, respectively, that may affect the operations, performance, development and results of our business. Because these factors could cause our actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf, you should not place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict which factors will arise. In addition, we cannot assess the impact of each factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

You should understand that, in addition to those factors discussed below under the caption “Risk Factors” and in the section captioned “Risk Factors” of our Form 10-K and our Quarterly Reports, factors that could affect our future results and could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements, as well as factors that could affect the Sellers’ ability to consummate the Asset Sale, include, but are not limited to:

 
·
the effect of receiving a “going concern” statement in our independent registered public accounting firm’s report on our 2008 financial statements;
 
 
·
our significant capital needs and ability to obtain financing both on a short-term and a long-term basis;
 
 
·
our ability to successfully research and develop marketable products and our ability to obtain regulatory approval to market and distribute such products;
 
 
·
anticipated trends and conditions in the industry in which we operate, including regulatory changes;
 
 
·
general economic conditions;
 
 
·
our ability to obtain the approval of the Assets Sale and Plan of Liquidation by our stockholders;
 
 
·
our ability to satisfy our liabilities and obligations out of the proceeds of the transactions described herein and other available resources, if any;
 
 
·
our ability to distribute any remaining cash to our stockholders; and
 
 
·
other risks and uncertainties as may be detailed from time to time in our public announcements and filings with the SEC.
 
Although we believe that our expectations are reasonable, we cannot assure you that our expectations will prove to be correct. Should any one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in this Proxy Statement as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected or intended.

These factors are not exhaustive, and new factors may emerge or changes to the foregoing factors may occur that could impact our business. Except to the extent required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or any other reason. All subsequent forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to herein. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this Proxy Statement may not occur. You should review carefully sections captioned “Risk Factors” included in our Form 10-K and our Quarterly Reports and the risks discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” below for a more complete discussion of these and other factors that may affect our business.

 
30

 

PROPOSAL NO. 1: APPROVAL OF THE SALE OF SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF THE ASSETS OF XCORPOREAL

General Overview

At the Special Meeting, our stockholders will be asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the sale of substantially all of our Assets to FUSA, including all of our assets, properties and rights used in our business, excluding our (i) cash, restricted cash and cash equivalents, (ii) accounts receivable, (iii) marketable securities, (iv) website and (v) insurance policies.

As consideration for the sale of substantially all of our assets to FUSA, on the closing date of the Asset Sale (the “Closing Date”) we will receive (a) $2,100,000, which is our portion of the Cash Purchase Price, in addition to $200,000 which was previously paid to us as the exclusivity fee, of which $1,650,000 will be paid to us on the Closing Date, $375,000 will be paid to us on April 1, 2010 and $75,000 will be paid to us on April 1, 2011, and (b) our share of the Royalty Payments and rights to the Option (each term as defined below). In addition, of the portion of the Cash Purchase Price being paid to NQCI, per the agreement of the Sellers, $1,871,430 is being paid to satisfy our liability to NQCI for NQCI’s attorneys’ fees and costs awarded by the arbitrator pursuant to the terms of the Partial Final Award issued on April 13, 2009.

The Asset Sale will be made pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement. The material terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement are presented below under the caption “Description of the Asset Purchase Agreement” and a copy of the Asset Purchase Agreement is attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex A. Stockholders are urged to carefully review the Asset Purchase Agreement in its entirety.

Background of the Asset Sale

In late 2007, we began to explore strategic alternatives available to us, including the possible sale of some of our assets or the equity of the Company. In February 2008, we engaged William Blair & Company (“William Blair”) as our financial advisor in connection with a possible private placement or the sale of our securities or merger, sale or exchange of 50% or more of our authorized capital stock or sale of some or all of our assets. At such time, our intent was to execute our modified business plan to continue the development of the PAK. Around this time, based on deteriorating economic conditions and our inability to obtain debt or equity financing, our Board of Directors began to discuss whether to sell the equity of the Company as a single entity or to sell certain of our assets in one or more transactions at an acceptable price. We did not believe that raising additional capital through an equity or debt offering was achievable given the ongoing arbitration with NQCI and the private investors which we contacted regarding such capital investments specifically indicated to us that the uncertainty of the outcome of the arbitration with NQCI was the reason why capital financing was unavailable to us. After extensive discussions, our Board of Directors concluded that sale of certain of our assets was the preferred course of action insofar as the proceeds of such sale would have allowed us to continue to develop certain of our products to be derived from the  extra-corporeal  platform technology. Moreover, the Board of Directors noted that even if a single buyer existed, a better aggregate price might be obtained by selling individual assets to buyers with a specific interest in them.

In March 2008, in light of our continuing deteriorating liquidity position, ongoing severe economic recession and our inability to obtain additional debt or equity financing, the Board of Directors reconsidered its strategy of selling certain of our assets and concluded that sale of the equity of the Company to a single buyer was the preferred course of action insofar as it would save time, minimize transaction expenses and provide the greatest possibility of a distribution to our stockholders. However, the Board of Directors also noted that there might not be a single buyer for our range of technologies. As a result of the foregoing considerations, the Board of Directors authorized our management to explore the sale of the equity of the Company to a single buyer as a preferred course of action, but agreed to study the response of buyers in order to validate the decision to pursue a single transaction.

We, William Blair and Synergy Partners, a Pacific Rim investment banker and agent (“Synergy”), prepared a list of more than 60 prospective acquirers and financing sources and we began making contact with them in March 2008. More than 30 prospective acquirers and investors expressed preliminary interest in all or parts of the Company and requested additional information, and out of those 5 potential acquirers also visited us. By late 2008, we concluded that none of the prospective buyers were interested in acquiring the equity of the Company and that either no bids would be forthcoming or bids would be significantly below what our Board of Directors believed to be the fair value of the Company due to the all-or-none requirement. However, a few prospective acquirers had a strong interest in acquiring our technology related to the PAK.

In September 2008, our former Chief Executive Officer, Dan Goldberger, visited two potential acquirers to determine their level of interest in either partnering with us or acquiring the equity of the Company. Both of these parties agreed to conduct further due diligence and provide their level of interest in a transaction.

In October 2008, Kelly J. McCrann, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, traveled to several locations worldwide to gauge the level of interest of three other potential strategic partners that expressed interest in a possible transaction with us.
 
 
31

 

In November 2008, Mr. McCrann, Dr. Victor Gura, our Chief Scientific and Medical Officer, Barry Fulkerson (our chief engineer) and Robert Weinstein, our Chief Financial Officer, attended the American Society of Nephrology conference held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. We privately debuted, under signed confidentiality agreements, our PAK prototype and displayed our WAK to a select group of parties that we believed might be interested such devices, some of which had already been contact by us. Based upon Mr. McCrann’s visits to the three potential strategic partners, we were approached by a third-party which is engaged in the manufacture and commercialization of dialysis and other medical devices (“Development Partner”), regarding an interest in partnering with us to develop a continuous renal replacement therapy (“CRRT”) device using our platform technology. As a result of our initial discussions, we facilitated the start of its due diligence process.

Several discussions and meetings, both at our headquarters and offices of the Development Partner, were held between Mr. McCrann, Dr. Gura, and two of our senior product engineers along with the Development Partner’s senior product development team.  After several discussions and meetings, a preliminary term sheet for the development of a CRRT device was drafted in December 2008. After subsequent negotiations over the contents of the term sheet, in March 2009, the Development Partner provided the Company a draft memorandum of understanding (“MOU”) expanding the terms outlined in the December 2008 term sheet. After providing the MOU, the Development Partner informed us that they would have to postpone their decision to move forward with this project based upon general economic conditions and other development projects the Development Partner was pursuing.

In light of our then diminishing resources, consisting primarily of capital raised through a private placement that closed during the fourth quarter 2006, and the apparent lack of interest in the Assets by the prospective acquirers exploring the acquisition of all of our assets in a single transaction, our Board of Directors continued to consider strategies for continuing to operate the Company as a going concern, again exploring the sale of some of the Assets, this time to a wider group of prospective acquirers without the requirement of buying the equity of the Company, or shutting down the Company’s business operations, liquidating assets and distributing any remaining cash proceeds to our stockholders. However, at such time, few prospective acquirers expressed an interest in aggressively pursuing the acquisition of our Assets due to the uncertain surrounding the outcome of the arbitration proceeding with NQCI, which commenced in 2006 and continued into the second quarter of 2009.

Given these circumstances, in late March 2009, Mr. McCrann began a preliminary dialogue with Mr. Ben Lipps, Chairman of the Board of Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. (“Fresenius Medical Care”), to determine the interest of Fresenius Medical Care to acquire certain or all of our Assets. From April 2009 to June 2009, Mr. McCrann and Mr. Lipps, along with Mohsen Reihany, senior advisor to Mr. Lipps, exchanged numerous telephone calls concerning a potential proposal by Fresenius Medical Care to purchase substantially all of our Assets. During the same period that discussions with Fresenius Medical Care were taking place, Mr. McCrann also held several preliminary discussions with another potential acquirer, whom he visited in October 2008. The other party expressed interest in acquiring certain of our assets but did not submit a final offer nor pursued extensive due diligence of the Company or our assets.

In June 2009, Fresenius Medical Care commenced its extensive due diligence review of our Company and our assets.

During the period from September 2008 to late September 2009, our Board of Directors held nine meetings to discuss the potential financing sources, strategic partners and potential third parties who may have been interested in acquiring our assets. The Board of Directors provided guidance relating to the Development Partner transaction, the ongoing discussions with companies interested in acquiring certain of our assets and the final decision to pursue the sale of substantially all of our assets to Fresenius Medical Care or its affiliates.

In addition, in the spring of 2009, Mr. McCrann engaged in discussions with a certain third party introduced to us by Synergy. Following the initial rounds of preliminary discussions to determine the third party’s interest in purchasing certain of the Assets, the chairman of the board and the head of the medical group of such third party visited our operating facility in Lake Forest in order to observe the demonstration of certain of our products. These meetings were followed by the engineers and sales representatives of the third party also visiting our operating facility later in the spring of 2009. However, following such discussions and visits of our operating facility, the third party informally indicated that it was only interested in our PAK technology, and subsequently ceased all discussions with us. During such discussions, our management apprised our Board of Directors of the status of the dialogue and the third party’s acquisition intent (or the lack thereof) with respect to our Assets. Our efforts to engage in further discussions with this party have not provided any meaningful results or proposals since.

Additionally, during the later parts of the summer 2009 and beginning of September 2009, Mr. McCrann engaged in discussions with another potential strategic acquirer to gauge its interest in purchasing certain and/or all of our Assets. Such strategic acquirer expressed an informal interest in certain of our assets, and specifically the WAK. During this time, the head of development for renal technology of such strategic acquirer visited our operating facility to further discuss its expression of interest, however, as a result of such visits no formal expression of interest was indicated to us and our efforts to engage in further discussions with this party have not provided any meaningful results or proposals to date. Throughout this process, Mr. McCrann and Mr. Weinstein apprised our Board of Directors of the status of the talks and this potential strategic acquirer’s intent (or the lack thereof) with respect to our Assets.

On August 6, 2009, our Board of Directors held a telephonic meeting with Messrs. McCrann and Weinstein and other members of our management and counsel to the Company to discuss the status of negotiations with interested bidders. These officers also discussed the current status of discussions with Fresenius Medical Care and was authorized to negotiate a letter of intent with Fresenius Medical Care or its affiliates. Management reported to the Board of Directors that discussions with the Development Partner continued and that other discussions now were focused on specific assets, rather than a transaction for the equity of the Company.

 
32

 

On September 9, 2009, we reviewed the terms of a transaction proposed by FUSA, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fresenius Medical Care, in a draft non-binding term sheet for the acquisition of all of the Assets, which also included proposed provisions prohibiting us from soliciting other offers. The non-binding term sheet indicated that any further efforts by FUSA would be subject to its remaining due diligence and confirmation by FUSA and its counsel of certain approvals that would allow it to proceed with the transaction.

Following our review of FUSA’s non-binding term sheet, Mr. McCrann held several telephonic discussions with FUSA, including its willingness to increase their purchase price. In connection with such discussions, FUSA continued to indicate that it was not interested in acquiring the equity of the Company through the purchase of all of our outstanding shares of common stock.

On September 21, 2009, the Sellers and FUSA executed an exclusivity letter (the “Exclusivity Letter”) pursuant to which the Sellers agreed to grant FUSA access to the books, records, personnel, properties, contracts and other data of the Sellers, subject to reasonable time, location and other restrictions for the purpose of FUSA further conducting its’ “due diligence” of the Seller’s operations in connection with FUSA’s intent in purchasing substantially all of the assets of the Sellers. The Sellers also agreed that, until the later of (i) December 21, 2009 and (ii) the date on which any of the parties provided the others with written notice that negotiations to execute a definitive agreement were terminated (which any of the parties were entitled to do in their sole discretion), they would not directly or indirectly (i) solicit or take any other action to facilitate any offers from third parties with respect to the acquisition of the Company or a part or all of the Assets, (ii) enter into an agreement to facilitate, approve or endorse such proposal or in connection with such proposal, abandon or terminate the proposed transaction between the Sellers and FUSA or (iii) enter into discussions, inquire or furnish information with respect to any such proposal (a “Acquisition Proposal”).

The Board of Directors held telephonic meetings with Mr. McCrann and Mr. Weinstein to discuss the status of the transaction with FUSA, including a detailed discussion of the terms of the non-binding term sheet with FUSA. During the later of such meetings, the Board of Directors determined that the Asset Sale would maximize stockholder value and that the Company’s best change to receive any royalty payment(s) from the sale of its assets is to consummate the Asset Sale and thereby, indirectly partnering with FUSA, the world's largest integrated provider of products and services for individuals undergoing dialysis because of chronic kidney failure. The Board of Directors also determined that approving the Asset Sale would increase the possibility that we will be able to distribute liquidation proceeds from the Liquidating Trust to our stockholders.

Our Board of Directors approved the Asset Purchase Agreement and the sale of the Assets to FUSA as described in this Proxy Statement. Under the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Sellers have agreed to restrictions similar to those contained in the Exclusivity Letter until the earlier of the consummation of the Asset Sale and the termination of the Asset Purchase Agreement in accordance with its terms; provided, that we may prior to obtaining approval of the Asset Sale contemplated by this Proxy Statement engage in negotiations or discussions with any party that has made an unsolicited bona fide Acquisition Proposal and, subject to certain conditions, furnish nonpublic information regarding the Company to such party, provided that our Board of Directors may only take such actions if it has determined in good faith, after consultation with its advisors, that such action is required in order for the Board of Directors to comply with its fiduciary obligations to our stockholders under applicable law. We agreed to promptly notify FUSA of any Acquisition Proposal, the terms thereof and requests related thereto. In addition, in consideration of FUSA signing the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Sellers agreed that in connection with the termination of the Asset Purchase Agreement as a result of any Seller proceeding with a Superior Proposal, contemporaneously with the closing of a transaction contemplated by a Superior Proposal, such terminating Seller shall be obligated to pay a termination fee of $2,500,000 to FUSA.  In the event such terminating Seller is the Company, the Company also agreed to reimburse FUSA for, among other things, all its reasonably incurred development expenses in connection with the provision of the Services (as defined below) by certain personnel of the Company to FUSA.

We will promptly consider in good faith any proposed alteration of the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement in response to any Acquisition Proposal.

The Sellers and FUSA executed the Asset Purchase Agreement on December 14, 2009 and we publicly announced this transaction on December 18, 2009.

THE FOLLOWING SECTION OF THE PROXY STATEMENT DESCRIBES MATERIAL ASPECTS OF THE PROPOSED SALE OF SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF OUR ASSETS. WHILE WE BELIEVE THAT THE DESCRIPTION COVERS THE MATERIAL TERMS OF THE ASSET SALE, THIS SUMMARY MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION THAT MAY BE IMPORTANT TO YOU. YOU SHOULD READ THIS ENTIRE DOCUMENT AND THE OTHER DOCUMENTS WE REFER TO CAREFULLY FOR A MORE COMPLETE UNDERSTANDING OF THE ASSET SALE.

Description of the Asset Purchase Agreement

The following is a brief summary of certain key provisions of the Asset Purchase Agreement. This description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Asset Purchase Agreement, a copy of which is attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex A. Stockholders are urged to read the Asset Purchase Agreement in its entirety.

 
33

 

Purchase and Sale of Assets

Out of the assets being sold by the Sellers to FUSA, we agreed to sell and FUSA agreed to purchase all of the Assets and rights of the Company consisting of the following:

 
·
all of our patents, trademarks, trade names, and other intellectual property, including domain names (the “Business IP Rights”) that comprise, are used, are held for use, or are intended for use by the Company in connection with or relating to the designs for portable hemodialysis devices (the “PAK Technology”);
 
·
the Business IP Rights that comprise, are used or are held for use by the Company in connection with or relating to the designs for continuous renal replacement therapy devices (the “CRRT Technology”);
 
·
the Business IP Rights that comprise, are used or are held for use by the Company in connection with or relating to the designs for wearable hemodialysis devices (the “HD WAK Technology”);
 
·
the Business IP Rights that comprise, are used or are held for use by the Company in connection with or relating to the designs for wearable ultrafiltration devices (the “WUD Technology”);
 
·
the Business IP Rights that comprise, are used or are held for use by the Company in connection with or relating to the designs for wearable continuous renal replacement therapy devices (the “WAK CRRT Technology”);
 
·
the Business IP Rights that comprise, are used or are held for use by the Company in connection with or relating to the development of the supersorbent technology (the “Supersorbent Technology”);
 
·
all of our other intellectual property used in connection with our business;
 
·
all software used internally by the Company (and collectively with the PAK Technology, the CRRT Technology, the HD WAK Technology, the WUD Technology, the WAK CRRT Technology and the Supersorbent Technology, the “Business Intellectual Property”);
 
·
our tangible property and equipment;
 
·
all of our personal property leases;
 
·
certain contracts or agreements to which we are a party relating to our business;
 
·
all permits relating to our business to the extent that such permits are transferable;
 
·
subject to certain exceptions, all of our books and records relating to our business; and
 
·
all goodwill associated with our business and the Business Intellectual Property.

FUSA will not be assuming any liabilities arising out of the operation of the business or liabilities associated with the Sellers’ ownership or use of any of the Assets prior to the closing of the Asset Purchase Agreement.

Purchase Price

The aggregate consideration (the “Aggregate Consideration”) for the Assets to be paid by FUSA to the Sellers consists of the following:

 
·
aggregate cash payments in the amount of $8,000,000 (the “Cash Purchase Price). The Cash Purchase Price shall be paid to the Sellers as follows: (a) an exclusivity fee in the amount of $200,000 previously paid by FUSA to us, (b) $3,800,000 on the date of closing (the “Closing Date”) of the transactions (the “Transactions”) contemplated under the Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Closing”), of which we and NQCI will receive $1,650,000 and $2,150,000, respectively, (c) $2,000,000 on April 1, 2010 (the “First Installment”), of which we and NQCI will receive $375,000 and $1,625,000, respectively, and (d) $2,000,000 on April 1, 2011 (the “Second Installment”), of which the Company and NQCI will receive $75,000 and $1,925,000, respectively. In the aggregate, if the Asset Sale is consummated, we will receive $2,300,000 and NQCI will receive $5,700,000 of the Cash Purchase Price. In addition, of the Cash Purchase Price being paid to NQCI, $1,871,430 is being paid to satisfy our liability to NQCI for NQCI’s attorneys’ fees and costs awarded by the arbitrator pursuant to the terms of the Partial Final Award issued on April 13, 2009 (the “Partial Final Award”);
 
 
·
during the life of the patents included in the HD WAK Technology (the “HD WAK Patents”), which expire between November 11, 2021 and September 9, 2024, we will be entitled to royalty payments equal to 60% of (i) 2% of the net revenues received by FUSA from the sale of wearable hemodialysis (“HD WAK”) devices in each country where such sales infringe valid and issued claims of the Sellers’ HD WAK Patents issued in such country (“HD WAK Devices Royalty”) plus (ii) $0.75 per treatment for the attendant disposables that incorporate the HD WAK Technology (“Attendant Disposables”), not to exceed a maximum of $1.50 per patient per week in a country where such sales infringe valid and issues claims of the HD WAK Patents issued in such country (the “Attendant Disposables Royalty”, and together with the HD WAK Devices Royalty, the “HD WAK Royalty”). Such payment for Attendant Disposables will not be payable with regard to Attendant Disposables that incorporate any technology for which a Supersorbent Royalty (as defined below) is paid by FUSA to any Seller or any of their affiliates.  NQCI will be entitled to the remaining 40% of the HD WAK Royalty; and
 

 
34

 

 
·
during the life of any patents included in the Supersorbent Technology (the “Supersorbent Patents”), we will be entitled to royalty payments equal in an amount to 40% of (i) the lesser of $0.75 per supersorbent cartridge or $1.50 per patient per week in each country where such sales infringe valid and issued claims of the Supersorbent Patents issued in such country less (B) any and all royalties payable to The Technion Research and Development Foundation Ltd. (“TRDF”) pursuant to the Research Agreement and Option for License, dated June 16, 2005 (the “Research Agreement”), or any subsequently executed license agreement between TRDF and FUSA. Such payment for supersorbent cartridges will not be payable with regard to supersorbent cartridges that incorporate any HD WAK Technology for which a HD WAK Royalty is paid by FUSA to any Seller or any of their affiliates (the “Supersorbent Royalty,” and together with the HD WAK Royalty, the “Royalty Payments”). NQCI will be entitled to the remaining 60% of the Supersorbent Royalty. While several applications for patents are pending, no patent incorporating the Supersorbent Technology has yet been issued.

The allocation of the Aggregate Consideration between the Sellers is consistent and was agreed to in accordance with the terms of the Memorandum (as defined below) and the Partial Final Award.

FUSA also granted to the Sellers an option to obtain a perpetual, worldwide license to the Supersorbent Technology for use in healthcare fields other than renal (the “Option”). The Option will be exercisable during the twelve-month period following FUSA’s receipt of regulatory approval for the sale of a supersorbent product in the United States or European Union, which we expect will require further development of the supersorbent technology with TRDF and successful completion of clinical trials by FUSA. In the event that the Option becomes exercisable and a Seller exercises the Option, the consideration payable to FUSA by such Seller(s) for the exercise of the Option will consist of a payment in the amount of $7,500,000, payable in immediately available funds, and a payment of an ongoing royalty in an amount equal to the lesser of $0.75 per supersorbent cartridge and $1.50 per patient per week in each country where such sales infringe valid and issued claims of the Supersorbent Patents issued in such country.

Assets to be Retained by the Company

We will retain all assets not sold to FUSA, including the following:

 
·
our cash, restricted cash and cash equivalents;
 
 
·
our accounts receivable;
 
 
·
our marketable securities;
 
 
·
our website, including its content, look and feel, verbiage and images;
 
 
·
our insurance policies;
 
 
·
security deposits for our corporate and operating facilities;
 
 
·
our share of the Cash Purchase Price, which is equal to $2,300,000;
 
 
·
our share of the Royalty Payments;
 
 
·
our rights to the Option;
 
 
·
certain computer and office equipment; and
 
 
·
our minute book, stock records, corporate seal and our and our employees’ corporate and personal, financial and SEC records.

FUSA will purchase our only business segment, which consists of the business related to our extra-corporeal platform and development of any products to be derived therefrom.

Representations and Warranties of the Company

In the Asset Purchase Agreement, we made certain customary representations and warranties to FUSA regarding:

 
·
organization, standing and power, and authority;
 
 
·
financial statements;
 
 
·
condition of acquired tangible assets; taxes; title to the purchased assets;
 
 
·
lack of infringement of or by our intellectual property;
 
 
·
compliance with laws, licenses and permits;
 
 
·
employee benefits, labor, and environmental matters; and
 
 
·
absence of litigation, required consents, and broker, finder and investment banking fees.

These representations and warranties may be subject to certain exceptions that are set forth in exhibits and schedules to the Asset Purchase Agreement.

 
35

 

Representations and Warranties of FUSA

FUSA made certain customary representations and warranties to the Sellers regarding organization and standing, authority and authorization, absence of litigation that is effecting or which could affect the legality, validity or enforceability of the Asset Purchase Agreement and the Transactions, brokers’ fees and availability of funds to pay the cash portion of the Aggregate Consideration for the Assets.

Conduct Prior to Closing

In order to obtain the approval of the Asset Sale, the Asset Purchase Agreement and the Transactions by our stockholders, our Board of Directors agreed: (a) to hold a meeting of our stockholders for the purpose of voting to approve and adopt the Asset Purchase Agreement and the Transactions contemplated hereby and, subject to the fiduciary duties of our Board of Directors, to (i) recommend approval and adoption of the Asset Purchase Agreement and the Transactions by our stockholders and include in any proxy or information statement such recommendation and (ii) take all reasonable and lawful action to solicit and obtain such approval, (b) as promptly as practicable to prepare this Proxy Statement, (c) at or prior to the closing, to deliver to FUSA a certificate of our Secretary setting forth the voting results from our stockholder meeting and (d) otherwise to use our reasonable best efforts to hold our stockholders meeting as soon as practicable after the date of the Asset Purchase Agreement. In addition, NQCI agreed, acting through its board of directors, subject to and in accordance with applicable law and its certificate of incorporation and by-laws, as soon as practicable, to solicit the written consent of its stockholders to approve and adopt the Asset Purchase Agreement and the Transactions.

Until the closing of Asset Purchase Agreement, we are obligated to carry on our business in the ordinary course in substantially the same manner as previously conducted immediately prior to the execution of the Asset Purchase Agreement. We also agreed to: (a) use our best efforts to carry on our business and our affairs in such a manner so that our representations, warranties and covenants contained in the Asset Purchase Agreement shall continue to be accurate and correct throughout such period, and on and as of the Closing Date as if made by us on the Closing Date, (b) promptly notify FUSA, in writing, of any material development with respect to our business or any of our assets or properties, (c) confer with FUSA concerning operational matters of a material nature, and (d) use our best efforts, recognizing the constraints of our financial condition, (i) to preserve intact our present business organization, (ii) to keep available the services of our present officers and employees, (iii) to preserve our relationships with customers, suppliers and others having business dealings with us, and (iv) not to do or permit to be done any action that would result in a Material Adverse Effect.  “Material Adverse Effect” means (in the case of either (x) or (y)) that (x) there has not been any fact, event, circumstance or change affecting or relating to Xcorporeal, Operations which, individually or, in the aggregate, has had a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of Xcorporeal and Operations, taken as a whole and (y) there has not been any fact, event, circumstance or change affecting or relating to NQCI which, individually or in the aggregate, has had a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of NQCI.

The parties further agreed not to issue or make any press release or other public statements or otherwise announce the transactions described in the Asset Purchase Agreement, except as approved by the parties in writing.

Until the closing of the Asset Purchase Agreement, we will afford FUSA and its officers, authorized employees, accountants, counsel and other authorized representatives reasonable access during normal business hours to the properties, books, records and personnel of the business, as FUSA may reasonably request (subject to any limitations that are reasonably required to preserve any applicable attorney client privilege or third party confidentiality obligation).

The Sellers also agreed to certain other covenants customary of the transactions of this nature.

Conditions Precedent to Each Party’s Obligations

The obligation of the parties to effect the Transactions is subject to the satisfaction, at or before the closing, of the following conditions:

 
·
the approval of the Asset Sale by each of the Seller’s stockholders holding the majority of the outstanding voting securities of such Seller (the “Stockholder Approvals”);
 
 
·
that no governmental authority  of competent jurisdiction shall have enacted, issued, promulgated, enforced or entered any statute, rule, regulation, executive order, decree, injunction or other order (whether temporary, preliminary or permanent) which is in effect and having the effect of making the Transactions illegal or otherwise prohibiting or materially restricting consummation of the Transactions; provided, however, that the parties shall use their reasonable best efforts to cause any such decree, judgment, injunction or other order to be vacated or lifted; and
 
 
·
that certain third party consents are obtained by the Sellers.

Conditions Precedent to FUSA’s Obligations

The obligation of FUSA to purchase the Assets is subject to the satisfaction, at or before the closing, of the following conditions:

 
·
that the representations and warranties of the Sellers contained in the Asset Purchase Agreement are true and correct in all respects as of the date of the Asset Purchase Agreement and as of the Closing Date;
 
 
36

 

 
·
the Sellers shall have performed in all material respects all obligations required to be performed by them under the Asset Purchase Agreement at or prior to the closing;
 
 
·
that no Material Adverse Effect (as defined below) shall have occurred with respect to the Assets or, recognizing the constraints of the Sellers’ financial situation, the Business since the date of the Asset Purchase Agreement and no fact or circumstance shall have occurred or arisen since the date of the Asset Purchase Agreement that would reasonably be expected to have such a Material Adverse Effect;
 
 
·
no fact or condition shall have arisen that would preclude in any material respect FUSA from taking title in the Assets;
 
 
·
prior to or concurrently with the closing, FUSA and us shall have negotiated and delivered a WAK/PAK Technology Assignment of License assigning to FUSA all of our licensed rights to current and future intellectual property comprised of certain U.S. patents and patent applications relating to PAK Technology and WAK HD Technology;
 
 
·
FUSA shall have received from counsel to the Sellers, one or more customary legal opinions; and
 
 
·
the Research Agreement shall have been validly assigned to FUSA and the exclusive license for use of the Supersorbent Technology in any and all medical applications, as contemplated by the Research Agreement, shall have been executed and delivered on terms and conditions substantially as set forth in Appendix C to the Research Agreement and otherwise on terms and conditions reasonably satisfactory to FUSA; such license shall be in the name of and for the benefit of FUSA or shall be in the name of and for the benefit of NQCI and shall be assigned to FUSA at the Closing with the written consent of TRDF.

Conditions Precedent to Our Obligations

Our obligation to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement is subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions:

 
·
that the representations and warranties of FUSA shall be true and correct in all respects (without giving effect to any limitation as to “materiality” or “material adverse effect” or any similar limitation set forth therein) as of the date of the Asset Purchase Agreement, and except to the extent such representations and warranties speak as of an earlier date, as of the Closing Date as though made on and as of the closing; and
 
 
·
that FUSA shall have performed in all material respects all obligations required to be performed by it under the Asset Purchase Agreement at or prior to closing.

The Closing

The closing of the Asset Purchase Agreement will take place on such date and at such time and place as may be mutually agreed upon by the parties as soon as practicable after the satisfaction or waiver of all conditions in the Asset Purchase Agreement.

Survival of Representations and Warranties and Indemnification

From the closing until April 1, 2011 (the “Survival Period”), in the event either of the Sellers, on one hand, and FUSA, on the other hand (each, as applicable, an “Indemnifying Party ”) breaches any of its representations, warranties or covenants contained in the Asset Purchase Agreement, except that the representations and warranties of the Sellers with respect to organization and standing, authority, the Assets being free and clear of all encumbrances (except as provided in the disclosure schedules to the Asset Purchase Agreement), certain other representation and warranties regarding the Assets, intellectual property and brokers shall survive as long as FUSA is required to pay the Royalty Payments to the Sellers or until termination of the Asset Purchase Agreement in accordance with its terms, and provided that FUSA, in the event of a breach by any of the Sellers, or the Sellers, in the event of a breach by FUSA (each, as applicable, an “ Indemnified Party ”) makes a written claim for indemnification to the other, then the Indemnifying Party shall indemnify and hold harmless the Indemnified Party, in the event the Indemnifying Party is FUSA, from and against any and all Damages incurred by or suffered to Sellers or its affiliates by reason of (a) any of the Assumed Liabilities (as defined below), including the failure of FUSA to pay, discharge or perform any of the Assumed Liabilities as and when due; and (b) any breach of any representation or warranty of FUSA contained herein, and in the event the Indemnifying Parties are the Sellers, from and against any and all Damages incurred by or suffered to FUSA or its affiliates by reason of (x) any liability or obligation relating to any Seller or the Assets, other than Assumed Liabilities, and (y) any breach of any representation or warranty of Sellers contained in the Asset Purchase Agreement.  In the event of the final determination of any liability under the Asset Purchase Agreement from Sellers to FUSA, FUSA may, upon written notice to Sellers, setoff or recoup, in whole or in part, such amounts from the First Installment, the Second Installment and the Royalty Payments. “Damages” means any loss, liability, claim, damage and expense, including reasonable attorneys’ fees.

The indemnification liability for the Sellers is capped at $2,000,000 plus the amount of Royalty Payments that have been paid, or are due and payable, to Sellers under the Asset Purchase Agreement. In addition, neither Seller will have any indemnification liability (for indemnification or otherwise) until the aggregate amount of all Damages actually incurred or suffered by FUSA under the Asset Purchase Agreement exceeds $50,000 (the “Threshold Amount”) and then only for the amount of the damages exceeding the Threshold Amount.

 
37

 

Exclusivity

The Sellers have agreed, similar to the restrictions contained in the Exclusivity Letter, that until the earlier of the consummation of the Asset Sale and the termination of the Asset Purchase Agreement in accordance with its terms (the “Termination Date”), they would not directly or indirectly (i) solicit or take any other action to facilitate any offers from third parties with respect to the acquisition of the Company or a part or all of the Assets, (ii) enter into an agreement to facilitate, approve or endorse such proposal or in connection with such proposal, abandon or terminate the Asset Sale transaction or (iii) enter into discussions, inquire or furnish information with respect to any such proposal (a “Acquisition Proposal”); provided, that the Sellers may prior to obtaining approval of the Asset Sale contemplated by this Proxy Statement engage in negotiations or discussions with any party that has made an unsolicited bona fide Acquisition Proposal and, subject to certain conditions, furnish nonpublic information regarding the Company to such party, provided that our Board of Directors may only take such actions if it has determined in good faith, after consultation with its advisors, that such action is required in order for the Board of Directors to comply with its fiduciary obligations to our stockholders under applicable law (the “Superior Proposal”). We agreed to promptly notify FUSA of any Acquisition Proposal, the terms thereof and requests related thereto. We will promptly consider in good faith any proposed alteration of the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement in response to any Acquisition Proposal. In addition, the parties agreed that in connection with the termination of the Asset Purchase Agreement as a result of any Seller proceeding with a Superior Proposal, contemporaneously with the closing of a transaction contemplated by a Superior Proposal, such terminating Seller shall be obligated to pay a termination fee of $2,500,000 to FUSA.  In the event such terminating Seller is the Company, the Company also agreed to reimburse FUSA for, among other things, all its reasonably incurred development expenses in connection with the provision of the Services (as defined below) by certain personnel of the Company to FUSA.

Termination

The Asset Purchase Agreement may be terminated under certain circumstances, including:

 
·
by the mutual agreement of FUSA and the Sellers;
 
 
·
by the Sellers or FUSA if any governmental authority shall have issued a final order, decree or ruling or taken any other action, which has the effect of permanently restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the transactions contemplated under the Asset Purchase Agreement;
 
 
·
by the Sellers if the board of directors of any Seller determines in good faith that it has received a Superior Proposal (as defined below) and that it is required to terminate the Asset Purchase Agreement in order to comply with its fiduciary duties, and otherwise complies with certain terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement;
 
 
·
by FUSA if the Stockholder Approvals have not been obtained on or before February 28, 2010; and
 
 
·
subject to certain limitations, by FUSA or any Seller, if the closing has not occurred on or before February 28, 2010 and the Asset Purchase Agreement has not previously been terminated.

Any termination of the Asset Purchase Agreement would be effective immediately upon delivery of a valid written notice of the terminating party to the other parties. If any party terminates the Asset Purchase Agreement, all obligations of the parties terminate without any liability of any party to any other party (except for any liability of any party for willful breaches of the Asset Purchase Agreement).

In connection with the termination as a result of any Seller proceeding with a Superior Proposal, contemporaneously with the closing of a transaction contemplated by a Superior Proposal, such terminating Seller shall be obligated to pay a termination fee of $2,500,000 to FUSA. In the event such terminating Seller is the Company, we also agreed to reimburse FUSA for, among other things, all of its reasonably incurred development expenses in connection with the provision of the Services (as defined below) by certain of our personnel to FUSA.

Side Agreement

In connection with the Asset Purchase Agreement, we entered into a side agreement, dated December 14, 2009 (the “Side Agreement”), with FUSA pursuant to which (i) subject to the approval of the lessor, FUSA agreed on the Closing Date to assume the lease agreement of our operating facility located at 80 Empire Drive, Lake Forest, California 92630 (the “Lease”) and in consideration of such assumption, we agreed to pay to FUSA on the Closing Date the amount of $175,000, representing approximately six months of rent and common area expenses that are expected to be incurred by FUSA under the Lease following the Closing Date, (ii) FUSA engaged us to perform such consulting, advisory and related services through three employees of the Company, including Dr. Victor Gura, our Chief Scientific and Medical Officer (collectively, the “Employees”), to and for FUSA as may be reasonably requested from time to time by FUSA and its affiliates (the “Services”), for the period beginning on November 16, 2009 and ending on the Closing Date, unless sooner terminated in accordance with the terms of the Side Agreement, and in consideration for the Services rendered by us during such term, FUSA agreed to pay to us a cash fee, payable in semi-monthly installments, at the annual rate for the full-time services of each of the Employees, as more fully described in the Side Agreement, and (iii) in consideration of FUSA having incurred and continuing to incur certain expenses on our behalf, we agreed to reimburse FUSA for certain of its expenses reasonably incurred on our behalf, including, tooling, prototyping and intellectual property maintenance expenses, all reasonably documented third party expenses incurred by FUSA in negotiating and documenting the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement and the Side Agreement (including FUSA’s reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses), consulting fees and certain other miscellaneous consulting expenses, in the event the closing under the Asset Purchase Agreement does not take place as a result of the Company consummating a Superior Proposal.  Pursuant to the Side Agreement, the Company has received payments in an aggregate amount of $197,291.64 for the Services of the Employees to FUSA and the Employees continued to receive their normal compensation from the Company in approximately the same aggregate amount.

 
38

 

The material terms of the Side Agreement are summarized above and a copy of the Side Agreement is attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex D. Stockholders are urged to carefully review the Side Agreement in its entirety.

Voting Agreement

In connection with the execution of the Asset Purchase Agreement, certain of the Sellers’ executive officers and/or directors executed a Stockholder Voting Agreement (the “Voting Agreement”).  Under the Voting Agreement, such directors and/or executive officers of the Company have committed (i) to vote all of the shares of the Company’s common stock owned by them as of December 14, 2009, together with all shares of our common stock acquired by them as a result of the exercise of any options owned by them as of such date, in favor of the adoption of the Asset Purchase Agreement and the approval of the Asset Sale, and (ii) subject to certain exceptions, not to enter into discussions concerning or provide confidential information in connection with alternative business combination transactions.  The shares subject to the Voting Agreement constitute approximately 41.4% of our outstanding common stock as of Record Date, and more than 50% of NQCI’s outstanding voting securities. The terms of the Voting Agreement are summarized above and a copy of the Voting Agreement is annexed as Exhibit B to the Asset Purchase Agreement, which is attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex A. Stockholders are urged to carefully review the Voting Agreement in its entirety.

Description of the Arbitration Proceeding and Other Agreements Entered Into With NQCI

The following is a brief summary of certain key provisions of the Partial Final Award issued on April 13, 2009 in our arbitration proceeding with NQCI as such relate to the Asset Purchase Agreement and certain key provisions of the Binding Memorandum of Understanding and the Agreement, dated as of August 7, 2009 (the “Memorandum”), and Stipulation Regarding Partial Final Award, dated as of August 7, 2009 (the “Stipulation”), entered into between us, Operations and NQCI. These descriptions are qualified in their entirety by reference to the descriptions of our legal proceedings set forth in our Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports. Stockholders are urged to read the full descriptions of our legal proceedings set forth in our Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports and the Memorandum and the Stipulation in their entirety.

Arbitration Proceeding with NQCI and the Issuance of the Partial Final Award

On December 1, 2006, we initiated the arbitration proceeding (the “Proceeding”) against NQCI for its alleged breach of the License Agreement (as defined below). On April 13, 2009, the arbitrator (the “Arbitrator”) in the Proceeding issued a Partial Final Award, which resolved the remaining issues that were pending for decision in the Proceeding. The Partial Final Award provided that we shall have a perpetual exclusive license (the “Perpetual License”) to the Technology (as defined in the Merger Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2006, or the “Merger Agreement”, among the Sellers and the License Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2006 (the “License Agreement”), between us and NQCI) primarily related to the WAK and any other Technology contemplated to be transferred under the Technology Transaction. Under the terms of the Partial Final Award, in consideration of the award of the Perpetual License to us, NQCI was awarded a royalty of 39% of all net income, ordinary or extraordinary, to be received by us (the “Royalty”) and NQCI is to receive 39% of any shares received in any merger transaction to which Xcorporeal or Operations may become a party. In addition, the Partial Final Award provided that we were obligated to pay NQCI $1,871,430 for its attorneys’ fees and costs previously awarded by the Arbitrator in an order issued on August 13, 2008, that NQCI’s application for interim royalties and expenses was denied and that NQCI was not entitled to recover any additional attorneys’ fees. The Partial Final Award followed the issuance by the arbitrator of an Interim Award on June 9, 2008. The Interim Award would have required us to issue 9,230,000 shares of our common stock to NQCI in exchange for the transfer of the Technology to us. The primary reason for the change in the relief provided for under the Interim Award (the requirement to issue shares) and the Partial Final Award (the royalty referred to above) resulted from our concern, expressed to the arbitrator, that such shares could not be issued to NQCI in compliance with the federal securities laws because of the financial condition of NQCI.

 Binding Memorandum of Understanding

On August 7, 2009, to clarify, resolve and settle disputes that have arisen between us and NQCI with respect to the Partial Final Award, including with respect to the rights of the parties regarding the Supersorbent Technology and the application of the Partial Final Award in the case of a sale of the Technology, we and Operations entered into the Memorandum with NQCI. Under the terms of the Memorandum, among other things, the parties agreed to: (i) assign and transfer all of their rights, title and interest in and to certain technology comprised of a certain U.S. Patent Application and related intellectual property (as described in the Memorandum) (the “Polymer Technology”) to a limited liability company to be formed under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “Joint Venture”), which was to be jointly owned by the parties and through which the parties would jointly pursue the development and exploitation of the Polymer Technology, and (ii) negotiate, execute and deliver within 60 days following the date of the Special Meeting an operating agreement governing the operation of the Joint Venture based on the terms set forth in the Memorandum (the “Operating Agreement”). However, as a result of the execution of the Asset Purchase Agreement and the intended transfer of all or substantially all of the Sellers’ assets thereunder, including all of the Sellers’ intellectual property, to FUSA, the parties have since abandoned their efforts to pursue the Operating Agreement.

 
39

 

Agreement and Stipulation Regarding Partial Final Award

In connection with the issuance of the Partial Final Award and the execution of the Memorandum, on August 7, 2009 Operations entered into the Stipulation with NQCI. Pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation, Operations and NQCI agreed (i) not to challenge the terms of the Partial Final Award or any portion of such award, (ii) that any of the parties may, at any time, seek to confirm all but not part of the Partial Final Award through the filing of an appropriate petition or motion with the appropriate court and in response to such action to confirm the Partial Final Award, no party will oppose, object to or in any way seek to hinder or delay the court’s confirmation of the Partial Final Award, but will in fact support and stipulate to such confirmation, and (iii) to waive any and all right to appeal from, seek appellate review of, file or prosecute any lawsuit, action, motion or proceeding, in law, equity, or otherwise, challenging, opposing, seeking to modify or otherwise attacking the confirmed Partial Final Award or the judgment thereon. In addition, under the terms of the Stipulations, as of December 1, 2009, NQCI has not attempted to execute on or file any motion, petition or application or commence any proceeding seeking the collection of any attorneys’ fees that have been awarded in NQCI’s favor under the terms of the Partial Final Award (the “Collection Action”), which was intended to allow the Parties a sufficient period within which to execute the Asset Purchase Agreement. In addition, in accordance with the terms of the Memorandum and as a result of the execution of the Asset Purchase Agreement, NQCI agreed not to proceed with the Collection Action until April 1, 2010 (the “Extension Date”) and the Extension Date shall automatically be further extended for a period of 60 days for each amendment to this Proxy Statement that we will file with the SEC in response to comments made by the SEC.

Payment of a Portion of the Aggregate Consideration to NQCI

Pursuant to the terms of the Memorandum and the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement and subject to the consummation of the Asset Sale, the Sellers have agreed that upon the consummation of the Asset Sale, they will allocate the Cash Purchase Price, the Royalty Payments and any other additional consideration received pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement as follows:
 
·      the Cash Purchase Price shall be paid to the Sellers as follows:
 
o      an exclusivity fee in the amount of $200,000 previously paid by FUSA to the Company,
 
o      $3,800,000 on the Closing Date (the “Initial Payment”),
 
o      $2,000,000 on April 1, 2010 as the First Installment,
 
o      $2,000,000 on April 1, 2011 as the Second Installment,
 
§      from the Initial Payment, we and NQCI will receive $1,650,000 and $2,150,000, respectively,
 
§      from the First Installment, we and NQCI will receive $375,000 and $1,625,000, respectively, and
 
§      from the Second Installment, we and NQCI will receive $75,000 and $1,925,000, respectively,
 
·      during the life of any HD WAK Patents, which expire between November 11, 2021 and September 9, 2024, we will be entitled to 60% of the HD WAK Royalty and NQCI will be entitled to the remaining 40% of the HD WAK Royalty, and
 
·      during the life of any Supersorbent Patents, we will be entitled to 40% of the Supersorbent Royalty payments and NQCI will be entitled to the remaining 60% of the Supersorbent Royalty. While several applications for patents are pending, no patent incorporating the Supersorbent Technology has yet been issued.
 
·      In addition, under the Asset Purchase Agreement, we and NQCI will also receive rights to the Option.

In the aggregate, if the Asset Sale is consummated, we would receive $2,300,000 (including the exclusivity fee of $200,000) and NQCI would receive $5,700,000 of the Cash Purchase Price.  In addition, of the Cash Purchase Price being paid to NQCI, $1,871,430  is being paid to satisfy our liability to NQCI for NQCI’s attorneys’ fees and costs awarded by the arbitrator pursuant to the terms of the Partial Final Award.

In the event that for any reason the timing or the amount of the payments under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement is other than as contemplated above, pursuant to the terms of the Memorandum the Sellers agreed to make such equitable adjustments as are required to preserve, to the maximum extent possible, the intent of the distribution of Transaction Proceeds pursuant to the provisions of the Memorandum. In the event that Asset Sale is not approved by our stockholders or we do not consummate the Asset Sale or if the terms of the Asset Sale are other than what is contemplated under the Memorandum and the Sellers instead consummate an alternative transaction, the Sellers agreed to apply the methodology specified in the Memorandum to the maximum extent possible in order to allocate between them the proceeds of such Transaction.

 
40

 
 
Pro Forma Financial Information
 
The following unaudited pro forma financial statements have been prepared to present the balance sheet as if the Asset Sale closed on September 30, 2009. Also presented are the Statement of Operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, as if the Asset Sale closed on January 1, 2008. Such pro forma financial statements were derived from our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and our unaudited consolidated financial statements for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009. The unaudited pro forma financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles on the basis of specific information and assumptions available at the present time regarding the transaction.
 
These unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and the related notes as filed as part of our Form 10-K and our unaudited financial statements and the related notes filed as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Form 10-Q”), attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex F. In addition, our stockholders should review the table on page 49 of this Proxy Statement, which presents possible outcomes of our highest and lowest estimates in the amount of our contractual liabilities that will exist as of the Closing Date and the per share amount of our portion of the cash proceeds of the Asset Sale that may be then available for distribution, if any, by the Trustee to our stockholders depending on certain possible outcomes related to the value of such contractual liabilities. The Company is currently attempting to negotiate settlements of such liabilities. The pro forma financial statements do not reflect such estimates and other assumptions made by the Company in the table on page 49 of this Proxy Statement.
 
XCORPOREAL, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
UNAUDITED PROFORMA
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
 
 
   
December 31, 2008
   
Proforma Adjustments
   
Notes
   
Proforma Statement of Operations After Asset Sale
 
Operating Expenses:
                       
Selling, general and administrative
  $ 9,001,819     $ 2,626,366      
A
    $ 11,628,185  
Research and development
    20,914,825       1,238,925      
B
      22,153,750  
Other expenses
    1,871,430       -               1,871,430  
Depreciation and amortization
    104,719       -               104,719  
                                 
Loss before other income, income taxes and other expenses
    (31,892,793 )     (3,865,291 )             (35,758,084 )
                                 
Gain on Asset Sale
    -       3,668,308      
C
      3,668,308  
Gain on Debt Settlement
    -       -               -  
Reduction of liabilities due to arbitrator's ruling & settlement
    -       1,585,299      
 D
      1,585,299  
Loss on disposal
    -       (3,627 )    
 E
      (3,627 )
Interest and other income
    323,249       -               323,249  
Change in and reduction of shares issuable
    8,583,900       1,569,100      
F
      10,153,000  
                                 
Loss before income taxes and other expenses
    (22,985,644 )     2,953,789               (20,031,855 )
                                 
Income taxes
    1,629       -               1,629  
                                 
Net loss
  $ (22,987,273 )   $ 2,953,789             $ (20,033,484 )
                                 
Basic and diluted loss per share
  $ (1.57 )                   $ (1.37 )
                                 
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
    14,604,274                       14,604,274  
 
 
 
41

 

 
XCORPOREAL, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
UNAUDITED PROFORMA
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
 
   
September 30, 2009
   
Proforma Adjustments
   
Notes
   
Proforma Statement of Operations After Asset Sale
 
                         
Operating Expenses:
                       
Selling, general and administrative
  $ 3,493,481     $ (446,013 )    
G
    $ 3,047,468  
Research and development
    2,415,055       (189,692 )    
H
      2,225,363  
Other expenses
    -       -               -  
Depreciation and amortization
    92,274       -               92,274  
                                 
Loss before other income, income taxes and other expenses
    (6,000,810 )     635,705               (5,365,105 )
                                 
Gain on Asset Sale
    -       -               -  
Gain on Debt Settlement
    -       436,677      
I
      436,677  
Reduction of liabilities due to arbitrator's ruling & settlement
    1,647,799       -               1,647,799  
Loss on disposal
    (382 )     -               (382 )
Interest and other income
    11,657       -               11,657  
Change in and reduction of shares issuable
    1,569,100       -               1,569,100  
                                 
Loss before income taxes and other expenses
    (2,772,636 )     1,072,382               (1,700,254 )
                                 
Income taxes
    775       -               775  
                                 
Net loss
  $ (2,773,411 )   $ 1,072,382             $ (1,701,029 )
                                 
Basic and diluted loss per share
  $ (0.19 )                   $ (0.12 )
                                 
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
    14,756,152                       14,756,152  
 
 
 
42

 

XCORPOREAL, INC.
(a Development Stage Company)
UNAUDITED PROFORMA
BALANCE SHEET
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
 
 
   
September 30, 2009
   
Proforma Adjustments
   
Notes
   
Proforma Balance Sheet After Asset Sale
 
                         
ASSETS
                       
Current
                       
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 35,734     $ (35,734 )    
J
    $ 0  
Marketable securities, at fair value
    288,703       (288,703 )    
K
      -  
Restricted cash
    305,871       (305,871 )    
L
      -  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    123,351       (123,351 )    
M
      0  
Accounts receivable
    -       493,260      
N
      493,260  
Expense receivable
    54,641       (42,905 )    
O
      11,736  
Tenant improvement allowance receivable
    43,260       (43,260 )    
P
      -  
Total Current Assets
    851,560       (346,564 )             504,996  
                                 
Property and equipment, net
    246,804       (243,163 )    
Q
      3,641  
                                 
Other assets
    819       (819 )    
R
      -  
                                 
Total Assets
  $ 1,099,183     $ (590,546 )           $ 508,637  
                                 
LIABILITIES
                               
Current
                               
Accounts payable
  $ 945,385     $ 125,585      
S
    $ 1,070,970  
Accrued legal fees and licensing expense
    1,871,430       (1,871,430 )    
T
      -  
Accrued royalties
    -       -               -  
Accrued professional fees
    442,444       56,250      
U
      498,694  
Accrued compensation
    143,040       258,233      
V
      401,273  
Accrued other liabilities
    72,137       (11,315 )    
W
      60,822  
Payroll liabilities
    1,054       4,764      
X
      5,818  
Deferred compensation
    171,513       (171,513 )    
Y
      -  
Deferred gain
    200,000       (200,000 )    
Z
      -  
Onerous lease
    -       775,700    
AA
      775,700  
Deferred rent
    280,390       (280,390 )  
BB
      (0 )
Total Current Liabilities
    4,127,393       (1,314,116 )             2,813,277  
                                 
Shares issuable
    -       -               -  
                                 
COMMITMENTS & CONTINGENCIES
         
                                 
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
                         
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding
    -       -               -  
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized, 15,154,687 and 14,754,687 issued and outstanding on September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively
    1,515       -               1,515  
Additional paid-in capital
    44,328,779       -               44,328,779  
Deficit accumulated during the development stage
    (47,358,504 )     723,570               (46,634,934 )
Total Stockholders' Deficit
    (3,028,210 )     723,570               (2,304,640 )
Total Liabilities & Stockholders' Deficit
  $ 1,099,183     $ (590,546 )           $ 508,637  
 
For purposes of determining the pro forma effect of the Asset Sale, the adjustments below have been made.
 
A.  
As a result of the consummation of the Asset Sale, severance payment in the amount of $611,500 to Messrs. McCrann and Weinstein and a transaction bonus in the amount of $432,500 to Mr. McCrann were accrued. In addition, in connection with the Asset Sale, $163,163 in prepaid expenses were expensed, remaining lease payment in the amount of $914,065 for our former principal executive office located in Los Angeles, CA were recognized, and other expenses in an aggregate total of $505,138 were accrued.
B.  
As a result of the consummation of the Asset Sale, a severance payment in the amount of $1,312,800 to Dr. Gura was accrued. In addition, $12,192 in prepaid expenses were expensed, $105,102 of deferred rent was reversed as a result of the transfer of the Lake Forest facility lease, and $19,035 of employer payroll tax was accrued.
C.  
Reflects the net gain on the Asset Sale.
D.  
Pursuant to the Partial Final Award, the amount of our liabilities due to NQCI in the arbitration was reduced.
E.  
Loss recognized from disposal of assets not included in the Asset Sale.
F.  
Pursuant to the Partial Final Award, reversed the accrual of 9,230,000 shares issuable to NQCI.
G.  
As a result of the consummation of the Asset Sale, expenditure of prepaid expenses was reversed in the amount of $53,162 pursuant to prepaid expenses as of December 31, 2008 fully expensed, full expenditure of $12,653 of the remaining prepaid expenses as of September 30, 2009, $120 credit recognition of unclaimed FSA contributions, $1,108 of employer payroll taxes accrued, depreciation and amortization reversed for an aggregate total of $241,961 pursuant to the assets sold as of December 31, 2008, and $164,531 of deferred rent reversed pursuant to the onerous lease of our former principal executive office located in Los Angeles, CA as of December 31, 2008.1
H.  
As a result of the consummation of the Asset Sale, $191,793 of deferred rent was reversed pursuant to the transfer of the Lake Forest facility lease as of December 31, 2008. In addition, $2,101 of employer payroll tax was accrued.
.
I.  
Reflects the gain from settlement of liabilities pertaining to $38,517 of compensation liabilities and $398,160 of other liabilities resulting from liquidation efforts following the consummation of the Asset Sale.
J.  
Records receipt of cash from proceeds upon closing of $1,650,000, $42,905 expense receivable, $305,871 release of restricted cash, and $288,703 pursuant to the closure of the investment account with cash used to pay severances of $1,523,027, $432,500 transaction bonus, $125,982 accrued PTO, $150,054 deferred compensation, $31,564 related employer payroll taxes, and $60,086 other liabilities.
K.  
Closure of investment account.
L.  
Release of restricted cash pursuant to the transfer of the Lake Forest facility lease.
M.  
Reflects the full expenditure of the remaining $65,815 of prepaid expenses, $20,367 Los Angeles office security deposit applied, and Lake Forest facility deposits of $37,169 refunded.
N.  
Reflects proceeds from the Asset Sale payable April 1, 2010 and April 1, 2011 plus $43,260 receivable from the unapplied tenant improvement allowance receivable.
O.  
Reflects employer payroll tax refund pursuant to COBRA premium assistance payments pending receipt.
P.  
Records accounts receivable of the unapplied tenant improvement allowance receivable to the monthly lease expense of the Lake Forest facility.
Q.  
Recognition of $241,110 net assets sold with $2,053 net disposal of assets excluded from the sale of assets.
R.  
Sale of intangible asset.
S.  
Payment of payables
T.  
NQCI legal fees pursuant to the arbitration paid directly to NQCI by the purchaser of the Asset Sale.
U.  
Settlement and accrual of professional fees totaling $393,750 and $450,000, respectively.
V.  
Reflects severance accruals of $1,924,300, $432,500 transaction bonus, $17,058 settlement, and $2,081,509 payment of a portion of these net compensation liabilities which included PTO accruals of $125,982.
W.  
Payment of accrued liabilities.
X.  
Pursuant to the payment of a portion of the compensation liabilities, related accrued employer payroll taxes paid.
Y.  
Settlement and payment of deferred compensation in the amount of $21,458 and $150,054, respectively.
Z.  
Gain recognized with consummation of Asset Sale.
AA.  
Accrued remaining lease payments for our former principal executive office located in Los Angeles, CA.
BB.  
Deferred rent reversed as a result of the LA onerous lease accrual and transfer of the Lake Forest facility lease.
 
 
 
43

 

Interests of Our Executive Officers and/or Directors in the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement

Certain of our executive officers have employment, change in control and other agreements that provide for severance payments full vesting of all unvested equity awards if any such executive officer's employment is terminated for any reason in connection with a change in control or if we terminate their employment at any time without cause or if they are constructively terminated and/or certain other payments in the event we successfully consummate the Asset Sale.

The consummation of the Asset Sale will constitute a change of control under these agreements triggering certain severance payments to our executive officers. The employment of each of these executive officers will be terminated by us either prior to or during the wind down of our activities. In either case, such terminations will be deemed terminations in connection with a change in control and/or require such other severance payments. The change of control, severance payments and/or certain other payments that will be due by the Company to our executive officers will be in the amount up to $1,924,300, if our executive officers are terminated as a result of the Asset Sale or if the Asset Sale is successfully consummated, assuming no excise tax gross-up payments are due. In particular, Kelly J. McCrann, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Robert Weinstein, our Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, and Dr. Victor Gura, our Chief Medical and Scientific Officer, may be entitled to severance payments in the amount up to $325,000, $286,500 and $1,312,800, respectively, under their employment agreements. In addition, if the Asset Sale is consummated, Mr. McCrann will be entitled to a payment of $432,500 as a sale transaction success fee.  Furthermore, in connection with certain restructuring efforts previously undertaken by us to reduce our operating expenses, Messrs. McCrann and Weinstein and Dr. Gura, may be entitled to receive deferred compensation in the amount of approximately $95,563, $83,531 and $82,050, respectively, our other employees may be entitled to receive deferred compensation, in the aggregate, of approximately $60,000, and a member of our Board of Directors may be entitled to receive deferred compensation in the amount of approximately $70,000.  Additionally, as of February 15, 2010, we estimate that certain of our employees would be entitled to receive accrued vacation pay, in the aggregate, of approximately $150,000.

In addition, Mr. McCrann (or an entity affiliated with Mr. McCrann) will also serve as the Trustee of the Liquidating Trust and under the terms of the Liquidating Trust Agreement, in the form attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex C, will receive the following compensation for his services as the Trustee: 10% of the aggregate Royalty Payments received by the Liquidating Trust up to $10 million and 5% of any Royalty Payments in excess thereof. Mr. McCrann will also be entitled to reimbursement of his expenses incurred as Trustee on behalf of the Liquidating Trust. The foregoing compensation arrangement was developed and approved by the independent members of the Board of Directors of the Company in November 2009 after Mr. McCrann informed the Board of Directors that he would be prepared to serve as trustee of the Liquidating Trust for compensation deemed appropriate by the independent members of the Board of Directors.

As of December 31, 2009, there were 1.16 million shares of common stock underlying unvested stock options held by our executive officers that will vest as a result of the Asset Sale. The weighted-average exercise price of those stock options is $3.25 per share. None of these stock options have an exercise price at or below $0.07, the last reported sale price of our common stock as quoted on the Pink Sheets on the Record Date. Since we do not anticipate that any substantial amount of our share of the Cash Purchase Price will be available for distribution to our stockholders, we anticipate that none of these stock options will be exercised. In addition, as of Record Date, our executive officers and/or directors also held 6,352,596 shares of common stock that will be entitled to the same per share liquidating distributions from the Liquidating Trust, if any, that will be made to the other shares of common stock outstanding.

Additionally, on the Closing Date a joint venture to be formed by FUSA and Dr. Gura may enter into an employment agreement with Dr. Gura, pursuant to which Dr. Gura would assist FUSA in the further development of the Assets for a certain period after Closing Date, at a set salary to be determined by FUSA and Dr. Gura. In addition, Dr. Gura may receive an ownership stake in such joint venture. On the Closing Date, FUSA will not enter into any other employment or consulting arrangements with any of our executive officers or employees. Other than described herein, we do not know whether FUSA will enter into any employee or consulting arrangements thereafter with any of our executive officers or employees and FUSA has not notified us of any intention to do so to date.

No Opinion of Financial Advisor

Our Board of Directors has not received any opinion from a financial advisor or other third party that the cash payment to be received by us in the Asset Sale is fair, from a financial point of view, to us and our stockholders. Over the past several months, we have engaged in extensive discussions and negotiations with other potential interested acquisition parties. As described in further detail under “Background of the Asset Sale,” the consideration offered by FUSA following our extensive discussions with FUSA and other potential acquirers of our Assets was far in excess of any other indication of interest received by us. As a result of the process described above, our Board of Directors believes that it has a good understanding of the perceived market value of the Assets and what a disinterested third party would be willing to pay. Accordingly, our Board of Directors believes that the financial consideration offered by FUSA is fair to us and our stockholders.

 
44

 

Accounting Treatment

Under generally accepted accounting principles, upon consummation of the Asset Sale, we will remove the net assets sold from our consolidated balance sheet and record the gain or loss on the sale, net of transaction, severance and other related costs in its consolidated statement of operations.

Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences to the Company

The following summary of the anticipated federal income tax consequences to us of the Asset Sale is not intended as tax advice and is not intended to be a complete description of the federal income tax consequences of the Asset Sale. This summary is based upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”), as presently in effect, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, current administrative interpretations and court decisions. No assurance can be given that future legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions will not significantly change these authorities, possibly with retroactive effect. No rulings have been requested or received from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) as to the matters discussed and there is no intent to seek any such ruling. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the IRS will not challenge the tax treatment of certain matters discussed or, if it does challenge the tax treatment, that it will not be successful.

The Asset Sale will be treated for federal income tax purposes as a taxable sale upon which gain or loss will be recognized by us. The amount of gain or loss recognized by us with respect to the sale of a particular asset will be measured by the difference between the amount realized by us on the sale of that asset and our tax basis in that asset. The amount realized by us on the Asset Sale will include the amount of cash received, the fair market value of any other property received, and total liabilities assumed or taken subject to by FUSA. For purposes of determining the amount realized by us with respect to specific assets, the total amount realized by us will generally be allocated among the assets according to the rules prescribed under Section 1060(a) of the Code. Our basis in our assets is generally equal to their cost, as adjusted for certain items, such as depreciation. The determination of whether gain or loss is recognized by us will be made with respect to each of the assets to be sold. Accordingly, we may recognize gain on the sale of certain assets and loss on the sale of certain others, depending on the amount of consideration allocated to an asset as compared with the basis of that asset.

Generally, the proposed sale of substantially all of our operating assets will not produce any separate and independent federal income tax consequences to our stockholders.

Each stockholder is urged to consult his or her own tax advisor as to the federal income tax consequences of the Asset Sale, and as to any state, local, foreign or other tax consequences based on his or her particular facts and circumstances.

EACH STOCKHOLDER SHOULD CONSULT ITS OWN TAX ADVISOR TO DETERMINE THE STOCKHOLDER’S PARTICULAR U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES AND OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES TO THE STOCKHOLDER OF THE ASSET SALE, INCLUDING ANY STATE, LOCAL AND FOREIGN TAX LAWS AND THE EFFECT OF ANY CHANGES IN SUCH LAWS.

Votes Required for the Approval of the Sale of Substantially All of the Assets of Xcorporeal

The approval of the Asset Sale requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

Recommendation of Our Board of Directors

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS DETERMINED THAT THE ASSET SALE IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF OUR COMPANY AND OUR STOCKHOLDERS. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS APPROVED THE ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “ FOR ” THE ASSET SALE PROPOSAL.

 
45

 

PROPOSAL NO. 2: APPROVAL OF THE PLAN OF LIQUIDATION AND DISSOLUTION

General

At the Special Meeting, our stockholders will be asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to voluntarily dissolve and liquidate the Company and if the Asset Sale Proposal and the Plan of Liquidation Proposal are approved by our stockholders, to consider and vote upon a proposal to transfer to the Liquidating Trust any available proceeds and payment rights received from the sale of our Assets and any other assets not used to satisfy our liabilities and obligations. If the Asset Sale Proposal, this proposal and the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal are approved and the Asset Sale is consummated, we will transfer to the Liquidating Trust the Remaining Assets and Remaining Liabilities and the trustee of the Liquidating Trust may make distributions to our stockholders in the future as beneficiaries of the trust. For a discussion of the actions we will take (i) if the Asset Sale is not approved by our stockholders, but the Plan of Liquidation is approved by our stockholders, or (ii) if the Asset Sale and the Plan of Liquidation are approved by our stockholders, but the Liquidating Trust Agreement is not approved by our stockholders, please see below under the section captioned “─Principal Provisions of the Plan of Liquidation.”

In giving consideration for approval of this Proposal No. 2 and the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal (Proposal No. 3), we urge our stockholders to read the discussion of Proposal No. 2 set forth below together with the discussion of the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal, which is set forth below under the caption “Proposal No. 3: Approval of the Liquidating Trust Agreement”.

A copy of the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement are attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex B and Annex C, respectively. Stockholders are urged to carefully review the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement in their entirety.

Background and Reasons for the Proposed Liquidation and Dissolution

Background for the Proposed Liquidation and Dissolution

The deterioration of the economy over the last 18 months, coupled with the prolonged delay in our ability to reach a resolution with respect to the consummation of the Technology Transaction, has significantly adversely affected us. Many of the expectations on which we had based our 2008 and 2009 business development plans slowly eroded as a result of the lengthy arbitration proceeding with NQCI commenced in 2006 and continuing into the second quarter of 2009. The possibility of an adverse decision in the arbitration proceeding with respect to our ownership right to the Technology has been a major factor in our inability to secure debt or equity financing. Accordingly, during the first nine months of 2009, we modified certain of our activities and business and instituted a variety of measures in an attempt to conserve cash and reduce our operating expenses. Our actions included: termination of employment of 20 of our employees or a reduction of approximately 77% of our labor force, deferral of compensation for 5 of our 6 employees with continued deferral for 3 of our 6 employees, reaching an agreement with the landlord for our operating facility in Lake Forest, CA, to apply $88,865, in lieu of reimbursement of such amount to us expended for the incurred improvements at such facility, toward rent payments with $45,605 applied as of September 30, 2009, refocusing our available assets and employee resources on the development of the PAK, agreeing to a direct reimbursement arrangement for PAK related research and development expenses with a certain third party with which we have agreed to an exclusivity period to negotiate a potential cooperative transaction, continuing vigorous efforts to minimize or defer our operating expenses, searching to obtain additional financing to support our operations and to satisfy our ongoing capital requirements in order to improve our liquidity position and continuing to prosecute our patents and take other steps to perfect our intellectual property rights. In light of the unprecedented economic slowdown, lack of access to capital markets and prolonged arbitration proceeding with NQCI, we were compelled to undertake the efforts outlined above in order to remain in the position to continue our operations. For a more detailed discussion of our restructuring efforts, please see section captioned “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Recent Developments” in our Form 10-Q, attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex F.

Due to our continuing substantially deteriorating financial position, we have continued some of the actions outlined above and will continue our efforts to streamline our operations in order to conserve any available resources. Our management evaluated any possible strategic alternatives, including entering into a transaction for the sale of substantially all or all of our assets, a business combination with another entity in a transaction where we would not be the surviving entity, licensing of certain of our intellectual property rights, as a means to further develop our technologies, discontinuing our operations and liquidating our assets and/or seeking protection under bankruptcy laws.

Unfortunately, none of the strategic alternatives that we pursued resulted in any agreements or transactions that offered long range success for the Company or means of securing additional financing. Because we have been unable to raise financing sufficient to support our operations and to satisfy our ongoing financing requirements, we have been unable to develop any of our products, submit 510(k) notifications to the FDA, conduct clinical trials or otherwise commercialize any of our products. In addition, we have been unable to take any efforts to continue the development of the PAK.

After an extensive review of a range of our strategic alternatives, including our continuing as an independent entity, exploring mergers and acquisitions and any possible financing arrangements and considerable efforts to maximize the value of our assets, our Board of Directors believes that the Asset Purchase Agreement presents the best offer for the sale of the Assets that will maximize stockholder value. If the Asset Sale is consummated and the Plan of Liquidation is approved, the Board of Directors believes that such actions would increase the possibility that we will be able to distribute liquidation proceeds from the Liquidating Trust to our stockholders as soon as practicable, including our share of any Royalty Payments made by FUSA and any value realized from our rights to the Option that could be available in the future for distribution to our stockholders.

 
46

 

As a result of the conditions outlined above and in connection with the execution of the Asset Purchase Agreement, our Board of Directors has determined that it is in the Company’s and our stockholders’ best interests to proceed with the Plan of Liquidation.

As of December 31, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities of approximately $0.2 million, excluding restricted cash. Based upon our restructuring efforts taken to date, including the voluntary deferral of 50% of the salaries of our three officers, we have been expending cash at a rate below $0.1 million per month, and expect to expend such resources at the same rate for the remainder of the first quarter of 2010 fiscal year. Under the current economic conditions and based on our current cash and cash equivalent resources and salary deferrals, including the exclusivity fee in the amount of $200,000 received by us in September 2009, and using assumptions that by nature are imprecise, our management believes that we will run out of cash by February 28, 2010. We will attempt, if possible, to further reduce our monthly cash burn rate and take certain other additional measures, including deferral of payments to certain parties, in order to provide an additional 30 days for us to hold the Special Meeting to give the opportunity to our stockholders to vote on the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement. In addition, in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation and the Memorandum, we are obligated to pay damages, costs and legal fees in connection with the arbitration proceeding with NQCI described above in an amount of $1,871,430. Moreover, our current liabilities significantly exceeded our current assets as of December 31, 2009 and as of the date of this Proxy Statement. Therefore, because we have been unsuccessful in our efforts to secure additional capital or sell any or all of our Assets, this has caused a material adverse effect on our plan of operations and unless the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement proposals are approved by our stockholders and the Asset Sale is consummated, we will forced to file for bankruptcy and cease our operations.

Prior to the mailing of this Proxy Statement, in connection with the Asset Sale, our Board of Directors adopted the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution of Xcorporeal, Inc. and the Liquidating Trust Agreement and directed that the Plan of Liquidation Proposal and the Liquidating Trust Agreement Proposal be submitted to our stockholders for approval at the Special Meeting.

Reasons for the Proposed Liquidation and Dissolution

In considering the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement, our Board of Directors carefully considered the terms of the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement and the dissolution process under Delaware law, as well as other available strategic alternatives. As part of our Board of Directors’ evaluation process, they considered the risks and timing of each alternative available to us, as well as management’s financial projections, and consulted with management and our legal and financial advisors. In approving the Plan of Liquidation, our Board of Directors considered several of the factors set out above as well as the following factors:

 
·
seeking to make available for distribution to our stockholders rights with the potential to yield the maximum amount of cash in the quickest period of time and taking such actions would increase the possibility that we will be able to distribute liquidation proceeds from the Liquidating Trust to our stockholders as soon as practicable, including our share of any Royalty Payments made by FUSA and any value realized from our rights to the Option under the Asset Purchase Agreement;
 
 
·
the significant costs associated with our ongoing operations, which we had already reduced to the extent management believed reasonable to permit continuation of our operations;
 
 
·
the significant uncertainties as to our ability to obtain the future financing required to permit us to execute our business strategy given the capital raising difficulties in the debt and equity capital markets;
 
 
·
the substantial accounting, legal and other expenses associated with being a small publicly-traded company in light of our existing and expected history of losses;
 
 
·
the ability to settle contingent liabilities and if such contingent liabilities cannot be settled to the satisfaction of our Board, the ability to seek confirmation from a court that all liabilities are satisfied prior to liquidation;
 
 
·
the terms and conditions of the Plan of Liquidation, including the provisions that permit our Board to revoke the plan if our Board determines that, in light of new proposals presented or changes in circumstances, dissolution and liquidation are no longer advisable and in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders;
 
 
·
the fact that Delaware corporate law requires that the Plan of Liquidation be approved by the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote, which ensures that our Board will not be taking actions of which a significant portion of our stockholders disapprove; and
 
 
·
the reduced cost of setting up the Liquidating Trust and implementing the Plan of Liquidation, coupled with the termination of our registration and reporting obligations under the Exchange Act, compared to the cost of operating a scaled-down public company.

Our Board of Directors also considered a number of potentially countervailing factors in its deliberations concerning the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement, including:

 
47

 

 
·
the uncertainty of the timing, nature and amount of any Royalty Payments and resulting liquidating distributions to stockholders;
 
 
·
uncertainty of the value, if any, of our rights to the Option;
 
 
·
the risks associated with the sale of the Assets to FUSA and any remaining non-cash assets as part of the Plan of Liquidation; and
 
 
·
the fact that, if the Plan of Liquidation is approved by our stockholders, stockholders would generally not be permitted to transfer shares of our common stock after the effective date of the Plan of Liquidation.

The preceding discussion is not meant to be an exhaustive description of the information and factors considered by our Board of Directors, but addresses the material information and factors considered. In view of the wide variety of factors considered in connection with its evaluation of the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement and the complexity of these matters, our Board of Directors did not quantify or otherwise attempt to assign relative weights to the various factors considered in reaching its determination. In considering the factors described above, individual members of our Board of Directors may have given different weight to different factors. After taking into account all of the factors set forth above, as well as others, our Board of Directors agreed that the benefits of the Asset Sale followed by our liquidation and dissolution pursuant to the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement outweigh the risks.

The Plan of Liquidation is Not Contingent Upon the Approval and Consummation of the Asset Sale

In lieu of satisfying all of our liabilities and obligations prior to making any transfers to the Liquidating Trust and eventual distributions by the Trustee to our stockholders, we may instead reserve assets deemed by management and our Board of Directors to be adequate to provide for such liabilities and obligations.

Uncertainties as to the precise value of the Royalty Payments and any value that we may realize from our rights to the Option and the ultimate amount of our liabilities make it impracticable to predict the aggregate net value ultimately distributable to stockholders. Claims, liabilities and expenses from operations (including, but not limited to, operating costs such as salaries, directors' fees, income taxes, payroll and local taxes, legal, accounting and miscellaneous office expenses), although currently declining, will continue to be incurred following stockholder approval of the Asset Sale and the approval and adoption of the Plan of Liquidation. These expenses will reduce the amount of assets available for ultimate distribution to our stockholders, if any, and, while a precise estimate of those expenses cannot currently be made, our management and Board of Directors estimates that available cash will be adequate to provide for our obligations, liabilities, expenses and claims (including contingent liabilities) and we will make every effort to maximize any distributions to be made to our stockholders. However, no assurances can be given that available cash and amounts received on the Asset Sale and the sale of our remaining assets will be adequate to provide for our obligations, liabilities, expenses and claims and to make cash distributions to stockholders. If such available cash and amounts received on the Asset Sale and the sale of our remaining assets are not adequate to provide for our obligations, liabilities, expenses and claims, distributions of cash to our stockholders will be reduced and could be eliminated.

Estimated Distribution to Stockholders

Subject to the approval of our stockholders of the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement and the consummation of the Asset Sale, the following table shows our management's estimate of cash proceeds and outlines our best estimate of potential distributions that could be made by the Trustee from the Liquidating Trust to our stockholders as of the date of this Proxy Statement. Our independent registered public accounting firm has not performed any procedures with respect to the information in the following table and, accordingly, does not express any form of assurance on that information. The following estimates are not guarantees and they do not reflect the total range of possible outcomes. The actual amount of our share of the Royalty Payments that may be received by us or the value we may derive from of our rights to the Option that may be realized by us in the future, if any, cannot be determined as of the date of this Proxy Statement. The table assumes that we will complete the proposed Asset Sale by February 28, 2010. Our current intention is to file the Certificate of Dissolution of the Company as soon as practicable after the completion of the Asset Sale. As the Trustee liquidates our share of the Royalty Payments, if any, to be paid by FUSA under the Asset Purchase Agreement and realizes any value from our rights to the Option, and we liquidate any other Remaining Assets and pay off our outstanding liabilities, the Trustee may distribute liquidation proceeds, if any, to our stockholders as the Trustee deems appropriate in its sole discretion under the terms of the Liquidating Trust. A creditor could seek an injunction against the making of distributions to our stockholders on the ground that the amounts to be distributed were needed to provide for the payment of our liabilities and expenses. To the extent the closing of the Asset Sale is delayed beyond February 28, 2010, the date on which FUSA has the right to terminate the Asset Purchase Agreement, we anticipate that we will be unable to continue as a going concern and will be forced to liquidate and file for bankruptcy.

The amount, if any, that the Trustee may ultimately distribute to our stockholders following liquidation, is heavily dependent on the success of the technology being sold to FUSA and the value of the Royalty Payments and the Option, if any. The actual amount of Royalty Payments that may be received by us or the value realized by us from our rights to the Option, if any, cannot be determined as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

 
48

 


The following table is not a guarantee of the final result of the potential contractual liabilities referenced above, but rather, merely presents possible outcomes of our highest and lowest estimates in the amount of our contractual liabilities that will exist as of the Closing Date and the per share amount of our portion of the Cash Purchase Price that would be then available for distribution, if any, by the Trustee to our stockholders depending on certain possible outcomes related to the value of such contractual liabilities. However, the actual amount of Royalty Payments that may be received by us in the future, if any, cannot be determined as of the date of this Proxy Statement. None of the Cash Purchase Price will be distributed to our stockholders under either the highest or lowest estimates of our contractual liabilities that will exists as of the Closing date.
 
   
High (1)
   
Low (2)
 
   
(in thousands, except per share)
 
Assets
               
Net Proceeds of Asset Sale (3)
 
$
2,262
   
$
2,262
 
Cash & cash equivalents at closing
 
$
0
   
$
0
 
All other assets
 
$
0
   
$
0
 
Total Assets
 
$
2,262
   
$
2,262
 
                 
Liabilities
               
Accounts payable
 
$
1,092
   
$
550
 
Accrued expenses (4)
 
$
401
   
$
329
 
Asset Sale expenses (5)
 
$
1,016
   
$
616
 
Wind down liabilities (6)
 
$
3,095
   
$
1,170
 
                 
Total Liabilities
 
$
5,604
   
$
2,665
 
                 
Net negative balance of cash available as a result of the Asset Sale
 
$
(3,342
)   
$
(403
) 
Net cash available for transfer to the Liquidating Trust as of the Closing Date
 
$
0
   
$
0
 
($ per share based on 15,354,687 shares outstanding as of January 4, 2010)
 
$
N/A
   
$
N/A
 

 
(1)
The low estimate assumes the highest amount of our contractual liabilities that we would expect to be liable for as of the Closing Date.
 
 
(2)
The high estimate assumes the most favorable resolution of our known contractual liabilities existing as of the Closing Date.
 
 
(3)
Represents $2,100,000 as our portion of the Cash Purchase Price (not including $200,000 received by us as the exclusivity fee) and includes receipt of $300,000 underlying the letter of credit issued to the landlord of our operating facility less $175,000 payable to FUSA in connection with its assumption of such lease pursuant to the Side Agreement, plus return of our a security deposit of $37,000 deposited with the landlord upon the execution of such lease.
 
 
(4)
Includes $261,144 of deferred compensation payable to our executive officers.
 
 
(5)
Includes $432,500 of sale transaction success bonus payable to our Chief Executive Officer.
 
 
(6)
Wind down liabilities primarily consist of the estimated severance costs of $611,500 and up to approximately $1.924 million that may be due to our executive officers less amounts paid through the expected Closing Date (as more fully discussed herein), and a range of estimates on additional expenses including up to approximately $740,000 as the remaining payments due under the lease of our principal executive offices and legal fees associated with the wind down of approximately $88,000.

We will attempt, if possible, to negotiate and take certain other additional measures, including deferral of payments to certain parties, in order to reduce our aggregate liabilities.

Sale of our Assets

The Plan of Liquidation gives our Board of Directors the authority to sell all or substantially all our remaining assets following our dissolution.  Approval of the Plan of Liquidation constitutes stockholder approval of any and all such sales and we will not require any further stockholder vote with respect to the approval of the specific terms of any particular asset sale approved by our Board of Directors. We may conduct sales by any means, including by competitive bidding or private negotiations. The prices at which we may be able to sell our share of the rights to any Royalty Payments or our rights to the Option will depend largely on factors beyond our control, including, without limitation, the value of such rights, the condition of the technology being sold to FUSA, FUSA’s ability to develop such technology, the financial condition of FUSA, the condition of financial markets, the availability of financing to prospective purchasers of our share of the rights to the Royalty Payments and/or the Option and regulatory approvals, as applicable.  In addition, we may not obtain as high a price for any rights to Royalty Payments or the Option as we might secure if we were not in liquidation.

 
49

 
If the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement are approved by our stockholders and the Asset Sale is consummated, we intend to transfer to the Liquidating Trust our share of the rights to any Royalty Payments and our rights to the Option and other Remaining Assets, if any, together with all of our Remaining Liabilities.

Our sale of an appreciated asset will result in the recognition of taxable gain to the extent that the proceeds from the sale of such asset exceeds our tax basis in such asset. We believe that we have sufficient useable net operating losses to offset substantially all of the federal income or gain that could be recognized by us for federal income tax purposes. As a result, we anticipate being subject only to the alternative minimum tax and related state tax liabilities, if any.

Principal Provisions of the Plan of Liquidation

Once the Plan of Liquidation is effective, the steps below will be completed at such times as our Board of Directors, in its absolute discretion, deems necessary, appropriate or advisable. A copy of the Plan of Liquidation is attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex B.

If the Asset Sale, the Plan of Liquidation and the Liquidating Trust Agreement are approved by our stockholders, we will take the following actions.

We will complete the Asset Sale and the closing of the Asset Purchase Agreement. Our officers will negotiate and consummate the sales of our other Remaining Assets and settle our contractual commitments and other liabilities insofar as our Board of Directors deems such sales necessary, appropriate or advisable. We will not solicit any further stockholder votes with respect to the approval of the specific terms of any particular sales of assets approved by our Board of Directors. On or before the date of the Special Meeting, we will establish the Liquidating Trust on the terms of the Liquidating Trust Agreement, attached hereto as Annex C, and as summarized in discussion of Proposal No. 3.

 We will file certificate of dissolution with the State of Delaware pursuant to Section 275 of the DGCL. Our dissolution will become effective, in accordance with Section 275 of the DGCL, upon proper filing of the certificate of dissolution with the Secretary of State of Delaware (the “Dissolution Date”). Pursuant to the DGCL, we will continue to exist for three years after the Dissolution Date or for such longer period as the Delaware Court of Chancery shall direct, for the purpose of prosecuting and defending suits, whether civil, criminal or administrative, by or against us, and enabling us to settle and close our business, to dispose of and convey our property, to discharge our liabilities and to distribute to our stockholders any remaining assets, but not for the purpose of continuing the business for which we were organized. Moreover, we will continue after such period for the purpose of pending legal actions.

Pursuant to the terms of the Liquidating Trust Agreement, the Trustee will pay or adequately provide for the payment of all of our known obligations and liabilities prior to any distributions to our stockholders. The Trustee of the Liquidating Trust will then distribute in accordance with the trust’s governance documents pro rata in one or more liquidating distributions over time to or for the benefit of our former stockholders and beneficiaries of the Liquidating Trust any available amount(s) of the Royalty Payments due to us or the value that the Trustee would be able to realize upon convers