UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended October 29, 2011
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-18225
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
California | 77-0059951 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
170 West Tasman Drive
San Jose, California 95134
(Address of principal executive office and zip code)
(408) 526-4000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES x NO ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x |
Accelerated filer ¨ | Non-accelerated filer ¨ | Smaller reporting company ¨ | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ¨ NO x
Number of shares of the registrants common stock outstanding as of November 15, 2011: 5,375,863,983
Cisco Systems, Inc.
FORM 10-Q for the Quarter Ended October 29, 2011
2
Item 1. | Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions, except par value)
(Unaudited)
October 29, 2011 |
July 30, 2011 |
|||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 4,747 | $ | 7,662 | ||||||
Investments |
39,641 | 36,923 | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $180 at October 29, 2011 and $204 at July 30, 2011 |
4,300 | 4,698 | ||||||||
Inventories |
1,622 | 1,486 | ||||||||
Financing receivables, net |
3,300 | 3,111 | ||||||||
Deferred tax assets |
2,158 | 2,410 | ||||||||
Other current assets |
1,499 | 941 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total current assets |
57,267 | 57,231 | ||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
3,753 | 3,916 | ||||||||
Financing receivables, net |
3,209 | 3,488 | ||||||||
Goodwill |
16,823 | 16,818 | ||||||||
Purchased intangible assets, net |
2,369 | 2,541 | ||||||||
Other assets |
3,543 | 3,101 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 86,964 | $ | 87,095 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||
Short-term debt |
$ | 589 | $ | 588 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
908 | 876 | ||||||||
Income taxes payable |
455 | 120 | ||||||||
Accrued compensation |
2,557 | 3,163 | ||||||||
Deferred revenue |
8,444 | 8,025 | ||||||||
Other current liabilities |
4,508 | 4,734 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total current liabilities |
17,461 | 17,506 | ||||||||
Long-term debt |
16,264 | 16,234 | ||||||||
Income taxes payable |
1,501 | 1,191 | ||||||||
Deferred revenue |
3,952 | 4,182 | ||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
572 | 723 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total liabilities |
39,750 | 39,836 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) |
||||||||||
Equity: |
||||||||||
Cisco shareholders equity: |
||||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value: 5 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||||
Common stock and additional paid-in capital, $0.001 par value: 20,000 shares authorized; 5,371 and 5,435 shares issued and outstanding at October 29, 2011 and July 30, 2011, respectively |
38,297 | 38,648 | ||||||||
Retained earnings |
7,910 | 7,284 | ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
981 | 1,294 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total Cisco shareholders equity |
47,188 | 47,226 | ||||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
26 | 33 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total equity |
47,214 | 47,259 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
$86,964 | $ | 87,095 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in millions, except per-share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
October 29, 2011 |
October 30, 2010 |
|||||||
NET SALES: |
||||||||
Product |
$ | 8,952 | $ | 8,700 | ||||
Service |
2,304 | 2,050 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total net sales |
11,256 | 10,750 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
COST OF SALES: |
||||||||
Product |
3,563 | 3,249 | ||||||
Service |
803 | 746 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total cost of sales |
4,366 | 3,995 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
GROSS MARGIN |
6,890 | 6,755 | ||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
||||||||
Research and development |
1,375 | 1,431 | ||||||
Sales and marketing |
2,452 | 2,402 | ||||||
General and administrative |
552 | 458 | ||||||
Amortization of purchased intangible assets |
99 | 113 | ||||||
Restructuring and other charges |
202 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total operating expenses |
4,680 | 4,404 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
OPERATING INCOME |
2,210 | 2,351 | ||||||
Interest income |
164 | 160 | ||||||
Interest expense |
(148 | ) | (166 | ) | ||||
Other income, net |
19 | 80 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Interest and other income, net |
35 | 74 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
2,245 | 2,425 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes |
468 | 495 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
NET INCOME |
$ | 1,777 | $ | 1,930 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income per share: |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.33 | $ | 0.34 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.33 | $ | 0.34 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Shares used in per-share calculation: |
||||||||
Basic |
5,394 | 5,595 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Diluted |
5,407 | 5,675 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash dividends declared per common share |
$ | 0.06 | $ | | ||||
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
October 29, 2011 |
October 30, 2010 |
|||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,777 | $ | 1,930 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation, amortization and other |
621 | 553 | ||||||
Share-based compensation expense |
341 | 407 | ||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
(22 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||
Deferred income taxes |
109 | 338 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
(21 | ) | (28 | ) | ||||
Net gains on investments |
(13 | ) | (108 | ) | ||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and divestitures: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
399 | 506 | ||||||
Inventories |
(168 | ) | (193 | ) | ||||
Financing receivables, net |
| (78 | ) | |||||
Other assets |
(374 | ) | (30 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable |
36 | 45 | ||||||
Income taxes, net |
(38 | ) | (408 | ) | ||||
Accrued compensation |
(548 | ) | (678 | ) | ||||
Deferred revenue |
232 | (367 | ) | |||||
Other liabilities |
2 | (200 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
2,333 | 1,667 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of investments |
(11,770 | ) | (9,569 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of investments |
7,721 | 6,232 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities of investments |
1,179 | 3,574 | ||||||
Acquisition of property and equipment |
(265 | ) | (326 | ) | ||||
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired |
(38 | ) | (69 | ) | ||||
Change in investments in privately held companies |
(95 | ) | (28 | ) | ||||
Other |
77 | 19 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(3,191 | ) | (167 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Issuances of common stock |
203 | 374 | ||||||
Repurchases of common stock |
(1,881 | ) | (2,701 | ) | ||||
Short-term borrowings, maturities less than 90 days, net |
| (16 | ) | |||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
21 | 28 | ||||||
Dividends paid |
(322 | ) | | |||||
Other |
(78 | ) | 30 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(2,057 | ) | (2,285 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(2,915 | ) | (785 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
7,662 | 4,581 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 4,747 | $ | 3,796 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash paid for: |
||||||||
Interest |
$ | 220 | $ | 270 | ||||
Income taxes |
$ | 398 | $ | 565 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended October 29, 2011 |
Shares of Common Stock |
Common
Stock and Additional Paid-In Capital |
Retained Earnings |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
Total Cisco Shareholders Equity |
Noncontrolling Interests |
Total Equity |
|||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE AT JULY 30, 2011 |
5,435 | $ | 38,648 | $ | 7,284 | $ | 1,294 | $ | 47,226 | $ | 33 | $ | 47,259 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
1,777 | 1,777 | 1,777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains and losses on investments |
(52 | ) | (52 | ) | (7 | ) | (59 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative instruments |
(50 | ) | (50 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustment and other |
(211 | ) | (211 | ) | (211 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
1,464 | (7 | ) | 1,457 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock |
45 | 203 | 203 | 203 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(109 | ) | (852 | ) | (829 | ) | (1,681 | ) | (1,681 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared |
(322 | ) | (322 | ) | (322 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax effects from employee stock incentive plans |
(43 | ) | (43 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense |
341 | 341 | 341 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
BALANCE AT OCTOBER 29, 2011 |
5,371 | $ | 38,297 | $ | 7,910 | $ | 981 | $ | 47,188 | $ | 26 | $ | 47,214 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended October 30, 2010 |
Shares of Common Stock |
Common Stock and Additional Paid-In Capital |
Retained Earnings |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
Total Cisco Shareholders Equity |
Noncontrolling Interests |
Total Equity |
|||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE AT JULY 31, 2010 |
5,655 | $ | 37,793 | $ | 5,851 | $ | 623 | $ | 44,267 | $ | 18 | $ | 44,285 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
1,930 | 1,930 | 1,930 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains and losses on investments |
40 | 40 | 2 | 42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative instruments |
49 | 49 | 49 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustment and other |
238 | 238 | 238 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
2,257 | 2 | 2,259 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock |
41 | 374 | 374 | 374 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(119 | ) | (880 | ) | (1,747 | ) | (2,627 | ) | (2,627 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax effects from employee stock incentive plans |
(9 | ) | (9 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase acquisitions |
6 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense |
407 | 407 | 407 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
BALANCE AT OCTOBER 30, 2010 |
5,577 | $ | 37,691 | $ | 6,034 | $ | 950 | $ | 44,675 | $ | 20 | $ | 44,695 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In September 2001, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program. As of October 29, 2011, the Companys Board of Directors had authorized an aggregate repurchase of up to $82 billion of common stock under this program with no termination date. For additional information regarding stock repurchases, see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The stock repurchases since the inception of this program and the related impact on Cisco shareholders equity are summarized in the following table (in millions):
Shares of Common Stock |
Common Stock and Additional Paid-In Capital |
Retained Earnings |
Total Cisco Shareholders Equity |
|||||||||||||
Repurchases of common stock under the repurchase program |
3,578 | $ | 15,866 | $ | 57,451 | $ | 73,317 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The fiscal year for Cisco Systems, Inc. (the Company or Cisco) is the 52 or 53 weeks ending on the last Saturday in July. Fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 are each 52-week fiscal years. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Cisco and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The Company conducts business globally and is primarily managed on a geographic basis. Beginning in fiscal 2012, the Company is organized into the following three geographic segments: the Americas; Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA); and Asia Pacific, Japan, and China (APJC). In fiscal 2011, the Company was organized into four geographic segments, which consisted of United States and Canada, European Markets, Emerging Markets, and Asia Pacific Markets. As a result of this geographic segment change in fiscal 2012, countries within the former Emerging Markets segment were consolidated into either EMEA or the Americas segment depending on their respective geographic locations. The Company has reclassified the geographic segment data for the prior period to conform to the current periods presentation.
The accompanying financial data as of October 29, 2011 and for the three months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 has been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The July 30, 2011 Consolidated Balance Sheet was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. However, the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 30, 2011.
The Company consolidates its investment in a venture fund managed by SOFTBANK Corp. and its affiliates (SOFTBANK) as the Company is the primary beneficiary. The noncontrolling interests attributed to SOFTBANK are presented as a separate component from the Companys equity in the equity section of the Consolidated Balance Sheets. SOFTBANKs share of the earnings in the venture fund is not presented separately in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and is included in other income, net, as this amount is not material for any of the fiscal periods presented.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments, except as disclosed herein) necessary to present fairly the statement of financial position as of October 29, 2011 and results of operations, cash flows, and equity for the three months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, as applicable, have been made. The results of operations for the three months ended October 29, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full fiscal year or any future periods.
In addition to the geographic segment change referred to above, certain other reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts in order to conform to the current periods presentation.
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date that the financial statements were issued.
7
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
2. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Recent Accounting Standards or Updates Not Yet Effective
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an accounting standard update to provide guidance on achieving a consistent definition of and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure concerning fair value as between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. This accounting standard update is effective for the Company beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2012. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update on its Consolidated Financial Statements but does not expect it will have a material impact.
In June 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to provide guidance on increasing the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. This accounting standard update eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity and requires that the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. This accounting standard update is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2013.
In August 2011, the FASB approved a revised accounting standard update intended to simplify how an entity tests goodwill for impairment. The amendment will allow an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. An entity no longer will be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. This accounting standard update will be effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
3. Business Combinations
The Company completed two business combinations during the three months ended October 29, 2011. A summary of the allocation of the total purchase consideration is presented as follows (in millions):
Shares Issued | Purchase Consideration |
Net Liabilities Assumed |
Purchased Intangible Assets |
Goodwill | ||||||||||||||||
Total acquisitions |
| $ | 38 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 19 | $ | 21 |
The total purchase consideration related to the Companys business combinations completed during the three months ended October 29, 2011 consisted of either cash consideration or cash consideration along with vested share-based awards assumed. Total transaction costs related to business combination activities for the three months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 were $2 million and $8 million, respectively, which were expensed as incurred and recorded as G&A expenses.
The Company continues to evaluate certain assets and liabilities related to business combinations completed during the recent periods. Additional information, which existed as of the acquisition date but was at that time unknown to the Company, may become known to the Company during the remainder of the measurement period, a period not to exceed 12 months from the acquisition date. Changes to amounts recorded as assets or liabilities may result in a corresponding adjustment to goodwill.
The goodwill generated from the Companys business combinations completed during the three months ended October 29, 2011 is primarily related to expected synergies. The goodwill is not deductible for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the operating results of each business combination from the date of acquisition. Pro forma results of operations for the acquisitions completed during the three months ended October 29, 2011 have not been presented because the effects of the acquisitions, individually and in the aggregate, were not material to the Companys financial results.
8
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
4. | Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets |
(a) Goodwill
Beginning in fiscal 2012, the Companys reportable segments were changed to the following segments: the Americas, EMEA, and APJC. As a result, the Company reallocated the goodwill at July 30, 2011 to these reportable segments. The following table presents the goodwill allocated to the Companys reportable segments as of and during the three months ended October 29, 2011 (in millions):
Balance at July 30, 2011 |
Acquisitions | Other | Balance at October 29, 2011 |
|||||||||||||
Americas |
$ | 11,627 | $ | 12 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 11,635 | |||||||
EMEA |
3,272 | 6 | (12 | ) | 3,266 | |||||||||||
APJC |
1,919 | 3 | | 1,922 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 16,818 | $ | 21 | $ | (16 | ) | $ | 16,823 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the preceding table, Other includes foreign currency translation and purchase accounting adjustments.
(b) Purchased Intangible Assets
The following table presents details of the Companys intangible assets acquired through business combinations completed during the three months ended October 29, 2011 (in millions, except years):
FINITE LIVES | INDEFINITE LIVES |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TECHNOLOGY | CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS |
OTHER | In-Process Research & Development |
TOTAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted- Average Useful Life (in Years) |
Amount | Weighted- Average Useful Life (in Years) |
Amount | Weighted- Average Useful Life (in Years) |
Amount | Amount | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
3.7 | $ | 19 | | $ | | | $ | | $ | | $ | 19 |
The following tables present details of the Companys purchased intangible assets (in millions):
October 29, 2011 |
Gross | Accumulated Amortization |
Net | |||||||||
Purchased intangible assets with finite lives: |
||||||||||||
Technology |
$ | 2,128 | $ | (642 | ) | $ | 1,486 | |||||
Customer relationships |
2,269 | (1,425 | ) | 844 | ||||||||
Other |
123 | (97 | ) | 26 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total purchased intangible assets with finite lives |
4,520 | (2,164 | ) | 2,356 | ||||||||
In-process research & development, with indefinite lives |
13 | | 13 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 4,533 | $ | (2,164 | ) | $ | 2,369 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2011 |
Gross | Accumulated Amortization |
Net | |||||||||
Purchased intangible assets with finite lives: |
||||||||||||
Technology |
$ | 1,961 | $ | (561 | ) | $ | 1,400 | |||||
Customer relationships |
2,277 | (1,346 | ) | 931 | ||||||||
Other |
123 | (91 | ) | 32 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total purchased intangible assets with finite lives |
4,361 | (1,998 | ) | 2,363 | ||||||||
In-process research & development, with indefinite lives |
178 | | 178 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 4,539 | $ | (1,998 | ) | $ | 2,541 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased intangible assets include intangible assets acquired through business combinations as well as through direct purchases or licenses.
9
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
The following table presents the amortization of purchased intangible assets (in millions):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
October 29, 2011 | October 30, 2010 | |||||||
Amortization of purchased intangible assets: |
||||||||
Cost of sales |
$ | 96 | $ | 106 | ||||
Operating expenses |
99 | 113 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 195 | $ | 219 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The estimated future amortization expense of purchased intangible assets with finite lives as of October 29, 2011 is as follows (in millions):
Fiscal Year |
Amount | |||
2012 (remaining nine months) |
$ | 580 | ||
2013 |
659 | |||
2014 |
474 | |||
2015 |
404 | |||
2016 |
187 | |||
Thereafter |
52 | |||
|
|
|||
Total |
$ | 2,356 | ||
|
|
10
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
5. | Restructuring and Other Charges |
In fiscal 2011, the Company initiated a number of key, targeted actions to address several areas in its business model. These actions are intended to simplify and focus the Companys organization and operating model; align the Companys cost structure given transitions in the marketplace; divest or exit underperforming operations; and deliver value to the Companys shareholders. The Company is taking these actions to align its business based on its five foundational priorities: leadership in its core business (routing, switching, and associated services) which includes comprehensive security and mobility solutions; collaboration; data center virtualization and cloud; video; and architectures for business transformation. The Company announced in July 2011 that it would incur pretax charges, which are not expected to exceed $1.3 billion, as part of these expense reduction actions. In connection with the July announcement, the Company has incurred cumulative charges of approximately $925 million through October 29, 2011 (included as part of the charges discussed below). The Company expects to complete these restructuring actions by the end of fiscal 2012 with the corresponding restructuring charges recognized during the remainder of fiscal 2012.
During the three months ended October 29, 2011, the Company incurred total restructuring charges of $202 million consisting of $174 million of employee severance charges and $28 million of other restructuring charges. The employee severance charges consisted of $212 million of charges primarily related to impacted employees in the Companys international locations, partially offset by a reduction of $38 million related to a change in estimate regarding certain employee severance charges incurred in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. Other charges incurred during the three months ended October 29, 2011 were primarily for the consolidation of excess facilities, as well as an incremental charge related to the sale of the Companys Juarez, Mexico manufacturing operations, which sale was completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2012.
The following table summarizes the activity related to the restructuring and other charges related to the Companys July 2011 announcement and the realignment and restructuring of the Companys consumer product lines announced during the third quarter of fiscal 2011 (in millions):
Voluntary Early Retirement Program |
Employee Severance |
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets |
Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Initial charges in fiscal 2011 |
$ | 453 | $ | 247 | $ | 71 | $ | 28 | $ | 799 | ||||||||||
Cash payments |
(436 | ) | (13 | ) | | | (449 | ) | ||||||||||||
Non-cash items |
| | (71 | ) | (17 | ) | (88 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Balance as of July 30, 2011 |
17 | 234 | | 11 | 262 | |||||||||||||||
Charges |
| 174 | | 28 | 202 | |||||||||||||||
Cash payments |
(17 | ) | (276 | ) | | (4 | ) | (297 | ) | |||||||||||
Non-cash items |
| | | (18 | ) | (18 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Balance as of October 29, 2011 |
$ | | $ | 132 | $ | | $ | 17 | $ | 149 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
6. | Balance Sheet Details |
The following tables provide details of selected balance sheet items (in millions):
October 29, 2011 |
July 30, 2011 |
|||||||
Inventories: |
||||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 193 | $ | 219 | ||||
Work in process |
43 | 52 | ||||||
Finished goods: |
||||||||
Distributor inventory and deferred cost of sales |
684 | 631 | ||||||
Manufactured finished goods |
437 | 331 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total finished goods |
1,121 | 962 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Service-related spares |
195 | 182 | ||||||
Demonstration systems |
70 | 71 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 1,622 | $ | 1,486 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Property and equipment, net: |
||||||||
Land, buildings, and building & leasehold improvements |
$ | 4,616 | $ | 4,760 | ||||
Computer equipment and related software |
1,410 | 1,429 | ||||||
Production, engineering, and other equipment |
5,075 | 5,093 | ||||||
Operating lease assets (1) |
293 | 293 | ||||||
Furniture and fixtures |
486 | 491 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
11,880 | 12,066 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (1) |
(8,127 | ) | (8,150 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 3,753 | $ | 3,916 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
(1) Accumulated depreciation related to operating lease assets was $171 and $169 as of October 29, 2011 and July 30, 2011, respectively. |
|
|||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||
Deferred tax assets |
$ | 1,895 | $ | 1,864 | ||||
Investments in privately held companies |
898 | 796 | ||||||
Other |
750 | 441 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 3,543 | $ | 3,101 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Deferred revenue: |
||||||||
Service |
$ | 8,321 | $ | 8,521 | ||||
Product: |
||||||||
Unrecognized revenue on product shipments and other deferred revenue |
3,209 | 3,003 | ||||||
Cash receipts related to unrecognized revenue from two-tier distributors |
866 | 683 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total product deferred revenue |
4,075 | 3,686 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 12,396 | $ | 12,207 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Reported as: |
||||||||
Current |
$ | 8,444 | $ | 8,025 | ||||
Noncurrent |
3,952 | 4,182 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 12,396 | $ | 12,207 | ||||
|
|
|
|
12
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
7. | Financing Receivables and Guarantees |
(a) Financing Receivables
Financing receivables primarily consist of lease receivables, loan receivables, and financed service contracts and other. Lease receivables represent sales-type and direct-financing leases resulting from the sale of the Companys and complementary third-party products and are typically collateralized by a security interest in the underlying assets. Lease receivables consist of arrangements with terms of four years on average while loan receivables generally have terms of up to three years. The financed service contracts and other category includes financing receivables related to technical support and other services, as well as an insignificant amount of receivables related to financing of certain indirect costs associated with leases. Revenue related to the technical support services is typically deferred and included in deferred service revenue and is recognized ratably over the period during which the related services are to be performed, which typically ranges from one to three years.
A summary of the Companys financing receivables is presented as follows (in millions):
October 29, 2011 |
Lease Receivables |
Loan Receivables |
Financed Service Contracts & Other (1) |
Total Financing Receivables |
||||||||||||
Gross |
$ | 3,086 | $ | 1,468 | $ | 2,557 | $ | 7,111 | ||||||||
Unearned income |
(237 | ) | | | (237 | ) | ||||||||||
Allowance for credit loss |
(233 | ) | (103 | ) | (29 | ) | (365 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total, net |
$ | 2,616 | $ | 1,365 | $ | 2,528 | $ | 6,509 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Reported as: |
||||||||||||||||
Current |
$ | 1,054 | $ | 861 | $ | 1,385 | $ | 3,300 | ||||||||
Noncurrent |
1,562 | 504 | 1,143 | 3,209 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total, net |
$ | 2,616 | $ | 1,365 | $ | 2,528 | $ | 6,509 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
July 30, 2011 |
Lease Receivables |
Loan Receivables |
Financed Service Contracts & Other (1) |
Total Financing Receivables |
||||||||||||
Gross |
$ | 3,111 | $ | 1,468 | $ | 2,637 | $ | 7,216 | ||||||||
Unearned income |
(250 | ) | | | (250 | ) | ||||||||||
Allowance for credit loss |
(237 | ) | (103 | ) | (27 | ) | (367 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total, net |
$ | 2,624 | $ | 1,365 | $ | 2,610 | $ | 6,599 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Reported as: |
||||||||||||||||
Current |
$ | 1,087 | $ | 673 | $ | 1,351 | $ | 3,111 | ||||||||
Noncurrent |
1,537 | 692 | 1,259 | 3,488 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total, net |
$ | 2,624 | $ | 1,365 | $ | 2,610 | $ | 6,599 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | As of October 29, 2011 and July 30, 2011, the deferred service revenue related to financed service contracts and other was $1,940 million and $2,044 million, respectively. |
Contractual maturities of the gross lease receivables at October 29, 2011 are summarized as follows (in millions):
Fiscal Year |
Amount | |||
2012 (remaining nine months) |
$ | 978 | ||
2013 |
988 | |||
2014 |
677 | |||
2015 |
325 | |||
2016 |
109 | |||
Thereafter |
9 | |||
|
|
|||
Total |
$ | 3,086 | ||
|
|
Actual cash collections may differ from the contractual maturities due to early customer buyouts, refinancings, or defaults.
13
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(b) Credit Quality of Financing Receivables
Financing receivables categorized by the Companys internal credit risk rating for each portfolio segment and class as of October 29, 2011 and July 30, 2011 are summarized as follows (in millions):
INTERNAL CREDIT RISK RATING |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 29, 2011 |
1 to 4 | 5 to 6 | 7 and Higher | Total | Residual Value |
Gross Receivables, Net of Unearned Income |
||||||||||||||||||
Established Markets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lease receivables |
$ | 1,193 | $ | 1,190 | $ | 20 | $ | 2,403 | $ | 291 | $ | 2,694 | ||||||||||||
Loan receivables |
206 | 258 | 6 | 470 | | 470 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financed service contracts & other |
1,610 | 870 | 49 | 2,529 | | 2,529 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Established Markets |
$ | 3,009 | $ | 2,318 | $ | 75 | $ | 5,402 | $ | 291 | $ | 5,693 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Growth Markets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lease receivables |
$ | 51 | $ | 90 | $ | 10 | $ | 151 | $ | 4 | $ | 155 | ||||||||||||
Loan receivables |
428 | 554 | 16 | 998 | | 998 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financed service contracts & other |
5 | 19 | 4 | 28 | | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Growth Markets |
$ | 484 | $ | 663 | $ | 30 | $ | 1,177 | $ | 4 | $ | 1,181 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 3,493 | $ | 2,981 | $ | 105 | $ | 6,579 | $ | 295 | $ | 6,874 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTERNAL CREDIT RISK RATING |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 30, 2011 |
1 to 4 | 5 to 6 | 7 and Higher | Total | Residual Value |
Gross Receivables, Net of Unearned Income |
||||||||||||||||||
Established Markets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lease receivables |
$ | 1,214 | $ | 1,182 | $ | 23 | $ | 2,419 | $ | 292 | $ | 2,711 | ||||||||||||
Loan receivables |
204 | 187 | 4 | 395 | | 395 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financed service contracts & other |
1,622 | 939 | 52 | 2,613 | | 2,613 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Established Markets |
$ | 3,040 | $ | 2,308 | $ | 79 | $ | 5,427 | $ | 292 | $ | 5,719 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Growth Markets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lease receivables |
$ | 35 | $ | 93 | $ | 18 | $ | 146 | $ | 4 | $ | 150 | ||||||||||||
Loan receivables |
458 | 580 | 35 | 1,073 | | 1,073 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financed service contracts & other |
1 | 19 | 4 | 24 | | 24 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Growth Markets |
$ | 494 | $ | 692 | $ | 57 | $ | 1,243 | $ | 4 | $ | 1,247 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 3,534 | $ | 3,000 | $ | 136 | $ | 6,670 | $ | 296 | $ | 6,966 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys internal credit risk ratings of 1 through 4 correspond to investment-grade ratings, while credit risk ratings of 5 and 6 correspond to non-investment-grade ratings. Credit risk ratings of 7 and higher correspond to substandard ratings and constitute a relatively small portion of the Companys financing receivables.
The financing receivables are disaggregated into two classes: the Established Markets and Growth Markets . The Growth Markets class primarily consists of emerging countries including Brazil, Russia, India, China and Mexico, among others. The Established Markets class consists of countries other than the emerging countries in which the Company has financing receivables.
In circumstances when collectability is not deemed reasonably assured, the associated revenue is deferred in accordance with the Companys revenue recognition policies, and the related allowance for credit loss, if any, is included in deferred revenue. The Company also records deferred revenue associated with financing receivables when there are remaining performance obligations, as it does for financed service contracts. Total allowances for credit loss and deferred revenue as of October 29, 2011 and July 30, 2011 were $2,644 million and $2,793 million, respectively and they were associated with financing receivables (net of unearned income) of $6,874 million, and $6,966 million as of their respective period ends. The losses that the Company has incurred historically as well as in the periods presented with respect to its financing receivables have been immaterial and consistent with the performance of an investment-grade portfolio.
As of October 29, 2011 and July 30, 2011, the portion of the portfolio that was deemed to be impaired, generally with a credit risk rating of 8 or higher, was immaterial. The total net write-offs of financing receivables were not material for the first quarter of fiscal 2012. During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company did not modify any financing receivables.
14
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
The following table presents the aging analysis of financing receivables by portfolio segment and class as of October 29, 2011 and July 30, 2011 (in millions):
October 29, 2011 |
31-60 Days Past Due (1) |
61-90 Days Past Due (1) |
Greater than 90 Days Past Due (1) (2) |
Total Past Due |
Current | Gross Receivables, Net of Unearned Income |
Non-Accrual Financing Receivables |
Impaired Financing Receivables |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Established Markets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lease receivables |
$ | 103 | $ | 75 | $ | 127 | $ | 305 | $ | 2,389 | $ | 2,694 | $ | 18 | $ | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
Loan receivables |
3 | 4 | 9 | 16 | 454 | 470 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financed service contracts & other |
64 | 97 | 241 | 402 | 2,127 | 2,529 | 14 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Established Markets |
$ | 170 | $ | 176 | $ | 377 | $ | 723 | $ | 4,970 | $ | 5,693 | $ | 34 | $ | 14 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Growth Markets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lease receivables |
$ | 4 | $ | 5 | $ | 2 | $ | 11 | $ | 144 | $ | 155 | $ | 9 | $ | 9 | ||||||||||||||||
Loan receivables |
2 | | 3 | 5 | 993 | 998 | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financed service contracts & other |
| | | | 28 | 28 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Growth Markets |
$ | 6 | $ | 5 | $ | 5 | $ | 16 | $ | 1,165 | $ | 1,181 | $ | 13 | $ | 12 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 176 | $ | 181 | $ | 382 | $ | 739 | $ | 6,135 | $ | 6,874 | $ | 47 | $ | 26 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2011 |
31-60 Days Past Due (1) |
61-90 Days Past Due (1) |
Greater than 90 Days Past Due (1) (2) |
Total Past Due |
Current | Gross Receivables, Net of Unearned Income |
Non-Accrual Financing Receivables |
Impaired Financing Receivables |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Established Markets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lease receivables |
$ | 85 | $ | 33 | $ | 139 | $ | 257 | $ | 2,454 | $ | 2,711 | $ | 16 | $ | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
Loan receivables |
6 | 1 | 9 | 16 | 379 | 395 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financed service contracts & other |
68 | 33 | 265 | 366 | 2,247 | 2,613 | 17 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Established Markets |
$ | 159 | $ | 67 | $ | 413 | $ | 639 | $ | 5,080 | $ | 5,719 | $ | 34 | $ | 13 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Growth Markets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lease receivables |
$ | 4 | $ | 2 | $ | 13 | $ | 19 | $ | 131 | $ | 150 | $ | 18 | $ | 18 | ||||||||||||||||
Loan receivables |
2 | 6 | 12 | 20 | 1,053 | 1,073 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financed service contracts & other |
| | | | 24 | 24 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Growth Markets |
$ | 6 | $ | 8 | $ | 25 | $ | 39 | $ | 1,208 | $ | 1,247 | $ | 21 | $ | 21 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 165 | $ | 75 | $ | 438 | $ | 678 | $ | 6,288 | $ | 6,966 | $ | 55 | $ | 34 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Past due financing receivables are those that are 31 days or more past due according to their contractual payment terms. The data in the preceding tables are presented by contract and the aging classification of each contract is based on the oldest outstanding receivable, and therefore past due amounts also include unbilled and current receivables within the same contract. The preceding aging tables also exclude pending adjustments on billed tax assessment in certain international markets. |
(2) | The balances of either unbilled or current financing receivables included in the greater-than-90 days past due category for lease receivables, loan receivables, and financed service contracts and other were $102 million, $10 million, and $212 million, respectively, as of October 29, 2011. Such balances for the same category of receivables were $116 million, $15 million, and $230 million, respectively, as of July 30, 2011. |
As of October 29, 2011, the Company had financing receivables of $48 million, net of unbilled or current receivables from the same contract, that were in the greater-than 90 days past due category but remained on accrual status. Such balance was $50 million as of July 30, 2011. A financing receivable may be placed on non-accrual status earlier if, in managements opinion, a timely collection of the full principal and interest becomes uncertain.
15
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(c) Allowance for Credit Loss Rollforward
The allowances for credit loss and the related financing receivables are summarized as follows (in millions):
CREDIT LOSS ALLOWANCES | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended October 29, 2011 |
Lease Receivables |
Loan Receivables |
Financed Service Contracts and Other |
Total | ||||||||||||
Allowance for credit loss as of July 30, 2011 |
$ | 237 | $ | 103 | $ | 27 | $ | 367 | ||||||||
Provisions |
2 | 5 | 2 | 9 | ||||||||||||
Foreign exchange and other |
(6 | ) | (5 | ) | | (11 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Allowance for credit loss as of October 29, 2011 |
$ | 233 | $ | 103 | $ | 29 | $ | 365 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross receivables as of October 29, 2011, net of unearned income |
$ | 2,849 | $ | 1,468 | $ | 2,557 | $ | 6,874 |
Financing receivables that were individually evaluated for impairment during the three month period ended October 29, 2011 were not material and therefore are not presented separately in the preceding table.
(d) Financing Guarantees
In the ordinary course of business, the Company provides financing guarantees for various third-party financing arrangements extended to channel partners and end-user customers. Payments under these financing guarantee arrangements were not material for the periods presented.
Channel Partner Financing Guarantees The Company facilitates arrangements for third-party financing extended to channel partners, consisting of revolving short-term financing, generally with payment terms ranging from 60 to 90 days. These financing arrangements facilitate the working capital requirements of the channel partners and, in some cases, the Company guarantees a portion of these arrangements. The volume of channel partner financing was $5.3 billion and $4.5 billion for the three months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, respectively. The balance of the channel partner financing subject to guarantees was $1.5 billion as of October 29, 2011 and $1.4 billion as of July 30, 2011.
End-User Financing Guarantees The Company also provides financing guarantees for third-party financing arrangements extended to end-user customers related to leases and loans that typically have terms of up to three years. The volume of financing provided by third parties for leases and loans for the three months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 was $411 million and $283 million, respectively. The volume of financing for which the Company has provided guarantees was $35 million for each of the respective periods.
Financing Guarantee Summary The aggregate amount of financing guarantees outstanding at October 29, 2011 and July 30, 2011, representing the total maximum potential future payments under financing arrangements with third parties along with the related deferred revenue are summarized in the following table (in millions):
October 29, 2011 |
July 30, 2011 |
|||||||
Maximum potential future payments relating to financing guarantees: |
||||||||
Channel partner |
$ | 349 | $ | 336 | ||||
End user |
259 | 277 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 608 | $ | 613 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Deferred revenue associated with financing guarantees: |
||||||||
Channel partner |
$ | (261 | ) | $ | (248 | ) | ||
End user |
(234 | ) | (248 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | (495 | ) | $ | (496 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Maximum potential future payments relating to financing guarantees, net of associated deferred revenue |
$ | 113 | $ | 117 | ||||
|
|
|
|
16
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
8. | Investments |
(a) Summary of Available-for-Sale Investments
The following tables summarize the Companys available-for-sale investments (in millions):
October 29, 2011 |
Amortized Cost |
Gross Unrealized Gains |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
||||||||||||
Fixed income securities: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. government securities |
$ | 20,206 | $ | 53 | $ | (5 | ) | $ | 20,254 | |||||||
U.S. government agency securities (1) |
10,026 | 27 | (4 | ) | 10,049 | |||||||||||
Non-U.S. government and agency securities (2) |
3,516 | 12 | (3 | ) | 3,525 | |||||||||||
Corporate debt securities |
4,299 | 44 | (23 | ) | 4,320 | |||||||||||
Asset-backed securities |
116 | 4 | (4 | ) | 116 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total fixed income securities |
38,163 | 140 | (39 | ) | 38,264 | |||||||||||
Publicly traded equity securities |
777 | 603 | (3 | ) | 1,377 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 38,940 | $ | 743 | $ | (42 | ) | $ | 39,641 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
July 30, 2011 |
Amortized Cost |
Gross Unrealized Gains |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
||||||||||||
Fixed income securities: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. government securities |
$ | 19,087 | $ | 52 | $ | | $ | 19,139 | ||||||||
U.S. government agency securities (1) |
8,742 | 35 | (1 | ) | 8,776 | |||||||||||
Non-U.S. government and agency securities (2) |
3,119 | 14 | (1 | ) | 3,132 | |||||||||||
Corporate debt securities |
4,333 | 65 | (4 | ) | 4,394 | |||||||||||
Asset-backed securities |
120 | 5 | (4 | ) | 121 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total fixed income securities |
35,401 | 171 | (10 | ) | 35,562 | |||||||||||
Publicly traded equity securities |
734 | 639 | (12 | ) | 1,361 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 36,135 | $ | 810 | $ | (22 | ) | $ | 36,923 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes corporate debt securities that are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). |
(2) | Includes agency and corporate debt securities that are guaranteed by non-U.S. governments. |
(b) Gains and Losses on Available-for-Sale Investments
The following table presents the net realized gains (losses) related to the Companys available-for-sale investments (in millions):
Three Months Ended |
October 29, 2011 | October 30, 2010 | ||||||
Net realized gains (losses): |
||||||||
Publicly traded equity securities |
$ | (16 | ) | $ | 19 | |||
Fixed income securities |
25 | 71 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 9 | $ | 90 | ||||
|
|
|
|
There were no material impairment charges on available-for-sale investments for the three months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010.
The following table summarizes the activity related to credit losses for fixed income securities (in millions):
October 29, 2011 | October 30, 2010 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | (23 | ) | $ | (95 | ) | ||
Sales of other-than-temporarily impaired fixed income securities |
| 27 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | (23 | ) | $ | (68 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
17
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
The following tables present the breakdown of the available-for-sale investments with gross unrealized losses and the duration that those losses had been unrealized at October 29, 2011 and July 30, 2011 (in millions):
UNREALIZED LOSSES LESS THAN 12 MONTHS |
UNREALIZED LOSSES 12 MONTHS OR GREATER |
TOTAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||
October 29, 2011 |
Fair Value | Gross Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value | Gross Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
||||||||||||||||||
Fixed income securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government securities |
$ | 4,767 | $ | (5 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 4,767 | $ | (5 | ) | ||||||||||
U.S. government agency securities (1) |
2,490 | (4 | ) | | | 2,490 | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. government and agency securities (2) |
1,603 | (3 | ) | | | 1,603 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities |
1,528 | (19 | ) | 68 | (4 | ) | 1,596 | (23 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities |
| | 101 | (4 | ) | 101 | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total fixed income securities |
10,388 | (31 | ) | 169 | (8 | ) | 10,557 | (39 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Publicly traded equity securities |
25 | (3 | ) | | | 25 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 10,413 | $ | (34 | ) | $ | 169 | $ | (8 | ) | $ | 10,582 | $ | (42 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
UNREALIZED LOSSES LESS THAN 12 MONTHS |
UNREALIZED LOSSES 12 MONTHS OR GREATER |
TOTAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||
July 30, 2011 |
Fair Value | Gross Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value | Gross Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
||||||||||||||||||
Fixed income securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agency securities (1) |
$ | 2,310 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,310 | $ | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-U.S. government and agency securities (2) |
875 | (1 | ) | | | 875 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities |
548 | (2 | ) | 56 | (2 | ) | 604 | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities |
| | 105 | (4 | ) | 105 | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total fixed income securities |
3,733 | (4 | ) | 161 | (6 | ) | 3,894 | (10 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Publicly traded equity securities |
112 | (12 | ) | | | 112 | (12 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 3,845 | $ | (16 | ) | $ | 161 | $ | (6 | ) | $ | 4,006 | $ | (22 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes corporate debt securities that are guaranteed by the FDIC. |
(2) | Includes agency and corporate debt securities that are guaranteed by non-U.S. governments. |
For fixed income securities that have unrealized losses as of October 29, 2011, the Company has determined that (i) it does not have the intent to sell any of these investments and (ii) it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell any of these investments before recovery of the entire amortized cost basis. In addition, as of October 29, 2011, the Company anticipates that it will recover the entire amortized cost basis of such fixed income securities and has determined that no other-than-temporary impairments associated with credit losses were required to be recognized during the three months ended October 29, 2011.
The Company has evaluated its publicly traded equity securities as of October 29, 2011 and has determined that there was no indication of other-than-temporary impairments in the respective categories of unrealized losses. This determination was based on several factors, which include the length of time and extent to which fair value has been less than the cost basis, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and the Companys intent and ability to hold the publicly traded equity securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.
(c) Maturities of Fixed Income Securities
The following table summarizes the maturities of the Companys fixed income securities at October 29, 2011 (in millions):
Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||
Less than 1 year |
$ | 18,989 | $ | 19,017 | ||||
Due in 1 to 2 years |
11,927 | 11,971 | ||||||
Due in 2 to 5 years |
7,045 | 7,069 | ||||||
Due after 5 years |
202 | 207 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 38,163 | $ | 38,264 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Actual maturities may differ from the contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay certain obligations.
18
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(d) Securities Lending
The Company periodically engages in securities lending activities with certain of its available-for-sale investments. These transactions are accounted for as a secured lending of the securities, and the securities are typically loaned only on an overnight basis. The average balance of securities lending for the three months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 was $1.7 billion and $2.1 billion, respectively. The Company requires collateral equal to at least 102% of the fair market value of the loaned security in the form of cash or liquid, high-quality assets. The Company engages in these secured lending transactions only with highly creditworthy counterparties, and the associated portfolio custodian has agreed to indemnify the Company against any collateral losses. The Company did not experience any losses in connection with the secured lending of securities during the periods presented. As of October 29, 2011 and July 30, 2011, the Company had no outstanding securities lending transactions.
9. | Fair Value |
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact, and it considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability.
(a) Fair Value Hierarchy
The accounting guidance for fair value measurement requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instruments categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy is as follows
Level 1 Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.
Level 3 Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
(b) Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of October 29, 2011 and July 30, 2011 were as follows (in millions):
OCTOBER 29, 2011 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS |
JULY 30, 2011 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total Balance |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total Balance |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Money market funds |
$ | 3,136 | $ | | $ | | $ | 3,136 | $ | 5,852 | $ | | $ | | $ | 5,852 | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agency securities (1) |
| | | | | 1 | | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale investments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government securities |
| 20,254 | | 20,254 | | 19,139 | | 19,139 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agency securities (1) |
| 10,049 | | 10,049 | | 8,776 | | 8,776 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. government and agency securities (2) |
| 3,525 | | 3,525 | | 3,132 | | 3,132 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities |
| 4,320 | | 4,320 | | 4,394 | | 4,394 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities |
| | 116 | 116 | | | 121 | 121 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publicly traded equity securities |
1,377 | | | 1,377 | 1,361 | | | 1,361 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative assets |
| 242 | 1 | 243 | | 220 | 2 | 222 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,513 | $ | 38,390 | $ | 117 | $ | 43,020 | $ | 7,213 | $ | 35,662 | $ | 123 | $ | 42,998 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities |
$ | | $ | 42 | $ | | $ | 42 | $ | | $ | 24 | $ | | $ | 24 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | | $ | 42 | $ | | $ | 42 | $ | | $ | 24 | $ | | $ | 24 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes corporate debt securities that are guaranteed by the FDIC. |
(2) | Includes agency and corporate debt securities that are guaranteed by non-U.S. governments. |
19
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Level 2 fixed income securities are priced using quoted market prices for similar instruments or nonbinding market prices that are corroborated by observable market data. The Company uses inputs such as actual trade data, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, and other similar data, which are obtained from quoted market prices, independent pricing vendors, or other sources, to determine the ultimate fair value of these assets and liabilities. The Company uses such pricing data as the primary input to make its assessments and determinations as to the ultimate valuation of its investment portfolio and has not made, during the periods presented, any material adjustments to such inputs. The Company is ultimately responsible for the financial statements and underlying estimates. The Companys derivative instruments are primarily classified as Level 2, as they are not actively traded and are valued using pricing models that use observable market inputs. The Company did not have any transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements during the periods presented.
Level 3 assets include asset-backed securities and certain derivative instruments, the values of which are determined based on discounted cash flow models using inputs that the Company could not corroborate with market data.
The following tables present a reconciliation for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 (in millions):
Asset-Backed Securities |
Derivative Assets |
Total | ||||||||||
Balance at July 30, 2011 |
$ | 121 | $ | 2 | $ | 123 | ||||||
Total gains and losses (realized and unrealized): |
||||||||||||
Included in other income, net |
| (1 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||
Sales and maturities |
(5 | ) | | (5 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance at October 29, 2011 |
$ | 116 | $ | 1 | $ | 117 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Losses attributable to assets still held as of October 29, 2011 |
$ | | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | ||||
Asset-Backed Securities |
Derivative Assets |
Total | ||||||||||
Balance at July 31, 2010 |
$ | 149 | $ | 3 | $ | 152 | ||||||
Total gains and losses (realized and unrealized): |
||||||||||||
Included in other income, net |
| (1 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||
Included in other comprehensive income |
(1 | ) | | (1 | ) | |||||||
Sales and maturities |
(6 | ) | | (6 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance at October 30, 2010 |
$ | 142 | $ | 2 | $ | 144 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Losses attributable to assets still held as of October 30, 2010 |
$ | | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (1 | ) |
(c) Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
The following tables present the Companys financial instruments and nonfinancial assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the indicated periods and the related recognized gains and losses for the periods (in millions):
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS USING | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Carrying Value as of October 29, 2011 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total Losses for the Three Months Ended October 29, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||
Investments in privately held companies |
$ | 1 | $ | | $ | | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||||||||
Property held for sale |
$ | 24 | $ | | $ | | $ | 24 | 89 | |||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 90 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS USING | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Carrying Value as of October 30, 2010 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total
Losses for the Three Months Ended October 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Investments in privately held companies |
$ | 9 | $ | | $ | | $ | 9 | $ | 3 |
The assets in the preceding tables were classified as Level 3 assets because the Company used unobservable inputs to value them, reflecting the Companys assessment of the assumptions market participants would use in pricing these assets due to the absence of quoted market prices and the inherent lack of liquidity. These assets were measured at fair value due to events or circumstances the Company identified as having significantly impacted the fair value during the respective indicated periods.
The fair value for investments in privately held companies was measured using financial metrics, comparison to other private and public companies, and analysis of the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuers, including recent financing activities and their capital structure as well as other economic variables. The impairment as a result of the evaluation for the investments in privately held companies was recorded to other income, net.
The fair value of property held for sale was measured using discounted cash flow techniques.
(d) Other
The fair value of certain of the Companys financial instruments that are not measured at fair value, including accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued compensation and other current liabilities, approximates the carrying amount because of their short maturities. In addition, the fair value of the Companys loan receivables and financed service contracts also approximates the carrying amount. The fair value of the Companys debt is disclosed in Note 10 and was determined using quoted market prices for those securities.
20
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
10. | Borrowings |
(a) Short-Term Debt
The following table summarizes the Companys short-term debt (in millions, except percentages):
October 29, 2011 | July 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Weighted-Average Interest Rate |
Amount | Weighted-Average Interest Rate |
|||||||||||||
Commercial paper |
$ | 500 | 0.13 | % | $ | 500 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||
Other notes and borrowings |
89 | 6.12 | % | 88 | 4.59 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total short-term debt |
$ | 589 | $ | 588 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
In fiscal 2011, the Company established a short-term debt financing program of up to $3.0 billion through the issuance of commercial paper notes. The Company used the proceeds from the issuance of commercial paper notes for general corporate purposes, including repayment of matured debt, if applicable. The outstanding commercial paper as of October 29, 2011 and July 30, 2011 had maturity dates of approximately three months or less.
Other notes and borrowings in the preceding table consist of notes and credit facilities established with a number of financial institutions that are available to certain foreign subsidiaries of the Company. These notes and credit facilities are subject to various terms and foreign currency market interest rates pursuant to individual financial arrangements between the financing institution and the applicable foreign subsidiary.
As of October 29, 2011, the estimated fair value of the short-term debt approximates its carrying value due to the short maturities.
(b) Long-Term Debt
The following table summarizes the Companys long-term debt (in millions, except percentages):
October 29, 2011 | July 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Effective Rate | Amount | Effective Rate | |||||||||||||
Senior Notes: |
||||||||||||||||
Floating-rate notes, due 2014 |
$ | 1,250 | 0.69 | % | $ | 1,250 | 0.60 | % | ||||||||
2.90% fixed-rate notes, due 2014 |
500 | 3.11 | % | 500 | 3.11 | % | ||||||||||
1.625% fixed-rate notes, due 2014 |
2,000 | 0.67 | % | 2,000 | 0.58 | % | ||||||||||
5.50% fixed-rate notes, due 2016 |
3,000 | 3.08 | % | 3,000 | 3.06 | % | ||||||||||
3.15% fixed-rate notes, due 2017 |
750 | 0.91 | % | 750 | 0.81 | % | ||||||||||
4.95% fixed-rate notes, due 2019 |
2,000 | 5.08 | % | 2,000 | 5.08 | % | ||||||||||
4.45% fixed-rate notes, due 2020 |
2,500 | 4.50 | % | 2,500 | 4.50 | % | ||||||||||
5.90% fixed-rate notes, due 2039 |
2,000 | 6.11 | % | 2,000 | 6.11 | % | ||||||||||
5.50% fixed-rate notes, due 2040 |
2,000 | 5.67 | % | 2,000 | 5.67 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
16,000 | 16,000 | ||||||||||||||
Unaccreted discount |
(72 | ) | (73 | ) | ||||||||||||
Hedge accounting adjustment |
336 | 307 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total long-term debt |
$ | 16,264 | $ | 16,234 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
To achieve its interest rate risk management objectives, the Company entered into interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $4.25 billion designated as fair value hedges of certain fixed-rate senior notes. In effect, these swaps convert the fixed interest rates of the fixed-rate notes to floating interest rates based on the London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR). The gains and losses related to changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps substantially offset changes in the fair value of the hedged portion of the underlying debt that are attributable to the changes in market interest rates. See Note 11.
The effective rates for the fixed-rate debt include the interest on the notes, the accretion of the discount, and, if applicable, adjustments related to hedging. Based on market prices, the fair value of the Companys long-term debt was $17.9 billion as of October 29, 2011.
21
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Interest is payable semiannually on each class of the senior fixed-rate notes and payable quarterly on the floating-rate notes. Each of the senior fixed-rate notes is redeemable by the Company at any time, subject to a make-whole premium.
The senior notes rank at par with the issued commercial paper notes, as well as any other commercial paper notes that may be issued in the future pursuant to the short-term debt financing program, as discussed earlier under Short-Term Debt. The Company was in compliance with all debt covenants as of October 29, 2011.
Future principal payments for long-term debt as of October 29, 2011 are summarized as follows (in millions):
Fiscal Year |
Amount | |||
2014 |
$ | 3,250 | ||
2015 |
500 | |||
2016 |
3,000 | |||
Thereafter |
9,250 | |||
|
|
|||
Total |
$ | 16,000 | ||
|
|
(c) Credit Facility
The Company has a credit agreement with certain institutional lenders providing for a $3.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility that is scheduled to expire on August 17, 2012. Any advances under the credit agreement will accrue interest at rates that are equal to, based on certain conditions, either (i) the higher of the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50% or Bank of Americas prime rate as announced from time to time or (ii) LIBOR plus a margin that is based on the Companys senior debt credit ratings as published by Standard & Poors Ratings Services and Moodys Investors Service, Inc. The credit agreement requires the Company to comply with certain covenants, including that it maintain an interest coverage ratio as defined in the agreement. The Company was in compliance with the required interest coverage ratio and the other covenants as of October 29, 2011.
The Company may also, upon the agreement of either the then-existing lenders or additional lenders not currently parties to the agreement, increase the commitments under the credit facility by up to an additional $1.9 billion and/or extend the expiration date of the credit facility up to August 15, 2014. As of October 29, 2011, the Company had not borrowed any funds under the credit facility.
11. | Derivative Instruments |
(a) Summary of Derivative Instruments
The Company uses derivative instruments primarily to manage exposures to foreign currency exchange rate, interest rate, and equity price risks. The Companys primary objective in holding derivatives is to reduce the volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, and equity prices. The Companys derivatives expose it to credit risk to the extent that the counterparties may be unable to meet the terms of the agreement. The Company does, however, seek to mitigate such risks by limiting its counterparties to major financial institutions. In addition, the potential risk of loss with any one counterparty resulting from this type of credit risk is monitored. Management does not expect material losses as a result of defaults by counterparties.
The fair values of the Companys derivative instruments and the line items on the Consolidated Balance Sheets to which they were recorded are summarized as follows (in millions):
DERIVATIVE ASSETS |
DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES |
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Line Item |
October 29, 2011 |
July 30, 2011 | Balance Sheet Line Item |
October 29, 2011 |
July 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency derivatives |
Other current assets | $ | 32 | $ | 67 | Other current liabilities | $ | 30 | $ | 12 | ||||||||||
Interest rate derivatives |
Other assets | 180 | 146 | Other long-term liabilities | | | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 212 | $ | 213 | $ | 30 | $ | 12 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency derivatives |
Other current assets | $ | 30 | $ | 7 | Other current liabilities | $ | 12 | $ | 12 | ||||||||||
Equity derivatives |
Other assets | 1 | 2 | Other long-term liabilities | | | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
31 | 9 | 12 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 243 | $ | 222 | $ | 42 | $ | 24 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
The effects of the Companys cash flow hedging instruments on other comprehensive income (OCI) and the Consolidated Statements of Operations are summarized as follows (in millions):
GAINS (LOSSES) RECOGNIZED IN OCI ON DERIVATIVES FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED (EFFECTIVE PORTION) |
GAINS (LOSSES)
RECLASSIFIED THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|||||||||||||||||
Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedging Instruments |
October 29, 2011 |
October 30, 2010 |
Line Item in Statements of Operations |
October 29, 2011 |
October 30, 2010 |
|||||||||||||
Foreign currency derivatives |
$ | (50 | ) | $ | 55 | Operating expenses | $ | | $ | 6 | ||||||||
Cost of salesservice | | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | (50 | ) | $ | 55 | $ | | $ | 7 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, the amounts recognized in earnings on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges related to the ineffective portion were not material, and the Company did not exclude any component of the changes in fair value of the derivative instruments from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. As of October 29, 2011, the Company estimates that approximately $32 million of net derivative losses related to its cash flow hedges included in AOCI will be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months.
The effect on the Consolidated Statements of Operations of derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges and the underlying hedged items is summarized as follows (in millions):
GAINS (LOSSES)
ON DERIVATIVES INSTRUMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED |
GAINS (LOSSES) RELATED TO HEDGED ITEMS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|||||||||||||||||
Derivatives Designated as Fair Value Hedging Instruments |
Line Item in Statements of Operations |
October
29, 2011 |
October
30, 2010 |
October 29, 2011 |
October 30, 2010 |
|||||||||||||
Interest rate derivatives |
Interest expense | $ | 35 | $ | 30 | $ | (36 | ) | $ | (32 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effect on the Consolidated Statements of Operations of derivative instruments not designated as hedges is summarized as follows (in millions):
GAINS (LOSSES) FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED |
||||||||||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments |
Line Item in Statements of Operations |
October 29, 2011 | October 30, 2010 | |||||||
Foreign currency derivatives |
Other income, net | $ | (57 | ) | $ | 114 | ||||
Total return swaps-deferred compensation |
Operating expenses | (20 | ) | 11 | ||||||
Equity derivatives |
Other income, net | 7 | 5 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | (70 | ) | $ | 130 | |||||
|
|
|
|
The notional amounts of the Companys outstanding derivatives are summarized as follows (in millions):
October 29, 2011 |
July 30, 2011 |
|||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||
Foreign currency derivativescash flow hedges |
$ | 2,707 | $ | 3,433 | ||||
Interest rate derivatives |
4,250 | 4,250 | ||||||
Net investment hedging instruments |
68 | 73 | ||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||
Foreign currency derivatives |
5,220 | 4,565 | ||||||
Total return swaps |
262 | 262 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 12,507 | $ | 12,583 | ||||
|
|
|
|
(b) Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
The Company conducts business globally in numerous currencies. Therefore, it is exposed to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. To limit the exposure related to foreign currency changes, the Company enters into foreign currency contracts. The Company does not enter into such contracts for trading purposes.
The Company hedges foreign currency forecasted transactions related to certain operating expenses and service cost of sales with currency options and forward contracts. These currency option and forward contracts, designated as cash flow hedges, generally have maturities of less than 18 months. The Company assesses effectiveness based on changes in total fair value of the derivatives. The effective portion of the derivative instruments gain or loss is initially reported as a component of AOCI and subsequently reclassified into earnings when the hedged exposure affects earnings. The ineffective portion, if any, of the gain or loss is reported in earnings immediately. During the fiscal years presented, the Company did not discontinue any cash flow hedge for which it was probable that a forecasted transaction would not occur.
23
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
The Company enters into foreign exchange forward and option contracts to reduce the short-term effects of foreign currency fluctuations on assets and liabilities such as foreign currency receivables, including long-term customer financings, investments, and payables. These derivatives are not designated as hedging instruments. Gains and losses on the contracts are included in other income, net, and substantially offset foreign exchange gains and losses from the remeasurement of intercompany balances or other current assets, investments, or liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the reporting entity.
The Company hedges certain net investments in its foreign subsidiaries with forward contracts, which generally have maturities of up to six months. The Company recognized a loss of $4 million and $5 million in OCI for the effective portion of its net investment hedges for the three months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, respectively.
(c) Interest Rate Risk
Interest Rate Derivatives, Investments The Companys primary objective for holding fixed income securities is to achieve an appropriate investment return consistent with preserving principal and managing risk. To realize these objectives, the Company may utilize interest rate swaps or other derivatives designated as fair value or cash flow hedges. As of October 29, 2011 and July 30, 2011 the Company did not have any outstanding interest rate derivatives related to its fixed income securities.
Interest Rate Derivatives Designated as Fair Value Hedge, Long-Term Debt In fiscal 2011, the Company entered into interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges related to fixed-rate senior notes that were issued in March 2011 and are due in 2014 and 2017. In fiscal 2010, the Company entered into interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges for a portion of senior fixed-rate notes that were issued in 2006 and are due in 2016. Under these interest rate swaps, the Company receives fixed-rate interest payments and makes interest payments based on LIBOR plus a fixed number of basis points. The effect of such swaps is to convert the fixed interest rates of the senior fixed-rate notes to floating interest rates based on LIBOR. The gains and losses related to changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps are included in interest expense and substantially offset changes in the fair value of the hedged portion of the underlying debt that are attributable to the changes in market interest rates. The fair value of the interest rate swaps was reflected in other assets.
(d) Equity Price Risk
The Company may hold equity securities for strategic purposes or to diversify its overall investment portfolio. The publicly traded equity securities in the Companys portfolio are subject to price risk. To manage its exposure to changes in the fair value of certain equity securities, the Company may enter into equity derivatives that are designated as fair value hedges. The changes in the value of the hedging instruments are included in other income (loss), net, and offset the change in the fair value of the underlying hedged investment. In addition, the Company periodically manages the risk of its investment portfolio by entering into equity derivatives that are not designated as accounting hedges. The changes in the fair value of these derivatives were also included in other income (loss), net. The Company did not have any equity derivatives outstanding related to its investment portfolio at October 29, 2011 and July 30, 2011.
The Company is also exposed to variability in compensation charges related to certain deferred compensation obligations to employees. Although not designated as accounting hedges, the Company utilizes derivatives such as total return swaps to economically hedge this exposure. The fair value of such derivative instruments was negligible as of October 29, 2011.
(e) Credit-Risk-Related Contingent Features
Certain derivative instruments are executed under agreements that have provisions requiring the Company and the counterparty to maintain a specified credit rating from certain credit rating agencies. If the Companys or the counterpartys credit rating falls below a specified credit rating, either party has the right to request collateral on the derivatives net liability position. Such provisions did not affect the Companys financial position as of October 29, 2011 and July 30, 2011.
24
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
12. | Commitments and Contingencies |
(a) Operating Leases
The Company leases office space in several U.S. locations. Outside the United States, larger leased sites include sites in Australia, Belgium, China, Germany, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Norway, and the United Kingdom. The Company also leases equipment and vehicles. Future minimum lease payments under all noncancelable operating leases with an initial term in excess of one year as of October 29, 2011 are as follows (in millions):
Fiscal Year |
Amount | |||
2012 (remaining nine months) |
$ | 253 | ||
2013 |
256 | |||
2014 |
189 | |||
2015 |
155 | |||
2016 |
67 | |||
Thereafter |
267 | |||
|
|
|||
Total |
$ | 1,187 | ||
|
|
(b) Purchase Commitments with Contract Manufacturers and Suppliers
The Company purchases components from a variety of suppliers and uses several contract manufacturers to provide manufacturing services for its products. During the normal course of business, in order to manage manufacturing lead times and help ensure adequate component supply, the Company enters into agreements with contract manufacturers and suppliers that either allow them to procure inventory based upon criteria as defined by the Company or that establish the parameters defining the Companys requirements. A significant portion of the Companys reported purchase commitments arising from these agreements consists of firm, noncancelable, and unconditional commitments. In certain instances, these agreements allow the Company the option to cancel, reschedule, and adjust the Companys requirements based on its business needs prior to firm orders being placed. As of October 29, 2011 and July 30, 2011, the Company had total purchase commitments for inventory of $4.178 billion and $4.313 billion, respectively.
The Company records a liability for firm, noncancelable, and unconditional purchase commitments for quantities in excess of its future demand forecasts consistent with the valuation of the Companys excess and obsolete inventory. As of October 29, 2011 and July 30, 2011, the liability for these purchase commitments was $164 million and $168 million, respectively, and was included in other current liabilities.
(c) Other Commitments
In connection with the Companys business combinations and asset purchases, the Company has agreed to pay certain additional amounts contingent upon the achievement of certain agreed-upon-technology, development, product, or other milestones or the continued employment with the Company of certain employees of the acquired entities. The Company recognized such compensation expense of $14 million and $37 million during the three months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, respectively. The largest component of this compensation expense during both periods was related to milestone payments made to former noncontrolling interest holders of Nuova Systems, Inc., the remaining interest of which the Company purchased in fiscal 2008. As of October 29, 2011, the Company estimated that future compensation expense and contingent consideration of up to $53 million may be required to be recognized pursuant to the applicable business combination and asset purchase agreements.
The Company also has certain funding commitments, primarily related to its investments in privately held companies and venture funds, some of which are based on the achievement of certain agreed-upon milestones, and some of which are required to be funded on demand. The funding commitments were $145 million and $192 million as of October 29, 2011 and July 30, 2011, respectively.
(d) Variable Interest Entities
In the ordinary course of business, the Company has investments in privately held companies and provides financing to certain customers. These privately held companies and customers may be considered to be variable interest entities. The Company evaluates on an ongoing basis its investments in these privately held companies and its customer financings and has determined that as of October 29, 2011 there were no material unconsolidated variable interest entities.
VCE is a joint venture that the Company formed in fiscal 2010 with EMC Corporation (EMC), with investments from VMware, Inc. (VMware) and Intel Corporation. VCE helps organizations leverage best-in-class technologies and disciplines from Cisco, EMC and VMware to enable the transformation to cloud computing.
During the three months ended October 29, 2011, the Company invested an additional $96 million in VCE. As of October 29, 2011, the Companys cumulative investment in VCE entity was approximately $205 million. The Companys ownership percentage has remained unchanged since inception at approximately 35% of the outstanding equity of VCE. The Company accounts for its investment in VCE under the equity method, and accordingly its carrying value in VCE as of October 29, 2011 was $95 million, reflecting its cumulative share of VCEs losses. Over the next 12 months, as VCE scales its operations, the Company expects that it will make additional investments in VCE and may incur additional losses proportionate with the Companys ownership percentage.
25
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(e) Product Warranties and Guarantees
The following table summarizes the activity related to product warranty liability during the three months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 (in millions):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
October 29, 2011 | October 30, 2010 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 342 | $ | 360 | ||||
Provision for warranties issued |
151 | 110 | ||||||
Payments |
(132 | ) | (120 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 361 | $ | 350 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The Company accrues for warranty costs as part of its cost of sales based on associated material product costs, labor costs for technical support staff, and associated overhead. The Companys products are generally covered by a warranty for periods ranging from 90 days to five years, and for some products the Company provides a limited lifetime warranty.
In the normal course of business, the Company indemnifies other parties, including customers, lessors, and parties to other transactions with the Company, with respect to certain matters. The Company has agreed to hold the other parties harmless against losses arising from a breach of representations or covenants or out of intellectual property infringement or other claims made against certain parties. These agreements may limit the time within which an indemnification claim can be made and the amount of the claim. In addition, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its officers and directors, and the Companys Amended and Restated Bylaws contain similar indemnification obligations to the Companys agents. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount under these indemnification agreements due to the Companys limited history with prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Historically, payments made by the Company under these agreements have not had a material effect on the Companys operating results, financial position, or cash flows.
The Company also provides financing guarantees, which are generally for various third-party financing arrangements to channel partners and other end-user customers. See Note 7. The Companys other guarantee arrangements as of October 29, 2011 that are subject to recognition and disclosure requirements were not material.
(f) Legal Proceedings
Brazilian authorities have investigated the Companys Brazilian subsidiary and certain of its current and former employees, as well as a Brazilian importer of the Companys products, and its affiliates and employees, relating to alleged evasion of import taxes and alleged improper transactions involving the subsidiary and the importer. Brazilian tax authorities have assessed claims against the Companys Brazilian subsidiary based on a theory of joint liability with the Brazilian importer for import taxes and related penalties. In addition to claims asserted during prior fiscal years by Brazilian federal tax authorities, tax authorities from the Brazilian state of Sao Paulo asserted similar claims on the same legal basis during the second quarter of fiscal 2011.
The asserted claims by Brazilian federal tax authorities are for calendar years 2003 through 2007 and the asserted claims by the tax authorities from the state of Sao Paulo are for calendar years 2005 through 2007. The total asserted claims by Brazilian state and federal tax authorities aggregated to approximately $483 million for the alleged evasion of import taxes, approximately $929 million for interest, and approximately $2.2 billion for various penalties, all determined using an exchange rate as of October 29, 2011. The Company has completed a thorough review of the matter and believes the asserted tax claims against it are without merit, and the Company intends to defend the claims vigorously. While the Company believes there is no legal basis for its alleged liability, due to the complexities and uncertainty surrounding the judicial process in Brazil and the nature of the claims asserting joint liability with the importer, the Company is unable to determine the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome against it and is unable to reasonably estimate a range of loss, if any. The Company does not expect a final judicial determination for several years.
On March 31, 2011, a purported shareholder class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against the Company and certain of its officers and directors. A second lawsuit with substantially similar allegations was filed with the same court on April 12, 2011 against the Company and certain of its officers and directors. The lawsuits are purportedly brought on behalf of those who purchased the Companys publicly traded securities between May 12, 2010 and February 9, 2011, and between February 3, 2010 and February 9, 2011, respectively. Plaintiffs allege that defendants made false and misleading statements during quarterly earnings calls, purport to assert claims for violations of the federal securities laws, and seek unspecified compensatory damages and other relief. The Company believes the claims are without merit and intends to defend the actions vigorously. While the Company believes there is no legal basis for liability, due to the uncertainty surrounding the litigation process, the Company is unable to reasonably estimate a range of loss, if any, at this time.
Beginning in April 2011, purported shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed in both the United States District Court for the Northern District of California and the California Superior Court for the County of Santa Clara against the Companys Board of Directors and several of its officers alleging that the Board allowed management to make allegedly false statements during earnings calls. The Companys management of its stock repurchase program is also alleged to have breached a fiduciary duty. The complaints include claims for violation of the federal securities laws, breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, unjust enrichment, and violations of the California Corporations Code. The complaint seeks compensatory damages, disgorgement, and other relief.
In addition, the Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, including intellectual property litigation. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, the Company does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
26
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
13. | Shareholders Equity |
(a) Stock Repurchase Program
In September 2001, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program. As of October 29, 2011, the Companys Board of Directors had authorized an aggregate repurchase of up to $82 billion of common stock under this program and the remaining authorized repurchase amount was $8.7 billion with no termination date. A summary of the stock repurchase activity under the stock repurchase program, reported based on the trade date, is summarized as follows (in millions, except per-share amounts):
Shares Repurchased |
Weighted- Average Price per Share |
Amount Repurchased |
||||||||||
Cumulative balance at July 30, 2011 |
3,478 | $ | 20.64 | $ | 71,773 | |||||||
Repurchase of common stock under the stock repurchase program |
100 | 15.37 | 1,544 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cumulative balance at October 29, 2011 |
3,578 | $ | 20.49 | $ | 73,317 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
The purchase price for the shares of the Companys stock repurchased is reflected as a reduction to shareholders equity. The Company is required to allocate the purchase price of the repurchased shares as (i) a reduction to retained earnings until retained earnings are zero and then as an increase to accumulated deficit and (ii) a reduction of common stock and additional paid-in capital. Issuance of common stock and the tax benefit related to employee stock incentive plans are recorded as an increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital.
(b) Cash Dividends on Shares of Common Stock
During the three months ended October 29, 2011, cash dividends of $0.06 per share, or $322 million were declared and paid on the Companys outstanding common stock. Any future dividends will be subject to the approval of the Companys Board of Directors.
(c) Other Repurchases of Common Stock
For the three months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, the Company repurchased approximately 9 million and 6 million shares, or $137 million and $127 million of common stock, respectively, in settlement of employee tax withholding obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock or stock units.
(d) Comprehensive Income
The components of comprehensive income for the three months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 are as follows (in millions):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
October 29, 2011 |
October 30, 2010 |
|||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,777 | $ | 1,930 | ||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||
Change in unrealized gains and losses on investments, net of tax benefit (expense) of $28 and ($17) for the first quarters of fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively |
(59 | ) | 42 | |||||
Change in derivative instruments |
(50 | ) | 49 | |||||
Change in cumulative translation adjustment and other, net of tax benefit (expense) of $21 and ($10) for the first quarters of fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively |
(211 | ) | 238 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Comprehensive income |
1,457 | 2,259 | ||||||
Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
7 | (2 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Comprehensive income attributable to Cisco |
$ | 1,464 | $ | 2,257 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The components of AOCI, net of tax, are summarized as follows (in millions):
October 29, 2011 |
July 30, 2011 |
|||||||
Net unrealized gains on investments |
$ | 435 | $ | 487 | ||||
Net unrealized (losses) gains on derivative instruments |
(44 | ) | 6 | |||||
Cumulative translation adjustment and other |
590 | 801 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 981 | $ | 1,294 | ||||
|
|
|
|
27
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
14. | Employee Stock Benefit Plans |
(a) Employee Stock Incentive Plans
Stock Incentive Plan Program Description As of October 29, 2011, the Company had five stock incentive plans: the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2005 Plan); the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (the 1996 Plan); the 1997 Supplemental Stock Incentive Plan (the Supplemental Plan); the Cisco Systems, Inc. SA Acquisition Long-Term Incentive Plan (the SA Acquisition Plan); and the Cisco Systems, Inc. WebEx Acquisition Long-Term Incentive Plan (the WebEx Acquisition Plan). In addition, the Company has, in connection with the acquisitions of various companies, assumed the share-based awards granted under stock incentive plans of the acquired companies or issued share-based awards in replacement thereof. Share-based awards are designed to reward employees for their long-term contributions to the Company and provide incentives for them to remain with the Company. The number and frequency of share-based awards are based on competitive practices, operating results of the Company, government regulations, and other factors. Since the inception of the stock incentive plans, the Company has granted share-based awards to a significant percentage of its employees, and the majority has been granted to employees below the vice president level. The Companys primary stock incentive plans are summarized as follows:
2005 Plan As amended on November 15, 2007, the maximum number of shares issuable under the 2005 Plan over its term is 559 million shares plus the amount of any shares underlying awards outstanding on November 15, 2007 under the 1996 Plan, the SA Acquisition Plan, and the WebEx Acquisition Plan that are forfeited or are terminated for any other reason before being exercised or settled. If any awards granted under the 2005 Plan are forfeited or are terminated for any other reason before being exercised or settled, then the shares underlying the awards will again be available under the 2005 Plan.
Pursuant to an amendment approved by the Companys shareholders on November 12, 2009, the number of shares available for issuance under the 2005 Plan was reduced by 1.5 shares for each share awarded as a stock grant or a stock unit, and any shares underlying awards outstanding under the 1996 Plan, the SA Acquisition Plan, and the WebEx Acquisition Plan that expire unexercised at the end of their maximum terms become available for reissuance under the 2005 Plan. The 2005 Plan permits the granting of stock options, stock, stock units, and stock appreciation rights to employees (including employee directors and officers), consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates, and non-employee directors of the Company. Stock options and stock appreciation rights granted under the 2005 Plan have an exercise price of at least 100% of the fair market value of the underlying stock on the grant date and prior to November 12, 2009 have an expiration date no later than nine years from the grant date. The expiration date for stock options and stock appreciation rights granted subsequent to the amendment approved on November 12, 2009 shall be no later than ten years from the grant date. The stock options will generally become exercisable for 20% or 25% of the option shares one year from the date of grant and then ratably over the following 48 or 36 months, respectively. Stock grants and stock units will generally vest with respect to 20% or 25% of the shares covered by the grant on each of the first through fifth or fourth anniversaries of the date of the grant, respectively. The Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board of Directors has the discretion to use different vesting schedules. Stock appreciation rights may be awarded in combination with stock options or stock grants, and such awards shall provide that the stock appreciation rights will not be exercisable unless the related stock options or stock grants are forfeited. Stock grants may be awarded in combination with non-statutory stock options, and such awards may provide that the stock grants will be forfeited in the event that the related non-statutory stock options are exercised.
1996 Plan The 1996 Plan expired on December 31, 2006, and the Company can no longer make equity awards under the 1996 Plan. The maximum number of shares issuable over the term of the 1996 Plan was 2.5 billion shares. Stock options granted under the 1996 Plan have an exercise price of at least 100% of the fair market value of the underlying stock on the grant date and expire no later than nine years from the grant date. The stock options generally become exercisable for 20% or 25% of the option shares one year from the date of grant and then ratably over the following 48 or 36 months, respectively. Certain other grants have utilized a 60-month ratable vesting schedule. In addition, the Board of Directors, or other committees administering the plan, have the discretion to use a different vesting schedule and have done so from time to time.
Supplemental Plan The Supplemental Plan expired on December 31, 2007, and the Company can no longer make equity awards under the Supplemental Plan. Officers and members of the Companys Board of Directors were not eligible to participate in the Supplemental Plan. Nine million shares were reserved for issuance under the Supplemental Plan.
Acquisition Plans In connection with the Companys acquisitions of Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. (Scientific-Atlanta) and WebEx Communications, Inc. (WebEx), the Company adopted the SA Acquisition Plan and the WebEx Acquisition Plan, respectively, each effective upon completion of the applicable acquisition. These plans constitute assumptions, amendments, restatements, and renamings of the 2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Scientific-Atlanta and the WebEx Communications, Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, respectively. The plans permit the grant of stock options, stock, stock units, and stock appreciation rights to certain employees of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates who had been employed by Scientific-Atlanta or its subsidiaries or WebEx or its subsidiaries, as applicable. As a result of the shareholder approval of the amendment and extension of the 2005 Plan, as of November 15, 2007, the Company will no longer make stock option grants or direct share issuances under either the SA Acquisition Plan or the WebEx Acquisition Plan.
28
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(b) Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which includes its subplan, the International Employee Stock Purchase Plan (together, the Purchase Plan), under which 471.4 million shares of the Companys common stock have been reserved for issuance as of October 29, 2011. Eligible employees are offered shares through a 24-month offering period, which consists of four consecutive 6-month purchase periods. Employees may purchase a limited number of shares of the Companys stock at a discount of up to 15% of the lesser of the market value at the beginning of the offering period or the end of each 6-month purchase period. The Purchase Plan is scheduled to terminate on January 3, 2020. No shares were issued under the Purchase Plan during the three months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010. As of October 29, 2011, 122 million shares were available for issuance under the Purchase Plan.
(c) Summary of Share-Based Compensation Expense
Share-based compensation expense consists primarily of expenses for stock options, stock purchase rights, restricted stock, and restricted stock units granted to employees. The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense (in millions):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
October 29, 2011 |
October 30, 2010 |
|||||||
Cost of sales product |
$ | 13 | $ | 15 | ||||
Cost of sales service |
37 | 43 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Share-based compensation expense in cost of sales |
50 | 58 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Research and development |
101 | 121 | ||||||
Sales and marketing |
142 | 164 | ||||||
General and administrative |
48 | 64 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Share-based compensation expense in operating expenses |
291 | 349 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total share-based compensation expense |
$ | 341 | $ | 407 | ||||
|
|
|
|
As of October 29, 2011, total compensation cost related to unvested share-based awards not yet recognized was $2.7 billion, which is expected to be recognized over approximately 2.2 years on a weighted-average basis. The income tax benefit for share-based compensation expense was $90 million and $109 million for the three months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, respectively.
The fair value of restricted stock units was measured based on the grant-date share price adjusted for expected dividend yield. The Company estimates the fair value of employee stock options on the date of grant using a lattice-binomial model. The lattice-binomial model is more capable than the Black-Scholes model of incorporating the features of the Companys employee stock options, such as the vesting provisions and various restrictions, including restrictions on transfer and hedging, among others, and the fact that options are often exercised prior to their contractual maturity. The use of the lattice-binomial model also requires extensive actual employee exercise behavior data for the relative probability estimation purpose and a number of complex assumptions, including expected volatility, risk-free interest rate, expected dividends, kurtosis, and skewness.
The Company uses third-party analyses to assist in developing the assumptions used in, as well as calibrating, its lattice-binomial model. The Company is responsible for determining the assumptions used in estimating the fair value of its share-based payment awards. The Companys determination of the fair value of share-based payment awards is affected by assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the Companys expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. Option-pricing models were developed for use in estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting or hedging restrictions and are fully transferable. Because the Companys employee stock options have certain characteristics that are significantly different from traded options, and because changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimated value, in managements opinion, the existing valuation models may not provide an accurate measure of the fair value or be indicative of the fair value that would be observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market for the Companys employee stock options.
29
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(d) Share-Based Awards Available for Grant
A summary of share-based awards available for grant is as follows (in millions):
Share- Based Awards Available for Grant |
||||
BALANCE AT JULY 31, 2010 |
295 | |||
Restricted stock, stock units, and other share-based awards granted and assumed |
(84 | ) | ||
Share-based awards canceled/forfeited/expired |
42 | |||
Additional shares reserved |
2 | |||
|
|
|||
BALANCE AT JULY 30, 2011 |
255 | |||
Restricted stock, stock units, and other share-based awards granted and assumed |
(17 | ) | ||
Share-based awards canceled/forfeited/expired |
23 | |||
Other |
(6 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
BALANCE AT OCTOBER 29, 2011 |
255 | |||
|
|
As reflected in the preceding table, for each share awarded as restricted stock or subject to a restricted stock unit award under the 2005 Plan, an equivalent of 1.5 shares was deducted from the available share-based award balance. For restricted stock units that were awarded with vesting contingent upon the achievement of future financial performance metrics, the maximum awards that can be achieved upon full vesting of such awards were reflected in the preceding table.
(e) Restricted Stock and Stock Unit Awards
A summary of the restricted stock and stock unit activity is as follows (in millions, except per-share amounts):
Restricted Stock/ Stock Units |
Weighted- Average Grant- Date Fair Value per Share |
Vest-Date Fair Value in Aggregate |
||||||||||
BALANCE AT JULY 31, 2010 |
97 | $ | 22.35 | |||||||||
Granted and assumed |
56 | 20.62 | ||||||||||
Vested |
(27 | ) | 22.54 | $ | 529 | |||||||
Canceled/forfeited |
(10 | ) | 22.04 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
BALANCE AT JULY 30, 2011 |
116 | 21.50 | ||||||||||
Granted and assumed |
11 | 15.68 | ||||||||||
Vested |
(25 | ) | 22.87 | $ | 400 | |||||||
Canceled/forfeited |
(8 | ) | 21.70 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
BALANCE AT OCTOBER 29, 2011 |
94 | $ | 20.41 | |||||||||
|
|
Certain of the restricted stock units awarded in fiscal 2012 are contingent on the future achievement of financial performance metrics.
Prior to the initial declaration of a quarterly cash dividend on March 17, 2011, the fair value of restricted stock units was measured based on the grant date share price reduced by the present value of the dividend using an expected dividend yield of 0%, as the Company did not historically pay cash dividends on its common stock. For awards granted on or subsequent to March 17, 2011, the Company used an annualized dividend yield based on the per-share dividends declared by its Board of Directors.
30
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(f) Stock Option Awards
A summary of the stock option activity is as follows (in millions, except per-share amounts):
STOCK OPTIONS OUTSTANDING | ||||||||
Number Outstanding |
Weighted- Average Exercise Price per Share |
|||||||
BALANCE AT JULY 31, 2010 |
732 | $ | 21.39 | |||||
Exercised |
(80 | ) | 16.55 | |||||
Canceled/forfeited/expired |
(31 | ) | 25.91 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
BALANCE AT JULY 30, 2011 |
621 | 21.79 | ||||||
Exercised |
(19 | ) | 10.23 | |||||
Canceled/forfeited/expired |
(11 | ) | 22.95 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
BALANCE AT OCTOBER 29, 2011 |
591 | $ | 22.14 | |||||
|
|
The following table summarizes significant ranges of outstanding and exercisable stock options as of October 29, 2011 (in millions, except years and share prices):
STOCK OPTIONS OUTSTANDING | STOCK OPTIONS EXERCISABLE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Range of Exercise Prices |
Number Outstanding |
Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years) |
Weighted- Average Exercise Price per Share |
Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
Number Exercisable |
Weighted- Average Exercise Price per Share |
Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
|||||||||||||||||||||
$ 0.01 15.00 |
36 | 1.85 | $ | 10.86 | $ | 275 | 34 | $ | 10.98 | $ | 260 | |||||||||||||||||
15.01 18.00 |
96 | 2.78 | 17.72 | 80 | 96 | 17.73 | 80 | |||||||||||||||||||||
18.01 20.00 |
166 | 1.66 | 19.29 | 1 | 166 | 19.29 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
20.01 25.00 |
151 | 3.62 | 22.75 | | 146 | 22.76 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
25.01 35.00 |
142 | 4.84 | 30.65 | | 119 | 30.63 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
591 | 3.12 | $ | 22.14 | $ | 356 | 561 | $ | 21.83 | $ | 341 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents the total pretax intrinsic value, based on the Companys closing stock price of $18.56 as of October 28, 2011, which would have been received by the option holders had those option holders exercised their stock options as of that date. The total number of in-the-money stock options exercisable as of October 29, 2011 was 136 million. As of July 30, 2011, 575 million outstanding stock options were exercisable and the weighted-average exercise price was $21.37.
15. | Income Taxes |
The following table provides details of income taxes (in millions, except percentages):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
October 29, 2011 |
October 30, 2010 |
|||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
$ | 2,245 | $ | 2,425 | ||||
Provision for income taxes |
$ | 468 | $ | 495 | ||||
Effective tax rate |
20.8 | % | 20.4 | % |
As of October 29, 2011, the Company had $3.0 billion of unrecognized tax benefits, of which $2.6 billion, if recognized, would favorably impact the effective tax rate. The Company regularly engages in discussions and negotiations with tax authorities regarding tax matters in various jurisdictions. It is reasonably possible that certain federal, foreign, and state tax matters may be concluded in the next 12 months. Specific positions that may be resolved include issues involving transfer pricing and various other matters. The Company estimates that the unrecognized tax benefits at October 29, 2011 could be reduced by approximately $400 million in the next 12 months.
31
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
16. | Segment Information and Major Customers |
(a) Net Sales and Gross Margin by Segment
The Company conducts business globally and is primarily managed on a geographic basis. As of October 29, 2011, the Company has three geographic segments: the Americas; EMEA; and APJC. In fiscal 2011, the Company was organized into four geographic segments, which consisted of United States and Canada, European Markets, Emerging Markets, and Asia Pacific Markets. As a result of this geographic segment change in fiscal 2012, countries within the former Emerging Markets segment were consolidated into either EMEA or the Americas segment depending on their respective geographic locations. The Company has reclassified the geographic segment data for the prior period to conform to the current periods presentation.
The Companys management makes financial decisions and allocates resources based on the information it receives from its internal management system. Sales are attribut