Definitive Notice and Proxy Statement
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

 

Filed by the Registrant  x                              Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨   Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨   Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x   Definitive Proxy Statement
¨   Definitive Additional Materials
¨   Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12

Apogee Enterprises, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

Not Applicable

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x   No fee required.
¨   Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
  (1)  

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

  (2)  

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

  (3)  

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

     

  (4)  

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

     

  (5)  

Total fee paid:

 

     

¨   Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨   Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 240.0-11 and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
  (1)  

Amount Previously Paid:

 

     

  (2)  

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

     

  (3)  

Filing Party:

 

     

  (4)  

Date Filed:

 

     

 

 

 


Table of Contents

LOGO

May 12, 2014

Dear Shareholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Apogee Enterprises, Inc. to be held at Apogee’s headquarters, 4400 West 78th Street, Suite 520, Minneapolis, Minnesota, commencing at 9:30 a.m. Central Daylight Time on Wednesday, June 25, 2014. The Corporate Secretary’s formal notice of the meeting and the proxy statement appear on the following pages and describe the matters to come before the meeting.

We hope that you will be able to attend the meeting, and we look forward to seeing you. Even if you plan to attend the meeting, we urge you to vote your shares by either Internet or mail as promptly as possible so your shares will be represented at the annual meeting. Instructions on voting your shares are on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials you received for the annual meeting. If you received paper copies of our proxy materials, instructions on the two ways to vote your shares can be found on the enclosed proxy form. Internet voting facilities for shareholders of record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (10:59 p.m. Central Daylight Time) on June 24, 2014. If you attend the meeting in person and you are a shareholder of record, you may at that time revoke any proxy previously given and vote in person, if desired.

 

Sincerely,    
LOGO     LOGO
Joseph F. Puishys     Bernard P. Aldrich
Chief Executive Officer     Chair of the Board of Directors


Table of Contents

APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC.

4400 West 78th Street

Suite 520

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435

 

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

to be held on June 25, 2014

 

 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Apogee Enterprises, Inc. will be held at Apogee’s headquarters, 4400 West 78th Street, Suite 520, Minneapolis, Minnesota, commencing at 9:30 a.m. Central Daylight Time on Wednesday, June 25, 2014 for the following purposes:

 

  1.

Election of two Class I directors for three-year terms ending in the year 2017 and one Class III director for a two-year term ending in the year 2016;

 

  2.

Advisory approval of Apogee’s executive compensation;

 

  3.

To consider and act upon a proposal to approve the 2014 Restatement of the Apogee Enterprises, Inc. 2009 Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan;

 

  4.

To consider and act upon a proposal to approve the 2014 Restatement of the Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors;

 

  5.

Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending February 28, 2015; and

 

  6.

Transaction of such other business as may properly be brought before the meeting.

The Board of Directors has fixed May 2, 2014 as the record date for the meeting. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on that date are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meeting.

Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we have sent our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) containing instructions on how to access our 2014 proxy statement and our fiscal 2014 Annual Report to Shareholders online. Shareholders who have received the Notice will not be sent a printed copy of our proxy materials in the mail unless they request to receive a printed copy.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to be held on June 25, 2014: Our 2014 Proxy Statement and our Fiscal 2014 Annual Report to Shareholders are available at www.proxyvote.com.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors,
LOGO
Patricia A. Beithon
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Minneapolis, Minnesota

May 12, 2014


Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

     1   

What is the purpose of the meeting?

     1   

Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?

     1   

How do I get electronic access to the proxy materials?

     1   

Who is entitled to vote at the meeting?

     1   

What are my voting rights?

     1   

How many shares must be present to hold the meeting?

     2   

How do I vote my shares?

     2   

What is a proxy?

     2   

What is the difference between a shareholder of record and a “street name” holder?

     3   

How do I vote if my shares are held in the 401(k) retirement plan, employee stock purchase plan or other plans of Apogee?

     3   

What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card?

     3   

Can I vote my shares in person at the meeting?

     3   

What vote is required for the election of directors or for a proposal to be approved?

     4   

How are votes counted?

     4   

Who will count the vote?

     5   

How does our Board of Directors recommend that I vote?

     5   

What if I do not specify how I want my shares voted?

     5   

Can I change my vote after submitting my proxy or voting instructions?

     5   

Will my vote be kept confidential?

     5   

How can I attend the meeting?

     6   

Who pays for the cost of proxy preparation and solicitation?

     6   

How can I communicate with our Board of Directors?

     6   

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

     6   

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT

     8   

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

     9   

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

     10   

Nominee – Class I Director for Term Expiring in 2017

     11   

Nominee – Class III Director for Term Expiring in 2016

     12   

Class II Director – Term Expiring in 2015

     12   

Class III Director – Term Expiring in 2016

     14   

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

     16   

Corporate Governance Section of Our Web Site

     16   

Code of Business Ethics and Conduct

     16   

Corporate Governance Guidelines

     16   

Board Independence

     16   

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Non-Employee Directors

     16   

Retirement Policy

     17   

Procedures for Shareholder Recommendations or Nominations of Director Candidates

     17   

Criteria for Membership on Our Board of Directors

     17   

Board Meetings and 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

     18   

Board Committee Membership, Meetings and Responsibilities

     18   

Risk Oversight by Our Board of Directors

     20   

Board Leadership Structure

     20   

 

i


Table of Contents

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

    21   

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

    21   

Non-Employee Director Compensation Arrangements During Fiscal 2014

    21   

Fiscal 2014 Non-Employee Director Compensation Table

    23   

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

    25   

Compensation Committee Report

    25   

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

    25   

Compensation Risk Analysis

    44   

Summary Compensation Table

    45   

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    48   

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

    49   

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

    51   

Retirement Plan Compensation

    52   

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

    53   

PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY APPROVAL OF APOGEE’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

    59   

PROPOSAL 3: APPROVAL OF THE 2014 RESTATEMENT OF THE APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. 2009 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

    60   

PROPOSAL 4: APPROVAL OF THE 2014 RESTATEMENT OF THE APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

    67   

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT AND PAYMENT OF FEES TO INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

    71   

Audit Committee Report

    71   

Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees and All Other Fees

    71   

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services Provided by Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    72   

PROPOSAL 5: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

    72   

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR OUR 2015 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

    72   

ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS

    73   

“HOUSEHOLDING” OF PROXY MATERIALS

    73   

OTHER MATTERS

    73   

APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. 2009 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN, AS AMENDED AND RESTATED (2014)

    APPENDIX A   

APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN, AS AMENDED AND RESTATED (2014)

    APPENDIX B   

 

ii


Table of Contents

LOGO

  

PROXY STATEMENT

2014 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD JUNE 25, 2014

 

The Board of Directors of Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (“Apogee” or the “Company”) is soliciting proxies for use at our annual meeting of shareholders to be held on Wednesday, June 25, 2014, and at any adjournment of the meeting. We are first making the proxy statement and form proxy card and voting instructions available to our shareholders on or about May 13, 2014.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

 

What is the purpose of the meeting?

At our annual meeting, shareholders will act upon the matters outlined in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders. These include:

 

 

election of directors;

 

 

advisory approval of Apogee’s executive compensation (the “Say on Pay Proposal”);

 

 

approving the 2014 Restatement of the Apogee Enterprises, Inc. 2009 Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan (the “Director Stock Plan Proposal”);

 

 

approving the 2014 Restatement of the Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Director Deferred Compensation Plan Proposal”); and

 

 

ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm.

Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?

In accordance with rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we may furnish proxy materials, including this proxy statement and our fiscal 2014 Annual Report to Shareholders, to our shareholders by providing access to such documents on the Internet instead of mailing printed copies. Most shareholders will not receive printed copies of the proxy materials unless they request them. Instead, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”), which was mailed to most of our shareholders, will instruct you as to how you may access and review all of the proxy materials

on the Internet. The Notice also instructs you as to how you may submit your proxy on the Internet. By accessing and reviewing the proxy materials on the Internet, you will save us the cost of printing and mailing these materials to you and reduce the impact of such printing and mailing on the environment. If you would like to receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials provided in the Notice.

How do I get electronic access to the proxy materials?

The Notice will provide you with instructions regarding how to view the proxy materials for our annual meeting on the Internet.

Who is entitled to vote at the meeting?

Our Board of Directors has set May 2, 2014 as the record date for the annual meeting. If you were a shareholder of record at the close of business on May 2, 2014, you are entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting.

As of the record date, 29,107,469 shares of common stock, par value $0.33-1/3, were issued and outstanding and, therefore, eligible to vote at the annual meeting.

What are my voting rights?

Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share. Therefore, 29,107,469 votes are entitled to be cast at the meeting. There is no cumulative voting.

 

 

1


Table of Contents

How many shares must be present to hold the meeting?

In accordance with our Amended and Restated Bylaws, shares equal to at least a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of our common stock as of the record date must be present at the meeting in order to hold the meeting and conduct business. This is called a quorum. Your shares are counted as present at the meeting if:

 

 

you are present and vote in person at the meeting;

 

 

you have properly submitted a proxy via the Internet or by mail, even if you abstain from voting on one or more matters; or

 

 

you hold your shares in street name (as discussed under “What is the difference between a shareholder of record and a “street name” holder?” on page 3) and you did not provide voting instructions to your broker and your broker uses its discretionary authority to vote your shares on the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm.

How do I vote my shares?

Your vote is important. Because many shareholders do not attend the meeting in person, it is necessary that a large number be represented by proxy. If you are a shareholder of record, you can give a proxy to be voted at the meeting in either of the following ways:

 

 

electronically via the Internet by following the “Vote by Internet” instructions on the Notice or, if you received paper copies of our proxy materials, the enclosed proxy card; or

 

 

by completing, signing and mailing the proxy card (if you received paper copies of our proxy materials).

The Internet voting procedure has been set up for your convenience. The procedure has been designed to authenticate your identity, allow you to give voting instructions, and confirm that those instructions have been recorded properly. If you are a shareholder of record and you would like to submit your proxy via the Internet, please refer to the specific instructions provided on the Notice or, if you received paper copies of our

proxy materials, the enclosed proxy card. If you received paper copies of our proxy materials and wish to submit your proxy by mail, please return your signed proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope to us before the annual meeting. If you are an employee and received our 2014 proxy materials electronically via the Internet at your company email address, you will only be able to give a proxy to be voted at the meeting electronically via the Internet as described under “How do I vote if my shares are held in the 401(k) retirement plan, employee stock purchase plan or other plans of Apogee?” on page 3.

If you hold your shares in street name, you must vote your shares in the manner prescribed by your broker or other nominee. Your broker or other nominee has enclosed or otherwise provided a voting instruction card for you to use in directing the broker or other nominee how to vote your shares.

If you properly submit your proxy via the Internet or return your executed proxy by mail and do not revoke your proxy, it will be voted in the manner you specify.

What is a proxy?

A proxy is your designation of another person to vote stock you own. That other person is called a proxy. If you designate someone as your proxy in a written document, that document also is called a proxy or a proxy card. When you designate someone a proxy, you may also direct the proxy how to vote your shares. We refer to this as your “proxy vote.” Three of our executive officers, Joseph F. Puishys, James S. Porter and Patricia A. Beithon, have been designated as the proxies to cast the votes of our shareholders at our 2014 annual meeting.

 

 

2


Table of Contents

What is the difference between a shareholder of record and a “street name” holder?

If your shares are registered directly in your name, you are considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares.

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, trust or other nominee, then the broker, bank, trust or other nominee is considered to be the shareholder of record with respect to those shares. However, you still are considered the beneficial owner of those shares, and your shares are said to be held in “street name.” Street name holders generally cannot vote their shares directly and must instead instruct the broker, bank, trust or other nominee how to vote their shares using the voting instruction form provided by the broker, bank, trust or other nominee. Please refer to “How do I vote my shares?” on page 2.

How do I vote if my shares are held in the 401(k) retirement plan, employee stock purchase plan or other plans of Apogee?

If you hold any shares in our 401(k) retirement plan, employee stock purchase plan or other plans of Apogee, your Internet proxy vote or completed proxy card will serve as voting instructions to the plan trustee. However, your voting instructions must be received at least one day prior to the annual meeting in order to count. In accordance with the terms of our 401(k) retirement plan, the trustee will vote all of the shares held in the plan in the same proportion as the actual proxy votes submitted by plan participants at least one day prior to the annual meeting. If you are a participant in our employee stock purchase plan, the plan custodian cannot vote your shares unless it receives timely instructions from you.

If you hold shares in our 401(k) retirement plan, employee stock purchase plan or other plans of Apogee and have a company email address, you will receive our 2014 proxy statement and 2014 Annual Report to Shareholders electronically at your company email address instead of receiving paper copies of these documents or the Notice in the mail. The email will provide instructions and a control number to use to provide voting instructions to the plan trustee via the Internet. If you receive our 2014 proxy statement and 2014 Annual Report to Shareholders electronically, you may only provide voting instructions to the plan trustee via the Internet and you will not receive a proxy card that can be returned by mail.

If you are an employee who received our 2014 proxy statement and 2014 Annual Report to Shareholders electronically and you wish to receive a paper copy of these materials, you should contact:

 

Internet:

  

www.apog.com

Email:

  

IR@apog.com

Telephone:

  

(877) 752-3432

Facsimile:

  

(952) 487-7565

Mail:

  

Investor Relations

  

Apogee Enterprises, Inc.

  

4400 West 78th Street, Suite 520

  

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435

What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card?

If you receive more than one Notice or proxy card, it means that you hold shares registered in more than one account in different names or variations of your name. To ensure that all of your shares are voted, if you submit your proxy vote via the Internet, vote once for each Notice or proxy card you receive, or sign and return each proxy card.

You may prefer to hold your shares in more than one account, and you are welcome to do so. However, some multiple accounts are unintentional and will occur if one stock purchase is made with a middle initial and a subsequent purchase is made without a middle initial. Please contact our Investor Relations Department at IR@apog.com, (877) 752-3432 (telephone) or (952) 487-7565 (facsimile) for information on how to merge your accounts.

Can I vote my shares in person at the meeting?

If you are a shareholder of record, you may vote your shares in person at the meeting by completing a ballot at the meeting. Even if you currently plan to attend the meeting, we recommend that you also submit your proxy as described above so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the meeting.

If you hold your shares in street name, you may vote your shares in person at the meeting only if you obtain a signed letter or other proxy from your broker, bank, trust or other nominee giving you the right to vote the shares at the meeting.

 

 

3


Table of Contents

If you are a participant in our 401(k) retirement plan, employee stock purchase plan or other plans of Apogee, you may submit a proxy vote as described above, but you may not vote your plan shares in person at the meeting.

What vote is required for the election of directors or for a proposal to be approved?

With respect to the election of directors, in accordance with Minnesota law, the nominees for election as Class I and Class III directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the annual meeting. This means that since shareholders will be electing two Class I directors and one Class III director, the two nominees for Class I director and one nominee for Class III director receiving the highest number of votes will be elected.

As provided in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, if a majority of our shares that are voted at the meeting are designated to be “withheld” from a director nominee’s election, then such nominee shall offer his or her resignation to our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for consideration. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate the best interests of Apogee and our shareholders and recommend to our Board of Directors the action to be taken with respect to that director’s offered resignation.

With respect to the Say on Pay Proposal, Director Stock Plan Proposal, Director Deferred Compensation Plan Proposal, and the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the annual meeting is required for the approval of those proposals (provided that the total number of shares voted in favor of the proposal constitutes more than 25% of our outstanding shares).

How are votes counted?

You may either vote “FOR” or “WITHHOLD” authority to vote for each nominee for our Board of Directors. You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on the Say on Pay Proposal, Director Stock Plan Proposal, Director Deferred Compensation Plan Proposal and the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm.

If you submit your proxy but ABSTAIN from voting or WITHHOLD authority to vote on one or more matters, your shares will be counted as present at the meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum. Your shares also will be counted as present at the meeting for the purpose of calculating the vote on the particular matter from which you abstained from voting or withheld authority to vote.

If you ABSTAIN from voting on a proposal, your abstention has the same effect as a vote against that proposal. We will not count WITHHOLD authority as either for or against a director nominee, so WITHHOLD authority has no effect on the election of a director; however, if a majority of our shares that are voted at the meeting are designated to be WITHHOLD authority from a director nominee’s election, then such director nominee shall offer his or her resignation to our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for consideration, as described under “What vote is required for the election of directors or for a proposal to be approved?” above.

If you hold your shares in street name and do not provide voting instructions to your broker, your shares will be considered “broker non-votes” and will not be voted on any proposal on which your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. Shares that constitute broker non-votes will be counted as present at the meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum but will not be represented at the meeting for purposes of calculating the vote with respect to such matter or matters. This effectively reduces the number of shares needed to approve such matter or matters. Your broker or other nominee has discretionary authority to vote your shares on the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm, even if your broker or other nominee does not receive voting instructions from you. Your broker or other nominee does not have discretionary authority to vote your shares on the election of directors, Say on Pay Proposal, Director Stock Plan Proposal or Director Deferred Compensation Plan Proposal if your broker or other nominee does not receive voting instructions from you.

 

 

4


Table of Contents

Who will count the vote?

Representatives of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., our tabulating agent, will tabulate the votes and act as independent inspector of election.

How does our Board of Directors recommend that I vote?

Our Board of Directors recommends a vote:

 

 

FOR all of the director nominees;

 

 

FOR the Say on Pay Proposal;

 

 

FOR the Director Stock Plan Proposal;

 

 

FOR the Director Deferred Compensation Plan Proposal; and

 

 

FOR ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending February 28, 2015.

What if I do not specify how I want my shares voted?

If you submit your proxy via the Internet or a signed proxy card and do not specify how you want to vote your shares, we will vote your shares:

 

 

FOR all of the director nominees;

 

 

FOR the Say on Pay Proposal;

 

 

FOR the Director Stock Plan Proposal;

 

 

FOR the Director Deferred Compensation Plan Proposal;

 

 

FOR ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending February 28, 2015; and

 

 

in the discretion of the persons named in the proxy on any other matters that properly come before the meeting and as to which we did not have knowledge prior to February 26, 2014.

Can I change my vote after submitting my proxy or voting instructions?

Yes. If you are a shareholder of record, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before your proxy is voted at the annual meeting, in any of the following ways:

 

 

by sending a written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary;

 

 

by submitting a later-dated proxy to our Corporate Secretary;

 

 

by submitting a later-dated proxy via the Internet; or

 

 

by voting in person at the meeting.

If you hold your shares in street name, you should contact your broker, bank, trust or other nominee for information on how to revoke your voting instructions and provide new voting instructions.

If you hold shares in our 401(k) retirement plan, employee stock purchase plan or other plans of Apogee, you may revoke your proxy and change your voting instructions at any time, but not less than one day before the annual meeting, in any of the following ways:

 

 

by sending a written notice of revocation to the plan trustee or plan custodian;

 

 

by submitting a later-dated voting instruction or proxy to the plan trustee or plan custodian; or

 

 

by submitting a later-dated voting instruction or proxy via the Internet.

Will my vote be kept confidential?

Yes. We have procedures to ensure that, regardless of whether shareholders vote via the Internet, by mail or in person, (1) all proxies, ballots and voting tabulations that identify shareholders are kept permanently confidential, except as disclosure may be required by federal or state law or expressly permitted by a shareholder; and (2) voting tabulations are performed by an independent third party.

 

 

5


Table of Contents

How can I attend the meeting?

You may be asked to present valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, before being admitted to the meeting. If you hold your shares in street name, you may also be asked to present proof of ownership to be admitted to the meeting. A recent statement from your broker, or letter from your bank, trust or other nominee are examples of proof of ownership.

Who pays for the cost of proxy preparation and solicitation?

We pay for the cost of proxy preparation and solicitation, including the reasonable charges and expenses of brokers and other nominees for forwarding proxy materials to the beneficial owners of our shares.

We are soliciting proxies primarily by mail and email. In addition, some of our officers and regular employees may solicit the return of proxies by telephone, facsimile, personal interview, email or telegram. These individuals will receive no additional compensation for these services.

How can I communicate with our Board of Directors?

Subject to reasonable constraints of time, topics and rules of order, you may direct comments to or ask questions of our Chair of the Board or Chief Executive Officer during our 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In addition, you may communicate directly with any director by writing to:

Apogee Directors

Apogee Enterprises, Inc.

4400 West 78th Street, Suite 520

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435

Attention: Corporate Secretary

Directors@apog.com

Our Corporate Secretary will promptly forward to our Board of Directors or the individually named directors all relevant written communications, as specified in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, received at the above addresses.

 

 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

The following table sets forth information concerning beneficial ownership of our common stock outstanding as of May 2, 2014, the record date for our 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, by persons known to us to own more than 5% of our common stock. Unless otherwise indicated, the named holders have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by them.

 

Name of Beneficial Owner

  

Amount and Nature

of Beneficial

Ownership (#)

  

% of Common

Stock

Outstanding

BlackRock, Inc.(1)

   2,492,464    8.6

Franklin Resources, Inc.(2)

   2,294,880    7.9

The Vanguard Group, Inc.(3)

   1,879,372    6.5

Westwood Management Corp.(4)

   1,538,187    5.3

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(5)

   1,445,851    5.0

 

 

(1) 

We have relied upon the information provided by BlackRock, Inc. in a Schedule 13G/A reporting information as of December 31, 2013. The Schedule 13G/A was filed by BlackRock, Inc. in its capacity as a parent holding company or control person and indicates that BlackRock, Inc. has sole investment power over 2,492,464 shares and sole voting power over 2,407,574 shares. BlackRock Fund Advisors, a subsidiary of BlackRock, Inc., beneficially owns 5% or greater of the outstanding shares of the security class reported on the Schedule 13G/A. The address for BlackRock, Inc. is 40 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10022.

 

(2) 

We have relied upon the information provided by Franklin Resources, Inc. (“FRI”), Charles B. Johnson, Rupert H. Johnson, Jr. and Franklin Advisory Services, LLC, an investment advisor (“Franklin”), in a jointly filed Schedule 13G/A reporting information as of December 31, 2013. Direct or indirect subsidiaries of FRI serve as investment managers of one or more open-end or

 

6


Table of Contents

closed-end investment companies or other managed accounts that hold the shares of our common stock in the ordinary course of business. In their capacity as investment managers, the subsidiaries of Franklin exercise sole investment discretion over the securities covered by an investment management agreement. Franklin Advisory Services, LLC has sole investment power over 2,294,880 shares and sole voting power over 2,146,280 shares, in the aggregate, held as of December 31, 2013. Charles B. Johnson and Rupert H. Johnson, Jr., each of whom owns in excess of 10% of the outstanding common stock of FRI, may be deemed to be the beneficial owners of securities held by entities advised by FRI subsidiaries. Franklin, FRI subsidiaries, Charles B. Johnson and Rupert H. Johnson, Jr. each disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares of our common stock. The filing persons and each of the investment management subsidiaries believe that they are not a “group” within the meaning of Rule 13d-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). The address for FRI is One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, CA 94403.

 

(3) 

We have relied upon the information provided by The Vanguard Group, Inc., an investment advisor (“Vanguard”), in a Schedule 13G/A reporting information as of December 31, 2013. Of the shares reported, Vanguard has sole investment power over 1,837,118 shares, shared investment power over 42,254 shares, and sole voting power over 44,554 shares. Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Vanguard, serving as an investment manager of collective trust accounts, is the beneficial owner of 42,254 shares and Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Vanguard, serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings, is the beneficial owner of 2,300 shares. The address for Vanguard is 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, PA 19355.

 

(4) 

We have relied upon the information provided by Westwood Management Corp., an investment advisor (“Westwood”), in a Schedule 13G reporting information as of December 31, 2013. Of the shares reported, Westwood has sole investment power over 1,538,187 shares, sole voting power over 1,360,246 shares and shared voting power over 33,361 shares. The address for Westwood is 200 Crescent Court, Suite 1200, Dallas, TX 75201.

 

(5) 

We have relied upon the information provided by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP, an investment advisor (“Dimensional Advisors”), in a Schedule 13G/A reporting information as of December 31, 2013. Dimensional Advisors furnishes investment advice to four investment companies and serves as investment manager to certain commingled group trusts and separate accounts (such investment companies, trusts and accounts are collectively referred to as the “Funds”). Subsidiaries of Dimensional Advisors may act as advisor or sub-advisor to certain Funds. All of the 1,445,851 shares listed are owned by the Funds. The Funds exercise sole investment power over 1,445,851 shares and sole voting power over 1,411,175 shares. The Funds also have the right to receive, or power to direct the receipt of dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of the securities held in their respective accounts. In its role as investment advisor, sub-advisor and/or manager, Dimensional Advisors and its subsidiaries may be deemed to be beneficial owners of the shares; however, Dimensional Advisors and its subsidiaries disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares. The address for Dimensional Advisors is Palisades West, Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road, Austin, TX 78746.

 

7


Table of Contents

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of May 2, 2014, the record date for our 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, by each of our directors, each of our executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table (our “Named Executive Officers”) and by all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership

 

Name of Beneficial

Owner

   Shares of
Common
Stock

Held
(#)(1)(2)
    Shares
Underlying
Options
Exercisable
Within 60
Days (#)(3)
     Total
Beneficial
Ownership
(#)
     % of
Common
Stock
Outstanding
   Phantom
Stock (#)(4)
    

Total

Stock-
Based
Ownership
(#)(5)

Non-Employee

Directors

                

Bernard P. Aldrich

     24,958        31,257         56,215       *      46,447       102,662

Jerome L. Davis

     19,569        21,946         41,515       *      33,011       74,526

Sara L. Hays

     21,669        16,072         37,741       *      20,881       58,622

John T. Manning

     30,937 (6)              30,937       *            30,937

Robert J. Marzec

     25,291        25,383         50,674       *      10,748       61,422

Stephen C. Mitchell(7)

     7,933                7,933       *            7,933

Donald A. Nolan

     3,122                3,122       *      1,494       4,616

Richard V. Reynolds

     23,958        10,000         33,958       *      23,800       57,758

David E. Weiss

     22,525        25,383         47,908       *            47,908

Named Executive

Officers

                

Joseph F. Puishys

     272,287        300,341         572,628       1.9            572,628

James S. Porter

     134,868                134,868       *            134,868

Patricia A. Beithon

     188,729                188,729       *            188,729

John A. Klein

     15,255                15,255       *            15,255

Gary R. Johnson

     54,208                54,208       *            54,208

All directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)

     845,309        430,382         1,275,691       4.3      136,381       1,412,072

 

 

*

Indicates less than 1%.

 

(1) 

Unless otherwise indicated, the individuals listed in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares owned by them, and such shares are not subject to any pledge. For our non-employee directors, the number indicated includes shares of restricted stock issued to the named individual pursuant to our 2009 Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (2011) (the “Director Stock Plan”). For our executive officers, the number of shares indicated includes shares issued to the named individual pursuant to our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (2011) (the “Stock Incentive Plan”), our employee stock purchase plan and our 401(k) retirement plan.

 

(2) 

Includes the following shares of restricted stock issued pursuant to our Director Stock Plan: 7,933 shares for each of Messrs. Aldrich, Davis, Manning, Marzec, Mitchell, Reynolds and Weiss and Ms. Hays; 3,122 shares for Mr. Nolan; and 66,586 shares for all executive officers and directors as a group. All shares of restricted stock held pursuant to our Director Stock Plan are subject to future vesting conditions and holders of such shares have no investment power over such shares.

 

8


Table of Contents

Includes the following shares issued to our Named Executive Officers pursuant to our Stock Incentive Plan:

 

Named Executive Officers

       Shares of Restricted Stock    

Joseph F. Puishys

       145,386  

James S. Porter

       15,185  

Patricia A. Beithon

       11,987  

John A. Klein

       5,933  

Gary R. Johnson

       4,406  

All directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)

       182,897  

All shares of restricted stock held pursuant to our Stock Incentive Plan are subject to future vesting conditions and the holders of such shares have no investment power over such shares.

 

(3) 

Includes shares underlying stock options exercisable currently or within 60 days of May 2, 2014.

 

(4) 

Includes phantom stock units, each representing the value of one share of our common stock, that are attributable to accounts in our Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (“Director Deferred Compensation Plan”), which is described under the heading “Director Deferred Compensation Plan” on page 22.

 

(5) 

The amounts in this column are derived by adding the amounts in the “Total Beneficial Ownership” and the “Phantom Stock” columns of the table.

 

(6) 

Includes 1,000 shares held by Mr. Manning’s wife.

 

(7) 

Mr. Mitchell will retire from our Board effective as of our 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

 

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of our securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership of those securities on Form 3 and reports of changes in ownership on Form 4 or Form 5. Specific due dates for these reports have been established by the SEC, and we are required to disclose in this proxy statement any failure to timely file the

required reports by these dates. Based solely on our review of the copies of these reports received by us and written representations from our directors and executive officers, we believe that our directors and executive officers complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements for the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014.

 

 

9


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

Our Restated Articles of Incorporation provide that our Board of Directors will be divided into three classes of directors of as nearly equal size as possible and the term of each class of directors is three years. Our articles further provide that the total number of directors will be determined exclusively by our Board of Directors. The term of one class expires each year in rotation. At our 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the terms of our Class I directors will expire.

Currently, we have ten directors, with four directors serving in Class I; however, Mr. Mitchell, who currently serves as a Class I director with a term expiring at our 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, will retire after 18 years of service on our Board. Our Board has determined to decrease the size of the Board to nine directors.

Robert J. Marzec and Donald A. Nolan have been nominated for re-election to our Board as Class I directors and David E. Weiss has been nominated for re-election to our Board as a Class III director. The Class I and Class III directors elected at our 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will serve until our Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2017 and 2016, respectively, or until their successors are elected and qualified. Each of the nominees has agreed to serve as a director if elected.

We have no reason to expect that any of the nominees will fail to be a candidate at our 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and, therefore, do not have in mind any substitute or substitutes for any of the nominees. If any of the nominees should be unable to serve as a director, proxies will be voted for a substitute nominee or nominees in accordance with the best judgment of the person or persons acting under the proxies.

Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the two Class I nominees and one Class III nominee for director. Unless authority for one or more of the nominees is withheld, proxies will be voted FOR the election of each of Messrs. Marzec and Nolan as Class I directors for a three-year term expiring at our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and FOR the election of Mr. Weiss as a Class III director for a two-year term expiring at our 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The nominees for election as directors and the directors whose terms of office will continue after the annual meeting have provided information about themselves in the following section. All of our directors possess the minimum qualities and skills described under “Criteria for Membership on Our Board of Directors” on page 17.

 

 

10


Table of Contents

Nominee – Class I Director for Term Expiring in 2017

 

LOGO   

ROBERT J. MARZEC

 

Age 69

 

Biography – Retired Audit Partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an international public accounting firm. Our director since 2005.

Mr. Marzec retired from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in 2002 after spending 36 years in its Assurance and Business Advisory Services (financial and regulatory reporting division). He held various leadership and audit positions, including Managing Partner of the Minneapolis office of PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP from 1991 to 1998.

Board Committee – Audit Committee Chair.

Key Attributes, Experience and Skills – Mr. Marzec has extensive public accounting and auditing experience at public, private and non-profit organizations and has a strong background in financial controls and reporting, financial management, financial analysis, SEC reporting requirements, mergers and acquisitions, and international business. During his service at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and on boards at other public and mutual companies and non-profit organizations, Mr. Marzec gained broad knowledge of many different companies and industries, and public company board and corporate governance practices.

Other Directorships Since 2009 – Formerly a director of Medtox Scientific, Inc. and Health Fitness Corporation.

Nominee – Class I Director for Term Expiring in 2017

 

LOGO

  

DONALD A. NOLAN

 

Age 53

 

Biography – President of the Materials Group for Avery Dennison Corporation, a global leader in labeling and packaging materials and solutions, since 2008. Our director since 2013.

Prior to joining Avery Dennison Corporation, Mr. Nolan served in various executive capacities for Valspar Corporation, a global leader in the paint and coatings industry, from 1996 to 2008, including Senior Vice President, Global Packaging and Automotive Coatings; Vice President, Global Packaging; Vice President, Packaging Coatings – Americas; and other marketing and sales and general management positions. Prior to joining Valspar Corporation, Mr. Nolan served in various marketing and sales positions with Loctite Corporation, Ashland Chemical Company and General Electric Company.

Board Committee – Audit Committee Member.

Key Attributes, Experience and Skills – Mr. Nolan brings to our Board 18 years of leadership experience at public companies and extensive expertise and insight to our Board in the areas of manufacturing operations, international business, financial management, product development, leadership development, and supply chain and logistics.

 

 

11


Table of Contents

Nominee – Class III Director for Term Expiring in 2016

 

LOGO   

DAVID E. WEISS

 

Age 70

 

Biography – Retired Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Storage Technology Corporation, a publicly-held developer, manufacturer and distributor of data storage solutions

for the management, retrieval and protection of business information. Our director since 2005.

Mr. Weiss has 33 years of leadership experience in the computer and information technology industry, serving as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Storage Technology Corporation from 1996 to 2000 and in other executive positions with Storage Technology Corporation from 1991 to 1996, including Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President, Senior Vice President for Marketing and Vice President – Global Marketing. Prior to joining Storage Technology Corporation, Mr. Weiss worked in various engineering management positions with IBM Corporation, a global computer and information technology company, from 1967 to 1991.

Board Committee – Compensation Committee Chair.

Key Attributes, Experience and Skills – As Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Storage Technology Corporation, Mr. Weiss led a global public company and public company board. Through his service at Storage Technology Corporation and IBM Corporation, he gained expertise in the areas of business operations, strategy development, information technology, mergers and acquisitions, financial management, leadership development and succession planning, executive compensation, marketing, investor relations and corporate governance.

Class II Director – Term Expiring in 2015

 

LOGO   

BERNARD P. ALDRICH

 

Age 64

 

Biography – Retired Chief Executive Officer and President of Rimage Corporation (now Qumu Corporation), a publicly-held  designer  and  manufacturer of on-demand publishing and duplicating

systems for CD and DVD – recordable media. Our director since 1999.

Mr. Aldrich retired as Chief Executive Officer and President and a director of Rimage Corporation in 2009, after 12 years of service in those capacities. Prior to joining Rimage Corporation in 1997, he served as President of several manufacturing companies controlled by Activar, Inc., an industrial plastics and construction supply company, from 1995 to 1996. Mr. Aldrich served as President of Colwell Industries, a company that designs, manufactures and distributes color merchandising tools, from 1992 to 1994 and as Chief Financial Officer of Advance Machine Co., a manufacturer and supplier of equipment for the commercial floor care industry, from 1973 to 1991.

Board Position – Non-Executive Chair of the Board since 2011.

Key Attributes, Experience and Skills – Mr. Aldrich has 13 years of public company operational experience, eight years of private company operational experience and 18 years of private company financial management experience. In addition to leading companies, he has a background and expertise in manufacturing operations, financial management, global markets, executive compensation, leadership development and corporate governance. Mr. Aldrich also has experience leading a public company board.

Other Directorships Since 2009 – Formerly a director of Rimage Corporation (now Qumu Corporation).

 

 

12


Table of Contents

Class II Director – Term Expiring in 2015

 

LOGO

  

JOHN T. MANNING

 

Age 65

 

Biography – Retired Vice Chairman and Audit Partner of BDO Seidman LLP (now BDO USA, LLP), the U.S. member firm of BDO International Limited, an international public accounting firm. Our

director since 2005.

Mr. Manning retired from BDO Seidman LLP in 2000 after 27 years of service. During his tenure with BDO Seidman LLP (and its affiliate, BDO International Limited), he worked in various management positions for 12 years, including Vice Chairman from 1995 to 1999, Managing Partner of the Richmond, Virginia office from 1990 to 1991, and various management positions in the international headquarters in Brussels, Belgium from 1992 to 1995. Prior to moving into management with BDO Seidman LLP, Mr. Manning spent 15 years providing auditing services to BDO Seidman LLP’s clients.

Board Committees – Audit Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Member.

Key Attributes, Experience and Skills – Mr. Manning has extensive public accounting, auditing and management experience. For over 15 years, he held leadership positions at BDO Seidman LLP and BDO International Limited with responsibilities for domestic and global strategy development and execution. He also led BDO Seidman LLP’s enterprise risk management program for over five years. During his tenure at BDO Seidman LLP, he gained broad knowledge of many different industries, including a specialty in the commercial construction industry, and experience working with public, private and not-for-profit boards. Mr. Manning has background and expertise in financial management, strategic planning, information technology, leadership development, risk assessment and mitigation, human resources, and international operations. Mr. Manning also has experience serving on public and private company boards.

Class II Director – Term Expiring in 2015

 

LOGO

  

JOSEPH F. PUISHYS

 

Age 56

 

Biography – Our Chief Executive Officer and President and director since August 2011.

Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Puishys served in various leadership positions at Honeywell International, Inc., a Fortune 100 diversified technology and manufacturing company, for over 32 years. He served as President of Honeywell Environment & Combustion Controls from 2008 to 2011; President of Honeywell Building Solutions from 2005 to 2008; President of Honeywell Building Solutions, America from 2004 to 2005; President of Bendix Friction Materials from 2002 to 2004; Vice President and General Manager of Garrett Engine Boosting Systems from 2000 to 2002; Vice President and General Manager, Aftermarket, Allied Signal Turbocharging Systems from 1996 to 2000; Vice President, Logistics, Allied Signal Automotive Products Group from 1992 to 1996; and various accounting and financial positions from 1979 to 1992.

Key Attributes, Experience and Skills – Mr. Puishys brings to our Board 32 years of experience at a Fortune 100 company and extensive expertise and insight in the areas of the commercial building and construction industry, global markets, sales and operations, business building, mergers and acquisitions, operational excellence, leadership development and financial management.

Other Directorships Since 2009 – Director of Arctic Cat Inc.

 

 

13


Table of Contents

Class III Director – Term Expiring in 2016

 

LOGO

  

JEROME L. DAVIS

 

Age 59

 

Biography – Former Corporate Vice President of Food and Retail for Waste Management, Inc., the leading provider of integrated environmental solutions in North America, from January 2010 to

June 2012. Our director since 2004.

Mr. Davis was President of Jerome L. Davis & Associates, LLC, a consulting firm focusing on executive coaching and leadership development, from 2006 until December 2009.

Mr. Davis was Global Vice President, Service Excellence for Electronic Data Systems, a business and technology services company, from July 2003 to October 2005. From May 2001 to July 2003, he served in various capacities at Electronic Data Systems, including Chief Client Executive Officer and President, Americas for Business Process Management. Prior to joining Electronic Data Systems, Mr. Davis served as President and Executive Officer of the Commercial Solutions Division of Maytag Corporation, a home and commercial appliance company, from October 1999 until May 2001. He served as Senior Vice President of Sales and Corporate Officer for Maytag’s Appliances Division from March 1998 to September 1999. From March 1992 to February 1998, Mr. Davis was Vice President of National Accounts and Area Vice President for Frito Lay, a global food company. Mr. Davis also held various sales and marketing positions with Proctor & Gamble, a global consumer products company, from 1977 to 1992.

Board Committees – Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Member.

Key Attributes, Experience and Skills – Mr. Davis brings to our Board 30 years of experience in Fortune 500 companies and extensive expertise and insight in the areas of marketing and sales, strategy development, international business, leadership development, succession planning, executive compensation and information technology. His role on another public company board provides him with public company board and corporate governance experience.

Other Directorships Since 2009 – Director of GameStop Corp.

Class III Director – Term Expiring in 2016

 

LOGO

  

SARA L. HAYS

 

Age 49

 

Biography – Principal of SLH Advisors, a privately-held project management and consulting services firm, since May 2011. Our director since 2005.

Ms. Hays served as Managing Director, Operations and General Counsel and member of the Executive and Investment Committees of Wrightwood Capital LLC (now part of Ares Management LLC), a real estate finance and investment company, from April 2005 through April 2011. Prior to joining Wrightwood Capital LLC, she spent over 10 years at Hyatt Hotels, a global hospitality company, initially as Development Counsel, structuring and negotiating management, venture, development and finance agreements, and ultimately serving as Senior Vice President and General Counsel and a member of Hyatt Hotels’ Managing Committee responsible for managing the legal risks associated with Hyatt Hotels’ worldwide operations, transactions and owned assets. Before joining Hyatt Hotels, Ms. Hays was an associate practicing commercial real estate law with the Chicago law firm of Coffield Ungaretti & Harris (now Ungaretti & Harris) from 1989 to 1994. Ms. Hays holds an MBA from Kellogg School of Management and a JD from Northwestern University School of Law.

Board Committee – Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair.

Key Attributes, Experience and Skills – Ms. Hays has over 24 years of experience as a strategic business partner and counsel to senior executives and board members in the commercial real estate, finance and hospitality industries with particular expertise in the areas of operations and strategic planning, complex transactions, including acquisitions, debt and equity structuring and workouts, fund formation and management, legal and risk management, investor relations and corporate governance. Ms. Hays has over 17 years of service as in-house counsel to corporations (14 years as a general counsel) and has managed a broad range of legal, enterprise risk, regulatory, compliance and corporate governance issues. Ms. Hays also has private company and non-profit board experience.

 

 

14


Table of Contents

Class III Director – Term Expiring in 2016

 

LOGO

  

RICHARD V. REYNOLDS

 

Age 65

 

Biography – Lieutenant General, U.S. Air Force, retired. Owner of The Van Fleet Group, LLC, a privately-held aerospace consulting firm. Our director since 2006.

General Reynolds retired from the U.S. Air Force in 2005 after 34 years of service, having served as Vice Commander, Air Force Materiel Command from 2003 to 2005; Commander, Aeronautical Systems Center of Air Force Materiel Command from 2001 to 2003; Commander, Air Force Flight Test Center of Air Force Materiel Command from 1998 to 2001; Program Executive Officer, Airlift and Trainers of the Air Force Program Executive Office from 1996 to 1998 and various other operational and leadership positions from 1971 to 1996.

General Reynolds formed The Van Fleet Group, LLC in 2006. He also served as Senior Manager/Senior Business Advisor of BearingPoint, Inc., an international management and technology consulting firm, from 2006 to 2009.

Board Committees – Audit Committee and Compensation Committee Member.

Key Attributes, Experience and Skills – General Reynolds’ service in senior leadership positions in the U.S. Air Force provides valuable business, leadership and management experience, including expertise in government contracting and procurement, risk assessment and mitigation, supply chain and logistics management, information technology and leadership development. General Reynolds also has experience serving on public and private company and non-profit boards.

Other Directorships Since 2009 – Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.

 

 

15


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

Corporate Governance Section of Our Web Site

Information relative to our corporate governance is available on our web site at www.apog.com by clicking on “Corporate Governance” and then the applicable document or information. This information includes:

 

 

Board of Directors – Background, Experience and Independence

 

Board Committees – Current Members

 

Board Committee Charters

 

How to Contact the Board

 

Management – Background and Experience

 

Our Code of Business Ethics and Conduct

 

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines

 

Our Restated Articles of Incorporation

 

Our Amended and Restated Bylaws

We will provide copies of any of the foregoing information without charge upon written request to: Corporate Secretary, Apogee Enterprises, Inc., 4400 West 78th Street, Suite 520, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435.

Code of Business Ethics and Conduct

Our Board of Directors has adopted our Code of Business Ethics and Conduct (our “Code of Conduct”), which is a statement of our high standards for ethical behavior and legal compliance. All of our employees, including our executive officers, and all members of our Board of Directors are required to comply with our Code of Conduct.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines outline the role, composition, qualifications, operation and other policies applicable to our Board of Directors and are revised as necessary to continue to reflect evolving corporate governance practices.

Board Independence

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, a substantial majority of the directors on our Board, and all members of our Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees must be independent. Each year, in accordance with NASDAQ rules, our Board of Directors affirmatively determines the independence of each director and nominee for election as a director in accordance with guidelines it has adopted, which include all elements of independence set forth in the NASDAQ listing standards.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviewed the applicable legal standards for Board member and Board committee member independence. In making its independence recommendation, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviewed a summary of the answers to annual questionnaires completed by each Board member regarding employment, business, familial, compensation and other relationships with Apogee and our management. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reported on its review to our Board of Directors. Based on this review, our Board of Directors has determined that the following non-employee directors are independent and have no material relationship with us except serving as a director and holding shares of our common stock: Bernard P. Aldrich, Jerome L. Davis, Sara L. Hays, John T. Manning, Robert J. Marzec, Stephen C. Mitchell, Donald A. Nolan, Richard V. Reynolds and David E. Weiss. Our Board of Directors has determined that Joseph F. Puishys is not independent because he serves as our Chief Executive Officer and President.

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Non-Employee Directors

Our Board of Directors believes that non-employee directors should have a significant equity interest in Apogee and established voluntary stock ownership guidelines for directors in 2002. The guidelines encourage share ownership by our directors in an amount having a market value of $150,000 (three times the current annual Board retainer of $50,000) to be achieved within five years of first being elected as a director. In calculating share ownership of our non-employee directors, we include shares of restricted stock issued pursuant to our Director Stock Plan and phantom stock units under our Director Deferred Compensation Plan, but do not include unexercised stock options. As of February 28, 2014, the last trading day of fiscal 2014, all our non-employee directors whose terms continue after our 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders met our stock ownership guidelines, except for Donald A. Nolan, who joined our Board on June 26, 2013 and is making progress toward meeting his stock ownership guideline within the required time period.

 

 

16


Table of Contents

Retirement Policy

Our Board of Directors has established a policy that, unless otherwise approved by a majority of our directors, no individual who is over 72 years of age may be elected to serve as a director.

Procedures for Shareholder Recommendations or Nominations of Director Candidates

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers recommendations of director candidates. A shareholder who wishes to recommend a director candidate to our Board of Directors for nomination by our Board of Directors at our annual meeting or for vacancies on our Board of Directors that arise between meetings must provide our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee with sufficient written documentation to permit a determination by our Board of Directors as to whether such candidate meets the required and desired director selection criteria set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the factors discussed below under the heading “Criteria for Membership on Our Board of Directors.” Such documentation and the name of the director candidate must be sent by U.S. mail to our Corporate Secretary at the address indicated on the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Our Corporate Secretary will send properly submitted shareholder recommendations to the Chair of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for consideration at a future committee meeting.

Alternatively, shareholders may directly nominate a person for election to our Board of Directors by complying with the procedures set forth in our Amended and Restated Bylaws and the rules and regulations of the SEC. Our Amended and Restated Bylaws are available on our website at www.apog.com by clicking on “Corporate Governance,” then “Bylaws.” Any shareholder nominations of director candidates for the 2015 election of directors should be submitted to our Corporate Secretary at the address indicated on the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders no later than February 27, 2015.

Director candidates recommended by shareholders in compliance with these procedures and who meet the criteria outlined above will be evaluated by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in the same manner as nominees proposed by other sources.

Criteria for Membership on Our Board of Directors

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines outline our director qualification standards. Director candidates should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values; be committed to representing the long-term interests of our stakeholders; have an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom and mature judgment; and be willing to challenge management in a constructive manner. Our Board of Directors strives for membership that is diverse in gender, ethnicity, age, geographic location, and business skills and experience at policy-making levels. In addition, director candidates must be willing to devote sufficient time to carrying out their duties and responsibilities effectively, and should be committed to serving on our Board of Directors for an extended period of time.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s procedure for reviewing the qualifications of all nominees for membership on our Board of Directors include making a preliminary assessment of each proposed nominee, based upon resume and biographical information, willingness to serve, and other background information, business experience and leadership skills. All director candidates who continue in the process are then interviewed by members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a majority of our other current directors. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee makes recommendations to our Board of Directors for inclusion in the slate of director nominees at a meeting of shareholders, or for appointment by our Board of Directors to fill a vacancy. Prior to recommending a director to stand for re-election for another term, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee applies its director candidate selection criteria, including a director’s past contributions to our Board of Directors, effectiveness as a director and desire to continue to serve as a director.

 

 

17


Table of Contents

Board Meetings and 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

During fiscal 2014, our Board of Directors met five times and our non-employee directors met in executive session without our Chief Executive Officer or any other members of management being present four times. Each of our directors attended at least 75% of the regularly scheduled and special meetings of our Board of Directors

and the Board committees on which he or she served that were held during the time he or she was a director during fiscal 2014.

All members of our Board of Directors are expected to attend our annual meetings of shareholders and all ten of the members of our Board of Directors attended our 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

 

 

Board Committee Membership, Meetings and Responsibilities

We currently have three standing Board committees: Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance. Each of those Committees consists entirely of independent, non-employee directors. On June 26, 2013, we disbanded our Strategy and Enterprise Risk Committee, with the full Board assuming oversight for strategy and enterprise risk. Each Committee operates under a written charter which is available on our website at www.apog.com (“Corporate Governance”).

The table below provides fiscal 2014 membership and meeting information for each of our standing Board committees.

 

Name

   Audit
  Committee  
    Compensation  
Committee
  Nominating
  and Corporate  
Governance
Committee
  Strategy and
  Enterprise Risk  
Committee(1)

Bernard P. Aldrich(2)

                

Jerome L. Davis

           M         M      

Sara L. Hays

       M (3)           C (4)       M (3)

John T. Manning

       M             M (4)       C (3)

Robert J. Marzec

       C             M (3)    

Stephen C. Mitchell

           M         C/M (5)    

Donald A. Nolan

       M (4)            

Joseph F. Puishys

                   M (3)

Richard V. Reynolds

       M         M (4)           M (3)

David E. Weiss

           C             M (3)

Fiscal 2014 Meetings

       9         7         4         1  

Fiscal 2014 Executive Sessions

       5         5         3         1  

C = Committee Chair      M = Committee Member

 

 

(1) 

Our Strategy and Enterprise Risk Committee disbanded on June 26, 2013.

 

(2) 

Mr. Aldrich serves as Non-Executive Chair of our Board.

 

(3) 

Through June 26, 2013.

 

(4) 

Since June 26, 2013.

 

(5) 

Mr. Mitchell served as Chair of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee through June 26, 2013 and continued to serve as a member of such Committee after such date.

 

18


Table of Contents

The primary functions of each of our current Board Committees are described below.

 

Board Committee

  

Responsibilities

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE

 

All Members Independent

 

This Committee has oversight responsibilities for our independent registered public accounting firm.

 

Each member meets the independence and experience requirements of the NASDAQ listing standards and the SEC.

 

John T. Manning and Robert J. Marzec are each “audit committee financial experts” under the rules of the SEC.

  

 

•   Directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the firm that serves as the independent accountants to audit our financial statements.

 

•   Oversees our system of financial controls and internal audit procedures.

 

•   Oversees our program to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and ethical business practices.

 

•   Assesses and establishes policies and procedures to manage our financial reporting and internal control risk.

 

•   Establishes policies and procedures for the pre-approval of all services by our independent registered public accounting firm.

 

•   Oversees our internal audit function.

 

•   Establishes procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal controls and auditing matters.

 

•   Considers the accountants’ independence.

 

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

 

All Members Independent

 

This Committee administers our executive compensation program.

 

Each member is a “non-employee” director, as defined in the Exchange Act, and is an “outside director” as defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

 

  

 

•   Establishes our executive compensation philosophy and compensation programs that comply with this philosophy.

 

•   Determines the compensation of our executive officers and other members of senior management.

 

•   Administers our stock incentive plans in which our employees participate.

 

•   Administers our annual cash and long-term incentive plans for executive officers and other members of senior management.

 

•   Reviews its decisions on compensation for our Chief Executive Officer with the full Board of Directors prior to communicating those decisions to our Chief Executive Officer.

 

NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

 

All Members Independent

 

This Committee identifies and evaluates Board candidates and oversees our corporate governance practices.

  

 

•   Establishes and implements procedures to review the qualifications for membership on our Board of Directors, including nominees recommended by shareholders.

 

•   Assesses our compliance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

 

•   Reviews our organizational structure and succession plans.

 

•   Makes recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding the composition and responsibilities of our Board committees and compensation for directors.

 

•   Conducts an annual performance review of our Board committees and Board of Directors as a whole and our directors whose terms are expiring at that year’s annual meeting of shareholders.

 

•   Conducts an annual review of the performance of our Chief Executive Officer, which includes soliciting assessments from all non-employee directors.

 

 

19


Table of Contents

Risk Oversight by Our Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors oversees our enterprise risk management processes, focusing on our business and strategic, financial, operational, information technology, and overall enterprise risk. In deciding to disband our Strategy and Enterprise Risk Committee on June 26, 2013, our Board determined that oversight of our Company’s strategy and overall enterprise risk management program would be more effective if performed by the full Board utilizing the skills and experiences of all Board members. In addition, our Board of Directors executes its overall responsibility for risk management through its Committees, as follows:

 

 

Our Audit Committee has primary responsibility for risks relating to the reliability of our financial reporting processes, system of internal controls and corporate compliance program. Our Audit Committee receives quarterly reports from management, our independent registered public accounting firm and internal audit partner regarding our financial reporting processes, internal controls and public filings. It also receives quarterly updates from management regarding Code of Conduct issues, litigation and legal claims, and other compliance matters.

 

 

Our Compensation Committee, with assistance from its independent compensation consultant, oversees the risks associated with our compensation programs, policies and practices with respect to both executive compensation and compensation generally.

 

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the risks associated with succession planning, non-employee director compensation, overall Board of Directors and Board Committee performance and corporate governance practices.

Our Board of Directors is kept abreast of the risk oversight efforts by our Committees through reports to our full Board by our Committee Chairs presented at each quarterly meeting of our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors considers specific risk topics, including risks associated with our strategic plan, mergers and acquisitions, and market risks.

Board Leadership Structure

Our Board of Directors separated the roles of Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and appointed Mr. Aldrich as the Non-Executive Chair of our Board in January 2011. In this capacity, Mr. Aldrich has chaired the meetings of our Board of Directors and executive sessions of our independent directors. The Non-Executive Chair of our Board, in consultation with our Chief Executive Officer, establishes the agenda for each meeting of our Board of Directors.

We believe our Board leadership structure supports the risk oversight function of our Board of Directors. In addition to having a Non-Executive Chair of the Board, strong independent directors chair each of our Board Committees, there is open communication between management and our directors, and all of our directors are actively involved in the risk oversight function.

 

 

20


Table of Contents

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

 

We have established written policies and procedures (the “Related Person Transaction Policy”) to assist us in reviewing transactions in excess of $120,000 involving our Company and our subsidiaries and Related Persons (“Related Person Transactions”). A Related Person includes our Company’s directors, director nominees and executive officers, beneficial owners of 5% or more of our Company’s common stock and their respective Immediate Family Members (as defined in our Related Person Transaction Policy). Our Related Person Transaction Policy supplements our Code of Conduct Conflict of Interest Policy (the “Conflict of Interest Policy”), which applies to all of our employees and directors.

Our Related Person Transaction Policy requires any Related Person Transaction to be promptly reported to the Chair of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. In approving, ratifying or rejecting a Related Person Transaction, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider such information as it deems important to determine if the Related Person Transaction is fair to our Company. Our Conflict of Interest Policy requires our employees and directors to report to our General Counsel any potential conflict of interest situations involving an employee or director or their Immediate Family Members. During fiscal 2014, there were no Related Person Transactions.

 

 

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

Non-Employee Director Compensation Arrangements During Fiscal 2014

Our Board of Directors approves the compensation for members of our Board of Directors and Board Committees based on the recommendations of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. We target compensation for service on our Board of Directors and Board committees generally at the median for board service at companies in our peer group of companies, using the same peer group used for executive compensation purposes described under the heading “Competitive Market” on page 33. Generally, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews and discusses the

compensation data and analysis provided by management using a third party compensation database. Our Chief Executive Officer participates in the discussions on compensation for members of our Board of Directors. Directors who are employees receive no additional compensation for serving on our Board of Directors.

Our non-employee directors receive cash compensation in the form of cash retainers and equity compensation in the form of restricted stock awards, as described under the heading “Restricted Stock Awards” on page 22. Mr. Puishys, our only employee director, receives no additional compensation for serving on our Board of Directors.

 

 

21


Table of Contents

The following table describes the compensation arrangements with our non-employee directors for fiscal 2014.

 

Compensation

   Fiscal 2014

Annual Cash Retainers:

  

Non-Executive Chair of the Board(1) (2)

   $110,000

Board Member(2)

       50,000

Audit Committee Chair

       30,000

Audit Committee Member

       15,000

Compensation Committee Chair

       20,000

Compensation Committee Member

       10,000

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair

       20,000

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Member

       10,000

Strategy and Enterprise Risk Committee Chair(3)

       20,000

Strategy and Enterprise Risk Committee Member(3)

       10,000

Equity Grant

   A time-based restricted stock award
of 3,122 shares that vests over
three years.

Charitable Matching Contributions Program for Non-Employee Directors

   $2,000 maximum aggregate annual
match.

 

(1) 

We pay an annual cash retainer to our Non-Executive Chair of the Board and do not pay any other cash compensation to him for service on our Board of Directors.

 

(2) 

Our Board of Directors increased the annual retainers for the Non-Executive Chair by $10,000 to $110,000 and for Board members by $10,000 to $50,000 effective as of July 1, 2013.

 

(3) 

On June 26, 2013, our Strategy and Enterprise Risk Committee was disbanded and the cash retainers were paid only for that portion of the year the Committee was in existence.

 

Restricted Stock Awards

Restricted stock awards to non-employee directors are issued pursuant to our Director Stock Plan. Each non-employee director receives a time-based restricted stock award on the date he or she is first elected to our Board and annually on the date of our annual meeting of shareholders if his or her term continues after such meeting. The number of shares of restricted stock subject to the award is determined by our Board of Directors, after recommendation by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and in consideration of various factors, including our performance, market data and trends, performance by our Board as a whole and the equity-based compensation received by non-employee directors approximating the 50th percentile of our peer group of companies, using the same peer group of companies used for executive compensation purposes. The outstanding time-based restricted stock awards vest in three annual installments over the three-year vesting period.

Director Deferred Compensation Plan

Our Director Deferred Compensation Plan was adopted by our Board of Directors to encourage our non-employee directors to continue to make contributions to the growth and profits of Apogee and to increase their ownership of shares of our common stock, thereby aligning their interests in the long-term success of Apogee with that of our other shareholders. Under the plan, participants may elect to defer all or a portion of their annual retainer into deferred stock accounts. There is no Company match on amounts deferred by our non-employee directors under such plan. Each participating director receives a credit of shares of our common stock in an amount equal to the amount deferred divided by the fair market value of one share of our common stock as of the crediting date. These accounts also are credited, as of the crediting date, with an amount equal to the dividend paid on one share of our common stock multiplied by the number of shares credited to each account. Participating directors may elect to receive the amounts credited to their accounts at a fixed date, at

 

 

22


Table of Contents

age 70 or following death or retirement from our Board of Directors. The amounts are paid out in the form of shares of our common stock (plus cash in lieu of fractional shares) either in a lump sum or in installments, at the participating director’s election. This plan is an unfunded, book-entry, “phantom stock unit” plan, as no trust or other vehicle has been established to hold any shares of our common stock.

Charitable Matching Contributions Program for Non-Employee Directors

Under our Charitable Matching Contributions Program for Non-Employee Directors, we match cash or publicly-traded stock contributions made by our non-employee directors to charitable organizations that are exempt from federal income tax up to a maximum aggregate amount of $2,000 per eligible non-employee director per calendar year.

 

 

Fiscal 2014 Non-Employee Director Compensation Table

The following table shows the compensation paid to our non-employee directors for fiscal 2014.

 

Name

   Fees Earned or
Paid in

Cash ($)(1)
   Stock
    Awards ($)(2)    
   All Other
    Compensation    
($)(3)
       Total ($)    

Bernard P. Aldrich

       106,667(4)    74,990    22,554    204,211

Jerome L. Davis

     66,667    74,990    17,494    159,151

Sara L. Hays

     68,333    74,990    13,163    156,486

John T. Manning

     75,000    74,990      5,492    155,482

Robert J. Marzec

     80,000    74,990      9,440    164,430

Stephen C. Mitchell

     70,000    74,990      5,492    150,482

Donald A. Nolan(5)

     43,333    74,990      1,024    119,347

Richard V. Reynolds

     71,667    74,990    14,235    160,892

David E. Weiss

     70,000    74,990      5,492    150,482

 

(1) 

Includes cash retainers deferred by non-employee directors under our Director Deferred Compensation Plan, as further described under the heading “Director Deferred Compensation Plan” on page 22. During fiscal 2014, Messrs. Davis and Nolan were our only non-employee directors to make deferrals of their annual cash retainers pursuant to our Director Deferred Compensation Plan, deferring $16,667 and $32,500, respectively, of their fiscal 2014 retainers.

 

(2) 

The amounts in this column are calculated based on the fair market value of our common stock on the date the award was made in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“FASB ASC Topic 718”). Each non-employee director received a time-based restricted stock award of 3,122 shares on June 26, 2013. The closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on June 26, 2013, the date of grant, was $24.02. The table below sets forth certain information with respect to the aggregate number of shares of unvested restricted stock and vested options to purchase shares of our common stock held by our non-employee directors as of March 1, 2014, the end of fiscal 2014. Our non-employee directors did not hold any unvested stock options as of March 1, 2014.

 

Name

   Aggregate
    Number of Shares  of    
Restricted Stock (#)
   Aggregate
    Number of Stock     
Options (#)

Bernard P. Aldrich

   7,933    31,257

Jerome L. Davis

   7,933    21,946

Sara L. Hays

   7,933    16,072

John T. Manning

   7,933          —

Robert J. Marzec

   7,933    25,383

Stephen C. Mitchell

   7,933          —

Donald A. Nolan

   3,122          —

Richard V. Reynolds

   7,933    10,000

David E. Weiss

   7,933    25,383

 

23


Table of Contents
(3) 

This column includes the dividend equivalents paid on phantom stock units pursuant to our Director Deferred Compensation Plan, dividends paid on shares of restricted stock issued pursuant to our Director Stock Plan and matching contributions pursuant to our Charitable Matching Contributions Program for Non-Employee Directors. The table below sets forth the amounts contributed or paid by the Company for our non-employee directors pursuant to such plans with respect to fiscal 2014.

 

Name

   Dividend
Equivalents Paid
on Phantom
Stock Units Held
in our Director
Deferred
Compensation
Plan ($)
   Dividends Paid
on Shares of
Restricted Stock
Issued Pursuant
to our Director
Stock Plan ($)
   Matching
Contributions
under our
Charitable
Matching
Contributions
Program for

Non-Employee
Directors ($)
   Total All Other
Compensation ($)

Bernard P. Aldrich

       17,062      3,492    2,000    22,554

Jerome L. Davis

       12,002      3,492    2,000    17,494

Sara L. Hays

       7,671      3,492    2,000    13,163

John T. Manning

            3,492    2,000      5,492

Robert J. Marzec

       3,948      3,492    2,000      9,440

Stephen C. Mitchell

            3,492    2,000      5,492

Donald A. Nolan

       150         874          —      1,024

Richard V. Reynolds

       8,743      3,492    2,000    14,235

David E. Weiss

            3,492    2,000      5,492

 

(4) 

We increased the annual retainer for service as our Non-Executive Chair by $10,000 on July 1, 2014, the fifth month in fiscal 2014.

 

(5) 

Mr. Nolan joined our Board of Directors on June 26, 2013.

 

24


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Compensation Committee Report

Our Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis section with management and the Committee’s independent compensation consultant. Based on its review and discussions with management, our Compensation Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s 2014 proxy statement and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014.

Compensation Committee of the

Board of Directors of Apogee

David E. Weiss, Chair

Jerome L. Davis

Stephen C. Mitchell

Richard V. Reynolds

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes Apogee’s executive compensation program for fiscal 2014, and certain elements of the fiscal 2015 program. In particular, this section explains how our Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) made decisions related to compensation for our executives, including our Named Executive Officers, for fiscal 2014.

Our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2014 were:

 

Joseph F. Puishys, Chief Executive Officer and President

 

James S. Porter, Chief Financial Officer

 

Patricia A. Beithon, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

 

John A. Klein, Senior Vice President, Operations and Supply Chain Management

 

Gary R. Johnson, Vice President and Treasurer

Messrs. Porter, Klein and Johnson and Ms. Beithon are collectively referred to as our “Other Named Executive Officers” in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis section.

Executive Summary

About Apogee. Our Company is a leader in technologies involving the design and development of value-added glass products and services for the commercial construction and picture framing industries. We are a leading fabricator of coated, high performance architectural glass for global markets. We are one of the largest U.S. full-service building glass installation and renovation companies. We design, engineer, fabricate and finish aluminum frames for window, curtainwall and storefront systems that comprise the outside skin of buildings in North America. We also provide value-added glass and acrylic for the custom picture framing market sector.

Our Fiscal 2014 Performance. Our Company delivered another year of significant growth as we executed on our business strategies in commercial construction market sectors that are showing some improvement. Our Company benefitted from increased sales, improving pricing and project margins in our segments serving the commercial construction market sectors, along with better execution.

 

 

We grew revenues 10% over fiscal 2013, with all of our segments showing growth in revenues.

 

 

We had operating income of $40,285,000, up 47% over operating income of $27,419,000 in fiscal 2013.

 

 

We increased our operating margin 130 basis points to 5.2%.

 

 

Our earnings per share increased 42% to $0.95 from $0.67 per share in fiscal 2013.

 

 

Our backlog at the end of fiscal 2014 was $329,600,000, an increase of 11% or $31,300,000 over backlog at the end of fiscal 2013.

 

 

We had positive cash flow from continuing operations of $52,921,000 in fiscal 2014, compared to $40,523,000 in fiscal 2013.

 

 

25


Table of Contents
 

We also maintained a strong financial position during fiscal 2014, with a net positive cash position of $28,700,000 at the end of fiscal 2014, after completing two acquisitions during fiscal 2014 for approximately $54,000,000 in cash.

 

 

Our stock price as of the last trading day of fiscal 2014 was $34.23, 31% higher than our stock price of $26.21 on the last trading day of fiscal 2013.

In addition to the significant financial improvements during fiscal 2014, we made considerable progress on our strategies to continue to grow in fiscal 2015 and beyond through new geographies, new products and new market sectors.

 

 

We expanded our North American geographic footprint in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 by acquiring a Canadian storefront and entrance system company with annual revenues of approximately C$60,000,000.

 

 

We expanded our U.S. geographic footprint for building glass installation and renovation services by opening two offices in Texas and successfully executed installation projects and were awarded new installation projects in our new Texas region.

 

 

We expanded our window product offerings during the second quarter of fiscal 2014, when we acquired certain assets and liabilities of a window fabrication company in Colorado that added historical window renovation products.

 

 

We increased our aluminum extrusion capacity with the installation of a third extrusion press that became operational in the first quarter of fiscal 2015.

 

 

We increased our anodizing capacity with enhancements to our anodizing facility.

 

 

We expanded our U.S. geographic footprint for storefront and entrance systems with a new fabrication facility in Texas.

 

 

We further penetrated new picture framing markets in Europe and certain other international geographies.

 

 

All of our business units introduced new products during fiscal 2014.

Additionally, we took actions to improve our operations for fiscal 2014 and future years.

 

 

We made significant investments in new capabilities and efficiencies at our Minnesota architectural glass fabrication facility with the installation of a new state-of-the-art glass coater, which we anticipate will be operational during the second quarter of fiscal 2015.

 

 

We continued our focus on company-wide continuous improvement and Lean manufacturing initiatives and improvements in our supply chain management.

 

 

We continued our long-standing focus on workplace and job site safety.

 

 

We continued our focus on developing our future senior leaders with senior and middle management leadership development programs.

 

 

26


Table of Contents

Creating Shareholder Value. With the U.S. commercial construction market sector only beginning to recover during fiscal 2014, our Company has delivered substantial improvement in total shareholder returns and has outperformed the companies in our compensation peer group (identified under “Competitive Market’ on page 33), and the Russell 2000 Index. In fiscal 2014, our Company delivered total shareholder returns of 32%, higher than our compensation peer group and the Russell 2000 Index. The chart below compares our Company’s total shareholder returns to our compensation peer group and the Russell 2000 Index for the past one, three and five-year periods.

 

 

LOGO

 

We have had significantly improved financial performance over the last three fiscal years, as evidenced by our growth in net sales and earnings per share from operations. These metrics among others are used in our incentive compensation plans to reward our executives and align pay with performance.

 

 

LOGO

 

 

 

LOGO

 

 

 

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Practices. Our compensation programs are designed to attract, motivate and retain executive talent to achieve long-term success of our Company; pay for sustainable performance in an ever-changing environment; and align the interests of our executive officers with our shareholders. We continue to refine our executive compensation program to reflect evolving executive compensation practices. The table on page 28 highlights our current executive compensation practices.

 

27


Table of Contents

Our Executive

Compensation Practices:

(What We Do)

 

 

See

Page

 

 

 

Executive Compensation Practices

We Have Not Implemented

or Have Discontinued:

(What We Don’t Do)

 

 

See

Page

 

 

We tie pay to performance. A significant percentage of both short-term compensation and long-term compensation is performance-based.

 

We review “tally sheets” and realizable pay and performance for our executives and use that information as a factor in making compensation decisions.

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

 

32

 

 

We do not have employment contracts for our Named Executive Officers, except for a transitional employment agreement with Mr. Puishys, who joined our Company on August 22, 2011 as our Chief Executive Officer and President, which expires on August 22, 2014.

 

 

42

 

We mitigate undue compensation risk, including utilizing caps on potential payments; multiple financial performance metrics; different metrics for our annual cash incentives and long-term performance awards; as well as robust Board and Board Committee processes to identify risk.

 

 

 

44

 

 

We do not believe any of our Company’s compensation programs create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company.

 

 

44

 

We have change-in-control severance agreements with all of our Named Executive Officers that provide benefits only upon a “double trigger.”

 

 

43

 

 

We do not provide for excise tax gross-ups or single triggers in our change-in-control severance agreements.

 

 

43

 

Our equity award agreements for grants made pursuant to our Stock Incentive Plan have “double trigger” change-in-control provisions for all employees.

 

 

 

56

       

 

We provide minimal perquisites to our executives.

 

 

46-47 

 

 

We do not provide tax reimbursement or tax “gross-ups” on any perquisites.

 

We do not provide automobile allowances to or pay for club memberships for our Named Executive Officers.

 

We do not have any Company-owned or leased aircraft.

 

 

 

46-47 

 

We have adopted stringent share ownership guidelines, and we review compliance annually.

 

We evaluate share utilization by annually reviewing overhang and annual burn rates.

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

 

33

 

 

We do not reprice underwater stock options or stock appreciation rights.

   

 

The Committee benefits from its utilization of a compensation consulting firm that fully meets the stringent independence requirements under the final rules of the Dodd-Frank Act.

 

 

32

 

 

The Committee’s compensation consulting firm does not provide any other services to our Company other than those requested by our Compensation Committee for executive compensation and our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee with respect to director compensation.

 

 

 

32

 

We have a clawback policy that applies to our Named Executive Officers and certain other executives.

 

We have a formal hedging policy that prohibits all employees and directors from engaging in hedging transactions in our Company’s securities.

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

 

43

 

 

The Committee’s independent compensation consulting firm does not provide any specific recommendations for compensation for our Named Executive Officers.

 

 

32

 

28


Table of Contents

The Role of Shareholder Vote on Say on Pay Proposal. Our Company provides our shareholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on our Say on Pay Proposal annually. At our Company’s annual meeting of shareholders held on June 26, 2013, 95.0% of the votes cast on the Say on Pay Proposal were voted in favor of the proposal. The Committee will continue to take into account the outcome of our Company’s Say on Pay Proposal when making future compensation decisions.

Our Executive Compensation Program. Total compensation includes a mix of short-term and long-term compensation and fixed and performance-based compensation.

 

 

Short-term compensation

 

  -

Base salary (fixed)

 

  -

Annual performance-based cash incentives (variable)

 

 

Long-term compensation

 

  -

Time-based restricted stock award (variable)

 

  -

Two-year cash-based performance awards on end-to-end cycles which are only earned upon achievement of certain two-year objective performance measures (variable). These awards are granted every other year.

 

 

Target Compensation Mix. The charts below illustrate the short-term and long-term mix, and fixed and performance-based mix of the primary compensation elements at target used by the Committee as a guideline in making compensation awards for our Named Executive Officers.

Target Compensation Mix

 

LOGO

LOGO

 

 

(1) 

Our two-year cash-based performance awards are on end-to-end performance cycles and are granted every other year. We have included the annualized (50%) value of such awards at target in the charts. Our two-year cash-based performance awards are granted at the beginning of the first year of the two-year performance cycle and are a component of long-term compensation for both years in the performance cycle.

 

29


Table of Contents

Highlights of Fiscal 2014 Compensation Actions. The following highlights the Committee’s key compensation decisions for fiscal 2014. These decisions were made after reviewing compensation data provided by the Committee’s independent compensation consultant.

 

 

Base Salaries. For fiscal 2014, the Committee awarded a base salary increase of 6.3% to our Chief Executive Officer, and base salary increases ranging from 2.5% to 3.0% to our Other Named Executive Officers. The fiscal 2014 base salary for our Chief Executive Officer was at the 45th percentile for chief executive officers in our Company’s peer group. The fiscal 2014 base salaries for our Other Named Executive Officers ranged from the 35th to 60th percentile for comparable positions in comparable markets.

 

 

Annual Cash Incentives. Our fiscal 2014 cash incentives paid out at 124.73% of target. Our Chief Executive Officer earned an annual cash incentive equal to 124.73% of his fiscal 2014 base salary and our Other Named Executive Officers earned fiscal 2014 annual cash incentives ranging from 31.18% to 74.84% of their fiscal 2014 base salaries.

 

 

Time-Based Restricted Stock Awards. On April 30, 2013, the Committee awarded time-based restricted stock awards to our Named Executive Officers, as outlined in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 45

   

and the “Fiscal 2014 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table on page 48.

 

 

Two-Year Cash-Based Performance Awards. Our fiscal 2013 – 2014 cash-based performance awards, granted during fiscal 2013, paid out at 112.34% of target and the amounts earned will be paid out in two equal annual installments in May 2014 and March 2015. Our Chief Executive Officer earned $1,348,080 and our Other Named Executive Officers earned amounts ranging from $151,561 to $606,636.

Our two-year cash-based performance awards are end-to-end awards granted every other year. Since the Committee granted the fiscal 2013 – 2014 cash-based performance awards during fiscal 2013, it did not grant any two-year cash-based performance awards during fiscal 2014. The Committee intends to grant fiscal 2015 – 2016 cash-based performance awards during the first quarter of fiscal 2015.

 

 

Legacy Three-Year Performance Share Units. At the beginning of fiscal 2013, we discontinued granting three-year performance share unit awards as a component of our long-term compensation. The legacy fiscal 2012 – 2014 performance share unit awards, the last of such awards, paid out at 134.59% of target. Messrs. Porter and Johnson and Ms. Beithon are our only Named Executive Officers who held fiscal 2012 – 2014 performance share units. No other three-year performance share unit awards are outstanding.

 

 

30


Table of Contents

Overview of Primary Compensation Elements

The table below provides an overview of the three primary compensation elements used in our executive compensation program.

 

Compensation
Element

 

Objective

 

How Determined

 

Market  Positioning(1)

 

How Impacted by
Performance

Base Salary   Attract and retain executives by offering pay programs that are competitive with the market.   Annual subjective assessment of executive leadership and individual performance, experience, tenure, competitive market data, internal equity among positions with similar responsibilities, and executive potential.   Targeted to be around the 50th percentile relative to competitive market practices.   Based on individual performance.

Annual Cash

Incentive Compensation

  Create an incentive for achievement of pre-defined annual Company performance results.  

For target bonus award opportunity percentages – competitive market data and trends and internal equity among positions with similar responsibilities.

 

For actual bonus payouts – performance against pre-established criteria in our annual cash incentive plan.

 

Target level performance results in target total cash compensation (base salary plus annual cash incentive compensation) that is generally slightly below the 50th percentile.

 

Above target performance results in maximum total cash compensation that is generally slightly above the 50th percentile.

 

Below target performance results in threshold total cash compensation that is generally at or below the 25th percentile.

  Payout dependent on achievement of one-year Company financial performance goals.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation:

 

•  Time-Based Restricted Stock and

 

•  Cash-Based Performance Awards

 

Align the interests of executives with shareholders and to focus on long-term sustained performance.

 

Create appropriate retention incentives.

  Company performance, annual subjective assessment of achievement of individual business objectives, market data and trends, internal equity among positions with similar responsibilities and executive potential.   Targeted generally to be at or slightly above the 50th percentile for target performance and up to the 75th percentile for maximum performance.  

Increase in our common stock price increases the value of the time-based restricted stock awards.

 

Payout of cash-based performance awards

is dependent on achievement of two-year Company financial performance goals.

 

(1) 

Actual pay levels may be above or below the targeted level depending on all of the factors outlined in the “How Determined” column of the table.

 

31


Table of Contents

Compensation Process

 

Our compensation program is evaluated annually taking into consideration changes to our business strategy, the economy and our competitive marketplace. The Committee reviews a compensation “tally sheet,” which lists total direct compensation (base salary, annual cash incentive compensation and long-term incentive awards), perquisites, other elements of executive compensation, broad-based employee benefits and wealth accumulation through Company equity and retirement plans for our Named Executive Officers. The compensation tally sheet is one of many factors used by the Committee to make individual compensation decisions.

The Committee does not generally consider compensation earned in prior years in establishing the elements and levels of compensation for the current fiscal year. However, the Committee does assess historical pay and performance to ensure continued alignment. The Committee also considers the annual performance evaluations of our Named Executive Officers and reviews its compensation consultant’s independent analyses of compensation for our Named Executive Officers and other executive officers based on comparable positions using both published survey sources and company peer group data to determine our competitive positioning relative to the markets where we recruit. Our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Committee on compensation for our Other Named Executive Officers, but does not participate in the determination of his own compensation.

The Committee makes the annual grant of long-term equity awards to executives primarily at its regularly scheduled meeting held during our Company’s first quarter of each fiscal year. The exact date of such meeting is generally established by the Committee more than a year in advance of the meeting.

Annually, the performance of each of our Named Executive Officers is evaluated based on a subjective assessment of (i) his or her executive leadership and (ii) achievement of agreed-upon individual business objectives for the just-completed fiscal year. The annual performance evaluation of our Chief Executive Officer is conducted by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, with all non-employee directors participating in the performance evaluation. The results of the Chief Executive

Officer’s annual performance evaluation are reviewed by the Committee and our full Board. Our Chief Executive Officer conducts or participates in the annual performance evaluation of our Other Named Executive Officers, reviews the results with members of the Committee, and makes recommendations to the Committee on compensation for our Other Named Executive Officers.

Consulting Assistance, Competitive Market and Compensation Positioning

Compensation Consultant Independence. In fiscal 2014, the Committee retained the services of Pearl Meyer & Partners (“PM&P”) to assist with the review of overall compensation for our executive officers, as well as the review of our proxy statement disclosure regarding executive compensation. PM&P reports directly to the Committee and the Committee can replace PM&P or hire additional consultants at any time. During fiscal 2014, PM&P attended five Committee meetings in person or by telephone, including executive sessions as requested, and consulted with the Chair of the Committee between meetings.

As required under the Dodd-Frank Act, the Committee has analyzed whether the work of PM&P as its compensation consultant raises any conflict of interest, taking into consideration the following factors under this rule: (i) PM&P does not provide any other services to our Company; (ii) the amount of fees from our Company paid to PM&P is less than 1% of PM&P’s total revenue; (iii) PM&P’s policies and procedures were designed to ensure independence; (iv) PM&P does not have any business or personal relationship with an executive officer of our Company; (v) PM&P does not have any business or personal relationship with any member of the Committee; and (vi) neither PM&P, nor any member of its consulting team, owns any stock of our Company. The Committee has determined, based on its analysis of the above factors, that PM&P is independent of our Company and the work of PM&P and the individual compensation advisors employed by PM&P as compensation consultants to the Committee has not created any conflict of interest. The Committee will continue to monitor the independence of its compensation consultant on an annual basis.

 

 

32


Table of Contents

Competitive Market. The Committee relies on its independent compensation consultant to help define the appropriate competitive market using a combination of peer group companies and surveys of manufacturing and general industry executive compensation identified by its compensation consultant. The information on the competitive market is used by the Committee:

 

 

As an input in developing base salary ranges, annual cash incentive targets and long-term incentive ranges;

 

To benchmark the form and mix of long-term awards;

 

To benchmark overhang levels (dilutive impact on our shareholders of equity compensation) and annual burn rate (the aggregate shares awarded as a percentage of total outstanding shares);

 

To assess the competitiveness of total direct compensation awarded to our Named Executive Officers and certain of our other executives; and

 

As an input in designing our compensation plans and philosophy.

The selection criteria identified for determining and reviewing our Company’s peer group generally include:

 

 

Companies with revenue within a similar range (0.33 to 2.0 multiple).

 

Companies with market capitalization within a similar range (0.33 to 2.0 multiple).

 

Companies with market capitalization to revenue ratio of greater than 0.5.

 

Companies in the same or similar industries.

 

Companies with business model similarity, which may include the following:

  -

Coatings for special purposes (e.g., protective, UV, etc.);

  -

Construction materials, primarily for commercial or industrial application;

  -

Specialized/customized product lines;

  -

Heavy-duty manufacturing operations and project-directed manufacturing;

  -

Project-based businesses;

  -

Green product or service initiatives; and

  -

Revenues generated primarily in the United States (greater than 60%).

 

Companies in the same geographic location (to a lesser degree).

 

Companies included in the prior-year peer group, to help ensure year-over-year consistency (where appropriate).

During the third quarter of fiscal 2013, using the selection criteria outlined above, the Committee, with the assistance of its independent compensation consultant, identified a peer group consisting of the 15 companies listed below. Each company selected met at least three of the selection criteria. During the third quarter of fiscal 2014, the Committee reevaluated and confirmed this 15-company peer group remains appropriate for compensation purposes.

Aegion Corp.

Azz incorporated

CLARCOR, Inc.

Columbus McKinnon Corporation

Daktronics, Inc.

Eagle Materials Inc.

EnPro Industries, Inc.

H.B. Fuller Company

Graco Inc.

Griffon Corporation

Lydall, Inc.

NCI Building Systems, Inc.

Quaker Chemical Corporation

Quanex Building Products Corporation

Tennant Company

Fiscal 2014 Individual Compensation Actions

Fiscal 2014 Annual Performance Evaluations. The performance during fiscal 2014 of each of our Named Executive Officers was evaluated based on a subjective assessment of (i) his or her executive leadership and (ii) achievement against his or her individual business objectives for fiscal 2014. Below is certain information regarding each Named Executive Officer’s individual business objectives for fiscal 2014 and accomplishments against those objectives.

 

 

Mr. Puishys. Mr. Puishys’ individual business objectives for fiscal 2014 were based on financial performance, geographic expansion, inorganic growth, commercial building retrofit initiative and new product introductions. During fiscal 2014, our Company exceeded its fiscal 2014 operating plan with revenue growth of 10%, and earnings per share of $0.95, a 42% increase over fiscal 2013. Also, during fiscal 2014, our Company completed the acquisition of a Canadian storefront and entrance system company and purchased certain assets of a window company that added historical window product offerings; exceeded our fiscal 2014 building glass installation services targets for orders and revenue for the new Texas region; and successfully

 

 

33


Table of Contents
 

executed on our new glass coater installation at our Minnesota architectural glass fabrication facility on schedule and budget with an operational start anticipated for the first half of fiscal 2015. All our business segments introduced new products during fiscal 2014 and our commercial building retrofit initiative exceeded our fiscal 2014 revenue target for that initiative.

 

 

Mr. Porter. Mr. Porter’s individual business objectives for fiscal 2014 were based on financial and operational performance, strategy and business development initiatives, commercial building retrofit initiative and organizational development. During fiscal 2014, revenue and earnings results exceeded our fiscal 2014 operating plan, with all four segments growing sales and earnings. In addition, during fiscal 2014, our Company improved operating margin by 130 basis points. Mr. Porter successfully led our strategy and business development efforts to expand international growth with the acquisition of a Canadian storefront and entrance system company and to expand our product offerings through the purchase of certain assets of a window company with historical window product offerings. Mr. Porter also provided support for integration efforts related to our acquisition of a Canadian storefront and entrance system company, took action to strengthen the finance organization and provided support for our commercial building retrofit initiative.

 

 

Ms. Beithon. Ms. Beithon’s individual business objectives for fiscal 2014 were based on compliance, corporate governance, litigation and claim management, and support for growth initiatives. Ms. Beithon provided legal and due diligence support for the acquisition of a Canadian storefront and entrance system company and purchase of certain assets of a window company with historical window product lines; provided legal support for other growth initiatives; continued to lead our corporate governance efforts; provided leadership for our company-wide compliance programs; managed successful resolution of various claims and litigation matters; and took actions to strengthen the legal organization.

 

Mr. Klein. Mr. Klein’s individual business objectives for fiscal 2014 were based on cost productivity savings, continuous improvement and Lean initiatives, supply chain and procurement initiatives and safety. During fiscal 2014, Mr. Klein led cost productivity initiatives resulting in savings of at least $11,000,000, exceeding our fiscal 2014 goal; implemented a Lean manufacturing scorecard at all our business units; audited each business unit on the maturity of its Lean manufacturing program; implemented various company-wide corporate buying programs that met our fiscal 2014 procurement savings goals; and provided leadership for safety. In addition, Mr. Klein also provided support for supply chain synergy opportunities and integration efforts related to our acquisition of a Canadian storefront and entrance system company.

 

 

Mr. Johnson. Mr. Johnson’s individual business objectives for fiscal 2014 were based on treasury management, enterprise risk management, credit facility management, real estate portfolio management and retirement plan management. During fiscal 2014, Mr. Johnson negotiated an extension to our $100,000,000 revolving credit facility on attractive terms and $4,000,000 of operating leases at attractive rates; led our cash management efforts; led efforts to secure significant state and local incentives in connection with facility and equipment investments; led treasury and tax due diligence and integration efforts with respect to our acquisition of a Canadian storefront and entrance system company; and continued to provide leadership for our tax, enterprise risk management and safety programs.

 

 

34


Table of Contents

Base Salary. Base salary reflects a fixed portion of the overall compensation package and is the base amount from which other compensation elements are determined, such as target annual cash incentive opportunities, long-term incentive compensation award opportunities, benefits and retirement savings opportunities. Because several other elements of compensation are driven by base salary, the Committee is careful to set the appropriate level of base salary.

In making salary adjustments, the Committee considers the executive’s base salary relative to the market, our compensation philosophy and other factors such as individual performance against business plans, leadership, initiatives, experience, knowledge and job criticality. After discussing these items, the Committee determined it was appropriate to deliver merit increases to all executives.

 

 

Below is information on the base salaries of our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2015.

 

Base Salary

Name

   Fiscal
2014
Base
Salary ($)
   Percent
Increase

in Fiscal
2014  (%)
   Percentile
in the
Fiscal 2014
Competitive
Market (%)
   Fiscal
2015
Base
Salary ($)
   Percent
Increase
in Fiscal
2015 (%)
   Percentile
in the
Fiscal 2015
Competitive
Market (%)

Joseph F. Puishys

   670,000    6.3    45    770,000    14.9    55

James S. Porter

   384,375    2.5    60    395,000      2.8    60

Patricia A. Beithon

   301,400    2.5    35    315,000      4.5    35

John A. Klein

   246,000    2.5    40    255,000      3.7    30

Gary R. Johnson

   210,545    3.0    50    215,810      2.5    40

 

Annual Cash Incentive Compensation. Annual cash incentive awards are designed to reward short-term performance results and the metrics are generally objective financial goals based on the annual operating plan approved by our Board of Directors. For fiscal 2014, annual cash incentive awards to our Named Executive Officers were made pursuant to our shareholder-approved Apogee Enterprises, Inc. 2012 Executive Management Incentive Plan (the “Executive MIP”), as described below.

Executive MIP. Our Executive MIP was adopted to ensure the tax deductibility of the annual cash incentive compensation that may be earned by our Named Executive Officers. Our Executive MIP is designed to be an annual bonus “pool” plan. Each fiscal year, the Committee establishes a bonus pool equal to a percentage of one or more performance factors from a list of approved factors set forth in our Executive MIP. Our Company must meet the selected performance factor in order for a bonus pool to be funded to allow for any actual payout under the plan.

Each fiscal year, the Committee selects the executives of our Company who will participate in our Executive MIP for that year and assigns a percentage of the bonus pool to each participating executive, with the total percentage not to exceed 100% of the bonus pool for any given fiscal year. The percentage of the bonus pool assigned to each participating executive establishes the maximum annual cash incentive award payout for that individual participant for the current fiscal year; however, no one individual payout can exceed $3,000,000 in any given fiscal year.

The actual annual cash incentive awards to be paid to participants after the annual bonus pool has been established may be adjusted downward based on the achievement of one or more additional predetermined, objective performance goals based on the annual operating plan approved by our Board of Directors. At least one of the additional predetermined, objective performance goals must be met at the threshold level in order for any annual cash incentive to be paid to an executive. In addition, if our Company is not profitable, no annual cash incentives will be paid even if the other goals are at or above threshold.

 

 

35


Table of Contents

Generally, if the threshold performance level for all financial goals is achieved, 50% or less of the target award will be paid; if target performance level for all financial goals is achieved, 100% of the target award will be paid; and if maximum performance level for all annual financial goals is achieved, 200% of the target award will be paid. If threshold performance level for only one financial metric is achieved and threshold

performance is not achieved for any of the other financial goals, less than 50% of the target award will be paid based on the weighting allocated to that specific financial performance goal. For any performance between these levels, awards will be interpolated. The Committee has the discretion to further reduce payouts under our Executive MIP as appropriate.

 

 

Fiscal 2014 Annual Cash Incentive Payouts. The performance factor used to establish the fiscal 2014 bonus pool under our Executive MIP was 7% of Apogee operating income. In fiscal 2014, we had operating income of $40,285,000, generating a bonus pool of $2,820,000. The performance goals used for fiscal 2014 awards for annual cash incentive awards made pursuant to our Executive MIP for our Named Executive Officers were a combination of Apogee net sales, earnings per share (“EPS”), and days working capital.

The tables below set forth certain information with respect to the fiscal 2014 annual cash incentive award payout ranges as a percentage of fiscal 2014 salary for our Named Executive Officers.

Fiscal 2014 Annual Cash Incentive Compensation Ranges

 

Name

     Threshold Payout  
as a Percentage
of Fiscal 2014
Salary (%)(1)
   Target Payout
  as a Percentage   
of Fiscal 2014
Salary (%)(2)
     Maximum Payout  
as a Percentage
of Fiscal 2014
Salary (%)(3)

Joseph F. Puishys

   5.00    100.00    200.00

James S. Porter

   3.00      60.00    120.00

Patricia A. Beithon

   2.50      50.00    100.00

John A. Klein

   2.00      40.00      80.00

Gary R. Johnson

   1.25      25.00      50.00

 

(1) 

Assumes threshold performance level is achieved for only the performance goal with the lowest weighting and is not achieved for any other performance goals. If actual results are below threshold performance level for all performance goals, the payout will be zero.

 

(2) 

Assumes target performance level is achieved for all performance goals.

 

(3) 

Assumes maximum performance level is achieved for all performance goals.

The following table outlines the performance metrics, weighting and performance levels and actual performance achievement for the fiscal 2014 performance cycle.

Fiscal 2014 Annual Cash Incentive Performance Levels

 

Performance Goal

    Weighting (%)     Threshold   Target   Maximum   Actual
Performance
Net Sales   25     $733,000,000       $761,000,000       $781,000,000       $771,445,000  
EPS   65   $0.75   $0.90   $1.05   $0.95
Days Working Capital   10   45.9 days   43.0 days   39.3 days   47.8 days

 

36


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the fiscal 2014 annual cash incentive compensation payouts for each of our Named Executive Officers.

Fiscal 2014 Annual Cash Incentive Compensation Payouts

 

     

Performance Metrics

     Potential Payout      Actual Payout

Name

  

Metric

   Weighting
(%)
     Target Payout
as a Percent of
Fiscal 2014
Salary (%)
     Target
Payout
Level ($)
     Percentage
of Target (%)
     Approved
Payout
Amount  ($)(1)
    

Percent of
Fiscal 2014
Salary (%)

Joseph

  

Net Sales

     25         25.00         167,500         38.06         255,002       38.06

F.

  

EPS

     65         65.00         435,500         86.67         580,689       86.67

Puishys

  

Days Working Capital

     10         10.00         67,000                      
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

        100         100.00         670,000         124.73         835,691       124.73

James

  

Net Sales

     25         15.00         57,656         38.06         87,791       22.84

S.

  

EPS

     65         39.00         149,906         86.67         199,875       52.00

Porter

  

Days Working Capital

     10         6.00         23,063                      
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

        100         60.00         230,625         124.73         287,666       74.84

Patricia

  

Net Sales

     25         12.50         37,675         38.06         57,356       19.03

A.

  

EPS

     65         32.50         97,955         86.67         130,627       43.34

Beithon

  

Days Working Capital

     10         5.00         15,070                      
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

        100         50.00         150,700         124.73         187,983       62.37

John

  

Net Sales

     25         10.00         24,600         38.06         37,441       15.22

A.

  

EPS

     65         26.00         63,960         86.67         85,288       34.67

Klein

  

Days Working Capital

     10         4.00         9,840                      
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

        100         40.00         98,400         124.73         122,729       49.89

Gary

  

Net Sales

     25         6.25         13,159         38.06         20,023       9.51

R.

  

EPS

     65         16.25         34,213         86.67         45,625       21.67

Johnson

  

Days Working Capital

     10         2.50         5,264                      
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

        100         25.00         52,636         124.73         65,648       31.18

 

(1) 

The individual approved payout amount for each of our Named Executive Officers is less than the maximum allocation of the bonus pool under our Executive MIP for such individual. Therefore, all approved payout amounts for our Named Executive Officers are fully deductible under Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

 

Long-Term Incentive Compensation. We utilize two instruments to deliver long-term incentive compensation. The mix of long-term incentive instruments is determined annually by the Committee. Commencing in fiscal 2013, the mix of long-term incentive compensation for our Named Executive Officers was time-based restricted stock awards and two-year cash-based performance awards, which are issued only in the first year of the two-year performance cycle (granted every other year). Prior to fiscal 2013, the mix of long-term incentive compensation was time-based restricted stock awards and three-year performance share unit awards, which the Committee discontinued issuing when it adopted the two-year cash-based performance awards.

Time-Based Restricted Stock Awards. Each year, the Committee determines a fixed dollar value of the time-based restricted stock award for each executive for the just-completed fiscal year. The Committee begins its deliberations

with a targeted fixed dollar value, as a percentage of base salary, which is compared to competitive levels of long-term incentives for comparable positions in the competitive market, based on data provided by the Committee’s independent compensation consultant. The Committee determines a final fixed dollar value for each of our Named Executive Officers after considering the subjective evaluation of each of our Named Executive Officers’ performance against his or her individual business objectives for the just completed fiscal year. The time-based restricted stock awards will generally vest in three equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary date of the award.

The Committee determined that Messrs. Puishys, Porter, Klein and Johnson and Ms. Beithon had substantially met his or her individual business objectives for fiscal 2013 and awarded our Named Executive Officers time-based restricted stock on April 30, 2013 as set forth below.

 

 

37


Table of Contents

Fiscal 2014 Restricted Stock Awards

 

Name

   Time-Based
Restricted  Stock
Awarded (#)
   Value of
Award ($)(1)
   Percentage of
Fiscal 2014
Salary (%)
   Grant Price ($)

Joseph F. Puishys(2)

   21,036    535,997    80    25.48

James S. Porter(3)

     7,241    184,501    48    25.48

Patricia A. Beithon(4)

     5,678    144,675    48    25.48

John A. Klein(5)

     2,896      73,790    30    25.48

Gary R. Johnson(6)

     1,818      46,323    22    25.48

 

(1) 

The value of the award was calculated by multiplying the number of shares of restricted stock by $25.48, the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on April 30, 2013, the date of grant.

 

(2) 

Mr. Puishys’ individual business objectives for fiscal 2013 were based on: financial performance, geographic expansion, intellectual property strategy, organizational development and new product introductions.

 

(3) 

Mr. Porter’s individual business objectives for fiscal 2013 were based on financial and operational performance, geographic expansion, organizational development, execution of our company-wide enterprise resource planning system implementation, and strategy and business development.

 

(4) 

Ms. Beithon’s individual business objectives for fiscal 2013 were based on compliance, corporate governance, litigation and claim management, and support for growth initiatives.

 

(5) 

Mr. Klein’s individual business objectives for fiscal 2013 were based on cost productivity savings, continuous improvement and Lean manufacturing training and implementation initiatives, procurement practices and organizational development.

 

(6) 

Mr. Johnson’s individual business objectives for fiscal 2013 were based on treasury management, enterprise risk management, credit facility management, real estate portfolio management and retirement plan management.

 

Two-Year Cash-Based Performance Awards. In fiscal 2013, our Company introduced two-year cash-based performance awards and discontinued issuing three-year performance share unit awards. The Committee believes that two-year cash-based performance awards provide incentive to focus executives on achievement of specific two-year financial performance goals that are aligned with business fundamentals and are better instruments for delivering long-term incentive compensation, as cash-based awards are not dilutive to our shareholders. The cash-based performance awards are designed to reward sustainable, profitable growth consistent with our strategic plan.

The two-year cash-based performance awards are end-to-end awards, have two-year performance periods and pay out in two equal annual installments after completion of the performance period. Generally, cash-based performance awards are made in the first quarter of the first fiscal year of the two-year performance period. The two-year performance periods do not overlap, therefore a grant of this award is made every other year. Since the fiscal 2013 – 2014 cash-based performance awards were issued during fiscal 2013, there were no cash-based performance awards granted in fiscal 2014.

 

 

38


Table of Contents

The Committee believes that a two-year performance cycle provides the necessary line of sight to set realistic targets aligned with our Company’s objectives. Non-overlapping cycles avoid the potential confusion associated with using different targets on the same metric or different metrics in the same year. To promote retention, 50% of the earned award is paid in the

first quarter of the year following completion of the performance cycle and the remaining 50% is paid one year later (approximately three years after commencement of the performance cycle), with each payment contingent on the executive being employed by our Company on the date the payment is made.

 

 

Two-Year Cash-Based Performance Awards and Payout Cycle

 

LOGO

 

The Committee determines the dollar value of cash-based performance awards granted to each participating executive at the target performance level based on consideration of individual performance, our Company performance, market data and trends, internal equity, executive potential and input from our Chief Executive Officer with respect to our Other Named Executive Officers and other participating executives. The dollar value at the

threshold performance level is determined as a percentage of base salary.

The Committee determined the dollar value for the fiscal 2013 – 2014 cash-based performance awards as a percentage of fiscal 2013 base salary at the threshold, target and maximum award levels for each of our Other Named Executive Officers on April 26, 2012, and for our Chief Executive Officer on April 27, 2012.

 

 

The table below sets forth certain information with respect to our fiscal 2013 – 2014 cash-based performance awards payout ranges as a percentage of salary at threshold, target and maximum performance.

Fiscal 2013 – 2014 Cash-Based Performance Award Payout Ranges

 

Name

     Threshold Payout  
as a Percentage
of Fiscal 2013
Salary (%)(1)
   Target Payout
  as a Percentage  
of Fiscal 2013
Salary (%)(2)
     Maximum Payout  
as a Percentage
of Fiscal 2013
Salary (%)(3)

Joseph F. Puishys

   31.75    190.48    380.95

James S. Porter

   24.00    144.00    288.00

Patricia A. Beithon

   24.00    144.00    288.00

John A. Klein

   15.00      90.00    180.00

Gary R. Johnson

   11.00      66.00    132.00

 

(1) 

Assumes threshold performance level is achieved for only one of the performance goals and is not achieved for any other performance goals. If actual results are below threshold performance level for all performance goals, the payout will be zero.

 

(2) 

Assumes target performance level is achieved for all performance goals.

 

(3) 

Assumes maximum performance level is achieved for all performance goals

 

39


Table of Contents

Fiscal 2013 – 2014 Cash-Based Performance Award Payouts. The performance goals for our fiscal 2013 – 2014 cash-based performance awards made pursuant to our Stock Incentive Plan were average return on invested capital (“ROIC”), cumulative EPS and cumulative net sales.

The table below outlines, with respect to our fiscal 2013 – 2014 cash-based performance awards, the performance metrics, weightings, performance levels and actual performance achievement for the fiscal 2013 – 2014 performance cycle.

Fiscal 2013 – 2014 Cash-Based Performance Award Payout Metrics and Payout Percentages

 

Performance Metric

   Weight
(%)
   Threshold
(50%)
  Target
(100%)
  Maximum
(200%)
  Actual
Performance
  Percentage
Earned

(%)
   Percentage
Payout

(%)

Average ROIC

       33-1/3          3.50 %       5.80 %       7.30 %       6.00 %       113.33          37.78  

Cumulative EPS

       33-1/3          $0.93         $1.55         $1.95         $1.62         117.50          39.17  

Cumulative Net Sales

       33-1/3          $1,366,400,000         $1,465,300,000         $1,567,000,000         $1,471,669,000         106.19          35.39  
                              

 

 

 
                                 112.34  
                              

 

 

 

The table below sets forth certain information with respect to the fiscal 2013 – 2014 cash-based performance award payouts earned for each of our Named Executive Officers.

Fiscal 2013 – 2014 Cash-Based Performance Award Payouts

 

      Performance Metrics      Potential Payout      Actual Amount Earned

Name

   Metric    Weighting
(%)
     Target
Payout as a
Percent of
Fiscal 2013
Salary

(%)
     Target
Payout
Level

($)
     Percentage
of Target
(%)
     Total
Earned
Amount
($)(1)
    

Percent

of

Fiscal

2013

Salary

(%)

Joseph

   Average ROIC      33-1/3         63.5         400,000         113.33         453,320       71.96

F.

  

Cumulative EPS

     33-1/3         63.5         400,000         117.50         470,000       74.60

Puishys

  

Cumulative Net Sales

     33-1/3         63.5         400,000         106.19         424,760       67.42
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

        100             190.5         1,200,000         112.34         1,348,080       213.98

James

  

Average ROIC

     33-1/3         48.0         180,000         113.33         203,994       54.40

S.

  

Cumulative EPS

     33-1/3         48.0         180,000         117.50         211,500       56.40

Porter

  

Cumulative Net Sales

     33-1/3         48.0         180,000         106.19         191,142       50.97
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

        100             144.0         540,000         112.34         606,636       161.77

Patricia

  

Average ROIC

     33-1/3         48.0         141,120         113.33         159,931       54.40

A.

  

Cumulative EPS

     33-1/3         48.0         141,120         117.50         165,816       56.40

Beithon

  

Cumulative Net Sales

     33-1/3         48.0         141,120         106.19         149,856       50.97
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

        100             144.0         423,360         112.34         475,603       161.77

John

  

Average ROIC

     33-1/3         30.0         72,000         113.33         81,597       34.00

A.

  

Cumulative EPS

     33-1/3         30.0         72,000         117.50         84,600       35.25

Klein

  

Cumulative Net Sales

     33-1/3         30.0         72,000         106.19         76,457       31.86
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

        100             90.0         216,000         112.34         242,654       101.11

Gary

  

Average ROIC

     33-1/3         22.0         44,971         113.33         50,965       24.93

R.

  

Cumulative EPS

     33-1/3         22.0         44,971         117.50         52,841       25.85

Johnson

  

Cumulative Net Sales

     33-1/3         22.0         44,971         106.19         47,755       23.36
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

        100             66.0         134,913         112.34         151,561       74.14

 

(1) 

The fiscal 2013 – 2014 cash-based performance award earned amounts are paid out in two equal annual installments. The first installment will be paid in May 2014 and the second installment will be paid in March 2015, contingent on the executive being employed by our Company on the date the second installment is paid. The table below sets forth the fiscal 2013 – 2014 cash-based performance award earned amounts payment schedule.

 

Name

   May 2014 ($)    March 2015 ($)

Joseph F. Puishys

   674,040    674,040

James S. Porter

   303,318    303,318

Patricia A. Beithon

   237,802    237,801

John A. Klein

   121,327    121,327

Gary R. Johnson

     75,781      75,780

 

40


Table of Contents

Legacy Fiscal 2012 – 2014 Performance Share Unit Payouts. Prior to fiscal 2013, we utilized three-year performance share unit awards as a long-term incentive vehicle, which were issued annually. When we implemented the cash-based performance awards in fiscal 2013, we discontinued the issuance of performance share unit awards; however, the fiscal 2011 – 2013 and fiscal 2012 – 2014 performance share unit awards remained outstanding at that time. The fiscal 2011 – 2013 performance share unit awards vested on April 30, 2013 and the fiscal 2012 – 2014 performance unit awards vested on April 29, 2014. We no longer have any performance share unit awards outstanding.

Performance share units represent the right to receive shares of our common stock at the end of the three-year performance period depending upon actual performance achieved over that period. If we perform better than the target level, more performance share units will vest. Likewise, if we perform below the target level, fewer or no performance share units will vest. Until issuance of the shares at the end of the three-year performance period, a participant has no voting rights, but dividends or other distributions (whether cash, stock or otherwise) accrue during the three-year performance period and will be paid only on the shares earned at the end of the performance period when such shares are issued.

 

 

The threshold, target and maximum goals and the payout of the fiscal 2012 – 2014 performance share unit awards are set forth in the tables below.

Fiscal 2012 – 2014 Performance Share Unit Award Payout Metrics and Payout Percentages

 

Performance Metric

   Weight
(%)
     Threshold
(50%)
     Target
(100%)
     Maximum
(200%)
     Actual
Performance
     Percentage
Earned

(%)
    

Percentage
Payout

(%)

Average ROIC

     33-1/3         2.90%         4.10%         5.30%         4.20%         108.33       36.11    

Cumulative EPS

     33-1/3         $1.08            $1.65            $2.20            $1.79            125.45       41.81    

Market Share Growth(1) (33-1/3%)

                    

Architectural Segments

     28-1/3         10.90%         13.90%         16.90%         36.10%         200.00       56.67    

Large-Scale Optical Segment

       5         20.00%         30.00%         35.00%         7.60%                   —    
                    

 

                     134.59    
                    

 

 

(1) 

For our Architectural Glass, Architectural Framing Systems and Architectural Services Segments (collectively referred to as the “Architectural Segments”), the target for growth at the end of the performance period was set at 3.0% above market growth (or 3.0% less than the market decline) in the U.S. commercial construction market for the performance period as reported in the McGraw-Hill report. The McGraw-Hill report is an industry report regarding growth in the construction industry, which is adjusted for the number of months by which our Architectural Segments lag the general commercial construction industry. The Committee relies on the McGraw-Hill report published just prior to the Committee meeting at which the payout is determined. The target for Large-Scale Optical Segment value-added picture framing glass and acrylic growth was pre-set at a 30.0% increase in market share.

The table below sets forth the shares earned under the fiscal 2012 – 2014 performance share unit awards.

Fiscal 2012 – 2014 Performance Share Unit Payouts

 

Name

   Target
Level of
Performance
Share

Units (#)
   Percentage
Payout (%)
   Additional
Shares
Issued (#)
   Total
Performance
Share
Unit
Payout (#)
   Market Value
of Total
Performance

Share Unit
Payout ($)(1)

Joseph F. Puishys(2)

       N/A          N/A          N/A          N/A          N/A  

James S. Porter

       18,354          134.59          6,349          24,703          774,686  

Patricia A. Beithon

       14,522          134.59          5,023          19,545          612,931  

John A. Klein(2)

       N/A          N/A          N/A          N/A          N/A  

Gary R. Johnson

       4,628          134.59          1,601          6,229          195,341  

 

 

41


Table of Contents
(1) 

Market value of the total performance share unit payout is calculated by multiplying ($31.36), the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on April 29, 2014, the date the Committee approved the final award, by the number of performance share units earned.

 

(2) 

Messrs. Puishys and Klein were not employed by our Company in fiscal 2012 when the fiscal 2012 – 2014 performance share unit awards were granted.

 

Other Benefit Programs. Executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers, are eligible to participate in our current benefit plans listed below.

 

 

Deferred Compensation Plans. Our executive officers may participate in voluntary non-qualified deferred compensation plans that allow participants to defer compensation to assist in saving for retirement and certain short-term needs. These plans are described under the headings “Deferred Compensation Plan” and “Legacy Deferred Compensation Plan” on page 53.

 

 

Legacy Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. Prior to fiscal 2009, we provided a non-qualified defined benefit retirement compensation plan to certain executive officers. This legacy plan was frozen in October 2008. Only two current employees are participants. This plan is described under the heading “Legacy Officers’ Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan” on page 52.

 

 

Other Benefits. Executive officers may participate on the same terms as all other employees in our 401(k) Retirement Plan, which is described under the heading “401(k) Retirement Plan” on page 53, and our employee stock purchase plan, which allows participants to purchase shares of our Company’s common stock by contributing up to $500 per week, with our Company contributing an amount equal to 15% of the participant’s weekly contributions. Executive officers also receive the same health and welfare benefits as those offered to all other full-time employees, with the exception that we offer enhanced long-term disability benefits to our executive officers.

 

 

Perquisites. Generally, the only perquisites we make available to our Named Executive Officers are reimbursement of financial and estate planning fees of up to $2,000 annually, enhanced long-term disability benefits, payment of relocation expenses and reimbursement of spousal travel expenses for certain Company events. We

   

also provide reimbursement of annual executive health physical costs to our Chief Executive Officer.

Transitional Employment Agreement with Our Chief Executive Officer

On August 5, 2011, Mr. Puishys and our Company entered into a transitional employment agreement setting forth the terms pursuant to which Mr. Puishys will serve as our Chief Executive Officer. The terms of Mr. Puishys’ transitional employment agreement were previously disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 8, 2011. The transitional employment agreement has a three-year term ending on August 22, 2014.

The transitional employment agreement provides that, if Mr. Puishys’ employment is terminated during the term of the agreement by our Company without “Cause” (as defined in the employment agreement) or by him for “Good Reason” (as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Puishys shall be entitled to severance equal in amount to one times the sum of Mr. Puishys’ annual base salary plus target annual bonus if the termination occurs prior to August 22, 2016; a lump sum payment equal to an amount equivalent to the cost of insurance premiums sufficient to pay for the continuation of medical and dental insurance for 12 months; and automatic acceleration of any unvested signing bonus equity awards.

The transitional employment agreement further provides that, if Mr. Puishys’ employment is terminated during the term of the agreement because Mr. Puishys dies or becomes “Totally Disabled” (as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Puishys or his spouse or estate, as the case may be, shall be entitled to any amounts due to Mr. Puishys for base salary through the date of termination and any other unpaid amounts to which Mr. Puishys is entitled as of the date of termination.

The transitional employment agreement also prohibits Mr. Puishys from competing with our Company or soliciting our employees to leave their employment for a period of two years after termination of his employment with our Company.

 

 

42


Table of Contents

Change-in-Control Program

The Committee believes that offering a change-in-control program provides executive officers a degree of security in the event of a corporate transaction and allows for better alignment of executive officer and shareholder interests. Our change-in-control severance agreements contain a “double trigger” for change-in-control benefits, which means that there must be both a change-in-control of our Company and a termination of the executive’s employment for the provisions to apply. We do not provide for a tax gross-up payment with respect to excise tax liability, if any, under Internal Revenue Code Section 4999 related to Section 280G excess parachute payments. Our change-in-control

severance agreements contain a “best-net-benefit” provision which provides that in the event that payments under the agreement trigger excise tax for the executive, the executive has the option to reduce the severance payment if the net benefit is greater than paying the excise tax himself or herself. Our Company has entered into change-in-control severance agreements with each of our Named Executive Officers. The Committee does not consider specific amounts payable under these arrangements when establishing annual compensation. See “Change-in-Control Severance Agreements” on page 56 and “Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination and Change-in-Control” on page 57 for more information on these arrangements.

 

 

Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines

We have had stock ownership guidelines for executives since 2001. The ownership guidelines are:

 

Position

   Value of Common
Stock to be Owned(1)

Chief Executive Officer and President

   5 times base salary

Executive Vice Presidents, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel

   3 times base salary

Other Executive Officers

   2 times base salary

Other Senior Corporate Executives

     1 time base salary

 

(1) 

Shares are valued based on the average closing price of our common stock for the fiscal year.

 

The Committee monitors compliance with our stock ownership guidelines annually. Each executive has five years from the date he or she becomes subject to the stock ownership guidelines to meet his or her ownership guideline. If an executive is promoted and the target is increased, an additional three-year period is provided to meet the ownership guideline. For purposes of calculating stock ownership, we include unvested shares of restricted stock and unearned performance share units at target level.

As of February 28, 2014, the last trading day of fiscal 2014, Messrs. Puishys, Porter and Johnson and Ms. Beithon had achieved their stock ownership guidelines. Mr. Klein, who joined our Company on April 30, 2012, is making progress to meeting his stock ownership guidelines within the required time period.

Hedging Policy

Our Board of Directors believes that the interests of our executive officers and employees and members of our Board of Directors should be aligned with the interests of our shareholders. As a result, we have adopted a hedging policy that prohibits all employees and members of our Board of Directors from engaging in the purchase or sale of financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds) that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of our Company’s securities.

 

 

43


Table of Contents

Clawback Policy

Our Board of Directors has adopted a policy regarding “clawbacks” of Named Executive Officer and other key executives’ performance-based short-term and long-term incentive compensation awards made on or after March 3, 2014. The policy provides the Board the discretion to clawback incentive compensation awarded or paid during the three-year period preceding the date of a restatement of the Company’s financial statements due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the U.S. federal securities laws.

Section 162(m) Policy

Under Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, we must meet specified requirements related to our performance and must obtain shareholder approval of certain compensation arrangements in order for us to fully deduct compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid to any of our Named Executive Officers, excluding our Chief Financial Officer. Our Executive MIP was approved by our shareholders in 2012 and includes specific performance criteria; therefore, annual incentive awards granted under our Executive MIP are deemed to meet the requirements of Section 162(m) and are not included in the $1,000,000 cap.

Our Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1997 Stock Incentive Plan”), our Amended and Restated 2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (the “2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan”), and our Stock Incentive Plan have been approved by our shareholders. Therefore, compensation attributable to certain equity awards and other awards granted under those plans may be excluded from the $1,000,000 cap under Section 162(m) as well. Additionally, cash compensation voluntarily deferred by our executive officers under our Deferred Compensation Plan and Legacy Deferred Compensation Plan is not subject to the Section 162(m) cap until the year paid. Compensation paid in fiscal 2014 subject to the Section 162(m) cap is not expected to exceed $1,000,000 for any of our Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Puishys, whose compensation exceeded the $1,000,000 cap by

$845,332, primarily due to the vesting of shares of a special, one-time new hire time-based restricted stock award that vests over a five year period beginning on August 22, 2011.

The Committee intends to continue its practice of paying competitive compensation consistent with our philosophy to attract, motivate and retain executive officers to manage our business in the best interests of our shareholders. As a result, the Committee may choose to provide non-deductible compensation to our executive officers if it deems such compensation to be in the best interests of our Company and shareholders.

Compensation Risk Analysis

During fiscal 2014, the Committee, with the assistance of its independent compensation consultant, assessed risk in our compensation plans, practices and policies, and all fiscal 2014 incentive compensation plans. In performing this risk assessment, the Committee considered the mix of fixed and variable compensation, the mix of short-term and long-term incentive compensation, the extent to which performance metrics are directly reflected in our audited financial statements or other objective reports, the relative weighting of the performance metrics, and the likelihood that achievement of performance metrics could have a material impact on our financial performance in succeeding fiscal periods. In addition, the Committee considered various compensation risk control mitigation features in our compensation plans, including balanced financial performance metrics, revenue, earnings and operational metrics; multiple financial performance metrics for our annual cash incentive and long-term equity incentive plans; different financial performance metrics for our annual cash incentive and long-term equity incentive plans; appropriate maximum caps on our annual cash incentive and long-term incentive plans; management stock ownership guidelines; and clawback and hedging policies. The Committee annually assesses the risk of our compensation programs, policies and practices. The Committee does not believe any of our Company’s compensation programs create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company.

 

 

44


Table of Contents

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the total compensation for services in all capacities for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 awarded to our Named Executive Officers.

Summary Compensation Table

 

Name and Principal Position

  Fiscal
Year
  Salary
($)
    Bonus
($)
    Stock
Awards

($)(1)
    Option
Awards
($)(2)
    Non-
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compen-
sation

($)(3)
    Change
in
Pension

Value  and
Non-
Qualified
Deferred
Compen-
sation
Earnings

($)(4)
    All Other
Compen-
sation

($)(5)
   

Total ($)

Joseph F. Puishys

  2014     664,615               535,997               2,183,771               68,327      3,452,710

Chief Executive Officer and President

  2013     625,961               500,004               1,200,000               78,381      2,404,346
  2012     323,077 (6)      500,000        1,800,000 (7)      1,300,000                      49,549      3,972,626

James S. Porter

  2014     383,113               184,501               894,302               28,890      1,490,806

Chief Financial Officer

  2013     373,075               188,995               415,575               27,922      1,005,567
  2012     367,637               431,108 (8)             432,840               16,211      1,247,796

Patricia A. Beithon

  2014     300,364               144,675               663,586        2,527        27,813      1,138,965

General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

  2013     292,842               148,175               271,509        34,295        30,575      777,396
  2012     290,888               352,066 (8)             285,400        110,859        19,758      1,058,971

John A. Klein

  2014     245,192               73,790               365,383               41,291      725,656

Senior Vice President, Operations and Supply

Chain Management

  2013     203,077 (9)             225,608               149,244               87,167      665,096

Gary R. Johnson

  2014     209,720               46,323               217,209        598        14,427      488,277

Vice President and Treasurer

  2013     203,612               49,469               94,398        595        11,649      359,723
  2012     202,276               109,153 (8)             99,230        209        10,469      421,337

 

(1) 

The amounts shown in this column represent the grant date fair value of the time-based restricted stock awards made in fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 to our Named Executive Officers, the performance share unit awards made in fiscal 2012, and the special one-time inducement awards of fully-vested shares of our Company’s common stock and time-based restricted stock made to Mr. Puishys in fiscal 2012, when he joined our Company. These amounts are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, based on the closing share price of our common stock on the date of grant. See Note 11 (Share-Based Compensation) to our fiscal 2014 Audited Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014.

 

(2) 

The amounts shown in this column represent the grant date fair value of options granted. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, the grant date fair value for the awards has been determined using the Black-Scholes method and based on the assumptions set forth in Note 11 (Share-Based Compensation) to our fiscal 2014 Audited Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014.

 

(3) 

The amounts in this column for fiscal 2014 represent the annual cash incentive awards earned for fiscal 2014 made pursuant to our Executive MIP and the full earned amount of the fiscal 2013 – 2014 cash-based performance awards for the two-year performance cycle made pursuant to our Stock Incentive Plan, reported in a single year as required by applicable SEC rules. Actual payments of earned fiscal 2013 – 2014 cash-based performance awards are made in two equal installments following the performance period and are contingent on continued active employment on each applicable payment date. The first payment of the fiscal 2013 – 2014 cash-based performance awards was made in May 2014 and the second is scheduled to be made in March 2015.

 

45


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth information with respect to fiscal 2014 non-equity incentive plan compensation for our Named Executive Officers.

 

Name

      Fiscal Year       Annual Cash
Incentive
    Awards Earned ($)    
  Two-Year
Cash-Based
Performance
    Awards Earned ($)    

Joseph F. Puishys

  2014       835,691         1,348,080  

James S. Porter

  2014       287,666         606,636  

Patricia A. Beithon

  2014       187,983         475,603  

John A. Klein

  2014       122,729         242,654  

Gary R. Johnson

  2014         65,648         151,561  

For fiscal 2013 and 2012, the amounts in this column represent only the annual cash incentive awards earned. These awards were made pursuant to our Executive MIP for fiscal 2013 and our prior Executive MIP and individual annual cash incentive plan for fiscal 2012.

Our Executive MIP is discussed under the heading “Executive MIP” on page 35, and the fiscal 2014 annual cash incentive awards made pursuant to such plan are discussed under the heading “Fiscal 2014 Annual Cash Incentive Payouts” on page 36 and “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” on page 48. Our two-year cash-based performance award long-term compensation is discussed under “Two-Year Cash-Based Performance Awards” on page 38 and the fiscal 2013 – 2014 cash-based performance awards were made pursuant to our Stock Incentive Plan and are discussed under “Fiscal 2013 – 2014 Cash-Based Performance Award Payouts” on page 40.

 

(4) 

The following table shows each component of the “Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column for each of our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012.

 

Name

   Fiscal Year    Change in
Pension Value ($)
   Above Market Earnings on
Amounts  Deferred Pursuant
to our Legacy Deferred
Compensation Plan ($)

Joseph F. Puishys

   2014        —                      —          
   2013        —                      —          
   2012        —                      —          

James S. Porter

   2014        —                      —          
   2013        —                      —          
   2012        —                      —          

Patricia A. Beithon

   2014        2,396                      131          
   2013        34,165                      130          
   2012        110,813                      46          

John A. Klein

   2014        —                      —          
   2013        —                      —          

Gary R. Johnson

   2014        —                      598          
   2013        —                      595          
   2012        —                      209          

 

(5) 

The following table shows each component of the “All Other Compensation” column for each of our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2014.

 

Name

   Perquisites
($)
  Company
Matching
Contributions
to Defined
Contribution
Plans ($)(a)
   Dividends
or Earnings
on Stock
Awards ($)(b)
   Dividend
Equivalents
Paid on

2011 – 2013
Performance
Share Units
Earned
   Relocation
Assistance ($)
  Total All
Other
Compensation
($)

Joseph F. Puishys

   3,088(c)     9,221    56,018          —        —   68,327

James S. Porter

     —   10,535      7,364    10,991        —   28,890

Patricia A. Beithon

   1,136(d)   12,100      5,880      8,697        —   27,813

John A. Klein

      931(d)     8,827      4,078          —    27,455(e)   41,291

Gary R. Johnson

      796(d)     8,971      1,888      2,772        —   14,427

 

 

46


Table of Contents
  (a) 

This column reports the amounts we set aside or accrued during fiscal 2014 under our 401(k) Retirement Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan as matching contributions on our Named Executive Officers’ contributions to such plans. Such contribution amounts are set forth in the table below. Our Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in our 401(k) Retirement Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan on the same basis as all eligible employees.

 

Name

       401(k) Retirement    
Plan Matching
Contributions ($)
   Employee Stock Purchase
Plan 15% Matching
Contributions ($)

Joseph F. Puishys

   9,221        —

James S. Porter

   8,975    1,560

Patricia A. Beithon

   8,980    3,120

John A. Klein

   8,827        —

Gary R. Johnson

   8,971        —

 

  (b) 

This column represents dividends paid on unvested restricted stock.

 

  (c) 

Includes $1,140 in premiums for enhanced long-term disability insurance and $1,948 for reimbursement of spousal travel.

 

  (d) 

Includes premiums for enhanced long-term disability insurance.

 

  (e) 

Includes $8,084 in expenses relating to the sale of his home and purchase of a new home, and $19,371 in miscellaneous relocation expenses.

 

(6) 

Mr. Puishys joined our Company as Chief Executive Officer and President on August 22, 2011, and his fiscal 2012 salary is only for the portion of the fiscal year that Mr. Puishys was our employee.

 

(7) 

The amount includes the special, one-time new hire awards of 59,952 fully vested shares of our common stock with a grant date fair market value of $500,000 and 155,875 shares of time-based restricted stock with a grant date fair market value of $1,300,000, which vest in equal annual installments over five years.

 

(8) 

The amounts include the grant date fair market value of the target payout amounts for the fiscal 2012 – 2014 performance share unit awards, which are as follows: Mr. Porter, $259,709; Ms. Beithon, $205,486; and Mr. Johnson, $65,486. The grant date fair market value of the maximum potential payout amounts for the performance share unit awards are as follows: Mr. Porter, $519,418; Ms. Beithon, $410,973; and Mr. Johnson, $130,972. Further information regarding the fiscal 2012 – 2014 performance share unit awards is included in the “Outstanding Equity Awards at 2014 Fiscal Year-End” table on page 49.

 

(9) 

Mr. Klein joined our Company as Senior Vice President, Operations and Supply Chain Management on April 30, 2012, and his fiscal 2013 salary is only for the portion of the fiscal year that he was our employee.

 

47


Table of Contents

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth information for our Named Executive Officers concerning (i) estimated possible payouts for fiscal 2014 annual cash incentive awards, and (ii) time-based restricted stock awards made during fiscal 2014.

Fiscal 2014 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

Name

   Grant
Date
     Estimated Possible Payouts under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)
    

All Other Stock

Awards: Number

of Shares of

    

Grant Date

Fair Value of

Stock and

      Threshold
($)
     Target
($)
     Maximum
($)
     Stock or
Units (#)(2)
     Option
Awards ($)(3)

Joseph F. Puishys

                 

Fiscal 2014 annual cash incentive award

     4/30/2013         33,500             670,000           1,340,000           —                   —    

Time-based restricted stock award

     4/30/2013         —             —           —           21,036           535,997    

James S. Porter

                 

Fiscal 2014 annual cash incentive award

     4/30/2013         11,531             230,625           461,250           —                   —    

Time-based restricted stock award

     4/30/2013         —             —           —           7,241           184,501    

Patricia A. Beithon

                 

Fiscal 2014 annual cash incentive award

     4/30/2013         7,535             150,700           301,400           —                   —    

Time-based restricted stock award

     4/30/2013         —             —           —           5,678           144,675    

John A. Klein

                 

Fiscal 2014 annual cash incentive award

     4/30/2013         4,920             98,400           196,800           —                   —    

Time-based restricted stock awards

     4/30/2013         —             —           —           2,896             73,790    

Gary R. Johnson

                 

Fiscal 2014 annual cash incentive award

     4/30/2013         2,632             52,636           105,273           —                   —    

Time-based restricted stock award

     4/30/2013         —             —           —           1,818             46,323    

 

(1) 

These columns show the range of possible payouts under the fiscal 2014 annual cash incentive awards. The fiscal 2014 annual cash incentive awards were made pursuant to our Executive MIP described under the heading “Executive MIP” on page 35 and all are based on results achieved against financial performance metrics. Amounts shown in the “Threshold” column assume threshold performance level is achieved for only the performance goal with the lowest weighting and is not achieved for any other performance goals. Amounts shown in the “Target” and “Maximum” columns assume target and maximum performance levels, respectively, are achieved for all performance goals. The fiscal 2014 annual cash incentive award payouts are described under the heading “Fiscal 2014 Annual Cash Incentive Payouts” on page 36 and shown in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 45 in the column titled “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”

 

(2) 

For our Named Executive Officers, these time-based restricted stock awards were based on performance during fiscal 2013 and vest in equal annual installments on the first three anniversaries of the grant date. Dividends or other distributions (whether cash, stock or otherwise) with respect to the shares of time-based restricted stock will be paid during the vesting period. In the event of total disability or death prior to the end of the vesting period, the shares of time-based restricted stock will be distributed at the end of the vesting period to the participant, or in the event of death, to his or her estate. Our time-based restricted stock program is described under “Time-Based Restricted Stock Awards” on page 37.

 

(3) 

The fair value of the restricted stock awards was calculated by multiplying the number of shares of our common stock by $25.48, the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on April 30, 2013, the date of the grant.

 

48


Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table summarizes the equity awards held by our Named Executive Officers as of March 1, 2014, the last day of fiscal 2014.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2014 Fiscal Year-End

 

     Option Awards      Stock Awards

Name

   Option
Grant

Date
    Number
of
Securities
Under-

lying
Unexer-
cised
Options
(#) Exer-
cisable
     Number of
Securities
Under-
lying
Unexer-
cised
Options

(#) Unexer-
cisable
     Option
Exercise
Price

($)(1)
     Option
Expiration
Date
     Number
of
Shares
or
Units of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
    Market
Value of
Shares
or
Units of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)(2)
     Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)(3)
    Equity Incentive
Plan
Awards: Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned Shares,

Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)(2)

Joseph

     8/22/2011 (4)      300,341           150,171         8.34           8/22/2021                                      —

F.

            —                   —                   93,525 (5)      3,201,361                       —

Puishys

            —                   —                   21,673 (6)      741,867                       —
            —                   —                   21,036 (7)      720,062                       —

James

     5/01/2007 (8)      18,058                   24.19           5/01/2017                                      —

S.

     4/29/2008 (8)      20,289                   21.59           4/29/2018                                      —

Porter

            —                   —                                  18,354 (9)    628,257
            —                   —                   4,038 (10)      138,221                       —
            —                   —                   8,624 (11)      295,200                       —
            —                   —                   7,241 (7)      247,859                       —

Patricia

     4/13/2005 (8)      17,411                   14.10           4/13/2015                                      —

A.

     4/25/2006 (8)      16,939                   15.77           4/25/2016                                      —

Beithon

     5/01/2007 (8)      14,946                   24.19           5/01/2017                                      —
     4/29/2008 (8)      17,104                   21.59           4/29/2018                                      —
            —                   —                                  14,522 (9)    497,088
            —                   —                   3,453 (10)      118,196                       —
            —                   —                   6,761 (11)      231,429                       —
            —                   —                   5,678 (7)      194,358                       —

John

            —                   —                   5,000 (12)      171,150                       —

A.

            —                   —                   3,125 (13)      106,969                       —

Klein

            —                   —                   2,896 (7)      99,130                       —

Gary

            —                   —                                  4,628 (9)    158,416

R.

            —                   —                   1,029 (10)      35,223                       —

Johnson

            —                   —                   2,257 (11)      77,257                       —
            —                   —                   1,818 (7)      62,230                       —

 

(1) 

The exercise price for all stock option and stock appreciation right (“SAR”) grants is 100% of the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the date of grant.

 

(2) 

The market value is calculated by multiplying the closing price of $34.23 of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on February 28, 2014, the last trading day of fiscal 2014, by the number of shares of restricted stock that had not vested or the number of unearned performance share unit awards as of March 1, 2014, the last day of fiscal 2014.

 

(3) 

Includes performance share unit awards with three-year performance periods until payout. At the beginning of each performance period, the threshold, target and maximum award levels are set. Our performance share unit award program is described under the heading “Legacy Fiscal 2012 – 2014 Performance Share Unit Payouts” on page 41.

 

(4) 

Represents a stock option award that vests in equal, annual installments on the first three anniversaries of the date of grant and has a 10-year term.

 

49


Table of Contents
(5) 

Represents an unvested time-based restricted stock award granted on August 22, 2011, which vests in equal, annual installments on the first five anniversaries of the date of grant.

 

(6) 

Includes unvested time-based restricted stock award granted on April 27, 2012, which vests in equal annual installments on the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.

 

(7) 

Includes unvested time-based restricted stock award granted on April 30, 2013, which vests in equal annual installments on the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.

 

(8) 

Represents SARs that vested in equal annual installments on the first three anniversaries of the date of grant and have 10-year terms. Upon exercise of a SAR, the holder will receive the number of shares of our common stock with a total value equivalent to the difference between the exercise price of the SAR and the fair market value of our common stock on the date of exercise. In the event of total disability or death, all outstanding SARs become immediately exercisable for a period of 12 months following the date of total disability or death.

 

(9) 

Represents performance share unit awards made on April 26, 2011 for the three-year performance period beginning on the first day of fiscal 2012 and ending on the last day of fiscal 2014, which will only be earned if the predetermined goals for the performance period are met. The number of shares in this column is equal to the target number of performance share units.

For each of our Named Executive Officers, the number of shares of our common stock that may be earned as a payout based on threshold, target and maximum performance levels during the three-year performance period is set forth below.

 

Name

   Performance Period    Estimated Future Payouts Based
on Performance Level
        Threshold (#)            Target (#)              Maximum (#)    

Joseph F. Puishys

   N/A      N/A                 N/A                    N/A  

James S. Porter

   Fiscal 2012 – 2014      9,177                 18,354               36,708  

Patricia A. Beithon

   Fiscal 2012 – 2014      7,261                 14,522               29,044  

John A. Klein

   N/A      N/A                 N/A                   N/A  

Gary R. Johnson

   Fiscal 2012 – 2014      2,314                 4,628                 9,256  

The performance share unit awards for the fiscal 2012 – 2014 performance period were paid out at the 134.59% level on April 29, 2014. Information regarding the performance share unit award payouts in fiscal 2014 is provided under the heading “Legacy Fiscal 2012 – 2014 Performance Share Unit Payouts” on page 41. The performance share unit awards for the fiscal 2012 – 2014 performance period are included in the table because such awards were not deemed earned and vested until April 29, 2014, which is after the last day of fiscal 2014.

 

(10) 

Includes unvested time-based restricted stock awards granted on April 26, 2011, which vested on April 26, 2014.

 

(11) 

Includes unvested time-based restricted stock awards granted on April 26, 2012, which vest in equal annual installments on the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.

 

(12) 

Includes unvested time-based restricted stock award granted on April 30, 2012, which vested on April 30, 2014.

 

(13) 

Includes unvested time-based restricted stock award granted on April 30, 2012 that vests in equal annual installments on the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.

 

50


Table of Contents

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table sets forth information on stock option and SAR award exercises and restricted stock awards vested during fiscal 2014 for each of our Named Executive Officers.

 

Fiscal 2014 Option Exercises and Stock Vested
     Option Awards      Stock Awards

Name

   Number of
Shares
  Acquired on  
Exercise (#)
     Value
Realized on
    Exercise ($)(1)    
     Number of
Shares
  Acquired on  
Vesting (#)
     Value
Realized on
    Vesting  ($)(2)    

Joseph F. Puishys

     —                 —                 42,012(3)            1,177,504(4)       

James S. Porter

     14,107                 513,520                 23,810(5)            606,808(6)    

Patricia A. Beithon

     22,000                 513,674                 19,101(5)            486,799(6)    

John A. Klein

     —                 —                 6,563(3)            167,255(7)    

Gary R. Johnson

     9,057                 287,053                 6,024(5)            153,524(6)    

 

(1) 

The value realized is the difference between the exercise price per share or SAR and the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the date of exercise multiplied by, in the case of a stock option, the number of shares acquired on exercise of the option or, in the case of a SAR, the number of SARs exercised.

 

(2) 

The value realized is determined by multiplying the shares acquired on vesting by the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the vesting date.

 

(3) 

Includes shares of time-based restricted stock that became vested and were distributed during fiscal 2014.

 

(4) 

Calculated using the closing prices of $25.49 and $28.91 on April 26, 2013 and August 22, 2013, respectively, for the shares of time-based restricted stock that became vested on April 27, 2013 and August 22, 2013, respectively.

 

(5) 

Includes fiscal 2011 – 2013 performance share unit awards and shares of time-based restricted stock that became vested and were distributed during fiscal 2014. The fiscal 2012 – 2014 performance share unit awards that were paid out on April 29, 2014 are not included in the table since such shares were not considered vested until April 29, 2014, which is after the last day of fiscal 2014.

 

(6) 

Calculated using the closing prices of $25.49 on April 26, 2013 for the shares of time-based restricted stock that became vested on April 26 and 27, 2013 and $25.48 on April 30, 2013 for the fiscal 2011 – 2013 performance share units that became vested on April 30, 2013.

 

(7) 

Calculated using the closing price of $25.48 on April 30, 2013 for shares of time-based restricted stock that became vested on April 30, 2013.

 

51


Table of Contents

Retirement Plan Compensation

Legacy Officers’ Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

Our Legacy Officers’ Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“Legacy SERP”) is a non-qualified, defined benefit retirement plan in which only Ms. Beithon and five other current or former members of senior management participate. Our Legacy SERP was amended in October 2008 so that no benefits will accrue to participants after December 31, 2008.

Benefits under our Legacy SERP are based on a participant’s highest average compensation for the five highest consecutive, completed calendar years of annual compensation during the last 10 years of employment. For purposes of calculating Legacy SERP benefits, compensation is divided into two categories: base salary and bonus compensation. Bonus compensation is the participant’s annual cash incentive compensation but does not include equity or deferred compensation (when received).

Benefits under our Legacy SERP are calculated as an annuity equal to a participant’s years of service to our Company multiplied by the sum of 2% of the their average monthly base salary and

4% of their average monthly bonus compensation, offset by benefits to be received under social security, our 401(k) Retirement Plan and our other defined contribution pension plans from contributions made by our Company. The maximum number of years of service that will be credited to any participant is 20 years. Benefits payable are generally a single life annuity unless the participant has made an election to receive a joint and survivor annuity or 10-year term certain and life annuity (both of which would be a reduced monthly benefit). A lump-sum payment is not available.

Under our Legacy SERP, the normal retirement age is 65 and a participant must be at least 55 years old to be eligible for benefits. If a participant retires from or terminates his or her employment with our Company on or after age 55 and elects to receive benefits prior to age 65, the participant’s monthly benefit will be reduced five-ninths of one percent for each of the first 60 months and five-eighteenths of one percent for each of the next 60 months by which the annuity starting date precedes the calendar month in which the participant would attain normal retirement age.

 

 

Fiscal 2014 Pension Benefits Table

The following table shows the present value of accumulated benefits under our Legacy SERP as of March 1, 2014, the measurement date used in preparing our fiscal 2014 Audited Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014, years of service credit and payments during fiscal 2014 for Ms. Beithon, our only Named Executive Officer who participates in our Legacy SERP.

 

Fiscal 2014 Pension Benefits

Name

       Plan Name        Number of
    Years Credited    
Service (#)
   Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefit ($)(1)
   Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year ($)

Patricia A. Beithon

   Legacy SERP    9    466,186   

 

(1) 

The present value of accumulated benefits is based on the assumptions used in determining our Legacy SERP benefit obligations and net periodic benefit cost for financial reporting purposes, except that no pre-retirement mortality assumption is used for these calculations. A complete description of the accounting policies and assumptions we used to calculate the present value of accumulated benefits can be found under Note 9 (Employee Benefit Plans – Officers’ Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP), Obligations and Funded Status of Defined-Benefit Pension Plans and Additional Information) to our fiscal 2014 Audited Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014.

 

52


Table of Contents

401(k) Retirement Plan

We provide our tax-qualified 401(k) retirement plan to substantially all of our U.S.-based, non-union employees and union employees at two of our manufacturing facilities who are scheduled to work more than 1,000 hours in a plan year. A participating employee may elect to contribute up to 60% of eligible earnings on a pre-tax basis into his or her 401(k) retirement plan account. We make a matching contribution for all of our eligible U.S.-based, non-union employees equal to 100% of the first 1% and 50% of the next 5% of the eligible compensation that the employee contributes to the plan, and matching contributions are made by our Company for union employees according to the terms of union contracts. Our employees are fully vested in their own contributions and become fully vested in our matching contributions after three years of vesting service.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

Deferred Compensation Plan

Our Deferred Compensation Plan is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for a select group of management and other highly compensated employees of our Company and our subsidiaries. Approximately 150 of our employees, including our Named Executive Officers, were eligible to participate in our Deferred Compensation Plan for the 2012 calendar year, 160 were eligible for the 2013 calendar year and 165 are eligible for the 2014 calendar year. Our Deferred Compensation Plan allows for deferrals by participants of up to 75% of base salary and sales commissions and up to 100% of bonuses and other cash or equity-based compensation approved by the Committee, and also provides that we may establish rules permitting a participant to defer performance-based compensation up to six months prior to the end of a performance period. There is no maximum dollar limit on the amount that may be deferred by a participant each year. A participant in our Deferred Compensation Plan may elect to have the participant’s account credited with earnings and investment gains and losses by assuming that deferred amounts were invested in one or more of 18 hypothetical investment fund options selected by the participant, which had investment returns ranging from -9.22% to 48.07% for calendar 2013. An Apogee common stock fund is not one of the investment options available under our Deferred Compensation

Plan. Participants are permitted to change their investment elections at any time. We may also make discretionary contributions to a participant’s account under our Deferred Compensation Plan, and our Company will designate a vesting schedule for each such contribution. The participants are always 100% vested in the amount they defer and the earnings, gains and losses credited to their accounts. Participants are entitled to receive a distribution from their account upon: a separation from service, a specified date, death, disability, retirement (as defined in our Deferred Compensation Plan), or unforeseeable emergency that results in “severe financial hardship” that is consistent with the meaning of such term under section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Distributions are in a lump sum, installments or a combination of lump sum with installments based upon the participant’s election as allowed under our Deferred Compensation Plan. Our Deferred Compensation Plan is an unfunded obligation of Apogee, and participants are unsecured creditors of Apogee.

Legacy Deferred Compensation Plan

Our Legacy Deferred Compensation Plan is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for a select group of management or highly compensated employees of our Company and subsidiaries; however, in October 2010, the plan was amended to prohibit any future participant deferrals to the plan after our fiscal 2011. A participant in our Legacy Deferred Compensation Plan may choose to have his or her account credited with the applicable interest rate as set forth in the plan or credited with earnings and investment gains and losses by assuming the deferred amounts were invested in one or more of 18 hypothetical investment fund options selected by the participant, which had investment returns ranging from -9.22% to 48.07% for calendar 2013. For amounts deferred for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2010, the applicable interest rate, which is not considered to be an “above-market” interest rate, is the monthly average yield for the last calendar month of the prior fiscal year on U.S. Treasury securities adjusted to a constant maturity of 10 years. For amounts deferred for plan years beginning prior to January 1, 2010, the applicable interest rate, which may be considered to be an “above-market” interest rate, is the greater of the following rates: (i) the sum of one and one-half percent (1-1/2%) plus

 

 

53


Table of Contents

the monthly average yield for the last calendar month of the prior fiscal year on U.S. Treasury securities adjusted to a constant maturity of 10 years; or (ii) one-half of the rate of Apogee’s after-tax return on beginning shareholders’

equity for the prior fiscal year. Our Legacy Deferred Compensation Plan is an unfunded obligation of Apogee, and participants are unsecured creditors of Apogee. Distributions are in either a lump sum or installments.

 

 

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table

The table below provides information on our Named Executive Officers’ compensation during fiscal 2014 under our Deferred Compensation Plan and Legacy Deferred Compensation Plan.

Fiscal 2014 Deferred Compensation

 

Name

  

Name of Plan

   Executive
Contributions
in Last Fiscal
Year ($)(1)
   Registrant
Contributions
in Last Fiscal
Year ($)
   Aggregate
Earnings

in Last Fiscal
Year ($)(1)
   Aggregate
Withdrawals/

Distributions
($)
   Aggregate
Balance

at Last Fiscal
Year End ($)

Joseph F. Puishys

   Deferred Comp.        —                                             —       
   Legacy Deferred Comp.        —                                             —       

James S. Porter

   Deferred Comp.        —                                             —       
   Legacy Deferred Comp.        —                                             —       

Patricia A. Beithon

   Deferred Comp.        —                                             —       
   Legacy Deferred Comp.        —                         131                     40,955(2)   

John A. Klein

   Deferred Comp.        —                                             —       
   Legacy Deferred Comp.        —                                             —       

Gary R. Johnson

   Deferred Comp.        9,440(3)                               4,883           15,141(3)   
   Legacy Deferred Comp.        —                         598                     186,944(4)   

 

(1) 

Pursuant to SEC rules, all earnings on non-qualified deferred compensation during fiscal 2014 in excess of 3.20%, 120% of the applicable federal rate compounded annually, have been deemed “above-market earnings.” During fiscal 2014, the interest paid on amounts deferred for plan years beginning prior to January 1, 2010 pursuant to our Legacy Deferred Compensation Plan was 3.48%. These amounts are reported in the “Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column of the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 45.

 

(2) 

The amount reported in this column for Ms. Beithon is not reported in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 45 because all of this amount was earned by her prior to fiscal 2012; however, all of this amount was reported in the “Summary Compensation Table” in the years earned.

 

(3) 

The amounts reported in this column for Mr. Johnson are reported in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 45 in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column.

 

(4) 

The amount reported in this column for Mr. Johnson for our Legacy Deferred Compensation Plan is not reported in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 45, as all of this amount was earned by him prior to fiscal 2012; however, this amount would have been reported in the “Summary Compensation Table” in the year earned provided Mr. Johnson was a Named Executive Officer in such years.

 

54


Table of Contents

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Following a Change-in-Control

Payments Made Upon Termination

Except for the transitional employment agreement entered into with Mr. Puishys in connection with his joining our Company as Chief Executive Officer and President in fiscal 2012, we do not have any employment agreements, employment arrangements or general severance plans covering our Named Executive Officers. Except as discussed below and under “Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination and Change-in-Control” on page 57 for Mr. Puishys, if the employment of any of our Other Named Executive Officers is voluntarily or involuntarily terminated, no additional payments or benefits will accrue or be owed to him or her, other than what the Named Executive Officer has accrued and is vested in under our benefit plans discussed above, including under the heading “Retirement Plan Compensation” on page 52. Any severance benefits payable to our Other Named Executive Officers not triggered by a change-in-control would be determined by the Compensation Committee at its discretion.

In connection with Mr. Puishys joining our Company as Chief Executive Officer and President on August 22, 2011, we entered into a transitional employment agreement which provides for a severance payment and certain other benefits if Mr. Puishys’ employment is terminated by us prior to August 22, 2016 without “Cause” (as defined in the transitional employment agreement) or by him for “Good Reason” (as defined in the transitional employment agreement). The severance payment and other benefits that would be payable to Mr. Puishys are described in more detail under “Transitional Employment Agreement with Our Chief Executive Officer” on page 42.

Except in connection with a change-in-control of Apogee and as described under “Transitional Employment Agreement with Our Chief Executive Officer” on page 42, a voluntary or involuntary termination will not trigger an acceleration of the vesting of any outstanding equity awards.

Payments Made Upon Disability

Under the terms of the Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Short-Term and Long-Term Disability Plans, each of our Named Executive Officers who participates in such plans is eligible for a disability benefit. The level of benefit depends upon the disability plan selected by our Named Executive Officer. Messrs. Puishys, Klein and Johnson and Ms. Beithon participate in our enhanced Long-Term Disability Plan and are eligible for a disability benefit that is equal to 100% of his or her monthly base salary during the first three months of disability and 60% of his or her monthly base salary up to a maximum of $15,000 per month thereafter. Mr. Porter has elected not to participate in our Long-Term Disability Plans and is only eligible to receive short-term disability benefits of $450 per week for 13 weeks.

If the employment of any of our Named Executive Officers is terminated due to disability, the terms of our performance share unit, SAR, stock option and restricted stock agreements provide for the immediate vesting of such awards.

Payments Made Upon Death

The terms of our performance share unit, SAR, stock option and restricted stock agreements provide for the immediate vesting of such awards in the event of the Named Executive Officer’s death.

 

 

55


Table of Contents

Change-in-Control Severance Agreements

We have entered into change-in-control severance agreements (the “CIC Severance Agreement”) with each of our Named Executive Officers. Our CIC Severance Agreement is designed to retain our executive officers and provide for continuity of management in the event of an actual or threatened Change-in-Control of Apogee (as defined in the CIC Severance Agreement).

Our CIC Severance Agreement is a “double trigger” agreement. It provides that, in the event of a Change-in-Control of Apogee, each executive officer who is a party to an agreement will have specific rights and receive specified benefits if the executive officer is terminated without “Cause” (as defined in the CIC Severance Agreement) or the executive officer voluntarily terminates his or her employment for “Good Reason” (as defined in the CIC Severance Agreement) within two years after the Change-in-Control. In these circumstances, Messrs. Puishys, Porter and Klein, and Ms. Beithon will each receive a severance payment equal to two times and Mr. Johnson at one time his or her annual base salary plus his or her annual cash incentive at target level performance for such fiscal year. In addition, all unvested options and restricted stock awards held by the executive officer that have not vested by the Employment Termination Date will be immediately vested on such date. Our CIC Severance Agreement provides that, for a 12-or 24-month period following a Change-in-Control, Apogee will continue to provide medical and dental insurance coverage for the executive officer and the executive officer’s dependents or will reimburse the executive officer for the cost of obtaining substantially similar benefits. No benefits will be paid to the executive officer pursuant to the CIC Severance Agreement unless the executive officer executes and delivers to Apogee a release of claims.

Our CIC Severance Agreements contain a “best-net-benefit” provision which provides that, in the event that payments under the agreements trigger excise tax for the executive officer, the executive officer has the option of either reducing the severance payment, if the net benefit is greater than paying the excise tax, or paying the excise tax himself or herself. To receive these severance benefits, the executive officer shall not: (1) solicit, directly or indirectly, any of our existing or prospective customers, vendors or suppliers for a purpose competitive to our business or to encourage such customers, vendors or suppliers to terminate business with us; (2) solicit, directly or indirectly, any of our employees to terminate his or her employment; or (3) engage in or carry on, directly or indirectly, in certain geographic markets a business competitive with our business.

The CIC Severance Agreements continue through December 31 of each year and provide for automatic extension for one-year terms prior to a Change-in-Control unless we give prior notice of termination.

The terms of the agreements for performance share units and cash-based performance units provide that in the event of a Change-in-Control prior to the end of a performance period, the performance period is deemed to end on the date of the Change-in-Control and our Named Executive Officers are entitled to retain performance share units or cash-based performance units, to the extent earned, as adjusted for the truncated performance period. The terms of the restricted stock agreements for awards made pursuant to our Stock Incentive Plan entered into prior to April 26, 2011 provide that in the event of a Change-in-Control, all shares of restricted stock that have not vested as of the date of the Change-in-Control will immediately vest and the terms of the restricted stock agreements for awards made pursuant to our Stock Incentive Plan entered into on or after April 26, 2011 provide that in the event of a Change-in-Control, all shares of restricted stock that have not vested by the Employment Termination Date will immediately vest.

 

 

56


Table of Contents

Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination and Change-in-Control

The table below shows potential payments to our Named Executive Officers upon certain terminations pursuant to agreement, disability, death and a change-in-control of our Company. The table below assumes that termination of employment or the change-in-control was effective as of February 28, 2014, the last trading day of fiscal 2014. The amounts shown are estimates of the amounts that would be paid to the executives upon termination of employment or the change-in-control, in addition to the base salary and bonus earned by our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2014. We have not included payments or benefits that are fully disclosed in the “Fiscal 2014 Pension Benefits” table on page 52 or “Fiscal 2014 Deferred Compensation” table on page 54. The actual amounts to be paid can only be determined at the actual time of a Named Executive Officer’s termination of employment.

 

Name

  

Type of Payment

   Payments Upon
Involuntary
Termination Without
Cause or Resignation
for Good Reason
Pursuant to
Employment
Agreement ($)
  Payments
Upon
Disability ($)
  Payments
Upon
Death ($)
  Payments After
a Change-in-
Control without
Termination ($)
  Payments Upon
Involuntary

or Good  Reason
Termination After a

Change-in-Control
Occurs ($)

Joseph

   Cash Severance Payment        1,340,000 (1)                               2,680,000 (2)

F.

   Health Insurance Benefits        12,595                                 25,189  

Puishys

   Reimbursement of Legal Costs                                        (3)
   Acceleration of Vesting                     
  

Stock Options

       3,887,927 (4)                       3,887,927 (4)       3,887,927 (4)
  

Restricted Stock

       3,201,361 (5)       4,663,290 (5)       4,663,290 (5)               4,663,290 (5)
  

Cash-Based Perf. Awards

       1,348,080 (6)       (7)       (7)       1,348,080 (6)       1,348,080 (6)
   Disability Payments                302,499 (8)                        
       

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 
  

Total

                 9,789,963                 4,965,789                 4,663,290                 5,236,007                   12,604,486  
       

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

James

   Cash Severance Payment                                        1,230,000 (2)

S.

   Health Insurance Benefits                                        32,906  

Porter

   Reimbursement of Legal Costs                                        (3)
   Acceleration of Vesting                     
  

Performance Share Units