SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

  

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2018

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ________ TO ________

 

Commission file number 0-24751

SALISBURY BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Connecticut   06-1514263
(State or other jurisdiction   (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization)   Identification No.)
     
5 Bissell Street, Lakeville, CT   06039
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip code)

(860) 435-9801

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ☑ No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes ☑ No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” , and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer ☐     Accelerated filer ☑     Non-accelerated filer ☐     Smaller reporting company ☐

Emerging growth company ☐

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ☐ No ☑

 

The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of November 8, 2018 is 2,804,881.

 
 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

      Page 
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION    
Item 1.  Financial Statements (unaudited)    
   CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 (unaudited) and DECEMBER 31, 2017  3 
   CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 AND 2017 (unaudited)  4 
   CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 AND 2017 (unaudited)  5 
   CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 AND 2017 ( unaudited)  5 
  

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 AND 2017 (unaudited)

 6 
   NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  8 
Item 2.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS  27 
Item 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK  46 
Item 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES  47 
     
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION   
Item 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS  48 
Item 1A.  RISK FACTORS  48 
Item 2.  UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS  48 
Item 3.  DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES  48 
Item 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES  48 
Item 5.  OTHER INFORMATION  48 
Item 6.  EXHIBITS  48 
SIGNATURES  49

 2 

 

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)

(dollars in thousands, except share data)    September 30, 2018      December 31, 2017  
ASSETS   (unaudited)      
Cash and due from banks  $5,860   $9,357 
Interest bearing demand deposits with other banks   36,360    39,129 
Total cash and cash equivalents   42,220    48,486 
Securities          
Available-for-sale at fair value   95,780    78,212 
CRA mutual fund   823    835 
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock at cost   4,988    3,813 
Loans held-for-sale   589    669 
Loans receivable, net (allowance for loan losses: $7,745 and $6,776)   898,625    801,703 
Other real estate owned   340    719 
Bank premises and equipment, net   18,494    16,401 
Goodwill   13,815    13,815 
Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization: $4,390 and $4,043)   1,490    1,837 
Accrued interest receivable   3,317    2,665 
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies   14,627    14,381 
Deferred taxes   1,454    677 
Other assets   2,153    2,771 
Total Assets  $1,098,715   $986,984 
LIABILITIES and SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY          
Deposits          
Demand (non-interest bearing)  $233,935   $220,536 
Demand (interest bearing)   151,830    142,575 
Money market   202,308    190,953 
Savings and other   176,415    144,600 
Certificates of deposit   137,673    116,831 
Total deposits   902,161    815,495 
Repurchase agreements   6,658    1,668 
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston advances   67,596    54,422 
Subordinated debt   9,829    9,811 
Note payable   289    313 
Capital lease liability   3,114    1,835 
Accrued interest and other liabilities   8,301    5,926 
Total Liabilities   997,948    889,470 
Shareholders' Equity          
Common stock - $0.10 per share par value          
Authorized: 5,000,000;          
Issued: 2,885,788 and 2,872,578 at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively          
Outstanding: 2,804,881 and 2,785,216   280    279 
Unearned compensation - restricted stock awards   (857)   (606)
Paid-in capital   43,757    42,998 
Retained earnings   58,561    54,664 
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net   (974)   179 
Total Shareholders' Equity   100,767    97,514 
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity  $1,098,715   $986,984 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 3 

 


Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (unaudited)

     Three months ended      Nine months ended  
Periods ended September 30, (in thousands except per share data)    2018      2017      2018      2017  
Interest and dividend income                    
Interest and fees on loans  $9,570   $8,196   $27,226   $24,544 
Interest on debt securities                    
Taxable   596    443    1,588    1,115 
Tax exempt   28    68    89    345 
Other interest and dividends   322    175    662    351 
Total interest and dividend income   10,516    8,882    29,565    26,355 
Interest expense                    
Deposits   1,323    682    3,098    1,776 
Repurchase agreements   4    2    6    4 
Capital lease   48    29    130    66 
Note payable   4    6    14    13 
Subordinated debt   156    156    468    468 
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston advances   481    241    1,314    769 
Total interest expense   2,016    1,116    5,030    3,096 
Net interest and dividend income   8,500    7,766    24,535    23,259 
Provision for loan losses   378    237    1,171    953 
Net interest and dividend income after provision for loan losses   8,122    7,529    23,364    22,306 
Non-interest income                    
Trust and wealth advisory   936    874    2,779    2,620 
Service charges and fees   932    935    2,693    2,799 
Gains on sales of mortgage loans, net   21    25    38    104 
Mortgage servicing, net   84    104    251    180 
Losses on CRA mutual fund   (6)       (26)    
Gain(Losses) on available-for-sale securities, net           16    (14)
Other   121    142    370    365 
Total non-interest income   2,088    2,080    6,121    6,054 
Non-interest expense                    
Salaries   3,078    2,829    8,864    8,266 
Employee benefits   1,065    1,004    3,192    2,923 
Premises and equipment   1,036    995    3,161    2,797 
Data processing   519    545    1,561    1,521 
Professional fees   496    481    1,725    1,962 
OREO gains, (losses) and (write-downs)   38    218    91    362 
Collections and other real estate owned   116    201    432    513 
FDIC insurance   141    106    394    354 
Marketing and community support   167    220    630    623 
Amortization of intangibles   111    142    347    395 
Other   562    479    1,528    1,561 
Total non-interest expense   7,329    7,220    21,925    21,277 
Income before income taxes   2,881    2,389    7,560    7,083 
Income tax provision   537    695    1,301    1,903 
Net income  $2,344   $1,694   $6,259   $5,180 
Net income available to common stock  $2,311   $1,678   $6,185   $5,139 
                     
Basic earnings per common share  $0.84   $0.61   $2.24   $1.87 
Weighted average common shares outstanding, to calculate basic earnings per share   2,764    2,759    2,762    2,755 
Diluted earnings per common share  $0.83   $0.60   $2.23   $1.85 
Weighted average common shares outstanding, to calculate diluted earnings per share   2,779    2,779    2,780    2,774 
Common dividends per share  $0.28   $0.28   $0.84   $0.84 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 4 

 


Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (unaudited)

     Three months ended      Nine months ended  
Periods ended September 30, (in thousands)    2018      2017      2018      2017  
Net income  $2,344   $1,694   $6,259   $5,180 
Other comprehensive (loss) income                    
Net unrealized (losses) gains on securities available-for-sale   (162)   (16)   (1,475)   106 
Reclassification of net realized (gains) losses and write-downs in net income (1)           (16)   14 
Unrealized (losses) gains on securities available-for-sale   (162)   (16)   (1,491)   120 
Income tax benefit (expense)   34    5    322    (41)
Other comprehensive (loss) income   (128)   (11)   (1,169)   79 
Comprehensive income  $2,216   $1,683   $5,090   $5,259 

(1) Reclassification adjustments include realized security gains and losses. The gains and losses have been reclassified out of other comprehensive income (loss) and have affected certain lines in the consolidated statements of income as follows: The pre-tax amount is reflected as gains on sales and calls of available-for-sale securities, net, the tax effect is included in the income tax provision and the after tax amount is included in net income. The net tax effect for the nine months ending September 30, 2018 and 2017 are ($3) thousand and $5 thousand, respectively.

Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (unaudited) Nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017

(dollars in thousands)  Common Stock Paid-in   Retained  

Unearned compensation

restricted

stock

 

Accumulated other comp-

rehensive

  Total shareholders'
   Shares  Amount  capital   earnings  awards   income (loss)   equity
Balances at December 31, 2016   2,758,086   $276   $42,085   $51,521   $(352)  $477   $94,007 
Net income for period               5,180            5,180 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax                       79    79 
Common stock dividends declared               (2,333)           (2,333)
Stock options exercised   12,150    1    311                312 
Issuance of restricted common stock   11,800    2    426        (428)        
Forfeiture of restricted common stock   (200)       (3)       3         
Issuance of vested common stock for directors   2,056        81                81 
Issuance of director’s restricted stock awards   2,024        83        (83)        
Stock based compensation-restricted stock awards                   200        200 
Balances at September 30, 2017   2,785,916   $279   $42,983   $54,368   $(660)  $556   $97,526 
Balances at December 31, 2017   2,785,216   $279   $42,998   $54,664   $(606)  $179   $97,514 
Net income for period               6,259            6,259 
Adoption of ASU 2016-01               (16)       16     
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax                        (1,169)   (1,169)
Common stock dividends declared               (2,346)           (2,346)
Stock options exercised   6,455        175                175 
Issuance of restricted common stock   9,250    1    409        (410)        
Issuance of director’s restricted stock awards   3,960        175        (175)        
Stock based compensation-restricted stock awards                   334        334 
Balances at September 30, 2018   2,804,881   $280   $43,757   $58,561   $(857)  $(974)  $100,767 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 5 

 

Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)

Nine months ended September 30, (in thousands)    2018      2017  
Operating Activities          
Net income  $6,259   $5,180 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities          
(Accretion), amortization and depreciation          
Securities   32    116 
Bank premises and equipment   1,249    979 
Core deposit intangible   347    395 
Modification fees on Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston advances   174    176 
Subordinated debt issuance costs   18    17 
Mortgage servicing rights   34    149 
Fair value adjustment on loans   (658)   (969)
Fair value adjustment on deposits   (30)   (64)
(Gains) and losses, including write-downs          
Sales and calls of securities available-for-sale, net   (16)   14 
CRA Mutual Fund   26     
Sales of loans, excluding capitalized servicing rights   (28)   (79)
Other real estate owned   91    395 
Sales/disposals of premises and equipment   1    1 
Provision for loan losses   1,171    953 
Proceeds from loans sold   1,946    4,495 
Loans originated for sale   (1,838)   (4,977)
Increase in deferred loan origination fees and costs, net   (179)   (38)
Mortgage servicing rights originated   (18)   (53)
(Decrease) increase in mortgage servicing rights impairment reserve       (24)
Increase in interest receivable   (647)   (84)
Deferred tax benefit   (471)    
Increase in prepaid expenses   (167)   (59)
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance policies   (246)   (259)
Decrease in income tax receivable   839    43 
(Increase) decrease in other assets   (48)   920 
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses   496    (384)
Increase in interest payable   283    157 
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities   1,596    (16)
Stock based compensation-restricted stock awards   334    200 
Net cash provided by operating activities   10,550    7,184 
Investing Activities          
(Purchases) redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock   (1,175)   173 
Purchases of securities available-for-sale   (40,035)   (36,654)
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale   8,410     
Proceeds from calls of securities available-for-sale   995    11,141 
Proceeds from maturities of securities available-for-sale   11,554    19,618 
Reinvestment of CRA Mutual Fund   (14)    
Loan originations and principal collections, net   (89,457)   (14,776)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off   50    232 
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned   288    177 
Capital expenditures   (1,209)   (1,306)
Cash and cash equivalents (paid) acquired from acquisition   (298)   22,387 
Net cash (used by) provided by investing activities   (110,891)   992 
Financing Activities          
Increase in deposit transaction accounts, net   57,502    18,714 
Increase in time deposits, net   20,872    136 
Increase (decrease) in securities sold under agreements to repurchase, net   4,990    (1,006)
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston advances   82,000     
Principal payments on Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston advances   (69,000)   (10,000)
Principal payments on note payable   (24)   (23)
Decrease in capital lease obligation   (94)   (139)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options   175    312 
Issuance of shares for directors’ fees       81 
Common stock dividends paid   (2,346)   (2,333)
Net cash provided by financing activities   94,075    5,742 
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents   (6,266)   13,918 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period   48,486    35,485 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period  $42,220   $49,403 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
 6 

 

 

Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary          
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)          
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:          
Cash paid for interest  $4,585   $2,810 
Cash paid for income taxes   665    1,958 
Non-cash investing and financing activity:          
Transfers from loans to other real estate owned       743 
Assets acquired under capital lease   1,373     
Adoption of ASU 2016-01   16     
Branch Acquisitions (1)          
Cash and cash equivalents (paid) acquired   (298)   22,387 
Net loans acquired   7,849    7,097 
Fixed assets acquired (including capital leases)   761    1,605 
Accrued interest receivable acquired   5    12 
Other assets acquired   5    20 
Core deposit intangible       632 
Goodwill       1,263 
Deposits assumed   8,322    31,433 
Capital lease assumed       1,580 
Other liabilities assumed       3 
(1)Includes branch acquisitions of Empire State Bank’s New Paltz, New York Branch in 2017 and Orange Bank & Trust Company’s Fishkill, New York Branch in 2018.

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

 7 

 

Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The interim (unaudited) consolidated financial statements of Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. ("Salisbury") include those of Salisbury and its wholly owned subsidiary, Salisbury Bank and Trust Company (the "Bank"). In the opinion of management, the interim unaudited consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position of Salisbury and the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the interim periods presented.

The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make extensive use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet, and revenues and expenses for the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, expected cash flows from loans acquired in a business combination, other-than-temporary impairment of securities and impairment of goodwill and intangibles.

Certain financial information, which is normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, but which is not required for interim reporting purposes, has been condensed or omitted. Operating results for the interim period ended September 30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2018. The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in Salisbury's 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The allowance for loan losses is a significant accounting policy and is presented in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and in Management’s Discussion and Analysis, which provides information on how significant assets are valued in the financial statements and how those values are determined. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the methods, assumptions and estimates underlying those amounts, management has identified the determination of the allowance for loan losses to be the accounting area that requires the most subjective judgments, and as such could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available.

Impact of New Accounting Pronouncements Issued

In May 2014, August 2015, May 2016, and December 2016, respectively, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, 2015-14, 2016-12, and 2016-20, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” The objective of ASU 2014-09 is to clarify principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. Since the guidance does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including loans and securities that are accounted for under other GAAP, the new guidance did not have a material impact on revenue most closely associated with financial instruments, including interest income and expense. The Bank completed its overall assessment of revenue streams and review of related contracts potentially affected by the ASU, including trust and asset management fees, deposit related fees, interchange fees, and merchant income. Salisbury’s revenue recognition policies conformed to Topic 606. As a result, no changes were required to be made to prior period financial statements due to the adoption of this ASU and no changes in revenue recognition were required in the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2018.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – overall (subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities." This ASU addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments by making targeted improvements to GAAP as follows: (1) require equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. However, an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer; (2) simplify the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment. When a qualitative assessment indicates that impairment exists, an entity is required to measure the investment at fair value; (3) eliminate the requirement to disclose the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost for entities that are not public business entities; (4) eliminate the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet; (5) require public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; (6) require an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments; (7) require separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (that is, securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements; and (8) clarify that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. ASU 2016-01 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Salisbury adopted the provisions of this ASU effective January 1, 2018. Adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on Salisbury’s financial statements. In accordance with (5) above, Salisbury measured the fair value of its loan portfolio as of September 30, 2018 using an exit price notion (see note 10).

 8 

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)”. Under the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases): 1) a lease liability, which is the present value of a lessee's obligation to make lease payments, and 2) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee's right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Lessor accounting under the new guidance remains largely unchanged as it is substantially equivalent to existing guidance for sales-type leases, direct financing leases, and operating leases. Leveraged leases have been eliminated, although lessors can continue to account for existing leveraged leases using the current accounting guidance. Other limited changes were made to align lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and the new revenue recognition standard. All entities will classify leases to determine how to recognize lease-related revenue and expense. Quantitative and qualitative disclosures will be required by lessees and lessors to meet the objective of enabling users of financial statements to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The intention is to require enough information to supplement the amounts recorded in the financial statements so that users can understand more about the nature of an entity’s leasing activities. ASU 2016-02 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018; early adoption is permitted. All entities are required to use a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements. They have the option to use certain relief; full retrospective application is prohibited. Salisbury does not expect ASU 2016-02 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation–Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” This ASU includes provisions intended to simplify various aspects related to how share-based payments are accounted for and presented in the financial statements. Some of the key provisions of this new ASU include: (1) companies will no longer record excess tax benefits and certain tax deficiencies in additional paid-in capital (“APIC”). Instead, they will record all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement, and APIC pools will be eliminated. The guidance also eliminates the requirement that excess tax benefits be realized before companies can recognize them. In addition, the guidance requires companies to present excess tax benefits as an operating activity on the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity; (2) increase the amount an employer can withhold to cover income taxes on awards and still qualify for the exception to liability classification for shares used to satisfy the employer’s statutory income tax withholding obligation. The new guidance will also require an employer to classify the cash paid to a tax authority when shares are withheld to satisfy its statutory income tax withholding obligation as a financing activity on its statement of cash flows (current guidance did not specify how these cash flows should be classified); and (3) permit companies to make an accounting policy election for the impact of forfeitures on the recognition of expense for share-based payment awards. Forfeitures can be estimated, as required today, or recognized when they occur. Salisbury has opted to recognize forfeitures as they occur as the impact is not expected to be material. Salisbury adopted ASU 2016-09 as of January 1, 2017. Adoption contributed a $105 thousand benefit to the tax provision in the second quarter 2017 and did not have a material effect on the financial results for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2017.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” which adds a new Topic 326 to the Codification and removes the thresholds that companies apply to measure credit losses on financial instruments measured at amortized cost, such as loans, receivables, and held-to-maturity debt securities. Under current U.S. GAAP, companies generally recognize credit losses when it is probable that the loss has been incurred. The revised guidance will remove all recognition thresholds and will require companies to recognize an allowance for credit losses for the difference between the amortized cost basis of a financial instrument and the amount of amortized cost that the company expects to collect over the instrument’s contractual life. ASU 2016-13 also amends the credit loss measurement guidance for available-for-sale debt securities and beneficial interests in securitized financial assets. The guidance in ASU 2016-13 is effective for “public business entities,” as defined, that are SEC filers for fiscal years and for interim periods with those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted as of the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Salisbury is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU 2016-13 to determine the potential impact the new standard will have on Salisbury’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments." This ASU is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how eight particular transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those years. Entities are required to apply the guidance retrospectively. If it is impracticable to apply the guidance retrospectively for an issue, the amendments related to that issue would be applied prospectively. Salisbury adopted ASU 2016-15 on January 1, 2018. ASU 2016-15 did not have a material impact on Salisbury’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business." This ASU is intended to add guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amendments in this update provide a screen to determine when a set of inputs, processes, and outputs is not a business. ASU 2017-01 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted for transactions for which the acquisition date occurs before the issuance date or effective date of the amendments, only when the transaction has not been reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance, or for transactions in which a subsidiary is deconsolidated or a group of assets is derecognized that occur before the issuance date or effective date of the amendments, only when the transaction has not been reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance. Entities should apply the guidance prospectively on or after the effective date. Salisbury adopted ASU 2017-01 on January 1, 2018. ASU 2017-01 did not impact Salisbury’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

 9 

 

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” This ASU is intended to allow companies to simplify how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The FASB is researching whether similar amendments should be considered for other entities, including public business entities. ASU 2017-04 is effective for public business entities that are SEC filers for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. Entities should apply the guidance prospectively. Salisbury is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU 2017-04 to determine the potential impact the new standard will have on Salisbury’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08, “Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities.” This ASU will amend the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. The Board is shortening the amortization period for the premium to the earliest call date. Under current generally accepted accounting principles, entities generally amortize the premium as an adjustment of yield over the contractual life of the instrument. ASU 2017-08 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. Entities should apply the guidance on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Salisbury is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU 2017-08 and does not expect that the adoption of the new standard will have a material impact on Salisbury’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting.” This ASU provides clarity in the accounting guidance regarding a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. ASU 2017-09 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods. Entities should apply the guidance prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. Salisbury adopted ASU 2017-09 on January 1, 2018. ASU 2017-09 did not impact Salisbury’s Consolidated Financial Statements. 

 

 10 

 

NOTE 2 - SECURITIES

The composition of securities is as follows:

(in thousands)   Amortized cost basis (1)    Gross un-realized gains    Gross un-realized losses    Fair value 
September 30, 2018                    
Available-for-sale                    
U.S. Government Agency notes  $4,991   $   $28   $4,963 
Municipal bonds   5,392    5    7    5,390 
Mortgage-backed securities:                    
U.S. Government agencies and U.S. Government- sponsored enterprises   34,845    21    467    34,399 
Collateralized mortgage obligations:                    
U.S. Government agencies   18,255    1    404    17,852 
Non-agency   1,423    395    21    1,797 
SBA bonds   28,607        757    27,850 
Corporate bonds   3,500    29        3,529 
Total securities available-for-sale  $97,013   $451   $1,684   $95,780 
CRA mutual fund  $823   $   $   $823 
Non-marketable securities                    
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock  $4,988   $   $   $4,988 
(in thousands)   Amortized cost basis (1)    Gross un-realized gains    Gross un-realized losses    Fair value 
December 31, 2017                    
Available-for-sale                    
Municipal bonds  $3,476   $11   $1   $3,486 
Mortgage-backed securities:                    
U.S. Government agencies and U.S. Government- sponsored enterprises   45,983    152    267    45,868 
Collateralized mortgage obligations:                    
U.S. Government agencies   10,462    2    87    10,377 
Non-agency   2,271    410    17    2,664 
SBA bonds   12,278    9    20    12,267 
Corporate bonds   3,500    59    9    3,550 
Total securities available-for-sale  $77,970   $643   $401   $78,212 
CRA mutual fund  $835   $   $   $835 
Non-marketable securities                    
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock  $3,813   $   $   $3,813 
(1)Net of other-than-temporary impairment write-downs recognized in earnings.

Salisbury sold $8.4 million in securities available-for-sale during the nine month period ended September 30, 2018 realizing a pre-tax gain of $16 thousand and related tax expense of $3 thousand. Salisbury did not sell any available-for-sale securities during the three month period ended September 30, 2018 or the nine month period ended September 30, 2017.

 11 

 

The following table summarizes, for all securities in an unrealized loss position, including debt securities for which a portion of other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) has been recognized in other comprehensive income (loss), the aggregate fair value and gross unrealized loss of securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of the dates presented:

September 30, 2018 (in thousands)  Less than 12 Months  12 Months or Longer  Total
   Fair
value
 

Unrealized

losses

  Fair
value
 

Unrealized

losses

  Fair
value
  Unrealized losses
Available-for-sale                  
U.S. Government Agency notes  $4,963   $28   $   $   $4,963   $28 
Municipal bonds   1,674    7            1,674    7 
Mortgage-backed securities   12,694    210    19,584    257    32,278    467 
Collateralized mortgage obligations:                              
U.S. Government Agencies   13,546    225    3,949    179    17,495    404 
Non-agency   94    4            94    4 
SBA bonds   25,346    643    2,428    114    27,774    757 
Total -temporarily impaired securities  $58,317   $1,117   $25,961   $550   $84,278   $1,667 
Other-than-temporarily impaired securities                              
Collateralized mortgage obligations                              
Non-agency           75    17    75    17 
Total temporarily impaired and other-than-temporarily impaired securities  $58,317   $1,117   $26,036   $567   $84,343   $1,684 
December 31, 2017 (in thousands)  Less than 12 Months  12 Months or Longer  Total
   Fair
value
 

Unrealized

losses

  Fair
value
 

Unrealized

losses

  Fair
value
  Unrealized losses
Available-for-sale                              
Municipal bonds  $479   $1   $   $   $479   $1 
Mortgage-backed securities   15,914    99    17,892    168    33,806    267 
Collateralized mortgage obligations                              
U.S. Government Agencies   9,317    87            9,317    87 
Non-agency           77    3    77    3 
SBA bonds   8,519    20            8,519    20 
Corporate bonds   1,491    9            1,491    9 
Total temporarily impaired securities   35,720    216    17,969    171    53,689    387 
Other-than-temporarily impaired securities                              
Collateralized mortgage obligations                              
Non-agency   101    14            101    14 
Total temporarily impaired and other-than-temporarily impaired securities  $35,821   $230   $17,969   $171   $53,790   $401 

The amortized cost, fair value and tax equivalent yield of securities, by maturity, are as follows:

September 30, 2018 (in thousands)  Maturity  Amortized cost  Fair value  Yield(1)
U.S. Government agency notes  After 5 years but within 10 years  $4,991   $4,963    3.59%
   Total   4,991    4,963    3.59 
Municipal bonds  Within 1 year   347    347    2.37 
   After 1 year but within 5 years   137    137    2.78 
   After 10 years but within 15 years   4,373    4,374    4.55 
   After 15 years   535    532    3.35 
   Total   5,392    5,390    4.29 
Mortgage-backed securities  U.S. Government agency and U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises   34,845    34,399    2.43 
Collateralized mortgage obligations  U.S. Government agency and U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises   18,255    17,852    3.00 
   Non-agency   1,423    1,797    5.36 
SBA bonds      28,607    27,850    3.06 
                   
Corporate bonds  After 5 years but within 10 years   3,500    3,529    5.57 
Securities available-for-sale     $97,013   $95,780    3.05%

(1)       Yield is based on amortized cost.

 12 

 

Salisbury evaluates securities for OTTI where the fair value of a security is less than its amortized cost basis at the balance sheet date. As part of this process, Salisbury considers whether it has the intent to sell each debt security and whether it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery. If either of these conditions is met, Salisbury recognizes an OTTI charge to earnings equal to the entire difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. For securities that meet neither of these conditions, an analysis is performed to determine if any of these securities are at risk for OTTI.

The following summarizes, by security type, the basis for evaluating if the applicable securities were OTTI at September 30, 2018.

U.S. Government agency notes: The contractual cash flows are guaranteed by U.S. government agencies. Two securities had unrealized losses at September 30, 2018, which approximated 0.57% of their amortized cost. Changes in fair values are a function of changes in investment spreads and interest rate movements and not changes in credit quality. Management expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities. Furthermore, Salisbury evaluates these securities for strategic fit and may reduce its position in these securities, although it is not more likely than not that Salisbury will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their cost basis, which may be maturity, and does not intend to sell these securities. Therefore, management does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2018.

Municipal bonds: Salisbury regularly monitors and analyzes its municipal bond portfolio for credit quality. Eight securities had unrealized losses at September 30, 2018, which approximated 0.44% of their amortized cost. Management believes the unrealized loss position is attributable to interest rate and spread movements and not changes in credit quality. Management expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities. Furthermore, Salisbury evaluates these securities for strategic fit and may reduce its position in these securities, although it is not more likely than not that Salisbury will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their cost basis, which may be maturity, and does not intend to sell these securities. Therefore, management evaluated the impairment status of these debt securities, and concluded that the gross unrealized losses were temporary in nature and does not consider these investments to be other-than temporarily impaired at September 30, 2018.

U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations: The contractual cash flows are guaranteed by U.S. government agencies and U.S. government-sponsored enterprises. Thirty-four securities had unrealized losses at September 30, 2018, which approximated 1.72% of their amortized cost. Changes in fair values are a function of changes in investment spreads and interest rate movements and not changes in credit quality. Management expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities. Furthermore, Salisbury evaluates these securities for strategic fit and may reduce its position in these securities, although it is not more likely than not that Salisbury will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their cost basis, which may be maturity, and does not intend to sell these securities. Therefore, management does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2018.

SBA bonds: The contractual cash flows are guaranteed by the U.S. government. Sixteen securities had unrealized losses at September 30, 2018, which approximated 2.65% of their amortized cost. Changes in fair values are a function of changes in investment spreads and interest rate movements and not changes in credit quality since time of purchase. Management expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities. Furthermore, Salisbury evaluates these securities for strategic fit and may reduce its position in these securities, although it is not more likely than not that Salisbury will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their cost basis, which may be maturity, and does not intend to sell these securities. Management evaluated the impairment status of these debt securities, and concluded that the gross unrealized losses were temporary in nature. Therefore, management does not consider these investments to be other-than temporarily impaired at September 30, 2018.

Non-agency CMOs: Salisbury performed a detailed cash flow analysis of its non-agency CMOs at September 30, 2018, to assess whether any of the securities were OTTI. Four securities had unrealized losses at September 30, 2018, which approximated 11.20% of its amortized cost. Salisbury uses cash flow forecasts for each security based on a variety of market driven assumptions and securitization terms, including prepayment speed, default or delinquency rate, and default severity for losses including interest, legal fees, property repairs, expenses and realtor fees, that, together with the loan amount are subtracted from collateral sales proceeds to determine severity. In 2009, Salisbury determined that five non-agency CMO securities reflected OTTI and recognized losses for deterioration in credit quality of $1,128,000. Salisbury judged the other non-agency CMO securities not to have additional OTTI and all other CMO securities not to be OTTI as of September 30, 2018. It is possible that future loss assumptions could change necessitating Salisbury to recognize future OTTI for further deterioration in credit quality. Salisbury evaluates these securities for strategic fit and depending upon such factor could reduce its position in these securities, although it has no present intention to do so, and it is not more likely than not that Salisbury will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their cost basis.

 13 

 

The following table presents activity related to credit losses recognized into earnings on the non-agency CMOs held by Salisbury for which a portion of an OTTI charge was recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income:

  Nine months ended September 30 (in thousands)    2018      2017  
Balance, beginning of period  $1,128   $1,128 
Credit component on debt securities in which OTTI was not previously recognized        
Balance, end of period  $1,128   $1,128 

The Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (FHLBB) is a cooperative that provides services, including funding in the form of advances, to its member banking institutions. As a requirement of membership, the Bank must own a minimum amount of FHLBB stock, calculated periodically based primarily on its level of borrowings from the FHLBB. No market exists for shares of the FHLBB and therefore, they are carried at par value. FHLBB stock may be redeemed at par value five years following termination of FHLBB membership, subject to limitations which may be imposed by the FHLBB or its regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Board, to maintain capital adequacy of the FHLBB. While the Bank currently has no intentions to terminate its FHLBB membership, the ability to redeem its investment in FHLBB stock would be subject to the conditions imposed by the FHLBB. Based on the capital adequacy and the liquidity position of the FHLBB, management believes there is no impairment related to the carrying amount of the Bank’s FHLBB stock as of September 30, 2018. Deterioration of the FHLBB’s capital levels may require the Bank to deem its restricted investment in FHLBB stock to be OTTI. If evidence of impairment exists in the future, the FHLBB stock would reflect fair value using either observable or unobservable inputs. The Bank will continue to monitor its investment in FHLBB stock.

NOTE 3 – LOANS

The composition of loans receivable and loans held-for-sale is as follows:

    September 30, 2018    December 31, 2017 
(In thousands)   Total Loans    Total Loans 
Residential 1-4 family  $348,218   $317,639 
Residential 5+ multifamily   30,715    18,108 
Construction of residential 1-4 family   13,125    11,197 
Home equity lines of credit   34,863    33,771 
Residential real estate   426,921    380,715 
Commercial   280,640    249,311 
Construction of commercial   10,685    9,988 
Commercial real estate   291,325    259,299 
Farm land   4,222    4,274 
Vacant land   8,726    7,883 
Real estate secured   731,194    652,171 
Commercial and industrial   150,715    132,731 
Municipal   18,388    17,494 
Consumer   4,605    4,794 
Loans receivable, gross   904,902    807,190 
Deferred loan origination fees and costs, net   1,468    1,289 
Allowance for loan losses   (7,745)   (6,776)
Loans receivable, net  $898,625   $801,703 
Loans held-for-sale          
Residential 1-4 family  $589   $669 

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Salisbury's loans consist primarily of residential and commercial real estate loans located principally in northwestern Connecticut, New York and Massachusetts towns, which constitute Salisbury's service area. Salisbury offers a broad range of loan and credit facilities to borrowers in its service area, including residential mortgage loans, commercial real estate loans, construction loans, working capital loans, equipment loans, and a variety of consumer loans, including home equity lines of credit, and installment and collateral loans. All residential and commercial mortgage loans are collateralized by first or second mortgages on real estate. The ability of single family residential and consumer borrowers to honor their repayment commitments is generally dependent on the level of overall economic activity within the market area and real estate values. The ability of commercial borrowers to honor their repayment commitments is dependent on the general economy as well as the health of the real estate economic sector in Salisbury’s market area.

 14 

 

Credit Quality

Salisbury uses credit risk ratings as part of its determination of the allowance for loan losses. Credit risk ratings categorize loans by common financial and structural characteristics that measure the credit strength of a borrower. The rating model has eight risk rating grades, with each grade corresponding to a progressively greater risk of default. Grades 1 through 4 are pass ratings and 5 through 8 are criticized as defined by the regulatory agencies. Risk ratings are assigned to differentiate risk within the portfolio and are reviewed on an ongoing basis and revised, if needed, to reflect changes in the borrowers' current financial position and outlook, risk profiles and the related collateral and structural positions.

Loans rated as "special mention" possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving management’s close attention that if left uncorrected may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loans at some future date.

Loans rated as "substandard" are loans where the Bank’s position is clearly not protected adequately by borrower current net worth or payment capacity. These loans have well defined weaknesses based on objective evidence and include loans where future losses to the Bank may result if deficiencies are not corrected, and loans where the primary source of repayment such as income is diminished and the Bank must rely on sale of collateral or other secondary sources of collection.

Loans rated "doubtful" have the same weaknesses as substandard loans with the added characteristic that the weakness makes collection or liquidation in full, given current facts, conditions, and values, to be highly improbable. The possibility of loss is high, but due to certain important and reasonably specific pending factors, which may work to strengthen the loan, its reclassification as an estimated loss is deferred until its exact status can be determined.

Loans classified as "loss" are considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as Bank assets is unwarranted. This classification does not mean that the loan has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather, it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this loan even though partial recovery may be made in the future.

Management actively reviews and tests its credit risk ratings against actual experience and engages an independent third-party to annually validate its assignment of credit risk ratings. In addition, the Bank’s loan portfolio is examined periodically by its regulatory agencies, the FDIC and the Connecticut Department of Banking.  

 15 

 

The composition of loans receivable by risk rating grade is as follows:

  (in thousands)  Pass  Special mention  Substandard  Doubtful  Loss  Total
  September 30, 2018                              
  Residential 1-4 family  $337,510   $4,330   $6,378   $   $   $348,218 
  Residential 5+ multifamily   28,925    787    1,003            30,715 
  Construction of residential 1-4 family   13,125                    13,125 
  Home equity lines of credit   34,039    311    513            34,863 
  Residential real estate   413,599    5,428    7,894            426,921 
  Commercial   266,678    3,195    10,767            280,640 
  Construction of commercial   10,324        361            10,685 
  Commercial real estate   277,002    3,195    11,128            291,325 
  Farm land   3,998        224            4,222 
  Vacant land   8,655    71                8,726 
  Real estate secured   703,254    8,694    19,246            731,194 
  Commercial and industrial   147,897    1,850    968            150,715 
  Municipal   18,388                    18,388 
  Consumer   4,572    33                4,605 
  Loans receivable, gross  $874,111   $10,577   $20,214   $   $   $904,902 
  (in thousands)  Pass  Special mention  Substandard  Doubtful  Loss  Total
  December 31, 2017                              
  Residential 1-4 family  $307,240   $6,452   $3,947   $   $   $317,639 
  Residential 5+ multifamily   16,129    957    1,022            18,108 
  Construction of residential 1-4 family   11,197                    11,197 
  Home equity lines of credit   32,891    710    170            33,771 
  Residential real estate   367,457    8,119    5,139            380,715 
  Commercial   232,492    4,456    12,363            249,311 
  Construction of commercial   9,622        366            9,988 
  Commercial real estate   242,114    4,456    12,729            259,299 
  Farm land   4,024        250            4,274 
  Vacant land   7,806    77                7,883 
  Real estate secured   621,401    12,652    18,118            652,171 
  Commercial and industrial   129,219    2,536    976            132,731 
  Municipal   17,494                    17,494 
  Consumer   4,744    50                4,794 
  Loans receivable, gross  $772,858   $15,238   $19,094   $   $   $807,190 

 16 

 

The composition of loans receivable by delinquency status is as follows:

      Past due   
                         
               180  30  Accruing   
(in thousands)          days  days  90 days 
      30-59  60-89  90-179  and  and  and  Non-
    Current  days  days  days  over  over  over  accrual
September 30, 2018                        
Residential 1-4 family  $344,342   $909   $32   $1,511   $1,424   $3,876   $   $3,599 
Residential 5+ multifamily   29,828    658        229        887        1,003 
Construction of residential 1-4 family   13,125                             
Home equity lines of credit   34,357    107    40        359    506        413 
Residential real estate   421,652    1,674    72    1,740    1,783    5,269        5,015 
Commercial   277,924    774    179        1,763    2,716        2,221 
Construction of commercial   10,428                257    257        257 
Commercial real estate   288,352    774    179        2,020    2,973        2,478 
Farm land   4,005    217                217        224 
Vacant land   8,726                             
Real estate secured   722,735    2,665    251    1,740    3,803    8,459        7,717 
Commercial and industrial   150,176    53    30    96    360    539    96    360 
Municipal   18,388                             
Consumer   4,584    11    10            21         
Loans receivable, gross  $895,883   $2,729   $291   $1,836   $4,163   $9,019   $96   $8,077 

 

      Past due   
                         
               180  30  Accruing   
(in thousands)          days  days  90 days 
      30-59  60-89  90-179  and  and  and  Non-
    Current  days  days  days  over  over  over  accrual
December 31, 2017                        
Residential 1-4 family  $314,798   $1,410   $165   $156   $1,110   $2,841   $   $2,045 
Residential 5+ multifamily   18,108                            151 
Construction of residential 1-4 family   11,197                             
Home equity lines of credit   33,219    75    477            552        66 
Residential real estate   377,322    1,485    642    156    1,110    3,393        2,262 
Commercial   244,869    1,888    758        1,796    4,442        3,364 
Construction of commercial   9,730                258    258        258 
Commercial real estate   254,599    1,888    758        2,054    4,700        3,622 
Farm land   4,032    242                242        250 
Vacant land   7,883                             
Real estate secured   643,836    3,615    1,400    156    3,164    8,335        6,134 
Commercial and industrial   131,991    131    218    391        740    31    470 
Municipal   17,494                             
Consumer   4,752    34    8            42         
Loans receivable, gross  $798,073   $3,780   $1,626   $547   $3,164   $9,117   $31   $6,604 

 

There were no troubled debt restructurings in the third quarter of 2018 or 2017. For the nine months ended September 2018, there was one troubled debt restructuring with a loan balance of $686 thousand and for the same period in 2017 there was one loan with a balance of $600 thousand.

 17 

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

Changes in the allowance for loan losses are as follows:

  Three months ended September 30, 2018  Three months ended September 30, 2017
  (in thousands)   Beginning balance 

Provision

 

Charge-

offs

 

Reco-

veries

  Ending balance  Beginning balance 

Provision

 

Charge-

offs

 

Reco-

veries

  Ending balance
Residential 1-4 family  $2,007   $201   $   $2   $2,210   $1,917   $(1)  $(88)  $4   $1,832 
Residential 5+ multifamily   258    80            338    116    9            125 
Construction of residential 1-4 family   82    8            90    71    5            76 
Home equity lines of credit   234    21            255    249    21    (5)       265 
Residential real estate  $2,581   $310   $   $2   $2,893   $2,353   $34   $(93)  $4   $2,298 
Commercial   2,776    211    (26)   1    2,962    2,338    78    (190)   117    2,343 
Construction of commercial   102    12            114    46    25            71 
Commercial real estate   2,878    223    (26)   1    3,076    2,384    103    (190)   117    2,414 
Farm land   37    (12)       7    32    23    32    (27)       28 
Vacant land   134    (27)           107    131    19            150 
Real estate secured   5,630    494    (26)   10    6,108    4,891    188    (310)   121    4,890 
Commercial and industrial   1,144    (173)   (2)   7    976    1,001    (28)   (41)   7    939 
Municipal   29    (11)           18    18    2            20 
Consumer   63    (9)   (10)   7    51    69    12    (17)   4    68 
Unallocated   515    77            592    514    63            577 
Totals  $7,381   $378   $(38)  $24   $7,745   $6,493   $237   $(368)  $132   $6,494 

 

 

  Nine months ended September 30, 2018  Nine months ended September 30, 2017
  (in thousands)   Beginning balance 

Provision

 

Charge-

offs

 

Reco-

veries

  Ending balance  Beginning balance 

Provision

 

Charge-

offs

 

Reco-

veries

  Ending balance
Residential 1-4 family  $1,862   $355   $(10)  $3   $2,210   $1,925   $67   $(167)  $7   $1,832 
Residential 5+ multifamily   155    183            338    62    63            125 
Construction of residential 1-4 family   75    15            90    91    (15)           76 
Home equity lines of credit   236    18        1    255    348    (79)   (5)   1    265 
Residential real estate  $2,328   $571   $(10)  $4   $2,893   $2,426   $36   $(172)  $8   $2,298 
Commercial   2,547    589    (175)   1    2,962    1,919    656    (378)   146    2,343 
Construction of commercial   80    34            114    38    33            71 
Commercial real estate   2,627    623    (175)   1    3,076    1,957    689    (378)   146    2,414 
Farm land   32    (7)       7    32    28    43    (43)       28 
Vacant land   131    (24)           107    170    (20)           150 
Real estate secured   5,118    1,163    (185)   12    6,108    4,581    748    (593)   154    4,890 
Commercial and industrial   984    (14)   (12)   18    976    1,080    (44)   (162)   65    939 
Municipal   30    (12)           18    53    (33)           20 
Consumer   81    5    (55)   20    51    76    42    (63)   13    68 
Unallocated   563    29            592    337    240            577 
Totals  $6,776   $1,171   $(252)  $50   $7,745   $6,127   $953   $(818)  $232   $6,494 

 

 18 

 

The composition of loans receivable and the allowance for loan losses is as follows:

  (in thousands)  Collectively evaluated 1  Individually evaluated  Total portfolio
    Loans    Allowance    Loans    Allowance    Loans    Allowance 
September 30, 2018                              
Residential 1-4 family  $341,775   $2,087   $6,443   $123   $348,218   $2,210 
Residential 5+ multifamily   29,037    338    1,678        30,715    338 
Construction of residential 1-4 family   13,125    90            13,125    90 
Home equity lines of credit   34,402    234    461    21    34,863    255 
Residential real estate   418,339    2,749    8,582    144    426,921    2,893 
Commercial   275,564    2,808    5,076    154    280,640    2,962 
Construction of commercial   10,324    114    361        10,685    114 
Commercial real estate   285,888    2,922    5,437    154    291,325    3,076 
Farm land   3,998    32    224        4,222    32 
Vacant land   8,534    104    192    3    8,726    107 
Real estate secured   716,759    5,807    14,435    301    731,194    6,108 
Commercial and industrial   150,210    976    505        150,715    976 
Municipal   18,388    18            18,388    18 
Consumer   4,605    51            4,605    51 
Unallocated allowance       592                592 
Totals  $889,962   $7,444   $14,940   $301   $904,902   $7,745 

 

  (in thousands)  Collectively evaluated 1  Individually evaluated  Total portfolio
    Loans    Allowance    Loans    Allowance    Loans    Allowance 
December 31, 2017                              
Residential 1-4 family  $312,456   $1,759   $5,183   $103   $317,639   $1,862 
Residential 5+ multifamily   16,361    154    1,747    1    18,108    155 
Construction of residential 1-4 family   11,197    75            11,197    75 
Home equity lines of credit   33,658    235    113    1    33,771    236 
Residential real estate   373,672    2,223    7,043    105    380,715    2,328 
Commercial   243,602    2,432    5,709    115    249,311    2,547 
Construction of commercial   9,622    80    366        9,988    80 
Commercial real estate   253,224    2,512    6,075    115    259,299    2,627 
Farm land   4,024    32    250        4,274    32 
Vacant land   7,684    129    199    3    7,883    132 
Real estate secured   638,604    4,896    13,567    223    652,171    5,119 
Commercial and industrial   132,212    952    519    32    132,731    984 
Municipal   17,494    30            17,494    30 
Consumer   4,794    80            4,794    80 
Unallocated allowance       563                563 
Totals  $793,104   $6,521   $14,086   $255   $807,190   $6,776 

1 Includes amounts reflecting ASC 310-30 accounting for purchased loans with deteriorated credit quality with respect to deterioration in credit quality that occurs subsequent to origination and which makes it probable that the Company will be unable to collect all contractually required payments from the borrower. ASC 310-30 loans and allowance were $1.7 million and $0, respectively for September 30, 2018 and $2.4 million and $92,000, respectively for December 31, 2017.

The credit quality segments of loans receivable and the allowance for loan losses are as follows:

September 30, 2018 (in thousands) Collectively evaluated  Individually evaluated  Total portfolio
    Loans    Allowance    Loans    Allowance    Loans   Allowance 
Performing loans  $880,412   $6,671   $   $   $880,412   $6,671 
Potential problem loans 1   9,550    181            9,550    181 
Impaired loans           14,940    301    14,940    301 
Unallocated allowance       592                592 
Totals  $889,962   $7,444   $14,940   $301   $904,902   $7,745 

 

 19 

 

December 31, 2017 (in thousands) Collectively evaluated  Individually evaluated  Total portfolio
    Loans    Allowance    Loans    Allowance    Loans   Allowance 
Performing loans  $783,206   $5,619   $   $   $783,206   $5,619 
Potential problem loans 1   9,898    339            9,898    339 
Impaired loans           14,086    255    14,086    255 
Unallocated allowance       563                563 
Totals  $793,104   $6,521   $14,086   $255   $807,190   $6,776 

1 Potential problem loans consist of performing loans that have been assigned a substandard credit risk rating and are not classified as impaired.

A specific valuation allowance is established for the impairment amount of each impaired loan, calculated using the present value of expected cash flows or fair value of collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. Certain data with respect to loans individually evaluated for impairment is as follows:

   Impaired loans with specific allowance   Impaired loans with no specific allowance
(in thousands)  Loan balance    Specific    Income   Loan balance    Income 
    Book    Note    Average    allowance    recognized    Book    Note    Average    recognized 
September 30, 2018                           
Residential  $2,818   $2,864   $3,633   $123   $74   $5,303   $6,358   $3,540   $83 
Home equity lines of credit   406    437    155    21    2    55    110    61     
Residential real estate   3,224    3,301    3,788    144    76    5,358    6,468    3,601    83 
Commercial   2,286    2,304    2,012    154    48    2,790    4,295    3,075    53 
Construction of commercial           11            361    384    352    5 
Farm land                       224    435    236     
Vacant land   43    43    43    3    2    149    171    152    8 
Real estate secured   5,553    5,648    5,854    301    126    8,882    11,753    7,416    149 
Commercial and industrial           52            505    602    459    3 
Consumer                           4         
Totals  $5,553   $5,648   $5,906   $301   $126   $9,387   $12,359   $7,875   $152 

 

   Impaired loans with specific allowance   Impaired loans with no specific allowance
(in thousands)  Loan balance    Specific    Income   Loan balance    Income 
    Book    Note    Average    allowance    recognized    Book    Note    Average    recognized 
September 30, 2017                           
Residential  $3,256   $3,367   $3,388   $86   $80   $3,803   $4,641   $3,605   $89 
Home equity lines of credit   47    47    88    1    1    209    264    173    6 
Residential real estate   3,303    3,414    3,476    87    81    4,012    4,905    3,778    95 
Commercial   1,894    2,033    2,916    149    59    4,743    6,195    3,438    93 
Construction of commercial   110    116    44        5    258    272    326     
Farm land                       980    1,177    982     
Vacant land   44    44    45    3    2    157    181    161    8 
Real estate secured   5,351    5,607    6,481    239    147    10,150    12,730    8,685    196 
Commercial and industrial   110    110    44    32    2    76    171    110    2 
Consumer                           6    2     
Totals  $5,461   $5,717   $6,525   $271   $149   $10,226   $12,907   $8,797   $198 

 

 20 

 

NOTE 4 - MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS

(in thousands)    September 30, 2018      December 31, 2017  
Residential mortgage loans serviced for others  $111,957   $117,538 
Fair value of mortgage servicing rights   1,034    1,010 

Changes in mortgage servicing rights are as follows:

     Three months ended      Nine months ended  
Periods ended September 30, (in thousands)    2018      2017      2018      2017  
Mortgage Servicing Rights                    
Balance, beginning of period  $217   $241   $233   $339 
Originated   11    15    18    53 
Amortization (1)   (11)   (13)   (34)   (149)
Balance, end of period  $217   $243   $217   $243 
Valuation Allowance                    
Balance, beginning of period  $   $(25)  $   $(23)
Decrease (increase) in impairment reserve (1)       26        24 
Balance, end of period  $   $1   $   $1 
Mortgage servicing rights, net  $217   $244   $217   $244 
(1)Amortization expense and changes in the impairment reserve are recorded in mortgage servicing, net.

NOTE 5 - PLEDGED ASSETS

(in thousands)    September 30, 2018      December 31, 2017  
Securities available-for-sale (at fair value)  $77,498   $67,377 
Loans receivable (at book value)   320,953    204,354 
Total pledged assets  $398,451   $271,731 

At September 30, 2018, securities were pledged as follows: $70.65 million to secure public deposits, $6.80 million to secure repurchase agreements and $0.05 million to secure FHLBB advances. In addition to securities, loans receivable were pledged to secure FHLBB advances and credit facilities.

NOTE 6 – EARNINGS PER SHARE

Salisbury defines unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends as participating securities that are included in computing earnings per share (EPS) using the two-class method.

The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each share of common stock and participating securities according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Under this method, all earnings (distributed and undistributed) are allocated to common shares and participating securities based on their respective rights to receive dividends. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income allocated to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity.

The following table sets forth the computation of earnings per share (basic and diluted) for the periods indicated:

     Three months ended      Nine months ended  
Periods ended September 30, (in thousands, except per share data)    2018      2017      2018      2017  
Net income  $2,344   $1,694   $6,259   $5,180 
Less: Undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities   (33)   (16)   (73)   (41)
Net income allocated to common stock  $2,311   $1,678   $6,186   $5,139 
Weighted average common shares issued   2,804    2,785    2,795    2,777 
Less: Unvested restricted stock awards   (40)   (26)   (33)   (22)
Weighted average common shares outstanding used to calculate basic earnings per common share   2,764    2,759    2,762    2,755 
Add: Dilutive effect of stock options   15    20    18    19 
Weighted average common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per common share   2,779    2,779    2,780    2,774 
Earnings per common share (basic)  $0.84   $0.61   $2.24   $1.87 
Earnings per common share (diluted)  $0.83   $0.60   $2.23   $1.85 

 21 

 

NOTE 7 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Capital Requirements

Salisbury and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional and discretionary actions by the regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on Salisbury’s and the Bank's financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, Salisbury and the Bank must meet specific guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Salisbury and the Bank's capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

The requirements of the final rules approved by the Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) and FDIC, include a common equity Tier 1 capital risk-weighted assets minimum ratio of 4.5%, minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 6.0%, require a minimum ratio of Total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8.0%, and require a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4.0%. A capital conservation buffer, comprised of common equity Tier 1 capital, is also established above the regulatory minimum capital requirements. The initial implementation of the capital conservation buffer began phasing in January 1, 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and increases each subsequent January 1, by an additional 0.625% until reaching its final level of 2.5% on January 1, 2019. As of September 30, 2018, the Bank exceeded the fully phased in regulatory requirement for the capital conservation buffer. Strict eligibility criteria for regulatory capital instruments were also implemented under the final rules.

Actual regulatory capital position and minimum capital requirements as defined "To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions" and "For Capital Adequacy Purposes" for Salisbury and the Bank are as follows:

      To be Well Capitalized
   Actual  For Capital Adequacy Purposes  Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
  (dollars in thousands)  Amount  Ratio  Amount  Ratio  Amount  Ratio
September 30, 2018                              
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets)                              
Salisbury  $104,815    12.26%  $68,400    8.0%   n/a     
Bank   101,836    11.91    68,400    8.0   $85,500    10.0%
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)                              
Salisbury   86,961    10.17    51,300    6.0    n/a     
Bank   93,983    10.99    51,300    6.0    68,400    8.0 
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)                              
Salisbury   86,961    10.17    38,475    4.5    n/a     
Bank   93,983    10.99    38,475    4.5    55,575    6.5 
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets)                              
Salisbury   86,961    8.02    43,396    4.0    n/a     
Bank   93,983    8.66    43,396    4.0    54,245    5.0 
December 31, 2017                              
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets)                              
Salisbury  $98,920    12.94%  $61,154    8.0%   n/a     
Bank   95,810    12.54    61,130    8.0   $76,413    10.0%
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)                              
Salisbury   82,034    10.73    45,865    6.0    n/a     
Bank   88,924    11.64    45,848    6.0    61,130    8.0 
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)                              
Salisbury   82,034    10.73    34,399    4.5    n/a     
Bank   88,924    11.64    34,386    4.5    49,668    6.5 
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets)                              
Salisbury   82,034    8.53    38,461    4.0    n/a     
Bank   88,924    9.25    38,461    4.0    48,076    5.0 

 

 22 

 

DIVIDENDS

Cash Dividends to Common Shareholders

Salisbury's ability to pay cash dividends is substantially dependent on the Bank's ability to pay cash dividends to Salisbury. There are certain restrictions on the payment of cash dividends and other payments by the Bank to Salisbury. Under Connecticut law, the Bank cannot declare a cash dividend except from net profits, defined as the remainder of all earnings from current operations. The total of all cash dividends declared by the Bank in any calendar year shall not, unless specifically approved by the Banking Commissioner, exceed the total of its net profits of that year combined with its retained net profits of the preceding two years.

FRB Supervisory Letter SR 09-4, February 24, 2009, revised March 30, 2009, notes that, as a general matter, the Board of Directors of a Bank Holding Company (“BHC”) should inform the Federal Reserve and should eliminate, defer, or significantly reduce dividends if (1) net income available to shareholders for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid during that period, is not sufficient to fully fund the dividends; (2) the prospective rate of earnings retention is not consistent with capital needs and overall current and prospective financial condition; or (3) the BHC will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios. Moreover, a BHC should inform the Federal Reserve reasonably in advance of declaring or paying a dividend that exceeds earnings for the period (e.g., quarter) for which the dividend is being paid or that could result in a material adverse change to the BHC capital structure.

NOTE 8 – BENEFITS

Salisbury’s 401(k) Plan expense was $240,000 and $210,000, respectively, for the three month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, and $765,000 and $681,000, respectively, for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017. Other post-retirement benefit obligation expense for endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangements was $19,000 and $53,000, respectively, for the three month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, and $20,000 and $88,000, respectively, for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.

ESOP

Salisbury offers an ESOP to eligible employees.  Under the Plan, Salisbury may make discretionary contributions to the Plan, which generally vest in full upon six years of qualified service. Salisbury’s ESOP expense was $62,000 and $34,000, respectively, for the three month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, and $188,000 and $83,000, respectively, for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.

Other Retirement Plans

A Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan") was adopted effective January 1, 2013. This Plan was adopted by the Bank for the benefit of certain key employees ("Executive" or "Executives") who have been selected and approved by the Bank to participate in this Plan and who have evidenced their participation by execution of a Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan Participation Agreement ("Participation Agreement") in a form provided by the Bank. This Plan is intended to comply with Internal Revenue Code ("Code") Section 409A and any regulatory or other guidance issued under such Section. Salisbury’s expense for this plan was $28 thousand and $36 thousand, respectively, for the three month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, and $85 thousand and $77 thousand, respectively, for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.

On January 19, 2018, the Compensation Committee granted a total of 53,500 Phantom Stock Appreciation Units pursuant to the 2013 Phantom Stock Appreciation Unit and Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), including 20,000 units to three Named Executive Officers. Mr. Cantele received 10,000 units, Mr. Davies received 5,000 units and Mr. Albero received 5,000 units. The units will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date. Salisbury’s expense for all Phantom Stock Appreciation Units was $60 thousand and $53 thousand, respectively, for the three month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, and $180 thousand and $87 thousand, respectively, for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.

Grants of Restricted Stock and Options

Restricted stock

Restricted stock expense was $105 thousand and $74 thousand, respectively, for the three month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, and $260 thousand and $194 thousand, respectively, for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017. In second quarter 2018, Salisbury granted a total of 13,210 shares of restricted stock to certain employees and Directors pursuant to its 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan. The fair value of the stock at grant date was $585,000. The restricted stock will vest three years from the grant date. Unrecognized compensation cost relating to the awards as of September 30, 2018 and 2017 totaled $857 thousand and $660 thousand, respectively. There were no forfeitures in the third quarter of 2018 or 2017, and year to date for 2018 and 2017 there were 0 and 200 shares forfeited, respectively.

Options

Salisbury issued stock options in conjunction with its acquisition of Riverside Bank in 2014. In the first quarter 2018, 1,350 stock options were exercised at $31.11 per share by one former Riverside Bank executive, who is currently a Named Executive Officer of Salisbury. In the second quarter 2018, there were 3,350 stock options exercised at $31.11 by two employees. In the third quarter 2018, there were 1,755 stock options exercised at $16.94 by one former Riverside employee. In the first quarter 2017, 12,150 stock options were exercised at $25.93 by former Riverside Bank executives. No stock options were exercised in the third or second quarters of 2017.

 23 

 

NOTE 9 – ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

The components of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income are as follows:

(in thousands)    September 30, 2018      December 31, 2017  
Unrealized (losses) gains on securities available-for-sale, net of tax  $(974)  $179 
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net  $(974)  $179 

NOTE 10 – FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Salisbury uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, other assets are recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held for sale, collateral dependent impaired loans, property acquired through foreclosure or repossession and mortgage servicing rights. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

Salisbury adopted ASC 820-10, “Fair Value Measurement - Overall,” which provides a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles. In accordance with ASC 820-10, Salisbury groups its financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value in three levels based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. GAAP specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the types of valuation information (“inputs”) are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect Salisbury’s market assumptions. These two types of inputs have created the following fair value hierarchy:

Level 1. Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange. Level 1 may also include U.S. Treasury, other U.S. Government and agency mortgage-backed securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active markets. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2. Significant other observable inputs. Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained from third party pricing services for identical or comparable assets or liabilities.
Level 3. Significant unobservable inputs. Valuations for assets and liabilities that are derived from other methodologies, including option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, are not based on market exchange, dealer, or broker traded transactions. Level 3 valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets and liabilities.

Salisbury adopted ASC 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – overall (subtopic 825-10) Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”, which requires the exit price notion to be used when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure. Salisbury estimated the fair value of its loan portfolio based on a loan-level assessment that incorporated probabilities of default by loan type and internal risk rating, product-level loss given defaults and prepayment rates as well as discount rates.

A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Salisbury did not have any significant transfers of assets between levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the nine month period ended September 30, 2018.

 24 

 

Assets measured at fair value are as follows:

   Fair Value Measurements Using  Assets at
(in thousands)  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  fair
            value
September 30, 2018                    
Assets at fair value on a recurring basis                    
U.S. Government Agency notes  $   $4,963   $   $4,963 
Municipal bonds       5,390        5,390 
Mortgage-backed securities:                    
U.S. Government agencies and U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises       34,399        34,399 
Collateralized mortgage obligations:                    
U.S. Government agencies       17,852        17,852 
Non-agency       1,797        1,797 
SBA bonds       27,850        27,850 
Corporate bonds       3,529        3,529 
Securities available-for-sale  $   $95,780   $   $95,780 
CRA mutual funds   823            823 
Assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis                    
Collateral dependent impaired loans  $   $   $6,002   $6,002 
Other real estate owned  $   $   $340   $340 
December 31, 2017                    
Assets at fair value on a recurring basis                    
Municipal bonds  $   $3,486   $   $3,486 
Mortgage-backed securities:                    
U.S. Government agencies and U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises       45,868        45,868 
Collateralized mortgage obligations:                    
U.S. Government agencies       10,377        10,377 
Non-agency       2,664        2,664 
SBA bonds       12,267        12,267 
Corporate bonds       3,550        3,550 
Securities available-for-sale  $   $78,212   $   $78,212 
CRA mutual funds   835            835 
Assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis                    
Collateral dependent impaired loans  $   $   $5,863   $5,863 
Other real estate owned  $   $   $719   $719 

 

 25 

 

Carrying values and estimated fair values of financial instruments are as follows:

  (in thousands)  Carrying  Estimated  Fair value measurements using
   value  fair value  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3
  September 30, 2018                         
Financial Assets                         
Cash and cash equivalents  $42,220   $42,220   $42,220   $   $ 
Securities available-for-sale   95,780    95,780        95,780     
CRA mutual fund   823    823    823         
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock   4,988    4,988            4,988 
Loans held-for-sale   589    599            599 
Loans receivable, net1   898,625    873,397            873,397 
Accrued interest receivable   3,317    3,317            3,317 
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies   14,627    14,627    14,627         
Financial Liabilities                         
Demand (non-interest-bearing)  $233,935   $233,935   $   $   $233,935 
Demand (interest-bearing)   151,830    151,830            151,830 
Money market   202,308    202,308            202,308 
Savings and other   176,415    176,415            176,415 
Certificates of deposit   137,673    137,648            137,648 
Deposits   902,161    902,136            902,136 
Repurchase agreements   6,658    6,658            6,658 
FHLBB advances   67,596    67,589            67,589 
Subordinated debt   9,829    10,063            10,063 
Note payable   289    297            297 
Capital lease liability   3,114    3,391            3,391 
Accrued interest payable   382    382            382 
December 31, 2017                         
Financial Assets                         
Cash and cash equivalents  $48,486   $48,486   $48,486   $   $ 
Securities available-for-sale   78,212    78,212        78,212     
CRA mutual fund   835    835    835         
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock   3,813    3,813            3,813 
Loans held-for-sale   669    669            669 
Loans receivable, net1   801,703    816,451            816,451 
Accrued interest receivable   2,665    2,665            2,665 
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies   14,381    14,381    14,381         
Financial Liabilities                         
Demand (non-interest-bearing)  $220,536   $220,536   $   $   $220,536 
Demand (interest-bearing)   142,575    142,575            142,575 
Money market   190,953    190,953            190,953 
Savings and other   144,600    144,600            144,600 
Certificates of deposit   116,831    115,290            115,290 
Deposits   815,495    813,954            813,954 
Repurchase agreements   1,668    1,668            1,668 
FHLBB advances   54,422    54,918            54,918 
Subordinated debt   9,811    10,313            10,313 
Note payable   313    341            341 
Capital lease liability   1,835    2,161            2,161 
Accrued interest payable   99    99            99 

1 In accordance with the prospective adoption of ASU No. 2016-01, the fair value of loans as of September 30, 2018 was measured using an exit price notion. The fair value of loans as of December 31, 2017 was measured using an entry price notion.

The carrying amounts of financial instruments shown in the above table are included in the consolidated balance sheets under the indicated captions or are included in accrued interest and other liabilities.

NOTE 11 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On October 26, 2018 the Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.28 per common share payable on November 30, 2018 to shareholders of record as of November 16, 2018.

 26 

 

Item 2.MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. (“Salisbury” or the “Company”) and its subsidiary should be read in conjunction with Salisbury's Annual Report on Form 10 K for the year ended December 31, 2017. Readers should also review other disclosures Salisbury files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

BUSINESS

Salisbury Bancorp, Inc., a Connecticut corporation, formed in 1998, is the bank holding company for Salisbury Bank and Trust Company (the "Bank"), a Connecticut-chartered and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC") insured commercial bank headquartered in Lakeville, Connecticut. Salisbury’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “SAL.” Salisbury's principal business consists of its operation and control of the business of the Bank.

The Bank, formed in 1848, currently provides commercial banking, consumer financing, retail banking and trust and wealth advisory services through a network of fourteen banking offices and ten ATMs located in: Litchfield County, Connecticut; Dutchess, Orange and Ulster Counties, New York; and Berkshire County, Massachusetts and through its internet website (salisburybank.com). In April 2018, the Bank completed its purchase of the Fishkill, New York branch from Orange Bank & Trust Company and consolidated its existing Fishkill branch with the newly acquired branch.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Salisbury’s consolidated financial statements follow GAAP as applied to the banking industry in which it operates. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. These estimates, assumptions and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates, assumptions and judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. Estimates, assumptions and judgments are necessary when assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not carried at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon a future event.

Salisbury’s significant accounting policies are presented in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which, along with this Management’s Discussion and Analysis, provide information on how significant assets are valued in the financial statements and how those values are determined. Management believes that the following accounting estimates are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating Salisbury’s reported financial results, and they require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

Loans

Loans acquired in business combinations are initially recorded at fair value with no carryover of the related allowance for credit losses. Determining the fair value of the loans involves estimating the amount and timing of cash flows initially expected to be collected and discounting those cash flows at an appropriate market rate of interest. The Bank continues to evaluate reasonableness of the timing and the amount of cash to be collected. Subsequent decreases in expected cash flows may result in changes in the amortization or accretion of fair market value adjustments, and in some cases may result in the loan being considered impaired. Such decreases may also result in recognition of additional provisions to the allowance for loan losses. For collateral dependent loans with deteriorated credit quality, the Bank estimates the fair value of the underlying collateral of the loans.  These values are discounted using market derived rates of return, with consideration given to the period of time and costs associated with the foreclosure and disposition of the collateral.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting estimate because it requires significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The loan portfolio also represents the largest asset type on the balance sheet. A discussion of the factors driving changes in the amount of the allowance for loan losses is included in the “Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

 27 

 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Management evaluates goodwill and identifiable intangible assets for impairment annually using valuation techniques that involve estimates for discount rates, projected future cash flows and time period calculations, all of which are susceptible to change based on changes in economic conditions and other factors. Future events or changes in the estimates, which are used to determine the carrying value of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets or which otherwise adversely affect their value or estimated lives could have a material adverse impact on the results of operations.

Available-For-Sale Securities

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment giving consideration to the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, estimates of future cash flows, delinquencies and default severity, and the intent and ability of Salisbury to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. The consideration of the above factors is subjective and involves estimates and assumptions about matters that are inherently uncertain. Should actual factors and conditions differ materially from those used by management, the actual realization of gains or losses on investment securities could differ materially from the amounts recorded in the financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

Topic 606 does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including loans and securities that are accounted for under other GAAP. Thus, the new guidance did not have a material impact on revenue most closely associated with financial instruments, including interest income and expense. Management evaluated its revenue streams and reviewed related contracts potentially affected by the ASU including trust and asset management fees, deposit related fees, interchange fees, and merchant income.

Revenue is recognized when, or as, obligations under the terms of a contract are satisfied, which occurs when control of the promised products or services is transferred to customers. Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration Salisbury expects to receive in exchange for transferring products or services to a customer (“transaction price”). To the extent the transaction price includes variable consideration, Salisbury estimates the amount of variable consideration that should be included in the transaction price utilizing the most likely amount to which Salisbury expects to be entitled. Variable consideration is included in the transaction price if, in Salisbury’s judgment, it is probable that a significant future reversal of cumulative revenue under the contract will not occur. Estimates of variable consideration and determination of whether to include estimated amounts in the transaction price are based largely on an assessment of Salisbury’s anticipated performance and all information (historical, current, and forecasted) that is reasonably available. Sales, value add, and other taxes collected on behalf of third parties are excluded from revenue.

When determining the transaction price of a contract, an adjustment is made if payment from a customer occurs either significantly before or significantly after performance, resulting in a significant financing component. Applying the practical expedient in paragraph 606-10-32-18, Salisbury does not assess whether a significant financing component exists if the period between when Salisbury performs its obligations under the contract and when the customer pays is one year or less. None of the Salisbury’s contracts contained a significant financing component as of September 30, 2018.

Contracts with customers may contain multiple performance obligations. For such arrangements, the transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation based on the estimated relative standalone selling prices of the promised products or services underlying each performance obligation. Salisbury determines standalone selling prices based on the price at which the performance obligation is sold separately. If the standalone selling price is not observable through fee schedules provided to its customers or through past transactions, Salisbury estimates the standalone selling price taking into account available information such as market conditions and internally approved pricing guidelines related to the performance obligations.

Contracts are often modified to account for changes in contract specifications and requirements. Contract modifications exist when the modification either creates new or changes the existing enforceable rights and obligations. Generally, contract modifications are for products or services that are distinct from the existing contract and are accounted for as if they were a new and separate contract. The original contract is still accounted for according to its original terms.

Product revenue is generally recognized when the customer obtains control of Salisbury’s product, which occurs at a point in time, and are generally upon completion of the service based on the terms of a contract. Service revenue is generally recognized over time as the services are delivered to the customer. The selection of the method to measure progress towards completion requires judgment and is based on the nature of the products or services to be provided. Salisbury generally measures its progress based on the right to invoice. Salisbury uses the right to invoice measure of progress when Salisbury has a right to invoice the customer for an amount that corresponds directly with the value to the customer of Salisbury’s performance to date. Under the right to invoice measure of progress, revenues are recorded equal to the amount Salisbury could invoice the customer. The right to invoice is generally determined by the passage of time during which the service is performed.

 28 

 

Trust and Wealth Advisory

The Trust and Wealth Advisory business generates revenue through a range of fiduciary services including trust and estate administration, wealth advisory, and investment management to individuals, families, businesses and institutions. Revenue from these services are generally recognized over time and is typically based on a right to invoice measure of progress (output method). Certain fees, such as real estate sale fees, asset liquidation fees, special asset fees, and daily money management fees, are recorded as revenue at a point in time at the completion of the service.

Customer Deposit Fees

The Customer Deposit business offers a variety of deposit accounts with a range of interest rates and other terms, which are designed to meet customer financial needs. Additional depositor related services provided to customers include Landlord/Tenant Lease Security Accounts and Services, Payroll Services, Cash Management (Remote Deposit Capture, ACH Origination, Wire Transfers and Positive Pay), ATM, Bank-by-Phone, Internet Banking, Internet Bill Pay, Person to Person Payments, Bank to Bank Transfers, Mobile Banking with remote deposit, and Online Financial Management with Account Aggregation Services. Monthly deposit account fees and account research fees are recognized over time using the right to invoice measure of progress. Overdraft protection, ATM services, cash management, bill pay, money transfers, among others, are generally recognized at point in time at the completion of the service.

Interchange Fees

Salisbury earns interchange fee revenue through customers’ use of the Bank’s debit cards. Interchange fees are generally recognized as revenue at a point in time when customers make a purchase using their debit card.

Transaction Price Allocated to Future Performance Obligations

ASC 606 requires that Salisbury disclose the aggregate amount of transaction price that is allocated to performance obligations that have not yet been satisfied as of September 30, 2018. The guidance provides certain practical expedients that limit this requirement and, therefore, Salisbury does not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for (1) contracts with an original expected length of one year or less and (2) contracts for which revenue is recognized at the amount to which Salisbury has the right to invoice for services performed. All revenue accounted for under the scope of ASC 606 meets one of these two criteria.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Securities and Short Term Funds

During the first nine months of 2018, securities available-for-sale increased $17.6 million to $95.8 million at September 30, 2018. Cash and cash equivalents (non-time interest-bearing deposits with other banks, money market funds and federal funds sold) decreased $6.3 million to $42.2 million at September 30, 2018.

Salisbury evaluates securities for OTTI where the fair value of a security is less than its amortized cost basis at the balance sheet date. As part of this process, Salisbury considers its intent to sell each debt security and whether it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery. If either of these conditions is met, Salisbury recognizes an OTTI charge to earnings equal to the entire difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. For securities that meet neither of these conditions, an analysis is performed to determine if any of these securities are at risk for OTTI.

Salisbury evaluates securities for strategic fit and may reduce its position in securities, although it is not more likely than not that Salisbury will be required to sell securities before recovery of their cost basis, which may be maturity. Therefore, management does not consider any of its securities, other than four non-agency CMO securities reflecting OTTI, to be OTTI at September 30, 2018. As of September 30, 2018 one of these positions reflected an unrealized loss of $17 thousand while the remaining three positions reflected an unrealized gain of $348 thousand.

Salisbury has, and continues to monitor, CMO securities where historical recognition of losses has occurred as a result of OTTI. Salisbury determined, as of September 30, 2018, that additional recognition of OTTI was not required. It is possible that future loss assumptions could change necessitating Salisbury to recognize future OTTI.

Loans

Net loans receivable increased $96.9 million to $898.6 million at September 30, 2018, compared with $801.7 million at December 31, 2017 and increased $114.5 million from $784.1 million at September 30, 2017. The increase in gross loans from fourth quarter 2017 primarily reflected growth in the residential mortgages of $46.2 million, commercial real estate of $32.0 million and commercial and industrial loans of $18.0 million. The increase in gross loans from third quarter 2017 primarily reflected growth in the residential mortgages of $52.3 million, commercial real estate of $34.7 million and commercial and industrial loans of $22.1 million.

 29 

 

Asset Quality

During the first nine months of 2018, non-performing assets increased $1.1 million primarily from a net increase in the balance of non-performing loans of $1.5 million, partly offset by a reduction in OREO assets of $0.4 million. During the first nine months of 2018, total impaired and potential problem loans increased by $0.5 million to $24.5 million, or 2.71% of gross loans receivable at September 30, 2018, from $24.0 million, or 2.97% of gross loans receivable at December 31, 2017.

Salisbury has cooperative relationships with the vast majority of its non-performing loan customers. Substantially all non-performing loans are collateralized with real estate and the repayment of such loans is largely dependent on the return of such loans to performing status or the liquidation of the underlying real estate collateral. Salisbury pursues the resolution of all non-performing loans through collections, restructures, voluntary liquidation of collateral by the borrower and, where necessary, legal action. When attempts to work with a customer to return a loan to performing status, including restructuring the loan, are unsuccessful, Salisbury will initiate appropriate legal action seeking to acquire property by deed in lieu of foreclosure or through foreclosure, or to liquidate business assets.

Past Due Loans

Loans past due 30 days or more decreased $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 to $9.0 million, or 1.0% of gross loans receivable compared with $9.1 million, or 1.13% of gross loans receivable at December 31, 2017.

The components of loans past due 30 days or greater are as follows:

(in thousands)    September 30, 2018      December 31, 2017  
Past due 30-59 days  $1,493   $2,594 
Past due 60-89 days   291    942 
Past due 90-179 days   97    31 
Past due 180 days and over        
Accruing loans   1,881    3,567 
Past due 30-59 days   1,236    1,186 
Past due 60-89 days       684 
Past due 90-179 days   1,739    516 
Past due 180 days and over   4,163    3,164 
Non-accrual loans   7,138    5,550 
Total loans past due 30 days or greater  $9,019   $9,117 

Credit Risk Ratings

Salisbury assigns credit risk ratings to loans receivable in order to manage credit risk and to determine the allowance for loan losses. Credit risk ratings categorize loans by common financial and structural characteristics that measure the credit strength of a borrower. Salisbury’s rating model has eight risk rating grades, with each grade corresponding to a progressively greater risk of default. Grades 1 through 4 are pass ratings and 5 through 8 are ratings (special mention, substandard, doubtful, and loss) defined by the bank’s regulatory agencies, the FDIC and CTDOB. Risk ratings are assigned to differentiate risk within the portfolio and are reviewed on an ongoing basis and revised, if needed, to reflect changes in the borrowers' current financial position and outlook, risk profiles and the related collateral and structural positions.

Loans risk rated as "special mention" possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving management’s close attention that if left uncorrected may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loans at some future date.
Loans risk rated as "substandard" are loans where the Bank’s position is clearly not protected adequately by borrower current net worth or payment capacity. These loans have well defined weaknesses based on objective evidence and include loans where future losses to the Bank may result if deficiencies are not corrected, and loans where the primary source of repayment such as income is diminished and the Bank must rely on sale of collateral or other secondary sources of collection.
Loans risk rated as "doubtful" have the same weaknesses as substandard loans with the added characteristic that the weakness makes collection or liquidation in full, given current facts, conditions, and values, to be highly improbable. The possibility of loss is high, but due to certain important and reasonably specific pending factors, which may work to strengthen the loan, its reclassification as an estimated loss is deferred until its exact status can be determined.
Loans risk rated as "loss" are considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as Bank assets is unwarranted. This classification does not mean that the loan has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather, it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this loan even though partial recovery may be made in the future.

 30 

 

Management actively reviews and tests its credit risk ratings against actual experience and engages an independent third-party to annually validate its assignment of credit risk ratings. In addition, the Bank’s loan portfolio and risk ratings are examined annually on a rotating basis by its two primary regulatory agencies, the FDIC and CTDOB.

Credit Quality Segments

Salisbury categorizes loans receivable into the following credit quality segments:

Impaired loans consist of all non-accrual loans and troubled debt restructured loans, and represent loans for which it is probable that Salisbury will not be able to collect all principal and interest amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreements.
Non-accrual loans, a sub-set of impaired loans, are loans for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued because, in the opinion of management, full collection of principal or interest is unlikely.
Non-performing loans consist of non-accrual loans, and accruing loans past due 90 days and over that are well collateralized, in the process of collection and where full collection of principal and interest is reasonably assured. Non-performing assets consist of non-performing loans plus real estate acquired in settlement of loans.
Troubled debt restructured loans are loans for which concessions such as reduction of interest rates, other than normal market rate adjustments, or deferral of principal or interest payments, extension of maturity dates, or reduction of principal balance or accrued interest, have been granted due to a borrower’s financial condition. Loan restructuring is employed when management believes the granting of a concession will increase the probability of the full or partial collection of principal and interest.
Potential problem loans consist of performing loans that have been assigned a substandard credit risk rating and are not classified as impaired.

 Impaired Loans

Loans individually evaluated for impairment (impaired loans) are loans for which Salisbury does not expect to collect all contractual principal and interest in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. Impaired loans include all modified loans classified as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) and loans on non-accrual status. The components of impaired loans are as follows:

(in thousands)    September 30, 2018      December 31, 2017  
Non-accrual loans, excluding troubled debt restructured loans  $6,846   $5,450 
Non-accrual troubled debt restructured loans   1,232    1,154 
Accruing troubled debt restructured loans   6,862    7,482 
Total impaired loans  $14,940   $14,086 
Commitments to lend additional amounts to impaired borrowers  $   $ 

 

Non-Performing Assets

Non-performing assets increased $1.1 million to $8.5 million, or 0.77% of assets at September 30, 2018, from $7.4 million, or 0.75% of assets at December 31, 2017.

The 15.8% increase in non-performing assets in the first nine months 2018 resulted primarily from $4.1 million of loans placed on non-accrual, partly offset by loan payoffs of $2.4 million, charged-offs of $0.3 million and a reduction of $0.3 million in real estate acquired in settlement of loans.

 31 

 

The components of non-performing assets are as follows:

(in thousands)    September 30, 2018      December 31, 2017  
Residential 1-4 family  $3,599   $2,045 
Residential 5+ multifamily   1,003    151 
Home equity lines of credit   413    66 
Commercial   2,478    3,622 
Farm land   224    250 
Vacant land        
Real estate secured   7,717    6,134 
Commercial and industrial   360    470 
Consumer        
Non-accruing loans   8,077    6,604 
Accruing loans past due 90 days and over   96    31 
Non-performing loans   8,173    6,635 
Foreclosed assets   340    719 
Non-performing assets  $8,513   $7,354 

The past due status of non-performing loans is as follows:

(in thousands)    September 30, 2018      December 31, 2017  
Current  $939   $1,054 
Past due 30-59 days   1,236    1,186 
Past due 60-89 days       684 
Past due 90-179 days   1,835    546 
Past due 180 days and over   4,163    3,165 
Total non-performing loans  $8,173   $6,635 

At September 30, 2018, 11.49% of non-performing loans were current with respect to loan payments, compared with 15.89% at December 31, 2017. Loans past due 180 days and over are substantially all mortgage loans in the process of foreclosures or liquidation. 

 32 

 

Troubled Debt Restructured Loans

Troubled debt restructured loans improved slightly during first nine months 2018 to $8.1 million, or 0.89% of gross loans receivable at September 30, 2018, compared to $8.6 million, or 1.07% of gross loans receivable at December 31, 2017.

The components of troubled debt restructured loans are as follows:

(in thousands)    September 30, 2018      December 31, 2017  
Residential 1-4 family  $2,846   $3,138 
Residential 5+ multifamily   675    1,595 
Home equity lines of credit   47    47 
Personal        
Vacant land   192    199 
Commercial   2,957    2,454 
Real estate secured   6,717    7,433 
Commercial and industrial   145    49 
Accruing troubled debt restructured loans   6,862    7,482 
Residential 1-4 family   229    269 
Residential 5+ multifamily   1003    151 
Commercial       624 
Real estate secured   1,232    1,044 
Commercial and Industrial       110 
Non-accrual troubled debt restructured loans   1,232    1,154 
Troubled debt restructured loans  $8,094   $8,636 

The past due status of troubled debt restructured loans is as follows:

(in thousands)    September 30, 2018      December 31, 2017  
Current  $6,793   $7,293 
Past due 30-59 days   69    189 
Past due 60-89 days        
Accruing troubled debt restructured loans   6,862    7,482 
Current   185    530 
Past due 30-59 days   798     
Past due 60-89 days       624 
Past due 90-179 days   249     
Past due 180 days and over        
Non-accrual troubled debt restructured loans   1,232    1,154 
Total troubled debt restructured loans  $8,094   $8,636 

At September 30, 2018, 86.21% of troubled debt restructured loans were current with respect to loan payments, as compared with 90.59% at December 31, 2017.

 33 

 

Potential Problem Loans

Potential problem loans consist of performing loans that have been assigned a substandard credit risk rating and are not classified as impaired. Potential problem loans decreased $0.3 million during the first nine months of 2018 to $9.6 million, or 1.06% of gross loans receivable at September 30, 2018, compared with $9.9 million, or 1.23% of gross loans receivable at December 31, 2017.

The components of potential problem loans are as follows:

(in thousands)    September 30, 2018      December 31, 2017  
Residential 1-4 family  $2,107   $1,432 
Residential 5+ multifamily        
Construction of residential 1-4 family        
Home equity lines of credit   99    104 
Residential real estate   2,206    1,536 
Commercial   6,881    7,905 
Construction of commercial        
Commercial real estate   6,881    7,905 
Farm land        
Vacant land        
Real estate secured   9,087    9,441 
Commercial and industrial   463    457 
Consumer        
Total potential problem loans  $9,550   $9,898 

The past due status of potential problem loans is as follows:

(in thousands)    September 30, 2018      December 31, 2017  
Current  $8,700   $8,520 
Past due 30-59 days   513    1,291 
Past due 60-89 days   241    56 
Past due 90-179 days   96    31 
Total potential problem loans  $9,550   $9,898 

At September 30, 2018, 91.1% of potential problem loans were current with respect to loan payments, as compared with 86.1% at December 31, 2017. Management cannot predict the extent to which economic or other factors may impact such borrowers’ future payment capacity, and there can be no assurance that such loans will not be placed on nonaccrual status, restructured, or require increased provisions for loan losses.

Deposits and Borrowings

Deposits increased $86.7 million during 2018, or 10.6%, to $902.1 million at September 30, 2018, compared with $815.5 million at December 31, 2017. Retail repurchase agreements balance increased by $5.0 million to $6.7 million at September 30, 2018 compared to $1.7 million at December 31, 2017. Salisbury acquired approximately $8 million in deposits as a result of the completion of its purchase of Orange Bank & Trust Company’s Fishkill, N.Y branch during the second quarter 2018. Total deposits at September 30, 2018 included five relationships totaling approximately $86.7 million, or 9.6% of total deposits. On June 28, 2018, approximately $38 million was deposited by a Trust and Wealth Advisory customer. As part of planned distributions, approximately $29 million of these funds were withdrawn on July 12, 2018 and the remainder was withdrawn on September 27, 2018.

 34 

 

The distribution of average total deposits by account type is as follows:

   September 30, 2018  December 31, 2017
(in thousands)  Average Balance  Percent  Weighted Average
Interest Rate
  Average Balance  Percent  Weighted Average
Interest Rate
Demand deposits  $220,608    24.66%   0.00%  $216,164    26.83%   0.00%
Interest-bearing checking accounts   149,749    16.74    0.30    135,756    16.85    0.23 
Regular savings accounts   179,298    20.04    0.70    145,779    18.09    0.29 
Money market savings   208,838    23.34    0.85    191,407    23.76    0.36 
Certificates of deposit 1   136,148    15.22    1.31    116,608    14.47    0.90 
Total deposits  $894,641    100.00%   0.59%  $805,714    100.00%   0.31%

1Certificates of deposit included Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (“CDARS”) one-way buys of $15.2 million at September 30, 2018. CDARS is a product offered by Promontory Interfinancial Network that enables participating financial institutions to buy or sell excess funds to other members to manage liquidity. Approximately $9.3 million of CDARS certificates of deposit mature in November 2018 and the remainder matures in August 2019. Salisbury did not enter into any CDARS one-way buys as of December 31, 2017.

The classification of certificates of deposit by interest rates is as follows:

Interest rates (in thousands)    September 30, 2018      December 31, 2017  
Less than 1.00%  $42,901   $50,226 
1.00% to 1.99%   52,272    52,558 
2.00% to 2.99%   42,500    14,047 
Total  $137,673   $116,831 

The distribution of certificates of deposit by interest rate and maturity is as follows:

   At September 30, 2018
  Interest rates  Less Than or Equal to One Year  More Than One to Two Years  More Than Two to Three Years  More Than Three Years  Total  Percent of Total
  Less than 1.00%  $36,565   $6,292   $43   $1   $42,901    31.16%
  1.00% to 1.99%   23,652    12,215    6,466    9,939    52,272    37.97 
  2.00% to 2.99%   23,140    9,030    4,723    5,607    42,500    30.87 
  Total  $83,357   $27,537   $11,232   $15,547   $137,673    100.00%

Scheduled maturities of time certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 or more are as follows:

Septmber 30, 2018 (in thousands)  Within
3 months
  Within
3-6 months
  Within
6-12 months
  Over
1 year
  Total
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and over  $15,030   $8,075   $13,986   $30,585   $67,675 

FHLBB advances increased $13.2 million during 2018 to $67.6 million at September 30, 2018, compared with $54.4 million at December 31, 2017. The net increase reflected new advances totaling $82.0 million entered into during 2018, partly offset by the maturity of $69.0 million of advances in 2018. During the third quarter 2018, Salisbury paid off $12 million of FHLBB advances and did not enter into any new advances.

Salisbury also has an Irrevocable Letter of Credit Reimbursement Agreement with the FHLBB, whereby upon the Bank’s request an irrevocable letter of credit is issued to secure municipal and certain other transactional deposit accounts.  These letters of credit are secured primarily by residential mortgage loans.  The amount of funds available from the FHLBB to the Bank is reduced by any letters of credit outstanding.  At September 30, 2018, Salisbury had $27 million of letters of credit outstanding and Salisbury’s remaining borrowing capacity at the FHLBB approximated $144 million.

 35 

 

Liquidity

Salisbury manages its liquidity position to ensure that there is sufficient funding availability at all times to meet both anticipated and unanticipated deposit withdrawals, loan originations and advances, securities purchases and other operating cash outflows. Salisbury's primary sources of liquidity are principal payments and maturities of securities and loans, short-term borrowings through repurchase agreements and FHLBB advances, net deposit growth and funds provided by operations. Liquidity can also be provided through sales of loans and available-for-sale securities.

Salisbury manages its liquidity in accordance with a liquidity funding policy, and also maintains a contingency funding plan that provides for the prompt and comprehensive response to unexpected demands for liquidity. Management believes Salisbury’s funding sources will meet anticipated funding needs.

Operating activities for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2018 provided net cash of $10.6 million. Investing activities utilized net cash of $110.9 million principally from $89.5 million of net loan originations and principal collections, $41.2 million of purchases of securities available-for-sale and FHLBB stock and $1.2 million of capital expenditures, partly offset by proceeds of $9.4 million from sale and calls of securities available-for-sale and $11.5 million from the maturity of available-for-sale-securities. Financing activities provided net cash of $94.1 million, principally due to a net increase in FHLBB advances of $13.0 million, a net increase in deposits of $57.5 million and an increase in time deposits of $20.9 million.

At September 30, 2018, Salisbury had outstanding commitments to fund new loan originations of $46.6 million and unused lines of credit of $128.4 million. Salisbury believes that these commitments can be met in the normal course of business. Salisbury believes that its liquidity sources will continue to provide funding sufficient to support operating activities, loan originations and commitments, and deposit withdrawals.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

For the three month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017

OVERVIEW

Net income allocated to common shareholders was $2.3 million, or $0.84 per common share, for the third quarter ended September 30, 2018 (third quarter 2018), compared with $1.7 million, or $0.61 per common share, for the third quarter ended September 30, 2017 (third quarter 2017), and $1.9 million, or $0.68 per common share, for the second quarter ended June 30, 2018 (second quarter 2018).

Net Interest Income

Tax equivalent net interest income for the third quarter 2018 increased $629 thousand, or 7.9%, versus third quarter 2017. Average earning assets increased $128.3 million versus third quarter 2017. Average total interest bearing deposits increased $68.6 million versus third quarter 2017. The average total interest bearing deposits for third quarter 2018 reflected approximately $38 million deposited by a Trust and Wealth Advisory client on June 28, 2018. Approximately $27 million of these funds were withdrawn in July, with the remainder withdrawn in September. The tax equivalent net interest margin for the third quarter 2018 was 3.29% compared with 3.49% for the third quarter 2017. The decline in the net interest margin primarily reflected the higher cost of borrowing from the FHLB and the repricing of deposits at higher interest rates.

 36 

 

The following table sets forth the components of Salisbury's fully tax-equivalent (“FTE”) net interest income and yields on average interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

Three months ended September 30,  Average Balance  Income / Expense  Average Yield / Rate
(dollars in thousands)    2018      2017      2018      2017      2018      2017  
Loans (a)(d)(f)  $896,516   $781,847   $9,678   $8,382    4.32%   4.29%
Securities (c)(d)   90,193    84,804    631    544    2.80    2.57 
FHLBB stock   5,218    3,442    70    39    5.37    4.53 
Short term funds (b)   54,032    47,558    252    136    1.87    1.14 
Total earning assets   1,045,959    917,651    10,631    9,101    4.07    3.97 
Other assets   53,846    59,018                     
Total assets  $1,099,805   $976,669                     
Interest-bearing demand deposits  $149,746   $139,247    114    85    0.30    0.25 
Money market accounts   208,836    197,274    447    187    0.86    0.38 
Savings and other   179,298    151,668    315    140    0.70    0.37 
Certificates of deposit   136,148    117,273    448    270    1.32    0.92 
Total interest-bearing deposits   674,028    605,462    1,324    682    0.79    0.45 
Repurchase agreements   4,271    4,017    4    2    0.37    0.20 
Capital lease   3,128    1,907    48    29    6.14    6.08 
Note payable   292    323    4    6    5.48    7.43 
Subordinated debt (net of issuance costs)   9,826    9,802    156    156    6.35    6.37 
FHLBB advances   70,845    28,630    481    241    2.72    3.37 
Total interest-bearing liabilities   762,390    650,141    2,017    1,116    1.06    0.69 
Demand deposits   230,760    223,458                     
Other liabilities   6,254    5,600                     
Shareholders’ equity   100,401    97,470                     
Total liabilities & shareholders’ equity  $1,099,805   $976,669                     
Net interest income            $8,614   $7,985           
Spread on interest-bearing funds                       3.01    3.28 
Net interest margin (e)                       3.29    3.49 

(a)       Includes non-accrual loans.

(b)Includes interest-bearing deposits in other banks and federal funds sold.
(c)Average balances of securities are based on historical cost.
(d)Includes tax exempt income benefit of $115,000 and $219,000, respectively, for 2018 and 2017 on tax-exempt securities and loans whose income and yields are calculated on a tax-equivalent basis.
(e)Net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.

 

 37 

 

The following table sets forth the changes in FTE interest due to volume and rate.

Three months ended September 30, (in thousands) 2018 versus 2017
Change in interest due to   Volume    Rate    Net 
Loans  $1,234   $62   $1,296 
Securities   36    51    87 
FHLBB stock   22    9    31 
Short term funds   24    92    116 
Interest-earning assets   1,316    214    1,530 
Deposits   106    536    642 
Repurchase agreements   0    2    2 
Capital lease   19    0    19 
Note payable   (1)   (1)   (2)
Subordinated debt            
FHLBB advances   321    (81)   240 
Interest-bearing liabilities   445    456    901 
Net change in net interest income  $871   $(242)  $629 

Interest Income

Tax equivalent interest income increased $1.5 million to $10.6 million for third quarter 2018 as compared with third quarter 2017. Loan income as compared to third quarter 2017 increased $1.3 million, or 15.5%, primarily due to a $114.7 million, or 14.7%, increase in average loans. Tax equivalent securities income increased $87 thousand, or 16.0%, for third quarter 2018 as compared with third quarter 2017, primarily due to a $5.4 million, or 6.4%, increase in average balances. Income on short-term funds as compared to third quarter 2017 increased $116 thousand, or 85.3%, primarily due to a $6.4 million, or 13.6%, increase in average short-term funds and a 73 basis point increase in the average short-term funds yields.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased $901 thousand to $2.0 million for third quarter 2018 as compared with third quarter 2017. Interest on deposit accounts increased $642 thousand, or 94.1%, as a result of a $68.6 million, or 11.3%, increase in the average balances and an average increase in deposit rates of 34 basis points as compared with third quarter 2017. Interest expense on FHLBB borrowings increased $240 thousand as a result of an average balance increase of $42.2 million as compared with third quarter 2017, partly offset by a lower average borrowings rate which decreased 35 basis points. Interest expense on subordinated debt totaled $156 thousand for the third quarter in both 2018 and 2017.

Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses was $378 thousand for third quarter 2018, compared with $237 thousand for third quarter 2017. Net loan charge-offs were $14 thousand and $236 thousand for the respective quarters.

The following table details the principal categories of credit quality ratios:

Three months ended September 30,    2018      2017  
Net charge-offs to average loans receivable, gross   0.00%   0.03%
Non-performing loans to loans receivable, gross   0.90    1.05 
Accruing loans past due 30-89 days to loans receivable, gross   0.20    0.44 
Allowance for loan losses to loans receivable, gross   0.86    0.82 
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans   94.76    78.12 
Non-performing assets to total assets   0.77    1.25 

Reserve coverage, as measured by the ratio of the allowance for loan losses to gross loans, increased to 0.86% at September 30, 2018 compared to 0.82% at September 30, 2017.

Non-performing loans (non-accrual loans plus accruing loans past-due 90 days or more) were $8.2 million, or 0.90% of gross loans receivable at September 30, 2018 as compared to $8.3 million, or 1.05%, at September 30, 2017. Accruing loans past due 30-89 days decreased $1.7 million to $1.8 million, or 0.20% of gross loans receivable from $3.5 million, or 0.44% of gross loans receivable, at September 30, 2017. See “Financial Condition – Asset Quality” above for further discussion and analysis.

 38 

 

The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of the probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the reporting date. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to earnings and by recoveries of amounts previously charged off, and is reduced by loan charge-offs. Loan charge-offs are recognized when management determines a loan, or portion of a loan, to be uncollectible. The allowance for loan losses is computed by segregating the portfolio into three components: (1) loans collectively evaluated for impairment: general loss allocation factors for non-impaired loans are segmented into pools of loans based on similar risk characteristics such as loan product, collateral type and loan-to-value, loan risk rating, historical loss experience, delinquency factors and other similar economic indicators, (2) loans individually evaluated for impairment: individual loss allocations for loans deemed to be impaired based on discounted cash flows or collateral value, and (3) unallocated: general loss allocations for other environmental factors.

Impaired loans and certain potential problem loans, when warranted, are individually evaluated for impairment. Impairment is measured for each individual loan, or for a borrower’s aggregate loan exposure, using either the fair value of the collateral, less estimated costs to sell if the loan is collateral dependent, or the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. A specific allowance is generally established when the collateral value or discounted cash flows of the loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan.

The component of the allowance for loan losses for loans collectively evaluated for impairment is estimated by stratifying loans into segments and credit risk ratings and then applying management’s general loss allocation factors. The general loss allocation factors are based on expected loss experience adjusted for historical loss experience and other qualitative factors, including levels or trends in delinquencies; trends in volume and terms of loans; effects of changes in risk selection and underwriting standards and other changes in lending policies, procedures and practices; experience/ability/depth of lending management and staff; and national and local economic trends and conditions. The qualitative factors are determined based on the various risk characteristics of each loan segment. There were no significant changes in Salisbury’s policies or methodology pertaining to the general component of the allowance for loan losses during the first nine months of 2018.

The unallocated component of the allowance is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. It reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating allocated and general reserves in the portfolio. Additionally reserves are established for off balance sheet exposures.

Determining the adequacy of the allowance and reserves at any given period is difficult, particularly during deteriorating or uncertain economic periods, and management must make estimates using assumptions and information that are often subjective and changing rapidly. The review of credit exposure related to loans is a continuing event in light of a changing economy and the dynamics of the banking and regulatory environment. Should the economic climate deteriorate, borrowers could experience difficulty and the level of non-performing loans, charge-offs and delinquencies could rise, requiring increased provisions and reserves. In management's judgment, Salisbury remains adequately reserved both against total loans and non-performing loans at September 30, 2018.

Management’s loan risk rating assignments, loss percentages and specific reserves are subjected annually to an independent credit review by an external firm. In addition, the Bank is examined annually on a rotational basis by one of its two primary regulatory agencies, the FDIC and CTDOB. As an integral part of their examination process, the FDIC and CTDOB review the adequacy and methodology of the Bank's credit risk ratings and allowance for loan losses.

Non-Interest Income

The following table details the principal categories of non-interest income.

Three months ended September 30, (dollars in thousands) 2018      2017      2018 vs. 2017  
Trust and wealth advisory  $936   $874   $62    7%
Service charges and fees   932    935    (3)    
Gains on sales of mortgage loans, net   21    25    (4)   (16)
Mortgage servicing, net   84    104    (20)   (19)
Loss on CRA mutual fund   (6)       (6)    
Other   121    142    (21)   (15)
Total non-interest income  $2,088   $2,080   $8    %

Non-interest income for third quarter 2018 increased $8 thousand versus third quarter 2017. Trust and Wealth Advisory income increased $62 thousand versus third quarter 2017. The increase primarily reflected higher asset management fees as well as higher estate and retirement planning fees. Assets under administration were $690 million as of September 30, 2018 compared with $668 million at June 30, 2018 and $595 million as of September 30, 2017. Service charges and fees decreased $3 thousand versus third quarter 2017 as higher interchange fees, resulting from higher debit card volume, was offset by lower deposit and other fees. Gains on the sales of mortgages declined $4 thousand versus third quarter 2017 primarily as a result of a reduction in the capitalization rates applied to sold mortgage loans to establish the mortgage servicing asset. Third quarter 2018 mortgage loans sales totaled $1.3 million versus $1.1 million for third quarter 2017. The reduction in mortgage servicing revenue primarily reflected the reversal of a previously recorded impairment charge of $25 thousand in the third quarter 2017. Third quarter 2018 and third quarter 2017 included net mortgage servicing amortization and periodic impairment (benefit) charges of $8 thousand and ($12) thousand, respectively. Other income includes bank owned life insurance income and rental income.

 39 

 

Non-Interest Expense

The following table details the principal categories of non-interest expense.

Three months ended September 30, (dollars in thousands) 2018      2017      2018 vs. 2017  
Salaries  $3,078   $2,829   $249    9%
Employee benefits   1,065    1,004    61    6 
Premises and equipment   1,036    995    41    4 
Data processing   519    545    (26)   (5)
Professional fees   496    481    15    3 
OREO gains, losses and write-downs   38    218    (180)   (83)
Collections, OREO, and loan related   116    201    (85)   (42)
FDIC insurance   141    106    35    33 
Marketing and community support   167    220    (53)   (24)
Amortization of intangibles   111    142    (31)   (22)
Other   562    479    83    17 
Total non-interest expense  $7,329   $7,220   $109    2%

Non-interest expense for third quarter 2018 increased $109 thousand versus third quarter 2017. Total salary and employee benefits expense increased $310 thousand in the current year’s quarter as compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase is mainly attributable to the mix and levels of staff and higher employee benefit costs, partly offset by higher deferred expense in the current quarter related to loan origination. Premises and equipment expense increased $41 thousand versus third quarter 2017. The year-over-year increase primarily reflected higher building depreciation and maintenance and repair costs as well as higher software expense, partly offset by lower equipment maintenance and repair costs. Data processing expense decreased $26 thousand versus third quarter 2017. The year over year decrease reflected lower Trust and Wealth Advisory data processing costs and lower ATM and debit card processing fees, partly offset by higher core data processing charges. Professional fees increased $15 thousand versus third quarter 2017 as higher internal audit fees were offset by lower consultation, investment management, audit and legal fees. OREO gains, losses and write-downs decreased $180 thousand versus third quarter 2017 due to a decline in the number of OREO properties owned by Salisbury. As of third quarter 2018, Salisbury owned one OREO property compared with six properties as of third quarter 2017. OREO and loan related expenses decreased $85 thousand versus third quarter 2017 primarily reflecting lower OREO carrying costs, lower delinquent taxes paid on foreclosed properties and lower litigation expense, partly offset by higher costs for appraisals and inspections. The increase in FDIC related expense primarily reflected asset growth. Marketing and community support costs decreased $53 thousand compared to the prior year third quarter.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rates for third quarter 2018 and third quarter 2017 were 18.65% and 29.09%, respectively. Generally, fluctuations in the effective tax rate result from changes in the mix of taxable and tax exempt income. Additionally, in December 2017, the federal statutory tax rate was reduced from 34% to 21%. Salisbury’s effective tax rate is generally less than the federal statutory rate due to holdings of tax-exempt municipal bonds and loans as well as bank owned life insurance.

Salisbury did not incur Connecticut income tax in 2018 (to date) or 2017, other than minimum state income tax, as a result of a Connecticut law that permits banks to shelter certain mortgage income from the Connecticut corporation business tax through the use of a special purpose entity called a Passive Investment Company or PIC. In 2004, Salisbury availed itself of this benefit by forming a PIC, SBT Mortgage Service Corporation. Salisbury's income tax provision reflects the full impact of the Connecticut legislation. Salisbury does not expect to pay other than minimum state income tax in the foreseeable future unless there is a change in Connecticut tax law.

For the nine month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017

Overview

Net income allocated to common shareholders was $6.2 million, or $2.24 per common share, for the nine month period ended September 30, 2018 (nine month period 2018), compared with $5.1 million, or $1.87 per common share, for the nine month period ended September 30, 2017 (nine month period 2017).

Net Interest Income

Tax equivalent net interest income for the nine months of 2018 increased $916 thousand, or 3.8%, versus the nine months of 2017. Average earning assets increased $97.1 million versus the nine months of 2017. Average total interest bearing deposits increased $53.8 million versus the nine months of 2017. The net interest margin of 3.36% decreased 21 basis points versus 3.57% for the nine months of 2017.

 40 

 

The following table sets forth the components of Salisbury's fully tax-equivalent (“FTE”) net interest and dividend income and yields on average interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

Nine months ended September 30,  Average Balance  Income / Expense  Average Yield / Rate
(dollars in thousands)    2018      2017      2018      2017      2018      2017  
Loans (a)(d)(f)  $859,578   $775,067   $27,551   $25,092    4.27%   4.32%
Securities (c)(d)   85,103    79,099    1,702    1,623    2.67    2.74 
FHLBB stock   4,709    3,631    162    104    4.59    3.82 
Short term funds (b)   41,987    36,449    500    247    1.59    0.90 
Total earning assets   991,377    894,246    29,915    27,066    4.02    4.04 
Other assets   53,634    56,695                     
Total assets  $1,045,011   $950,941                     
Interest-bearing demand deposits  $146,904   $133,700    305    230    0.28    0.23 
Money market accounts   193,754    189,718    950    487    0.65    0.34 
Savings and other   169,156    144,464    732    285    0.58    0.26 
Certificates of deposit   128,216    116,395    1,110    774    1.15    0.89 
Total interest-bearing deposits   638,030    584,277    3,097    1,776    0.65    0.41 
Repurchase agreements   3,008    2,462    6    4    0.27    0.22 
Capital lease   2,753    925    130    66    6.30    9.51 
Note payable   300    330    14    13    6.22    5.25 
Subordinated debt (net of issuance costs)   9,820    9,796    468    468    6.35    6.37 
FHLBB advances   65,569    37,222    1,314    769    2.67    2.75 
Total interest-bearing liabilities   719,480    635,012    5,029    3,096    0.93    0.65 
Demand deposits   220,543    213,782                     
Other liabilities   5,870    5,893                     
Shareholders’ equity   99,118    96,254                     
Total liabilities & shareholders’ equity  $1,045,011   $950,941                     
Net interest income            $24,886   $23,970           
Spread on interest-bearing funds                       3.09    3.39 
Net interest margin (e)                       3.36    3.57 
(a)Includes non-accrual loans.
(b)Includes interest-bearing deposits in other banks and federal funds sold.
(c)Average balances of securities are based on historical cost.
(d)Includes tax exempt income benefit of $350,000 and $711,000, respectively for 2018 and 2017 on tax-exempt securities and loans whose income and yields are calculated on a tax-equivalent basis.
(e)Net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.

 

 41 

 

The following table sets forth the changes in FTE interest due to volume and rate.

Nine months ended September 30, (in thousands) 2018 versus 2017
Change in interest due to   Volume    Rate    Net 
Loans  $2,722   $(263)  $2,459 
Securities   122    (43)   79 
FHLBB stock   34    24    58 
Short term funds   52    201    253 
Interest-earning assets   2,930    (81)   2,849 
Deposits   212    1,109    1,321 
Repurchase agreements   1    1    2 
Capital lease   108    (44)   64 
Note payable   (1)   2    1 
Subordinated Debt   1    (1)    
FHLBB advances   577    (32)   545 
Interest-bearing liabilities   898    1,035    1,933 
Net change in net interest income  $2,032   $(1,116)  $916 

Interest Income

Tax equivalent interest income increased $2.8 million to $29.9 million for the nine month period 2018 as compared with the nine month period 2017. Loan income, as compared to the nine months of 2017, increased $2.5 million or 9.8% primarily due to an $84.5 million, or 10.9%, increase in average loans. The increase was partially offset by a 5 basis point decrease in the average loan yield. The average loan yields for the nine month period 2017 reflected higher net accretion related to fair value adjustments for loans related to the Riverside acquisition.

Tax equivalent securities income increased $79 thousand, or 4.9%, for the nine month period 2018 as compared with the nine month period 2017, primarily due to a $6.0 million, or 7.6%, increase in average volume, partly offset by a 7 basis point decrease in average yield.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased $1.9 million, or 62.4%, to $5.0 million for the nine month period 2018 as compared with the nine month period 2017. Interest on deposit accounts increased $1.3 million, or 74.3%, as a result of a $53.8 million increase in the average balances. The increase in deposit interest expense reflected growth in average deposit balances and a 24 basis point increase in average deposit rates compared with the nine month period 2017. Average deposits reflected Salisbury’s acquisition of approximately $8 million in deposits as a result of the completion of its purchase of Orange Bank & Trust Company’s Fishkill, N.Y branch during the second quarter 2018. Interest expense on FHLBB borrowings increased $545 thousand as a result of an average balance increase of $28.3 million as compared with the nine month period 2017, partially offset by a decrease in the average borrowings rate by 8 basis points. Interest expense on subordinated debt totaled $468 thousand for the nine month periods 2018 and 2017.

Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses was $1,171 thousand for the nine month period ended September 30, 2018 as compared to $953 thousand for the nine month period ended September 30, 2017. Net loan charge-offs were $202 thousand and $586 thousand for the respective nine month periods.

Reserve coverage at September 30, 2018, as measured by the ratio of allowance for loan losses to gross loans, at 0.86%, compares with 0.82% a year ago at September 30, 2017. During the first nine months of 2018, non-performing loans (non-accrual loans and accruing loans past-due 90 days or more) increased $1.5 million to $8.2 million. Non-performing loans represent 0.90% of gross loans receivable, an increase from 0.82% at December 31, 2017. At September 30, 2018, accruing loans past due 30-89 days decreased $1.7 million to $1.8 million or 0.20% of gross loans receivable from 0.44% at December 31, 2017. See “Financial Condition – Asset Quality” for further discussion and analysis.

 42 

 

Non-interest income

The following table details the principal categories of non-interest income.

Nine months ended September 30, (dollars in thousands) 2018      2017      2018 vs. 2017  
Trust and wealth advisory  $2,779   $2,620   $159    6%
Service charges and fees   2,693    2,799    (106)   (4)
Gains on sales of mortgage loans, net   38    104    (66)   (63)
Mortgage servicing, net   251    180    71    39 
Losses on CRA mutual fund   (26)       (26)   n/a 
Gains (losses) on sales, calls and write-downs of available-for-sale securities, net   16    (14)   30    n/a 
Other   370    365    5    1 
Total non-interest income  $6,121   $6,054   $67    1%

Non-interest income for the nine month period ended September 30, 2018 increased $67 thousand versus the same period in 2017. Trust and wealth advisory revenues increased $159 thousand mainly due to growth in asset based fees as well as higher estate and retirement planning fees. Assets under administration increased $95.9 million to $690.4 million as of third quarter 2018. Discretionary assets under administration increased $61.0 million to $435.4 million as of third quarter 2018. Service charges and fees decreased $106 thousand from third quarter 2017 as higher interchange fees were offset by lower ATM and other deposit fees. Income from sales and servicing of mortgage loans decreased $66 thousand due to a decrease in the number of loans sold. Mortgage loans sales totaled $1.9 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2018 and $4.4 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2017. Net mortgage servicing income increased $71 thousand from the third quarter 2017 primarily due to lower amortization of mortgage servicing rights, which was partly offset by a reduction in mortgage servicing fee income. The third quarter 2017 also included a benefit for the reversal of impairment charges for mortgage servicing rights. The nine month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 included mortgage servicing amortization of $34 thousand and $149 thousand, respectively. Other income includes bank owned life insurance income and rental income.

Non-interest expense

The following table details the principal categories of non-interest expense.

Nine months ended September 30, (dollars in thousands) 2018      2017      2018 vs. 2017  
Salaries  $8,864   $8,266   $598    7%
Employee benefits   3,192    2,923    269    9 
Premises and equipment   3,161    2,797    364    13 
Data processing   1,561    1,521    40    3 
Professional fees   1,725    1,962    (237)   (12)
OREO gains, losses and write-downs   91    362    (271)   (75)
Collections, OREO, and loan related   432    513    (81)   (16)
FDIC insurance   394    354    40    11 
Marketing and community support   630    623    7    1 
Amortization of intangible assets   347    395    (48)   (12)
Other   1,528    1,561    (33)   (2)
Non-interest expense  $21,925   $21,277   $648    3%

 

Non-interest expense for the nine month period ended September 30, 2018 increased $648 thousand versus the same period in 2017. Salaries and benefits increased $867 thousand primarily due to increased staffing levels, merit adjustments and higher production accruals, reflecting higher loan origination volume, and higher deferred compensation accruals, partly offset by higher deferred expense in the current nine month period related to loan origination. Premises and equipment increased $364 thousand mainly due to higher lease expense, partly reflecting the acquisition of the New Paltz branch in June 2017, higher building and equipment maintenance and repair and depreciation costs. Data processing increased $40 thousand mainly due to higher core processing, data communications costs, partly offset by lower Trust and Wealth Advisory data processing costs and lower ATM and debit card processing related expenses. Professional fees decreased $237 thousand versus the nine month period 2017 reflected lower consulting, legal, audit and investment management fees. OREO gains, losses and write-downs decreased $271 thousand versus the nine month period 2017 due to a decline in the number of OREO properties owned by Salisbury. As of third quarter 2018, Salisbury owned one OREO property compared with six properties as of third quarter 2017. OREO and loan related expenses decreased $81 thousand year over year primarily reflecting lower OREO carrying costs and lower litigation expense, partly offset by higher costs for appraisals and inspections. The increase in FDIC related expense primarily reflected asset growth. Marketing and community support costs increased $7 thousand compared to the same period in 2017. Amortization of intangible assets decreased $48 thousand due to the aging off of expenses related to previous acquisitions.

 43 

 

Income taxes

The effective income tax rates for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017 were 17.21% and 26.86%, respectively. Fluctuations in the effective tax rate result from changes in the mix of taxable and tax exempt income. Additionally, in December 2017, the federal statutory tax rate was reduced from 34% to 21%. Salisbury’s effective tax rate is generally less than the federal statutory rate due to holdings of tax-exempt municipal bonds, tax-exempt loans and bank owned life insurance and other tax advantaged assets.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

Shareholders’ equity was $100.8 million at September 30, 2018, up $3.2 million from December 31, 2017. Book value and tangible book value per common share were $35.93 and $30.47, respectively, compared with $35.01 and $29.39, respectively, at December 31, 2017. Contributing to the increase in shareholders’ equity for year-to-date 2018 was net income of $6.2 million and issued stock of $.5 million, partially offset by other common stock dividends of $2.3 million. Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale, net of tax, of $(1.2) million as of September 30, 2018.

Capital Requirements

Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional and discretionary actions by the regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on Salisbury’s and the Bank's financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, Salisbury and the Bank must meet specific guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Salisbury and the Bank's capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Salisbury and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Salisbury and the Bank must meet specific guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices.

Under current regulatory definitions, Salisbury and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject and the Bank is considered to be well-capitalized. As a result, the Bank pays lower federal deposit insurance premiums than those banks that are not “well- capitalized.”  Requirements for classification as a well-capitalized institution and for minimum capital adequacy along with Salisbury’s and the Bank's regulatory capital ratios are as follows:

    September 30, 2018  December 31, 2017
     Salisbury   Bank   Salisbury   Bank
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets)   12.26%   11.91%   12.94%   12.54%
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)   10.17    10.99    10.73    11.64 
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)   10.17    10.99    10.73    11.64 
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets)   8.02    8.66    8.53    9.25 

A well-capitalized institution, which is the highest capital category for an institution as defined by the Prompt Corrective Action regulations issued by the FDIC and the FRB, is one which maintains a Total Risk-Based ratio of 10% or above, a Tier 1 Risk-Based ratio of 8% or above, a Common Equity Tier 1 ratio of 6.5% or above, and a Leverage ratio of 5% or above, and is not subject to any written order, written agreement, capital directive, or prompt corrective action directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level. Maintaining strong capital is essential to Salisbury and the Bank’s safety and soundness. However, the effective management of capital resources requires generating attractive returns on equity to build value for shareholders while maintaining appropriate levels of capital to fund growth, meet regulatory requirements and be consistent with prudent industry practices.

The Federal Reserve Board (FRB) and the FDIC approved the final rules implementing the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s capital guidelines for bank holding companies and their bank subsidiaries. Under the final rules, minimum requirements increased for both the quantity and quality of capital held by the Bank and Salisbury. The rules include a common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets minimum ratio of 4.5%, a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 6.0%, require a minimum ratio of Total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8.0%, and require a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4.0%. A capital conservation buffer, comprised of common equity Tier 1 capital, is also established above the regulatory minimum capital requirements. This capital conservation buffer began phasing in January 1, 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and increases each subsequent year by an additional 0.625% until reaching its final level of 2.50% on January 1, 2019. Strict eligibility criteria for regulatory capital instruments were also implemented under the final rules.

The phase-in period for the final rules began for Salisbury and the Bank on January 1, 2015. As of September 30, 2018, the Company and the Bank met each of their capital requirements and the most recent notification from the FDIC categorized the Bank as “well-capitalized.” There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category.

 44 

 

Dividends

During the nine month period ended September 30, 2018, Salisbury paid $2.3 million in common stock dividends.

On October 26, 2018, the Board of Directors of Salisbury declared a common stock dividend of $0.28 per common share payable on November 30, 2018 to shareholders of record on November 16, 2018. Common stock dividends, when declared, are generally paid the last Friday of February, May, August and November, although Salisbury is not obligated to pay dividends on those dates or at any other time.

Salisbury's ability to pay cash dividends is dependent on the Bank's ability to pay cash dividends to Salisbury. There are certain restrictions on the payment of cash dividends and other payments by the Bank to Salisbury. Under Connecticut law, the Bank cannot declare a cash dividend except from net profits, defined as the remainder of all earnings from current operations. The total of all cash dividends declared by the Bank in any calendar year shall not, unless specifically approved by the Banking Commissioner, exceed the total of its net profits of that year combined with its retained net profits of the preceding two years.

FRB Supervisory Letter SR 09-4, February 24, 2009, revised December 31, 2015, states that, as a general matter, the Board of Directors of a Bank Holding Company (“BHC”) should inform the Federal Reserve and should eliminate, defer, or significantly reduce dividends if (1) net income available to shareholders for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid during that period, is not sufficient to fully fund the dividends; (2) the prospective rate of earnings retention is not consistent with capital needs and overall current and prospective financial condition; or (3) the BHC will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios. Moreover, a BHC should inform the Federal Reserve reasonably in advance of declaring or paying a dividend that exceeds earnings for the period (e.g., quarter) for which the dividend is being paid or that could result in a material adverse change to the BHC capital position.

Salisbury believes that the payment of common stock cash dividends is appropriate, provided that such payment considers Salisbury's capital needs, asset quality, and overall financial condition and does not adversely affect the financial stability of Salisbury or the Bank. The continued payment of common stock cash dividends by Salisbury will be dependent on Salisbury's future core earnings, financial condition and capital needs, regulatory restrictions, and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors of Salisbury.

IMPACT OF INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES

Salisbury’s consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto presented elsewhere in this Form 10-Q are prepared in conformity with GAAP, which require the measurement of financial condition and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money, over time, due to inflation. Unlike some other types of companies, the financial nature of Salisbury’s consolidated financial statements is more clearly affected by changes in interest rates than by inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily fluctuate in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the prices of goods and services. However, inflation does affect Salisbury to some extent because, as prices increase, the money supply grows and interest rates are affected by inflationary expectations. There is no precise method, however, to measure the effects of inflation on Salisbury’s consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, any examination or analysis of the financial statements should take into consideration the possible effects of inflation. Although not a material factor in recent years, inflation could impact earnings in future periods.

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Form 10-Q and future filings made by Salisbury with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as other filings, reports and press releases made or issued by Salisbury and the Bank, and oral statements made by executive officers of Salisbury and the Bank, may include forward-looking statements relating to such matters as:

(a)assumptions concerning future economic and business conditions and their effect on the economy in general and on the markets in which Salisbury and the Bank do business; and
(b)expectations for revenues and earnings for Salisbury and the Bank.

Such forward-looking statements are based on assumptions rather than historical or current facts and, therefore, are inherently uncertain and subject to risk. For those statements, Salisbury claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

 45 

 

Salisbury notes that a variety of factors could cause the actual results or experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations described or implied by such forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties that may affect the operation, performance, development and results of Salisbury’s and the Bank’s business include the following:

(a)the risk of adverse changes in business conditions in the banking industry generally and in the specific markets in which the Bank operates;
(b)changes in the legislative and regulatory environment that negatively impacts Salisbury and the Bank through increased operating expenses;
(c)increased competition from other financial and non-financial institutions;
(d)the impact of technological advances and cybersecurity matters;
(e)interest rate fluctuations; and
(f)other risks detailed from time to time in Salisbury’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Such developments could have an adverse impact on Salisbury’s and the Bank’s financial position and results of operations. 

Item 3.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Salisbury manages its exposure to interest rate risk through its Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) using risk limits and policy guidelines to manage assets and funding liabilities to produce financial results that are consistent with Salisbury’s liquidity, capital adequacy, growth, risk and profitability targets. Interest rate risk is the risk of a negative impact to future earnings due to changes in interest rates.

The ALCO manages interest rate risk using income simulation to measure interest rate risk inherent in Salisbury’s financial instruments at a given point in time by showing the effect of interest rate shifts on net interest income over a 24-month horizon. In management’s September 30, 2018 analysis, the simulations incorporate static growth assumptions over the simulation horizons for regulatory compliance and interest rate risk measurement purposes. In the dynamic growth scenarios, allowances are made for loan, deposit and security product mix shifts in selected interest rate scenarios, such as movements between lower rate savings and money market deposit accounts and higher rate time deposits, and changes in the reinvestment of loan and securities cash flows. Additionally, the simulations take into account the specific re-pricing, maturity and prepayment characteristics of differing financial instruments that may vary under different interest rate scenarios.

The ALCO reviews the simulation results to determine whether Salisbury’s exposure to change in net interest income remains within established tolerance levels over the simulation horizons and to develop appropriate strategies to manage this exposure. Salisbury’s tolerance levels for changes in net interest income in its income simulations varies depending on the magnitude of interest rate changes and level of risk-based capital. All changes are measured in comparison to the projected net interest income that would result from an “unchanged” rate scenario where interest rates remain stable over the forecast horizon. The ALCO also evaluates the directional trends of net interest income, net interest margin and other financial measures over the forecast horizon for consistency with its liquidity, capital adequacy, growth, risk and profitability targets.

ALCO uses four interest rate scenarios to evaluate interest risk exposure and may vary these interest rate scenarios to show the effect of steepening or flattening changes in yield curves as well as parallel changes in interest rates. At September 30, 2018, ALCO used the following interest rate scenarios: (1) unchanged interest rates; (2) immediately rising interest rates – immediate parallel upward shift in market interest rates of 300 basis points across the yield curve; (3) immediately falling interest rates – immediate parallel downward shift in market interest rates of 100 basis points across the yield curve; and (4) gradual and non-parallel increase in interest rates – upward shift in market interest rates ranging from 68 basis points for the 2-year Treasury rates to 57 basis points for the 10-year Treasury in year one and then a gradual decline in market interest rates ranging from 149 basis points for the 2-year Treasury rates to 128 basis points for the 10-year Treasury in year two. Deposit rates are assumed to shift by lesser amounts due to their relative historical insensitivity to market interest rate movements. Further, deposits are assumed to have certain minimum rate levels below which they will not fall. Income simulations do not reflect adjustments in strategy that the ALCO could implement in response to rate shifts.

As of September 30, 2018, net interest income simulations indicated that Salisbury’s exposure to changing interest rates over the simulation horizons remained within its tolerance levels.

 46 

 

The following table sets forth the estimated change in net interest income from an unchanged interest rate scenario over the periods indicated for changes in market interest rates using Salisbury’s financial instruments as of September 30, 2018.

As of September 30, 2018  Months 1-12    Months 13-24  
Immediately rising interest rates (static growth assumptions)   (4.0)%   2.3%
Immediately falling interest rates (static growth assumptions)   (2.1)   (5.1)
Gradual, non-parallel rising interest rates in year one, then gradual, non-parallel falling interest rates in year two   (0.7)   0.9 

The negative exposure of net interest income to immediately and gradually rising rates as compared to the unchanged rate scenario results from a faster projected rise in the cost of funds versus income from earning assets, as relatively rate-sensitive money market and time deposits re-price faster than longer duration earning assets. The negative exposure of net interest income to immediately falling rates as compared to an unchanged rate scenario results from a greater decline in earning asset yields compared to rates paid on funding liabilities, as a result of faster prepayments on existing assets and lower reinvestment rates on future loans originated and securities purchased.

While the ALCO reviews simulation assumptions and back-tests simulation results to ensure that they are reasonable and current, income simulation may not always prove to be an accurate indicator of interest rate risk or future net interest margin. Over time, the re-pricing, maturity and prepayment characteristics of financial instruments and the composition of Salisbury’s balance sheet may change to a different degree than estimated. Simulation modeling assumes Salisbury’s expectation for future balance sheet growth, which is a function of the business environment and customer behavior. Another significant simulation assumption is the sensitivity of core savings deposits to fluctuations in interest rates. Income simulation results assume that changes in both core savings deposit rates and balances are related to changes in short-term interest rates. The assumed relationship between short-term interest rate changes and core deposit rate and balance changes used in income simulation may differ from the ALCO’s estimates. Lastly, mortgage-backed securities and mortgage loans involve a level of risk that unforeseen changes in prepayment speeds may cause related cash flows to vary significantly in differing rate environments. Such changes could affect the level of reinvestment risk associated with cash flow from these instruments, as well as their market value. Changes in prepayment speeds could also increase or decrease the amortization of premium or accretion of discounts related to such instruments, thereby affecting interest income.

Salisbury also monitors the potential change in market value of its available-for-sale debt securities in changing interest rate environments. The purpose is to determine market value exposure that may not be captured by income simulation, but which might result in changes to Salisbury’s capital and liquidity position. Results are calculated using industry-standard analytical techniques and securities data. Available-for-sale equity securities are excluded from this analysis because the market value of such securities cannot be directly correlated with changes in interest rates.

The following table summarizes the potential change in market value of available-for-sale debt securities resulting from immediate parallel rate shifts:

As of September 30, 2018 (in thousands)    Rates up 100bp      Rates up 200bp  
U.S. Treasury notes  $   $ 
U.S. Government agency notes   (353)   (631)
Municipal bonds   (221)   (422)
Mortgage backed securities   (1,243)   (2,210)
Collateralized mortgage obligations   (961)   (1,931)
SBA pools   (1,960)   (3,094)
Other   (116)   (219)
Total available-for-sale debt securities  $(4,854)  $(8,507)

  

Item 4.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Salisbury’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of Salisbury’s disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2018. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of September 30, 2018.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. 

 47 

 

Changes in Internal Controls

In addition, based on an evaluation of its internal controls over financial reporting, no change in Salisbury’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2018 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Salisbury’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Bank is involved in various claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, which management currently believes are not material, individually or in the aggregate, to the business, financial condition or operating results of Salisbury or any of its subsidiaries. There are no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the registrant’s business, to which Salisbury is a party or of which any of its property is subject.

Item 1A.RISK FACTORS

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, there were no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in Salisbury’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Item 2.UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None

Item 3.DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

Item 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable

Item 5.OTHER INFORMATION

None

Item 6.EXHIBITS

Exhibit No. Description
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Registrant’s 1998 Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed April 23, 1998, File No.: 33-50857).
3.1.1 Amendment to Article Third of Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Registrant’s Form 8-K filed March 11, 2009).
3.1.2 Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Registrant’s Form 8-K filed March 19, 2009).
3.1.3 Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation for the Series B Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on August 25, 2011).
3.1.4 Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Registrant’s Form 8-K filed October 30, 2014).
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Form 8-K filed November 25, 2014).
4.1 Form of Subordinated Note, dated as of December 10, 2015, issued by Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Registrant’s Form 8-K filed December 10, 2015).
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
31.1 Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 17 CF 240.13a-14, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 48 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

    SALISBURY BANCORP, INC.
     
November 8, 2018 By:   /s/ Richard J. Cantele, Jr.  
    Richard J. Cantele, Jr.,
    President and Chief Executive Officer
     
November 8, 2018 By:   /s/ Peter Albero  
    Peter Albero,
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

49