·
|
How
can I be more competitive?
|
·
|
What
am I missing to be more
competitive?
|
·
|
What
products do I need?
|
·
|
What
technology do I need to be more
competitive?
|
·
|
How
is my cost structure affecting my ability to run my business most
effectively?
|
·
|
What
markets am I not serving?
|
·
|
What
markets do I need to serve better?
|
·
|
How
do I build this product in this part of the world versus that part of the
world?
|
A:
|
I
think you asked, what’s going to happen with the Natco name? As
Jack just said over my shoulder, you know we are very, very fortunate in
that we are bringing two highly regarded and well-recognized brands to the
table in Cameron and in Natco. As I said in my remarks, if you look below
Natco and you see the test brand, you see Cynara, you see all of the other
Port-a-test – the brands that we have reserved at a product level, I
expect that those will continue as they have within the Petreco family,
brands that they cobrand with Petreco and with Cameron. And I
know that will be a central effort of this transition team is how do we
put the best face on the combined entity for our customers so that they
clearly understand what it is that we offer and we take advantage of that
brand identity in the various markets that we’ll serve. You
want to add anything to that?
|
A2:
|
No,
I would agree to that. You know, we’ve got a lot of
ideas. John and I can come up with a lot of ways to – we do
know it will not be called Petco. (Laughter)
|
A:
|
And
we took Patrico
off the table,
too. (Laughter)
|
A2:
|
If
you do go to the Cameron website and you look in our process technologies
under the Petreco brand, you will see every similar to Natco, Wemco,
Vortoil – things that really make up the value of the brand
itself. We are very, very focused on maintaining visibility to
those product technologies and those brandings that are there, but we do
have – we’re going to have some smart people working on
this. So, I’m confident we’ll come up with the right way to get
this out into the public and capture the best of both of what we
bring.
|
A:
|
Guillermo,
do you have a question? I saw your hand go
up.
|
Q:
|
I
know. How long will we be remaining in this
building?
|
A:
|
I
hope for some time. And again, that’s going to be a topic of
the transition team, but as you know, most of the DPS group is right down
the street here and they are fresh out of room and as you know on one of
my spending sprees, I’ve contracted for more space and so, I think that
we’ll come up with an optimal solution, but it’s clearly going to be in
this zip code and I think, most likely will be in this building. That’s a
safe bet, I heard. Yeah?
|
Q:
|
You
had mentioned about our present path with Oracle – and I know Cameron’s on
SAP. What are the plans down the road for
that?
|
A:
|
They’re
going to convert to Oracle
(laughter).
|
Q2:
|
Can
we get rid of them both?
|
A:
|
Yeah.
We’re gonna go back to the “Big Chief” tablet. That was a lot
easier to do. No, we have begun to sort of have that discussion
about where do we end up. And I think the short answer is for
Natco, we continue on the course that we’re on. It’s too
important for us to stop and then wait. So, clearly, we’ll stay
on the Go Live 2 a plan that we’re on – we’ve got a lot of things to do
around data cleansing and all the kinds of things and then in time, we’ll
figure out where we end up as a combined entity but all lights are green
for Oracle. Everyone stay focused. Everyone keep working and we look
forward to a successful implementation of the program as we have it
contemplated right now.
|
Q:
|
Will
the various parts of Natco be split up? Things like Linco would probably
be best served in the measurement group, TEST maybe in some other
group.
|
A:
|
Well,
that’s a question for Jack. So, I’ll let him
…
|
Q:
|
You
know, quite honestly, we haven’t probably grounded all of
that. I think right now our focus is to embrace Natco as Natco
looks like and see where we can leverage the various pieces of Natco with
the various pieces of Cameron and you know, our intent is to one plus one
equals three, not two. And where we can put the pieces that
make up Natco. Natco’s not unlike Cameron. There’s
lots of technologies kind of embedded in pieces of it. And if you look at
– we do have a measurement company – it’s about $120 million piece of our
business. It’s part of our valve group. There’s
probably some opportunity there. We don’t really understand what all of
that is yet and I think we – there’s certain things we can’t do yet and
until we get that green light to be able to dive into some of this in a
deeper way. You know, we just agreed to do this
yesterday. So, there’s some things we haven’t quite been able
to run the ground yet and but you know, our mission is to make sure we
create as much value as we can and there’s some obvious opportunities with
leveraging. You know as I said, some of the compression
technology and the valve and the surface wellhead technologies with
existing pieces of Natco, but it’s really more just linking those
together. It’s really more of disconnecting and what fits. But
in terms of embedding something in something else, that really hasn’t been
run to ground yet and we will. We will look at those. I’m going to
reiterate what John said as well as far as
communications. Obviously, we’re going to be looking at how we
can make this a bigger, better company. So, that means there
will be some changes. I don’t know what they’ll all be and I
don’t know who all it will affect, but our mission here is to make sure
that we communicate that as effectively and as quickly and as much as what
we know when we know it. And I believe in that,
too. I truly believe in what John has said that if you don’t
communicate what’s going on, you create a lot of uncertainty, you create a
lot of – a lot of rumors that probably are going to be unfounded and
untrue and we’d rather communicate to you what’s really happening when it
happens and what we can and that’s the commitment I have and I believe in
that and I think that’s kind of driven by our HR philosophy, too, and I
think you’ll appreciate that.
|
M:
|
Great.
We echo the same thing. Yes,
sir?
|
Q:
|
When
does the business integration start at the grunt
level?
|
A:
|
At
the what level?
|
Q:
|
Grunt
level. (Laughter)
|
A:
|
Well,
nothing officially can happen until the transaction closes,
right. So, that’s one of the main rules that we have to abide
by, but hopefully, in the transitional period, which again is probably 75
to 90 days, we’ll formulate jointly those plans so that those closings
whatever those plans turn out to be, we can implement as quickly and
efficiently as we can.
|
|
Got
another one? Yes?
|
Q:
|
How
will the manufacturing facilities be affected for Natco being that Petreco
uses subcontractors for their
equipment?
|
A:
|
Well,
one of the synergies and I’ll let Jack respond as well, but one of the
synergies that we saw putting the two companies together was we had
typically had sort of a manufacturing centric focus around certainly
S&T and to a lesser degree but still – still a pretty important focus
around IES. That being said, we also have had ours to fill and capacity to
use within these shops. As Jack said, Petreco has used a
model where they subcontracted out all of our fabrication around the
world. That cost them some margin when they do that and it’s a
different model. For us, from our shareholders, we saw this as
an opportunity to actually fill our shops possibly with some of that
Petreco work that otherwise would be going elsewhere. So, I think that’s a
great example where one plus one equals three kind of opportunities
exists. So, I think that’s a good outcome of
it.
|
A2:
|
I
would agree. I had the privilege last week to hook up with
Patrick here and run up and see Electra and run over and see New Iberia
firsthand what your capabilities are and what you’re doing and obviously,
there’s a lot of opportunity for Cameron to leverage what’s already there
and that is that’s truly one of the opportunities we’re going to have to
understand and take full advantage
of.
|
A:
|
And
again, I think you heard Jack say, they are very much manufacturers. So,
they get it.
|
|
Any
more? Bob Curcio.
|
Q:
|
I’m
going to ask the hard question.
|
A:
|
Okay.
|
Q:
|
Jack,
from a manufacturing standpoint, just say how many facilities you have in
Cameron that are manufacturing?
|
A:
|
Oh,
wow! Bob would ask me that question. Well, okay about
25. I mean, when you look – Cameron has 250 locations in 70
countries. Not all of them are manufacturers. We build product
in Brazil. We build product in Malaysia. We build product in
Singapore. We build product in Romania. We build product in
France. We build product in Italy. We build product in the
UK. We build product in Ireland. Let’s see, what
country have we not … Germany. We build product in
Germany. Then we come over to this side of the world. We build
product in Argentina. We build product in Mexico. We build product in
Venezuela, a little bit, still. I don’t know – our finance guys
aren’t here. Maybe we didn’t get paid this week (laughter). We
build product in Louisiana. We build product in Texas. We build product in
Oklahoma. We build product in Canada. We build
product – what else did we – we don’t build anything in California like
you do, unfortunately. We do build all over the world but we don’t build
any of what you guys do. But when you’re looking at wellhead
technology, drilling technology, the valve technology, we probably build
70 percent of what we sell. That’s probably a good rule of
thumb.
|
M:
|
Okay. If
you ask one more question, you can take an early lunch – if you quit now,
you have to go back to
work. Cindy? Save the
group.
|
Q:
|
I
have two questions. One about business and then the one that
probably a lot of people want to ask, but nobody’s gonna
ask. The first is about our activities over in the Middle East
with our new facility and then moving into Brazil, are we going to be
continuing forward with all of the things that we have in
place?
|
A:
|
Yes
and yes. We talked at length this morning on the analysts
conference call about the benefits of bringing the two companies together
as it affects the Saudi market and the manufacturing joint venture and
Cameron has the same partner in Saudi that we have. So, that’s a big plus
to start with. And again, we now have the opportunity to bring
the full product line into the Kingdom. The plant itself is on schedule.
We should be up and running by the end of the year. I think
being able to not only address markets within the Kingdom itself but also
in the region, that’ll help that ramp-up and, again, I think being
together gives us a lot more substance, a lot more opportunities that stir
up work that put through the shop. So, I think it’s a huge plus
going forward. And your second
question?
|
Q:
|
Is
about the employees and do you anticipate a lot of layoffs due to
redundancies and job positions and
otherwise?
|
A:
|
Well,
look, the honest answer is we’re going to have to sort through all of that
through this transitional period, right? But I think what you
hear in the message that we have both tried to convey today is that there
is far more complimentary activity by bringing these two companies
together than consolidation. This is not about whacking out a
bunch of people to make a business work. This business will work from the
top line from the opportunities that we’ve identified. That
being said, there are also positions that are likely redundant when the
two organizations come together and that is our commitment that as we sort
through what that means to everyone as an individual, ‘cause that’s where
it counts. It counts what has affected me – we’ll be as
forthright as we can. I think everyone in this room and
listening in knows that Patrick and I have from the get-go had an
established practice and we treat people right on the way into the
organization, we treat people right when they’re in the organization and
if this comes to a fact where someone is leaving the organization because
of this combination, we’re gonna treat ‘em right, treat ‘em with respect
and help ‘em move into whatever is next on their personal
horizon.
|
|
And
that, again, that’s a worrisome thing that’s lurking around on everybody’s
mind. But just relax, it’ll take care of
itself.
|
|
One
more.
|
Q:
|
This
question is on a lighter note. Will we have access to the – to
Cameron’s gym and
deli? (laughter)
|
A:
|
I
don’t see why not. Get over there early. The access is – well, I guess
it’s 24/7, right, if you have the right pass. I’m sure Mr.
Fleming would not exclude a key part of their organization, let’s put it
that way. Put him on the spot. No, I think it is a
wonderful – you know, the one thing I miss about where I’m at over there
on Post Oak is that you don’t have access to a cafeteria and a place where
people gather and have lunch in a lighter environment and it’s been a very
big asset for that building and one that I encourage everyone to
use. So, yeah, it’s – and I think certain outside people have
access into it, but if you’re a Cameron employee, it’s easier to get
through the process. So, I’m sure that will be a great option for
you.
|
M:
|
They
have a lot of cool stuff. (Laughter) All right. Let me close
with one kind of thank you. This effort that we’ve announced
last night did not come about easily and there about I would say five,
then a dozen, then two dozen people that worked tirelessly to get Natco in
position to address due diligence and to do the number of things that have
to happen in order to get this far in this process and I thank everyone of
you for that effort. There’s still a lot of work to do to get the deal
done. There’s still a lot of work to do to run our business and to manage
our business everyday. So, again, from the bottom of my heart and on
behalf of Patrick, we thank you for the work that you’ve done and the
sacrifice you made and what is ahead. So, celebrate the day. Be
a little nervous, but it’s good – it’s an exciting thing moving forward.
So, I appreciate everybody coming today. Thank
you. (Applause)
|
|
(Meeting
Concludes)
|