CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration Statement No.
333-121561
PROSPECTUS
$862,500,000 5.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2009
356,404,924 Shares of Class A Common Stock Issuable
Upon
Conversion of the 5.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2009
This prospectus relates to $862,500,000 aggregate principal
amount of 5.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2009 of Charter
Communications, Inc., and 356,404,924 shares of
Class A common stock of Charter Communications, Inc., which
are initially issuable upon conversion of the notes, plus an
indeterminate number of shares as may become issuable upon
conversion as a result of adjustments to the conversion rate.
The convertible senior notes were originally issued and sold by
Charter Communications, Inc. to certain initial purchasers in a
private placement. The convertible senior notes and shares
offered by this prospectus are to be sold for the account of the
holders. Holders of the convertible senior notes may convert the
convertible senior notes into shares of Charter Communications,
Inc. Class A common stock at any time before their maturity
or their prior redemption or repurchase by Charter
Communications, Inc.
The convertible senior notes are issued only in denominations of
$1,000 and integral multiples of $1,000. The convertible senior
notes are currently designated for trading in the Private
Offerings, Resale and Trading through Automated Linkages
(PORTAL) Market of the National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc. Charter Communications, Inc.s Class A
common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the
symbol CHTR. The last reported sale price of our
Class A common stock on the Nasdaq National Market on
July 18, 2005 was $1.33 per share.
The principal terms of the convertible senior notes include the
following:
|
|
|
Interest |
|
accrues from November 22, 2004 at the rate of 5.875% per
year, payable semi-annually on each May 16 and
November 16, commencing on May 16, 2005. |
|
Maturity Date |
|
November 16, 2009 |
|
Conversion Rate |
|
413.2231 shares of Class A common stock per each $1,000
principal amount of notes, subject to adjustment. This is
equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $2.42
per share. Upon conversion, we will have the right to deliver,
in lieu of our Class A common stock, cash or a combination
of cash and Class A common stock. |
|
Ranking |
|
rank equally with any of Charter Communications, Inc.s
existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness, but are
effectively subordinated to our secured indebtedness and
structurally subordinated to all existing and future
indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries. |
|
Redemption |
|
Following the earlier of (1) the sale of the notes pursuant
to an effective registration statement or
(2) November 22, 2006, we may redeem the notes in
whole or in part at any time at a redemption price equal to 100%
of the accreted principal amount of the notes plus any accrued
and unpaid interest and liquidated damages, if any, on the notes
to but not including the redemption date, if the closing price
of our Class A common stock has exceeded a specified
percentage of the conversion price for at least 20 trading
days in any consecutive 30 trading day period. |
|
Make Whole Provisions |
|
If you convert your notes at any time prior to November 16,
2007, you will receive, in addition to shares of our
Class A common stock, or cash in lieu thereof, the
remaining portion of a portfolio of U.S. government
securities pledged as security in respect of the notes you
converted, subject to certain limitations. If you convert notes
that have been called for redemption, you will receive an
additional redemption make whole amount. In addition, if certain
corporate transactions that constitute a change of control occur
on or prior to November 16, 2009, we will increase the
conversion rate in certain circumstances, unless such
transaction constitutes a public acquirer change of control and
we elect to modify the conversion into public acquirer common
stock, as described in this prospectus. |
The convertible senior notes and the shares of Class A
common stock offered by this prospectus may be offered in
negotiated transactions, ordinary brokerage transactions or
otherwise, at negotiated prices or at the market prices
prevailing at the time of sale.
See Risk Factors beginning on page 14 of
this prospectus to read about important factors you should
consider before buying the convertible senior notes or shares of
our Class A common stock.
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES
COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY
STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY
OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A
CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
The distribution of this prospectus and the offering and sale of
the convertible senior notes or Class A common stock in
certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law. Charter
Communications, Inc. requires persons into whose possession this
prospectus comes to inform themselves about and to observe any
such restrictions. This prospectus does not constitute an offer
of, or an invitation to purchase, any of the convertible senior
notes or shares of Class A common stock in any jurisdiction
in which such offer or invitation would be unlawful.
Neither Charter Communications, Inc. nor any of its
representatives is making any representation to any offeree or
purchaser of the convertible senior notes or shares of
Class A common stock regarding the legality of an
investment by such offeree or purchaser under appropriate legal
investment or similar laws. Each purchaser should consult with
his own advisors as to legal, tax, business, financial and
related aspects of a purchase of the notes or shares of
Class A common stock.
Prospectus dated July 19, 2005.
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with
information that is different from that contained in this
prospectus. We are offering to sell the notes and shares offered
hereby only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are
permitted. The information in this prospectus is complete and
accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of
the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of
securities.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
i |
|
|
ii |
|
|
1 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
37 |
|
|
39 |
|
|
44 |
|
|
46 |
|
|
47 |
|
|
81 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
105 |
|
|
122 |
|
|
126 |
|
|
146 |
|
|
170 |
|
|
173 |
|
|
194 |
|
|
202 |
|
|
204 |
|
|
211 |
|
|
215 |
|
|
217 |
|
|
217 |
|
|
F-1 |
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus includes forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and
Section 21E of the Exchange Act, regarding, among other
things, our plans, strategies and prospects, both business and
financial. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and
expectations reflected in or suggested by these forward-looking
statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that we will
achieve or realize these plans, intentions or expectations.
Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks,
uncertainties and assumptions. Many of the forward-looking
statements contained in this prospectus may be identified by the
use of forward-looking words such as believe,
expect, anticipate, should,
planned, will, may,
intend, estimated and
potential, among others. Important factors that
could cause actual results to differ materially from the
forward-looking statements we make in this prospectus are set
forth in this prospectus and in other reports or documents that
we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or SEC, and include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to sustain and grow revenues and cash flows from
operating activities by offering video, high-speed data,
telephony and other services and to maintain a stable customer
base, particularly in the face of increasingly aggressive
competition from other service providers; |
i
|
|
|
|
|
the availability of funds to meet interest payment obligations
under our debt and to fund our operations and necessary capital
expenditures, either through cash flows from operating
activities, further borrowings or other sources; |
|
|
|
our ability to comply with all covenants in our indentures and
credit facilities, any violation of which would result in a
violation of the applicable facility or indenture and could
trigger a default of other obligations under cross-default
provisions; |
|
|
|
our ability to pay or refinance debt as it becomes due; |
|
|
|
our ability to obtain programming at reasonable prices or to
pass programming cost increases on to our customers; |
|
|
|
general business conditions, economic uncertainty or
slowdown; and |
|
|
|
the effects of governmental regulation, including but not
limited to local franchise authorities, on our business. |
All forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person
acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety
by this cautionary statement.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-1 to register the sale of the securities covered by
this prospectus. This prospectus, which forms part of that
registration statement, does not contain all the information
included in the registration statement. For further information
about us and the securities described in this prospectus, you
should refer to the registration statement and its exhibits.
Our Class A common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National
Market under the symbol CHTR. We file annual,
quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other
information with the SEC. You may read and copy at prescribed
rates any document we file at the SECs public reference
room at Room 1200, 450 Fifth Street, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference
room. Our SEC filings are also available to the public at the
SECs website at www.sec.gov.
ii
SUMMARY
This summary contains a general discussion of our business, and
summary financial information. It does not contain all the
information that you should consider before making an investment
decision regarding the notes or our Class A common stock.
For a more complete understanding of an investment in the notes
or our Class A common stock, you should read this entire
prospectus. Unless otherwise noted, all business data in this
summary is as of March 31, 2005.
Unless otherwise stated, the discussion in this prospectus of
our business and operations includes the business and operations
of Charter Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Unless the
context otherwise requires, the terms we,
us and our refer to Charter
Communications, Inc. and its direct and indirect subsidiaries on
a consolidated basis. The term Charter refers to the
issuer, Charter Communications, Inc.
Our Business
We are a broadband communications company operating in the
United States, with approximately 6.23 million customers at
March 31, 2005. Through our broadband network of coaxial
and fiber optic cable, we offer our customers traditional cable
video programming (analog and digital, which we refer to as
video service), high-speed cable Internet access
(which we refer to as high-speed data service),
advanced broadband cable services (such as video on demand
(VOD), high definition television service, and
interactive television) and, in some of our markets, we offer
telephone service (which we refer to as telephony).
See Business Products and Services for
further description of these terms, including
customers.
At March 31, 2005, we served approximately
5.98 million analog video customers, of which approximately
2.69 million were also digital video customers. We also
served approximately 1.98 million high-speed data customers
(including approximately 229,400 who received only high-speed
data services). We also provided telephony service to
approximately 55,300 customers as of that date.
Our principal executive offices are located at Charter Plaza,
12405 Powerscourt Drive, St. Louis, Missouri 63131.
Our telephone number is (314) 965-0555 and we have a
website accessible at www.charter.com. The information posted or
linked on our website is not part of this prospectus and you
should rely solely on the information contained in this
prospectus and the related documents to which we refer herein
when deciding to make an investment in the notes or our
Class A common stock.
Strategy
Our principal financial goal is to maximize our return on
invested capital. To do so, we will focus on increasing
revenues, growing our customer base, improving customer
retention and enhancing customer satisfaction by providing
reliable, high-quality service offerings, superior customer
service and attractive bundled offerings.
Specifically, in the near term, we are focusing on:
|
|
|
|
|
generating improvements in the overall customer experience in
such critical areas as service delivery, customer care, and new
product offerings; |
|
|
|
developing more sophisticated customer management capabilities
through investment in our customer care and marketing
infrastructure, including targeted marketing capabilities; |
|
|
|
executing growth strategies for new services, including digital
simulcast, VOD, telephony, and digital video recorder service
(DVR); |
|
|
|
managing our operating costs by exercising discipline in capital
and operational spending; and |
|
|
|
identifying opportunities to continue to improve our balance
sheet and liquidity. |
We have begun an internal operational improvement initiative
aimed at helping us gain new customers and retain existing
customers, which is focused on customer care, technical
operations and sales. We intend to continue efforts to focus
management attention on instilling a customer service oriented
1
culture throughout the company and to give those areas of our
operations priority of resources for staffing levels, training
budgets and financial incentives for employee performance in
those areas.
We believe that our high-speed data service will continue to
provide a substantial portion of our revenue growth in the near
future. We also plan to continue to expand our marketing of
high-speed data service to the business community, which we
believe has shown an increasing interest in high-speed data
service and private network services. Additionally, we plan to
continue to prepare additional markets for telephony launches in
2005.
We believe we offer our customers an excellent choice of
services through a variety of bundled packages, particularly
with respect to our digital video and high-speed data services,
as well as telephony in certain markets. Our digital platform
enables us to offer a significant number and variety of
channels, and we offer customers the opportunity to choose among
groups of channel offerings, including premium channels, and to
combine selected programming with other services such as
high-speed data, high definition television (in selected
markets) and VOD (in selected markets).
We continue to pursue opportunities to improve our liquidity.
Our efforts in this regard resulted in the completion of a
number of transactions in 2004, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
the December 2004 sale by our subsidiaries, CCO Holdings, LLC
and CCO Holdings Capital Corp., of $550 million of senior
floating rate notes due 2010; |
|
|
|
the November 2004 sale of the $862.5 million of 5.875%
convertible senior notes due 2009; |
|
|
|
the December 2004 redemption of all of our 5.75% convertible
senior notes due 2005 ($588 million principal amount); |
|
|
|
the April 2004 sale of $1.5 billion of senior second lien
notes by our subsidiary, Charter Communications Operating, LLC
(Charter Operating), together with the concurrent
refinancing of its credit facilities; and |
|
|
|
the sale in the first half of 2004 of non-core cable systems for
a total of $735 million, the proceeds of which were used to
reduce indebtedness. |
Recent Events
|
|
|
Approval and Funding of Litigation Settlement |
On June 30, 2005, the Federal District Court for the
Eastern District of Missouri entered its final approval of the
Stipulation of Settlement, as amended, of certain shareholder
class action and derivative lawsuits filed against Charter which
are more fully described in Business Legal
Proceedings. On July 8, 2005, Charter delivered to
the claims administrator its portion of the settlement
consideration under the Stipulation in the form of
13.4 million shares of Class A common stock and
approximately $63 million in cash, and Charter has paid
$4.5 million to its insurance carriers to satisfy certain
outstanding claims in connection with the settlement. See
Business Legal Proceedings.
|
|
|
Issuance of Charter Operating Notes in Exchange for Charter
Holdings Notes; Repurchase of Convertible Notes |
In June 2005, our subsidiary, Charter Operating, consummated
exchange transactions with a small number of institutional
holders of Charter Holdings 8.25% senior notes due 2007 pursuant
to which Charter Operating issued, in private placements,
approximately $62 million principal amount of new notes
with terms identical to Charter Operatings 8.375% senior
second lien notes due 2014 in exchange for approximately
$62 million of the Charter Holdings 8.25% senior notes due
2007. Since March 31, 2005, we repurchased, in private
transactions from a small number of institutional holders, a
total of $97 million principal amount of our 4.75%
convertible senior notes due 2006 leaving $25 million
principal amount outstanding.
2
|
|
|
Principal Management Changes |
On January 17, 2005, Robert P. May was appointed as Interim
President and Chief Executive Officer of Charter, replacing
Carl E. Vogel who, effective on the same date, resigned his
position as President, Chief Executive Officer, and a member of
the board of directors of Charter and each of Charters
subsidiaries for which Mr. Vogel served as a director and
officer. Additionally, Mr. May was appointed to the
Executive Committee of Charters board of directors and
will continue to serve on the boards Strategic Planning
Committee. He was also appointed as an officer and director of
Charters subsidiaries for which Mr. Vogel was a
director and officer.
Charters board of directors has formed an Executive Search
Committee to oversee Charters search for a permanent
President and Chief Executive Officer.
In April 2005, Michael J. Lovett was appointed to the position
of Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Prior
to that appointment, Mr. Lovett had been serving as
Charters Executive Vice President, Operations and Customer
Care. In April 2005, we also named Paul E. Martin Interim Chief
Financial Officer. Mr. Martin had been serving as
co-Interim Chief Financial Officer along with Derek Chang, our
former Executive Vice President of Finance and Strategy.
Mr. Chang resigned all positions with Charter effective
April 15, 2005. Curtis S. Shaw, former Executive Vice
President, General Counsel and Secretary, also resigned
effective April 15, 2005.
|
|
|
Sale of 5.875% Convertible Senior Notes and Redemption of
5.75% Convertible Senior Notes |
On November 22, 2004, we issued and sold
$862.5 million total principal amount of 5.875% convertible
senior notes due 2009, which are convertible into shares of our
Class A common stock, par value $.001 per share, at a rate
of 413.2231 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes (or
approximately $2.42 per share), subject to adjustment in certain
circumstances. At the time of the issuance of the notes, we
agreed to file the registration statement containing this
prospectus for resale of the notes and shares of Class A
common stock issuable upon conversion of the notes by the
holders thereof. On December 23, 2004, we used a portion of
the proceeds from the sale of the notes to redeem all of our
outstanding 5.75% convertible senior notes due 2005 (total
principal amount of $588 million). We also used a portion
of the proceeds from the sale of the notes to purchase certain
U.S. government securities which were pledged as security
for the notes and which we expect to use to fund the first six
interest payments on the notes.
In connection with the initial sale of the notes, we filed a
registration statement with the Securities and Exchange
Commission that can be used by Citigroup Global Markets Inc. to
sell up to 150 million shares of our Class A common
stock that we will loan to an affiliate of Citigroup Global
Markets Inc. pursuant to a share lending agreement. That
registration statement was declared effective on July 18, 2005.
For additional terms of the notes and the arrangements governing
the loan of shares of our Class A common stock, see
Registered Borrow Facility and Description of
Notes.
3
Organizational Structure
The chart below sets forth the organizational structure of
Charter and its principal direct and indirect subsidiaries. The
equity ownership, voting percentages and indebtedness amounts
shown below are approximations as of March 31, 2005 on the
pro forma basis described in Unaudited Pro Forma
Consolidated Financial Statements (including giving effect
to the issuance of the shares pursuant to the share lending
agreement) and do not give effect to any exercise, conversion or
exchange of then outstanding options, preferred stock,
convertible notes and other convertible or exchangeable
securities.
|
|
(1) |
Charter acts as the sole manager of Charter Holdco and its
direct and indirect limited liability company subsidiaries.
Charters certificate of incorporation requires that its
principal assets be securities of Charter Holdco, the terms of
which mirror the terms of securities issued by Charter. See
Description of Capital Stock and Membership Units.
Since March 31, 2005 Charter repurchased $97 million
in principal amount of the convertible notes then outstanding. |
(2) |
These membership units are held by Charter Investment, Inc. and
Vulcan Cable III Inc., each of which is 100% owned by Paul
G. Allen, our Chairman and controlling shareholder. They are
exchangeable at any time on a one-for-one basis for shares of
Charter Class A common stock. |
(3) |
The percentages shown in this table reflect the issuance of the
150 million shares of Class A common stock by Charter
pursuant to the share lending agreement and the corresponding
issuance of an equal number of mirror membership units by
Charter Holdco to Charter. However, for accounting purposes,
Charters common equity interest in Charter Holdco will
remain at 47%, and Paul G. Allens ownership of
Charter Holdco will remain at 53%. These percentages exclude the
150 million mirror membership units issued to Charter due
to the required return of the issued mirror units upon return of
the shares pursuant to the share lending agreement. See
Registered Borrow Facility. |
(4) |
In June 2005, Charter Operating issued approximately
$62 million of additional notes in exchange for
$62 million of Charter Holdings senior notes. See
Recent Events. |
(5) |
Represents 100% of the preferred membership interests in
CC VIII, LLC, a subsidiary of CC V Holdings, LLC. An
issue has arisen regarding the ultimate ownership of such
CC VIII, LLC membership interests following
Mr. Allens acquisition of those interests on
June 6, 2003. See Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions Transactions Arising out of Our
Organizational Structure and Mr. Allens Investment in
Charter Communications, Inc. and Its
Subsidiaries Equity Put
Rights CC VIII. |
4
The Notes
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
Charter Communications, Inc. (Charter) |
|
Notes Offered |
|
$862,500,000 original principal amount of
5.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2009. |
|
Maturity Date |
|
November 16, 2009. |
|
Interest |
|
5.875% per annum on the accreted principal amount, payable
semi-annually in arrears on May 16 and November 16 of
each year, commencing May 16, 2005. If we elect to accrete
the principal amount of the notes to pay any liquidated damages
we owe, we will be entitled to defer any interest, which we
refer to as the deferred interest, that accrues with respect to
the excess of the accreted principal amount over the original
principal amount until May 16, 2008, or any earlier
repurchase, redemption or acceleration of the notes. We will not
pay any interest on such deferred interest. |
|
Security |
|
Our subsidiary, Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC
(Charter Holdco), has purchased and pledged to us as
security for an intercompany note, and we have repledged to the
trustee under the indenture as security for the benefit of the
holders of the notes, approximately $144 million of
U.S. government securities, which we refer to as the
Pledged Securities. We believe that the total amount of the
Pledged Securities will be sufficient, upon receipt of scheduled
payments thereon, to provide for the payment in full of the
first six scheduled interest payments due on the original
principal amount of the notes, but not any liquidated damages we
may owe or any deferred interest in respect of the accretion of
the principal amount of the notes. The notes will not otherwise
be secured. See Description of the Notes
Security. Holders who convert their notes prior to
November 16, 2007 will receive the cash proceeds from the
liquidation of a portion of the Pledged Securities, as described
below in Interest Make Whole Upon
Conversion. |
|
Ranking |
|
The notes will be unsecured (except to the extent described
above under Security) and unsubordinated obligations
and will rank, in right of payment, the same as all of
Charters existing and future senior unsecured
indebtedness. The notes will rank senior in right of payment to
all of Charters subordinated indebtedness and will be
effectively subordinated to any of Charters secured
indebtedness and structurally subordinated to indebtedness and
other liabilities of our subsidiaries. As of March 31,
2005, Charter had no secured indebtedness and our subsidiaries
had total indebtedness and other liabilities of
$20.5 billion, excluding intercompany obligations. |
|
Conversion Rights |
|
Holders may convert their notes at the conversion rate at any
time prior to the close of business on the business day prior to
the maturity date. |
|
|
|
The initial conversion rate will be 413.2231 shares of our
Class A common stock, par value $.001 per share, per
$1,000 original principal amount of notes. This represents an
initial |
5
|
|
|
|
|
conversion price of approximately $2.42 per share of our
Class A common stock. We will increase the conversion rate
in the same proportion that the principal amount of the notes
increases if we elect to accrete the principal amount of the
notes to pay certain liquidated damages instead of paying them
in cash. In addition, if certain corporate transactions that
constitute a change of control occur on or prior to the maturity
date, we will increase the conversion rate in certain
circumstances, unless such transaction constitutes a public
acquirer change of control and we elect to satisfy our
conversion obligation with public acquirer common stock. See
Description of Notes Conversion
Rights Make Whole Amount and Public Acquirer Change
of Control. |
|
|
|
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no holder of notes will be
entitled to receive shares of our Class A common stock upon
conversion to the extent, but only to the extent, that such
receipt would cause such holder to become, directly or
indirectly, a beneficial owner of more than the specified
percentage of the shares of Class A common stock
outstanding at such time. With respect to any conversion prior
to November 16, 2008, the specified percentage will be
4.9%, and with respect to any conversion thereafter, the
specified percentage will be 9.9%. See Description of
Notes Conversion Rights Limitation on
Beneficial Ownership. |
|
|
|
Upon conversion, we will have the right to deliver, in lieu of
shares of our Class A common stock, cash or a combination
of cash and our Class A common stock. If we elect to pay
holders cash upon conversion, such payment will be based on the
average of the sale prices of our Class A common stock over
the 20 trading day period beginning on the third trading day
immediately following the conversion date of the notes, which we
refer to as the average price. |
|
|
|
As described in this prospectus, the conversion rate may be
adjusted upon the occurrence of certain events, including for
any cash dividend on our Class A common stock, but will not
be adjusted for accrued and unpaid interest. By delivering to
the holder shares of our Class A common stock, and in
certain circumstances cash, we will satisfy our obligations with
respect to the notes subject to the conversion, subject to our
obligations described under Description of
Notes Conversion Rights Interest Make
Whole Upon Conversion below. Except to the extent we are
required to pay any Early Conversion Make Whole Amount or
Redemption Make Whole Amount, upon conversion of a note, accrued
and unpaid interest will be paid or deemed to be paid in full,
rather than canceled, extinguished or forfeited. |
|
|
|
The notes called for redemption may be surrendered for
conversion prior to the close of business on the business day
immediately preceding the redemption date. |
|
Interest Make Whole Upon
Conversion |
|
Holders who convert their notes prior to November 16, 2007
will receive, in addition to a number of shares of our
Class A |
6
|
|
|
|
|
common stock calculated at the conversion rate for the accreted
principal amount of notes, or cash in lieu thereof, the cash
proceeds of the sale by the trustee of the Pledged Securities
remaining with respect to the notes being converted, which we
refer to as the Early Conversion Make Whole Amount, subject to
the limitation described under Description of
Notes Conversion Rights Interest Make
Whole Upon Conversion. The percentage of the remaining
Pledged Securities to be sold will be determined based on the
aggregate original principal amount of notes being converted as
a percentage of the total original principal amount of notes
then outstanding. The trustee will liquidate the Pledged
Securities to be released, rounded down to the nearest whole
multiple of the minimum denomination of such Pledged Securities,
and deliver the cash value thereof to the converting holder. The
Early Conversion Make Whole Amount will not compensate a
converting holder for interest such holder would have earned in
respect of any increase in the principal amount of the notes if
we elect to accrete such principal amount to pay any liquidated
damages we may owe. |
|
|
|
Holders who convert notes that have been called for redemption
will receive, in addition to the Early Conversion Make Whole
Amount, the amount of any deferred interest and the present
value of the interest on the notes converted that would have
been payable for the period from and including November 16,
2007, or if later, the redemption date, to but excluding
November 16, 2009, which we refer to as the Redemption Make
Whole Amount. The Redemption Make Whole Amount will be
calculated by discounting the amount of such interest on a
semi-annual basis using a discount rate equal to 3.0% plus the
published U.S. Treasury rate for the maturity most closely
approximating the period from and including the redemption date
to but excluding November 16, 2009. We may pay the
Redemption Make Whole Amount in cash or in shares of our
Class A common stock, with the number of such shares
determined based on the average of the sale prices of our
Class A common stock over the 10 trading days immediately
preceding the applicable conversion date. If we elect to pay the
Redemption Make Whole Amount in shares of our Class A
common stock, the number of shares we deliver, together with the
shares deliverable upon conversion, will not exceed 462 per
$1,000 original principal amount of notes, subject to the
anti-dilution adjustments, and we must deliver cash with respect
to the remainder of the Redemption Make Whole Amount, if any. |
|
Exchange in Lieu of Conversion |
|
Unless we have called the relevant notes for redemption, we may,
in lieu of delivering shares of our Class A common stock,
or cash in lieu thereof, upon conversion, direct the conversion
agent to surrender notes a holder has tendered for conversion to
a financial institution designated by us for exchange in lieu of
conversion. In order to accept any such notes, the designated
institution must agree to deliver, in exchange for such notes, a
number of shares of our Class A common stock calculated
using the applicable conversion rate for the accreted principal
amount |
7
|
|
|
|
|
of the notes, plus cash for any fractional shares, or, at its
option, cash or a combination of cash and shares of our
Class A common stock in lieu thereof, calculated based on
the average price. If the designated institution accepts any
such notes, it will deliver the appropriate number of shares of
our Class A common stock (and cash, if any), or cash in
lieu thereof, to the conversion agent and the conversion agent
will deliver those shares or cash to the holder. Such designated
institution will also deliver cash equal to any Early Conversion
Make Whole Amount we would owe such holder if we had paid it the
conversion value of its notes. Any notes exchanged by the
designated institution will remain outstanding. If the
designated institution agrees to accept any notes for exchange
but does not timely deliver the related consideration, we will,
as promptly as practical thereafter, but not later than the
third business day following (1) the conversion date or
(2) if the designated institution elects to deliver cash or
a combination of cash and shares of our Class A common
stock, the determination of the average price, convert the notes
and deliver shares of our Class A common stock, as
described under Description of Notes
Conversion Rights General, or, at our option
cash in lieu thereof based on the average price, along with any
applicable Early Conversion Make Whole Amount. See
Description of Notes Exchange in Lieu of
Conversion. |
|
Fundamental Change |
|
Upon a fundamental change, each holder of the notes may require
us to repurchase some or all of its notes at a purchase price
equal to 100% of the accreted principal amount of the notes,
plus any accrued and unpaid interest, including any liquidated
damages and deferred interest. See Description of
Notes Fundamental Change Requires Us to Repurchase
Notes at the Option of the Holder. |
|
Make Whole Amount and Public Acquirer Change of Control |
|
If certain transactions that constitute a change of control
occur on or prior to the maturity date, under certain
circumstances, we will increase the conversion rate by a number
of additional shares for any conversion of notes in connection
with such transactions, as described under Description of
Notes Conversion Rights Make Whole
Amount and Public Acquirer Change of Control. The number
of additional shares will be determined based on the date such
transaction becomes effective and the price paid per share of
our Class A common stock in such transaction. However, if
such transaction constitutes a public acquirer change of
control, in lieu of increasing the conversion rate, we may elect
to adjust our conversion obligation such that upon conversion of
the notes, we will deliver acquirer common stock or cash in lieu
thereof as described under Description of
Notes Conversion Rights Make Whole
Amount and Public Acquirer Change of Control. |
|
Redemption |
|
Following the earlier of (1) the sale of any notes pursuant
to an effective registration statement or
(2) November 22, 2006, we may redeem the notes (or, in
the case of clause (1) above, any such notes that have been
sold pursuant to an effective |
8
|
|
|
|
|
registration statement) in whole or in part for cash at any time
at a redemption price equal to 100% of the accreted principal
amount of the notes plus any accrued and unpaid interest,
deferred interest and liquidated damages, if any, on the notes
to but not including the redemption date, if the closing price
of our Class A common stock has exceeded, for at least 20
trading days in any consecutive 30 trading day period, 180% of
the conversion price if such 30 day trading period is prior
to November 16, 2007 and 150% if such 30 trading day period
begins thereafter. The conversion price as of any
day will equal the accreted principal amount of $1,000 original
principal amount of notes divided by the conversion rate in
effect on such day. |
|
Sinking Fund |
|
None. |
|
|
Registered Borrow Facility |
|
We filed and agreed to use our reasonable best efforts to cause
to become effective within 130 calendar days after the issue
date of the notes, a registration statement with the Securities
and Exchange Commission covering our Class A common stock
that can be used by Citigroup Global Markets Inc., one of the
initial purchasers of the notes, which we refer to as Citigroup,
to sell up to 150 million shares that we will loan to an
affiliate of Citigroup. |
|
|
|
|
|
The registration statement relating to the registered borrow
facility was declared effective on July 18, 2005, after the
required deadline of April 1, 2005. As a result, we incurred
liquidated damages during the period from April 2, 2005 until
July 17, 2005 at a rate per month equal to 0.25% of the accreted
principal amount of the notes for the first 60 days of such
failure and 0.50% of the accreted principal amount of the notes
thereafter, in each case with such damages accruing daily and
paid monthly. All such liquidated damages have been or will be
paid in cash. |
|
|
|
|
We have been advised by Citigroup that it intends to use the
short sales of our Class A common stock registered pursuant
to such registration statement to facilitate transactions by
which investors in the notes will hedge their investment in the
notes. We will not receive any of the proceeds from such short
sales of Class A common stock, but we will receive a loan
fee of $.001 for each share that we lend pursuant to the share
lending agreement. |
|
United States Federal Income Tax Considerations |
|
Under the indenture governing the notes, we have agreed, and by
acceptance of a beneficial interest in the notes each holder of
a note is deemed to have agreed, to treat the notes for United
States federal income tax purposes as debt instruments that are
subject to the U.S. Treasury regulations governing
contingent payment debt instruments. For United States federal
income tax |
9
|
|
|
|
|
purposes, interest will accrue from the issue date of the notes
at a constant rate of 15% per year (subject to certain
adjustments), compounded semi-annually, which represents the
yield on our comparable nonconvertible, fixed-rate debt
instruments with terms and conditions otherwise similar to the
notes. U.S. Holders (as defined herein) will be required to
include interest in income as it accrues regardless of their
method of tax accounting. The rate at which interest accrues for
United States federal income tax purposes generally will exceed
the cash payments of interest. |
|
|
|
U.S. Holders will recognize gain or loss on the sale,
exchange, conversion, redemption or repurchase of a note in an
amount equal to the difference between the amount realized,
including the fair market value of any common stock received
upon conversion, and their adjusted tax basis in the note. Any
gain recognized by a U.S. Holder on the sale, exchange,
conversion, redemption or repurchase of a note generally will be
ordinary interest income; any loss will be ordinary loss to the
extent of the interest previously included in income, and,
thereafter, capital loss. See United States Federal Income
Tax Considerations. |
|
Use of Proceeds |
|
We will not receive any proceeds from the sales of notes or
shares offered hereby by the selling security holders. |
|
Events of Default |
|
Customary events of default, including a default caused by the
failure to pay interest or principal at maturity and the
acceleration of indebtedness for borrowed money aggregating
$100 million or more. |
|
Trading |
|
The notes are designated as eligible for trading in the PORTAL
Market. Our Class A common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq
National Market under the symbol CHTR. |
10
Summary Consolidated Financial Data
Charter is a holding company whose principal assets are a
controlling common equity interest in Charter Communications
Holding Company, LLC and mirror notes that are
payable by Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC to
Charter which have the same principal amount and terms as those
of Charters convertible senior notes. Charter
Communications Holding Company, LLC is a holding company whose
primary assets are equity interests in our cable operating
subsidiaries and intercompany loan receivables. Charter
consolidates Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC on the
basis of voting control. Charter Communications Holding Company,
LLCs limited liability agreement provides that so long as
Charters Class B common stock retains its special
voting rights, Charter will maintain 100% voting interest in
Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC. Voting control
gives Charter full authority and control over the operations of
Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC.
The following table presents summary financial and other data
for Charter and its subsidiaries and has been derived from the
audited consolidated financial statements of Charter and its
subsidiaries for the three years ended December 31, 2004
and the unaudited consolidated financial statements of Charter
and its subsidiaries for the three months ended March 31, 2005
and 2004. The consolidated financial statements of Charter and
its subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2002 to
2004 have been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm. The pro forma data set forth below
represent our unaudited pro forma consolidated financial
statements after giving effect to the following transactions as
if they occurred on January 1 of the respective period for
the statement of operations data and other financial data and as
of the last day of the respective period for the operating data
and balance sheet data:
|
|
|
(1) the disposition of certain assets in March and April
2004 and the use of proceeds in each case to pay down credit
facilities; |
|
|
(2) the issuance and sale of the CCO Holdings senior
floating rate notes in December 2004 and the Charter Operating
senior second lien notes in April 2004; |
|
|
(3) an increase in amounts outstanding under the Charter
Operating credit facilities in April 2004 and the use of such
funds, together with the proceeds from the sale of the Charter
Operating senior second lien notes, to refinance amounts
outstanding under the credit facilities of our subsidiaries, CC
VI Operating, CC VIII Operating and Falcon; |
|
|
(4) the repayment of $530 million of borrowings under
the Charter Operating revolving credit facility with net
proceeds from the issuance and sale of the CCO Holdings senior
floating rate notes in December 2004, which were included in our
cash balance at December 31, 2004; |
|
|
(5) the redemption of all of CC V Holdings
outstanding 11.875% senior discount notes due 2008 with cash on
hand; |
|
|
(6) the establishment of a registered borrow facility for
the issuance of up to 150 million shares of our Class A
common stock pursuant to a share lending agreement the sole
effect of which is to increase common shares issued and
outstanding. See Registered Borrow Facility; and |
|
|
(7) the issuance and sale of $863 million of 5.875%
convertible senior notes in November 2004 with proceeds used for
(i) the purchase of certain U.S. government securities
pledged as security for the 5.875% convertible senior notes (and
which we expect to use to fund the first six interest payments
thereon), (ii) redemption of the outstanding 5.75%
convertible senior notes due 2005 and (iii) general
corporate purposes. |
The following information should be read in conjunction with
Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data,
Capitalization, Unaudited Pro Forma
Consolidated Financial Statements, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, Registered Borrow Facility and the
historical consolidated financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
Actual | |
|
Actual | |
|
Actual | |
|
Pro Forma(a) | |
|
Pro Forma(a) | |
|
Actual | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share, share and customer data) | |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video
|
|
$ |
3,420 |
|
|
$ |
3,461 |
|
|
$ |
3,373 |
|
|
$ |
3,352 |
|
|
$ |
828 |
|
|
$ |
842 |
|
|
High-speed data
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
Advertising sales
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
4,566 |
|
|
|
4,819 |
|
|
|
4,977 |
|
|
|
4,948 |
(b) |
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (excluding depreciation and amortization)
|
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
1,952 |
|
|
|
2,080 |
|
|
|
2,068 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,436 |
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
1,489 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
Impairment of franchises
|
|
|
4,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets, net
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
Option compensation expense (income), net
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Special charges, net
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Unfavorable contracts and other settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
8,888 |
|
|
|
4,303 |
|
|
|
7,023 |
|
|
|
7,106 |
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(4,322 |
) |
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
(2,046 |
) |
|
|
(2,158 |
) |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(1,503 |
) |
|
|
(1,557 |
) |
|
|
(1,670 |
) |
|
|
(1,709 |
) |
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
|
(420 |
) |
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments and hedging activities, net
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
Loss on debt to equity conversions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before minority interest, income taxes and cumulative
effect of accounting change
|
|
|
(5,944 |
) |
|
|
(725 |
) |
|
|
(3,698 |
) |
|
|
(3,818 |
) |
|
|
(376 |
) |
|
|
(334 |
) |
Minority interest(c)
|
|
|
3,176 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
(2,768 |
) |
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
(3,679 |
) |
|
|
(3,799 |
) |
|
|
(380 |
) |
|
|
(337 |
) |
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$ |
(2,308 |
) |
|
$ |
(238 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,576 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,682 |
) |
|
$ |
(420 |
) |
|
$ |
(352 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per common share, basic and diluted(d)
|
|
$ |
(7.85 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.82 |
) |
|
$ |
(11.92 |
) |
|
$ |
(12.27 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.43 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
|
|
294,440,261 |
|
|
|
294,597,519 |
|
|
|
300,291,877 |
|
|
|
300,291,877 |
|
|
|
295,106,077 |
|
|
|
303,308,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
2,167 |
|
|
$ |
854 |
|
|
$ |
924 |
|
|
$ |
922 |
|
|
$ |
188 |
|
|
$ |
211 |
|
|
Deficiencies of earnings to cover fixed charges(e)
|
|
$ |
5,944 |
|
|
$ |
725 |
|
|
$ |
3,698 |
|
|
$ |
3,818 |
|
|
$ |
376 |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
Actual | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Actual | |
|
Actual | |
|
Actual | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Operating Data (end of period)(f):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analog video customers
|
|
|
6,431,300 |
|
|
|
6,200,500 |
|
|
|
5,991,500 |
|
|
|
6,192,000 |
|
|
|
5,984,800 |
|
|
Digital video customers
|
|
|
2,671,900 |
|
|
|
2,588,600 |
|
|
|
2,674,700 |
|
|
|
2,657,400 |
|
|
|
2,694,600 |
|
|
Residential high-speed data customers
|
|
|
1,565,600 |
|
|
|
1,527,800 |
|
|
|
1,884,400 |
|
|
|
1,653,000 |
|
|
|
1,978,400 |
|
|
Telephony customers
|
|
|
24,900 |
|
|
|
24,900 |
|
|
|
45,400 |
|
|
|
26,300 |
|
|
|
55,300 |
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual | |
|
|
As of March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Balance Sheet Data (end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
16,794 |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
18,929 |
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
Minority interest(c)
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
Shareholders deficit
|
|
|
(4,751 |
) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Actual revenues exceeded pro forma revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and the three months ended March 31,
2004 by $29 million and $29 million, respectively. Pro
forma loss before cumulative effect of accounting change, net of
tax exceeded actual loss before cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax by $106 million and $127 million
for the year ended December 31, 2004 and the three months
ended March 31, 2004, respectively. The unaudited pro forma
financial information required allocation of certain revenues
and expenses and such information has been presented for
comparative purposes and is not intended (a) to provide any
indication of what our actual financial position or results of
operations would have been had the transactions described above
been completed on the dates indicated or (b) to project our
results of operations for any future date. |
|
(b) |
|
Pro forma 2004 revenue by quarter is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Revenue | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
1st Quarter
|
|
$ |
1,185 |
|
2nd Quarter
|
|
|
1,239 |
|
3rd Quarter
|
|
|
1,248 |
|
4th Quarter
|
|
|
1,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pro forma revenue
|
|
$ |
4,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Minority interest represents the percentage of Charter
Communications Holding Company, LLC not owned by Charter, plus
preferred membership interests in CC VIII, LLC, an indirect
subsidiary of Charter Holdco. Paul G. Allen indirectly holds the
preferred membership units in CC VIII, LLC as a result of
the exercise of a put right originally granted in connection
with the Bresnan transaction in 2000. An issue has arisen
regarding the ultimate ownership of the CC VIII, LLC
membership interests following the consummation of the Bresnan
put transaction on June 6, 2003. See Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions Transactions
Arising Out of Our Organizational Structure and
Mr. Allens Investment in Charter and Its
Subsidiaries Equity Put Rights
CC VIII. Effective January 1, 2005, Charter
ceased recognizing minority interest in earnings or losses of
CC VIII, LLC for financial reporting purposes until such
time as the resolution of the issue is determinable or certain
other events occur. Reported losses allocated to minority
interest on the statement of operations are limited to the
extent of any remaining minority interest on the balance sheet
related to Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC. Because
minority interest in Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC
was substantially eliminated at December 31, 2003,
beginning in 2004, Charter absorbs substantially all losses
before income taxes that otherwise would have been allocated to
minority interest. This resulted in an approximate additional
$2.0 billion of loss before cumulative effect of accounting
change for the year ended December 31, 2004. Under our
existing capital structure, Charter will absorb substantially
all future losses. |
|
(d) |
|
Loss per common share, basic and diluted, assumes none of the
membership units of Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC
are exchanged for Charter common stock and none of the
outstanding options to purchase membership units of Charter
Communications Holding Company, LLC that are automatically
exchanged for Charter common stock are exercised. Basic loss per
share equals loss before cumulative effect of accounting change
less dividends on preferred stock-redeemable divided by weighted
average shares outstanding. If the membership units were
exchanged or options exercised, the effects would be
antidilutive. Therefore, basic and diluted loss per common share
is the same. |
|
(e) |
|
Earnings include net loss plus fixed charges. Fixed charges
consist of interest expense and an estimated interest component
of rent expense. |
|
(f) |
|
See Business Products and Services for
definitions of the terms contained in this section. |
13
RISK FACTORS
An investment in the notes or our Class A common stock
entails the following risks. You should carefully consider these
risk factors, as well as the other information contained in this
prospectus, before making a decision to invest in the notes or
our Class A common stock.
Risks Related to Significant Indebtedness of Us and Our
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
We and our subsidiaries have a significant amount of
existing debt and may incur substantial additional debt in the
future, which could adversely affect our financial health and
our ability to react to changes in our business. |
Charter and its subsidiaries have a significant amount of debt
and may (subject to applicable restrictions in their debt
instruments) incur additional debt in the future. As of
March 31, 2005, our total debt was approximately
$18.9 billion, and our shareholders deficit was
approximately $4.8 billion. The deficiency of earnings to
cover fixed charges for the three month period ended
March 31, 2005 was approximately $334 million. In 2006
and beyond, significant amounts will become due under our
remaining long-term debt obligations. For instance, in 2009
$5.0 billion of our debt matures. The maturities of these
obligations are set forth in Description of Certain
Indebtedness.
We believe that as a result of our significant levels of debt
and operating performance, our access to the debt markets could
be limited. If our business does not generate sufficient cash
flow from operating activities, and sufficient funds are not
available to us from borrowings under our credit facilities or
from other sources, we may not be able to repay our debt, fund
our other liquidity and capital needs, grow our business or
respond to competitive challenges. Further, if we are unable to
repay or refinance our debt, as it becomes due, we could be
forced to restructure our obligations or seek protection under
the bankruptcy laws. If we were to raise capital through the
issuance of additional equity or to engage in a recapitalization
or other similar transaction, our shareholders could suffer
significant dilution and our noteholders might not receive
principal and interest payments to which they are contractually
entitled on a timely basis or at all.
Our significant amount of debt could have other important
consequences to you. For example, the debt will or could:
|
|
|
|
|
require us to dedicate a significant portion of our cash flow
from operating activities to payments on our debt, which will
reduce our funds available for working capital, capital
expenditures and other general corporate expenses; |
|
|
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes
in our business, the cable and telecommunications industries and
the economy at large; |
|
|
|
place us at a disadvantage as compared to our competitors that
have proportionately less debt; |
|
|
|
make us vulnerable to interest rate increases, because a
significant amount of our borrowings are, and will continue to
be, at variable rates of interest; |
|
|
|
expose us to increased interest expense as we refinance our
existing lower interest rate instruments; |
|
|
|
adversely affect our relationship with customers and suppliers; |
|
|
|
limit our ability to borrow additional funds in the future, due
to applicable financial and restrictive covenants in our debt;
and |
|
|
|
make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations to the
holders of our notes and for our subsidiaries to satisfy their
obligations to their lenders under their credit facilities and
to their bondholders. |
Due to our significant amount of debt, we did not pay dividends
on our preferred stock at March 31, and June 30, 2005,
because our Board of Directors was unable to conclude with
sufficient certainty that we had surplus under Delaware law with
which to pay such a dividend.
14
A default by one of our subsidiaries under its debt obligations
could result in the acceleration of those obligations, the
obligations of our other subsidiaries and our obligations under
the notes and our other convertible notes. We may not have the
ability to fund our obligations under the notes in the event of
such a default. If current debt levels increase, the related
risks that we and you now face will intensify.
|
|
|
Because of our holding company structure, the notes are
structurally subordinated in right of payment to all liabilities
of our subsidiaries. Restrictions in our subsidiaries debt
instruments limit their ability to provide funds to us. |
Our principal assets are our equity interests in Charter Holdco
(which in turn holds indirect equity interests in our operating
subsidiaries) and certain mirror debt instruments issued to us
by Charter Holdco, the terms of which match our existing
outstanding indebtedness. We have no operating assets.
Accordingly, except for those interest payments to be funded by
the Pledged Securities, we will need to receive distributions
from our subsidiaries or raise additional financing in order to
service our debt. Our subsidiaries are separate and distinct
legal entities and are not obligated to make funds available to
us in the form of loans, distributions or otherwise for payment
of the notes or our existing senior convertible notes or other
obligations.
Our subsidiaries ability to make distributions to us are
restricted by the terms of their credit facilities and
indentures. Our indirect subsidiaries include the borrowers and
guarantors under the Charter Operating credit facilities. Some
of our subsidiaries are also obligors under several series of
senior high-yield notes issued by them. The notes are
structurally subordinated in right of payment to indebtedness
and other liabilities of our subsidiaries, the total principal
amount of which was $20.5 billion as of March 31, 2005
excluding intercompany obligations.
The indentures governing the senior notes and senior discount
notes of Charter Communications Holdings, LLC (Charter
Holdings) permit Charter Holdings to make distributions to
Charter Holdco for payment of interest on the notes and our
existing convertible senior notes, only if, after giving effect
to the distribution, Charter Holdings can incur additional debt
under the leverage ratio of 8.75 to 1.0, there is no default
under its indentures and other specified tests are met. For the
quarter ended March 31, 2005, there was no default under
Charter Holdings indentures and other specified tests were
met. However, Charter Holdings did not meet the leverage ratio
of 8.75 to 1.0 based on March 31, 2005 financial results.
As a result, distributions from Charter Holdings to Charter or
Charter Holdco are currently restricted and will continue to be
restricted until that test is met.
During this restriction period, the indentures governing the
Charter Holdings notes permit Charter Holdings and its
subsidiaries to make specified investments in Charter Holdco or
Charter, up to an amount determined by a formula, as long as
there is no default under the indentures. As of March 31,
2005, Charter Holdco was owed $161 million in intercompany
loans from its subsidiaries, which amount was available to pay
principal and interest on Charters convertible senior
notes. In addition, Charter has $145 million of securities
pledged as security for the first six interest payments on
Charters 5.875% convertible senior notes.
In the event of bankruptcy, liquidation or dissolution of one or
more of our subsidiaries, that subsidiarys assets would
first be applied to satisfy its own obligations, then to any
obligations owed by its parent companies that are our
subsidiaries, and following such payments, such subsidiary may
not have sufficient assets remaining to make payments to us as
an equity holder or otherwise. In that event:
|
|
|
|
|
the lenders under our subsidiaries credit facilities and
the holders of their other debt instruments will have the right
to be paid before us from any of our subsidiaries
assets; and |
|
|
|
although Mr. Allens indirect ownership interest in
CC VIII, LLC is currently the subject of a dispute, Paul G.
Allen, as an indirect holder of preferred membership interests
in our subsidiary, CC VIII, LLC, may have a claim on a
portion of its assets that would reduce the amounts available
for repayment to holders of the notes. See Risk
Factors Risks Related to Our Business
Our dispute with Paul G. Allen concerning the ownership of an
interest in CC VIII, LLC could adversely impact our ability
to repay our debt, the value of our common stock and our ability
to obtain future financing. |
15
In addition, the notes are unsecured and will rank equally with
all other existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness of
Charter and will be effectively subordinated in right of payment
to all existing secured debt and any future secured debt we may
incur to the extent of the value of the assets securing such
debt. Our subsidiaries credit facilities are secured by
pledges of equity interests and intercompany notes. See
Description of Certain Indebtedness for a summary of
our outstanding indebtedness and a description of our credit
facilities and other indebtedness.
|
|
|
The agreements and instruments governing our debt and the
debt of our subsidiaries contain restrictions and limitations
that could significantly affect our ability to operate our
business and adversely affect you, as a shareholder or holder of
the notes. |
The Charter Operating credit facilities and the indentures
governing our and our subsidiaries other debt contain a
number of significant covenants that could adversely affect our
ability to operate our business, and therefore could adversely
affect our results of operations, our ability to repay the notes
and the price of our Class A common stock. These covenants
restrict our and our subsidiaries ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional debt; |
|
|
|
repurchase or redeem equity interests and debt; |
|
|
|
issue equity; |
|
|
|
make certain investments or acquisitions; |
|
|
|
pay dividends or make other distributions; |
|
|
|
receive distributions from our subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
dispose of assets or merge; |
|
|
|
enter into related party transactions; |
|
|
|
grant liens; and |
|
|
|
pledge assets. |
Furthermore, the Charter Operating credit facilities require us
to, among other things, maintain specified financial ratios,
meet specified financial tests and provide audited financial
statements with an unqualified opinion from our independent
auditors. See Description of Certain Indebtedness
for details on our debt covenants. Charter Operatings
ability to comply with these provisions may be affected by
events beyond our control.
The breach of any covenants or obligations in the foregoing
indentures or credit facilities, not otherwise waived or
amended, could result in a default under the applicable debt
agreement or instrument and could trigger acceleration of the
related debt, which in turn could trigger defaults under other
agreements governing our long-term indebtedness. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources. In addition, the secured lenders under
the Charter Operating credit facilities and the holders of the
Charter Operating senior second-lien notes could foreclose on
their collateral, which includes equity interests in our
subsidiaries, and exercise other rights of secured creditors.
Any default under those credit facilities, the indenture
governing the notes or the indentures governing our other
convertible notes or our subsidiaries debt could adversely
affect our growth, our financial condition and our results of
operations and our ability to make payments on the notes, our
other notes and Charter Operatings credit facilities and
other debt of our subsidiaries. See Description of Certain
Indebtedness.
|
|
|
We may not generate sufficient cash flow to fund our
capital expenditures, ongoing operations and debt obligations,
including our payment obligations under the notes. |
Our ability to service our debt (including payments on the
notes) and our subsidiaries debt and to fund our and our
subsidiaries planned capital expenditures and our ongoing
operations will depend on our and our subsidiaries ability
to generate cash flow. Our ability to generate cash flow is
dependent on many factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
our future operating performance; |
16
|
|
|
|
|
the demand for our products and services; |
|
|
|
general economic conditions and conditions affecting customer
and advertiser spending; |
|
|
|
competition and our ability to stabilize customer
losses; and |
|
|
|
legal and regulatory factors affecting our business. |
Some of these factors are beyond our control. If we are unable
to generate sufficient cash flow, we may not be able to service
and repay our debt (including the notes), operate our business,
respond to competitive challenges or fund our other liquidity
and capital needs. Cash flows from operating activities and
amounts available under our credit facilities may not be
sufficient to permit us to fund our operations and satisfy our
principal repayment obligations that come due in 2006 and, we
believe, such amounts will not be sufficient to fund our
operations and satisfy such repayment obligations thereafter.
Additionally, franchise valuations performed in accordance with
the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, are based on the projected cash flows
derived by selling products and services to new customers in
future periods. Declines in future cash flows could result in
lower valuations which in turn may result in impairments to the
franchise assets in our financial statements.
|
|
|
Charter Operating may not be able to access funds under
its credit facilities if it fails to satisfy the covenant
restrictions in its credit facilities, which could adversely
affect our financial condition and our ability to conduct our
business. |
Our subsidiaries have historically relied on access to credit
facilities in order to fund operations and to service parent
company debt, and we expect such reliance to continue in the
future. Unused availability under the Charter Operating credit
facilities was approximately $1.2 billion as of March 31,
2005. However, Charter Operatings access to these funds is
subject to its satisfaction of the covenants and conditions to
borrowing in those facilities.
An event of default under the credit facilities or indentures,
if not waived, could result in the acceleration of those debt
obligations and, consequently, other debt obligations. Such
acceleration could result in the exercise of remedies by our
creditors and could force us to seek the protection of the
bankruptcy laws, which could materially adversely impact our
ability to operate our business and to make payments under our
debt instruments. In addition, an event of default under the
credit facilities, such as the failure to maintain the
applicable required financial ratios, would prevent additional
borrowing under our subsidiary credit facilities, which could
materially adversely affect our ability to operate our business
and to make payments under our debt instruments.
|
|
|
All of our and our subsidiaries outstanding debt is
subject to change of control provisions. We may not have the
ability to raise the funds necessary to fulfill our obligations
under our indebtedness following a change of control, which
would place us in default under the applicable debt
instruments. |
We may not have the ability to raise the funds necessary to
fulfill our obligations under the notes, our other convertible
senior notes and our subsidiaries senior notes, senior
discount notes, senior floating rate notes and credit facilities
following a change of control. Under the indentures governing
the notes and our other convertible senior notes, upon the
occurrence of specified change of control events, including
certain specified dispositions of stock by Mr. Allen, we
are required to offer to repurchase all of our outstanding
convertible senior notes. However, Charter may not have
sufficient funds at the time of the change of control event to
make the required repurchase of its convertible senior notes,
and our subsidiaries are limited in their ability to make
distributions or other payments to us to fund any required
repurchase. In addition, a change of control under our
subsidiaries credit facilities and indentures governing
our subsidiaries notes would require the repayment of
borrowings totaling $18.0 billion at March 31, 2005
under those credit facilities and indentures. Because such
credit facilities and notes are obligations of our subsidiaries,
the credit facilities and our subsidiaries notes would
have to be repaid by our subsidiaries before their assets could
be available to us to repurchase the notes and our other
convertible senior notes.
17
Additionally, our subsidiaries may not have sufficient funds at
the time of the change of control to make the required
repurchases or repayments. Our failure to make or complete a
change of control offer would place us in default under the
notes and our other convertible senior notes. The failure of our
subsidiaries to make a change of control offer or repay the
amounts outstanding under their credit facilities would place
them in default under these agreements and could result in a
default under the indentures governing the notes and our other
convertible senior notes and our subsidiaries credit
facilities and notes.
|
|
|
If we do not fulfill our obligations to you under the
notes, you will not have any recourse against Mr. Allen or
his affiliates. |
None of our direct or indirect equity holders, directors,
officers, employees or affiliates, including, without
limitation, Mr. Allen or his affiliates, Charter
Investment, Inc. or Vulcan Cable III Inc., will be an
obligor or guarantor under the notes. The indenture governing
the notes expressly provides that these parties will not have
any liability for our obligations under the notes or the
indenture governing the notes. If we do not fulfill our
obligations to you under the notes, you will have no recourse
against any of our direct or indirect equity holders, directors,
officers, employees or affiliates including, without limitation,
Mr. Allen, Charter Investment, Inc. or Vulcan
Cable III Inc.
|
|
|
Paul G. Allen and his affiliates are not obligated to
purchase equity from, contribute to or loan funds to us or any
of our subsidiaries in the future. |
Paul G. Allen and his affiliates have purchased equity,
contributed funds and provided other financial support to
Charter and Charter Holdco in the past. However, Mr. Allen
and his affiliates are not obligated to purchase equity from,
contribute to or loan funds to us or any of our subsidiaries in
the future.
Risks Related to Our Business
|
|
|
We operate in a very competitive business environment,
which affects our ability to attract and retain customers and
can adversely affect our business and operations. We have lost a
significant number of customers to direct broadcast satellite
competition, and further loss of customers could have a material
negative impact on our business. |
The industry in which we operate is highly competitive and has
become more so in recent years. In some instances, we compete
against companies with fewer regulatory burdens, easier access
to financing, greater personnel resources, greater brand name
recognition and long-established relationships with regulatory
authorities and customers. Increasing consolidation in the cable
industry and the repeal of certain ownership rules may provide
additional benefits to certain of our competitors, either
through access to financing, resources or efficiencies of scale.
Our principal competitor for video services throughout our
territory is direct broadcast satellite television services,
also known as DBS. Competition from DBS, including intensive
marketing efforts, aggressive pricing and the ability of DBS to
provide certain services that we are in the process of
developing, has had an adverse impact on our ability to retain
customers. DBS has grown rapidly over the last several years and
continues to do so. The cable industry, including Charter, has
lost a significant number of subscribers to DBS competition, and
we face serious challenges in this area in the future. We
believe that competition from DBS service providers may present
greater challenges in areas of lower population density, and
that our systems service a higher concentration of such areas
than those of other major cable service providers.
Local telephone companies and electric utilities can offer video
and other services in competition with us and they increasingly
may do so in the future. Certain telephone companies have begun
more extensive deployment of fiber in their networks that will
enable them to begin providing video services, as well as
telephony and high-bandwidth Internet access services, to
residential and business customers. Some of these telephone
companies have obtained, and are now seeking, franchises or
operating authorizations that are less burdensome than existing
Charter franchises. The subscription television industry also
faces competition from free broadcast television and from other
communications and entertainment media.
18
Further loss of customers to DBS or other alternative video and
data services could have a material negative impact on the value
of our business and its performance.
With respect to our Internet access services, we face
competition, including intensive marketing efforts and
aggressive pricing, from dial-up and digital
subscriber line (DSL). DSL service is competitive
with high-speed data service over cable systems. Telephone
companies (which already have telephone lines into the
household, an existing customer base and other operational
functions in place) and other companies offer DSL service. In
addition, DBS providers have entered into joint marketing
arrangements with Internet access providers to offer bundled
video and Internet service, which competes with our ability to
provide bundled services to our customers.
In order to attract new customers, from time to time we make
promotional offers, including offers of temporarily
reduced-price or free service. These promotional programs result
in significant advertising, programming and operating expenses,
and also require us to make capital expenditures to acquire
additional digital set-top terminals. Customers who subscribe to
our services as a result of these offerings may not remain
customers for any significant period of time following the end
of the promotional period. A failure to retain existing
customers and customers added through promotional offerings or
to collect the amounts they owe us could have an adverse effect
on our business and financial results.
Mergers, joint ventures and alliances among franchised, wireless
or private cable operators, satellite television providers,
local exchange carriers and others may provide additional
benefits to some of our competitors, either through access to
financing, resources or efficiencies of scale, or the ability to
provide multiple services in direct competition with us.
We cannot assure you that our cable systems will allow us to
compete effectively. Additionally, as we expand our offerings to
include other telecommunications services, and to introduce new
and enhanced services, we will be subject to competition from
other providers of the services we offer. We cannot predict the
extent to which competition may affect our business and
operations in the future. See Business
Competition.
|
|
|
Our dispute with Paul G. Allen concerning the ownership of
an interest in CC VIII, LLC could adversely impact the value of
our common stock, our ability to repay our debt and our ability
to obtain future financing. |
As part of our acquisition of the cable systems owned by Bresnan
Communications Company Limited Partnership in February 2000, CC
VIII, LLC, our indirect limited liability company subsidiary,
issued, after adjustments, 24,273,943 Class A preferred
membership units (which we refer to collectively as the CC VIII
interest) with a value and an initial capital account of
approximately $630 million to certain sellers affiliated
with AT&T Broadband, subsequently owned by Comcast
Corporation (which we refer to as the Comcast sellers). Our
controlling shareholder, Paul G. Allen, granted the Comcast
sellers the right to sell to him the CC VIII interest for
approximately $630 million plus 4.5% interest annually from
February 2000 (which we refer to as the Comcast put right). In
April 2002, the Comcast sellers exercised the Comcast put right
in full, and this transaction was consummated on June 6,
2003. Accordingly, Mr. Allen has become the holder of the
CC VIII interest, indirectly through an affiliate.
We are in a dispute with Mr. Allen as to whether he is
entitled to retain the CC VIII interest, or whether he must
exchange that interest for units of our subsidiary, Charter
Holdco. The dispute concerns whether the documentation for the
Bresnan transaction was correct and complete with regard to the
ultimate ownership of the CC VIII interest following
consummation of the Comcast put right. The law firm that
prepared the documents for the Bresnan transaction brought this
matter to the attention of Charter and representatives of
Mr. Allen in 2002. After subsequently conducting an
investigation of the relevant facts and circumstances, a Special
Committee of Charters Board of Directors determined that a
scriveners error had occurred in February 2000
in connection with the preparation of the Bresnan transaction
documents, resulting in the inadvertent deletion of a provision
that would have required an automatic exchange of the
CC VIII interest for 24,273,943 Charter Holdco
membership units if the Comcast sellers exercised the Comcast
put right and sold the CC VIII interest to Mr. Allen
or his
19
affiliates. Mr. Allen disagrees with the Special
Committees determinations and contends that the
transaction is accurately reflected in the transaction
documentation and contemporaneous and subsequent company public
disclosures. If the Special Committee and Mr. Allen are
unable to reach a resolution through an ongoing mediation
process or to agree on an alternative dispute resolution
process, the Special Committee intends to seek resolution of
this dispute through judicial proceedings in an action that
would be commenced, after appropriate notice, in the Delaware
Court of Chancery against Mr. Allen and his affiliates
seeking contract reformation, declaratory relief as to the
respective rights of the parties regarding this dispute and
alternative forms of legal and equitable relief. This dispute
and related matters (including certain issues associated with
the ultimate disposition of the interest in CC VIII) are
more fully described in Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions Transactions Arising Out of Our
Organizational Structure and Mr. Allens Investment in
Charter and Its Subsidiaries Equity Put
Rights CC VIII.
If it is determined that Mr. Allen is entitled to retain
the CC VIII interest, then our indirect interest in
CC VIII would continue to exclude the value of
Mr. Allens interest in CC VIII, consistent with
our current treatment of the CC VIII interest in our
financial statements. As a result, the amounts available for
repayment to holders of the notes or our other creditors,
including creditors of our subsidiaries, would not include the
value represented by Mr. Allens CC VIII
interest, and the value of our Class A common stock
similarly would not reflect any value attributable to
Mr. Allens CC VIII interest (which also could
affect the trading value of the notes). Further, such retained
interest in CC VIII could reduce our borrowing capacity
(due to a portion of the equity interest being held by a party
other than Charter or a Charter subsidiary) or make it more
difficult for us to secure financing for our CC VIII
subsidiary due to concerns as to possible claims that could be
asserted by Mr. Allen as the holder of a minority interest
in CC VIII. In addition, if it is determined that
Mr. Allen is entitled to retain the CC VIII interest,
such retention could complicate efforts to sell our CC VIII
subsidiary or its assets to a third party, and Mr. Allen
could be entitled to receive a portion of the proceeds of such a
sale, thereby reducing the amount of such proceeds that would
otherwise be available to us and our security holders.
|
|
|
We are currently the subject of certain lawsuits and other
legal matters, the unfavorable outcome of which could adversely
affect our business and financial condition. |
A number of putative federal class action lawsuits, which were
filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
of Missouri against us and certain of our former and present
officers and directors alleging violations of securities laws,
and were consolidated for pretrial purposes. In addition, a
number of shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed against us
in the same and other jurisdictions. A shareholders derivative
suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of Missouri against us and our then current directors.
Also, three shareholder derivative suits were filed in Missouri
state court against us, our then current directors and our
former independent auditor. These state court actions were
consolidated. The federal shareholder derivative suit and the
consolidated derivative suit each alleged that the defendants
breached their fiduciary duties.
Charter entered into Stipulations of Settlement setting forth
proposed terms of settlement for the above-described class
actions and derivative suits. On May 23, 2005 the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
conducted the final fairness hearing for the actions, and it
issued its final order approving the settlement on June 30,
2005. Members of the class have 30 days from the issuance
of that order to file an appeal challenging the approval. A
notice of appeal has been filed relating to the settlement, but
Charter does not yet know the specific issues presented by such
appeal. There can be no assurance that there will not be other
appeals, or that any such appeal would not be successful. See
Business Legal Proceedings.
In October 2001, two customers, Nikki Nicholls and Geraldine M.
Barber, filed a class action suit against Charter Holdco in
South Carolina state court purportedly on behalf of a class of
Charter Holdcos customers, alleging, among other things,
that Charter Holdco improperly charged them a wire maintenance
fee without request or permission. They also claimed that
Charter Holdco improperly required them to rent analog and/or
digital set-top terminals even though their television sets were
cable ready. A substantively identical case was
filed in the Superior Court of Athens Clarke County,
Georgia by Emma S. Tobar on March 26, 2002,
20
alleging a nationwide class for these claims. Following
mediation the parties reached a tentative settlement, subject to
final documentation and court approval. On November 10,
2004, the court granted final approval of the settlement,
rejecting the positions advanced by two objectors to the
settlement. On December 13, 2004, the court entered a
written order formally approving that settlement. On
January 11, 2005, certain class members appealed the order
entered by the Georgia court. Those objectors voluntarily
dismissed their appeal with prejudice on February 8, 2005.
On February 9, 2005, the South Carolina Court of Common
Pleas entered a court order of dismissal for the South Carolina
Class Action. Additionally, in November 2004, one of the
objectors to this settlement filed a similar, but not identical,
lawsuit in Massachusetts state court. The action purports to be
brought on behalf of three different classes of customers and
generally alleges that the putative class members were
overcharged for converter boxes and remote controls.
Furthermore, we are also a party to, or otherwise involved in,
other lawsuits, claims, proceedings and legal matters that have
arisen in the ordinary course of conducting our business,
certain of which are described in Business
Legal Proceedings. In addition, our restatement of our
2000, 2001 and 2002 financial statements could lead to
additional or expanded claims or investigations.
We cannot predict with certainty the ultimate outcome of any of
the lawsuits, claims, proceedings and other legal matters to
which we are a party to, or otherwise involved in, due to, among
other things, (i) the inherent uncertainties of litigation
and legal matters generally, (ii) the remaining conditions
to the finalization of the settlements and resolutions described
above, (iii) the possibility of appeals and objections to
the settlements described above, and (iv) the need for us
to comply with, and/or otherwise implement, certain covenants,
conditions, undertakings, procedures and other obligations that
would be, or have been, imposed under the terms of the
settlements and resolutions described above.
The termination of the settlements described above, an
unfavorable outcome in any of the lawsuits pending against us,
or in any other legal matter, including those described above,
or our failure to comply with or properly implement the terms of
the settlements described above, could result in substantial
potential liabilities and otherwise have a material adverse
effect on our business, consolidated financial condition and
results of operations, in our liquidity, our operations, and/or
our ability to comply with any debt covenants. Further, these
legal matters, and our actions in response to them, could result
in substantial potential liabilities, additional defense and
other costs, increase our indemnification obligations, divert
managements attention, and/or adversely affect our ability
to execute our business and financial strategies.
See Business Legal Proceedings for
additional information concerning these and other litigation
matters.
|
|
|
We have a history of net losses and expect to continue to
experience net losses. Consequently, we may not have the ability
to finance future operations. |
We have had a history of net losses and expect to continue to
report net losses for the foreseeable future. Our net losses are
principally attributable to insufficient revenue to cover the
interest costs we incur because of our high level of debt, the
depreciation expenses that we incur resulting from the capital
investments we have made in our cable properties, and the
amortization and impairment of our franchise intangibles. We
expect that these expenses (other than amortization and
impairment of franchises) will remain significant, and we expect
to continue to report net losses for the foreseeable future. We
reported losses before cumulative effect of accounting change of
$2.3 billion for 2002, $238 million for 2003 and
$3.6 billion for 2004 and $293 million and $352 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2005,
respectively. Continued losses would reduce our cash available
from operations to service our indebtedness, as well as limit
our ability to finance our operations.
|
|
|
We may not have the ability to pass our increasing
programming costs on to our customers, which would adversely
affect our cash flow and operating margins. |
Programming has been, and is expected to continue to be, our
largest operating expense item. In recent years, the cable
industry has experienced a rapid escalation in the cost of
programming, particularly
21
sports programming. We expect programming costs to continue to
increase because of a variety of factors, including inflationary
or negotiated annual increases, additional programming being
provided to customers and increased costs to purchase
programming. The inability to fully pass these programming cost
increases on to our customers would have an adverse impact on
our cash flow and operating margins. As measured by programming
costs, and excluding premium services (substantially all of
which were renegotiated and renewed in 2003), as of July 7,
2005, approximately 9% of our current programming contracts were
expired, and approximately another 21% were scheduled to expire
at or before the end of 2005. There can be no assurance that
these agreements will be renewed on favorable or comparable
terms. Our programming costs increased by approximately 6% in
2004 and we expect our programming costs in 2005 to increase at
a higher rate than in 2004. To the extent that we are unable to
reach agreement with certain programmers on terms that we
believe are reasonable we may be forced to remove such
programming channels from our line-up, which could result in a
further loss of customers.
|
|
|
If our required capital expenditures exceed our
projections, we may not have sufficient funding, which could
adversely affect our growth, financial condition and results of
operations. |
During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we spent
approximately $211 million on capital expenditures. During
2005, we expect capital expenditures to be approximately
$1 billion. The actual amount of our capital expenditures
depends on the level of growth in high-speed data customers and
in the delivery of other advanced services, as well as the cost
of introducing any new services. We may need additional capital
if there is accelerated growth in high-speed data customers or
in the delivery of other advanced services. If we cannot obtain
such capital from increases in our cash flow from operating
activities, additional borrowings or other sources, our growth,
financial condition and results of operations could suffer
materially.
|
|
|
Our inability to respond to technological developments and
meet customer demand for new products and services could limit
our ability to compete effectively. |
Our business is characterized by rapid technological change and
the introduction of new products and services. We cannot assure
you that we will be able to fund the capital expenditures
necessary to keep pace with unanticipated technological
developments, or that we will successfully anticipate the demand
of our customers for products and services requiring new
technology. Our inability to maintain and expand our upgraded
systems and provide advanced services in a timely manner, or to
anticipate the demands of the marketplace, could materially
adversely affect our ability to attract and retain customers.
Consequently, our growth, financial condition and results of
operations could suffer materially.
|
|
|
We may not be able to carry out our strategy to improve
operating results by standardizing and streamlining operations
and procedures. |
In prior years, we experienced rapid growth through acquisitions
of a number of cable operators and the rapid rebuild and rollout
of advanced services. Our future success will depend in part on
our ability to standardize and streamline our operations. The
failure to implement a consistent corporate culture and
management, operating or financial systems or procedures
necessary to standardize and streamline our operations and
effectively operate our enterprise could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
|
|
|
Recent management changes could disrupt operations. |
Since August 2004, we have experienced a number of changes in
our senior management, including changes in our Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer,
Executive Vice President of Finance and Strategy and Interim
co-Chief Financial Officer and our Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary. Further, the individuals
currently serving as Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and General Counsel are serving in an interim capacity.
These senior management changes could disrupt our ability to
manage our business as we transition to and integrate a
22
new management team, and any such disruption could adversely
affect our operations, growth, financial condition and results
of operations.
|
|
|
Malicious and abusive Internet practices could impair our
high-speed data services. |
Our high-speed data customers utilize our network to access the
Internet and, as a consequence, we or they may become victim to
common malicious and abusive Internet activities, such as
unsolicited mass advertising (or spam) and dissemination of
viruses, worms and other destructive or disruptive software.
These activities could have adverse consequences on our network
and our customers, including degradation of service, excessive
call volume to call centers and damage to our or our
customers equipment and data. Significant incidents could
lead to customer dissatisfaction and, ultimately, loss of
customers or revenue, in addition to increased costs to us to
service our customers and protect our network. Any significant
loss of high-speed data customers or revenue or significant
increase in costs of serving those customers could adversely
affect our growth, financial condition and results of operations.
|
|
|
We could be deemed an investment company under
the Investment Company Act of 1940. This would impose
significant restrictions on us and would be likely to have a
material adverse impact on our growth, financial condition and
results of operation. |
Our principal assets are our equity interests in Charter Holdco
and certain indebtedness of Charter Holdco. If our membership
interest in Charter Holdco were to constitute less than 50% of
the voting securities issued by Charter Holdco, then our
interest in Charter Holdco could be deemed an investment
security for purposes of the Investment Company Act. This
may occur, for example, if a court determines that the
Class B common stock is no longer entitled to special
voting rights and, in accordance with the terms of the Charter
Holdco limited liability company agreement, our membership units
in Charter Holdco were to lose their special voting privileges.
A determination that such interest was an investment security
could cause us to be deemed to be an investment company under
the Investment Company Act, unless an exemption from
registration were available or we were to obtain an order of the
Securities and Exchange Commission excluding or exempting us
from registration under the Investment Company Act.
If anything were to happen which would cause us to be deemed an
investment company, the Investment Company Act would impose
significant restrictions on us, including severe limitations on
our ability to borrow money, to issue additional capital stock
and to transact business with affiliates. In addition, because
our operations are very different from those of the typical
registered investment company, regulation under the Investment
Company Act could affect us in other ways that are extremely
difficult to predict. In sum, if we were deemed to be an
investment company it could become impractical for us to
continue our business as currently conducted and our growth, our
financial condition and our results of operations could suffer
materially.
|
|
|
If a court determines that the Class B common stock
is no longer entitled to special voting rights, we would lose
our rights to manage Charter Holdco. In addition to the
investment company risks discussed above, this could materially
impact the value of the Class A common stock and the
notes. |
If a court determines that the Class B common stock is no
longer entitled to special voting rights, Charter would no
longer have a controlling voting interest in, and would lose its
right to manage, Charter Holdco. If this were to occur:
|
|
|
|
|
we would retain our proportional equity interest in Charter
Holdco but would lose all of our powers to direct the management
and affairs of Charter Holdco and its subsidiaries; and |
|
|
|
we would become strictly a passive investment vehicle and would
be treated under the Investment Company Act as an investment
company. |
This result, as well as the impact of being treated under the
Investment Company Act as an investment company, could
materially adversely impact:
|
|
|
|
|
the liquidity of the Class A common stock and the notes; |
|
|
|
how the Class A common stock and the notes trade in the
marketplace; |
23
|
|
|
|
|
the price that purchasers would be willing to pay for the
Class A common stock in a change of control transaction or
otherwise; and |
|
|
|
the market price of the Class A common stock and the notes. |
Uncertainties that may arise with respect to the nature of our
management role and voting power and organizational documents as
a result of any challenge to the special voting rights of the
Class B common stock, including legal actions or
proceedings relating thereto, may also materially adversely
impact the value of the Class A common stock and the notes.
Risks Related to Mr. Allens Controlling
Position
|
|
|
The failure by Mr. Allen to maintain a minimum voting
and economic interest in us could trigger a change of control
default under our subsidiarys credit facilities. |
The Charter Operating credit facilities provide that the failure
by Mr. Allen to maintain a 35% direct or indirect voting
interest in the applicable borrower would result in a change of
control default. Such a default could result in the acceleration
of repayment of the notes and our and our subsidiaries
other indebtedness, including borrowings under the Charter
Operating credit facilities. See Risks Related
to Significant Indebtedness of Us and Our
Subsidiaries All of our and our subsidiaries
outstanding debt is subject to change of control provisions. We
may not have the ability to raise the funds necessary to fulfill
our obligations under our indebtedness following a change of
control, which would place us in default under the applicable
debt instruments.
|
|
|
Mr. Allen controls our stockholder voting and may
have interests that conflict with your interests. |
Mr. Allen has the ability to control us. Through his
control of approximately 93% of the voting power of our capital
stock, Mr. Allen, as sole Class B shareholder, is
entitled to elect all but one of our board members and
effectively has the voting power to elect the remaining board
member as well since he controls more than the majority of the
vote of the Class A and Class B shareholders voting
together as a class. By virtue of Mr. Allens control
of the voting power of Charter, we are a controlled
company under Nasdaq rule 4350(c)(5) and are not
subject to requirements that a majority of our directors be
independent (as defined in Nasdaqs rules) or
that there be a nominating committee of Charters board.
Charter does not have a nominating committee. Mr. Allen
thus has the ability to control fundamental corporate
transactions requiring equity holder approval, including, but
not limited to, the election of all of our directors, approval
of merger transactions involving us and the sale of all or
substantially all of our assets.
Mr. Allen is not restricted from investing in, and has
invested and engaged in, other businesses involving or related
to the operation of cable television systems, video programming,
high-speed data service, telephony or business and financial
transactions conducted through broadband interactivity and
Internet services. Mr. Allen may also engage in other
businesses that compete or may in the future compete with us.
Mr. Allens control over our management and affairs
could create conflicts of interest if he is faced with decisions
that could have different implications for him, us and the
holders of the notes and our Class A common stock. Further,
Mr. Allen could effectively cause us to enter into
contracts with another entity in which he owns an interest or to
decline a transaction into which he (or another entity in which
he owns an interest) ultimately enters.
Current and future agreements between us and either
Mr. Allen or his affiliates may not be the result of
arms-length negotiations. Consequently, such agreements
may be less favorable to us than agreements that we could
otherwise have entered into with unaffiliated third parties. See
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
24
|
|
|
We are not permitted to engage in any business activity
other than the cable transmission of video, audio and data
unless Mr. Allen authorizes us to pursue that particular
business activity, which could adversely affect our ability to
offer new products and services outside of the cable
transmission business and to enter into new businesses, and
could adversely affect our growth, financial condition and
results of operations. |
Our certificate of incorporation and Charter Holdcos
limited liability company agreement provide that Charter and
Charter Holdco and its subsidiaries, cannot engage in any
business activity outside the cable transmission business except
for specified businesses. This will be the case unless we first
offer the opportunity to pursue the particular business activity
to Mr. Allen, he decides not to pursue it and he consents
to our engaging in the business activity. The cable transmission
business means the business of transmitting video, audio
(including telephone services), and data over cable television
systems owned, operated or managed by us from time to time.
These provisions may limit our ability to take advantage of
attractive business opportunities.
|
|
|
The loss of Mr. Allens services could adversely
affect our ability to manage our business. |
Mr. Allen is Chairman of our board of directors and
provides strategic guidance and other services to us. If we were
to lose his services, our growth, financial condition and
results of operations could be adversely impacted.
|
|
|
The special tax allocation provisions of the Charter
Holdco limited liability company agreement may cause us in some
circumstances to pay more taxes than if the special tax
allocation provisions were not in effect. |
Charter Holdcos limited liability company agreement
provided that through the end of 2003, net tax losses of Charter
Holdco that would otherwise have been allocated to us based
generally on our percentage ownership of outstanding common
membership units of Charter Holdco would instead be allocated to
the membership units held by Vulcan Cable III Inc. and
Charter Investment, Inc. The purpose of these special tax
allocation provisions was to allow Mr. Allen to take
advantage for tax purposes of the losses generated by Charter
Holdco. However, beginning in 2002, due to tax capital account
limitations, certain net tax losses of Charter Holdco were
allocated to us and have continued to be so allocated since that
time. The limited liability company agreement further provides
that beginning at the time that Charter Holdco generates net tax
profits (as determined under the applicable federal income tax
rules for determining book profits), the net tax profits that
would otherwise have been allocated to us based generally on our
percentage of outstanding common membership units of Charter
Holdco will instead generally be allocated to membership units
held by Vulcan Cable III Inc. and Charter Investment, Inc.
In some situations, the special tax allocation provisions could
result in our having to pay taxes in an amount that is more or
less than if Charter Holdco had allocated net tax losses and net
tax profits to its members based generally on the percentage of
outstanding common membership units owned by such members from
the time of the completion of the offering. See
Description of Capital Stock and Membership
Units Special Tax Allocation Provisions. For
further discussion on the details of the tax allocation
provisions see Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates Income Taxes.
|
|
|
The issuance of our Class A common stock pursuant to
the share lending agreement, as well as possible future
conversions of the notes, significantly increase the risk that
we will experience an ownership change in the future for tax
purposes, resulting in a material limitation on the use of a
substantial amount of our existing net operating loss
carryforwards. |
As of March 31, 2005, Charter had approximately
$5.4 billion of tax net operating losses (resulting in a
gross deferred tax asset of approximately $2.1 billion),
expiring in the years 2010 through 2025. Due to uncertainties in
projected future taxable income, valuation allowances have been
established against the gross deferred tax assets for book
accounting purposes except for deferred benefits available to
offset certain deferred tax liabilities. Currently, such tax net
operating losses can accumulate and be used to
25
offset any future taxable income of Charter. An ownership
change as defined in Section 382 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, would place significant
limitations, on an annual basis, on the use of such net
operating losses to offset any future taxable income we may
generate. Such limitations, in conjunction with the net
operating loss expiration provisions, could effectively
eliminate our ability to use a substantial portion of our net
operating losses to offset future taxable income. In connection
with the original issuance of the notes offered hereby, we
agreed to issue additional shares of our Class A common
stock pursuant to a share lending agreement. See
Registered Borrow Facility. While the tax treatment
of the issuance of shares issued pursuant to a borrowing
transaction under the share lending agreement is uncertain, we
do not believe that such issuance would result in our
experiencing an ownership change. However, future transactions
and the timing of such transactions could cause an ownership
change. Such transactions include additional issuances of common
stock by us (including but not limited to issuances upon future
conversion of our 5.875% convertible senior notes or as
contemplated in the proposed settlement of derivative class
action litigation), reacquisitions of the borrowed shares by us,
or acquisitions or sales of shares by certain holders of our
shares, including persons who have held, currently hold, or
accumulate in the future five percent or more of our outstanding
stock (including upon an exchange by Paul Allen or his
affiliates, directly or indirectly, of membership units of
Charter Holdco into our Class A common stock). Many of the
foregoing transactions are beyond our control.
Risks Related to Regulatory and Legislative Matters
|
|
|
Our business is subject to extensive governmental
legislation and regulation, which could adversely affect our
business. |
Regulation of the cable industry has increased cable
operators administrative and operational expenses and
limited their revenues. Cable operators are subject to, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
rules governing the provision of cable equipment and
compatibility with new digital technologies; |
|
|
|
rules and regulations relating to subscriber privacy; |
|
|
|
limited rate regulation; |
|
|
|
requirements governing when a cable system must carry a
particular broadcast station and when it must first obtain
consent to carry a broadcast station; |
|
|
|
rules for franchise renewals and transfers; and |
|
|
|
other requirements covering a variety of operational areas such
as equal employment opportunity, technical standards and
customer service requirements. |
Additionally, many aspects of these regulations are currently
the subject of judicial proceedings and administrative or
legislative proposals. There are also ongoing efforts to amend
or expand the federal, state and local regulation of some of our
cable systems, which may compound the regulatory risks we
already face. Certain states and localities are considering new
telecommunications taxes that could increase operating expenses.
|
|
|
Our cable systems are operated under franchises that are
subject to non-renewal or termination. The failure to renew a
franchise in one or more key markets could adversely affect our
business. |
Our cable systems generally operate pursuant to franchises,
permits and similar authorizations issued by a state or local
governmental authority controlling the public rights-of-way.
Many franchises establish comprehensive facilities and service
requirements, as well as specific customer service standards and
monetary penalties for non-compliance. In many cases, franchises
are terminable if the franchisee fails to comply with
significant provisions set forth in the franchise agreement
governing system operations. Franchises are generally granted
for fixed terms and must be periodically renewed. Local
franchising authorities may resist granting a renewal if either
past performance or the prospective operating proposal is
considered inadequate. Franchise authorities often demand
concessions or other commitments as a condition to renewal. In
some instances, franchises have not been renewed at expiration,
and we have operated and are operating under either temporary
operating agreements or without a license while
26
negotiating renewal terms with the local franchising
authorities. Approximately 10% of our franchises, covering
approximately 9% of our video customers, were expired as of
March 31, 2005. Approximately 6% of additional franchises,
covering approximately an additional 8% of our video customers,
will expire on or before December 31, 2005, if not renewed
prior to expiration.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with all
significant provisions of our franchise agreements and certain
of our franchisors have from time to time alleged that we have
not complied with these agreements. Additionally, although
historically we have renewed our franchises without incurring
significant costs, we cannot assure you that we will be able to
renew, or to renew as favorably, our franchises in the future. A
termination of and/or a sustained failure to renew a franchise
in one or more key markets could adversely affect our business
in the affected geographic area.
|
|
|
Our cable systems are operated under franchises that are
non-exclusive. Accordingly, local franchising authorities can
grant additional franchises and create competition in market
areas where none existed previously, resulting in overbuilds,
which could adversely affect results of operations. |
Our cable systems are operated under non-exclusive franchises
granted by local franchising authorities. Consequently, local
franchising authorities can grant additional franchises to
competitors in the same geographic area or operate their own
cable systems. In addition, certain telephone companies are
seeking authority to operate in local communities without first
obtaining a local franchise. As a result, competing operators
may build systems in areas in which we hold franchises. In some
cases municipal utilities may legally compete with us without
obtaining a franchise from the local franchising authority. The
existence of more than one cable system operating in the same
territory is referred to as an overbuild. These overbuilds could
adversely affect our growth, financial condition and results of
operations by creating or increasing competition. As of
March 31, 2005, we are aware of overbuild situations
impacting approximately 5% of our estimated homes passed, and
potential overbuild situations in areas servicing approximately
1% of our estimated homes passed. Additional overbuild
situations may occur in other systems.
|
|
|
Local franchise authorities have the ability to impose
additional regulatory constraints on our business, which could
further increase our expenses. |
In addition to the franchise agreement, cable authorities in
some jurisdictions have adopted cable regulatory ordinances that
further regulate the operation of cable systems. This additional
regulation increases the cost of operating our business. We
cannot assure you that the local franchising authorities will
not impose new and more restrictive requirements. Local
franchising authorities also have the power to reduce rates and
order refunds on the rates charged for basic services.
|
|
|
Further regulation of the cable industry could cause us to
delay or cancel service or programming enhancements or impair
our ability to raise rates to cover our increasing costs,
resulting in increased losses. |
Currently, rate regulation is strictly limited to the basic
service tier and associated equipment and installation
activities. However, the Federal Communications Commission (or
FCC) and the U.S. Congress continue to be concerned that
cable rate increases are exceeding inflation. It is possible
that either the FCC or the U.S. Congress will again
restrict the ability of cable system operators to implement rate
increases. Should this occur, it would impede our ability to
raise our rates. If we are unable to raise our rates in response
to increasing costs, our losses would increase.
There has been considerable legislative interest recently in
requiring cable operators to offer historically bundled
programming services on an á la carte basis. Although the
FCC recently made a recommendation to Congress against the
imposition of an á la carte mandate, it is still possible
that new marketing restrictions could be adopted in the future.
Such restrictions could adversely affect our operations.
27
|
|
|
Actions by pole owners might subject us to significantly
increased pole attachment costs. |
Pole attachments are cable wires that are attached to poles.
Cable system attachments to public utility poles historically
have been regulated at the federal or state level, generally
resulting in favorable pole attachment rates for attachments
used to provide cable service. The FCC clarified that a cable
operators favorable pole rates are not endangered by the
provision of Internet access, and that approach ultimately was
upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States. Despite the
existing regulatory regime, utility pole owners in many areas
are attempting to raise pole attachment fees and impose
additional costs on cable operators and others. In addition, the
favorable pole attachment rates afforded cable operators under
federal law can be increased by utility companies if the
operator provides telecommunications services, as well as cable
service, over cable wires attached to utility poles. Any
significant increased costs could have a material adverse impact
on our profitability and discourage system upgrades and the
introduction of new products and services.
|
|
|
We may be required to provide access to our networks to
other Internet service providers, which could significantly
increase our competition and adversely affect our ability to
provide new products and services. |
A number of companies, including independent Internet service
providers, or ISPs, have requested local authorities and the FCC
to require cable operators to provide non-discriminatory access
to cables broadband infrastructure, so that these
companies may deliver Internet services directly to customers
over cable facilities. In a June 2005 ruling, commonly referred
to as Brand X, the Supreme Court upheld an FCC
decision (and overruled a conflicting Ninth Circuit opinion)
making it much less likely that any non-discriminatory
open access requirements (which are generally
associated with common carrier regulation of
telecommunications services) will be imposed on the
cable industry by local, state or federal authorities. The
Supreme Court held that the FCC was correct in classifying cable
provided Internet service as an information service,
rather than a telecommunications service. This
favorable regulatory classification limits the ability of
various governmental authorities to impose open access
requirements on cable-provided Internet service. Given the
recency of the Brand X decision, however, the nature
of any legislative or regulatory response remains uncertain. The
imposition of open access requirements could materially affect
our business.
If we were required to allocate a portion of our bandwidth
capacity to other Internet service providers, we believe that it
would impair our ability to use our bandwidth in ways that would
generate maximum revenues.
|
|
|
Changes in channel carriage regulations could impose
significant additional costs on us. |
Cable operators also face significant regulation of their
channel carriage. They currently can be required to devote
substantial capacity to the carriage of programming that they
would not carry voluntarily, including certain local broadcast
signals, local public, educational and government access
programming, and unaffiliated commercial leased access
programming. This carriage burden could increase in the future,
particularly if cable systems were required to carry both the
analog and digital versions of local broadcast signals (dual
carriage) or to carry multiple program streams included with a
single digital broadcast transmission (multicast carriage).
Additional government-mandated broadcast carriage obligations
could disrupt existing programming commitments, interfere with
our preferred use of limited channel capacity and limit our
ability to offer services that would maximize customer appeal
and revenue potential. Although the FCC issued a decision in
February 2005, confirming an earlier ruling against mandating
either dual carriage or multicast carriage, that decision has
been appealed. In addition, the FCC could reverse its own ruling
or Congress could legislate additional carriage obligations.
28
|
|
|
Offering voice communications service may subject us to
additional regulatory burdens, causing us to incur additional
costs. |
In 2002, we began to offer voice communications services on a
limited basis over our broadband network. We continue to explore
development and deployment of VOIP services. The regulatory
requirements applicable to VOIP service are unclear although the
FCC has declared that certain VOIP services are not subject to
traditional state public utility regulation. The full extent of
the FCC preemption of VOIP services is not yet clear. Expanding
our offering of these services may require us to obtain certain
authorizations, including federal, state and local licenses. We
may not be able to obtain such authorizations in a timely
manner, or conditions could be imposed upon such licenses or
authorizations that may not be favorable to us. Furthermore,
telecommunications companies generally are subject to
significant regulation, including payments to the Federal
Universal Service Fund and the intercarrier compensation regime,
and it may be difficult or costly for us to comply with such
regulations, were it to be determined that they applied to VOIP
offerings such as ours. In addition, pole attachment rates are
higher for providers of telecommunications services than for
providers of cable service. If there were to be a final legal
determination by the FCC, a state Public Utility Commission, or
appropriate court that VOIP services are subject to these higher
rates, our pole attachment costs could increase significantly,
which could adversely affect our financial condition and results
of operations.
Additional Risks Related to this Offering, the Notes and the
Class A Common Stock.
|
|
|
We may be unable to purchase the notes for cash following
a fundamental change. |
Holders of the notes have the right to require us to repurchase
the notes in cash upon the occurrence of a fundamental change
prior to maturity. Any of our future debt agreements may contain
a similar provision. We may not have sufficient funds to make
the required purchase in cash at such time or the ability to
arrange necessary financing on acceptable terms. In addition,
our ability to purchase the notes may be limited by law or the
terms of other agreements relating to our debt outstanding at
the time. However, if we fail to purchase the notes as required
by the indenture, that would constitute an event of default
under the indenture governing the notes which, in turn, may
constitute an event of default, and result in the acceleration
of the maturity of our then existing indebtedness.
|
|
|
There is currently no public market for the notes, and an
active trading market may not develop for the notes. The failure
of a market to develop for the notes could adversely affect the
liquidity and value of the notes. |
The notes are a new issue of securities, and there is no
existing market for the notes. Although the notes are eligible
for trading in the PORTAL Market, we do not intend to apply for
listing of the notes on any securities exchange or for quotation
of the notes on any automated dealer quotation system. A market
may not develop for the notes, and if a market does develop, it
may not be sufficiently liquid for your purposes. If an active,
liquid market does not develop for the notes, the market price
and liquidity of the notes may be adversely affected. If any of
the notes are traded after their initial issuance, they may
trade at a discount from their initial offering price.
The liquidity of the trading market, if any, and future trading
prices of the notes will depend on many factors, including,
among other things, the market price of our Class A common
stock, our ability to register the sale of common stock loaned
to an affiliate of Citigroup as described in Registered
Borrow Facility Registration Rights on Shares
Covered by Share Lending Agreement, prevailing interest
rates, our operating results, financial performance and
prospects, the market for similar securities and the overall
securities market, and may be adversely affected by unfavorable
changes in these factors. Historically, the market for
convertible debt has been subject to disruptions that have
caused volatility in prices. The market for the notes may be
subject to disruptions that could have a negative effect on the
holders of the notes, regardless of our operating results,
financial performance or prospects.
29
|
|
|
Although the Pledged Securities will secure both principal
and interest on the notes, the ability of holders of notes to
enforce their security interest in the Pledged Securities will
be delayed if we become the subject of a case under the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code. |
Although the Pledged Securities are primarily intended to secure
the first six installments of interest on the notes, if the
principal amount of the notes becomes due and payable prior to
November 16, 2007, any Pledged Securities then held by the
trustee would also secure the accreted principal amount of the
notes then due. If we become the subject of a case under the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code, however, the ability of holders of
notes to enforce their security interest in the Pledged
Securities and receive payment in respect of the Pledged
Securities, or any other payment of principal on the notes,
would be delayed by the imposition of the automatic stay under
Section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code. Any such delay could be
for a substantial period of time.
|
|
|
The notes do not restrict our ability to incur additional
debt, repurchase our securities or to take other actions that
could negatively impact holders of the notes. |
We are not restricted under the terms of the notes from
incurring additional debt, including secured debt, or from
repurchasing our securities. In addition, the limited covenants
applicable to the notes do not require us to achieve or maintain
any minimum financial results relating to our financial position
or results of operations. Our ability to recapitalize, incur
additional debt and take other actions that are not limited by
the terms of the notes could have the effect of diminishing our
ability to make payments on the notes when due. Certain of our
other debt instruments may, however, restrict these and other
actions.
|
|
|
The trading prices for the notes will be directly affected
by the trading prices for our Class A common stock, which
may be volatile, which could cause the value of your investment
to decline. |
We expect that the trading price of the notes in the secondary
market will be significantly affected by the trading price of
our Class A common stock, the general level of interest
rates and our credit quality. This may result in greater
volatility in the trading prices of the notes than would be
expected for nonconvertible debt securities.
It is impossible to predict whether the price of our
Class A common stock or interest rates will rise or fall.
Trading prices of our Class A common stock will be
influenced by our operating results and prospects and by
economic, financial, regulatory and other factors. In addition,
general market conditions, including the level of, and
fluctuations in, the trading prices of stocks generally, and
sales of substantial amounts of our Class A common stock by
us in the market after the offering of the notes, or the
perception that such sales may occur, could affect the price of
our Class A common stock.
The price of our Class A common stock also could be
affected by any sales of our Class A common stock by
investors who view the notes as a more attractive means of
equity participation in our company and by hedging or arbitrage
trading activity that we expect to develop involving our
Class A common stock as a result of the issuance of the
notes. The hedging or arbitrage trading activity that has
developed and could further develop with respect to our
Class A common stock as a result of the issuance of the
notes could cause a decline or retard any increase in the
trading price of our Class A common stock or the notes
since investors in the notes may sell short our Class A
common stock in order to establish initial hedge positions, and
may increase those positions, particularly as the trading price
of our Class A common stock increases, in order to hedge
their notes. See Registered Borrow Facility.
|
|
|
If any registration statement covering shares to be lent
pursuant to the share lending agreement is not declared
effective, the trading price of the notes and the Class A
common stock may be adversely affected. |
We have filed and have agreed to use our reasonable best efforts
to cause to become effective a registration statement by a
specified date covering the shares of our Class A common
stock to be lent to an affiliate of Citigroup pursuant to the
share lending agreement. This registration statement became
effective on July 18, 2005. However, if less than 150 million
shares of our Class A common stock are sold
30
pursuant to such registration statement, Citigroup or its
affiliate has the right to request that we file up to four
additional registration statements with respect to the shares
that may be lent pursuant to the share lending agreement. See
Registered Borrow Facility. We cannot assure you as
to if or when any such registration statement will be declared
effective. The SEC has broad discretion in reviewing any
registration statement and may delay or deny the effectiveness
of a registration statement for a variety of reasons. If any
such registration statement is delayed or is not declared
effective, the trading price of the notes and the Class A
common stock may be adversely affected.
|
|
|
We will be entitled to defer payment of a portion of the
interest on the notes if we elect to accrete the principal
amount of the notes. |
As noted above, we have incurred and are incurring liquidated
damages in connection with the registration statement relating
to the Registered Borrow Facility. The first three payments of
such liquidated damages have been made in cash. However, in lieu
of paying any such liquidated damages in cash, we may elect in
the future to accrete the principal amount of the notes. If we
make this election, we will have the right to defer the interest
payable on the portion of the accreted principal amount of the
notes that exceeds the original principal amount of the notes.
This deferred interest will not bear additional interest and
will be payable on May 16, 2008 or upon any earlier
redemption, repurchase or acceleration of the notes unless paid
earlier. We may also pay any deferred interest on any interest
payment date prior to May 16, 2008, upon prior notice to
holders.
|
|
|
Your right to convert your notes will be limited if, upon
conversion of your notes, you would have beneficial ownership of
more than a specified percentage of our Class A common
stock. |
Holders of notes will not be entitled to receive shares of our
Class A common stock upon conversion to the extent (but
only to the extent) that such receipt would cause such
converting holder to become, directly or indirectly, a
beneficial owner (within the meaning of
Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder) of more than the specified
percentage of the shares of Class A common stock
outstanding at such time. With respect to any conversion prior
to November 16, 2008, the specified percentage will be
4.9%, and with respect to any conversion thereafter, the
specified percentage will be 9.9%. If any delivery of shares of
our Class A common stock owed to a holder upon conversion
of notes is not made, in whole or in part, as a result of this
limitation, our obligation to make such delivery shall not be
extinguished and we shall deliver such shares as promptly as
practicable after, but in no event later than two trading days
after, any such converting holder gives notice to us that such
delivery would not result in it being the beneficial owner of
more than the specified percentage of the shares of Class A
common stock outstanding at such time. Although we have the
right to deliver cash in lieu of delivering shares of our
Class A common stock upon conversion of the notes, we have
no obligation to do so, even if by doing so we would enable you
to avoid these limitations on your right to convert the notes.
|
|
|
If you hold notes, you will not be entitled to any rights
with respect to our Class A common stock, but you will be
subject to all changes made with respect to our Class A
common stock. |
If you hold notes, you will not be entitled to any rights with
respect to our Class A common stock (including, without
limitation, voting rights and rights to receive any dividends or
other distributions on our Class A common stock), but you
will be subject to all changes affecting the Class A common
stock. You will only be entitled to rights on the Class A
common stock if and when we deliver shares of our Class A
common stock to you upon conversion of your notes. For example,
in the event that an amendment is proposed to our charter or
bylaws requiring shareholder approval and the record date for
determining the shareholders of record entitled to vote on the
amendment occurs prior to your conversion of notes, you will not
be entitled to vote on the amendment, although you will
nevertheless be subject to any changes in the powers,
preferences or special rights of our Class A common stock
or other classes of capital stock.
31
|
|
|
The conversion rate of the notes may not be adjusted for
all dilutive events. |
The conversion rate of the notes is subject to adjustment for
certain events including, but not limited to, dividends on our
Class A common stock, the issuance of certain rights or
warrants, subdivisions or combinations of our Class A
common stock, certain distributions of assets, debt securities,
capital stock or cash to holders of our Class A common
stock and certain tender or exchange offers as described under
Description of Notes Conversion
Rights Conversion Rate Adjustments. The
conversion rate will not be adjusted for other events, such as
an issuance of Class A common stock for cash, that may
adversely affect the trading price of the notes or the
Class A common stock. There can be no assurance that an
event that adversely affects the value of the notes, but does
not result in an adjustment to the conversion rate, will not
occur.
|
|
|
The make whole premium payable on notes converted in
connection with certain fundamental changes may not adequately
compensate you for the lost option time value of your notes as a
result of such fundamental change. |
If certain transactions that constitute a change of control
occur prior to the maturity date of the notes, under certain
circumstances, we will increase the conversion rate by a number
of additional shares for any conversions of notes in connection
with such transaction. The amount of the additional shares will
be determined based on the date on which the transaction becomes
effective and the price paid per share of our Class A
common stock in such transaction as described below under
Description of Notes Conversion
Rights Make Whole Amount and Public Acquirer Change
of Control. While the number of additional shares is
designed to compensate you for the lost option time value of
your notes as a result of such transaction, the amount of the
make whole premium is only an approximation of such lost option
time value and may not adequately compensate you for such loss.
In addition, if the price paid per share of our Class A
common stock in the transaction is less than $2.16 or greater
than $5.00, the conversion rate will not be increased. In no
event will the number of shares issuable upon conversion of a
note exceed 462 per $1,000 original principal amount of notes,
subject to anti-dilution adjustments, regardless of when the
transaction becomes effective or of the price paid per share of
our Class A common stock in the transaction.
|
|
|
You may have to pay taxes with respect to some
distributions on our Class A common stock that result in
adjustments to the conversion rate. |
The conversion rate of the notes is subject to adjustment for
certain events arising from stock splits and combinations, stock
dividends, certain cash dividends and certain other actions by
us that modify our capital structure. See Description of
Notes Conversion Rights Conversion Rate
Adjustments. If the conversion rate is adjusted as a
result of a distribution that is taxable to our Class A
common stock holders, such as a cash dividend, you may be
required to include an amount in income for federal income tax
purposes, notwithstanding the fact that you do not actually
receive such distribution. The amount that you would have to
include in income would generally be equal to the amount of the
distribution that you would have received if you had converted
your notes into our Class A common stock. In addition,
Non-U.S. Holders (as defined herein) of the notes may, in
certain circumstances, be deemed to have received a distribution
subject to U.S. federal withholding tax requirements. See
United States Federal Income Tax Considerations.
|
|
|
Conversion of the notes will dilute the ownership
interests of existing stockholders. |
If and to the extent we deliver shares of our Class A
common stock upon conversion of the notes, the conversion of
some or all of the notes will dilute the ownership interest of
existing stockholders. Any sales in the public market of the
Class A common stock issuable upon such conversion could
adversely affect prevailing market prices of our Class A
common stock.
32
|
|
|
The failure to maintain a minimum share price of
$1.00 per share of Class A common stock could result
in delisting of our shares on the Nasdaq National Market, which
would harm the market price of our Class A common
stock. |
In order to retain our listing on the Nasdaq National Market we
are required to maintain a minimum bid price of $1.00 per
share. Although, as of July 18, 2005, the trading price of
our Class A common stock was $1.33 per share, our
stock has traded below this $1.00 minimum in the recent
past. If the bid price falls below the $1.00 minimum for
more than 30 consecutive trading days, we will have
180 days to satisfy the $1.00 minimum bid price for a
period of at least 10 trading days. If we are unable to
take action to increase the bid price per share (either by
reverse stock split or otherwise), we could be subject to
delisting from the Nasdaq National Market.
The failure to maintain our listing on the Nasdaq National
Market would harm the liquidity of our Class A common stock
and would have an adverse effect on the market price of our
common stock. If the stock were to trade it would likely trade
on the OTC pink sheets, which provide
significantly less liquidity than does Nasdaq. As a result, the
liquidity of our common stock would be impaired, not only in the
number of shares which could be bought and sold, but also
through delays in the timing of transactions, reduction in
security analysts and news medias coverage and lower
prices for our common stock than might otherwise be attained. In
addition, our common stock would become subject to the
low-priced security or so-called penny stock rules
that impose additional sales practice requirements on
broker-dealers who sell such securities.
|
|
|
The effect of the issuance of our shares of Class A
common stock pursuant to the share lending agreement and upon
conversion of the notes, including sales of our Class A
common stock in short sale transactions by holders of the notes,
may have a negative effect on the market price of our
Class A common stock. |
We have agreed pursuant to a share lending agreement to lend to
Citigroup Global Markets Limited, one of the initial purchasers
of the notes, up to 150 million shares of our Class A
common stock. We refer to Citigroup Global Markets Limited as
Citigroup. We could loan all or substantially all of the
150 million shares of our Class A common stock to such
affiliate, to be sold in a registered offering by Citigroup on
behalf of such affiliate. Such loaned shares must be returned by
November 16, 2009. See Registered Borrow
Facility. Any shares not initially borrowed may be
borrowed by the affiliate of Citigroup from time to time prior
to November 16, 2006 and sold to others under the
registration statement. We have been advised by Citigroup Global
Markets Limited that it or an affiliate intends to facilitate
the establishment by the note holders of hedged positions in the
notes. While issuance of shares upon the conversion of the
convertible notes may result in a reduction of an equal number
in the outstanding borrowed shares under the share lending
agreement, the increase in the number of shares of our
Class A common stock issued or issuable pursuant to the
share lending agreement or upon conversion of the notes could
have a negative effect on the market price of our Class A
common stock. Since there will be more shares sold or available
for sale, the market price of our Class A common stock may
decline or not increase as much as it might have without the
availability of such shares. The market price of our
Class A common stock also could decline as a result of
other short sales of our Class A common stock by the
holders of the notes to hedge their investment in the notes. We
understand that many investors in the notes have already hedged
their investment by selling additional shares of our
Class A common stock short in order to establish initial
hedge positions. The offering of our Class A common stock
pursuant to the share lending agreement may result in
establishment of hedged positions by other holders or in
replacement of existing hedged position by those holders who are
already hedged. We expect that all such hedged parties may
increase those positions as the market price of the Class A
common stock increases, since such price increases will increase
the likelihood that such holders will convert their notes and
receive Class A common stock. Therefore, such short sales
could retard any increase in the market price of our
Class A common stock or cause a decline. See
Business Legal Proceedings and
Registered Borrow Facility.
33
|
|
|
The market price of our Class A common stock and
therefore the price of the notes could be adversely affected by
the large number of additional shares of Class A common
stock eligible for issuance in the future. |
As of March 31, 2005, 304,763,192 shares of
Class A common stock were issued and outstanding, and
50,000 shares of Class B common stock were issued and
outstanding. An additional 339,132,031 shares of
Class A common stock were issuable upon conversion of
outstanding units of Charter Holdco (increasing by
24,273,943 shares if Mr. Allen is required to
contribute his CC VIII membership interest to Charter
Holdco), and 29,067,828 shares were issuable upon the
exercise of outstanding options under our option plans. Also,
approximately 356 million shares are now issuable upon
conversion of the notes. Furthermore, additional shares and
warrants to acquire shares may be issuable in connection with
the settlement of certain outstanding litigation matters, as
more fully described in Business Legal
Proceedings. In addition, to the extent that we elect to
satisfy our obligations under the settlement agreement by
issuing securities rather than paying cash, any decrease in the
price of our Class A common stock as a result of this
offering (even if only temporary) would increase the number of
shares and warrants issuable under the applicable Stipulations
of Settlement. The shares and warrants are expected to be
available for immediate resale. The shares issuable upon
exercise of the warrants are expected to be issued pursuant to a
registration statement and therefore available for immediate
resale, if and when issued. All of the 339,132,031 shares
of Class A common stock issuable upon exchange of Charter
Holdco membership units and all shares of the Class A
common stock issuable upon conversion of shares of our
Class B common stock will have demand and/or
piggyback registration rights attached to them. All
of the 356 million shares issuable upon conversion of the
notes will be eligible for resale pursuant to this prospectus.
The sale of a substantial number of shares of Class A
common stock or the perception that such sales could occur could
adversely affect the market price for the Class A common
stock because the sale could cause the amount of the
Class A common stock available for sale in the market to
exceed the demand for the Class A common stock and could
also make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities or
equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that
we deem appropriate. This could adversely affect our ability to
fund our current and future obligations. See Shares
Eligible for Future Sale.
|
|
|
You should consider the United States federal income tax
consequences of owning the notes. |
Under the indenture governing the notes, we have agreed, and, by
acceptance of a beneficial interest in a note, each holder is
deemed to have agreed, to treat the notes for U.S. federal
income tax purposes as indebtedness that is subject to the
U.S. Treasury regulations governing contingent payment debt
instruments.
Consequently, despite some uncertainty as to the proper
application of such regulations, you will generally be required
to accrue interest income at a constant rate of 15% per
year (subject to certain adjustments), compounded semi-annually,
which represents the estimated yield on our comparable
non-convertible, fixed rate debt instruments with terms and
conditions otherwise similar to the notes. The amount of
interest required to be included by you in income for each year
generally will be in excess of the stated coupon on the notes
for that year.
You will recognize gain or loss on the sale, exchange,
conversion, redemption or repurchase of a note in an amount
equal to the difference between the amount realized, including
the fair market value of any of our common stock received, and
your adjusted tax basis in the note. Any gain recognized by you
on the sale, exchange, conversion, redemption or repurchase of a
note will be treated as ordinary interest income; any loss will
be ordinary loss to the extent of interest previously included
in income, and thereafter will be treated as capital loss.
A discussion of the material United States federal income tax
consequences of ownership of the notes is contained in this
prospectus under the heading United States Federal Income
Tax Considerations. You are strongly urged to consult your
tax advisor as to the federal, state, local or other tax
consequences of acquiring, owning, and disposing of the notes.
34
USE OF PROCEEDS
We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale by the
selling security holders of the notes or shares of Class A
common stock offered hereby.
35
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK AND DIVIDEND POLICY
Our Class A common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National
Market under the symbol CHTR. The following table
sets forth, for the periods indicated, the range of high and low
last reported sale price per share of Class A common stock
on the Nasdaq National Market. There is no established trading
market for our Class B common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
$2.30 |
|
|
|
$1.35 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
$1.53 |
|
|
|
$0.90 |
|
Third Quarter through July 18
|
|
|
$1.39 |
|
|
|
$1.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
First Quarter
|
|
|
$5.43 |
|
|
|
$3.99 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
$4.70 |
|
|
|
$3.61 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
$3.90 |
|
|
|
$2.61 |
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
$3.01 |
|
|
|
$2.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
First Quarter
|
|
|
$1.73 |
|
|
|
$0.76 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
$4.18 |
|
|
|
$0.94 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
$5.50 |
|
|
|
$3.32 |
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
$4.71 |
|
|
|
$3.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
First Quarter
|
|
|
$16.85 |
|
|
|
$9.10 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
$11.53 |
|
|
|
$2.96 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
$4.65 |
|
|
|
$1.81 |
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
$2.27 |
|
|
|
$0.76 |
|
As of March 31, 2005, there were 3,786 holders of
record of our Class A common stock, one holder of our
Class B common stock, and 10 holders of record of our
Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock.
The last reported sale price of our Class A common stock on
the Nasdaq National Market on July 18, 2005 was
$1.33 per share.
We have never paid and do not expect to pay any cash dividends
on our Class A common stock in the foreseeable future.
Charter Holdco is required under certain circumstances to pay
distributions pro rata to all its common members to the extent
necessary for any common member to pay taxes incurred with
respect to its share of taxable income attributed to Charter
Holdco. Covenants in the indentures and credit agreements
governing the debt of our subsidiaries restrict their ability to
make distributions to us and, accordingly, limit our ability to
declare or pay cash dividends. We intend to cause Charter Holdco
and its subsidiaries to retain future earnings, if any, to
finance the operation of the business of Charter Holdco and its
subsidiaries. In addition, we may only pay dividends from
legally available surplus under Delaware law. Charter elected
not to declare the March 31 and June 30, 2005
dividends on its Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred
Stock because it was unable to conclude with certainty that it
had such surplus. Under the Certificate of Designation governing
the Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, we may
not pay dividends on our common stock unless and until the full
cumulative dividends on all outstanding shares of the
Series A Preferred Stock have been paid for all past
dividend periods and sufficient funds shall have been set aside
for payment of the dividend on the Series A Convertible
Redeemable Preferred Stock for the then current dividend period.
36
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth as of March 31, 2005, on a
consolidated basis the actual (historical) capitalization
of Charter.
The following information should be read in conjunction with
Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data,
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial
Statements, Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and the historical consolidated financial statements and related
notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Actual | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars | |
|
|
in | |
|
|
millions) | |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charter Communications, Inc.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.875% convertible senior notes due 2009(a)
|
|
$ |
835 |
|
|
|
|
4.75% convertible senior notes due 2006
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
Charter Holdings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior and senior discount notes(b)
|
|
|
8,346 |
|
|
|
CCH II:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.250% senior notes due 2010
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
CCO Holdings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83/4% senior
notes due 2013
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
Senior floating rate notes due 2010
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
Charter Operating:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.000% senior second lien notes
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
|
8.375% senior second lien notes
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
Renaissance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.00% senior discount notes due 2008
|
|
|
116 |
|
Credit facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charter Operating(c)
|
|
|
5,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
18,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock redeemable(d)
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest(e)
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders deficit:
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock; $.001 par value;
1.75 billion shares authorized; 304,763,192 shares
issued and outstanding(f)
|
|
|
|
|
Class B common stock; $.001 par value;
750 million shares authorized; 50,000 shares issued
and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock; $.001 par value; 250 million shares
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in-capital
|
|
|
4,798 |
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(9,549 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders deficit
|
|
|
(4,751 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$ |
14,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents $863 million of 5.875% convertible senior notes
of which $30 million, related to certain provisions of the
5.875% convertible senior notes that for accounting purposes
were derivatives which required bifurcation, was recorded as
accounts payable and accrued expenses and other long-term
liabilities with the resulting long-term debt of
$832 million. The debt has accreted to $835 million at
March 31, 2005 and will accrete to the $863 million
face value over three years, the duration of our pledged
securities. |
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of | |
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Actual | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars | |
|
|
|
|
in | |
|
|
|
|
millions) | |
(b)
|
|
Represents the following Charter Holdings notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.250% senior notes due 2007 |
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
|
8.625% senior notes due 2009 |
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
9.920% senior discount notes due 2011 |
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
10.000% senior notes due 2009 |
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
10.250% senior notes due 2010 |
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
11.750% senior discount notes due 2010 |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
10.750% senior notes due 2009 |
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
11.125% senior notes due 2011 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
13.500% senior discount notes due 2011 |
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
9.625% senior notes due 2009 |
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
10.000% senior notes due 2011 |
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
11.750% senior discount notes due 2011 |
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
12.125% senior discount notes due 2012 |
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
|
The amounts outstanding under the Charter Operating credit
facilities as of March 31, 2005 totaled $5.1 billion.
Borrowing availability under the credit facilities totaled $1.2
billion as of March 31, 2005, none of which was restricted
due to covenants. |
|
(d) |
|
In connection with Charters acquisition of Cable USA, Inc.
and certain cable system assets from affiliates of Cable USA,
Inc., Charter issued 545,259 shares of Series A
Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock valued at and with a
liquidation preference of $55 million. Holders of the
preferred stock have no voting rights but are entitled to
receive cumulative cash dividends at an annual rate of 5.75%,
payable quarterly or 7.75% if not paid but accrued. Beginning
January 1, 2005, Charter is accruing the dividend on its
Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock. The
preferred stock is redeemable by Charter at its option on or
after August 31, 2004 and must be redeemed by Charter at
any time upon a change of control, or if not previously redeemed
or converted, on August 31, 2008. The preferred stock is
convertible, in whole or in part, at the option of the holders
from April 1, 2002 through August 31, 2008, into
shares of Class A common stock at an initial conversion
rate equal to a conversion price of $24.71 per share of
Class A common stock, subject to certain customary
adjustments. |
|
(e) |
|
Minority interest represents the percentage of Charter
Communications Holding Company, LLC not owned by Charter, or
approximately 53% of total members equity of Charter
Communications Holding Company, LLC, plus $656 million of
preferred membership interests in CC VIII, LLC, an indirect
subsidiary of Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC. Paul
G. Allen indirectly holds the preferred membership units in CC
VIII as a result of the exercise of put rights originally
granted in connection with the Bresnan transaction in 2000. An
issue has arisen regarding the ultimate ownership of the CC VIII
membership interests following the consummation of the Bresnan
put transaction on June 6, 2003. See Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions Transactions
Arising Out of Our Organizational Structure and
Mr. Allens Investment in Charter and its
Subsidiaries Equity Put Rights CC
VIII. |
|
(f) |
|
Although the shares offered pursuant to the share lending
agreement will be considered issued and outstanding, we do not
expect they will impact our earnings per share under current
accounting literature. See Share Lending Agreement
for further discussion related to the accounting of the share
lending agreement. Pro forma for the issuance of these shares,
at March 31, 2005 there were 454,763,192 shares issued
and outstanding. |
38
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following unaudited pro forma consolidated financial
statements are based on the historical consolidated financial
statements of Charter, adjusted on a pro forma basis to reflect
the following transactions as if they had occurred on
January 1, 2004 (for the unaudited pro forma consolidated
statement of operations):
|
|
|
(1) the disposition of certain assets in March and April
2004, with proceeds used to pay down credit facilities; |
|
|
(2) the issuance and sale of the CCO Holdings senior
floating rate notes in December 2004 and the Charter Operating
senior second lien notes in April 2004; |
|
|
(3) an increase in amounts outstanding under the Charter
Operating credit facilities in April 2004 and the use of such
funds, together with the proceeds from the sale of the Charter
Operating senior second lien notes, to refinance amounts
outstanding under the credit facilities of our subsidiaries,
CC VI Operating, CC VIII Operating and Falcon; |
|
|
(4) the repayment of $530 million of borrowings under
the Charter Operating revolving credit facility with net
proceeds from the issuance and sale of the CCO Holdings senior
floating rate notes in December 2004, which were included in our
cash balance at December 31, 2004; |
|
|
(5) the redemption of all of CC V Holdings
outstanding 11.875% senior discount notes due 2008 with cash on
hand; |
|
|
(6) the establishment of a registered borrow facility for
the issuance of up to 150 million shares of our
Class A common stock pursuant to a share lending agreement,
the sole effect of which is to increase common shares issued and
outstanding; and |
|
|
(7) the issuance and sale of $863 million of 5.875%
convertible senior notes in November 2004 with proceeds used for
(i) the purchase of certain U.S. government securities
pledged as security for the 5.875% convertible senior notes (and
which we expect to use to fund the first six interest payments
thereon), (ii) redemption of outstanding 5.75% convertible
senior notes due 2005 and (iii) general corporate purposes. |
The unaudited pro forma adjustments are based on information
available to us as of the date of this prospectus and certain
assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the
circumstances. The Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial
Statements required allocation of certain revenues and expenses
and such information has been presented for comparative purposes
and is not intended (a) to provide any indication of what
our actual financial position or results of operations would
have been had the transactions described above been completed on
the dates indicated or (b) to project our results of
operations for any future date.
The unaudited pro forma balance sheet as of March 31, 2005
and an unaudited pro forma statement of operations for the three
months ended March 31, 2005 are not provided as pro forma
adjustments are not significant for that period.
39
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset | |
|
Financing | |
|
|
|
Offering | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dispositions | |
|
Transactions | |
|
|
|
Adjustments | |
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
(Note A) | |
|
(Note B) | |
|
Subtotal | |
|
(Note C) | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share and share amounts) | |
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video
|
|
$ |
849 |
|
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
828 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
828 |
|
|
High-speed data
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
Advertising
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,185 |
|
Costs and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (excluding depreciation and amortization)
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of assets, net
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Option compensation expense, net
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
Special charges, net
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(418 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(422 |
) |
Gain on derivative instruments and hedging activities, net
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Loss on debt to equity conversions
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Other, net
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(410 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(435 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(439 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before minority interest, income taxes, and cumulative
effect of accounting change
|
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(372 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(376 |
) |
Minority interest
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(376 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(380 |
) |
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$ |
(293 |
) |
|
$ |
(94 |
) |
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
|
$ |
(416 |
) |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per common share, basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(1.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1.43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
(Note D)
|
|
|
295,106,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,106,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
Note A: Represents the elimination of operating
results related to the disposition of certain assets in March
and April 2004 and a reduction of interest expense related to
the use of the net proceeds from such sales to repay a portion
of our subsidiaries credit facilities.
Note B: Represents adjustment to interest expense
associated with the completion of the financing transactions
discussed in pro forma assumptions two through five (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on the Charter Operating senior second lien notes and
the amended and restated Charter Operating credit facilities at
a weighted average rate of 4.9%
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
Interest on CCO Holdings senior floating rate notes
|
|
|
9 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
6 |
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
Historical interest expense for Charter Operating credit
facilities and on subsidiary credit facilities repaid
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
Historical interest expense for Charter Operatings
revolving credit facility repaid with cash on hand
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Historical interest expense for the CC V Holdings 11.875% senior
discount notes due 2008 repaid with cash on hand.
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net increase in interest expense for other financing transactions
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note C: Represents the increase in interest expense
from the issuance of $863 million of convertible senior
notes due 2009 with a stated interest rate of 5.875% and the
amortization of deferred debt issuance cost associated with such
issuance, reduced by the use of proceeds to retire
$588 million of our then outstanding 5.75% convertible
senior notes due 2005 and the interest on the $144 million
of securities purchased and pledged as security for interest
payments on such debt (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on the convertible senior notes issued in November 2004
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs
|
|
|
1 |
|
Less interest from the pledged securities
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Less interest on 5.75% convertible senior notes retired
with proceeds
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pro forma interest expense adjustment
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note D: Loss per common share, basic and diluted
assumes none of the membership units of Charter Communications
Holding Company, LLC are exchanged for Charter common stock and
none of the outstanding options to purchase membership units of
Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC that are
automatically exchanged for Charter common stock are exercised.
Basic loss per share equals loss before cumulative effect of
accounting change less dividends on preferred stock-redeemable
divided by weighted average shares outstanding. If the
membership units were exchanged or options exercised, the
effects would be antidilutive. Therefore, basic and diluted loss
per common share is the same. Although the shares offered by
this prospectus will be considered issued and outstanding, we do
not expect they will impact our earnings per share under current
accounting literature. See Share Lending Agreement
for further discussion related to the accounting of the share
lending agreement.
41
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset | |
|
Financing | |
|
|
|
Offering | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dispositions | |
|
Transactions | |
|
|
|
Adjustments | |
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
(Note A) | |
|
(Note B) | |
|
Subtotal | |
|
(Note C) | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share and share amounts) | |
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video
|
|
$ |
3,373 |
|
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,352 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,352 |
|
|
High-speed data
|
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
Advertising
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,977 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,948 |
|
Costs and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (excluding depreciation and amortization)
|
|
|
2,080 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,068 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
967 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,489 |
|
|
Impairments of franchises
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of assets, net
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
Option compensation expense, net
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
Special charges, net
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
Unfavorable contracts and other settlements
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,023 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(2,046 |
) |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,158 |
) |
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(1,670 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(1,699 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(1,709 |
) |
Gain on derivative instruments and hedging activities, net
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
Loss on debt to equity conversions
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,652 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(1,660 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,660 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before minority interest, income taxes, and cumulative
effect of accounting change
|
|
|
(3,698 |
) |
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(3,818 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,818 |
) |
Minority interest
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
(3,679 |
) |
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(3,799 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,799 |
) |
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$ |
(3,576 |
) |
|
$ |
(94 |
) |
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,682 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3,682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per common share, basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(11.92 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(12.27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
(Note D)
|
|
|
300,291,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,291,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
Note A: Represents the elimination of operating
results related to the disposition of certain assets in March
and April 2004 and a reduction of interest expense related to
the use of the net proceeds from such sales to repay a portion
of our subsidiaries credit facilities.
Note B: Represents adjustment to interest expense
associated with the completion of the financing transactions
discussed in pro forma assumptions two through five (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on the Charter Operating senior second lien notes and
the amended and restated Charter Operating credit facilities at
a weighted average rate of 4.9%
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
Interest on CCO Holdings senior floating rate notes
|
|
|
35 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
10 |
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
Historical interest expense for Charter Operating credit
facilities and on subsidiary credit facilities repaid
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
Historical interest expense for Charter Operatings
revolving credit facility repaid with cash on hand
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
Historical interest expense for the CC V Holdings 11.875% senior
discount notes due 2008 repaid with cash on hand.
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net increase in interest expense for other financing transactions
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to loss on extinguishment of debt represents the
elimination of the write-off of deferred financing fees and
third party costs related to the Charter Operating refinancing
in April 2004.
Note C: Represents the increase in interest expense
from the issuance of $863 million of convertible senior
notes due 2009 with a stated interest rate of 5.875% and the
amortization of deferred debt issuance cost associated with such
issuance, reduced by the use of proceeds to retire
$588 million of our then outstanding 5.75% convertible
senior notes due 2005 and the interest on the $144 million
of securities purchased and pledged as security for interest
payments on such debt (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on the convertible senior notes issued in November 2004
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs
|
|
|
4 |
|
Less interest from the pledged securities
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Less interest on 5.75% convertible senior notes retired
with proceeds
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pro forma interest expense adjustment
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to loss on extinguishment of debt represents the
elimination of the premium paid to retire the 5.75% convertible
senior notes and the write-off of the related deferred financing
fees.
Note D: Loss per common share, basic and diluted
assumes none of the membership units of Charter Communications
Holding Company, LLC are exchanged for Charter common stock and
none of the outstanding options to purchase membership units of
Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC that are
automatically exchanged for Charter common stock are exercised.
Basic loss per share equals loss before cumulative effect of
accounting change less dividends on preferred stock-redeemable
divided by weighted average shares outstanding. If the
membership units were exchanged or options exercised, the
effects would be antidilutive. Therefore, basic and diluted loss
per common share is the same. Although the shares offered by
this prospectus will be considered issued and outstanding, we do
not expect they will impact our earnings per share under current
accounting literature. See Share Lending Agreement
for further discussion related to the accounting of the share
lending agreement.
43
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table presents summary financial and other data
for Charter and its subsidiaries and has been derived from the
audited consolidated financial statements of Charter and its
subsidiaries for the five years ended December 31, 2004 and
the unaudited consolidated financial statements of Charter and
its subsidiaries for the three months ended March 31, 2004
and 2005. The consolidated financial statements of Charter and
its subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2000 to
2004 have been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm. The following information should be read
in conjunction with Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and the historical consolidated financial statements and related
notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share amounts) | |
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
3,141 |
|
|
$ |
3,807 |
|
|
$ |
4,566 |
|
|
$ |
4,819 |
|
|
$ |
4,977 |
|
|
$ |
1,214 |
|
|
$ |
1,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (excluding depreciation and amortization)
|
|
|
1,187 |
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
1,952 |
|
|
|
2,080 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
826 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,398 |
|
|
|
2,683 |
|
|
|
1,436 |
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
Impairment of franchises
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
Option compensation expense (income), net
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Special charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Unfavorable contracts and other settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,229 |
|
|
|
5,018 |
|
|
|
8,888 |
|
|
|
4,303 |
|
|
|
7,023 |
|
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(1,088 |
) |
|
|
(1,211 |
) |
|
|
(4,322 |
) |
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
(2,046 |
) |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(1,040 |
) |
|
|
(1,310 |
) |
|
|
(1,503 |
) |
|
|
(1,557 |
) |
|
|
(1,670 |
) |
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
(420 |
) |
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments and hedging activities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
Loss on debt to equity conversions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before minority interest, income taxes and cumulative
effect of accounting change
|
|
|
(2,148 |
) |
|
|
(2,630 |
) |
|
|
(5,944 |
) |
|
|
(725 |
) |
|
|
(3,698 |
) |
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
(334 |
) |
Minority interest(a)
|
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
3,176 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
(868 |
) |
|
|
(1,169 |
) |
|
|
(2,768 |
) |
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
(3,679 |
) |
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
|
(337 |
) |
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
(858 |
) |
|
|
(1,157 |
) |
|
|
(2,308 |
) |
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
(3,576 |
) |
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
(352 |
) |
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(858 |
) |
|
|
(1,167 |
) |
|
|
(2,514 |
) |
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
(4,341 |
) |
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
(352 |
) |
Dividends on preferred stock redeemable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to common stock
|
|
$ |
(858 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,168 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,517 |
) |
|
$ |
(242 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,345 |
) |
|
$ |
(294 |
) |
|
$ |
(353 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per common share, basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(3.80 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.33 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.55 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.82 |
) |
|
$ |
(14.47 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.00 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
|
|
225,697,775 |
|
|
|
269,594,386 |
|
|
|
294,440,261 |
|
|
|
294,597,519 |
|
|
|
300,291,877 |
|
|
|
295,106,077 |
|
|
|
303,308,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share amounts) | |
|
|
|
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficiencies of earnings to cover fixed charges(b)
|
|
$ |
2,148 |
|
|
$ |
2,630 |
|
|
$ |
5,944 |
|
|
$ |
725 |
|
|
$ |
3,698 |
|
|
$ |
235 |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
Balance Sheet Data (end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
24,352 |
|
|
$ |
26,463 |
|
|
$ |
22,384 |
|
|
$ |
21,364 |
|
|
$ |
17,673 |
|
|
$ |
20,572 |
|
|
$ |
16,794 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
13,061 |
|
|
|
16,343 |
|
|
|
18,671 |
|
|
|
18,647 |
|
|
|
19,464 |
|
|
|
18,108 |
|
|
|
18,929 |
|
Minority interest(a)
|
|
|
4,571 |
|
|
|
4,434 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
656 |
|
Redeemable securities
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock redeemable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Shareholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
2,767 |
|
|
|
2,585 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
(4,406 |
) |
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
(4,751 |
) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Minority interest represents the percentage of Charter
Communications Holding Company, LLC not owned by Charter, plus
preferred membership interests in CC VIII, LLC, an indirect
subsidiary of Charter. Paul G. Allen indirectly holds the
preferred membership units in CC VIII, LLC as a result of the
exercise of a put right originally granted in connection with
the Bresnan transaction in 2000. An issue has arisen regarding
the ultimate ownership of the CC VIII, LLC membership interest
following the consummation of the Bresnan put transaction on
June 6, 2003. See Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions Transactions Arising Out of Our
Organizational Structure and Mr. Allens Investment in
Charter and Its Subsidiaries Equity Put
Rights CC VIII. Effective January 1,
2005, Charter ceased recognizing minority interest in earnings
and losses of CC VIII, LLC for financial reporting purposes
until such time as the resolution of the issue is determinable
or other events occur. Reported losses allocated to minority
interest on the statement of operations are limited to the
extent of any remaining minority interest on the balance sheet
related to Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC. Because
minority interest in Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC
was substantially eliminated at December 31, 2003,
beginning in 2004, Charter began to absorb substantially all
losses before income taxes that otherwise would have been
allocated to minority interest. As a result of negative equity
at Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC, during the year
ended December 31, 2004, no additional losses were
allocated to minority interest, resulting in an approximate
additional $2.4 billion of net losses. Under our existing
capital structure, Charter will absorb substantially all future
losses. |
|
(b) |
|
Earnings include net loss plus fixed charges. Fixed charges
consist of interest expense and an estimated interest component
of rent expense. |
45
SUPPLEMENTARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
The following tables present quarterly financial data for the
periods presented on the consolidated statements of operations
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
1,271 |
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
51 |
|
Loss before minority interest and income taxes
|
|
|
(334 |
) |
Net loss applicable to common stock
|
|
|
(353 |
) |
Basic and diluted loss per common share
|
|
|
(1.16 |
) |
Weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
303,308,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
First Quarter | |
|
Second Quarter | |
|
Third Quarter | |
|
Fourth Quarter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
1,214 |
|
|
$ |
1,239 |
|
|
$ |
1,248 |
|
|
$ |
1,276 |
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(2,344 |
) |
|
|
108 |
|
Loss before minority interest, income taxes and cumulative
effect of accounting change
|
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
(366 |
) |
|
|
(2,776 |
) |
|
|
(321 |
) |
Net loss applicable to common stock
|
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
(416 |
) |
|
|
(3,295 |
) |
|
|
(340 |
) |
Basic and diluted loss per common share before cumulative effect
of accounting change
|
|
|
(1.00 |
) |
|
|
(1.39 |
) |
|
|
(8.36 |
) |
|
|
(1.12 |
) |
Basic and diluted loss per common share
|
|
|
(1.00 |
) |
|
|
(1.39 |
) |
|
|
(10.89 |
) |
|
|
(1.12 |
) |
Weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
295,106,077 |
|
|
|
300,522,815 |
|
|
|
302,604,978 |
|
|
|
302,934,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
First Quarter | |
|
Second Quarter | |
|
Third Quarter | |
|
Fourth Quarter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
1,178 |
|
|
$ |
1,217 |
|
|
$ |
1,207 |
|
|
$ |
1,217 |
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
Income (loss) before minority interest and income taxes
|
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock
|
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
Basic income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
(0.62 |
) |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
(0.20 |
) |
Diluted Income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
(0.62 |
) |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
(0.20 |
) |
Weighted-average shares outstanding, basic
|
|
|
294,466,137 |
|
|
|
294,474,596 |
|
|
|
294,566,878 |
|
|
|
294,875,504 |
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding, diluted
|
|
|
294,466,137 |
|
|
|
294,474,596 |
|
|
|
637,822,843 |
|
|
|
294,875,504 |
|
46
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Reference is made to Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements, which describes important factors that could
cause actual results to differ from expectations and
non-historical information contained herein. In addition, the
following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements of Charter
Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries as of and for the years
ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and the unaudited
consolidated financial statements of Charter Communications,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of and for the three months ended
March 31, 2005.
Introduction
In 2004 and the first quarter of 2005, we completed several
transactions that improved our liquidity. Our efforts in this
regard resulted in the completion of a number of transactions in
2004, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
the December 2004 sale by our subsidiaries, CCO Holdings,
LLC and CCO Holdings Capital Corp., of $550 million of
senior floating rate notes due 2010; |
|
|
|
the November 2004 sale by Charter of $862.5 million of
5.875% convertible senior notes due 2009; |
|
|
|
the December 2004 redemption of all of our 5.75%
convertible senior notes due 2005 ($588 million principal
amount); |
|
|
|
the April 2004 sale of $1.5 billion of senior
second-lien notes by our subsidiary, Charter Operating, together
with the concurrent refinancing of its credit facilities; |
|
|
|
the sale in the first half of 2004 of non-core cable systems for
a total of $735 million, the proceeds of which were used to
reduce indebtedness; and |
|
|
|
the March 2005 issuance of Charter Operating notes in
exchange for Charter Holdings notes. |
During the years 1999 through 2001, we grew significantly,
principally through acquisitions of other cable businesses
financed by debt and, to a lesser extent, equity. We have no
current plans to pursue any significant acquisitions. However,
we may pursue exchanges of non-strategic assets or divestitures,
such as the sale of cable systems to Atlantic Broadband Finance,
LLC discussed under Liquidity and Capital
Resources Sale of Assets, below. We therefore
do not believe that our historical growth rates are accurate
indicators of future growth.
The industrys and our most significant operational
challenges in 2004 and 2003 included competition from DBS
providers and DSL service providers. See
Business Competition. We believe that
competition from DBS has resulted in net analog video customer
losses and decreased growth rates for digital video customers.
Competition from DSL providers combined with limited
opportunities to expand our customer base now that approximately
28% of our analog video customers subscribe to our high-speed
data services has resulted in decreased growth rates for
high-speed data customers. In the recent past, we have grown
revenues by offsetting video customer losses with price
increases and sales of incremental advanced services such as
high-speed data, video on demand, digital video recorders and
high definition television. We expect to continue to grow
revenues through continued growth in high-speed data and
incremental new services including VOIP telephony, high
definition television, VOD and DVR service.
Historically, our ability to fund operations and investing
activities has depended on our continued access to credit under
our subsidiaries credit facilities. We expect we will
continue to borrow under our subsidiaries credit
facilities from time to time to fund cash needs. The occurrence
of an event of default under our subsidiaries credit
facilities could result in borrowings from these facilities
being unavailable to us and could, in the event of a payment
default or acceleration, trigger events of default under our
notes and our subsidiaries outstanding notes and would
have a material adverse effect on us. Approximately
$23 million of indebtedness under our subsidiaries
credit facilities is scheduled to mature during the remainder of
2005. We expect to fund payment of such indebtedness through
borrowings under our subsidiaries revolving credit
facilities.
47
Acquisitions
The following table sets forth information regarding our
significant acquisitions from January 1, 2000 to
December 31, 2002 (none in 2003, 2004 or 2005):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Price | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
Acquired | |
|
|
Acquisition | |
|
Cash | |
|
Assumed | |
|
Issued/Other | |
|
Total | |
|
Customers | |
|
|
Date | |
|
Paid | |
|
Debt | |
|
Consideration | |
|
Price | |
|
(approx) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Interlake
|
|
|
1/00 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
Bresnan
|
|
|
2/00 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
1,014 |
(a) |
|
|
3,077 |
|
|
|
695,800 |
|
Capital Cable
|
|
|
4/00 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
23,200 |
|
Farmington
|
|
|
4/00 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
5,700 |
|
Kalamazoo
|
|
|
9/00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
(b) |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
50,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total 2000 Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,188 |
|
|
$ |
963 |
|
|
$ |
1,185 |
|
|
$ |
3,336 |
|
|
|
781,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AT&T Systems
|
|
|
6/01 |
|
|
$ |
1,711 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
1,736 |
(c) |
|
|
551,100 |
|
Cable USA
|
|
|
8/01 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
(d) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
30,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total 2001 Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,756 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
1,836 |
|
|
|
581,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Speed Access Corp.
|
|
|
2/02 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Enstar Limited Partnership Systems
|
|
|
4/02 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
21,600 |
|
Enstar Income Program II-1, L.P.
|
|
|
9/02 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
6,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total 2002 Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total 2000-2002 Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,085 |
|
|
$ |
963 |
|
|
$ |
1,265 |
|
|
$ |
5,313 |
|
|
|
1,391,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Comprised of $385 million in equity in Charter Holdco and
$629 million of equity in CC VIII. |
|
(b) |
|
In connection with this transaction, we acquired all of the
outstanding stock of Cablevision of Michigan in exchange for
11,173,376 shares of Charter Class A common stock. |
|
(c) |
|
Comprised of approximately $1.7 billion, as adjusted, in
cash and a cable system located in Florida valued at
approximately $25 million, as adjusted. |
|
(d) |
|
In connection with this transaction, at the closing we and
Charter Holdco acquired all of the outstanding stock of Cable
USA and the assets of related affiliates in exchange for cash
and 505,664 shares of Charter Series A convertible
redeemable preferred stock. In the first quarter of 2003, an
additional $0.34 million in cash was paid and 39,595
additional shares of Charter Series A convertible
redeemable preferred stock were issued to certain sellers. |
All acquisitions were accounted for under the purchase method of
accounting and results of operations were included in our
consolidated financial statements from their respective dates of
acquisition.
We have no current plans to pursue any significant acquisitions.
However, we will continue to evaluate opportunities to
consolidate our operations through the sale of cable systems to,
or exchange of like-kind assets with, other cable operators as
such opportunities arise, and on a very limited basis, consider
strategic new acquisitions. Our primary criteria in considering
these opportunities are the rationalization of our operations
into geographic clusters and the potential financial benefits we
expect to ultimately realize as a result of the sale, exchange,
or acquisition.
48
Overview of Operations
Approximately 87% and 86% of our revenues for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 and for the year ended
December 31, 2004, respectively, are attributable to
monthly subscription fees charged to customers for our video,
high-speed data, telephone and commercial services provided by
our cable systems. Generally, these customer subscriptions may
be discontinued by the customer at any time. The remaining 13%
and 14%, respectively, of revenue is derived primarily from
advertising revenues, franchise fee revenues, which are
collected by us but then paid to local franchising authorities,
pay-per-view and VOD programming where users are charged a fee
for individual programs viewed, installation or reconnection
fees charged to customers to commence or reinstate service, and
commissions related to the sale of merchandise by home shopping
services. We have increased revenues during the past three
years, primarily through the sale of digital video and
high-speed data services to new and existing customers and price
increases on video services offset in part by dispositions of
systems. Going forward, our goal is to increase revenues by
stabilizing our analog video customer base, implementing price
increases on certain services and packages and increasing the
number of our customers who purchase high-speed data services,
digital video and new products and services such as VOIP
telephony, VOD, high definition television and DVR service. To
accomplish this, we are increasing prices for certain services
and we are offering new bundling of services combining digital
video and our advanced services (such as high-speed data service
and high definition television) at what we believe are
attractive price points. See Business Sales
and Marketing for more details.
Our success in our efforts to grow revenues and improve margins
will be impacted by our ability to compete against companies
with often fewer regulatory burdens, easier access to financing,
greater personnel resources, greater brand name recognition and
long-established relationships with regulatory authorities and
customers. Additionally, controlling our cost of operations is
critical, particularly cable programming costs, which have
historically increased at rates in excess of inflation and are
expected to continue to increase. See Business
Programming for more details. We are attempting to control
our costs of operations by maintaining strict controls on
expenses. More specifically, we are focused on managing our cost
structure by renegotiating programming agreements to reduce the
rate of historical increases in programming cost, managing our
workforce to control increases and improve productivity, and
leveraging our size in purchasing activities.
Our expenses primarily consist of operating costs, selling,
general and administrative expenses, depreciation and
amortization expense and interest expense. Operating costs
primarily include programming costs, the cost of our workforce,
cable service related expenses, advertising sales costs,
franchise fees and expenses related to customer billings. Our
income from operations decreased from $175 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2004 to $51 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2005. We had a positive operating margin
(defined as income (loss) from operations divided by revenues)
of 4% and 14% for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and
2004, respectively. The decline in income from operations and
operating margin for the three months ended March 31, 2005
is principally due to the one-time gain as a result of the sale
of certain cable systems in Florida, Pennsylvania, Maryland,
Delaware and West Virginia to Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC of
approximately $108 million, recognized in the three months
ended March 31, 2004 and asset impairment charges of
$31 million recognized in the three months ended
March 31, 2005. For the years ended December 31, 2004
and 2002, loss from operations was $2.0 billion and
$4.3 billion, respectively. For the year ended
December 31, 2003, income from operations was
$516 million. Operating margin was 11% for the year ended
December 31, 2003, whereas for the years ending
December 31, 2004 and 2002, we had negative operating
margin of 41% and 95%, respectively. The improvement in income
from operations and operating margin from 2002 to 2003 was
principally due to a $4.6 billion franchise impairment
charge in the fourth quarter of 2002 which did not recur in 2003
and the recognition of gains in 2003 of $93 million related
to unfavorable contracts and other settlements and gain on sale
of systems. Although we do not expect charges for impairment in
the future of comparable magnitude, potential charges could
occur due to changes in market conditions.
We have a history of net losses. Further, we expect to continue
to report net losses for the foreseeable future. Our net losses
are principally attributable to insufficient revenue to cover
the interest costs on our
49
high level of debt, the depreciation expenses that we incur
resulting from the capital investments we have made in our cable
properties and the amortization and impairment of our franchise
intangibles. We expect that these expenses (other than
impairment of franchises) will remain significant, and we
therefore expect to continue to report net losses for the
foreseeable future. Additionally, because minority interest in
Charter Holdco was substantially eliminated at December 31,
2003, beginning in the first quarter of 2004, we began to absorb
substantially all future losses before income taxes that
otherwise would have been allocated to minority interest. This
resulted in an additional $2.4 billion of net loss for the
year ended December 31, 2004. Under our existing capital
structure, future losses will continue to be absorbed by
Charter. Effective January 1, 2005, we ceased recognizing
minority interest in earnings or losses of CC VIII, LLC for
financial reporting purposes until the dispute between Charter
and Mr. Allen regarding the preferred membership interests
in CC VIII, LLC is determinable or other events occur.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Certain of our accounting policies require our management to
make difficult, subjective or complex judgments. Management has
discussed these policies with the Audit Committee of
Charters board of directors and the Audit Committee has
reviewed the following disclosure. We consider the following
policies to be the most critical in understanding the estimates,
assumptions and judgments that are involved in preparing our
financial statements and the uncertainties that could affect our
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalization of labor and overhead costs; |
|
|
|
Useful lives of property, plant and equipment; |
|
|
|
Impairment of property, plant, and equipment, franchises, and
goodwill; |
|
|
|
Income taxes; and |
|
|
|
Litigation. |
In addition, there are other items within our financial
statements that require estimates or judgment but are not deemed
critical, such as the allowance for doubtful accounts, but
changes in judgment, or estimates in these other items could
also have a material impact on our financial statements.
Capitalization of labor and overhead costs. The cable
industry is capital intensive, and a large portion of our
resources are spent on capital activities associated with
extending, rebuilding, and upgrading our cable network. As of
March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and 2003, the net
carrying amount of our property, plant and equipment (consisting
primarily of cable network assets) was approximately
$6.1 billion (representing 36% of total assets),
$6.3 billion (representing 36% of total assets) and
$7.0 billion (representing 33% of total assets),
respectively. Total capital expenditures for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 and the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002 were approximately $211 million,
$924 million, $854 million and $2.2 billion,
respectively.
Costs associated with network construction, initial customer
installations, installation refurbishments and the addition of
network equipment necessary to provide advanced services are
capitalized. Costs capitalized as part of initial customer
installations include materials, direct labor, and certain
indirect costs. These indirect costs are associated with the
activities of personnel who assist in connecting and activating
the new service and consist of compensation and overhead costs
associated with these support functions. The costs of
disconnecting service at a customers dwelling or
reconnecting service to a previously installed dwelling are
charged to operating expense in the period incurred. Costs for
repairs and maintenance are charged to operating expense as
incurred, while equipment replacement and betterments, including
replacement of cable drops from the pole to the dwelling, are
capitalized.
We make judgments regarding the installation and construction
activities to be capitalized. We capitalize direct labor and
certain indirect costs (overhead) using standards
developed from actual costs and applicable operational data. We
calculate standards for items such as the labor rates, overhead
rates and the actual amount of time required to perform a
capitalizable activity. For example, the standard
50
amounts of time required to perform capitalizable activities are
based on studies of the time required to perform such
activities. Overhead rates are established based on an analysis
of the nature of costs incurred in support of capitalizable
activities and a determination of the portion of costs that is
directly attributable to capitalizable activities. The impact of
changes that resulted from these studies were not significant in
the periods presented.
Labor costs directly associated with capital projects are
capitalized. We capitalize direct labor costs associated with
personnel based upon the specific time devoted to network
construction and customer installation activities. Capitalizable
activities performed in connection with customer installations
include such activities as:
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduling a truck roll to the customers
dwelling for service connection; |
|
|
|
Verification of serviceability to the customers dwelling
(i.e., determining whether the customers dwelling is
capable of receiving service by our cable network and/or
receiving advanced or data services); |
|
|
|
Customer premise activities performed by in-house field
technicians and third-party contractors in connection with
customer installations, installation of network equipment in
connection with the installation of expanded services and
equipment replacement and betterment; and |
|
|
|
Verifying the integrity of the customers network
connection by initiating test signals downstream from the
headend to the customers digital set-top terminal. |
Judgment is required to determine the extent to which overhead
is incurred as a result of specific capital activities, and
therefore should be capitalized. The primary costs that are
included in the determination of the overhead rate are
(i) employee benefits and payroll taxes associated with
capitalized direct labor, (ii) direct variable costs
associated with capitalizable activities, consisting primarily
of installation and construction vehicle costs, (iii) the
cost of support personnel, such as dispatch, that directly
assist with capitalizable installation activities, and
(iv) indirect costs directly attributable to capitalizable
activities.
While we believe our existing capitalization policies are
appropriate, a significant change in the nature or extent of our
system activities could affect managements judgment about
the extent to which we should capitalize direct labor or
overhead in the future. We monitor the appropriateness of our
capitalization policies, and perform updates to our internal
studies on an ongoing basis to determine whether facts or
circumstances warrant a change to our capitalization policies.
We capitalized direct labor and overhead of $45 million,
$164 million, $174 million and $335 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2005 and the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Capitalized
internal direct labor and overhead costs significantly decreased
in 2004 and 2003 compared to 2002 primarily due to the
substantial completion of the upgrade of our systems and a
decrease in the amount of capitalizable installation costs.
Useful lives of property, plant and equipment. We
evaluate the appropriateness of estimated useful lives assigned
to our property, plant and equipment, based on annual studies of
such useful lives, and revise such lives to the extent warranted
by changing facts and circumstances. Any changes in estimated
useful lives as a result of these studies, which were not
significant in the periods presented, will be reflected
prospectively beginning in the period in which the study is
completed. The effect of a one-year decrease in the weighted
average remaining useful life of our property, plant and
equipment would be an increase in depreciation expense for the
year ended December 31, 2004 of approximately
$296 million. The effect of a one-year increase in the
weighted average useful life of our property, plant and
equipment would be a decrease in depreciation expense for the
year ended December 31, 2004 of approximately
$198 million.
Depreciation expense related to property, plant and equipment
totaled $379 million, $1.5 billion, $1.5 billion
and $1.4 billion, representing approximately 31%, 21%, 34%
and 16% of costs and expenses, for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002,
51
respectively. Depreciation is recorded using the straight-line
composite method over managements estimate of the
estimated useful lives of the related assets as listed below:
|
|
|
|
|
Cable distribution systems
|
|
|
7-20 years |
|
Customer equipment and installations
|
|
|
3-5 years |
|
Vehicles and equipment
|
|
|
1-5 years |
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
5-15 years |
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
5 years |
|
Impairment of property, plant and equipment, franchises and
goodwill. As discussed above, the net carrying value of our
property, plant and equipment is significant. We also have
recorded a significant amount of cost related to franchises,
pursuant to which we are granted the right to operate our cable
distribution network throughout our service areas. The net
carrying value of franchises as of March 31, 2005,
December 31, 2004 and 2003 was approximately
$9.8 billion (representing 59% of total assets),
$9.9 billion (representing 56% of total assets) and
$13.7 billion (representing 64% of total assets),
respectively. Furthermore, our noncurrent assets included
approximately $52 million of goodwill.
We adopted SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002.
SFAS No. 142 requires that franchise intangible assets
that meet specified indefinite-life criteria no longer be
amortized against earnings, but instead must be tested for
impairment annually based on valuations, or more frequently as
warranted by events or changes in circumstances. In determining
whether our franchises have an indefinite-life, we considered
the exclusivity of the franchise, the expected costs of
franchise renewals, and the technological state of the
associated cable systems with a view to whether or not we are in
compliance with any technology upgrading requirements. We have
concluded that as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 more
than 99% of our franchises qualify for indefinite-life treatment
under SFAS No. 142, and that less than one percent of
our franchises do not qualify for indefinite-life treatment due
to technological or operational factors that limit their lives.
Costs of finite-lived franchises, along with costs associated
with franchise renewals, are amortized on a straight-line basis
over 10 years, which represents managements best
estimate of the average remaining useful lives of such
franchises. Franchise amortization expense was $1 million
and $4 million for the three months ended March 31,
2005 and for the year ended December 31, 2004,
respectively, and $9 million for each of the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002. We expect that amortization
expense on franchise assets will be approximately
$3 million annually for each of the next five years. Actual
amortization expense in future periods could differ from these
estimates as a result of new intangible asset acquisitions or
divestitures, changes in useful lives and other relevant
factors. Our goodwill is also deemed to have an indefinite life
under SFAS No. 142.
SFAS No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or Disposal
of Long-Lived Assets, requires that we evaluate the
recoverability of our property, plant and equipment and
franchise assets which did not qualify for indefinite-life
treatment under SFAS No. 142 upon the occurrence of
events or changes in circumstances which indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Such events
or changes in circumstances could include such factors as the
impairment of our indefinite life franchises under
SFAS No. 142, changes in technological advances,
fluctuations in the fair value of such assets, adverse changes
in relationships with local franchise authorities, adverse
changes in market conditions or poor operating results. Under
SFAS No. 144, a long-lived asset is deemed impaired
when the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the projected
undiscounted future cash flows associated with the asset. No
impairments of long-lived assets were recorded in the years
ended December 31, 2004, 2003 or 2002. We were also
required to evaluate the recoverability of our indefinite-life
franchises, as well as goodwill, as of January 1, 2002 upon
adoption of SFAS No. 142, and on an annual basis or
more frequently as deemed necessary.
Under both SFAS No. 144 and SFAS No. 142, if
an asset is determined to be impaired, it is required to be
written down to its estimated fair market value. We determine
fair market value based on estimated discounted future cash
flows, using reasonable and appropriate assumptions that are
consistent with internal forecasts. Our assumptions include
these and other factors: penetration rates for analog and
52
digital video and high-speed data, revenue growth rates,
expected operating margins and capital expenditures.
Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate future
cash flows, and such estimates include inherent uncertainties,
including those relating to the timing and amount of future cash
flows and the discount rate used in the calculation.
Based on the guidance prescribed in Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) Issue No. 02-7, Unit of Accounting
for Testing of Impairment of Indefinite-Lived Intangible
Assets, franchises were aggregated into essentially
inseparable asset groups to conduct the valuations. The asset
groups generally represent geographic clustering of our cable
systems into groups by which such systems are managed.
Management believes such groupings represent the highest and
best use of those assets. We determined that our franchises were
impaired upon adoption of SFAS No. 142 on
January 1, 2002 and as a result recorded the cumulative
effect of a change in accounting principle of $206 million
(approximately $572 million before minority interest
effects of $306 million and tax effects of
$60 million). As required by SFAS No. 142, the
standard has not been retroactively applied to results for the
period prior to adoption.
Our valuations, which are based on the present value of
projected after tax cash flows, result in a value of property,
plant and equipment, franchises, customer relationships and our
total entity value. The value of goodwill is the difference
between the total entity value and amounts assigned to the other
assets. The use of different valuation assumptions or
definitions of franchises or customer relationships, such as our
inclusion of the value of selling additional services to our
current customers within customer relationships versus
franchises, could significantly impact our valuations and any
resulting impairment.
Franchises, for valuation purposes, are defined as the future
economic benefits of the right to solicit and service potential
customers (customer marketing rights), and the right to deploy
and market new services such as interactivity and telephony to
the potential customers (service marketing rights). Fair value
is determined based on estimated discounted future cash flows
using assumptions consistent with internal forecasts. The
franchise after-tax cash flow is calculated as the after-tax
cash flow generated by the potential customers obtained and the
new services added to those customers in future periods. The sum
of the present value of the franchises after-tax cash flow
in years 1 through 10 and the continuing value of the after-tax
cash flow beyond year 10 yields the fair value of the franchise.
Prior to the adoption of EITF Topic D-108, Use of the
Residual Method to Value Acquired Assets Other than
Goodwill, discussed below, we followed a residual method of
valuing our franchise assets, which had the effect of including
goodwill with the franchise assets.
We follow the guidance of EITF Issue 02-17, Recognition
of Customer Relationship Intangible Assets Acquired in a
Business Combination, in valuing customer relationships.
Customer relationships, for valuation purposes, represent the
value of the business relationship with our existing customers
and are calculated by projecting future after-tax cash flows
from these customers including the right to deploy and market
additional services such as interactivity and telephony to these
customers. The present value of these after-tax cash flows
yields the fair value of the customer relationships.
Substantially all our acquisitions occurred prior to
January 1, 2002. We did not record any value associated
with the customer relationship intangibles related to those
acquisitions. For acquisitions subsequent to January 1,
2002, we did assign a value to the customer relationship
intangible, which is amortized over its estimated useful life.
In September 2004, EITF Topic D-108, Use of the Residual
Method to Value Acquired Assets Other than Goodwill, was
issued, which requires the direct method of separately valuing
all intangible assets and does not permit goodwill to be
included in franchise assets. We performed an impairment
assessment as of September 30, 2004, and adopted Topic
D-108 in that assessment resulting in a total franchise
impairment of approximately $3.3 billion. We recorded a
cumulative effect of accounting change of $765 million
(approximately $875 million before tax effects of
$91 million and minority interest effects of
$19 million) for the year ended December 31, 2004
representing the portion of our total franchise impairment
attributable to no longer including goodwill with franchise
assets. The effect of the adoption was to increase net loss and
loss per share by $765 million and $2.55 for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The remaining $2.4 billion of the
total franchise impairment was attributable to the use of lower
projected growth rates and the resulting revised estimates of
future cash flows in our valuation and was recorded as
53
impairment of franchises in our consolidated statements of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2004. Sustained
analog video customer losses by us and our industry peers in the
third quarter of 2004 primarily as a result of increased
competition from DBS providers and decreased growth rates in our
and our industry peers high speed data customers in the
third quarter of 2004, in part as a result of increased
competition from DSL providers, led us to lower our projected
growth rates and accordingly revise our estimates of future cash
flows from those used at October 1, 2003. See
Business Competition.
The valuation completed at October 1, 2003 showed franchise
values in excess of book value and thus resulted in no
impairment. Our annual impairment assessment as of
October 1, 2002, based on revised estimates from
January 1, 2002 of future cash flows and projected
long-term growth rates in our valuation, led to the recognition
of a $4.6 billion impairment charge in the fourth quarter
of 2002.
The valuations used in our impairment assessments involve
numerous assumptions as noted above. While economic conditions,
applicable at the time of the valuation, indicate the
combination of assumptions utilized in the valuations are
reasonable, as market conditions change so will the assumptions
with a resulting impact on the valuation and consequently the
potential impairment charge.
Sensitivity Analysis. The effect on the impairment charge
recognized in the third quarter of 2004 of the indicated
increase/decrease in the selected assumptions is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage/ | |
|
|
|
|
Percentage Point | |
|
Impairment Charge | |
Assumption |
|
Change | |
|
Increase/(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Annual Operating Cash Flow(1)
|
|
|
+/- 5% |
|
|
$ |
(890)/$921 |
|
Long-Term Growth Rate(2)
|
|
|
+/- 1 pts |
(3) |
|
|
(1,579)/1,232 |
|
Discount Rate
|
|
|
+/- 0.5 pts |
(3) |
|
|
1,336/(1,528) |
|
|
|
(1) |
Operating Cash Flow is defined as revenues less operating
expenses and selling general and administrative expenses. |
|
(2) |
Long-Term Growth Rate is the rate of cash flow growth beyond
year ten. |
|
(3) |
A percentage point change of one point equates to 100 basis
points. |
Income Taxes. All operations are held through Charter
Holdco and its direct and indirect subsidiaries. Charter Holdco
and the majority of its subsidiaries are not subject to income
tax. However, certain of these subsidiaries are corporations and
are subject to income tax. All of the taxable income, gains,
losses, deductions and credits of Charter Holdco are passed
through to its members: Charter, Charter Investment, Inc. and
Vulcan Cable III Inc. Charter is responsible for its share
of taxable income or loss of Charter Holdco allocated to it in
accordance with the Charter Holdco limited liability company
agreement (LLC Agreement) and partnership tax rules
and regulations.
The LLC Agreement provided for certain special allocations of
net tax profits and net tax losses (such net tax profits and net
tax losses being determined under the applicable federal income
tax rules for determining capital accounts). Under the LLC
Agreement, through the end of 2003, net tax losses of Charter
Holdco that would otherwise have been allocated to Charter based
generally on its percentage ownership of outstanding common
units were allocated instead to membership units held by Vulcan
Cable III Inc. and Charter Investment, Inc. (the
Special Loss Allocations) to the extent of their
respective capital account balances. After 2003, under the LLC
Agreement, net tax losses of Charter Holdco are allocated to
Charter, Vulcan Cable III Inc. and Charter Investment, Inc.
based generally on their respective percentage ownership of
outstanding common units to the extent of their respective
capital account balances. The LLC Agreement further provides
that, beginning at the time Charter Holdco generates net tax
profits, the net tax profits that would otherwise have been
allocated to Charter based generally on its percentage ownership
of outstanding common membership units will instead generally be
allocated to Vulcan Cable III Inc. and Charter Investment,
Inc. (the Special Profit Allocations). The Special
Profit Allocations to Vulcan Cable III Inc. and Charter
Investment, Inc. will generally continue until the cumulative
amount of the Special Profit Allocations offsets the cumulative
amount of the Special
54
Loss Allocations. The amount and timing of the Special Profit
Allocations are subject to the potential application of, and
interaction with, the Curative Allocation Provisions described
in the following paragraph. The LLC Agreement generally provides
that any additional net tax profits are to be allocated among
the members of Charter Holdco based generally on their
respective percentage ownership of Charter Holdco common
membership units.
Because the respective capital account balance of each of Vulcan
Cable III Inc. and Charter Investment, Inc. was reduced to
zero by December 31, 2002, certain net tax losses of
Charter Holdco that were to be allocated for 2002, 2003, 2004
and possibly later years, subject to resolution of the issue
described in Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions Transactions Arising out of Our
Organizational Structure and Mr. Allens Investment in
Charter Communications, Inc. and Its Subsidiaries
Equity Put Rights CC VIII, to Vulcan
Cable III Inc. and Charter Investment, Inc. instead have
been and will be allocated to Charter (the Regulatory
Allocations). The LLC Agreement further provides that, to
the extent possible, the effect of the Regulatory Allocations is
to be offset over time pursuant to certain curative allocation
provisions (the Curative Allocation Provisions) so
that, after certain offsetting adjustments are made, each
members capital account balance is equal to the capital
account balance such member would have had if the Regulatory
Allocations had not been part of the LLC Agreement. The
cumulative amount of the actual tax losses allocated to Charter
as a result of the Regulatory Allocations through the year ended
December 31, 2004 is approximately $4.0 billion.
As a result of the Special Loss Allocations and the Regulatory
Allocations referred to above, the cumulative amount of losses
of Charter Holdco allocated to Vulcan Cable III Inc. and
Charter Investment, Inc. is in excess of the amount that would
have been allocated to such entities if the losses of Charter
Holdco had been allocated among its members in proportion to
their respective percentage ownership of Charter Holdco common
membership units. The cumulative amount of such excess losses
was approximately $2.1 billion through December 31,
2003 and $1.0 billion through December 31, 2004.
In certain situations, the Special Loss Allocations, Special
Profit Allocations, Regulatory Allocations and Curative
Allocation Provisions described above could result in Charter
paying taxes in an amount that is more or less than if Charter
Holdco had allocated net tax profits and net tax losses among
its members based generally on the number of common membership
units owned by such members. This could occur due to differences
in (i) the character of the allocated income (e.g.,
ordinary versus capital), (ii) the allocated amount and
timing of tax depreciation and tax amortization expense due to
the application of section 704(c) under the Internal
Revenue Code, (iii) the potential interaction between the
Special Profit Allocations and the Curative Allocation
Provisions, (iv) the amount and timing of alternative
minimum taxes paid by Charter, if any, (v) the
apportionment of the allocated income or loss among the states
in which Charter Holdco does business, and (vi) future
federal and state tax laws. Further, in the event of new capital
contributions to Charter Holdco, it is possible that the tax
effects of the Special Profit Allocations, Special Loss
Allocations, Regulatory Allocations and Curative Allocation
Provisions will change significantly pursuant to the provisions
of the income tax regulations or the terms of a contribution
agreement with respect to such contributions. Such change could
defer the actual tax benefits to be derived by Charter with
respect to the net tax losses allocated to it or accelerate the
actual taxable income to Charter with respect to the net tax
profits allocated to it. As a result, it is possible under
certain circumstances, that Charter could receive future
allocations of taxable income in excess of its currently
allocated tax deductions and available tax loss carryforwards.
The ability to utilize net operating loss carryforwards is
potentially subject to certain limitations as discussed below.
In addition, under their exchange agreement with Charter, Vulcan
Cable III Inc. and Charter Investment, Inc. may exchange
some or all of their membership units in Charter Holdco for
Charters Class B common stock, be merged with
Charter, or be acquired by Charter in a non-taxable
reorganization. If such an exchange were to take place prior to
the date that the Special Profit Allocation provisions had fully
offset the Special Loss Allocations, Vulcan Cable III Inc.
and Charter Investment, Inc. could elect to cause Charter Holdco
to make the remaining Special Profit Allocations to Vulcan
Cable III Inc. and Charter Investment, Inc. immediately
prior to the consummation of the exchange. In the event Vulcan
Cable III Inc. and Charter Investment, Inc. choose not to
make such election or to the
55
extent such allocations are not possible, Charter would then be
allocated tax profits attributable to the membership units
received in such exchange pursuant to the Special Profit
Allocation provisions. Mr. Allen has generally agreed to
reimburse Charter for any incremental income taxes that Charter
would owe as a result of such an exchange and any resulting
future Special Profit Allocations to Charter. The ability of
Charter to utilize net operating loss carryforwards is
potentially subject to certain limitations (see Risk
Factors Risks Related to Mr. Allens
Controlling Position). If Charter were to become subject
to such limitations (whether as a result of an exchange
described above or otherwise), and as a result were to owe taxes
resulting from the Special Profit Allocations, then
Mr. Allen may not be obligated to reimburse Charter for
such income taxes.
As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and 2003,
we have recorded net deferred income tax liabilities of
$230 million, $216 million and $417 million,
respectively. Additionally, as of March 31, 2005,
December 31, 2004 and 2003, we have deferred tax assets of
$3.7 billion, $3.5 billion and $1.7 billion,
respectively, which primarily relate to financial and tax losses
allocated to Charter from Charter Holdco. We are required to
record a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not
that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will
not be realized. Given the uncertainty surrounding our ability
to utilize our deferred tax assets, these items have been offset
with a corresponding valuation allowance of $3.3 billion,
$3.2 billion and $1.3 billion at March 31, 2005,
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Charter Holdco is currently under examination by the Internal
Revenue Service for the tax years ending December 31, 2000,
2002 and 2003. Our results (excluding Charter and our indirect
corporate subsidiaries) for these years are subject to this
examination. Management does not expect the results of this
examination to have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial condition, results of operations or our
liquidity, including our ability to comply with our debt
covenants.
Litigation. Legal contingencies have a high degree of
uncertainty. When a loss from a contingency becomes estimable
and probable, a reserve is established. The reserve reflects
managements best estimate of the probable cost of ultimate
resolution of the matter and is revised accordingly as facts and
circumstances change and, ultimately when the matter is brought
to closure. We have established reserves for certain matters
including those described in Business Legal
Proceedings. If any of the litigation matters described in
Business Legal Proceedings is resolved
unfavorably resulting in payment obligations in excess of
managements best estimate of the outcome, such resolution
could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial condition, results of operations or our liquidity.
56
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 Compared to Three
Months Ended March 31, 2004
The following table sets forth the percentages of revenues that
items in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of
operations constituted for the periods presented (dollars in
millions, except per share and share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
1,271 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
1,214 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (excluding depreciation and amortization)
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
Asset impairment charges
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets, net
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
)% |
|
Option compensation expense, net
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
Special charges, net
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
96 |
% |
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments and hedging activities, net
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on debt to equity conversions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(385 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before minority interest and income taxes
|
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(337 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(352 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends on preferred stock redeemable
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to common stock
|
|
$ |
(353 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per common share, basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(1.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
|
|
303,308,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,106,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues. Revenues increased by $57 million, or 5%,
from $1.2 billion for the three months ended March 31,
2004 to $1.3 billion for the three months ended
March 31, 2005. This increase is principally the result of
an increase of 325,400 and 37,200 high-speed data and digital
video customers, respectively, as well as price increases for
video and high-speed data services, and is offset partially by a
decrease of 207,200 analog video customers. The cable system
sales to Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC, which closed in March
and April 2004 (referred to in this section as the System
Sales) reduced the increase in revenues by
$29 million. Our goal is to increase revenues by improving
customer service which we
57
believe will stabilize our analog video customer base,
implementing price increases on certain services and packages
and increasing the number of customers who purchase high-speed
data services, digital video and advanced products and services
such as VOIP telephony, VOD, high definition television and DVR
service.
Average monthly revenue per analog video customer increased to
$70.75 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 from
$65.31 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 primarily
as a result of incremental revenues from advanced services and
price increases. Average monthly revenue per analog video
customer represents total annual revenue, divided by twelve,
divided by the average number of analog video customers during
the respective period.
Revenues by service offering were as follows (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 over 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% | |
|
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Change | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Video
|
|
$ |
842 |
|
|
|
66% |
|
|
$ |
849 |
|
|
|
70% |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
High-speed data
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
17% |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
14% |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
Advertising sales
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Commercial
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
4% |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Other
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
7% |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
7% |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,271 |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
$ |
1,214 |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video revenues consist primarily of revenues from analog and
digital video services provided to our non-commercial customers.
Video revenues decreased by $7 million, or 1%, from
$849 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004
to $842 million for the three months ended March 31,
2005. Approximately $21 million of the decrease was the
result of the System Sales and approximately an additional
$24 million related to a decline in analog video customers.
The decreases were offset by increases of approximately
$33 million resulting from price increases and incremental
video revenues from existing customers and approximately
$5 million resulting from an increase in digital video
customers.
Revenues from high-speed data services provided to our
non-commercial customers increased $47 million, or 28%,
from $168 million for the three months ended March 31,
2004 to $215 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2005. Approximately $35 million of the
increase related to the increase in the average number of
customers receiving high-speed data services, whereas
approximately $15 million related to the increase in
average price of the service. The increase in high-speed data
revenues was reduced by approximately $3 million as a
result of the System Sales.
Advertising sales revenues consist primarily of revenues from
commercial advertising customers, programmers and other vendors.
Advertising sales increased $5 million, or 8%, from
$59 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004
to $64 million for the three months ended March 31,
2005, primarily as a result of an increase in new advertising
sales customers and in advertising rates. The increase was
offset by a decrease of $1 million as a result of the
System Sales. For each of the three months ended March 31,
2005 and 2004, we received $3 million in advertising sales
revenues from vendors.
Commercial revenues consist primarily of revenues from cable
video and high-speed data services to our commercial customers.
Commercial revenues increased $9 million, or 16%, from
$56 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004
to $65 million for the three months ended March 31,
2005, primarily as a result of an increase in commercial
high-speed data revenues. The increase was reduced by
approximately $2 million as a result of the System Sales.
Other revenues consist of revenues from franchise fees,
telephony revenue, equipment rental, customer installations,
home shopping, dial-up Internet service, late payment fees, wire
maintenance fees and other miscellaneous revenues. Other
revenues increased $3 million, or 4%, from $82 million
for the three months
58
ended March 31, 2004 to $85 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2005. The increase was primarily the
result of an increase in installation revenue, telephony revenue
and franchise fees and was partially offset by approximately
$2 million as a result of the System Sales and decreases in
home shopping revenue.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses increased
$47 million, or 9%, from $512 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2004 to $559 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2005. The increase in
operating expenses was reduced by approximately $12 million
as a result of the System Sales. Programming costs included in
the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations
were $358 million and $334 million, representing 29%
and 32% of total costs and expenses for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Key expense
components as a percentage of revenues were as follows (dollars
in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 over 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% | |
|
|
Expenses | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Expenses | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Change | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Programming
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
|
|
28% |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
|
27% |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
|
7% |
|
Advertising sales
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
2% |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
2% |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9% |
|
Service
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
14% |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
13% |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
14% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
559 |
|
|
|
44% |
|
|
$ |
512 |
|
|
|
42% |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
|
9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programming costs consist primarily of costs paid to programmers
for analog, premium, digital channels, VOD and pay-per-view
programming. The increase in programming costs of
$24 million, or 7%, for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 over the three months ended March 31,
2004, was a result of price increases, particularly in sports
programming, an increased number of channels carried on our
systems, and an increase in digital video customers, partially
offset by a decrease in analog video customers. Additionally,
the increase in programming costs was reduced by $9 million
as a result of the System Sales. Programming costs were offset
by the amortization of payments received from programmers in
support of launches of new channels of $9 million and
$14 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005
and 2004, respectively.
Our cable programming costs have increased in every year we have
operated in excess of U.S. inflation and cost-of-living
increases, and we expect them to continue to increase because of
a variety of factors, including inflationary or negotiated
annual increases, additional programming being provided to
customers and increased costs to purchase programming. In 2005,
we expect programming costs to increase at a higher rate than in
2004. These costs will be determined in part on the outcome of
programming negotiations in 2005 and will likely be subject to
offsetting events or otherwise affected by factors similar to
the ones mentioned in the preceding paragraph. Our increasing
programming costs will result in declining operating margins for
our video services to the extent we are unable to pass on cost
increases to our customers. We expect to partially offset any
resulting margin compression from our traditional video services
with revenue from advanced video services, increased high-speed
data revenues, advertising revenues and commercial service
revenues.
Advertising sales expenses consist of costs related to
traditional advertising services provided to advertising
customers, including salaries, benefits and commissions.
Advertising sales expenses increased $2 million, or 9%,
primarily as a result of increased salary, benefit and
commission costs. Service costs consist primarily of service
personnel salaries and benefits, franchise fees, system
utilities, Internet service provider fees, maintenance and pole
rent expense. The increase in service costs of $21 million,
or 14%, resulted primarily from increased labor costs to support
our infrastructure, increased equipment maintenance and higher
fuel prices. The increase in service costs was reduced by
$3 million as a result of the System Sales.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling,
general and administrative expenses decreased by
$2 million, or 1%, from $239 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2004 to
59
$237 million for the three months ended March 31,
2005. Included in the decrease in selling, general and
administrative expenses was $4 million as a result of the
System Sales. Key components of expense as a percentage of
revenues were as follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 over 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% | |
|
|
Expenses | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Expenses | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Change | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
General and administrative
|
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
|
16% |
|
|
$ |
208 |
|
|
|
17% |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
Marketing
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
3% |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
3% |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
|
19% |
|
|
$ |
239 |
|
|
|
20% |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of
salaries and benefits, rent expense, billing costs, call center
costs, internal network costs, bad debt expense and property
taxes. The decrease in general and administrative expenses of
$6 million, or 3%, resulted primarily from the System Sales
of $4 million, decreases in bad debt expense of
$5 million, property taxes of $6 million and salaries
and benefits of $4 million offset by increases in costs
associated with our commercial business of $3 million and
professional fees of $6 million.
Marketing expenses increased $4 million, or 13%, as a
result of an increased investment in targeted marketing and
branding campaigns.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and
amortization expense increased by $11 million, or 3%, from
$370 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004
to $381 million for the three months ended March 31,
2005. The increase in depreciation related to an increase in
capital expenditures, which was offset by lower depreciation as
the result of the System Sales.
Asset Impairment Charges. Asset impairment charges for
the three months ended March 31, 2005 represent the
write-down of assets related to two pending cable asset sales to
fair value less costs to sell. See Note 3 to the condensed
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
(Gain) Loss on Sale of Assets, Net. The loss on sale of
assets of $4 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 represents the loss recognized on the
disposition of plant and equipment. Gain on sale of assets of
$106 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004
primarily represents the pretax gain realized on the sale of
cable systems to Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC which closed in
March 2004.
Option Compensation Expense, Net. Option compensation
expense of $4 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 primarily represents options expensed in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation. Option compensation expense of
$14 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004
includes the expense of approximately $6 million related to
a stock option exchange program, under which our employees were
offered the right to exchange all stock options (vested and
unvested) issued under the 1999 Charter Communications Option
Plan and 2001 Stock Incentive Plan that had an exercise price
over $10 per share for shares of restricted Charter
Class A common stock or, in some instances, cash. The
exchange offer closed in February 2004. Additionally, during the
three months ended March 31, 2004, we recognized
approximately $3 million related to the options granted
under the Charter Long-Term Incentive Program and approximately
$5 million related to options granted and expensed in
accordance with SFAS No. 123.
Special Charges, Net. Special charges of $4 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2005 represents
$4 million of severance and related costs of our management
realignment. Special charges of $10 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2004 represents approximately
$9 million of litigation costs related to the tentative
settlement of the South Carolina national class action suit
subject to final documentation and court approval and
approximately $1 million of severance and related costs of
our workforce reduction.
60
Interest Expense, Net. Net interest expense increased by
$27 million, or 7%, from $393 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2004 to $420 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2005. The increase in net
interest expense was a result of an increase in our average
borrowing rate from 8.22% in the first quarter of 2004 to 8.86%
in the first quarter of 2005 coupled with an increase of
$848 million in average debt outstanding from
$18.4 billion for the first quarter of 2004 compared to
$19.2 billion for the first quarter of 2005 and was offset
partially by $19 million in gains related to embedded
derivatives in Charters 5.875% convertible senior
notes issued in November 2004. See Note 9 to the condensed
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
Net. Net gain on derivative instruments and hedging
activities increased $34 million from a loss of
$7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004
to a gain of $27 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2005. The increase is primarily the result of an
increase in gains on interest rate agreements that do not
qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
which increased from a loss of $6 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2004 to a gain of $26 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
Loss on Debt to Equity Conversions. Loss on debt to
equity conversions of $8 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2004 represents the loss recognized from a
privately negotiated exchange of $10 million principal
amount of Charters 5.75% convertible senior notes
held by a single unrelated party for shares of Charter
Class A common stock, which resulted in the issuance of
more shares in the exchange transaction than would have been
issued pursuant to the original terms of the convertible senior
notes.
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt. Gain on extinguishment of
debt of $7 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 represents approximately $11 million
related to the issuance of Charter Operating notes in exchange
for Charter Holdings notes and approximately $1 million
related to the repurchase of $34 million principal amount
of our 4.75% convertible senior notes due 2006. These gains
were offset by approximately $5 million of losses related
to the redemption of our subsidiarys, CC V Holdings, LLC,
11.875% notes due 2008. See Note 6 to the condensed
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
Other, Net. Net other income of $1 million and net
other expense of $2 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, primarily represents
gains and losses on equity investments.
Minority Interest. Minority interest represents the 2%
accretion of the preferred membership interests in our indirect
subsidiary, CC VIII, LLC, and in the first quarter of 2004, the
pro rata share of the profits and losses of CC VIII, LLC.
Effective January 1, 2005, we ceased recognizing minority
interest in earnings or losses of CC VIII, LLC for financial
reporting purposes until such time as the resolution of the
dispute between Charter and Mr. Allen regarding the
preferred membership interests in CC VIII, LLC is
determinable or certain other events occur. See Note 7 to
the condensed consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus. Reported losses allocated to
minority interest on the statement of operations are limited to
the extent of any remaining minority interest on the balance
sheet related to Charter Holdco. Because minority interest in
Charter Holdco is substantially eliminated, Charter absorbs
substantially all losses before income taxes that otherwise
would be allocated to minority interest. Subject to any changes
in Charter Holdcos capital structure, future losses will
continue to be substantially absorbed by Charter.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense of
$15 million and $54 million was recognized for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
The income tax expense is recognized through increases in
deferred tax liabilities related to our investment in Charter
Holdco, as well as through current federal and state income tax
expense and increases in the deferred tax liabilities of certain
of our indirect corporate subsidiaries. Additionally, the sale
of certain systems to Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC on
March 1, 2004 resulted in income tax expense of
$14 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004.
61
Net Loss. Net loss increased by $59 million, or 20%,
from $293 million for the three months ended March 31,
2004 to $352 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 as a result of the factors described above.
Preferred Stock Dividends. On August 31, 2001,
Charter issued 505,664 shares (and on February 28,
2003 issued an additional 39,595 shares) of Series A
Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock in connection with the
Cable USA acquisition, on which Charter pays or accrues a
quarterly cumulative cash dividend at an annual rate of 5.75% if
paid or 7.75% if accrued on a liquidation preference of
$100 per share. Beginning January 1, 2005, Charter is
accruing the dividend on its Series A Convertible
Redeemable Preferred Stock.
Loss Per Common Share. The loss per common share
increased by $0.16 from $1.00 per common share for the
three months ended March 31, 2004 to $1.16 per common
share for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as a result
of the factors described above.
Year Ended December 31, 2004, December 31, 2003 and
December 31, 2002
The following table sets forth the percentages of revenues that
items in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations
constitute for the indicated periods (dollars in millions,
except per share and share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
4,977 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
4,819 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
4,566 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (excluding depreciation and amortization)
|
|
|
2,080 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
1,952 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
1,436 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
Impairment of franchises
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,638 |
|
|
|
102 |
% |
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets, net
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option compensation expense, net
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special charges, net
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
Unfavorable contracts and other settlements
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,023 |
|
|
|
141 |
% |
|
|
4,303 |
|
|
|
89 |
% |
|
|
8,888 |
|
|
|
195 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(2,046 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
)% |
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
(4,322 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
)% |
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(1,670 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,557 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,503 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments and hedging activities, net
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on debt to equity conversions
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before minority interest, income taxes and cumulative
effect of accounting change
|
|
|
(3,698 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(725 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,944 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
(3,679 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,768 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
(3,576 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,308 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net loss
|
|
|
(4,341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,514 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends on preferred stock redeemable
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to common stock
|
|
$ |
(4,345 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,517 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per common share, basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(14.47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.82 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(8.55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
300,291,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,597,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,440,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2003
Revenues. Revenues increased by $158 million, or 3%,
from $4.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2003
to $5.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2004.
This increase is principally the result of an increase of
318,800 and 2,800 high-speed data customers and digital
video customers, respectively, as well as price increases for
video and high-speed data services, and is offset partially by a
decrease of 439,800 analog video customers. Included in the
reduction in analog video customers and reducing the increase in
digital video and high-speed data customers are 230,800 analog
video customers, 83,300 digital video customers and 37,800
high-speed data customers sold in the cable system sales to
Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC, which closed in March and
April 2004 (collectively, with the cable system sale to
WaveDivision Holdings, LLC in October 2003, referred to in
this section as the System Sales). The System Sales
reduced the increase in revenues by $160 million.
Average monthly revenue per analog video customer increased from
$61.92 for the year ended December 31, 2003 to $68.02 for
the year ended December 31, 2004 primarily as a result of
price increases and incremental revenues from advanced services.
Average monthly revenue per analog video customer represents
total annual revenue, divided by twelve, divided by the average
number of analog video customers during the respective period.
Revenues by service offering were as follows (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 over 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% | |
|
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Change | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Video
|
|
$ |
3,373 |
|
|
|
68 |
% |
|
$ |
3,461 |
|
|
|
72 |
% |
|
$ |
(88 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
High-speed data
|
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
Advertising sales
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Commercial
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Other
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,977 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
4,819 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video revenues consist primarily of revenues from analog and
digital video services provided to our non-commercial customers.
Video revenues decreased by $88 million, or 3%, from
$3.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2003 to
$3.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Approximately $116 million of the decrease was the result
of the System Sales and approximately an additional
$65 million related to a decline in analog video customers.
These decreases were offset by increases of approximately
$66 million resulting from price increases and incremental
video revenues from existing customers and approximately
$27 million resulting from an increase in digital video
customers.
Revenues from high-speed data services provided to our
non-commercial customers increased $185 million, or 33%,
from $556 million for the year ended December 31, 2003
to $741 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Approximately $163 million of the increase related to the
increase in the average number of customers receiving high-speed
data services, whereas approximately $35 million related
63
to the increase in average price of the service. The increase in
high-speed data revenues was reduced by approximately
$12 million as a result of the System Sales.
Advertising sales revenues consist primarily of revenues from
commercial advertising customers, programmers and other vendors.
Advertising sales increased $26 million, or 10%, from
$263 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 to
$289 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
primarily as a result of an increase in national advertising
campaigns and election related advertising. The increase was
offset by a decrease of $7 million as a result of the
System Sales. For the years ended December 31, 2004 and
2003, we received $16 million and $15 million,
respectively, in advertising revenue from vendors.
Commercial revenues consist primarily of revenues from cable
video and high-speed data services to our commercial customers.
Commercial revenues increased $34 million, or 17%, from
$204 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, to
$238 million for the year ended December 31, 2004,
primarily as a result of an increase in commercial high-speed
data revenues. The increase was reduced by approximately
$14 million as a result of the System Sales.
Other revenues consist of revenues from franchise fees,
telephony revenue, equipment rental, customer installations,
home shopping, dial-up Internet service, late payment fees, wire
maintenance fees and other miscellaneous revenues. For the year
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, franchise fees
represented approximately 49% and 48%, respectively, of total
other revenues. Other revenues increased $1 million from
$335 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 to
$336 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. The
increase was primarily the result of an increase in home
shopping and infomercial revenue and was partially offset by
approximately $11 million as a result of the System Sales.
Operating expenses. Operating expenses increased
$128 million, or 7%, from $2.0 billion for the year
ended December 31, 2003 to $2.1 billion for the year
ended December 31, 2004. The increase in operating expenses
was reduced by approximately $59 million as a result of the
System Sales. Programming costs included in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations were $1.3 billion and
$1.2 billion, representing 63% and 64% of total operating
expenses for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. Key expense components as a percentage of revenues
were as follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 over 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% | |
|
|
Expenses | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Expenses | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Change | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Programming
|
|
$ |
1,319 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
$ |
1,249 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Advertising sales
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Service
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,080 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
$ |
1,952 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programming costs consist primarily of costs paid to programmers
for analog, premium and digital channels and pay-per-view
programming. The increase in programming costs of
$70 million, or 6%, for the year ended December 31,
2004 over the year ended December 31, 2003 was a result of
price increases, particularly in sports programming, an
increased number of channels carried on our systems, and an
increase in digital video customers, partially offset by a
decrease in analog video customers. Additionally, the increase
in programming costs was reduced by $42 million as a result
of the System Sales. Programming costs were offset by the
amortization of payments received from programmers in support of
launches of new channels of $59 million and
$62 million for the years ended December 31, 2004 and
2003, respectively. Programming costs for the year ended
December 31, 2004 also include a $5 million reduction
related to the settlement of a dispute with TechTV, Inc., a
related party. See Note 22 to the consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Advertising sales expenses consist of costs related to
traditional advertising services provided to advertising
customers, including salaries, benefits and commissions.
Advertising sales expenses increased $10 million, or 11%,
primarily as a result of increased salary, benefit and
commission costs. The increase in
64
advertising sales expenses was reduced by $2 million as a
result of the System Sales. Service costs consist primarily of
service personnel salaries and benefits, franchise fees, system
utilities, Internet service provider fees, maintenance and pole
rental expense. The increase in service costs of
$48 million, or 8%, resulted primarily from additional
activity associated with ongoing infrastructure maintenance. The
increase in service costs was reduced by $15 million as a
result of the System Sales.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling,
general and administrative expenses increased by
$31 million, or 3%, from $940 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003 to $971 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004. The increase in selling, general
and administrative expenses was reduced by $22 million as a
result of the System Sales. Key components of expense as a
percentage of revenues were as follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 over 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% | |
|
|
Expenses | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Expenses | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Change | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
General and administrative
|
|
$ |
849 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
$ |
833 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Marketing
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
971 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
$ |
940 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of
salaries and benefits, rent expense, billing costs, call center
costs, internal network costs, bad debt expense and property
taxes. The increase in general and administrative expenses of
$16 million, or 2%, resulted primarily from increases in
costs associated with our commercial business of
$21 million, third party call center costs resulting from
increased emphasis on customer service of $10 million and
bad debt expense of $10 million offset by decreases in
costs associated with salaries and benefits of $21 million
and rent expense of $3 million.
Marketing expenses increased $15 million, or 14%, as a
result of an increased investment in marketing and branding
campaigns.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and
amortization expense increased by $42 million, or 3%, to
$1.5 billion in 2004. The increase in depreciation related
to an increase in capital expenditures, which was partially
offset by lower depreciation as the result of the System Sales.
Impairment of franchises. We performed an impairment
assessment during the third quarter of 2004. The use of lower
projected growth rates and the resulting revised estimates of
future cash flows in our valuation, primarily as a result of
increased competition, led to the recognition of a
$2.4 billion impairment charge for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
(Gain) loss on sale of assets, net. Gain on sale of
assets of $86 million for the year ended December 31,
2004 primarily represents the pretax gain of $104 million
realized on the sale of systems to Atlantic Broadband Finance,
LLC which closed in March and April 2004 offset by losses
recognized on the disposition of plant and equipment. Loss on
sale of assets of $5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003 represents the loss recognized on the
disposition of plant and equipment offset by a gain of
$21 million recognized on the sale of cable systems in Port
Orchard, Washington which closed on October 1, 2003.
Option compensation expense, net. Option compensation
expense of $31 million for the year ended December 31,
2004 primarily represents $22 million related to options
granted and expensed in accordance with SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Additionally,
during the year ended December 31, 2004, we expensed
approximately $8 million related to a stock option exchange
program, under which our employees were offered the right to
exchange all stock options (vested and unvested) issued under
the 1999 Charter Communications Option Plan and 2001 Stock
Incentive Plan that had an exercise price over $10 per
share for shares of restricted Charter Class A common stock
or, in some instances, cash. The exchange offer closed in
February 2004. Option compensation expense of $4 million
for the year ended December 31, 2003 primarily represents
options expensed in accordance with
65
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation. See Note 19 to our consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for more
information regarding our option compensation plans.
Special charges, net. Special charges of
$104 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
represents approximately $85 million of aggregate value of
the Charter Class A common stock and warrants to purchase
Charter Class A common stock contemplated to be issued as
part of a settlement of the consolidated federal class actions,
state derivative actions and federal derivative action lawsuits,
approximately $10 million of litigation costs related to
the tentative settlement of a South Carolina national class
action suit, all of which settlements are subject to final
documentation and court approval and approximately
$12 million of severance and related costs of our workforce
reduction and realignment. Special charges for the year ended
December 31, 2004 were offset by $3 million received
from a third party in settlement of a dispute. Special charges
of $21 million for the year ended December 31, 2003
represents approximately $26 million of severance and
related costs of our workforce reduction partially offset by a
$5 million credit from a settlement from the Internet
service provider Excite@Home related to the conversion of about
145,000 high-speed data customers to our Charter Pipeline
service in 2001.
Unfavorable contracts and other settlements. Unfavorable
contracts and other settlements of $5 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004 relates to changes in estimated
legal reserves established in connection with prior business
combinations, which based on an evaluation of current facts and
circumstances, are no longer required.
Unfavorable contracts and other settlements of $72 million
for the year ended December 31, 2003 represents the
settlement of estimated liabilities recorded in connection with
prior business combinations. The majority of this benefit
(approximately $52 million) is due to the renegotiation in
2003 of a major programming contract, for which a liability had
been recorded for the above market portion of that agreement in
connection with a 1999 and a 2000 acquisition. The remaining
benefit relates to the reversal of previously recorded
liabilities, which are no longer required.
Interest expense, net. Net interest expense increased by
$113 million, or 7%, from $1.6 billion for the year
ended December 31, 2003 to $1.7 billion for the year
ended December 31, 2004. The increase in net interest
expense was a result of an increase in our average borrowing
rate from 7.99% in the year ended December 31, 2003 to
8.66% in the year ended December 31, 2004 partially offset
by a decrease of $306 million in average debt outstanding
from $18.9 billion in 2003 to $18.6 billion in 2004.
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments and hedging activities,
net. Net gain on derivative instruments and hedging
activities increased $4 million from a gain of
$65 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 to a
gain of $69 million for the year ended December 31,
2004. The increase is primarily the result of an increase in
gains on interest rate agreements that do not qualify for hedge
accounting under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which
increased from a gain of $57 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003 to a gain of $65 million for the
year ended December 31, 2004. This was coupled with a
decrease in gains on interest rate agreements, as a result of
hedge ineffectiveness on designated hedges, which decreased from
$8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 to
$4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Loss on debt to equity conversions. Loss on debt to
equity conversions of $23 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 represents the loss recognized from
privately negotiated exchanges of a total of $30 million
principal amount of Charters 5.75% convertible senior
notes held by two unrelated parties for shares of Charter
Class A common stock. The exchange resulted in the issuance
of more shares in the exchange transaction than would have been
issuable under the original terms of the convertible senior
notes.
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt. Loss on
extinguishment of debt of $31 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 represents the write-off of deferred
financing fees and third party costs related to the Charter
Communications Operating refinancing in April 2004 and the
redemption of our 5.75% convertible senior notes due 2005
in December 2004. Gain on extinguishment of debt of
66
$267 million for the year ended December 31, 2003
represents the gain realized on the purchase of an aggregate
$609 million principal amount of our outstanding
convertible senior notes and $1.3 billion principal amount
of Charter Holdings senior notes and senior discount notes
in consideration for an aggregate of $1.6 billion principal
amount of 10.25% notes due 2010 issued by our indirect
subsidiary, CCH II. The gain is net of the write-off of
deferred financing costs associated with the retired debt of
$27 million.
Other, net. Net other expense decreased by
$19 million from $16 million in 2003 to income of
$3 million in 2004. Other expense in 2003 included
$11 million associated with amending a revolving credit
facility of our subsidiaries and costs associated with
terminated debt transactions that did not recur in 2004. In
addition, gains on equity investments increased $7 million
in 2004 over 2003.
Minority interest. Minority interest represents the 2%
accretion of the preferred membership interests in our indirect
subsidiary, CC VIII, LLC, and since June 6, 2003, the
pro rata share of the profits and losses of CC VIII, LLC.
See Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions Transactions Arising out of Our
Organizational Structure and Mr. Allens Investment in
Charter Communications, Inc. and Its Subsidiaries
Equity Put Rights CC VIII. Reported
losses allocated to minority interest on the statement of
operations are limited to the extent of any remaining minority
interest on the balance sheet related to Charter Holdco. Because
minority interest in Charter Holdco was substantially eliminated
at December 31, 2003, beginning in the first quarter of
2004, Charter began to absorb substantially all future losses
before income taxes that otherwise would have been allocated to
minority interest. For the year ended December 31, 2003,
53.5% of our losses were allocated to minority interest. As a
result of negative equity at Charter Holdco during the year
ended December 31, 2004, no additional losses were
allocated to minority interest, resulting in an additional
$2.4 billion of net losses. Under our existing capital
structure, future losses will be substantially absorbed by
Charter.
Income tax benefit. Income tax benefit of
$103 million and $110 million was recognized for the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The
income tax benefits were realized as a result of decreases in
certain deferred tax liabilities related to our investment in
Charter Holdco as well as decreases in the deferred tax
liabilities of certain of our indirect corporate subsidiaries.
The income tax benefit recognized in the year ended
December 31, 2004 was directly related to the impairment of
franchises as discussed above. The deferred tax liabilities
decreased as a result of the write-down of franchise assets for
financial statement purposes, but not for tax purposes. We do
not expect to recognize a similar benefit associated with the
impairment of franchises in future periods. However, the actual
tax provision calculations in future periods will be the result
of current and future temporary differences, as well as future
operating results.
The income tax benefit recognized in the year ended
December 31, 2003 was directly related to the tax losses
allocated to Charter from Charter Holdco. In the second quarter
of 2003, Charter started receiving tax loss allocations from
Charter Holdco. Previously, the tax losses had been allocated to
Vulcan Cable III Inc. and Charter Investment, Inc. in
accordance with the Special Loss Allocations provided under the
Charter Holdco limited liability company agreement. We do not
expect to recognize a similar benefit related to our investment
in Charter Holdco after 2003 related to tax loss allocations
received from Charter Holdco, due to limitations associated with
our ability to offset future tax benefits against the remaining
deferred tax liabilities. However, the actual tax provision
calculations in future periods will be the result of current and
future temporary differences, as well as future operating
results.
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax.
Cumulative effect of accounting change of $765 million (net
of minority interest effects of $19 million and tax effects
of $91 million) in 2004 represents the impairment charge
recorded as a result of our adoption of EITF Topic D-108.
Net loss. Net loss increased by $4.1 billion from
$238 million in 2003 to $4.3 billion in 2004 as a
result of the factors described above. The impact to net loss in
2004 of the impairment of franchises, cumulative effect of
accounting change and the reduction in losses allocated to
minority interest was to increase net loss by approximately
$3.7 billion. The impact to net loss in 2003 of the gain on
the sale of
67
systems, unfavorable contracts and settlements and gain on debt
exchange, net of income tax impact, was to decrease net loss by
$168 million.
Preferred stock dividends. On August 31, 2001, in
connection with the Cable USA acquisition, Charter issued
505,664 shares (and on February 28, 2003 issued an
additional 39,595 shares) of Series A Convertible
Redeemable Preferred Stock, on which it pays or accrues a
quarterly cumulative cash dividend at an annual rate of 5.75% if
paid or 7.75% if accrued on a liquidation preference of
$100 per share.
Loss per common share. The loss per common share
increased by $13.65, from $0.82 per common share for the
year ended December 31, 2003 to $14.47 per common
share for the year ended December 31, 2004 as a result of
the factors described above.
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2002
Revenues. Revenues increased by $253 million, or 6%,
from $4.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2002
to $4.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2003.
This increase is principally the result of an increase of
427,500 high-speed data customers, as well as price increases
for video and high-speed data services, and is offset partially
by a decrease of 147,500 and 10,900 in analog and digital video
customers, respectively. Included within the decrease of analog
and digital video customers and reducing the increase of
high-speed data customers are 25,500 analog video customers,
12,500 digital video customers and 12,200 high-speed data
customers sold in the Port Orchard, Washington sale on
October 1, 2003.
Average monthly revenue per analog video customer increased from
$56.91 for the year ended December 31, 2002 to $61.92 for
the year ended December 31, 2003 primarily as a result of
price increases and incremental revenues from advanced services.
Average monthly revenue per analog video customer represents
total annual revenue, divided by twelve, divided by the average
number of analog video customers during the respective period.
Revenues by service offering were as follows (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 over 2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Revenues | |
|
% of Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
% of Revenues | |
|
Change | |
|
% Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Video
|
|
$ |
3,461 |
|
|
|
72 |
% |
|
$ |
3,420 |
|
|
|
75 |
% |
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
High-speed data
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
65 |
% |
Advertising sales
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
)% |
Commercial
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
Other
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,819 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
4,566 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
253 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video revenues consist primarily of revenues from analog and
digital video services provided to our non-commercial customers.
Video revenues increased by $41 million, or 1%, for the
year ended December 31, 2003 compared to the year ended
December 31, 2002. Video revenues increased approximately
$65 million due to price increases and incremental video
revenues from existing customers and $82 million as a
result of increases in the average number of digital video
customers, which were partially offset by a decrease of
approximately $106 million as a result of a decline in
analog video customers.
Revenues from high-speed data services provided to our
non-commercial customers increased $219 million, or 65%,
from $337 million for the year ended December 31, 2002
to $556 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Approximately $206 million of the increase related to the
increase in the average number of customers, whereas
approximately $13 million related to the increase in the
average price of the service. The increase in customers was
primarily due to the addition of high-speed data customers in
our existing service areas. We were also able to offer this
service to more of our customers,
68
as the estimated percentage of homes passed that could receive
high-speed data service increased from 82% as of
December 31, 2002 to 87% as of December 31, 2003 as a
result of our system upgrades.
Advertising sales revenues consist primarily of revenues from
commercial advertising customers, programmers and other vendors.
Advertising sales decreased $39 million, or 13%, from
$302 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, to
$263 million for the year ended December 31, 2003,
primarily as a result of a decrease in advertising from vendors
of approximately $64 million offset partially by an
increase in local advertising sales revenues of approximately
$25 million. For the years ended December 31, 2003 and
2002, we received $15 million and $79 million,
respectively, in advertising revenue from vendors.
Commercial revenues consist primarily of revenues from video and
high-speed data services to our commercial customers. Commercial
revenues increased $43 million, or 27%, from
$161 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, to
$204 million for the year ended December 31, 2003,
primarily due to an increase in commercial high-speed data
revenues.
Other revenues consist of revenues from franchise fees,
equipment rental, customer installations, home shopping, dial-up
Internet service, late payment fees, wire maintenance fees and
other miscellaneous revenues. For the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002, franchise fees represented
approximately 48% and 46%, respectively, of total other
revenues. Other revenues decreased $11 million, or 3%, from
$346 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 to
$335 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The
decrease was due primarily to a decrease in franchise fees after
an FCC ruling in March 2002, no longer requiring the collection
of franchise fees for high-speed data services. Franchise fee
revenues are collected from customers and remitted to franchise
authorities.
The decrease in accounts receivable of 27% compared to the
increase in revenues of 6% is primarily due to the timing of
collection of receivables from programmers for fees associated
with the launching of their networks coupled with our tightened
credit and collections policy. These fees from programmers are
not recorded as revenue but, rather, are recorded as reductions
of programming expense on a straight-line basis over the term of
the contract. Programmer receivables decreased $40 million,
or 57%, from $70 million as of December 31, 2002 to
$30 million as of December 31, 2003.
Operating expenses. Operating expenses increased
$145 million, or 8%, from $1.8 billion for the year
ended December 31, 2002 to $2.0 billion for the year
ended December 31, 2003. Programming costs included in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations were
$1.2 billion and $1.2 billion, representing 64% and
65% of total operating expenses for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Key expense
components as a percentage of revenues were as follows (dollars
in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 over 2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% | |
|
|
Expenses | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Expenses | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Change | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Programming
|
|
$ |
1,249 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
$ |
1,166 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Advertising sales
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Service
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,952 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
$ |
1,807 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programming costs consist primarily of costs paid to programmers
for analog, premium and digital channels and pay-per-view
programs. The increase in programming costs of $83 million,
or 7%, was due to price increases, particularly in sports
programming, and due to an increased number of channels carried
on our systems, partially offset by decreases in analog and
digital video customers. Programming costs were offset by the
amortization of payments received from programmers in support of
launches of new channels against programming costs of
$62 million and $57 million for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Advertising sales expenses consist of costs related to
traditional advertising services provided to advertising
customers, including salaries and benefits and commissions.
Advertising sales expenses
69
increased $1 million, or 1%, primarily due to increased
sales commissions, taxes and benefits. Service costs consist
primarily of service personnel salaries and benefits, franchise
fees, system utilities, Internet service provider fees,
maintenance and pole rental expense. The increase in service
costs of $61 million, or 11%, resulted primarily from
additional activity associated with ongoing infrastructure
maintenance and customer service, including activities
associated with our promotional programs.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling,
general and administrative expenses decreased by
$23 million, or 2%, from $963 million for the year
ended December 31, 2002 to $940 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003. Key components of expense as a
percentage of revenues were as follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 over 2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% | |
|
|
Expenses | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Expenses | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Change | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
General and administrative
|
|
$ |
833 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
$ |
810 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Marketing
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
940 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
$ |
963 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of
salaries and benefits, rent expense, billing costs, call center
costs, internal network costs, bad debt expense and property
taxes. The increase in general and administrative expenses of
$23 million, or 3%, resulted primarily from increases in
salaries and benefits of $4 million, call center costs of
$25 million and internal network costs of $16 million.
These increases were partially offset by a decrease in bad debt
and collection expense of $27 million as a result of our
strengthened credit policies.
Marketing expenses decreased $46 million, or 30%, due to
reduced promotional activity related to our service offerings
including reductions in advertising, telemarketing and direct
sales activities.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and
amortization expense increased by $17 million, or 1%, from
$1.4 billion in 2002 to $1.5 billion in 2003 due
primarily to an increase in depreciation expense related to
additional capital expenditures in 2003 and 2002.
Impairment of franchises. We performed our annual
impairment assessments as of October 1, 2002 and 2003.
Revised estimates of future cash flows and the use of a lower
projected long-term growth rate in our valuation led to a
$4.6 billion impairment charge in the fourth quarter of
2002. Our 2003 assessment performed on October 1, 2003 did
not result in an impairment.
Loss on sale of assets, net. Loss on sale of assets for
the year ended December 31, 2003 represents $26 million of
losses related to the disposition of fixed assets offset by the
$21 million gain recognized on the sale of cable systems in
Port Orchard, Washington on October 1, 2003. Loss on sale
of assets for the year ended December 31, 2002 represents
losses related to the disposition of fixed assets.
Option compensation expense, net. Option compensation
expense decreased by $1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003 compared to the year ended
December 31, 2002. Option compensation expense includes
expense related to exercise prices on certain options that were
issued prior to our initial public offering in 1999 that were
less than the estimated fair values of our common stock at the
time of grant. Compensation expense was recognized over the
vesting period of such options and was recorded until the last
vesting period lapsed in April 2004. On January 1, 2003, we
adopted SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, using the prospective method under which we
will recognize compensation expense of a stock-based award to an
employee over the vesting period based on the fair value of the
award on the grant date.
Special charges, net. Special charges of $21 million
for the year ended December 31, 2003 represent
approximately $26 million of severance and related costs of
our ongoing initiative to reduce our workforce partially offset
by a $5 million credit from a settlement from the Internet
service provider Excite@Home
70
related to the conversion of about 145,000 high-speed data
customers to our Charter Pipeline service in 2001. In the fourth
quarter of 2002, we recorded a special charge of
$35 million, of which $31 million was associated with
our workforce reduction program. The remaining $4 million
is related to legal and other costs associated with our
shareholder lawsuits and governmental investigations.
Unfavorable contracts and other settlements. Unfavorable
contracts and other settlements of $72 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003 represents the settlement of
estimated liabilities recorded in connection with prior business
combinations. The majority of this benefit (approximately
$52 million) is due to the renegotiation in 2003 of a major
programming contract, for which a liability had been recorded
for the above market portion of that agreement in connection
with a 1999 and a 2000 acquisition. The remaining benefit
relates to the reversal of previously recorded liabilities,
which, based on an evaluation of current facts and
circumstances, are no longer required.
Interest expense, net. Net interest expense increased by
$54 million, or 4%, from $1.5 billion for the year
ended December 31, 2002 to $1.6 billion for the year
ended December 31, 2003. The increase in net interest
expense was a result of increased average debt outstanding in
2003 of $18.9 billion compared to $17.8 billion in
2002, partially offset by a decrease in our average borrowing
rate from 8.02% in 2002 to 7.99% in 2003. The increased debt was
primarily used for capital expenditures.
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments and hedging activities,
net. Net gain on derivative instruments and hedging
activities increased $180 million from a loss of
$115 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 to a
gain of $65 million for the year ended December 31,
2003. The increase is primarily due to an increase in gains on
interest rate agreements, which do not qualify for hedge
accounting under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which
increased from a loss of $101 million for the year ended
December 31, 2002 to a gain of $57 million for the
year ended December 31, 2003.
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt. Net gain on
extinguishment of debt of $267 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003 represents the gain realized on the
purchase, in a non-monetary transaction, of a total of
$609 million principal amount of our outstanding
convertible senior notes and $1.3 billion principal amount
of Charter Holdings senior notes and senior discount notes
in consideration for a total of $1.6 billion principal
amount of 10.25% notes due 2010 issued by our indirect
subsidiary, CCH II. The gain is net of the write-off of
deferred financing costs associated with the retired debt of
$27 million.
Other expense, net. Other expense increased by
$12 million from $4 million in 2002 to
$16 million in 2003. This increase is primarily due to
increases in costs associated with amending a revolving credit
facility of our subsidiaries and costs associated with
terminated debt transactions.
Minority interest. Minority interest represents the
allocation of losses to the minority interest based on ownership
of Charter Holdco, the 10% dividend on preferred membership
units in our indirect subsidiary, Charter Helicon, LLC and the
2% accretion of the preferred membership interests in our
indirect subsidiary, CC VIII, LLC, and since June 6, 2003,
the pro rata share of the profits of CC VIII, LLC. See
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Transactions Arising Out of Our Organizational Structure and
Mr. Allens Investment in Charter Communications, Inc.
and Its Subsidiaries Equity Put Rights
CC VIII.
Income tax benefit. Income tax benefit of
$110 million and $460 million was recognized for the
years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The
income tax benefits were realized as a result of decreases in
certain deferred tax liabilities related to our investment in
Charter Holdco as well as decreases in the deferred tax
liabilities of certain of our indirect corporate subsidiaries.
The income tax benefit recognized in the year ended
December 31, 2003 was directly related to the tax losses
allocated to Charter from Charter Holdco. In the second quarter
of 2003, Charter started receiving tax loss allocations from
Charter Holdco. Previously, the tax losses had been allocated to
Vulcan Cable III Inc. and Charter Investment, Inc. in
accordance with the Special Loss Allocations provided under the
Charter Holdco limited liability company agreement. We do not
expect to recognize a similar
71
benefit after 2003 related to tax loss allocations received from
Charter Holdco, due to limitations associated with our ability
to offset future tax benefits against the remaining deferred tax
liabilities. However, the actual tax provision calculations in
future periods will be the result of current and future
temporary differences, as well as future operating results.
The income tax benefit recognized in the year ended
December 31, 2002 was directly related to the impairment of
franchises associated with the adoption of
SFAS No. 142.
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax.
Cumulative effect of accounting change in 2002 represents the
impairment charge recorded as a result of adopting
SFAS No. 142.
Net loss. Net loss decreased by $2.3 billion, or
91%, from $2.5 billion in 2002 to $238 million in 2003
as a result of the factors described above. The impact of the
gain on sale of system, unfavorable contracts and settlements
and gain on debt exchange, net of minority interest and income
tax impacts, was to decrease net loss by $168 million in
2003. The impact of the impairment of franchises and the
cumulative effect of accounting change, net of minority interest
and income tax impacts, was to increase net loss by
$1.6 billion in 2002.
Preferred stock dividends. On August 31, 2001, in
connection with the Cable USA acquisition, Charter issued
505,664 shares (and on February 28, 2003 issued an
additional 39,595 shares) of Series A Convertible
Redeemable Preferred Stock on which it pays or accrues a
quarterly cumulative cash dividend at an annual rate of 5.75% if
paid or 7.75% if accrued on a liquidation preference of
$100 per share.
Loss per common share. Loss per common share decreased by
$7.73, from $8.55 per common share for the year ended
December 31, 2002 to $0.82 per common share for the
year ended December 31, 2003 as a result of the factors
described above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Introduction
This section contains a discussion of our liquidity and capital
resources, including a discussion of our cash position, sources
and uses of cash, access to credit facilities and other
financing sources, historical financing activities, cash needs,
capital expenditures and outstanding debt.
Overview
We have a significant level of debt. For the remainder of 2005,
$23 million of our debt matures, and in 2006, an additional
$152 million matures. In 2007 and beyond, significant
additional amounts will become due under our remaining long-term
debt obligations.
Our business requires significant cash to fund debt service
costs, capital expenditures and ongoing operations. We have
historically funded our debt service costs, operating activities
and capital requirements through cash flows from operating
activities, borrowings under the credit facilities of our
subsidiaries, sales of assets, issuances of debt and equity
securities and cash on hand. However, the mix of funding sources
changes from period to period. For the three months ended
March 31, 2005, we generated $153 million of net cash
flows from operating activities after paying cash interest of
$249 million. In addition, we used approximately
$211 million for purchases of property, plant and
equipment. Finally, we had net cash flows used in financing
activities of $578 million, which included, among other things,
approximately $628 million in repayment of outstanding
borrowings under the Charter Operating revolving credit facility
through a series of transactions in February 2005. We
expect that our mix of sources of funds will continue to change
in the future based on overall needs relative to our cash flow
and on the availability of funds under the credit facilities of
our subsidiaries, our access to the debt and equity markets, the
timing of possible asset sales and our ability to generate cash
flows from operating activities. We continue to explore asset
dispositions as one of several possible actions that we could
take in the future to improve our liquidity, but we do not
presently consider future asset sales as a significant source of
liquidity.
72
We expect that cash on hand, cash flows from operating
activities and the amounts available under our credit facilities
will be adequate to meet our cash needs in 2005. Cash flows from
operating activities and amounts available under our credit
facilities may not be sufficient to permit us to fund our
operations and satisfy our principal repayment obligations that
come due in 2006 and, we believe, such amounts will not be
sufficient to fund our operations and satisfy such repayment
obligations thereafter.
It is likely that we will require additional funding to repay
debt maturing after 2006. We are working with our financial
advisors to address such funding requirements. However, there
can be no assurance that such funding will be available to us.
Although Mr. Allen and his affiliates have purchased equity
from us in the past, Mr. Allen and his affiliates are not
obligated to purchase equity from, contribute to or loan funds
to us in the future.
Credit Facilities and Covenants
Our ability to operate depends upon, among other things, our
continued access to capital, including credit under the Charter
Operating credit facilities. These credit facilities, along with
our and our subsidiaries indentures, contain certain
restrictive covenants, some of which require us to maintain
specified financial ratios and meet financial tests and to
provide audited financial statements with an unqualified opinion
from our independent auditors. We are in compliance with the
covenants under our indentures and credit facilities and the
indentures of our subsidiaries, and we expect to remain in
compliance with those covenants for the next twelve months. As
of March 31, 2005, we had borrowing availability under our
credit facilities of $1.2 billion, none of which was
restricted due to covenants. Continued access to our credit
facilities is subject to our remaining in compliance with the
covenants of these credit facilities, including covenants tied
to our operating performance. If our operating performance
results in non-compliance with these covenants, or if any of
certain other events of non-compliance under these credit
facilities or indentures governing our debt occurs, funding
under the credit facilities may not be available and defaults on
some or potentially all of our debt obligations could occur. An
event of default under the covenants governing any of our debt
instruments could result in the acceleration of our payment
obligations under that debt and, under certain circumstances, in
cross-defaults under our other debt obligations, which could
have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
condition and results of operations.
The Charter Operating credit facilities required us to redeem
the CC V Holdings, LLC notes as a result of the Charter Holdings
leverage ratio becoming less than 8.75 to 1.0. In satisfaction
of this requirement, in March 2005, CC V Holdings, LLC redeemed
all of its outstanding notes, at 103.958% of principal amount,
plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. The
total cost of the redemption including accrued and unpaid
interest was approximately $122 million and was funded with
borrowings under the Charter Operating credit facilities.
Specific Limitations
Our ability to make interest payments on our convertible senior
notes, and, in 2006 and 2009, to repay the outstanding principal
of our convertible senior notes of $122 million and
$863 million, respectively, as of March 31, 2005, will
depend on our ability to raise additional capital and/or on
receipt of payments or distributions from Charter Holdco or its
subsidiaries, including CCH II, CCO Holdings and Charter
Operating. During the three months ended March 31, 2005,
Charter Holdings distributed $60 million to Charter Holdco.
As of March 31, 2005, Charter Holdco was owed
$161 million in intercompany loans from its subsidiaries,
which amount was available to pay interest and principal on
Charters convertible senior notes. In addition, Charter
has $145 million of governmental securities pledged as
security for the first six interest payments on Charters
5.875% convertible senior notes.
Distributions by Charters subsidiaries to a parent company
(including Charter and Charter Holdco) for payment of principal
on Charters convertible senior notes, however, are
restricted by the indentures governing the CCH II notes, CCO
Holdings notes, and Charter Operating notes, unless under their
respective indentures there is no default and a specified
leverage ratio test is met at the time of such event.
The indentures governing the Charter Holdings notes permit
Charter Holdings to make distributions to Charter Holdco for
payment of interest or principal on the convertible senior
notes, only if, after giving effect to the distribution, Charter
Holdings can incur additional debt under the leverage ratio of
8.75 to 1.0, there is
73
no default under the Charter Holdings indentures and other
specified tests are met. For the quarter ended March 31,
2005, there was no default under Charter Holdings
indentures and other specified tests were met. However, Charter
Holdings did not meet the leverage ratio of 8.75 to 1.0 based on
March 31, 2005 financial results. As a result,
distributions from Charter Holdings to Charter or Charter Holdco
are currently restricted and will continue to be restricted
until that test is met. During this restriction period, the
indentures governing the Charter Holdings notes permit Charter
Holdings and its subsidiaries to make specified investments in
Charter Holdco or Charter, up to an amount determined by a
formula, as long as there is no default under the indentures.
We were required to have effective the registration statement of
which this prospectus forms a part by April 21, 2005. Since
this registration statement was not effective by that date, we
incurred liquidated damages since that date until July 14,
2005, the day prior to the effective date of the registration
statement containing this prospectus, at a rate of 0.25% per
annum of the accreted principal amount of the notes. The
liquidated damages will be payable by Charter in cash.
In addition, we were required to register by April 1, 2005,
150 million shares of our Class A common stock that we
expect to lend to Citigroup Global Markets Limited pursuant to a
share lending agreement. Such registration statement was not
declared effective by that date, and we incurred liquidated
damages from April 2, 2005 until July 17, 2005, the
day before the effective date of such registration statement.
These liquidated damages have been or will be paid in cash.
These liquidated damages accrued at a rate of 0.25% per month of
the accreted principal amount of the convertible notes for the
first 60 days after April 1, 2005 and 0.50% per month
of the accreted principal amount of the convertible notes
thereafter.
Our significant amount of debt could negatively affect our
ability to access additional capital in the future. No
assurances can be given that we will not experience liquidity
problems if we do not obtain sufficient additional financing on
a timely basis as our debt becomes due or because of adverse
market conditions, increased competition or other unfavorable
events. If, at any time, additional capital or borrowing
capacity is required beyond amounts internally generated or
available under our credit facilities or through additional debt
or equity financings, we would consider:
|
|
|
|
|
issuing equity that would significantly dilute existing
shareholders; |
|
|
issuing convertible debt or some other securities that may have
structural or other priorities over our existing notes and may
also significantly dilute Charters existing shareholders; |
|
|
further reducing our expenses and capital expenditures, which
may impair our ability to increase revenue; |
|
|
selling assets; or |
|
|
requesting waivers or amendments with respect to our credit
facilities, the availability and terms of which would be subject
to market conditions. |
If the above strategies are not successful, we could be forced
to restructure our obligations or seek protection under the
bankruptcy laws. In addition, if we need to raise additional
capital through the issuance of equity or find it necessary to
engage in a recapitalization or other similar transaction, our
shareholders could suffer significant dilution and our
noteholders might not receive principal and interest payments to
which they are contractually entitled.
Issuance of Charter Operating Notes in Exchange for Charter
Holdings Notes; Repurchase of Convertible Notes
In March and June 2005, our subsidiary, Charter Operating,
consummated exchange transactions with a small number of
institutional holders of Charter Holdings 8.25% senior
notes due 2007 pursuant to which Charter Operating issued, in
private placement transactions, approximately $271 million
and $62 million, respectively, principal amount of new
notes with terms identical to Charter Operatings
8.375% senior second lien notes due 2014 in exchange for
approximately $284 million and $62 million,
respectively, of the Charter Holdings 8.25% senior notes
due 2007. In addition, in March 2005, we repurchased from a
single holder $34 million principal amount of our 4.75%
convertible senior notes due 2006 for a price equal to 98% of
the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. Since
March 31,
74
2005, we repurchased, in private transactions, from a small
number of institutional holders, a total of $97 million
principal amount of the 4.75% convertible senior notes, leaving
$25 million principal amount outstanding.
Sale of Assets
In March 2004, we closed the sale of certain cable systems
in Florida, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware and West Virginia
to Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC. We closed the sale of an
additional cable system in New York to Atlantic Broadband
Finance, LLC in April 2004. The total net proceeds from the
sale of all of these systems were approximately
$735 million. The proceeds were used to repay a portion of
our revolving credit facilities.
|
|
|
Summary of Outstanding Contractual Obligations |
The following table summarizes our payment obligations as of
December 31, 2004 under our long-term debt and certain
other contractual obligations and commitments (dollars in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments by Period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Less than | |
|
1-3 | |
|
3-5 | |
|
More than | |
|
|
Total | |
|
1 Year | |
|
Years | |
|
Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt Principal Payments(1)
|
|
$ |
19,791 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
917 |
|
|
$ |
5,898 |
|
|
$ |
12,946 |
|
Long-Term Debt Interest Payments(2)
|
|
|
10,109 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
3,348 |
|
|
|
3,332 |
|
|
|
1,975 |
|
Payments on Interest Rate Instruments(3)
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital and Operating Lease Obligations(1)
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Programming Minimum Commitments(4)
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other(5)
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
31,920 |
|
|
$ |
1,937 |
|
|
$ |
5,142 |
|
|
$ |
9,835 |
|
|
$ |
15,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The table presents maturities of long-term debt outstanding as
of December 31, 2004 and does not reflect the effects of
the March 2005 redemption of the CC V Holdings, LLC notes.
Refer to Description of Certain Indebtedness and
Notes 9 and 23 to our December 31, 2004 consolidated
financial statements included in this prospectus for a
description of our long-term debt and other contractual
obligations and commitments. |
|
(2) |
Interest payments on variable debt are estimated using amounts
outstanding at December 31, 2004 and the average implied
forward London Interbank Offering Rate (LIBOR) rates applicable
for the quarter during the interest rate reset based on the
yield curve in effect at December 31, 2004. Actual interest
payments will differ based on actual LIBOR rates and actual
amounts outstanding for applicable periods. |
|
(3) |
Represents amounts we will be required to pay under our interest
rate hedge agreements estimated using the average implied
forward LIBOR rates applicable for the quarter during the
interest rate reset based on the yield curve in effect at
December 31, 2004. |
|
(4) |
We pay programming fees under multi-year contracts ranging
generally from three to six years typically based on a flat fee
per customer, which may be fixed for the term or may in some
cases, escalate over the term. Programming costs included in the
accompanying statements of operations were $1.3 billion,
$1.2 billion and $1.2 billion for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Certain of
our programming agreements are based on a flat fee per month or
have guaranteed minimum payments. The table sets forth the
aggregate guaranteed minimum commitments under our programming
contracts. |
|
(5) |
Other represents other guaranteed minimum
commitments, which consist primarily of commitments to our
billing services vendors. |
75
The following items are not included in the contractual
obligations table because the obligations are not fixed and/ or
determinable due to various factors discussed below. However, we
incur these costs as part of our operations:
|
|
|
|
|
We also rent utility poles used in our operations. Generally,
pole rentals are cancelable on short notice, but we anticipate
that such rentals will recur. Rent expense incurred for pole
rental attachments for the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003 and 2002, was $43 million, $40 million and
$41 million, respectively. |
|
|
We pay franchise fees under multi-year franchise agreements
based on a percentage of revenues earned from video service per
year. We also pay other franchise related costs, such as public
education grants under multi-year agreements. Franchise fees and
other franchise-related costs included in the accompanying
statements of operations were $164 million,
$162 million and $160 million for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. |
|
|
We also have $166 million in letters of credit, primarily
to our various workers compensation, property casualty and
general liability carriers as collateral for reimbursement of
claims. These letters of credit reduce the amount we may borrow
under our credit facilities. |
|
|
|
Historical Operating, Financing and Investing
Activities |
We held $32 million in cash and cash equivalents as of
March 31, 2005 compared to $650 million as of
December 31, 2004. The decrease in cash and cash
equivalents reflects the repayment of approximately
$628 million of outstanding borrowings under the Charter
Operating revolving credit facility through a series of
transactions in February 2005.
Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating
activities increased $38 million, or 33%, from
$115 million for the three months ended March 31,
2004 to $153 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2005. For the three months ended
March 31, 2005, net cash provided by operating activities
increased primarily as a result of changes in operating assets
and liabilities that provided $92 million more cash during
the three months ended March 31, 2005 than the
corresponding period in 2004 primarily driven by collections of
accounts receivable offset by an increase in cash interest
expense of $71 million over the corresponding prior period.
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased
$293 million, or 38%, from $765 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003 to $472 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004. For the year ended
December 31, 2004, net cash provided by operating
activities decreased primarily as a result of changes in
operating assets and liabilities that provided $83 million
less cash during the year ended December 31, 2004 than the
corresponding period in 2003 and an increase in cash interest
expense of $203 million over the corresponding prior
period. The change in operating assets and liabilities is
primarily the result of the benefit in the year ended
December 31, 2003 from collection of receivables from
programmers related to network launches, while accounts
receivable remained essentially flat in the year ended
December 31, 2004.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002 was $765 million and
$748 million, respectively. Operating activities provided
$17 million more cash in 2003 than in 2002 primarily due to
an increase in revenue over cash costs year over year partially
offset by changes in operating assets and liabilities that
provided $82 million less cash in 2003 than in 2002.
Investing Activities. Net cash used by investing
activities for the three months ended March 31, 2005
was $193 million and net cash provided by investing
activities for the three months ended March 31, 2004
was $526 million. Investing activities used
$719 million more cash during the three months ended
March 31, 2005 than the corresponding period in 2004
primarily as a result of proceeds from the sale of certain cable
systems to Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC in 2004 offset by
increased cash used for capital expenditures.
Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $243 million and
$817 million, respectively. Investing activities used
$574 million less cash during the year ended
December 31, 2004 than the corresponding period in 2003
primarily as a result of cash provided by
76
proceeds from the sale of certain cable systems to Atlantic
Broadband Finance, LLC offset by increased cash used for capital
expenditures.
Net cash used in investing activities for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002 was $817 million and
$2.4 billion, respectively. Investing activities used
$1.5 billion less cash in 2003 than in 2002 primarily as a
result of reductions in capital expenditures and acquisitions.
Purchases of property, plant and equipment used
$1.3 billion less cash in 2003 than in 2002 as a result of
reduced rebuild and upgrade activities and our efforts to reduce
capital expenditures. Payments for acquisitions used
$139 million less cash in 2003 than in 2002.
Financing Activities. Net cash used in financing
activities decreased $37 million from $615 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2004 to
$578 million for the three months ended March 31,
2005. The decrease in cash used during the three months
ended March 31, 2005 as compared to the corresponding
period in 2004, was primarily the result of an increase in
borrowings of long-term debt.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2004 was $294 million and the net cash
used in financing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2003 was $142 million. The increase in
cash provided during the year ended December 31, 2004, as
compared to the corresponding period in 2003, was primarily the
result of an increase in borrowings of long-term debt and
proceeds from issuance of debt reduced by repayments of
long-term debt.
Net cash used in financing activities was $142 million for
the year ended December 31, 2003, whereas net cash provided
by financing activities for the year ended December 31,
2002 was $1.9 billion. Financing activities provided
$2.1 billion less cash in 2003 than in 2002. The decrease
in cash provided in 2003 compared to 2002 was primarily due to a
decrease in borrowings of long-term debt.
We have significant ongoing capital expenditure requirements.
However, we experienced a significant decline in such
requirements starting in 2003. This decline was primarily the
result of a substantial reduction in rebuild costs as our
network had been largely upgraded and rebuilt in prior years.
Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions of cable systems,
were $211 million, $190 million, $924 million,
$854 million and $2.2 billion for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 and the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The
majority of the capital expenditures in 2004 and 2003 related to
our customer premise equipment costs. The majority of the
capital expenditures in 2002 related to our rebuild and upgrade
program and purchases of customer premise equipment. Capital
expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2005
increased as compared to the three months ended March 31,
2004 as a result of increased spending on support capital
related to our investment in service improvements and scalable
infrastructure related to telephony services and digital
simulcast offset by a decrease in the purchase of customer
premise equipment. See the table below for more details.
Upgrading our cable systems has enabled us to offer digital
television, high-speed data services, VOD, interactive services,
additional channels and tiers, expanded pay-per-view options and
VOIP telephony services to a larger customer base. Our capital
expenditures are funded primarily from cash flows from operating
activities, the issuance of debt and borrowings under credit
facilities. In addition, during the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004 and the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, our liabilities related
to capital expenditures increased $14 million and decreased
$6 million, $43 million, $33 million and
$55 million, respectively.
During 2005, we expect capital expenditures to increase to
approximately $1 billion. The increase in capital
expenditures for 2005 compared to 2004 is the result of expected
increases in telephony services and deployment of advanced
digital boxes. We expect that the nature of these expenditures
will continue to be composed primarily of purchases of customer
premise equipment and for scalable infrastructure costs. We
expect to fund capital expenditures for 2005 primarily from cash
flows from operating activities and borrowings under our credit
facilities.
77
We have adopted capital expenditure disclosure guidance, which
was developed by eleven publicly traded cable system operators,
including Charter, with the support of the National
Cable & Telecommunications Association
(NCTA). The disclosure is intended to provide more
consistency in the reporting of operating statistics in capital
expenditures and customers among peer companies in the cable
industry. These disclosure guidelines are not required
disclosure under GAAP, nor do they impact our accounting for
capital expenditures under GAAP.
The following table presents our major capital expenditures
categories in accordance with NCTA disclosure guidelines for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 and the years
ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Customer premise equipment(a)
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
451 |
|
|
$ |
380 |
|
|
$ |
748 |
|
Scalable infrastructure(b)
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
Line extensions(c)
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
Upgrade/Rebuild(d)
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
777 |
|
Support capital(e)
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures(f)
|
|
$ |
211 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
924 |
|
|
$ |
854 |
|
|
$ |
2,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Customer premise equipment includes costs incurred at the
customer residence to secure new customers, revenue units and
additional bandwidth revenues. It also includes customer
installation costs in accordance with SFAS 51 and customer
premise equipment (e.g., set-top terminals and cable modems,
etc.). |
|
(b) |
|
Scalable infrastructure includes costs, not related to customer
premise equipment or our network, to secure growth of new
customers, revenue units and additional bandwidth revenues or
provide service enhancements (e.g., headend equipment). |
|
(c) |
|
Line extensions include network costs associated with entering
new service areas (e.g., fiber/coaxial cable, amplifiers,
electronic equipment, make-ready and design engineering). |
|
(d) |
|
Upgrade/rebuild includes costs to modify or replace existing
fiber/coaxial cable networks, including betterments. |
|
(e) |
|
Support capital includes costs associated with the replacement
or enhancement of non-network assets due to technological and
physical obsolescence (e.g., non-network equipment, land,
buildings and vehicles). |
|
(f) |
|
Represents all capital expenditures made during the three months
ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 and the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. |
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to various market risks, including fluctuations
in interest rates. We use interest rate risk management
derivative instruments, such as interest rate swap agreements
and interest rate collar agreements (collectively referred to
herein as interest rate agreements) as required under the terms
of the credit facilities of our subsidiaries. Our policy is to
manage interest costs using a mix of fixed and variable rate
debt. Using interest rate swap agreements, we agree to exchange,
at specified intervals through 2007, the difference between
fixed and variable interest amounts calculated by reference to
an agreed-upon notional principal amount. Interest rate collar
agreements are used to limit our exposure to, and to derive
benefits from, interest rate fluctuations on variable rate debt
to within a certain range of rates. Interest rate risk
management agreements are not held or issued for speculative or
trading purposes.
As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, our
long-term debt totaled approximately $18.9 billion and
$19.5 billion, respectively. This debt was comprised of
approximately $5.1 billion and $5.5 billion of
78
credit facility debt, $12.9 billion and $13.0 billion
accreted value of high-yield notes and $957 million and
$990 million accreted value of convertible senior notes,
respectively.
As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the
weighted average interest rate on the credit facility debt was
approximately 7.0% and 6.8%, the weighted average interest rate
on the high-yield notes was approximately 9.9% and 9.9%, and the
weighted average interest rate on the convertible senior notes
was approximately 5.7% and 5.7%, respectively, resulting in a
blended weighted average interest rate of 8.9% and 8.8%,
respectively. The interest rate on approximately 82% and 83% of
the total principal amount of our debt was effectively fixed,
including the effects of our interest rate hedge agreements as
of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
The fair value of our high-yield notes was $11.2 billion
and $12.2 billion at March 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively. The fair value of our
convertible senior notes was $859 million and
$1.1 billion at March 31, 2005 and December 31,
2004, respectively. The fair value of our credit facilities was
$5.1 billion and $5.5 billion at March 31, 2005
and December 31, 2004, respectively. The fair value of
high-yield and convertible notes is based on quoted market
prices, and the fair value of the credit facilities is based on
dealer quotations.
We do not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading
purposes. We do, however, have certain interest rate derivative
instruments that have been designated as cash flow hedging
instruments. Such instruments effectively convert variable
interest payments on certain debt instruments into fixed
payments. For qualifying hedges, SFAS No. 133 allows
derivative gains and losses to offset related results on hedged
items in the consolidated statement of operations. We have
formally documented, designated and assessed the effectiveness
of transactions that receive hedge accounting. For the three
months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 and the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, net gain (loss) on
derivative instruments and hedging activities includes gains of
$1 million and losses of $1 million, gains of
$4 million and $8 million and losses of
$14 million, respectively, which represent cash flow hedge
ineffectiveness on interest rate hedge agreements arising from
differences between the critical terms of the agreements and the
related hedged obligations. Changes in the fair value of
interest rate agreements designated as hedging instruments of
the variability of cash flows associated with floating-rate debt
obligations that meet the effectiveness criteria of SFAS
No. 133 are reported in accumulated other comprehensive
loss. For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
and the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, a
gain of $9 million, $2 million, $42 million and
$48 million and losses of $65 million, respectively,
related to derivative instruments designated as cash flow
hedges, was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss and
minority interest. The amounts are subsequently reclassified
into interest expense as a yield adjustment in the same period
in which the related interest on the floating-rate debt
obligations affects earnings (losses).
Certain interest rate derivative instruments are not designated
as hedges as they do not meet the effectiveness criteria
specified by SFAS No. 133. However, management believes
such instruments are closely correlated with the respective
debt, thus managing associated risk. Interest rate derivative
instruments not designated as hedges are marked to fair value,
with the impact recorded as gain (loss) on derivative
instruments and hedging activities in our statements of
operations. For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and
2004 and the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
net gain (loss) on derivative instruments and hedging
activities includes gains of $26 million and losses of
$6 million, gains of $65 million and $57 million
and losses of $101 million, respectively, for interest rate
derivative instruments not designated as hedges.
79
The table set forth below summarizes the fair values and
contract terms of financial instruments subject to interest rate
risk maintained by us as of December 31, 2004 (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
Total | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
451 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
$ |
4,260 |
|
|
$ |
8,631 |
|
|
$ |
13,726 |
|
|
$ |
12,807 |
|
|
Average Interest Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
8.25 |
% |
|
|
10.93 |
% |
|
|
8.85 |
% |
|
|
9.32 |
% |
|
|
9.12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Variable Rate
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
$ |
630 |
|
|
$ |
780 |
|
|
$ |
4,315 |
|
|
$ |
6,065 |
|
|
$ |
6,052 |
|
|
Average Interest Rate
|
|
|
6.47 |
% |
|
|
7.08 |
% |
|
|
7.17 |
% |
|
|
7.45 |
% |
|
|
7.73 |
% |
|
|
8.40 |
% |
|
|
8.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable to Fixed Swaps
|
|
$ |
990 |
|
|
$ |
873 |
|
|
$ |
775 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,638 |
|
|
$ |
(69 |
) |
|
Average Pay Rate
|
|
|
7.94 |
% |
|
|
8.23 |
% |
|
|
8.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Receive Rate
|
|
|
6.36 |
% |
|
|
7.08 |
% |
|
|
7.20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.85 |
% |
|
|
|
|
The notional amounts of interest rate instruments do not
represent amounts exchanged by the parties and, thus, are not a
measure of our exposure to credit loss. The amounts exchanged
are determined by reference to the notional amount and the other
terms of the contracts. The estimated fair value approximates
the costs (proceeds) to settle the outstanding contracts.
Interest rates on variable debt are estimated using the average
implied forward London Interbank Offering Rate
(LIBOR) rates for the year of maturity based on the yield
curve in effect at December 31, 2004.
At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we had
outstanding $2.2 billion and $2.7 billion and
$20 million and $20 million, respectively, in notional
amounts of interest rate swaps and collars, respectively. The
notional amounts of interest rate instruments do not represent
amounts exchanged by the parties and, thus, are not a measure of
exposure to credit loss. The amounts exchanged are determined by
reference to the notional amount and the other terms of the
contracts.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued the revised SFAS No. 123, Share-Based
Payment, which addresses the accounting for share-based
payment transactions in which a company receives employee
services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of that
company or (b) liabilities that are based on the fair value
of the companys equity instruments or that may be settled
by the issuance of such equity instruments. This statement will
be effective for us beginning January 1, 2006. Because we
adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS
No. 123 on January 1, 2003, we do not expect this
revised standard to have a material impact on our financial
statements.
We do not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet
effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a
material effect on our accompanying financial statements.
80
BUSINESS
Overview
We are a broadband communications company operating in the
United States, with approximately 6.23 million customers at
March 31, 2005. Through our broadband network of coaxial
and fiber optic cable, we offer our customers traditional cable
video programming (analog and digital, which we refer to as
video service), high-speed cable Internet access
(which we refer to as high-speed data service),
advanced broadband cable services (such as video on demand
(VOD), high definition television service and
interactive television) and, in some of our markets, we offer
telephone service (which we refer to as telephony).
See Business Products and Services for
further description of these terms, including
customers.
At March 31, 2005, we served approximately
5.98 million analog video customers, of which approximately
2.69 million were also digital video customers. We also
served approximately 1.98 million high-speed data customers
(including approximately 229,400 who received only high-speed
data services). We also provided telephony service to
approximately 55,300 customers as of that date.
At March 31, 2005, our investment in cable properties,
long-term debt, accumulated deficit and total shareholders
deficit were $16.0 billion, $18.9 billion,
$9.5 billion and $4.8 billion, respectively. Our
working capital deficit was $1.0 billion at March 31,
2005. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, our
revenues, net loss applicable to common stock and loss per
common share were approximately $1.3 billion,
$353 million and $1.16, respectively.
We have a history of net losses. Further, we expect to continue
to report net losses for the foreseeable future. Our net losses
are principally attributable to insufficient revenue to cover
the interest costs we incur because of our high level of debt,
the depreciation expenses that we incur resulting from the
capital investments we have made in our cable properties, and
the amortization and impairment of our franchise intangibles. We
expect that these expenses (other than impairment of franchises)
will remain significant, and we therefore expect to continue to
report net losses for the foreseeable future. Additionally,
because minority interest in Charter Holdco was substantially
eliminated at December 31, 2003, beginning in the first
quarter of 2004, we absorb substantially all future losses
before income taxes that otherwise would have been allocated to
minority interest. This resulted in an additional
$2.4 billion of net loss for the year ended
December 31, 2004. Under our existing capital structure,
future losses will continue to be absorbed by Charter.
Charter was organized as a Delaware corporation in 1999 and
completed an initial public offering of its Class A common
stock in November 1999. Charter is a holding company whose
principal assets are an approximate 47% equity interest and a
100% voting interest in Charter Holdco, the direct parent of
Charter Holdings. Charter also holds certain preferred equity
and indebtedness of Charter Holdco that mirror the terms of
securities issued by Charter. Charters only business is to
act as the sole manager of Charter Holdco and its subsidiaries.
As sole manager, Charter controls the affairs of Charter Holdco
and its subsidiaries. Certain of our subsidiaries commenced
operations under the Charter Communications name in
1994, and our growth to date has been primarily due to
acquisitions and business combinations, most notably
acquisitions completed from 1999 through 2001, pursuant to which
we acquired a total of approximately 5.5 million customers.
We do not expect to make any significant acquisitions in the
foreseeable future, but plan to evaluate opportunities to
consolidate our operations through exchanges of cable systems
with other cable operators, as they arise. We may also sell
certain assets from time to time. Paul G. Allen owns
approximately 53% of Charter Holdco through affiliated entities.
His membership units are convertible at any time for shares of
our Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis.
Paul G. Allen controls Charter with an as-converted common
equity interest of approximately 57% and a beneficial voting
control interest of approximately 93% as of March 31, 2005.
81
Business Strategy
Our principal financial goal is to maximize our return on
invested capital. To do so, we will focus on increasing
revenues, growing our customer base, improving customer
retention and enhancing customer satisfaction by providing
reliable, high-quality service offerings, superior customer
service and attractive bundled offerings.
Specifically, in the near term, we are focusing on:
|
|
|
|
|
generating improvements in the overall customer experience in
such critical areas as service delivery, customer care, and new
product offerings; |
|
|
|
developing more sophisticated customer management capabilities
through investment in our customer care and marketing
infrastructure, including targeted marketing capabilities; |
|
|
|
executing growth strategies for new services, including digital
simulcast, VOD, telephony, and digital video recorder service
(DVR); |
|
|
|
managing our operating costs by exercising discipline in capital
and operational spending; and |
|
|
|
identifying opportunities to continue to improve our balance
sheet and liquidity. |
We have begun an internal operational improvement initiative
aimed at helping us gain new customers and retain existing
customers, which is focused on customer care, technical
operations and sales. We intend to increase efforts to focus
management attention on instilling a customer service oriented
culture throughout the company and to give those areas of our
operations increased priority of resources for staffing levels,
training budgets and financial incentives for employee
performance in those areas.
We believe that our high-speed data service will continue to
provide a substantial portion of our revenue growth in the near
future. We also plan to continue to expand our marketing of
high-speed data service to the business community, which we
believe has shown an increasing interest in high-speed data
service and private network services. Additionally, we plan to
continue to prepare additional markets for telephony launches in
2005.
We believe we offer our customers an excellent choice of
services through a variety of bundled packages, particularly
with respect to our digital video and high-speed data services
as well as telephony in certain markets. Our digital platform
enables us to offer a significant number and variety of
channels, and we offer customers the opportunity to choose among
groups of channel offerings, including premium channels, and to
combine selected programming with other services such as
high-speed data, high definition television (in selected
markets) and VOD (in selected markets).
We continue to pursue opportunities to improve our liquidity.
Our efforts in this regard resulted in the completion of a
number of transactions in 2004, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
the December 2004 sale by our subsidiaries, CCO Holdings, LLC
and CCO Holdings Capital Corp. of $550 million of senior
floating rate notes due 2010; |
|
|
|
the November 2004 sale of $862.5 million of 5.875%
convertible senior notes due 2009 described in this prospectus; |
|
|
|
the December 2004 redemption of all of our 5.75% convertible
senior notes due 2005 ($588 million principal amount); |
|
|
|
the April 2004 sale of $1.5 billion of senior second lien
notes by our subsidiary, Charter Operating, together with the
concurrent refinancing of its credit facilities; and |
|
|
|
the sale in the first half of 2004 of non-core cable systems for
$735 million, the proceeds of which were used to reduce
indebtedness. |
Charter Background
In 1998, Mr. Allen acquired approximately 99% of the
non-voting economic interests in Marcus Cable, which owned
various operating subsidiaries that served approximately
1.1 million customers. Thereafter, in December 1998, Mr.
Allen acquired, through a series of transactions, approximately
94% of
82
the equity interests of Charter Investment, Inc., which
controlled various operating subsidiaries that serviced
approximately 1.2 million customers.
In March and April of 1999, Mr. Allen acquired the
remaining interests in Marcus Cable and, through a series of
transactions, combined the Marcus companies with the Charter
companies. As a consequence, the former operating subsidiaries
of Marcus Cable and all of the cable systems they owned came
under the ownership of Charter Holdings.
In July 1999, Charter was formed as a wholly owned subsidiary of
Charter Investment, Inc., and in November 1999, Charter
completed its initial public offering.
During 1999 and 2000, Charter completed 16 cable system
acquisitions for a total purchase price of $14.7 billion
including $9.1 billion in cash, $3.3 billion of assumed
debt, $1.9 billion of equity interests issued and Charter
cable systems valued at $420 million. These transactions
resulted in a net total increase of approximately
3.9 million customers as of their respective dates of
acquisition.
In February 2001, Charter entered into several agreements with
AT&T Broadband, LLC involving several strategic cable system
transactions that resulted in a net addition of customers for
our systems. In the AT&T transactions, which closed in June
2001, Charter acquired cable systems from AT&T Broadband
serving approximately 551,000 customers for a total of $1.74
billion consisting of $1.71 billion in cash and a Charter
cable system valued at $25 million. In 2001, Charter also
acquired all of the outstanding stock of Cable USA, Inc. and the
assets of certain of its related affiliates in exchange for
consideration valued at $100 million (consisting of
Series A preferred stock with a face amount of
$55 million and the remainder in cash and assumed debt).
During 2002, Charter purchased additional cable systems in
Illinois serving approximately 28,000 customers, for a total
cash purchase price of approximately $63 million.
For additional information regarding Charters acquisitions
see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Acquisitions.
In 2003 and 2004, Charter sold certain non-core cable systems
serving approximately 264,100 customers in Florida,
Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, West Virginia and Washington
for an aggregate consideration of approximately
$826 million.
Products and Services
We offer our customers traditional cable video programming
(analog and digital video) as well as high-speed data services
and in some areas advanced broadband services such as high
definition television, VOD and interactive television. We sell
our video programming and high-speed data services on a
subscription basis, with prices and related charges, that vary
primarily based on the types of service selected, whether the
services are sold as a bundle versus on an
à la carte basis, and the equipment necessary
to receive the services, with some variation in prices depending
on geographic location. In addition, we offer telephony service
to a limited number of customers.
83
The following table summarizes our customer statistics for
analog and digital video, residential high-speed data, and
residential telephony as of March 31, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate as of | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005(a) | |
|
2004(a) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cable Video Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analog Video:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential (non-bulk) analog video customers(b)
|
|
|
5,732,600 |
|
|
|
5,953,200 |
|
|
|
Multi-dwelling (bulk) and commercial unit customers(c)
|
|
|
252,200 |
|
|
|
238,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analog video customers(b)(c)
|
|
|
5,984,800 |
|
|
|
6,192,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Video:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital video customers(d)
|
|
|
2,694,600 |
|
|
|
2,657,400 |
|
|
Non-Video Cable Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential high-speed data customers(e)
|
|
|
1,978,400 |
|
|
|
1,653,000 |
|
|
|
Telephony customers(f)
|
|
|
55,300 |
|
|
|
26,300 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Customers include all persons our corporate billing
records show as receiving service (regardless of their payment
status), except for complimentary accounts (such as our
employees). In addition, at March 31, 2005 and 2004,
customers include approximately 43,100 and 53,100
persons whose accounts were over 60 days past due in
payment, approximately 7,000 and 5,800 persons whose accounts
were over 90 days past due in payment, and approximately
3,600 and 2,200 of which were over 120 days past due in
payment, respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
Residential (non-bulk) analog video customers
include all customers who receive video services, except for
complimentary accounts (such as our employees). |
|
(c) |
|
Included within video customers are those in
commercial and multi-dwelling structures, which are calculated
on an equivalent bulk unit (EBU) basis. EBU is
calculated for a system by dividing the bulk price charged to
accounts in an area by the most prevalent price charged to
non-bulk residential customers in that market for the comparable
tier of service. The EBU method of estimating analog video
customers is consistent with the methodology used in determining
costs paid to programmers and has been consistently applied year
over year. As we increase our effective analog prices to
residential customers without a corresponding increase in the
prices charged to commercial service or multi-dwelling
customers, our EBU count will decline even if there is no real
loss in commercial service or multi-dwelling customers. |
|
(d) |
|
Digital video customers include all households that
have one or more digital set-top terminals. Included in
digital video customers on March 31, 2005 and
2004 are approximately 10,000 and 12,000 customers,
respectively, that receive digital video service directly
through satellite transmission. |
|
(e) |
|
All of these customers also receive video service and are
included in the video statistics above except for approximately
229,400 and 142,700 of these customers at March 31, 2005
and 2004, respectively, who were residential high-speed data
only customers. |
|
(f) |
|
Telephony customers include all households receiving
telephone service. |
Our video service offerings include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Analog Video. All of our video customers receive a
package of basic programming, which generally consists of local
broadcast television, local community programming, including
governmental and public access, and limited satellite-delivered
or non-broadcast channels, such as weather, shopping and
religious services. Our basic channel line-up generally has
between 15 and 30 channels. |
84
|
|
|
|
|
Expanded Basic Video. This expanded programming level
includes a package of satellite-delivered or non-broadcast
channels and generally has between 30 and 50 channels in
addition to the basic channel line-up. |
|
|
|
Premium Channels. These channels provide commercial-free
movies, sports and other special event entertainment
programming. Although we offer subscriptions to premium channels
on an individual basis, we offer an increasing number of premium
channel packages and we offer premium channels with our advanced
services. |
|
|
|
Pay-Per-View. These channels allow customers to pay on a
per event basis to view a single showing of a recently released
movie, a one-time special sporting event, music concert or
similar event on a commercial-free basis. |
|
|
|
Digital Video. We offer digital video service to our
customers in several different service combination packages. All
of our digital packages include a digital set-top terminal, an
interactive electronic programming guide, an expanded menu of
pay-per-view channels and the option to also receive digital
packages which range from 4 to 30 additional video channels. We
also offer our customers certain digital packages with one or
more premium channels that give customers access to several
different versions of the same premium channel. Some digital
tier packages focus on the interests of a particular customer
demographic and emphasize, for example, sports, movies, family
or ethnic programming. In addition to video programming, digital
video service enables customers to receive our advanced services
such as VOD and high definition television. Other digital
packages bundle digital television with our advanced services,
such as high-speed data services. |
|
|
|
Video On Demand and Subscription Video on Demand. We
offer VOD service, which allows customers to access hundreds of
movies and other programming at any time with digital picture
quality. In some systems we also offer subscription VOD (SVOD)
for a monthly fee or included in a digital tier premium channel
subscription. |
|
|
|
High Definition Television. High definition television
offers our digital customers video programming at a higher
resolution than the standard analog or digital video image. |
|
|
|
Digital Video Recorder. DVR service enables customers to
digitally record programming and to pause and rewind live
programming. |
We offer high-speed data services to our residential and
commercial customers primarily via cable modems attached to
personal computers. We generally offer our high-speed data
service as Charter High-Speed
Internettm.
We also offer traditional dial-up Internet access in a very
limited number of our markets.
We ended the first quarter of 2005 with 18% penetration of
high-speed data homes passed, an increase from
16% penetration of high-speed data homes passed at
March 31, 2004. This gave us a percentage increase in
high-speed data customers of 20% and an increase in high-speed
data revenues of 28% in the three months ended March 31,
2005 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2004.
We continue to deploy voice communications services using VOIP
to transmit digital voice signals over our systems. At
March 31, 2005, our telephone service was available to
approximately 1.1 million homes and we were marketing to
approximately two-thirds of those homes. We will continue to
prepare additional markets for VOIP launches in 2005.
85
We offer integrated network solutions to commercial and
institutional customers. These solutions include high-speed data
and video services. In addition, we offer high-speed data
services to small businesses.
We receive revenues from the sale of local advertising on
satellite-delivered networks such as MTV®, CNN® and
ESPN®. In any particular market, we generally insert local
advertising on up to 39 channels. Our system rebuilds have
increased the number of available channels on which we are able
to insert local advertising. We also provide cross-channel
advertising to some programmers.
From time to time, certain of our vendors, including equipment
vendors, have purchased advertising from us. For the three
months ended March 31, 2005 and the years ending
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, we had advertising
revenues from vendors of approximately $3 million,
$16 million, $15 million and $79 million,
respectively. These revenues resulted from purchases at market
rates pursuant to binding agreements.
Pricing of Our Products and Services
Our revenues are derived principally from the monthly fees our
customers pay for the services we offer. A one-time installation
fee, which is sometimes waived or discounted during certain
promotional periods, is charged to new customers. The prices we
charge vary based on the level of service the customer chooses
and the geographic market. Most of our pricing is reviewed and
adjusted on an annual basis.
In accordance with the Federal Communications Commissions
rules, the prices we charge for cable-related equipment, such as
set-top terminals and remote control devices, and for
installation services are based on actual costs plus a permitted
rate of return.
Although our cable service offerings vary across the markets we
serve because of various factors including competition and
regulatory factors, our services, when offered on a stand-alone
basis, are typically offered at monthly price ranges, excluding
franchise fees and other taxes, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Range as of | |
Service |
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
Analog video packages
|
|
$ |
7.00 |
|
|
- |
|
$ |
54.00 |
|
Premium channels
|
|
$ |
10.00 |
|
|
- |
|
$ |
15.00 |
|
Pay-per-view events
|
|
$ |
2.99 |
|
|
- |
|
$ |
179.00 |
|
Digital video packages (including high-speed data service for
higher tiers)
|
|
$ |
34.00 |
|
|
- |
|
$ |
112.00 |
|
High-speed data service
|
|
$ |
21.95 |
|
|
- |
|
$ |
49.99 |
|
Video on demand (per selection)
|
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
|
- |
|
$ |
29.99 |
|
High definition television
|
|
$ |
3.99 |
|
|
- |
|
$ |
6.99 |
|
Digital video recorder (DVR)
|
|
$ |
6.99 |
|
|
- |
|
$ |
9.99 |
|
In addition, from time to time we offer free service or
reduced-price service during promotional periods in order to
attract new customers.
Our Network Technology
The following table sets forth the technological capacity of our
systems as of March 31, 2005 based on a percentage of homes
passed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550 Megahertz | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than | |
|
to | |
|
750 | |
|
|
|
Two-way | |
|
Two-way | |
550 Megahertz | |
|
660 Megahertz | |
|
Megahertz | |
|
870 Megahertz | |
|
Capability | |
|
Enabled | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
8 |
% |
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
42% |
|
|
|
45% |
|
|
|
92% |
|
|
|
87% |
|
86
As a result of the upgrade of our systems over the past several
years, approximately 92% of the homes passed by our systems have
bandwidth of 550 megahertz or greater. This bandwidth
capacity enables us to offer digital television, high-speed data
services and other advanced services. It also enables us to
offer up to 82 analog channels, and even more channels when
our bandwidth is used for digital signal transmissions. Our
increased bandwidth also permits two-way communication for
Internet access, interactive services, and potentially,
telephony services.
As part of our systems upgrade and partly as a result of system
sales, we reduced the number of headends that serve our
customers from 1,138 at January 1, 2001 to 744 at
March 31, 2005. Because headends are the control centers of
a cable system, where incoming signals are amplified, converted,
processed and combined for transmission to the customer,
reducing the number of headends reduces related equipment,
service personnel and maintenance expenditures. We believe that
the headend consolidation, together with our other upgrades,
allows us to provide enhanced picture quality and greater system
reliability. As a result of the upgrade, approximately 84% of
our customers were served by headends serving at least 10,000
customers as of March 31, 2005.
As of March 31, 2005, our cable systems consisted of
approximately 222,100 strand miles, including approximately
53,600 strand miles of fiber optic cable, passing approximately
12.2 million households and serving approximately
6.2 million customers.
We adopted the hybrid fiber coaxial cable (HFC)
architecture as the standard for our systems upgrades. HFC
architecture combines the use of fiber optic cable with coaxial
cable. Fiber optic cable is a communication medium that uses
glass fibers to transmit signals over long distances with
minimum signal loss or distortion. Fiber optic cable has
excellent broadband frequency characteristics, noise immunity
and physical durability and can carry hundreds of video, data
and voice channels over extended distances. Coaxial cable is
less expensive and requires a more extensive signal
amplification in order to obtain the desired transmission levels
for delivering channels. In most systems, we deliver our signals
via fiber optic cable from the headend to a group of nodes, and
use coaxial cable to deliver the signal from individual nodes to
the homes passed served by that node. Our system design enables
a maximum of 500 homes passed to be served by a single node.
Currently, our average node serves approximately 385 homes
passed. Our system design provides for six strands of fiber to
each node, with two strands activated and four strands reserved
for spares and future services. The design also provides reserve
capacity for the addition of future services.
The primary advantages of HFC architecture over traditional
coaxial-only cable networks include:
|
|
|
|
|
increased bandwidth capacity, for more channels and other
services; |
|
|
|
dedicated bandwidth for two-way services, which avoids reverse
signal interference problems that can occur with two-way
communication capability; and |
|
|
|
improved picture quality and service reliability. |
We currently maintain a national network operations center to
monitor our data networks and to further our strategy of
providing high quality service. Centralized monitoring is
increasingly important as we increase the number of high-speed
data customers utilizing two-way high-speed data service. Our
local dispatch centers focus primarily on monitoring the HFC
plant.
Management of Our Systems
Many of the functions associated with our financial management
are centralized, including accounting, billing, finance and
acquisitions, payroll, accounts payable and benefits
administration, information system design and support, internal
audit, purchasing, marketing, programming contract
administration and Internet service, network and circuits
administration. We operate with four divisions. Each division is
supported by operational, financial, marketing and engineering
functions.
87
Customer Care
We have 36 customer service locations, including
14 divisional contact centers that serve approximately 97%
of our customers. Our customer care centers are managed
divisionally by a Vice President of Customer Care and are
supported by a corporate care team, which oversees and supports
deployment and execution of care strategies and initiatives on a
company-wide basis. This reflects a substantial consolidation of
our customer care function from over 300 service centers in
2001. We believe that this consolidation will allow us to
improve the consistency of our service delivery and customer
satisfaction by reducing or eliminating the logistical
challenges and poor economies of scale inherent in maintaining
and supervising a larger number of separately managed service
centers.
Specifically, through this consolidation, we are now able to
service our customers 24 hours a day, seven days a week and
utilize technologically advanced equipment that we believe
enhances interactions with our customers through more
intelligent call routing, data management, and forecasting and
scheduling capabilities. We believe this consolidation also
allows us to more effectively provide our customer care
specialists with ongoing training intended to improve complaint
resolution, equipment troubleshooting, sales of new and
additional services, and customer retention.
We believe that, despite our consolidation, we have not yet
sufficiently improved in the area of customer care, and that
this lack of improvement has in part led to a continued net loss
of customers. Accordingly, we have begun an internal operational
improvement initiative aimed at helping us gain new customers
and retain existing customers, which is focused on customer
care, among other areas. We intend to increase our efforts to
focus management attention on instilling a customer service
oriented culture throughout the company and to give those areas
of our operations increased priority of resources for staffing
levels, training budgets and financial incentives for employee
performance in those areas.
In a further effort to better serve our customers, we have also
entered into outsource partnership agreements with two key
outsource providers. We believe the establishment of these
relationships expands our ability to achieve our service
objectives and increases our ability to support marketing
activities by providing additional capacity available to support
customer inquiries.
We also utilize our website to enhance customer care by enabling
customers to view and pay their bills online, obtain useful
information and perform various equipment troubleshooting
procedures.
Sales and Marketing
In the third quarter of 2004, Charter shifted primary
responsibility for implementing sales and marketing strategies
to the divisional and system level, with a single corporate team
to ensure compliance with guidelines established by the
corporate marketing department designed to promote national
branding consistency. Our marketing infrastructure is intended
to promote interaction, information flow and sharing of best
practices between our corporate office and our field offices,
which make strategic decisions as to when and how marketing
programs will be implemented.
Due to our focus in 2003 on certain other operational matters
and due to certain financial constraints, we reduced spending in
2003 on marketing our products and services. Marketing
expenditures increased 14% for the year ended December 31,
2004 to $122 million. We expect to increase our spending on
marketing in 2005 and as such marketing expenditures increased
13% to $35 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2005.
We monitor government regulation, customer perception,
competition, pricing and product preferences, among other
factors, to increase our responsiveness to our customers. Our
coordinated marketing strategies include door-to-door
solicitation, telemarketing, media advertising, e-marketing,
direct mail solicitation and retail locations. In 2004, we
increased our focus on marketing and selling our services
through consumer electronics retailers and other retailers that
sell televisions or cable modems.
In January 2004, we introduced the first national branding
campaign in Charters history. The Get Hooked
branding initiative was a key focal point of our national
marketing campaigns in 2004, with the
88
aim of promoting deeper market penetration and increased revenue
per customer. In 2004, our corporate team produced eight
national Get Hooked marketing campaigns designed to:
|
|
|
|
|
Promote awareness and loyalty among existing customers and
attract new customers; |
|
|
|
Announce the availability of our advanced services as we roll
them out in our systems; |
|
|
|
Promote our advanced services (such as DVR, high definition
television, telephony, VOD and SVOD) with the goal that our
customers will view their cable connection as one-stop shopping
for video, voice, high-speed data and interactive
services; and |
|
|
|
Promote our bundling of digital video and high-speed data
services and pricing strategies. |
Programming
We believe that offering a wide variety of programming is an
important factor that influences a customers decision to
subscribe to and retain our cable services. We rely on market
research, customer demographics and local programming
preferences to determine channel offerings in each of our
markets. We obtain basic and premium programming from a number
of suppliers, usually pursuant to a written contract. Our
programming contracts generally continue for a fixed period of
time, usually from three to ten years, and are subject to
negotiated renewal. Some program suppliers offer financial
incentives to support the launch of a channel and ongoing
marketing support or launch fees. We also negotiate volume
discount pricing structures. Programming costs are usually
payable each month based on calculations performed by us and are
subject to adjustment based on the results of periodic audits by
the programmers.
Programming tends to be made available to us for a license fee,
which is generally paid based on the number of customers to whom
we make such programming available. Such license fees may
include volume discounts available for higher
numbers of customers, as well as discounts for channel placement
or service penetration. Some channels are available without cost
to us for a limited period of time, after which we pay for the
programming. For home shopping channels, we receive a percentage
of the amount our customers spend on home shopping purchases.
Our cable programming costs have increased, in every year we
have operated, in excess of customary inflationary and
cost-of-living type increases. We expect them to continue to
increase due to a variety of factors, including annual increases
imposed by programmers and additional programming being provided
to customers as a result of system rebuilds and bandwidth
reallocation, both of which increase channel capacity.
In particular, sports programming costs have increased
significantly over the past several years. In addition,
contracts to purchase sports programming sometimes contain
built-in cost increases for programming added during the term of
the contract.
Historically, we have absorbed increased programming costs in
large part through increased prices to our customers. However,
with the impact of competition and other marketplace factors,
there is no assurance that we will be able to continue to do so.
In order to maintain or mitigate reductions of margins despite
increasing programming costs, we plan to continue to migrate
certain program services from our analog level of service to our
digital tiers. As we migrate our programming to our digital tier
packages, certain programming that was previously available to
all of our customers via an analog signal, may be part of an
elective digital tier package. As a result, the customer base
upon which we pay programming fees will proportionately
decrease, and the overall expense for providing that service
would likewise decrease. Reductions in the size of certain
programming customer bases may result in the loss of specific
volume discount benefits.
As measured by programming costs, and excluding premium services
(substantially all of which were renegotiated and renewed in
2003), as of July 7, 2005 approximately 9% of our current
programming
89
contracts were expired, and approximately another 21% are
scheduled to expire at or before the end of 2005. We plan to
seek to renegotiate the terms of our agreements with certain
programmers as these agreements come due for renewal. There can
be no assurance that these agreements will be renewed on
favorable or comparable terms. To the extent that we are unable
to reach agreement with certain programmers on terms that we
believe are reasonable, we may be forced to remove such
programming channels from our line-up, which could result in a
further loss of customers. In addition, our inability to fully
pass these programming cost increases on to our customers would
have an adverse impact on our cash flow and operating margins.
Franchises
As of March 31, 2005, our systems operated pursuant to a
total of approximately 4,100 franchises, permits and similar
authorizations issued by local and state governmental
authorities. Each franchise, permit or similar authorization is
awarded by a governmental authority and such governmental
authority often must approve a transfer to another party. Most
franchises are subject to termination proceedings in the event
of a material breach. In addition, most franchises require us to
pay the granting authority a franchise fee of up to 5.0% of
revenues as defined in the various agreements, which is the
maximum amount that may be charged under the applicable federal
law. We are entitled to and generally do pass this fee through
to the customer.
Prior to the scheduled expiration of most franchises, we
initiate renewal proceedings with the granting authorities. This
process usually takes three years but can take a longer period
of time. The Communications Act provides for an orderly
franchise renewal process in which granting authorities may not
unreasonably withhold renewals. In connection with the franchise
renewal process, many governmental authorities require the cable
operator to make certain commitments. Historically we have been
able to renew our franchises without incurring significant
costs, although any particular franchise may not be renewed on
commercially favorable terms or otherwise. Our failure to obtain
renewals of our franchises, especially those in the major
metropolitan areas where we have the most customers, could have
a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
condition, results of operations or our liquidity, including our
ability to comply with our debt covenants. Approximately 10% of
our franchises, covering approximately 9% of our analog video
customers were expired as of March 31, 2005. Approximately
6% of additional franchises, covering approximately 8% of
additional analog video customers will expire on or before
December 31, 2005, if not renewed prior to expiration. We
expect to renew substantially all of these franchises.
Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the 1996 Telecom
Act), state and local authorities are prohibited from
limiting, restricting or conditioning the provision of
telecommunications services. They may, however, impose
competitively neutral requirements and manage the
public rights-of-way. Granting authorities may not require a
cable operator to provide telecommunications services or
facilities, other than institutional networks, as a condition of
an initial franchise grant, a franchise renewal, or a franchise
transfer. The 1996 Telecom Act also limits franchise fees to an
operators cable-related revenues and clarifies that they
do not apply to revenues that a cable operator derives from
providing new telecommunications services. In a March 2002
decision, the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) held that revenue derived from the provision
of cable modem service should not be added to franchise fee
payments already limited by federal law to 5% of traditional
cable service revenue. The same decision tentatively limited
local franchising authority regulation of cable modem service.
The FCC decision was appealed and ultimately affirmed by the
Supreme Court in a June 2005 ruling.
Competition
We face competition in the areas of price, service offerings,
and service reliability. We compete with other providers of
television signals and other sources of home entertainment. In
addition, as we continue to expand into additional services such
as high-speed Internet access and telephony, we face competition
from other providers of each type of service. We operate in a
very competitive business environment, which can adversely
affect our business and operations.
90
In terms of competition for customers, we view ourselves as a
member of the broadband communications industry, which
encompasses multi-channel video for television and related
broadband services, such as high-speed data and other
interactive video services. In the broadband industry, our
principal competitor for video services throughout our territory
is direct broadcast satellite (DBS), and in markets
where it is available, our principal competitor for data
services is digital subscriber line (DSL). We do not
consider other cable operators to be significant one-on-one
competitors in the market overall, as traditional overbuilds are
infrequent and spotty geographically (although in a particular
market, a cable operator overbuilder would likely be a
significant competitor at the local level). As of March 31,
2005, we are aware of traditional overbuild situations in
service areas covering approximately 5% of our total homes
passed and potential overbuilds in areas servicing approximately
1% of our total homes passed.
Although cable operators tend not to be direct competitors for
customers, their relative size may affect the competitive
landscape in terms of how a cable company competes against
non-cable competitors in the marketplace as well as in
relationships with vendors who deal with cable operators. For
example, a larger cable operator might have better access to and
pricing for the multiple types of services cable companies
offer. Also, a larger entity might have different access to
financial resources and acquisition opportunities.
Our key competitors include:
|
|
|
Direct Broadcast Satellite |
Direct broadcast satellite (DBS) is a significant
competitor to cable systems. The DBS industry has grown rapidly
over the last several years, far exceeding the growth rate of
the cable television industry, and now serves more than
24 million subscribers nationwide. DBS service allows the
subscriber to receive video services directly via satellite
using a relatively small dish antenna. Consistent with
increasing consolidation in the communications industry, News
Corp., one of the worlds largest media companies, acquired
a controlling interest in DIRECTV, Inc. (DirecTV) in
2003, the largest domestic DBS company. This business
combination could further strengthen DirecTVs competitive
posture, particularly through favorable programming arrangements
with various News Corp. affiliates and subsidiaries, such as the
Fox television network. Additionally, EchoStar Communications
Corporation (EchoStar) and DirecTV both have entered
into joint marketing agreements with major telecommunications
companies to offer bundled packages combining phone, data and
video services.
Video compression technology and high powered satellites allow
DBS providers to offer more than 200 digital channels from a
single satellite, thereby surpassing the typical analog cable
system. In 2003, major DBS competitors offered a greater variety
of channel packages, and were especially competitive at the
lower end pricing, such as a monthly price of approximately $30
for 75 channels compared to approximately $40 for the closest
comparable package in most of our markets. In addition, while we
continue to believe that the initial investment by a DBS
customer exceeds that of a cable customer, the initial equipment
cost for DBS has decreased substantially, as the DBS providers
have aggressively marketed offers to new customers of incentives
for discounted or free equipment, installation and multiple
units. DBS providers are able to offer service nationwide and
are able to establish a national image and branding with
standardized offerings, which together with their ability to
avoid franchise fees of up to 5% of revenues and property tax,
leads to greater efficiencies and lower costs in the lower tiers
of service. However, we believe that many consumers continue to
prefer our stronger local presence in our markets. We believe
that cable-delivered VOD and SVOD service are superior to DBS
service because cable headends can store thousands of titles
which customers can access and control independently, whereas
DBS technology can only make available a much smaller number of
titles with DVR-like customer control. We also believe that our
higher tier products, particularly our bundled premium packages,
are price-competitive with DBS packages and that many consumers
prefer our ability to economically bundle video packages with
data packages. Further, cable providers have the potential in
some areas to provide a more complete whole house
communications package when combining video, high-speed data and
voice. We believe that this ability to bundle, combined with the
introduction of more new products that DBS cannot readily offer
(local high definition television and local interactive
television) differentiates us from
91
DBS competitors and could enable us to win back some of our
former customers who migrated to satellite. However, recent
joint marketing arrangements between DBS providers and
telecommunications carriers allow similar bundling of services
in certain areas. Competition from DBS service providers may
also present greater challenges in areas of lower population
density, and we believe that our systems serve a higher
concentration of such areas than those of other major cable
service providers.
DBS companies historically were prohibited from retransmitting
popular local broadcast programming. However, a change to the
copyright laws in 1999, which was continued in 2004, eliminated
this legal impediment. As a result, DBS companies now may
retransmit such programming, once they have secured
retransmission consent from the popular broadcast stations they
wish to carry, and honor mandatory carriage obligations of less
popular broadcast stations in the same television markets. In
response to the legislation, DirecTV and EchoStar have been
carrying the major network stations in many of the nations
television markets. DBS, however, is limited in the local
programming it can provide because of the current capacity
limitations of satellite technology. DBS companies do not offer
local broadcast programming in every U.S. market, although
the number of markets covered is substantial and increasing.
DBS providers have made attempts at widespread deployment of
high-speed Internet access services via satellite but those
services have been technically constrained and of limited
appeal. However, DBS providers have entered into joint marketing
arrangements with telecommunications carriers allowing them to
offer terrestrial DSL services in many markets.
|
|
|
DSL and Other Broadband Services |
Digital subscriber line (DSL) service allows
Internet access to subscribers at data transmission speeds
greater than those available over conventional telephone lines.
DSL service therefore is competitive with high-speed Internet
access over cable systems. Most telephone companies which
already have plant, an existing customer base, and other
operational functions in place (such as, billing, service
personnel, etc.) offer DSL service. DSL actively markets its
service and many providers have offered promotional pricing with
a one-year service agreement. The FCC has initiated a rulemaking
proceeding that could materially reduce existing regulation of
DSL service, essentially freeing such service from traditional
telecommunications regulation. It is also possible that federal
legislation could reduce regulation of Internet services offered
by incumbent telephone companies. Legislative action and the
FCCs decisions and policies in this area are subject to
change. We expect DSL to remain a significant competitor to our
data services. In addition, the further deployment of fiber by
telephone companies into their networks will enable them to
provide higher bandwidth Internet service than provided over
traditional DSL lines.
In addition to terrestrially based DSL, satellite-based delivery
options are in development. Local wireless Internet services
have also begun to operate in many markets using unlicensed
radio spectrum. This service option, popularly known as
wi-fi, offers another alternative to cable-based
Internet access.
High-speed Internet access facilitates the streaming of video
into homes and businesses. As the quality and availability of
video streaming over the Internet improves, video streaming
likely will compete with the traditional delivery of video
programming services over cable systems. It is possible that
programming suppliers will consider bypassing cable operators
and market their services directly to the consumer through video
streaming over the Internet.
We believe that pricing for residential and commercial data
services on our system is generally comparable to that for
similar DSL services and that some residential customers prefer
our ability to bundle data services with video services.
However, DSL providers may currently be in a better position to
offer data services to businesses since their networks tend to
be more complete in commercial areas. They also have the ability
to bundle telephony with data services for a higher percentage
of their customers, and that ability is appealing to many
consumers. Joint marketing arrangements between DSL providers
and DBS providers may allow some additional bundling of
services. Moreover, major telephone companies, such as SBC and
Verizon, are now deploying fiber deep into their networks that
will enable them to offer high bandwidth video services over
their networks, in addition to established voice and Internet
services.
92
Cable television has long competed with broadcast television,
which consists of television signals that the viewer is able to
receive without charge using an off-air antenna. The
extent of such competition is dependent upon the quality and
quantity of broadcast signals available through
off-air reception compared to the services provided
by the local cable system. Traditionally, cable television has
provided a higher picture quality and more channel offerings
than broadcast television. However, the recent licensing of
digital spectrum by the FCC will provide traditional
broadcasters with the ability to deliver high definition
television pictures and multiple digital-quality program
streams, as well as advanced digital services such as
subscription video and data transmission.
Cable systems are operated under non-exclusive franchises
granted by local authorities. More than one cable system may
legally be built in the same area. It is possible that a
franchising authority might grant a second franchise to another
cable operator and that such a franchise might contain terms and
conditions more favorable than those afforded us. In addition,
entities willing to establish an open video system, under which
they offer unaffiliated programmers non-discriminatory access to
a portion of the systems cable system, may be able to
avoid local franchising requirements. Well financed businesses
from outside the cable industry, such as public utilities that
already possess fiber optic and other transmission lines in the
areas they serve, may over time become competitors. There are a
number of cities that have constructed their own cable systems,
in a manner similar to city-provided utility services. There
also has been interest in traditional overbuilds by private
companies. Constructing a competing cable system is a capital
intensive process which involves a high degree of risk. We
believe that in order to be successful, a competitors
overbuild would need to be able to serve the homes and
businesses in the overbuilt area on a more cost-effective basis
than we can. Any such overbuild operation would require either
significant access to capital or access to facilities already in
place that are capable of delivering cable television
programming.
As of March 31, 2005, we are aware of overbuild situations
impacting approximately 5% of our total homes passed and
potential overbuild situations in areas servicing approximately
1% of our total homes passed. Additional overbuild situations
may occur in other systems. In response to such overbuilds,
these systems have been designated priorities for the upgrade of
cable plant and the launch of new and enhanced services. As of
March 31, 2005, we have upgraded many of these systems to
at least 750 megahertz two-way HFC architecture.
|
|
|
Telephone Companies and Utilities |
The competitive environment has been significantly affected by
technological developments and regulatory changes enacted under
the 1996 Telecom Act, which is designed to enhance competition
in the cable television and local telephone markets. Federal
cross-ownership restrictions historically limited entry by local
telephone companies into the cable business. The 1996 Telecom
Act modified this cross-ownership restriction, making it
possible for local exchange carriers, who have considerable
resources, to provide a wide variety of video services
competitive with services offered by cable systems.
Telephone companies can lawfully enter the cable television
business, and although activity in this area historically has
been quite limited, recent announcements by telephone companies
indicate a growing interest in offering a video product. Local
exchange carriers do already provide facilities for the
transmission and distribution of voice and data services,
including Internet services, in competition with our existing or
potential interactive services ventures and businesses. Some
telephone companies have begun more extensive deployment of
fiber in their networks that will enable them to begin providing
video services, as well as telephony and Internet access
service. At least one major telephone company, SBC, plans to
provide Internet protocol video over its upgraded network. SBC
contends that its use of this technology should allow it to
provide video service without a cable franchise as required
under Title VI of the Communications Act. Other telephone
companies deploying fiber more extensively are attempting
through various means (including federal and state legislation)
to weaken or streamline the franchising requirements applicable
to them. If telephone companies are successful in avoiding or
weakening the franchise and other regulatory requirements
93
that are applicable to cable operators like Charter, their
competitive posture would be enhanced. We cannot predict the
likelihood of success of the broadband services offered by our
competitors or the impact on us of such competitive ventures.
The large scale entry of major telephone companies as direct
competitors in the video marketplace could adversely affect the
profitability and valuation of established cable systems.
As we expand our offerings to include Internet access and other
telecommunications services, we will be subject to competition
from other telecommunications providers. The telecommunications
industry is highly competitive and includes competitors with
greater financial and personnel resources, who have brand name
recognition and long-standing relationships with regulatory
authorities and customers. Moreover, mergers, joint ventures and
alliances among franchise, wireless or private cable operators,
local exchange carriers and others may result in providers
capable of offering cable television, Internet, and
telecommunications services in direct competition with us. For
example, major local exchange carriers have entered into
arrangements with EchoStar and DirecTV in which they will market
packages combining phone service, DSL and DBS services.
Additionally, we are subject to competition from utilities which
possess fiber optic transmission lines capable of transmitting
signals with minimal signal distortion. Utilities are also
developing broadband over power line technology, which will
allow the provision of Internet and other broadband services to
homes and offices.
Additional competition is posed by satellite master antenna
television systems, or SMATV systems, serving multiple dwelling
units, or MDUs, such as condominiums, apartment complexes, and
private residential communities. These private cable systems may
enter into exclusive agreements with such MDUs, which may
preclude operators of franchise systems from serving residents
of such private complexes. Private cable systems can offer both
improved reception of local television stations and many of the
same satellite-delivered program services that are offered by
cable systems. SMATV systems currently benefit from operating
advantages not available to franchised cable systems, including
fewer regulatory burdens and no requirement to service low
density or economically depressed communities. Exemption from
regulation may provide a competitive advantage to certain of our
current and potential competitors.
Cable systems also compete with wireless program distribution
services such as multi-channel multipoint distribution systems
or wireless cable, known as MMDS, which uses
low-power microwave frequencies to transmit television
programming over-the-air to paying customers. MMDS services,
however, require unobstructed line of sight
transmission paths and MMDS ventures have been quite limited to
date.
The FCC has completed its auction of Multichannel Video
Distribution & Data Service (MVDDS)
licenses. MVDDS is a new terrestrial video and data fixed
wireless service that the FCC hopes will spur competition to the
cable and DBS industries.
Properties
Our principal physical assets consist of cable distribution
plant and equipment, including signal receiving, encoding and
decoding devices, headend reception facilities, distribution
systems and customer drop equipment for each of our cable
systems.
Our cable plant and related equipment are generally attached to
utility poles under pole rental agreements with local public
utilities and telephone companies, and in certain locations are
buried in underground ducts or trenches. We own or lease real
property for signal reception sites and own most of our service
vehicles.
Historically, our subsidiaries have owned the real property and
buildings for our data centers, customer contact centers and our
divisional administrative offices. Since early 2003 we have
reduced our
94
total real estate portfolio square footage by approximately 17%
and have decreased our operating annual lease costs by
approximately 30%. We plan to continue reducing our number of
administrative offices and lease the space, where possible,
while attempting to sell those existing locations that we
believe are no longer required. Our subsidiaries generally have
leased space for business offices throughout our operating
divisions. Our headend and tower locations are located on owned
or leased parcels of land, and we generally own the towers on
which our equipment is located. Charter Holdco owns the real
property and building for our principal executive offices.
The physical components of our cable systems require maintenance
as well as periodic upgrades to support the new services and
products we introduce. See Business Our
Network Technology. We believe that our properties are
generally in good operating condition and are suitable for our
business operations.
Employees
As of March 31, 2005, we had approximately
16,100 full-time equivalent employees. At March 31,
2005, approximately 100 of our employees were represented by
collective bargaining agreements. We have never experienced a
work stoppage.
The corporate office, which includes employees of Charter and
Charter Holdco, is responsible for coordinating and overseeing
our operations. The corporate office performs certain financial
and administrative functions on a centralized basis such as
accounting, taxes, billing, finance and acquisitions, payroll
and benefit administration, information system design and
support, internal audit, purchasing, marketing and programming
contract administration and oversight and coordination of
external auditors and consultants. The corporate office performs
these services on a cost reimbursement basis pursuant to a
management services agreement. See Certain Relationships
and Related Transactions Transactions Arising Out of
Our Organizational Structure and Mr. Allens
Investment in Charter and Its Subsidiaries
Intercompany Management Arrangements and
Mutual Services Agreements.
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
Securities Class Actions and Derivative Suits |
Fourteen putative federal class action lawsuits (the
Federal Class Actions) were filed against
Charter and certain of its former and present officers and
directors in various jurisdictions allegedly on behalf of all
purchasers of Charters securities during the period from
either November 8 or November 9, 1999 through July 17
or July 18, 2002. Unspecified damages were sought by the
plaintiffs. In general, the lawsuits alleged that Charter
utilized misleading accounting practices and failed to disclose
these accounting practices and/or issued false and misleading
financial statements and press releases concerning
Charters operations and prospects. The Federal
Class Actions were specifically and individually identified
in public filings made by Charter prior to the date of this
prospectus.
In October 2002, Charter filed a motion with the Judicial Panel
on Multidistrict Litigation (the Panel) to transfer
the Federal Class Actions to the Eastern District of Missouri.
On March 12, 2003, the Panel transferred the six Federal
Class Actions not filed in the Eastern District of Missouri
to that district for coordinated or consolidated pretrial
proceedings with the eight Federal Class Actions already
pending there. The Panels transfer order assigned the
Federal Class Actions to Judge Charles A. Shaw. By virtue
of a prior court order, StoneRidge Investment Partners LLC
became lead plaintiff upon entry of the Panels transfer
order. StoneRidge subsequently filed a Consolidated Amended
Complaint. The Court subsequently consolidated the Federal
Class Actions into a single action (the Consolidated
Federal Class Action) for pretrial purposes. On
June 19, 2003, following a status and scheduling conference
with the parties, the Court issued a Case Management Order
setting forth a schedule for the pretrial phase of the
Consolidated Federal Class Action. Motions to dismiss the
Consolidated Amended Complaint were filed. On February 10,
2004, in response to a joint motion made by StoneRidge and
defendants Charter, Vogel and Allen, the court entered an order
providing, among other things, that: (1) the parties who
filed such motion engage in a mediation within ninety
(90) days; and (2) all proceedings in the Consolidated
95
Federal Class Actions were stayed until May 10, 2004.
On May 11, 2004, the Court extended the stay in the
Consolidated Federal Class Action for an additional sixty
(60) days. On July 12, 2004, the parties submitted a
joint motion to again extend the stay, this time until
September 10, 2004. The Court granted that extension on
July 20, 2004. On August 5, 2004, Stoneridge, Charter
and the individual defendants who were the subject of the suit
entered into a Memorandum of Understanding setting forth
agreements in principle to settle the Consolidated Federal
Class Action. These parties subsequently entered into
Stipulations of Settlement dated as of January 24, 2005
(described more fully below) which incorporate the terms of the
August 5, 2004 Memorandum of Understanding.
The Consolidated Federal Class Action is entitled:
|
|
|
|
|
In re Charter Communications, Inc. Securities Litigation, MDL
Docket No. 1506 (All Cases), StoneRidge Investments
Partners, LLC, Individually and On Behalf of All Others
Similarly Situated, v. Charter Communications, Inc., Paul
Allen, Jerald L. Kent, Carl E. Vogel, Kent Kalkwarf, David G.
Barford, Paul E. Martin, David L. McCall, Bill Shreffler, Chris
Fenger, James H. Smith, III, Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.,
Motorola, Inc. and Arthur Andersen, LLP, Consolidated Case
No. 4:02-CV-1186-CAS. |
On September 12, 2002, a shareholders derivative suit (the
State Derivative Action) was filed in the Circuit
Court of the City of St. Louis, State of Missouri (the
Missouri State Court), against Charter and its then
current directors, as well as its former auditors. The
plaintiffs allege that the individual defendants breached their
fiduciary duties by failing to establish and maintain adequate
internal controls and procedures. Unspecified damages, allegedly
on Charters behalf, are sought by the plaintiffs.
The consolidated State Derivative Action is entitled:
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth Stacey, Derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant
Charter Communications, Inc., v. Ronald L. Nelson, Paul G.
Allen, Marc B. Nathanson, Nancy B. Peretsman, William Savoy,
John H. Tory, Carl E. Vogel, Larry W. Wangberg, Arthur Andersen,
LLP and Charter Communications, Inc. |
On March 12, 2004, an action substantively identical to the
State Derivative Action was filed in the Missouri State Court,
against Charter and certain of its current and former directors,
as well as its former auditors. The plaintiffs in that case
alleged that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary
duties by failing to establish and maintain adequate internal
controls and procedures. Unspecified damages, allegedly on
Charters behalf, were sought by plaintiffs. On
July 14, 2004, the Court consolidated this case with the
State Derivative Action.
This action is entitled:
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Schimmel, Derivatively on behalf on Nominal Defendant
Charter Communications, Inc., v. Ronald L. Nelson, Paul G.
Allen, Marc B. Nathanson, Nancy B. Peretsman, William D. Savoy,
John H. Tory, Carl E. Vogel, Larry W. Wangberg, and Arthur
Andersen, LLP, and Charter Communications, Inc. |
Separately, on February 12, 2003, a shareholders derivative
suit (the Federal Derivative Action), was filed
against Charter and its then current directors in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. The
plaintiff in that suit alleged that the individual defendants
breached their fiduciary duties and grossly mismanaged Charter
by failing to establish and maintain adequate internal controls
and procedures. Unspecified damages, allegedly on Charters
behalf, were sought by the plaintiffs.
The Federal Derivative Action is entitled:
|
|
|
|
|
Arthur Cohn, Derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant Charter
Communications, Inc., v. Ronald L. Nelson, Paul G. Allen,
Marc B. Nathanson, Nancy B. Peretsman, William Savoy, John H.
Tory, Carl E. Vogel, Larry W. Wangberg, and Charter
Communications, Inc. |
As noted above, Charter and the individual defendants entered
into a Memorandum of Understanding on August 5, 2004
setting forth agreements in principle regarding settlement of
the Consolidated Federal
96
Class Action, the State Derivative Action(s) and the
Federal Derivative Action (the Actions). Charter and
various other defendants in those actions subsequently entered
into Stipulations of Settlement dated as of January 24,
2005, setting forth a settlement of the Actions in a manner
consistent with the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding.
The Stipulations of Settlement, along with various supporting
documentation, were filed with the Court on February 2,
2005. An amendment to the Stipulations was later filed with the
Court and made effective as of May 23, 2005. On
May 23, 2005 the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Missouri conducted the final fairness
hearing for the Actions, and on June 30, 2005, the court
issued its final approval of the settlements. Members of the
class have 30 days from the issuance of the June 30 order
approving the settlement to file an appeal challenging the
approval. A notice of appeal has been filed relating to the
settlement, but Charter does not yet know the specific issues
presented by such appeal.
As amended, the Stipulations of Settlement provide that, in
exchange for a release of all claims by plaintiffs against
Charter and its former and present officers and directors named
in the Actions, Charter would pay to the plaintiffs a
combination of cash and equity collectively valued at
$144 million, which will include the fees and expenses of
plaintiffs counsel. Of this amount, $64 million would
be paid in cash (by Charters insurance carriers) and the
$80 million balance was to be paid (subject to
Charters right to substitute cash therefor described
below) in shares of Charter Class A common stock having an
aggregate value of $40 million and ten-year warrants to
purchase shares of Charter Class A common stock having an
aggregate warrant value of $40 million, with such values in
each case being determined pursuant to formulas set forth in the
Stipulations of Settlement. However, Charter had the right, in
its sole discretion, to substitute cash for some or all of the
aforementioned securities on a dollar for dollar basis. Pursuant
to that right, Charter has elected to fund the $80 million
obligation with 13.4 million shares of Charter Class A
common stock (having an aggregate value of approximately
$15 million pursuant to the formula set forth in the
Stipulations of Settlement) with the remaining balance (less an
agreed upon $1.6 million discount in respect of that
portion allocable to plaintiffs attorneys fees) to
be paid in cash. In addition, Charter had agreed to issue
additional shares of its Class A common stock to its
insurance carrier having an aggregate value of $5 million;
however, Charter and its carriers agreed that Charter would pay
them $4.5 million in lieu of issuing such shares, and
Charter has paid that amount to its carriers. Charter delivered
the settlement consideration to the claims administrator on
July 8, 2005, and it will be held in escrow pending any
appeals of the approval.
As part of the settlements, Charter also committed to a variety
of corporate governance changes, internal practices and public
disclosures, some of which have already been undertaken and none
of which are inconsistent with measures Charter is taking in
connection with the recent conclusion of the SEC investigation
described below.
|
|
|
Government Investigations |
In August 2002, Charter became aware of a grand jury
investigation being conducted by the U.S. Attorneys
Office for the Eastern District of Missouri into certain of its
accounting and reporting practices, focusing on how Charter
reported customer numbers, and its reporting of amounts received
from digital set-top terminal suppliers for advertising. The
U.S. Attorneys Office publicly stated that Charter is
not a target of the investigation. Charter was also advised by
the U.S. Attorneys Office that no current officer or
member of its board of directors is a target of the
investigation. On July 24, 2003, a federal grand jury
charged four former officers of Charter with conspiracy and mail
and wire fraud, alleging improper accounting and reporting
practices focusing on revenue from digital set-top terminal
suppliers and inflated customer account numbers. Each of the
indicted former officers pled guilty to single conspiracy counts
related to the original mail and wire fraud charges and were
sentenced April 22, 2005. Charter fully cooperated with the
investigation, and following the sentencings, the
U.S. Attorneys Office for the Eastern District of
Missouri announced that its investigation was concluded and that
no further indictments would issue.
On November 4, 2002, Charter received an informal,
non-public inquiry from the staff of the SEC. The SEC issued a
formal order of investigation dated January 23, 2003, and
subsequently served document
97
and testimony subpoenas on Charter and a number of its former
employees. The investigation and subpoenas generally concerned
Charters prior reports with respect to its determination
of the number of customers, and various of its accounting
policies and practices including its capitalization of certain
expenses and dealings with certain vendors, including
programmers and digital set-top terminal suppliers. On
July 27, 2004, the SEC and Charter reached a final
agreement to settle the investigation. In the Settlement
Agreement and Cease and Desist Order, Charter agreed to entry of
an administrative order prohibiting any future violations of
United States securities laws and requiring certain other
remedial internal practices and public disclosures. Charter
neither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing, and the SEC assessed
no fine against Charter.
Charter is generally required to indemnify, under certain
conditions, each of the named individual defendants in
connection with the matters described above pursuant to the
terms of its bylaws and (where applicable) such individual
defendants employment agreements. In accordance with these
documents, in connection with the pending grand jury
investigation, the now-settled SEC investigation and the
above-described lawsuits, some of Charters current and
former directors and current and former officers have been
advanced certain costs and expenses incurred in connection with
their defense. See Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions Indemnification Advances for
greater detail. On February 22, 2005, Charter filed suit
against four of its former officers who were indicted in the
course of the grand jury investigation. These suits seek to
recover the legal fees and other related expenses advanced to
these individuals by Charter for the grand jury investigation,
SEC investigation and class action and related lawsuits. One of
these former officers, James Smith, has counterclaimed against
Charter alleging, among other things, that Charter owes him
additional indemnification for legal fees that Charter did not
pay. Another of these former officers, David McCall, has
counterclaimed against Charter that Charter owes him accrued
sick leave.
In October 2001, two customers, Nikki Nicholls and Geraldine M.
Barber, filed a class action suit against Charter Holdco in
South Carolina Court of Common Pleas (the South Carolina
Class Action), purportedly on behalf of a class of
Charter Holdcos customers, alleging that Charter Holdco
improperly charged them a wire maintenance fee without request
or permission. They also claimed that Charter Holdco improperly
required them to rent analog and/or digital set-top terminals
even though their television sets were cable ready.
A substantively identical case was filed in the Superior Court
of Athens Clarke County, Georgia by Emma S. Tobar on
March 26, 2002 (the Georgia Class Action),
alleging a nationwide class for these claims. Charter Holdco
removed the South Carolina Class Action to the United
States District Court for the District of South Carolina in
November 2001, and moved to dismiss the suit in December 2001.
The federal judge remanded the case to the South Carolina Court
of Common Pleas in August 2002 without ruling on the motion to
dismiss. The plaintiffs subsequently moved for a default
judgment, arguing that upon return to state court, Charter
Holdco should have, but did not file a new motion to dismiss.
The state court judge granted the plaintiffs motion over
Charter Holdcos objection in September 2002. Charter
Holdco immediately appealed that decision to the South Carolina
Court of Appeals and the South Carolina Supreme Court, but those
courts ruled that until a final judgment was entered against
Charter Holdco, they lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
In January 2003, the Court of Common Pleas granted the
plaintiffs motion for class certification. In October and
November 2003, Charter Holdco filed motions (a) asking that
court to set aside the default judgment, and (b) seeking
dismissal of plaintiffs suit for failure to state a claim.
In January 2004, the Court of Common Pleas granted in part and
denied in part Charter Holdcos motion to dismiss for
failure to state a claim. It also took under advisement Charter
Holdcos motion to set aside the default judgment. In April
2004, the parties to both the Georgia and South Carolina
Class Actions participated in a mediation. The mediator
made a proposal to the parties to settle the lawsuits. In May
2004, the parties accepted the mediators proposal and
reached a tentative settlement, subject to final documentation
and
98
court approval. As a result of the tentative settlement, we
recorded a special charge of $9 million in our consolidated
statement of operations in the first quarter of 2004. On
July 8, 2004, the Superior Court of Athens
Clarke County, Georgia granted a motion to amend the Tobar
complaint to add Nicholls, Barber and April Jones as plaintiffs
in the Georgia Class Action and to add any potential class
members in South Carolina. The court also granted preliminary
approval of the proposed settlement on that date. On
August 2, 2004, the parties submitted a joint request to
the South Carolina Court of Common Pleas to stay the South
Carolina Class Action pending final approval of the
settlement and on August 17, 2004, that court granted the
parties request. On November 10, 2004, the court
granted final approval of the settlement, rejecting positions
advanced by two objectors to the settlement. On
December 13, 2004, the court entered a written order
formally approving that settlement. On January 11, 2005,
certain class members appealed the order entered by the Georgia
court. Those objectors voluntarily dismissed their appeal with
prejudice on February 8, 2005. On February 9, 2005,
the South Carolina Court of Common Pleas entered a court order
of dismissal for the South Carolina Class Action. Additionally,
one of the objectors to this settlement filed a similar, but not
identical, lawsuit in Massachusetts state court. The action
purports to be brought on behalf of three different classes of
customers and generally alleges that the putative class members
were overcharged for converter boxes and remote controls.
The South Carolina Class Action was entitled:
|
|
|
|
|
Nikki Nicholls and Geraldine M. Barber, on behalf of themselves
and all others similarly situated v. Charter Communications
Holding Company, LLC and City of Spartanburg filed on
October 29, 2001. |
The Georgia Class Action was entitled:
|
|
|
|
|
Emma S. Tobar, Nikki Nicholls, Geraldine M. Barber and April
Jones, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated v. Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC,
et al, originally filed on March 26, 2002. |
In addition to the matters set forth above, Charter is also
party to other lawsuits and claims that arose in the ordinary
course of conducting its business. In the opinion of management,
after taking into account recorded liabilities, the outcome of
these other lawsuits and claims are not expected to have a
material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition,
results of operations or our liquidity.
99
REGULATION AND LEGISLATION
The following summary addresses the key regulatory and
legislative developments affecting the cable industry. Cable
system operations are extensively regulated by the FCC, some
state governments and most local governments. A failure to
comply with these regulations could subject us to substantial
penalties. Our business can be dramatically impacted by changes
to the existing regulatory framework, whether triggered by
legislative, administrative, or judicial rulings. Congress and
the FCC have expressed a particular interest in increasing
competition in the communications field generally and in the
cable television field specifically. The 1996 Telecom Act
altered the regulatory structure governing the nations
communications providers. It removed barriers to competition in
both the cable television market and the local telephone market.
We could be materially disadvantaged in the future if we are
subject to regulations that do not equally impact our key
competitors. Congress and the FCC have frequently revisited the
subject of communications regulation, and they are likely to do
so in the future. In addition, franchise agreements with local
governments must be periodically renewed, and new operating
terms may be imposed. Future legislative, regulatory, or
judicial changes could adversely affect our operations. We can
provide no assurance that the already extensive regulation of
our business will not be expanded in the future.
Cable Rate Regulation
The cable industry has operated under a federal rate regulation
regime for more than a decade. The regulations currently
restrict the prices that cable systems charge for basic service
and associated equipment. All other cable offerings are now
universally exempt from rate regulation. Although rate
regulation operates pursuant to a federal formula, local
governments, commonly referred to as local franchising
authorities, are primarily responsible for administering this
regulation. The majority of our local franchising authorities
have never certified to regulate basic cable rates, but they
retain the right to do so (and order rate reductions and
refunds), except in those specific communities facing
effective competition. Federal law defines effective
competition as existing in a variety of circumstances that
historically were rarely satisfied, but are increasingly likely
to be satisfied with the recent increase in
DBS competition. We already have secured official
recognition by the FCC of effective competition in many of our
communities.
There have been frequent calls to impose expanded rate
regulation on the cable industry. Confronted with rapidly
increasing cable programming costs, it is possible that Congress
may adopt new constraints on the retail pricing or packaging of
cable programming. Such constraints could adversely affect our
operations.
The federal rate regulations also require cable operators to
maintain a geographically uniform rate within each
community, except in those communities facing effective
competition. As we attempt to respond to a changing marketplace
with competitive pricing practices, we may face legal restraints
and challenges that impede our ability to compete.
Must Carry/ Retransmission Consent
Federal law currently includes must carry
regulations, which require cable systems to carry certain local
broadcast television stations that the cable operator would not
select voluntarily. Alternatively, popular commercial television
stations can prohibit cable carriage unless the cable operator
first negotiates for retransmission consent, which
may be conditioned on significant payments or other concessions.
Either option has a potentially adverse effect on our business.
The burden associated with must carry could increase
significantly if cable systems were required to simultaneously
carry both the analog and digital signals of each television
station (dual carriage), as the broadcast industry transitions
from an analog to a digital format.
The burden could also increase significantly if cable systems
become required to carry multiple program streams included
within a single digital broadcast transmission (multicast
carriage). Additional
100
government-mandated broadcast carriage obligations could disrupt
existing programming commitments, interfere with our preferred
use of limited channel capacity and limit our ability to offer
services that would maximize customer appeal and revenue
potential. Although the FCC issued a decision in February 2005,
confirming an earlier ruling against mandating either dual
carriage or multicast carriage, that decision has been appealed.
In addition, the FCC could modify its position or Congress could
legislate additional carriage obligations. In particular,
broadcast carriage burdens may increase as Congress and the FCC
attempt to transition broadcasters to digital spectrum and
reclaim analog spectrum.
There are indications that broadcasters invoking retransmission
consent may be even more forceful in upcoming negotiations.
These negotiations could result in increased broadcast carriage
burdens or the loss of popular programming.
Access Channels
Local franchise agreements often require cable operators to set
aside certain channels for public, educational and governmental
access programming. Federal law also requires cable systems to
designate a portion of their channel capacity for commercial
leased access by unaffiliated third parties. Increased activity
in this area could further burden the channel capacity of our
cable systems.
Access to Programming
The FCC recently extended a regulation prohibiting video
programmers affiliated with cable companies from favoring cable
operators over new competitors and requiring such programmers to
sell their satellite-delivered programming to other multichannel
video distributors. This provision limits the ability of
vertically integrated cable programmers to offer exclusive
programming arrangements to cable companies. DBS providers
traditionally had no similar restriction on exclusive
programming, but the FCC recently imposed that restriction as
part of its approval of the DirecTV-News Corp. merger. The FCC
has also adopted regulations to avoid unreasonable conduct in
retransmission consent negotiations between broadcasters and
multichannel video programming distributors, including cable and
DBS. It imposed special conditions on the DirectTV-News Corp.
merger, including a requirement that Fox affiliated broadcast
stations enter into commercial arbitration for disputes over
retransmission consent. Given the heightened competition and
media consolidation that Charter faces, it is possible that we
will find it increasingly difficult to gain access to popular
programming at favorable terms. Such difficulty could adversely
impact our business.
Ownership Restrictions
Federal regulation of the communications field traditionally
included a host of ownership restrictions, which limited the
size of certain media entities and restricted their ability to
enter into competing enterprises. Through a series of
legislative, regulatory, and judicial actions, most of these
restrictions recently were eliminated or substantially relaxed.
For example, historic restrictions on local exchange carriers
offering cable service within their telephone service area, as
well as those prohibiting broadcast stations from owning cable
systems within their broadcast service area, no longer exist.
Changes in this regulatory area could alter the business
landscape in which we operate, as formidable new competitors
(including electric utilities, local exchange carriers, and
broadcast/media companies) may increasingly choose to offer
cable services.
The FCC previously adopted regulations precluding any cable
operator from serving more than 30% of all domestic multichannel
video subscribers and from devoting more than 40% of the
activated channel capacity of any cable system to the carriage
of affiliated national video programming services. These cable
ownership restrictions were invalidated by the courts, and the
FCC is now considering adoption of replacement regulations.
101
Internet Service
Over the past several years, proposals have been advanced that
would require cable operators offering Internet service to
provide non-discriminatory access to unaffiliated Internet
service providers. In a June 2005 ruling, commonly referred to
as Brand X, the Supreme Court upheld an FCC decision (and
overruled a conflicting Ninth Circuit opinion) making it much
less likely that any non-discriminatory open access
requirements (which are generally associated with common carrier
regulation of telecommunications services) will be
imposed on the cable industry by local, state or federal
authorities. The Supreme Court held that the FCC was correct in
classifying cable-provided Internet service as an
information service, rather than a
telecommunications service. This favorable
regulatory classification limits the ability of various
governmental authorities to impose open access requirements on
cable-provided Internet service. Given the recency of the
Brand X decision, however, the nature of any legislative
or regulatory response remains uncertain. The imposition of open
access requirements could materially affect our business.
As the Internet has matured, it has become the subject of
increasing regulatory interest. There is now a host of federal
laws affecting Internet service, including the Digital
Millennium Copyright Act, which affords copyright owners certain
rights against us that could adversely affect our relationship
with any customer accused of violating copyright laws. Recently
enacted Anti-Spam legislation also imposes new obligations on
our operations. The adoption of new Internet regulations could
adversely affect our business.
Phone Service
The 1996 Telecom Act created a more favorable regulatory
environment for us to provide telecommunications services. In
particular, it limited the regulatory role of local franchising
authorities and established requirements ensuring that we could
interconnect with other telephone companies to provide a viable
service. Many implementation details remain unresolved, and
there are substantial regulatory changes being considered that
could impact, in both positive and negative ways, our primary
telecommunications competitors and our own entry into the field
of phone service. The FCC and state regulatory authorities are
considering, for example, whether common carrier regulation
traditionally applied to incumbent local exchange carriers
should be modified. The FCC recently decided that alternative
voice technologies, like certain types of VOIP, should be
regulated only at the federal level, rather than by individual
states. While this decision appears to be a positive development
for VOIP offerings, it is unclear whether and how the FCC will
apply certain types of common carrier regulations, such as
intercarrier compensation and universal service obligations to
alternative voice technology. The FCC recently imposed
traditional 911 emergency service obligations on VOIP provided
telephony, as well as certain additional notice requirements.
The treatment of these regulations and other regulatory matters
will affect our potential expansion into phone service.
Pole Attachments
The Communications Act requires most utilities to provide cable
systems with access to poles and conduits and simultaneously
regulates the rates charged for this access. The Act specifies
that significantly higher rates apply if the cable plant is
providing telecommunications service, as well as traditional
cable service. The FCC has clarified that a cable
operators favorable pole rates are not endangered by the
provision of Internet access, and that determination was upheld
by the United States Supreme Court. It remains possible that the
underlying pole attachment formula, or its application to
Internet and telecommunications offerings, will be modified in a
manner that substantially increases our pole attachment costs.
102
Cable Equipment
The FCC has undertaken several steps to promote competition in
the delivery of cable equipment and compatibility with new
digital technology. The FCC has expressly ruled that cable
customers must be allowed to purchase set-top terminals from
third parties and established a multi-year phase-in during which
security functions (which would remain in the operators
exclusive control) would be unbundled from the basic converter
functions, which could then be provided by third party vendors.
The first phase of implementation has already passed. A
prohibition on cable operators leasing digital set-top terminals
that integrate security and basic navigation functions was
scheduled to go into effect as of July 1, 2006, but the FCC
extended the deadline for one year to July 1, 2007.
The FCC has adopted rules implementing an agreement between
major cable operators and manufacturers of consumer electronics
on plug and play specifications for one-way digital
televisions. The rules require cable operators to provide
CableCard security modules and support to customer
owned digital televisions and similar devices already equipped
with built-in set-top terminal functionality. Cable operators
must support basic home recording rights and copy protection
rules for digital programming content. The FCCs plug and
play rules are under appeal, although the appeal has been stayed
pending FCC reconsideration.
The FCC adopted companion broadcast flag rules,
requiring cable carriage of a code embedded in digital broadcast
programming that will regulate the further use of copyright
programming. However, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the
D.C. Circuit recently held that the FCC lacks jurisdiction to
impose the broadcast flag rules.
The FCC is conducting additional related rulemakings, and the
cable and consumer electronics industries are currently
negotiating an agreement that would establish additional
plug and play specifications for two-way digital
televisions.
The FCC rules are subject to challenge and inter-industry
negotiations are ongoing. It is unclear how this process will
develop and how it will affect our offering of cable equipment
and our relationship with our customers.
Other Communications Act Provisions and FCC Regulatory
Matters
In addition to the Communications Act provisions and FCC
regulations noted above, there are other statutory provisions
and FCC regulations affecting our business. The Communications
Act, for example, includes cable-specific privacy obligations.
The Act carefully limits our ability to collect and disclose
personal information.
FCC regulations include a variety of additional areas,
including, among other things: (1) equal employment
opportunity obligations; (2) customer service standards;
(3) technical service standards; (4) mandatory
blackouts of certain network, syndicated and sports programming;
(5) restrictions on political advertising;
(6) restrictions on advertising in childrens
programming; (7) restrictions on origination cablecasting;
(8) restrictions on carriage of lottery programming;
(9) sponsorship identification obligations;
(10) closed captioning of video programming;
(11) licensing of systems and facilities;
(12) maintenance of public files; and (13) emergency
alert systems.
It is possible that Congress or the FCC will expand or modify
its regulation of cable systems in the future, and we cannot
predict at this time how that might impact our business. For
example, there have been recent discussions about imposing
indecency restrictions directly on cable programming.
Copyright
Cable systems are subject to federal copyright licensing
covering carriage of television and radio broadcast signals. The
possible modification or elimination of this compulsory
copyright license is the
103
subject of continuing legislative review and could adversely
affect our ability to obtain desired broadcast programming. We
cannot predict the outcome of this legislative activity.
Moreover, the Copyright Office has not yet provided any guidance
as to the how the compulsory copyright license should apply to
newly offered digital broadcast signals.
Copyright clearances for non-broadcast programming services are
arranged through private negotiations. Cable operators also must
obtain music rights for locally originated programming and
advertising from the major music performing rights
organizations. These licensing fees have been the source of
litigation in the past, and we cannot predict with certainty
whether license fee disputes may arise in the future.
Franchise Matters
Cable systems generally are operated pursuant to nonexclusive
franchises granted by a municipality or other state or local
government entity in order to cross public rights-of-way. Cable
franchises generally are granted for fixed terms and in many
cases include monetary penalties for noncompliance and may be
terminable if the franchisee fails to comply with material
provisions.
The specific terms and conditions of cable franchises vary
materially between jurisdictions. Each franchise generally
contains provisions governing cable operations, franchise fees,
system construction, maintenance, technical performance, and
customer service standards. A number of states subject cable
systems to the jurisdiction of centralized state government
agencies, such as public utility commissions. Although local
franchising authorities have considerable discretion in
establishing franchise terms, there are certain federal
protections. For example, federal law caps local franchise fees
and includes renewal procedures designed to protect incumbent
franchisees from arbitrary denials of renewal. Even if a
franchise is renewed, however, the local franchising authority
may seek to impose new and more onerous requirements as a
condition of renewal. Similarly, if a local franchising
authoritys consent is required for the purchase or sale of
a cable system, the local franchising authority may attempt to
impose more burdensome requirements as a condition for providing
its consent.
104
MANAGEMENT
Directors
The persons listed below are directors of Charter.
|
|
|
Director |
|
Position(s) |
|
|
|
Paul G. Allen
|
|
Chairman of the board of directors |
W. Lance Conn
|
|
Director |
Jonathan L. Dolgen
|
|
Director |
Robert P. May
|
|
Director, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer |
David C. Merritt
|
|
Director |
Marc B. Nathanson
|
|
Director |
Jo Allen Patton
|
|
Director |
John H. Tory
|
|
Director |
Larry W. Wangberg
|
|
Director |
The following sets forth certain biographical information with
respect to the directors listed above.
Paul G. Allen, 52, has been Chairman of our board of
directors since July 1999, and Chairman of the board of
directors of Charter Investment, Inc. (a predecessor to, and
currently an affiliate of, Charter) since December 1998.
Mr. Allen, co-founder of Microsoft Corporation, has been a
private investor for more than 15 years, with interests in
over 50 technology, telecommunications, content and biotech
companies. Mr. Allens investments include Vulcan
Inc., Vulcan Productions, Inc., the Portland Trail Blazers NBA
and Seattle Seahawks NFL franchises, and investments in
DreamWorks LLC and Oxygen Media. In addition, Mr. Allen is
a director of Vulcan Programming Inc., Vulcan Ventures, Vulcan
Inc., Vulcan Cable III Inc., numerous privately held
companies and, until its sale in May 2004 to an unrelated third
party, TechTV L.L.C.
W. Lance Conn, 37, was elected to our board of
directors in September 2004. Since July 2004, Mr. Conn has
served as Executive Vice President, Investment Management for
Vulcan Inc., the investment and project management company that
oversees a diverse multi-billion dollar portfolio of investments
by Paul G. Allen. Prior to joining Vulcan Inc., Mr. Conn
was employed by America Online, Inc., an interactive online
services company, from March 1996 to May 2003. From 1997 to
2000, Mr. Conn served in various senior business
development roles at America Online. In 2000, Mr. Conn
began supervising all of America Onlines European
investments, alliances and business initiatives. In 2002, he
became Senior Vice President of America Online U.S. where he led
a company-wide effort to restructure and optimize America
Onlines operations. From September 1994 until February
1996, Mr. Conn was an attorney with the Shaw Pittman law
firm in Washington, D.C. Mr. Conn holds a J.D. degree
from the University of Virginia, a masters degree in
history from the University of Mississippi and an A.B. in
history from Princeton University.
Jonathan L. Dolgen, 60, was elected to our board of
directors in October 2004. Since July 2004, Mr. Dolgen has
also been a Senior Advisor to Viacom, Inc. (Viacom)
a worldwide entertainment and media company, where he provides
advisory services to the current Chairman and Chief Executive of
Viacom, or others designated by him, on an as requested basis.
Since July 2004, Mr. Dolgen has been a private investor and
since September 2004, Mr. Dolgen has been a principal of Wood
River Ventures, LLC, a private start-up entity that is seeking
investment and other opportunities primarily in the media
sector. From April 1994 to July 2004, Mr. Dolgen served as
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Viacom Entertainment
Group, a unit of Viacom, where he oversaw various operations of
Viacoms businesses, which during 2003 and 2004 primarily
included the operations engaged in motion picture production and
distribution, television production and distribution, regional
theme parks, theatrical exhibition and publishing.
Mr. Dolgen began his career in the entertainment industry
in 1976, and until joining the Viacom Entertainment Group,
served in executive positions at Columbia Pictures Industries,
Inc., Twentieth Century Fox and Fox, Inc., and Sony Pictures
Entertainment. Mr. Dolgen holds a B.S. degree from Cornell
University and a J.D. degree from New York University.
105
Robert P. May, 56, was elected to our board of directors
in October 2004 and became our Interim President and Chief
Executive Officer in January 2005. Mr. May has served on
the board of directors of HealthSouth Corporation, a national
provider of healthcare services, since October 2002, and has
been its Chairman since July 2004. Mr. May also served as
HealthSouth Corporations Interim Chief Executive Officer
from March 2003 until May 2004, and as Interim President of its
Outpatient and Diagnostic Division from August 2003 to January
2004. Since March 2001, Mr. May has been a private investor
and principal of RPM Systems, which provides strategic business
consulting services. From March 1999 to March 2001, Mr. May
served on the board of directors and was Chief Executive of PNV
Inc., a national telecommunications company. PNV Inc. filed for
bankruptcy in December 2000. Prior to his employment at PNV
Inc., Mr. May was Chief Operating Officer and a member of
the board of directors of Cablevision Systems Corporation from
October 1996 to February 1998, and from 1973 to 1993
he held several senior executive positions with Federal Express
Corporation, including President, Business Logistics Services.
Mr. May was educated at Curry College and Boston College
and attended Harvard Business Schools Program for
Management Development.
David C. Merritt, 51, was elected to our board of
directors in July 2003, and was also appointed as Chairman of
the Audit Committee at that time. Since October 2003,
Mr. Merritt has been a Managing Director of Salem Partners,
LLC, an investment banking firm. He was a Managing Director in
the Entertainment Media Advisory Group at Gerard Klauer
Mattison & Co., Inc., a company that provides financial
advisory services to the entertainment and media industries from
January 2001 through April 2003. Prior to that, he served as
Chief Financial Officer of CKE Associates, Ltd., a privately
held company with interests in talent management, film
production, television production, music and new media from July
1999 to November 2001. He also served as a director of
Laser-Pacific Media Corporation from January 2001 until October
2003 and served as Chairman of its audit committee. During
December 2003, he became a director of Outdoor Channel Holdings,
Inc. Mr. Merritt joined KPMG LLP in 1975 and served in a
variety of capacities during his years with the firm, including
national partner in charge of the media and entertainment
practice and before joining CKE Associates, Mr. Merritt was
an audit and consulting partner of KPMG LLP for 14 years.
Mr. Merritt holds a B.S. degree in Business and Accounting
from California State University Northridge.
Marc B. Nathanson, 60, has been a director of Charter
since January 2000. Mr. Nathanson is the Chairman of
Mapleton Investments LLC, an investment vehicle formed in 1999.
He also founded and served as Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Falcon Holding Group, Inc., a cable operator, and its
predecessors, from 1975 until 1999. He served as Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of Enstar Communications Corporation, a
cable operator, from 1988 until November 1999. Prior to 1975,
Mr. Nathanson held executive positions with Teleprompter
Corporation, Warner Cable and Cypress Communications
Corporation. In 1995, he was appointed by the President of the
United States to the Broadcasting Board of Governors, and from
1998 through September 2002, served as its Chairman.
Mr. Nathanson holds a bachelors degree in Mass
Communications from the University of Denver and a masters
degree in Political Science from University of California/
Santa Barbara.
Jo Allen Patton, 47, has been a director of Charter since
April 2004. Ms. Patton joined Vulcan Inc. as Vice President
in 1993, and since that time she has served as an officer and
director of many affiliates of Mr. Allen, including her
current position as President and Chief Executive Officer of
Vulcan Inc. since July 2001. Ms. Patton is also President
of Vulcan Productions, an independent feature film and
documentary production company, Vice Chair of First &
Goal, Inc., which developed and operated the Seattle Seahawks
NFL stadium, and served as Executive Director of the six Paul G.
Allen Foundations. Ms. Patton is a co-founder of the
Experience Music Project museum, as well as the Science Fiction
Museum and Hall of Fame. Ms. Patton is the sister of
Mr. Allen.
John H. Tory, 51, has been a director of Charter since
December 2001. Mr. Tory served as the Chief Executive
Officer of Rogers Cable Inc., Canadas largest broadband
cable operator, from 1999 until 2003. From 1995 to 1999,
Mr. Tory was President and Chief Executive Officer of
Rogers Media Inc., a broadcasting and publishing company. Prior
to joining Rogers, Mr. Tory was a Managing Partner and
member of the executive committee at Tory Tory
DesLauriers & Binnington, one of Canadas largest
law
106
firms. Mr. Tory serves on the board of directors of a
number of Canadian companies, including Cara Operations Limited.
Mr. Tory was educated at University of Toronto Schools,
Trinity College (University of Toronto) and Osgoode Hall Law
School.
On June 29, 2005, Mr. Tory formally notified Charter
that he intends to resign from its board of directors and the
board committees on which he serves. Mr. Tory was elected
Leader of the Ontario Progressive Conservative Party in
September 2004 and elected to Parliament in March 2005. The date
for Mr. Torys departure has not yet been determined,
but he has indicated that he will continue to serve on
Charters board and its committees at least until the date
of the annual shareholders meeting or until a replacement
director is named.
Larry W. Wangberg, 63, has been a director of Charter
since January 2002. From August 1997 to May 2004,
Mr. Wangberg was a director of TechTV L.L.C., a cable
television network controlled by Paul Allen. He also served as
its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from August 1997
through July 2002. In May 2004, TechTV L.L.C. was sold to an
unrelated party. Prior to joining TechTV L.L.C.,
Mr. Wangberg was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
StarSight Telecast Inc., an interactive navigation and program
guide company which later merged with Gemstar International,
from 1994 to 1997. Mr. Wangberg was Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Times Mirror Cable Television and Senior
Vice President of its corporate parent, Times Mirror Co., from
1983 to 1994. He currently serves on the boards of Autodesk Inc.
and ADC Telecommunications. Mr. Wangberg holds a
bachelors degree in Mechanical Engineering and a
masters degree in Industrial Engineering, both from the
University of Minnesota.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee, which has a written charter approved by the
board of directors, consisted of three directors as of
March 28, 2005: Charles Lillis, John Tory and David
Merritt, all of whom are believed to be independent in
accordance with the applicable corporate governance listing
standards of the NASDAQ National Market. Charters board of
directors has determined that, in its judgment, David Merritt is
an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of the
applicable federal regulations.
On March 29, 2005, Charter announced the resignation of
Charles M. Lillis from its board of directors, effective on
March 28, 2005. Mr. Lillis was one of three
independent members of the Audit Committee. As a result of his
resignation, Charter no longer complies with Nasdaqs
Marketplace Rule 4350(d)(2)(A), requiring an Audit
Committee with at least three members who are
independent as defined in that rule. On
March 31, 2005, Charter received notification from Nasdaq
of its noncompliance with Marketplace Rule 4350. Nasdaq has
informed Charter that it has until the date of its next annual
shareholder meeting to regain compliance or its Class A
common stock will be delisted. Charter intends to regain
compliance by appointing, within such timeframe, a new Audit
Committee member who meets the independence requirements of the
Nasdaq rules.
On June 29, 2005, John Tory formally notified Charter that
he intends to resign from its board of directors and the board
committees on which he serves. The date for Mr. Torys
departure has not yet been determined, but he has indicated that
he will continue to serve on Charters board and its
committees at least until the date of the annual shareholders
meeting or until a replacement director is named.
Director Compensation
Each non-employee member of our board receives an annual
retainer of $40,000 in cash plus restricted stock, vesting one
year after date of grant, with a value on the date of grant of
$50,000. In addition, the Audit Committee chair receives $25,000
per year, and the chair of each other committee receives $10,000
per year. Prior to February 22, 2005, all committee members
also received $1,000 for attendance at each committee meeting.
Beginning on February 22, 2005 each director also receives
$1,000 for telephonic attendance at each meeting of the full
board and $2,000 for in-person attendance. Each director of
Charter is entitled to reimbursement for costs incurred in
connection with attendance at board and committee meetings.
Vulcan has informed us that, in accordance with its internal
policy, Mr. Conn turns over to Vulcan all cash compensation he
receives for his participation on Charters board of
directors or committees thereof.
107
Directors who were employees did not receive additional
compensation in 2003 or 2004. Mr. Vogel, who was our
President and Chief Executive Officer in 2004, was the only
director who was also an employee during 2004.
Our Bylaws provide that all directors are entitled to
indemnification to the maximum extent permitted by law from and
against any claims, damages, liabilities, losses, costs or
expenses incurred in connection with or arising out of the
performance by them of their duties for us or our subsidiaries.
In addition, we have been informed by Vulcan that the bylaws of
Vulcan, Inc. also provide that Ms. Patton and Messrs. Allen and
Conn are entitled to similar indemnification in connection with
their service on our Board of Directors.
Executive Officers
The following persons are executive officers of Charter
Communications, Inc.:
|
|
|
Executive Officers |
|
Position |
|
|
|
Paul G. Allen
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors |
Robert P. May
|
|
Interim President and Chief Executive Officer |
Wayne H. Davis
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Technical Officer |
Sue Ann Hamilton
|
|
Executive Vice President Programming |
Thomas J. Hearity
|
|
Senior Vice President, Acting General Counsel and Secretary |
Michael J. Lovett
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer |
Paul E. Martin
|
|
Senior Vice President, Interim Chief Financial Officer,
Principal Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller |
Lynne F. Ramsey
|
|
Senior Vice President Human Resources |
Information regarding our executive officers who do not serve as
directors is set forth below.
Wayne H. Davis, 51, Executive Vice President and Chief
Technical Officer. Prior to his current position, Mr. Davis
served as Senior Vice President, Engineering and Technical
Operations, and as Assistant to the President/ Vice President of
Management Services since July 2002 and prior to that, he was
Vice President of Engineering/ Operations for Charters
National Region from December 2001. Before joining Charter,
Mr. Davis held the position of Vice President of
Engineering for Comcast Corporation, Inc. Prior to that, he held
various engineering positions including Vice President of
Engineering for Jones Intercable Inc. He began his career in the
cable industry in 1980. He attended the State University of New
York at Albany. Mr. Davis serves as an advisory board
member of Cedar Point Communications, and as a board member of
@Security Broadband Corp., a company in which Charter owns an
equity investment interest. Mr. Davis is also a member of
the Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers.
Sue Ann R. Hamilton, 44, Executive Vice President of
Programming. Ms. Hamilton joined Charter as Senior Vice
President of Programming in March 2003 and was promoted to her
current position in April 2005. From March 1999 to November
2002, Ms. Hamilton served as Vice President of Programming for
AT&T Broadband, L.L.C. Prior to that, from October 1993 to
March 1999, Ms. Hamilton held numerous management positions at
AT&T Broadband, L.L.C. and Tele-Communications, Inc. (TCI),
which was acquired by AT&T Broadband, L.L.C. in 1999. Prior
to her cable television career with TCI, she was a partner with
Kirkland & Ellis representing domestic and international
clients in complex commercial transactions and securities
matters. A magna cum laude graduate of Carleton College in
Northfield, Minnesota, Ms. Hamilton received a J.D. degree from
Stanford Law School, where she was Associate Managing Editor of
the Stanford Law Review and Editor of the Stanford
Journal of International Law.
Thomas J. Hearity, 58, Senior Vice President, Acting
General Counsel and Secretary. Mr Hearity joined Charter as Vice
President and Associate General counsel in September 2003 and
was promoted to Senior Vice President and Associate General
Counsel in August 2004. He was appointed to Acting General
Counsel in April 2005 and appointed Secretary in May 2005. Prior
to joining Charter, Mr. Hearity served as outside counsel for
Charter and several other major wireline and wireless
108
telecommunications firms from 1996 to 2003. Mr. Hearity served
as counsel for the NYNEX Corporation from 1984 to 1996. Mr.
Hearity graduated with honors and received a B.A. degree in
History and a J.D. degree from the University of Iowa.
Michael J. Lovett, 44, Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer. Mr. Lovett was promoted to his current
position in April 2005. Prior to that he served as Executive
Vice President, Operations and Customer Care from September 2004
through March 2005, and as Senior Vice President, Midwest
Division Operations and as Senior Vice President of Operations
Support, since joining Charter in August 2003 until September
2004. Mr. Lovett was Chief Operating Officer of Voyant
Technologies, Inc., a voice conferencing hardware/ software
solutions provider, from December 2001 to August 2003. From
November 2000 to December 2001, he was Executive Vice President
of Operations for OneSecure, Inc., a startup company delivering
management/ monitoring of firewalls and virtual private
networks. Prior to that, Mr. Lovett was Regional Vice
President at AT&T from June 1999 to November 2000 where he
was responsible for operations. Mr. Lovett was Senior Vice
President at Jones Intercable from October 1989 to June 1999
where he was responsible for operations in nine states.
Mr. Lovett began his career in cable television at Centel
Corporation where he held a number of positions.
Paul E. Martin, 44, Senior Vice President, Interim Chief
Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Corporate
Controller. Mr. Martin has been employed by Charter since
March 2000, when he joined Charter as Vice President and
Corporate Controller. In April 2002, Mr. Martin was
promoted to Senior Vice President, Principal Accounting Officer
and Corporate Controller, in August 2004 was named Interim
co-Chief Financial Officer and in April 2005 was named Interim
Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining Charter,
Mr. Martin was Vice President and Controller for Operations
and Logistics for Fort James Corporation, a manufacturer of
paper products. From 1995 to February 1999, Mr. Martin was
Chief Financial Officer of Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc.
Mr. Martin received a B.S. degree with honors in Accounting
from the University of Missouri St. Louis.
Lynne F. Ramsey, 47, Senior Vice President, Human
Resources. Ms. Ramsey joined Charters Human Resources
group in March 2001 and served as Corporate Vice President,
Human Resources. She was promoted to her current position in
July 2004. Before joining Charter, Ms. Ramsey was Executive Vice
President of Human Resources for Broadband Infrastructure Group
from March 2000 through November 2000. From 1994 to 1999,
Ms. Ramsey served as Senior Vice President of Human
Resources for Firstar Bank, previously Mercantile Bank of
St. Louis. She served as Vice President of Human Resources
for United Postal Savings from 1982 through 1994, when it was
acquired by Mercantile Bank of St. Louis. Ms. Ramsey
received a bachelors degree in Education from Maryville
College and a masters degree in Human Resources Management
from Washington University.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
Until April 2004, when Mr. Savoy resigned from the
board, the Compensation Committee of Charter was comprised of
Messrs. Allen, Savoy and Nathanson. In 2004, Ms. Peretsman
and Mr. Merritt served as the Option Plan Committee that
administered the 1999 Charter Communications Option Plan and the
Charter Communications, Inc. 2001 Stock Incentive Plan until
Mr. Lillis replaced Ms. Peretsman on the Option Plan
Committee in July 2004.
No member of the Compensation Committee or the Option Plan
Committee was an officer or employee of Charter or any of its
subsidiaries during 2004, except for Mr. Allen, who served
as a non-employee chairman of the Compensation Committee. Also,
Mr. Nathanson was an officer of certain subsidiaries of
Charter prior to their acquisition by Charter in 1999 and held
the title of Vice Chairman of Charters board of
directors, a non-executive, non-salaried position in 2004.
Mr. Allen is the 100% owner and a director of Vulcan Inc.
and certain of its affiliates, which employed Mr. Savoy,
one of our directors until April 27, 2004, as an executive
officer in the past and currently employs Mr. Conn and
Ms. Patton as executive officers. Mr. Allen also was a
director of and indirectly owned 98% of TechTV, of which
Mr. Wangberg, one of our directors, was a director until
the sale of TechTV to an unrelated third party in May 2004.
Transactions between Charter and members of the Compensation
Committee are more fully
109
described in Director Compensation and
in Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions Other Miscellaneous Relationships.
During 2004, (1) none of our executive officers served on
the compensation committee of any other company that has an
executive officer currently serving on the board of directors,
Compensation Committee or Option Plan Committee of Charter and
(2) except for Carl Vogel who served as a director of
Digeo, Inc., an entity of which Paul Allen is a director and by
virtue of his position as Chairman of the board of directors of
Digeo, Inc. is also a non-employee executive officer. None of
our executive officers served as a director of another entity,
one of whose executive officers served on the Compensation
Committee or Option Plan Committee of Charter.
Executive Compensation
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth information as of December 31,
2004 regarding the compensation to those executive officers
listed below for services rendered for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004. These officers consist of
the Chief Executive Officer, each of the other four most highly
compensated executive officers as of December 31, 2004, and
one other highly compensated executive officer who served during
2004 but was not an executive officer on December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Award | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Restricted | |
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
|
Year | |
|
|
|
Other Annual | |
|
Stock | |
|
Underlying | |
|
All Other | |
Name and Principal |
|
Ended | |
|
|
|
Compensation | |
|
Awards | |
|
Options | |
|
Compensation | |
Position |
|
Dec. 31 | |
|
Salary($) | |
|
Bonus($) | |
|
($) | |
|
($) | |
|
(#) | |
|
($)(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Carl E. Vogel(2)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
1,038,462 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
(8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,658,000 |
(18) |
|
|
580,000 |
|
|
|
42,426 |
(24) |
|
Former President and Chief |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
(9) |
|
|
30,345 |
(15) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
12,639 |
(24) |
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
980,769 |
|
|
|
330,000 |
(9) |
|
|
214,961 |
(15) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
10,255 |
(24) |
Margaret A. Bellville(3)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
478,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,309 |
(16) |
|
|
612,000 |
(19) |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
204,408 |
(25) |
|
Former Executive Vice |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
581,730 |
|
|
|
203,125 |
(9) |
|
|
30,810 |
(16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,139 |
(25) |
|
President, Chief Operating |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
9,615 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
(9)(10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derek Chang(4)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
448,077 |
|
|
|
85,700 |
(11) |
|
|
7,255 |
(17) |
|
|
395,250 |
(20) |
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
|
5,510 |
|
|
Former Executive Vice President of |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
15,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,000 |
(20) |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance and Strategy, Interim co-Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven A. Schumm(5)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
467,308 |
|
|
|
15,815 |
(12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
862,952 |
(21) |
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
|
12,360 |
|
|
Former Executive Vice |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
448,077 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
9,889 |
|
|
President and Chief |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
436,058 |
|
|
|
588,000 |
(13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
5,255 |
|
|
Administrative Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtis S. Shaw(6)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
422,115 |
|
|
|
16,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
395,250 |
(22) |
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
|
12,592 |
|
|
Former Executive Vice President, |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
275,782 |
|
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
9,411 |
(26) |
|
General Counsel and Secretary |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
249,711 |
|
|
|
281,500 |
(14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
3,096 |
|
Michael J. Lovett(7)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
291,346 |
|
|
|
241,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
351,570 |
(23) |
|
|
172,000 |
|
|
|
15,150 |
(27) |
|
Executive Vice President, |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
81,731 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
(27) |
|
Operations and Customer Care |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Except as noted in notes 24 through 27 below, these amounts
consist of matching contributions under our 401(k) plan,
premiums for supplemental life insurance available to
executives, and long-term disability available to executives. |
|
|
(2) |
Mr. Vogel resigned from all of his positions with Charter
and its subsidiaries on January 17, 2005. |
|
|
(3) |
Ms. Bellville became the Chief Operating Officer of Charter
in December 2002 and terminated her employment, effective
September 30, 2004. |
|
|
(4) |
Mr. Chang was hired as Executive Vice President of Finance
and Strategy in December 2003, and was appointed Interim
co-Chief Financial Officer in August 2004. Mr. Chang
resigned from all positions with Charter and its subsidiaries
effective April 15, 2005. |
110
|
|
|
|
(5) |
Mr. Schumms position with Charter and its
subsidiaries was eliminated, resulting in the termination of his
employment on January 28, 2005. |
|
|
(6) |
Mr. Shaw resigned from all positions with Charter and its
subsidiaries effective April 15, 2005. |
|
|
(7) |
Mr. Lovett joined Charter in August 2003 and was promoted to
Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer in April 2005. |
|
|
(8) |
Mr. Vogels bonus for 2004 was a mid-year
discretionary bonus. |
|
|
(9) |
Mr. Vogels and Ms. Bellvilles 2002 and
2003 bonuses were determined in accordance with the terms of
their respective employment agreements. |
|
|
(10) |
Includes a one-time signing bonus of $150,000 pursuant to an
employment agreement. |
|
(11) |
Mr. Changs bonus for 2004 represents the 2004 portion
of a $150,000 special bonus which was paid in connection with
his continued service as Interim co-Chief Financial Officer
through April 15, 2005. |
|
(12) |
Mr. Schumms bonus for 2004 was determined in
accordance with his separation agreement. |
|
(13) |
Includes a stay bonus representing the principal and
interest forgiven under employees promissory note,
amounting to $363,000 for 2002; and $225,000 awarded as a bonus
for services performed in 2002. |
|
(14) |
Includes a stay bonus representing the principal and
interest forgiven under employees promissory note,
amounting to $181,500 for 2002; and $100,000 awarded as a bonus
for services performed in 2002. |
|
(15) |
Amount attributed to personal use of the corporate airplane in
2003 and $100,000 attributed to personal use and commuting in
the corporate airplane in 2002 and $114,961 for purchase of a
car in 2002. |
|
(16) |
Includes (i) for 2004, reimbursement for taxes (on a
grossed up basis) paid in respect of prior
reimbursements for relocation expenses, and (ii) for 2003,
$26,010 attributed to personal use of the corporate airplane and
$4,800 for car allowance. |
|
(17) |
Includes reimbursement for taxes (on a grossed up
basis) paid in respect of prior reimbursements for relocation
expenses. |
|
(18) |
Includes 340,000 performance shares granted in January 2004
under our Long-Term Incentive Program that were to vest on the
third anniversary of the grant date only if Charter meets
certain performance criteria. Also includes 680,000 restricted
shares issued in exchange for stock options held by the named
officer pursuant to the February 2004 option exchange program
described below, one half of which constituted performance
shares which were to vest on the third anniversary of the grant
date only if Charter meets certain performance criteria, and the
other half of which were to vest over three years in equal
one-third installments. At December 31, 2004, the value of
all of the named officers unvested restricted stock
holdings (including performance shares) was $2,310,468, based on
a per share market value (closing sale price) of $2.24 for our
Class A common stock on December 31, 2004. All
performance shares were forfeited upon termination of
employment. The remainder of the restricted shares will vest in
part on the terms described below under Employment
Arrangements. |
|
(19) |
These restricted shares consisted solely of performance shares
granted under our Long-Term Incentive Program that were to have
vested on the third anniversary of the grant date only if
Charter meets certain performance criteria. At December 31,
2004, the value of all of the named officers unvested
restricted stock holdings (including performance shares) was $0,
since all performance shares were previously forfeited upon the
termination of employment. |
|
(20) |
Restricted shares granted in 2003 vest over four years in equal
one-fourth installments. Restricted shares granted in 2004
represent 77,500 performance shares granted under our Long-Term
Incentive Program that were to vest on the third anniversary of
the grant date only if Charter meets certain performance
criteria. At December 31, 2004, the value of all of the
named officers unvested restricted stock holdings
(including performance shares) was $257,600 based on a per share
market value (closing sale price) of $2.24 for our Class A
common stock on December 31, 2004. All performance shares
were forfeited upon termination of employment. The remainder of
restricted shares will vest in part on the terms described below
under Employment Arrangements. |
111
|
|
(21) |
Includes 77,500 performance shares granted in January 2004 under
our Long-Term Incentive Program that were to vest on the third
anniversary of the grant date only if Charter meets certain
performance criteria. Also includes restricted shares issued in
exchange for stock options held by the named officer pursuant to
the February 2004 option exchange program described below. One
half of these restricted shares constitutes performance shares
which were to vest on the third anniversary of the grant date
only if Charter meets certain performance criteria and the other
half of which were to vest over three years in equal one-third
installments. At December 31, 2004, the value of all of the
named officers unvested restricted stock holdings
(including performance shares) was $417,240, based on a per
share market value (closing sale price) of $2.24 for our
Class A common stock on December 31, 2004. All
performance shares were forfeited upon the termination of
employment. The remainder of the restricted shares will vest in
part on the terms described below under Employment
Arrangements. |
|
(22) |
These restricted shares consist solely of performance shares
granted under our Long-Term Incentive Program that will vest on
the third anniversary of the grant date only if Charter meets
certain performance criteria. At December 31, 2004, the
value of all of the named officers unvested restricted
stock holdings (including performance shares) was $173,600 based
on a per share market value (closing sale price) of $2.24 for
our Class A common stock on December 31, 2004. All
performance shares were forfeited upon termination of employment. |
|
(23) |
These restricted shares consist solely of performance shares
granted under our Long-Term Incentive Program that will vest on
the third anniversary of the grant date only if Charter meets
certain performance criteria. At December 31, 2004, the
value of all of the named officers unvested restricted
stock holdings (including performance shares) was $197,120,
based on a per share market value (closing sale price) of $2.24
for our Class A common stock on December 31, 2004. |
|
(24) |
In addition to items in note 1 above, includes (i) for
2004, $28,977 attributed to personal use of the corporate
airplane, $10,000 as reimbursement for tax advisory services and
(ii) for 2003, $10,000 as reimbursement for tax advisory
services; and (iii) for 2002, $10,000 as reimbursement for
tax advisory services. |
|
(25) |
In addition to items in note 1 above, includes (i) for
2004, $183,899 for severance and accrued vacation at termination
of employment, $10,299 for COBRA payments following termination,
$4,650 for automobile allowance and $2,831 attributed to
personal use of the corporate airplane, and (ii) for 2003,
$5,000 as reimbursement for tax advisory services, $7,500 for
legal services and $93,684 paid in relation to relocation
expenses. |
|
(26) |
In addition to items in note 1 above, includes for 2003,
$2,287 attributed to personal use of the corporate airplane. |
|
(27) |
In addition to items in note 1 above, includes,
(i) for 2004, $7,200 for automobile allowance, and $597
attributed to personal use of the corporate airplane and
(ii) for 2003, $2,400 for automobile allowance. |
112
2004 Option Grants
The following table shows individual grants of options made to
individuals named in the Summary Compensation Table during 2004.
All such grants were made under the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan
and the exercise price was based upon the fair market value of
Charters Class A common stock on the respective grant
dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Realizable | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value at Assumed Annual | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
% of Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of Stock Price | |
|
|
Securities | |
|
Options | |
|
|
|
|
|
Appreciation | |
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Granted to | |
|
|
|
|
|
For Option Term(2) | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Employees | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Expiration | |
|
| |
Name |
|
Granted(#)(1) | |
|
in 2004 | |
|
Price ($/Sh) | |
|
Date | |
|
5%($) | |
|
10%($) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Carl E. Vogel(3)
|
|
|
580,000 |
|
|
|
6.17 |
% |
|
$ |
5.17 |
|
|
|
1/27/14 |
|
|
|
1,885,803 |
|
|
|
4,778,996 |
|
Margaret A. Bellville(4)
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
|
5.17 |
|
|
|
1/27/14 |
|
|
|
650,277 |
|
|
|
1,647,930 |
|
Derek Chang(5)
|
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
% |
|
|
5.17 |
|
|
|
1/27/14 |
|
|
|
438,937 |
|
|
|
1,112,353 |
|
Steven A. Schumm(6)
|
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
% |
|
|
5.17 |
|
|
|
1/27/14 |
|
|
|
438,937 |
|
|
|
1,112,353 |
|
Curtis S. Shaw(7)
|
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
% |
|
|
5.17 |
|
|
|
1/27/14 |
|
|
|
438,937 |
|
|
|
1,112,353 |
|
Michael J. Lovett
|
|
|
77,000 |
|
|
|
0.82 |
% |
|
|
5.17 |
|
|
|
1/27/14 |
|
|
|
251,982 |
|
|
|
638,573 |
|
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
% |
|
|
4.555 |
|
|
|
4/27/14 |
|
|
|
35,808 |
|
|
|
90,744 |
|
|
|
|
82,000 |
|
|
|
0.87 |
% |
|
|
2.865 |
|
|
|
10/26/14 |
|
|
|
147,746 |
|
|
|
374,418 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Options are transferable under limited conditions, primarily to
accommodate estate planning purposes. These options generally
vest in four equal installments commencing on the first
anniversary following the grant date. |
|
(2) |
This column shows the hypothetical gains on the options granted
based on assumed annual compound price appreciation of 5% and
10% over the full ten-year term of the options. The assumed
rates of 5% and 10% appreciation are mandated by the SEC and do
not represent our estimate or projection of future prices. |
|
(3) |
Mr. Vogels employment terminated on January 17,
2005. Under the terms of the separation agreement, his options
will continue to vest until December 31, 2005, and all
vested options are exercisable until sixty (60) days
thereafter. |
|
(4) |
Ms. Bellvilles employment terminated on
September 30, 2004. Under the terms of the separation
agreement, her options will continue to vest until
December 31, 2005, and all vested options are exercisable
until sixty (60) days thereafter. |
|
(5) |
Mr. Chang resigned effective April 15, 2005.
Mr. Changs agreement provided that one half of his
unvested restricted shares would immediately vest, and one half
of his unvested options of the initial option grant would vest
if he elected to terminate his employment due to a change in our
Chief Executive Officer. |
|
(6) |
Mr. Schumms employment terminated on January 28,
2005. Under the terms of the separation agreement, his options
will continue to vest until April 28, 2006, and all vested
options are exercisable until sixty (60) days thereafter. |
|
(7) |
Mr. Shaw resigned, effective April 15, 2005. As of
that date, his options are no longer exercisable. |
113
2004 Aggregated Option Exercises and Option
Value
The following table sets forth, for the individuals named in the
Summary Compensation Table, (i) information concerning
options exercised during 2004, (ii) the number of shares of
our Class A common stock underlying unexercised options at
year-end 2004, and (iii) the value of unexercised
in-the-money options (i.e., the positive spread
between the exercise price of outstanding options and the market
value of our Class A common stock) on December 31,
2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Unexercised | |
|
Value of Unexercised In-the | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options at December 31, | |
|
Money Options at | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
2004 (#)(1) | |
|
December 31, 2004 ($)(2) | |
|
|
Acquired on | |
|
Value | |
|
| |
|
| |
Name |
|
Exercise (#) | |
|
Realized ($) | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Carl E. Vogel(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,499,999 |
|
|
|
3,230,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margaret A. Bellville(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385,416 |
|
|
|
314,584 |
|
|
|
254,375 |
|
|
|
75,625 |
|
Derek Chang(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,500 |
|
|
|
397,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven A. Schumm(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,500 |
|
|
|
502,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtis S. Shaw(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438,833 |
|
|
|
420,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Lovett
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
247,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Options granted prior to 2001 and under the 1999 Charter
Communications Option Plan, when vested, are exercisable for
membership units of Charter Holdco which are immediately
exchanged on a one-for-one basis for shares of our Class A
common stock upon exercise of the option. Options granted under
the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan and after 2000 are exercisable for
shares of our Class A common stock. |
|
(2) |
Based on a per share market value (closing price) of $2.24 as of
December 31, 2004 for our Class A common stock. |
|
(3) |
Mr. Vogels employment terminated on January 17,
2005. Under the terms of the separation agreement, his options
will continue to vest until December 31, 2005, and all
vested options are exercisable until sixty (60) days
thereafter. |
|
(4) |
Ms. Bellvilles employment terminated on
September 30, 2004. Under the terms of the separation
agreement, her options will continue to vest until
December 31, 2005, and all vested options are exercisable
until sixty (60) days thereafter. |
|
(5) |
Mr. Chang resigned from all of his positions with Charter
effective April 15, 2005. One half of the remainder of his
options will vest on the terms described below under
Employment Arrangements. |
|
(6) |
Mr. Schumms employment terminated on January 28,
2005. Under the terms of the separation agreement, his options
will continue to vest until April 28, 2006, and all vested
options are exercisable until sixty (60) days thereafter. |
|
(7) |
Mr. Shaw resigned from all of his positions with Charter
effective April 15, 2005. As of that date, his options are
no longer exercisable. |
Option/ Stock Incentive Plans
The Plans. We have granted stock options, restricted
stock and other incentive compensation under two
plans the 1999 Charter Communications Option Plan
and the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. The 1999 Charter
Communications Option Plan provided for the grant of options to
purchase membership units in Charter Holdco to current and
prospective employees and consultants of Charter Holdco and its
affiliates and to our current and prospective non-employee
directors. Membership units received upon exercise of any
options are immediately exchanged for shares of Charter
Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis.
The 2001 Stock Incentive Plan provides for the grant of
non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, dividend
equivalent rights, performance units and performance shares,
share awards, phantom stock
114
and/or shares of restricted stock (not to exceed
3,000,000 shares) as each term is defined in the 2001 Stock
Incentive Plan. Employees, officers, consultants and directors
of Charter and its subsidiaries and affiliates are eligible to
receive grants under the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Generally,
options expire 10 years from the grant date. Unless sooner
terminated by our board of directors, the 2001 Stock Incentive
Plan will terminate on February 12, 2011, and no option or
award can be granted thereafter.
Together, the plans allow for the issuance of up to a total of
90,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock (or
units exchangeable for our Class A common stock). Any
shares covered by options that are terminated under the 1999
Charter Communications Option Plan will be transferred to the
2001 Stock Incentive Plan, and no new options will be granted
under the 1999 Charter Communications Option Plan. At
March 31, 2005, 1,309,620 shares had been issued under
the plans upon exercise of options, 655,749 had been issued upon
vesting of restricted stock granted under the plans, and
1,162,176 shares were subject to future vesting under
restricted stock agreements. Of the remaining
86,872,455 shares covered by the plans, as of
March 31, 2005, 29,067,828 were subject to outstanding
options (30% of which were vested), and there were 11,627,420
performance shares granted under Charters Long-Term
Incentive Program, which will vest on the third anniversary of
the date of grant conditional upon Charters performance
against certain financial targets approved by Charters
board of directors at the time of the award. As of
March 31, 2005, 46,177,207 shares remained available
for future grants under the plans.
The plans authorize the repricing of options, which could
include reducing the exercise price per share of any outstanding
option, permitting the cancellation, forfeiture or tender of
outstanding options in exchange for other awards or for new
options with a lower exercise price per share, or repricing or
replacing any outstanding options by any other method.
In January 2004, the Compensation Committee of our board of
directors approved our Long-Term Incentive Program, or LTIP,
which is a program administered under the 2001 Stock Incentive
Plan. Under the LTIP, employees of Charter and its subsidiaries
whose pay classifications exceed a certain level are eligible to
receive stock options, and more senior level employees were
eligible to receive stock options and performance shares. The
stock options vest 25% on each of the first four anniversaries
of the date of grant. The performance shares vest on the third
anniversary of the date of grant shares of Class A common
stock are issued, conditional upon our performance against
financial performance measures established by our management and
approved by the board of directors or Compensation Committee as
of the time of the award. We granted 6,899,600 performance
shares in January 2004 under this program and recognized expense
of $8 million in the first three quarters of 2004. However,
in the fourth quarter of 2004, we reversed the entire
$8 million of expense based on our assessment of the
probability of achieving the financial performance measures
established by management and required to be met for the
performance shares to vest.
The 2001 Stock Incentive Plan must be administered by, and
grants and awards to eligible individuals must be approved by
our board of directors or a committee thereof consisting solely
of nonemployee directors as defined in Section 16b-3 under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The board of
directors or such committee determines the terms of each stock
option grant, restricted stock grant or other award at the time
of grant, including the exercise price to be paid for the
shares, the vesting schedule for each option, the price, if any,
to be paid by the grantee for the restricted stock, the
restrictions placed on the shares, and the time or times when
the restrictions will lapse. The board of directors or such
committee also has the power to accelerate the vesting of any
grant or extend the term thereof.
Upon a change of control of Charter, the board of directors or
the administering committee can shorten the exercise period of
any option, have the survivor or successor entity assume the
options with appropriate adjustments, or cancel options and pay
out in cash. If an optionees or grantees employment
is terminated without cause or for good
reason following a change in control (as those
terms are defined in the plans), unless otherwise provided in an
agreement, with respect to such optionees or
grantees awards under the plans, all outstanding options
will become immediately and fully exercisable, all outstanding
stock appreciation rights will become immediately and fully
exercisable, the restrictions on the
115
outstanding restricted stock will lapse, and all of the
outstanding performance shares will vest and the restrictions on
all of the outstanding performance shares will lapse as if all
performance objectives had been satisfied at the maximum level.
February 2004 Option Exchange. In January 2004, we
offered employees of Charter and its subsidiaries the right to
exchange all stock options (vested and unvested) under the 1999
Charter Communications Option Plan and 2001 Stock Incentive Plan
that had an exercise price over $10 per share for shares of
restricted Charter Class A common stock or, in some
instances, cash. Based on a sliding exchange ratio, which varied
depending on the exercise price of an employees
outstanding options, if an employee would have received more
than 400 shares of restricted stock in exchange for
tendered options, we issued to that employee shares of
restricted stock in the exchange. If, based on the exchange
ratios, an employee would have received 400 or fewer shares of
restricted stock in exchange for tendered options, we instead
paid to the employee cash in an amount equal to the number of
shares the employee would have received multiplied by $5.00. The
offer applied to options to purchase a total of
22,929,573 shares of Class A common stock, or
approximately 48% of our 47,882,365 total options (vested and
unvested) issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2003.
Participation by employees was voluntary. Non-employee members
of the board of directors of Charter or any of its subsidiaries
were not eligible to participate in the exchange offer.
In the closing of the exchange offer on February 20, 2004,
we accepted for cancellation eligible options to purchase
approximately 18,137,664 shares of our Class A common
stock. In exchange, we granted approximately
1,966,686 shares of restricted stock, including 460,777
performance shares to eligible employees of the rank of senior
vice president and above, and paid a total cash amount of
approximately $4 million (which amount includes applicable
withholding taxes) to those employees who received cash rather
than shares of restricted stock. The restricted stock was
granted on February 25, 2004. Employees tendered
approximately 79% of the options eligible to be exchanged under
the program.
The cost of the stock option exchange program was approximately
$10 million, with a 2004 cash compensation expense of
approximately $4 million and a non-cash compensation
expense of approximately $6 million to be expensed ratably
over the three-year vesting period of the restricted stock
issued in the exchange.
|
|
|
2005 Executive Cash Award Plan |
On June 9, 2005, Charter adopted the 2005 Executive Cash
Award Plan (Plan), to provide additional incentive
to, and retain the services of, certain officers of Charter and
its subsidiaries, to achieve the highest level of individual
performance and contribute to the success of Charter. Eligible
participants are employees of Charter or any of its
subsidiaries, at the level of Vice President and above, who have
been recommended by the CEO and designated and approved as Plan
participants by the Compensation Committee of Charters
board of directors. At the time the Plan was adopted, the
interim CEO recommended and the Compensation Committee
designated and approved as Plan participants the permanent
President and Chief Executive Officer position (when filled),
Executive Vice President positions and selected Senior Vice
President positions.
The Plan provides that each participant be granted an award
which represents an opportunity to receive cash payments in
accordance with the Plan. An award will be credited in book
entry format to a participants account in an amount equal
to 100% of a participants base salary on the date of Plan
approval in 2005 and 20% of participants base salary in
each year 2006 through 2009, based on that participants
base salary as of May 1 of the applicable year. The Plan
awards will vest at the rate of 50% of the plan award balance at
the end of 2007 and 100% of the plan award balance at the end of
2009. Participants will be entitled to receive payment of the
vested portion of the award if the participant remains employed
by Charter continuously from the date of the participants
initial participation through the end of the calendar year in
which his or her award becomes vested, subject to payment of
pro-rated award balances to a participant who terminates due to
death or disability or in the event Charter elects to terminate
the Plan.
116
A participants eligibility for, and right to receive, any
payment under the Plan (except in the case of intervening death)
is conditioned upon the participant first executing and
delivering to Charter an agreement releasing and giving up all
claims that participant may have against Charter and related
parties arising out of or based upon any facts or conduct
occurring prior to the payment date, and containing additional
restrictions on post-employment use of confidential information,
non-competition and non-solicitation and recruitment of
customers and employees.
Employment Arrangements and Related
Agreements
Charter entered into an agreement with Robert P. May, effective
January 17, 2005, whereby Mr. May serves as
Charters Interim President and Chief Executive Officer
(the May Executive Services Agreement). Under the
May Executive Services Agreement, Mr. May receives a
$1,250,000 base fee per year. If Mr. May becomes
Charters permanent President and Chief Executive Officer
or is terminated without cause, Mr. May will be eligible to
receive a one-time discretionary bonus up to 100% of the actual
base fee paid to him for his interim service under the
agreement, based on individual and company performance.
Mr. May will continue to receive the compensation and
reimbursement of expenses to which he is entitled in his
capacity as a member of the board of directors. Mr. May may
terminate the May Executive Services Agreement on
thirty (30) days notice. Charter may terminate such
agreement upon three (3) months notice, and Charter may
elect at its discretion to pay Mr. May the base rate for
such period in lieu of all or part of the notice.
Mr. Mays employment agreement provided that Charter
would provide equity incentives commensurate with his position
and responsibilities, as determined by the board of directors.
Accordingly, Mr. May has been granted 100,000 shares of
restricted stock under our 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. The
100,000 restricted shares will vest on the date on which
Mr. Mays interim service as President and Chief
Executive Officer shall terminate (unless there is an earlier
termination event for Cause, as defined in the 2001 Stock
Incentive Plan). Mr. May serves as an independent
contractor and is not entitled to any vacation or eligible to
participate in any employee benefit programs of Charter. Charter
will reimburse Mr. May for reasonable transportation costs
from Mr. Mays residence in Florida or other locations
to Charters offices and will provide temporary living
quarters or reimburse expenses related thereto.
On April 1, 2005, we entered into an employment agreement
with Mr. Lovett, pursuant to which he will be employed as
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for a term
commencing April 1, 2005 and expiring on April 1,
2008. The contract will be reviewed every 18 months thereafter
and may be extended pursuant to such reviews. Under the
agreement, Mr. Lovett will receive an annual base salary of
$575,000 and will be eligible to receive an annual bonus
targeted at 80% of his base salary under our senior management
bonus plan. We agreed to provide Mr. Lovett with equity
incentives commensurate with his position and responsibilities,
as determined by the board of directors in its discretion.
Accordingly, Mr. Lovett has been granted 75,000 shares of
restricted stock under our 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. The 75,000
restricted shares will vest one third on each of the first three
anniversaries of the date of grant (unless there is an earlier
termination event for Cause, as defined in the 2001 Stock
Incentive Plan). If his employment is terminated without cause
or if he terminates his employment due to a change in control or
for good reason (as defined in the agreement), we will pay Mr.
Lovett an amount equal to the aggregate base salary due to Mr.
Lovett during the remainder of the term, within fifteen days of
termination. In addition, if we terminate his employment without
cause, Mr. Lovett will be entitled to receive a pro rated bonus
for the fiscal year in which he is terminated based upon
financial results through the month of termination. Mr.
Lovetts agreement includes a covenant not to compete for
the balance of the term and for two years thereafter. The
agreement further provides that Mr. Lovett is entitled to
receive certain relocation expenses and to participate in any
benefit plan generally afforded to, and to receive vacation and
sick pay on such terms as are offered to, our other senior
executive officers.
Effective April 15, 2005, Charter has entered into an
agreement governing the terms of the service of Mr. Paul E.
Martin as Interim Chief Financial Officer. Under the terms of
the agreement, Mr. Martin will receive approximately
$13,700 each month for his service in the capacity of Interim
Chief Financial Officer until a permanent Chief Financial
Officer is employed. Under the agreement, Mr. Martin will
also
117
be eligible to receive an additional bonus opportunity of up to
approximately $13,600 per month served as Interim Chief
Financial Officer, payable in accordance with Charters
2005 Executive Bonus Plan. The amounts payable to
Mr. Martin under the agreement are in addition to all other
amounts Mr. Martin receives for his services in his
capacity as Senior Vice President, Principal Accounting Officer
and Corporate Controller. In addition, Mr. Martin received
an additional special bonus of $50,000 for his service as
Interim co-Chief Financial Officer prior to April 15, 2005.
This amount is in addition to the bonus agreed upon in 2004 for
his service in that capacity through March 31, 2005.
Until his resignation effective April 15, 2005,
Mr. Chang was employed under the terms contained in an
offer letter effective December 2, 2003 providing for an
annual base salary of $400,000 (which was increased to $450,000
per year) and eligibility for an annual incentive target of 100%
of the base salary (based on a combination of personal
performance goals and overall company performance).
Mr. Chang was also eligible to participate in our 2001
Stock Incentive Plan. Under this plan, Mr. Chang was
granted 350,000 options to purchase Class A common stock
and 50,000 restricted shares on December 9, 2003.
Mr. Chang was also entitled to participate in our LTIP.
Mr. Changs agreement provided that one half of his
unvested restricted shares would immediately vest, and one half
of his unvested options of the initial option grant would vest
if he was terminated without cause or if he elected to terminate
his employment due to (1) a change in our Chief Executive
Officer, (2) a change in reporting relationship to anyone
other than the Chief Executive Officer, (3) a requirement
that the employee relocate, or (4) a change of control of
Charter, if terminated without cause. In addition,
Mr. Chang was entitled to eighteen months of full severance
benefits at his current compensation rate, plus the pro rata
portion of his bonus amounts within thirty days after
termination because of any of these events. In light of
Mr. Vogels resignation, Charter and Mr. Chang
agreed that he would have until April 15, 2005 to exercise
his right to terminate his employment and receive the foregoing
vesting, severance and other benefits. In addition, Charter
agreed that it would pay Mr. Chang a special $150,000
bonus, in addition to any other bonuses to which he would be
otherwise entitled, conditioned on Mr. Changs
continued service as Interim co-Chief Financial Officer through
March 31, 2005, which was paid in April 2005.
Until his resignation in January 2005, Mr. Vogel was
employed as President and Chief Executive Officer, earning a
base annual salary of $1,000,000 and was eligible to receive an
annual bonus of up to $500,000, a portion of which was based on
personal performance goals and a portion of which was based on
company performance measured against criteria established by the
board with Mr. Vogel. Pursuant to his employment agreement,
Mr. Vogel was granted 3,400,000 options to purchase
Class A common stock and 50,000 shares of restricted
stock under our 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. In the February 2004
option exchange, Mr. Vogel exchanged his 3,400,000 options
for 340,000 shares of restricted stock and 340,000 performance
shares. Mr. Vogels initial 50,000 restricted shares
vested 25% on the grant date, with the remainder vesting in 36
equal monthly installments beginning December 2002. The 340,000
shares of restricted stock were to vest over a three-year
period, with one-third of the shares vesting on each of the
first three anniversaries of the grant date. The 340,000
performance shares were to vest at the end of a three-year
period if certain financial criteria were met.
Mr. Vogels agreement provided that, if Mr. Vogel
is terminated without cause or if Mr. Vogel terminated the
agreement for good reason, he is entitled to his aggregate base
salary due during the remainder of the term and full prorated
benefits and bonus for the year in which termination occurs.
Mr. Vogels agreement included a covenant not to
compete for the balance of the initial term or any renewal term,
but no more than one year in the event of termination without
cause or by Mr. Vogel with good reason.
Mr. Vogels agreement entitled him to participate in
any disability insurance, pensions or other benefit plans
afforded to employees generally or to our executives, including
our LTIP. We agreed to reimburse Mr. Vogel annually for the
cost of term life insurance in the amount of $5 million,
although he declined this reimbursement in 2002, 2003 and 2004.
Mr. Vogel was entitled to reimbursement of fees and dues
for his membership in a country club of his choice, which he
declined in 2002, 2003 and 2004, and reimbursement for up to
$10,000 per year for tax, legal and financial planning
services. His agreement also provided for a car and associated
expenses for Mr. Vogels use. Mr. Vogels
agreement provided for automatic one-year renewals and also
provided that we would cause him to be elected to our board of
directors without any additional compensation.
118
In February 2005, Charter entered into an agreement with
Mr. Vogel setting forth the terms of his resignation. Under
the terms of the agreement, Mr. Vogel received in February
2005 all accrued and unpaid base salary and vacation pay through
the date of resignation and a lump sum payment equal to the
remainder of his base salary during 2005 (totaling $953,425). In
addition, he will receive a lump sum cash payment of $500,000 at
December 31, 2005, which is subject to reduction to the
extent of compensation attributable to certain competitive
activities.
Mr. Vogel will continue to receive certain health benefits
during 2005 and COBRA premiums for such health insurance
coverage for 18 months thereafter. All of his outstanding
stock options, as well as his restricted stock granted in 2004
(excluding 340,000 shares of restricted stock granted as
performance units, which will automatically be
forfeited), will continue to vest through December 31,
2005. In addition, one-half of the remaining unvested portion of
his 2001 restricted stock grant vested upon the effectiveness of
the agreement, and the other half was forfeited. Mr. Vogel
had 60 days after December 31, 2005 to exercise any
outstanding vested stock options. Under the agreement,
Mr. Vogel waived any further right to any bonus or
incentive plan participation and provided certain releases of
claims against Charter and its subsidiaries from any claims
arising out of or based upon any facts occurring prior to the
date of the agreement, but Charter will continue to provide
Mr. Vogel certain indemnification rights and to include
Mr. Vogel in its director and officer liability insurance
for a period of six years. Charter and its subsidiaries also
agreed to provide releases of certain claims against
Mr. Vogel with certain exceptions reserved. Mr. Vogel
has also agreed, with limited exceptions that he will continue
to be bound by the covenant not to compete, confidentiality and
non-disparagement provisions contained in his 2001 employment
agreement.
Ms. Bellville was employed as Executive Vice President,
Chief Operating Officer. Until her resignation in September
2004, she was employed under an employment agreement entered
into as of April 27, 2003, that would have terminated on
September 1, 2007. Her annual base salary was $625,000 and
she was eligible to receive an annual bonus in an amount to be
determined by our board of directors, with a contractual minimum
for 2003 of $203,125. Commencing in 2004, Ms. Bellville
would have been eligible to receive a target annual bonus equal
to 100% of her base salary for the applicable year at the
discretion of the board of directors, 50% to be based on
personal performance goals and 50% to be based on overall
company performance. Under a prior offer letter dated
December 3, 2002, Ms. Bellville was granted 500,000
options to purchase shares of our Class A common stock,
which vested 25% on the date of the grant (December 9,
2002), with the balance to vest in 36 equal installments
commencing January 2003. Ms. Bellvilles employment
agreement provided that if she was terminated without cause or
if she terminated the agreement for good reason (including due
to a change in control or if Ms. Bellville was required to
report, directly or indirectly, to persons other than the Chief
Executive Officer), we would pay Ms. Bellville an amount
equal to the aggregate base salary due to Ms. Bellville
during the remainder of the term, or renewal term and a full
prorated bonus for the year in which the termination occurs,
within thirty days of termination. Ms. Bellvilles
agreement included a covenant not to compete for the balance of
the initial term or any renewal term, but no more than one year,
in the event of termination without cause or by her with good
reason. Her agreement further provided that she was entitled to
participate in any disability insurance, pension or other
benefit plan afforded to employees generally or to executives,
including our LTIP. Ms. Bellville was entitled to a monthly
car allowance and reimbursement for all business expenses
associated with the use of such car. Ms. Bellvilles
agreement provided that she was entitled to the reimbursement of
dues for her membership in a country club of her choice, and
reimbursement for up to $5,000 per year for tax, legal and
financial planning services.
On September 16, 2004, Charter entered into an agreement
with Ms. Bellville governing the terms and conditions of
her resignation as an officer and employee of Charter. Under the
terms of this agreement, Ms. Bellville has the right to
receive 65 weeks of base pay based on an annual base of
$625,000, plus usual compensation for all accrued vacation and
other leave time. Her options to purchase 700,000 shares of
Class A common stock will continue to vest during the
salary continuation period. Ms. Bellville will have
60 days after the expiration of the salary continuation
period to exercise any outstanding vested options at the
applicable exercise prices established at each grant date. To
date,
119
Ms. Bellville has exercised her options to purchase
350,000 shares. Ms. Bellville was entitled to and
received relocation benefits under Charters current
relocation policy with respect to a move to a specified
geographic area and was provided outplacement assistance for
6 months following the date of her separation from Charter.
Her resignation was effective September 30, 2004. The
agreement provides that the previously existing employment
agreement would terminate, except for certain ongoing
obligations on Ms. Bellvilles part concerning
confidentiality, non-solicitation and non-disparagement. The
contractual restriction on her ability to solicit current
Charter employees does not apply to persons who, at the time of
solicitation, have not worked for Charter in the prior
6 months and are not receiving severance from Charter. In
addition, the non-competition provisions of her employment
agreement were waived. Under the agreement, Ms. Bellville
waived a right to any bonus or incentive plan and released
Charter from any claims arising out of or based upon any facts
occurring prior to the date of the agreement, but Charter will
continue to provide Ms. Bellville certain indemnification
rights for that period.
In addition to the indemnification provisions which apply to all
employees under our bylaws, Mr. Vogels and Ms.
Bellvilles agreements provide that we will indemnify and
hold harmless each employee to the maximum extent permitted by
law from and against any claims, damages, liabilities, losses,
costs or expenses in connection with or arising out of the
performance by the applicable employee of his or her duties.
Each of the above agreements also contains confidentiality and
non-solicitation provisions.
Effective January 28, 2005, we eliminated the position of
Chief Administrative Officer, resulting in the termination of
employment of Steven A. Schumm, Executive Vice President and
Chief Administrative Officer from Charter and each of our
subsidiaries for which Mr. Schumm served as an officer.
Pursuant to a Separation Agreement executed on February 8,
2005, we will continue to pay Mr. Schumms base salary
for 65 weeks at an annual rate of $450,000, and
Mr. Schumm was paid a bonus of $15,815 at the time other
executives received their bonuses in April 2005.
Mr. Schumms stock options will continue to vest
during the 65-week severance period, and he will have
60 days thereafter to exercise any vested options.
Thomas A. Cullen resigned, effective April 30, 2005, from
his position as Executive Vice President of Advanced Services
and Business Development of Charter and each of Charters
subsidiaries for which Mr. Cullen served as an officer.
Pursuant to a Separation Agreement and Release executed on
March 15, 2005, Charter will continue to pay
Mr. Cullens base salary for 65 weeks following
the termination of his employment at a rate of $5,769 per week,
and Mr. Cullen will be paid a one time payment of $10,347
to cover COBRA payments. Mr. Cullens stock options
will continue to vest during the 65-week severance period, and
he will have 60 days thereafter to exercise any vested
options.
We have established separation guidelines which generally apply
to all employees in situations where management determines that
an employee is entitled to severance benefits. Severance
benefits are granted solely in managements discretion and
are not an employee entitlement or guaranteed benefit. The
guidelines provide that persons employed at the level of Senior
Vice President may be eligible to receive between six and
fifteen months of severance benefits and persons employed at the
level of Executive Vice President may be eligible to receive
between nine and eighteen months of severance benefits in the
event of separation under certain circumstances generally
including elimination of a position, work unit or general staff
reduction. Separation benefits are contingent upon the signing
of a separation agreement containing certain provisions
including a release of all claims against us. Severance amounts
paid under these guidelines are distinct and separate from any
one-time, special or enhanced severance programs that may be
approved by us from time to time.
Our senior executives are eligible to receive bonuses according
to our 2005 Executive Bonus Plan. Under this plan, our executive
officers and certain other management and professional employees
are eligible to receive an annual bonus. Each participating
employee would receive his or her target bonus if Charter (or
such employees division) meets specified performance
measures for revenues, operating cash flow, free cash flow and
customer satisfaction.
120
Limitation of Directors Liability and
Indemnification Matters
Our certificate of incorporation limits the liability of
directors to the maximum extent permitted by Delaware law. The
Delaware General Corporation Law provides that a corporation may
eliminate or limit the personal liability of a director for
monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director,
except for liability for:
|
|
|
(1) any breach of the directors duty of loyalty to
the corporation and its shareholders; |
|
|
(2) acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; |
|
|
(3) unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock
purchases or redemptions; or |
|
|
(4) any transaction from which the director derived an
improper personal benefit. |
Our bylaws provide that we will indemnify all persons whom we
may indemnify pursuant thereto to the fullest extent permitted
by law.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers or
persons controlling us pursuant to the foregoing provisions, we
have been informed that in the opinion of the SEC, such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the
Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
We have reimbursed certain of our current and former directors,
officers and employees in connection with their defense in
certain legal actions. See Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions Other Miscellaneous
Relationships Indemnification Advances.
121
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information regarding
beneficial ownership of Charters Class A common stock
as of May 31, 2005 by:
|
|
|
|
|
each person currently serving as a director of Charter; |
|
|
|
the current chief executive officer and individuals named in the
Summary Compensation Table; |
|
|
|
all persons currently serving as directors and officers of
Charter, as a group; and |
|
|
|
each person known by us to own beneficially 5% or more of our
outstanding Class A common stock as of May 31, 2005. |
With respect to the percentage of voting power set forth in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
each holder of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote
per share; and |
|
|
|
each holder of Class B common stock is entitled to
(i) ten votes per share of Class B common stock held
by such holder and its affiliates and (ii) ten votes per
share of Class B Common Stock for which membership units in
Charter Holdco held by such holder and its affiliates are
exchangeable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested | |
|
Receivable | |
|
|
|
Class B | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted | |
|
on Exercise | |
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Class A | |
|
of Vested | |
|
|
|
Issuable | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Shares | |
|
Shares | |
|
Options or | |
|
Number of | |
|
upon | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
(Voting and | |
|
(Voting | |
|
Other | |
|
Class B | |
|
Exchange or | |
|
% of | |
|
Voting | |
|
|
Investment | |
|
Power | |
|
Convertible | |
|
Shares | |
|
Conversion of | |
|
Equity | |
|
Power | |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Power)(1) | |
|
Only)(2) | |
|
Securities(3) | |
|
Owned | |
|
Units(4) | |
|
(4)(5) | |
|
(5)(6) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Paul G. Allen(7)
|
|
|
29,126,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
339,132,031 |
|
|
|
57.18 |
% |
|
|
92.54 |
% |
Charter Investment, Inc.(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222,818,858 |
|
|
|
42.21 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
Vulcan Cable III Inc.(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,313,173 |
|
|
|
27.61 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
Robert P. May
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
John H. Tory
|
|
|
30,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Marc B. Nathanson
|
|
|
425,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
David C. Merritt
|
|
|
25,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Jo Allen Patton
|
|
|
10,977 |
|
|
|
40,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
W. Lance Conn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Jonathan L. Dolgen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Larry W. Wangberg
|
|
|
28,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Michael J. Lovett
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
All current directors and executive officers as a group
(16 persons)
|
|
|
29,666,247 |
|
|
|
221,901 |
|
|
|
883,625 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
339,132,031 |
|
|
|
57.35 |
% |
|
|
92.56 |
% |
Carl E. Vogel(10)
|
|
|
208,126 |
|
|
|
226,666 |
|
|
|
932,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Margaret A. Bellville(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Derek Chang(12)
|
|
|
41,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Curtis S. Shaw(12)
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Steven A. Schumm(13)
|
|
|
30,568 |
|
|
|
36,256 |
|
|
|
276,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Amaranth L.L.C.(14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,322,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.53 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
Scott A. Bommer(15)
|
|
|
18,237,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.98 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
Glenview Capital Management, LLC(16)
|
|
|
19,903,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.53 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
Glenview Capital GP, LLC(16)
|
|
|
19,903,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.53 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
Lawrence M. Robbins(16)
|
|
|
19,903,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.53 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
Steelhead Partners, LLC(16)
|
|
|
24,835,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.14 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
J-K Navigator Fund, L.P.(17)
|
|
|
18,447,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.05 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
James Michael Johnston(17)
|
|
|
24,835,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.14 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
Brian Katz Klein(17)
|
|
|
24,835,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.14 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes shares for which the named person has sole voting and
investment power; or shared voting and investment power with a
spouse. Does not include shares that may be acquired through
exercise of options. |
122
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Includes unvested shares of restricted stock issued under the
Charter Communications, Inc. 2001 Stock Incentive Plan
(including those issued in the February 2004 option exchange for
those eligible employees who elected to participate), as to
which the applicable director or employee has sole voting power
but not investment power. Excludes certain performance units
granted under the Charter 2001 Stock Incentive Plan with respect
to which shares will not be issued until the third anniversary
of the grant date and then only if Charter meets certain
performance criteria (and which consequently do not provide the
holder with any voting rights). |
|
|
(3) |
Includes shares of Class A common stock issuable upon
exercise of options that have vested or will vest on or before
July 30, 2005 under the 1999 Charter Communications Option
Plan and the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. |
|
|
(4) |
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with
Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act. The beneficial owners at
May 31, 2005 of Class B common stock, Charter Holdco
membership units and convertible senior notes of Charter are
deemed to be beneficial owners of an equal number of shares of
Class A common stock because such holdings are either
convertible into Class A shares (in the case of
Class B shares and convertible senior notes) or
exchangeable (directly or indirectly) for Class A shares
(in the case of the membership units) on a one-for-one basis.
Unless otherwise noted, the named holders have sole investment
and voting power with respect to the shares listed as
beneficially owned. An issue has arisen as to whether the
documentation for the Bresnan transaction was correct and
complete with regard to the ultimate ownership of the CC VIII,
LLC membership interests following the consummation of the
Bresnan put transaction on June 6, 2003. See Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions Transactions
Arising Out of Our Organizational Structure and
Mr. Allens Investment in Charter Communications, Inc.
and Its Subsidiaries Equity Put Rights
CC VIII. |
|
|
(5) |
The calculation of this percentage assumes for each person that: |
|
|
|
|
|
304,966,995 shares of Class A common stock are issued
and outstanding as of May 31, 2005; |
|
|
|
50,000 shares of Class B common stock held by
Mr. Allen have been converted into shares of Class A
common stock; |
|
|
|
the acquisition by such person of all shares of Class A
common stock that such person or affiliates of such person has
the right to acquire upon exchange of membership units in
subsidiaries or conversion of Series A Convertible
Redeemable Preferred Stock or 5.875% or 4.75% convertible
senior notes; |
|
|
|
the acquisition by such person of all shares that may be
acquired upon exercise of options to purchase shares or
exchangeable membership units that have vested or will vest by
July 30, 2005; and |
|
|
|
that none of the other listed persons or entities has received
any shares of Class A common stock that are issuable to any
of such persons pursuant to the exercise of options or otherwise. |
A person is deemed to have the right to acquire shares of
Class A common stock with respect to options vested under
the 1999 Charter Communications Option Plan. When vested, these
options are exercisable for membership units of Charter Holdco,
which are immediately exchanged on a one-for-one basis for
shares of Charter Class A common stock. A person is also
deemed to have the right to acquire shares of Class A
common stock issuable upon the exercise of vested options under
the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
(6) |
The calculation of this percentage assumes that
Mr. Allens equity interests are retained in the form
that maximizes voting power (i.e., the 50,000 shares of
Class B common stock held by Mr. Allen have not been
converted into shares of Class A common stock; that the
membership units of Charter Holdco owned by each of Vulcan
Cable III Inc. and Charter Investment, Inc. have not been
exchanged for shares of Class A common stock). |
|
|
(7) |
The total listed includes: |
|
|
|
|
|
222,818,858 membership units in Charter Holdco held by Charter
Investment, Inc.; and |
|
|
|
116,313,173 membership units in Charter Holdco held by Vulcan
Cable III Inc. |
123
|
|
|
The listed total excludes 24,273,943 shares of Class A
common stock issuable upon exchange of units of Charter Holdco,
which may be issuable to Charter Investment, Inc. (which is
owned by Mr. Allen) as a consequence of the closing of his
purchase of the membership interests in CC VIII, LLC that were
put to Mr. Allen and were purchased by him on June 6,
2003. An issue has arisen regarding the ultimate ownership of
such CC VIII, LLC membership interests following the
consummation of such put transaction. See Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions Transactions
Arising Out of Our Organizational Structure and
Mr. Allens Investment in Charter Communications, Inc.
and Its Subsidiaries Equity Put Rights
CC VIII. |
|
|
The address of this person is: 505 Fifth Avenue South,
Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98104. |
|
|
|
|
(8) |
Includes 222,818,858 membership units in Charter Holdco, which
are exchangeable for shares of Class B common stock on a
one-for-one basis, which are convertible to shares of
Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis. The address of
this person is Charter Plaza, 12405 Powerscourt Drive,
St. Louis, MO 63131. |
|
|
(9) |
Includes 116,313,173 membership units in Charter Holdco, which
are exchangeable for shares of Class B common stock on a
one-for-one basis, which are convertible to shares of
Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis. The address of
this person is: 505 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 900, Seattle,
WA 98104. |
|
|
(10) |
Mr. Vogel terminated his employment effective on
January 17, 2005. His stock options and restricted stock
shown in this table continue to vest through December 31,
2005, and his options will be exercisable for another
60 days thereafter. |
|
(11) |
Ms. Bellville resigned from Charter effective
September 30, 2004. Under the terms of her separation
agreement, her options will continue to vest until
December 31, 2005, and all vested options are exercisable
until sixty (60) days thereafter. |
|
(12) |
Mr. Chang and Mr. Shaw resigned effective
April 15, 2005. |
|
(13) |
Includes 1,000 shares for which Mr. Schumm has shared
investment and voting power. Mr. Schumms employment
was terminated effective January 28, 2005. His stock
options and restricted stock shown in this table continue to
vest for 65 weeks following his termination, and his options
will be exercisable for another 60 days thereafter. |
|
(14) |
The equity ownership reported in this table is based upon
holders Schedule 13G filed with the SEC
February 2, 2005. The address of this person is:
c/o Amaranth Advisors L.L.C., One American Lane,
Greenwich, Connecticut, 06831. |
|
(15) |
The equity ownership reported in this table is based upon the
holders Schedule 13G filed with the SEC
March 28, 2005. The address of this person is
712 Fifth Avenue, 42nd Floor, New York, New York, 10019.
Mr. Bommer is the managing member of SAB Capital Advisors,
L.L.C., which serves as general partner of SAB Capital Partners,
L.P. and SAB Capital Partners II, L.P. (which in turn
collectively hold 10,124,695 shares of Class A common
stock). Mr. Bommer is also the managing member of SAB
Capital Management, L.L.C., which serves as general partner of
SAB Overseas Capital Management, L.P. (which in turn serves as
investment manager to and has investment discretion over the
securities held by a holder of 8,113,049 shares of
Class A common stock). |
|
(16) |
The equity ownership reported in this table is based upon the
holders Schedule 13G filed with the SEC June 3,
2005. The address of the principal business office of the
reporting person is 399 Park Avenue, Floor 39, New
York, New York 10022. The shares shown consist of:
(A) 1,669,400 shares held for the account of Glenview
Capital Partners; (B) 5,991,000 shares held for the
account of Glenview Capital Master Fund; and
(C) 12,243,100 shares held for the account of Glenview
Institutional Partners, Glenview Capital Management serves as
investment manager to each of Glenview Capital Partners,
Glenview Institutional Partners, and Glenview Capital Master
Fund. Glenview Capital GP is the general partner of
Glenview Capital Partners and Glenview Institutional Partners.
Glenview Capital GP also serves as the sponsor of the
Glenview Capital Master Fund. Mr. Robbins is the Chief
Executive Officer of Glenview Capital Management and Glenview
Capital GP. |
124
|
|
(17) |
The equity ownership reported in this table is based upon the
holders Schedule 13G filed with the SEC May 23,
2005. The business address of the reporting person is
1301 First Avenue, Suite 201, Seattle, WA 98101.
Steelhead Partners, LLC acts as general partner of J-K Navigator
Fund, L.P., and J. Michael Johnston and Brian K. Klein act
as the member-managers of Steelhead Partners, LLC. Accordingly,
shares shown as beneficially held by Steelhead Partners, LLC,
Mr. Johnston and Mr. Klein include shares beneficially
held by J-K Navigator Fund, L.P. |
Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation
plans
The following information is provided as of December 31,
2004 with respect to equity compensation plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities | |
|
|
|
Number of securities | |
|
|
to be issued upon | |
|
Weighted average | |
|
remaining available | |
|
|
exercise of outstanding | |
|
exercise price of | |
|
for future issuance | |
|
|
options, warrants | |
|
outstanding options, | |
|
under equity | |
Plan Category |
|
and rights | |
|
warrants and rights | |
|
compensation plans | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
24,834,513 |
(1) |
|
$ |
6.57 |
|
|
|
54,701,158 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
475,653 |
(2) |
|
$ |
10.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
25,310,166 |
|
|
$ |
6.64 |
|
|
|
54,701,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
This total does not include 2,076,860 shares issued
pursuant to restricted stock grants made under our 2001 Stock
Incentive Plan, which were subject to vesting based on continued
employment or 6,899,600 performance shares issued under our LTIP
plan, which are subject to vesting upon Charters
achievement of certain performance criteria during a three-year
performance cycle ending on December 31, 2007. |
|
(2) |
Includes shares of Class A common stock to be issued upon
exercise of options granted pursuant to an individual
compensation agreement with a consultant. In 2003, we agreed to
exchange 186,385 of these options for 18,638 shares of
Class A common stock, and we anticipate that exchange to be
consummated in 2005. |
125
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The following sets forth certain transactions in which we are
involved and in which the directors, executive officers and
affiliates of Charter have or may have a material interest. The
transactions fall generally into three broad categories:
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions in which Mr. Allen has an interest that
arise directly out of Mr. Allens investment in
Charter and Charter Holdco. A large number of the
transactions described below arise out of Mr. Allens
direct and indirect (through Charter Investment, Inc., or the
Vulcan entities, each of which Mr. Allen controls)
investment in Charter and its subsidiaries, as well as
commitments made as consideration for the investments themselves. |
|
|
|
Transactions with third party providers of products, services
and content in which Mr. Allen has or had a material
interest. Mr. Allen has had numerous investments in the
areas of technology and media. We have a number of commercial
relationships with third parties in which Mr. Allen has or
had an interest. |
|
|
|
Other Miscellaneous Transactions. We have a limited
number of transactions in which certain of the officers,
directors and principal shareholders of Charter and its
subsidiaries, other than Mr. Allen, have an interest. |
A number of our debt instruments and those of our subsidiaries
require delivery of fairness opinions for transactions with
Mr. Allen or his affiliates involving more than
$50 million. Such fairness opinions have been obtained
whenever required. All of our transactions with Mr. Allen
or his affiliates have been considered for approval either by
the board of directors of Charter or a committee of the board of
directors. All of our transactions with Mr. Allen or his
affiliates have been deemed by the board of directors or a
committee of the board of directors to be in our best interest.
Related party transactions are approved by our Audit Committee
in compliance with the listing requirements applicable to NASDAQ
National Market listed companies. Except where noted below, we
do not believe that these transactions present any unusual risks
for us that would not be present in any similar commercial
transaction.
The chart below summarizes certain information with respect to
these transactions. Additional information regarding these
transactions is provided following the chart.
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction |
|
Interested Related Party |
|
Description of Transaction |
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany Management Arrangements
|
|
Paul G. Allen |
|
Subsidiaries of Charter Holdco paid Charter approximately
$79 million, $84 million, $90 million and
$30 million for management services rendered in 2002, 2003
and 2004 and the three months ended March 31, 2005,
respectively. |
Mutual Services Agreement
|
|
Paul G. Allen |
|
Charter paid Charter Holdco approximately $70 million,
$73 million, $74 million and $20 million for
services rendered in 2002, 2003 and 2004 and the three months
ended March 31, 2005, respectively. |
Previous Management Agreement
|
|
Paul G. Allen |
|
No fees were paid in 2002, 2003, 2004 or 2005, although total
management fees accrued and payable to Charter Investment, Inc.,
exclusive of interest, were approximately $14 million at
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and March 31, 2005. |
126
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction |
|
Interested Related Party |
|
Description of Transaction |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Provisions of Charter Holdcos Operating Agreement
|
|
Paul G. Allen |
|
In 2002, the operating agreement of Charter Holdco allocated
certain of our tax losses to entities controlled by Paul Allen. |
Channel Access Agreement
|
|
Paul G. Allen
W. Lance Conn
Jo Allen Patton |
|
At Vulcan Ventures request, we will provide Vulcan
Ventures with exclusive rights for carriage on eight of our
digital cable channels as partial consideration for a 1999
capital contribution of approximately $1.3 billion. |
Equity Put Rights
|
|
Paul G. Allen |
|
Certain sellers of cable systems that we acquired were granted,
or previously had the right, as described below, to put to Paul
Allen equity in us (in the case of Rifkin and Falcon), Charter
Holdco (in the case of Rifkin) and CC VIII, LLC (in the case of
Bresnan) issued to such sellers in connection with such
acquisitions. |
Previous Funding Commitment of Vulcan Inc.
|
|
Paul G. Allen
W. Lance Conn
Jo Allen Patton |
|
Pursuant to a commitment letter dated April 14, 2003,
Vulcan Inc., which is an affiliate of Paul Allen, agreed to
lend, under certain circumstances, or cause an affiliate to lend
to Charter Holdings or any of its subsidiaries a total amount of
up to $300 million, which amount included a subfacility of
up to $100 million for the issuance of letters of credit.
In November 2003, the commitment was terminated. We incurred
expenses to Vulcan Inc. totaling $5 million in connection
with the commitment prior to termination. |
Mirror Securities
|
|
|
|
To comply with the organizational documents of Charter and
Charter Holdco, Charter Holdco issued certain mirror securities
to Charter, redeemed certain other mirror securities, and paid
interest and dividends on outstanding mirror notes and preferred
units. |
High Speed Access Corp. Asset Purchase Agreement
|
|
Paul G. Allen
W. Lance Conn
Jo Allen Patton |
|
In February 2002, our subsidiary purchased certain assets of
High Speed Access for $78 million, plus the delivery of
37,000 shares of High Speed Access Series D preferred
stock and certain warrants. In connection with the transaction,
High Speed Access also purchased 38,000 shares of its
Series D preferred stock from Vulcan Ventures for
approximately $8 million, and all of Vulcan Ventures
shares of High Speed Access common stock. |
127
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction |
|
Interested Related Party |
|
Description of Transaction |
|
|
|
|
|
High Speed Access Corp.
|
|
Paul G. Allen |
|
In January 2002, we granted to High Speed Access a royalty free
right to use intellectual property purchased by Charter
Communications Holding Company, LLC, received approximately
$4 million in management fees and approximately
$17 million in revenues and paid approximately
$2 million under agreements that have terminated. |
TechTV Carriage Agreement
|
|
Paul G. Allen
W. Lance Conn
Jo Allen Patton
William D. Savoy
Larry W. Wangberg |
|
We recorded approximately $4 million, $1 million,
$5 million and $0.3 million from TechTV under the
affiliation agreement in 2002, 2003, 2004 and the three months
ended March 31, 2005, respectively, related to launch
incentives as a reduction of programming expense. We paid TechTV
approximately $0.2 million, $80,600, $2 million and
$0.5 million in 2002, 2003, 2004 and the three months ended
March 31, 2005, respectively. |
Oxygen Media Corporation Carriage Agreement
|
|
Paul G. Allen
W. Lance Conn
Jo Allen Patton |
|
We paid Oxygen Media approximately $6 million,
$9 million, $13 million and $3 million under a
carriage agreement in exchange for programming in 2002, 2003,
2004 and the three months ended March 31, 2005,
respectively. |
|
|
|
|
We recorded approximately $2 million, $1 million,
$1 million and $0.1 million in 2002, 2003, 2004 and
the three months ended March 31, 2005, respectively, from
Oxygen Media related to launch incentives as a reduction of
programming expense. |
|
|
|
|
We received 1 million shares of Oxygen Preferred Stock
with a liquidation preference of $33.10 per share in March 2005.
We recognized approximately $6 million, $9 million,
$13 million and $1 million as a reduction of
programming expense in 2002, 2003, 2004 and the three months
ended March 31, 2005, respectively, in recognition of the
guaranteed value of the investment. |
Portland Trail Blazers Carriage Agreement
|
|
Paul G. Allen |
|
We paid approximately $1 million for rights to carry the
cable broadcast of certain Trail Blazers basketball games in
2002, approximately $135,200 in 2003, approximately $96,100 in
2004 and approximately $22,300 for the three months ended
March 31, 2005. |
128
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction |
|
Interested Related Party |
|
Description of Transaction |
|
|
|
|
|
Action Sports Cable Network Carriage Agreement
|
|
Paul G. Allen |
|
We paid approximately $1 million for rights to carry the
programming of Action Sports Cable Network in 2002. |
Click2learn, Inc. Software License Agreement
|
|
Paul G. Allen
W. Lance Conn
Jo Allen Patton |
|
We paid approximately $250,000, $57,100, $0 and $0 under the
Software License Agreement in 2002, 2003, 2004 and the three
months ended March 31, 2005, respectively. |
Digeo, Inc. Broadband Carriage Agreement
|
|
Paul G. Allen
William D. Savoy
Carl E. Vogel |
|
We paid Digeo approximately $3 million, $4 million,
$3 million and $2 million for customized development
of the i-channels and the local content tool kit in 2002, 2003,
2004 and the three months ended March 31, 2005,
respectively. We entered into a license agreement in 2004 for
the Digeo software that runs DVR units purchased from a third
party. We paid approximately $474,400 and $920,300 in license
and maintenance fees in 2004 and 2005. In 2004 we executed a
purchase agreement for the purchase of up to 70,000 DVR units
and a related software license agreement, both subject to
satisfaction of certain conditions. |
Viacom Networks
|
|
Jonathan L. Dolgen |
|
We are party to certain affiliation agreements with networks of
Viacom, pursuant to which Viacom provides Charter with
programming for distribution via our cable systems. For the
years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and for
the three months ended March 31, 2005, Charter paid Viacom
approximately $177 million, $188 million,
$194 million and $50 million, respectively, for
programming, and Charter recorded as receivables approximately
$5 million, $5 million, $8 million and $0 from
Viacom for launch incentives and marketing support for the years
ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and for the three
months ended March 31, 2005, respectively. |
ADC Telecommunications Inc.
|
|
Larry W. Wangberg |
|
We paid $759,600, $60,100, $344,800 and $112,800 to purchase
certain access/network equipment in 2002, 2003, 2004 and for the
three months ended March 31, 2005, respectively. |
129
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction |
|
Interested Related Party |
|
Description of Transaction |
|
|
|
|
|
HDNet and HDNet Movies Network
|
|
Mark Cuban |
|
Charter Holdco is party to an agreement to carry two
around-the-clock, high-definition networks, HDNet and HDNet
Movies. We paid HDNet and HDNet Movies approximately $21,900,
$609,100 and $447,400 in 2003 and 2004 and for the three months
ended March 31, 2005. |
Affiliate leases and agreements
|
|
David L. McCall
Marc B. Nathanson |
|
We paid approximately $117,600, $189,200, $43,400 and $0 in
2002, 2003 and 2004 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, respectively, under an office lease
agreement to a partnership controlled by Mr. McCall, a
former executive officer who resigned in January 2003. |
|
|
|
|
We paid approximately $76,000, $16,600, $0 and $0 in 2002, 2003
and 2004 and for the three months ended March 31, 2005,
respectively, to companies controlled by Mr. Nathanson
under a warehouse lease agreement. |
Construction Services
|
|
David L. McCall |
|
In 2002, 2003, 2004 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, we paid $644,800, $381,300, $0 and $0,
respectively, to a construction company controlled by
Mr. McCalls brother and $3 million, $373,800, $0
and $0, respectively, to a construction company controlled by
Mr. McCalls son. |
Carriage fees
|
|
David C. Merritt |
|
We paid approximately $1 million, $1 million,
$1 million and $298,300 in 2002, 2003, 2004 and for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 to carry The Outdoor
Channel. Mr. Merritt is a director of an affiliate of this
channel. |
Payment for relatives services
|
|
Howard L. Wood
Carl E. Vogel |
|
In 1999, a daughter of a former director, received a bonus in
the form of a three-year promissory note bearing interest at
7% per year. The amount of principal and interest forgiven
on this note for the year ended December 31, 2001, was
$85,500, and the outstanding balance on the note was forgiven
effective as of February 22, 2002. Since June 2003,
Mr. Vogels brother-in-law has been an employee of
Charter Holdco and has received a salary commensurate with his
position in the engineering department. |
130
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction |
|
Interested Related Party |
|
Description of Transaction |
|
|
|
|
|
Radio advertising
|
|
Marc B. Nathanson |
|
We believe that through a third party advertising agency, we
have paid approximately $113,200, $79,700 and $49,700 in 2002,
2003 and 2004, respectively, to Mapleton Communications, an
affiliate of Mapleton Investments, LLC. |
Enstar Limited Partnership Systems Purchase and Management
Services
|
|
Charter officers who were appointed by a Charter subsidiary (as
general partner) to serve as officers of Enstar limited
partnerships |
|
Certain of our subsidiaries purchased certain assets of the
Enstar Limited Partnerships for approximately $63 million
in 2002. We also earned approximately $1 million, $469,300,
$0 and $0 in 2002, 2003, 2004 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, respectively, by providing management
services to the Enstar Limited Partnerships. |
Indemnification Advances
|
|
Directors and current and former officers named in certain legal
proceedings |
|
Charter reimbursed certain of its current and former directors
and executive officers a total of approximately $3 million,
$8 million, $3 million and $0 for costs incurred in
connection with litigation matters in 2002, 2003 and 2004 and
for the three months ended March 31, 2005, respectively. |
The following sets forth additional information regarding the
transactions summarized above.
Transactions Arising Out of Our Organizational Structure and
Mr. Allens Investment in Charter Communications, Inc.
and Its Subsidiaries
As noted above, a number of our related party transactions arise
out of Mr. Allens investment in Charter and its
subsidiaries. Some of these transactions are with Charter
Investment, Inc. and Vulcan Ventures (both owned 100% by
Mr. Allen), Charter (controlled by Mr. Allen) and
Charter Holdco (approximately 47% owned by us and 53% owned by
other affiliates of Mr. Allen). See
Summary Organizational Structure for
more information regarding the ownership by Mr. Allen and
certain of his affiliates.
|
|
|
Intercompany Management Arrangements |
Charter is a party to management arrangements with Charter
Holdco and certain of its subsidiaries. Under these agreements,
Charter provides management services for the cable systems owned
or operated by its subsidiaries. These management agreements
provide for reimbursement to Charter for all costs and expenses
incurred by it for activities relating to the ownership and
operation of the managed cable systems, including overhead,
administration and salary expense.
The total amount paid by Charter Holdco and all of its
subsidiaries is limited to the amount necessary to reimburse
Charter for all of its expenses, costs, losses, liabilities and
damages paid or incurred by it in connection with the
performance of its services under the various management
agreements and in connection with its corporate overhead,
administration, salary expense and similar items. The expenses
subject to reimbursement include fees Charter is obligated to
pay under the mutual services agreement with Charter Investment,
Inc. Payment of management fees by Charters operating
subsidiaries is subject to certain restrictions under the credit
facilities and indentures of such subsidiaries and the
indentures governing the Charter Holdings public debt. If any
portion of the management fee due and payable is not paid, it is
deferred by Charter and accrued as a liability of such
subsidiaries. Any deferred amount of the
131
management fee will bear interest at the rate of 10% per
year, compounded annually, from the date it was due and payable
until the date it is paid. For the years ended December 31,
2002, 2003 and 2004 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, the subsidiaries of Charter Holdco paid
approximately $79 million, $84 million,
$90 million and $30 million, respectively, in
management fees to Charter.
|
|
|
Mutual Services Agreement |
Charter, Charter Holdco and Charter Investment, Inc. are parties
to a mutual services agreement whereby each party shall provide
rights and services to the other parties as may be reasonably
requested for the management of the entities involved and their
subsidiaries, including the cable systems owned by their
subsidiaries all on a cost-reimbursement basis. The officers and
employees of each party are available to the other parties to
provide these rights and services, and all expenses and costs
incurred in providing these rights and services are paid by
Charter. Each of the parties will indemnify and hold harmless
the other parties and their directors, officers and employees
from and against any and all claims that may be made against any
of them in connection with the mutual services agreement except
due to its or their gross negligence or willful misconduct. The
mutual services agreement expires on November 12, 2009, and
may be terminated at any time by any party upon thirty
days written notice to the other. For the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and for the three months
ended March 31, 2005, Charter paid approximately
$70 million, $73 million, $74 million and
$20 million to Charter Holdco for services rendered
pursuant to the mutual services agreement. All such amounts are
reimbursable to Charter pursuant to a management arrangement
with our subsidiaries. See Intercompany
Management Arrangements. The accounts and balances related
to these services eliminate in consolidation. Charter
Investment, Inc. no longer provides services pursuant to this
agreement.
|
|
|
Previous Management Agreement with Charter Investment,
Inc. |
Prior to November 12, 1999, Charter Investment, Inc.
provided management and consulting services to our operating
subsidiaries for a fee equal to 3.5% of the gross revenues of
the systems then owned, plus reimbursement of expenses. The
balance of management fees payable under the previous management
agreement was accrued with payment at the discretion of Charter
Investment, Inc., with interest payable on unpaid amounts. For
the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, and the
three months ended March 31, 2005, Charters
subsidiaries did not pay any fees to Charter Investment, Inc. to
reduce management fees payable. As of December 31, 2002,
2003 and 2004 and March 31, 2005, total management fees
payable by our subsidiaries to Charter Investment, Inc. were
approximately $14 million, exclusive of any interest that
may be charged.
|
|
|
Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC Limited
Liability Agreement Taxes |
The limited liability company agreement of Charter Holdco
contains special provisions regarding the allocation of tax
losses and profits among its members Vulcan
Cable III Inc., Charter Investment, Inc. and us. In some
situations, these provisions may cause us to pay more tax than
would otherwise be due if Charter Holdco had allocated profits
and losses among its members based generally on the number of
common membership units. See Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates Income Taxes.
|
|
|
Vulcan Ventures Channel Access Agreement |
Vulcan Ventures, an entity controlled by Mr. Allen,
Charter, Charter Investment and Charter Holdco are parties to an
agreement dated September 21, 1999 granting to Vulcan
Ventures the right to use up to eight of our digital cable
channels as partial consideration for a prior capital
contribution of $1.325 billion. Specifically, at Vulcan
Ventures request, we will provide Vulcan Ventures with
exclusive rights for carriage of up to eight digital cable
television programming services or channels on each of the
digital cable systems with local and to the extent available,
national control of the digital product owned, operated,
controlled or managed by Charter or its subsidiaries now or in
the future of 550 megahertz or more. If the system offers
digital services but has less than 550 megahertz of capacity,
then the
132
programming services will be equitably reduced. Upon request of
Vulcan Ventures, we will attempt to reach a comprehensive
programming agreement pursuant to which it will pay the
programmer, if possible, a fee per digital video customer. If
such fee arrangement is not achieved, then we and the programmer
shall enter into a standard programming agreement. The initial
term of the channel access agreement was 10 years, and the
term extends by one additional year (such that the remaining
term continues to be 10 years) on each anniversary date of
the agreement unless either party provides the other with notice
to the contrary at least 60 days prior to such anniversary
date. To date, Vulcan Ventures has not requested to use any of
these channels. However, in the future it is possible that
Vulcan Ventures could require us to carry programming that is
less profitable to us than the programming that we would
otherwise carry and our results would suffer accordingly.
CC VIII. As part of the acquisition of the cable systems
owned by Bresnan Communications Company Limited Partnership in
February 2000, CC VIII, Charters indirect limited
liability company subsidiary, issued, after adjustments,
24,273,943 Class A preferred membership units
(collectively, the CC VIII interest) with a value
and an initial capital account of approximately
$630 million to certain sellers affiliated with AT&T
Broadband, subsequently owned by Comcast Corporation (the
Comcast sellers). While held by the Comcast sellers,
the CC VIII interest was entitled to a 2% priority return on its
initial capital account and such priority return was entitled to
preferential distributions from available cash and upon
liquidation of CC VIII. While held by the Comcast sellers, the
CC VIII interest generally did not share in the profits and
losses of CC VIII. Mr. Allen granted the Comcast sellers
the right to sell to him the CC VIII interest for approximately
$630 million plus 4.5% interest annually from February 2000
(the Comcast put right). In April 2002, the Comcast
sellers exercised the Comcast put right in full, and this
transaction was consummated on June 6, 2003. Accordingly,
Mr. Allen has become the holder of the CC VIII interest,
indirectly through an affiliate. Consequently, subject to the
matters referenced in the next paragraph, Mr. Allen
generally thereafter will be allocated his pro rata share (based
on number of membership interests outstanding) of profits or
losses of CC VIII. In the event of a liquidation of CC VIII,
Mr. Allen would be entitled to a priority distribution with
respect to the 2% priority return (which will continue to
accrete). Any remaining distributions in liquidation would be
distributed to CC V Holdings, LLC and Mr. Allen in
proportion to CC V Holdings, LLCs capital account and
Mr. Allens capital account (which will equal the
initial capital account of the Comcast sellers of approximately
$630 million, increased or decreased by
Mr. Allens pro rata share of CC VIIIs profits
or losses (as computed for capital account purposes) after
June 6, 2003). The limited liability company agreement of
CC VIII does not provide for a mandatory redemption of the CC
VIII interest.
An issue has arisen as to whether the documentation for the
Bresnan transaction was correct and complete with regard to the
ultimate ownership of the CC VIII interest following
consummation of the Comcast put right. Specifically, under the
terms of the Bresnan transaction documents that were entered
into in June 1999, the Comcast sellers originally would have
received, after adjustments, 24,273,943 Charter Holdco
membership units, but due to an FCC regulatory issue raised by
the Comcast sellers shortly before closing, the Bresnan
transaction was modified to provide that the Comcast sellers
instead would receive the preferred equity interests in CC VIII
represented by the CC VIII interest. As part of the last-minute
changes to the Bresnan transaction documents, a draft amended
version of the Charter Holdco limited liability company
agreement was prepared, and contract provisions were drafted for
that agreement that would have required an automatic exchange of
the CC VIII interest for 24,273,943 Charter Holdco
membership units if the Comcast sellers exercised the Comcast
put right and sold the CC VIII interest to Mr. Allen
or his affiliates. However, the provisions that would have
required this automatic exchange did not appear in the final
version of the Charter Holdco limited liability company
agreement that was delivered and executed at the closing of the
Bresnan transaction. The law firm that prepared the documents
for the Bresnan transaction brought this matter to the attention
of Charter and representatives of Mr. Allen in 2002.
133
Thereafter, the board of directors of Charter formed a Special
Committee (currently comprised of Messrs. Merritt, Tory and
Wangberg) to investigate the matter and take any other
appropriate action on behalf of Charter with respect to this
matter. After conducting an investigation of the relevant facts
and circumstances, the Special Committee determined that a
scriveners error had occurred in February 2000
in connection with the preparation of the last-minute revisions
to the Bresnan transaction documents and that, as a result,
Charter should seek the reformation of the Charter Holdco
limited liability company agreement, or alternative relief, in
order to restore and ensure the obligation that the CC VIII
interest be automatically exchanged for Charter Holdco units.
The Special Committee further determined that, as part of such
contract reformation or alternative relief, Mr. Allen
should be required to contribute the CC VIII interest to
Charter Holdco in exchange for 24,273,943 Charter Holdco
membership units. The Special Committee also recommended to the
board of directors of Charter that, to the extent the contract
reformation is achieved, the board of directors should consider
whether the CC VIII interest should ultimately be held by
Charter Holdco or Charter Holdings or another entity owned
directly or indirectly by them.
Mr. Allen disagrees with the Special Committees
determinations described above and has so notified the Special
Committee. Mr. Allen contends that the transaction is
accurately reflected in the transaction documentation and
contemporaneous and subsequent company public disclosures.
The parties engaged in a process of non-binding mediation to
seek to resolve this matter, without success. The Special
Committee is evaluating what further actions or processes it may
undertake to resolve this dispute. To accommodate further
deliberation, each party has agreed to refrain from initiating
legal proceedings over this matter until it has given at least
ten days prior notice to the other. In addition, the
Special Committee and Mr. Allen have determined to utilize
the Delaware Court of Chancerys program for mediation of
complex business disputes in an effort to resolve the
CC VIII interest dispute. If the Special Committee and
Mr. Allen are unable to reach a resolution through that
mediation process or to agree on an alternative dispute
resolution process, the Special Committee intends to seek
resolution of this dispute through judicial proceedings in an
action that would be commenced, after appropriate notice, in the
Delaware Court of Chancery against Mr. Allen and his
affiliates seeking contract reformation, declaratory relief as
to the respective rights of the parties regarding this dispute
and alternative forms of legal and equitable relief. The
ultimate resolution and financial impact of the dispute are not
determinable at this time.
Rifkin. On September 14, 1999, Mr. Allen and
Charter Holdco entered into a put agreement with certain sellers
of the Rifkin cable systems that received a portion of their
purchase price in the form of 3,006,202 Class A preferred
membership units of Charter Holdco. This put agreement allowed
these holders to compel Charter Holdco to redeem their
Class A preferred membership units at any time before
September 14, 2004 at $1.00 per unit, plus accretion
thereon at 8% per year from September 14, 1999.
Mr. Allen had guaranteed the redemption obligation of
Charter Holdco. These units were put to Charter Holdco for
redemption, and were redeemed on April 18, 2003 for a total
price of approximately $3.9 million.
Mr. Allen also was a party to a put agreement with certain
sellers of the Rifkin cable systems that received a portion of
their purchase price in the form of shares of Class A
common stock of Charter. Under this put agreement, such holders
have the right to sell to Mr. Allen any or all of such
shares of Charters Class A common stock at
$19 per share (subject to adjustments for stock splits,
reorganizations and similar events), plus interest at a rate of
4.5% per year, compounded annually from November 12,
1999. Approximately 4.6 million shares were put to
Mr. Allen under these agreements prior to their expiration
on November 12, 2003.
Falcon. Mr. Allen also was a party to a put
agreement with certain sellers of the Falcon cable systems
(including Mr. Nathanson, one of our directors) that
received a portion of their purchase price in the form of shares
of Class A common stock of Charter. Under the Falcon put
agreement, such holders had the right to sell to Mr. Allen
any or all shares of Class A common stock received in the
Falcon acquisition at $25.8548 per share (subject to
adjustments for stock splits, reorganizations and similar
events), plus interest at a rate of 4.5% per year,
compounded annually from November 12, 1999.
134
Approximately 19.4 million shares were put to
Mr. Allen under these agreements prior to their expiration
on November 12, 2003.
|
|
|
Previous Funding Commitment of Vulcan Inc. |
Effective April 14, 2003, our subsidiary, Charter
Communications VII, LLC entered into a commitment letter with
Vulcan Inc., which is an affiliate of Paul Allen, under which
Vulcan Inc. agreed to lend, under certain circumstances, or
cause an affiliate to lend initially to Charter Communications
VII, LLC, or another subsidiary of Charter Holdings, up to
$300 million, which amount included a subfacility of up to
$100 million for the issuance of letters of credit. No
amounts were ever drawn under the commitment letter. In November
2003, the commitment was terminated. We incurred expenses to
Vulcan Inc. totaling $5 million in connection with the
commitment (including an extension fee) prior to termination.
Ms. Jo Allen Patton is a director and the President and Chief
Executive Officer of Vulcan Inc., and Mr. Lance Conn is
Executive Vice President of Vulcan Inc.
Charter is a holding company and its principal assets are its
equity interest in Charter Holdco and certain mirror notes
payable by Charter Holdco to Charter, and mirror preferred units
held by Charter, which have the same principal amount and terms
as those of Charters convertible senior notes and
Charters outstanding preferred stock. In 2002, 2003 and
2004, Charter Holdco paid to Charter $73 million,
$68 million and $49 million, respectively, related to
interest on the mirror notes, and Charter Holdco paid an
additional $4 million related to dividends on the mirror
preferred membership units.
In connection with our 2003 repurchase of approximately
$477 million of our outstanding 4.75% senior
convertible notes due 2006 and approximately $132 million
of our outstanding 5.75% senior convertible notes due 2005,
$520 million of CCH II 10.25% senior notes were
transferred (through a series of distributions) by CCH II
to Charter Holdco, which in turn assigned those CCH II
senior notes to us in exchange for the cancellation of mirror
notes of each series having a principal amount equal to the
amount of convertible notes of that series repurchased by us. As
part of the closing of that transaction, Charter Holdco also
paid to Charter cash in the amount of $10 million, which
represented the sum of (a) all accrued and unpaid interest
on the portions of the mirror notes transferred by Charter to
Charter Holdco, to, but not including, the date of the closing,
on the basis set forth in the mirror notes, (b) an amount
equal to the total amount of cash payable by Charter in lieu of
fractional interests in the 10.25% CCH II senior notes
which would have otherwise been due to the holders as a
consequence of the exchange and (c) the costs and expenses
relating to such transactions. Further, during 2004 Charter
Holdco issued 7,252,818 common membership units to Charter
in cancellation of $30 million principal amount of mirror
notes so as to mirror the issuance by Charter of Class A
common stock in exchange for a like principal amount of its
outstanding convertible notes.
In addition, in connection with our November 2004 sale of
$862.5 million principal amount of 5.875% convertible
senior notes due 2009, Charter Holdco issued to us mirror notes
in identical principal amount in exchange for the proceeds from
our offering. Charter Holdco then purchased and pledged certain
U.S. government securities to us as security for the mirror
notes (which were in turn repledged by us to the trustee for the
benefit of holders of our 5.875% convertible senior notes and
which we expect to use to fund the first six interest payments
on the notes), and agreed to lend common units to us, the terms
of which will, to the extent practicable, mirror the terms of
the shares offered hereby. Charter Holdco also redeemed the
remaining $588 million principal amount of the mirror notes
in respect of our 5.75% convertible senior notes due 2005
concurrently with our December 23, 2004 redemption of our
5.75% convertible senior notes. In addition, in November 2004,
Charter Holdco entered into a unit lending agreement with
Charter in which it agreed to lend common units to Charter that
would mirror the anticipated loan of Class A common shares
by Charter to Citigroup Global Markets pursuant to a share
lending agreement. The members of Charter Holdco (including the
entities controlled by Mr. Allen) also at that time entered
into a letter agreement providing, among other things, that for
purposes of the allocation provisions of the Limited Liability
Company Agreement of Charter Holdco, the mirror units be treated
as disregarded and not outstanding until such time (and except
to the extent) that, under Charters
135
share lending agreement, Charter treats the loaned shares in a
manner that assumes they will neither be returned to Charter by
the borrower nor otherwise be acquired by Charter in lieu of
such a return. In March, April and May 2005, Charter
Holdco repurchased a total of $131 million in principal
amount of mirror convertible notes due 2006 concurrently with
our repurchases of equal principal amounts of our 4.75%
convertible senior notes due 2006, for purchase prices equal to
the prices we paid in our repurchases.
|
|
|
Allocation of Business Opportunities with
Mr. Allen |
As described under Third Party Business
Relationships in which Mr. Allen has or had an
Interest in this section, Mr. Allen and a number of
his affiliates have interests in various entities that provide
services or programming to our subsidiaries. Given the diverse
nature of Mr. Allens investment activities and
interests, and to avoid the possibility of future disputes as to
potential business, Charter and Charter Holdco, under the terms
of their respective organizational documents, may not, and may
not allow their subsidiaries, to engage in any business
transaction outside the cable transmission business except for
the Digeo, Inc. joint venture; a joint venture to develop a
digital video recorder set-top terminal; an existing investment
in Cable Sports Southeast, LLC, a provider of regional sports
programming; as an owner of the business of Interactive
Broadcaster Services Corporation or, Chat TV, an investment in
@Security Broadband Corp., a company developing broadband
security applications; and incidental businesses engaged in as
of the closing of Charters initial public offering in
November 1999. This restriction will remain in effect until all
of the shares of Charters high-vote Class B
common stock have been converted into shares of Charter
Class A common stock due to Mr. Allens equity
ownership falling below specified thresholds.
Should Charter or Charter Holdco or any of their subsidiaries
wish to pursue, or allow their subsidiaries to pursue, a
business transaction outside of this scope, it must first offer
Mr. Allen the opportunity to pursue the particular business
transaction. If he decides not to pursue the business
transaction and consents to Charter or its subsidiaries engaging
in the business transaction, they will be able to do so. In any
such case, the restated certificate of incorporation of Charter
and the limited liability company agreement of Charter Holdco
would need to be amended accordingly to modify the current
restrictions on the ability of such entities to engage in any
business other than the cable transmission business. The cable
transmission business means the business of transmitting video,
audio, including telephony, and data over cable systems owned,
operated or managed by Charter, Charter Holdco or any of their
subsidiaries from time to time.
Under Delaware corporate law, each director of Charter,
including Mr. Allen, is generally required to present to
Charter, any opportunity he or she may have to acquire any cable
transmission business or any company whose principal business is
the ownership, operation or management of cable transmission
businesses, so that we may determine whether we wish to pursue
such opportunities. However, Mr. Allen and the other
directors generally will not have an obligation to present other
types of business opportunities to Charter and they may exploit
such opportunities for their own account.
Also, conflicts could arise with respect to the allocation of
corporate opportunities between us and Mr. Allen and his
affiliates in connection with his investments in businesses in
which we are permitted to engage under Charters restated
certificate of incorporation. Certain of the indentures of
Charter and its subsidiaries require the applicable issuer of
notes to obtain, under certain circumstances, approval of the
board of directors of Charter and, where a transaction or series
of related transactions is valued at or in excess of
$50 million, a fairness opinion with respect to
transactions in which Mr. Allen has an interest. Related
party transactions are approved by our Audit Committee in
compliance with the listing requirements applicable to NASDAQ
National Market listed companies. We have not instituted any
other formal plan or arrangement to address potential conflicts
of interest.
The restrictive provisions of the organizational documents
described above may limit our ability to take advantage of
attractive business opportunities. Consequently, our ability to
offer new products and services outside of the cable
transmission business and enter into new businesses could be
adversely affected, resulting in an adverse effect on our
growth, financial condition and results of operations.
136
Third Party Business Relationships in Which Mr. Allen
has or had an Interest
As previously noted, Mr. Allen has and has had extensive
investments in the areas of media and technology. We have a
number of commercial relationships with third parties in which
Mr. Allen has an interest. Mr. Allen or his affiliates
own equity interests or warrants to purchase equity interests in
various entities with which we do business or which provide us
with products, services or programming. Mr. Allen owns 100%
of the equity of Vulcan Ventures Incorporated and Vulcan Inc.
and is the president of Vulcan Ventures. Ms. Jo Allen Patton is
a director and the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Vulcan Inc. and is a director and Vice President of Vulcan
Ventures. Mr. Lance Conn is Executive Vice President of Vulcan
Inc. and Vulcan Ventures. The various cable, media, Internet and
telephony companies in which Mr. Allen has invested may
mutually benefit one another. We can give no assurance, nor
should you expect, that any of these business relationships will
be successful, that we will realize any benefits from these
relationships or that we will enter into any business
relationships in the future with Mr. Allens
affiliated companies.
Mr. Allen and his affiliates have made, and in the future
likely will make, numerous investments outside of us and our
business. We cannot assure you that, in the event that we or any
of our subsidiaries enter into transactions in the future with
any affiliate of Mr. Allen, such transactions will be on
terms as favorable to us as terms we might have obtained from an
unrelated third party.
High Speed Access Corp. was a provider of high-speed Internet
access services over cable modems. During the period from 1997
to 2000, certain Charter entities entered into Internet-access
related service agreements, and both Vulcan Ventures, an entity
owned by Mr. Allen, and Charter Holdco made equity
investments in High Speed Access.
On February 28, 2002, our subsidiary, CC Systems, purchased
from High Speed Access the contracts and associated assets, and
assumed related liabilities, that served our customers,
including a customer contact center, network operations center
and provisioning software. At the closing, certain of our
subsidiaries paid $78 million to High Speed Access and
delivered 37,000 shares of High Speed Accesss
Series D convertible preferred stock and all of the
warrants to buy High Speed Access common stock owned by Charter
Holdco (which had been acquired pursuant to two network services
agreements which were cancelled in connection with this
transaction, as described below), and High Speed Access
purchased 38,000 shares of its Series D Preferred
Stock from Vulcan Ventures for $8 million. Additional
purchase price adjustments were made as provided in the asset
purchase agreement. Charter Holdco obtained a fairness opinion
from a qualified investment-banking firm regarding the valuation
of the assets purchased. Concurrently with the closing of the
transaction, High Speed Access also purchased all of its common
stock held by Vulcan Ventures.
In conjunction with the High Speed Access asset purchase, on
February 28, 2002, Charter Communications Holding Company
granted High Speed Access the right to use certain intellectual
property sold by High Speed Access to Charter Holdco. High Speed
Access does not pay any fees under the agreement. The domestic
portion of the license terminated on June 30, 2002, and the
international portion of the license expired on February 2,
2005. Prior to closing the asset purchase, Charter performed
certain management services formerly performed by High Speed
Access, for which it received approximately $4 million in
January and February 2002. Concurrently with the asset purchase,
all of the other agreements between Charter Holdco and High
Speed Access Corp. (other than the license agreement described
above), namely the programming content agreement, the services
agreement, the systems access agreement, the 1998 network
services agreement and the May 2000 network services agreement,
were terminated. The revenues we earned from High Speed Access
for the year ended December 31, 2002 were approximately
$17 million. In addition, for the year ended
December 31, 2002, we paid High Speed Access approximately
$2 million under the 1998 network services agreement
and the 2000 network services agreement, representing a per
customer fee to High Speed Access according to agreed pricing
terms and compensation for services exceeding certain minimum
thresholds.
137
Immediately prior to the asset purchase, Vulcan Ventures
beneficially owned approximately 37%, and Charter Holdco and its
subsidiaries beneficially owned approximately 13%, of the common
stock of High Speed Access (including the shares of common stock
which could be acquired upon conversion of the Series D
preferred stock, and upon exercise of the warrants owned by
Charter Holdco). Following the consummation of the asset
purchase, neither Charter Holdco nor Vulcan Ventures
beneficially owned any securities of, or were otherwise
affiliated with, High Speed Access.
On May 12, 2000, Charter entered into a five-year network
services agreement with High Speed Access, which was assigned by
Charter Communications, Inc. to Charter Holdco on August 1,
2000. With respect to each system launched or intended to be
launched, we paid a per customer fee to High Speed Access
according to agreed pricing terms. In addition, we compensated
High Speed Access for services exceeding certain minimum
thresholds.
In 2001, Charter Holdco was a party to a systems access and
investment agreement with Vulcan Ventures and High Speed Access
and a related network services agreement with High Speed Access.
These agreements provided High Speed Access with exclusive
access to certain of our homes passed. The term of the network
services agreement was, as to a particular cable system, five
years from the date revenue billing commenced for that cable
system. The programming content agreement provided each of
Vulcan Ventures and High Speed Access with a license to use
certain content and materials of the other on a non-exclusive,
royalty-free basis.
Under the above described transactions, we also earned certain
warrants to purchase High Speed Access stock. These warrants
were cancelled in February 2002 in connection with the asset
purchase described above. As a result of the transaction with
High Speed Access described above, we neither paid to, nor
received, any amounts from High Speed Access in 2003.
TechTV, Inc. (TechTV) operated a cable television
network that offered programming mostly related to technology.
Pursuant to an affiliation agreement that originated in 1998 and
that terminates in 2008, TechTV has provided us with programming
for distribution via our cable systems. The affiliation
agreement provides, among other things, that TechTV must offer
Charter certain terms and conditions that are no less favorable
in the affiliation agreement than are given to any other
distributor that serves the same number of or fewer TechTV
viewing customers. Additionally, pursuant to the affiliation
agreement, we were entitled to incentive payments for channel
launches through December 31, 2003.
In March 2004, Charter Holdco entered into agreements with
Vulcan Programming and TechTV, which provide for
(i) Charter Holdco and TechTV to amend the affiliation
agreement which, among other things, revises the description of
the TechTV network content, provides for Charter Holdco to waive
certain claims against TechTV relating to alleged breaches of
the affiliation agreement and provides for TechTV to make
payment of outstanding launch receivables due to Charter Holdco
under the affiliation agreement, (ii) Vulcan Programming to
pay approximately $10 million and purchase over a 24-month
period, at fair market rates, $2 million of advertising
time across various cable networks on Charter cable systems in
consideration of the agreements, obligations, releases and
waivers under the agreements and in settlement of the
aforementioned claims and (iii) TechTV to be a provider of
content relating to technology and video gaming for
Charters interactive television platforms through
December 31, 2006 (exclusive for the first year). For the
years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and for the
three months ended March 31, 2005, we recognized
approximately $4 million, $1 million, $5 million
and $0.3 million, respectively, of the Vulcan Programming
payment as an offset to programming expense and paid
approximately $0.2 million, $80,600, $2 million and
$0.5 million, respectively, to TechTV under the affiliation
agreement.
We believe that Vulcan Programming, which is 100% owned by
Mr. Allen, owned an approximate 98% equity interest in
TechTV at the time Vulcan Programming sold TechTV to an
unrelated third party in May 2004. Until September 2003,
Mr. Savoy, a former Charter director, was the president and
director of Vulcan Programming and was a director of TechTV.
Mr. Wangberg, one of Charters directors, was the
138
chairman, chief executive officer and a director of TechTV.
Mr. Wangberg resigned as the chief executive officer of
TechTV in July 2002. He remained a director of TechTV along with
Mr. Allen until Vulcan Programming sold TechTV.
Oxygen Media LLC (Oxygen) provides programming
content aimed at the female audience for distribution over cable
systems and satellite. On July 22, 2002, Charter Holdco
entered into a carriage agreement with Oxygen, whereby we agreed
to carry programming content from Oxygen. Under the carriage
agreement, we currently make Oxygen programming available to
approximately 5 million of our video customers. The term of
the carriage agreement was retroactive to February 1, 2000,
the date of launch of Oxygen programming by us, and was to run
for a period of five years from that date. For the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and for the three months
ended March 31, 2005, we paid Oxygen approximately
$6 million, $9 million, $13 million and
$3 million, respectively, for programming content. In
addition, Oxygen pays us marketing support fees for customers
launched after the first year of the term of the carriage
agreement up to a total of $4 million. We recorded
approximately $2 million, $1 million, $1 million
and $0.1 million related to these launch incentives as a
reduction of programming expense for each of the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and for the three months
ended March 31, 2005, respectively.
Concurrently with the execution of the carriage agreement,
Charter Holdco entered into an equity issuance agreement
pursuant to which Oxygens parent company, Oxygen Media
Corporation (Oxygen Media), granted a subsidiary of
Charter Holdco a warrant to purchase 2.4 million
shares of Oxygen Media common stock for an exercise price of
$22.00 per share. In February 2005, this warrant expired
unexercised. Charter Holdco was also to receive unregistered
shares of Oxygen Media common stock with a guaranteed fair
market value on the date of issuance of $34 million, on or
prior to February 2, 2005, with the exact date to be
determined by Oxygen Media, but this commitment was later
revised as discussed below.
We recognize the guaranteed value of the investment over the
life of the carriage agreement as a reduction of programming
expense. For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and
2004 and for the three months ended March 31, 2005, we
recorded approximately $6 million, $9 million,
$13 million and $1 million, respectively, as a
reduction of programming expense. The carrying value of our
investment in Oxygen was approximately $10 million,
$19 million, $32 million and $33 million as of
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and March 31, 2005,
respectively.
In August 2004, Charter Holdco and Oxygen entered into
agreements that amended and renewed the carriage agreement. The
amendment to the carriage agreement (a) revises the number
of our customers to which Oxygen programming must be carried and
for which we must pay, (b) releases Charter Holdco from any
claims related to the failure to achieve distribution benchmarks
under the carriage agreement, (c) requires Oxygen to make
payment on outstanding receivables for marketing support fees
due to us under the carriage agreement; and (d) requires
that Oxygen provide its programming content to us on economic
terms no less favorable than Oxygen provides to any other cable
or satellite operator having fewer subscribers than us. The
renewal of the carriage agreement (a) extends the period
that we will carry Oxygen programming to our customers through
January 31, 2008, and (b) requires license fees to be
paid based on customers receiving Oxygen programming, rather
than for specific customer benchmarks.
In August 2004, Charter Holdco and Oxygen also amended the
equity issuance agreement to provide for the issuance of
1 million shares of Oxygen Preferred Stock with a
liquidation preference of $33.10 per share plus accrued
dividends to Charter Holdco in place of the $34 million of
unregistered shares of Oxygen Media common stock. Oxygen Media
delivered these shares in March 2005. The preferred stock is
convertible into common stock after December 31, 2007 at a
conversion ratio, the numerator of which is the liquidation
preference and the denominator which is the fair market value
per share of Oxygen Media common stock on the conversion date.
139
As of March 31, 2005, through Vulcan Programming,
Mr. Allen owned an approximate 31% interest in Oxygen
assuming no exercises of outstanding warrants or conversion or
exchange of convertible or exchangeable securities.
Ms. Jo Allen Patton is a director and the President of
Vulcan Programming. Mr. Lance Conn is a Vice President of
Vulcan Programming.
Marc Nathanson has an indirect beneficial interest of less than
1% in Oxygen.
|
|
|
Portland Trail Blazers and Action Sports Cable
Network |
On October 7, 1996, the former owner of our Falcon cable
systems entered into a letter agreement and a cable television
agreement with Trail Blazers Inc. for the cable broadcast in the
metropolitan area surrounding Portland, Oregon of pre-season,
regular season and playoff basketball games of the Portland
Trail Blazers, a National Basketball Association basketball
team. Mr. Allen is the 100% owner of the Portland Trail
Blazers and Trail Blazers Inc. After the acquisition of the
Falcon cable systems in November 1999, we continued to operate
under the terms of these agreements until their termination on
September 30, 2001. Under the letter agreement, Trail
Blazers Inc. was paid a fixed fee for each customer in areas
directly served by the Falcon cable systems. Under the cable
television agreement, we shared subscription revenues with Trail
Blazers Inc. For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003
and 2004 and for the three months ended March 31, 2005, we
paid approximately $1 million, $135,200, $96,100 and
$22,300, respectively, in connection with the cable broadcast of
Portland Trail Blazers basketball games under the October 1996
cable television agreement and subsequent local cable
distribution agreements.
On July 1, 2001, Charter Holdco and Action Sports Cable
Network (Action Sports), which was 100% owned by
Mr. Allen, entered into a new carriage agreement for a
five-year term, which became effective on October 1, 2001
with the expiration of the previous agreement. Under the July
2001 carriage agreement, Charter Holdco pays Action Sports a
fixed fee for each customer receiving the Action Sports
programming, which covered sporting events in the Pacific
Northwest, including the Portland Trail Blazers, the Seattle
Seahawks, a National Football League football team, and the
Portland Fire, a Womens National Basketball Association
basketball team. On November 5, 2002, Action Sports, which
was 100% owned by Mr. Allen, announced that it was
discontinuing its business following its failure to obtain an
acceptable carriage agreement with AT&T Cable, the cable
television provider in Portland, Oregon. Action Sports service
was terminated on November 5, 2002 and Charter Holdco
ceased carriage of the service. For the year ended
December 31, 2002, we paid Action Sports approximately
$1 million for rights to carry its programming.
Charter Holdco executed a Software License Agreement effective
September 30, 2002, with Click2learn, Inc.
(Click2learn), a company which provided enterprise
software for organizations seeking to capture, manage and
disseminate knowledge throughout their extended enterprise. As
of December 31, 2003, Mr. Allen owned an approximate
21% interest in Click2learn through 616,120 shares held of
record by Vulcan Ventures and 387,096 shares issuable upon
exercise of a warrant issued to Vulcan Ventures. In March 2004,
Click2learn was merged with an unrelated company, resulting in a
new company, SumTotal Systems, Inc., which is publicly
traded. We have been informed by Vulcan that, as of
December 31, 2004, Mr. Allen owned an approximate 10%
interest in SumTotal Systems, Inc. through his ownership in
Vulcan Ventures. Mr. Allen owns 100% of Vulcan Ventures.
Ms. Jo Allen Patton is a director and Vice President
of Vulcan Ventures. Mr. Lance Conn is Executive Vice
President of Vulcan Ventures. For the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, we paid approximately
$250,000, $57,100 and $0, respectively, to Click2learn. For the
year ended December 31, 2004 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, we paid approximately $0 and $0,
respectively to SumTotal Systems, Inc.
In March 2001, Charter Ventures and Vulcan Ventures Incorporated
formed DBroadband Holdings, LLC for the sole purpose of
purchasing equity interests in Digeo. In connection with the
execution of the broadband carriage agreement, DBroadband
Holdings, LLC purchased an equity interest in Digeo funded by
contributions from Vulcan Ventures Incorporated. The equity
interest is subject to a priority return of
140
capital to Vulcan Ventures up to the amount contributed by
Vulcan Ventures on Charter Ventures behalf. After Vulcan
Ventures recovers its amount contributed and any cumulative loss
allocations, Charter Ventures has a 100% profit interest in
DBroadband Holdings, LLC. Charter Ventures is not required to
make any capital contributions, including capital calls, and may
require Vulcan Ventures, through January 24, 2004, to make
certain additional contributions through DBroadband Holdings,
LLC to acquire additional equity in Digeo as necessary to
maintain Charter Ventures pro rata interest in Digeo in
the event of certain future Digeo equity financings by the
founders of Digeo. These additional equity interests are also
subject to a priority return of capital to Vulcan Ventures up to
amounts contributed by Vulcan Ventures on Charter Ventures
behalf. DBroadband Holdings, LLC is therefore not included in
our consolidated financial statements. Pursuant to an amended
version of this arrangement, in 2003, Vulcan Ventures
contributed a total of $29 million to Digeo,
$7 million of which was contributed on Charter
Ventures behalf, subject to Vulcan Ventures
aforementioned priority return. Since the formation of
DBroadband Holdings, LLC, Vulcan Ventures has contributed
approximately $56 million on Charter Ventures behalf.
On March 2, 2001, a subsidiary of Charter, Charter
Communications Ventures, LLC (Charter Ventures)
entered into a broadband carriage agreement with Digeo
Interactive, LLC (Digeo Interactive), a wholly owned
subsidiary of Digeo, Inc. (Digeo), an entity
controlled by Paul Allen. The carriage agreement provided that
Digeo Interactive would provide to Charter a portal
product, which would function as the television-based Internet
portal (the initial point of entry to the Internet) for
Charters customers who received Internet access from
Charter. The agreement term was for 25 years and Charter
agreed to use the Digeo portal exclusively for six years. Before
the portal product was delivered to Charter, Digeo terminated
development of the portal product.
On September 27, 2001, Charter and Digeo Interactive
amended the broadband carriage agreement. According to the
amendment, Digeo Interactive would provide to Charter the
content for enhanced Wink interactive television
services, known as Charter Interactive Channels
(i-channels). In order to provide the i-channels,
Digeo Interactive sublicensed certain Wink technologies to
Charter. Charter is entitled to share in the revenues generated
by the i-channels. Currently, our digital video customers who
receive i-channels receive the service at no additional charge.
On September 28, 2002, Charter entered into a second
amendment to its broadband carriage agreement with Digeo
Interactive. This amendment supersedes the amendment of
September 27, 2001. It provides for the development by
Digeo Interactive of future features to be included in the Basic
i-TV service provided by Digeo and for Digeos development
of an interactive toolkit to enable Charter to
develop interactive local content. Furthermore, Charter may
request that Digeo Interactive manage local content for a fee.
The amendment provides for Charter to pay for development of the
Basic i-TV service as well as license fees for customers who
receive the service, and for Charter and Digeo to split certain
revenues earned from the service. In 2002, 2003 and 2004 and for
the three months ended March 31, 2005, we paid Digeo
Interactive approximately $3 million, $4 million,
$3 million and $2 million, respectively, for
customized development of the i-channels and the local content
tool kit. We received no revenues under the broadband carriage
agreement in 2003. This amendment expired pursuant to its terms
on December 31, 2003. Digeo Interactive is continuing to
provide the Basic i-TV service on a month-to-month basis.
On June 30, 2003, Charter Holdco entered into an agreement
with Motorola, Inc. for the purchase of 100,000 digital video
recorder (DVR) units. The software for these DVR
units is being supplied by Digeo Interactive under a license
agreement entered into in April 2004. Under the license
agreement Digeo Interactive granted to Charter Holdco the right
to use Digeos proprietary software for the number of DVR
units that Charter deploys from a maximum of 10 headends through
year-end 2004. This maximum number of headends was increased
from 10 to 15 pursuant to a letter agreement executed on
June 11, 2004 and the date for entering into license
agreements for units deployed was extended to June 30,
2005. The number of headends was increased from 15 to 20
pursuant to a letter agreement dated August 4, 2004, from
20 to 30 pursuant to a letter agreement dated September 28,
2004 and from 30 to 50 headends by a letter agreement in
February 2005. The license granted for each unit deployed under
the
141
agreement is valid for five years. In addition, Charter will pay
certain other fees including a per-headend license fee and
maintenance fees. Maximum license and maintenance fees during
the term of the agreement are expected to be approximately
$7 million. The agreement provides that Charter is entitled
to receive contract terms, considered on the whole, and license
fees, considered apart from other contract terms, no less
favorable than those accorded to any other Digeo customer.
Charter paid approximately $474,400 and $920,300 in license and
maintenance fees for the year ending December 31, 2004 and
the three months ending March 31, 2005, respectively.
In April 2004, we launched DVR service (using units containing
the Digeo software) in our Rochester, Minnesota market using a
broadband media center that is an integrated set-top terminal
with a cable converter, DVR hard drive and connectivity to other
consumer electronics devices (such as stereos, MP3 players, and
digital cameras).
In May 2004, Charter Holdco entered into a binding term sheet
with Digeo Interactive for the development, testing and purchase
of 70,000 Digeo PowerKey DVR units. The term sheet provided that
the parties would proceed in good faith to negotiate, prior to
year-end 2004, definitive agreements for the development,
testing and purchase of the DVR units and that the parties would
enter into a license agreement for Digeos proprietary
software on terms substantially similar to the terms of the
license agreement described above. In November 2004, Charter
Holdco and Digeo Interactive executed the license agreement and
in December 2004, the parties executed the purchase agreement,
each on terms substantially similar to the binding term sheet.
Total purchase price and license and maintenance fees during the
term of the definitive agreements are expected to be
approximately $41 million. The definitive agreements are
terminable at no penalty to Charter in certain circumstances.
In late 2003, Microsoft sued Digeo for $9 million in a
breach of contract action, involving an agreement that Digeo and
Microsoft had entered into in 2001. Digeo informed us that it
believed it had an indemnification claim against us for half
that amount. Digeo settled with Microsoft agreeing to make a
cash payment and to purchase certain amounts of Microsoft
software products and consulting services through 2008. In
consideration of Digeo agreeing to release us from its potential
claim against us, after consultation with outside counsel we
agreed, in June 2005, to purchase a total of $2.3 million
in Microsoft consulting services through 2008, a portion of
which amounts Digeo has informed us will count against
Digeos purchase obligations with Microsoft. To date, we
have made no such payments under this agreement.
We believe that Vulcan Ventures, an entity controlled by
Mr. Allen, owns an approximate 60% equity interest in
Digeo, Inc., on a fully-converted non-diluted basis.
Mr. Allen is a director of Digeo, and Mr. Vogel was a
director of Digeo in 2002, 2003 and 2004. During 2002, 2003,
2004 and 2005, Mr. Vogel held options to
purchase 10,000 shares of Digeo common stock.
Other Miscellaneous Relationships
Pursuant to certain affiliation agreements with networks of
Viacom, Inc. (Viacom), including MTV, MTV2,
Nickelodeon, VH1, TVLand, CMT, Spike TV, Comedy Central,
Viacom Digital Suite, CBS-owned and operated broadcast stations,
Showtime, The Movie Channel, and Flix, Viacom provides Charter
with programming for distribution via our cable systems. The
affiliation agreements provide for, among other things, rates
and terms of carriage, advertising on the Viacom networks, which
Charter can sell to local advertisers and marketing support. For
the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and for
the three months ended March 31, 2005, Charter paid Viacom
approximately $177 million, $188 million,
$194 million and $50 million, respectively, for
programming. Charter recorded approximately $5 million,
$5 million, $8 million and $0 as receivables from
Viacom networks related to launch incentives for certain
channels and marketing support, respectively, for the years
ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and for the three
months ended March 31, 2005. From April 1994 to July 2004,
Mr. Dolgen served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of the Viacom Entertainment Group.
142
|
|
|
ADC Telecommunications Inc. |
Charter and Charter Holdco purchase certain equipment for use in
our business from ADC Telecommunications, which provides
broadband access and network equipment. Mr. Wangberg serves
as a director for ADC Telecommunications. For the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and for the three months
ended March 31, 2005, we paid $759,600, $60,100, $344,800
and $112,800, respectively, to ADC Telecommunications under this
arrangement.
|
|
|
HDNet and HDNet Movies Network |
On January 10, 2003 we signed an agreement to carry two
around-the-clock, high-definition networks, HDNet and HDNet
Movies. HDNet Movies delivers a commercial-free schedule of
full-length feature films converted from 35mm to
high-definition, including titles from an extensive library of
Warner Bros. films. HDNet Movies will feature a mix of
theatrical releases, made-for-TV movies, independent films and
shorts. The HDNet channel features a variety of HDTV
programming, including live sports, sitcoms, dramas, action
series, documentaries, travel programs, music concerts and
shows, special events, and news features including the popular
HDNet World Report. HDNet also offers a selection of classic and
recent television series. We paid HDNet and HDNet Movies
approximately $21,900, $609,100 and $447,400 in 2003 and 2004
and for the three months ended March 31, 2005. We believe
that entities controlled by Mr. Cuban owned approximately
81% of HDNet as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 and for the
three months ended March 31, 2005. As of March 31,
2005, we believe that Mark Cuban, co-founder and president of
HDNet, owned approximately 19,000,000 shares, or 6.2% of the
total common equity in Charter based on a Schedule 13G
filed with the SEC on May 21, 2003. However, we believe
Mr. Cuban disposed of his interest in Charter in April 2005.
|
|
|
Affiliate Leases and Agreements |
David L. McCall, who served as Senior Vice President
Operations Eastern Division during 2002 and January
2003, is a partner in a partnership that leases office space to
us under a lease agreement, which expires December 31,
2010. The partnership received approximately $117,600, $189,200,
$43,400 and $0 pursuant to such lease and related agreements for
the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and for
the three months ended March 31, 2005, respectively. In
addition, during 2002 and 2003, we paid approximately $644,800
and $381,300, respectively, for construction services to a
construction company controlled by Mr. McCalls
brother under a construction agreement that expired on
December 31, 2003. We also paid approximately
$3 million, $373,800, $0 and $0 during 2002, 2003 and 2004
and for the three months ended March 31, 2005,
respectively, for construction services to a construction
company controlled by Mr. McCalls son under several
agreements, the last of which expired January 31, 2004.
Companies controlled by Mr. Nathanson, a director of
Charter, leased certain warehouse space in Riverside,
California, to our subsidiaries. For the years ended
December 31, 2002 and 2003, total rent paid for the
Riverside warehouse space was approximately $76,000 and $16,600,
respectively, under a lease agreement which expired
March 15, 2003.
We have carried The Outdoor Channel on a month-to-month basis
since the expiration of an affiliation agreement in
July 2002. We paid approximately $1 million,
$1 million, $1 million and $298,300 to The Outdoor
Channel during 2002, 2003 and 2004 and for the three months
ended March 31, 2005, respectively. In December 2003,
Mr. Merritt became director of Outdoor Channel Holdings,
Inc., an affiliate of The Outdoor Channel, Inc.
|
|
|
Payments for Relatives Services |
Additionally, in 1999, Heather Wood, a daughter of Howard Wood,
a former director, who resigned as a Vice President of Charter
Holdco in February 2002, received a bonus in the form of a
three-year
143
promissory note bearing interest at 7% per year. One-third
of the original outstanding principal amount of the note and
interest were forgiven as long as she remained employed by
Charter Holdco at the end of each of the first three
anniversaries of the issue date in February 1999. The amount of
principal and interest forgiven on this note for the year ended
December 31, 2001, was $85,500, and the outstanding balance
on the note was forgiven effective as of February 22, 2002.
Since June 2003, Mr. Vogels brother-in-law has been
an employee of Charter Holdco and has received a salary
commensurate with his position in the engineering department.
We believe that, through a third party advertising agency, we
have paid approximately $113,200, $79,700 and $49,700, in 2002,
2003 and 2004, respectively, to Mapleton Communications, an
affiliate of Mapleton Investments, LLC that owns radio stations
in Oregon and California. Mr. Nathanson is the Chairman and
owner of Mapleton Investments, LLC.
|
|
|
Purchase of Certain Enstar Limited Partnership Systems;
Management Fees |
In April 2002, Interlink Communications Partners, LLC, Rifkin
Acquisition Partners, LLC and Charter Communications
Entertainment I, LLC, each an indirect, wholly owned
subsidiary of Charter Holdings, completed the cash purchase of
certain assets of Enstar Income Program II-2, L.P., Enstar
Income/ Growth Program Six-A, L.P., Enstar Income Program IV-1,
L.P., Enstar Income Program IV-2, L.P., and Enstar Income
Program IV-3, L.P., serving approximately 21,600 customers, for
a total cash sale price of approximately $48 million. In
September 2002, Charter Communications Entertainment I, LLC
purchased all of Enstar Income Program II-1, L.P.s
Illinois cable television systems, serving approximately 6,400
customers, for a cash sale price of $15 million. Enstar
Communications Corporation, a direct subsidiary of Charter
Holdco is a general partner of the Enstar limited partnerships
but does not exercise control over them. The purchase prices
were allocated to assets acquired based on fair values,
including approximately $41 million assigned to franchises
and $4 million assigned to other intangible assets
amortized over a useful life of three years.
In addition, Enstar Cable Corporation, the manager of the Enstar
limited partnerships through a management agreement, engaged
Charter Holdco to manage the Enstar limited partnerships.
Pursuant to the management agreement, Charter Holdco provides
management services to the Enstar limited partnerships in
exchange for management fees. The Enstar limited partnerships
also purchase basic and premium programming for their systems at
cost from Charter Holdco. For the years ended December 31,
2002, 2003 and 2004 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, Charter Holdco earned approximately
$1 million, $469,300, $0 and $0, respectively, by providing
management services to the Enstar limited partnerships. In
September 2003 the Enstar limited partnerships completed sales
of all their remaining assets, and as a result no further
management fees were paid in 2004. In November 2004, the Enstar
limited partnerships were dissolved.
All of the executive officers of Charter (with the exception of
Mr. Allen), Charter Holdco and Charter Holdings act as
officers of Enstar Communications Corporation.
Pursuant to Charters bylaws (and the employment agreements
of certain of our current and former officers), Charter is
obligated (subject to certain limitations) to indemnify and hold
harmless, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any officer,
director or employee against all expense, liability and loss
(including, among other things, attorneys fees) reasonably
incurred or suffered by such officer, director or employee as a
result of the fact that he or she is a party or is threatened to
be made a party or is otherwise involved in any action, suit or
proceeding by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a
director, officer or employee of Charter. In addition, Charter
is obligated to pay, as an advancement of its indemnification
obligation, the expenses (including attorneys fees)
incurred by any officer, director or employee in defending any
such action, suit or proceeding in advance of its final
disposition, subject to an obligation to
144
repay those amounts under certain circumstances. Pursuant to
these indemnification arrangements and as an advancement of
costs, Charter has reimbursed certain of its current and former
directors and executive officers a total of approximately
$3 million, $8 million, $3 million and $0 in
respect of invoices received in 2002, 2003 and 2004 and for the
three months ended March 31, 2005, respectively, in
connection with their defense of certain legal actions described
herein. See Business Legal Proceedings.
Those current and former directors and officers include: Paul G.
Allen, David C. Andersen, David G. Barford, Mary Pat Blake, J.
Christian Fenger, Kent D. Kalkwarf, Ralph G. Kelly, Jerald L.
Kent, Paul E. Martin, David L. McCall, Ronald L. Nelson, Nancy
B. Peretsman, John C. Pietri, William D. Savoy, Steven A.
Schumm, Curtis S. Shaw, William J. Shreffer, Stephen E. Silva,
James Trey Smith and Carl E. Vogel. These amounts were submitted
to Charters director and officer insurance carrier and
have been reimbursed consistent with the terms of the Securities
Class Action and Derivative Action Settlements described in
Business Legal Proceedings. On or about
February 22, 2005, Charter filed lawsuits against the four
former officers who were indicted and pled guilty as part of the
government investigation conducted by the United States
Attorneys Office. These suits seek to recover fees and
related expenses that Charter advanced these former officers
under the indemnification provisions described above. One of
these former officers, James Smith, has counterclaimed against
Charter alleging, among other things, that Charter owes him
additional indemnification for legal fees that Charter did not
pay. Another of these former officers, David McCall, has
counterclaimed against Charter that Charter owes him accrued
sick leave.
145
DESCRIPTION OF NOTES
The 5.875% convertible senior notes due 2009 offered hereby (the
Notes) were issued under an indenture dated as of
November 22, 2004 between us and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
trustee. Copies of the indenture, the pledge agreement, the
resale registration rights agreement and the borrow facility
registration rights agreement are included as exhibits to the
registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part and
will be made available upon request. We have summarized portions
of these documents below. This summary is not complete. We urge
you to read the indenture, the pledge agreement, the resale
registration rights agreement and the borrow facility
registration rights agreement because these documents define
your rights as a holder of the Notes. In this section,
Charter Communications, Inc., we,
our and us each refers only to Charter
Communications, Inc. and not to any existing or future
subsidiary.
General
The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of Charter
Communications, Inc. and are convertible into our Class A
common stock as described under Conversion
Rights below. The Notes were issued in an aggregate
original principal amount of $862,500,000 and will mature on
November 16, 2009.
The Notes bear interest at the rate of 5.875% per year on
the accreted principal amount from November 22, 2004, the
date of original issuance of the Notes, or from the most recent
date to which interest had been paid or provided for. Interest
is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 16 and
November 16 of each year, commencing May 16, 2005, to
holders of record at the close of business on the preceding
May 1 and November 1, respectively. Interest is
computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve
30-day months. In the event of the maturity, conversion,
purchase by us at the option of the holder or redemption of a
Note, interest will cease to accrue on the Note under the terms
of and subject to the conditions of the indenture.
Principal is payable, and Notes may be presented for conversion,
registration of transfer and exchange, without service charge,
at our office or agency in New York, New York, which is
initially the office or agency of the trustee in New York, New
York. See Form, Denomination and
Registration.
The principal amount of the Notes will increase if we elect to
accrete the principal amount to pay liquidated damages we may
owe in connection with the registered borrow facility. See
Registered Borrow Facility Registration Rights
on Shares Covered by Share Lending Agreement. We will be
entitled to defer any interest, which we refer to as the
deferred interest, that accrues with respect to the excess of
the accreted principal amount over the original principal amount
until May 16, 2008, or any earlier purchase by us at the
option of the holder, redemption or acceleration of the Notes.
We will pay any accrued deferred interest on May 16, 2008
to the record holders of the Notes as of the close of business
on May 1, 2008 unless paid earlier. We may elect to pay any
accrued deferred interest on any interest payment date prior to
May 16, 2008 if we notify the trustee and the record
holders of Notes at least 10 days prior to the record date
for such interest payment date. We will not pay any additional
interest on such accrued deferred interest.
The indenture does not contain any financial covenants or any
restrictions on the payment of dividends, the incurrence of
senior debt or other indebtedness, or the issuance or repurchase
of securities by us. The indenture will contain no covenants or
other provisions to protect holders of the Notes in the event of
a highly leveraged transaction or a fundamental change, except
to the extent described under Fundamental
Change Requires Us to Repurchase Notes at the Option of the
Holder below.
Ranking
The Notes are our unsecured, except with respect to the Pledged
Securities as described below, and unsubordinated obligations.
The Notes rank, in right of payment, the same as all of our
existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness,
except with respect to the Pledged Securities as described
below. The Notes rank senior in right of payment to all of our
subordinated indebtedness and will be
146
effectively subordinated to any secured indebtedness, except
with respect to the Pledged Securities as described below, and
structurally subordinated to indebtedness and other liabilities
of our subsidiaries.
As of March 31, 2005, Charter Communications, Inc. had no
secured indebtedness and our subsidiaries had total indebtedness
and other liabilities of $20.5 billion, excluding
intercompany obligations.
Security
Our subsidiary, Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC,
which we refer to as Charter Holdco, has purchased and pledged
to us as security for an intercompany note, and pursuant to a
pledge agreement we repledged to the trustee as security for the
benefit of the holders of the Notes (and not for the benefit of
our other creditors), U.S. government securities, which we
refer to as the Pledged Securities, in such amount as will be
sufficient upon receipt of scheduled payments with respect to
such Pledged Securities to provide for payment in full of the
first six scheduled interest payments due on the Notes, without
regard to any liquidated damages we may owe or any deferred
interest in respect of accretion of the principal amount of the
Notes. Charter Holdco used approximately $144 million of
the net proceeds from the offering to acquire such Pledged
Securities.
The Pledged Securities were repledged by us to the trustee for
the exclusive benefit of the holders of the Notes and are held
by the trustee in a pledge account. Immediately prior to each of
the first six interest payment dates, the trustee will release
from the pledge account cash generated by Pledged Securities
then maturing sufficient to pay the interest then due on the
original principal amount of the Notes. A failure to pay
interest on the original principal amount of the Notes when due
through the first six scheduled interest payment dates will
constitute an immediate event of default under the indenture,
with no grace period (unless the failure to make such payment
results from the failure by the trustee to release such proceeds
from the pledge account, provided such failure is not caused by
any act or omission by us). Upon any conversion of Notes prior
to November 16, 2007, the trustee will liquidate a portion
of the Pledged Securities and release from the pledge account
proceeds sufficient to pay the Early Conversion Make Whole
Amount described under Conversion
Rights Interest Make Whole Upon Conversion. If
any Early Conversion Make Whole Amount is limited by the formula
described therein, the portion of the proceeds of the
liquidation of the Pledged Securities not paid to the converting
holder as a result of such limitation will be released to
Charter Holdco from the pledge account.
If prior to November 16, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
an event of default under the Notes occurs and is
continuing, and |
|
|
|
the trustee or the holders of 25% in aggregate original
principal amount of the Notes accelerate the Notes by declaring
the accreted principal amount of the Notes to be immediately due
and payable (by written consent, at a meeting of Note holders or
otherwise), except for the occurrence of an event of default
relating to our bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization, upon
which the Notes will be accelerated automatically, |
then the proceeds from the liquidation of the Pledged Securities
will be promptly released to Note holders, subject to the
automatic stay provisions of bankruptcy law, if applicable.
Distributions from the pledge account will be applied:
|
|
|
|
|
first, to any accrued and unpaid interest on the Notes, and |
|
|
|
second, to the extent available, to the repayment of a portion
of the principal amount of the Notes. |
However, if any event of default is cured or waived prior to the
acceleration of the Notes by the trustee or holders of the Notes
referred to above, the trustee and the holders of the Notes will
not be able to accelerate the Notes as a result of that event of
default.
For example, if the first two interest payments were made when
due but the third interest payment was not made when due and the
Note holders promptly exercised their right to declare the
accreted principal amount of the Notes to be immediately due and
payable then, assuming automatic stay
147
provisions of bankruptcy law are inapplicable and the proceeds
of the Pledged Securities are promptly distributed from the
pledge account,
|
|
|
|
|
an amount equal to the interest payment due with respect to the
third interest payment would be distributed from the pledge
account as accrued interest, and |
|
|
|
the balance of the proceeds of the pledge account would be
distributed as a portion of the principal amount of the Notes. |
In addition, Note holders would have an unsecured claim against
us for the remainder of the accreted principal amount of their
Notes.
Once we make the first six scheduled interest payments on the
Notes, all of the remaining Pledged Securities, if any, will be
released to Charter Holdco from the pledge account and
thereafter the Notes will be unsecured.
Conversion Rights
Holders may convert their Notes into shares of our Class A
common stock at an initial conversion rate of
413.2231 shares of our Class A common stock, par value
$.001 per share, per $1,000 original principal amount of
Notes, unless previously redeemed or purchased. This is
equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately
$2.42 per share.
The conversion rate and the equivalent conversion price in
effect at any given time are referred to as the applicable
conversion rate and the applicable conversion
price, respectively, and will be subject to adjustment as
set forth in Conversion Rate Adjustments
below. In addition, if we elect to accrete the principal amount
of the Notes to pay any liquidated damages, we will increase the
conversion rate at the same rate as the accretion rate and over
the same period of time. A holder may convert fewer than all of
such holders Notes so long as the Notes converted are a
multiple of $1,000 original principal amount.
Upon conversion of a Note, a holder will not receive any cash
payment of interest (unless such conversion occurs between a
regular record date and the interest payment date to which it
relates), subject to our obligations described under
Interest Make Whole Upon Conversion
below, and we will not adjust the conversion rate to account for
accrued and unpaid interest. Our delivery to the holder of cash
and shares, if any, of our Class A common stock into which
the Note is convertible will be deemed to satisfy our obligation
with respect to such Note, subject to our obligations described
under Interest Make Whole Upon
Conversion below. Except to the extent we are required to
make payments in respect of such obligations, any accrued but
unpaid interest will be deemed to be paid in full upon
conversion, rather than cancelled, extinguished or forfeited.
For a discussion of the tax treatment to a holder of receiving
our Class A common stock upon conversion, see United
States Federal Income Tax Considerations.
Holders of Notes at the close of business on a regular record
date will receive payment of interest payable on the
corresponding interest payment date notwithstanding the
conversion of such Notes at any time after the close of business
on the applicable regular record date. Notes surrendered for
conversion by a holder after the close of business on any
regular record date but prior to the next interest payment date
must be accompanied by payment of an amount equal to the
interest that the holder is to receive on the Notes;
provided, however, that no such payment need be made
(1) if the conversion date is prior to November 16,
2007, (2) we have specified a redemption date that is after
a record date and on or prior to the next interest payment date,
(3) if we have specified a purchase date following a
fundamental change that is after a record date and on or prior
to the next interest payment date or (4) only to the extent
of overdue interest, if any overdue interest exists at the time
of conversion with respect to such Note.
If a holder converts Notes, we will pay any documentary, stamp
or similar issue or transfer tax due on the issue of shares of
our Class A common stock upon the conversion, if any,
unless the tax is due because
148
the holder requests the shares to be issued or delivered to a
person other than the holder, in which case the holder will pay
that tax.
If a holder wishes to exercise its conversion right, such holder
must deliver an irrevocable duly completed conversion notice,
together, if the Notes are in certificated form, with the
certificated security, to the conversion agent along with
appropriate endorsements and transfer documents, if required,
and pay any transfer or similar tax, if required. The date a
holder makes such required deliveries is the conversion date for
the Notes converted. The conversion agent will, on the
holders behalf, convert the Notes into shares of our
Class A common stock, subject to our right to deliver cash
or a combination of cash and shares. Holders may obtain copies
of the required form of the conversion notice from the
conversion agent. A certificate, or a book-entry transfer
through The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, or
DTC, for the number of full shares of our Class A common
stock into which any Notes are converted, together with a cash
payment for any fractional shares, and cash or shares, if
applicable, with respect to any Early Conversion Make Whole
Amount or Redemption Make Whole Amount as described under
Interest Make Whole Upon Conversion
below, will be delivered through the conversion agent on the
conversion settlement date, which will be as soon as
practicable, but no later than the fifth business day, following
the conversion date, unless we elect cash settlement as
described under Cash Settlement Option
below. The trustee will initially act as the conversion agent.
Notes called for redemption may be surrendered for conversion at
any time prior to the close of business on the business day
immediately preceding the redemption date. If a holder has
already delivered a purchase notice as described under
Fundamental Change Requires Us to Repurchase
Notes at the Option of the Holder with respect to a Note,
however, the holder may not surrender that Note for conversion
until the holder has withdrawn the purchase notice in accordance
with the indenture.
Upon conversion, we will have the right to deliver, in lieu of
shares of our Class A common stock, cash or a combination
of cash and Class A common stock. We will inform converting
holders through the trustee no later than two business days
following the conversion date if we elect to pay cash in lieu of
delivering shares and will specify in such notice the percentage
of the shares otherwise deliverable for which we will pay cash,
unless we have already informed holders of our election in a
notice of redemption for the Notes, as described under
Redemption below. If we elect to pay
holders cash upon conversion, such payment will be based on the
average price of our Class A common stock. If we elect cash
settlement, the conversion settlement date on which
we deliver the cash and shares of our Class A common stock,
if any, together with the cash or shares, if applicable, with
respect to any Early Conversion Make Whole Amount or Redemption
Make Whole Amount, to converting holders will be the third
business day following the determination of the average price.
We will deliver cash in lieu of any fractional shares of our
Class A common stock issuable in connection with any
conversion of Notes based upon the average price.
The average price of our Class A common stock
means, with respect to any conversion of Notes, the average of
the sale prices of our Class A common stock over the 20
trading day period beginning on the third trading day
immediately following the applicable conversion date.
The sale price of our Class A common stock on
any date means the closing sale price per share (or if no
closing sale price is reported, the average of the bid and asked
prices or, if more than one in either case, the average of the
average bid and the average asked prices) on that date as
reported in transactions for the principal U.S. securities
exchange on which our common stock is traded or, if our common
stock is not listed on a U.S. national or regional
securities exchange, as reported by the Nasdaq National Market.
The sale price will be determined without reference to
after-hours or extended market trading.
If our Class A common stock is not listed for trading on a
U.S. national or regional securities exchange and not
reported by the Nasdaq National Market on the relevant date, the
sale price will be the last quoted bid price for our
common stock on the Nasdaq Small Cap Market or in the
over-the-counter market on the relevant date as reported by Pink
Sheets LLC or any similar organization.
149
If our Class A common stock is not so quoted, the
sale price will be the average of the mid-point of
the last bid and asked prices for our common stock on the
relevant date from each of at least three nationally recognized
independent investment banking firms selected by us for this
purpose.
Trading day means a day during which trading in
securities generally occurs on the principal U.S. national
or regional securities exchange on which our Class A common
stock is then listed or, if our Class A common stock is not
then listed on a national or regional securities exchange, on
the Nasdaq National Market or, if our Class A common stock
is not then quoted on Nasdaq National Market, on the principal
other market on which our Class A common stock is then
traded.
|
|
|
Limitation on Beneficial Ownership |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no holder of Notes will be
entitled to receive shares of our Class A common stock upon
conversion to the extent (but only to the extent) that such
receipt would cause such converting holder to become, directly
or indirectly, a beneficial owner (within the
meaning of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and the rules
and regulations promulgated thereunder) of more than the
specified percentage of the shares of Class A common stock
outstanding at such time. With respect to any conversion prior
to November 16, 2008, the specified percentage will be
4.9%, and with respect to any conversion thereafter until the
maturity of the Notes, the specified percentage will be 9.9%.
Any purported delivery of shares of our Class A common
stock upon conversion of Notes shall be void and have no effect
to the extent (but only to the extent) that such delivery would
result in the converting holder becoming the beneficial owner of
more than the specified percentage of the shares of Class A
common stock outstanding at such time. If any delivery of shares
of our Class A common stock owed to a holder upon
conversion of Notes is not made, in whole or in part, as a
result of this limitation, our obligation to make such delivery
shall not be extinguished and we shall deliver such shares as
promptly as practicable after, but in no event later than two
trading days after, any such converting holder gives notice to
us that such delivery would not result in it being the
beneficial owner of more than the specified percentage of the
shares of Class A common stock outstanding at such time.
|
|
|
Interest Make Whole Upon Conversion |
|
|
|
Early Conversion Make Whole Amount |
Holders who convert their Notes prior to November 16, 2007
will receive, in addition to a number of shares of our
Class A common stock equal to the conversion rate, or cash
in lieu thereof, the cash proceeds, subject to the limitation
described below, of the sale by the trustee of the Pledged
Securities remaining with respect to the Notes being converted,
which we refer to as the Early Conversion Make Whole Amount;
provided that if a holder converts Notes after the close
of business on any regular record date but prior to the next
interest payment date, the Pledged Securities with respect to
the Notes being converted that will mature immediately prior to
the applicable interest payment date shall be excluded from such
sale and from the Early Conversion Make Whole Amount since the
proceeds thereof will be paid to such holder on such interest
payment date. The Early Conversion Make Whole Amount will not
compensate a converting holder for any deferred interest in
respect of accretion of the principal amount of the Notes if we
elect to accrete such principal amount to pay any liquidated
damages we may owe.
Upon receipt by the conversion agent of a conversion notice, the
trustee will liquidate a portion of the Pledged Securities,
excluding, in the case of any conversion after the close of
business on any regular record date but prior to the next
interest payment date, Pledged Securities that will mature
immediately prior to the applicable interest payment date,
rounded down to the nearest whole multiple of the minimum
denomination of such Pledged Securities, and release the cash
proceeds thereof to the converting holder. The percentage of the
remaining Pledged Securities to be sold will be determined based
on the aggregate original principal amount of Notes being
converted as a percentage of the total original principal amount
of Notes then outstanding.
If a holder converts Notes prior to the earlier of (1) the
sale of such Notes pursuant to an effective registration
statement (including under this prospectus) or
(2) November 22, 2006, the Early Conversion
150
Make Whole Amount such holder will receive upon conversion of
each $1,000 original principal amount of Notes will not exceed
$18.18, which is the amount determined pursuant to the following
formula:
Where CR is 413.2231, the initial conversion rate for the Notes
and OP is $2.16, the last reported sale price of our
Class A common stock on the date we priced this offering of
Notes. The portion of the Early Conversion Make Whole Amount not
paid to the holder upon conversion of its Notes because of the
limitation described above will be paid to Charter Holdco
promptly following the sale of the relevant Pledged Securities.
Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, the cash proceeds
received upon conversion by any holders who convert Notes that
have been called for redemption will not be limited by the
formula described above.
|
|
|
Redemption Make Whole Amount |
Any holders who convert Notes that have been called for
redemption shall receive, in addition to the Early Conversion
Make Whole Amount, if applicable, the present value of the
interest on the Notes converted that would have been payable for
the period from and including November 16, 2007, or if
later, the redemption date, to but excluding November 16,
2009, plus any accrued and unpaid deferred interest, which we
refer to as the Redemption Make Whole Amount. The Redemption
Make Whole Amount shall be calculated by discounting the amount
of such interest, other than any deferred interest, on a
semi-annual basis using a discount rate equal to 3.0% plus the
arithmetic mean of the yields under the respective headings
This Week and Last Week published in the
Statistical Release under the caption Treasury Constant
Maturities for the maturity (rounded to the nearest month)
corresponding to the period from and including the redemption
date to but excluding November 16, 2009. If no maturity
exactly corresponds to such maturity, yields for the two
published maturities most closely corresponding to such maturity
shall be calculated pursuant to the immediately preceding
sentence and the applicable rate shall be interpolated or
extrapolated from such yields on a straight-line basis, rounding
in each of such relevant periods to the nearest month. For the
purpose of calculating the applicable rate, the most recent
Statistical Release published prior to the date of determination
of the Redemption Make Whole Amount shall be used.
The term Statistical Release shall mean the
statistical release designated H.15(519) or any
successor publication which is published weekly by the Federal
Reserve System and which establishes yields on actively traded
U.S. government securities adjusted to constant maturities
or, if such statistical release is not published at the time of
any determination under the indenture, then such other
reasonably comparable index that we will designate.
We may pay the Redemption Make Whole Amount in cash or in shares
of our Class A common stock, with the number of such shares
determined based on the average of the sale prices of our
Class A common stock over the ten trading days immediately
preceding the applicable conversion date. If we elect to pay the
Redemption Make Whole Amount in shares of our Class A
common stock, the number of shares we deliver, together with the
shares deliverable upon conversion, shall not exceed 462 per
$1,000 original principal amount of Notes, subject to adjustment
in the same manner as the conversion rate as set forth under
Conversion Rate Adjustments, and we must
deliver cash with respect to the remainder of the Redemption
Make Whole Amount, if any.
|
|
|
Make Whole Amount and Public Acquirer Change of
Control |
If a transaction described in clause (2) of the definition
of change of control (as set forth under
Fundamental Change Requires Us to Repurchase
Notes at the Option of the Holder) occurs on or prior to
November 16, 2009, we must give notice to all record
holders of Notes and the trustee at least ten trading days prior
to the anticipated effective date of such change of control
transaction. We must also give notice to all record holders of
Notes and the trustee that such a transaction has occurred
within 15 days after the actual effective date of such
change of control transaction. If a holder elects to convert its
Notes at any time following the date we give notice of the
anticipated effective date of such change of
151
control transaction we will increase the applicable conversion
rate for the Notes surrendered for conversion by a number of
additional shares of Class A common stock (the
additional shares), as described below.
The number of additional shares will be determined by reference
to the table below and is based on the date on which such change
of control transaction becomes effective (the effective
date) and the price (the stock price) paid per
share of our Class A common stock in such transaction. If
the holders of our Class A common stock receive only cash
in the change of control transaction, the stock price shall be
the cash amount paid per share. Otherwise the stock price shall
be the average of the sale prices of our Class A common
stock on the 10 trading days up to but not including the
effective date.
The additional shares will be delivered to holders who elect to
convert their Notes during the period described above on the
later of (1) five business days following the effective
date and (2) the conversion settlement date for those Notes.
The stock prices set forth in the first row of the table (i.e.,
the column headers) will be adjusted as of any date on which the
conversion rate of the Notes is adjusted. The adjusted stock
prices will equal the stock prices applicable immediately prior
to such adjustment multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of
which is the conversion rate immediately prior to the adjustment
giving rise to the stock price adjustment and the denominator of
which is the conversion rate as so adjusted. Our obligation to
deliver the additional shares will be subject to adjustment in
the same manner as the conversion rate as set forth under
Conversion Rate Adjustments.
The following table sets forth the hypothetical stock price and
number of additional shares to be received per
$1,000 original principal amount of Notes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Price | |
|
|
| |
Effective Date |
|
$2.16 | |
|
$2.25 | |
|
$2.50 | |
|
$3.00 | |
|
$3.50 | |
|
$4.00 | |
|
$4.50 | |
|
$5.00 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
November 16, 2004
|
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
November 16, 2005
|
|
|
54.7 |
|
|
|
48.2 |
|
|
|
33.6 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
November 16, 2006
|
|
|
74.2 |
|
|
|
66.2 |
|
|
|
48.5 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
November 16, 2007
|
|
|
95.1 |
|
|
|
85.5 |
|
|
|
64.0 |
|
|
|
36.5 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
November 16, 2008
|
|
|
85.6 |
|
|
|
75.0 |
|
|
|
52.0 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
November 16, 2009
|
|
|
49.7 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
The exact stock price and effective dates may not be set forth
on the table, in which case:
|
|
|
1. if the stock price is between two stock price amounts on
the table or the effective date is between two dates on the
table, the additional premium will be determined by
straight-line interpolation between the number of additional
shares set forth for the higher and lower stock price amounts
and the two dates, as applicable, based on a 365 day year; |
|
|
2. if the stock price is in excess of $5.00 per share
(subject to adjustment), no additional shares will be issued
upon conversion; and |
|
|
3. if the stock price is less than $2.16 per share
(the last reported sale price of our Class A common stock
on the date the Notes were priced) (subject to adjustment), no
additional shares will be issued upon conversion. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event will the total number
of shares of Class A common stock issuable upon conversion
exceed 462 per $1,000 original principal amount of Notes,
subject to adjustment in the same manner as the conversion rate
as set forth under Conversion Rate
Adjustments.
Our obligation to deliver the additional shares could be
considered a penalty, in which case the enforceability thereof
would be subject to general principles of reasonableness of
economic remedies.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, and in lieu of adjusting the
conversion rate as set forth above, in the case of a
public acquirer change of control (as defined below)
we may elect that, from and after the effective date of such
public acquirer change of control, the right to convert a Note
will be changed into a
152
right to convert a Note into a number of shares of
acquirer common stock (as defined below). The
conversion rate following the effective date of such transaction
will be a number of shares of acquirer common stock equal to the
product of:
|
|
|
|
|
the conversion rate in effect immediately prior to the effective
date of such change of control, times |
|
|
|
the average of the quotients obtained, for each trading day in
the 10 consecutive trading day period commencing on the trading
day next succeeding the effective date of such public acquirer
change of control (the valuation period), of: |
|
|
|
(i) the acquisition value of our Class A
common stock on each such trading day in the valuation period,
divided by |
|
|
(ii) the closing sale price of the acquirer common stock on
each such trading day in the valuation period. |
The acquisition value of our Class A common
stock means, for each trading day in the valuation period, the
value of the consideration paid per share of our Class A
common stock in connection with such public acquirer change of
control, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
for any cash, 100% of the face amount of such cash, |
|
|
|
for any acquirer common stock or any other securities that are
traded on a U.S. national securities exchange or approved
for quotation on the Nasdaq National Market, 100% of the closing
sale price of such acquirer common stock or other traded
securities on each such trading day; and |
|
|
|
for any other securities, assets or property, 102% of the fair
market value of such security, asset or property on each such
trading day, as determined by two independent nationally
recognized investment banks selected by the trustee for this
purpose. |
After the adjustment of the conversion rate in connection with a
public acquirer change of control, the conversion rate will be
subject to further similar adjustments in the event that any of
the events described above occur thereafter.
A public acquirer change of control is any
transaction described in clause (2) of the definition of
change control below where the acquirer, or any entity that is a
direct or indirect beneficial owner (as defined in
Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of more than 50% of the
total voting power of all shares of such acquirers capital
stock that are entitled to vote generally in the election of
directors has a class of common stock traded on a national
securities exchange or quoted on the Nasdaq National Market or
which will be so traded or quoted when issued or exchanged in
connection with such change of control. We refer to such
acquirers or other entitys class of common stock
traded on a national securities exchange or quoted on the Nasdaq
National Market or which will be so traded or quoted when issued
or exchanged in connection with such fundamental change as the
acquirer common stock.
|
|
|
Conversion Rate Adjustments |
The initial conversion rate will be adjusted for certain events,
including:
|
|
|
(1) the issuance of our Class A common stock as a
dividend or distribution on our Class A common stock, or
certain subdivisions and combinations of our Class A common
stock, in which event the conversion rate will be adjusted based
on the following formula: |
153
where,
|
|
|
|
|
|
CR 0 |
|
= |
|
the conversion rate in effect at the close of business on the
record date |
|
CR 1 |
|
= |
|
the conversion rate in effect immediately after the record date |
|
OS 0 |
|
= |
|
the number of shares of our Class A common stock
outstanding at the close of business on the record date |
|
OS 1 |
|
= |
|
the number of shares of our Class A common stock that would
be outstanding immediately after such event |
|
|
|
(2) the issuance to all holders of our Class A common
stock of certain rights or warrants to purchase our Class A
common stock (or securities convertible into our Class A
common stock) for a period expiring 45 days or less from
the date of issuance of such rights or warrants at less than (or
having a conversion price per share less than) the current
market price of our Class A common stock; provided
that the conversion rate will be readjusted to the extent
that such rights or warrants are not exercised prior to the
expiration, in which event the conversion rate will be adjusted
based on the following formula: |
|
|
|
CR1
= CR 0 × |
|
OS 0 + X
OS 0 + Y |
where,
|
|
|
|
|
|
CR 0 |
|
= |
|
the conversion rate in effect at the close of business on the
record date |
|
CR 1 |
|
= |
|
the conversion rate in effect immediately after the record date |
|
OS 0 |
|
= |
|
the number of shares of our Class A common stock
outstanding at the close of business on the record date |
|
X |
|
= |
|
the total number of shares of our Class A common stock
issuable pursuant to such rights |
|
Y |
|
= |
|
the number of shares of our Class A common stock equal to
the aggregate price payable to exercise such rights divided by
the average of the sale prices of our Class A common stock
for the ten consecutive trading days prior to the business day
immediately preceding the announcement of the issuance of such
rights |
|
|
|
(3) the dividend or other distribution to all holders of
our Class A common stock of shares of our capital stock
(other than Class A common stock) or evidences of our
indebtedness or our assets (excluding (A) any dividend,
distribution or issuance covered by clause (1) or
(2) above and (B) any dividend or distribution paid
exclusively in cash), in which event the conversion rate will be
adjusted based on the following formula: |
|
|
|
CR1
= CR 0 × |
|
SP 0
SP 0 - FMV |
where,
|
|
|
|
|
|
CR 0 |
|
= |
|
the conversion rate in effect at the close of business on the
record date |
|
CR 1 |
|
= |
|
the conversion rate in effect immediately after the record date |
|
SP 0 |
|
= |
|
the current market price |
|
FMV |
|
= |
|
the fair market value (as determined by our board of directors)
of the shares of capital stock, evidences of indebtedness,
assets or property distributed with respect to each outstanding
share of our Class A common stock on the record date for
such distribution |
154
|
|
|
With respect to an adjustment pursuant to this clause (3)
where there has been a payment of a dividend or other
distribution on our Class A common stock or shares of
capital stock of, or similar equity interests in, a subsidiary
or other business unit of ours, in which event the conversion
rate will be adjusted based on the following formula: |
|
|
|
CR1
= CR 0 × |
|
FMV 0 + MP 0
MP 0 |
where,
|
|
|
|
|
|
CR 0 |
|
= |
|
the conversion rate in effect at the close of business on the
record date |
|
CR1 |
|
= |
|
the conversion rate in effect immediately after the record date |
|
FMV 0 |
|
= |
|
the average of the sale prices of the capital stock or similar
equity interest distributed to holders of our Class A
common stock applicable to one share of our Class A common
stock over the 10 trading days commencing on and including
the fifth trading day after the date on which
ex-distribution trading commences for such dividend
or distribution on the Nasdaq National Market or such other
national or regional exchange or market on which the securities
are then listed or quoted |
|
MP 0 |
|
= |
|
the average of the sale prices of our Class A common stock
over the 10 trading days commencing on and including the
fifth trading day after the date on which ex-distribution
trading commences for such dividend or distribution on the
Nasdaq National Market or such other national or regional
exchange or market on which the securities are then listed or
quoted |
|
|
|
(4) dividends or other distributions consisting exclusively
of cash to all holders of our Class A common stock, in
which event the conversion rate will be adjusted based on the
following formula: |
|
|
|
CR1
= CR 0 × |
|
SP 0
SP 0 - C |
where,
|
|
|
|
|
|
CR 0 |
|
= |
|
the conversion rate in effect at the close of business on the
record date |
|
CR 1 |
|
= |
|
the conversion rate in effect immediately after the record date |
|
SP 0 |
|
= |
|
the current market price |
|
C |
|
= |
|
the amount in cash per share we distribute to holders of our
Class A common stock |
|
|
|
(5) we or one or more of our subsidiaries make purchases of
our Class A common stock pursuant to a tender offer or
exchange offer by us or one of our subsidiaries for our
Class A common stock to the extent that the cash and value
of any other consideration included in the payment per share of
our Class A common stock exceeds the current market price
per share of our Class A common stock on the trading day
next succeeding the last date on which tenders or exchanges may
be made pursuant to such tender or exchange offer (the
expiration date), in which event the conversion rate
will be adjusted based on the following formula: |
|
|
|
CR1
= CR 0 × |
|
FMV + (SP1
×
OS1)
OS 0 ×
SP1 |
155
where,
|
|
|
|
|
CR 0 |
|
= |
|
the conversion rate in effect on the expiration date |
CR 1 |
|
= |
|
the conversion rate in effect immediately after the expiration
date |
FMV |
|
= |
|
the fair market value (as determined by our board of directors)
of the aggregate value of all cash and any other consideration
paid or payable for shares validly tendered or exchanged and not
withdrawn as of the expiration date (the purchased
shares) |
OS 1 |
|
= |
|
the number of shares of our Class A common stock
outstanding immediately after the expiration date less any
purchased shares |
OS 0 |
|
= |
|
the number of shares of our Class A common stock
outstanding immediately after the expiration date, including any
purchased shares |
SP 1 |
|
= |
|
the sale price of our Class A common stock on the trading
day next succeeding the expiration date |
|
|
|
(6) someone other than us or one of our subsidiaries makes
a payment in respect of a tender offer or exchange offer in
which, as of the expiration date, our board of directors is not
recommending rejection of the offer, in which event the
conversion rate will be adjusted based on the following formula: |
|
|
|
|
|
CR1 = CR
0 |
|
× |
|
FMV + (SP1
×
OS1)
OS 0 ×
SP1 |
where,
|
|
|
|
|
CR 0 |
|
= |
|
the conversion rate in effect on the expiration date |
CR 1 |
|
= |
|
the conversion rate in effect immediately after the expiration
date |
FMV |
|
= |
|
the fair market value (as determined by our board of directors)
of the aggregate consideration payable to our shareholders based
on the acceptance (up to any maximum specified in the terms of
the tender or exchange offer) of all shares validly tendered or
exchanged and not withdrawn as of the expiration date |
OS 1 |
|
= |
|
the number of shares of our Class A common stock
outstanding immediately after the expiration date less any
purchased shares |
OS 0 |
|
= |
|
the number of shares of our Class A common stock
outstanding immediately after the expiration date, including any
purchased shares |
SP 1 |
|
= |
|
the sale price of our Class A common stock on the trading
day next succeeding the expiration date |
|
|
|
The adjustment referred to in this clause (6) will only be
made if: |
|
|
|
|
|
the tender offer or exchange offer is for an amount that
increases the offerors ownership of Class A common
stock to more than 25% of the total shares of Class A
common stock outstanding; and |
|
|
|
the cash and value of any other consideration included in the
payment per share of Class A common stock exceeds the sale
price of our Class A common stock on the trading day next
succeeding the last date on which tenders or exchanges may be
made pursuant to the tender or exchange offer. |
|
|
|
However, the adjustment referred to in this clause (6) will
generally not be made if as of the closing of the offer, the
offering documents disclose a plan or an intention to cause us
to engage in a consolidation or merger or a sale of the
consolidated assets of us and our subsidiaries substantially as
an entirety. |
Current market price of our Class A common
stock on any day means the average of the sale price of our
Class A common stock for each of the 10 consecutive trading
days ending on the earlier of the day in question and the day
before the ex-date with respect to the issuance or
distribution requiring such
156
computation. For purposes of this paragraph, ex-date
means the first date on which the shares of our Class A
common stock trade on the applicable exchange or in the
applicable market, regular way, without the right to receive
such issuance or distribution.
Record date means, for purpose of this section, with
respect to any dividend, distribution or other transaction or
event in which the holders of our Class A common stock have
the right to receive any cash, securities or other property or
in which our Class A common stock (or other applicable
security) is exchanged for or converted into any combination of
cash, securities or other property, the date fixed for
determination of holders of our Class A common stock
entitled to receive such cash, securities or other property
(whether such date is fixed by our board of directors or by
statute, contract or otherwise).
To the extent that we have a rights plan in effect upon
conversion of the Notes into Class A common stock, you will
receive, in addition to the Class A common stock, the
rights under the rights plan, unless prior to any conversion,
the rights have separated from the Class A common stock, in
which case the conversion rate will be adjusted at the time of
separation as if we distributed, to all holders of our
Class A common stock, shares of our capital stock,
evidences of indebtedness or assets as described above, subject
to readjustment in the event of the expiration, termination or
redemption of such rights.
Except as stated above, the conversion rate will not be adjusted
for the issuance of our Class A common stock or any
securities convertible into or exchangeable for our Class A
common stock or carrying the right to purchase any of the
foregoing.
In the case of any recapitalization, reclassification or change
of our Class A common stock (other than changes resulting
from a subdivision or combination), a consolidation, merger or
combination involving us, a sale, lease or other transfer to
another corporation of the consolidated assets of ours and our
subsidiaries substantially as an entirety, or any statutory
share exchange, in each case as a result of which holders of our
Class A common stock are entitled to receive stock, other
securities, other property or assets (including cash or any
combination thereof) with respect to or in exchange for our
Class A common stock, the holders of the Notes then
outstanding will be entitled thereafter to convert those Notes
into the kind and amount of shares of stock, other securities or
other property or assets (including cash or any combination
thereof) that they would have owned or been entitled to receive
upon such recapitalization, reclassification, change,
consolidation, merger, combination, sale, lease, transfer or
statutory share exchange had such Notes been converted into our
Class A common stock immediately prior to such transaction.
We will agree in the indenture not to become a party to any such
transaction unless its terms are consistent with the foregoing.
We may from time to time, to the extent permitted by law and
subject to applicable rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market, increase
the conversion rate of the Notes by any amount for any period of
at least 20 days. In that case we will give at least
15 days notice of such increase. We may make such increases
in the conversion rate, to the extent permitted by law and
subject to applicable rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market, in
addition to those set forth above, as our board of directors
deems advisable to avoid or diminish any income tax to holders
of our Class A common stock resulting from any dividend or
distribution of stock (or rights to acquire stock) or from any
event treated as such for income tax purposes.
As a result of any adjustment of the conversion rate, the
holders of Notes may, in certain circumstances, be deemed to
have received a distribution subject to U.S. income tax as
a dividend. In certain other circumstances, the absence of an
adjustment may result in a taxable dividend to the holders of
Class A common stock. In addition, non-U.S. holders of
Notes in certain circumstances may be deemed to have received a
distribution subject to U.S. federal withholding tax
requirements. See United States Federal Income Tax
Considerations Tax Consequences to
U.S. Holders Constructive Dividends and
Tax Consequences to
Non-U.S. Holders Constructive Dividends.
Exchange in Lieu of Conversion
Unless we have called the relevant Notes for redemption, when a
holder surrenders Notes for conversion, we may direct the
conversion agent to surrender, on or prior to the date two
business days
157
following the conversion date, such Notes to a financial
institution designated by us for exchange in lieu of conversion.
In order to accept any such Notes, the designated institution
must agree to deliver, in exchange for such Notes, a number of
shares of our common stock equal to the applicable conversion
rate, or at its option, cash or a combination of cash and shares
of our common stock in lieu thereof, calculated based on the
average price, plus cash for any fractional shares and any Early
Conversion Make Whole Amount.
If the designated institution accepts any such Notes, it will
deliver the appropriate number of shares of our common stock
(and cash, if any), or cash in lieu thereof, to the conversion
agent and the conversion agent will deliver those shares or cash
to the holder. Such designated institution will also deliver
cash equal to any Early Conversion Make Whole Amount we would
owe such holder if we had converted its Notes. Any Notes
exchanged by the designated institution will remain outstanding.
If the designated institution agrees to accept any Notes for
exchange but does not timely deliver the related consideration,
we will, as promptly as practical thereafter, but not later than
the third business day following (1) the conversion date,
or (2) if the designated institution elects to deliver cash
or a combination of cash and shares of our common stock, the
determination of the average price, convert the Notes and
deliver shares of our common stock, as described under
Conversion Rights General,
or, at our option cash in lieu thereof based on the average
price, along with any applicable Early Conversion Make Whole
Amount.
Our designation of an institution to which the Notes may be
submitted for exchange does not require the institution to
accept any Notes. If the designated institution declines to
accept any Notes surrendered for exchange, we will convert those
Notes into shares of our Class A common stock, or cash in
lieu thereof, as described under Conversion
Rights above. We will not pay any consideration to, or
otherwise enter into any arrangement with, the designated
institution for or with respect to such designation.
Redemption
Following the earlier of (1) the sale of any Notes pursuant
to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a
part or (2) November 22, 2006, we may redeem for cash
the Notes (or, in the case of clause (1) above, any such
Notes that have been sold pursuant to an effective registration
statement) in whole or in part, at a price equal to 100% of the
accreted principal amount of such Notes plus accrued and unpaid
interest, deferred interest and liquidated damages, if any, on
the Notes to, but excluding, the redemption date, if the closing
price of our Class A common stock has exceeded, for at
least 20 trading days in any consecutive 30 trading day period,
180% of the conversion price if such 30 trading day period
begins prior to November 16, 2007 and 150% if such 30
trading day period begins thereafter. The conversion
price as of any day will equal the accreted principal
amount of $1,000 original principal amount of Notes divided by
the conversion rate in effect on such day. We are required to
give notice of redemption to the trustee and all registered
holders not less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior to the
redemption date. We must specify in such notice (1) whether
we will deliver shares of our Class A common stock, or cash
in lieu thereof, upon conversion of any Notes called for
redemption, (2) if we elect to deliver cash, the percentage
of the shares otherwise deliverable for which we will pay cash
and (3) whether we will deliver cash or shares of our
Class A common stock upon conversion with respect to the
Redemption Make Whole Amount.
Notes or portions of Notes called for redemption will be
convertible by the holder until the close of business on the
business day prior to the redemption date.
If we decide to redeem fewer than all of the outstanding Notes,
the trustee will select the Notes to be redeemed (in original
principal amounts of $1,000 or integral multiples thereof) by
lot, on a pro rata basis or by another method the trustee
considers fair and appropriate.
If any Notes are to be redeemed in part only, we will issue a
new Note or Notes with a principal amount equal to the
unredeemed principal portion thereof. If the trustee selects a
portion of your Note for partial redemption and you convert a
portion of the same Note, the converted portion will be deemed to
158
be from the portion selected for redemption. In the event of any
redemption in part, we will not be required to issue, register
the transfer of or exchange any certificated Note during a
period of 15 days before the mailing of the redemption
notice.
Fundamental Change Requires Us to Repurchase Notes at the
Option of the Holder
If a fundamental change occurs, each holder of Notes will have
the right to require us to purchase some or all of that
holders Notes for cash on a repurchase date that is not
less than 20 nor more than 35 business days after the date of
our notice of the fundamental change. We will purchase such
Notes at a purchase price equal to 100% of the accreted
principal amount of the Notes to be purchased, plus any accrued
and unpaid interest (including deferred interest and liquated
damages, if any) to but excluding the fundamental change
repurchase date, unless such fundamental change repurchase date
falls after a record date and on or prior to the corresponding
interest payment date, in which case we will pay the full amount
of accrued and unpaid interest (including liquated damages, if
any, but excluding any deferred interest) payable on such
interest payment date to the holder of record at the close of
business on the corresponding record date.
Within 20 days after the occurrence of a fundamental
change, we are required to give notice to all holders of Notes,
as provided in the indenture, of the occurrence of the
fundamental change and of their resulting repurchase right and
the fundamental change repurchase date. We must also deliver a
copy of our notice to the trustee. To exercise the repurchase
right, a holder of Notes must deliver, on or before the
fundamental change repurchase date specified in our notice,
written notice to the trustee of the holders exercise of
its repurchase right, together with the Notes with respect to
which the right is being exercised. We will promptly pay the
repurchase price for Notes surrendered for repurchase following
the fundamental change repurchase date.
You may withdraw any written repurchase notice by delivering a
written notice of withdrawal to the paying agent prior to the
close of business on the repurchase date. The withdrawal notice
must state:
|
|
|
|
|
the original principal amount of the withdrawn Notes; |
|
|
|
if certificated Notes have been issued, the certificate number
of the withdrawn Notes (or, if your Notes are not certificated,
your withdrawal notice must comply with appropriate DTC
procedures); and |
|
|
|
the original principal amount, if any, that remains subject to
the repurchase notice. |
Payment of the repurchase price for a Note for which a
repurchase notice has been delivered and not withdrawn is
conditioned upon book-entry transfer or delivery of the Note,
together with necessary endorsements, to the paying agent at its
corporate trust office in the Borough of Manhattan, The City of
New York, or any other office of the paying agent, at any time
after delivery of the repurchase notice. Payment of the
repurchase price for the Note will be made promptly following
the later of the fundamental change repurchase date and the time
of book-entry transfer or delivery of the Note. If the paying
agent holds money sufficient to pay the repurchase price of the
Note, on the repurchase date, then, on and after the business
day following the repurchase date:
|
|
|
|
|
the Note will cease to be outstanding; |
|
|
|
interest will cease to accrue; and |
|
|
|
all other rights of the holder will terminate, other than the
right to receive the repurchase price upon delivery of the Note. |
This will be the case whether or not book-entry transfer of the
Note has been made or the Note has been delivered to the paying
agent.
A fundamental change will be deemed to have occurred
upon a change of control or a termination of trading.
159
A termination of trading will be deemed to have
occurred if our Class A common stock (or other common stock
into which the Notes are then convertible) is neither listed for
trading on a U.S. national securities exchange nor approved
for trading on the Nasdaq National Market; provided that
a termination of trading will not occur so long as our
Class A common stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq
Small Cap market or quoted bid prices for our Class A
common stock in the over-the-counter market are reported by Pink
Sheets LLC or any similar organization.
A change of control will be deemed to have occurred
at such time after the original issuance of the Notes when the
following has occurred:
|
|
|
(1) the consummation of any transaction (including, without
limitation, any merger or consolidation), the result of which is
that any person or group within the
meaning of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act other than
Paul G. Allen and Related Parties, becomes the direct or
indirect beneficial owner as defined in
Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act of more than 35% of the
Voting Stock of Charter Communications, Inc., measured by voting
power rather than number of shares, unless Mr. Allen and
the Related Parties, collectively, beneficially own, directly or
indirectly, a greater percentage of Voting Stock of Charter
Communications, Inc., measured by voting power rather than
number of shares, than such person; |
|
|
(2) the consummation of any transaction or event (whether
by means of a liquidation, share exchange, tender offer,
consolidation, recapitalization, reclassification, merger of us
or any sale, lease or other transfer of the consolidated assets
of ours and our subsidiaries) or a series of related
transactions or events pursuant to which our common stock is
exchanged for, converted into or constitutes solely the right to
receive cash, securities or other property more than 10% of the
fair market value of which consists of cash, securities or other
property that are not, or upon issuance will not be, traded on
any U.S. national securities exchange or quoted on the
Nasdaq National Market; |
|
|
(3) the sale, transfer, conveyance, lease or other
disposition (including by way of liquidation or dissolution, but
excluding by way of merger or consolidation), in one or a series
of related transactions, of all or substantially all of the
assets of Charter Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, to any person or group
as defined above; |
|
|
(4) the purchase by Mr. Allen or any Allen Affiliates
in any transaction or series of transactions, of shares of our
Class A common stock, which results in the aggregate number
of shares of Class A common stock held by Mr. Allen
and any Allen Affiliates exceeding 70% of the total number of
shares of Class A common stock issued and outstanding
(including any shares borrowed pursuant to the share lending
agreement) at such time to the extent that the closing price per
share of the Class A common stock for any five trading days
within the period of the ten consecutive trading days
immediately after the later of the last date of such purchases
or the public announcement of such purchases is less than 100%
of the applicable conversion price of the Notes in effect on
each of those trading days; provided that the calculation
of the number of shares of Class A common stock held by
Mr. Allen and any Allen Affiliates will not include any
share of our Class A common stock acquired by
Mr. Allen or any Allen Affiliates as a result of the
exchange or conversion of membership units of Charter Holdco or
shares of our Class B common stock or any securities
exchangeable or convertible into shares of Class A common
stock or issued in exchange (by merger or otherwise) for shares
of a Person that holds units of Charter Holdco. |
|
|
(5) the adoption of a plan relating to the liquidation or
dissolution of Charter Holdco; or |
|
|
(6) continuing directors (as defined below in this section)
cease to constitute at least a majority of our board of
directors. |
As used in connection with the definition of change of control,
the following terms will have the meaning described below:
Allen Affiliate means any person in which
Mr. Allen, directly or indirectly, owns at least a 50.1%
equity interest, provided that Charter Communications, Inc.,
Charter Holdco or any of its subsidiaries will not be included
in such definition.
160
Continuing director means a director who either was
a member of our board of directors on November 16, 2004 or
who becomes a member of our board of directors subsequent to
that date and whose appointment, election or nomination for
election by our shareholders is duly approved by a majority of
the continuing directors on our board of directors at the time
of such approval, either by a specific vote or by approval of
the proxy statement issued by us on behalf of the board of
directors in which such individual is named as nominee for
director.
Related Party means:
|
|
|
(i) the spouse or an immediate family member, estate or
heir of the Mr. Allen; or |
|
|
(ii) any trust, corporation, partnership or other entity,
the beneficiaries, stockholders, partners, owners or persons
beneficially holding an 80% or more controlling interest of
which consist of Mr. Allen and/or such other persons
referred to in the immediately preceding clause (i) or this
clause (ii). |
Voting Stock of any person as of any date means the
capital stock of such person that is at the time entitled to
vote in the election of the board of directors of such person.
The beneficial owner shall be determined in accordance with
Rule 13d-3 promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act.
The term person includes any syndicate or group
which would be deemed to be a person under
Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act.
The definition of change of control includes a phrase relating
to the conveyance, transfer, sale, lease or disposition of our
consolidated assets substantially as an entirety.
There is no precise, established definition of the phrase
substantially as an entirety. under applicable law.
Accordingly, your ability to require us to repurchase your Notes
as a result of a conveyance, transfer, sale, lease or other
disposition of less than all our assets may be uncertain.
Rule 13e-4 under the Exchange Act, as amended, requires the
dissemination of certain information to security holders if an
issuer tender offer occurs and may apply if the repurchase
option becomes available to holders of the Notes. We will comply
with this rule to the extent applicable at that time.
We may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, at any time
purchase the Notes in the open market or by tender at any price
or by private agreement. Any Note so purchased by us may, to the
extent permitted by applicable law, be reissued or resold or may
be surrendered to the trustee for cancellation. Any Notes
surrendered to the trustee may not be reissued or resold and
will be canceled promptly.
The foregoing provisions would not necessarily protect holders
of the Notes if highly leveraged or other transactions involving
us occur that may adversely affect holders.
Our ability to repurchase Notes upon the occurrence of a
fundamental change is subject to important limitations. Our
subsidiaries existing credit agreements and indentures
contain and any future credit agreements or other agreements
relating to our indebtedness may also contain provisions
prohibiting repurchase of the Notes under certain circumstances,
or expressly prohibit our repurchase of the Notes upon a
fundamental change or may provide that a fundamental change
constitutes an event of default under that agreement. If a
fundamental change occurs at a time when we are prohibited from
repurchasing Notes, we could seek the consent of our or our
subsidiaries lenders and noteholders to repurchase the
Notes or attempt to refinance this debt. If we do not obtain
consent, we would not be permitted to repurchase the Notes. Our
failure to repurchase tendered Notes would constitute an event
of default under the indenture, which might constitute a default
under the terms of our other indebtedness.
No Notes may be purchased by us at the option of the holders
upon a fundamental change if the accreted principal amount of
the Notes has been accelerated, and such acceleration has not
been rescinded, on or prior to such date.
The fundamental change purchase feature of the Notes may in
certain circumstances make more difficult or discourage a
takeover of our company. The fundamental change repurchase
feature, however, is not the result of our knowledge of any
specific effort to accumulate shares of our Class A common
stock,
161
to obtain control of us by means of a merger, tender offer
solicitation or otherwise, or by management to adopt a series of
anti-takeover provisions. Instead, the fundamental change
repurchase feature is a standard term contained in securities
similar to the Notes.
Consolidation, Merger and Sale of Assets
We may, without the consent of the holders of Notes, consolidate
with, merge into or sell, lease or otherwise transfer in one
transaction or a series of related transactions the consolidated
assets of ours and our subsidiaries substantially as an entirety
to any corporation, limited liability company, partnership or
trust organized under the laws of the United States or any of
its political subdivisions provided that:
|
|
|
|
|
the surviving entity assumes all our obligations under the
indenture and the Notes; |
|
|
|
if as a result of such transaction the Notes become convertible
into common stock or other securities issued by a third party
that is not the successor under the Notes and the indenture,
such third party fully and unconditionally guarantees all
obligations of Charter Communications, Inc. or such successor
under the Notes and the indenture; |
|
|
|
at the time of such transaction, no event of default, and no
event which, after notice or lapse of time, would become an
event of default, shall have happened and be continuing; and |
|
|
|
an officers certificate and an opinion of counsel, each
stating that the consolidation, merger or transfer complies with
the provisions of the indenture, have been delivered to the
trustee. |
Information Requirement
We will agree that for a period of two years after closing,
during any period in which we are not subject to the reporting
requirements of the Exchange Act, to make available to holders
of the Notes, or beneficial owners of interests therein, or any
prospective purchaser of the Notes, the information required by
Rule 144A(d)(4) to be made available in connection with the
sale of Notes or beneficial interests in the Notes.
Covenant
We agreed in the indenture that we will redeem our outstanding
5.75% convertible senior notes due 2005 to the extent of
the proceeds from the sale of the Notes, net of the purchase
price of Pledged Securities and expenses of the offering, and
that we will issue the related notice of redemption no later
than the close of business on the business day immediately
following the closing of the sale of the Notes. We consummated
the redemption on December 23, 2004.
Events of Default
Each of the following will constitute an event of default under
the indenture:
|
|
|
|
|
our failure to pay when due the principal on any of the Notes at
maturity, upon redemption or exercise of a repurchase right or
otherwise; |
|
|
|
our failure to pay an installment of interest (including
liquidated damages, if any) other than any deferred interest on
any of the Notes for 30 days after the date when due;
provided that a failure to make any of the first six
scheduled interest payments on the original principal amount of
the Notes on the applicable interest payment date will
constitute an event of default with no grace or cure period
(unless the failure to make such payment results from the
failure by the trustee to release the relevant cash amount from
the pledge account, provided that such failure is not caused by
any act or omission by us); |
|
|
|
our failure to deliver shares of our Class A common stock,
or cash in lieu thereof, when due upon conversion of Notes,
together with cash in respect of any fractional shares and any
Early |
162
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion Make Whole Amount and any Redemption Make Whole
Amount, upon conversion of a Note, and that failure continues
for 10 days; |
|
|
|
our failure to comply with our obligations described under
Covenant when required and such failure
continues for five days; |
|
|
|
our failure for 30 days after written notice thereof has
been given to us by the trustee or to us and the trustee by the
holders of at least 25% in aggregate original principal amount
of the Notes then outstanding to comply with any of the other
covenants or agreements in the indenture; |
|
|
|
our failure to make any payment under any mortgage, indenture or
instrument under which there may be issued or by which there may
be secured or evidenced any indebtedness for money borrowed by
us or any of our significant subsidiaries (or the payment of
which is guaranteed by us or any of our significant
subsidiaries) whether such indebtedness or guarantee now exists,
or is created after the issue date, if that default: |
|
|
|
(i) is caused by a failure to pay at final stated maturity
the principal amount on such indebtedness prior to the
expiration of the grace period provided in such indebtedness on
the date of such default (a Payment Default); or |
|
|
(ii) results in the acceleration of such indebtedness prior
to its express maturity, |
|
|
|
and, in each case, the principal amount of any such
indebtedness, together with the principal amount of any other
such indebtedness under which there has been a Payment Default
or the maturity of which has been so accelerated, aggregates
$100 million or more; |
|
|
|
|
|
our failure to give timely notice of a fundamental change or of
the anticipated effective date of a change of control
transaction as described under Conversion
Rights Make Whole Amount and Public Acquirer Change
of Control; and |
|
|
|
certain events of our bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization
or any significant subsidiary of ours. |
Significant subsidiary has the meaning set forth in
clauses (1) and (2) of the definition thereof in
Regulation S-X under the Securities Act.
If an event of default specified in the eighth bullet point
above occurs and is continuing, then the principal of all the
Notes and the interest thereon shall automatically become
immediately due and payable. If an event of default shall occur
and be continuing, other than an event of default specified in
the eighth bullet point above, the trustee or the holders of at
least 25% in aggregate original principal amount of the Notes
then outstanding may declare the Notes due and payable at their
accreted principal amount together with accrued and unpaid
interest (including deferred interest and liquidated damages, if
any), and thereupon the trustee may, at its discretion, proceed
to protect and enforce the rights of the holders of Notes by
appropriate judicial proceedings. Such declaration may be
rescinded and annulled with the written consent of the holders
of a majority in aggregate original principal amount of the
Notes then outstanding, subject to the provisions of the
indenture.
The holders of a majority in aggregate original principal amount
of Notes at the time outstanding through their written consent,
or the holders of a majority in aggregate original principal
amount of Notes then outstanding represented at a meeting at
which a quorum is present by a written resolution, may waive any
existing default or event of default and its consequences except
any default or event of default:
|
|
|
|
|
in any payment on the Notes; |
|
|
|
in respect of the failure to convert the Notes; or |
|
|
|
in respect of the covenants or provisions in the indenture that
may not be modified or amended without the consent of the holder
of each Note affected as described in
Modification, Waiver and Meetings below. |
163
Holders of a majority in aggregate original principal amount of
the Notes then outstanding through their written consent, or the
holders of a majority in aggregate original principal amount of
the Notes then outstanding represented at a meeting at which a
quorum is present by a written resolution, may direct the time,
method and place of conducting any proceeding for any remedy
available to the trustee or exercising any trust or power
conferred upon the trustee, subject to the provisions of the
indenture. The indenture contains a provision entitling the
trustee, subject to the duty of the trustee during a default to
act with the required standard of care, to be indemnified by the
holders of Notes before proceeding to exercise any right or
power under the indenture at the request of such holders. The
rights of holders of the Notes to pursue remedies with respect
to the indenture and the Notes are subject to a number of
additional requirements set forth in the indenture.
The indenture provides that the trustee shall, within
90 days of the occurrence of a default, give to the
registered holders of the Notes notice of all uncured defaults
known to it, but the trustee shall be protected in withholding
such notice if it, in good faith, determines that the
withholding of such notice is in the best interest of such
registered holders, except in the case of a default in the
payment of the principal of, or premium, if any, or interest on,
any of the Notes when due or in the payment of any conversion,
redemption or repurchase obligation.
We are required to furnish annually to the trustee a statement
as to the fulfillment of our obligations under the indenture. In
addition, we are required to file with the trustee a written
notice of the occurrence of any default or event of default
within five business days of our becoming aware of the
occurrence of any default or event of default.
Modification, Waiver and Meetings
The indenture contains provisions for convening meetings of the
holders of Notes to consider matters affecting their interests.
The indenture (including the terms and conditions of the Notes)
may be modified or amended by us and the trustee, without the
consent of the holder of any Note, for the purposes of, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
adding to our covenants for the benefit of the holders of Notes; |
|
|
|
adding additional dates on which holders may require us to
repurchase their Notes; |
|
|
|
surrendering any right or power conferred upon us; |
|
|
|
providing for conversion rights of holders of Notes if any
reclassification or change of our Class A common stock or
any consolidation, merger or sale of the consolidated assets of
us and our subsidiaries substantially as an entirety occurs; |
|
|
|
providing for the assumption of our obligations to the holders
of Notes in the case of a merger, consolidation, conveyance,
sale, transfer or lease; |
|
|
|
increasing the conversion rate in the manner described in the
indenture, provided that the increase will not adversely affect
the interests of holders of Notes in any material respect; |
|
|
|
complying with the requirements of the SEC in order to effect or
maintain the qualification of the indenture under the Trust
Indenture Act of 1939, as amended; |
|
|
|
making any changes or modifications to the indenture necessary
in connection with the registration of the Notes under the
Securities Act, as contemplated by the registration rights
agreement, provided that this action does not adversely affect
the interests of the holders of the Notes in any material
respect; |
|
|
|
curing any ambiguity or correcting or supplementing any
defective provision contained in the indenture; provided
that such modification or amendment does not, in the good
faith opinion of our board of directors, adversely affect the
interests of the holders of Notes in any material respect;
provided further that any amendment made solely to
conform the provisions of the indenture to the |
164
|
|
|
|
|
description of the Notes in this prospectus will not be deemed
to adversely affect the interests of the holders of the
Notes; or |
|
|
|
adding or modifying any other provisions which we and the
trustee may deem necessary or desirable and which will not
adversely affect the interests of the holders of Notes. |
Modifications and amendments to the indenture or to the terms
and conditions of the Notes may also be made, and noncompliance
by us with any provision of the indenture or the Notes may be
waived, either:
|
|
|
|
|
with the written consent of the holders of at least a majority
in aggregate original principal amount of the Notes at the time
outstanding; or |
|
|
|
by the adoption of a resolution at a meeting of holders at which
a quorum is present by at least a majority in aggregate original
principal amount of the Notes represented at such meeting. |
However, no such modification, amendment or waiver may, without
the written consent or the affirmative vote of the holder of
each Note affected:
|
|
|
|
|
change the maturity of the principal of or any installment of
interest on any Note (including any payment of liquidated
damages); |
|
|
|
reduce the principal amount of, or any premium, if any, on any
Note; |
|
|
|
reduce the interest rate or amount of interest (including any
liquidated damages) on any Note; |
|
|
|
reduce the Early Conversion Make Whole Amount or the Redemption
Make Whole Amount or otherwise modify the provisions of the
indenture related thereto in a manner adverse to the holders of
the Notes; |
|
|
|
modify the provisions of the indenture relating to the Pledged
Securities as described above under
Security in a manner adverse to the
holders of the Notes; |
|
|
|
other than as contemplated by the terms of the indenture, change
the currency of payment of principal of, premium, if any, or
interest on any Note; |
|
|
|
impair the right to institute suit for the enforcement of any
payment on or with respect to, or the conversion of, any Note; |
|
|
|
except as otherwise permitted or contemplated by provisions of
the indenture concerning specified reclassifications or
corporate reorganizations, impair or adversely affect the
conversion rights of holders of the Notes; |
|
|
|
adversely affect any repurchase option of holders; |
|
|
|
modify the redemption provisions of the indenture in a manner
adverse to the holders of Notes; |
|
|
|
reduce the percentage in aggregate original principal amount of
Notes outstanding necessary to modify or amend the indenture or
to waive any past default; or |
|
|
|
reduce the percentage in aggregate original principal amount of
Notes outstanding required for any other waiver under the
indenture. |
The quorum at any meeting called to adopt a resolution will be
persons holding or representing a majority in aggregate original
principal amount of the Notes at the time outstanding.
Form, Denomination and Registration
The Notes were issued in fully registered form, without coupons,
in denominations of $1,000 original principal amount and whole
multiples of $1,000.
165
Global Notes: Book-Entry Form
The Notes are evidenced by one or more global Notes deposited
with the trustee as custodian for DTC, and registered in the
name of Cede & Co., as DTCs nominee. Record
ownership of the global Notes may be transferred, in whole or in
part, only to another nominee of DTC or to a successor of DTC or
its nominee, except as set forth below.
Ownership of beneficial interests in a global Note will be
limited to persons that have accounts with DTC or its nominee
(participants) or persons that may hold interests
through participants. Transfers between direct DTC participants
will be effected in the ordinary way in accordance with
DTCs rules and will be settled in same-day funds. Holders
may also beneficially own interests in the global Notes held by
DTC through certain banks, brokers, dealers, trust companies and
other parties that clear through or maintain a custodial
relationship with a direct DTC participant, either directly or
indirectly.
So long as Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, is the
registered owner of the global Notes, Cede & Co. for
all purposes will be considered the sole holder of the global
Notes. Except as provided below, owners of beneficial interests
in the global Notes will not be entitled to have certificates
registered in their names, will not receive or be entitled to
receive physical delivery of certificates in definitive form,
and will not be considered holders thereof. The laws of some
states require that certain persons take physical delivery of
securities in definitive form. Consequently, the ability to
transfer a beneficial interest in the global Notes to such
persons may be limited.
We will wire, through the facilities of the trustee, principal,
premium, if any, and interest payments on the global Notes to
Cede & Co., the nominee for DTC, as the registered
owner of the global Notes. We, the trustee and any paying agent
will have no responsibility or liability for paying amounts due
on the global Notes to owners of beneficial interests in the
global Notes.
It is DTCs current practice, upon receipt of any payment
of principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the global
Notes, to credit participants accounts on the payment date
in amounts proportionate to their respective beneficial
interests in the Notes represented by the global Notes, as shown
on the records of DTC, unless DTC believes that it will not
receive payment on the payment date. Payments by DTC
participants to owners of beneficial interests in Notes
represented by the global Notes held through DTC participants
will be the responsibility of DTC participants, as is now the
case with securities held for the accounts of customers
registered in street name.
If a holder would like to convert Notes into Class A common
stock pursuant to the terms of the Notes, the holder should
contact the holders broker or other direct or indirect DTC
participant to obtain information on procedures, including
proper forms and cut-off times, for submitting those requests.
Because DTC can only act on behalf of DTC participants, who in
turn act on behalf of indirect DTC participants and other banks,
a holders ability to pledge the holders interest in
the Notes represented by global Notes to persons or entities
that do not participate in the DTC system, or otherwise take
actions in respect of such interest, may be affected by the lack
of a physical certificate.
Neither we nor the trustee (nor any registrar, paying agent or
conversion agent under the indenture) will have any
responsibility for the performance by DTC or direct or indirect
DTC participants of their obligations under the rules and
procedures governing their operations. DTC has advised us that
it will take any action permitted to be taken by a holder of
Notes, including, without limitation, the presentation of Notes
for conversion as described below, only at the direction of one
or more direct DTC participants to whose account with DTC
interests in the global Notes are credited and only for the
principal amount of the Notes for which directions have been
given.
DTC has advised us as follows: DTC is a limited purpose trust
company organized under the laws of the State of New York, a
member of the Federal Reserve System, a clearing
corporation within the meaning of the Uniform Commercial
Code and a clearing agency registered pursuant to
the provisions of Section 17A of the Exchange Act. DTC was
created to hold securities for DTC participants and to
facilitate the clearance and settlement of securities
transactions between DTC participants through electronic
book-entry changes to the accounts of its participants, thereby
eliminating the need for physical movement of certificates.
Participants include securities brokers and dealers, banks,
trust companies and
166
clearing corporations and may include certain other
organizations such as the initial purchasers of the Notes.
Certain DTC participants or their representatives, together with
other entities, own DTC. Indirect access to the DTC system is
available to others such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust
companies that clear through, or maintain a custodial
relationship with, a participant, either directly or indirectly.
Although DTC has agreed to the foregoing procedures in order to
facilitate transfers of interests in the global Notes among DTC
participants, it is under no obligation to perform or continue
to perform such procedures, and such procedures may be
discontinued at any time. If DTC is at any time unwilling or
unable to continue as depositary and a successor depositary is
not appointed by us within 90 days, we will cause Notes to
be issued in definitive registered form in exchange for the
global Notes. None of us, the trustee or any of their respective
agents will have any responsibility for the performance by DTC,
direct or indirect DTC participants of their obligations under
the rules and procedures governing their operations, including
maintaining, supervising or reviewing the records relating to,
or payments made on account of, beneficial ownership interests
in global Notes.
According to DTC, the foregoing information with respect to DTC
has been provided to its participants and other members of the
financial community for informational purposes only and is not
intended to serve as a representation, warranty or contract
modification of any kind.
Certificated Notes
We will issue the Notes in definitive certificated form if DTC
notifies us that it is unwilling or unable to continue as
depositary or DTC ceases to be a clearing agency registered
under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
and a successor depositary is not appointed by us within
90 days. In addition, beneficial interests in a global Note
may be exchanged for definitive certificated Notes upon request
by or on behalf of DTC in accordance with customary procedures.
The indenture permits us to determine at any time and in our
sole discretion that Notes shall no longer be represented by
global Notes. DTC has advised us that, under its current
practices, it would notify its participants of our request, but
will only withdraw beneficial interests from the global Notes at
the request of each DTC participant. We would issue definitive
certificates in exchange for any such beneficial interests
withdrawn.
Any Note that is exchangeable pursuant to the preceding sentence
is exchangeable for Notes registered in the names which DTC will
instruct the trustee. It is expected that DTCs
instructions may be based upon directions received by DTC from
its participants with respect to ownership of beneficial
interests in that global Note. Subject to the foregoing, a
global Note is not exchangeable except for a global Note or
global Notes of the same aggregate denominations to be
registered in the name of DTC or its nominee.
Notices
Except as otherwise provided in the indenture, notices to
holders of Notes will be given by mail to the addresses of
holders of the Notes as they appear in the Note register.
Governing Law
The indenture, the Notes and the registration rights agreement
are governed by, and construed in accordance with, the law of
the State of New York.
Information Regarding the Trustee
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee under the indenture, has been
appointed by us as paying agent, collateral agent, conversion
agent, registrar and custodian with regard to the Notes. The
trustee or its affiliates may from time to time in the future
provide banking and other services to us in the ordinary course
of their business.
Resale Registration Rights
We have agreed to file with the SEC, at our expense, the shelf
registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part
covering resales by holders of all Notes and the Class A
common stock issuable
167
upon conversion of the Notes. Under the terms of the
registration rights agreement, we agreed to use our reasonable
best efforts to:
|
|
|
|
|
file such shelf registration statement with the SEC within
30 days after the earliest date of original issuance of any
of the Notes; |
|
|
|
cause such registration statement to become effective as
promptly as is practicable, but in no event later than
150 days after the earliest date of original issuance of
any of the Notes; and |
|
|
|
keep the registration statement effective for a period (the
registration period) from the date such registration
statement is declared effective by the SEC until such date that
is the earlier of (1) the date as of which all the Notes or
the Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of the
Notes have been sold either under Rule 144 under the
Securities Act (or any similar provision then in force) or
pursuant to the shelf registration statement; (2) the date
as of which all the Notes or the Class A common stock
issuable upon conversion of the Notes held by non-affiliates are
eligible to be sold to the public pursuant to Rule 144(k)
under the Securities Act or any successor provision; and
(3) the date on which there are no outstanding registrable
securities. |
This prospectus forms a part of the registration statement that
we agreed to file, cause to become effective and keep effective,
as described above.
We also agreed to provide to each registered holder copies of
this prospectus, notify each registered holder when the shelf
registration statement has become effective and take certain
other actions as are required to permit unrestricted resales of
the Notes and the Class A common stock issuable upon
conversion of the Notes. A holder who sells those securities
pursuant to the shelf registration statement generally will be
required to be named as a selling securityholder in this
prospectus and to deliver a prospectus to purchasers and will be
bound by the provisions of the registration rights agreement,
which are applicable to that holder (including certain
indemnification provisions). If a shelf registration statement
covering the Notes and Class A common stock is not
effective, they may not be sold or otherwise transferred except
pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities
Act and any other applicable securities laws or in a transaction
not subject to those laws.
We may suspend the holders use of the prospectus for a
maximum of 45 days in any 90-day period, and not to exceed
an aggregate of 90 days in any 12-month period, if
(i) we, in our reasonable judgment, believe we may possess
material non-public information the disclosure of which would
have a material adverse effect on us and our subsidiaries taken
as a whole or (ii) the prospectus would, in our judgment,
contain a material misstatement or omission as a result of an
event that has occurred or is continuing. However, if the
disclosure relates to a proposed or pending material business
transaction, the disclosure of which we determine in good faith
would be reasonably likely to impede our ability to consummate
such transaction, or would otherwise have a material adverse
effect on us and our subsidiaries taken as a whole, we may
extend the suspension period from 45 days to 60 days.
We will not specify the nature of the event giving rise to a
suspension in any notice to holders of the Notes of the
existence of such a suspension.
If,
|
|
|
|
|
on the 30th day following the earliest date of original issuance
of any of the Notes, the shelf registration statement had not
been filed with the SEC; or |
|
|
|
on the 150th day following the earliest date of original
issuance of any of the Notes, the shelf registration statement
was not declared effective; or |
|
|
|
prior to or on the 45th, 60th or 90th day, as the case may be,
of any period that the prospectus has been suspended as
described in the preceding paragraph (in each case except
as the result of filing of a post-effective amendment solely to
add additional selling securityholders), such suspension has not
been terminated |
(each, a registration default), liquidated damages
will accrue on the Notes, from and including the day following
the registration default to but excluding the earlier of
(i) the day after the end of the registration period and
(ii) the day on which the registration default has been
cured. Liquidated damages will be paid semi-annually in arrears,
with the first semi-annual payment due on the first interest
payment date, as
168
applicable, following the date on which such liquidated damages
begin to accrue, and will accrue at a rate equal to:
|
|
|
|
|
0.25% per annum of the accreted principal amount for the
first 90 days following such registration default; and |
|
|
|
0.50% per annum of the accreted principal amount after the
first 90 days following such registration default. |
Because the registration statement of which this prospectus
forms a part was not declared effective on or prior to
April 21, 2005 (i.e., the
150th
day following the original issuance of the Notes), we incurred
liquidated damages as described above from April 22, 2005
through July 14, 2005, the day prior to the effective date
of the registration statement.
In no event will liquidated damages relating to the resale
registration statement accrue at a rate per year exceeding
0.50%. Liquidated damages will be computed on the basis of a
360-day year composed of twelve 30-day months. If a holder has
converted some or all of its Notes into Class A common
stock, the holder will be entitled to receive equivalent amounts
based on the accreted principal amount of the Notes converted. A
holders right to liquidated damages shall be its sole
remedy in the event of a registration default.
169
REGISTERED BORROW FACILITY
Share Lending Agreement
We understand that, when we sold the notes, and for some time
thereafter, it was difficult for investors in the notes to
borrow shares of our Class A common stock for the purpose
of shorting such stock to hedge their investment in the notes.
We also understand that many investors in convertible securities
seek to hedge their exposure to the issuers common stock
by selling the stock short to establish an initial hedge
position that partially offsets the long position represented by
the convertible securities. Such investors then dynamically
adjust their hedge position over time as the market price of the
underlying stock and the time to maturity of the convertible
securities changes. As the stock price increases, investors will
generally increase their hedge position by borrowing and
shorting more shares, and as the stock price decreases,
investors will generally decrease their hedge position by buying
shares in the market and closing out their stock loans.
Because there were not sufficient shares of our Class A
common stock available for investors to borrow when we offered
the notes, and because we understood that the shares that were
available were relatively expensive to borrow, we were concerned
that, in order to sell the notes, we would be forced to offer
terms that would have been unfavorable to us. To address this
concern, and to make it possible or less expensive for
prospective investors in the notes to hedge their investment, we
entered into a share lending agreement, dated November 22,
2004, with Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
(Citigroup), as agent for Citigroup Global Markets
Limited (CGML), as borrower. Under this agreement,
we agreed to loan to CGML up to 150 million shares of our
Class A common stock on one or more occasions prior to
November 16, 2006 or, if earlier, the date as of which all
of the notes cease to be outstanding as the result of
conversion, repurchase, redemption or otherwise. We will receive
a loan fee of $.001 per share for each share that we loan
to CGML, payable at the time such share is borrowed. Citigroup
Global Markets Holdings Inc. guaranteed the obligations of CGML
under the share lending agreement.
Notwithstanding the difficulties that we believe holders faced
in establishing hedge positions at the time we initially sold
the notes and for some time thereafter, we now understand that
many investors in the notes have since been able to borrow
shares of our Class A common stock for the purpose of
shorting such stock to hedge their investment in the notes.
However, we are nonetheless required under the registration
rights agreement to register the shares. As noted below, we have
been advised by CGML that it or its affiliates intend to use the
short sales of our Class A common stock to facilitate the
establishment by the holders of our notes of hedged positions
with respect to such notes. These holders may include holders
who have not yet established hedge positions and may also
include other holders who have already established hedge
positions but wish to establish new hedge positions through CGML
because these new hedge positions will be less expensive to
maintain than their pre-existing hedge positions. We understand
that such holders who are already hedged will likely seek to
close out their existing hedge positions by obtaining shares in
the open market.
Under the agreement, CGML agreed that it will not transfer or
dispose of the borrowed shares except for the purpose of
directly or indirectly facilitating the hedging of the notes by
holders. Any shares of our Class A common stock that Citigroup
returns to us to reduce its stock loan after such shares have
been sold into the public market pursuant to a registration
statement cannot be reborrowed.
Share loans under the share lending agreement will terminate and
the borrowed shares must be returned to us:
|
|
|
|
|
if and when CGML in its discretion terminates all or any portion
of a loan at any time; |
|
|
|
if and when we terminate any or all of the outstanding loans
upon a default by CGML under the share lending agreement,
including a breach by CGML of any of its representations and
warranties, covenants or agreements under the share lending
agreement or the bankruptcy of CGML; or |
|
|
|
on November 16, 2009, the termination date for the share
lending agreement or, sooner, if and when all of the notes have
been converted, repaid, redeemed or are otherwise no longer
outstanding. |
170
We will not otherwise have the right to terminate any loan of
borrowed shares.
Any shares that we loan to CGML will be issued and outstanding
for corporate law purposes, and accordingly, the purchasers of
the borrowed shares and their transferees have all of the rights
of a holder of our outstanding shares of Class A common
stock, including the right to vote the shares on all matters
submitted to a vote of our stockholders and the right to receive
any dividends or other distributions that we may pay or make on
our outstanding shares of Class A common stock, although.
However, under the share lending agreement, CGML has agreed:
|
|
|
|
|
to pay to us an amount equal to any cash dividends that we pay
on the borrowed shares, and |
|
|
|
to pay or deliver to us any other distribution, in liquidation
or otherwise, that we make on the borrowed shares. |
CGML has also agreed under the share lending agreement that it
will not vote any borrowed shares of which it is the record
owner and it will not transfer or dispose of any borrowed shares
except pursuant to a registration statement that is effective
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. However, investors
that purchase the shares from CGML (and any subsequent
transferees of such purchasers) will be entitled to the same
voting rights with respect to those shares as any other holder
of our Class A common stock.
If the credit ratings of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings,
Inc., the guarantor of CGMLs obligations under the share
lending agreement, decline below a specified level, CGML has
agreed under the share lending agreement to post and maintain
with Citigroup, as collateral agent on our behalf, collateral in
the form of cash, government securities, certificates of
deposit, high grade commercial paper of U.S. issuers or
money market shares with a market value at least equal to 100%
of the market value of the borrowed shares as security for the
obligation of CGML to return the borrowed shares to us when
required.
In view of the contractual undertakings of CGML in the share
lending agreement, which have the effect of substantially
eliminating the economic dilution that otherwise would result
from the issuance of the borrowed shares, we believe that under
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles currently in
effect, the borrowed shares will not be considered outstanding
for the purpose of computing and reporting our earnings per
share.
The existence of the share lending agreement and the short
positions established in connection with facilitating the
hedging of the notes could have the effect of causing the market
price of our Class A common stock to be lower over the term
of the share lending agreement than it would have been had we
not entered into the agreement.
Our issuance of 150 million shares of our Class A
common stock offered pursuant to the share lending agreement
will be essentially analogous to a sale of shares coupled with a
forward contract for the reacquisition of the shares at a future
date. An instrument that requires physical settlement by
repurchase of a fixed number of shares in exchange for cash is
considered a forward purchase instrument. While the share
lending agreement does not require a cash payment upon return of
the shares, physical settlement is required (i.e., the
150 million shares must be returned at the end of the
arrangement. Assuming that the entire 150 million shares
are lent, the fair value of the common stock to be lent is
approximately $200 million based on the closing price of
our common stock on July 18, 2005. However, the net effect
on shareholders deficit of the share lending agreement
(exclusive of the adjustment for the fair value of the stock
borrow facility discussed below) which includes our requirement
to lend the shares and the counterparties requirement to
return the shares, is to increase equity by $150,000, which
represents the cash received upon lending of the shares and is
equal to the par value of the common stock to be issued.
The shares to be issued are required to be returned, in
accordance with the contractual arrangement, and will be treated
in basic and diluted earnings per share as if they were already
returned and retired. Consequently, there will be no impact of
the 150 million shares of common stock subject to the share
lending agreement in the earnings per share calculation.
However, the shares will nonetheless be issued and outstanding
and will be eligible for trading in the Nasdaq National Market.
Accordingly, the increase in supply of shares may have an
adverse impact on the trading price of our Class A common
stock. See
171
Risk Factors Additional Risks Related to this
Offering, the Notes and the Class A Common
Stock The effect of the issuance of our shares of
Class A common stock pursuant to the share lending
agreement and upon conversion of the notes, including sales of
our Class A common stock in short sale transactions by the
holders of the notes, may have a negative effect on the market
price of our Class A common stock. Accordingly, the
existence of the share lending agreement and the short positions
established in connection with facilitating the hedging of the
notes could have the effect of causing the market price of our
Class A common stock to be lower over the term of the share
lending agreement than it would have been had we not entered
into the agreement, but we believe that entering into the share
lending agreement was in our best interests and the best
interests of our shareholders as it facilitated the sale of the
notes on terms more favorable to us than we could have otherwise
obtained.
The share lending agreement was entered into to facilitate the
ability of the purchasers of the notes to improve or enhance
their yield on the notes and as such was a cost of the
5.875% notes issuance transaction. We determined that the
fair value of the stock borrow facility was approximately
$13 million on the date of issuance of these notes.
Therefore, we recorded such value at issuance as an increase to
deferred financing fees and additional paid in capital in our
consolidated financial statements. We are amortizing the value
of the stock borrow facility to interest expense over the
five-year term of these notes.
Registration Rights on Shares Covered by Share Lending
Agreement
We agreed to use our reasonable best efforts to cause to become
effective within 130 days after the original issue date of
the notes, a registration statement with the Securities and
Exchange Commission covering our Class A common stock that
can be used by Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as agent for the
borrower, to sell up to 150 million shares that we will
loan to borrower pursuant to the share lending agreement.
Such registration statement was not declared effective by that
date, and we therefore have incurred liquidated damages as
defined in the related indenture from April 2, 2005 and
will continue to incur such damages until July 17, 2005,
the day prior to the effective date. These liquidated damages
have been or will be paid in cash, at a rate of 0.25% per month
of the accreted principal amount of the convertible notes for
the first 60 days of the default, and at a rate of 0.50%
per month of the accreted principal amount of the convertible
notes thereafter.
All borrow facility liquidated damages will be computed on the
basis of a 360-day year composed of twelve 30-day months and
when accrued will be paid, or added to the accreted principal
amount of the notes, monthly on the sixteenth day of each month
to record holders of notes as of the close of business on the
first day of each month. Holders who convert their notes into
our Class A common stock will not be entitled to any borrow
facility liquidated damages.
If less than 150 million shares are sold by Citigroup Global
Markets Inc., as agent for the borrower, Citigroup Global
Markets Inc. has the right to request that we file up to four
additional registration statements to register the remaining
shares of our Class A common stock that may be lent
pursuant to the share lending agreement. In each such case, we
will be required to use our commercially reasonable efforts to
cause such registration to become effective. However, we are not
subject to liquidated damages if any such registration statement
is not declared effective by any specific date (or at all).
172
DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN INDEBTEDNESS
As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, our actual
total debt was approximately $18.9 billion and
$19.5 billion, as summarized below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual | |
|
Actual | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
Start date for | |
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
|
cash interest | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Interest |
|
payment on | |
|
|
|
|
Face | |
|
Accreted | |
|
Face | |
|
Accreted | |
|
payment |
|
discount | |
|
Maturity | |
|
|
value | |
|
value(a) | |
|
value | |
|
value(a) | |
|
dates |
|
notes | |
|
date(b) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Charter Communications, Inc.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.750% convertible senior notes due 2006(c)
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
12/1 & 6/1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/1/06 |
|
|
5.875% convertible senior notes due 2009(c)
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
5/16 & 11/16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/16/09 |
|
Charter Holdings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.250% senior notes due 2007(d)
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
4/1 & 10/1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/1/07 |
|
|
8.625% senior notes due 2009
|
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
4/1 & 10/1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/1/09 |
|
|
9.920% senior discount notes due 2011
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
4/1 & 10/1 |
|
|
10/1/04 |
|
|
|
4/1/11 |
|
|
10.000% senior notes due 2009
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
4/1 & 10/1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/1/09 |
|
|
10.250% senior notes due 2010
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
1/15 & 7/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/15/10 |
|
|
11.750% senior discount notes due 2010
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
1/15 & 7/15 |
|
|
7/15/05 |
|
|
|
1/15/10 |
|
|
10.750% senior notes due 2009
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
4/1 & 10/1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/1/09 |
|
|
11.125% senior notes due 2011
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
1/15 & 7/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/15/11 |
|
|
13.500% senior discount notes due 2011
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
1/15 & 7/15 |
|
|
7/15/06 |
|
|
|
1/15/11 |
|
|
9.625% senior notes due 2009
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
5/15 & 11/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/15/09 |
|
|
10.000% senior notes due 2011
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
5/15 & 11/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/15/11 |
|
|
11.750% senior discount notes due 2011
|
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
5/15 & 11/15 |
|
|
11/15/06 |
|
|
|
5/15/11 |
|
|
12.125% senior discount notes due 2012
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
1/15 & 7/15 |
|
|
7/15/07 |
|
|
|
1/15/12 |
|
CCH II:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.250% senior notes due 2010
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
3/15 & 9/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/15/10 |
|
CCO Holdings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.750% senior notes due 2013
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
5/15 & 11/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/15/13 |
|
|
Senior floating rate notes due 2010
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
3/15, 6/15, 9/15 & 12/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/15/10 |
|
Charter Operating:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8% senior second lien notes due 2012
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
4/30 & 10/30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/12 |
|
|
83/8% senior
second lien notes due 2014(d)
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
4/30 & 10/30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/30/14 |
|
Renaissance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.000% senior discount notes due 2008
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
4/15 & 10/15 |
|
|
10/15/03 |
|
|
|
4/15/08 |
|
CC V Holdings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.875% senior discount notes due 2008(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
6/1 & 12/1 |
|
|
6/1/04 |
|
|
|
12/1/08 |
|
Credit Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charter Operating
|
|
|
5,088 |
|
|
|
5,088 |
|
|
|
5,515 |
|
|
|
5,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,204 |
|
|
$ |
18,929 |
|
|
$ |
19,791 |
|
|
$ |
19,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The accreted value presented above represents the face value of
the notes less the original issue discount at the time of sale
plus the accretion to the balance sheet date. |
|
(b) |
|
In general, the obligors have the right to redeem all of the
notes set forth in the above table (except with respect to the
5.875% convertible senior notes due 2009 and the Charter
Holdings notes with terms of eight years) in whole or part at
their option, beginning at various times prior to their stated
maturity dates, subject to certain conditions, upon the payment
of the outstanding principal amount (plus a specified redemption
premium) and all accrued and unpaid interest. The 5.875%
convertible senior notes are redeemable if the closing price of
our Class A common stock exceeds the conversion price by
certain percentages as described below. For additional
information, see Note 9 to our consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. |
|
(c) |
|
The 4.75% convertible senior notes and the 5.875% convertible
senior notes are convertible at the option of the holders into
shares of Class A common stock at a conversion rate,
subject to certain adjustments, of 38.0952 and 413.2231 shares,
respectively, per $1,000 principal amount of notes, which is
equivalent to a price of $26.25 and $2.42 per share,
respectively. Certain anti-dilutive provisions cause adjustments
to occur automatically upon the occurrence of specified events.
Additionally, the conversion ratio may be adjusted by us when
deemed appropriate. Since March 31, |
173
|
|
|
|
|
2005, we repurchased, from a small number of institutional
holders, a total of $97 million principal amount of the
4.75% convertible senior notes, leaving $25 million
principal amount outstanding. |
|
(d) |
|
Since March 31, 2005, Charter Operating, consummated
exchange transactions with a small number of institutional
holders of Charter Holdings 8.25% senior notes due 2007 pursuant
to which Charter Operating issued, in a private placement,
approximately $62 million principal amount of its 8.375%
senior second lien notes due 2014 in exchange for approximately
$62 million of the Charter Holdings 8.25% senior notes due
2007. The Charter Holdings notes received in the exchange were
thereafter distributed to Charter Holdings and cancelled. |
|
(e) |
|
On March 14, 2005, CC V Holdings, LLC redeemed all of
its outstanding notes, at 103.958% of principal amount, plus
accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. We are
not required to redeem any of the other notes listed above prior
to their stated maturity dates. |
As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, our
long-term debt totaled approximately $18.9 billion and
$19.5 billion, respectively. This debt was comprised of
approximately $5.1 billion and $5.5 billion of credit
facility debt, $12.9 billion and $13.0 billion
accreted value of high-yield notes and $957 million and
$990 million accreted value of convertible senior notes at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the
weighted average interest rate on the credit facility debt was
approximately 7.0% and 6.8%, respectively, the weighted average
interest rate on our high-yield notes was approximately 9.9% and
9.9%, and the weighted average interest rate on the convertible
senior notes was approximately 5.7% and 5.7%, respectively,
resulting in a blended weighted average interest rate of 8.9%
and 8.8%, respectively. The interest rate on approximately 82%
and 83% of the total principal amount of our debt was
effectively fixed, including the effects of our interest rate
hedge agreements as of March 31, 2005 and December 31,
2004, respectively. The fair value of our high-yield notes was
$11.2 billion and $12.2 billion at March 31, 2005
and December 31, 2004, respectively. The fair value of our
convertible senior notes was $859 million and
$1.1 billion at March 31, 2005 and December 31,
2004, respectively. The fair value of our credit facilities was
approximately $5.1 billion and $5.5 billion at
March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
The fair value of high-yield and convertible notes is based on
quoted market prices, and the fair value of the credit
facilities is based on dealer quotations.
The following description is a summary of certain material
provisions of the amended and restated Charter Operating credit
facilities and the public notes of our subsidiaries
(collectively, the Debt Agreements). The summary
does not restate the terms of the Debt Agreements in their
entirety, nor does it describe all terms of the Debt Agreements.
The agreements and instruments governing each of the Debt
Agreements are complicated and you should consult such
agreements and instruments for more detailed information
regarding the Debt Agreements.
|
|
|
Charter Operating Credit Facilities
General |
The Charter Operating credit facilities were amended and
restated concurrently with the sale of $1.5 billion senior
second-lien notes in April 2004, among other things, to
defer maturities and increase availability under these
facilities and to enable Charter Operating to acquire the
interests of the lenders under the CC VI Operating,
CC VIII Operating and Falcon credit facilities,
thereby consolidating all credit facilities under one amended
and restated Charter Operating credit agreement.
The Charter Operating credit facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
provide borrowing availability of up to $6.5 billion; |
|
|
|
provide for two term facilities: |
|
|
|
(i) a Term A facility with a total principal amount of
$2.0 billion, of which 12.5% matures in 2007, 30% matures
in 2008, 37.5% matures in 2009 and 20% matures in 2010; and |
174
|
|
|
(ii) a Term B facility with a total principal amount
of $3.0 billion, which shall be repayable in 27 equal
quarterly installments aggregating in each loan year to 1% of
the original amount of the Term B facility, with the
remaining balance due at final maturity in 2011; and |
|
|
|
|
|
provide for a revolving credit facility, in a total amount of
$1.5 billion, with a maturity date in 2010. |
Amounts outstanding under the Charter Operating credit
facilities bear interest, at Charter Operatings election,
at a base rate or the Eurodollar rate, as defined, plus a margin
for Eurodollar loans of up to 3.00% for the Term A facility
and revolving credit facility, and up to 3.25% for the
Term B facility, and for base rate loans of up to 2.00% for
the Term A facility and revolving credit facility, and up
to 2.25% for the Term B facility. A quarterly commitment
fee of up to .75% is payable on the average daily unborrowed
balance of the revolving credit facilities.
The obligations of our subsidiaries under the Charter Operating
credit facilities (the Obligations) are guaranteed
by Charter Operatings immediate parent company, CCO
Holdings, and the subsidiaries of Charter Operating, except for
immaterial subsidiaries and subsidiaries precluded from
guaranteeing by reason of the provisions of other indebtedness
to which they are subject (the non-guarantor
subsidiaries, primarily Renaissance and its subsidiaries).
The Obligations are also secured by (i) a lien on all of
the assets of Charter Operating and its subsidiaries (other than
assets of the non-guarantor subsidiaries), to the extent such
lien can be perfected under the Uniform Commercial Code by the
filing of a financing statement, and (ii) by a pledge by
CCO Holdings of the equity interests owned by it in Charter
Operating or any of Charter Operatings subsidiaries, as
well as intercompany obligations owing to it by any of such
entities. Upon the Charter Holdings Leverage Ratio (as defined
in the indenture governing the Charter Holdings senior notes and
senior discount notes) being under 8.75 to 1.0, the Charter
Operating credit facilities require that the 11.875% notes
due 2008 issued by CC V Holdings, LLC be redeemed. Because such
Leverage Ratio was determined to be under 8.75 to 1.0, CC V
Holdings, LLC redeemed such notes in March 2005, and CC V
Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaries (other than non-guarantor
subsidiaries) became guarantors of the Obligations and have
granted a lien on all of their assets as to which a lien can be
perfected under the Uniform Commercial Code by the filing of a
financing statement.
|
|
|
Charter Operating Credit Facilities
Restrictive Covenants |
The Charter Operating credit facilities contain representations
and warranties, and affirmative and negative covenants customary
for financings of this type. The financial covenants measure
performance against standards set for leverage, debt service
coverage, and interest coverage, tested as of the end of each
quarter. The maximum allowable leverage ratio is 4.25 to 1.0
until maturity, tested as of the end of each quarter beginning
September 30, 2004. Additionally, the Charter Operating
credit facilities contain provisions requiring mandatory loan
prepayments under specific circumstances, including when
significant amounts of assets are sold and the proceeds are not
reinvested in assets useful in the business of the borrower
within a specified period, and upon the incurrence of certain
indebtedness when the ratio of senior first lien debt to
operating cash flow is greater than 2.0 to 1.0.
The Charter Operating credit facilities permit Charter Operating
and its subsidiaries to make distributions to pay interest on
the Charter Operating senior second-lien notes, the CCH II
senior notes, the CCO Holdings senior notes, the Charter
convertible senior notes and the Charter Holdings senior notes,
provided that, among other things, no default has occurred and
is continuing under the Charter Operating credit facilities.
Conditions to future borrowings include absence of a default or
an event of default under the Charter Operating credit
facilities and the continued accuracy in all material respects
of the representations and warranties, including the absence
since December 31, 2003 of any event, development or
circumstance that has had or could reasonably be expected to
have a material adverse effect on our business.
175
The events of default under the Charter Operating credit
facilities include, among other things:
|
|
|
(i) the failure to make payments when due or within the
applicable grace period, |
|
|
(ii) the failure to comply with specified covenants,
including but not limited to a covenant to deliver audited
financial statements with an unqualified opinion from our
independent auditors, |
|
|
(iii) the failure to pay or the occurrence of events that
cause or permit the acceleration of other indebtedness owing by
CCO Holdings, Charter Operating or Charter Operatings
subsidiaries in amounts in excess of $50 million in
aggregate principal amount, |
|
|
(iv) the failure to pay or the occurrence of events that
result in the acceleration of other indebtedness owing by
certain of CCO Holdings direct and indirect parent
companies in amounts in excess of $200 million in aggregate
principal amount, |
|
|
(v) Paul Allen and/or certain of his family members and/or
their exclusively owned entities (collectively, the Paul
Allen Group) ceasing to have the power, directly or
indirectly, to vote at least 35% of the ordinary voting power of
Charter Operating, |
|
|
(vi) the consummation of any transaction resulting in any
person or group (other than the Paul Allen Group) having power,
directly or indirectly, to vote more than 35% of the ordinary
voting power of Charter Operating, unless the Paul Allen Group
holds a greater share of ordinary voting power of Charter
Operating, |
|
|
(vii) certain of Charter Operatings indirect or
direct parent companies having indebtedness in excess of
$500 million aggregate principal amount which remains
undefeased three months prior to the final maturity of such
indebtedness, and |
|
|
(viii) Charter Operating ceasing to be a wholly-owned
direct subsidiary of CCO Holdings, except in certain very
limited circumstances. |
Outstanding Notes
|
|
|
Charter Communications, Inc. Notes |
|
|
|
Charter 5.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2009 |
See Description of Notes for the terms of
$862.5 million outstanding principal amount of 5.875%
convertible senior notes due 2009.
|
|
|
Charter 4.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2006 |
In May 2001, Charter issued 4.75% convertible senior notes
with a total principal amount at maturity of $633 million.
As of March 31, 2005, there was $122 million in total
principal amount of these notes outstanding. Since
March 31, 2005, we repurchased, from a small number of
institutional holders, $97 million total principal amount
of these notes, leaving $25 million in principal amount
outstanding. The 4.75% convertible notes rank equally with any
of our future unsubordinated and unsecured indebtedness, but are
structurally subordinated to all existing and future
indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries.
The 4.75% convertible notes are convertible at the option of the
holder into shares of Class A common stock at a conversion
rate of 38.0952 shares per $1,000 principal amount of
notes, which is equivalent to a price of $26.25 per share,
subject to certain adjustments. Specifically, the adjustments
include anti-dilutive provisions, which automatically occur
based on the occurrence of specified events to provide
protection rights to holders of the notes. Additionally, Charter
may adjust the conversion ratio under certain circumstances when
deemed appropriate. These notes are redeemable at our option at
amounts decreasing from 101.9% to 100% of the principal amount,
plus accrued and unpaid interest beginning on June 4, 2004,
to the date of redemption. Interest is payable semiannually on
December 1 and June 1, beginning December 1,
2001, until maturity on June 1, 2006.
176
Upon a change of control, subject to certain conditions and
restrictions, Charter may be required to repurchase the notes,
in whole or in part, at 100% of their principal amount plus
accrued interest at the repurchase date.
|
|
|
Charter Communications Holdings, LLC Notes |
|
|
|
March 1999 Charter Holdings Notes |
The March 1999 Charter Holdings notes were issued under three
separate indentures, each dated as of March 17, 1999, among
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital, as the issuers, and BNY
Midwest Trust Company, as trustee. Charter Holdings and Charter
Capital exchanged these notes for new notes with substantially
similar terms, except that the new notes are registered under
the Securities Act.
The March 1999 Charter Holdings notes are general unsecured
obligations of Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. Cash
interest on the March 1999 9.920% Charter Holdings notes began
to accrue on April 1, 2004.
The March 1999 Charter Holdings notes are senior debt
obligations of Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. They rank
equally with all other current and future unsubordinated
obligations of Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. They are
structurally subordinated to the obligations of Charter
Holdings subsidiaries, including the CCH II notes,
the CCO Holdings notes, the Renaissance notes, the Charter
Operating credit facilities and the Charter Operating notes.
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital will not have the right to
redeem the March 1999 8.250% Charter Holdings notes prior to
their maturity on April 1, 2007. Charter Holdings and
Charter Capital may redeem some or all of the March 1999 8.625%
Charter Holdings notes and the March 1999 9.920% Charter
Holdings notes at any time, in each case, at a premium. The
optional redemption price declines to 100% of the principal
amount of March 1999 Charter Holdings notes redeemed, plus
accrued and unpaid interest, if any, for redemption on or after
April 1, 2007.
In the event that a specified change of control event occurs,
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital must offer to repurchase
any then outstanding March 1999 Charter Holdings notes at 101%
of their principal amount or accreted value, as applicable, plus
accrued and unpaid interest, if any.
The indentures governing the March 1999 Charter Holdings notes
contain restrictive covenants that limit certain transactions or
activities by Charter Holdings and its restricted subsidiaries.
See Summary of Restrictive Covenants Under the
Charter Holdings High-Yield Notes. Substantially all of
Charter Holdings direct and indirect subsidiaries are
currently restricted subsidiaries.
|
|
|
January 2000 Charter Holdings Notes |
The January 2000 Charter Holdings notes were issued under three
separate indentures, each dated as of January 12, 2000,
among Charter Holdings and Charter Capital, as the issuers, and
BNY Midwest Trust Company, as trustee. In June 2000, Charter
Holdings and Charter Capital exchanged these notes for new notes
with substantially similar terms, except that the new notes are
registered under the Securities Act.
The January 2000 Charter Holdings notes are general unsecured
obligations of Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. Cash
interest on the January 2000 11.75% Charter Holdings notes began
to accrue on January 15, 2005.
The January 2000 Charter Holdings notes are senior debt
obligations of Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. They rank
equally with all other current and future unsubordinated
obligations of Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. They are
structurally subordinated to the obligations of Charter
Holdings subsidiaries, including the CCH II notes,
the CCO Holdings notes, the Renaissance notes, the Charter
Operating credit facilities and the Charter Operating notes.
177
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital will not have the right to
redeem the January 2000 10.00% Charter Holdings notes prior to
their maturity on April 1, 2009. Charter Holdings and
Charter Capital may redeem some or all of the January 2000
10.25% Charter Holdings notes and the January 2000 11.75%
Charter Holdings notes at any time, in each case, at a premium.
The optional redemption price declines to 100% of the principal
amount of the January 2000 Charter Holdings notes redeemed, plus
accrued and unpaid interest, if any, for redemption on or after
January 15, 2008.
In the event that a specified change of control event occurs,
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital must offer to repurchase
any then outstanding January 2000 Charter Holdings notes at 101%
of their total principal amount or accreted value, as
applicable, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.
The indentures governing the January 2000 Charter Holdings notes
contain substantially identical events of default, affirmative
covenants and negative covenants as those contained in the
indentures governing the March 1999 Charter Holdings notes. See
Summary of Restrictive Covenants Under the
Charter Holdings High-Yield Notes.
|
|
|
January 2001 Charter Holdings Notes |
The January 2001 Charter Holdings notes were issued under three
separate indentures, each dated as of January 10, 2001,
each among Charter Holdings and Charter Capital, as the issuers,
and BNY Midwest Trust Company, as trustee. In March 2001,
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital exchanged these notes for
new notes, with substantially similar terms, except that the new
notes are registered under the Securities Act.
The January 2001 Charter Holdings notes are general unsecured
obligations of Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. Cash
interest on the January 2001 13.500% Charter Holdings notes will
not accrue prior to January 15, 2006.
The January 2001 Charter Holdings notes are senior debt
obligations of Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. They rank
equally with all other current and future unsubordinated
obligations of Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. They are
structurally subordinated to the obligations of Charter
Holdings subsidiaries, including the CCH II notes,
the CCO Holdings notes, the Renaissance notes, the Charter
Operating credit facilities and the Charter Operating notes.
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital will not have the right to
redeem the January 2001 10.750% Charter Holdings notes prior to
their maturity on October 1, 2009. On or after
January 15, 2006, Charter Holdings and Charter Capital may
redeem some or all of the January 2001 11.125% Charter Holdings
notes and the January 2001 13.500% Charter Holdings notes at any
time, in each case, at a premium. The optional redemption price
declines to 100% of the principal amount of the January 2001
Charter Holdings notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid
interest, if any, for redemption on or after January 15,
2009.
In the event that a specified change of control event occurs,
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital must offer to repurchase
any then outstanding January 2001 Charter Holdings notes at 101%
of their total principal amount or accreted value, as
applicable, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.
The indentures governing the January 2001 Charter Holdings notes
contain substantially identical events of default, affirmative
covenants and negative covenants as those contained in the
indentures governing the March 1999 Charter Holdings notes. See
Summary of Restrictive Covenants Under the
Charter Holdings High-Yield Notes.
|
|
|
May 2001 Charter Holdings Notes |
The May 2001 Charter Holdings notes were issued under three
separate indentures, each among Charter Holdings and Charter
Capital, as the issuers, and BNY Midwest Trust Company, as
trustee. In September 2001, Charter Holdings and Charter Capital
exchanged substantially all of these notes for new notes with
substantially similar terms, except that the new notes are
registered under the Securities Act.
178
The May 2001 Charter Holdings notes are general unsecured
obligations of Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. Cash
interest on the May 2001 11.750% Charter Holdings notes will not
accrue prior to May 15, 2006.
The May 2001 Charter Holdings notes are senior debt obligations
of Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. They rank equally with
all other current and future unsubordinated obligations of
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. They are structurally
subordinated to the obligations of Charter Holdings
subsidiaries, including the CCH II notes, the CCO Holdings
notes, the Renaissance notes, the Charter Operating credit
facilities and the Charter Operating notes.
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital will not have the right to
redeem the May 2001 9.625% Charter Holdings notes prior to their
maturity on November 15, 2009. On or after May 15,
2006, Charter Holdings and Charter Capital may redeem some or
all of the May 2001 10.000% Charter Holdings notes and the May
2001 11.750% Charter Holdings notes at any time, in each case,
at a premium. The optional redemption price declines to 100% of
the principal amount of the May 2001 Charter Holdings notes
redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, for
redemption on or after May 15, 2009.
In the event that a specified change of control event occurs,
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital must offer to repurchase
any then outstanding May 2001 Charter Holdings notes at 101% of
their total principal amount or accreted value, as applicable,
plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.
The indentures governing the May 2001 Charter Holdings notes
contain substantially identical events of default, affirmative
covenants and negative covenants as those contained in the
indentures governing the March 1999 Charter Holdings notes. See
Summary of Restrictive Covenants Under the
Charter Holdings High-Yield Notes.
|
|
|
January 2002 Charter Holdings Notes |
The January 2002 Charter Holdings notes were issued under three
separate indentures, each among Charter Holdings and Charter
Capital, as the issuers, and BNY Midwest Trust Company, as
trustee, two of which were supplements to the indentures for the
May 2001 Charter Holdings notes. In July 2002, Charter Holdings
and Charter Capital exchanged substantially all of these notes
for new notes, with substantially similar terms, except that the
new notes are registered under the Securities Act.
The January 2002 Charter Holdings notes are general unsecured
obligations of Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. Cash
interest on the January 2002 12.125% Charter Holdings notes will
not accrue prior to January 15, 2007.
The January 2002 Charter Holdings notes are senior debt
obligations of Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. They rank
equally with the current and future unsecured and unsubordinated
debt of Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. They are
structurally subordinated to the obligations of Charter
Holdings subsidiaries, including the CCH II notes,
the CCO Holdings notes, the Renaissance notes, the Charter
Operating credit facilities and the Charter Operating notes.
The Charter Holdings 12.125% senior discount notes are
redeemable at the option of the issuers at amounts decreasing
from 106.063% to 100% of accreted value beginning
January 15, 2007.
In the event that a specified change of control event occurs,
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital must offer to repurchase
any then outstanding January 2002 Charter Holdings notes at 101%
of their total principal amount or accreted value, as
applicable, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.
The indentures governing the January 2002 Charter Holdings notes
contain substantially identical events of default, affirmative
covenants and negative covenants as those contained in the
indentures governing the March 1999 Charter Holdings notes. See
Summary of Restrictive Covenants Under the
Charter Holdings High-Yield Notes.
179
|
|
|
Summary of Restrictive Covenants Under the Charter Holdings
High-Yield Notes |
The limitations on incurrence of debt and issuance of preferred
stock contained in Charter Holdings indentures permit
Charter Holdings and its subsidiaries to incur additional debt
or issue preferred stock, so long as there is no default under
the Charter Holdings indentures. These limitations restrict the
incurrence of debt unless, after giving pro forma effect to the
incurrence, the Charter Holdings Leverage Ratio would be below
8.75 to 1.0. In addition, regardless of whether the leverage
ratio could be met, so long as no default exists or would result
from the incurrence or issuance, Charter Holdings and its
restricted subsidiaries are permitted to issue:
|
|
|
|
|
up to $3.5 billion of debt under credit facilities, |
|
|
|
up to $75 million of debt incurred to finance the purchase
or capital lease of new assets, |
|
|
|
up to $300 million of additional debt for any purpose, |
|
|
|
additional debt in an amount equal to 200% of new cash equity
proceeds received by Charter Holdings and its restricted
subsidiaries since March 1999, the date of our first indenture,
and not allocated for restricted payments or permitted
investments, and |
|
|
|
other items of indebtedness for specific purposes such as
intercompany debt, refinancing of existing debt, and interest
rate swaps to provide protection against fluctuation in interest
rates. |
Indebtedness under a single facility or agreement may be
incurred in part under one of the categories listed above and in
part under another. Accordingly, indebtedness under our credit
facilities is incurred under a combination of the categories of
permitted indebtedness listed above.
The restricted subsidiaries of Charter Holdings are generally
not permitted to issue debt securities contractually
subordinated in right of payment to other debt of the issuing
subsidiary or preferred stock, in either case in any public or
Rule 144A offering.
The Charter Holdings indentures permit Charter Holdings and its
restricted subsidiaries to incur debt under one category, and
later reclassify that debt into another category. The Charter
Operating credit facilities generally impose more restrictive
limitations on incurring new debt than Charter Holdings
indentures, so our subsidiaries that are subject to the Charter
Operating credit facilities may not be permitted to utilize the
full debt incurrence that would otherwise be available under the
Charter Holdings indenture covenants.
Generally, under Charter Holdings high-yield indentures:
|
|
|
|
|
Charter Holdings and its restricted subsidiaries are generally
permitted to pay dividends on equity interests, repurchase
interests, or make other specified restricted payments only if,
after giving pro forma effect to the transaction, the Charter
Holdings Leverage Ratio would be below 8.75 to 1.0 and if no
default exists or would exist as a consequence of such
incurrence. If those conditions are met, restricted payments in
a total amount of up to 100% of Charter Holdings
consolidated EBITDA, as defined, minus 1.2 times its
consolidated interest expense, plus 100% of new cash and
non-cash equity proceeds received by Charter Holdings and not
allocated to the debt incurrence covenant or to permitted
investments, all cumulatively from March 1999, the date of the
first Charter Holdings indenture, plus $100 million. |
In addition, Charter Holdings may make distributions or
restricted payments, so long as no default exists or would be
caused by transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
to repurchase management equity interests in amounts not to
exceed $10 million per fiscal year, |
|
|
|
regardless of the existence of any default, to pay pass-through
tax liabilities in respect of ownership of equity interests in
Charter Holdings or its restricted subsidiaries, or |
180
|
|
|
|
|
to make other specified restricted payments including merger
fees up to 1.25% of the transaction value, repurchases using
concurrent new issuances, and certain dividends on existing
subsidiary preferred equity interests. |
Charter Holdings and its restricted subsidiaries may not make
investments except permitted investments if there is a default
under the indentures or if, after giving effect to the
transaction, the Charter Holdings Leverage Ratio would be above
8.75 to 1.0.
Permitted investments include:
|
|
|
|
|
investments by Charter Holdings in restricted subsidiaries or by
restricted subsidiaries in Charter Holdings, |
|
|
|
investments in productive assets (including through equity
investments) aggregating up to $150 million since March
1999, |
|
|
|
investments aggregating up to 100% of new cash equity proceeds
received by Charter Holdings since March 1999 and not allocated
to the debt incurrence or restricted payments covenant, and |
|
|
|
other investments aggregating up to $50 million since March
1999. |
Charter Holdings is not permitted to grant liens on its assets
other than specified permitted liens. Permitted liens include
liens securing debt and other obligations incurred under our
subsidiaries credit facilities, liens securing the
purchase price of new assets, liens securing indebtedness of up
to $50 million and other specified liens incurred in the
ordinary course of business. The lien covenant does not restrict
liens on assets of subsidiaries of Charter Holdings.
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital, its co-issuer, are
generally not permitted to sell all or substantially all of
their assets or merge with or into other companies unless their
leverage ratio after any such transaction would be no greater
than their leverage ratio immediately prior to the transaction,
or unless after giving effect to the transaction, the Charter
Holdings Leverage Ratio would be below 8.75 to 1.0, no default
exists, and the surviving entity is a U.S. entity that
assumes the Charter Holdings notes.
Charter Holdings and its restricted subsidiaries may generally
not otherwise sell assets or, in the case of restricted
subsidiaries, issue equity interests, unless they receive
consideration at least equal to the fair market value of the
assets or equity interests, consisting of at least 75% in cash,
assumption of liabilities, securities converted into cash within
60 days or productive assets. Charter Holdings and its
restricted subsidiaries are then required within 365 days
after any asset sale either to commit to use the net cash
proceeds over a specified threshold to acquire assets, including
current assets, used or useful in their businesses or use the
net cash proceeds to repay debt, or to offer to repurchase the
Charter Holdings notes with any remaining proceeds.
Charter Holdings and its restricted subsidiaries may generally
not engage in sale and leaseback transactions unless, at the
time of the transaction, Charter Holdings could have incurred
secured indebtedness in an amount equal to the present value of
the net rental payments to be made under the lease, and the sale
of the assets and application of proceeds is permitted by the
covenant restricting asset sales.
Charter Holdings restricted subsidiaries may generally not
enter into restrictions on their ability to make dividends or
distributions or transfer assets to Charter Holdings on terms
that are materially more restrictive than those governing their
debt, lien, asset sale, lease and similar agreements existing
when they entered into the indentures, unless those restrictions
are on customary terms that will not materially impair Charter
Holdings ability to repay the high-yield notes.
The restricted subsidiaries of Charter Holdings are generally
not permitted to guarantee or pledge assets to secure debt of
Charter Holdings, unless the guaranteeing subsidiary issues a
guarantee of the notes of comparable priority and tenor, and
waives any rights of reimbursement, indemnity or subrogation
arising from the guarantee transaction for at least one year.
181
The indentures also restrict the ability of Charter Holdings and
its restricted subsidiaries to enter into certain transactions
with affiliates involving consideration in excess of
$15 million without a determination by the board of
directors of Charter Holdings that the transaction is on terms
no less favorable than arms length, or transactions with
affiliates involving over $50 million without receiving an
independent opinion as to the fairness of the transaction
addressed to the holders of the Charter Holdings notes.
In September 2003, CCH II and CCH II Capital Corp.
jointly issued approximately $1.6 billion total principal
amount of 10.25% senior notes due 2010. The CCH II
notes are general unsecured obligations of CCH II and
CCH II Capital Corp. They rank equally with all other
current or future unsubordinated obligations of CCH II and
CCH II Capital Corp. The CCH II notes are structurally
subordinated to all obligations of subsidiaries of CCH II,
including the CCO Holdings notes, the Renaissance notes, the
Charter Operating credit facilities and the Charter Operating
notes.
Interest on the CCH II notes accrues at 10.25% per
annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on each
March 15 and September 15, commencing on
March 15, 2004.
At any time prior to September 15, 2006, the issuers of the
CCH II notes may redeem up to 35% of the total principal
amount of the CCH II notes on a pro rata basis at a
redemption price equal to 110.25% of the principal amount of
CCH II notes redeemed, plus any accrued and unpaid interest.
On or after September 15, 2008, the issuers of the
CCH II notes may redeem all or a part of the notes at a
redemption price that declines ratably from the initial
redemption price of 105.125% to a redemption price on or after
September 15, 2009 of 100.0% of the principal amount of the
CCH II notes redeemed, plus, in each case, any accrued and
unpaid interest.
In the event of specified change of control events, CCH II
must offer to purchase the outstanding CCH II notes from
the holders at a purchase price equal to 101% of the total
principal amount of the notes, plus any accrued and unpaid
interest.
The indenture governing the CCH II notes contains
restrictive covenants that limit certain transactions or
activities by CCH II and its restricted subsidiaries,
including the covenants summarized below. Substantially all of
CCH IIs direct and indirect subsidiaries are
currently restricted subsidiaries.
The covenant in the indenture governing the CCH II notes
that restricts incurrence of debt and issuance of preferred
stock permits CCH II and its subsidiaries to incur or issue
specified amounts of debt or preferred stock, if, after giving
effect to the incurrence, CCH II could meet a leverage
ratio (ratio of consolidated debt to four times EBITDA from the
most recent fiscal quarter for which internal financial reports
are available) of 5.5 to 1.0.
In addition, regardless of whether the leverage ratio could be
met, so long as no default exists or would result from the
incurrence or issuance, CCH II and its restricted
subsidiaries are permitted to incur or issue:
|
|
|
|
|
up to $9.75 billion of debt under credit facilities,
including debt under credit facilities outstanding on the issue
date of the CCH II notes, |
|
|
|
up to $75 million of debt incurred to finance the purchase
or capital lease of new assets, |
|
|
|
up to $300 million of additional debt for any
purpose, and |
|
|
|
other items of indebtedness for specific purposes such as
intercompany debt, refinancing of existing debt, and interest
rate swaps to provide protection against fluctuation in interest
rates. |
The restricted subsidiaries of CCH II are generally not
permitted to issue debt securities contractually subordinated to
other debt of the issuing subsidiary or preferred stock, in
either case in any public or Rule 144A offering.
182
The CCH II indenture permits CCH II and its restricted
subsidiaries to incur debt under one category, and later
reclassify that debt into another category. Our and our
subsidiaries credit agreements generally impose more
restrictive limitations on incurring new debt than the
CCH II indenture, so we and our subsidiaries that are
subject to credit agreements are not permitted to utilize the
full debt incurrence that would otherwise be available under the
CCH II indenture covenants.
Generally, under the CCH II indenture, CCH II and its
restricted subsidiaries are permitted to pay dividends on equity
interests, repurchase interests, or make other specified
restricted payments only if CCH II can incur $1.00 of new
debt under the leverage ratio test, which requires that
CCH II meet a 5.5 to 1.0 leverage ratio after giving effect
to the transaction, and if no default exists or would exist as a
consequence of such incurrence. If those conditions are met,
restricted payments in a total amount of up to 100% of CCH
IIs consolidated EBITDA, as defined, minus 1.3 times its
consolidated interest expense, plus 100% of new cash and
non-cash equity proceeds received by CCH II and not
allocated to the debt incurrence covenant, all cumulatively from
the fiscal quarter commenced July 1, 2003, plus
$100 million.
In addition, CCH II may make distributions or restricted
payments, so long as no default exists or would be caused by
transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
to repurchase management equity interests in amounts not to
exceed $10 million per fiscal year; |
|
|
|
regardless of the existence of any default, to pay pass-through
tax liabilities in respect of ownership of equity interests in
CCH II or its restricted subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
regardless of the existence of any default, to pay interest when
due on Charter Holdings notes, to pay, so long as there is no
default, interest on the convertible senior notes (including the
notes) of Charter, to purchase, redeem or refinance, so long as
CCH II could incur $1.00 of indebtedness under the 5.5 to
1.0 leverage ratio test referred to above and there is no
default, Charter Holdings notes, Charter notes, and other direct
or indirect parent company notes (including the CCH II
notes); |
|
|
|
to make distributions in connection with the private exchanges
pursuant to which the CCH II notes were issued; and |
|
|
|
other specified restricted payments including merger fees up to
1.25% of the transaction value, repurchases using concurrent new
issuances, and certain dividends on existing subsidiary
preferred equity interests. |
The indenture governing the CCH II notes restricts
CCH II and its restricted subsidiaries from making
investments, except specified permitted investments, or creating
new unrestricted subsidiaries, if there is a default under the
indenture or if CCH II could not incur $1.00 of new debt
under the 5.5 to 1.0 leverage ratio test described
above after giving effect to the transaction.
Permitted investments include:
|
|
|
|
|
investments by CCH II and its restricted subsidiaries in
CCH II and in other restricted subsidiaries, or entities
that become restricted subsidiaries as a result of the
investment; |
|
|
|
investments aggregating up to 100% of new cash equity proceeds
received by CCH II since September 23, 2003 to the
extent the proceeds have not been allocated to the restricted
payments covenant described above; |
|
|
|
investments resulting from the private exchanges pursuant to
which the CCH II notes were issued; |
|
|
|
other investments up to $750 million outstanding at any
time; and |
|
|
|
certain specified additional investments, such as investments in
customers and suppliers in the ordinary course of business and
investments received in connection with permitted asset sales. |
CCH II is not permitted to grant liens on its assets other
than specified permitted liens. Permitted liens include liens
securing debt and other obligations incurred under our
subsidiaries credit facilities, liens
183
securing the purchase price of new assets, liens securing
indebtedness up to $50 million and other specified liens
incurred in the ordinary course of business. The lien covenant
does not restrict liens on assets of subsidiaries of CCH II.
|
|
|
83/4%
Senior Notes due 2013 |
In November 2003, CCO Holdings and CCO Holdings Capital Corp.
jointly issued $500 million total principal amount of
83/4% senior
notes due 2013. The CCO Holdings notes are general unsecured
obligations of CCO Holdings and CCO Holdings Capital Corp. They
rank equally with all other current or future unsubordinated
obligations of CCO Holdings and CCO Holdings Capital Corp. The
CCO Holdings notes are structurally subordinated to all
obligations of CCO Holdings subsidiaries, including the
Renaissance notes, the Charter Operating credit facilities and
the Charter Operating notes.
Interest on the CCO Holdings senior notes accrues at
83/4% per
year and is payable semi-annually in arrears on each May 15
and November 15.
At any time prior to November 15, 2006, the issuers of the
CCO Holdings senior notes may redeem up to 35% of the total
principal amount of the CCO Holdings senior notes to the extent
of public equity proceeds they have received on a pro rata basis
at a redemption price equal to 108.75% of the principal amount
of CCO Holdings senior notes redeemed, plus any accrued and
unpaid interest.
On or after November 15, 2008, the issuers of the CCO
Holdings senior notes may redeem all or a part of the notes at a
redemption price that declines ratably from the initial
redemption price of 104.375% to a redemption price on or after
November 15, 2011 of 100.0% of the principal amount of the
CCO Holdings senior notes redeemed, plus, in each case, any
accrued and unpaid interest.
|
|
|
Senior Floating Rate Notes Due 2010 |
In December 2004, CCO Holdings and CCO Holdings Capital
Corp. jointly issued $550 million total principal amount of
senior floating rate notes due 2010.
Interest on the CCO Holdings senior floating rate notes accrues
at the LIBOR rate plus 4.125% annually, from December 15,
2004 or, if interest already has been paid, from the date it was
most recently paid. Interest is reset and payable quarterly in
arrears on each March 15, June 15, September 15
and December 15, commencing on March 15, 2005.
At any time prior to December 15, 2006, the issuers of the
senior floating rate notes may redeem up to 35% of the notes in
an amount not to exceed the amount of proceeds of one or more
public equity offerings at a redemption price equal to 100% of
the principal amount, plus a premium equal to the interest rate
per annum applicable to the notes on the date notice of
redemption is given, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any,
to the redemption date, provided that at least 65% of the
original aggregate principal amount of the notes issued remains
outstanding after the redemption.
The issuers of the senior floating rate notes may redeem the
notes in whole or in part at the issuers option from
December 15, 2006 until December 14, 2007 for 102% of
the principal amount, from December 15, 2007 until
December 14, 2008 for 101% of the principal amount and from
and after December 15, 2008, at par, in each case, plus
accrued and unpaid interest.
|
|
|
Additional terms of the CCO Holdings Senior Notes and Senior
Floating Rate Notes |
The CCO Holdings notes are general unsecured obligations of CCO
Holdings and CCO Holdings Capital Corp. They rank equally with
all other current or future unsubordinated obligations of CCO
Holdings and CCO Holdings Capital Corp. The CCO Holdings notes
are structurally subordinated to all obligations of subsidiaries
of CCO Holdings, including the Renaissance notes, the Charter
Operating notes and the Charter Operating credit facilities.
184
In the event of specified change of control events, CCO Holdings
must offer to purchase the outstanding CCO Holdings senior notes
from the holders at a purchase price equal to 101% of the total
principal amount of the notes, plus any accrued and unpaid
interest.
The indenture governing the CCO Holdings senior notes contains
restrictive covenants that limit certain transactions or
activities by CCO Holdings and its restricted subsidiaries,
including the covenants summarized below. Substantially all of
CCO Holdings direct and indirect subsidiaries are
currently restricted subsidiaries.
The covenant in the indenture governing the CCO Holdings senior
notes that restricts incurrence of debt and issuance of
preferred stock permits CCO Holdings and its subsidiaries to
incur or issue specified amounts of debt or preferred stock, if,
after giving pro forma effect to the incurrence or issuance, CCO
Holdings could meet a leverage ratio (ratio of consolidated debt
to four times EBITDA, as defined, from the most recent fiscal
quarter for which internal financial reports are available) of
4.5 to 1.0.
In addition, regardless of whether the leverage ratio could be
met, so long as no default exists or would result from the
incurrence or issuance, CCO Holdings and its restricted
subsidiaries are permitted to incur or issue:
|
|
|
|
|
up to $9.75 billion of debt under credit facilities,
including debt under credit facilities outstanding on the issue
date of the CCO Holdings senior notes; |
|
|
|
up to $75 million of debt incurred to finance the purchase
or capital lease of new assets; |
|
|
|
up to $300 million of additional debt for any
purpose; and |
|
|
|
other items of indebtedness for specific purposes such as
intercompany debt, refinancing of existing debt, and interest
rate swaps to provide protection against fluctuation in interest
rates. |
The restricted subsidiaries of CCO Holdings are generally not
permitted to issue debt securities contractually subordinated to
other debt of the issuing subsidiary or preferred stock, in
either case in any public or Rule 144A offering.
The CCO Holdings indenture permits CCO Holdings and its
restricted subsidiaries to incur debt under one category, and
later reclassify that debt into another category. The Charter
Operating credit facilities generally impose more restrictive
limitations on incurring new debt than CCO Holdings
indenture, so our subsidiaries that are subject to credit
facilities are not permitted to utilize the full debt incurrence
that would otherwise be available under the CCO Holdings
indenture covenants.
Generally, under CCO Holdings indenture:
|
|
|
|
|
CCO Holdings and its restricted subsidiaries are permitted to
pay dividends on equity interests, repurchase interests, or make
other specified restricted payments only if CCO Holdings can
incur $1.00 of new debt under the leverage ratio test, which
requires that CCO Holdings meet a 4.5 to 1.0 leverage ratio
after giving effect to the transaction, and if no default exists
or would exist as a consequence of such incurrence. If those
conditions are met, restricted payments are permitted in a total
amount of up to 100% of CCO Holdings consolidated EBITDA,
as defined, minus 1.3 times its consolidated interest expense,
plus 100% of new cash and appraised non-cash equity proceeds
received by CCO Holdings and not allocated to the debt
incurrence covenant, all cumulatively from the fiscal quarter
commenced on October 1, 2003, plus $100 million. |
In addition, CCO Holdings may make distributions or restricted
payments, so long as no default exists or would be caused by the
transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
to repurchase management equity interests in amounts not to
exceed $10 million per fiscal year; |
|
|
|
to pay, regardless of the existence of any default, pass-through
tax liabilities in respect of ownership of equity interests in
Charter Holdings or its restricted subsidiaries; |
185
|
|
|
|
|
to pay, regardless of the existence of any default, interest
when due on Charter Holdings notes and our notes; |
|
|
|
to pay, so long as there is no default, interest on the Charter
convertible notes; |
|
|
|
to purchase, redeem or refinance Charter Holdings notes, CCH II
notes, Charter notes, and other direct or indirect parent
company notes, so long as CCO Holdings could incur $1.00 of
indebtedness under the 4.5 to 1.0 leverage ratio test referred
to above and there is no default; or |
|
|
|
to make other specified restricted payments including merger
fees up to 1.25% of the transaction value, repurchases using
concurrent new issuances, and certain dividends on existing
subsidiary preferred equity interests. |
The indenture governing the CCO Holdings senior notes restricts
CCO Holdings and its restricted subsidiaries from making
investments, except specified permitted investments, or creating
new unrestricted subsidiaries, if there is a default under the
indenture or if CCO Holdings could not incur $1.00 of new debt
under the 4.5 to 1.0 leverage ratio test described above after
giving effect to the transaction.
Permitted investments include:
|
|
|
|
|
investments by CCO Holdings and its restricted subsidiaries in
CCO Holdings and in other restricted subsidiaries, or entities
that become restricted subsidiaries as a result of the
investment, |
|
|
|
investments aggregating up to 100% of new cash equity proceeds
received by CCO Holdings since November 10, 2003 to the
extent the proceeds have not been allocated to the restricted
payments covenant described above, |
|
|
|
other investments up to $750 million outstanding at any
time, and |
|
|
|
certain specified additional investments, such as investments in
customers and suppliers in the ordinary course of business and
investments received in connection with permitted asset sales. |
CCO Holdings is not permitted to grant liens on its assets other
than specified permitted liens. Permitted liens include liens
securing debt and other obligations incurred under our
subsidiaries credit facilities, liens securing the
purchase price of new assets, liens securing indebtedness up to
$50 million and other specified liens incurred in the
ordinary course of business. The lien covenant does not restrict
liens on assets of subsidiaries of CCO Holdings.
CCO Holdings and CCO Holdings Capital, its co-issuer, are
generally not permitted to sell all or substantially all of
their assets or merge with or into other companies unless their
leverage ratio after any such transaction would be no greater
than their leverage ratio immediately prior to the transaction,
or unless CCO Holdings and its subsidiaries could incur $1.00 of
new debt under the 4.50 to 1.0 leverage ratio test described
above after giving effect to the transaction, no default exists,
and the surviving entity is a U.S. entity that assumes the
CCO Holdings senior notes.
CCO Holdings and its restricted subsidiaries may generally not
otherwise sell assets or, in the case of restricted
subsidiaries, issue equity interests, unless they receive
consideration at least equal to the fair market value of the
assets or equity interests, consisting of at least 75% in cash,
assumption of liabilities, securities converted into cash within
60 days or productive assets. CCO Holdings and its
restricted subsidiaries are then required within 365 days
after any asset sale either to commit to use the net cash
proceeds over a specified threshold to acquire assets, including
current assets, used or useful in their businesses or use the
net cash proceeds to repay debt, or to offer to repurchase the
CCO Holdings senior notes with any remaining proceeds.
CCO Holdings and its restricted subsidiaries may generally not
engage in sale and leaseback transactions unless, at the time of
the transaction, CCO Holdings could have incurred secured
indebtedness in an amount equal to the present value of the net
rental payments to be made under the lease, and the sale of the
assets and application of proceeds is permitted by the covenant
restricting asset sales.
186
CCO Holdings restricted subsidiaries may generally not
enter into restrictions on their ability to make dividends or
distributions or transfer assets to CCO Holdings on terms that
are materially more restrictive than those governing their debt,
lien, asset sale, lease and similar agreements existing when
they entered into the indenture, unless those restrictions are
on customary terms that will not materially impair CCO
Holdings ability to repay its notes.
The restricted subsidiaries of CCO Holdings are generally not
permitted to guarantee or pledge assets to secure debt of CCO
Holdings, unless the guarantying subsidiary issues a guarantee
of the notes of comparable priority and tenor, and waives any
rights of reimbursement, indemnity or subrogation arising from
the guarantee transaction for at least one year.
The indenture also restricts the ability of CCO Holdings and its
restricted subsidiaries to enter into certain transactions with
affiliates involving consideration in excess of $15 million
without a determination by the board of directors that the
transaction is on terms no less favorable than arms-length, or
transactions with affiliates involving over $50 million
without receiving an independent opinion as to the fairness of
the transaction to the holders of the CCO Holdings notes.
|
|
|
Charter Communications Operating, LLC Notes |
On April 27, 2004, Charter Operating and Charter
Communications Operating Capital Corp. jointly issued
$1.1 billion of 8% senior second lien notes due 2012
and $400 million of
83/8% senior
second lien notes due 2014, for total gross proceeds of
$1.5 billion.
The Charter Operating notes were sold in a private transaction
that was not subject to the registration requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933. The Charter Operating notes are not
expected to have the benefit of any exchange or other
registration rights, except in specified limited circumstances.
In the first quarter of 2005, as a result of the occurrence of
the guarantee and pledge date (generally, upon the Charter
Holdings leverage ratio being below 8.75 to 1.0), CCO Holdings
and those subsidiaries of Charter Operating that are currently
guarantors of, or otherwise obligors with respect to,
indebtedness under the Charter Operating credit facilities and
related obligations provided guarantees of the Charter Operating
notes. The note guarantee of each such existing guarantor is,
and the note guarantee of any additional future subsidiary
guarantor will be:
|
|
|
|
|
a senior obligation of such guarantor; |
|
|
|
structurally senior to the outstanding senior notes of CCO
Holdings and CCO Holdings Capital Corp. (except in the case of
CCO Holdings note guarantee, which is structurally pari
passu with such senior notes), the outstanding senior notes
of CCH II and CCH II Capital Corp., the outstanding
senior notes and senior discount notes of Charter Holdings, the
outstanding convertible senior notes of Charter and any future
indebtedness of parent companies of CCO Holdings (but subject to
provisions in the Charter Operating indenture that permit
interest and, subject to meeting the 4.25 to 1.0 leverage ratio
test, principal payments to be made thereon); and |
|
|
|
senior in right of payment to any future subordinated
indebtedness of such guarantor. |
All the subsidiaries of Charter Operating (except CCO NR Sub,
LLC, and certain other subsidiaries that are not deemed material
and are designated as nonrecourse subsidiaries under the Charter
Operating credit facilities) are restricted subsidiaries of
Charter Operating under the Charter Operating notes.
Unrestricted subsidiaries generally will not be subject to the
restrictive covenants in the Charter Operating indenture.
In the event of specified change of control events, Charter
Operating must offer to purchase the Charter Operating notes at
a purchase price equal to 101% of the total principal amount of
the Charter Operating notes repurchased plus any accrued and
unpaid interest thereon.
The limitations on incurrence of debt contained in the indenture
governing the Charter Operating notes permit Charter Operating
and its restricted subsidiaries that are guarantors of the
Charter Operating
187
notes to incur additional debt or issue shares of preferred
stock if, after giving pro forma effect to the incurrence,
Charter Operating could meet a leverage ratio test (ratio of
consolidated debt to four times EBITDA, as defined, from the
most recent fiscal quarter for which internal financial reports
are available) of 4.25 to 1.0.
In addition, regardless of whether the leverage ratio test could
be met, so long as no default exists or would result from the
incurrence or issuance, Charter Operating and its restricted
subsidiaries are permitted to incur or issue:
|
|
|
|
|
up to $6.5 billion of debt under credit facilities (but
such incurrence is permitted only by Charter Operating and its
restricted subsidiaries that are guarantors of the Charter
Operating notes, so long as there are such guarantors),
including debt under credit facilities outstanding on the issue
date of the Charter Operating notes; |
|
|
|
up to $75 million of debt incurred to finance the purchase
or capital lease of assets; |
|
|
|
up to $300 million of additional debt for any
purpose, and |
|
|
|
other items of indebtedness for specific purposes such as
refinancing of existing debt and interest rate swaps to provide
protection against fluctuation in interest rates and, subject to
meeting the leverage ratio test, debt existing at the time of
acquisition of a restricted subsidiary. |
The indenture governing the Charter Operating notes permits
Charter Operating to incur debt under one of the categories
above, and later reclassify the debt into a different category.
The Charter Operating credit facilities generally impose more
restrictive limitations on incurring new debt than the Charter
Operating indenture, so our subsidiaries that are subject to the
Charter Operating credit facilities are not permitted to utilize
the full debt incurrence that would otherwise be available under
the Charter Operating indenture covenants.
Generally, under Charter Operatings indenture, Charter
Operating and its restricted subsidiaries are permitted to pay
dividends on equity interests, repurchase interests, or make
other specified restricted payments only if Charter Operating
could incur $1.00 of new debt under the leverage ratio test,
which requires that Charter Operating meet a 4.25 to 1.0
leverage ratio after giving effect to the transaction, and if no
default exists or would exist as a consequence of such
incurrence. If those conditions are met, restricted payments are
permitted in a total amount of up to 100% of Charter
Operatings consolidated EBITDA, as defined, minus 1.3
times its consolidated interest expense, plus 100% of new cash
and appraised non-cash equity proceeds received by Charter
Operating and not allocated to the debt incurrence covenant, all
cumulatively from the fiscal quarter commenced April 1,
2004, plus $100 million.
In addition, Charter Operating may make distributions or
restricted payments, so long as no default exists or would be
caused by the transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
to repurchase management equity interests in amounts not to
exceed $10 million per fiscal year; |
|
|
|
regardless of the existence of any default, to pay pass-through
tax liabilities in respect of ownership of equity interests in
Charter Operating or its restricted subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
to pay, regardless of the existence of any default, interest
when due on the Charter Holdings notes, the CCH II notes,
CCO Holdings notes, and our notes; |
|
|
|
to pay, so long as there is no default, interest on the Charter
convertible notes; |
|
|
|
to purchase, redeem or refinance the Charter Holdings notes,
CCH II notes, the CCO Holdings notes, the Charter notes,
and other direct or indirect parent company notes, so long as
Charter Operating could incur $1.00 of indebtedness under the
4.25 to 1.0 leverage ratio test referred to above and there is
no default, or |
|
|
|
to make other specified restricted payments including merger
fees up to 1.25% of the transaction value, repurchases using
concurrent new issuances, and certain dividends on existing
subsidiary preferred equity interests. |
188
The indenture governing the Charter Operating notes restricts
Charter Operating and its restricted subsidiaries from making
investments, except specified permitted investments, or creating
new unrestricted subsidiaries, if there is a default under the
indenture or if Charter Operating could not incur $1.00 of new
debt under the 4.25 to 1.0 leverage ratio test described above
after giving effect to the transaction.
Permitted investments include:
|
|
|
|
|
investments by Charter Operating and its restricted subsidiaries
in Charter Operating and in other restricted subsidiaries, or
entities that become restricted subsidiaries as a result of the
investment, |
|
|
|
investments aggregating up to 100% of new cash equity proceeds
received by Charter Operating since April 27, 2004 to the
extent the proceeds have not been allocated to the restricted
payments covenant described above, |
|
|
|
other investments up to $750 million outstanding at any
time, and |
|
|
|
certain specified additional investments, such as investments in
customers and suppliers in the ordinary course of business and
investments received in connection with permitted asset sales. |
Charter Operating and its restricted subsidiaries are not
permitted to grant liens senior to the liens securing the
Charter Operating notes, other than permitted liens, on their
assets to secure indebtedness or other obligations, if, after
giving effect to such incurrence, the senior secured leverage
ratio (generally, the ratio of obligations secured by first
priority liens to four times EBITDA, as defined, from the most
recent fiscal quarter for which internal financial reports are
available) would exceed 3.75 to 1.0. Permitted liens include
liens securing indebtedness and other obligations under
permitted credit facilities, liens securing the purchase price
of new assets, liens securing indebtedness of up to
$50 million and other specified liens incurred in the
ordinary course of business.
Charter Operating and Charter Communications Operating Capital
Corp., its co-issuer, are generally not permitted to sell all or
substantially all of their assets or merge with or into other
companies unless their leverage ratio after any such transaction
would be no greater than their leverage ratio immediately prior
to the transaction, or unless Charter Operating and its
subsidiaries could incur $1.00 of new debt under the 4.25 to 1.0
leverage ratio test described above after giving effect to the
transaction, no default exists, and the surviving entity is a
U.S. entity that assumes the Charter Operating notes.
Charter Operating and its restricted subsidiaries generally may
not otherwise sell assets or, in the case of restricted
subsidiaries, issue equity interests, unless they receive
consideration at least equal to the fair market value of the
assets or equity interests, consisting of at least 75% in cash,
assumption of liabilities, securities converted into cash within
60 days or productive assets. Charter Operating and its
restricted subsidiaries are then required within 365 days
after any asset sale either to commit to use the net cash
proceeds over a specified threshold to acquire assets, including
current assets, used or useful in their businesses or use the
net cash proceeds to repay debt, or to offer to repurchase the
Charter Operating notes with any remaining proceeds.
Charter Operating and its restricted subsidiaries may generally
not engage in sale and leaseback transactions unless, at the
time of the transaction, Charter Operating could have incurred
secured indebtedness in an amount equal to the present value of
the net rental payments to be made under the lease, and the sale
of the assets and application of proceeds is permitted by the
covenant restricting asset sales.
Charter Operatings restricted subsidiaries may generally
not enter into restrictions on their ability to make dividends
or distributions or transfer assets to Charter Operating on
terms that are materially more restrictive than those governing
their debt, lien, asset sale, lease and similar agreements
existing when Charter Operating entered into the indenture
governing the Charter Operating senior second lien notes unless
those restrictions are on customary terms that will not
materially impair Charter Operatings ability to repay the
Charter Operating notes.
189
The restricted subsidiaries of Charter Operating are generally
not permitted to guarantee or pledge assets to secure debt of
Charter Operating, unless the guarantying subsidiary issues a
guarantee of the notes of comparable priority and tenor, and
waives any rights of reimbursement, indemnity or subrogation
arising from the guarantee transaction for at least one year.
The indenture also restricts the ability of Charter Operating
and its restricted subsidiaries to enter into certain
transactions with affiliates involving consideration in excess
of $15 million without a determination by the board of
directors that the transaction is on terms no less favorable
than arms-length, or transactions with affiliates involving over
$50 million without receiving an independent opinion as to
the fairness of the transaction to the holders of the Charter
Operating notes.
Charter Operating and its restricted subsidiaries are generally
not permitted to transfer equity interests in restricted
subsidiaries unless the transfer is of all of the equity
interests in the restricted subsidiary or the restricted
subsidiary remains a restricted subsidiary and net proceeds of
the equity sale are applied in accordance with the asset sales
covenant.
Since the occurrence of the guarantee and pledge date, the
collateral for the Charter Operating notes consists of all of
Charter Operatings and its subsidiaries assets that
secure the obligations of Charter Operating or any subsidiary of
Charter Operating with respect to the Charter Operating credit
facilities and the related obligations. The collateral currently
consists of the capital stock of Charter Operating held by
CCO Holdings, all of the intercompany obligations owing to
CCO Holdings by Charter Operating or any subsidiary of Charter
Operating, and substantially all of Charter Operatings and
the guarantors assets (other than the assets of
CCO Holdings) in which security interests may be perfected
under the Uniform Commercial Code by filing a financing
statement (including capital stock and intercompany
obligations), including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
with certain exceptions, all capital stock (limited in the case
of capital stock of foreign subsidiaries, if any, to 66% of the
capital stock of first tier foreign Subsidiaries) held by
Charter Operating or any guarantor; and |
|
|
|
with certain exceptions, all intercompany obligations owing to
Charter Operating or any guarantor. |
In March 2005, CC V Holdings, LLC redeemed in full the
notes outstanding under the CC V indenture. Following that
redemption CC V Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaries
guaranteed the Charter Operating credit facilities and the
related obligations and secured those guarantees with
first-priority liens, and guaranteed the notes and secured the
Charter Operating senior second lien notes with second-priority
liens, on substantially all of their assets in which security
interests may be perfected under the Uniform Commercial Code by
filing a financing statement (including capital stock and
intercompany obligations).
In addition, if Charter Operating or its subsidiaries exercise
any option to redeem in full the notes outstanding under the
Renaissance indenture, then, provided that the Leverage
Condition remains satisfied, the Renaissance entities will be
required to provide corresponding guarantees of the Charter
Operating credit facilities and related obligations and note
guarantees and to secure the Charter Operating notes and the
Charter Operating credit facilities and related obligations with
corresponding liens.
In the event that additional liens are granted by Charter
Operating or its subsidiaries to secure obligations under the
Charter Operating credit facilities or the related obligations,
second priority liens on the same assets will be granted to
secure the Charter Operating notes, which liens will be subject
to the provisions of an intercreditor agreement (to which none
of Charter Operating or its affiliates are parties).
Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, no such second priority
liens need be provided if the time such lien would otherwise be
granted is not during a guarantee and pledge availability period
(when the Leverage Condition is satisfied), but such second
priority liens will be required to be provided in accordance
with the foregoing sentence on or prior to the fifth business
day of the commencement of the next succeeding guarantee and
pledge availability period.
190
CC V Holdings, LLC Notes
These notes were redeemed on March 14, 2005 and are therefore no
longer outstanding. See Summary Recent
Events.
The 10% senior discount notes due 2008 were issued by
Renaissance Media (Louisiana) LLC, Renaissance Media (Tennessee)
LLC and Renaissance Media Holdings Capital Corporation, with
Renaissance Media Group LLC as guarantor and the United States
Trust Company of New York as trustee. Renaissance Media Group
LLC, which is the direct or indirect parent company of these
issuers, is now a subsidiary of Charter Operating. The
Renaissance 10% notes and the Renaissance guarantee are
unsecured, unsubordinated debt of the issuers and the guarantor,
respectively. In October 1998, the issuers of the Renaissance
notes exchanged $163 million of the original issued and
outstanding Renaissance notes for an equivalent value of new
Renaissance notes. The form and terms of the new Renaissance
notes are the same in all material respects as the form and
terms of the original Renaissance notes except that the issuance
of the new Renaissance notes was registered under the Securities
Act.
There was no payment of any interest in respect of the
Renaissance notes prior to October 15, 2003. Since
October 15, 2003, interest on the Renaissance notes is
payable semi-annually in arrears in cash at a rate of
10% per year. On April 15, 2003, the Renaissance notes
became redeemable at the option of the issuers thereof, in whole
or in part, initially at 105% of their principal amount at
maturity, plus accrued interest, declining to 100% of the
principal amount at maturity, plus accrued interest, on or after
April 15, 2006.
Our acquisition of Renaissance triggered change of control
provisions of the Renaissance notes that required us to offer to
purchase the Renaissance notes at a purchase price equal to 101%
of their accreted value on the date of the purchase, plus
accrued interest, if any. In May 1999, we made an offer to
repurchase the Renaissance notes, and holders of Renaissance
notes representing 30% of the total principal amount outstanding
at maturity tendered their Renaissance notes for repurchase.
The limitations on incurrence of debt contained in the indenture
governing the Renaissance notes permit Renaissance Media Group
and its restricted subsidiaries to incur additional debt, so
long as they are not in default under the indenture:
|
|
|
|
|
if, after giving effect to the incurrence, Renaissance Media
Group could meet a leverage ratio (ratio of consolidated debt to
four times consolidated EBITDA, as defined, from the most recent
quarter) of 6.75 to 1.0, and, regardless of whether the leverage
ratio could be met, |
|
|
|
up to the greater of $200 million or 4.5 times Renaissance
Media Groups consolidated annualized EBITDA, as defined, |
|
|
|
up to an amount equal to 5% of Renaissance Media Groups
consolidated total assets to finance the purchase of new assets, |
|
|
|
up to two times the sum of (a) the net cash proceeds of new
equity issuances and capital contributions, and (b) 80% of
the fair market value of property received by Renaissance Media
Group or an issuer as a capital contribution, in each case
received after the issue date of the Renaissance notes and not
allocated to make restricted payments, and |
|
|
|
other items of indebtedness for specific purposes such as
intercompany debt, refinancing of existing debt and interest
rate swaps to provide protection against fluctuation in interest
rates. |
The indenture governing the Renaissance notes permits us to
incur debt under one of the categories above, and reclassify the
debt into a different category.
Under the indenture governing the Renaissance notes, Renaissance
Media Group and its restricted subsidiaries are permitted to pay
dividends on equity interests, repurchase interests, make
restricted investments, or make other specified restricted
payments only if Renaissance Media Group could incur
191
$1.00 of additional debt under the debt incurrence test, which
requires that Renaissance Media Group meet the 6.75 to 1.0
leverage ratio after giving effect to the transaction of the
indebtedness covenant and that no default exists or would occur
as a consequence thereof. If those conditions are met,
Renaissance Media Group and its restricted subsidiaries are
permitted to make restricted payments in a total amount not to
exceed the result of 100% of Renaissance Media Groups
consolidated EBITDA, as defined, minus 130% of its consolidated
interest expense, plus 100% of new cash equity proceeds received
by Renaissance Media Group and not allocated to the indebtedness
covenant, plus returns on certain investments, all cumulatively
from June 1998. Renaissance Media Group and its restricted
subsidiaries may make permitted investments up to
$2 million in related businesses and other specified
permitted investments, restricted payments up to
$10 million, dividends up to 6% each year of the net cash
proceeds of public equity offerings, and other specified
restricted payments without meeting the foregoing test.
Renaissance Media Group and its restricted subsidiaries are not
permitted to grant liens on their assets other than specified
permitted liens, unless corresponding liens are granted to
secure the Renaissance notes. Permitted liens include liens
securing debt permitted to be incurred under credit facilities,
liens securing debt incurred under the incurrence of
indebtedness test, in amounts up to the greater of
$200 million or 4.5 times Renaissance Media Groups
consolidated EBITDA, as defined, liens as deposits for
acquisitions up to 10% of the estimated purchase price, liens
securing permitted financings of new assets, liens securing debt
permitted to be incurred by restricted subsidiaries, and
specified liens incurred in the ordinary course of business.
Renaissance Media Group and the issuers of the Renaissance notes
are generally not permitted to sell or otherwise dispose of all
or substantially all of their assets or merge with or into other
companies unless their consolidated net worth after any such
transaction would be equal to or greater than their consolidated
net worth immediately prior to the transaction, or unless
Renaissance Media Group could incur $1.00 of additional debt
under the debt incurrence test, which would require them to meet
a leverage ratio of 6.75 to 1.00 after giving effect to the
transaction.
Renaissance Media Group and its subsidiaries may generally not
otherwise sell assets or, in the case of subsidiaries, equity
interests, unless they receive consideration at least equal to
the fair market value of the assets, consisting of at least 75%
cash, temporary cash investments or assumption of debt. Charter
Holdings and its restricted subsidiaries are then required
within 12 months after any asset sale either to commit to
use the net cash proceeds over a specified threshold either to
acquire assets used in their own or related businesses or use
the net cash proceeds to repay debt, or to offer to repurchase
the Renaissance notes with any remaining proceeds.
Renaissance Media Group and its restricted subsidiaries may
generally not engage in sale and leaseback transactions unless
the lease term does not exceed three years or the proceeds are
applied in accordance with the covenant limiting asset sales.
Renaissance Media Groups restricted subsidiaries may
generally not enter into restrictions on their abilities to make
dividends or distributions or transfer assets to Renaissance
Media Group except those not more restrictive than is customary
in comparable financings.
The restricted subsidiaries of Renaissance Media Group are not
permitted to guarantee or pledge assets to secure debt of the
Renaissance Media Group or its restricted subsidiaries, unless
the guarantying subsidiary issues a guarantee of the Renaissance
notes of comparable priority and tenor, and waives any rights of
reimbursement, indemnity or subrogation arising from the
guarantee transaction.
Renaissance Media Group and its restricted subsidiaries are
generally not permitted to issue or sell equity interests in
restricted subsidiaries, except sales of common stock of
restricted subsidiaries so long as the proceeds of the sale are
applied in accordance with the asset sale covenant, and
issuances as a result of which the restricted subsidiary is no
longer a restricted subsidiary and any remaining investment in
that subsidiary is permitted by the covenant limiting restricted
payments.
The indenture governing the Renaissance notes also restricts the
ability of Renaissance Media Group and its restricted
subsidiaries to enter into certain transactions with affiliates
involving consideration in
192
excess of $2 million without a determination by the
disinterested members of the board of directors that the
transaction is on terms no less favorable than arms length, or
transactions with affiliates involving over $4 million with
affiliates without receiving an independent opinion as to the
fairness of the transaction to Renaissance Media Group.
All of these covenants are subject to additional specified
exceptions. In general, the covenants of the Charter Operating
credit facilities are more restrictive than those of our
indentures.
Cross-Defaults
Our indentures and those of certain of our subsidiaries include
various events of default, including cross-default provisions.
Under these provisions, a failure by any of the issuers or any
of their restricted subsidiaries to pay at the final maturity
thereof the principal amount of other indebtedness having a
principal amount of $100 million or more (or any other
default under any such indebtedness resulting in its
acceleration) would result in an event of default under the
indenture governing the applicable notes. The Renaissance
indenture contains a similar cross-default provision with a
$10 million threshold that applies to the issuers of the
Renaissance notes and their restricted subsidiaries. As a
result, an event of default related to the failure to repay
principal at maturity or the acceleration of the indebtedness
under the Charter Holdings notes, CCH II notes, CCO Holdings
notes, Charter Operating notes, the Charter Operating credit
facilities or the Renaissance notes could cause cross-defaults
under our subsidiaries indentures.
193
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK AND MEMBERSHIP UNITS
General
Our capital stock and the provisions of our restated certificate
of incorporation and bylaws are as described below. These
summaries are qualified by reference to the restated certificate
of incorporation and the bylaws, copies of which have been filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Our authorized capital stock consists of 1.750 billion
shares of Class A common stock, par value $.001 per
share, 750 million shares of Class B common stock, par
value $.001 per share, and 250 million shares of
preferred stock, par value $.001 per share.
Our restated certificate of incorporation and Charter
Communications Holding Company, LLCs amended and restated
limited liability company agreement contain provisions that are
designed to cause the number of shares of our common stock that
are outstanding to equal the number of common membership units
of Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC owned by Charter
and to cause the value of a share of common stock to be equal to
the value of a common membership unit. These provisions are
meant to allow a holder of our common stock to easily understand
the economic interest that such holders common shares
represent of Charter Communications Holding Company, LLCs
business.
In particular, provisions in our restated certificate of
incorporation provide that:
|
|
|
(1) at all times the number of shares of our common stock
outstanding will be equal to the number of Charter
Communications Holding Company, LLC common membership units
owned by Charter. |
|
|
(2) Charter will not hold any assets other than, among
other allowable assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
working capital and cash held for the payment of current
obligations and receivables from Charter Communications Holding
Company, LLC; |
|
|
|
common membership units of Charter Communications Holding
Company, LLC; and |
|
|
|
obligations and equity interests of Charter Communications
Holding Company, LLC that correspond to obligations and equity
interests issued by Charter; |
|
|
|
(3) Charter will not borrow any money or enter into any
capital lease unless Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC
enters into the same arrangements with Charter so that
Charters liability flows through to Charter Communications
Holding Company, LLC. |
Provisions in Charter Communications Holding Company, LLCs
amended and restated limited liability company agreement provide
that, upon the contribution by Charter of assets acquired
through the issuance of common stock by Charter, Charter
Communications Holding Company, LLC will issue to Charter that
number of common membership units as equals the number of shares
of common stock issued by Charter. In the event of the
contribution by Charter of assets acquired through the issuance
of indebtedness or preferred interests of Charter, Charter
Communications Holding Company, LLC will issue to Charter a
corresponding obligation or interest, respectively to allow
Charter to pass through to Charter Communications Holding
Company, LLC these liabilities or preferred interests. Such
liabilities or preferred interest of Charter Communication
Holding Company, LLC will be assets of Charter, in addition to
the Class B common units of Charter Communications Holding
Company, LLC that are held by Charter.
Common Stock
As of March 31, 2005, there were 304,763,192 shares of
Class A common stock issued and outstanding and
50,000 shares of Class B common stock issued and
outstanding. If, as described below, all shares of Class B
common stock convert to shares of Class A common stock as a
result of dispositions by Mr. Allen and his affiliates, the
holders of Class A common stock will be entitled to elect
all members of
194
the board of directors, other than any members elected
separately by the holders of any preferred shares with the right
to vote, of which there are currently none outstanding.
Voting Rights. The holders of Class A common
stock and Class B common stock generally have identical
rights, except:
|
|
|
|
|
each Class A common shareholder is entitled to one vote per
share; and |
|
|
|
each Class B common shareholder is entitled to a number of
votes based on the number of outstanding Class B common
stock and Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC membership
units exchangeable for Class B common stock. For example,
Mr. Allen is entitled to ten votes for each share of
Class B common stock held by him or his affiliates and ten
votes for each membership unit held by him or his
affiliates; and |
|
|
|
the Class B common shareholders have the sole power to vote
to amend or repeal the provisions of our restated certificate of
incorporation relating to: |
|
|
|
(1) the activities in which Charter may engage; |
|
|
(2) the required ratio of outstanding shares of common
stock to outstanding membership units owned by Charter; and |
|
|
(3) the restrictions on the assets and liabilities that
Charter may hold. |
The effect of the provisions described in the final bullet point
is that holders of Class A common stock have no right to
vote on these matters. These provisions allow Mr. Allen,
for example, to amend the restated certificate of incorporation
to permit Charter to engage in currently prohibited business
activities without having to seek the approval of holders of
Class A common stock.
The voting rights relating to the election of Charters
board of directors are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
The Class B common shareholders, voting separately as a
class, are entitled to elect all but one member of our board of
directors. |
|
|
|
Class A and Class B common shareholders, voting
together as one class, are entitled to elect the remaining
member of our board of directors who is not elected by the
Class B common shareholders. |
|
|
|
Class A common shareholders and Class B common
shareholders are not entitled to cumulate their votes in the
election of directors. |
|
|
|
In addition, Charter may issue one or more series of preferred
stock that entitle the holders of such preferred stock to elect
directors. |
Other than the election of directors and any matters where
Delaware law or Charters restated certificate of
incorporation or bylaws requires otherwise, all matters to be
voted on by shareholders must be approved by a majority of the
votes cast by the holders of shares of Class A common stock
and Class B common stock present in person or represented
by proxy, voting together as a single class, subject to any
voting rights granted to holders of any preferred stock.
Amendments to Charters restated certificate of
incorporation that would adversely alter or change the powers,
preferences or special rights of the Class A common stock
or the Class B common stock must be approved by a majority
of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of the
outstanding shares of the affected class, voting as a separate
class. In addition, the following actions by Charter must be
approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a
majority of the voting power of the outstanding Class B
common stock, voting as a separate class:
|
|
|
|
|
the issuance of any Class B common stock other than to
Mr. Allen and his affiliates and other than pursuant to
specified stock splits and dividends; |
195
|
|
|
|
|
the issuance of any stock other than Class A common stock
(and other than Class B common stock as described
above); and |
|
|
|
the amendment, modification or repeal of any provision of its
restated certificate of incorporation relating to capital stock
or the removal of directors. |
Charter will lose its rights to manage the business of Charter
Communications Holding Company, LLC and Charter Investment, Inc.
will become the sole manager of Charter Communications Holding
Company, LLC if at any time a court holds that the holders of
the Class B common stock no longer:
|
|
|
|
|
have the number of votes per share of Class B common stock
described above; |
|
|
|
have the right to elect, voting separately as a class, all but
one member of Charters board of directors, except for any
directors elected separately by the holders of preferred
stock; or |
|
|
|
have the right to vote as a separate class on matters that
adversely affect the Class B common stock with respect to: |
|
|
|
(1) the issuance of equity securities of Charter other than
the Class A common stock; or |
|
|
(2) the voting power of the Class B common stock. |
These provisions are contained in the amended and restated
limited liability company agreement of Charter Communications
Holding Company, LLC. The Class B common stock could lose
these rights if a holder of Class A common stock
successfully challenges in a court proceeding the voting rights
of the Class B common stock. In any of these circumstances,
Charter would also lose its 100% voting control of Charter
Communications Holding Company, LLC as provided in Charter
Communications Holding Company, LLCs amended and restated
limited liability company agreement. These provisions exist to
assure Mr. Allen that he will be able to control Charter
Communications Holding Company, LLC in the event he was no
longer able to control Charter through his ownership of
Class B common stock. These events could have a material
adverse impact on our business and the market price of the
Class A common stock and the notes. See Risk
Factors Risks Related to Our Business.
Dividends. Holders of Class A common stock
and Class B common stock will share ratably (based on the
number of shares of common stock held) in any dividend declared
by our board of directors, subject to any preferential rights of
any outstanding preferred stock. Dividends consisting of shares
of Class A common stock and Class B common stock may
be paid only as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
shares of Class A common stock may be paid only to holders
of Class A common stock; |
|
|
|
shares of Class B common stock may be paid only to holders
of Class B common stock; and |
|
|
|
the number of shares of each class of common stock payable per
share of such class of common stock shall be equal in number. |
Our restated certificate of incorporation provides that we may
not pay a stock dividend unless the number of outstanding
Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC common membership
units are adjusted accordingly. This provision is designed to
maintain the equal value between shares of common stock and
membership units and the one-to-one exchange ratio.
Conversion of Class B Common Stock. Each
share of outstanding Class B common stock will
automatically convert into one share of Class A common
stock if, at any time, Mr. Allen or any of his affiliates
sells any shares of common stock of Charter or membership units
of Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC and as a result
of such sale, Mr. Allen and his affiliates no longer own
directly and indirectly common stock and other equity interests
in Charter and membership units in Charter Communications
Holding Company, LLC that in total represent at least:
|
|
|
|
|
20% of the sum of the values, calculated as of November 12,
1999, of the shares of Class B common stock directly or
indirectly owned by Mr. Allen and his affiliates and the
shares of Class B common stock for which outstanding
Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC member- |
196
|
|
|
|
|
ship units directly or indirectly owned by Mr. Allen and
his affiliates were exchangeable on that date, and |
|
|
|
5% of the sum of the values, calculated as of the measuring
date, of shares of outstanding common stock and other equity
interests in Charter and the shares of Charter common stock for
which outstanding Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC
membership units are exchangeable on such date. |
These provisions exist to assure that Mr. Allen will no
longer be able to control Charter if after sales of his equity
interests he owns an insignificant economic interest in our
business. The conversion of all Class B common stock in
accordance with these provisions would not trigger Charter
Communications Holding Company, LLCs limited liability
company agreement provisions described above whereby Charter
would lose its management rights and special voting rights
relating to Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC in the
event of an adverse determination of a court affecting the
rights of the Class B common stock.
Each holder of a share of Class B common stock has the
right to convert such share into one share of Class A
common stock at any time on a one-for-one basis. If a
Class B common shareholder transfers any shares of
Class B common stock to a person other than an authorized
Class B common shareholder, these shares of Class B
common stock will automatically convert into shares of
Class A common stock. Authorized Class B common
shareholders are Paul G. Allen entities controlled by
Mr. Allen, Mr. Allens estate, any organization
qualified under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue
Code that is Mr. Allens beneficiary upon his death
and certain trusts established by or for the benefit of
Mr. Allen. In this context controlled means the
ownership of more than 50% of the voting power and economic
interest of an entity and transfer means the
transfer of record or beneficial ownership of any such share of
Class B common stock.
Other Rights. Shares of Class A common stock
will be treated equally in the event of any merger or
consolidation of Charter so that:
|
|
|
|
|
each class of common shareholders will receive per share the
same kind and amount of capital stock, securities, cash and/or
other property received by any other class of common
shareholders, provided that any shares of capital stock so
received may differ in a manner similar to the manner in which
the shares of Class A common stock and Class B common
stock differ; or |
|
|
|
each class of common shareholders, to the extent they receive a
different kind (other than as described above) or different
amount of capital stock, securities, cash and/or other property
than that received by any other class of common shareholders,
will receive for each share of common stock they hold, stock,
securities, cash and/or either property having a value
substantially equivalent to that received by such other class of
common shareholders. |
Upon Charters liquidation, dissolution or winding up,
after payment in full of the amounts required to be paid to
preferred shareholders, if any, all common shareholders,
regardless of class, are entitled to share ratably in any assets
and funds available for distribution to common shareholders.
No shares of any class of common stock are subject to redemption
or have preemptive right to purchase additional shares of common
stock.
Preferred Stock
Charters board of directors is authorized, subject to the
approval of the holders of the Class B common stock, to
issue from time to time up to a total of 250 million shares
of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the numbers,
powers, designations, preferences, and any special rights of the
shares of each such series thereof, including:
|
|
|
|
|
dividend rights and rates; |
|
|
|
conversion rights; |
197
|
|
|
|
|
voting rights; |
|
|
|
terms of redemption (including any sinking fund provisions) and
redemption price or prices; |
|
|
|
liquidation preferences; and |
|
|
|
the number of shares constituting and the designation of such
series. |
Pursuant to their authority the board of directors has
designated 1 million of the above-described
250 million shares as Series A Convertible Redeemable
Preferred Stock (Series A Preferred Stock).
Holders of the Series A Preferred Stock have no voting
rights but are entitled to receive cumulative cash dividends at
an annual rate of 5.75%, payable quarterly. If for any reason
Charter fails to pay the dividends on the Series A
Preferred Stock on a timely basis, the dividend rate on each
share increases to an annual rate of 7.75% until the payment is
made. The Series A Preferred Stock is redeemable by Charter
at its option on or after August 31, 2004 and must be
redeemed by Charter at any time upon a change of control, or if
not previously redeemed or converted, on August 31, 2008.
The Series A Preferred Stock is convertible, in whole or in
part, at the option of the holders on or before August 31,
2008, into shares of common stock at an initial conversion rate
equal to a conversion price of $24.71 per share of common
stock, subject to certain customary adjustments. The redemption
price per share of Series A Preferred Stock is the
liquidation preference of $100, subject to certain customary
adjustments. At March 31, 2005, there were
545,259 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
outstanding, with an aggregate liquidation preference of
approximately $55 million. These shares are convertible
into approximately 2.2 million shares of Class A
common stock.
Charter has no present plans to issue any other shares of
preferred stock.
Options
As of March 31, 2005, options to purchase a total of
1,809,751 membership units in Charter Communications Holding
Company, LLC were outstanding pursuant to the 1999 Charter
Communications Option Plan, and options to purchase a total of
27,258,077 shares of Class A common stock were
outstanding pursuant to Charters 2001 Stock Incentive
Plan. Of these options, 9,745,313 have vested. The membership
units received upon exercise of any of the options under the
1999 Charter Communications Option Plan are automatically
exchanged for shares of our Class A common stock on a
one-for-one basis. In addition, a portion of the unvested
options will vest each month. There are also additional options
outstanding to purchase an aggregate of 475,653 shares of
Class A common stock, which were issued to a consultant
outside of the plan. We have agreed to exchange 186,385 of these
options for 18,638 shares of Class A common stock.
Convertible Notes
At March 31, 2005, we had outstanding $862.5 million
principal amount of our 5.875% convertible senior notes due
2009, which are convertible (at approximately $2.42 per share)
into a total of approximately 356 million shares of our
Class A common stock. At March 31, 2005, we also had
outstanding approximately $122 million principal amount of
our 4.75% senior convertible notes due 2006, which are
convertible (at approximately $26.25 per share) into a
total of approximately 4.6 million shares of Class A
common stock.
Anti-takeover Effects of Provisions of Charters
Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws
Provisions of Charters restated certificate of
incorporation and bylaws may be deemed to have an anti-takeover
effect and may delay, defer or prevent a tender offer or
takeover attempt that a shareholder might consider in its best
interest, including those attempts that might result in a
premium over the market price for the shares held by
shareholders.
Special Meeting of Shareholders. Our bylaws
provide that, subject to the rights of holders of any series of
preferred stock, special meetings of our shareholders may be
called only by the chairman of our board of directors, our chief
executive officer or a majority of our board of directors.
198
Advance Notice Requirements For Shareholder Proposals And
Director Nominations. Our bylaws provide that
shareholders seeking to bring business before an annual meeting
of shareholders, or to nominate candidates for election as
directors at an annual meeting of shareholders, must provide
timely prior written notice of their proposals. To be timely, a
shareholders notice must be received at our principal
executive offices not less than 45 days nor more than
70 days prior to the first anniversary of the date on which
we first mailed our proxy statement for the prior years
annual meeting. If, however, the date of the annual meeting is
more than 30 days before or after the anniversary date of
the prior years annual meeting, notice by the shareholder
must be received not less than 90 days prior to the annual
meeting or by the 10th day following the public announcement of
the date of the meeting, whichever occurs later, and not more
than 120 days prior to the annual meeting. Our bylaws
specify requirements as to the form and content of a
shareholders notice. These provisions may limit
shareholders in bringing matters before an annual meeting of
shareholders or in making nominations for directors at an annual
meeting of shareholders.
Authorized But Unissued Shares. The authorized but
unissued shares of Class A common stock are available for
future issuance without shareholder approval and, subject to
approval by the holders of the Class B common stock, the
authorized but unissued shares of Class B common stock and
preferred stock are available for future issuance. These
additional shares may be utilized for a variety of corporate
purposes, including future public offerings to raise additional
capital, corporate acquisitions and employee benefit plans. The
existence of authorized but unissued shares of common stock and
preferred stock could render more difficult or discourage an
attempt to obtain control of us by means of a proxy contest,
tender offer, merger or otherwise.
Membership Units of Charter Communications Holding Company
The Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC limited
liability company agreement provides for three separate classes
of common membership units designed Class A, Class B
and Class C and one class of preferred membership units
designated Class A. As of March 31, 2005, there were
643,945,223 Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC common
membership units issued and outstanding, 304,813,192 of which
were held by Charter.
Class A Common Membership Units. As of
March 31, 2005, there were a total of 324,300,479 issued
and outstanding Class A common membership units, consisting
of 217,585,246 units owned by Charter Investment, Inc. and
106,715,233 units owned by Vulcan Cable III Inc.
Class B Common Membership Units. As of
March 31, 2005, there were a total of 304,813,192 issued
and outstanding Class B common membership units, all of
which are owned by Charter.
Class C Common Membership Units. As of
March 31, 2005, there were a total of
14,831,552 issued and outstanding Class C common
membership units, consisting of 5,233,612 units owned by
Charter Investment, Inc. and 9,597,940 units owned by
Vulcan Cable III Inc.
In addition, Charter Investment, Inc., an affiliate of
Mr. Allen owns 24,273,943 units of CC VIII, LLC
membership units. An issue has arisen regarding the ultimate
ownership of such CC VIII, LLC membership interests
following Mr. Allens acquisition of those interests
on June 6, 2003. See Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions Transactions Arising out of Our
Organizational Structure and Mr. Allens Investment in
Charter Communications, Inc. and Its Subsidiaries
Equity Put Rights CC VIII.
Convertible Preferred Membership Units. As of
March 31, 2005, there were a total of 545,259 issued and
outstanding convertible preferred membership units. These units
are owned by Charter and mirror the terms of Charters
Series A Preferred Stock.
Any matter requiring a vote of the members of Charter
Communications Holding Company, LLC requires the affirmative
vote of a majority of the Class B common membership units.
Charter owns all Class B common membership units and
therefore controls Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC.
Because Mr. Allen owns high vote Class B common
stock of Charter that entitles him to
199
approximately 93% of the voting power of the outstanding common
stock of Charter, Mr. Allen controls us and through us has
voting control of Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC.
The net cash proceeds that Charter receives from any issuance of
shares of common stock will be immediately transferred to
Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC in exchange for
membership units equal in number to the number of shares of
common stock issued by Charter.
Exchange Agreement
Charter is a party to an agreement permitting Vulcan
Cable III Inc., Charter Investment, Inc. and any other
affiliate of Mr. Allen to exchange at any time on a
one-for-one basis any or all of their Charter Holdco common
membership units for shares of Class B common stock. This
exchange may occur directly or, at the election of the
exchanging holder, indirectly through a tax-free reorganization
such as a share exchange or a statutory merger of any
Allen-controlled entity with and into Charter or a wholly owned
subsidiary of Charter. In the case of an exchange in connection
with a tax-free share exchange or a statutory merger, shares of
Class A common stock held by Mr. Allen or the
Allen-controlled entity will also be exchanged for Class B
common stock. Mr. Allen currently owns shares of
Class A common stock as a result of the exercise of put
rights granted to sellers in the Falcon acquisition and the
Rifkin acquisition.
Charter Holdco common membership units held by Mr. Allen
and his affiliates are exchangeable at any time for shares of
our Class B common stock, which is then convertible into
shares of Class A common stock. The exchange agreement and
the 1999 Charter Communications Option Plan state that common
membership units are exchangeable for shares of common stock at
a value equal to the fair market value of the common membership
units. The exchange ratio of common membership units to shares
of Class A common stock will be one to one because Charter
and Charter Holdco have been structured so that the fair market
value of a share of the Class A common stock equals the
fair market value of a common membership unit owned by Charter.
Our organizational documents achieve this result by:
|
|
|
|
|
limiting the assets and liabilities that Charter may
hold; and |
|
|
|
requiring the number of shares of our common stock outstanding
at any time to equal the number of common membership units owned
by Charter. |
If we fail to comply with these provisions or they are changed,
the exchange ratio may vary from one to one and will then be
based on a pre-determined formula contained in the exchange
agreements and the 1999 Charter Communications Option Plan. This
formula will be based on the then current relative fair market
values of common membership units and common stock.
Special Tax Allocation Provisions.
Charter Communications Holding Company, LLCs limited
liability company agreement contains a number of provisions
affecting allocation of net tax losses and net tax profits to
its members. In some situations, these provisions could result
in Charter having to pay income taxes in an amount that is more
or less than it would have had to pay if these provisions did
not exist. For additional information see
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates Income Taxes.
Other Material Terms of the Amended and Restated Limited
Company Agreement of Charter Communications Holding Company,
LLC
General. Charter Communications Holding Company,
LLCs amended and restated limited liability company
agreement contains provisions that permit each member (and its
officers, directors, agents, shareholders, members, partners or
affiliates) to engage in businesses that may compete with the
businesses of Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC or any
subsidiary. However, the directors
200
of Charter, including Mr. Allen, are subject to fiduciary
duties under Delaware corporate law that generally require them
to present business opportunities in the cable transmission
business to Charter.
The amended and restated limited liability company agreement
restricts the business activities that Charter Communications
Holding Company, LLC may engage in.
Transfer Restrictions. The amended and restated
limited liability company agreement restricts the ability of
each member to transfer its membership interest unless specified
conditions have been met. These conditions include:
|
|
|
|
|
the transfer will not result in the loss of any license or
regulatory approval or exemption that has been obtained by
Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC and is materially
useful in its business as then conducted or proposed to be
conducted; |
|
|
|
the transfer will not result in a material and adverse
limitation or restriction on the operations of Charter
Communications Holding Company, LLC and its subsidiaries taken
as a whole; |
|
|
|
the proposed transferee agrees in writing to be bound by the
limited liability company agreement; and |
|
|
|
except for a limited number of permitted transfers under the
limited liability company agreement, the transfer has been
approved by the manager in its sole discretion. |
Amendments to the Limited Liability Company
Agreement. Any amendment to the limited liability
company agreement generally may be adopted only upon the
approval of a majority of the Class B common membership
units. The agreement may not be amended in a manner that
adversely affects the rights of any class of common membership
units without the consent of holders holding a majority of the
membership units of that class.
Registration Rights
Holders of Class B Common Stock. Charter,
Mr. Allen, Charter Investment, Inc. and Vulcan
Cable III Inc., are parties to a registration rights
agreement. The agreement gives Mr. Allen and his affiliates
the right to cause us to register the shares of Class A
common stock issued to them upon conversion of any shares of
Class B common stock that they may hold.
This registration rights agreement provides that each eligible
holder is entitled to unlimited piggyback
registration rights permitting them to include their shares of
Class A common stock in registration statements filed by
us. These holders may also exercise their demand rights causing
us, subject to specified limitations, to register their
Class A shares, provided that the amount of shares subject
to each demand has a market value at least equal to
$50 million or, if the market value is less than
$50 million, all of the Class A shares of the holders
participating in the offering are included in such registration.
We are obligated to pay the costs associated with all such
registrations.
Holders may elect to have their shares registered pursuant to a
shelf registration statement if at the time of the election,
Charter is eligible to file a registration statement on
Form S-3 and the amount of shares to be registered has a
market value equal to at least $100 million on the date of
the election.
All shares of Class A common stock issuable to the
registration rights holders in exchange for Charter
Communications Holding Company, LLC membership units and upon
conversion of outstanding Class B common stock and
conversion of Class B common stock issuable to the
registration rights holders upon exchange of Charter
Communications Holding Company, LLC membership units are subject
to the registration rights described above.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our Class A common
stock is Mellon Investor Services, LLC.
201
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
As of March 31, 2005, we had 304,763,192 shares of
Class A common stock issued and outstanding, all of which
are eligible for immediate resale (subject to limitations of
Rule 144 in the case of shares held by affiliates).
As of March 31, 2005, the following additional shares of
Class A common stock are or will be issuable after giving
effect to the issuance of shares described in Registered
Borrow Facility and the redemption of our 5.75%
convertible senior notes due 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
339,132,031 shares of Class A common stock will be
issuable upon conversion of Class B common stock issuable
upon exchange of Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC
membership units held by Vulcan Cable III Inc. and Charter
Investment, Inc. These membership units are exchangeable for
shares of Class B common stock on a one-for-one basis.
Shares of Class B common stock are convertible into shares
of Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis. |
|
|
|
24,273,943 shares of Class A common stock may be
issuable upon the exchange of Charter Communications Holding
Company, LLC membership units potentially issuable in exchange
for CC VIII, LLC membership units held by an affiliate of
Mr. Allen. An issue has arisen regarding the ultimate
ownership of such CC VIII, LLC membership interests following
Mr. Allens acquisition of those interests on
June 6, 2003. See Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions Transactions Arising Out of Our
Organizational Structure and Mr. Allens Investment in
Charter Communications, Inc. and Its Subsidiaries
Equity Put Rights CC VIII. |
|
|
|
50,000 shares of Class A common stock will be issuable
upon conversion of outstanding Class B common stock on a
one-for-one basis. |
|
|
|
Up to 90,000,000 shares of Class A common stock (or
units exchangeable for Class A common stock) are authorized
for issuance pursuant to Charters 2001 Stock Incentive
Plan and 1999 Charter Communications Option Plan. At
March 31, 2005, 1,309,620 shares had been issued under
the plans upon exercise of options, 655,749 shares had been
issued upon vesting of restricted stock grants, and
1,162,176 shares are subject to future vesting under
restricted stock agreements. Of the remaining
86,872,455 shares covered by the plans, as of
March 31, 2005, 29,067,828 were subject to outstanding
options (30% of which were vested), and there were 11,627,420
performance units granted under Charters long-term
incentive program, which will vest on the third anniversary of
the date of grant conditional upon Charters performance
against financial targets approved by the board of directors at
the time of the awards. 46,177,207 shares remained
available for future grant under the plans. |
|
|
|
356,404,924 shares of Class A common stock are
issuable upon conversion of our 5.875% convertible senior notes
due 2009. |
|
|
|
An aggregate of 6,850,671 shares of Class A common
stock would be issuable upon conversion of our 4.75% convertible
senior notes due 2006 and our Series A convertible
redeemable preferred stock. |
|
|
|
As more fully described in Business Legal
Proceedings, 13,400,000 shares of Class A common
stock issued on July 8, 2005 in settlement of certain legal
proceedings. |
|
|
|
Up to 150 million shares of Class A common stock to be
issued as described in Registered Borrow Facility. |
All of the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon
exchange of Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC
membership units and upon conversion of shares of our
Class B common stock are subject to demand and piggyback
registration rights.
All of the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon
conversion of outstanding convertible senior notes due 2006 and
convertible preferred stock would be eligible for immediate
resale. Shares issuable
202
upon conversion of the 5.875% convertible senior notes due 2009
are eligible for resale pursuant to the resale shelf
registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.
All of the shares issuable to claimants pursuant to the
settlements will be eligible for immediate resale and, upon
filing of an anticipated shelf registration statement for the
issuance of warrant shares, all of the shares issuable upon
exercise of the warrants will also be eligible for immediate
resale.
A registration statement on Form S-8 covering the
Class A common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of
options under the 1999 Charter Communications Option Plan was
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in May 2000
and registration statements on Form S-8 covering shares
issuable under the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan were filed in May
2001 and November 2003. The shares of Class A common stock
covered by the Form S-8 registration statements generally
may be resold in the public market without restriction or
limitation, except in the case of our affiliates who generally
may only resell such shares in accordance with the provisions of
Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933.
The sale of a substantial number of shares of Class A
common stock, or the perception that such sales could occur,
could adversely affect prevailing market prices for the
Class A common stock. In addition, any such sale or
perception could make it more difficult for us to sell equity
securities or equity related securities in the future at a time
and price that we deem appropriate.
203
UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following discussion describes the material
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the ownership and
disposition of the notes and our Class A common stock into
which the notes may be converted. This discussion applies only
to notes that are held as capital assets.
This discussion does not describe all of the tax consequences
that may be relevant to a holder in light of its particular
circumstances or to holders subject to special rules, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
certain financial institutions; |
|
|
|
insurance companies; |
|
|
|
dealers and certain traders in securities; |
|
|
|
persons holding the notes as part of a straddle,
hedge, conversion or similar transaction; |
|
|
|
U.S. Holders (as defined below) whose functional currency
is not the U.S. dollar; |
|
|
|
certain former citizens or residents of the United States; |
|
|
|
partnerships or other entities classified as partnerships for
U.S. federal income tax purposes; and |
|
|
|
persons subject to the alternative minimum tax. |
This summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code), administrative pronouncements,
judicial decisions and final, temporary and proposed Treasury
regulations, changes to any of which subsequent to the date of
this prospectus may affect the tax consequences described
herein, possibly with retroactive effect. Persons considering
the purchase of notes are strongly urged to consult with their
tax advisors regarding all aspects of the United States federal
income tax consequences of an investment in the notes and with
respect to any tax consequences arising under the laws of any
state, local or foreign taxing jurisdiction.
Classification of the Notes
We believe that the notes will be treated as indebtedness
subject to the special Treasury regulations governing contingent
payment debt instruments (the contingent debt
regulations). Such regulations generally apply to debt
instruments that provide for one or more payments that are
contingent in timing or amount, if the likelihood of such
payment being made is not remote and the amount of
such payment is not incidental. While it is unclear
whether in fact any of the alternative payments on the notes are
remote, we intend to take the position that the potential
receipt of the Early Conversion Make Whole Amount may be a
contingency that is not remote or
incidental within the meaning of the contingent debt
regulations. Accordingly, while the correct treatment of the
notes is uncertain, we intend to treat the notes as debt
instruments subject to the contingent debt regulations because
of the potential receipt of the Early Conversion Make Whole
Amount. Moreover, under the indenture governing the notes, we
have agreed, and by acceptance of a beneficial interest in a
note each holder of a note is deemed to have agreed (in the
absence of an administrative pronouncement or judicial ruling to
the contrary), for U.S. federal income tax purposes, to
treat the notes as debt instruments that are subject to the
contingent debt regulations and to be bound by our application
of the contingent debt regulations to the notes, including our
determination of the rate at which interest will be deemed to
accrue on the notes and the related projected payment
schedule determined by us as described below, and our
treatment of the fair market value of any common stock received
upon conversion of a note as a contingent payment.
We do not intend to seek a ruling from the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) with respect to the U.S. federal
income tax consequences discussed below. Due to the absence of
authorities that directly address the proper characterization of
the notes and the application of the contingent payment
regulations to the notes, no assurance can be given that the IRS
will accept, or that a court will uphold, the characterization
of the notes as indebtedness or the tax consequences described
herein. Holders should be aware that a different treatment from
that described below could affect the amount, timing, source and
204
character of income, gain or loss with respect to an investment
in the notes. For example, a holder might be required to accrue
interest income at a higher or lower rate, might not recognize
income, gain or loss upon conversion of a note into common
stock, and might recognize capital gain or loss upon a taxable
disposition of a note.
The remainder of this discussion assumes that the notes are
treated as indebtedness subject to the contingent debt
regulations.
Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders
As used herein, the term U.S. Holder means a
beneficial owner of a note that is for United States federal
income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
a citizen or resident of the United States; |
|
|
|
a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized in
or under the laws of the United States or of any political
subdivision thereof; or |
|
|
|
an estate the income of which is subject to United States
federal income taxation regardless of its source or a trust the
administration of which is subject to the primary supervision of
a U.S. court and which has one or more United States
persons who have the authority to control all substantial
decisions of the trust or that was in existence on,
August 20, 1996, was treated as a United States person
under the Code on that date and has made a valid election to be
treated as a United States person under the Code. |
|
|
|
Interest Accruals on the Notes |
Pursuant to the contingent debt regulations, U.S. Holders
of the notes are required to accrue interest income on the notes
on a constant-yield basis, based on a comparable yield to
maturity as described below, regardless of whether such holders
use the cash or accrual method of tax accounting. As such,
U.S. Holders generally are required to include interest in
income each year in excess of any stated interest payments
actually received in that year.
The contingent debt regulations provide that a U.S. Holder
must accrue an amount of ordinary interest income, as original
issue discount for U.S. federal income tax purposes, for
each accrual period prior to and including the maturity date of
the notes that equals:
|
|
|
|
|
the product of (a) the adjusted issue price (as defined
below) of the notes as of the beginning of the accrual period
and (b) the comparable yield to maturity (as defined below)
of the notes, adjusted for the length of the accrual period; |
|
|
|
divided by the number of days in the accrual period; and |
|
|
|
multiplied by the number of days during the accrual period that
the U.S. Holder held the notes. |
The issue price of the notes is the first price at
which a substantial amount of the notes is sold to the public,
excluding sales to bond houses, brokers or similar persons or
organizations acting in the capacity of underwriters, placement
agents or wholesalers. The adjusted issue price of a
note is its issue price increased by any interest income
previously accrued, determined without regard to any adjustments
to interest accruals described below, and decreased by the
projected amount of any payments (in accordance with the
projected payment schedule described below) previously made with
respect to the notes.
The term comparable yield as used in the contingent
debt regulations means the annual yield we would pay, as of the
issue date, on a fixed-rate, nonconvertible debt instrument with
no contingent payments, but with terms and conditions otherwise
comparable to those of the notes. We have determined that the
comparable yield for the notes is 15%, compounded semi-annually.
The precise manner of calculating the comparable yield is not
entirely clear. If our determination of the comparable yield were
205
successfully challenged by the IRS, the redetermined yield could
be materially greater or less than the comparable yield
determined by us.
The contingent debt regulations require that we provide to
U.S. Holders, solely for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, a schedule of the projected amounts of payments (which
we refer to as projected payments) on the notes.
This schedule must produce a yield to maturity that equals the
comparable yield. The projected payment schedule includes an
estimate for a payment at maturity taking into account the
conversion feature. In this regard, the fair market value of any
common stock (and cash, if any) received by a holder upon
conversion will be treated as a contingent payment.
U.S. Holders also may obtain the projected payment schedule
by submitting a written request for such information to us at:
Charter Communications, Inc., 12405 Powerscourt Drive,
St. Louis, Missouri 63131. Attention: Senior Vice
President, Investor Relations.
The comparable yield and the projected payment schedule are
not used for any purpose other than to determine a holders
interest accruals and adjustments thereto in respect of the
notes for U.S. federal income tax purposes. They do not
constitute a projection or representation by us regarding the
actual amounts that will be paid on the notes, or the value at
any time of the common stock into which the notes may be
converted. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a
U.S. Holder is required under the contingent debt
regulations to use the comparable yield and the projected
payment schedule established by us in determining interest
accruals and adjustments in respect of a note, unless such
U.S. Holder timely discloses and justifies the use of a
different comparable yield and projected payment schedule to the
IRS.
|
|
|
Adjustments to Interest Accruals on the Notes |
If, during any taxable year, a U.S. Holder of notes
receives actual payments with respect to such notes that, in the
aggregate, exceed the total amount of projected payments for
that taxable year, the U.S. Holder will incur a net
positive adjustment under the contingent debt regulations
equal to the amount of such excess. The U.S. Holder will
treat a net positive adjustment as additional interest income in
that taxable year.
If a U.S. Holder receives in a taxable year actual payments
with respect to the notes that, in the aggregate, are less than
the amount of projected payments for that taxable year, the
U.S. Holder will incur a net negative
adjustment under the contingent debt regulations equal to
the amount of such deficit. This net negative adjustment will
(a) reduce the U.S. Holders interest income on
the notes for that taxable year, and (b) to the extent of
any excess after the application of (a), give rise to an
ordinary loss to the extent of the U.S. Holders
interest income on the notes during prior taxable years, reduced
to the extent such interest was offset by prior net negative
adjustments.
A net negative adjustment is not subject to the two percent
floor limitation on miscellaneous itemized deductions under
Section 67 of the Code. Any net negative adjustment in
excess of the amounts described in (a) and (b) will be carried
forward as a negative adjustment to offset future interest
income with respect to the notes or to reduce the amount
realized on a sale, exchange, conversion, redemption or
repurchase of the notes.
|
|
|
Purchasers of Notes at a Price Other than the Adjusted Issue
Price |
If a U.S. Holder purchases a note in the secondary market for an
amount that differs from the adjusted issue price
(as defined above) of the notes at the time of purchase, such
holder will be required to accrue interest income on the notes
in accordance with the comparable yield even if market
conditions have changed since the date of issuance. A U.S.
Holder must reasonably determine whether the difference between
the tax basis in a note and the adjusted issue price of a note
is attributable to a change in expectations as to the contingent
amounts potentially payable in respect of the notes or a change
in daily portion of interest, or both, and allocate the
difference accordingly. If the tax basis in a note is less than
its adjusted issue price, a positive adjustment discussed above
in Adjustments to Interest Accruals on the
Notes will result, and if the tax basis exceeds the
adjusted issue price of a note, a negative adjustment discussed
above in Adjustments to Interest Accruals on
the Notes will result.
206
Adjustments allocated to the contingent payments will be taken
into account when the contingent payments are made. Adjustments
allocated to the daily portion of interest will be taken into
account as the daily portion of interest accrues. Any negative
or positive adjustment of the kind described above made by a
U.S. Holder will decrease or increase, respectively, the
holders tax basis in the notes. U.S. Holders should
consult their own tax advisors regarding these allocations.
|
|
|
Sale, Exchange, Conversion, Redemption or Repurchase of
Notes |
Generally the sale, exchange, conversion, redemption or
repurchase of a note will result in taxable gain or loss to a
U.S. Holder. The amount of gain or loss on a sale,
exchange, conversion, redemption or repurchase of a note will be
equal to the difference between (a) the amount of cash plus
the fair market value of any other property received by the
U.S. Holder, including the fair market value of any common
stock received, and (b) the U.S. Holders
adjusted tax basis in the note.
A U.S. Holders adjusted tax basis in a note generally
will be equal to the U.S. Holders original purchase
price for the note, increased by any interest income previously
accrued by the U.S. Holder (determined without regard to
any adjustments to interest accruals described above) and
decreased by the amount of any projected payments that
previously have been scheduled to be made in respect of the
notes (without regard to the actual amount paid).
Gain recognized by a U.S. Holder upon a sale, exchange,
conversion, redemption or repurchase of a Note generally will be
treated as ordinary interest income; any loss will be ordinary
loss to the extent of the excess of previous interest inclusions
over the total net negative adjustments previously taken into
account as ordinary losses in respect of the note, and
thereafter capital loss (which will be long-term if the note is
held for more than one year). The deductibility of capital
losses is subject to limitations. A U.S. Holder who sells
the notes at a loss that meets certain thresholds may be
required to file a disclosure statement with the IRS.
A U.S. Holders tax basis in common stock received
upon a conversion of a note will equal the then current fair
market value of such common stock. The U.S. Holders
holding period for the common stock received will commence on
the day immediately following the date of conversion.
If at any time we were to make a distribution of cash or
property to our stockholders that would be taxable to the
stockholders as a dividend for U.S. federal income tax
purposes and, in accordance with the anti-dilution provisions of
the notes, the conversion rate of the notes were increased, such
increase may be deemed to be the payment of a taxable dividend
to holders of the notes to the extent of our current and
accumulated earnings and profits, notwithstanding the fact that
the holders do not receive a cash payment.
If the conversion rate is increased at our discretion or in
certain other circumstances, such increase also may be deemed to
be the payment of a taxable dividend to holders, notwithstanding
the fact that the holders do not receive a cash payment. In
certain circumstances the failure to make an adjustment of the
conversion rate under the indenture may result in a taxable
distribution to holders of our common stock.
Any deemed distribution will be taxable as a dividend, return of
capital or capital gain in accordance with the tax rules
applicable to corporate distributions, but may not be eligible
for the reduced rates of tax applicable to certain dividends
paid to individual holders or the dividends-received deduction
applicable to certain dividends paid to corporate holders.
Generally, a reasonable increase in the conversion rate in the
event of stock dividends or distributions of rights to subscribe
for our common stock will not be a taxable constructive dividend.
|
|
|
Taxation of Distributions on Common Stock |
Distributions paid on our common stock received upon a
conversion of a note, other than certain pro rata distributions
of common shares, will be treated as a dividend to the extent
paid out of current or
207
accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under
U.S. federal income tax principles) and will be includible
in income by the U.S. Holder and taxable as ordinary income
when received. If a distribution exceeds our current and
accumulated earnings and profits, the excess will be first
treated as a tax-free return of the U.S. Holders
investment, up to the U.S. Holders basis in the
common stock. Any remaining excess will be treated as a capital
gain. Dividends received by non-corporate U.S. Holders in
tax years prior to 2009 will be eligible to be taxed at reduced
rates if the holder meets certain holding period and other
applicable requirements. Dividends received by a corporate
U.S. Holder will be eligible for the dividends-received
deduction if the holder meets certain holding period and other
applicable requirements.
|
|
|
Sale or Other Disposition of Common Stock |
Gain or loss realized by a U.S. Holder on the sale or other
disposition of our common stock received upon a conversion of a
note will be capital gain or loss for U.S. federal income
tax purposes, and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the
U.S. Holder held the common stock for more than one year.
The amount of the U.S. Holders gain or loss will be
equal to the difference between the U.S. Holders tax
basis in the common stock disposed of and the amount realized on
the disposition. A U.S. Holder who sells the stock at a
loss that meets certain thresholds may be required to file a
disclosure statement with the IRS.
Tax Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders
As used herein, the term Non-U.S. Holder means
a beneficial owner of a note that is, for U.S. federal
income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual who is classified as a nonresident alien for
U.S. federal income tax purposes; |
|
|
|
a foreign corporation; or |
|
|
|
a foreign estate or trust. |
Non-U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors
to determine the United States federal, state, local and foreign
tax consequences that may be relevant to them.
Generally, all payments on the notes made to a
Non-U.S. Holder, including a payment in our common stock or
cash pursuant to a conversion, exchange, redemption or
retirement of a note and any gain realized on a sale of the
notes, will be exempt from United States federal withholding
tax, provided that:
|
|
|
1. in the case of gain realized on
the sale, exchange, conversion, redemption or repurchase of the
notes, we are not, and have not been within the shorter of the
five-year period preceding such sale, conversion, exchange,
redemption or retirement and the period during which the
Non-U.S. Holder held the notes, a U.S. real property
holding corporation; and |
|
|
2. (a) such
Non-U.S. Holder does not own, actually or constructively,
10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of
our stock entitled to vote, and is not a controlled foreign
corporation related, directly or indirectly, to us through stock
ownership and is not a bank receiving certain types of interest
and the certification requirement described below has been
fulfilled with respect to the Non-U.S. Holder; or |
|
|
(b) such payments are effectively connected with the
conduct by the Non-U.S. Holder of a trade or business in
the United States. |
If, contrary to our expectations, the notes were not treated as
indebtedness, any of the payments thereon could be subject to
United States federal withholding tax despite a Non-U.S.
Holders compliance with all of the requirements enumerated
above in clauses 1 and 2.
We believe that we are not, and do not anticipate becoming, a
U.S. real property holding corporation.
208
The certification requirement referred to above will be
fulfilled if the beneficial owner of a note certifies on IRS
Form W-8BEN, under penalties of perjury, that is not a
U.S. person and provides its name and address.
If a Non-U.S. Holder of the notes is engaged in a trade or
business in the United States, and if the payments on the notes
are effectively connected with the conduct of this trade or
business, the Non-U.S. Holder, although exempt from
U.S. withholding tax, will generally be taxed in the same
manner as a U.S. Holder (see Tax
Consequences to U.S. Holders above), except that the
Non-U.S. Holder will be required to provide a properly
executed IRS Form W-8ECI in order to claim an exemption
from withholding tax. These Non-U.S. Holders should consult
their own tax advisors with respect to other tax consequences of
the ownership of the notes, including the possible imposition of
a branch profits tax at 30% (or at a reduced rate under an
applicable tax treaty) for corporate Non-U.S. Holders.
If a Non-U.S. Holder were deemed to have received a
constructive dividend (see Tax Consequences to
U.S. Holders Constructive Dividends
above), the Non-U.S. Holder generally will be subject to
withholding tax at a 30% rate, subject to reduction by an
applicable tax treaty, on the taxable amount of the dividend. To
claim the benefit of a tax treaty, a Non-U.S. Holder must
comply with all certification requirements necessary to qualify
for treaty benefits. In the case of any constructive dividend it
is possible that the U.S. federal tax on this constructive
dividend would be withheld from interest, shares of your common
stock or sales proceeds subsequently paid or credited to a
Non-U.S. Holder. A Non-U.S. Holder who is subject to
withholding tax under such circumstances should consult its own
tax advisor as to whether it can obtain a refund for all or a
portion of the withholding tax.
Dividends paid to a Non-U.S. Holder of common stock
generally will be subject to U.S. withholding tax at a 30%
rate, subject to reduction under an applicable treaty. In order
to obtain a reduced rate of withholding, a Non-U.S. Holder
will be required to provide a properly executed IRS
Form W-8BEN certifying its entitlement to benefits under a
treaty. A Non-U.S. Holder who is subject to withholding tax
under such circumstances should consult its tax advisor as to
whether it can obtain a refund for all or a portion of the
withholding tax.
If a Non-U.S. Holder of a common stock is engaged in a
trade or business in the United States, and if the dividends (or
constructive dividends) are effectively connected with the
conduct of this trade or business, the Non-U.S. Holder,
although exempt from U.S. withholding tax, will generally
be taxed in the same manner as a U.S. Holder (see
Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders
above), except that the Non-U.S. Holder will be required to
provide a properly executed IRS Form W-8ECI in order to
claim an exemption from withholding tax. These
Non-U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors with
respect to other tax consequences of the ownership of our common
stock, including the possible imposition of a branch profits tax
at 30% (or at a reduced rate under an applicable tax treaty) for
corporate Non-U.S. Holders.
A Non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to
U.S. federal income and withholding tax on gain realized on
a sale or other disposition of common stock received upon a
conversion of a note, unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the gain is effectively connected with the conduct by such
Non-U.S. Holder of a trade or business in the United States; |
|
|
|
in the case of a Non-U.S. Holder who is a nonresident alien
individual, the individual is present in the United States for
183 or more days in the taxable year of the disposition and
certain other conditions are met; or |
209
|
|
|
|
|
we are or have been a U.S. real property holding
corporation at any time within the shorter of the five year
period preceding such sale, exchange or disposition and the
period the Non-U.S. Holder held the common stock. We
believe that we were not, are not, and do not anticipate
becoming, a U.S. real property holding corporation. |
Backup Withholding Tax and Information Reporting
Information returns may be filed with the IRS in connection with
payments on the notes, common stock and the proceeds from a sale
or other disposition of the notes or common stock. A
U.S. Holder may be subject to United States backup
withholding tax on these payments if it fails to provide its
taxpayer identification number to the paying agent and comply
with certification procedures or otherwise establish an
exemption from backup withholding. A Non-U.S. Holder may be
subject to United States backup withholding tax on these
payments unless the Non-U.S. Holder complies with
certification procedures to establish that it is not a
U.S. person. The certification procedures required to claim
the exemption from withholding tax on certain payments on the
notes, described above, will satisfy the certification
requirements necessary to avoid the backup withholding tax as
well. The amount of any backup withholding from a payment will
be allowed as a credit against the Holders
U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle the
Holder to a refund, provided that the required information is
timely furnished to the IRS.
210
SELLING SECURITYHOLDERS
Convertible Senior Notes and Shares of Class A Common Stock
Issuable Upon Conversion
We originally sold the 5.875% convertible senior notes
offered hereby on November 22, 2004 to certain initial
purchasers, who have advised us that the convertible senior
notes were resold in transactions exempt from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act to qualified
institutional buyers, as defined in Rule 144A of the
Securities Act. These subsequent purchasers, or their
transferees, pledgees, donees or successors, may from time to
time offer and sell any or all of the convertible senior notes
and/or shares of the Class A common stock issuable upon
conversion of the convertible senior notes pursuant to this
prospectus.
The convertible senior notes and the shares of Class A
common stock issuable upon conversion of the convertible senior
notes have been registered in accordance with a registration
rights agreement. Pursuant to the registration rights agreement,
we were required to file a registration statement with regard to
the convertible senior notes and the shares of our Class A
common stock issuable upon conversion of the convertible senior
notes and we are required to keep the registration statement
effective until the earliest of:
(1) the sale of all the registrable securities registered
under the registration rights agreement;
(2) the expiration of the holding period applicable to
these securities under Rule 144(k) under the Securities Act with
respect to persons who are not our affiliates; or
(3) there are no registrable securities outstanding.
The selling securityholders may choose to sell convertible
senior notes and/or the shares of Class A common stock
issuable upon conversion of the convertible senior notes from
time to time. See Plan of Distribution.
Table Listing Securities Offered In This Prospectus
The following table sets forth:
(1) the name of each selling securityholder who has
provided us with notice as of the date of this prospectus
pursuant to the registration rights agreement entered into in
connection with the issuance of the convertible senior notes or
shares of Class A common stock, as applicable, of its
possible intent to sell or otherwise dispose of convertible
senior notes and/or shares of Class A common stock;
(2) the amount of outstanding convertible senior notes
beneficially owned by the selling securityholder prior to the
offering, assuming no conversion of the convertible senior
notes, and the principal amount of convertible senior notes
which it may sell pursuant to the registration statement of
which this prospectus forms a part; and
(3) the principal number of shares of our Class A common
stock issued or issuable to the selling securityholder prior to
the offering, and the principal number of shares which it may
sell pursuant to the registration statement of which this
prospectus forms a part. The information contained under the
column heading Shares That May be Sold assumes
conversion of the full amount of the convertible senior notes
held by the holder at the initial rate of 413.3321 shares
of Class A common stock per each $1,000 principal amount of
convertible senior notes prior to the offering.
To our knowledge, no selling securityholder nor any of its
affiliates has held any position or office with, been employed
by or otherwise has had any material relationship with us or our
affiliates during the three years prior to the date of this
prospectus.
A selling securityholder may offer all or some portion of the
convertible senior notes and shares of the Class A common
stock. Accordingly, no estimate can be given as to the amount or
percentage of convertible senior notes or our Class A
common stock that will be held by the selling securityholders
upon termination of sales pursuant to this prospectus. In
addition, the selling securityholders identified below
211
may have sold, transferred or disposed of all or a portion of
their convertible senior notes since the date on which they
provided the information regarding their holdings in
transactions exempt from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Class A | |
|
|
Convertible Senior Notes | |
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Shares of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal | |
|
Common | |
|
|
|
|
Amount of | |
|
Amount of | |
|
Stock | |
|
|
|
|
Notes Owned | |
|
Notes That | |
|
Owned | |
|
Shares That | |
Selling Securityholder |
|
Before Offering | |
|
May Be Sold | |
|
Before Offering | |
|
May Be Sold | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
ADAR Investment Fund LTD
|
|
$ |
22,145,000 |
|
|
$ |
22,145,000 |
|
|
|
9,150,825 |
|
|
|
9,150,825 |
|
AG Domestic Convertibles, L.P.
|
|
$ |
11,600,000 |
|
|
$ |
11,600,000 |
|
|
|
4,793,387 |
|
|
|
4,793,387 |
|
AG Offshore Convertibles, Ltd.
|
|
$ |
26,900,00 |
|
|
$ |
26,900,000 |
|
|
|
11,115,701 |
|
|
|
11,115,701 |
|
AHFP Context
|
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
|
123,966 |
|
|
|
123,966 |
|
Akanthos Arbitrage Master Fund, LP
|
|
$ |
16,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
16,000,000 |
|
|
|
6,611,569 |
|
|
|
6,611,569 |
|
Banc of America Securities LLC
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
|
144,628 |
|
|
|
144,628 |
|
Basso Fund Ltd.
|
|
$ |
1,700,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,700,000 |
|
|
|
702,479 |
|
|
|
702,479 |
|
Basso Holdings Ltd.
|
|
$ |
4,800,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,800,000 |
|
|
|
1,983,470 |
|
|
|
1,983,470 |
|
Basso Multi-Strategy Holding Fund Ltd.
|
|
$ |
11,200,000 |
|
|
$ |
11,200,000 |
|
|
|
4,628,098 |
|
|
|
4,628,098 |
|
BBT Fund, L.P.
|
|
$ |
3,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,239,669 |
|
|
|
1,239,669 |
|
Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc.
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
413,223 |
|
|
|
413,223 |
|
CC Convertible Arbitrage, Ltd.
|
|
$ |
4,950,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,950,000 |
|
|
|
2,045,454 |
|
|
|
2,045,454 |
|
Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.(1)
|
|
$ |
23,751,000 |
|
|
$ |
23,751,000 |
|
|
|
9,814,461 |
|
|
|
9,814,461 |
|
Citigroup Global Markets Ltd.(1)
|
|
$ |
141,387,000 |
|
|
$ |
141,387,000 |
|
|
|
58,424,374 |
|
|
|
58,424,374 |
|
CNH CA Master Account, L.P.
|
|
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
619,834 |
|
|
|
619,834 |
|
Context Convertible Arbitrage Fund, LP
|
|
$ |
1,725,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,725,000 |
|
|
|
712,809 |
|
|
|
712,809 |
|
Context Convertible Arbitrage Offshore, Ltd.
|
|
$ |
5,400,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,400,000 |
|
|
|
2,231,404 |
|
|
|
2,231,404 |
|
Corporate High Yield III, Inc.
|
|
$ |
945,000 |
|
|
$ |
945,000 |
|
|
|
390,495 |
|
|
|
390,495 |
|
Corporate High Yield V, Inc.
|
|
$ |
1,555,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,555,000 |
|
|
|
642,561 |
|
|
|
642,561 |
|
Corporate High Yield VI, Inc.
|
|
$ |
1,625,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,625,000 |
|
|
|
671,487 |
|
|
|
671,487 |
|
Corporate High Yield Fund, Inc.
|
|
$ |
875,000 |
|
|
$ |
875,000 |
|
|
|
361,570 |
|
|
|
361,570 |
|
DBAG London
|
|
$ |
17,600,000 |
|
|
$ |
17,600,000 |
|
|
|
7,272,726 |
|
|
|
7,272,726 |
|
Deephaven Domestic Convertible Trading Ltd.
|
|
$ |
4,650,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,650,000 |
|
|
|
1,921,487 |
|
|
|
1,921,487 |
|
Delaware Delchester Fund
|
|
$ |
1,080,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,080,000 |
|
|
|
446,280 |
|
|
|
446,280 |
|
Delaware Diversified Income Fund
|
|
$ |
415,000 |
|
|
$ |
415,000 |
|
|
|
171,487 |
|
|
|
171,487 |
|
Delaware Dividend Income Fund
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
|
206,611 |
|
|
|
206,611 |
|
Delaware High-Yield Opportunities Fund
|
|
$ |
290,000 |
|
|
$ |
290,000 |
|
|
|
119,834 |
|
|
|
119,834 |
|
Delaware VIP Diversified Income Series
|
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
|
|
18,595 |
|
|
|
18,595 |
|
Delaware VIP High Yield Series
|
|
$ |
655,000 |
|
|
$ |
655,000 |
|
|
|
270,661 |
|
|
|
270,661 |
|
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
|
|
$ |
4,584,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,584,000 |
|
|
|
1,894,214 |
|
|
|
1,894,214 |
|
Dividend & Income Fund
|
|
$ |
165,000 |
|
|
$ |
165,000 |
|
|
|
68,181 |
|
|
|
68,181 |
|
DKR Saturn Multi-Strategy Holding Fund Ltd.
|
|
$ |
2,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
826,446 |
|
|
|
826,446 |
|
Edge Investment Master Fund, LTD
|
|
$ |
3,500 |
|
|
$ |
3,500 |
|
|
|
1,446 |
|
|
|
1,446 |
|
Eton Park Fund, L.P.
|
|
$ |
1,872,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,872,000 |
|
|
|
773,553 |
|
|
|
773,553 |
|
Eton Park Master Fund, Ltd.
|
|
$ |
2,928,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,928,000 |
|
|
|
1,209,917 |
|
|
|
1,209,917 |
|
Finch Tactical Plus Class B
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
|
82,644 |
|
|
|
82,644 |
|
Fore Convertible Master Fund, Ltd.
|
|
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
619,834 |
|
|
|
619,834 |
|
Fore ERISA Fund, Ltd.
|
|
$ |
179,000 |
|
|
$ |
179,000 |
|
|
|
73,966 |
|
|
|
73,966 |
|
Fore Multi Strategy Master Fund, Ltd.
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
|
144,628 |
|
|
|
144,628 |
|
Fore Opportunity Fund, LP
|
|
$ |
69,000 |
|
|
$ |
69,000 |
|
|
|
28,512 |
|
|
|
28,512 |
|
Fore Opportunity Offshore Fund, Ltd
|
|
$ |
231,000 |
|
|
$ |
231,000 |
|
|
|
95,454 |
|
|
|
95,454 |
|
212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Class A | |
|
|
Convertible Senior Notes | |
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Shares of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal | |
|
Common | |
|
|
|
|
Amount of | |
|
Amount of | |
|
Stock | |
|
|
|
|
Notes Owned | |
|
Notes That | |
|
Owned | |
|
Shares That | |
Selling Securityholder |
|
Before Offering | |
|
May Be Sold | |
|
Before Offering | |
|
May Be Sold | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Geode U.S. Convertible Arbitrage Fund, aggregated account
of Geode Capital Master Fund Ltd.
|
|
$ |
3,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,239,669 |
|
|
|
1,239,669 |
|
Global Dividend & Income Fund
|
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
|
16,528 |
|
|
|
10,330 |
|
Grace Brothers, Ltd.
|
|
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
619,834 |
|
|
|
619,834 |
|
Guggenheim Portfolio Company VIII (Cayman), Ltd.
|
|
$ |
1,138,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,138,000 |
|
|
|
470,247 |
|
|
|
470,247 |
|
HFR RVA Combined Master Trust
|
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
|
51,652 |
|
|
|
51,652 |
|
Highbridge International LLC
|
|
$ |
36,520,000 |
|
|
$ |
36,520,000 |
|
|
|
15,090,907 |
|
|
|
15,090,907 |
|
Kamunting Street Master Fund, LTD
|
|
$ |
22,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
22,500,000 |
|
|
|
9,297,519 |
|
|
|
9,297,519 |
|
KBC Financial Products USA Inc.
|
|
$ |
4,885,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,885,000 |
|
|
|
2,018,594 |
|
|
|
2,018,594 |
|
KDC Convertible Arbfund L.P.
|
|
$ |
2,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
826,446 |
|
|
|
826,446 |
|
Laurel Ridge Capital, LP
|
|
$ |
5,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
2,066,115 |
|
|
|
2,066,115 |
|
LDG Limited
|
|
$ |
322,000 |
|
|
$ |
322,000 |
|
|
|
133,057 |
|
|
|
133,057 |
|
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company Separate Account 20
|
|
$ |
590,000 |
|
|
$ |
590,000 |
|
|
|
243,801 |
|
|
|
243,801 |
|
Lyxor/ Context Fund Ltd.
|
|
$ |
1,075,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,075,000 |
|
|
|
444,214 |
|
|
|
444,214 |
|
Man Convertible Bond Master Fund, Ltd.
|
|
$ |
3,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,239,669 |
|
|
|
1,239,669 |
|
Man Mac I, Limited
|
|
$ |
3,391,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,391,000 |
|
|
|
1,401,239 |
|
|
|
1,401,239 |
|
Marathon Global Convertible Master Fund Ltd.
|
|
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
619,834 |
|
|
|
619,834 |
|
Merced Partners Limited Partnership
|
|
$ |
2,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
1,033,057 |
|
|
|
1,033,057 |
|
Merrill Lynch Bond High Income Fund
|
|
$ |
9,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,000,000 |
|
|
|
3,719,007 |
|
|
|
3,719,007 |
|
Merrill Lynch Global Investment Series: Income Strategies Fund
|
|
$ |
5,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
2,066,115 |
|
|
|
2,066,115 |
|
MLIF US High Yield Fund, Inc.
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
|
206,611 |
|
|
|
206,611 |
|
ML Master US High Yield Fund, Inc.
|
|
$ |
2,200,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,200,000 |
|
|
|
909,090 |
|
|
|
909,090 |
|
Mohican VCA Master Fund, Ltd.
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
|
206,611 |
|
|
|
206,611 |
|
Morgan Stanley Convertible Securities Trust
|
|
$ |
800,000 |
|
|
$ |
800,000 |
|
|
|
330,578 |
|
|
|
330,578 |
|
MSS Convertible Arbitrage 1 c/o TQA Investors, LLC
|
|
$ |
31,000 |
|
|
$ |
31,000 |
|
|
|
12,809 |
|
|
|
12,809 |
|
National Bank of Canada
|
|
$ |
700,000 |
|
|
$ |
700,000 |
|
|
|
289,256 |
|
|
|
289,256 |
|
Oppenheimer Convertible Securities Fund
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
413,223 |
|
|
|
413,223 |
|
Optimum Fixed Income Fund
|
|
$ |
65,000 |
|
|
$ |
65,000 |
|
|
|
26,859 |
|
|
|
26,859 |
|
President and Fellows of Harvard College
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
|
144,628 |
|
|
|
144,628 |
|
Putnam Convertible Income-Growth Trust
|
|
$ |
8,425,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,425,000 |
|
|
|
3,481,404 |
|
|
|
3,481,404 |
|
Putnam High Income Bond Fund
|
|
$ |
2,075,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,075,000 |
|
|
|
857,437 |
|
|
|
857,437 |
|
Raytheon Savings & Investment Plan Trust
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
|
61,983 |
|
|
|
61,983 |
|
Regiment Capital, Ltd.
|
|
$ |
650,000 |
|
|
$ |
650,000 |
|
|
|
268,595 |
|
|
|
268,595 |
|
Royal Bank of Canada (Norshield)
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
|
41,322 |
|
|
|
41,322 |
|
Royal Bank of Ontario
|
|
$ |
2,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
826,446 |
|
|
|
826,446 |
|
Saranac Capital Management L.P. on behalf of Citigroup
Alternative Investments Diversified Arbitrage Strategies Fund
Ltd.
|
|
$ |
357,000 |
|
|
$ |
357,000 |
|
|
|
147,520 |
|
|
|
147,520 |
|
Saranac Capital Management L.P. on behalf of Citigroup
Alternative Investments Enhanced Arbitrage Strategies Fund
|
|
$ |
65,000 |
|
|
$ |
65,000 |
|
|
|
26,859 |
|
|
|
26,859 |
|
213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Class A | |
|
|
Convertible Senior Notes | |
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Shares of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal | |
|
Common | |
|
|
|
|
Amount of | |
|
Amount of | |
|
Stock | |
|
|
|
|
Notes Owned | |
|
Notes That | |
|
Owned | |
|
Shares That | |
Selling Securityholder |
|
Before Offering | |
|
May Be Sold | |
|
Before Offering | |
|
May Be Sold | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Saranac Capital Management L.P. on behalf of Citigroup
Alternative Investments QIP Multi Strategy Arbitrage Portfolio
|
|
$ |
1,692,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,692,000 |
|
|
|
699,173 |
|
|
|
699,173 |
|
Saranac Capital Management L.P. on behalf of Saranac Erisa
Arbitrage LTD
|
|
$ |
698,000 |
|
|
$ |
698,000 |
|
|
|
288,429 |
|
|
|
288,429 |
|
Saranac Capital Management L.P. on behalf of Saranac Erisa
Arbitrage LP
|
|
$ |
48,000 |
|
|
$ |
48,000 |
|
|
|
19,834 |
|
|
|
19,834 |
|
Saranac Capital Management L.P. on behalf of Saranac Arbitrage
LTD
|
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
|
16,528 |
|
|
|
16,528 |
|
Satellite Asset Management, L.P.
|
|
$ |
12,300,000 |
|
|
$ |
12,300,000 |
|
|
|
5,082,644 |
|
|
|
5,082,644 |
|
Sphinx Convertible Arbitrage Fund SPC
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
|
144,628 |
|
|
|
144,628 |
|
Sphinx Fund c/o TQA Investors, LLC
|
|
$ |
496,000 |
|
|
$ |
496,000 |
|
|
|
204,958 |
|
|
|
204,958 |
|
St. Albans Partners Ltd.
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
413,223 |
|
|
|
413,223 |
|
St. Thomas Trading, Ltd.
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
413,223 |
|
|
|
413,223 |
|
Sturgeon Limited
|
|
$ |
71,000 |
|
|
$ |
71,000 |
|
|
|
29,338 |
|
|
|
29,338 |
|
Susquehanna Capital Group
|
|
$ |
6,980,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,980,000 |
|
|
|
2,884,297 |
|
|
|
2,884,297 |
|
SuttonBrook Capital Portfolio LP
|
|
$ |
12,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
12,500,000 |
|
|
|
5,165,288 |
|
|
|
5,165,288 |
|
Tamarack International, Ltd.
|
|
$ |
2,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
1,033,057 |
|
|
|
1,033,057 |
|
Tempo Master Fund, LP
|
|
$ |
2,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
826,446 |
|
|
|
826,446 |
|
Tenor Opportunity Master Fund Ltd.
|
|
$ |
4,200,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,200,000 |
|
|
|
1,735,537 |
|
|
|
1,735,537 |
|
The High-Yield Bond Portfolio
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
|
2,066 |
|
|
|
2,066 |
|
TQA Master Fund, Ltd.
|
|
$ |
2,836,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,836,000 |
|
|
|
1,171,900 |
|
|
|
1,171,900 |
|
TQA Master Plus Fund, Ltd.
|
|
$ |
4,551,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,551,000 |
|
|
|
1,880,578 |
|
|
|
1,880,578 |
|
UBS AG London Branch
|
|
$ |
45,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
45,500,000 |
|
|
|
18,801,651 |
|
|
|
18,801,651 |
|
UBS AG London F/ B/ O HFS
|
|
$ |
5,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
2,066,115 |
|
|
|
2,066,115 |
|
UBS OConnor LLC F/B/O OConnor Global Convertible
Arbitrage Master Limited
|
|
$ |
6,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,000,000 |
|
|
|
2,479,338 |
|
|
|
2,479,338 |
|
Univest Convertible Arbitrage Fund II Ltd. (Norshield)
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
|
41,322 |
|
|
|
41,322 |
|
Van Kampen Harbor Fund
|
|
$ |
1,200,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
495,867 |
|
|
|
495,867 |
|
Whitebox Convertible Arbitrage Partners, L.P.
|
|
$ |
3,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,239,669 |
|
|
|
1,239,669 |
|
Whitebox Hedged High Yield Partners, L.P.
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
413,223 |
|
|
|
413,223 |
|
White River Securities LLC
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
413,223 |
|
|
|
413,223 |
|
Wolverine Convertible Arbitrage Fund Limited
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
|
103,305 |
|
|
|
103,305 |
|
World Income Fund, Inc.
|
|
$ |
800,000 |
|
|
$ |
800,000 |
|
|
|
330,578 |
|
|
|
330,578 |
|
Yield Strategies Fund I, L.P.
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
|
206,611 |
|
|
|
206,611 |
|
Yield Strategies Fund II, L.P.
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
|
206,611 |
|
|
|
206,611 |
|
Zurich Institutional Benchmarks Master Fund Ltd. c/o TQA
Investors, LLC
|
|
$ |
696,000 |
|
|
$ |
696,000 |
|
|
|
287,603 |
|
|
|
287,603 |
|
|
|
(1) |
These entities and/or their affiliates have provided, and may
from time to time provide, investment banking services to
Charter Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including,
among other things, acting as lead and/or co-manager with
respect to offerings of debt and equity securities. |
If, after the date of this prospectus, a securityholder notifies
us pursuant to the registration rights agreement of its intent
to dispose of convertible senior notes pursuant to the
registration statement, we may supplement this prospectus to
include that information.
214
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
We are registering the convertible senior notes and the shares
of our Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of the
convertible senior notes to permit public secondary trading of
these securities by the holders from time to time after the date
of this prospectus. We have agreed, among other things, to bear
all expenses, other than underwriting discounts and selling
commissions, in connection with the registration and sale of the
convertible senior notes and the shares of our Class A
common stock covered by this prospectus.
We will not receive any of the proceeds from the offering or
sale by the selling securityholders of the convertible senior
notes or the shares of our Class A common stock covered by
this prospectus. The convertible senior notes and shares of
Class A common stock may be sold from time to time directly
by any selling securityholder or, alternatively, through
underwriters, broker-dealers or agents. If convertible senior
notes or shares of Class A common stock are sold through
underwriters or broker-dealers, the selling securityholder will
be responsible for underwriting discounts or commissions or
agents commissions.
The convertible senior notes or shares of Class A common
stock may be sold:
|
|
|
|
|
in one or more transactions at fixed prices, |
|
|
|
at prevailing market prices at the time of sale, |
|
|
|
at varying prices determined at the time of sale, or |
|
|
|
at negotiated prices. |
These sales may be effected in transactions, which may involve
block trades or transactions in which the broker acts as agent
for the seller and the buyer:
|
|
|
|
|
on any national securities exchange or quotation service on
which the convertible senior notes or shares of Class A
common stock may be listed or quoted at the time of sale, |
|
|
|
in the over-the-counter market, |
|
|
|
in transactions otherwise than on a national securities exchange
or quotation service or in the over-the-counter market or |
|
|
|
through the writing of options. |
In connection with sales of the convertible senior notes or
shares of Class A common stock, any selling securityholder
may loan or pledge convertible senior notes or shares of our
Class A common stock to broker-dealers that in turn may
sell the securities.
The outstanding Class A common stock is publicly traded on
the Nasdaq National Market. The initial purchasers of the
convertible senior notes have advised us that certain of the
initial purchasers are making and currently intend to continue
making a market in the convertible senior notes. However, they
are not obligated to do so and any market-making of this type
may be discontinued at any time without notice, in the sole
discretion of the initial purchasers. We do not intend to apply
for listing of the convertible senior notes on the Nasdaq
National Market or any securities exchange. Accordingly, we
cannot assure that any trading market will develop or have any
liquidity.
The selling securityholders and any broker-dealers, agents or
underwriters that participate with the selling securityholders
in the distribution of the convertible senior notes or the
shares of Class A common stock to be offered by selling
securityholders may be deemed to be underwriters
within the meaning of the Securities Act, in which event any
commissions received by these broker-dealers, agents or
underwriters and any profits realized by the selling
securityholders on the resales of the convertible senior notes
or the shares may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or
discounts under the Securities Act.
In addition, any securities covered by this prospectus which
qualify for sale pursuant to Rule 144, Rule 144A or
any other available exemption from registration under the
Securities Act may be sold under Rule 144, Rule 144A
or any of the other available exemptions rather than pursuant to
this prospectus.
215
There is no assurance that any selling securityholder will sell
any or all of the convertible senior notes or shares of
Class A common stock to be offered by selling
securityholders as described in this prospectus, and any selling
securityholders may transfer, devise or gift the securities by
other means not described in this prospectus.
We originally sold the convertible senior notes to the initial
purchasers in November 2004 in a private placement. We agreed to
indemnify and hold the initial purchasers of the convertible
senior notes harmless against certain liabilities under the
Securities Act that could arise in connection with the sale of
the convertible senior notes by the initial purchasers. The
registration rights agreement we entered into in connection with
the sale of the convertible senior notes provides for us and
those selling securityholders listed on the Selling
Securityholders Table as holders of convertible senior notes to
indemnify each other against certain liabilities arising under
the Securities Act.
Pursuant to the registration rights agreement we entered into in
connection with the sale of the convertible senior notes, we
agreed to use reasonable efforts to cause the registration
statement to which this prospectus relates to become effective
within 150 days after the date the convertible senior notes
were originally issued and to keep the registration statement
effective until the earlier of (1) the date as of which all the
notes or the Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of
the notes have been sold either under Rule 144 under the
Securities Act (or any similar provision then in force) or
pursuant to the shelf registration statement; (2) the date as of
which all the notes or the Class A common stock issuable upon
conversion of the notes held by non-affiliates are eligible to
be sold to the public pursuant to Rule 144(k) under the
Securities Act or any successor provision; and (3) the date on
which there are no outstanding registrable securities.
The registration rights agreement we entered into in connection
with the sale of the convertible senior notes provides that,
under certain circumstances, we may suspend the use of this
prospectus in connection with sales of convertible senior notes
and shares of Class A common stock for a period not to
exceed an aggregate of 45 days in any 90-day period or
90 days in any 12-month period. We will bear the expenses
of preparing and filing the registration statement and all
post-effective amendments.
216
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the securities offered by this prospectus has
been passed upon for Charter Communications, Inc. by
Irell & Manella, LLP.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Charter Communications,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and
for the three year periods ended December 31, 2004, which
are included in this prospectus, have been audited by
KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
as stated in their report included in this prospectus, which
includes explanatory paragraphs regarding the adoption,
effective January 1, 2002, of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, effective September 30, 2004 of
EITF Topic D-108, Use of the Residual Method to Value
Acquired Assets Other than Goodwill, and, effective
January 1, 2003, of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, as amended by Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation Transition and
Disclosure an amendment to FASB Statement
No. 123. The consolidated financial statements
referred to above have been included in this prospectus in
reliance upon the authority of KPMG LLP as experts in giving
said report.
217
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
F-28 |
|
|
|
|
F-29 |
|
|
|
|
F-30 |
|
|
|
|
F-31 |
|
|
|
|
F-32 |
|
|
|
|
F-33 |
|
F-1
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
650 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $12
and $15, respectively
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTMENT IN CABLE PROPERTIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
of $5,689 and $5,311, respectively
|
|
|
6,120 |
|
|
|
6,289 |
|
|
Franchises
|
|
|
9,846 |
|
|
|
9,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment in cable properties, net
|
|
|
15,966 |
|
|
|
16,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
16,794 |
|
|
$ |
17,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS DEFICIT |
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$ |
1,256 |
|
|
$ |
1,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
1,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT
|
|
|
18,929 |
|
|
|
19,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEFERRED MANAGEMENT FEES RELATED PARTY
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MINORITY INTEREST
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PREFERRED STOCK REDEEMABLE; $.001 par value;
1 million shares authorized; 545,259 shares issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS DEFICIT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common stock; $.001 par value;
1.75 billion shares authorized; 304,763,192 and
305,203,770 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Common stock; $.001 par value;
750 million shares authorized; 50,000 shares issued
and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock; $.001 par value; 250 million shares
authorized; no non-redeemable shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
4,798 |
|
|
|
4,794 |
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(9,549 |
) |
|
|
(9,196 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders deficit
|
|
|
(4,751 |
) |
|
|
(4,406 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders deficit
|
|
$ |
16,794 |
|
|
$ |
17,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
F-2
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
REVENUES
|
|
$ |
1,271 |
|
|
$ |
1,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (excluding depreciation and amortization)
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
Asset impairment charges
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of fixed assets, net
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
Option compensation expense, net
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
Special charges, net
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments and hedging activities, net
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
Loss on debt to equity conversions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(385 |
) |
|
|
(410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before minority interest and income taxes
|
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(235 |
) |
MINORITY INTEREST
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(337 |
) |
|
|
(239 |
) |
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(352 |
) |
|
|
(293 |
) |
Dividends on preferred stock redeemable
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to common stock
|
|
$ |
(353 |
) |
|
$ |
(294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS PER COMMON SHARE, basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(1.16 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
|
|
303,308,880 |
|
|
|
295,106,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
F-3
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in millions)
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(352 |
) |
|
$ |
(293 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows from
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
Asset impairment charges
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option compensation expense, net
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
Noncash interest expense
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments and hedging activities, net
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets, net
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
Loss on debt to equity conversions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from
dispositions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
Change in accrued expenses related to capital expenditures
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings of long-term debt
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(775 |
) |
|
|
(779 |
) |
|
Payments for debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
(578 |
) |
|
|
(615 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(618 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH PAID FOR INTEREST
|
|
$ |
249 |
|
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONCASH TRANSACTIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of debt by Charter Communications Operating, LLC
|
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement of Charter Communications Holdings, LLC debt
|
|
$ |
(284 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt exchanged for Charter Class A common stock
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
F-4
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
|
|
1. |
Organization and Basis of Presentation |
Charter Communications, Inc. (Charter) is a holding
company whose principal assets at March 31, 2005 are the
47% controlling common equity interest in Charter Communications
Holding Company, LLC (Charter Holdco) and
mirror notes which are payable by Charter Holdco to
Charter and have the same principal amount and terms as those of
Charters convertible senior notes. Charter Holdco is the
sole owner of Charter Communications Holdings, LLC
(Charter Holdings). The condensed consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of Charter, Charter
Holdco, Charter Holdings and all of their wholly owned
subsidiaries where the underlying operations reside,
collectively referred to herein as the Company.
Charter consolidates Charter Holdco on the basis of voting
control. Charter Holdcos limited liability company
agreement provides that so long as Charters Class B
common stock retains its special voting rights, Charter will
maintain a 100% voting interest in Charter Holdco. Voting
control gives Charter full authority and control over the
operations of Charter Holdco. All significant intercompany
accounts and transactions among consolidated entities have been
eliminated. The Company is a broadband communications company
operating in the United States. The Company offers its customers
traditional cable video programming (analog and digital video)
as well as high-speed data services and, in some areas, advanced
broadband services such as high definition television, video on
demand and telephony. The Company sells its cable video
programming, high-speed data and advanced broadband services on
a subscription basis. The Company also sells local advertising
on satellite-delivered networks.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of
the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States for interim
financial information and the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures
typically included in Charters Annual Report on
Form 10-K have been condensed or omitted for this quarterly
report. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements are unaudited and are subject to review by regulatory
authorities. However, in the opinion of management, such
financial statements include all adjustments, which consist of
only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair
presentation of the results for the periods presented. Interim
results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full
year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Areas involving
significant judgments and estimates include capitalization of
labor and overhead costs; depreciation and amortization costs;
impairments of property, plant and equipment, franchises and
goodwill, income taxes and contingencies. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Certain 2004 amounts have been reclassified to conform with the
2005 presentation.
|
|
2. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
The Company incurred net loss applicable to common stock of
$353 million and $294 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The
Companys net cash flows from operating activities were
$153 million and $115 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
The Company has a significant level of debt. The Companys
long-term financing as of March 31, 2005 consists of
$5.1 billion of credit facility debt, $12.9 billion
accreted value of high-yield notes and $957 million
F-5
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
accreted value of convertible senior notes. For the remainder of
2005, $23 million of the Companys debt matures, and
in 2006, an additional $152 million of the Companys
debt matures. In 2007 and beyond, significant additional amounts
will become due under the Companys remaining long-term
debt obligations.
The Company has historically required significant cash to fund
debt service costs, capital expenditures and ongoing operations.
Historically, the Company has funded these requirements through
cash flows from operating activities, borrowings under its
credit facilities, sales of assets, issuances of debt and equity
securities and from cash on hand. However, the mix of funding
sources changes from period to period. For the three months
ended March 31, 2005, the Company generated
$153 million of net cash flows from operating activities,
after paying cash interest of $249 million. In addition,
the Company used approximately $211 million for purchases
of property, plant and equipment. Finally, the Company had net
cash flows used in financing activities of $578 million,
which included, among other things, approximately
$628 million in repayment of borrowings under the
Companys revolving credit facility through a series of
transactions in February 2005. This repayment was the primary
reason cash on hand decreased by $618 million to
$32 million at March 31, 2005.
The Company expects that cash on hand, cash flows from operating
activities and the amounts available under its credit facilities
will be adequate to meet its cash needs in 2005. Cash flows from
operating activities and amounts available under the
Companys credit facilities may not be sufficient to fund
the Companys operations and satisfy its principal
repayment obligations that come due in 2006 and, the Company
believes, will not be sufficient to fund its operations and
satisfy such repayment obligations thereafter.
It is likely that the Company will require additional funding to
repay debt maturing after 2006. The Company is working with its
financial advisors to address such funding requirements.
However, there can be no assurance that such funding will be
available to the Company. Although Mr. Allen and his
affiliates have purchased equity from the Company in the past,
Mr. Allen and his affiliates are not obligated to purchase
equity from, contribute to or loan funds to the Company in the
future.
|
|
|
Credit Facilities and Covenants |
The Companys ability to operate depends upon, among other
things, its continued access to capital, including credit under
the Charter Communications Operating, LLC (Charter
Operating) credit facilities. These credit facilities,
along with the Companys indentures, contain certain
restrictive covenants, some of which require the Company to
maintain specified financial ratios and meet financial tests and
to provide audited financial statements with an unqualified
opinion from the Companys independent auditors. As of
March 31, 2005, the Company was in compliance with the
covenants under its indentures and credit facilities and the
Company expects to remain in compliance with those covenants for
the next twelve months. As of March 31, 2005, the Company
had borrowing availability under the credit facilities of
$1.2 billion, none of which was restricted due to
covenants. Continued access to the Companys credit
facilities is subject to the Company remaining in compliance
with the covenants of these credit facilities, including
covenants tied to the Companys operating performance. If
the Companys operating performance results in
non-compliance with these covenants, or if any of certain other
events of non-compliance under these credit facilities or
indentures governing the Companys debt occurs, funding
under the credit facilities may not be available and defaults on
some or potentially all of the Companys debt obligations
could occur. An event of default under the covenants governing
any of the Companys debt instruments could result in the
acceleration of its payment obligations under that debt and,
under certain circumstances, in cross-defaults under its other
debt obligations, which could have a material adverse effect on
the Companys consolidated financial condition or results
of operations.
F-6
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
The Charter Operating credit facilities required the Company to
redeem the CC V Holdings, LLC notes as a result of the
Charter Holdings leverage ratio becoming less than 8.75 to 1.0.
In satisfaction of this requirement, in March 2005,
CC V Holdings, LLC redeemed all of its outstanding
notes, at 103.958% of principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid
interest to the date of redemption. The total cost of the
redemption including accrued and unpaid interest was
approximately $122 million. The Company funded the
redemption with borrowings under the Charter Operating credit
facilities.
Charters ability to make interest payments on its
convertible senior notes, and, in 2006 and 2009, to repay the
outstanding principal of its convertible senior notes of
$122 million and $863 million, respectively, will
depend on its ability to raise additional capital and/or on
receipt of payments or distributions from Charter Holdco or its
subsidiaries, including CCH II, LLC
(CCH II), CCO Holdings, LLC (CCO
Holdings) and Charter Operating. During the three months
ended March 31, 2005, Charter Holdings distributed
$60 million to Charter Holdco. As of March 31, 2005,
Charter Holdco was owed $161 million in intercompany loans
from its subsidiaries, which amount was available to pay
interest and principal on Charters convertible senior
notes. In addition, Charter has $145 million of
governmental securities pledged as security for the first six
interest payments on Charters 5.875% convertible
senior notes.
Distributions by Charters subsidiaries to a parent company
(including Charter and Charter Holdco) for payment of principal
on Charters convertible senior notes, however, are
restricted by the indentures governing the CCH II notes,
CCO Holdings notes, and Charter Operating notes, unless under
their respective indentures there is no default and a specified
leverage ratio test is met at the time of such event.
The indentures governing the Charter Holdings notes permit
Charter Holdings to make distributions to Charter Holdco for
payment of interest or principal on the convertible senior
notes, only if, after giving effect to the distribution, Charter
Holdings can incur additional debt under the leverage ratio of
8.75 to 1.0, there is no default under Charter Holdings
indentures and other specified tests are met. For the quarter
ended March 31, 2005, there was no default under Charter
Holdings indentures and other specified tests were met.
However, Charter Holdings did not meet the leverage ratio of
8.75 to 1.0 based on March 31, 2005 financial results. As a
result, distributions from Charter Holdings to Charter or
Charter Holdco are currently restricted and will continue to be
restricted until that test is met. During this restriction
period, the indentures governing the Charter Holdings notes
permit Charter Holdings and its subsidiaries to make specified
investments in Charter Holdco or Charter, up to an amount
determined by a formula, as long as there is no default under
the indentures.
The Company was required to register for resale by
April 21, 2005 its 5.875% convertible senior notes due
2009, issued in November 2004. Since these convertible notes
were not registered by that date, the Company is incurring
liquidated damages, at a rate from 0.25% per annum of the
accreted principal amount of the convertible notes. The rate
will increase to 0.50% from and after July 20, 2005 if the
notes have not been registered by that date. The liquidated
damages will be payable by Charter in cash so long as the
convertible notes remain unregistered, but not to exceed a
maximum period of two years from the original issuance date. In
addition, Charter was required to register by April 1, 2005
150 million shares of its Class A common stock that
Charter expects to lend to Citigroup Global Markets Limited
pursuant to a share lending agreement. Because this registration
statement was not declared effective by such date, the Company
is incurring liquidated damages from April 2, 2005 until
the effective date of the registration statement. These
liquidated damages can be paid in cash or additional principal
on a monthly basis. These liquidated damages accrue as incurred
at a rate of 0.25% per month of the accreted principal
amount of the convertible notes for the first 60 days of
the default and 0.50% per month of the accreted principal
amount of the convertible notes thereafter (or 0.375% and
0.75% per month respectively, if in lieu of
F-7
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
paying such liquidated damages in cash, the Company elects to
pay such damages by adding to the outstanding principal amount
of the notes). In April 2005, the first liquidated damage
payment was made in cash. Such amounts will accrue so long as
the convertible notes remain unregistered, but not to exceed a
maximum period of two years from the original issuance date.
As of March 31, 2005, the Company has concluded that two
pending cable asset sales, representing approximately 28,000
customers, are probable of closing within the next twelve months
thus meeting the criteria for assets held for sale under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets. As such the assets were written down to
fair value less estimated costs to sell resulting in asset
impairment charges in the first quarter of 2005 of approximately
$31 million. At March 31, 2005 assets held for sale
included in investment in cable properties are approximately
$33 million.
In March 2004, the Company closed the sale of certain cable
systems in Florida, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware and West
Virginia to Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC. The Company closed
the sale of an additional cable system in New York to Atlantic
Broadband Finance, LLC in April 2004. These transactions
resulted in a $104 million pretax gain recorded as a gain
on sale of assets in the Companys consolidated statements
of operations. Subject to post-closing contractual adjustments,
the total net proceeds from the sale of all of these systems
were approximately $733 million. The proceeds were used to
repay a portion of amounts outstanding under the Companys
credit facilities.
|
|
4. |
Franchises and Goodwill |
Franchise rights represent the value attributed to agreements
with local authorities that allow access to homes in cable
service areas acquired through the purchase of cable systems.
Management estimates the fair value of franchise rights at the
date of acquisition and determines if the franchise has a finite
life or an indefinite-life as defined by SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Franchises that
qualify for indefinite-life treatment under
SFAS No. 142 are tested for impairment annually based
on valuations, or more frequently as warranted by events or
changes in circumstances. Franchises are aggregated into
essentially inseparable asset groups to conduct the valuations.
The asset groups generally represent geographic clustering of
the Companys cable systems into groups by which such
systems are managed. Management believes such grouping
represents the highest and best use of those assets.
The Companys valuations, which are based on the present
value of projected after tax cash flows, result in a value of
property, plant and equipment, franchises, customer
relationships and its total entity value. The value of goodwill
is the difference between the total entity value and amounts
assigned to the other assets.
Franchises, for valuation purposes, are defined as the future
economic benefits of the right to solicit and service potential
customers (customer marketing rights), and the right to deploy
and market new services such as interactivity and telephony to
the potential customers (service marketing rights). Fair value
is determined based on estimated discounted future cash flows
using assumptions consistent with internal forecasts. The
franchise after-tax cash flow is calculated as the after-tax
cash flow generated by the potential customers obtained and the
new services added to those customers in future periods. The sum
of the present value of the franchises after-tax cash flow
in years 1 through 10 and the continuing value of the after-tax
cash flow beyond year 10 yields the fair value of the franchise.
The Company follows the guidance of EITF Issue 02-17,
Recognition of Customer Relationship Intangible Assets
Acquired in a Business Combination, in valuing customer
relationships. Customer
F-8
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
relationships, for valuation purposes, represent the value of
the business relationship with existing customers and are
calculated by projecting future after-tax cash flows from these
customers including the right to deploy and market additional
services such as interactivity and telephony to these customers.
The present value of these after-tax cash flows yield the fair
value of the customer relationships. Substantially all
acquisitions occurred prior to January 1, 2002. The Company
did not record any value associated with the customer
relationship intangibles related to those acquisitions. For
acquisitions subsequent to January 1, 2002 the Company did
assign a value to the customer relationship intangible, which is
amortized over its estimated useful life.
As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004,
indefinite-lived and finite-lived intangible assets are
presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Net | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Net | |
|
|
Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Carrying | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchises with indefinite lives
|
|
$ |
9,814 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,814 |
|
|
$ |
9,845 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,845 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,866 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,866 |
|
|
$ |
9,897 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finite-lived intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchises with finite lives
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchises with indefinite lives decreased $31 million as a
result of the asset impairment charges recorded related to two
pending cable asset sales (see Note 3). Franchise
amortization expense for each of the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004 was $1 million, which
represents the amortization relating to franchises that did not
qualify for indefinite-life treatment under
SFAS No. 142, including costs associated with
franchise renewals. The Company expects that amortization
expense on franchise assets will be approximately
$3 million annually for each of the next five years. Actual
amortization expense in future periods could differ from these
estimates as a result of new intangible asset acquisitions or
divestitures, changes in useful lives and other relevant factors.
|
|
5. |
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following
as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Accounts payable trade
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
148 |
|
Accrued capital expenditures
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
Accrued expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
Programming costs
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
Franchise-related fees
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
State sales tax
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,256 |
|
|
$ |
1,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-9
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
Long-term debt consists of the following as of March 31,
2005 and December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Face | |
|
Accreted | |
|
Face | |
|
Accreted | |
|
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charter Communications, Inc.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.75% convertible senior notes due 2006
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
5.875% convertible senior notes due 2009
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
Charter Holdings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.250% senior notes due 2007
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
8.625% senior notes due 2009
|
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
9.920% senior discount notes due 2011
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
10.000% senior notes due 2009
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
10.250% senior notes due 2010
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
11.750% senior discount notes due 2010
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
10.750% senior notes due 2009
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
11.125% senior notes due 2011
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
13.500% senior discount notes due 2011
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
9.625% senior notes due 2009
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
10.000% senior notes due 2011
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
11.750% senior discount notes due 2011
|
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
12.125% senior discount notes due 2012
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
CCH II, LLC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.250% senior notes due 2010
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
CCO Holdings, LLC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83/4% senior
notes due 2013
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
Senior floating rate notes due 2010
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
Charter Operating:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8% senior second lien notes due 2012
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
83/8% senior
second lien notes due 2014
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
Renaissance Media Group LLC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.000% senior discount notes due 2008
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
CC V Holdings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.875% senior discount notes due 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
Credit Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charter Operating
|
|
|
5,088 |
|
|
|
5,088 |
|
|
|
5,515 |
|
|
|
5,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,204 |
|
|
$ |
18,929 |
|
|
$ |
19,791 |
|
|
$ |
19,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accreted values presented above represent the face value of
the notes less the original issue discount at the time of sale
plus the accretion to the balance sheet date.
F-10
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt |
In March 2005, the Companys subsidiary, Charter Operating,
consummated exchange transactions with a small number of
institutional holders of Charter Holdings 8.25% senior
notes due 2007 pursuant to which Charter Operating issued, in a
private placement, approximately $271 million principal
amount of new notes with terms identical to Charter
Operatings 8.375% senior second lien notes due 2014
in exchange for approximately $284 million of the Charter
Holdings 8.25% senior notes due 2007. The exchanges
resulted in a net gain on extinguishment of debt of
approximately $11 million.
In March 2005, the Company repurchased from a single holder
$34 million principal amount of its 4.75% convertible
senior notes due 2006 for a price equal to 98% of the principal
amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. This transaction
resulted in a net gain on extinguishment of debt of
approximately $1 million.
In March 2005, the Companys subsidiary, CC V
Holdings, LLC, redeemed all of its 11.875% notes due 2008,
at 103.958% of principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid
interest to the date of redemption. The total cost of redemption
was approximately $122 million and was funded through
borrowings under the Charter Operating credit facilities. The
redemption resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt of
approximately $5 million. Following such redemption,
CC V Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaries (other than
non-guarantor subsidiaries) guaranteed the Charter Operating
credit facilities and granted a lien on all of their assets as
to which a lien can be perfected under the Uniform Commercial
Code by the filing of a financing statement.
|
|
|
Loss on Debt to Equity Conversions |
The Company recognized a loss of approximately $8 million
recorded as loss on debt to equity conversion on the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the three
months ended March 31, 2004 from a privately negotiated
exchange of $10 million principal amount of Charters
5.75% convertible senior notes for shares of Charter
Class A common stock. The exchanges resulted in the
issuance of more shares in the exchange transaction than would
have been issuable under the original terms of the convertible
senior notes.
|
|
7. |
Minority Interest and Equity Interest of Charter Holdco |
Charter is a holding company whose primary asset is a
controlling equity interest in Charter Holdco, the indirect
owner of the Companys cable systems, and $957 million
and $990 million at March 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively, of mirror notes which are
payable by Charter Holdco to Charter and have the same principal
amount and terms as those of Charters convertible senior
notes. Minority interest on the Companys consolidated
balance sheets represents the ownership percentage of Charter
Holdco not owned by Charter, or approximately 53% of total
members equity of Charter Holdco, plus $659 million
and $656 million of preferred membership interests in
CC VIII, LLC (CC VIII), an indirect
subsidiary of Charter Holdco, as of March 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively. As more fully described in
Note 17, this preferred interest arises from the
approximately $630 million of preferred membership units
issued by CC VIII in connection with an acquisition in
February 2000 and continues to be the subject of a dispute
between Charter and Mr. Allen. Generally, operating
earnings or losses are allocated to the minority owners based on
their ownership percentage, thereby increasing or decreasing the
Companys net loss, respectively. To the extent they relate
to CC VIII, the allocations of earnings or losses are
subject to adjustment based on the ultimate resolution of this
disputed ownership. Due to the uncertainties related to the
ultimate resolution, effective January 1, 2005, the Company
ceased recognizing minority interest in earnings or losses of
CC VIII for financial reporting purposes until such time as
the resolution of the
F-11
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
matter is determinable or other events occur. For the three
months ended March 31, 2005, Charters results
included $9 million attributable to CC VIII.
Members deficit of Charter Holdco was $4.7 billion
and $4.4 billion as of March 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively. Gains and losses arising
from the issuance by Charter Holdco of its membership units are
recorded as capital transactions, thereby increasing or
decreasing shareholders equity and decreasing or
increasing minority interest on the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets. Minority interest was approximately 53% as of
March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004. Minority
interest includes the proportionate share of changes in fair
value of interest rate derivative agreements. Such amounts are
temporary as they are contractually scheduled to reverse over
the life of the underlying instrument. Additionally, reported
losses allocated to minority interest on the consolidated
statement of operations are limited to the extent of any
remaining minority interest on the balance sheet related to
Charter Holdco. Because minority interest in Charter Holdco is
substantially eliminated, Charter absorbs substantially all
losses before income taxes that otherwise would be allocated to
minority interest. Subject to any changes in Charter
Holdcos capital structure, future losses will continue to
be substantially absorbed by Charter.
Changes to minority interest consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority | |
|
|
Interest | |
|
|
| |
Balance, December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
648 |
|
|
CC VIII 2% Priority Return (see Note 17)
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Changes in fair value of interest rate agreements
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
656 |
|
|
|
|
|
Certain marketable equity securities are classified as
available-for-sale and reported at market value with unrealized
gains and losses recorded as accumulated other comprehensive
loss on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Additionally, the Company reports changes in the fair value of
interest rate agreements designated as hedging the variability
of cash flows associated with floating-rate debt obligations,
that meet the effectiveness criteria of SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, in accumulated other comprehensive loss, after
giving effect to the minority interest share of such gains and
losses. Comprehensive loss for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004 was $349 million and
$293 million, respectively.
|
|
9. |
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities |
The Company uses interest rate risk management derivative
instruments, such as interest rate swap agreements and interest
rate collar agreements (collectively referred to herein as
interest rate agreements) to manage its interest costs. The
Companys policy is to manage interest costs using a mix of
fixed and variable rate debt. Using interest rate swap
agreements, the Company has agreed to exchange, at specified
intervals through 2007, the difference between fixed and
variable interest amounts calculated by reference to an
agreed-upon notional principal amount. Interest rate collar
agreements are used to limit the Companys exposure to and
benefits from interest rate fluctuations on variable rate debt
to within a certain range of rates.
The Company does not hold or issue derivative instruments for
trading purposes. The Company does, however, have certain
interest rate derivative instruments that have been designated
as cash flow hedging instruments. Such instruments effectively
convert variable interest payments on certain debt instruments
F-12
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
into fixed payments. For qualifying hedges,
SFAS No. 133 allows derivative gains and losses to
offset related results on hedged items in the consolidated
statement of operations. The Company has formally documented,
designated and assessed the effectiveness of transactions that
receive hedge accounting. For the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, net gain (loss) on derivative
instruments and hedging activities includes gains of
$1 million and losses of $1 million, respectively,
which represent cash flow hedge ineffectiveness on interest rate
hedge agreements arising from differences between the critical
terms of the agreements and the related hedged obligations.
Changes in the fair value of interest rate agreements designated
as hedging instruments of the variability of cash flows
associated with floating-rate debt obligations that meet the
effectiveness criteria of SFAS No. 133 are reported in
accumulated other comprehensive loss. For the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, a gain of $9 million and
$2 million, respectively, related to derivative instruments
designated as cash flow hedges, was recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive loss and minority interest. The amounts are
subsequently reclassified into interest expense as a yield
adjustment in the same period in which the related interest on
the floating-rate debt obligations affects earnings (losses).
Certain interest rate derivative instruments are not designated
as hedges as they do not meet the effectiveness criteria
specified by SFAS No. 133. However, management
believes such instruments are closely correlated with the
respective debt, thus managing associated risk. Interest rate
derivative instruments not designated as hedges are marked to
fair value, with the impact recorded as gain (loss) on
derivative instruments and hedging activities in the
Companys condensed consolidated statements of operations.
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, net
gain (loss) on derivative instruments and hedging activities
includes gains of $26 million and losses of
$6 million, respectively, for interest rate derivative
instruments not designated as hedges.
As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the
Company had outstanding $2.2 billion and $2.7 billion
and $20 million and $20 million, respectively, in
notional amounts of interest rate swaps and collars,
respectively. The notional amounts of interest rate instruments
do not represent amounts exchanged by the parties and, thus, are
not a measure of exposure to credit loss. The amounts exchanged
are determined by reference to the notional amount and the other
terms of the contracts.
Certain provisions of the Companys 5.875% convertible
senior notes issued in November 2004 were considered embedded
derivatives for accounting purposes and were required to be
accounted for separately from the convertible senior notes. In
accordance with SFAS No. 133, these derivatives are
marked to market with gains or losses recorded in interest
expense on the Companys consolidated statement of
operations. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, the
Company recognized $19 million in gains related to these
derivatives. At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004,
$4 million and $10 million, respectively, is recorded
in accounts payable and accrued expenses relating to the
short-term portion of these derivatives and $8 million and
$21 million, respectively, is recorded in other long-term
liabilities related to the long-term portion.
F-13
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
Revenues consist of the following for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Video
|
|
$ |
842 |
|
|
$ |
849 |
|
High-speed data
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
Advertising sales
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Commercial
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Other
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,271 |
|
|
$ |
1,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses consist of the following for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Programming
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
Advertising sales
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Service
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
559 |
|
|
$ |
512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist of the
following for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
General and administrative
|
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
$ |
208 |
|
Marketing
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
$ |
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of selling expense are included in general and
administrative and marketing expense.
F-14
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
The Company has recorded special charges as a result of reducing
its workforce, consolidating administrative offices and
management realignment in 2004 and 2005. The activity associated
with this initiative is summarized in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at January 1,
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
Special Charges
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Payments
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31,
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2004, special charges
also include approximately $9 million, which represents
litigation costs related to the tentative settlement of a
national class action suit, subject to final documentation and
court approval (see Note 15).
All operations are held through Charter Holdco and its direct
and indirect subsidiaries. Charter Holdco and the majority of
its subsidiaries are not subject to income tax. However, certain
of these subsidiaries are corporations and are subject to income
tax. All of the taxable income, gains, losses, deductions and
credits of Charter Holdco are passed through to its members:
Charter, Charter Investment, Inc. (Charter
Investment) and Vulcan Cable III Inc. (Vulcan
Cable). Charter is responsible for its share of taxable
income or loss of Charter Holdco allocated to Charter in
accordance with the Charter Holdco limited liability company
agreement (LLC Agreement) and partnership tax rules
and regulations.
As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the
Company had net deferred income tax liabilities of approximately
$230 million and $216 million, respectively.
Approximately $213 million of the deferred tax liabilities
recorded in the condensed consolidated financial statements at
March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, relate to
certain indirect subsidiaries of Charter Holdco, which file
separate income tax returns.
During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 the
Company recorded $15 million and $54 million of income
tax expense, respectively. The sale of systems to Atlantic
Broadband, LLC on March 1, 2004 resulted in income tax
expense of $14 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2004.
Income tax expense is recognized through increases in the
deferred tax liabilities related to Charters investment in
Charter Holdco, as well as current federal and state income tax
expense and increases to the deferred tax liabilities of certain
of Charters indirect corporate subsidiaries. The Company
recorded an additional deferred tax asset of approximately
$135 million during the three months ended March 31,
2005, relating to net operating loss carryforwards, but recorded
a valuation allowance with respect to these amounts because of
the uncertainty of the ability to realize a benefit from these
carryforwards in the future.
The Company has deferred tax assets of approximately
$3.7 billion and $3.5 billion as of March 31,
2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, which primarily
relate to financial and tax losses allocated to Charter from
Charter Holdco. The deferred tax assets also include
approximately $2.2 billion and $2.1 billion of tax net
operating loss carryforwards as of March 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2004,
F-15
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
respectively (generally expiring in years 2005 through 2025), of
Charter and its indirect corporate subsidiaries. Valuation
allowances of $3.3 billion and $3.2 billion as of
March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 exist with
respect to these deferred tax assets, respectively.
Realization of any benefit from the Companys tax net
operating losses is dependent on: (1) Charter and its
indirect corporate subsidiaries ability to generate future
taxable income and (2) the absence of certain future
ownership changes of Charters common stock. An
ownership change as defined in the applicable
federal income tax rules, would place significant limitations,
on an annual basis, on the use of such net operating losses to
offset any future taxable income the Company may generate. Such
limitations, in conjunction with the net operating loss
expiration provisions, could effectively eliminate the
Companys ability to use a substantial portion of its net
operating losses to offset any future taxable income. Future
transactions and the timing of such transactions could cause an
ownership change. Such transactions include additional issuances
of common stock by the Company (including but not limited to the
anticipated issuance of 150 million shares of common stock
under the share lending agreement, the issuance of shares of
common stock upon future conversion of Charters
convertible senior notes and the issuance of common stock as
contemplated in the class action settlement discussed in
Note 15, reacquisition of the borrowed shares by Charter,
or acquisitions or sales of shares by certain holders of
Charters shares, including persons who have held,
currently hold, or accumulate in the future five percent or more
of Charters outstanding stock (including upon an exchange
by Paul Allen or his affiliates, directly or indirectly, of
membership units of Charter Holdco into CCI common stock)). Many
of the foregoing transactions are beyond managements
control.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets,
management considers whether it is more likely than not that
some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized.
Because of the uncertainties in projecting future taxable income
of Charter Holdco, valuation allowances have been established
except for deferred benefits available to offset certain
deferred tax liabilities.
Charter Holdco is currently under examination by the Internal
Revenue Service for the tax years ending December 31, 1999,
2000, 2002 and 2003. The results of the Company (excluding
Charter and the indirect corporate subsidiaries) for these years
are subject to this examination. Management does not expect the
results of this examination to have a material adverse effect on
the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
Fourteen putative federal class action lawsuits (the
Federal Class Actions) were filed against
Charter and certain of its former and present officers and
directors in various jurisdictions allegedly on behalf of all
purchasers of Charters securities during the period from
either November 8 or November 9, 1999 through July 17 or
July 18, 2002. Unspecified damages were sought by the
plaintiffs. In general, the lawsuits alleged that Charter
utilized misleading accounting practices and failed to disclose
these accounting practices and/or issued false and misleading
financial statements and press releases concerning
Charters operations and prospects. The Federal
Class Actions were specifically and individually identified
in public filings made by Charter prior to the date of this
quarterly report.
In October 2002, Charter filed a motion with the Judicial Panel
on Multidistrict Litigation (the Panel) to transfer
the Federal Class Actions to the Eastern District of
Missouri. On March 12, 2003, the Panel transferred the six
Federal Class Actions not filed in the Eastern District of
Missouri to that district for coordinated or consolidated
pretrial proceedings with the eight Federal Class Actions
already pending there. The Panels transfer order assigned
the Federal Class Actions to Judge Charles A. Shaw. By
virtue of a prior court order, StoneRidge Investment Partners
LLC became lead plaintiff upon entry of
F-16
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
the Panels transfer order. StoneRidge subsequently filed a
Consolidated Amended Complaint. The Court subsequently
consolidated the Federal Class Actions into a single action
(the Consolidated Federal Class Action) for
pretrial purposes. On June 19, 2003, following a status and
scheduling conference with the parties, the Court issued a Case
Management Order setting forth a schedule for the pretrial phase
of the Consolidated Federal Class Action. Motions to
dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint were filed. On
February 10, 2004, in response to a joint motion made by
StoneRidge and defendants Charter, Vogel and Allen, the court
entered an order providing, among other things, that:
(1) the parties who filed such motion engage in a mediation
within ninety (90) days; and (2) all proceedings in
the Consolidated Federal Class Actions were stayed until
May 10, 2004. On May 11, 2004, the Court extended the
stay in the Consolidated Federal Class Action for an
additional sixty (60) days. On July 12, 2004, the
parties submitted a joint motion to again extend the stay, this
time until September 10, 2004. The Court granted that
extension on July 20, 2004. On August 5, 2004,
Stoneridge, Charter and the individual defendants who were the
subject of the suit entered into a Memorandum of Understanding
setting forth agreements in principle to settle the Consolidated
Federal Class Action. These parties subsequently entered
into Stipulations of Settlement dated as of January 24,
2005 (described more fully below) which incorporate the terms of
the August 5, 2004 Memorandum of Understanding.
On September 12, 2002, a shareholders derivative suit (the
State Derivative Action) was filed in the Circuit
Court of the City of St. Louis, State of Missouri (the
Missouri State Court) against Charter and its then
current directors, as well as its former auditors. The
plaintiffs allege that the individual defendants breached their
fiduciary duties by failing to establish and maintain adequate
internal controls and procedures. Unspecified damages, allegedly
on Charters behalf, were sought by the plaintiffs.
On March 12, 2004, an action substantively identical to the
State Derivative Action was filed in the Missouri State Court,
against Charter and certain of its current and former directors,
as well as its former auditors. The plaintiffs in that case
alleged that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary
duties by failing to establish and maintain adequate internal
controls and procedures. Unspecified damages, allegedly on
Charters behalf, were sought by plaintiffs. On
July 14, 2004, the Court consolidated this case with the
State Derivative Action.
Separately, on February 12, 2003, a shareholders derivative
suit (the Federal Derivative Action) was filed
against Charter and its then current directors in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. The
plaintiff in that suit alleged that the individual defendants
breached their fiduciary duties and grossly mismanaged Charter
by failing to establish and maintain adequate internal controls
and procedures. Unspecified damages, allegedly on Charters
behalf, were sought by the plaintiffs.
As noted above, Charter and the individual defendants entered
into a Memorandum of Understanding on August 5, 2004
setting forth agreements in principle regarding settlement of
the Consolidated Federal Class Action, the State Derivative
Action(s) and the Federal Derivative Action (the
Actions). Charter and various other defendants in
those actions subsequently entered into Stipulations of
Settlement dated as of January 24, 2005, setting forth a
settlement of the Actions in a manner consistent with the terms
of the Memorandum of Understanding. The Stipulations of
Settlement, along with various supporting documentation, were
filed with the Court on February 2, 2005. The Stipulations
of Settlement provide that, in exchange for a release of all
claims by plaintiffs against Charter and its former and present
officers and directors named in the Actions, Charter would pay
to the plaintiffs a combination of cash and equity collectively
valued at $144 million, which would include the fees and
expenses of plaintiffs counsel. Of this amount,
$64 million would be paid in cash (by Charters
insurance carriers) and the balance would be paid in shares of
Charter Class A common stock having an aggregate value of
$40 million and ten-year warrants to purchase shares of
Charter Class A common stock having an aggregate warrant
value of $40 million, with such values in each case being
determined pursuant to formulas set forth in the
F-17
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
Stipulations of Settlement. The warrants would have an exercise
price equal to 150% of the fair market value (as defined) of
Charter Class A common stock as of the date of the entry of
the order of final judgment approving the settlement. In
addition, Charter would issue additional shares of its
Class A common stock to its insurance carrier having an
aggregate value of $5 million. Under this formula, the
Company expects (based on recent trading prices of
Charters Class A common stock) that the number of
shares issued will be determined based on a per share value
equal to the average closing price over the thirty calendar day
period immediately preceding the final valuation date (which is
the later of the date on which a final judgment is entered or
the date of entry of an order approving the award of fees and
costs to the class action plaintiffs counsel). Warrants
are expected to become exercisable approximately one year from
the date of the final judgment and will have an exercise price
equal to 150% of the volume weighted average price of
Charters Class A common stock over the thirty day
period immediately preceding the final valuation date. The
warrants will be valued based on a Black Scholes valuation
method. Accordingly, any further declines in Charters
stock price prior to the final valuation date could result in
more shares and warrants being issued to the plaintiffs in the
settlement. In the event that the valuation formula in the
Stipulations provides for a per share value of less than $2.25,
Charter may elect to terminate the settlement. As a result, in
the second quarter of 2004, the Company recorded a
$149 million litigation liability within other long-term
liabilities and a $64 million insurance receivable as part
of other non-current assets on its consolidated balance sheet
and an $85 million special charge on its consolidated
statement of operations. Additionally, as part of the
settlements, Charter will also commit to a variety of corporate
governance changes, internal practices and public disclosures,
some of which have already been undertaken and none of which are
inconsistent with measures Charter is taking in connection with
the recent conclusion of the SEC investigation described below.
Documents related to the settlement of the Actions have now been
executed and filed. On February 15, 2005, the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri gave
preliminary approval to the settlement of the Actions. The
settlement of each of the lawsuits remains conditioned upon,
among other things, final judicial approval of the settlements
following notice to the class, and dismissal, with prejudice, of
the consolidated derivative actions now pending in Missouri
State Court, which are related to the Federal Derivative
Actions. The hearing to consider final approval of the
settlement is scheduled for May 23, 2005.
In August 2002, Charter became aware of a grand jury
investigation being conducted by the U.S. Attorneys
Office for the Eastern District of Missouri into certain of its
accounting and reporting practices, focusing on how Charter
reported customer numbers, and its reporting of amounts received
from digital set-top terminal suppliers for advertising. The
U.S. Attorneys Office has publicly stated that
Charter is not a target of the investigation. Charter was also
advised by the U.S. Attorneys Office that no current
officer or member of its board of directors is a target of the
investigation. On July 24, 2003, a federal grand jury
charged four former officers of Charter with conspiracy and mail
and wire fraud, alleging improper accounting and reporting
practices focusing on revenue from digital set-top terminal
suppliers and inflated customer account numbers. Each of the
indicted former officers pled guilty to single conspiracy counts
related to the original mail and wire fraud charges and were
sentenced on April 22, 2005. Charter fully cooperated with
the investigation, and following the sentencings, the
U.S. Attorneys Office for the Eastern District of
Missouri announced that its investigation was concluded and that
no further indictments would issue.
On November 4, 2002, Charter received an informal,
non-public inquiry from the staff of the SEC. The SEC issued a
formal order of investigation dated January 23, 2003, and
subsequently served document and testimony subpoenas on Charter
and a number of its former employees. The investigation and
subpoenas generally concerned Charters prior reports with
respect to its determination of the number of customers, and
various of its accounting policies and practices including its
capitalization of certain expenses and dealings with certain
vendors, including programmers and digital set-top terminal
suppliers.
F-18
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
On July 27, 2004, the SEC and Charter reached a final
agreement to settle the investigation. In the Settlement
Agreement and Cease and Desist Order, Charter agreed to entry of
an administrative order prohibiting any future violations of
United States securities laws and requiring certain other
remedial internal practices and public disclosures. Charter
neither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing, and the SEC assessed
no fine against Charter.
Charter is generally required to indemnify each of the named
individual defendants in connection with the matters described
above pursuant to the terms of its bylaws and (where applicable)
such individual defendants employment agreements. In
accordance with these documents, in connection with the pending
grand jury investigation, the now-settled SEC investigation and
the above-described lawsuits, some of Charters current and
former directors and current and former officers have been
advanced certain costs and expenses incurred in connection with
their defense. On February 22, 2005, Charter filed suit
against four of its former officers who were indicted in the
course of the grand jury investigation. These suits seek to
recover the legal fees and other related expenses advanced to
these individuals by Charter for the grand jury investigation,
SEC investigation and class action and related lawsuits.
In October 2001, two customers, Nikki Nicholls and Geraldine M.
Barber, filed a class action suit against Charter Holdco in
South Carolina Court of Common Pleas (the South Carolina
Class Action), purportedly on behalf of a class of
Charter Holdcos customers, alleging that Charter Holdco
improperly charged them a wire maintenance fee without request
or permission. They also claimed that Charter Holdco improperly
required them to rent analog and/or digital set-top terminals
even though their television sets were cable ready.
A substantively identical case was filed in the Superior Court
of Athens Clarke County, Georgia by Emma S. Tobar on
March 26, 2002 (the Georgia Class Action),
alleging a nationwide class for these claims. Charter Holdco
removed the South Carolina Class Action to the United
States District Court for the District of South Carolina in
November 2001, and moved to dismiss the suit in December 2001.
The federal judge remanded the case to the South Carolina Court
of Common Pleas in August 2002 without ruling on the motion to
dismiss. The plaintiffs subsequently moved for a default
judgment, arguing that upon return to state court, Charter
Holdco should have, but did not, file a new motion to dismiss.
The state court judge granted the plaintiffs motion over
Charter Holdcos objection in September 2002. Charter
Holdco immediately appealed that decision to the South Carolina
Court of Appeals and the South Carolina Supreme Court, but those
courts ruled that until a final judgment was entered against
Charter Holdco, they lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
In January 2003, the Court of Common Pleas granted the
plaintiffs motion for class certification. In October and
November 2003, Charter Holdco filed motions (a) asking that
court to set aside the default judgment, and (b) seeking
dismissal of plaintiffs suit for failure to state a claim.
In January 2004, the Court of Common Pleas granted in part and
denied in part Charter Holdcos motion to dismiss for
failure to state a claim. It also took under advisement Charter
Holdcos motion to set aside the default judgment. In April
2004, the parties to both the Georgia and South Carolina
Class Actions participated in a mediation. The mediator
made a proposal to the parties to settle the lawsuits. In May
2004, the parties accepted the mediators proposal and
reached a tentative settlement, subject to final documentation
and court approval. As a result of the tentative settlement, the
Company recorded a special charge of $9 million in its
consolidated statement of operations in the first quarter of
2004 (see Note 13). On July 8, 2004, the Superior
Court of Athens Clarke County, Georgia granted a
motion to amend the Tobar complaint to add Nicholls, Barber and
April Jones as plaintiffs in the Georgia Class Action and
to add any potential class members in South Carolina. The court
also granted preliminary approval of the proposed settlement on
that date. On August 2, 2004, the parties submitted a joint
request to the South Carolina Court of Common Pleas to stay the
South Carolina Class Action pending final approval of the
settlement and on August 17, 2004, that court granted the
parties request. On November 10, 2004, the court
granted
F-19
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
final approval of the settlement, rejecting positions advanced
by two objectors to the settlement. On December 13, 2004
the court entered a written order formally approving that
settlement. On January 11, 2005, certain class members
appealed the order entered by the Georgia court. Those objectors
voluntarily dismissed their appeal with prejudice on
February 8, 2005. On February 9, 2005, the South
Carolina Court of Common Pleas entered a court order of
dismissal for the South Carolina Class Action.
Additionally, one of the objectors to this settlement recently
filed a similar, but not identical, lawsuit.
In addition to the matters set forth above, Charter is also
party to other lawsuits and claims that arose in the ordinary
course of conducting its business. In the opinion of management,
after taking into account recorded liabilities, the outcome of
these other lawsuits and claims are not expected to have a
material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated
financial condition, results of operations or its liquidity.
|
|
16. |
Stock Compensation Plans |
Prior to January 1, 2003, the Company accounted for
stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related
interpretations, as permitted by SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. On
January 1, 2003, the Company adopted the fair value
measurement provisions of SFAS No. 123 using the
prospective method, under which the Company recognizes
compensation expense of a stock-based award to an employee over
the vesting period based on the fair value of the award on the
grant date consistent with the method described in Financial
Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 28,
Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable
Stock Option or Award Plans. Adoption of these provisions
resulted in utilizing a preferable accounting method as the
condensed consolidated financial statements will present the
estimated fair value of stock-based compensation in expense
consistently with other forms of compensation and other expense
associated with goods and services received for equity
instruments. In accordance with SFAS No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
Transition and Disclosure, the fair value method is being
applied only to awards granted or modified after January 1,
2003, whereas awards granted prior to such date will continue to
be accounted for under APB No. 25, unless they are modified
or settled in cash. The ongoing effect on consolidated results
of operations or financial condition will depend on future
stock-based compensation awards granted by the Company.
F-20
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
SFAS No. 123 requires pro forma disclosure of the
impact on earnings as if the compensation expense for these
plans had been determined using the fair value method. The
following table presents the Companys net loss and loss
per share as reported and the pro forma amounts that would have
been reported using the fair value method under
SFAS No. 123 for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net loss applicable to common stock
|
|
$ |
(353 |
) |
|
$ |
(294 |
) |
Add back stock-based compensation expense related to stock
options included in reported net loss
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Less employee stock-based compensation expense determined under
fair value based method for all employee stock option awards
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Effects of unvested options in stock option exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$ |
(353 |
) |
|
$ |
(244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per common shares, basic and diluted As reported
|
|
$ |
(1.16 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.00 |
) |
Add back stock-based compensation expense related to stock
options included in reported net loss
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
Less employee stock-based compensation expense determined under
fair value based method for all employee stock option awards
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
Effects of unvested options in stock option exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$ |
(1.16 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In January 2004, Charter began an option exchange program in
which the Company offered its employees the right to exchange
all stock options (vested and unvested) under the 1999 Charter
Communications Option Plan and 2001 Stock Incentive Plan that
had an exercise price over $10 per share for shares of
restricted Charter Class A common stock or, in some
instances, cash. Based on a sliding exchange ratio, which varied
depending on the exercise price of an employees
outstanding options, if an employee would have received more
than 400 shares of restricted stock in exchange for
tendered options, Charter issued to that employee shares of
restricted stock in the exchange. If, based on the exchange
ratios, an employee would have received 400 or fewer shares of
restricted stock in exchange for tendered options, Charter
instead paid the employee cash in an amount equal to the number
of shares the employee would have received multiplied by $5.00.
The offer applied to options (vested and unvested) to purchase a
total of 22,929,573 shares of Charter Class A common
stock, or approximately 48% of the Companys 47,882,365
total options (vested and unvested) issued and outstanding as of
December 31, 2003. Participation by employees was
voluntary. Those members of Charters board of directors
who were not also employees of the Company were not eligible to
participate in the exchange offer.
In the closing of the exchange offer on February 20, 2004,
the Company accepted for cancellation eligible options to
purchase approximately 18,137,664 shares of Charter
Class A common stock. In exchange, the Company granted
1,966,686 shares of restricted stock, including 460,777
performance shares to eligible employees of the rank of senior
vice president and above, and paid a total cash amount of
approximately $4 million (which amount includes applicable
withholding taxes) to those employees who received cash rather
than shares of restricted stock. The restricted stock was
granted on February 25, 2004. Employees tendered
approximately 79% of the options exchangeable under the program.
F-21
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
The cost to the Company of the stock option exchange program was
approximately $10 million, with a 2004 cash compensation
expense of approximately $4 million and a non-cash
compensation expense of approximately $6 million to be
expensed ratably over the three-year vesting period of the
restricted stock issued in the exchange.
In January 2004, the Compensation Committee of the board of
directors of Charter approved Charters Long-Term Incentive
Program (LTIP), which is a program administered
under the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Under the LTIP, employees
of Charter and its subsidiaries whose pay classifications exceed
a certain level are eligible to receive stock options, and more
senior level employees are eligible to receive stock options and
performance shares. The stock options vest 25% on each of the
first four anniversaries of the date of grant. The performance
units vest on the third anniversary of the grant date and shares
of Charter Class A common stock are issued, conditional
upon Charters performance against financial performance
targets established by Charters management and approved by
its board of directors. Charter granted 6.9 million shares
in January 2004 under this program and recognized expense of
$3 million in the first quarter of 2004. However, in the
fourth quarter of 2004, the Company reversed the $8 million
of expense recorded in the first three quarters of 2004 based on
the Companys assessment of the probability of achieving
the financial performance measures established by Charter and
required to be met for the performance shares to vest. In March
2005, Charter granted 2.5 million performance shares and
5.3 million options under the LTIP. The impact of such
grants were de minimis to the Companys results of
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
|
|
17. |
Related Party Transactions |
The following sets forth certain transactions in which the
Company and the directors, executive officers and affiliates of
the Company are involved. Unless otherwise disclosed, management
believes that each of the transactions described below was on
terms no less favorable to the Company than could have been
obtained from independent third parties.
CC VIII. As part of the acquisition of the cable systems
owned by Bresnan Communications Company Limited Partnership in
February 2000, CC VIII, Charters indirect limited
liability company subsidiary, issued, after adjustments,
24,273,943 Class A preferred membership units
(collectively, the CC VIII interest) with a value
and an initial capital account of approximately
$630 million to certain sellers affiliated with AT&T
Broadband, subsequently owned by Comcast Corporation (the
Comcast sellers). While held by the Comcast sellers,
the CC VIII interest was entitled to a 2% priority return on its
initial capital account and such priority return was entitled to
preferential distributions from available cash and upon
liquidation of CC VIII. While held by the Comcast sellers, the
CC VIII interest generally did not share in the profits and
losses of CC VIII. Mr. Allen granted the Comcast sellers
the right to sell to him the CC VIII interest for approximately
$630 million plus 4.5% interest annually from February 2000
(the Comcast put right). In April 2002, the Comcast
sellers exercised the Comcast put right in full, and this
transaction was consummated on June 6, 2003. Accordingly,
Mr. Allen has become the holder of the CC VIII interest,
indirectly through an affiliate. Consequently, subject to the
matters referenced in the next paragraph, Mr. Allen
generally thereafter will be allocated his pro rata share (based
on number of membership interests outstanding) of profits or
losses of CC VIII. In the event of a liquidation of CC VIII,
Mr. Allen would be entitled to a priority distribution with
respect to the 2% priority return (which will continue to
accrete). Any remaining distributions in liquidation would be
distributed to CC V Holdings, LLC and Mr. Allen in
proportion to CC V Holdings, LLCs capital account and
Mr. Allens capital account (which will equal the
initial capital account of the Comcast sellers of approximately
$630 million, increased or decreased by
Mr. Allens pro rata share of CC VIIIs
F-22
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
profits or losses (as computed for capital account purposes)
after June 6, 2003). The limited liability company
agreement of CC VIII does not provide for a mandatory redemption
of the CC VIII interest.
An issue has arisen as to whether the documentation for the
Bresnan transaction was correct and complete with regard to the
ultimate ownership of the CC VIII interest following
consummation of the Comcast put right. Specifically, under the
terms of the Bresnan transaction documents that were entered
into in June 1999, the Comcast sellers originally would have
received, after adjustments, 24,273,943 Charter Holdco
membership units, but due to an FCC regulatory issue raised by
the Comcast sellers shortly before closing, the Bresnan
transaction was modified to provide that the Comcast sellers
instead would receive the preferred equity interests in CC VIII
represented by the CC VIII interest. As part of the last-minute
changes to the Bresnan transaction documents, a draft amended
version of the Charter Holdco limited liability company
agreement was prepared, and contract provisions were drafted for
that agreement that would have required an automatic exchange of
the CC VIII interest for 24,273,943 Charter Holdco membership
units if the Comcast sellers exercised the Comcast put right and
sold the CC VIII interest to Mr. Allen or his
affiliates. However, the provisions that would have required
this automatic exchange did not appear in the final version of
the Charter Holdco limited liability company agreement that was
delivered and executed at the closing of the Bresnan
transaction. The law firm that prepared the documents for the
Bresnan transaction brought this matter to the attention of
Charter and representatives of Mr. Allen in 2002.
Thereafter, the board of directors of Charter formed a Special
Committee (currently comprised of Messrs. Merritt, Tory and
Wangberg) to investigate the matter and take any other
appropriate action on behalf of Charter with respect to this
matter. After conducting an investigation of the relevant facts
and circumstances, the Special Committee determined that a
scriveners error had occurred in February 2000
in connection with the preparation of the last-minute revisions
to the Bresnan transaction documents and that, as a result,
Charter should seek the reformation of the Charter Holdco
limited liability company agreement, or alternative relief, in
order to restore and ensure the obligation that the CC VIII
interest be automatically exchanged for Charter Holdco units.
The Special Committee further determined that, as part of such
contract reformation or alternative relief, Mr. Allen
should be required to contribute the CC VIII interest to
Charter Holdco in exchange for 24,273,943 Charter Holdco
membership units. The Special Committee also recommended to the
board of directors of Charter that, to the extent the contract
reformation is achieved, the board of directors should consider
whether the CC VIII interest should ultimately be held by
Charter Holdco or Charter Holdings or another entity owned
directly or indirectly by them.
Mr. Allen disagrees with the Special Committees
determinations described above and has so notified the Special
Committee. Mr. Allen contends that the transaction is
accurately reflected in the transaction documentation and
contemporaneous and subsequent company public disclosures.
The parties engaged in a process of non-binding mediation to
seek to resolve this matter, without success. The Special
Committee is evaluating what further actions or processes it may
undertake to resolve this dispute. To accommodate further
deliberation, each party has agreed to refrain from initiating
legal proceedings over this matter until it has given at least
ten days prior notice to the other. In addition, the
Special Committee and Mr. Allen have determined to utilize
the Delaware Court of Chancerys program for mediation of
complex business disputes in an effort to resolve the
CC VIII interest dispute. If the Special Committee and
Mr. Allen are unable to reach a resolution through that
mediation process or to agree on an alternative dispute
resolution process, the Special Committee intends to seek
resolution of this dispute through judicial proceedings in an
action that would be commenced, after appropriate notice, in the
Delaware Court of Chancery against Mr. Allen and his
affiliates seeking contract reformation, declaratory relief as
to the respective rights of the parties regarding this dispute
and alternative forms of
F-23
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
legal and equitable relief. The ultimate resolution and
financial impact of the dispute are not determinable at this
time.
TechTV, Inc. TechTV, Inc. (TechTV) operated a
cable television network that offered programming mostly related
to technology. Pursuant to an affiliation agreement that
originated in 1998 and that terminates in 2008, TechTV has
provided the Company with programming for distribution via
Charters cable systems. The affiliation agreement
provides, among other things, that TechTV must offer Charter
certain terms and conditions that are no less favorable in the
affiliation agreement than are given to any other distributor
that serves the same number of or fewer TechTV viewing
customers. Additionally, pursuant to the affiliation agreement,
the Company was entitled to incentive payments for channel
launches through December 31, 2003.
In March 2004, Charter Holdco entered into agreements with
Vulcan Programming and TechTV, which provide for
(i) Charter Holdco and TechTV to amend the affiliation
agreement which, among other things, revises the description of
the TechTV network content, provides for Charter Holdco to waive
certain claims against TechTV relating to alleged breaches of
the affiliation agreement and provides for TechTV to make
payment of outstanding launch receivables due to Charter Holdco
under the affiliation agreement, (ii) Vulcan Programming to
pay approximately $10 million and purchase over a 24-month
period, at fair market rates, $2 million of advertising
time across various cable networks on Charter cable systems in
consideration of the agreements, obligations, releases and
waivers under the agreements and in settlement of the
aforementioned claims and (iii) TechTV to be a provider of
content relating to technology and video gaming for
Charters interactive television platforms through
December 31, 2006 (exclusive for the first year). For each
of the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, the
Company recognized approximately $0.3 million, of the
Vulcan Programming payment as an offset to programming expense
and paid approximately $0.5 million and $0.2 million,
respectively, to Tech TV under the affiliation agreement.
The Company believes that Vulcan Programming, which is 100%
owned by Mr. Allen, owned an approximate 98% equity
interest in TechTV at the time Vulcan Programming sold TechTV to
an unrelated third party in May 2004. Until September 2003,
Mr. Savoy, a former Charter director, was the president and
director of Vulcan Programming and was a director of TechTV.
Mr. Wangberg, one of Charters directors, was the
chairman, chief executive officer and a director of TechTV.
Mr. Wangberg resigned as the chief executive officer of
TechTV in July 2002. He remained a director of TechTV along with
Mr. Allen until Vulcan Programming sold TechTV.
Digeo, Inc. In March 2001, a subsidiary of Charter,
Charter Communication Ventures, LLC (Charter
Ventures), and Vulcan Ventures Incorporated formed
DBroadband Holdings, LLC for the sole purpose of purchasing
equity interests in Digeo, Inc. (Digeo), an entity
controlled by Paul Allen. In connection with the execution of
the broadband carriage agreement, DBroadband Holdings, LLC
purchased an equity interest in Digeo funded by contributions
from Vulcan Ventures Incorporated. The equity interest is
subject to a priority return of capital to Vulcan Ventures up to
the amount contributed by Vulcan Ventures on Charter
Ventures behalf. After Vulcan Ventures recovers its amount
contributed and any cumulative loss allocations, Charter
Ventures has a 100% profit interest in DBroadband Holdings, LLC.
Charter Ventures is not required to make any capital
contributions, including capital calls, and may require Vulcan
Ventures, through January 24, 2004, to make certain
additional contributions through DBroadband Holdings, LLC to
acquire additional equity in Digeo as necessary to maintain
Charter Ventures pro rata interest in Digeo in the event
of certain future Digeo equity financings by the founders of
Digeo. These additional equity interests are also subject to a
priority return of capital to Vulcan Ventures up to amounts
contributed by Vulcan Ventures on Charter Ventures behalf.
DBroadband Holdings, LLC is therefore not included in the
Companys consolidated financial statements. Pursuant to
F-24
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
an amended version of this arrangement, in 2003, Vulcan Ventures
contributed a total of $29 million to Digeo,
$7 million of which was contributed on Charter
Ventures behalf, subject to Vulcan Ventures
aforementioned priority return. Since the formation of
DBroadband Holdings, LLC, Vulcan Ventures has contributed
approximately $56 million on Charter Ventures behalf.
On March 2, 2001, Charter Ventures entered into a broadband
carriage agreement with Digeo Interactive, LLC (Digeo
Interactive), a wholly owned subsidiary of Digeo. The
carriage agreement provided that Digeo Interactive would provide
to Charter a portal product, which would function as
the television-based Internet portal (the initial point of entry
to the Internet) for Charters customers who received
Internet access from Charter. The agreement term was for
25 years and Charter agreed to use the Digeo portal
exclusively for six years. Before the portal product was
delivered to Charter, Digeo terminated development of the portal
product.
On September 27, 2001, Charter and Digeo Interactive
amended the broadband carriage agreement. According to the
amendment, Digeo Interactive would provide to Charter the
content for enhanced Wink interactive television
services, known as Charter Interactive Channels
(i-channels). In order to provide the i-channels,
Digeo Interactive sublicensed certain Wink technologies to
Charter. Charter is entitled to share in the revenues generated
by the i-channels. Currently, the Companys digital video
customers who receive i-channels receive the service at no
additional charge.
On September 28, 2002, Charter entered into a second
amendment to its broadband carriage agreement with Digeo
Interactive. This amendment superseded the amendment of
September 27, 2001. It provided for the development by
Digeo Interactive of future features to be included in the Basic
i-TV service to be provided by Digeo and for Digeos
development of an interactive toolkit to enable
Charter to develop interactive local content. Furthermore,
Charter could request that Digeo Interactive manage local
content for a fee. The amendment provided for Charter to pay for
development of the Basic i-TV service as well as license fees
for customers who would receive the service, and for Charter and
Digeo to split certain revenues earned from the service. The
Company paid Digeo Interactive approximately $2 million and
$0.7 million for customized development of the i-channels
and the local content tool kit for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. This amendment
expired pursuant to its terms on December 31, 2003. Digeo
Interactive is continuing to provide the Basic i-TV service on a
month-to-month basis.
On June 30, 2003, Charter Holdco entered into an agreement
with Motorola, Inc. for the purchase of 100,000 digital video
recorder (DVR) units. The software for these DVR
units is being supplied by Digeo Interactive, LLC under a
license agreement entered into in April 2004. Under the license
agreement Digeo Interactive granted to Charter Holdco the right
to use Digeos proprietary software for the number of DVR
units that Charter deployed from a maximum of 10 headends
through year-end 2004. This maximum number of headends was
increased from 10 to 15 pursuant to a letter agreement executed
on June 11, 2004 and the date for entering into license
agreements for units deployed was extended to June 30,
2005. The number of headends was increased from 15 to 20
pursuant to a letter agreement dated August 4, 2004, from
20 to 30 pursuant to a letter agreement dated September 28,
2004 and from 30 to 50 headends by a letter agreement in
February 2005. The license granted for each unit deployed under
the agreement is valid for five years. In addition, Charter will
pay certain other fees including a per-headend license fee and
maintenance fees. Maximum license and maintenance fees during
the term of the agreement are expected to be approximately
$7 million. The agreement provides that Charter is entitled
to receive contract terms, considered on the whole, and license
fees, considered apart from other contract terms, no less
favorable than those accorded to any other Digeo customer.
Charter paid approximately $0.9 million in license and
maintenance fees for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
F-25
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
In April 2004, the Company launched DVR service using units
containing the Digeo software in Charters Rochester,
Minnesota market using a broadband media center that is an
integrated set-top terminal with a cable converter, DVR hard
drive and connectivity to other consumer electronics devices
(such as stereos, MP3 players, and digital cameras).
In May 2004, Charter Holdco entered into a binding term sheet
with Digeo Interactive for the development, testing and purchase
of 70,000 Digeo PowerKey DVR units. The term sheet provided that
the parties would proceed in good faith to negotiate, prior to
year-end 2004, definitive agreements for the development,
testing and purchase of the DVR units and that the parties would
enter into a license agreement for Digeos proprietary
software on terms substantially similar to the terms of the
license agreement described above. In November 2004, Charter
Holdco and Digeo Interactive executed the license agreement and
in December 2004, the parties executed the purchase agreement,
each on terms substantially similar to the binding term sheet.
Product development and testing are continuing. Total purchase
price and license and maintenance fees during the term of the
definitive agreements are expected to be approximately
$41 million. The definitive agreements are terminable at no
penalty to Charter in certain circumstances.
The Company believes that Vulcan Ventures, an entity controlled
by Mr. Allen, owns an approximate 51% equity interest in
Digeo, Inc., on a fully-converted basis. Mr. Allen is a
director of Digeo, and Mr. Vogel was a director of Digeo in
2004. During 2004, Mr. Vogel held options to
purchase 10,000 shares of Digeo common stock.
Oxygen Media LLC. Oxygen Media LLC (Oxygen)
provides programming content aimed at the female audience for
distribution over cable systems and satellite. On July 22,
2002, Charter Holdco entered into a carriage agreement with
Oxygen, whereby the Company agreed to carry programming content
from Oxygen. Under the carriage agreement, the Company currently
makes Oxygen programming available to approximately
5 million of its video customers. The term of the carriage
agreement was retroactive to February 1, 2000, the date of
launch of Oxygen programming by the Company, and runs for a
period of five years from that date. For the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company paid Oxygen
approximately $3 million and $4 million, respectively,
for programming content. In addition, Oxygen pays the Company
marketing support fees for customers launched after the first
year of the term of the carriage agreement up to a total of
$4 million. The Company recorded approximately
$0.1 million and $0.4 million related to these launch
incentives as a reduction of programming expense for each of the
three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Concurrently with the execution of the carriage agreement,
Charter Holdco entered into an equity issuance agreement
pursuant to which Oxygens parent company, Oxygen Media
Corporation (Oxygen Media), granted a subsidiary of
Charter Holdco a warrant to purchase 2.4 million
shares of Oxygen Media common stock for an exercise price of
$22.00 per share. In February 2005, this warrant expired
unexercised. Charter Holdco was also to receive unregistered
shares of Oxygen Media common stock with a guaranteed fair
market value on the date of issuance of $34 million, on or
prior to February 2, 2005, with the exact date to be
determined by Oxygen Media, but this commitment was later
revised as discussed below.
The Company recognized the guaranteed value of the investment
over the life of the carriage agreement as a reduction of
programming expense. For the three months ended March 31,
2005 and 2004, the Company recorded approximately
$1 million and $4 million, respectively, as a
reduction of programming expense. The carrying value of the
Companys investment in Oxygen was approximately
$33 million and $32 million as of March 31, 2005
and December 31, 2004, respectively.
F-26
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and where
indicated)
(Unaudited)
In August 2004, Charter Holdco and Oxygen entered into
agreements that amended and renewed the carriage agreement. The
amendment to the carriage agreement (a) revises the number
of the Companys customers to which Oxygen programming must
be carried and for which the Company must pay, (b) releases
Charter Holdco from any claims related to the failure to achieve
distribution benchmarks under the carriage agreement,
(c) requires Oxygen to make payment on outstanding
receivables for marketing support fees due to the Company under
the carriage agreement; and (d) requires that Oxygen
provide its programming content to the Company on economic terms
no less favorable than Oxygen provides to any other cable or
satellite operator having fewer subscribers than the Company.
The renewal of the carriage agreement (a) extends the
period that the Company will carry Oxygen programming to the
Companys customers through January 31, 2008, and
(b) requires license fees to be paid based on customers
receiving Oxygen programming, rather than for specific customer
benchmarks.
In August 2004, Charter Holdco and Oxygen also amended the
equity issuance agreement to provide for the issuance of
1 million shares of Oxygen Preferred Stock with a
liquidation preference of $33.10 per share plus accrued
dividends to Charter Holdco on February 1, 2005 in place of
the $34 million of unregistered shares of Oxygen Media
common stock. Oxygen Media delivered these shares in March 2005.
The preferred stock is convertible into common stock after
December 31, 2007 at a conversion ratio per share of
preferred stock, the numerator of which is the liquidation
preference and the denominator of which is the fair market value
per share of Oxygen Media common stock on the conversion date.
As of March 31, 2005, through Vulcan Programming,
Mr. Allen owned an approximate 31% interest in Oxygen
assuming no exercises of outstanding warrants or conversion or
exchange of convertible or exchangeable securities. Ms. Jo
Allen Patton is a director and the President of Vulcan
Programming. Mr. Lance Conn is a Vice President of Vulcan
Programming. Marc Nathanson has an indirect beneficial interest
of less than 1% in Oxygen.
F-27
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors
Charter Communications, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Charter Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as
of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in shareholders equity
(deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2004. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Charter Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
As discussed in note 7 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective September 30, 2004, the Company
adopted EITF Topic D-108, Use of the Residual Method to Value
Acquired Assets Other than Goodwill.
As discussed in note 19 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
Transition and Disclosure an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 123.
St. Louis, Missouri
March 1, 2005
F-28
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
650 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $15
and $17, respectively
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
922 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTMENT IN CABLE PROPERTIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
of $5,311 and $3,950, respectively
|
|
|
6,289 |
|
|
|
7,014 |
|
|
Franchises
|
|
|
9,878 |
|
|
|
13,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment in cable properties, net
|
|
|
16,167 |
|
|
|
20,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
17,673 |
|
|
$ |
21,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS DEFICIT |
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$ |
1,217 |
|
|
$ |
1,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,217 |
|
|
|
1,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT
|
|
|
19,464 |
|
|
|
18,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEFERRED MANAGEMENT FEES RELATED PARTY
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MINORITY INTEREST
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PREFERRED STOCK REDEEMABLE; $.001 par value;
1 million shares authorized; 545,259 shares issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS DEFICIT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common stock; $.001 par value;
1.75 billion shares authorized; 305,203,770 and
295,038,606 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Common stock; $.001 par value;
750 million shares authorized; 50,000 shares issued
and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock; $.001 par value; 250 million shares
authorized; no non-redeemable shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
4,794 |
|
|
|
4,700 |
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(9,196 |
) |
|
|
(4,851 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders deficit
|
|
|
(4,406 |
) |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders deficit
|
|
$ |
17,673 |
|
|
$ |
21,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-29
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in millions, except per share and share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
REVENUES
|
|
$ |
4,977 |
|
|
$ |
4,819 |
|
|
$ |
4,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (excluding depreciation and amortization)
|
|
|
2,080 |
|
|
|
1,952 |
|
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
1,436 |
|
|
Impairment of franchises
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,638 |
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Option compensation expense, net
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Special charges, net
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
Unfavorable contracts and other settlements
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,023 |
|
|
|
4,303 |
|
|
|
8,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(2,046 |
) |
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
(4,322 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(1,670 |
) |
|
|
(1,557 |
) |
|
|
(1,503 |
) |
|
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments and hedging activities, net
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
Loss on debt to equity conversions
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,652 |
) |
|
|
(1,241 |
) |
|
|
(1,622 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before minority interest, income taxes and cumulative
effect of accounting change
|
|
|
(3,698 |
) |
|
|
(725 |
) |
|
|
(5,944 |
) |
MINORITY INTEREST
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
3,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
(3,679 |
) |
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
(2,768 |
) |
INCOME TAX BENEFIT
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
(3,576 |
) |
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
(2,308 |
) |
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE, NET OF TAX
|
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(4,341 |
) |
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
(2,514 |
) |
|
|
Dividends on preferred stock redeemable
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to common stock
|
|
$ |
(4,345 |
) |
|
$ |
(242 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,517 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS PER COMMON SHARE, basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(14.47 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.82 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
|
|
300,291,877 |
|
|
|
294,597,519 |
|
|
|
294,440,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-30
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
Total | |
|
|
Class A |
|
Class B |
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
Other | |
|
Shareholders | |
|
|
Common |
|
Common |
|
Paid-In | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
Capital | |
|
Deficit | |
|
Income (Loss) | |
|
(Deficit) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
BALANCE, December 31, 2001
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,694 |
|
|
$ |
(2,092 |
) |
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
2,585 |
|
|
Issuance of common stock related to acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Changes in fair value of interest rate agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
Option compensation expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Loss on issuance of equity by subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Dividends on preferred stock redeemable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,514 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,514 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,697 |
|
|
|
(4,609 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
Changes in fair value of interest rate agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
Option compensation expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Issuance of common stock related to acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Loss on issuance of equity by subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Dividends on preferred stock redeemable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,700 |
|
|
|
(4,851 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
Changes in fair value of interest rate agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
Option compensation expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
Issuance of common stock in exchange for convertible notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
Dividends on preferred stock redeemable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,794 |
|
|
$ |
(9,196 |
) |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,406 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-31
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(4,341 |
) |
|
$ |
(238 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,514 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows from
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(377 |
) |
|
|
(3,176 |
) |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
1,436 |
|
|
|
Impairment of franchises
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,638 |
|
|
|
Option compensation expense, net
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
Special charges, net
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash interest expense
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
Gain on derivative instruments and hedging activities, net
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
Loss on debt to equity conversions
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(460 |
) |
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net
|
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
Unfavorable contracts and other settlements
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisitions and dispositions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
Receivables from and payables to related party, including
deferred management fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(924 |
) |
|
|
(854 |
) |
|
|
(2,167 |
) |
|
Change in accrued expenses related to capital expenditures
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sale of systems
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
(817 |
) |
|
|
(2,363 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Borrowings of long-term debt
|
|
|
3,148 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
4,106 |
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(5,448 |
) |
|
|
(1,368 |
) |
|
|
(2,134 |
) |
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
2,882 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
Purchase of pledge securities
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
1,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
319 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period
|
|
$ |
650 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH PAID FOR INTEREST
|
|
$ |
1,302 |
|
|
$ |
1,111 |
|
|
$ |
1,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONCASH TRANSACTIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt exchanged for Charter Class A common stock
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Issuance of debt by CCH II, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of preferred stock redeemable, as payment
for acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of equity as partial payments for acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-32
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
|
|
1. |
Organization and Basis of Presentation |
Charter Communications, Inc. (Charter) is a holding
company whose principal assets at December 31, 2004 are the
47% controlling common equity interest in Charter Communications
Holding Company, LLC (Charter Holdco) and
mirror notes which are payable by Charter Holdco to
Charter and have the same principal amount and terms as those of
Charters convertible senior notes. Charter Holdco is the
sole owner of Charter Communications Holdings, LLC
(Charter Holdings). The consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of Charter, Charter Holdco,
Charter Holdings and all of their wholly owned subsidiaries
where the underlying operations reside, collectively referred to
herein as the Company. Charter consolidates Charter
Holdco on the basis of voting control. Charter Holdcos
limited liability company agreement provides that so long as
Charters Class B common stock retains its special
voting rights, Charter will maintain a 100% voting interest in
Charter Holdco. Voting control gives Charter full authority and
control over the operations of Charter Holdco. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions among consolidated
entities have been eliminated. The Company is a broadband
communications company operating in the United States. The
Company offers its customers traditional cable video programming
(analog and digital video) as well as high-speed data services
and, in some areas, advanced broadband services such as high
definition television, video on demand and telephony. The
Company sells its cable video programming, high-speed data and
advanced broadband services on a subscription basis. The Company
also sells local advertising on satellite-delivered networks.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Areas involving
significant judgments and estimates include capitalization of
labor and overhead costs; depreciation and amortization costs;
impairments of property, plant and equipment, franchises and
goodwill; income taxes; and contingencies. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications. Certain prior year amounts have been
reclassified to conform with the 2004 presentation.
|
|
2. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
The Company incurred net loss applicable to common stock of
$4.3 billion, $242 million and $2.5 billion in
2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The Companys net cash
flows from operating activities were $472 million,
$765 million and $748 million for the years ending
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
The Company has a significant level of debt. The Companys
long-term financing as of December 31, 2004 consists of
$5.5 billion of credit facility debt, $13.3 billion
principal amount of high-yield notes and $1.0 billion
principal amount of convertible senior notes. In 2005,
$30 million of the Companys debt will mature and in
2006, an additional $186 million of the Companys debt
will mature. In 2007 and beyond, significant additional amounts
will become due under the Companys remaining long-term
debt obligations.
The Company has historically required significant cash to fund
capital expenditures and debt service costs. Historically, the
Company has funded these requirements through cash flows from
operating activities, borrowings under its credit facilities,
sales of assets, issuances of debt and equity securities and
cash on hand. However, the mix of funding sources changes from
period to period. For the year ended December 31, 2004, the
Company, generated $472 million of net cash flows from
operating activities, after paying cash interest of
$1.3 billion. In addition, the Company generated
approximately $744 million from the sale of assets,
substantially all of which was used to fund operations,
including capital expenditures.
F-33
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
Finally, the Company had net cash flows from financing
activities of $294 million, which included, among other
things, the proceeds from the issuance in December of
$550 million of CCO Holdings, LLC (CCO
Holdings) Notes. This debt issuance was the primary reason
cash on hand increased by $523 million to $650 million
at December 31, 2004. Approximately $622 million was
used to repay outstanding borrowings under the Companys
revolving credit facility, through a series of transactions
executed in February 2005.
The Company expects that cash on hand, cash flows from operating
activities and the amounts available under its credit facilities
will be adequate to meet its cash needs in 2005. Cash flows from
operating activities and amounts available under the
Companys credit facilities may not be sufficient to fund
the Companys operations and satisfy its principal
repayment obligations that come due in 2006 and, the Company
believes, will not be sufficient to fund its operations and
satisfy such repayment obligations thereafter.
It is likely that the Company will require additional funding to
repay debt maturing after 2006. The Company is working with its
financial advisors to address such funding requirements.
However, there can be no assurance that such funding will be
available to the Company. Although Mr. Allen and his
affiliates have purchased equity from the Company in the past,
Mr. Allen and his affiliates are not obligated to purchase
equity from, contribute to or loan funds to the Company in the
future.
|
|
|
Credit Facilities and Covenants |
The Companys ability to operate depends upon, among other
things, its continued access to capital, including credit under
the Charter Communications Operating, LLC (Charter
Operating) credit facilities. These credit facilities,
along with the Companys indentures, are subject to certain
restrictive covenants, some of which require the Company to
maintain specified financial ratios and meet financial tests and
to provide audited financial statements with an unqualified
opinion from the Companys independent auditors. As of
December 31, 2004, the Company was in compliance with the
covenants under the Companys indentures and under its
credit facilities and the Company expects to remain in
compliance with those covenants for the next twelve months. As
of December 31, 2004, the Company had borrowing
availability under the credit facilities of $804 million,
none of which was restricted due to covenants. Continued access
to the Companys credit facilities is subject to the
Company remaining in compliance with the applicable covenants of
these credit facilities, including covenants tied to the
Companys operating performance. If the Companys
operating performance results in non-compliance with these
covenants, or if any of certain other events of non-compliance
under these credit facilities or indentures governing the
Companys debt occurs, funding under the credit facilities
may not be available and defaults on some or potentially all of
the Companys debt obligations could occur. An event of
default under the covenants governing any of the Companys
debt instruments could result in the acceleration of its payment
obligations under that debt and, under certain circumstances, in
cross-defaults under its other debt obligations, which could
have a material adverse effect on the Companys
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
The Charter Operating credit facilities require the Company to
redeem the CC V Holdings notes within 45 days after the
first date that the Charter Holdings leverage ratio is less than
8.75 to 1.0. In satisfaction of this requirement, CC V Holdings,
LLC has called for redemption all of its outstanding notes, at
103.958% of principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest
to the date of redemption, which is expected to be
March 14, 2005. The total cost of the redemption including
accrued and unpaid interest is expected to be $122 million.
The Company intends to fund the redemption with borrowings under
its credit facilities.
F-34
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
Charters ability to make interest payments on its
convertible senior notes, and, in 2006 and 2009, to repay the
outstanding principal of its convertible senior notes, will
depend on its ability to raise additional capital and/or on
receipt of payments or distributions from Charter Holdco or its
subsidiaries, including CCH II, LLC
(CCH II), CCO Holdings, LLC (CCO
Holdings) and Charter Operating. The indentures governing
the CCH II notes, CCO Holdings notes, and Charter Operating
notes, however, restrict these entities and their subsidiaries
from making distributions to their parent companies (including
Charter and Charter Holdco) for payment of principal on
Charters convertible senior notes, in each case unless
there is no default under the applicable indenture and a
specified leverage ratio test is met at the time of such event.
CCH II, CCO Holdings and Charter Operating meet the
applicable leverage ratio test under each of their respective
indentures, and as a result are not prohibited from making any
such distributions to their respective direct parent.
The indentures governing the Charter Holdings notes permit
Charter Holdings to make distributions to Charter Holdco for
payment of interest or principal on the convertible senior
notes, only if, after giving effect to the distribution, Charter
Holdings can incur additional debt under the leverage ratio of
8.75 to 1.0, there is no default under Charter Holdings
indentures and other specified tests are met. For the quarter
ended December 31, 2004, there was no default under Charter
Holdings indentures and other specified tests were met. In
addition, Charter Holdings met the leverage ratio of 8.75 to 1.0
based on December 31, 2004 financial results. As a result,
distributions from Charter Holdings to Charter or Charter Holdco
are not currently restricted. Such distributions will again be
restricted, however, if Charter Holdings fails to meet its
leverage ratio test. In the past, Charter Holdings has from time
to time failed to meet this leverage ratio test and there can be
no assurance that Charter Holdings will satisfy this test in the
future.
During periods when such distributions are restricted, the
indentures governing the Charter Holdings notes permit Charter
Holdings and its subsidiaries to make specified investments in
Charter Holdco or Charter, up to an amount determined by a
formula, as long as there is no default under the indentures. As
of December 31, 2004, Charter Holdco had $106 million
in cash on hand and was owed $29 million in intercompany
loans from its subsidiaries, which were available to pay
interest on Charters 4.75% convertible senior notes,
which is expected to be approximately $7 million in 2005.
In addition, Charter has $144 million of governmental
securities pledged as security for the six interest payments on
Charters 5.875% convertible senior notes.
In March 2004, the Company closed the sale of certain cable
systems in Florida, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware and West
Virginia to Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC. The Company closed
the sale of an additional cable system in New York to Atlantic
Broadband Finance, LLC in April 2004. These transactions
resulted in a $104 million pretax gain recorded as a gain
on sale of assets in the Companys consolidated statements
of operations. Subject to post-closing contractual adjustments,
the total net proceeds from the sale of all of these systems
were approximately $733 million. The proceeds were used to
repay a portion of amounts outstanding under the Companys
credit facilities.
|
|
3. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with
original maturities of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. These investments are carried at cost, which
approximates market value.
F-35
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost, including
all material, labor and certain indirect costs associated with
the construction of cable transmission and distribution
facilities. Costs associated with initial customer installations
and the additions of network equipment necessary to enable
advanced services are capitalized. Costs capitalized as part of
initial customer installations include materials, labor, and
certain indirect costs. Indirect costs are associated with the
activities of the Companys personnel who assist in
connecting and activating the new service and consist of
compensation and indirect costs associated with these support
functions. Indirect costs primarily include employee benefits
and payroll taxes, direct variable costs associated with
capitalizable activities, consisting primarily of installation
and construction vehicle costs, the cost of dispatch personnel
and indirect costs directly attributable to capitalizable
activities. The costs of disconnecting service at a
customers dwelling or reconnecting service to a previously
installed dwelling are charged to operating expense in the
period incurred. Costs for repairs and maintenance are charged
to operating expense as incurred, while plant and equipment
replacement and betterments, including replacement of cable
drops from the pole to the dwelling, are capitalized.
Depreciation is recorded using the straight-line composite
method over managements estimate of the useful lives of
the related assets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cable distribution systems
|
|
|
7-20 years |
|
Customer equipment and installations
|
|
|
3-5 years |
|
Vehicles and equipment
|
|
|
1-5 years |
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
5-15 years |
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
5 years |
|
Franchise rights represent the value attributed to agreements
with local authorities that allow access to homes in cable
service areas acquired through the purchase of cable systems.
Management estimates the fair value of franchise rights at the
date of acquisition and determines if the franchise has a finite
life or an indefinite-life as defined by Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. All franchises that
qualify for indefinite-life treatment under
SFAS No. 142 are no longer amortized against earnings
but instead are tested for impairment annually as of
October 1, or more frequently as warranted by events or
changes in circumstances (see Note 7). The Company
concluded that 99% of its franchises qualify for indefinite-life
treatment; however, certain franchises did not qualify for
indefinite-life treatment due to technological or operational
factors that limit their lives. These franchise costs are
amortized on a straight-line basis over 10 years. Costs
incurred in renewing cable franchises are deferred and amortized
over 10 years.
Other noncurrent assets primarily include goodwill, deferred
financing costs, governmental securities and investments in
equity securities. Costs related to borrowings are deferred and
amortized to interest expense over the terms of the related
borrowings.
Investments in equity securities are accounted for at cost,
under the equity method of accounting or in accordance with
SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities. Charter recognizes losses for
any decline in value considered to be other than temporary.
Certain marketable equity securities are classified as
available-for-sale and reported at market value with unrealized
gains and losses recorded as accumulated other comprehensive
income or loss.
F-36
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
The following summarizes investment information as of and for
the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying | |
|
Gain (loss) for the | |
|
|
Value at | |
|
Years Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity investments, under the cost method
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Equity investments, under the equity method
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Marketable securities, at market value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As required by the indentures to the Companys
5.875% convertible senior notes issued in November 2004,
the Company purchased U.S. government securities valued at
approximately $144 million with maturities corresponding to
the interest payment dates for the convertible senior notes.
These securities were pledged and are held in escrow to provide
payment in full for the first six interest payments of the
convertible senior notes (see Note 9). These securities are
accounted for as held-to-maturity securities. At
December 31, 2004, the carrying value and fair value of the
securities was approximately $144 million with
approximately $48 million recorded in prepaid and other
assets and approximately $96 million recorded in other
assets in the Companys consolidated balance sheet.
|
|
|
Valuation of Property, Plant and Equipment |
The Company evaluates the recoverability of property, plant and
equipment for impairment when events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. Such events or changes in circumstances could
include such factors as impairment of the Companys
indefinite life franchise under SFAS No. 142, changes
in technological advances, fluctuations in the fair value of
such assets, adverse changes in relationships with local
franchise authorities, adverse changes in market conditions or
poor operating results. If a review indicates that the carrying
value of such asset is not recoverable from estimated
undiscounted cash flows, the carrying value of such asset is
reduced to its estimated fair value. While the Company believes
that its estimates of future cash flows are reasonable,
different assumptions regarding such cash flows could materially
affect its evaluations of asset recoverability. No impairment of
property, plant and equipment occurred in 2004, 2003 and 2002.
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments |
The Company accounts for derivative financial instruments in
accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended.
For those instruments which qualify as hedging activities,
related gains or losses are recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income. For all other derivative instruments, the
related gains or losses are recorded in the income statement.
The Company uses interest rate risk management derivative
instruments, such as interest rate swap agreements, interest
rate cap agreements and interest rate collar agreements
(collectively referred to herein as interest rate agreements) as
required under the terms of the credit facilities of the
Companys subsidiaries. The Companys policy is to
manage interest costs using a mix of fixed and variable rate
debt. Using interest rate swap agreements, the Company agrees to
exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed
and variable interest amounts calculated by reference to an
agreed-upon notional principal amount. Interest rate cap
agreements are used to lock in a maximum interest rate should
variable rates rise, but enable the Company to otherwise pay
lower market rates. Interest rate collar agreements are used to
limit exposure to
F-37
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
and benefits from interest rate fluctuations on variable rate
debt to within a certain range of rates. The Company does not
hold or issue any derivative financial instruments for trading
purposes.
Certain provisions of the Companys 5.875% convertible
senior notes issued in November 2004 were considered embedded
derivatives for accounting purposes and were required to be
separately accounted for from the convertible senior notes. In
accordance with SFAS No. 133, these derivatives are
marked to market with gains or losses recorded in interest
expense on the Companys consolidated statement of
operations. For the year ended December 31, 2004, the
Company recognized $1 million in losses related to these
derivatives. At December 31, 2004, $10 million is
recorded in accounts payable and accrued expenses relating to
the short-term portion of these derivatives and $21 million
is recorded in other long-term liabilities related to the
long-term portion.
Revenues from residential and commercial video and high-speed
data services are recognized when the related services are
provided. Advertising sales are recognized at estimated
realizable values in the period that the advertisements are
broadcast. Local governmental authorities impose franchise fees
on the Company ranging up to a federally mandated maximum of 5%
of gross revenues as defined in the franchise agreement. Such
fees are collected on a monthly basis from the Companys
customers and are periodically remitted to local franchise
authorities. Franchise fees are reported as revenues on a gross
basis with a corresponding operating expense.
The Company has various contracts to obtain analog, digital and
premium video programming from program suppliers whose
compensation is typically based on a flat fee per customer. The
cost of the right to exhibit network programming under such
arrangements is recorded in operating expenses in the month the
programming is available for exhibition. Programming costs are
paid each month based on calculations performed by the Company
and are subject to adjustment based on periodic audits performed
by the programmers. Certain programming contracts contain launch
incentives to be paid by the programmers. The Company receives
these payments related to the activation of the
programmers cable television channel and recognizes the
launch incentives on a straight-line basis over the life of the
programming agreement as a reduction of programming expense.
This offset to programming expense was $59 million,
$62 million and $57 million for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Programming
costs included in the accompanying statement of operations were
$1.3 billion, $1.2 billion and $1.2 billion for
the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the
deferred amount of launch incentives, included in other
long-term liabilities, totaled $106 million and
$170 million, respectively.
Advertising costs associated with marketing the Companys
products and services are generally expensed as costs are
incurred. Such advertising expense was $72 million,
$62 million and $60 million for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
The Company has historically accounted for stock-based
compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board
(APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, and related interpretations, as
permitted by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation. On January 1,
F-38
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
2003, the Company adopted the fair value measurement provisions
of SFAS No. 123 using the prospective method under
which the Company will recognize compensation expense of a
stock-based award to an employee over the vesting period based
on the fair value of the award on the grant date consistent with
the method described in Financial Accounting Standards Board
Interpretation (FIN) No. 28, Accounting for
Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or
Award Plans. Adoption of these provisions resulted in
utilizing a preferable accounting method as the consolidated
financial statements will present the estimated fair value of
stock-based compensation in expense consistently with other
forms of compensation and other expense associated with goods
and services received for equity instruments. In accordance with
SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation Transition and Disclosure, the fair
value method was applied only to awards granted or modified
after January 1, 2003, whereas awards granted prior to such
date were accounted for under APB No. 25, unless they were
modified or settled in cash.
SFAS No. 123 requires pro forma disclosure of the
impact on earnings as if the compensation expense for these
plans had been determined using the fair value method. The
following table presents the Companys net loss and loss
per share as reported and the pro forma amounts that would have
been reported using the fair value method under
SFAS No. 123 for the years presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net loss applicable to common stock
|
|
$ |
(4,345 |
) |
|
$ |
(242 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,517 |
) |
Add back stock-based compensation expense related to stock
options included in reported net loss (net of minority interest)
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Less employee stock-based compensation expense determined under
fair value based method for all employee stock option awards
(net of minority interest)
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
Effects of unvested options in stock option exchange (see
Note 19)
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$ |
(4,299 |
) |
|
$ |
(254 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,571 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per common shares, basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
(14.47 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.82 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$ |
(14.32 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.86 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The
following weighted average assumptions were used for grants
during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively: risk-free interest rates of 3.3%, 3.0%, and 3.6%;
expected volatility of 92.4%, 93.6% and 64.2%; and expected
lives of 4.6 years, 4.5 years and 4.3 years,
respectively. The valuations assume no dividends are paid.
|
|
|
Unfavorable Contracts and Other Settlements |
The Company recognized $5 million of benefit for the year
ended December 31, 2004 related to changes in estimated
legal reserves established as part of previous business
combinations, which, based on an evaluation of current facts and
circumstances, are no longer required.
The Company recognized $72 million of benefit for the year
ended December 31, 2003 as a result of the settlement of
estimated liabilities recorded in connection with prior business
combinations. The majority of this benefit (approximately
$52 million) is due to the renegotiation of a major
programming
F-39
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
contract, for which a liability had been recorded for the above
market portion of the agreement in conjunction with the Falcon
acquisition in 1999 and the Bresnan acquisition in 2000. The
remaining benefit relates to the reversal of previously recorded
liabilities, which are no longer required.
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for
temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and
the tax basis of the Companys assets and liabilities and
expected benefits of utilizing net operating loss carryforwards.
The impact on deferred taxes of changes in tax rates and tax
law, if any, applied to the years during which temporary
differences are expected to be settled, are reflected in the
consolidated financial statements in the period of enactment
(see Note 21).
Minority interest on the consolidated balance sheets represents
the portion of members equity of Charter Holdco not owned
by Charter, plus preferred membership interests in an indirect
subsidiary of Charter held by Mr. Paul G. Allen. Minority
interest totaled $648 million and $689 million as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, on the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Gains or losses
arising from issuances by Charter Holdco of its membership units
are recorded as capital transactions thereby increasing or
decreasing shareholders equity and decreasing or
increasing minority interest on the consolidated balance sheets.
These losses totaled $0, $1 million and $1 million for
the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively, on the accompanying consolidated statements of
changes in shareholders equity. Operating losses are
allocated to the minority owners based on their ownership
percentage, thereby reducing the Companys net loss.
Reported losses allocated to minority interest on the statement
of operations are limited to the extent of any remaining
minority interest on the balance sheet related to Charter
Holdco. Because minority interest in Charter Holdco was
substantially eliminated at December 31, 2003, beginning in
2004, Charter began to absorb substantially all future losses
before income taxes that otherwise would have been allocated to
minority interest.
Basic loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss
applicable to common stock by 300,291,877 shares,
294,597,519 shares and 294,440,261 shares for the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, representing
the weighted-average common shares outstanding during the
respective periods. Diluted loss per common share equals basic
loss per common share for the periods presented, as the effect
of stock options is antidilutive because the Company incurred
net losses. All membership units of Charter Holdco are
exchangeable on a one-for-one basis into common stock of Charter
at the option of the holders. As of December 31, 2004,
Charter Holdco has 644,385,801 membership units outstanding.
Should the holders exchange units for shares, the effect would
not be dilutive because the Company incurred net losses.
SFAS No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information, established standards
for reporting information about operating segments in annual
financial statements and in interim financial reports issued to
shareholders. Operating segments are defined as components of an
enterprise about which separate financial information is
available that is evaluated on a regular basis by the chief
F-40
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding
how to allocate resources to an individual segment and in
assessing performance of the segment.
The Companys operations are managed on the basis of
geographic divisional operating segments. The Company has
evaluated the criteria for aggregation of the geographic
operating segments under paragraph 17 of
SFAS No. 131 and believes it meets each of the
respective criteria set forth. The Company delivers similar
products and services within each of its geographic divisional
operations. Each geographic and divisional service area utilizes
similar means for delivering the programming of the
Companys services; have similarity in the type or class of
customer receiving the products and services; distributes the
Companys services over a unified network; and operates
within a consistent regulatory environment. In addition, each of
the geographic divisional operating segments has similar
economic characteristics. In light of the Companys similar
services, means for delivery, similarity in type of customers,
the use of a unified network and other considerations across its
geographic divisional operating structure, management has
determined that the Company has one reportable segment,
broadband services.
On February 28, 2002, CC Systems, LLC, a subsidiary of the
Company, and High Speed Access Corp. (HSA) closed
the Companys acquisition from HSA of the contracts and
associated assets, and assumed related liabilities, that served
certain of the Companys high-speed data customers. At
closing, the Company paid approximately $78 million in cash
and delivered 37,000 shares of HSAs Series D
convertible preferred stock and all the warrants to buy HSA
common stock owned by the Company. The purchase price has been
allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on
fair values, including approximately $8 million assigned to
intangible assets and amortized over an average useful life of
three years and approximately $52 million assigned to
goodwill. During the period from 1997 to 2000, certain
subsidiaries of the Company entered into Internet-access related
service agreements with HSA, and both Vulcan Ventures and
certain of the Companys subsidiaries made equity
investments in HSA. (see Note 22 for additional
information).
In April 2002, Interlink Communications Partners, LLC, Rifkin
Acquisition Partners, LLC and Charter Communications
Entertainment I, LLC, each an indirect, wholly-owned
subsidiary of Charter Holdings, completed the purchase of
certain assets of Enstar Income Program II-2, L.P., Enstar
Income Program IV-3, L.P., Enstar Income/ Growth Program
Six-A, L.P., Enstar Cable of Macoupin County and Enstar IV/
PBD Systems Venture, serving approximately 21,600 (unaudited)
customers, for a total cash purchase price of $48 million.
In September 2002, Charter Communications Entertainment I,
LLC purchased all of Enstar Income Program II-1,
L.P.s Illinois cable systems, serving approximately 6,400
(unaudited) customers, for a cash purchase price of
$15 million. Enstar Communications Corporation, a direct
subsidiary of Charter Holdco, is a general partner of the Enstar
limited partnerships but does not exercise control over them.
The purchase prices were allocated to assets acquired based on
fair values, including $41 million assigned to franchises
and $4 million assigned to other intangible assets
amortized over a useful life of three years.
The 2002 acquisitions were funded primarily from borrowings
under the credit facilities of the Companys subsidiaries.
F-41
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
|
|
5. |
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
Activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts is summarized as
follows for the years presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
Charged to expense
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
Uncollected balances written off, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
Property, Plant and Equipment |
Property, plant and equipment consists of the following as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cable distribution systems
|
|
$ |
6,596 |
|
|
$ |
6,347 |
|
Customer equipment and installations
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
3,160 |
|
Vehicles and equipment
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,600 |
|
|
|
10,964 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(5,311 |
) |
|
|
(3,950 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,289 |
|
|
$ |
7,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company periodically evaluates the estimated useful lives
used to depreciate its assets and the estimated amount of assets
that will be abandoned or have minimal use in the future. A
significant change in assumptions about the extent or timing of
future asset retirements, or in the Companys use of new
technology and upgrade programs, could materially affect future
depreciation expense.
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003 and 2002 was $1.5 billion, $1.5 billion and
$1.4 billion respectively.
|
|
7. |
Franchises and Goodwill |
On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142,
which eliminates the amortization of indefinite-lived intangible
assets. Accordingly, beginning January 1, 2002, all
franchises that qualify for indefinite-life treatment under
SFAS No. 142 are no longer amortized against earnings
but instead are tested for impairment annually based on
valuations, or more frequently as warranted by events or changes
in circumstances. Based on the guidance prescribed in Emerging
Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 02-7,
Unit of Accounting for Testing of Impairment of
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets, franchises are
aggregated into essentially inseparable asset groups to conduct
the valuations. The asset groups generally represent geographic
clustering of the Companys cable systems into groups by
which such systems are managed. Management believes such
grouping represents the highest and best use of those assets.
The Companys valuations, which are based on the present
value of projected after tax cash flows, result in a value of
property, plant and equipment, franchises, customer
relationships and its total entity
F-42
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
value. The value of goodwill is the difference between the total
entity value and amounts assigned to the other assets.
Franchises, for valuation purposes, are defined as the future
economic benefits of the right to solicit and service potential
customers (customer marketing rights), and the right to deploy
and market new services such as interactivity and telephony to
the potential customers (service marketing rights). Fair value
is determined based on estimated discounted future cash flows
using assumptions consistent with internal forecasts. The
franchise after-tax cash flow is calculated as the after-tax
cash flow generated by the potential customers obtained and the
new services added to those customers in future periods. The sum
of the present value of the franchises after-tax cash flow
in years 1 through 10 and the continuing value of the after-tax
cash flow beyond year 10 yields the fair value of the franchise.
Prior to the adoption of EITF Topic D-108, Use of the
Residual Method to Value Acquired Assets Other than
Goodwill, discussed below, the Company followed a residual
method of valuing its franchise assets, which had the effect of
including goodwill with the franchise assets.
The Company follows the guidance of EITF Issue 02-17,
Recognition of Customer Relationship Intangible Assets
Acquired in a Business Combination, in valuing customer
relationships. Customer relationships, for valuation purposes,
represent the value of the business relationship with existing
customers and are calculated by projecting future after-tax cash
flows from these customers including the right to deploy and
market additional services such as interactivity and telephony
to these customers. The present value of these after-tax cash
flows yield the fair value of the customer relationships.
Substantially all acquisitions occurred prior to January 1,
2002. The Company did not record any value associated with the
customer relationship intangibles related to those acquisitions.
For acquisitions subsequent to January 1, 2002 the Company
did assign a value to the customer relationship intangible,
which is amortized over its estimated useful life.
In September 2004, the SEC staff issued Topic D-108 which
requires the direct method of separately valuing all intangible
assets and does not permit goodwill to be included in franchise
assets. The Company performed an impairment assessment as of
September 30, 2004, and adopted Topic D-108 in that
assessment resulting in a total franchise impairment of
approximately $3.3 billion. The Company recorded a
cumulative effect of accounting change of $765 million
(approximately $875 million before tax effects of
$91 million and minority interest effects of
$19 million) for the year ended December 31, 2004
representing the portion of the Companys total franchise
impairment attributable to no longer including goodwill with
franchise assets. The effect of the adoption was to increase net
loss and loss per share by $765 million and $2.55 for the
year ended December 31, 2004. The remaining
$2.4 billion of the total franchise impairment was
attributable to the use of lower projected growth rates and the
resulting revised estimates of future cash flows in the
Companys valuation, and was recorded as impairment of
franchises in the Companys accompanying consolidated
statements of operations for the year ended December 31,
2004. Sustained analog video customer losses by the Company in
the third quarter of 2004 primarily as a result of increased
competition from direct broadcast satellite providers and
decreased growth rates in the Companys high-speed data
customers in the third quarter of 2004, in part, as a result of
increased competition from digital subscriber line service
providers led to the lower projected growth rates and the
revised estimates of future cash flows from those used at
October 1, 2003.
The valuation completed at October 1, 2003 showed franchise
values in excess of book value and thus resulted in no
impairment. The Companys annual impairment assessment as
of October 1, 2002, based on revised estimates from
January 1, 2002 of future cash flows and projected
long-term growth rates in the Companys valuation, led to
the recognition of a $4.6 billion impairment charge in the
fourth quarter of 2002.
F-43
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, indefinite-lived and
finite-lived intangible assets are presented in the following
table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Net | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Net | |
|
|
Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Carrying | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchises with indefinite lives
|
|
$ |
9,845 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,845 |
|
|
$ |
13,606 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,606 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,897 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,897 |
|
|
$ |
13,658 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finite-lived intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchises with finite lives
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2004, the net carrying
amount of indefinite-lived intangible assets was reduced by
$490 million as a result of the sale of cable systems,
primarily the sale to Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC, discussed
in Note 2. Additionally, in the first and fourth quarters
of 2004, approximately $29 million and $8 million,
respectively, of franchises that were previously classified as
finite-lived were reclassified to indefinite-lived, based on the
Companys renewal of these franchise assets in 2003 and
2004. Franchise amortization expense for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $4 million,
$9 million and $9 million, respectively, which
represents the amortization relating to franchises that did not
qualify for indefinite-life treatment under
SFAS No. 142, including costs associated with
franchise renewals. The Company expects that amortization
expense on franchise assets will be approximately
$3 million annually for each of the next five years. Actual
amortization expense in future periods could differ from these
estimates as a result of new intangible asset acquisitions or
divestitures, changes in useful lives and other relevant factors.
|
|
8. |
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following
as of December 31, 2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Accounts payable trade
|
|
$ |
148 |
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
Accrued capital expenditures
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
Accrued expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
Programming costs
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
Franchise related fees
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
State sales tax
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,217 |
|
|
$ |
1,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
Long-term debt consists of the following as of December 31,
2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Face | |
|
Accreted | |
|
Face | |
|
Accreted | |
|
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charter Communications, Inc.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.75% convertible senior notes due 2005
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
618 |
|
|
$ |
618 |
|
|
|
4.750% convertible senior notes due 2006
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
5.875% convertible senior notes due 2009
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charter Holdings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.250% senior notes due 2007
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
8.625% senior notes due 2009
|
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
9.920% senior discount notes due 2011
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
1,082 |
|
|
|
10.000% senior notes due 2009
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
10.250% senior notes due 2010
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
11.750% senior discount notes due 2010
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
10.750% senior notes due 2009
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
11.125% senior notes due 2011
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
13.500% senior discount notes due 2011
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
9.625% senior notes due 2009
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
10.000% senior notes due 2011
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
11.750% senior discount notes due 2011
|
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
12.125% senior discount notes due 2012
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
CCH II, LLC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.250% senior notes due 2010
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
CCO Holdings, LLC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83/4% senior
notes due 2013
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
Senior floating notes due 2010
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charter Operating:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8% senior second-lien notes due 2012
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83/8% senior
second-lien notes due 2014
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renaissance Media Group LLC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.000% senior discount notes due 2008
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
CC V Holdings, LLC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.875% senior discount notes due 2008
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
Credit Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charter Operating
|
|
|
5,515 |
|
|
|
5,515 |
|
|
|
4,459 |
|
|
|
4,459 |
|
CC VI Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
Falcon Cable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
CC VIII Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,791 |
|
|
$ |
19,464 |
|
|
$ |
19,208 |
|
|
$ |
18,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-45
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
The accreted values presented above represents the face value of
the notes less the original issue discount at the time of sale
plus the accretion to the balance sheet date.
On November 22, 2004, the Company issued
$862.5 million original principal amount of
5.875% convertible senior notes due 2009, which are
convertible into shares of Charters Class A common
stock, par value $.001 per share, at a rate of
413.2231 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes (or
approximately $2.42 per share), subject to adjustment in
certain circumstances. On December 23, 2004, the Company
used a portion of the proceeds from the sale of the notes to
redeem all of its outstanding 5.75% convertible senior
notes due 2005 (total principal amount of $588 million).
The redemption resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt of
$10 million.
In April 2004, Charters indirect subsidiaries, Charter
Operating and Charter Communications Operating Capital Corp.,
sold $1.5 billion of senior second-lien notes in a private
transaction. Additionally, Charter Operating amended and
restated its $5.1 billion credit facilities, among other
things, to defer maturities and increase availability under
those facilities to approximately $6.5 billion, consisting
of a $1.5 billion six-year revolving credit facility, a
$2.0 billion six-year term loan facility and a
$3.0 billion seven-year term loan facility. Charter
Operating used the additional borrowings under the amended and
restated credit facilities, together with proceeds from the sale
of the Charter Operating senior second-lien notes to refinance
the credit facilities of its subsidiaries, CC VI Operating
Company, LLC (CC VI Operating), Falcon Cable
Communications, LLC (Falcon Cable), and CC VIII
Operating, LLC (CC VIII Operating), all in
concurrent transactions. In addition, Charter Operating was
substituted as the lender in place of the banks under those
subsidiaries credit facilities. These transactions
resulted in losses on extinguishment of debt of $21 million.
The Company recognized a loss of approximately $23 million
recorded as loss on debt to equity conversion on the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2004 from privately negotiated exchanges
of a total of $30 million principal amount of
Charters 5.75% convertible senior notes for shares of
Charter Class A common stock. The exchanges resulted in the
issuance of more shares in the exchange transaction than would
have been issuable under the original terms of the convertible
senior notes.
In September 2003, Charter, Charter Holdings and their indirect
subsidiary, CCH II purchased, in a non-monetary transaction, a
total of approximately $609 million principal amount of
Charters outstanding convertible senior notes and
approximately $1.3 billion principal amount of the senior
notes and senior discount notes issued by Charter Holdings from
institutional investors in a small number of privately
negotiated transactions. As consideration for these securities,
CCH II issued approximately $1.6 billion principal
amount of 10.25% notes due 2010, and realized approximately
$294 million of debt discount. CCH II also issued an
additional $30 million principal amount of
10.25% notes for an equivalent amount of cash and used the
proceeds for transaction costs and for general corporate
purposes. This transaction resulted in a gain on extinguishment
of debt of $267 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003. See discussion of the CCH II notes
below for more details.
5.75% Charter Convertible Notes. In October and November
2000, Charter issued 5.75% convertible senior notes with a
total principal amount at maturity of $750 million. The
5.75% Charter convertible notes were convertible at the option
of the holder into shares of Class A common stock at a
conversion rate of 46.3822 shares per $1,000 principal
amount of notes, which was equivalent to a price of
$21.56 per share, subject to certain adjustments. The
remaining $588 million of these notes was redeemed on
December 23, 2004 at a price of 101.15% of the outstanding
principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest through the
redemption date.
F-46
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
4.75% Charter Convertible Notes. In May 2001, Charter
issued 4.75% convertible senior notes with a total
principal amount at maturity of $633 million. As of
December 31, 2004, there was $156 million in total
principal amount of these notes outstanding. The 4.75% Charter
convertible notes rank equally with any of Charters future
unsubordinated and unsecured indebtedness, but are structurally
subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness and other
liabilities of Charters subsidiaries.
The 4.75% Charter convertible notes are convertible at the
option of the holder into shares of Class A common stock at
a conversion rate of 38.0952 shares per $1,000 principal
amount of notes, which is equivalent to a price of
$26.25 per share, subject to certain adjustments.
Specifically, the adjustments include anti-dilutive provisions,
which automatically occur based on the occurrence of specified
events to provide protection rights to holders of the notes.
Additionally, Charter may adjust the conversion ratio under
certain circumstances when deemed appropriate. These notes are
redeemable at Charters option at amounts decreasing from
101.9% to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid
interest beginning on June 4, 2004, to the date of
redemption. Interest is payable semiannually on December 1
and June 1, beginning December 1, 2001, until maturity
on June 1, 2006.
Upon a change of control, subject to certain conditions and
restrictions, Charter may be required to repurchase the notes,
in whole or in part, at 100% of their principal amount plus
accrued interest at the repurchase date.
5.875% Charter Convertible Notes. In November 2004,
Charter issued 5.875% convertible senior notes due 2009
with a total original principal amount of $862.5 million.
The 5.875% Charter convertible notes are convertible at any time
at the option of the holder into shares of Class A common
stock at an initial conversion rate of 413.2231 shares per
$1,000 principal amount of notes, which is equivalent to a
conversion price of approximately $2.42 per share, subject
to certain adjustments. Specifically, the adjustments include
anti-dilutive provisions, which cause adjustments to occur
automatically based on the occurrence of specified events to
provide protection rights to holders of the notes. The
conversion rate may also be increased (but not to exceed
462 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes) upon a
specified change of control transaction. Additionally, Charter
may elect to increase the conversion rate under certain
circumstances when deemed appropriate and subject to applicable
limitations of the NASDAQ stock market. Holders who convert
their notes prior to November 16, 2007 will receive an
early conversion make whole amount in respect of their notes
based on a proportional share of the portfolio of pledged
securities described below, with specified adjustments.
The 5.875% Charter convertible notes are unsecured (except with
respect to the collateral as described below) and rank equally
with existing and future unsubordinated and unsecured
indebtedness (except with respect to the collateral described
below), but are structurally subordinated to all existing and
future indebtedness and other liabilities of Charters
subsidiaries. Upon a change of control and certain other
fundamental changes, subject to certain conditions and
restrictions, Charter may be required to repurchase the notes,
in whole or in part, at 100% of their principal amount plus
accrued interest at the repurchase date.
Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears. Charter Holdco
used a portion of the proceeds from the sale of the notes to
purchase a portfolio of U.S. government securities in an
amount which the Company believes will be sufficient to make the
first six interest payments on the notes. These government
securities were pledged to the Company as security for a mirror
note issued by Charter Holdco to Charter (as discussed below)
and pledged to the trustee under the indenture governing the
notes as security for the Companys obligations thereunder.
The Company expects to use such securities to fund the first six
interest payments under the notes. The pledged securities
totaled $144 million at December 31, 2004. Any holder
that converts its notes prior to the third anniversary of the
issue date will be entitled to receive, in
F-47
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
addition to the requisite number of shares upon conversion, an
interest make whole payment equal to the cash proceeds from the
sale by the trustee of that portion of the remaining pledged
U.S. government securities which secure interest payments
on the notes so converted, subject to certain limitations with
respect to notes that have not been sold prior to being
registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
Following the earlier of the sale of the notes pursuant to an
effective registration statement or the date two years following
the issue date, the notes in whole or in part may be redeemed
for cash at any time at a redemption price equal to 100% of the
aggregate principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest,
deferred interest and liquidated damages, if any, but only if
for any 20 trading days in any 30 consecutive trading day period
the closing price has exceeded 180% of the conversion price, if
such 30 trading day period begins prior to November 16,
2007 or 150% of the conversion price, if such 30 trading period
begins thereafter. Holders who convert notes that the Company
has called for redemption shall receive, in addition to the
early conversion make whole amount, if applicable, the present
value of the interest on the notes converted that would have
been payable for the period from the later of November 17,
2007 and the redemption date through the scheduled maturity date
for the notes, plus any accrued deferred interest.
The Company is required to register the 5.875% Charter
convertible notes by April 21, 2005. If the 5.875% Charter
convertible notes are not registered by such date, the Company
will incur liquidating damages as defined in the related
indenture. In conjunction with issuing the 5.875% Charter
convertible notes, the Company filed a registration statement to
sell up to 150 million shares of the Companys
Class A common stock pursuant to a share lending agreement.
The share lending agreement is required to be registered by
April 1, 2005. If the share lending agreement is not
registered by such date, the Company will incur liquidating
damages as defined in the related indenture.
In connection with our November 2004 sale of the
$862.5 million principal amount of 5.875% convertible
senior notes due 2009, Charter Holdco issued to Charter mirror
notes in identical principal amount in exchange for the proceeds
from its offering. Charter Holdco then purchased and pledged
certain U.S. government securities to Charter as security
for the mirror notes (which were in turn repledged by Charter to
the trustee for the benefit of holders of Charters
5.875% convertible senior notes and which Charter expects
to use to fund the first six interest payments on the notes),
and agreed to lend common units to Charter, the terms of which
will, to the extent practicable, mirror the terms of the shares.
Charter Holdco also redeemed the remaining $588 million
principal amount of the mirror notes in respect of our
5.75% convertible senior notes due 2005 concurrently with
its December 23, 2004 redemption of its
5.75% convertible senior notes.
In addition, in December 2004, Charter Holdco entered into a
unit lending agreement with Charter in which it agreed to lend
common units to Charter that would mirror the anticipated loan
of Class A common shares by Charter to Citigroup Global
Markets pursuant to a share lending agreement. The members of
Charter Holdco (including the entities controlled by
Mr. Allen) also at that time entered into a letter
agreement providing, among other things, that for purposes of
the allocation provisions of the Limited Liability Company
Agreement of Charter Holdco, the mirror units be treated as
disregarded and not outstanding until such time (and except to
the extent) that, under Charters share lending agreement,
Charter treats the loaned shares in a manner that assumes they
will neither be returned by Charter by the borrower nor
otherwise be acquired by Charter in lieu of such a return.
March 1999 Charter Holdings Notes. The March 1999 Charter
Holdings notes are general unsecured obligations of Charter
Holdings and Charter Communications Capital Corporation
(Charter Capital). The March 1999 8.250% Charter
Holdings notes mature on April 1, 2007, and as of
December 31, 2004, there was $451 million in total
principal amount outstanding. The March 1999 8.625% Charter
Holdings notes mature on April 1, 2009 and as of
December 31, 2004, there was $1.2 billion in total
principal
F-48
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
amount outstanding. The March 1999 9.920% Charter Holdings notes
mature on April 1, 2011 and as of December 31, 2004,
the total principal amount outstanding and accreted value was
$1.1 billion. Cash interest on the March 1999 9.920%
Charter Holdings notes began to accrue on April 1, 2004.
The March 1999 Charter Holdings notes are senior debt
obligations of Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. They rank
equally with all other current and future unsubordinated
obligations of Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. They are
structurally subordinated to the obligations of Charter
Holdings subsidiaries, including the CCH II notes,
the CCO Holdings notes, the Renaissance notes, the CC V Holdings
notes, the Charter Operating credit facilities and the Charter
Operating notes.
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital will not have the right to
redeem the March 1999 8.250% Charter Holdings notes prior to
their maturity on April 1, 2007. On or after April 1,
2004, Charter Holdings and Charter Capital may redeem some or
all of the March 1999 8.625% Charter Holdings notes and the
March 1999 9.920% Charter Holdings notes at any time, in each
case, at a premium. The optional redemption price declines to
100% of the principal amount of March 1999 Charter Holdings
notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, for
redemption on or after April 1, 2007.
In the event that a specified change of control event occurs,
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital must offer to repurchase
any then outstanding March 1999 Charter Holdings notes at 101%
of their principal amount or accreted value, as applicable, plus
accrued and unpaid interest, if any.
The indentures governing the March 1999 Charter Holdings notes
contain restrictive covenants that limit certain transactions or
activities by Charter Holdings and its restricted subsidiaries.
Substantially all of Charter Holdings direct and indirect
subsidiaries are currently restricted subsidiaries.
January 2000 Charter Holdings Notes. The January 2000
Charter Holdings notes are general unsecured obligations of
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. The January 2000 10.00%
Charter Holdings notes mature on April 1, 2009, and as of
December 31, 2004, there was $640 million in total
principal amount of these notes outstanding. The January 2000
10.25% Charter Holdings notes mature on January 15, 2010
and as of December 31, 2004, there was $318 million in
total principal amount of these notes outstanding. The January
2000 11.75% Charter Holdings notes mature on January 15,
2010 and as of December 31, 2004, the total principal
amount outstanding was $450 million and the total accreted
value of these notes was approximately $448 million. Cash
interest on the January 2000 11.75% Charter Holdings notes began
to accrue on January 15, 2005.
The January 2000 Charter Holdings notes are senior debt
obligations of Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. They rank
equally with all other current and future unsubordinated
obligations of Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. They are
structurally subordinated to the obligations of Charter
Holdings subsidiaries, including the CCH II notes,
the CCO Holdings notes, the Renaissance notes, the CC V Holdings
notes, the Charter Operating credit facilities and the Charter
Operating notes.
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital will not have the right to
redeem the January 2000 10.00% Charter Holdings notes prior to
their maturity on April 1, 2009. Charter Holdings and
Charter Capital may redeem some or all of the January 2000
10.25% Charter Holdings notes and the January 2000 11.75%
Charter Holdings notes at any time, in each case, at a premium.
The optional redemption price declines to 100% of the principal
amount of the January 2000 Charter Holdings notes redeemed, plus
accrued and unpaid interest, if any, for redemption on or after
January 15, 2008.
In the event that a specified change of control event occurs,
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital must offer to repurchase
any then outstanding January 2000 Charter Holdings notes at 101%
of their total principal amount or accreted value, as
applicable, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.
F-49
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
The indentures governing the January 2000 Charter Holdings notes
contain substantially identical events of default, affirmative
covenants and negative covenants as those contained in the
indentures governing the March 1999 Charter Holdings notes.
January 2001 Charter Holdings Notes. The January 2001
Charter Holdings notes are general unsecured obligations of
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. The January 2001 10.750%
Charter Holdings notes mature on October 1, 2009, and as of
December 31, 2004, there was $874 million in total
principal amount of these notes outstanding. The January 2001
11.125% Charter Holdings notes mature on January 15, 2011
and as of December 31, 2004, there was $500 million in
total principal amount outstanding. The January 2001 13.500%
Charter Holdings notes mature on January 15, 2011 with a
total principal amount at maturity of $675 million. As of
December 31, 2004, the total accreted value of these
13.500% notes was approximately $589 million. Cash
interest on the January 2001 13.500% Charter Holdings notes will
not accrue prior to January 15, 2006.
The January 2001 Charter Holdings notes are senior debt
obligations of Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. They rank
equally with all other current and future unsubordinated
obligations of Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. They are
structurally subordinated to the obligations of Charter
Holdings subsidiaries, including the CCH II notes,
the CCO Holdings notes, the Renaissance notes, the CC V Holdings
notes, the Charter Operating credit facilities and the Charter
Operating notes.
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital will not have the right to
redeem the January 2001 10.750% Charter Holdings notes prior to
their maturity date on October 1, 2009. On or after
January 15, 2006, Charter Holdings and Charter Capital may
redeem some or all of the January 2001 11.125% Charter Holdings
notes and the January 2001 13.500% Charter Holdings notes at any
time, in each case, at a premium. The optional redemption price
declines to 100% of the principal amount of the January 2001
Charter Holdings notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid
interest, if any, for redemption on or after January 15,
2009.
In the event that a specified change of control event occurs,
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital must offer to repurchase
any then outstanding January 2001 Charter Holdings notes at 101%
of their total principal amount or accreted value, as
applicable, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.
The indentures governing the January 2001 Charter Holdings notes
contain substantially identical events of default, affirmative
covenants and negative covenants as those contained in the
indentures governing the March 1999 and January 2000 Charter
Holdings notes.
May 2001 Charter Holdings Notes. The May 2001 Charter
Holdings notes are general unsecured obligations of Charter
Holdings and Charter Capital. The May 2001 9.625% Charter
Holdings notes mature on November 15, 2009, and as of
December 31, 2004, combined with the January 2002
additional bond issue, there was $640 million in total
principal amount outstanding. The May 2001 10.000% Charter
Holdings notes mature on May 15, 2011 and as of
December 31, 2004, combined with the January 2002
additional bond issue, there was $710 million in total
principal amount outstanding. The May 2001 11.750% Charter
Holdings notes mature on May 15, 2011 and as of
December 31, 2004, the total principal amount outstanding
was $939 million and the total accreted value of the
11.750% notes was approximately $803 million. Cash
interest on the May 2001 11.750% Charter Holdings notes will not
accrue prior to May 15, 2006.
The May 2001 Charter Holdings notes are senior debt obligations
of Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. They rank equally with
all other current and future unsubordinated obligations of
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. They are structurally
subordinated to the obligations of Charter Holdings
F-50
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
subsidiaries, including the CCH II notes, the CCO Holdings
notes, the Renaissance notes, the CC V Holdings notes, the
Charter Operating credit facilities and the Charter Operating
notes.
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital will not have the right to
redeem the May 2001 9.625% Charter Holdings notes prior to their
maturity on November 15, 2009. On or after May 15,
2006, Charter Holdings and Charter Capital may redeem some or
all of the May 2001 10.000% Charter Holdings notes and the May
2001 11.750% Charter Holdings notes at any time, in each case,
at a premium. The optional redemption price declines to 100% of
the principal amount of the May 2001 Charter Holdings notes
redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, for
redemption on or after May 15, 2009.
In the event that a specified change of control event occurs,
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital must offer to repurchase
any then outstanding May 2001 Charter Holdings notes at 101% of
their total principal amount or accreted value, as applicable,
plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.
The indentures governing the May 2001 Charter Holdings notes
contain substantially identical events of default, affirmative
covenants and negative covenants as those contained in the
indentures governing the March 1999, January 2000 and January
2001 Charter Holdings notes.
January 2002 Charter Holdings Notes. The January 2002
Charter Holdings notes are general unsecured obligations of
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. The January 2002 Charter
Holdings notes consist of $330 million in total principal
amount at maturity of 12.125% senior discount notes due
2012.
The January 2002 12.125% senior discount notes mature on
January 15, 2012, and as of December 31, 2004, the
total principal amount outstanding was $330 million and the
total accreted value of these notes was approximately
$259 million. Cash interest on the January 2002 12.125%
Charter Holdings notes will not accrue prior to January 15,
2007.
The January 2002 Charter Holdings notes are senior debt
obligations of Charter Holdings and Charter Capital. They rank
equally with the current and future unsecured and unsubordinated
debt of Charter Holdings. They are structurally subordinated to
the obligations of Charter Holdings subsidiaries,
including the CCH II notes, the CCO Holdings notes, the
Renaissance notes, the CC V Holdings notes, the Charter
Operating credit facilities and the Charter Operating notes.
The Charter Holdings 12.125% senior discount notes are
redeemable at the option of the issuers at amounts decreasing
from 106.063% to 100% of accreted value beginning
January 15, 2007.
In the event that a specified change of control event occurs,
Charter Holdings and Charter Capital must offer to repurchase
any then outstanding January 2002 Charter Holdings notes at 101%
of their total principal amount or accreted value, as
applicable, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.
The indentures governing the January 2002 Charter Holdings notes
contain substantially identical events of default, affirmative
covenants and negative covenants as those contained in the
indentures governing the March 1999, January 2000, January 2001
and May 2001 Charter Holdings notes.
CCH II Notes. In September 2003, CCH II and
CCH II Capital Corp. jointly issued $1.6 billion total
principal amount of 10.25% senior notes due 2010. The
CCH II notes are general unsecured obligations of
CCH II and CCH II Capital Corp. They rank equally with
all other current or future unsubordinated obligations of
CCH II and CCH II Capital Corp. The CCH II notes
are structurally subordinated to all obligations of subsidiaries
of CCH II, including the CCO Holdings notes, the
Renaissance notes, the CC V Holdings notes, the Charter
Operating credit facilities and the Charter Operating notes.
F-51
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
Interest on the CCH II notes accrues at 10.25% per
annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on each March 15
and September 15, commencing on March 15, 2004.
At any time prior to September 15, 2006, the issuers of the
CCH II notes may redeem up to 35% of the total principal
amount of the CCH II notes on a pro rata basis at a
redemption price equal to 110.25% of the principal amount of
CCH II notes redeemed, plus any accrued and unpaid interest.
On or after September 15, 2008, the issuers of the
CCH II notes may redeem all or a part of the notes at a
redemption price that declines ratably from the initial
redemption price of 105.125% to a redemption price on or after
September 15, 2009 of 100.0% of the principal amount of the
CCH II notes redeemed, plus, in each case, any accrued and
unpaid interest.
In the event of specified change of control events, CCH II
must offer to purchase the outstanding CCH II notes from
the holders at a purchase price equal to 101% of the total
principal amount of the notes, plus any accrued and unpaid
interest.
The indenture governing the CCH II notes contains
restrictive covenants that limit certain transactions or
activities by CCH II and its restricted subsidiaries.
Substantially all of CCH IIs direct and indirect
subsidiaries are currently restricted subsidiaries.
|
|
|
83/4% Senior
Notes due 2013 |
In November 2003, CCO Holdings and CCO Holdings Capital Corp.
jointly issued $500 million total principal amount of
83/4% senior
notes due 2013. The CCO Holdings notes are general unsecured
obligations of CCO Holdings and CCO Holdings Capital Corp. They
rank equally with all other current or future unsubordinated
obligations of CCO Holdings and CCO Holdings Capital Corp. The
CCO Holdings notes are structurally subordinated to all
obligations of CCO Holdings subsidiaries, including the
Renaissance notes, the CC V Holdings notes, the Charter
Operating credit facilities and the Charter Operating notes.
Interest on the CCO Holdings senior notes accrues at
83/4%
per year and is payable semi-annually in arrears on each
May 15 and November 15.
At any time prior to November 15, 2006, the issuers of the
CCO Holdings senior notes may redeem up to 35% of the total
principal amount of the CCO Holdings senior notes to the extent
of public equity proceeds they have received on a pro rata basis
at a redemption price equal to 108.75% of the principal amount
of CCO Holdings senior notes redeemed, plus any accrued and
unpaid interest.
On or after November 15, 2008, the issuers of the CCO
Holdings senior notes may redeem all or a part of the notes at a
redemption price that declines ratably from the initial
redemption price of 104.375% to a redemption price on or after
November 15, 2011 of 100.0% of the principal amount of the
CCO Holdings senior notes redeemed, plus, in each case, any
accrued and unpaid interest.
In the event of specified change of control events, CCO Holdings
must offer to purchase the outstanding CCO Holdings senior notes
from the holders at a purchase price equal to 101% of the total
principal amount of the notes, plus any accrued and unpaid
interest.
|
|
|
Senior Floating Rate Notes Due 2010 |
In December 2004, CCO Holdings and CCO Holdings Capital Corp.
jointly issued $550 million total principal amount of
senior floating rate notes due 2010.
F-52
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
Interest on the CCO Holdings senior floating rate notes accrues
at the LIBOR rate plus 4.125% annually, from December 15,
2004 or, if interest already has been paid, from the date it was
most recently paid. Interest is reset and payable quarterly in
arrears on each March 15, June 15, September 15 and
December 15, commencing on March 15, 2005.
At any time prior to December 15, 2006, the issuers of the
senior floating rate notes may redeem up to 35% of the notes in
an amount not to exceed the amount of proceeds of one or more
public equity offerings at a redemption price equal to 100% of
the principal amount, plus a premium equal to the interest rate
per annum applicable to the notes on the date notice of
redemption is given, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any,
to the redemption date, provided that at least 65% of the
original aggregate principal amount of the notes issued remains
outstanding after the redemption.
The issuers of the senior floating rate notes may redeem the
notes in whole or in part at the issuers option from
December 15, 2006 until December 14, 2007 for 102% of
the principal amount, from December 15, 2007 until
December 14, 2008 for 101% of the principal amount and from
and after December 15, 2008, at par, in each case, plus
accrued and unpaid interest.
The indentures governing the CCO Holdings senior notes contain
restrictive covenants that limit certain transactions or
activities by CCO Holdings and its restricted subsidiaries.
Substantially all of CCO Holdings direct and indirect
subsidiaries are currently restricted subsidiaries.
Charter Operating Notes. On April 27, 2004, Charter
Operating and Charter Communications Operating Capital Corp.
jointly issued $1.1 billion of 8% senior second-lien
notes due 2012 and $400 million of
83/8% senior
second-lien notes due 2014, for total gross proceeds of
$1.5 billion. Interest on the Charter Operating notes is
payable semi-annually in arrears on each April 30 and
October 30, commencing on October 30, 2004.
The Charter Operating notes were sold in a private transaction
that was not subject to the registration requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933. The Charter Operating notes are not
expected to have the benefit of any exchange or other
registration rights, except in specified limited circumstances.
On the issue date of the Charter Operating notes, because of
restrictions contained in the Charter Holdings indentures, there
were no Charter Operating note guarantees, even though Charter
Operatings immediate parent, CCO Holdings, and certain of
the Companys subsidiaries were obligors and/or guarantors
under the Charter Operating credit facilities. Upon the
occurrence of the guarantee and pledge date (generally, the
fifth business day after the Charter Holdings leverage ratio is
certified to be below 8.75 to 1.0), CCO Holdings and those
subsidiaries of Charter Operating that are then guarantors of,
or otherwise obligors with respect to, indebtedness under the
Charter Operating credit facilities and related obligations will
be required to guarantee the Charter Operating notes. The note
guarantee of each such guarantor will be:
|
|
|
|
|
a senior obligation of such guarantor; |
|
|
|
structurally senior to the outstanding senior notes of CCO
Holdings and CCO Holdings Capital Corp. (except in the case of
CCO Holdings note guarantee, which ranks equally with such
senior notes), the outstanding senior notes of CCH II and
CCH II Capital Corp., the outstanding senior notes and
senior discount notes of Charter Holdings and the outstanding
convertible senior notes of Charter (but subject to provisions
in the Charter Operating indenture that permit interest and,
subject to meeting the 4.25 to 1.0 leverage ratio test,
principal payments to be made thereon); and |
|
|
|
senior in right of payment to any future subordinated
indebtedness of such guarantor. |
As a result of the above leverage ratio test being met, CCO
Holdings and certain of its subsidiaries provided the additional
guarantees described above during the first quarter of 2005.
F-53
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
All the subsidiaries of Charter Operating (except CCO NR Sub,
LLC, and certain other subsidiaries that are not deemed material
and are designated as nonrecourse subsidiaries under the Charter
Operating credit facilities) are restricted subsidiaries of
Charter Operating under the Charter Operating notes.
Unrestricted subsidiaries generally will not be subject to the
restrictive covenants in the Charter Operating indenture.
In the event of specified change of control events, Charter
Operating must offer to purchase the Charter Operating notes at
a purchase price equal to 101% of the total principal amount of
the Charter Operating notes repurchased plus any accrued and
unpaid interest thereon.
The indenture governing the Charter Operating senior notes
contains restrictive covenants that limit certain transactions
or activities by Charter Operating and its restricted
subsidiaries. Substantially all of Charter Operatings
direct and indirect subsidiaries are currently restricted
subsidiaries.
Renaissance Notes. In connection with the acquisition of
Renaissance in April 1999, the Company assumed $163 million
principal amount at maturity of 10.000% senior discount
notes due 2008 of which $49 million was repurchased in May
1999. The Renaissance notes did not require the payment of
interest until April 15, 2003. From and after
April 15, 2003, the Renaissance notes bear interest,
payable semi-annually, on April 15 and October 15,
commencing on October 15, 2003. The Renaissance notes are
due on April 15, 2008.
CC V Holdings Notes. Charter Holdco acquired CC V
Holdings in November 1999 and assumed CC V Holdings
outstanding 11.875% senior discount notes due 2008 with an
accreted value of $113 million as of December 31,
2003. Commencing December 1, 2003, cash interest on
the CC V Holdings 11.875% notes will be payable
semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 of each year.
In February 2005, these notes were called with an anticipated
redemption date of March 14, 2005.
High-Yield Restrictive Covenants; Limitation on
Indebtedness. The indentures governing the notes of the
Companys subsidiaries contain certain covenants that
restrict the ability of Charter Holdings, Charter Capital,
CCH II, CCH II Capital Corp., CCO Holdings, CCO
Holdings Capital Corp., Charter Operating, Charter
Communications Operating Capital Corp., the CC V Holdings notes
issuers, Renaissance Media Group, and all of their restricted
subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional debt; |
|
|
|
pay dividends on equity or repurchase equity; |
|
|
|
make investments; |
|
|
|
sell all or substantially all of their assets or merge with or
into other companies; |
|
|
|
sell assets; |
|
|
|
enter into sale-leasebacks; |
|
|
|
in the case of restricted subsidiaries, create or permit to
exist dividend or payment restrictions with respect to the bond
issuers, guarantee their parent companies debt, or issue
specified equity interests; |
|
|
|
engage in certain transactions with affiliates; and |
|
|
|
grant liens. |
Charter Operating Credit Facilities. In April 2004,
Charter Operating amended and restated its $5.1 billion
credit facilities, among other things, to defer maturities and
increase availability under those
F-54
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
facilities to approximately $6.5 billion, consisting of a
$1.5 billion revolving credit facility with a maturity date
in 2010; a $2.0 billion Term A loan facility of which 12.5%
matures in 2007, 30% matures in 2008, 37.5% matures in 2009 and
20% matures in 2010; and a $3.0 billion Term B loan
facility which is repayable in 27 equal quarterly installments
aggregating in each loan year to 1% of the original amount of
the Term B facility, with the remaining balance due at final
maturity in 2011. Charter Operating used the additional
borrowings under the amended and restated credit facilities,
together with proceeds from the sale of the Charter Operating
senior second-lien notes to refinance the credit facilities of
its subsidiaries, CC VI Operating, Falcon Cable, and
CC VIII Operating,, all in concurrent transactions. In
addition, Charter Operating was substituted as the lender in
place of the banks under those subsidiaries credit
facilities.
Amounts outstanding under the Charter Operating credit
facilities bear interest, at Charter Operatings election,
at a base rate or the Eurodollar rate (2.07% to 2.28% as of
December 31, 2004), as defined, plus a margin for
Eurodollar loans of up to 3.00% for the Term A facility and
revolving credit facility, and up to 3.25% for the Term B
facility, and for base rate loans of up to 2.00% for the Term A
facility and revolving credit facility, and up to 2.25% for the
Term B facility. A quarterly commitment fee of up to .75% is
payable on the average daily unborrowed balance of the revolving
credit facilities.
The obligations of Charters subsidiaries under the Charter
Operating credit facilities (the Obligations) are
guaranteed by Charter Operatings immediate parent company,
CCO Holdings, and the subsidiaries of Charter Operating, except
for immaterial subsidiaries and subsidiaries precluded from
guaranteeing by reason of the provisions of other indebtedness
to which they are subject (the non-guarantor
subsidiaries, primarily Renaissance and CC V Holdings and
their subsidiaries). The Obligations are also secured by
(i) a lien on all of the assets of Charter Operating and
its subsidiaries (other than assets of the non-guarantor
subsidiaries), to the extent such lien can be perfected under
the Uniform Commercial Code by the filing of a financing
statement, and (ii) by a pledge by CCO Holdings of the
equity interests owned by it in Charter Operating or any of
Charter Operatings subsidiaries, as well as intercompany
obligations owing to it by any of such entities. Upon the
Charter Holdings Leverage Ratio (as defined in the indenture
governing the Charter Holdings senior notes and senior discount
notes) being under 8.75 to 1.0, the Charter Operating credit
facilities require that the 11.875% notes due 2008 issued
by CC V Holdings, LLC be redeemed. Because such Leverage
Ratio was determined to be under 8.75 to 1.0 in February 2005,
CC V Holdings has called for redemption of such notes with an
anticipated redemption date of March 14, 2005. Following
such redemption and provided the Leverage Ratio of Charter
Holdings remains under 8.75 to 1.0, CC V Holdings and its
subsidiaries (other than non-guarantor subsidiaries) will
guarantee the Obligations and grant a lien on all of their
assets as to which a lien can be perfected under the Uniform
Commercial Code by the filing of a financing statement.
The Charter Operating credit facilities were amended and
restated previously as of June 19, 2003 to allow for the
insertion of intermediate holding companies between Charter
Holdings and Charter Operating. In exchange for the
lenders consent to the organizational restructuring,
Charter Operatings pricing increased by 50 basis
points across all levels in the pricing grid then in effect
under the Charter Operating credit facilities.
Amounts under the Charter Operating credit facilities, as
amended in 2003, bore interest at the Eurodollar rate or the
base rate, each as defined, plus a margin of up to 3.0% for
Eurodollar loans (3.15% to 3.92% as of December 31, 2003)
and 2.0% for base rate loans. A quarterly commitment fee of
between 0.25% and 0.375% per annum was payable on the
unborrowed balance of the revolving credit facilities.
As of December 31, 2004, outstanding borrowings under the
Charter Operating credit facilities were approximately
$5.5 billion and the unused total potential availability
was $804 million.
F-55
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
CC VI Operating Credit Facilities. As discussed above, in
April 2004, Charter Operating was substituted as the lender in
place of the banks for the CC VI Operating Credit
Facilities.
Prior to April 2004, amounts under the CC VI Operating
credit facilities bore interest at the Eurodollar rate or the
base rate, each as defined, plus a margin of up to 2.5% for
Eurodollar loans (2.40% to 3.66% as of December 31, 2003)
and 1.5% for base rate loans. A quarterly commitment fee of
0.25% per year was payable on the unborrowed balance of the
Term A facility and the revolving facility.
Falcon Cable Credit Facilities. As discussed above, in
April 2004, Charter Operating was substituted as the lender in
place of the banks for the Falcon Cable Credit Facilities.
Prior to April 2004, amounts under the Falcon Cable credit
facilities bore interest at the Eurodollar rate or the base
rate, each as defined, plus a margin of up to 2.25% for
Eurodollar loans (2.40% to 3.42% as of December 31, 2003)
and up to 1.25% for base rate loans. A quarterly commitment fee
of between 0.25% and 0.375% per year was payable on the
unborrowed balance of the revolving facilities.
CC VIII Operating Credit Facilities. As discussed above,
in April 2004, Charter Operating was substituted as the lender
in place of the banks for the CC VIII Operating Credit
Facilities.
Prior to April 2004, amounts under the CC VIII Operating
credit facilities bear interest at the Eurodollar rate or the
base rate, each as defined, plus a margin of up to 2.50% for
Eurodollar loans (2.15% to 3.66% as of December 31, 2003)
and up to 1.50% for base rate loans. A quarterly commitment fee
of 0.25% was payable on the unborrowed balance of the revolving
credit facilities.
Charter Operating Credit Facilities Restrictive
Covenants. The Charter Operating credit facilities contain
representations and warranties, affirmative and negative
covenants similar to those described above with respect to the
indentures governing the Companys notes, information
requirements, events of default and financial covenants. The
financial covenants, as defined, measure performance against
standards set for leverage, debt service coverage, and operating
cash flow coverage of cash interest expense on a quarterly basis
or as applicable. Additionally, the credit facilities contain
provisions requiring mandatory loan prepayments under specific
circumstances, including when significant amounts of assets are
sold and the proceeds are not promptly reinvested in assets
useful in the business of the borrower within a specified
period. The Charter Operating credit facilities also provide
that in the event that any indebtedness of CCO Holdings remains
outstanding on the date, which is six months prior to the
scheduled final maturity, the term loans under the Charter
Operating credit facilities will mature and the revolving credit
facilities will terminate on such date. The events of default
under the Charter Operating credit facilities include, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the failure to make payments when due or within the applicable
grace period, |
|
|
|
the failure to comply with specified covenants, including but
not limited to a covenant to deliver audited financial
statements with an unqualified opinion from the Companys
independent auditors, |
|
|
|
the failure to pay or the occurrence of events that cause or
permit the acceleration of other indebtedness owing by CCO
Holdings, Charter Operating or Charter Operatings
subsidiaries in amounts in excess of $50 million in
aggregate principal amount, |
|
|
|
the failure to pay or the occurrence of events that result in
the acceleration of other indebtedness owing by certain of CCO
Holdings direct and indirect parent companies in amounts
in excess of $200 million in aggregate principal amount, |
F-56
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Allen and/or certain of his family members and/or their
exclusively owned entities (collectively, the Paul Allen
Group) ceasing to have the power, directly or indirectly,
to vote at least 35% of the ordinary voting power of Charter
Operating, |
|
|
|
the consummation of any transaction resulting in any person or
group (other than the Paul Allen Group) having power, directly
or indirectly, to vote more than 35% of the ordinary voting
power of Charter Operating, unless the Paul Allen Group holds a
greater share of ordinary voting power of Charter Operating, |
|
|
|
certain of Charter Operatings indirect or direct parent
companies having indebtedness in excess of $500 million
aggregate principal amount which remains undefeased three months
prior to the final maturity of such indebtedness, and |
|
|
|
Charter Operating ceasing to be a wholly-owned direct subsidiary
of CCO Holdings, except in certain very limited circumstances. |
In the event of a default under the Companys
subsidiaries credit facilities or notes, the
subsidiaries creditors could elect to declare all amounts
borrowed, together with accrued and unpaid interest and other
fees, to be due and payable. In such event, the
subsidiaries credit facilities and indentures would not
permit the Companys subsidiaries to distribute funds to
Charter Holdco or Charter to pay interest or principal on
Charters notes. In addition, the lenders under the
Companys credit facilities could foreclose on their
collateral, which includes equity interests in the
Companys subsidiaries, and exercise other rights of
secured creditors. In any such case, the Company might not be
able to repay or make any payments on its notes. Additionally,
an acceleration or payment default under Charter
Operatings credit facilities would cause a cross-default
in the indentures governing the Charter Holdings notes,
CCH II notes, CCO Holdings notes, Charter Operating notes
and Charters convertible senior notes and would trigger
the cross-default provision of the Charter Operating Credit
Agreement. Any default under any of the subsidiaries
credit facilities or notes might adversely affect the holders of
Charters notes and the Companys growth, financial
condition and results of operations and could force the Company
to examine all options, including seeking the protection of the
bankruptcy laws.
Based upon outstanding indebtedness as of December 31,
2004, the amortization of term loans, scheduled reductions in
available borrowings of the revolving credit facilities, and the
maturity dates for all senior and subordinated notes and
debentures, total future principal payments on the total
borrowings under all debt agreements as of December 31,
2004, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
2006
|
|
|
186 |
|
2007
|
|
|
731 |
|
2008
|
|
|
858 |
|
2009
|
|
|
5,040 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
12,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the amounts of debt scheduled to mature during 2005, it is
managements intent to fund the repayments from borrowings
on the Companys revolving credit facility. The
accompanying consolidated balance sheet reflects this intent by
presenting all debt balances as long-term while the table above
reflects actual debt maturities as of the stated date.
F-57
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
|
|
10. |
Minority Interest and Equity Interest of Charter Holdco |
Charter is a holding company whose primary asset is a
controlling equity interest in Charter Holdco, the indirect
owner of the Companys cable systems, and $990 million
and $774 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, of mirror notes which are payable by Charter
Holdco to Charter and have the same principal amount and terms
as those of Charters convertible senior notes. Minority
interest on the Companys consolidated balance sheets
represents the ownership percentage of Charter Holdco not owned
by Charter, or 52.8% of total members equity of Charter
Holdco, plus $656 million and $694 million of
preferred membership interests in CC VIII, LLC (CC
VIII), an indirect subsidiary of Charter Holdco, as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003 respectively. As more fully
described in Note 22, this preferred interest arises from
the approximately $630 million of preferred membership
units issued by CC VIII in connection with an acquisition in
February 2000. As of December 31, 2003, minority interest
also includes $25 million of preferred interest in Charter
Helicon, LLC, another indirect subsidiary of Charter Holdco,
issued in connection with the 1999 Helicon acquisition. As of
December 31, 2004, the preferred interest in Charter
Helicon, LLC was reclassified to other long-term liabilities.
Members equity of Charter Holdco was ($4.4) billion,
($57) million and $662 million as of December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Gains and losses arising from
the issuance by Charter Holdco of its membership units are
recorded as capital transactions, thereby increasing or
decreasing shareholders equity and decreasing or
increasing minority interest on the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets. Minority interest was 52.8% as of
December 31, 2004 and 53.5% as of December 31, 2003
and 2002. Minority interest includes the proportionate share of
changes in fair value of interest rate risk derivative
agreements. Such amounts are temporary as they are contractually
scheduled to reverse over the life of the underlying instrument.
Additionally, reported losses allocated to minority interest on
the consolidated statement of operations are limited to the
extent of any remaining minority interest on the balance sheet
related to Charter Holdco. Because minority interest in Charter
Holdco was substantially eliminated at December 31, 2003,
beginning in 2004, the Company began to absorb substantially all
losses before income taxes that otherwise would have been
allocated to minority interest. This resulted in an additional
$2.4 billion of net loss for the year ended
December 31, 2004. Subject to any changes in Charter
Holdcos capital structure, future losses will be
substantially absorbed by Charter. Changes to minority interest
consist of the following for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority | |
|
|
Interest | |
|
|
| |
Balance, December 31, 2001
|
|
$ |
4,434 |
|
|
Minority interest in loss of a subsidiary
|
|
|
(3,176 |
) |
|
Minority interest in change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
Minority interest in income tax benefit
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
Changes in fair value of interest rate agreements
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2002
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
Minority interest in loss of a subsidiary
|
|
|
(377 |
) |
|
Minority interest in income tax benefit
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
Changes in fair value of interest rate agreements
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
F-58
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority | |
|
|
Interest | |
|
|
| |
Balance, December 31, 2003
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
Minority interest in loss of a subsidiary
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
Minority interest in cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
Reclass of Helicon, LLC interest
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
Changes in fair value of interest rate agreements
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. |
Preferred Stock Redeemable |
On August 31, 2001, in connection with its acquisition of
Cable USA, Inc. and certain cable system assets from affiliates
of Cable USA, Inc., the Company issued 505,664 shares of
Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock (the
Preferred Stock) valued at and with a liquidation preference of
$51 million. Holders of the Preferred Stock have no voting
rights but are entitled to receive cumulative cash dividends at
an annual rate of 5.75%, payable quarterly. If for any reason
Charter fails to pay the dividends on the Preferred Stock on a
timely basis, the dividend rate on each share increases to an
annual rate of 7.75% until the payment is made. The Preferred
Stock is redeemable by Charter at its option on or after
August 31, 2004 and must be redeemed by Charter at any time
upon a change of control, or if not previously redeemed or
converted, on August 31, 2008. The Preferred Stock is
convertible, in whole or in part, at the option of the holders
from April 1, 2002 through August 31, 2008, into
shares of common stock at an initial conversion rate equal to a
conversion price of $24.71 per share of common stock,
subject to certain customary adjustments. The redemption price
per share of Preferred Stock is the Liquidation Preference of
$100, subject to certain customary adjustments. In the first
quarter of 2003, the Company issued 39,595 additional shares of
preferred stock valued at and with a liquidation preference of
$4 million.
The Companys Class A common stock and Class B
common stock are identical except with respect to certain
voting, transfer and conversion rights. Holders of Class A
common stock are entitled to one vote per share and holder of
Class B common stock is entitled to ten votes for each
share of Class B common stock held and for each Charter
Holdco membership unit held. The Class B common stock is
subject to significant transfer restrictions and is convertible
on a share for share basis into Class A common stock at the
option of the holder. Charter Holdco membership units are
exchangeable on a one-for-one basis for shares of Class A
common stock.
Certain marketable equity securities are classified as
available-for-sale and reported at market value with unrealized
gains and losses recorded as accumulated other comprehensive
loss on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Additionally, the Company reports changes in the fair value of
interest rate agreements designated as hedging the variability
of cash flows associated with floating-rate debt obligations,
that meet the effectiveness criteria of SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, in accumulated other comprehensive loss, after
giving effect to the minority interest share of such gains and
losses. Comprehensive loss for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002 was $4.3 billion, $219 million and
$2.5 billion, respectively.
F-59
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
|
|
14. |
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities |
The Company uses interest rate risk management derivative
instruments, such as interest rate swap agreements and interest
rate collar agreements (collectively referred to herein as
interest rate agreements) to manage its interest costs. The
Companys policy is to manage interest costs using a mix of
fixed and variable rate debt. Using interest rate swap
agreements, the Company has agreed to exchange, at specified
intervals through 2007, the difference between fixed and
variable interest amounts calculated by reference to an
agreed-upon notional principal amount. Interest rate collar
agreements are used to limit the Companys exposure to and
benefits from interest rate fluctuations on variable rate debt
to within a certain range of rates.
The Company does not hold or issue derivative instruments for
trading purposes. The Company does, however, have certain
interest rate derivative instruments that have been designated
as cash flow hedging instruments. Such instruments effectively
convert variable interest payments on certain debt instruments
into fixed payments. For qualifying hedges,
SFAS No. 133 allows derivative gains and losses to
offset related results on hedged items in the consolidated
statement of operations. The Company has formally documented,
designated and assessed the effectiveness of transactions that
receive hedge accounting. For the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002, net gain (loss) on derivative instruments
and hedging activities includes gains of $4 million and
$8 million and losses of $14 million, respectively,
which represent cash flow hedge ineffectiveness on interest rate
hedge agreements arising from differences between the critical
terms of the agreements and the related hedged obligations.
Changes in the fair value of interest rate agreements designated
as hedging instruments of the variability of cash flows
associated with floating-rate debt obligations that meet the
effectiveness criteria SFAS No. 133 are reported in
accumulated other comprehensive loss. For the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, a gain of
$42 million and $48 million and losses of
$65 million, respectively, related to derivative
instruments designated as cash flow hedges, was recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive loss and minority interest. The
amounts are subsequently reclassified into interest expense as a
yield adjustment in the same period in which the related
interest on the floating-rate debt obligations affects earnings
(losses).
Certain interest rate derivative instruments are not designated
as hedges as they do not meet the effectiveness criteria
specified by SFAS No. 133. However, management
believes such instruments are closely correlated with the
respective debt, thus managing associated risk. Interest rate
derivative instruments not designated as hedges are marked to
fair value, with the impact recorded as gain (loss) on
derivative instruments and hedging activities in the
Companys consolidated statement of operations. For the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, net gain
(loss) on derivative instruments and hedging activities includes
gains of $65 million, $57 million and losses of
$101 million, respectively, for interest rate derivative
instruments not designated as hedges.
As of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company had
outstanding $2.7 billion, $3.0 billion and
$3.4 billion and $20 million, $520 million and
$520 million, respectively, in notional amounts of interest
rate swaps and collars, respectively. The notional amounts of
interest rate instruments do not represent amounts exchanged by
the parties and, thus, are not a measure of exposure to credit
loss. The amounts exchanged are determined by reference to the
notional amount and the other terms of the contracts.
|
|
15. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
The Company has estimated the fair value of its financial
instruments as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 using
available market information or other appropriate valuation
methodologies. Considerable judgment, however, is required in
interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value.
F-60
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
Accordingly, the estimates presented in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements are not necessarily indicative
of the amounts the Company would realize in a current market
exchange.
The carrying amounts of cash, receivables, payables and other
current assets and liabilities approximate fair value because of
the short maturity of those instruments. The Company is exposed
to market price risk volatility with respect to investments in
publicly traded and privately held entities.
The fair value of interest rate agreements represents the
estimated amount the Company would receive or pay upon
termination of the agreements. Management believes that the
sellers of the interest rate agreements will be able to meet
their obligations under the agreements. In addition, some of the
interest rate agreements are with certain of the participating
banks under the Companys credit facilities, thereby
reducing the exposure to credit loss. The Company has policies
regarding the financial stability and credit standing of major
counterparties. Nonperformance by the counterparties is not
anticipated nor would it have a material adverse effect on the
Companys consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
The estimated fair value of the Companys notes and
interest rate agreements at December 31, 2004 and 2003 are
based on quoted market prices, and the fair value of the credit
facilities is based on dealer quotations.
A summary of the carrying value and fair value of the
Companys debt and related interest rate agreements at
December 31, 2004 and 2003 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Carrying | |
|
Fair | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Fair | |
|
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charter convertible notes
|
|
$ |
990 |
|
|
$ |
1,127 |
|
|
$ |
774 |
|
|
$ |
732 |
|
Charter Holdings debt
|
|
|
8,579 |
|
|
|
7,669 |
|
|
|
8,316 |
|
|
|
7,431 |
|
CCH II debt
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
1,698 |
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
1,680 |
|
CCO Holdings debt
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
Charter Operating debt
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facilities
|
|
|
5,515 |
|
|
|
5,502 |
|
|
|
7,227 |
|
|
|
6,949 |
|
Other
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
Interest Rate Agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets (Liabilities)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
(171 |
) |
Collars
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
The weighted average interest pay rate for the Companys
interest rate swap agreements was 8.07% and 7.25% at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
F-61
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
Revenues consist of the following for the years presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Video
|
|
$ |
3,373 |
|
|
$ |
3,461 |
|
|
$ |
3,420 |
|
High-speed data
|
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
Advertising sales
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
Commercial
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
Other
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,977 |
|
|
$ |
4,819 |
|
|
$ |
4,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses consist of the following for the years
presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Programming
|
|
$ |
1,319 |
|
|
$ |
1,249 |
|
|
$ |
1,166 |
|
Advertising sales
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Service
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,080 |
|
|
$ |
1,952 |
|
|
$ |
1,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. Selling, General and
Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist of the
following for the years presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
General and administrative
|
|
$ |
849 |
|
|
$ |
833 |
|
|
$ |
810 |
|
Marketing
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
971 |
|
|
$ |
940 |
|
|
$ |
963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of selling expense are included in general and
administrative and marketing expense.
|
|
19. |
Stock Compensation Plans |
The Company grants stock options, restricted stock and other
incentive compensation pursuant to the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan
of Charter (the 2001 Plan). Prior to 2001, options
were granted under the 1999 Option Plan of Charter Holdco (the
1999 Plan).
The 1999 Plan provided for the grant of options to purchase
membership units in Charter Holdco to current and prospective
employees and consultants of Charter Holdco and its affiliates
and current and prospective non-employee directors of Charter.
Options granted generally vest over five years from the grant
date, with 25% vesting 15 months after the anniversary of
the grant date and ratably thereafter. Options not exercised
accumulate and are exercisable, in whole or in part, in any
subsequent period, but
F-62
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
not later than 10 years from the date of grant. Membership
units received upon exercise of the options are automatically
exchanged into Class A common stock of Charter on a
one-for-one basis.
The 2001 Plan provides for the grant of non-qualified stock
options, stock appreciation rights, dividend equivalent rights,
performance units and performance shares, share awards, phantom
stock and/or shares of restricted stock (not to exceed
3,000,000), as each term is defined in the 2001 Plan.
Employees, officers, consultants and directors of the Company
and its subsidiaries and affiliates are eligible to receive
grants under the 2001 Plan. Options granted generally vest over
four years from the grant date, with 25% vesting on the
anniversary of the grant date and ratably thereafter. Generally,
options expire 10 years from the grant date.
The 2001 Plan allows for the issuance of up to a total of
90,000,000 shares of Charter Class A common stock (or
units convertible into Charter Class A common stock). The
total shares available reflect a July 2003 amendment to the 2001
Plan approved by the board of directors and the shareholders of
Charter to increase available shares by 30,000,000 shares.
In 2001, any shares covered by options that terminated under the
1999 Plan were transferred to the 2001 Plan, and no new options
can be granted under the 1999 Plan.
In the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, certain
directors were awarded a total of 182,932 and
80,603 shares, respectively, of restricted Class A
common stock of which 25,705 shares had been cancelled as
of December 31, 2004. The shares vest one year from the
date of grant. In December 2003 and January 2004, in connection
with new employment agreements, certain officers were awarded
50,000 and 50,000 shares, respectively, of restricted
Class A common stock of which 50,000 shares had been
cancelled as of December 31, 2004. The shares vest annually
over a four-year period beginning from the date of grant. As of
December 31, 2004, deferred compensation remaining to be
recognized in future period totaled $0.4 million.
F-63
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
A summary of the activity for the Companys stock options,
excluding granted shares of restricted Class A common
stock, for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002, is as follows (amounts in thousands, except per share
data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Options outstanding, beginning of period
|
|
|
47,882 |
|
|
$ |
12.48 |
|
|
|
53,632 |
|
|
$ |
14.22 |
|
|
|
46,558 |
|
|
$ |
17.10 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
9,405 |
|
|
|
4.88 |
|
|
|
7,983 |
|
|
|
3.53 |
|
|
|
13,122 |
|
|
|
4.88 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(839 |
) |
|
|
2.02 |
|
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
3.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(31,613 |
) |
|
|
15.16 |
|
|
|
(13,568 |
) |
|
|
14.10 |
|
|
|
(6,048 |
) |
|
|
16.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding, end of period
|
|
|
24,835 |
|
|
$ |
6.57 |
|
|
|
47,882 |
|
|
$ |
12.48 |
|
|
|
53,632 |
|
|
$ |
14.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average remaining contractual life
|
|
|
8 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable, end of period
|
|
|
7,731 |
|
|
$ |
10.77 |
|
|
|
22,861 |
|
|
$ |
16.36 |
|
|
|
17,844 |
|
|
$ |
17.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted
|
|
$ |
3.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
Options Exercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
Average | |
Range of |
|
Number | |
|
Contractual | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Number | |
|
Contractual | |
|
Exercise | |
Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Life | |
|
Price | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Life | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) | |
|
|
|
|
$ 1.11 - $1.60
|
|
|
3,144 |
|
|
|
8 years |
|
|
$ |
1.52 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
8 years |
|
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
$ 2.85 - $4.56
|
|
|
7,408 |
|
|
|
8 years |
|
|
|
3.45 |
|
|
|
2,080 |
|
|
|
8 years |
|
|
|
3.28 |
|
$ 5.06 - $5.17
|
|
|
8,857 |
|
|
|
9 years |
|
|
|
5.14 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
9 years |
|
|
|
5.06 |
|
$ 9.13 - $13.68
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
|
|
7 years |
|
|
|
11.08 |
|
|
|
1,481 |
|
|
|
7 years |
|
|
|
11.28 |
|
$13.96 - $23.09
|
|
|
3,162 |
|
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
19.63 |
|
|
|
2,855 |
|
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
19.59 |
|
On January 1, 2003, the Company adopted the fair value
measurement provisions of SFAS No. 123, under which
the Company recognizes compensation expense of a stock-based
award to an employee over the vesting period based on the fair
value of the award on the grant date. Adoption of these
provisions resulted in utilizing a preferable accounting method
as the consolidated financial statements present the estimated
fair value of stock-based compensation in expense consistently
with other forms of compensation and other expense associated
with goods and services received for equity instruments. In
accordance with SFAS No. 123, the fair value method
will be applied only to awards granted or modified after
January 1, 2003, whereas awards granted prior to such date
will continue to be accounted for under APB No. 25, unless
they are modified or settled in cash. The ongoing effect on
consolidated results of operations or
F-64
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
financial condition will be dependent upon future stock based
compensation awards granted. The Company recorded
$31 million of option compensation expense for the year
ended December 31, 2004.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123, the Company
used the intrinsic value method prescribed by
APB No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, to account for the option plans. Option
compensation expense of $5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2002, was recorded in the consolidated
statements of operations since the exercise prices of certain
options were less than the estimated fair values of the
underlying membership interests on the date of grant.
In January 2004, the Company began an option exchange program in
which the Company offered its employees the right to exchange
all stock options (vested and unvested) under the 1999 Charter
Communications Option Plan and 2001 Stock Incentive Plan that
had an exercise price over $10 per share for shares of
restricted Charter Class A common stock or, in some
instances, cash. Based on a sliding exchange ratio, which varied
depending on the exercise price of an employees outstanding
options, if an employee would have received more than
400 shares of restricted stock in exchange for tendered
options, Charter issued that employee shares of restricted stock
in the exchange. If, based on the exchange ratios, an employee
would have received 400 or fewer shares of restricted stock in
exchange for tendered options, Charter instead paid the employee
cash in an amount equal to the number of shares the employee
would have received multiplied by $5.00. The offer applied to
options (vested and unvested) to purchase a total of
22,929,573 shares of Class A common stock, or
approximately 48% of the Companys 47,882,365 total options
issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2003.
Participation by employees was voluntary. Those members of the
Companys board of directors who were not also employees of
the Company or any of its subsidiaries were not eligible to
participate in the exchange offer.
In the closing of the exchange offer on February 20, 2004,
the Company accepted for cancellation eligible options to
purchase approximately 18,137,664 shares of its
Class A common stock. In exchange, the Company granted
1,966,686 shares of restricted stock, including 460,777
performance shares to eligible employees of the rank of senior
vice president and above, and paid a total cash amount of
approximately $4 million (which amount includes applicable
withholding taxes) to those employees who received cash rather
than shares of restricted stock. The restricted stock was
granted on February 25, 2004. Employees tendered
approximately 79% of the options eligible to be exchanged under
the program.
The cost to the Company of the stock option exchange program was
approximately $10 million, with a 2004 cash compensation
expense of approximately $4 million and a non-cash
compensation expense of approximately $6 million to be
expensed ratably over the three-year vesting period of the
restricted stock in the exchange.
In January 2004, the Compensation Committee of the board of
directors of Charter approved Charters Long-Term Incentive
Program (LTIP), which is a program administered
under the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Under the LTIP, employees
of Charter and its subsidiaries whose pay classifications exceed
a certain level are eligible to receive stock options, and more
senior level employees are eligible to receive stock options and
performance shares. The stock options vest 25% on each of the
first four anniversaries of the date of grant. The performance
shares vest on the third anniversary of the grant date and
shares of Charter Class A common stock are issued,
conditional upon Charters performance against financial
performance measures established by Charters management
and approved by its board of directors as of the time of the
award. Charter granted 6.9 million shares in January 2004
under this program and recognized expense of $8 million in
the first three quarters of 2004. However, in the fourth quarter
of 2004, the Company reversed the entire $8 million of
expense based on the Companys assessment of the
probability of achieving the financial performance measures
established by Charter and required to be met for the
performance shares to vest.
F-65
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
In the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company began a workforce
reduction program and consolidation of its operations from three
divisions and ten regions into five operating divisions,
eliminating redundant practices and streamlining its management
structure. The Company has recorded special charges as a result
of reducing its workforce and consolidating administrative
offices in 2003 and 2004. The activity associated with this
initiative is summarized in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Severance | |
|
|
|
|
|
Special | |
|
|
/Leases | |
|
Litigation | |
|
Other | |
|
Charge | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Special Charges
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Charges
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
21 |
|
Payments
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Charges
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
Payments
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2002 special charges
include $4 million related to legal and other costs
associated with the Companys ongoing grand jury
investigation, shareholder lawsuits and SEC investigation and
$1 million associated with severance costs related to a
2001 restructuring plan. For the year ended December 31,
2003, the severance and lease costs were offset by a
$5 million settlement from the Internet service provider
Excite@Home related to the conversion of high-speed data
customers to Charter Pipeline service in 2001. For the year
ended December 31, 2004, special charges include
approximately $85 million, representing the aggregate value
of the Charter Class A common stock and warrants to
purchase Charter Class A common stock contemplated to be
issued as part of a settlement of consolidated federal and state
class actions and federal derivative action lawsuits and
approximately $10 million of litigation costs related to
the tentative settlement of a national class action suit, all of
which are subject to final documentation and court approval (see
Note 23). For the year ended December 31, 2004,
special charges were offset by $3 million received from a
third party in settlement of a dispute.
All operations are held through Charter Holdco and its direct
and indirect subsidiaries. Charter Holdco and the majority of
its subsidiaries are not subject to income tax. However, certain
of these subsidiaries are corporations and are subject to income
tax. All of the taxable income, gains, losses, deductions and
credits of Charter Holdco are passed through to its members:
Charter, Charter Investment, Inc. (Charter
Investment) and Vulcan Cable III Inc. (Vulcan
Cable). Charter is responsible for its share of taxable
income or loss of Charter Holdco allocated to Charter in
accordance with the Charter Holdco limited liability company
agreement (LLC Agreement) and partnership tax rules
and regulations.
The LLC Agreement provides for certain special allocations of
net tax profits and net tax losses (such net tax profits and net
tax losses being determined under the applicable federal income
tax rules for determining capital accounts). Pursuant to the LLC
Agreement, through the end of 2003, net tax losses of Charter
Holdco that would otherwise have been allocated to Charter based
generally on its percentage
F-66
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
ownership of outstanding common units were allocated instead to
membership units held by Vulcan Cable and Charter Investment
(the Special Loss Allocations) to the extent of
their respective capital account balances. After 2003, pursuant
to the LLC Agreement, net tax losses of Charter Holdco are to be
allocated to Charter, Vulcan Cable and Charter Investment based
generally on their respective percentage ownership of
outstanding common units to the extent of their respective
capital account balances. The LLC Agreement further provides
that, beginning at the time Charter Holdco generates net tax
profits, the net tax profits that would otherwise have been
allocated to Charter based generally on its percentage ownership
of outstanding common membership units will instead generally be
allocated to Vulcan Cable and Charter Investment (the
Special Profit Allocations). The Special Profit
Allocations to Vulcan Cable and Charter Investment will
generally continue until the cumulative amount of the Special
Profit Allocations offsets the cumulative amount of the Special
Loss Allocations. The amount and timing of the Special Profit
Allocations are subject to the potential application of, and
interaction with, the Curative Allocation Provisions described
in the following paragraph. The LLC Agreement generally provides
that any additional net tax profits are to be allocated among
the members of Charter Holdco based generally on their
respective percentage ownership of Charter Holdco common
membership units.
Because the respective capital account balance of each of Vulcan
Cable and Charter Investment was reduced to zero by
December 31, 2002, certain net tax losses of Charter Holdco
that were to be allocated for 2002, 2003, 2004 and possibly
later years (subject to resolution of the issue described in
Note 22) to Vulcan Cable and Charter Investment instead
have been and will be allocated to Charter (the Regulatory
Allocations). The LLC Agreement further provides that, to
the extent possible, the effect of the Regulatory Allocations is
to be offset over time pursuant to certain curative allocation
provisions (the Curative Allocation Provisions) so
that, after certain offsetting adjustments are made, each
members capital account balance is equal to the capital
account balance such member would have had if the Regulatory
Allocations had not been part of the LLC Agreement. The
cumulative amount of the actual tax losses allocated to Charter
as a result of the Regulatory Allocations through the year ended
December 31, 2004 is approximately $4.0 billion.
As a result of the Special Loss Allocations and the Regulatory
Allocations referred to above, the cumulative amount of losses
of Charter Holdco allocated to Vulcan Cable and Charter
Investment is in excess of the amount that would have been
allocated to such entities if the losses of Charter Holdco had
been allocated among its members in proportion to their
respective percentage ownership of Charter Holdco common
membership units. The cumulative amount of such excess losses
was approximately $2.1 billion through December 31,
2003 and $1.0 billion through December 31, 2004.
In certain situations, the Special Loss Allocations, Special
Profit Allocations, Regulatory Allocations and Curative
Allocation Provisions described above could result in Charter
paying taxes in an amount that is more or less than if Charter
Holdco had allocated net tax profits and net tax losses among
its members based generally on the number of common membership
units owned by such members. This could occur due to differences
in (i) the character of the allocated income (e.g.,
ordinary versus capital), (ii) the allocated amount and
timing of tax depreciation and tax amortization expense due to
the application of section 704(c) under the Internal
Revenue Code, (iii) the potential interaction between the
Special Profit Allocations and the Curative Allocation
Provisions, (iv) the amount and timing of alternative
minimum taxes paid by Charter, if any, (v) the
apportionment of the allocated income or loss among the states
in which Charter Holdco does business, and (vi) future
federal and state tax laws. Further, in the event of new capital
contributions to Charter Holdco, it is possible that the tax
effects of the Special Profit Allocations, Special Loss
Allocations, Regulatory Allocations and Curative Allocation
Provisions will change significantly pursuant to the provisions
of the income tax regulations or the terms of a contribution
agreement with respect to such contribution. Such change could
defer the actual tax benefits to be derived
F-67
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
by Charter with respect to the net tax losses allocated to it or
accelerate the actual taxable income to Charter with respect to
the net tax profits allocated to it. As a result, it is possible
under certain circumstances, that Charter could receive future
allocations of taxable income in excess of its currently
allocated tax deductions and available tax loss carryforwards.
The ability to utilize net operating loss carryforwards is
potentially subject to certain limitations as discussed below.
In addition, under their exchange agreement with Charter, Vulcan
Cable and Charter Investment may exchange some or all of their
membership units in Charter Holdco for Charters
Class B common stock, be merged with Charter, or be
acquired by Charter in a non-taxable reorganization. If such an
exchange were to take place prior to the date that the Special
Profit Allocation provisions had fully offset the Special Loss
Allocations, Vulcan Cable and Charter Investment could elect to
cause Charter Holdco to make the remaining Special Profit
Allocations to Vulcan Cable and Charter Investment immediately
prior to the consummation of the exchange. In the event Vulcan
Cable and Charter Investment choose not to make such election or
to the extent such allocations are not possible, Charter would
then be allocated tax profits attributable to the membership
units received in such exchange pursuant to the Special Profit
Allocation provisions. Mr. Allen has generally agreed to
reimburse Charter for any incremental income taxes that Charter
would owe as a result of such an exchange and any resulting
future Special Profit Allocations to Charter. The ability of
Charter to utilize net operating loss carryforwards is
potentially subject to certain limitations as discussed below.
If Charter were to become subject to certain limitations
(whether as a result of an exchange described above or
otherwise), and as a result were to owe taxes resulting from the
Special Profit Allocations, then Mr. Allen may not be
obligated to reimburse Charter for such income taxes.
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the
Company recorded deferred income tax benefits as shown below.
The income tax benefits were realized through reductions in the
deferred tax liabilities related to Charters investment in
Charter Holdco, as well as the deferred tax liabilities of
certain of Charters indirect corporate subsidiaries. In
2003, Charter received tax loss allocations from Charter Holdco.
Previously, the tax losses had been allocated to Vulcan Cable
and Charter Investment in accordance with the Special Loss
Allocations provided under the Charter Holdco amended and
restated limited liability company agreement. The Company does
not expect to recognize a similar benefit related to its
investment in Charter Holdco after 2003 due to limitations on
its ability to offset future tax benefits against the remaining
deferred tax liabilities. However, the actual tax provision
calculation in future periods will be the result of current and
future temporary differences, as well as future operating
results.
Current and deferred income tax expense (benefit) is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal income taxes
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
State income taxes
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax expense
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred benefit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal income taxes
|
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
State income taxes
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit:
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income benefit
|
|
$ |
(194 |
) |
|
$ |
(110 |
) |
|
$ |
(520 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-68
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
The Company recorded the portion of the income tax benefit
associated with the adoption of EITF Topic D-108 and
SFAS No. 142 as a $91 million and a
$60 million reduction of the cumulative effect of
accounting change on the accompanying statement of operations
for the years ended December 31, 2004 and December 31,
2002, respectively.
The Companys effective tax rate differs from that derived
by applying the applicable federal income tax rate of 35%, and
average state income tax rate of 5% for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Statutory federal income taxes
|
|
$ |
(1,288 |
) |
|
$ |
(122 |
) |
|
$ |
(969 |
) |
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
Valuation allowance provided
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(520 |
) |
Less: cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
$ |
(103 |
) |
|
$ |
(110 |
) |
|
$ |
(460 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax effects of these temporary differences that give rise to
significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax
liabilities at December 31, 2004 and 2003 which are
included in long-term liabilities are presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforward
|
|
$ |
3,533 |
|
|
$ |
1,723 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
3,541 |
|
|
|
1,729 |
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
|
|
(3,151 |
) |
|
|
(1,291 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
$ |
438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Charter Holdco
|
|
$ |
(365 |
) |
|
$ |
(553 |
) |
|
Indirect Corporate Subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant & equipment
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
Franchises
|
|
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(606 |
) |
|
|
(855 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$ |
(216 |
) |
|
$ |
(417 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2004, the Company has deferred tax
assets of $3.5 billion, which primarily relate to financial
and tax losses allocated to Charter from Charter Holdco. The
deferred tax assets include $2.1 billion of tax net
operating loss carryforwards (generally expiring in years 2005
through 2024) of Charter and its indirect corporate
subsidiaries. Valuation allowances of $3.2 billion exist
with respect to these deferred tax assets.
F-69
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
The change of approximately $1.9 billion in valuation
allowance between the years ended December 31, 2004 and
2003, presented above, includes the provision for valuation
allowance, the impact of the decrease in deferred tax
liabilities and the impact of additional losses resulting from
the cumulative effect of accounting change.
Full realization of the Companys tax net operating losses
is dependent on: (1) Charter and its indirect corporate
subsidiaries ability to generate future taxable income and
(2) the absence of certain future ownership
changes of Charters common stock. An ownership
change as defined in the applicable federal income tax
rules, would place significant limitations, on an annual basis,
on the use of such net operating losses to offset any future
taxable income the Company may generate. Such limitations, in
conjunction with the net operating loss expiration provisions,
could effectively eliminate the Companys ability to use a
substantial portion of its net operating losses to offset future
taxable income. Future transactions and the timing of such
transactions could cause an ownership change. Such transactions
include additional issuances of common stock by the Company
(including but not limited the anticipated issuances of
150 million shares of common stock under the share lending
agreement in conjunction with the issuance of 5.875% convertible
senior notes in November 2004 or upon future conversion of
Charters convertible senior notes), reacquisitions of the
borrowed shares by Charter, or acquisitions or sales of shares
by certain holders of Charters shares, including persons
who have held, currently hold, or accumulate in the future five
percent or more of Charters outstanding stock (including
upon an exchange by Paul Allen or his affiliates, directly or
indirectly, of membership units of Charter Holdco into CCI
common stock). Many of the foregoing transactions are beyond
managements control.
The total valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $3.2 billion and
$1.3 billion, respectively. In assessing the realizability
of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax
assets will be realized. Because of the uncertainties in
projecting future taxable income of Charter Holdco, valuation
allowances have been established except for deferred benefits
available to offset certain deferred tax liabilities.
The Company is currently under examination by the Internal
Revenue Service for the tax years ending December 31, 1999
and 2000. Management does not expect the results of this
examination to have a material adverse effect on the
Companys consolidated financial condition or results of
operation.
|
|
22. |
Related Party Transactions |
The following sets forth certain transactions in which the
Company and the directors, executive officers and affiliates of
the Company are involved. Unless otherwise disclosed, management
believes that each of the transactions described below was on
terms no less favorable to the Company than could have been
obtained from independent third parties.
Charter is a holding company and its principal assets are its
equity interest in Charter Holdco and certain mirror notes
payable by Charter Holdco to Charter and mirror preferred units
held by Charter, which have the same principal amount and terms
as those of Charters convertible senior notes and
Charters outstanding preferred stock. In 2004, Charter
Holdco paid to Charter $49 million related to interest on
the mirror notes, and Charter Holdco paid an additional
$4 million related to dividends on the mirror preferred
membership units. Further, during 2004 Charter Holdco issued
7,252,818 common membership units to Charter in cancellation of
$30 million principal amount of mirror notes so as to
mirror the issuance by Charter of Class A common stock in
exchange for a like principal amount of its outstanding
convertible notes.
F-70
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
Charter is a party to management arrangements with Charter
Holdco and certain of its subsidiaries. Under these agreements,
Charter provides management services for the cable systems owned
or operated by its subsidiaries. The management services include
such services as centralized customer billing services, data
processing and related support, benefits administration and
coordination of insurance coverage and self-insurance programs
for medical, dental and workers compensation claims. Costs
associated with providing these services are billed and charged
directly to the Companys operating subsidiaries and are
included within operating costs in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations. Such costs totaled $202 million,
$210 million and $176 million for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. All other
costs incurred on the behalf of Charters operating
subsidiaries are considered a part of the management fee and are
recorded as a component of selling, general and administrative
expense, in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the
management fee charged to the Companys operating
subsidiaries approximated the expenses incurred by Charter
Holdco and Charter on behalf of the Companys operating
subsidiaries. The credit facilities of the Companys
operating subsidiaries prohibit payments of management fees in
excess of 3.5% of revenues until repayment of the outstanding
indebtedness. In the event any portion of the management fee due
and payable is not paid, it is deferred by Charter and accrued
as a liability of such subsidiaries. Any deferred amount of the
management fee will bear interest at the rate of 10% per
year, compounded annually, from the date it was due and payable
until the date it is paid.
Mr. Allen, the controlling shareholder of Charter, and a
number of his affiliates have interests in various entities that
provide services or programming to Charters subsidiaries.
Given the diverse nature of Mr. Allens investment
activities and interests, and to avoid the possibility of future
disputes as to potential business, Charter and Charter Holdco,
under the terms of their respective organizational documents,
may not, and may not allow their subsidiaries to engage in any
business transaction outside the cable transmission business
except for certain existing approved investments. Should Charter
or Charter Holdco or any of their subsidiaries wish to pursue,
or allow their subsidiaries to pursue, a business transaction
outside of this scope, it must first offer Mr. Allen the
opportunity to pursue the particular business transaction. If he
decides not to pursue the business transaction and consents to
Charter or its subsidiaries engaging in the business
transaction, they will be able to do so. The cable transmission
business means the business of transmitting video, audio,
including telephony, and data over cable systems owned, operated
or managed by Charter, Charter Holdco or any of their
subsidiaries from time to time.
Mr. Allen or his affiliates own or have owned equity
interests or warrants to purchase equity interests in various
entities with which the Company does business or which provides
it with products, services or programming. Among these entities
are TechTV L.L.C. (TechTV), Oxygen Media Corporation
(Oxygen Media), Digeo, Inc., Click2learn, Inc.,
Trail Blazer Inc., Action Sports Cable Network (Action
Sports) and Microsoft Corporation. In addition,
Mr. Allen and William Savoy, a former Charter director,
were directors of USA Networks, Inc. (USA Networks),
who operates the USA Network, The Sci-Fi Channel, Trio, World
News International and Home Shopping Network, owning
approximately 5% and less than 1%, respectively, of the common
stock of USA Networks. In 2002, Mr. Allen and
Mr. Savoy sold their common stock and are no longer
directors of the USA Network. In May 2004, TechTV was sold to an
unrelated third party. Mr. Allen owns 100% of the equity of
Vulcan Ventures Incorporated (Vulcan Ventures) and
Vulcan Inc. and is the president of Vulcan Ventures. Ms. Jo
Allen Patton is a director and the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Vulcan Inc. and is a director and Vice President of
Vulcan Ventures. Mr. Lance Conn is Executive Vice President
of Vulcan Inc. and Vulcan Ventures. Mr. Savoy was a vice
president and a director of Vulcan Ventures until his
resignation in September 2003 and he resigned as a director of
Charter in April 2004. The various cable, media, Internet and
telephony companies in which Mr. Allen has invested may
mutually benefit one another. The Company can give no assurance,
nor should you expect, that any of these business
F-71
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
relationships will be successful, that the Company will realize
any benefits from these relationships or that the Company will
enter into any business relationships in the future with
Mr. Allens affiliated companies.
Mr. Allen and his affiliates have made, and in the future
likely will make, numerous investments outside of the Company
and its business. The Company cannot assure that, in the event
that the Company or any of its subsidiaries enter into
transactions in the future with any affiliate of Mr. Allen,
such transactions will be on terms as favorable to the Company
as terms it might have obtained from an unrelated third party.
Also, conflicts could arise with respect to the allocation of
corporate opportunities between the Company and Mr. Allen
and his affiliates. The Company has not instituted any formal
plan or arrangement to address potential conflicts of interest.
High Speed Access Corp. (High Speed Access)
was a provider of high-speed Internet access services over cable
modems. During the period from 1997 to 2000, certain Charter
entities entered into Internet-access related service
agreements, and both Vulcan Ventures, an entity owned by
Mr. Allen, and Charter Holdco made equity investments in
High Speed Access.
On February 28, 2002, Charters subsidiary, CC
Systems, purchased from High Speed Access the contracts and
associated assets, and assumed related liabilities, that served
the Companys customers, including a customer contact
center, network operations center and provisioning software.
Immediately prior to the asset purchase, Vulcan Ventures
beneficially owned approximately 37%, and the Company
beneficially owned approximately 13%, of the common stock of
High Speed Access (including the shares of common stock which
could be acquired upon conversion of the Series D preferred
stock, and upon exercise of the warrants owned by Charter
Holdco). Following the consummation of the asset purchase,
neither the Company nor Vulcan Ventures beneficially owned any
securities of, or were otherwise affiliated with, High Speed
Access.
The Company receives or will receive programming for broadcast
via its cable systems from TechTV (now G4), USA Networks, Oxygen
Media, Trail Blazers Inc. and Action Sports. The Company pays a
fee for the programming service generally based on the number of
customers receiving the service. Such fees for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were each less than 1% of
total operating expenses with the exception of USA Networks
which was 2%, 2% and 2% of total operating expenses for the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
In addition, the Company receives commissions from USA Networks
for home shopping sales generated by its customers. Such
revenues for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 were less than 1% of total revenues. On November 5,
2002, Action Sports announced that it was discontinuing its
business. The Company believes that the failure of Action Sports
will not materially affect the Companys business or
results of operations.
Tech TV. The Company receives from TechTV programming for
distribution via its cable system pursuant to an affiliation
agreement. The affiliation agreement provides, among other
things, that TechTV must offer Charter certain terms and
conditions that are no less favorable in the affiliation
agreement than are given to any other distributor that serves
the same number of or fewer TechTV viewing customers.
Additionally, pursuant to the affiliation agreement, the Company
was entitled to incentive payments for channel launches through
December 31, 2003.
In March 2004, Charter Holdco entered into agreements with
Vulcan Programming and TechTV, which provide for
(i) Charter Holdco and TechTV to amend the affiliation
agreement which, among other things, revises the description of
the TechTV network content, provides for Charter Holdco to waive
certain claims against TechTV relating to alleged breaches of
the affiliation agreement and provides for TechTV to make
payment of outstanding launch receivables due to Charter Holdco
under the affiliation agreement, (ii) Vulcan Programming to
pay approximately $10 million and purchase over a 24-month
period, at fair market rates, $2 million of advertising
time across various cable networks on Charter cable
F-72
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
systems in consideration of the agreements, obligations,
releases and waivers under the agreements and in settlement of
the aforementioned claims and (iii) TechTV to be a provider
of content relating to technology and video gaming for
Charters interactive television platforms through
December 31, 2006 (exclusive for the first year). For the
year ended December 31, 2004, the Company recognized
approximately $5 million of the Vulcan Programming payment
as an offset to programming expense and paid approximately
$2 million to Tech TV under the affiliation agreement.
Oxygen. Concurrently with the execution of a carriage
agreement, Charter Holdco entered into an equity issuance
agreement pursuant to which Oxygen Media LLCs
(Oxygen) parent company, Oxygen Media Corporation
(Oxygen Media), granted a subsidiary of Charter
Holdco a warrant to purchase 2.4 million shares of
common stock of Oxygen Media for an exercise price of
$22.00 per share. In February 2005, the warrant expired
unexercised. Charter Holdco was also to receive unregistered
shares of Oxygen Media common stock with a guaranteed fair
market value on the date of issuance of $34 million, on or
prior to February 2, 2005 with the exact date to be
determined by Oxygen Media, but this commitment was later
revised as discussed below.
The Company recognizes the guaranteed value of the investment
over the life of the carriage agreement as a reduction of
programming expense. For the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003 and 2002, the Company recorded approximately
$13 million, $9 million, and $6 million,
respectively, as a reduction of programming expense. The
carrying value of the Companys investment in Oxygen was
approximately $32 million and $19 million as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
In August 2004, Charter Holdco and Oxygen entered into
agreements that amended and renewed the carriage agreement. The
amendment to the carriage agreement (a) revises the number
of the Companys customers to which Oxygen programming must
be carried and for which the Company must pay, (b) releases
Charter Holdco from any claims related to the failure to achieve
distribution benchmarks under the carriage agreement,
(c) requires Oxygen to make payment on outstanding
receivables for marketing support fees due to the Company under
the affiliation agreement; and (d) requires that Oxygen
provide its programming content to the Company on economic terms
no less favorable than Oxygen provides to any other cable or
satellite operator having fewer subscribers than the Company.
The renewal of the carriage agreement (a) extends the
period that the Company will carry Oxygen programming to its
customers through January 31, 2008, and (b) requires
license fees to be paid based on customers receiving Oxygen
programming, rather than for specific customer benchmarks.
In August 2004, Charter Holdco and Oxygen also amended the
equity issuance agreement to provide for the issuance of
1 million shares of Oxygen Preferred Stock with a
liquidation preference of $33.10 per share plus accrued
dividends to Charter Holdco on February 1, 2005 in place of
the $34 million of unregistered shares of Oxygen Media
common stock. Oxygen Media will deliver these shares in March
2005. The preferred stock is convertible into common stock after
December 31, 2007 at a conversion ratio, the numerator of
which is the liquidation preference and the denominator which is
the fair market value per share of Oxygen Media common stock on
the conversion date.
Digeo, Inc. In March 2001, Charter Ventures and Vulcan
Ventures Incorporated formed DBroadband Holdings, LLC for the
sole purpose of purchasing equity interests in Digeo. In
connection with the execution of the broadband carriage
agreement, DBroadband Holdings, LLC purchased an equity interest
in Digeo funded by contributions from Vulcan Ventures
Incorporated. The equity interest is subject to a priority
return of capital to Vulcan Ventures up to the amount
contributed by Vulcan Ventures on Charter Ventures behalf.
After Vulcan Ventures recovers its amount contributed and any
cumulative loss allocations, Charter Ventures has a 100% profit
interest in DBroadband Holdings, LLC. Charter Ventures is not
required to make any capital contributions, including capital
calls, and may require
F-73
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
Vulcan Ventures, through January 24, 2004, to make certain
additional contributions through DBroadband Holdings, LLC to
acquire additional equity in Digeo as necessary to maintain
Charter Ventures pro rata interest in Digeo in the event
of certain future Digeo equity financings by the founders of
Digeo. These additional equity interests are also subject to a
priority return of capital to Vulcan Ventures up to amounts
contributed by Vulcan Ventures on Charter Ventures behalf.
DBroadband Holdings, LLC is therefore not included in the
Companys consolidated financial statements. Pursuant to an
amended version of this arrangement, in 2003, Vulcan Ventures
contributed a total of $29 million to Digeo,
$7 million of which was contributed on Charter
Ventures behalf, subject to Vulcan Ventures
aforementioned priority return. Since the formation of
DBroadband Holdings, LLC, Vulcan Ventures has contributed
approximately $56 million on Charter Ventures behalf.
On June 30, 2003, Charter Holdco entered into an agreement
with Motorola, Inc. for the purchase of 100,000 digital video
recorder (DVR) units. The software for these DVR
units is being supplied by Digeo Interactive, LLC under a
license agreement entered into in April 2004. Under the license
agreement Digeo Interactive granted to Charter Holdco the right
to use Digeos proprietary software for the number of DVR
units that Charter deploys from a maximum of 10 headends through
year-end 2004. This maximum number of headends was increased
from 10 to 15 pursuant to a letter agreement executed on
June 11, 2004 and the date for entering into license
agreements for units deployed was extended to June 30,
2005. The number of headends was increased again from 15 to 20
pursuant to a letter agreement dated August 4, 2004, from
20 to 30 pursuant to a letter agreement dated September 28,
2004 and from 30 to 50 headends by a letter agreement in
February 2005. The license granted for each unit deployed under
the agreement is valid for five years. In addition, Charter will
pay certain other fees including a per-headend license fee and
maintenance fees. Maximum license and maintenance fees during
the term of the agreement are expected to be approximately
$7 million. The agreement provides that Charter is entitled
to receive contract terms, considered on the whole, and license
fees, considered apart from other contract terms, no less
favorable than those accorded to any other Digeo customer.
Charter paid $474,400 in license and maintenance fees in 2004.
In April 2004, the Company launched DVR service (using units
containing the Digeo software) in its Rochester, Minnesota
market using a broadband media center that is an integrated
set-top terminal with a cable converter, DVR hard drive and
connectivity to other consumer electronics devices (such as
stereos, MP3 players, and digital cameras).
In May 2004, Charter Holdco entered into a binding term sheet
with Digeo Interactive for the development, testing and purchase
of 70,000 Digeo PowerKey DVR units. The term sheet provided that
the parties would proceed in good faith to negotiate, prior to
year-end 2004, definitive agreements for the development,
testing and purchase of the DVR units and that the parties would
enter into a license agreement for Digeos proprietary
software on terms substantially similar to the terms of the
license agreement described above. In November 2004, Charter
Holdco and Digeo Interactive executed the license agreement and
in December 2004, the parties executed the purchase agreement,
each on terms substantially similar to the binding term sheet.
Product development and testing is continuing. Total purchase
price and license and maintenance fees during the term of the
definitive agreements are expected to be approximately
$41 million. The definitive agreements are terminable at no
penalty to Charter in certain circumstances.
A wholly owned subsidiary of Digeo, Digeo Interactive, provides
interactive channel (i-channel) service to Charter on a
month-to-month basis. In the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003 and 2002, Charter paid Digeo Interactive $3 million,
$4 million and $3 million, respectively, for
customized development of i-channels and an interactive
toolkit to enable Charter to develop interactive
local content.
F-74
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
On January 10, 2003, the Company signed an agreement to
carry two around-the-clock, high-definition networks, HDNet and
HDNet Movies. HDNet Movies delivers a commercial-free schedule
of full-length feature films converted from 35mm to
high-definition, including titles from an extensive library of
Warner Bros. films. HDNet Movies will feature a mix of
theatrical releases, made-for-TV movies, independent films and
shorts. The HDNet channel features a variety of HDTV
programming, including live sports, sitcoms, dramas, action
series, documentaries, travel programs, music concerts and
shows, special events, and news features including HDNet World
Report. HDNet also offers a selection of classic and recent
television series. The Company paid HDNet and HDNet Movies
approximately $0.6 million in 2004. The Company believes
that entities controlled by Mr. Cuban owned approximately
81% of HDNet as of December 31, 2004. As of
December 31, 2004, the Company believes that Mark Cuban,
co-founder and president of HDNet, owned approximately 6.2% of
the total common equity in Charter based on a Schedule 13G
filed with the SEC on May 21, 2003.
Certain related parties, including members of the board of
directors and officers, hold interests in the Companys
senior convertible debt and senior notes and discount notes of
the Companys subsidiary of approximately
$59.6 million of face value at December 31, 2004.
As part of the acquisition of the cable systems owned by Bresnan
Communications Company Limited Partnership in February 2000,
CC VIII, LLC, Charters indirect limited liability
company subsidiary, issued, after adjustments, 24,273,943
Class A preferred membership units (collectively, the
CC VIII interest) with a value and an initial
capital account of approximately $630 million to certain
sellers affiliated with AT&T Broadband, subsequently owned
by Comcast Corporation (the Comcast sellers). While
held by the Comcast sellers, the CC VIII interest was
entitled to a 2% priority return on its initial capital account
and such priority return was entitled to preferential
distributions from available cash and upon liquidation of
CC VIII. While held by the Comcast sellers, the
CC VIII interest generally did not share in the profits and
losses of CC VIII. Mr. Allen granted the Comcast
sellers the right to sell to him the CC VIII interest for
approximately $630 million plus 4.5% interest annually from
February 2000 (the Comcast put right). In April
2002, the Comcast sellers exercised the Comcast put right in
full, and this transaction was consummated on June 6, 2003.
Accordingly, Mr. Allen has become the holder of the
CC VIII interest, indirectly through an affiliate.
Consequently, subject to the matters referenced in the next
paragraph, Mr. Allen generally thereafter will be allocated
his pro rata share (based on number of membership interests
outstanding) of profits or losses of CC VIII. In the event
of a liquidation of CC VIII, Mr. Allen would be
entitled to a priority distribution with respect to the 2%
priority return (which will continue to accrete). Any remaining
distributions in liquidation would be distributed to CC V
Holdings, LLC and Mr. Allen in proportion to CC V
Holdings, LLCs capital account and Mr. Allens
capital account (which will equal the initial capital account of
the Comcast sellers of approximately $630 million,
increased or decreased by Mr. Allens pro rata share
of CC VIIIs profits or losses (as computed for
capital account purposes) after June 6, 2003). The limited
liability company agreement of CC VIII does not provide for
a mandatory redemption of the CC VIII interest.
An issue has arisen as to whether the documentation for the
Bresnan transaction was correct and complete with regard to the
ultimate ownership of the CC VIII interest following
consummation of the Comcast put right. Specifically, under the
terms of the Bresnan transaction documents that were entered
into in June 1999, the Comcast sellers originally would have
received, after adjustments, 24,273,943 Charter Holdco
membership units, but due to an FCC regulatory issue raised by
the Comcast sellers shortly before closing, the Bresnan
transaction was modified to provide that the Comcast sellers
instead would receive the preferred equity interests in
CC VIII represented by the CC VIII interest. As part
of the last-minute changes to the Bresnan transaction documents,
a draft amended version of the Charter Holdco limited liability
company agreement was prepared, and contract provisions were
drafted for that
F-75
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
agreement that would have required an automatic exchange of the
CC VIII interest for 24,273,943 Charter Holdco membership
units if the Comcast sellers exercised the Comcast put right and
sold the CC VIII interest to Mr. Allen or his
affiliates. However, the provisions that would have required
this automatic exchange did not appear in the final version of
the Charter Holdco limited liability company agreement that was
delivered and executed at the closing of the Bresnan
transaction. The law firm that prepared the documents for the
Bresnan transaction brought this matter to the attention of
Charter and representatives of Mr. Allen in 2002.
Thereafter, the board of directors of Charter formed a Special
Committee (currently comprised of Messrs. Merritt, Tory and
Wangberg) to investigate the matter and take any other
appropriate action on behalf of Charter with respect to this
matter. After conducting an investigation of the relevant facts
and circumstances, the Special Committee determined that a
scriveners error had occurred in February 2000
in connection with the preparation of the last-minute revisions
to the Bresnan transaction documents and that, as a result,
Charter should seek the reformation of the Charter Holdco
limited liability company agreement, or alternative relief, in
order to restore and ensure the obligation that the CC VIII
interest be automatically exchanged for Charter Holdco units.
The Special Committee further determined that, as part of such
contract reformation or alternative relief, Mr. Allen
should be required to contribute the CC VIII interest to
Charter Holdco in exchange for 24,273,943 Charter Holdco
membership units. The Special Committee also recommended to the
board of directors of Charter that, to the extent the contract
reformation is achieved, the board of directors should consider
whether the CC VIII interest should ultimately be held by
Charter Holdco or Charter Holdings or another entity owned
directly or indirectly by them.
Mr. Allen disagrees with the Special Committees
determinations described above and has so notified the Special
Committee. Mr. Allen contends that the transaction is
accurately reflected in the transaction documentation and
contemporaneous and subsequent company public disclosures.
The parties engaged in a process of non-binding mediation to
seek to resolve this matter, without success. The Special
Committee is evaluating what further actions or processes it may
undertake to resolve this dispute. To accommodate further
deliberation, each party has agreed to refrain from initiating
legal proceedings over this matter until it has given at least
ten days prior notice to the other. In addition, the
Special Committee and Mr. Allen have determined to utilize
the Delaware Court of Chancerys program for mediation of
complex business disputes in an effort to resolve the
CC VIII interest dispute. If the Special Committee and
Mr. Allen are unable to reach a resolution through that
mediation process or to agree on an alternative dispute
resolution process, the Special Committee intends to seek
resolution of this dispute through judicial proceedings in an
action that would be commenced, after appropriate notice, in the
Delaware Court of Chancery against Mr. Allen and his
affiliates seeking contract reformation, declaratory relief as
to the respective rights of the parties regarding this dispute
and alternative forms of legal and equitable relief. The
ultimate resolution and financial impact of the dispute are not
determinable at this time.
F-76
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
|
|
23. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
The following table summarizes the Companys payment
obligations as of December 31, 2004 for its contractual
obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating and Capital Lease Obligations(1)
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
Programming Minimum Commitments(2)
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other(3)
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,939 |
|
|
$ |
403 |
|
|
$ |
411 |
|
|
$ |
435 |
|
|
$ |
343 |
|
|
$ |
262 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The Company leases certain facilities and equipment under
noncancellable operating leases. Leases and rental costs charged
to expense for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002, were $23 million, $30 million and
$31 million, respectively. |
|
(2) |
The Company pays programming fees under multi-year contracts
ranging from three to six years typically based on a flat fee
per customer, which may be fixed for the term or may in some
cases, escalate over the term. Programming costs included in the
accompanying statement of operations were $1.3 billion,
$1.2 billion and $1.2 billion for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Certain of
the Companys programming agreements are based on a flat
fee per month or have guaranteed minimum payments. The table
sets forth the aggregate guaranteed minimum commitments under
the Companys programming contracts. |
|
(3) |
Other represents other guaranteed minimum
commitments, which consist primarily of commitments to the
Companys billing services vendors. |
The following items are not included in the contractual
obligation table due to various factors discussed below.
However, the Company incurs these costs as part of its
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
The Company also rents utility poles used in its operations.
Generally, pole rentals are cancelable on short notice, but the
Company anticipates that such rentals will recur. Rent expense
incurred for pole rental attachments for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, was $43 million,
$40 million and $41 million, respectively. |
|
|
|
The Company pays franchise fees under multi-year franchise
agreements based on a percentage of revenues earned from video
service per year. The Company also pays other franchise related
costs, such as public education grants under multi-year
agreements. Franchise fees and other franchise-related costs
included in the accompanying statement of operations were
$164 million, $162 million and $160 million for
the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. |
|
|
|
The Company also has $166 million in letters of credit,
primarily to its various workers compensation, property
casualty and general liability carriers as collateral for
reimbursement of claims. These letters of credit reduce the
amount the Company may borrow under its credit facilities. |
Fourteen putative federal class action lawsuits (the
Federal Class Actions) were filed against
Charter and certain of its former and present officers and
directors in various jurisdictions allegedly on
F-77
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
behalf of all purchasers of Charters securities during the
period from either November 8 or November 9, 1999
through July 17 or July 18, 2002. Unspecified damages
were sought by the plaintiffs. In general, the lawsuits alleged
that Charter utilized misleading accounting practices and failed
to disclose these accounting practices and/or issued false and
misleading financial statements and press releases concerning
Charters operations and prospects. The Federal
Class Actions were specifically and individually identified
in public filings made by Charter prior to the date of these
financial statements.
In October 2002, Charter filed a motion with the Judicial Panel
on Multidistrict Litigation (the Panel) to transfer
the Federal Class Actions to the Eastern District of
Missouri. On March 12, 2003, the Panel transferred the six
Federal Class Actions not filed in the Eastern District of
Missouri to that district for coordinated or consolidated
pretrial proceedings with the eight Federal Class Actions
already pending there. The Panels transfer order assigned
the Federal Class Actions to Judge Charles A. Shaw. By
virtue of a prior court order, StoneRidge Investment Partners
LLC became lead plaintiff upon entry of the Panels
transfer order. StoneRidge subsequently filed a Consolidated
Amended Complaint. The Court subsequently consolidated the
Federal Class Actions into a single action (the
Consolidated Federal Class Action) for pretrial
purposes. On June 19, 2003, following a status and
scheduling conference with the parties, the Court issued a Case
Management Order setting forth a schedule for the pretrial phase
of the Consolidated Class Action. Motions to dismiss the
Consolidated Amended Complaint were filed. On
February 10, 2004, in response to a joint motion made
by StoneRidge and defendants, Charter, Vogel and Allen, the
court entered an order providing, among other things, that:
(1) the parties who filed such motion engage in a mediation
within ninety (90) days; and (2) all proceedings in
the Consolidated Federal Class Actions were stayed until
May 10, 2004. On May 11, 2004, the Court extended the
stay in the Consolidated Federal Class Action for an
additional sixty (60) days. On July 12, 2004, the
parties submitted a joint motion to again extend the stay, this
time until September 10, 2004. The Court granted that
extension on July 20, 2004. On August 5, 2004,
Stoneridge, Charter and the individual defendants who were the
subject of the suit entered into a Memorandum of Understanding
setting forth agreements in principle to settle the Consolidated
Federal Class Action. These parties subsequently entered
into Stipulations of Settlement dated as of January 24,
2005 (described more fully below) which incorporate the terms of
the August 5, 2004 Memorandum of Understanding.
On September 12, 2002, a shareholders derivative suit (the
State Derivative Action) was filed in the Circuit
Court of the City of St. Louis, State of Missouri (the
Missouri State Court) against Charter and its then
current directors, as well as its former auditors. A
substantively identical derivative action was later filed and
consolidated into the State Derivative Action. The plaintiffs
allege that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary
duties by failing to establish and maintain adequate internal
controls and procedures. Unspecified damages, allegedly on
Charters behalf, were sought by the plaintiffs.
On March 12, 2004, an action substantively identical to the
State Derivative Action was filed in the Missouri State Court,
against Charter and certain of its current and former directors,
as well as its former auditors. The plaintiffs in that case
alleged that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary
duties by failing to establish and maintain adequate internal
controls and procedures. Unspecified damages, allegedly on
Charters behalf, were sought by plaintiffs. On
July 14, 2004, the Court consolidated this case with the
State Derivative Action.
Separately, on February 12, 2003, a shareholders derivative
suit (the Federal Derivative Action) was filed
against Charter and its then current directors in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. The
plaintiff in that suit alleged that the individual defendants
breached their fiduciary duties and grossly mismanaged Charter
by failing to establish and maintain adequate internal controls
and procedures.
F-78
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
As noted above, Charter entered into Memoranda of Understanding
on August 5, 2004 setting forth agreements in principle
regarding settlement of the Consolidated Federal
Class Action, the State Derivative Action(s) and the
Federal Derivative Action (the Actions). Charter and
various other defendants in those actions subsequently entered
into Stipulations of Settlement dated as of January 24,
2005, setting forth a settlement of the Actions in a manner
consistent with the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding.
The Stipulations of Settlement, along with the various
supporting documentation, were filed with the Court on
February 2, 2005. The Settlements provide that, in exchange
for a release of all claims by plaintiffs against Charter and
its former and present officers and directors named in the
Actions, Charter will pay to the plaintiffs a combination of
cash and equity collectively valued at $144 million, which
will include the fees and expenses of plaintiffs counsel.
Of this amount, $64 million will be paid in cash (by
Charters insurance carriers) and the balance will be paid
in shares of Charter Class A common stock having an
aggregate value of $40 million and ten-year warrants to
purchase shares of Charter Class A common stock having an
aggregate warrant value of $40 million. The warrants would
have an exercise price equal to 150% of the fair market value
(as defined) of Charter Class A common stock as of the date
of the entry of the order of final judgment approving the
settlement. In addition, Charter expects to issue additional
shares of its Class A common stock to its insurance carrier
having an aggregate value of $5 million. As a result, in
the second quarter of 2004, the Company recorded a
$149 million litigation liability within other long-term
liabilities and a $64 million insurance receivable as part
of other non-current assets on its consolidated balance sheet
and an $85 million special charge on its consolidated
statement of operations. Additionally, as part of the
settlements, Charter will also commit to a variety of corporate
governance changes, internal practices and public disclosures,
some of which have already been undertaken and none of which are
inconsistent with measures Charter is taking in connection with
the recent conclusion of the SEC investigation described below.
Documents related to the settlement of the Actions have now been
executed and filed. On February 15, 2005, the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri gave
preliminary approval to the settlement of the Actions. The
settlement of each of the lawsuits remains conditioned upon,
among other things, final judicial approval of the settlements
following notice to the class, and dismissal, with prejudice, of
the consolidated derivative actions now pending in Missouri
State Court, which are related to the Federal Derivative Action.
In addition to the Federal Class Actions, the State
Derivative Action (s), the new Missouri State Court derivative
action and the Federal Derivative Action, six putative class
action lawsuits have been filed against Charter and certain of
its then current directors and officers in the Court of Chancery
of the State of Delaware (the Delaware
Class Actions). The lawsuits were filed after the
filing of a 13D amendment by Mr. Allen indicating that he
was exploring a number of possible alternatives with respect to
restructuring or expanding his ownership interest in Charter.
Charter believes the plaintiffs speculated that Mr. Allen
might have been contemplating an unfair bid for shares of
Charter or some other sort of going private transaction on
unfair terms and generally alleged that the defendants breached
their fiduciary duties by participating in or acquiescing to
such a transaction. The lawsuits, which are substantively
identical, were brought on behalf of Charters securities
holders as of July 29, 2002, and sought unspecified
damages and possible injunctive relief. However, no such
transaction by Mr. Allen has been presented. On
April 30, 2004, orders of dismissal without prejudice were
entered in each of the Delaware Class Actions.
In August 2002, Charter became aware of a grand jury
investigation being conducted by the U.S. Attorneys
Office for the Eastern District of Missouri into certain of its
accounting and reporting practices, focusing on how Charter
reported customer numbers and its reporting of amounts received
from digital set-top terminal suppliers for advertising. The
U.S. Attorneys Office has publicly stated that
Charter is not a target of the investigation. Charter was also
advised by the U.S. Attorneys Office that no current
officer or member of its board of directors is a target of the
investigation. On July 24, 2003, a federal grand jury
charged four former officers of Charter with conspiracy and mail
and wire fraud,
F-79
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
alleging improper accounting and reporting practices focusing on
revenue from digital set-top terminal suppliers and inflated
customer account numbers. Trial was set for February 7,
2005. Subsequently, each of the indicted former officers pled
guilty to single conspiracy counts related to the original mail
and wire fraud charges and are awaiting sentencing. The Company
is fully cooperating with the investigation.
On November 4, 2002, Charter received an informal,
non-public inquiry from the staff of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). The SEC issued a formal order of
investigation dated January 23, 2003, and subsequently
served document and testimony subpoenas on Charter and a number
of its former employees. The investigation and subpoenas
generally concerned Charters prior reports with respect to
its determination of the number of customers, and various of its
accounting policies and practices including its capitalization
of certain expenses and dealings with certain vendors, including
programmers and digital set-top terminal suppliers. On
July 27, 2004, the SEC and Charter reached a final
agreement to settle the investigation. In the Settlement
Agreement and Cease and Desist Order, Charter agreed to entry of
an administrative order prohibiting any future violation of
United States securities laws and requiring certain other
remedial internal practices and public disclosures. Charter
neither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing, and the SEC assessed
no fine against Charter.
Charter is generally required to indemnify each of the named
individual defendants in connection with the matters described
above pursuant to the terms of its bylaws and (where applicable)
such individual defendants employment agreements. In
accordance with these documents, in connection with the pending
grand jury investigation, the now-settled SEC investigation and
the above-described lawsuits, some of Charters current and
former directors and current and former officers have been
advanced certain costs and expenses incurred in connection with
their defense. On February 22, 2005, Charter filed suit
against four of its former officers who were indicted in the
course of the grand jury investigation. These suits seek to
recover the legal fees and other related expenses advanced to
these individuals by Charter for the grand jury investigation,
SEC investigation and class action and related lawsuits.
In October 2001, two customers, Nikki Nicholls and Geraldine M.
Barber, filed a class action suit against Charter Holdco in
South Carolina Court of Common Pleas (the South Carolina
Class Action), purportedly on behalf of a class of
Charter Holdcos customers, alleging that Charter Holdco
improperly charged them a wire maintenance fee without request
or permission. They also claimed that Charter Holdco improperly
required them to rent analog and/or digital set-top terminals
even though their television sets were cable ready.
A substantively identical case was filed in the Superior Court
of Athens Clarke County, Georgia by Emma S. Tobar on
March 26, 2002 (the Georgia Class Action),
alleging a nationwide class for these claims. Charter Holdco
removed the South Carolina Class Action to the United
States District Court for the District of South Carolina in
November 2001, and moved to dismiss the suit in December 2001.
The federal judge remanded the case to the South Carolina Court
of Common Pleas in August 2002 without ruling on the motion to
dismiss. The plaintiffs subsequently moved for a default
judgment, arguing that upon return to state court, Charter
Holdco should have, but did not file a new motion to dismiss.
The state court judge granted the plaintiffs motion over
Charter Holdcos objection in September 2002. Charter
Holdco immediately appealed that decision to the South Carolina
Court of Appeals and the South Carolina Supreme Court, but those
courts ruled that until a final judgment was entered against
Charter Holdco, they lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
In January 2003, the Court of Common Pleas granted the
plaintiffs motion for class certification. In October and
November 2003, Charter Holdco filed motions (a) asking that
court to set aside the default judgment, and (b) seeking
dismissal of plaintiffs suit for failure to state a claim.
In January 2004, the Court of Common Pleas granted in part and
denied in part Charter Holdcos motion to dismiss for
failure to state a claim. It also took under advisement Charter
Holdcos motion to set aside the default judgment. In April
2004, the parties to both the Georgia and South Carolina
Class Actions participated in a
F-80
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
mediation. The mediator made a proposal to the parties to settle
the lawsuits. In May 2004, the parties accepted the
mediators proposal and reached a tentative settlement,
subject to final documentation and court approval. As a result
of the tentative settlement, we recorded a special charge of
$9 million in our consolidated statement of operations in
the first quarter of 2004. On July 8, 2004, the Superior
Court of Athens Clarke County, Georgia granted a
motion to amend the Tobar complaint to add Nicholls, Barber and
April Jones as plaintiffs in the Georgia Class Action and
to add any potential class members in South Carolina. The court
also granted preliminary approval of the proposed settlement on
that date. On August 2, 2004, the parties submitted a joint
request to the South Carolina Court of Common Pleas to stay the
South Carolina Class Action pending final approval of the
settlement and on August 17, 2004, that court granted the
parties request. On November 10, 2004, the court
granted final approval of the settlement, rejecting positions
advanced by two objectors to the settlement. On
December 13, 2004 the court entered a written order
formally approving that settlement. On January 11, 2005,
certain class members appealed the order entered by the Georgia
court. That appeal was dismissed on or about February 3,
2005. Additionally, one of the objectors to this settlement
recently filed a similar, but not identical, lawsuit.
Furthermore, Charter is also party to, other lawsuits and claims
that arose in the ordinary course of conducting its business. In
the opinion of management, after taking into account recorded
liabilities, the outcome of these other lawsuits and claims are
not expected to have a material adverse effect on the
Companys consolidated financial condition, results of
operations or its liquidity.
|
|
|
Regulation in the Cable Industry |
The operation of a cable system is extensively regulated by the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC), some state
governments and most local governments. The FCC has the
authority to enforce its regulations through the imposition of
substantial fines, the issuance of cease and desist orders
and/or the imposition of other administrative sanctions, such as
the revocation of FCC licenses needed to operate certain
transmission facilities used in connection with cable
operations. The 1996 Telecom Act altered the regulatory
structure governing the nations communications providers.
It removed barriers to competition in both the cable television
market and the local telephone market. Among other things, it
reduced the scope of cable rate regulation and encouraged
additional competition in the video programming industry by
allowing local telephone companies to provide video programming
in their own telephone service areas.
The 1996 Telecom Act required the FCC to undertake a number of
implementing rulemakings. Moreover, Congress and the FCC have
frequently revisited the subject of cable regulation. Future
legislative and regulatory changes could adversely affect the
Companys operations.
|
|
24. |
Employee Benefit Plan |
The Companys employees may participate in the Charter
Communications, Inc. 401(k) Plan. Employees that qualify for
participation can contribute up to 50% of their salary, on a
pre-tax basis, subject to a maximum contribution limit as
determined by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company matches
50% of the first 5% of participant contributions. The Company
made contributions to the 401(k) plan totaling $7 million,
$7 million and $8 million for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
|
|
25. |
Recently Issued Accounting Standards |
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued the revised SFAS No. 123, Share
Based Payment, which addresses the accounting for
share-based payment transactions in which a
F-81
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
company receives employee services in exchange for
(a) equity instruments of that company or
(b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the
companys equity instruments or that may be settled by the
issuance of such equity instruments. This statement will be
effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2005. Because
Charter adopted the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 123 on January 1, 2003, the Company does
not expect this revised standard to have a material impact on
its financial statements.
Charter does not believe that any other recently issued, but not
yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have
a material effect on the Companys accompanying financial
statements.
|
|
26. |
Parent Company Only Financial Statements |
As the result of limitations on, and prohibitions of,
distributions, substantially all of the net assets of the
consolidated subsidiaries are restricted from distribution to
Charter, the parent company. The following condensed parent-only
financial statements of Charter account for the investment in
Charter Holdco under the equity method of accounting. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements of the Company and notes
thereto.
Charter Communications, Inc. (Parent Company Only)
Condensed Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Receivable from related party
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Investment in Charter Holdco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable from Charter Holdco
|
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,093 |
|
|
$ |
838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS DEFICIT |
Current liabilities
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
Convertible notes
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
774 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Losses in excess of investment
|
|
|
4,406 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Other long term liabilities
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock redeemable
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Shareholders deficit
|
|
|
(4,406 |
) |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders deficit
|
|
$ |
1,093 |
|
|
$ |
838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-82
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
Condensed Statement of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
REVENUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
Management fees
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in losses of Charter Holdco
|
|
|
(4,488 |
) |
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
(2,922 |
) |
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
(4,551 |
) |
|
|
(435 |
) |
|
|
(3,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(4,484 |
) |
|
|
(355 |
) |
|
|
(2,919 |
) |
Income taxes
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(4,341 |
) |
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
(2,514 |
) |
Dividend on preferred equity
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss after preferred dividends
|
|
$ |
(4,345 |
) |
|
$ |
(242 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,517 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-83
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss after preferred dividends
|
|
$ |
(4,345 |
) |
|
$ |
(242 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,517 |
) |
|
Equity in losses of Charter Holdco
|
|
|
4,488 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
2,922 |
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(405 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from Charter Holdco
|
|
|
(863 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments from Charter Holdco
|
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Charter Holdco
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of convertible notes
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paydown of convertible notes
|
|
|
(588 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-84
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in millions, except where indicated)
|
|
27. |
Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data |
The following table presents quarterly data for the periods
presented on the consolidated statement of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
First Quarter | |
|
Second Quarter | |
|
Third Quarter | |
|
Fourth Quarter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
1,214 |
|
|
$ |
1,239 |
|
|
$ |
1,248 |
|
|
$ |
1,276 |
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(2,344 |
) |
|
|
108 |
|
Loss before minority interest and income taxes
|
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
(366 |
) |
|
|
(2,776 |
) |
|
|
(321 |
) |
Net loss applicable to common stock
|
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
(416 |
) |
|
|
(3,295 |
) |
|
|
(340 |
) |
Basic and diluted loss per common share
|
|
|
(1.00 |
) |
|
|
(1.39 |
) |
|
|
(10.89 |
) |
|
|
(1.12 |
) |
Weighted-average shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
|
|
295,106,077 |
|
|
|
300,522,815 |
|
|
|
302,604,978 |
|
|
|
302,934,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
First Quarter | |
|
Second Quarter | |
|
Third Quarter | |
|
Fourth Quarter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
1,178 |
|
|
$ |
1,217 |
|
|
$ |
1,207 |
|
|
$ |
1,217 |
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
Income (loss) before minority interest and income taxes
|
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock
|
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
Basic income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
(0.62 |
) |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
(0.20 |
) |
Diluted income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
(0.62 |
) |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
(0.20 |
) |
Weighted-average shares outstanding, basic
|
|
|
294,466,137 |
|
|
|
294,474,596 |
|
|
|
294,566,878 |
|
|
|
294,875,504 |
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding, diluted
|
|
|
294,466,137 |
|
|
|
294,474,596 |
|
|
|
637,822,843 |
|
|
|
294,875,504 |
|
F-85