10-Q
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
 
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
0-25732
(Commission File Number)
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
  13-4146982
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
     
2000 Westchester Avenue, Purchase, New York
(Address of principal executive offices)
  10577
(Zip Code)
(914) 701-8000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þAccelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes þ No o
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS: As of June 30, 2008, there were 21,744,810 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding.
 
 

 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
                 
            Page  
   
 
           
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION        
   
 
           
      Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements        
   
 
           
   
 
  Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 (unaudited)     1  
   
 
           
   
 
  Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (unaudited)     2  
   
 
           
   
 
  Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (unaudited)     3  
   
 
           
   
 
  Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements     4  
   
 
           
      Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations     14  
   
 
           
      Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk     28  
   
 
           
      Controls and Procedures     28  
   
 
           
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION        
   
 
           
      Legal Proceedings     30  
   
 
           
      Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds     30  
   
 
           
      Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders     30  
   
 
           
      Exhibits     31  
   
 
           
   
 
  Signatures     32  
   
 
           
   
 
  Exhibit Index     33  
 EX-10.2: EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT RONALD A. LANE
 EX-31.1: CERTIFICATION
 EX-31.2: CERTIFICATION
 EX-32.1: CERTIFICATION

 


Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2008     2007  
Assets
               
Current Assets
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 367,538     $ 477,309  
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $3,483 and $3,481, respectively
    137,548       134,014  
Prepaid maintenance
    61,306       72,250  
Deferred taxes
    26,712       35,053  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    30,768       24,693  
 
           
Total current assets
    623,872       743,319  
Property and equipment
               
Property and equipment, net
    841,512       594,872  
Other Assets
               
Deposits and other assets
    39,050       41,038  
Lease contracts and intangible assets, net
    37,042       37,961  
 
           
Total Assets
  $ 1,541,476     $ 1,417,190  
 
           
 
               
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
               
Current Liabilities
               
Accounts payable
  $ 25,587     $ 29,600  
Accrued liabilities
    161,078       163,831  
Deferred gain
    152,836       151,742  
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases
    30,332       28,444  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    369,833       373,617  
Other Liabilities
               
Long-term debt and capital leases
    457,097       365,619  
Deferred taxes
    16,115       21,570  
Other liabilities
    97,871       93,682  
 
           
Total other liabilities
    571,083       480,871  
 
           
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
               
Minority interest
    9,802       13,477  
Stockholders’ Equity
               
Preferred stock, $1 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued
           
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 21,912,851 and 21,796,484 shares issued, 21,744,810 and 21,636,250 shares outstanding (net of treasury stock), at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively
    219       218  
Additional paid-in-capital
    349,657       341,537  
Receivable from issuance of subsidiary stock
    (39,543 )     (77,065 )
Treasury stock, at cost; 168,041 and 160,234 shares, respectively
    (7,018 )     (6,599 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    1,860       1,750  
Retained earnings
    285,583       289,384  
 
           
Total stockholders’ equity
    590,758       549,225  
 
           
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
  $ 1,541,476     $ 1,417,190  
 
           
See accompanying notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

1


Table of Contents

Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2008     June 30, 2007     June 30, 2008     June 30, 2007  
 
                               
Operating Revenues
  $ 438,780     $ 372,627     $ 811,801     $ 727,962  
 
                       
 
                               
Operating Expenses
                               
Aircraft fuel
    207,031       122,123       351,522       234,434  
Salaries, wages and benefits
    52,845       61,438       111,748       123,188  
Maintenance, materials and repairs
    40,271       37,937       93,843       83,219  
Aircraft rent
    40,869       38,702       80,327       77,123  
Ground handling and airport fees
    19,096       18,385       37,622       35,706  
Landing fees and other rent
    20,213       18,288       38,930       36,018  
Depreciation and amortization
    12,817       10,062       21,183       19,637  
Gain on disposal of aircraft
    (2,726 )     (37 )     (2,726 )     (1,005 )
Travel
    12,882       12,610       26,609       24,604  
Minority interest
    (239 )           (3,675 )      
Other
    22,169       21,883       45,466       46,312  
 
                       
Total operating expenses
    425,228       341,391       800,849       679,236  
 
                       
 
                               
Operating income
    13,552       31,236       10,952       48,726  
 
                       
 
                               
Non-operating Expenses
                               
Interest income
    (3,118 )     (3,838 )     (8,476 )     (7,259 )
Interest expense
    11,709       11,274       23,092       22,522  
Capitalized interest
    (2,274 )     (1,121 )     (4,049 )     (1,963 )
Other (income) expense, net
    607       (271 )     139       92  
 
                       
Total non-operating expenses
    6,924       6,044       10,706       13,392  
 
                       
 
                               
Income before income taxes
    6,628       25,192        246       35,334  
Income tax expense (benefit)
    5,098       (17,993 )     4,047       (14,048 )
 
                       
 
                               
Net income (loss)
  $ 1,530     $ 43,185     $ (3,801 )   $ 49,382  
 
                       
 
                               
Income (loss) per share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.07     $ 2.04     $ (0.18 )   $ 2.34  
 
                       
 
                               
Diluted
  $ 0.07     $ 2.01     $ (0.18 )   $ 2.30  
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted average shares:
                               
Basic
    21,506       21,175       21,465       21,110  
 
                       
 
                               
Diluted
    21,656       21,452       21,465       21,393  
 
                       
See accompanying notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2


Table of Contents

Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
                 
    Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2008     June 30, 2007  
 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
               
Net income (loss)
  $ (3,801 )   $ 49,382  
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    21,183       19,637  
Accretion of debt discount
    3,632       3,519  
Amortization of operating lease discount
    919       918  
Provision for (release of) allowance for doubtful accounts
    (502 )     555  
Gain on disposal of aircraft
    (2,726 )     (1,005 )
Deferred taxes
    2,886       (25,607 )
Stock-based compensation expense
    3,758       4,108  
Minority interest
    (3,675 )      
Other, net
          496  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
    4,785       (8,030 )
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    26,459       43,973  
 
           
 
               
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
               
Capital expenditures
    (274,424 )     (30,400 )
Proceeds from sale of aircraft
          6,000  
Insurance proceeds
    5,900        
 
           
Net cash used by investing activities
    (268,524 )     (24,400 )
 
           
 
               
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
               
Proceeds from loan
    107,259        
Proceeds from stock option exercises
    3,162       4,050  
Purchase of treasury stock
    (419 )     (673 )
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation expense
    1,201       1,563  
Proceeds from issuance of subsidiary stock
    38,616       75,000  
Payments on debt
    (17,525 )     (18,842 )
 
           
Net cash provided by financing activities
    132,294       61,098  
 
           
 
               
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (109,771 )     80,671  
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period
    477,309       231,807  
 
           
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period
  $ 367,538     $ 312,478  
 
           
See accompanying notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3


Table of Contents

Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2008
1. Basis of Presentation
     The accompanying interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (the “Financial Statements”) are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. As permitted by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the Financial Statements exclude certain footnote disclosures normally included in audited consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). In the opinion of management, the Financial Statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items, necessary to fairly state the financial position of Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings” or “AAWW”) and its consolidated subsidiaries as of June 30, 2008, the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. The Financial Statements include the accounts of Holdings and its consolidated subsidiaries. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The year end balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. The Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Holdings that was filed with the SEC on February 28, 2008 (the “2007 10-K”).
     Holdings is the parent company of two principal operating subsidiaries, Atlas Air, Inc. (“Atlas”), which is wholly owned, and Polar Air Cargo Worldwide, Inc. (“Polar”), of which Holdings has a 51% economic interest and 75% voting interest. On June 28, 2007, Polar issued shares representing a 49% economic interest and a 25% voting interest to DHL Network Operations (USA), Inc. (“DHL”), a subsidiary of Deutsche Post AG (“DP”). Prior to that date, Polar was wholly owned by Holdings and was the parent company of Polar Air Cargo, Inc. (“Polar LLC”). Holdings, Atlas, Polar and Polar LLC are referred to collectively as the “Company”. The Company provides air cargo and related services throughout the world, serving Asia, the Middle East, Australia, Europe, South America, Africa and North America through: (i) contractual lease arrangements including contracts through which the Company leases an aircraft to a customer and provides value-added services including, crew, maintenance and insurance (“ACMI”); (ii) airport-to-airport scheduled air cargo service (“Scheduled Service”); (iii) military charter (“AMC Charter”); (iv) seasonal, commercial and ad-hoc charter services (“Commercial Charter”); and (v) dry leasing or sub-leasing of aircraft and engines (“Dry Leasing” or “Dry Lease”). The Company operates only Boeing 747 freighter aircraft.
     The Company’s quarterly results have in the past been subject to seasonal and other fluctuations and the operating results for any quarter are therefore not necessarily indicative of results that may be otherwise expected for the entire year.
     Except for per share data, all dollar amounts are in thousands unless otherwise noted.
2. General
DHL
     In March 2008, Atlas entered into a three year ACMI agreement and related agreements with Polar for two Boeing 747-400 aircraft, beginning on March 21, 2008. Polar entered into an interim blocked space agreement (the “Interim BSA”) with DHL covering these two aircraft commencing on March 30, 2008 and expiring on October 27, 2008. In addition, on March 21, 2008, Polar and DHL amended and restated the original blocked space agreement entered into in June 2007 (the “Amended BSA”) to include these two additional aircraft as part of that agreement beginning on the expiration of the Interim BSA. See Note 3 of the 2007 10-K for discussion of the blocked space agreement. Under the Interim BSA, Polar began express network flying (“Express Network ACMI”) on March 30, 2008 and the direct contribution for such flying is included as part of the ACMI reporting segment (see Note 4 for further discussion).
Investments
     The Company holds a minority interest (49%) in a private company, which is accounted for under the equity method. The June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 aggregate carrying value of the investment was $5.8 million and $5.6 million, respectively, and was included within Deposits and other assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

4


Table of Contents

     Atlas has Dry Leased three owned aircraft to this company. The leases have terms that mature in the third quarter of 2009. The carrying value of these leased aircraft as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was $165.8 million and $168.1 million, respectively. The related accumulated depreciation as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was $18.9 million and $16.5 million, respectively. The leases provide for payment of rent and a provision for maintenance costs associated with the aircraft. Total rental income for the three aircraft was $10.8 million and $11.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $21.6 million and $22.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Property and equipment, net
     Property and equipment, net consisted of the following at:
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2008     2007  
 
               
Flight equipment
  $ 682,929     $ 583,468  
Ground equipment
    24,057       23,040  
Purchase deposits for flight equipment
    232,230       75,026  
Less: accumulated depreciation
    (97,704 )     (86,662 )
 
           
Property and equipment, net
  $ 841,512     $ 594,872  
 
           
     At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, included in purchase deposits for flight equipment is capitalized interest of $9.2 million and $5.2 million, respectively.
     On January 11, 2008, AAWW entered into an aircraft purchase agreement under which AAWW or its designee agreed to acquire two Boeing 747-400 aircraft. The acquisition of such aircraft was completed on May 6, 2008. The aircraft include one production Boeing 747-400 freighter, which entered service on June 12, 2008, and one passenger configured Boeing 747-400 aircraft that will be converted to freighter configuration and is expected to enter service in the third quarter of 2008. The purchase price for these aircraft was approximately $167.5 million, which includes conversion costs, of which $152.3 million has been paid. The remaining $15.2 million will be paid upon completion of the freighter conversion.
     In February 2008, one of the Company’s Boeing 747-200 aircraft (tail number N527MC) on a short-term ACMI lease to a customer was damaged due to improper shipper packaging of a load which damaged the hull. The plane landed safely but as a result of this incident the airframe was damaged beyond economic repair. Atlas negotiated a net $5.9 million cash-in-lieu-of-repair settlement with its insurance carriers and received the insurance proceeds in June 2008. The Company removed the engines and other certain high value rotable parts, which were transferred into rotable inventory. The remainder of the airframe is being sold for scrap metal. Since the settlement proceeds exceeded the net book value of the airframe after salvaging certain rotable parts, the Company recorded a gain of $2.7 million in the second quarter of 2008.
     In March 2007, the Company sold aircraft tail number N536MC for $6.0 million and recorded a gain of approximately $1.0 million.
Concentration of Credit Risk and Significant Customers
     United States Military Airlift Mobility Command (“AMC”) charters accounted for 25.5% and 25.6% of the Company’s total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and 25.3% and 29.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Accounts receivable from AMC were $19.6 million and $32.2 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The International Airline of United Arab Emirates (“Emirates”) accounted for 14.1% and 11.7% of the Company’s total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and 7.6% and 11.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Emirates accounted for 38.9% and 47.6% of the Company’s ACMI revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and 40.1% and 47.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Accounts receivable from Emirates were $8.5 million and $13.4 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. No other customer accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s total operating revenues or accounts receivable during these periods.
Debt Discount

5


Table of Contents

     At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had $71.8 million and $75.4 million, respectively, of unamortized discount related to fair market value adjustments recorded against debt upon application of fresh-start accounting.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
     In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to U.S. GAAP requiring use of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial assets and financial liabilities for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Issued in February 2008, FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 157-1 “Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13” (“FSP 157-1”) removed leasing transactions accounted for under Statement 13 and related guidance from the scope of SFAS No. 157. FSP 157-2 “Partial Deferral of the Effective Date of Statement 157” (“FSP 157-2”), deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.
     The implementation of SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and financial liabilities, effective January 1, 2008, did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
     SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). SFAS No. 157 classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:
     
Level 1
  Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
 
   
Level 2
  Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or
 
   
 
  Unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or
 
   
 
  Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability
 
   
Level 3
  Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability
     The Company endeavors to utilize the best available information in measuring fair value.
     As of June 30, 2008, the Company did not have any financial assets or liabilities that were impacted by SFAS No. 157.
     In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.
     In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements” (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 160 establishes requirements for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the Company (sometimes called “minority interests”) be clearly identified, presented, and disclosed in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity. All changes in the parent’s ownership interests are required to be accounted for consistently as equity transactions and any non-controlling equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries must be measured initially at fair value. SFAS No. 160 is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. However, presentation and disclosure requirements must be retrospectively applied to comparative financial statements. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 160 on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

6


Table of Contents

     In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 expands quarterly disclosure requirements in SFAS No. 133 about an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 161 on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Reclassifications
     Certain reclassifications have been made in the prior period’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statement amounts and related note disclosures to conform to the current period’s presentation, primarily related to the classification of segments and commission income.
3. Notes Payable
     On January 30, 2008, Atlas entered into a $270.3 million pre-delivery deposit payment (“PDP”) financing facility with Norddeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale (the “PDP Financing Facility”), which is intended to fund a portion of Atlas’ PDP obligations in respect of the first five aircraft to be delivered to Atlas under its Boeing 747-8F purchase agreement with The Boeing Company (“Boeing”). These aircraft are scheduled for delivery between February and July 2010.
     The facility is comprised of five separate tranches and is secured by certain of Atlas’ rights in and to the purchase agreement, but only to the extent related to the first five aircraft scheduled to be delivered thereunder. In the case of a continuing event of default by Atlas, the lenders will have certain rights to assume Atlas’ position and accept delivery of the related aircraft. Each tranche relating to each aircraft will become due on the earlier of (a) the date the aircraft is delivered or (b) up to nine months following the last day of the scheduled delivery month, depending on the cause of the delivery delay.
     Funds available under the facility are subject to certain up-front and commitment fees, and funds drawn under the facility bear interest at Libor plus a margin. The facility is guaranteed by AAWW and is subject to typical and customary events of default. As of June 30, 2008, the Company had borrowed $107.3 million under the facility and has unused availability of $163.0 million.
4. Segment Reporting
     The Company has five reportable segments: ACMI, Scheduled Service, AMC Charter, Commercial Charter and Dry Leasing. Each segment has different operating and economic characteristics which are separately reviewed by the Company’s senior management.
     The Company is pursuing growth in its Dry Leasing business. The increasing importance of this business has led senior management to classify Dry Leasing as a separate reportable segment and in the first quarter of 2008, the Company formed a wholly owned subsidiary, based in Ireland, for the purpose of Dry Leasing aircraft and engines. The Company currently Dry Leases three Boeing 747-400s to an affiliate in which the Company owns a minority (49%) interest. These aircraft are currently in the service of British Airways. In addition, the Company currently has one Boeing 747-200 aircraft Dry Leased to a cargo operator. Previously, the Company included Dry Lease revenue with Other Revenue and did not report the segment results separately.
     In addition to reporting the Dry Lease segment separately, in the first quarter of 2008 the Company changed the principal economic performance metric it reports for each of its business segments. Previously, the Company used Fully Allocated Contribution (“FAC”) as its economic performance metric. FAC was computed by allocating all operating and non-operating costs to segments, and only taxes, post-emergence costs and related professional fees, gains on the sale of aircraft, and other unusual items were not allocated to segments. As part of the change, Management has adopted an economic performance metric that shows profitability of each segment after allocation of direct costs and ownership (“Direct Contribution”). Management believes that Direct Contribution is a better measurement of segment profitability. Direct costs and ownership include crew costs, maintenance, fuel, ground operations, sales costs, aircraft rent, interest expense related to aircraft debt and aircraft depreciation. Direct Contribution shows each segment’s contribution to corporate fixed costs. Although corporate fixed costs are not allocated to each segment, the total corporate fixed costs are disclosed. Direct Contribution consists of income (loss) before taxes, excluding post-emergence costs and related professional fees, gains on the sale of aircraft, and unallocated fixed costs. Unallocated

7


Table of Contents

fixed costs include corporate overhead, non-aircraft depreciation, interest income, foreign exchange gains and losses and other non-operating costs.
     Management allocates the direct costs of aircraft operation and ownership among the various segments based on the aircraft type and activity levels in each segment. Allocation methods are standard activity-based methods commonly used in the industry.
     The ACMI segment provides aircraft, crew, maintenance and insurance services, whereby customers receive the use of an insured and maintained aircraft and crew in exchange for, in most cases, a guaranteed monthly level of operation at a predetermined rate for defined periods of time. The customer bears the commercial revenue risk and the obligation for other direct operating costs, including fuel. Beginning on March 30, 2008, Polar began Express Network ACMI flying with two aircraft for DHL. Under the terms of the Interim BSA, DHL is responsible for the commercial revenue risk (yields and cargo loads) and bears all of the direct costs of operation, including fuel, for these two aircraft. For segment reporting purposes all revenue derived from ACMI and related services provided to Polar for Express Network ACMI operations have been reclassified from Scheduled Service to the ACMI segment (see table below for reconciliation of revenue per the Financial Statements to revenue by segment). All costs associated with providing such services have also been reclassified for purposes of calculating Direct Contribution. Non-ACMI costs and an equal amount of revenue remain in the Scheduled Service segment.
     The Scheduled Service segment provides airport-to-airport scheduled air freight and available on-forwarding services primarily to freight forwarding customers. The Company carries all of the commercial revenue risk (yields and cargo loads) and bears all of the direct costs of operation, including fuel. Distribution costs include direct sales costs through the Company’s own sales force and through commissions paid to general sales agents. Commission rates typically range between 2.5% and 5% of commissionable revenue sold. Scheduled Service is highly seasonal, with peak demand coinciding with the retail holiday season, which traditionally begins in September and lasts through mid-December.
     The AMC Charter segment provides full-planeload charter flights to the U.S. Military through the AMC. The AMC Charter business is similar to the Commercial Charter business in that the Company is responsible for the direct operating costs of the aircraft. However, in the case of AMC operations, the price of fuel consumed during AMC flights is fixed by the military. The contracted charter rates (per mile) and fuel prices (per gallon) are established and fixed by the AMC for twelve-month periods running from October to September of the next year. The Company receives reimbursement from the AMC each month if the price of fuel paid by the Company to vendors for AMC missions exceeds the fixed price; if the price of fuel paid by the Company is less than the fixed price, then the Company pays the difference to the AMC.
     The Commercial Charter segment provides full-planeload airfreight capacity on one or multiple flights to freight forwarders, airlines and other air cargo customers. Charters are typically paid in advance and as with Scheduled Service, the Company bears the direct operating costs (except as otherwise defined in the charter contracts).
     The Dry Leasing segment provides for the leasing of aircraft and engines to customers.
     The following table sets forth revenues and Direct Contribution for the Company’s five reportable business segments reconciled to operating income (loss) and income (loss) before income taxes as required by SFAS No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, for the stated periods:
                                                 
    June 30, 2008     June 30, 2007  
            Express                     Express        
    Revenue per     Network             Revenue per     Network        
    Financial     ACMI     Segment     Financial     ACMI     Segment  
For the Three Months Ended   Statements     Revenue     Revenue     Statements     Revenue     Revenue  
Revenues:
                                               
ACMI
  $ 76,247     $ 15,834     $ 92,081     $ 91,252     $     $ 91,252  
Scheduled Service
    213,423       (15,834 )     197,589       144,245             144,245  
AMC Charter
    111,756             111,756       95,471             95,471  
Commercial Charter
    24,370             24,370       28,634             28,634  
Dry Leasing
    12,984             12,984       13,025             13,025  
 
                                   
Total operating revenues
  $ 438,780     $     $ 438,780     $ 372,627     $     $ 372,627  
 
                                   

8


Table of Contents

                                                 
    June 30, 2008   June 30, 2007  
            Express                     Express        
    Revenue per     Network             Revenue per     Network        
    Financial     ACMI     Segment     Financial     ACMI     Segment  
For the Six Months Ended   Statements     Revenue     Revenue     Statements     Revenue     Revenue  
Revenues:
                                               
ACMI
  $ 154,222     $ 15,934     $ 170,156     $ 175,539     $     $ 175,539  
Scheduled Service
    372,897       (15,934 )     356,963       270,118             270,118  
AMC Charter
    205,740             205,740       211,963             211,963  
Commercial Charter
    52,864             52,864       44,329             44,329  
Dry Leasing
    26,078             26,078       26,013             26,013  
 
                                   
Total operating revenues
  $ 811,801     $     $ 811,801     $ 727,962     $     $ 727,962  
 
                                   
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2008     June 30, 2007     June 30, 2008     June 30, 2007  
Direct Contribution:
                               
ACMI
  $ 18,547     $ 20,918     $ 23,758     $ 32,973  
Scheduled Service
    (19,965 )     237       (29,515 )     899  
AMC Charter
    28,469       24,559       51,935       46,302  
Commercial Charter
    (1,788 )     2,796       (3,586 )     2,261  
Dry Leasing
    2,702       4,495       7,207       9,015  
 
                       
Total Direct Contribution for reportable segments
    27,965       53,005       49,799       91,450  
 
                               
Add back (subtract):
                               
Unallocated fixed costs
    (24,063 )     (27,850 )     (52,279 )     (57,121 )
Gain on sale of aircraft
    2,726       37       2,726       1,005  
 
                       
Income (loss) before income taxes
    6,628       25,192       246       35,334  
 
                       
 
                               
Add back (subtract):
                               
Interest income
    (3,118 )     (3,838 )     (8,476 )     (7,259 )
Interest expense
    11,709       11,274       23,092       22,522  
Capitalized interest
    (2,274 )     (1,121 )     (4,049 )     (1,963 )
Other, net
    607       (271 )     139       92  
 
                       
Operating income
  $ 13,552     $ 31,236     $ 10,952     $ 48,726  
 
                       
5. Commitments and Contingencies
     On September 8, 2006, Atlas and Boeing entered into a purchase agreement (the “Boeing Agreement”) providing for the purchase by Atlas of 12 Boeing 747-8F freighter aircraft. The Boeing Agreement provides for deliveries of the aircraft to begin in 2010, with all 12 aircraft expected to be in service by the end of 2011. In addition, the Boeing Agreement provides Atlas with rights to purchase up to an additional 14 Boeing 747-8F aircraft, of which one is being held under option. Committed expenditures under the Boeing Agreement, including agreements for spare engines and related flight equipment and also including estimated amounts for contractual price escalations, pre-delivery deposits and required option payments, will be $156.4 million for the remainder of 2008, $185.3 million in 2009, $983.4 million in 2010 and $686.6 million in 2011.
Guarantees and Indemnifications
Restricted Deposits and Letters of Credit
     At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had $7.1 million and $8.5 million, respectively, of restricted deposits either pledged under standby letters of credit related to collateral or for certain deposits required in the normal course of business for items, including, but not limited to, foreign exchange trades, airfield privileges, judicial and credit card deposits and insurance. These amounts are included in Deposits and other assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Labor
     The Air Line Pilots Association (“ALPA”) represents all of the Company’s U.S. crewmembers employed at both Atlas and Polar. Additionally, the Company employs 46 crewmembers through its branch office in Stansted, England who are not represented by a union. Collectively, these employees represent approximately 49.5% of the Company’s workforce as of June 30, 2008. The Company is subject to risks of work interruption or stoppage as permitted by the Railway Labor Act of 1926 (the “Railway Labor Act”), and may incur additional administrative expenses associated with union representation of its employees.

9


Table of Contents

     The Atlas collective bargaining agreement became amendable in February 2006. Polar’s collective bargaining agreement with ALPA became amendable in April 2007. While both units have filed Railway Labor Act “Section 6” notices to begin negotiations for amended agreements, those negotiations have been placed on hold in favor of completing the merger of the two crew forces as more fully described below.
     In November 2004, in order to increase efficiency and assist in controlling costs, the Company initiated steps to merge the ALPA represented crewmember bargaining units of Atlas and Polar. The processes for completing this merger are set forth in both the Atlas and Polar collective bargaining agreements. Both agreements provide for a seniority integration process and the negotiation of a single collective bargaining agreement (“SCBA”). This seniority list integration process was completed by ALPA on November 21, 2006.
     On July 11, 2007, the Company filed grievances under both the Atlas and Polar collective bargaining agreements to compel the commencement of SCBA negotiations. In response, ALPA, on behalf of the Atlas crew force, conceded the Company’s grievance. They also executed a Merger Protocol Letter of Agreement. However, ALPA, on behalf of the Polar crew force, rejected the Company’s grievance and disputed whether it could be required to combine SCBA negotiations and whether the dispute could be scheduled for immediate arbitration. Initial hearings regarding the merits of the Company’s grievance were conducted on March 25 through March 27, 2008. Additional hearing dates had been scheduled for July 15 through July 19, 2008. However, by letter dated May 23, 2008 ALPA presented the integrated seniority lists to the Company and directed the Atlas and Polar Master Executive Councils (“MEC”) to begin the required negotiations for the SCBA. As a result, the Company withdrew its grievance, without prejudice.
     In accordance with the provisions of both the Atlas and Polar contracts, the parties are first to engage in direct negotiations for a SCBA. If nine months after ALPA has presented the integrated seniority lists to the Company any open contract issues remain, those issues are to be resolved by final and binding interest arbitration. Currently, the Company anticipates the SCBA direct negotiations and any required interest arbitration to be completed by the third quarter of 2009 at which time the SCBA and integrated seniority lists will be implemented.
     By letter dated June 16, 2008, the Company was advised by the National Mediation Board (“NMB”) that the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“IBT”) had filed a petition to replace ALPA as the representative of the crewmembers of both Atlas and Polar. As part of its petition the IBT has also asserted that Atlas and Polar constitute a “single carrier” for representation purposes under the Railway Labor Act. The NMB is currently conducting its required investigation into this matter. If the NMB determines that Atlas and Polar constitute a single carrier for representation purposes and that the IBT has submitted the requisite showing of interest, it will conduct a representation election to determine whether ALPA or the IBT will represent the Company’s Atlas and Polar crewmembers. If the NMB determines that Atlas and Polar do not constitute a single carrier for representation purposes but that the IBT has submitted the requisite showing of interest to represent the Company’s Atlas crewmembers, it will conduct an election to determine whether ALPA or the IBT will represent just the Company’s Atlas crewmembers. A change in the certified representative of the Company’s crewmembers is not anticipated to affect the underlying collective bargaining agreements. Additionally, a change in the certified representative of either or both the Company’s Atlas and Polar crewmembers will not affect the completion of the pending merger. The Company anticipates this matter will be resolved in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Legal Proceedings
     Except for the updated items below, information with respect to legal proceedings appears in Note 12 of the 2007 10-K.
Department of Justice Investigation and Related Litigation
     In February 2006, the United States Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) initiated an investigation into the pricing practices of a number of cargo carriers, including Polar LLC (the “DOJ Investigation”). In connection with this investigation, Polar LLC received a subpoena dated February 14, 2006 requesting discovery of additional relevant documents. The Company is fully cooperating with the DOJ in its investigation. Although the Company continues to engage in discussions with the DOJ, there has been no formal action against the Company by the DOJ concerning the matters that are the subject of the DOJ Investigation.
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Inquiry
     The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (the “ACCC”) notified Polar LLC by letter dated June 28, 2007 that it would be required to furnish information and to produce documents to the ACCC in connection with matters that may constitute violations of certain provisions of the Australian Trade Practices Act. Polar LLC has submitted

10


Table of Contents

information and documentation to the ACCC as required by this initial request. Polar LLC has submitted additional documentation to the ACCC in response to additional requests for information received from the ACCC.
New Zealand Commerce Commission Inquiry
     The New Zealand Commerce Commission (the “Commission”) notified Polar LLC by letter dated November 8, 2007 that it would be required to provide information and to produce documents to the Commission in connection with matters that may constitute violations of certain provisions of the New Zealand Commerce Act 1986. Polar LLC has submitted information and documentation to the Commission as required by this request.
Swiss Competition Commission Inquiry
     By letter dated March 11, 2008, the Swiss Competition Commission (the “Swiss Commission”) notified Polar LLC that it would be required to provide information and to produce documents in connection with the Commission’s investigation into the levy of fuel and other surcharges by certain cargo carriers on flights into and out of Switzerland. The Swiss Commission is assessing the impact of these surcharges on pricing and competition within the air freight market in Switzerland. Polar LLC has submitted information and documentation to the Swiss Commission as required by this request.
6. Income (Loss) Per Share and Number of Common Shares Outstanding
     Basic income (loss) per share represents the income (loss) divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the measurement period. Diluted income (loss) per share represents the income (loss) divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the measurement period while also giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares that were outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive common securities that would be added to basic shares to arrive at weighted-average diluted shares consist of 0.1 million stock options and shares of restricted stock for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The impact of these options and restricted shares would be anti-dilutive for the six months ended June 30, 2008 due to losses incurred and are not included in the diluted loss per share calculation. Anti-dilutive options that are out of the money for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were de minimis.
     The calculation of basic and diluted income per share for the three and six months ended June 30 is as follows:
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2008     June 30, 2007     June 30, 2008     June 30, 2007  
Numerator:
                               
Net income (loss)
  $ 1,530     $ 43,185     $ (3,801 )   $ 49,382  
 
                       
 
                               
Denominator for basic earnings per share:
    21,506       21,175       21,465       21,110  
Effect of dilutive securities:
                               
Stock options
    109       189       (a)     191  
Restricted stock
    41       88       (a)     92  
 
                       
Denominator for diluted earnings per share:
    21,656       21,452       21,465       21,393  
 
                       
Basic income per share
  $ 0.07     $ 2.04     $ (0.18 )   $ 2.34  
 
                       
Diluted income per share
  $ 0.07     $ 2.01     $ (0.18 )   $ 2.31  
 
                       
 
(a)   Anti-dilutive.
     The calculation of diluted shares is calculated per SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share, and reflects the potential dilution that could occur from stock options and restricted shares using the treasury stock method and does not include restricted shares and units in which performance or market conditions have not been satisfied of 0.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 0.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.
7. Taxes
     The Company’s effective tax rate consists of an expense of 76.9% and a benefit of 71.4% for the second quarter of 2008 and 2007, respectively. The effective rate differs from the statutory rate primarily due to losses incurred by Polar during the second quarter of 2008 for which no tax benefit was recorded, the recognition of a deferred tax asset related to the Company’s investment in Polar during the second quarter of 2007, the non-deductibility of certain items for tax purposes and the relationship of these items to the Company’s projected operating results for the year. Polar did not record income tax benefits related to its losses in the first and second quarters of 2008 because Polar has no prior period income to

11


Table of Contents

apply against these losses, and, therefore, the losses may only offset future income. Until Polar generates future income, no tax benefit will be recorded.
     The Company maintains a reserve for unrecognized income tax benefits consistent with the requirements of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, (“FIN 48”). The Company’s FIN 48 reserve balance did not change from December 31, 2007 except for a de minimis amount of interest expense related to this reserve during the first and second quarters of 2008. The Company will maintain this reserve until its uncertain positions are reviewed and resolved or until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, if earlier.
     During the second quarter of 2008, the Internal Revenue Service commenced an income tax examination related to the Company’s consolidated federal income tax returns for 2005 and 2006. The Service has not proposed any assessment of additional income taxes for those years. In Hong Kong, the years 2001 through 2005 are under examination for Atlas, and the years 2003 through 2005 are under examination for Polar Air Cargo, Inc. The tax authorities in Hong Kong have not proposed any assessment of additional income taxes.
     For federal income tax purposes, 2007 remains subject to examination. Certain tax attributes, reflected on the Company’s federal income tax returns as filed including NOLs, differ significantly from those reflected in the Financial Statements. Such attributes are subject to future audit in the event the IRS determines to examine any open tax years.
     In the second quarter, the Company resolved an employment tax examination with the Internal Revenue Service and released tax reserves and accrued interest totaling $4.5 million for 2004 and 2005, which is shown as a reduction in Operating expenses on the Statement of Operations. The Internal Revenue Service is not conducting an employment tax examination for any other years.
8. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
     Comprehensive income (loss) included changes in the fair value of certain financial derivative instruments, which qualify for hedge accounting, and unrealized gains and losses on certain investments. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company did not have any derivative instruments. The differences between net income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30 are as follows:
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2008     June 30, 2007     June 30, 2008     June 30, 2007  
 
                               
Net income (loss)
  $ 1,530     $ 43,185     $ (3,801 )   $ 49,382  
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net of taxes of $324 and $1,672
          (551 )           1,744  
Other
    (36 )     163       110       419  
 
                       
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
    (36 )     (388 )     110       2,163  
 
                       
 
                       
Comprehensive income (loss)
  $ 1,494     $ 42,797     $ (3,691 )   $ 51,545  
 
                       
     A roll-forward of the amounts included in Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes, is shown below:
         
    Accumulated Other  
    Comprehensive  
    Income  
Balance at December 31, 2007
  $ 1,750  
Change in value during period,
    146  
 
     
Balance at March 31, 2008
    1,896  
 
     
Change in value during period,
    (36 )
 
     
Balance at June 30, 2008
  $ 1,860  
 
     
     Other is primarily composed of unrealized gains and losses on foreign currency translation.
9. Subsequent Events

12


Table of Contents

     On July 3, 2008, Atlas entered into a $58.4 million five year term loan agreement with BNP Paribas and DVB Bank AG, secured by aircraft tail number N419, which was acquired on May 6, 2008 (see Note 2 for further discussion).
     Atlas also received a commitment from the same banks for a $41.6 million five year term loan to be secured by aircraft tail number N429, also acquired on May 6, 2008. That loan is expected to close in the third quarter of 2008, when the conversion of the aircraft from passenger to freighter is completed.
     Funds available under the loan agreements are subject to certain up-front and commitment fees, and funds drawn under the loan agreements will bear interest at Libor, plus a margin. The facility is guaranteed by AAWW and is subject to typical and customary events of default.

13


Table of Contents

     ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
     The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited Financial Statements and notes thereto appearing in this report and our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 included in our 2007 10-K.
     In this report, references to “we,” “our” and “us” are references to AAWW and its subsidiaries, as applicable.
Background
Certain Terms — Glossary
     The following terms represent industry-related items and statistics specific to the airline and cargo industry sectors. They are used by management for statistical analysis purposes to better evaluate and measure operating levels, results, productivity and efficiency.
     
ATM
  Available Ton Miles, which represent the maximum available tons (capacity) per actual miles flown. It is calculated by multiplying the available capacity (tonnage) of the aircraft by the miles flown by the aircraft.
 
   
Block Hours
  The time interval between when an aircraft departs the terminal until it arrives at the destination terminal.
 
   
RATM
  Revenue per ATM, which represents the average revenue received per available ton mile flown. It is calculated by dividing operating revenues by ATMs.
 
   
Revenue Per
Block Hour
  Calculated by dividing operating revenues by Block Hours.
 
   
RTM
  Revenue Ton Mile, which is calculated by multiplying actual revenue tons carried by miles flown.
 
   
Load Factor
  The average amount of weight flown divided by the maximum available capacity. It is calculated by dividing RTMs by ATMs.
 
   
Yield
  The average amount a customer pays to fly one ton of cargo one mile. It is calculated by dividing operating revenues by RTMs.
 
   
A Checks
  Low level maintenance checks performed on aircraft at an interval of approximately 400 to 1,100 flight hours.
 
   
C Checks
  High level or “heavy” airframe maintenance checks, which are more intensive in scope than an A Checks and are generally performed on 18 to 24 month intervals.
 
   
D Checks
  High level or “heavy” airframe maintenance checks, which are the most extensive in scope and are generally performed on an interval of six to ten years or 25,000 to 28,000 flight hours, whichever comes first for Boeing 747-200s and six years for Boeing 747-400s.
 
   
Direct
Contribution
  Direct Contribution consists of income (loss) before taxes, excluding post-emergence costs and related professional fees, gains on the sale of aircraft, and unallocated fixed costs. We evaluate performance and allocate resources to our segments based upon this measure.
Business Strategy
     We are the leading provider of aircraft and outsourced aircraft operating solutions to the global air freight industry. We manage and operate the world’s largest fleet of 747 freighters. We provide a unique and compelling value proposition to our customers by giving them access to new production freighters that deliver the highest reliability and lowest unit cost in the marketplace combined with outsourced aircraft operating services that lead the industry in terms of quality and global scale. Our customers include airlines, freight forwarders, the U.S. military and charter brokers. We provide global services with operations in Asia, the Middle-East, Australia, Europe, South America, Africa and North America.

14


Table of Contents

     We believe that demand for high-efficiency, wide-body freighter aircraft and related outsourced aircraft operating solutions will increase due to growing international trade, in particular growth in developing markets in Asia and South America. According to industry studies, global cargo traffic, measured in revenue tonne-kilometers, is expected to triple over the next two decades. As demand continues to increase, we believe that the supply of suitable freighter aircraft will not keep pace with this increase in demand as a result of limited production capacity, limited passenger-to-freight conversion capacity and the anticipated retirement of aging aircraft currently operating in the world fleet.
     As of June 30, 2008, our existing fleet of 38 wide-body, freighter aircraft, including 22 modern, high-efficiency, Boeing 747-400 aircraft, and our complementary operating solutions, uniquely position us to benefit from the forecasted growth and increasing demand for wide-body freighter airplanes in the global air freight market. Our market position is further enhanced by our order of 12 new state-of-the-art Boeing 747-8F aircraft, scheduled to be delivered in 2010 and 2011. We are the only current provider of these aircraft to the outsourced freighter market. In addition to these 12 aircraft, we also hold rights to purchase up to an additional 14 Boeing 747-8F aircraft, providing us with flexibility to expand our fleet in response to market conditions.
     We believe that the scale, scope and quality of our outsourced services are unparalleled in our industry. The relative operating cost efficiency of our current 747-400F aircraft and future 747-8F aircraft compared with other wide body freighter aircraft, including their superior fuel efficiency, create a compelling value proposition for our customers and position us well for growth in both the wet and Dry Lease areas of our business.
     Our primary services are:
    Freighter aircraft leasing services, which encompasses the following:
    Fully outsourced aircraft operating solutions of aircraft, crew, maintenance and insurance known as wet leasing or ACMI. An ACMI lease is a contract for the use of one or more dedicated aircraft together with complementary operating services. We typically contract these services for three to six year periods on Boeing 747-400s and for shorter periods on Boeing 747-200s. Our outsourced operating solutions include crew, maintenance and insurance for the aircraft, while customers assume fuel, yield and demand risk;
 
    Express Network ACMI, where Polar provides outsourced airport-to-airport wide-body cargo aircraft solutions to DHL. AAWW currently operates two aircraft, and will operate a minimum of six additional dedicated Boeing 747-400 aircraft servicing the requirements of DHL’s trans-Pacific express operations. Polar will also continue to provide scheduled air-cargo service on these aircraft to our Scheduled Service air-cargo freight forwarders and other shipping customers;
 
    Aircraft and engine leasing solutions known as Dry Leasing. Dry Leasing usually involves the leasing of aircraft to customers who are responsible for crew, maintenance and insurance and who assume fuel, yield and demand risk. We typically Dry Lease to third parties for one or more dedicated aircraft for three-to-five year periods. In February 2008, Holdings formed a wholly owned subsidiary based in Ireland, to further its Dry Leasing efforts.
    Charter services, which encompasses the following:
    AMC Charter services, where we provide air cargo services for the Air Mobility Command, or the AMC;
 
    Commercial Charters, where we provide all-inclusive cargo aircraft charters to brokers, freight forwarders, direct shippers and airlines.
     We look to achieve our strategy through:
    Actively managing our fleet with a focus on leading-edge aircraft;
 
    Accelerating fleet growth and expanding our leasing business;
 
    Focusing on securing long-term contracts;

15


Table of Contents

    Driving significant and ongoing efficiencies and productivity improvements;
 
    Selectively pursuing and evaluating future acquisitions and alliances.
     See “Business Overview” and “Business Strategy and Outlook” in the 2007 10-K for additional information.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
     The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Financial Statements and notes thereto and other financial information appearing and referred to elsewhere in this report.
Operating Statistics
     The table below sets forth selected operating data for the three months ended June 30:
                                 
                    Increase /     Percent  
    2008     2007     (Decrease)     Change  
Block Hours
                               
ACMI
    12,587       15,283       (2,696 )     (17.6 %)
Scheduled Service
    12,073       10,164       1,909       18.8 %
AMC Charter
    5,249       5,459       (210 )     (3.8 %)
Commercial Charter
    1,246       1,837       (591 )     (32.2 %)
Other
    209       151       58       38.4 %
 
                       
Total Block Hours
    31,364       32,894       (1,530 )     (4.7 %)
 
                       
 
                               
Revenue Per Block Hour
                               
ACMI
  $ 6,058     $ 5,971     $ 87       1.5 %
AMC Charter
  $ 21,291     $ 17,489     $ 3,802       21.7 %
Commercial Charter
  $ 19,559     $ 15,587     $ 3,972       25.5 %
 
                               
Scheduled Service Traffic
                               
RTM’s (000’s)
    458,324       376,275       82,049       21.8 %
ATM’s (000’s)
    717,365       593,816       123,549       20.8 %
Load Factor
    63.9 %     63.4 %     5 bps          
RATM
  $ 0.298     $ 0.243     $ 0.055       22.6 %
Yield
  $ 0.466     $ 0.383     $ 0.083       21.7 %
 
                               
Fuel
                               
Scheduled Service and Commercial Charter
                               
Average fuel cost per gallon ***
  $ 3.61     $ 2.12     $ 1.49       70.3 %
Fuel gallons consumed (000’s)
    43,647       38,880       4,767       12.3 %
AMC
                               
Average fuel cost per gallon
  $ 2.86     $ 2.25     $ 0.61       27.1 %
Fuel gallons consumed (000’s)
    17,242       17,710       (468 )     (2.6 %)
 
                               
Fleet (average during the period)
                               
Operating Aircraft count*
    29.9       32.0       (2.1 )     (6.6 %)
Dry Leased **
    5.3       5.0       0.3       6.0 %
 
*   This average does not include one Boeing 747-400 currently undergoing freighter conversion.
 
**   Dry Leased aircraft are not included in the operating fleet average aircraft count.
 
***   Includes all into plane costs.
Operating Revenues
     The following table compares our operating revenues for the three months ended June 30:

16


Table of Contents

                                 
                    Increase /     Percent  
    2008     2007     (Decrease)     Change  
Operating Revenues
                               
ACMI
  $ 76,247     $ 91,252     $ (15,005 )     (16.4 %)
Scheduled Service
    213,423       144,245       69,178       48.0 %
AMC Charter
    111,756       95,471       16,285       17.1 %
Commercial Charter
    24,370       28,634       (4,264 )     (14.9 %)
Dry Leasing revenue
    12,984       13,025       (41 )     (0.3 %)
 
                       
Total operating revenues
  $ 438,780     $ 372,627     $ 66,153       17.8 %
 
                       
     ACMI revenue decreased due to lower Block Hours, while revenue per Block Hour increased slightly compared with the same quarter in the prior year. ACMI Block Hours were 12,587 for the second quarter of 2008, compared with 15,283 for the second quarter of 2007, a decrease of 2,696 Block Hours, or 17.6%. Revenue per Block Hour was $6,058 for the second quarter of 2008, compared with $5,971 for the second quarter of 2007, an increase of $87 per Block Hour, or 1.5%. The reduction in Block Hours was due to a reallocation of one Boeing 747-400 to Express Network ACMI service for DHL. This aircraft is one of the two Boeing 747-400s, which we began flying for DHL in the second quarter of 2008 in Trans-Pacific Express Network ACMI service. The revenue and operating statistics for the Express Network ACMI operation are included in Scheduled Service. We redeployed one Boeing 747-200 at the end of its ACMI contract to the Charter business unit during 2008. During the three months ended June 30, 2008 there was an average of nine Boeing 747-400 aircraft and an average of 1.4 Boeing 747-200 aircraft supporting ACMI compared with an average of ten Boeing 747-400 aircraft and an average of 2.9 Boeing 747-200 aircraft supporting ACMI for the comparable period in 2007.
     Scheduled Service revenue increased significantly due to higher revenue ton miles as well as higher yields per revenue ton mile. RTMs in the Scheduled Service segment were 458.3 million on a total capacity of 717.4 million ATMs in the second quarter of 2008, compared with RTMs of 376.3 million on a total capacity of 593.8 million ATMs in the second quarter of 2007. Block Hours were 12,073 in the second quarter of 2008, compared with 10,164 for the second quarter of 2007, an increase of 1,909, or 18.8%. Load Factor was 63.9% with a Yield of $0.466 in the second quarter of 2008, compared with a Load Factor of 63.4% with a Yield of $0.383 in the second quarter of 2007, representing an increase of 0.5 percentage points in load factor and an increase in yield of 21.7%. Scheduled Service revenue and Block Hours in the second quarter of 2008 increased over the second quarter of 2007 due to the addition of two Boeing 747-400 aircraft for the purpose of serving DHL’s Trans-Pacific Express Network ACMI. One of the aircraft was sourced from ACMI service and the second aircraft was sourced via the deployment of a maintenance spare. The substantial increase in Scheduled Service yield is primarily the result of the fuel surcharge increases that were implemented consistent with the increasing price of fuel and the start-up of Express Network ACMI during the second quarter of 2008. RATM in our Scheduled Service segment was $0.298 in the second quarter of 2008, compared with $0.243 in the second quarter of 2007, representing an increase of 22.6%.
     AMC Charter revenue increased primarily as a result of the increase in the AMC’s per ton mile rate offset partially by a small reduction in Block Hours. The AMC’s mileage rate includes the cost of fuel, which increased significantly on a quarter-over-quarter basis. AMC Charter Block Hours were 5,249 for the second quarter of 2008, compared with 5,459 for the second quarter of 2007, a decrease of 210 Block Hours, or 3.8%. Revenue per Block Hour was $21,291 for the second quarter of 2008, compared with $17,489 for the second quarter of 2007, an increase of $3,802 per Block Hour, or 21.7%. The AMC demand for Boeing 747 widebody cargo flying fell during the period, which drove the reduction in Atlas’ AMC Block Hours flown during the second quarter of 2008 compared with the second quarter of 2007. The AMC raised the wide body cargo per ton mile rate in October 2007 by 2.3% in the normal course of its annual rate making process. The AMC then raised its “pegged fuel price” on February 1, 2008 to $2.70 per gallon and again on June 1, 2008 to $3.20 per gallon. The changes from the rate making process as well as the interim increases in the “pegged fuel price” had the effect of increasing the AMC revenue per Block Hour from $17,489 for the second quarter of 2007 to $21,291 for the second quarter of 2008.
     Commercial Charter revenue decreased as a result of a decrease in Block Hours that was partially offset by an increase in Revenue per Block Hour. The increase in revenue per Block Hour was the result of pricing increases effected to compensate for the higher cost of fuel. Commercial Charter Block Hours were 1,246 for the second quarter of 2008, compared with 1,837 for the second quarter of 2007, a decrease of 591, or 32.2%. Revenue per Block Hour was $19,559 for the second quarter of 2008, compared with $15,587 for the second quarter of 2007, an increase of $3,972 per Block Hour, or 25.5%. The decrease in Block Hours is partially the result of the retirement of one Boeing 747-200 aircraft at the end of the first quarter of 2008 and the retirement of a damaged Boeing 747-200 aircraft in February 2008 (see Note 2 to our Financial Statements for further discussion).

17


Table of Contents

     Dry Leasing revenue was essentially unchanged on a year over year basis. The Company had three Boeing 747-400 aircraft and one Boeing 747-200 aircraft on Dry Lease to third parties at June 30, 2008 and three Boeing 747-400 aircraft and two Boeing 747-200 aircraft on Dry Lease to third parties at June 30, 2007. We experienced customer defaults on three Dry Leased Boeing 747-200 aircraft in the second quarter of 2008 as the two customers leasing these aircraft filed for protection under local insolvency laws. We have repossessed two of the three aircraft from one customer and have been in negotiations regarding the lease of the third aircraft with the other customer. All rents and maintenance reserves payable to us under these Dry Leases were fully reserved against in the second quarter of 2008.
     Total Operating revenue increased in the second quarter of 2008 compared with the second quarter of 2007, primarily as a result of the fuel-driven price increases in the Scheduled Service and AMC business and new Express Network ACMI flying, offset by reductions in ACMI and Commercial Charter flying.
Operating Expenses
     The following table compares our operating expenses for the three months ended June 30:
                                 
                    Increase /     Percent  
    2008     2007     (Decrease)     Change  
Operating Expenses
                               
Aircraft fuel
  $ 207,031     $ 122,123     $ 84,908       69.5 %
Salaries, wages and benefits
    52,845       61,438       (8,593 )     (14.0 %)
Maintenance, materials and repairs
    40,271       37,937       2,334       6.2 %
Aircraft rent
    40,869       38,702       2,167       5.6 %
Ground handling and airport fees
    19,096       18,385        711       3.9 %
Landing fees and other rent
    20,213       18,288       1,925       10.5 %
Depreciation and amortization
    12,817       10,062       2,755       27.4 %
Gain on disposal of aircraft
    (2,726 )     (37 )     2,689       7,267.6 %
Travel
    12,882       12,610        272       2.2 %
Minority interest
    (239 )            239        
Other
    22,169       21,883       286       1.3 %
 
                       
Total operating expense
  $ 425,228     $ 341,391     $ 83,837       24.6 %
 
                       
     Aircraft fuel expense increased as a result of increased market prices for fuel. The average fuel price per gallon for the Scheduled Service and Commercial Charter businesses was approximately $3.61 for the second quarter of 2008, compared with approximately $2.12 for the second quarter of 2007, an increase of $1.49, or 70.3%. Fuel consumption for the Scheduled Service and Commercial Charter businesses increased 4.8 million gallons or 12.3% to 43.6 million gallons for the second quarter of 2008 from 38.9 million gallons during the second quarter of 2007. The average pegged price per gallon for the AMC business was approximately $2.86 for the second quarter of 2008, compared with approximately $2.25 for the second quarter of 2007, an increase of $0.61, or 27.1%. AMC Fuel consumption decreased by 0.5 million gallons, or 2.6%, to 17.2 million gallons for the second quarter of 2008 from 17.7 million gallons during the second quarter of 2007. The decrease in our AMC fuel consumption is commensurate with the decrease of Block Hours in that segment. We do not incur fuel expense in our ACMI service as the cost of fuel is borne by the customer.
     Salaries, wages and benefits decreased due to the reduction in Block Hours as well as lower profit sharing and incentive compensation accruals related to decreased profitability in the second quarter of 2008 compared to the second quarter of 2007. In the second quarter of 2008, we also released employment tax reserves related to the successful resolution of an examination with the IRS resulting in a $2.7 million non-recurring benefit for the period.
     Maintenance materials and repair increased as a result of increases in heavy maintenance. Heavy maintenance activity reflects one additional Boeing 747-400 D Check offset by one less Boeing 747-200 C Check and one less CF6-50 engine overhaul. There were two C Checks on Boeing 747-200 aircraft in the second quarter of 2008, as compared with three C Checks during the second quarter of 2007. For our Boeing 747-400 aircraft, there was one D Check in the second quarter of 2008 compared with none in the prior period. There were ten engine overhauls in the second quarter of 2008 compared with eleven during the second quarter of 2007. The average cost per overhaul on engines increased during the second quarter of 2008 compared with 2007.
     Aircraft rent increased primarily due to short-term engine leases and supplemental rent expense for return conditions on two leased aircraft. In the second quarter, short-term engine leases added $0.9 million of

18


Table of Contents

additional rent expense and we recognized $0.9 million in supplemental rent expense to reflect maintenance return condition obligations related to two of our leased Boeing 747-200 aircraft.
     Ground handling and airport fees increased primarily as a result of an increase in Scheduled Service flying. Scheduled Service has the highest departure driven ground handling expense of any of our service types.
     Landing fees and other rent increased primarily as a result of the increase in overfly fees related to non-ACMI Block Hours. The higher overfly fees are the result of flying a more fuel efficient route, allowing us to recover the additional overfly fees in fuel savings. We generally do not incur landing fees in our ACMI service as the cost is borne by the customer.
     Depreciation and amortization increased primarily as a result of increases in scrapping of certain engine parts and rotables during overhaul. During the quarter we saw an increase of $2.3 million as a result of scrapping.
     Gain on disposal of aircraft in the second quarter of 2008 was the result of the disposal of aircraft tail number N527FT, which was damaged and subsequently scrapped (except for engines and other valuable rotable parts) after we reached a settlement with our insurer (see Note 2 our Financial Statements for further discussion). The gain represents the amount the insurance proceeds exceed the net book value of the aircraft.
     Travel increased as a result of an increase in the cost of airline ticket prices and increases in travel requirements to meet our customers’ flight schedules.
     Minority Interest is related to DHL’s 49% ownership interest in Polar. The amount of Polar loss attributable to DHL was $0.2 million for the quarter, which is reflected as a decrease in our consolidated operating expenses.
     Other operating expenses remained flat compared to the same quarter in the prior year. AMC commission expense increased by approximately $2.4 million due to higher AMC mileage rates, partially offset by a $1.8 million benefit from reduced interest from a settlement with the IRS on an employment tax examination.
     Total operating expense increased in the second quarter of 2008 compared with the second quarter of 2007 primarily due to the increased price of aircraft fuel.
Non-operating Expenses
     The following table compares our non-operating expenses for the three months ended June 30:
                                 
                    Increase /   Percent
    2008   2007   (Decrease)   Change
Non-operating Expenses
                               
Interest income
  $ (3,118 )   $ (3,838 )   $ (720 )     (18.8 %)
Interest expense
    11,709       11,274        435       3.9 %
Capitalized interest
    (2,274 )     (1,121 )     1,153       102.9 %
Other (income) expense, net
     607       (271 )     (878 )     (324.0 %)
     Interest income decreased in the quarter as a reduction in the effective yield on cash and cash equivalents offset higher cash balances available for investing.
     Interest expense increased on a year over year basis due to increased debt related to our PDP financing facility on five of our twelve firm Boeing 747-8F orders. Long-term debt and capital leases including the current portion averaged approximately $468.5 million in the second quarter of 2008 compared with approximately $408.4 million in the second quarter of 2007.
     Capitalized interest expense increased due to interest paid on our PDP financing facility in 2008 and increases in PDP balances paid to Boeing related to our Boeing 747-8F orders.
     Other (income) expense, net decreased primarily due to realized losses on the exchange of foreign denominated currencies into U.S. dollars. The U.S. dollar strengthened slightly against most foreign currencies during the second quarter of 2008 compared with the beginning of the quarter.
     Income taxes. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2008 was 76.9%. The comparable period for 2007 had

19


Table of Contents

a tax benefit associated with the issuance of Polar shares to DHL. Our rate for the second quarter of 2008 differed from the statutory rate primarily due to losses incurred by our Polar subsidiary. Polar did not record income tax benefits related to its losses in the second quarter of 2008 because Polar has no prior period income and therefore these losses may only offset future income. Until future income occurs, no tax benefit will be recorded. Our rates for the second quarter of 2007 reflect the recognition of a deferred tax asset of $37.0 million offset by a tax reserve of $9.3 million related to the transaction with DHL. (See Note 7 to our Financial Statements).
Segments
     Management allocates the direct costs of aircraft operation and ownership among the reportable segments based on the aircraft type and activity levels in each segment. Direct costs include crew costs, maintenance, fuel, ground operations, sales costs, aircraft rent, interest expense related to aircraft debt and aircraft depreciation. Certain of our costs are fixed, indirect costs. These costs are not affected by fleet types or activity levels in our business segments and therefore these costs are not allocated among segments. Examples of unallocated fixed costs are administrative costs including operations administration, finance, human resources, information technology, non-aircraft depreciation, and other non-operating costs.
     For purposes of segment disclosure, management views the Direct Contribution from our Express Network ACMI flying as a split between the ACMI contribution derived from the Flight Services Agreement and other related services tied to the DHL Express Network ACMI operation, which is shown in ACMI, and the residual contribution attributable to Scheduled Service operations. The consolidation of Polar results reflects Express Network ACMI flying as Scheduled Service revenue in our Financial Statements and operating statistics. For segment reporting purposes all revenue derived from ACMI and related services provided to Polar for Express Network ACMI operations have been reclassified from Scheduled Service to the ACMI segment (see table below for reconciliation of revenue per the Financial Statements to revenue by segment). All costs associated with providing such services have also been reclassified for purposes of calculating Direct Contribution. Non-ACMI costs and an equal amount of revenue remain in the Scheduled Service segment.
     Ownership costs are apportioned to segments based on aircraft equivalents (derived from Block Hours flown) except for certain ACMI flying, which involves dedicated aircraft, in which case the allocation is based on the number of dedicated aircraft. The following table compares our Direct Contribution for segments (see Note 4 to our Financial Statements for the reconciliation to operating income (loss) and our reasons for using Direct Contribution) for the three months ended June 30:
                                 
                    Increase /     Percent  
    2008     2007     (Decrease)     Change  
Direct Contribution:
                               
ACMI
  $ 18,547     $ 20,918     $ (2,371 )     (11.3 %)
Scheduled Service
    (19,965 )     237       (20,202 )     (8,524.1 %)
AMC Charter
    28,469       24,559       3,910       15.9 %
Commercial Charter
    (1,788 )     2,796       (4,584 )     (163.9 %)
Dry Leasing
    2,702       4,495       (1,793 )     (39.9 %)
 
                       
Total Direct Contribution
  $ 27,965     $ 53,005     $ (25,040 )     (47.2 %)
 
                       
 
Unallocated Fixed Costs
  $ 24,063     $ 27,850     $ (3,787 )     (13.6 %)
 
                       
ACMI Segment
     During the three months ended June 30, 2008 there was an average of eleven Boeing 747-400 aircraft (including two DHL Trans-Pacific Express Network ACMI aircraft) and an average of 1.4 Boeing 747-200 aircraft supporting ACMI compared with an average of ten Boeing 747-400 aircraft and an average of 2.9 Boeing 747-200 aircraft supporting ACMI for the comparable period in 2007. ACMI segment Direct Contribution decreased primarily due to ownership and maintenance costs. Ownership costs increased as a result of more CF6-80 engine leases in support of our Boeing 747-400 fleet. The increase in maintenance costs was primarily due to one additional Boeing 747-400 D-Check in the second quarter of 2008 compared with the same quarter last year.
Scheduled Service Segment
     Direct Contribution relating to the Scheduled Service segment decreased primarily as a result of fuel price increases,

20


Table of Contents

ownership, and maintenance costs. Ownership costs increased as a result of more CF6-80 engine leases in support of our Boeing 747-400 fleet. The increase in maintenance costs was primarily due to one additional Boeing 747-400 D-Check in the second quarter of 2008 compared with the same quarter last year as well as higher engine maintenance expense. The increased costs were partially offset by fuel-surcharge-driven Yield increases.
AMC Charter Segment
     Direct Contribution relating to the AMC Charter segment increased slightly on fewer Block Hours. Although the price of fuel increased significantly on a quarter-over-quarter basis, the AMC reimburses the Company for its AMC fuel costs. The quarter-over-quarter increase in the AMC mileage rate, which includes a standard profit margin allowed by the AMC, was partially offset by cost increases in commissions, fuel and maintenance.
Commercial Charter Segment
     Direct Contribution relating to the Commercial Charter segment declined as a result of a decrease in Block Hours and increases in fuel costs that were not fully offset by fuel-driven price increases. The decrease in Block Hours was partially due to the unavailability of one Boeing 747-200 equivalent during the second quarter of 2008.
Dry Leasing
     Direct Contribution relating to the Dry Leasing segment declined due to an increase in costs related to return condition accruals and the operating costs of our Dry Leasing subsidiary. In addition, we experienced customer defaults on three Dry Leased Boeing 747-200 aircraft in the second quarter of 2008 as the two customers leasing these aircraft filed for protection under local insolvency laws. We have repossessed two of the three aircraft from one customer and have been in negotiations regarding the lease of the third aircraft with the other customer. The two repossessed aircraft have been made available for use by our AMC and Commercial Charter Segments. All rents and maintenance reserves payable to us under these Dry Leases were fully reserved against in the second quarter of 2008.
Unallocated Fixed Costs
     Unallocated fixed costs for the second quarter of 2008 were $24.1 million compared to $27.9 million in the same quarter of the prior year. The decrease of $3.8 million, or 13.6%, is primarily attributable to a one time benefit from the release of employment tax reserves and reduced accrued interest from a settlement with the IRS on an employment tax examination
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
Operating Statistics
     The table below sets forth selected operating data for the six months ended June 30:
                                 
                    Increase /     Percent  
    2008     2007     (Decrease)     Change  
Block Hours
                               
ACMI
    25,648       29,440       (3,792 )     (12.9 %)
Scheduled Service
    21,830       19,165       2,665       13.9 %
AMC Charter
    9,822       12,310       (2,488 )     (20.2 %)
Commercial Charter
    2,989       3,037       (48 )     (1.6 %)
Other
    419       354       65       18.4 %
 
                       
Total Block Hours
    60,708       64,306       (3,598 )     (5.6 %)
 
                       
 
                               
Revenue Per Block Hour
                               
ACMI
  $ 6,013     $ 5,963     $ 50       0.8 %
AMC Charter
  $ 20,946     $ 17,219     $ 3,727       21.6 %
Commercial Charter
  $ 17,688     $ 14,593     $ 3,095       21.2 %
 
                               
Scheduled Service Traffic
                               
RTM’s (000’s)
    818,728       711,359       107,369       15.1 %
ATM’s (000’s)
    1,280,232       1,116,934       163,298       14.6 %
Load Factor
    64.0 %     63.7 %   3 bps          
RATM
  $ 0.291     $ 0.242     $ 0.049       20.2 %

21


Table of Contents

                                 
                    Increase /     Percent  
    2008     2007     (Decrease)     Change  
Yield
  $ 0.455     $ 0.380     $ 0.075       19.7 %
 
                               
Fuel
                               
Scheduled Service and Commercial Charter
                               
Average fuel cost per gallon ***
  $ 3.26     $ 2.03     $ 1.23       60.6 %
Fuel gallons consumed (000’s)
    81,313       71,695       9,618       13.4 %
AMC
                               
Average fuel cost per gallon
  $ 2.72     $ 2.25     $ 0.47       20.9 %
Fuel gallons consumed (000’s)
    31,858       39,588       (7,730 )     (19.5 %)
 
                               
Fleet (average during the period)
                               
Operating Aircraft count*
    30.3       32.0       (1.7 )     (5.3 %)
Dry Leased **
    5.4       5.0       0.4       8.0 %
Out-of-service **
    0.4       0.3       0.1       33.3 %
 
*   This average does not include one Boeing 747-400 currently undergoing freighter conversion.
 
**   Dry Leased and out-of-service aircraft are not included in the operating fleet average aircraft count.
 
***   Includes all into plane costs.
Operating Revenues
     The following table compares our operating revenues for the six months ended June 30:
                                 
                    Increase /     Percent  
    2008     2007     (Decrease)     Change  
Operating Revenues
                               
ACMI
  $ 154,222     $ 175,539     $ (21,317 )     (12.1 %)
Scheduled Service
    372,897       270,118       102,779       38.0 %
AMC Charter
    205,740       211,963       (6,223 )     (2.9 %)
Commercial Charter
    52,864       44,329       8,535       19.3 %
Dry Leasing revenue
    26,078       26,013       65       0.2 %
 
                       
Total operating revenues
  $ 811,801     $ 727,962     $ 83,839       11.5 %
 
                       
     ACMI revenue decreased due to lower Block Hours, while revenue per Block Hour increased slightly compared with the same period in the prior year. ACMI Block Hours were 25,648 for the first half of 2008, compared with 29,440 for the first half of 2007, a decrease of 3,792 Block Hours, or 12.9%. Revenue per Block Hour was $6,013 for the first six months of 2008, compared with $5,963 for the first six months of 2007, an increase of $50 per Block Hour, or 0.8%. The reduction in Block Hours was due to a reallocation of one Boeing 747-400 to Express Network ACMI Service for DHL during the second quarter. This aircraft is one of the two Boeing 747-400s that we began flying for DHL in the second quarter of 2008 in Trans-Pacific Express Network ACMI service. The Block Hours and associated statistics for the Express Network ACMI operation are included in Scheduled Service. We redeployed one Boeing 747-200 at the end of its ACMI contract to the Charter business unit in March 2008. During the six months ended June 30, 2008 there was an average of 9.5 Boeing 747-400 aircraft and an average 1.8 Boeing 747-200 aircraft supporting ACMI compared with an average of ten Boeing 747-400 aircraft and an average of 2.8 Boeing 747-200 aircraft supporting ACMI for the comparable period in 2007.
     Scheduled Service revenue increased significantly due to higher revenue ton miles as well as higher yields per revenue ton mile. RTMs in the Scheduled Service segment were 818.7 million on a total capacity of 1,280.2 million ATMs in the first half of 2008, compared with RTMs of 711.4 million on a total capacity of 1,116.9 million ATMs in the first half of 2007. Block Hours were 21,830 in the first half of 2008, compared with 19,165 for the first half of 2007, an increase of 2,665, or 13.9%. Load Factor was 64.0% with a Yield of $0.455 in the first half of 2008, compared with a Load Factor of 63.7% with a Yield of $0.380 in the first half of 2007, representing an increase of 0.3 percentage points in load factor and an increase in yield of 19.7%. Scheduled Service Block Hours in the second half of 2008 increased over the second half of 2007 due to the addition of two 747-400 aircraft during the second quarter for the purpose of serving DHL’s Trans-Pacific Express Network ACMI. One of the aircraft was sourced from ACMI service and the second aircraft was sourced via the deployment of a maintenance spare. The prior period in 2007 was also affected by relatively soft demand in Trans-Pacific markets and the redeployment of approximately one Boeing 747-400 from Scheduled Service to AMC to take advantage of

22


Table of Contents

the strong AMC demand. The substantial increase in Scheduled Service yield is primarily the result of fuel surcharge increases that were implemented consistent with the increasing price of fuel in the first half of 2008 compared with the same period in 2007 and the start-up of Express Network ACMI at the end of March 2008. RATM in our Scheduled Service segment was $0.291 in the first half of 2008, compared with $0.242 in the first half of 2007, representing an increase of 20.2%.
     AMC Charter revenue decreased primarily due to a significantly lower volume of AMC Charter flights offset almost entirely by an increase in AMC mileage rates. AMC Charter Block Hours were 9,822 for the first half of 2008, compared with 12,310 for the first half of 2007, a decrease of 2,488 Block Hours, or 20.2%. Revenue per Block Hour was $20,946 for the first half of 2008, compared with $17,219 for the first half of 2007, an increase of $3,727 per Block Hour, or 21.6%. The decrease in AMC Charter activity on a year-over-year basis reflects the spike in AMC demand we experienced in the first quarter of 2007. The AMC demand for Boeing 747 widebody cargo flying fell during the period, which drove the reduction in Atlas’ AMC Block Hours flown during the second half of 2008 compared with the second half of 2007. The AMC raised the wide body cargo per ton mile rate in October 2007 by 2.3% in the normal course of its annual rate making process. The AMC then raised its “pegged fuel price” on February 1, 2008 to $2.70 per gallon and again on June 1, 2008 to $3.20 per gallon. The changes from the rate making process as well as the interim increases in the “pegged fuel price” had the effect of increasing the AMC revenue per Block Hour from $17,219 for the first half of 2007 to $20,946 for the first half of 2008.
     Commercial Charter revenue increased as a result of an increase in Revenue per Block Hour, which offset a small reduction in Block Hours flown in the segment on a year-over-year basis. The increase in revenue per Block Hour was the result of pricing increases we made to compensate for the higher cost of fuel. Commercial Charter Block Hours were 2,989 for the first half of 2008, compared with 3,037 for the first half of 2007, a decrease of 48, or 1.6%. Revenue per Block Hour was $17,688 for the first half of 2008, compared with $14,593 for the first half of 2007, an increase of $3,095 per Block Hour, or 21.2%. The decrease in Block Hours is partially the result of the retirement of one Boeing 747-200 aircraft during the second quarter of 2008 and the retirement of a damaged Boeing 747-200 aircraft in February 2008 (see Note 2 to our Financial Statements for further discussion).
     Dry Leasing revenue remained flat on a year over year basis due to the reduction of Boeing 747-200 aircraft on Dry Lease in the second quarter of 2008. The Company had three Boeing 747-400 aircraft and one Boeing 747-200 aircraft on Dry Lease to third parties at June 30, 2008 and three Boeing 747-400 aircraft and two Boeing 747-200 aircraft on Dry Lease to third parties at June 30, 2007. We experienced customer defaults on three Dry Leased Boeing 747-200 aircraft in the second quarter of 2008 as the two customers leasing these aircraft filed for protection under local insolvency laws. We have repossessed two of the three aircraft from one customer and have been in negotiations regarding the lease of the third aircraft with the other customer. All rents and maintenance reserves payable to us under these Dry Leases were fully reserved against in the second quarter of 2008.
     Total Operating revenue increased in the second half of 2008 compared with the second half of 2007 primarily as a result of the fuel-driven price increases in Scheduled Service and Commercial Charter service, and new Express Network ACMI flying, offset by the volume-driven reductions in revenue from ACMI and AMC flying.
Operating Expenses
     The following table compares our operating expenses for the six months ended June 30:
                                 
                    Increase /     Percent    
    2008     2007     (Decrease)     Change  
Operating Expenses
                               
Aircraft fuel
  $ 351,522     $ 234,434     $ 117,088       49.9 %
Salaries, wages and benefits
    111,748       123,188       (11,440 )     (9.3 %)
Maintenance, materials and repairs
    93,843       83,219       10,624       12.8 %
Aircraft rent
    80,327       77,123       3,204       4.2 %
Ground handling and airport fees
    37,622       35,706       1,916       5.4 %
Landing fees and other rent
    38,930       36,018       2,912       8.1 %
Depreciation and amortization
    21,183       19,637       1,546       7.9 %
Gain on disposal of aircraft
    (2,726 )     (1,005 )     1,721       171.2 %
Travel
    26,609       24,604       2,005       8.1 %
Minority interest
    (3,675 )           3,675        
Other
    45,466       46,312       (846 )     (1.8 %)
 
                       
Total operating expense
  $ 800,849     $ 679,236     $ 121,613       17.9 %
 
                       

23


Table of Contents

     Aircraft fuel expense increased as a result of increased market prices for fuel. The average fuel price per gallon for the Scheduled Service and Commercial Charter businesses was approximately $3.26 for the first half of 2008, compared with approximately $2.03 for the first half of 2007, an increase of $1.23, or 60.6%. Fuel consumption for the Scheduled Service and Commercial Charter businesses increased 9.6 million gallons or 13.4% to 81.3 million gallons for the first half of 2008 from 71.7 million gallons during the first half of 2007. The average pegged price per gallon for the AMC business was approximately $2.72 for the first half of 2008, compared with approximately $2.25 for the first half of 2007, an increase of $0.47, or 20.9%. AMC Fuel consumption decreased by 7.7 million gallons, or 19.5%, to 31.9 million gallons for the first half of 2008 from 39.6 million gallons during the first half of 2007. The decrease in our AMC fuel consumption corresponds to the decrease of 2,488 Block Hours in that segment. We do not incur fuel expense in our ACMI service as the cost of fuel is borne by the customer.
     Salaries, wages and benefits decreased due to the reduction in Block Hours as well as lower profit sharing and incentive compensation accruals related to decreased profitability in the first half of 2008 compared to the first half of 2007. In the second quarter, we also released employment tax reserves related to the successful resolution of an examination with the IRS resulting in a $2.7 million non-recurring benefit for the period.
     Maintenance materials and repair increased as a result of increases in line and heavy maintenance. Heavy maintenance activity reflects two additional Boeing 747-400 D Checks offset by three fewer Boeing 747-200C Checks. There were five C Checks on Boeing 747-200 aircraft in the first half of 2008, as compared with eight C Checks during the first half of 2007. For our Boeing 747-400 freighters, there were two D Checks in the first half of 2008 compared with none in the prior period. There were 26 engine overhauls in both the first half of 2008 and the first half of 2007. The average cost per overhaul on engines increased during the first half of 2008 compared with 2007. Line maintenance costs per Block Hour showed an increase of 17.3%, or approximately $3.8 million for the first half of 2008 compared with the first half of 2007, attributable to greater rotable repairs, increases in line maintenance, and an unfavorable shift in spare parts loaning and borrowing.
     Aircraft rent increased primarily due to short-term engine leases and supplemental rent expense for return conditions on two leased aircraft. In the first half of 2008, short-term leases resulted in $1.5 million of additional rent expense and we recognized $0.9 million in supplemental expense to reflect maintenance return condition obligations related to two of our leased Boeing 747-200 aircraft.
     Ground handling and airport fees increased primarily as a result of an increase in Scheduled Service flying. Scheduled Service has the highest departure driven ground handling expense of any of our service types.
     Landing fees and other rent increased primarily as a result of the increase in overfly fees related to non-ACMI Block Hours. The higher overfly fees are the result of flying a more fuel efficient route, allowing us to recover the additional overfly fees in fuel savings. We generally do not incur landing fees in our ACMI service as the cost is borne by the customer.
     Depreciation and amortization increased primarily as a result of a reduction in the average fleet life of the Boeing 747-200 aircraft during the second half of 2007 and increases in scrapping of certain engine parts and rotables during overhaul.
     Gain on disposal of aircraft in the second half of 2008 was the result of the disposal of aircraft tail number N527FT, which was damaged and subsequently scrapped (except for engines and other valuable rotable parts) after we reached a settlement with our insurer (see Note 2 our Financial Statements for further discussion). The gain represents the amount the insurance proceeds exceed the net book value of the aircraft. The gain in 2007 was the result of the sale of aircraft tail number N536MC.
     Travel increased as a result of greater crew travel requirements as well as an increase in the cost of airline ticket prices, weakness in the U.S. dollar and increases in travel requirements to meet our customers’ flight schedules.
     Minority Interest is related to DHL’s 49% ownership interest in Polar. The amount of Polar loss attributable to DHL was $3.7 million for the first half of 2008, which is reflected as a decrease in our consolidated operating expenses.
     Other operating expenses decreased slightly compared to the same quarter in the prior year. Bad debt expense decreased by approximately $1.0 million and we recorded a $1.8 million benefit from reduced interest from a settlement with the IRS on an employment tax examination, partially offset by an increase in AMC commission expense of

24


Table of Contents

approximately $2.0 million related to higher AMC mileage rates.
     Total operating expense increased in the first half of 2008 compared with the first half of 2007 primarily due to the increased price of aircraft fuel.
Non-operating Expenses
     The following table compares our non-operating expenses for the six months ended June 30:
                                 
                    Increase /   Percent  
    2008   2007   (Decrease)   Change
Non-operating Expenses
                               
Interest income
  $ (8,476 )   $ (7,259 )   $ 1,217       16.8 %
Interest expense
    23,092       22,522        570       2.5 %
Capitalized interest
    (4,049 )     (1,963 )     2,086       106.3 %
Other (income) expense, net
     139       92       47       51.1 %
     Interest income increased in the first half as higher cash balances available for investing were offset by a reduction in the effective yield on cash and cash equivalents.
     Interest expense increased by 2.5% on a year over year basis due to increased debt related to the PDP financing facility on five of our twelve firm Boeing 747-8F orders. Long-term debt and capital leases including the current portion averaged approximately $443.7 million in the first half of 2008 compared with approximately $411.8 million in the first half of 2007.
     Capitalized interest increased due to interest paid on our PDP financing facility in 2008 and increases in PDP balances paid to Boeing related to our Boeing 747-8F orders.
     Other (income) expense, net increased slightly due to realized losses on the exchange of foreign denominated currencies into U.S. dollars. The U.S. dollar strengthened slightly against most foreign currencies during the first half of 2008 compared with the beginning of the year.
     Income taxes The effective tax rate for the first half of 2008 was an expense of 1,645.1% compared with a benefit of 39.8% for the first half of 2007. Our rate for the first half of 2008 differed from the statutory rate primarily due to losses incurred by our Polar subsidiary and the disproportionate relationship of those losses to consolidated pretax income for the period. Polar did not record income tax benefits related to its losses in the first half of 2008 because Polar has no prior period income and these losses may only offset future income. Until future income occurs, no tax benefit will be recorded. Our rates for the first half of 2007 reflect the recognition of a deferred tax asset of $37.0 million offset by a tax reserve of $9.3 million related to the issuance of shares in Polar to DHL.
Segments
     Management allocates the direct costs of aircraft operation and ownership among the reportable segments based on the aircraft type and activity levels in each segment. Direct costs include crew costs, maintenance, fuel, ground operations, sales costs, aircraft rent, interest expense related to aircraft debt and aircraft depreciation. Certain of our costs are fixed, indirect costs. These costs are not affected by fleet types or activity levels in our business segments and therefore these costs are not allocated among segments. Examples of unallocated fixed costs are administrative costs including operations administration, finance, human resources, information technology, non-aircraft depreciation, and other non-operating costs.
     For purposes of segment disclosure, management views the Direct Contribution from our Express Network ACMI flying as a split between the ACMI contribution derived from the Flight Services Agreement and other related services tied to the DHL Express Network ACMI operation, which is shown in ACMI, and the residual contribution attributable to Scheduled Service operations. The consolidation of Polar results reflects Express Network ACMI flying as Scheduled Service revenue in our financial statements and operating statistics. For segment reporting purposes all revenue derived from ACMI and related services provided to Polar for Express Network ACMI operations have been reclassified from Scheduled Service to the ACMI segment (see table below for reconciliation of revenue per the Financial Statements to revenue by segment). All costs associated with providing such services have also been reclassified

25


Table of Contents

for purposes of calculating Direct Contribution. Non-ACMI costs and an equal amount of revenue remain in the Scheduled Service segment.
     Ownership costs are apportioned to segments based on aircraft equivalents (derived from Block Hours flown) except for certain ACMI flying, which involves dedicated aircraft, in which case the allocation is based on the number of dedicated aircraft. The following table compares our Direct Contribution for segments (see Note 4 to our Financial Statements for the reconciliation to operating income (loss) and our reasons for using Direct Contribution) for the six months ended June 30:
                                 
                    Increase /     Percent  
    2008     2007     (Decrease)     Change  
Direct Contribution:
                               
ACMI
  $ 23,758     $ 32,973     $ (9,215 )     (27.9 %)
Scheduled Service
    (29,515 )     899       (30,414 )     (3,383.2 %)
AMC Charter
    51,935       46,302       5,633       12.2 %
Commercial Charter
    (3,586 )     2,261       (5,847 )     (258.6 %)
Dry Leasing
    7,207       9,015       (1,808 )     (20.1 %)
 
                       
Total Direct Contribution
  $ 49,799     $ 91,450     $ (41,651 )     (45.5 %)
 
                       
 
                               
Unallocated Fixed Costs
  $ 52,279     $ 57,121     $ (4,842 )     (8.5 %)
 
                       
ACMI Segment
     During the six months ended June 30, 2008 there was an average of 10.5 Boeing 747-400 aircraft and an average of 1.8 Boeing 747-200 aircraft supporting ACMI compared with an average of ten Boeing 747-400 aircraft and an average of three Boeing 747-200 aircraft supporting ACMI for the comparable period in 2007. ACMI segment Direct Contribution decreased primarily due to a decrease in Block Hours flown as well as increases in ownership and maintenance costs. Ownership costs increased as a result of more CF6-80 engine leases in support of our expanded Boeing 747-400 fleet. The increase in maintenance costs was primarily due to two additional Boeing 747-400 D-Checks and one additional CF6-80 engine overhaul in the first half of 2008 compared with the same period last year
Scheduled Service Segment
     Direct Contribution relating to the Scheduled Service segment decreased primarily as a result of fuel price increases as well as higher ownership and maintenance costs. Ownership costs increased as a result of more CF6-80 engine leases in support of our expanded Boeing 747-400 fleet. The increase in maintenance costs was primarily due to two additional Boeing 747-400 D-Checks in the first half of 2008 compared with the first half of 2007 as well as higher engine maintenance expense. The increased costs were partially offset by fuel-surcharge-driven yield increases.
AMC Charter Segment
     Direct Contribution relating to the AMC Charter segment increased 12.2% on 20.2% fewer Block Hours. The increase in the Direct Contribution is due to contractual rate increases as well as the interim increases in the “pegged fuel price” (see AMC Revenue discussion above), which had the effect of increasing the AMC revenue per Block Hour from $17,219 for the first half of 2007 to $20,946 for the first half of 2008. Although the price of fuel increased significantly on a period-over-period basis, the AMC reimburses the Company for its AMC fuel costs. The increase in the AMC mileage rate, which includes a standard profit margin allowed by the AMC, was partially offset by cost increases in commissions and fuel.
Commercial Charter Segment
     Direct Contribution relating to the Commercial Charter segment declined as a result of increases in fuel costs that were not fully offset by fuel-driven price increases. The decrease in Block Hours was partially due to the unavailability of one Boeing 747-200 equivalent since February 2008
Dry Leasing
     Direct Contribution relating to the Dry Leasing segment declined due to an increase in costs related to return condition accruals and the operating costs of our Dry Leasing subsidiary. In addition, we experienced customer defaults on three Dry Leased Boeing 747-200 aircraft in the second quarter of 2008 as the two customers leasing these aircraft filed for protection under local insolvency laws. We have repossessed two of the three aircraft from one customer and have been in negotiations regarding the lease of the third aircraft with the other customer. The two repossessed aircraft have been made

26


Table of Contents

available for use by our AMC and Commercial Charter Segments. All rents and maintenance reserves payable to us under these Dry Leases were fully reserved against in the second quarter of 2008.
Unallocated Fixed Costs
     Unallocated fixed costs for the first half of 2008 were $52.3 million compared to $57.1 million in the same period of the prior year. The decrease of $4.8 million or 8.5% is attributable primarily to a one time benefit from the release of employment tax reserves and reduced accrued interest from a settlement with the IRS on an employment tax examination.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
     At June 30, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of $367.5 million, compared with $477.3 million at December 31, 2007, a decrease of $109.8 million, or 23.0%. The decrease in cash is the result of payments used for investing activities of $268.5 million partially offset by cash provided by operating and financing activities of $26.5 million and $132.3 million, respectively. On January 30, 2008, Atlas entered into a $270.3 million PDP Financing Facility with Norddeutsche Landesbank, in connection with five new Boeing 747-8F wide-body freighters scheduled for delivery between February and July 2010. In addition on July 3, 2008, Atlas entered into a $58.4 million, five year term loan and a commitment for an additional $41.1 million five term loan expected to close in the third quarter of 2008. We consider cash on hand, the PDP Financing Facility, the term loans (see Notes 3 and 9 to our Financial Statements) and cash generated from operations to be sufficient to meet our debt and lease obligations and to fund expected capital expenditures. Capital Expenditures for the remainder of 2008 are projected to be approximately $194.5 million, which includes Boeing 747-8F aircraft pre-delivery deposits (see Note 5 to our Financial Statements) and the remaining payments due on the Boeing 747-400 conversion freighter.
     We expect to utilize tax loss carryforwards to offset most taxable income generated during 2008. We may pay significant U.S. cash income taxes in 2009. Management is considering certain income tax planning opportunities that may reduce our effective tax rate and cash tax liability in 2008 and beyond. However, these planning opportunities are not yet fully developed, and the potential tax rate reduction and cash tax savings, if any, are not yet quantifiable. The Company expects to pay foreign income taxes in Hong Kong starting in 2008. These taxes could be offset in the U.S. by a foreign tax credit. The Company expects to pay no significant foreign income taxes in jurisdictions other than Hong Kong. Two of the Company’s foreign branch operations are subject to income tax in Hong Kong.
     Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities for the first half of 2008 was $26.5 million, compared with net cash provided by operating activities of $43.9 million for the first half of 2007. The decrease in cash from operating activities is the result of the net loss and an increase in accounts receivable partially offset by an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
     Investing Activities. Net cash used for investing activities was $268.5 million for the first half of 2008, consisting primarily of capital expenditures of $274.4 million (including Boeing 747-8F pre-delivery deposits of $96.9 million and payments made for the acquisition of two Boeing 747-400 aircraft of $152.3 million) offset by insurance proceeds of $5.9 million. Net cash used by investing activities was $24.4 million for the first half of 2007 consisting primarily of capital expenditures of $30.4 million (including Boeing 747-8F aircraft pre-delivery deposits of $12.4 million) offset by $6.0 million in proceeds from the sale of a Boeing 747-200 aircraft.
     Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $132.3 million for the first half of 2008, which consisted primarily of $107.3 million in borrowings under the PDP Financing Facility, proceeds from the DHL investment of $38.6 million, $3.2 million in proceeds from the exercise of stock options and a $1.2 million tax benefit on restricted stock and stock options offset by $17.5 million of payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations and a $0.4 million purchase of treasury stock. Net cash provided by financing activities was $61.1 million for the first half of 2007, which reflects proceeds from the DHL investment of $75.0 million and $4.0 million in proceeds from stock option exercises and $1.6 million in tax benefits on restricted stock and stock options, offset by $18.8 million of payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations and a $0.7 million purchase of treasury stock.
Debt Agreements
     See Note 6 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in the 2007 10-K for a description of the Company’s debt obligations and amendments thereto.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

27


Table of Contents

     There were no material changes in our off-balance sheet arrangements during the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Critical Accounting Policies
     There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from the information provided in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” included in our 2007 10-K.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
     See Note 2 to our Financial Statements for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements.
Forward Looking Statements
     Our disclosure and analysis in this report, including but not limited to the information discussed in the “Business Strategy” section above, contain forward-looking information about our financial results, estimates and business prospects that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. From time to time, we also may provide oral or written forward-looking statements in other materials we release to the public. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations or forecasts of future events. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historic or current facts. They use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “will,” “target” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with a discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, future performance, sales efforts, expenses, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, the outcome of contingencies such as legal proceedings and financial results.
     We cannot guarantee that any forward-looking statement will be realized, although we believe we have been prudent in our plans and assumptions. Achievement of future results is subject to risks, uncertainties and inaccurate assumptions. Should known or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove inaccurate, actual results could vary materially from past results and those anticipated, estimated or projected. Investors should bear this in mind as they consider forward-looking statements.
     We undertake no obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our Form 10-Q, 8-K and 10-K reports filed with the SEC. Our 2007 10-K listed various important risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expected and historic results. We note these factors for investors as permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors. Consequently, you should not consider any such list to be a complete set of all potential risks or uncertainties.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
     There have been no material changes in market risks from the information provided in Item 7A “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” included in our 2007 10-K, except as follows:
     Aviation fuel. Our results of operations are affected by changes in the price and availability of aviation fuel. Market risk is estimated at a hypothetical 10% increase or decrease in the average cost per gallon of fuel for the second quarter of 2008. Based on actual fuel consumption during the second quarter of 2008 for the Scheduled Service and Commercial Charter business segments, such an increase or decrease would result in a change to aviation fuel expense of approximately $15.8 million for the second quarter of 2008. Fuel prices for AMC are set each September by the military and are fixed for the year and adjusted to actual costs incurred. ACMI does not present an aviation fuel market risk, as the cost of fuel is borne by the customer.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
     An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, and Chief Financial Officer, or CFO, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2008. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported

28


Table of Contents

within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
     There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended June 30, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

29


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
     With respect to the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008, the information required in response to this Item is set forth in Note 5 to our Financial Statements contained in this report, and such information is incorporated herein by reference. Such description contains all of the information required with respect hereto.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
     We made the following repurchases of shares of our common stock during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008:
                                 
                            Maximum Number (or  
                    Total Number of     Approximate Dollar  
                    Shares Purchased as     Value) of Shares  
    Total Number of             Part of Publicly     that May Yet Be  
    Shares Purchased     Average Price Paid     Announced Plans or     Purchased Under the  
Period   (a)   per Share   Programs (b)   Plans or Programs
April 1, 2008 through April 30, 2008
    170     $ 58.54              
 
                               
May 1, 2008 through May 31, 2008
    1,275     $ 61.62              
 
                               
June 1, 2008 through June 30, 2008
    3,747     $ 52.41              
 
                               
Total
    5,192     $ 54.87              
 
                               
 
(a)   This column reflects the repurchase of 5,192 shares of common stock, previously issued by Holdings, to satisfy individual income tax liabilities of our employees at statutory minimum rates resulting from the vesting of restricted shares during such period.
 
(b)   There are no approved share repurchase programs.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
     At our annual meeting of stockholders held in New York, New York on May 21, 2008, our stockholders re-elected our Board of Directors, and the shares present at the meeting were voted for or withheld from each nominee were as follows:
                 
Name   Number of Shares Voted For   Number of Shares Withheld
Robert F. Agnew
    17,369,608       94,122  
Timothy J. Bernlohr
    16,846,263       617,467  
Keith E. Butler
    17,369,656       94,074  
Eugene I. Davis
    16,574,488       889,242  
William J. Flynn
    17,419,452       44,278  
James S. Gilmore III
    10,687,376       6,776,354  
Carol B Hallett
    17,406,467       57,263  
Frederick McCorkle
    16,883,389       580,341  
     Jeffrey H. Erickson, our former President and Chief Executive Officer, did not to stand for election and retired from the Board at the time of the meeting.

30


Table of Contents

     The Audit Committee’s designation of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 was ratified by the stockholders. The shares present at the meeting were voted on the proposal as follows: 17,158,062 shares voted for approval, 305,228 shares voted against the proposal, with 440 shares abstaining.
At the meeting, our stockholders also approved an amendment to the Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. 2007 Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”) to increase the amount of shares reserved under the 2007 Plan by 1,100,000. The shares present at the meeting were voted on the proposal as follows: 16,122,814 shares voted for approval, 497,113 shares voted against the proposal, with 62,702 shares abstaining. There were 781,101 broker non-votes in respect of this proposal.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
     a. Exhibits
     See accompanying Exhibit Index included after the signature page of this report for a list of exhibits filed or furnished with this report.

31


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
 
 
Dated: August 7, 2008  /s/ William J. Flynn    
  William J. Flynn   
  President and Chief Executive Officer   
 
     
Dated: August 7, 2008  /s/ Jason Grant    
  Jason Grant   
  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   

32


Table of Contents

         
EXHIBIT INDEX
         
Exhibit Number   Description
       
 
  10.1    
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings Incentive Plan (As Amended), filed as Exhibit 10 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 21, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
       
 
  10.2    
Employment Agreement by and between Ronald A. Lane and Atlas Air, Inc.
       
 
  31.1    
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, furnished herewith.
       
 
  31.2    
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer, furnished herewith.
       
 
  32.1    
Section 1350 Certifications, furnished herewith.

33