Calavo Growers, Inc.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006
Commission file number: 000-33385
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
California
|
|
33-0945304 |
(State of incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1141-A Cummings Road, Santa Paula, CA
|
|
93060 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (805) 525-1245
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value per Share
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated Filer þ Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark if whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Based on the closing price as reported on the Nasdaq National Market, the aggregate market
value of the Registrants Common Stock held by non-affiliates on April 30, 2006 (the last business
day of the Registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $119.4
million. Shares of Common Stock held by each executive officer and director and by each
shareholder affiliated with a director or an executive officer have been excluded from this
calculation because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate
status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes. The number of outstanding
shares of the Registrants Common Stock as of November 30, 2006 was 14,292,833.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the Registrants Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
which we intend to hold on April 25, 2007, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form
10-K. The definitive Proxy Statement will be filed within 120 days after October 31, 2006.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains statements relating to future results of Calavo Growers,
Inc. (including certain projections and business trends) that are forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are subject to the safe harbor created by those
sections. Forward-looking statements frequently are identifiable by the use of words such as
believe, anticipate, expect, intend, will, and other similar expressions. Our actual
results may differ materially from those projected as a result of certain risks and uncertainties.
These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: increased competition, general
economic and business conditions, energy costs and availability, conducting substantial amounts of
business internationally, pricing pressures on agricultural products, adverse weather and growing
conditions confronting avocado growers, new governmental regulations, as well as other risks and
uncertainties, including those set forth in Item 1A. Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K and those detailed from time to time in our other filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. These forward-looking statements are made only as of the date hereof, and
we undertake no obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements, whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise.
2
PART I
Item 1. Business
General development of the business
We engage in the procurement and marketing of avocados and other perishable foods and the
preparation and distribution of processed avocado products. Our expertise in marketing and
distributing avocados, processed avocados, and other perishable foods allows us to deliver a wide
array of fresh and processed food products to food distributors, produce wholesalers, supermarkets,
and restaurants on a worldwide basis. Through our three operating facilities in Southern
California, our distribution centers in Texas and New Jersey (our New Jersey facility commenced
operations in the first quarter of fiscal 2007), and our two facilities in Mexico, we sort, pack
and/or ripen avocados procured in California and Mexico and prepare processed avocado products.
Additionally, we procure avocados internationally, principally from Chile and the Dominican
Republic, and distribute other perishable foods, such as Hawaiian grown papayas. We currently
report our operations in two business segments, (1) fresh products and (2) processed products, down
from three business segments disclosed in the prior year. See footnote 11 in our consolidated
financial statements for further information about our business segments.
On October 9, 2001, we completed a series of transactions whereby common and preferred
shareholders of Calavo Growers of California (the Cooperative), an agricultural marketing
cooperative association, exchanged all of their outstanding shares for shares of our common stock.
Concurrent with this transaction, the Cooperative was merged into us with Calavo Growers, Inc.
(Calavo) emerging as the surviving entity. These transactions had the effect of converting the
legal structure of the business from a non profit cooperative to a for-profit corporation. All
references herein to us for periods prior to the merger refer to the business and operations of the
Cooperative.
In February 2003, our Board of Directors approved a plan whereby the operations of our
processed products business would be relocated. The plan called for the closing of our Santa
Paula, California and Mexicali, Baja California Norte processing facilities and the relocation of
these operations to a new facility in Uruapan, Michoacan, Mexico. This restructuring has provided
for cost savings in the elimination of certain transportation costs, duplicative overhead
structures, and savings in the overall cost of labor and services. The Uruapan facility commenced
operations in February 2004 and the Santa Paula and Mexicali facilities were closed in February
2003 and August 2004. We incurred no costs related to this restructuring during fiscal 2006.
In November 2003, we acquired all the outstanding common shares of Maui Fresh International,
Inc. (Maui). Maui distributes a multi-product line of produce through retail, food service and
terminal market wholesale channels. Maui has significant operations in Santa Paula, California,
Nogales, Arizona, and Hawaii. Maui packs and distributes a diversified line, comprised of more
than 20 commodities, including tropical, speciality, and exotic fruits, chilies and hothouse-grown
items, as well as other conventional fruits and vegetables.
In March 2005, we completed the sale of our old corporate headquarters building (located in
Santa Ana) for $3.4 million. This transaction resulted in a pre-tax gain on sale of approximately
$1.7 million. In conjunction with such sale, we relocated our corporate offices to Santa Paula,
California in March 2005. Total expenses related to such relocation approximated $0.4 million.
In June 2005, in order to increase our market share of California avocados and increase
synergies within the marketplace, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with Limoneira Company
(Limoneira). Pursuant to such agreement, we acquired approximately 15.1% of Limoneiras
outstanding common stock for $23.45 million and Limoneira acquired approximately 6.9% of our
outstanding common stock for $10 million. The transaction was settled by a net cash payment by us
of $13.45 million. Additionally, such agreement also provided for: (1) Calavo to lease office
space from Limoneira in Santa Paula, California for a period of 10 years at an initial annual gross
rental of approximately $0.2 million (subject to annual CPI increases, as defined), (2) Calavo to
market Limoneiras avocados and (3) Calavo and Limoneira to use good faith reasonable efforts to
maximize avocado packing efficiencies for both parties by consolidating their fruit packing
operations. Various opportunities are currently being considered, including the use of existing
packing facilities, an investment in existing vacant facilities, and/or an investment in a new
consolidated facility for both parties. Limoneira primarily engages in growing citrus and
avocados, picking and hauling citrus, and packing lemons. The issuances of the shares discussed
above are exempt from registration under federal and state securities laws.
In August 2006, we entered into a joint venture agreement with San Rafael Distributing (SRD)
for the purpose of the marketing, sale and distribution of fresh produce from the existing location
of SRD at the Los Angeles Wholesale Produce Market (Terminal Market), located in Los Angeles,
California. Such joint venture operates under the name of Maui Fresh International, LLC (Maui
Fresh) and commenced operations in August 2006. SRD and Calavo each have an equal one-half
ownership interest in Maui Fresh, ut
3
SRD shall have overall management responsibility for the operations of Maui Fresh at the
Terminal Market. We will use the equity method to account for our investment.
Our principal executive offices are located at 1141-A Cummings Road, Santa Paula, California
93060; telephone (805) 525-1245.
At October 31, 2006, we employed approximately 750 employees worldwide.
Available information
We maintain an Internet website at http://www.calavo.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports filed or
furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and other information related to us, are available, free of charge, on our website as soon
as reasonably practicable after we electronically file those documents with, or otherwise furnish
them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our Internet website and the information
contained therein, or connected thereto, is not and is not intended to be incorporated into this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Fresh products
Calavo was founded in 1924 to market California avocados. In California, the growing area
stretches from San Diego County to Monterey County, with the majority of the growing areas located
approximately 100 miles north and south of Los Angeles County. The storage life of fresh avocados
is limited. It generally ranges from one to four weeks, depending upon the maturity of the fruit,
the growing methods used, and the handling conditions in the distribution chain.
The Hass variety is the predominant avocado variety marketed on a worldwide basis. California
grown Hass avocados are available year-round, with peak production periods occurring between
February through September. Other varieties have a more limited picking season and generally
command a lower price. Approximately 2,300 growers deliver avocados to us, generally pursuant to a
standard marketing agreement. Over the past several years, our share of the California avocado
crop has remained strong, with approximately 36% of the 2006 California avocado crop handled by us,
based on data published by the California Avocado Commission. We attribute our solid foothold in
the California industry principally to the competitiveness of the per pound returns we pay and the
communication and service we maintain with our growers.
California avocados delivered to our packinghouses are graded, sized, packed, cooled and, at
times, ripened for delivery to customers. Our ability to estimate the size, as well as the timing
of the delivery of the annual avocado crop, has a substantial impact on both our costs and the
sales price we receive for the fruit. To that end, our field personnel maintain direct contact
with growers and farm managers and coordinate harvest plans. The feedback from our field-managers
is used by our sales department to prepare sales plans used by our direct sales force.
A significant portion of our costs are fixed. As a result, significant fluctuations in the
volume of avocados delivered have a considerable impact on the per pound packing costs of avocados
we handle. Generally, larger crops will result in a lower per pound handling cost. We believe
that our cost structure is geared to optimally handle larger avocado crops. Our strategy calls for
continued efforts in aggressively recruiting new growers, retaining existing growers, and procuring
a larger percentage of the California avocado crop.
California avocados delivered to us are grouped as a homogenous pool on a weekly basis based
on the variety, size, and grade. The proceeds we receive from the sale of each separate avocado
pool, net of a packing and marketing fee to cover our costs and a profit, are paid back to the
growers once each month. The packing and marketing fee we withhold is periodically determined and
revised based on our estimated per pound packing and operating costs, as well as our operating
profit. Significant competitive pressures dictate that we set the packing and marketing fee at the
lowest possible level to attract new and retain existing grower business. We believe that, if net
proceeds paid ceased to be competitive, growers would choose to deliver their avocados to alternate
competitive handlers. Consequently, we strive to deliver growers the highest return possible on
avocados delivered to our packinghouses.
The California avocado market is highly competitive with 9 major avocado handlers. A
marketing order enacted by the state legislature is in effect for California grown avocados and
provides the financial resource to fund generic advertising and promotional programs. Avocados
handled by us are identifiable through packaging and the Calavo brand name sticker. We have
developed a series of marketing and sales initiatives primarily aimed at our largest customers that
are designed to differentiate our products and services from those offered by our competitors.
Some of these key initiatives are as follows:
4
|
|
|
We continue to have success with our ProRipeVIP avocado ripening program. This
proprietary program allows us to deliver avocados evenly ripened to our customers
specifications. We have invested in the Aweta AFS (acoustic firmness sensor) technology and
equipment. ProRipeVIP is the next generation of selling conditioned avocados that have
firmness determined via soundwaves. This technology is new to avocados. The most
significant and compelling reason we choose to invest in Aweta systems is because the
acoustic sensors measure firmness of the entire piece of fruit, as opposed to competitive
mechanical tests that use pressure and calculated averages to measure firmness. We believe
that ripened avocados help our customers address the consumers immediate needs and
accelerate the sale of avocados through their stores. We currently have three Aweta systems
in use in the United States, which, we believe, can effectively meet our customers demand
for conditioned fruit. |
|
|
|
|
We have developed various display techniques and packages that appeal to consumers and,
in particular, impulse buyers. Some of our techniques include the bagging of avocados and
the strategic display of the bags within the produce section of retail stores. Our research
has demonstrated that consumers generally purchase a larger quantity of avocados when
presented in a bag as opposed to the conventional bulk displays. We also believe that the
value proposition of avocados in a bag provides for a higher level of sales to grocery
stores. |
|
|
|
|
From time to time, we market our avocados under joint promotion programs with other food
manufacturers. Under these programs, we seek to increase the promotional exposure of our
products by providing certain sales incentives. These incentives will be offered in
conjunction with various promotional campaigns designed to advertise the products of all
parties involved. We believe these programs will help us minimize our advertising costs, as
they will be shared with other parties, while still achieving recognition in the
marketplace. |
We sell avocados to a diverse group of supermarket chains, wholesalers, food service and other
distributors, under the Calavo family of brand labels, as well as private labels. The
consolidation in the supermarket industry has led to fewer, but bigger buyers. From time to time,
sales are transacted via e-commerce. We believe that our largest customers will require us and our
competitors to implement one or more e-commerce distribution solutions to facilitate their
procurement and inventory management programs. In our judgment, the shift to e-commerce by our
largest customers will favorably impact larger handlers like us, which have the ability and
financial resources to support these strategies. From time to time, some of our larger customers
seek short-term sales contracts that formalize their pricing and volume requirements. Generally,
these contracts contain provisions that establish a price floor and/or ceiling during the contract
duration. Again, in our judgment, the shift by our customers to drafting sales contracts benefits
large handlers like us, which have the ability to fulfill the terms of these contracts. During
fiscal year 2006, our 5 and 25 largest customers represented approximately 21% and 42% of our total
consolidated revenues. During fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004 none of our California avocado
customers represented more than 10% of total consolidated revenues.
We leverage our expertise in the handling and marketing of California avocados to our
non-California sourced avocados and perishable food products. We believe that the sales generated
from these sources complement our offering of California avocados to our customers and stabilize
the supply of avocados during seasons of low California production. Sales generated from these
sources include avocados grown outside of California and other perishable food products, such as
papayas, tomatoes, ginger, and pineapple. We primarily import and market avocados from Mexico and
Chile. We handle some of these products on a consignment basis for the suppliers. Pursuant to
these arrangements, from time to time, we make advances to Chilean packers and Mexican growers.
Historically, we made such advances related to both pre-harvest and post-harvest activities, but
our focus during fiscal 2006 was primarily related to post-harvest activities. Typically, we
obtain collateral (i.e. fruit, fixed assets, etc.) that approximates the value at risk, prior to
making such advances. Historical experience demonstrates that providing post-harvest advances
results in our acquiring full market risk for the product, as it is possible (although unlikely)
that our resale proceeds may be less than the amounts we paid to the grower. This is a result of
the high level of volatility inherent in the avocado and perishable food markets, which are subject
to significant pricing declines based on the availability of fruit in the market. In the event
that we do make a pre-season advance, our ability to recover such pre-harvest advance would be
largely dependent on the growers ability to deliver avocados to us, as well as the inherent risks
of farming, such as weather and pests. We do not anticipate making significant pre-season advances
during fiscal 2007.
Net sales generated by non-California sourced avocados depend principally on the availability
of Chilean and Mexican grown avocados in the U.S. markets. In November 2004, the United States
Department of Food and Agriculture (USDA) published a rule allowing Hass avocado imports from
Mexico into all 50 states year round (up from 31 states for only a six month period), except for
California, Florida, and Hawaii. We expect the restriction on such states to be lifted in February
2007. For the remaining 47 states, however, Mexico was able to deliver its fruit for all of fiscal
2006 and 2005. The implementation of this rule resulted in a significant increase in the sale of
Mexican sourced fruit during fiscal 2005, as compared to fiscal 2004. See Item 7 for a detailed
description of such increase.
In 1998, we invested in the Mexican avocado market by building a packinghouse in Uruapan,
Mexico. We believe that our continued success in marketing Mexican avocados is largely dependent
upon securing a reliable, high-quality supply of avocados at
5
reasonable prices. The Mexican avocado harvest is both complimentary and competitive with the
California market, as the Mexican harvest typically runs from September to June. As a result, it
is common for Mexican growers to monitor the supply of avocados for export to the United States in
order to obtain higher field prices. During 2006, we packed and distributed approximately 18% of
the avocados exported from Mexico into the United States and approximately 5% of the avocados
exported from Mexico to countries other than the United States, based on our estimates.
In recent years, the volume of avocados exported by Chilean growers to the United States has
continued to increase. Chilean growers continue to increase/monitor avocado plantings to
capitalize on returns available in the worldwide avocado markets. Sales of Chilean grown avocados
have generally been significant during our 4th and 1st fiscal quarters.
Additionally, with the Chilean harvesting season being complimentary to the California season
(August through February), Chilean avocados are able to command competitive retail pricing in the
market. During 2006, we distributed approximately 7% of the Chilean imports into the United
States, based on our estimates.
In recent years, our distribution of other perishable food products has generally been limited
to papayas procured from a Hawaiian packing operation, which is owned by the Chairman of our Board
of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President. The acquisition of Maui, however, expanded
our perishable food products to include additional papayas, tomatoes, chili peppers, pineapples,
and ginger. While Maui has numerous product offerings, the aforementioned commodities account for
the majority of its sales.
Maui has operations in Arizona, California, and Hawaii. The primary focus of these operations
is the growing, shipping and distribution of fresh produce. Maui primarily sources its products
from the United States and Mexico and has customers located primarily in the United States and
Canada. These customers are principally in the retail, foodservice, and wholesale sectors. Maui
does not experience significant fluctuations in sales related to seasonality.
Processed Products
In the 1960s and early 1970s, we pioneered the process of freezing avocado pulp and
developed a wide variety of guacamole recipes to address the diverse tastes of consumers and buyers
in the food service industry. Our customers include both companies in the food service industry
and the retail business. Sales are made principally through a commissioned nationwide broker
network, which is supported by our regional sales managers. We believe that our marketing strength
is distinguished by providing quality products, innovation, year-round product availability,
strategically located warehouses, and market relationships. During fiscal year 2006, our 5 and 25
largest customers represented approximately 7% and 12% of our total consolidated revenues. During
fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004 none of our processed product customers represented more than 10%
of total consolidated revenues.
The processed product segment was originally conceived as a mechanism to stabilize the price
of California avocados by reducing the volume of avocados available to the marketplace. With the
introduction of low cost processed products delivered from Mexican based processors, however, we
realigned the segments strategy by shifting the fruit procurement and pulp processing functions to
Mexico. In 1995, we invested in a processing plant in Mexicali, Mexico to derive the benefit of
competitive avocado prices available in Mexico.
In February 2003, our Board of Directors approved a plan whereby the operations of our
processed products business would be relocated. The plan called for the closing of our Santa
Paula, California and Mexicali, Baja California Norte (Mexicali) processing facilities and
relocating these operations to a new facility in Uruapan, Michoacan, Mexico (Uruapan). This
restructuring has provided for cost savings in the elimination of certain transportation costs,
duplicative overhead structures, and savings in the overall cost of labor and services. The
Uruapan facility commenced operations in February 2004 and the Santa Paula and Mexicali facilities
ceased production in February 2003 and August 2004.
Through January 2003, the primary function of our Mexicali processed operation was to produce
pulp for our Santa Paula plant. Our processing facility in Santa Paula, California would receive
the pulp from Mexicali, add ingredients, and package the product in
various containers. The product would then be frozen for storage with shipment to warehouses and,
ultimately, to our customers. From January 2003 to August 2004, however, our Mexicali processed
operations became primarily focused on our individually quick frozen (IQF) avocado half product
line and one of our high-pressure lines.
Our IQF line provides food service and retail customers with peeled avocado halves that are
ripe and suitable for immediate consumption. These halves were frozen, packaged and shipped out of
Mexicali to warehouses located in the U.S., and, ultimately, to our customers.
During fiscal year 2006, we primarily operated one high-pressure line designed to manufacture
processed avocado products that are not frozen (guacamole) in Uruapan. This machine ran at about
80% capacity during fiscal 2006. We anticipate that we will
6
operate such high-pressure machine at a similar capacity during fiscal year 2007. We
presently own another, much smaller, high-pressure machine, also located in Uruapan, that was used
occasionally during fiscal 2006. We anticipate trading such smaller machine in for credit towards
another large high-pressure machine (similar to the large machine that is currently in use in
Uruapan), once we receive the second high-pressure machine. This second large high-pressure
machine was ordered in July 2006 and is expected to be received during our second fiscal quarter of
2007. Utilizing avocado pulp and chunks, these high-pressure machines allow us to deliver fresh
guacamole to retail and food service customers. Sales of our high-pressure product totaled
approximately $13.9 million and $8.7 million for fiscal years 2006 and 2005.
Although the additions of these product offerings are fairly recent, we believe that these
high pressure machines will position our company to deliver the widest available array of processed
avocado products to our customers. Consequently, we believe we are currently the only single
source company supplying the complete range of processed avocado products, including frozen
guacamole, ultra high pressure treated guacamole, and frozen avocado halves to foodservice and
retail customers.
Sales and Other Financial Information by Business Segment and Product Category
Sales and other financial information by business segment are provided in Note 11 to our
consolidated financial statements that are included in this Annual Report.
Patents and Trademarks
Our trademarks include the Calavo brand name and related logos. We also utilize the following
trademarks in conducting our business: Avo Fresco, Bueno, Calavo Gold, Celebrate the Taste, El
Dorado, Fresh Ripe, Select, Taste of Paradise, The First Name in Avocados, Tico, Mfresh, and
Triggered Avocados, and ProRipeVIP.
Working Capital Requirements
Generally, we make payments to our California avocado growers and other suppliers in advance
of collecting all of the related accounts receivable. We generally bridge the timing between
vendor payments and customer receipts by using operating cash flows and commercial bank borrowings.
In addition, we provide crop loans and other advances to some of our growers, which are also
funded through operating cash flows and borrowings. We generally experience larger levels of
commercial bank borrowings during the California Hass avocado crop harvesting season.
Non-California sourced avocados and perishable food products often requires working capital to
finance the payment of advances to suppliers and collection of accounts receivable. These working
capital needs are also financed through the use of operating cash flows and bank borrowings and are
generally concentrated during the Chilean Hass avocado crop harvesting season.
With respect to our processed products business, we require working capital to finance the
production of our processed avocado products, building and maintaining an adequate supply of
finished product, and collecting our accounts receivable balances. These working capital needs are
financed through the use of operating cash flows and bank borrowings.
Backlog
Our customers do not place product orders significantly in advance of the requested product
delivery dates. Customers typically order perishable products two to ten days in advance of
shipment, and typically order processed products within thirty days in advance of shipment.
Research and Development
We do not undertake significant research and development efforts. Research and development
programs, if any, are limited to the continuous process of refining and developing new techniques
to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of our processed products operations and the handling,
ripening, storage, and packing of fresh avocados.
Compliance with Government Regulations
The California State Department of Food and Agriculture oversees the packing and processing of
California avocados and conducts tests for fruit quality and packaging standards. All of our
packages are stamped with the state seal as meeting standards. Various states have instituted
regulations providing differing levels of oversight with respect to weights and measures, as well
as quality standards.
7
The USDA regulates and reviews imported food products. In particular, the USDA regulates the
distribution of Mexican avocados within 47 states in the U.S. by requiring avocado importers and
handlers to execute compliance agreements. These agreements represent an acknowledgment by
handlers of the distribution restrictions placed on Mexican avocados and are used as a tool to
ensure compliance with existing regulations. From time to time, we have been approached by USDA
representatives in their oversight of the compliance agreement process. We continue to consult
with USDA representatives to ensure that our systems of internal control provide a high level of
reliability in securing compliance agreements on behalf of our customers.
As a manufacturer and marketer of processed avocado products, our operations are subject to
extensive regulation by various federal government agencies, including the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), the USDA and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), as well as state and local
agencies, with respect to production processes, product attributes, packaging, labeling, storage
and distribution. Under various statutes and regulations, these agencies prescribe requirements and
establish standards for safety, purity and labeling. In addition, advertising of our products is
subject to regulation by the FTC, and our operations are subject to certain health and safety
regulations, including those issued under the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Our
manufacturing facilities and products are subject to periodic inspection by federal, state and
local authorities.
As a result of our agricultural and food processing activities, we are subject to numerous
environmental laws and regulations. These laws and regulations govern the treatment, handling,
storage and disposal of materials and waste and the remediation of contaminated properties.
We seek to comply at all times with all such laws and regulations and to obtain any necessary
permits and licenses, and we are not aware of any instances of material non-compliance. We believe
our facilities and practices are sufficient to maintain compliance with applicable governmental
laws, regulations, permits and licenses. Nevertheless, there is no guarantee that we will be able
to comply with any future laws and regulations or requirements for necessary permits and licenses.
Our failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations or obtain any necessary permits and
licenses could subject us to civil remedies including fines, injunctions, recalls or seizures, as
well as potential criminal sanctions.
Employees
As of October 31, 2006, we had approximately 750 employees, of which approximately 230 were
located in the United States and 520 were located in Mexico. None of Calavos United States
employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Approximately 450 of Calavos Mexican
employees are represented by a union. We consider the relationship with our employees to be good
and we have never experienced a significant work stoppage.
The following is a summary of the number of salaried and hourly employees as of October
31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Salaried |
|
Hourly |
United States |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although agriculture is a seasonal industry, avocados have a wider window of production than
most perishable commodities. Consequently, we employ hourly personnel more routinely throughout the
year when compared to other agriculture-dependent companies.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Risks Related to Our Business
We are subject to increasing competition that may adversely affect our operating results.
The market for avocados and processed avocado products is highly competitive and affects each
of our businesses. Each of our businesses are subject to competitive pressures, including the
following:
|
|
|
California avocados are impacted by an increasing volume of foreign grown avocados being
imported into the United States. Recently, there have been significant plantings of
avocados in Mexico, Chile, New Zealand, the Dominican Republic, and other parts of the
world, which have had, and will continue to have, the effect of increasing the volume of
foreign grown avocados entering the United States market. Generally, an increase in foreign
grown avocados in the markets we distribute in has the effect of lowering prices for
California grown avocados and adversely impacting our results from operations. |
8
|
|
|
California avocado are subject to competition from other California avocado handlers. If
we are unable to consistently pay California growers a competitive price for their avocados,
these growers may choose to have their avocados marketed by alternate handlers. |
|
|
|
|
Non-California sourced avocados and perishable food products are impacted by competitors
operating in Mexico. Generally, handlers of Mexican grown avocados operate facilities that
are substantially smaller than our facility in Uruapan, Mexico. If we are unable to pack
and market a sufficient volume of Mexican grown avocados, smaller handlers will have a lower
per unit cost and be able to offer Mexican avocados at a more competitive price to our
customers. |
|
|
|
|
Non-California sourced avocados and perishable food products are also subject to
competition from other California avocado handlers that market Chilean grown avocados. If
we are unable to consistently pay Chilean packers a competitive price for their avocados,
these packers may choose to have their avocados marketed by alternate handlers. |
We are subject to the risks of doing business internationally.
We conduct a substantial amount of business with growers and customers who are located outside
the United States. We purchase avocados from foreign growers and packers, sell fresh avocados and
processed avocado products to foreign customers, and operate a packinghouse and a processing plant
in Mexico. For additional information about our non-California sourced fruit, see the Business
section included in this Annual Report.
Our current international operations are subject to a number of inherent risks, including:
|
|
|
Local economic and political conditions, including disruptions in trading and capital
markets; |
|
|
|
|
Restrictive foreign governmental actions, such as restrictions on transfers of funds and
trade protection measures, including export duties and quotas and customs duties and
tariffs; |
|
|
|
|
Changes in legal or regulatory requirements affecting foreign investment, loans, taxes,
imports, and exports; and |
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange rate fluctuations which, depending upon the nature of the changes, may
make our domestic-sourced products more expensive compared to foreign grown products or may
increase our cost of obtaining foreign-sourced products. |
We and our growers are subject to the risks that are inherent in farming.
Our results of operations may be adversely affected by numerous factors over which we have
little or no control and that are inherent in farming, including reductions in the market prices
for our products, adverse weather and growing conditions, pest and disease problems, and new
government regulations regarding farming and the marketing of agricultural products.
We are subject to rapidly changing USDA and FDA regulations which govern the importation of foreign
avocados into the United States and the processing of processed avocado products.
The USDA has established, and continues to modify, regulations governing the importation of
avocados into the United States. Our permits that allow us to import foreign-sourced avocados into
the United States generally are contingent on our compliance with these regulations. Our results
of operations may be adversely affected if we are unable to comply with existing and modified
regulations and are unable to secure avocado import permits in the future.
The FDA establishes, and continues to modify, regulations governing the production of
processed avocado products. Our results of operations may be adversely affected if we are unable
to comply with existing and modified regulations.
Our business could be adversely affected if we lost key members of our management.
We are dependent on the efforts and performance of our current directors and officers. If we
were to lose any key members of management, our business could be adversely affected. You should
read the information under Executive Officers in this Annual Report for additional information
about our management.
The acquisition of other businesses could pose risks to our operating income.
We intend to review acquisition prospects that would complement our business. While we are
not currently a party to any agreement with respect to any acquisitions, we may acquire other
businesses in the future. Future acquisitions by us could result in accounting charges,
potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, and increased debt and contingent liabilities,
any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and the market price of our
common stock. Acquisitions entail numerous risks, including the assimilation of the acquired
operations, diversion of managements attention to other business concerns, risks of entering
markets in which we have limited prior experience, and the potential loss of key employees of
acquired organizations. We may be
9
unable to successfully integrate businesses or the personnel of any business that might be
acquired in the future, and our failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our
business and on the market price of our common stock.
Our ability to competitively serve our customers is a function of reliable and low cost
transportation. Disruption of the supply of these services and/or significant increases in the cost
of these services could impact our operating income.
We use multiple forms of transportation to bring our products to market. They include ocean,
truck, and air-cargo. Disruption to the timely supply of these services or dramatic increases in
the cost of these services for any reason including availability of fuel for such services, labor
disputes, or governmental restrictions limiting specific forms of transportation could have an
adverse effect on our ability to serve our customers and consumers and could have an adverse effect
on our financial performance.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
We lease our corporate headquarters building. Additionally, we own two packinghouses and one
distribution and ripening facility (our former processing facility) in California, lease one
facility in New Jersey, operate in a distribution center in Texas, own one processing facility in
Mexico, and lease one packinghouse in Mexico.
In March 2005, we completed the sale of our corporate headquarters building (located in Santa
Ana, CA) for $3.4 million. In conjunction with such sale, we relocated our corporate offices to
Santa Paula, California in March 2005. We currently lease our corporate headquarters from
Limoneira (see note 12 to the consolidated financial statements).
Our two California facilities handle avocados delivered to us by California and Chilean
growers. The Temecula, California facility was built in 1985 and has been improved in capacity and
efficiency since then. The Santa Paula, California facility was purchased in 1955 and has had
recent equipment improvements equivalent to our Temecula facility. We believe that the combined
annual capacity of the two packinghouses, under normal workweek operations, is sufficient to pack
the annually budgeted volume of California avocados delivered to us by our growers.
Our Santa Paula, California processing facility was built in 1975 and had a major expansion in
1988. In conjunction with our restructuring plan, which was approved in February 2003, this
facility ceased operating as a processed product avocado processing facility and now functions
primarily as a ripening, storage and shipping facility for our fresh avocado operation.
Additionally, it also serves to store certain processed avocado products as well. Also, effective
December 2005, we sort and pack certain tropical commodities as well. We believe that the annual
capacity of this facility will be sufficient to pack and ripen, if necessary, the expected annual
volume of avocados and specialty commodities delivered to us.
Our leased Swedesboro, New Jersey facility primarily ripens, sorts, packs and ships avocados.
We believe that the annual capacity of this facility will be sufficient to handle our budgeted
annual production needs.
Our distribution center located in San Antonio, Texas is neither leased nor owned, but rather
operates pursuant to a usage agreement whereby we pay handling and distribution fees. This
facility primarily ripens, sorts, packs and ships fresh avocados under our supervision. We believe
that the annual capacity of this facility will be sufficient to handle our budgeted annual
production needs.
Our owned processing facility in Uruapan, Michoacan, Mexico was constructed pursuant to our
restructuring plan approved in February 2003. This facility commenced operations in February 2004.
We believe that the annual capacity of this facility will be sufficient to process our budgeted
annual production needs.
Our Uruapan, Mexico packinghouse, owned by the same landlord as our former Mexicali facility,
was also built to our specifications. We are committed to leasing the facility through 2008 and
have the option to purchase such facility at the end of the lease term. We believe that the annual
capacity of this facility will be sufficient to process our budgeted annual production needs.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we become involved in legal proceedings that are related to our business
operations. We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings that could have a material
adverse effect upon our financial position or results of operations.
10
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of our shareholders during the quarter ended October 31,
2006.
Executive Officers
The following table sets forth the name, age and position of individuals who hold positions as
executive officers of our company. There are no family relationships between any director or
executive officer and any other director or executive officer of our company. Executive officers
are elected by the Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
Lecil E. Cole
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President |
Arthur J. Bruno
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary |
Robert J. Wedin
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Vice President, Sales and Fresh Marketing |
Alan C. Ahmer
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Vice President, Processed Product Sales and Production |
Michael A. Browne
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Vice President, Fresh Operations |
Lecil E. Cole has been a member of our board of directors since February 1982 and has served
as Chairman of the Board since 1988. Mr. Cole has also served as our Chief Executive Officer and
President since February 1999. He served as an executive of Safeway Stores from 1964 to 1976 and
as Chairman of Central Coast Federal Land Bank from 1986 to 1996. Mr. Cole has served as Chairman
and President of Hawaiian Sweet, Inc. and Tropical Hawaiian Products, Inc. since 1996. Mr. Cole
farms approximately 4,400 acres in California and Hawaii on which avocados, papayas, and cattle are
produced and raised.
Arthur J. Bruno has served as our Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary since
October 2003. During fiscal 2004, Mr. Bruno also assumed the title and responsibilities of Chief
Operating Officer. From 1988 to 2003, Mr. Bruno served as the president and co-founder of Maui
Fresh International, Inc. Mr. Bruno is a Certified Public Accountant.
Robert J. Wedin has served as our Vice President since 1993. Mr. Wedin joined us in 1973 at
our then Santa Barbara packinghouse. Beginning in 1990, Mr. Wedin served as a director of the
California Avocado Commission for a period of ten years. Mr. Wedin currently is a board member of
Producesupply.org and serves as a member of that organizations executive committee.
Alan C. Ahmer has served as our Vice President since 1989. Mr. Ahmer joined us in 1979 as a
regional sales manager in our processed products business. In September 2003, Mr. Ahmers new
title became Vice-President, Processed Products Sales and Production.
Michael A. Browne has served as our Vice President since 2005. From 1997 until joining us,
Mr. Browne served as the founder and co-owner of Fresh Directions International, a closely held
multinational fresh produce company, which marketed fresh avocados from Mexico, Chile, and the
Dominican Republic. Mr. Browne joined us in May 2005.
11
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
In March 2002, our common stock began trading on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol
CVGW. In July 2002, our common stock began trading on the Nasdaq National Market under the
symbol CVGW.
The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices per
share of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006 |
|
High |
|
Low |
First Quarter |
|
$ |
10.50 |
|
|
$ |
9.59 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
$ |
11.00 |
|
|
$ |
9.51 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
$ |
11.94 |
|
|
$ |
9.37 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
10.24 |
|
|
$ |
9.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2005 |
|
High |
|
Low |
First Quarter |
|
$ |
12.38 |
|
|
$ |
10.10 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
$ |
11.81 |
|
|
$ |
9.76 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
$ |
10.92 |
|
|
$ |
10.00 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
10.25 |
|
|
$ |
8.66 |
|
As of October 31, 2006, there were approximately 1,400 stockholders of record of our common
stock.
During the year ended October 31, 2006, we did not issue any shares of common stock that were
not registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
Dividend Policy
Our dividend policy is to provide for an annual dividend payment, as determined by the Board
of Directors. We anticipate that dividends will be paid in the first quarter of our fiscal year.
On January 3, 2007, we paid a $0.32 per share dividend in the aggregate amount of $4,573,000
to shareholders of record on December 15, 2006.
On January 3, 2006, we paid a $0.32 per share dividend in the aggregate amount of $4,564,000
to shareholders of record on December 15, 2005.
12
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following summary consolidated financial data (other than pounds information) for each of
the years in the five-year period ended October 31, 2006 are derived from the audited consolidated
financial statements of Calavo Growers, Inc. and our predecessor, Calavo Growers of California.
Historical results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected in any
future period. The following data should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto that are included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
Income Statement Data: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
273,910 |
|
|
$ |
258,822 |
|
|
$ |
274,218 |
|
|
$ |
246,761 |
|
|
$ |
242,671 |
|
Gross margin |
|
|
29,271 |
|
|
|
21,734 |
|
|
|
25,404 |
|
|
|
25,465 |
|
|
|
25,823 |
|
Net income |
|
|
5,788 |
|
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
6,210 |
|
|
|
7,160 |
|
|
|
6,915 |
|
Basic and diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
Balance Sheet Data as of End of
Period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
12,023 |
|
|
$ |
17,618 |
|
|
$ |
20,353 |
|
|
$ |
20,735 |
|
|
$ |
18,833 |
|
Total assets(4) |
|
|
107,494 |
|
|
|
108,482 |
|
|
|
67,398 |
|
|
|
53,689 |
|
|
|
55,132 |
|
Short-term debt(4) |
|
|
1,308 |
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
3,222 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion(2)(4) |
|
|
10,406 |
|
|
|
11,719 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
3,180 |
|
Shareholders equity(4) |
|
|
58,943 |
|
|
|
64,746 |
|
|
|
43,937 |
|
|
|
37,147 |
|
|
|
30,556 |
|
Cash Flows Provided by (Used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
$ |
7,819 |
|
|
$ |
5,568 |
|
|
$ |
4,460 |
|
|
$ |
15,222 |
|
|
$ |
8,135 |
|
Investing(3)(4) |
|
|
(4,663 |
) |
|
|
(11,941 |
) |
|
|
(8,474 |
) |
|
|
(4,475 |
) |
|
|
(2,078 |
) |
Financing(4) |
|
|
(4,239 |
) |
|
|
6,870 |
|
|
|
(725 |
) |
|
|
(6,293 |
) |
|
|
(7,193 |
) |
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per share |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
Net book value per share |
|
$ |
4.12 |
|
|
$ |
4.51 |
|
|
$ |
3.25 |
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
$ |
2.38 |
|
Pounds of California avocados sold |
|
|
218,460 |
|
|
|
104,950 |
|
|
|
152,725 |
|
|
|
122,950 |
|
|
|
158,187 |
|
Pounds of non-California avocados sold |
|
|
70,063 |
|
|
|
103,830 |
|
|
|
69,410 |
|
|
|
70,348 |
|
|
|
69,512 |
|
Pounds of processed avocados products sold |
|
|
20,489 |
|
|
|
15,628 |
|
|
|
13,317 |
|
|
|
14,707 |
|
|
|
14,248 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating results for fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004 include the acquisition of Maui Fresh
International, Inc. For fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004, Mauis net sales, gross margins,
and net income were as follows: (2006) $22.1 million, $1.4 million, and $0.2 million, (2005)
$21.7 million, $1.1 million, and $0.4 million, and (2004) $19.8 million, $1.4 million, and
$0.5 million. |
|
(2) |
|
In July 2003, our Board of Directors approved the retirement of our Industrial Development
Revenue Bond. The bonds were initially floated to provide the financing to construct our
Temecula, California packinghouse. We repaid the final $2.8 million in principal under the
indenture in September 2003. |
|
(3) |
|
Cash flows used in investing activities for fiscal 2004 and 2003 include the effect of
constructing a processing facility in Uruapan, Michoacan, Mexico. The Uruapan facility
commenced operations in February 2004. |
|
(4) |
|
Total assets, short-term debt, long-term debt, equity, cash flows used in investing
activities, and cash flows provided by financing activities for fiscal 2005 include the effect
of the stock purchase agreement with Limoneira Company. See Note 12 to the consolidated
financial statements. |
13
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results
of operations together with Selected Consolidated Financial Data and our consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto that appear elsewhere in this Annual Report. This discussion and
analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions.
Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as
a result of various factors, including, but not limited to, those presented under Risks related to
our business included in Item 1A and elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Overview
We are a leader in the distribution of avocados, processed avocado products, and other
perishable food products throughout the United States and elsewhere in the world. Our history and
expertise in handling California grown avocados has allowed us to develop a reputation of
delivering quality products, at competitive prices, while providing a competitive return to our
growers. This reputation has enabled us to expand our product offering to include avocados sourced
on an international basis, processed avocado products, and other perishable foods. During the
second quarter of fiscal 2006, we examined our California avocados and international avocados and
perishable food products reporting segments. We concluded that these two reporting segments have
similar economic characteristics, production processes, customers and distribution methods.
Therefore, in accordance with the aggregation criteria of FASB Statement No. 131, Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, we combined these two operating segments into
one reportable segment, fresh products. As a result, we now report our operations in two different
business segments: (1) fresh products and (2) processed products. See footnote 11 in our
consolidated financial statements for further discussion. We report our financial results on a
November 1 to October 31 fiscal year basis to coincide with the California avocado harvest season.
On October 9, 2001, we completed a series of transactions whereby common and preferred
shareholders of Calavo Growers of California, an agricultural marketing cooperative association,
exchanged all of their outstanding shares for shares of our common stock. Concurrently with this
transaction, the Cooperative was merged into us with Calavo emerging as the surviving entity.
These transactions had the effect of converting the legal structure of the business from a
non-profit cooperative to a for-profit corporation. The merger and the conversion were approved on
an overwhelming basis by both the Cooperatives shareholders and our board of directors. Prior to
the merger, the Cooperative reported results of operations as constituting either member (the
packing and distribution of avocados procured from either members or associate members) or
non-member business (non-member business included both the processed product business and the
sourcing and distribution of all crops that were not procured from the Cooperatives members).
In August 2006, we entered into a joint venture agreement with San Rafael Distributing (SRD)
for the purpose of marketing, sale and distribution of fresh produce from the existing location of
SRD at the Los Angeles Wholesale Produce Market (Terminal Market), located in Los Angeles,
California. Such joint venture operates under the name of Maui Fresh International, LLC (Maui
Fresh) and commenced operations in August 2006. SRD and Calavo each have an equal one-half
ownership interest in Maui Fresh, but SRD shall have overall management responsibility for the
operations of Maui Fresh at the Terminal Market. Therefore, pursuant to Accounting Principle Board
(APB) 18 and Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 03-16, we believe that our level of economic
influence is that of significant. As such, we will use the equity method to account for our
investment. See note 16 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Our Fresh Products business grades, sizes, packs, cools, and ripens (if desired) avocados
grown in California for delivery to our customers. We presently operate three packinghouses in
Southern California. These packinghouses handled approximately 36% of the California avocado crop
during the 2006 fiscal year, based on data obtained from the California Avocado Commission. Our
operating results and the returns we pay our growers are highly dependent on the volume of avocados
delivered to our packinghouses, as a significant portion of our costs are fixed. Our strategy
calls for continued efforts in retaining existing growers, aggressively recruiting new growers, and
procuring a larger percentage of the California avocado crop to improve our results from
operations.
Additionally, our Fresh products business also procures avocados grown in Mexico and Chile, as
well as other various commodities, including papayas, tomatoes, chili peppers, pineapples, and
ginger. We operate a packinghouse in Mexico that, together with certain co-packers that we
frequently purchase fruit from, handled approximately 18% of the Mexican avocado crop bound for the
United States market and approximately 5% of the avocados exported from Mexico to countries other
than the United States, during the 2005-2006 Mexican season, based on our estimates. Additionally,
during the 2005-2006 Chilean avocado season, we handled approximately 7% of the Chilean avocado
crop, based on our estimates. Our strategy is to procure and sell non-Californian grown avocados
to complement our distribution efforts of California grown avocados. We believe that the
introduction of these avocados, although competitive at times with California grown avocados,
provides a level of supply stability that may, over time, help solidify the demand for avocados
among consumers in the United States and elsewhere in the world. We believe our efforts in
distributing our other various commodities, such as those shown above, complement our offerings of
avocados. From time to time, we continue to explore distribution of other crops that provide
reasonable returns to the business.
14
Our processed products
business procures avocados, processes avocados into a wide variety of
guacamole products, and distributes the processed product to our customers. In February 2003, our
Board of Directors approved a plan whereby the operations of our processed products business would
be relocated. The plan called for the closing of our Santa Paula, California and Mexicali, Baja
California Norte processing facilities and the relocation of these operations to a new facility in
Uruapan, Michoacan, Mexico. This restructuring has provided for cost savings in the elimination of
certain transportation costs, duplicative overhead structures, and savings in the overall cost of
labor and services. The Uruapan facility commenced operations in February 2004 and the Santa Paula
and Mexicali facilities were closed in February 2003 and August 2004. During fiscal 2005, we
incurred costs related to this restructuring approximating $0.4 million, which are recorded in our
income statement as both cost of sales ($0.3 million) and selling, general and administrative
expenses ($0.1 million). All the above amounts have been paid and we do not expect any additional
operating costs related to this restructuring.
Processed products
customers include both food service industry and retail businesses. Our
strategy calls for the development of new guacamole recipes and other processed avocado products
that address the diverse taste of todays consumers. We also seek to expand our relationships with
major food service companies and develop alliances that will allow our products to reach a larger
percentage of the marketplace.
Our Fresh Products business is highly seasonal and is characterized by crop volume and price
changes. Furthermore, the operating results of all of our businesses, including our processed
products business, have been, and will continue to be, affected by substantial quarterly and annual
fluctuations and market downturns due to a number of factors, such as pests and disease, weather
patterns, changes in demand by consumers, the timing of the receipt, reduction, or cancellation of
significant customer orders, the gain or loss of significant customers, market acceptance of our
products, our ability to develop, introduce, and market new products on a timely basis,
availability and cost of avocados and supplies from growers and vendors, new product introductions
by our competitors, change in the mix of avocados and processed products we sell, and general
economic conditions. We believe, however, that we are currently positioned to address these risks
and deliver favorable operating results for the foreseeable future.
Recent Developments
Dividend Payment
In January 2007, we paid a $0.32 per share dividend in the aggregate amount of $4.6 million to
shareholders of record on December 15, 2006.
Short-term borrowings
In October 2006, we renewed and extended one of our short-term, non-collateralized, revolving
credit facilities. This credit facility now expires in February 2010. Under the terms of this
agreement, we are advanced funds for working capital purposes. Total credit available under this
short-term borrowing agreement was $12 million, with an average interest rate of 6.2% at October
31, 2006. Under this credit facility, we had no amounts outstanding as of October 31, 2006. The
credit facility contains various financial covenants, the most
significant relating to working capital, tangible net worth (as
defined), and Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and
Amortization (EBITDA) (as defined). We were in compliance with all
such covenants at October 31, 2006, except for the working
capital covenants with which we obtained appropriate waivers.
Retirement of Common Stock
In December 2005, we repurchased 120,000 shares of our common stock at an average price per
share of $10.00 from the estate of a deceased former member of our Board of Directors.
Operating Lease
In August 2006, we entered into an operating lease agreement with Columbia New Jersey
Commodore Industrial, LLC to rent approximately 30,000 square feet of building space in Swedesboro,
New Jersey. This lease enables us to not only invest in our ProRipeVIPTM avocado
ripening program, but also expand our refrigeration and storage capabilities. The lease has a term
of approximately 15 years and includes scheduled rent increases. Pursuant to FASB Technical
Bulletin 85-3, our straight-line rent expense for such lease will approximate $13,000 per month for
the duration of such lease. This facility commenced operations during the first quarter of fiscal
2007.
15
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based
upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial
statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, we re-evaluate all of our estimates,
including those related to the areas of customer and grower receivables, inventories, useful lives
of property, plant and equipment, promotional allowances, income taxes, retirement benefits, and
commitments and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form
the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not
readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may materially differ from these estimates
under different assumptions or conditions as additional information becomes available in future
periods.
Management has discussed the development and selection of critical accounting estimates with
the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee has reviewed our disclosure
relating to critical accounting estimates in this Annual Report.
We believe the following are the more significant judgments and estimates used in the
preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Promotional allowances. We provide for promotional allowances at the time of sale, based on
our historical experience. Our estimates are generally based on evaluating the average length of
time between the product shipment date and the date on which we pay the customer the promotional
allowance. The product of this lag factor and our historical promotional allowance payment rate is
the basis for the promotional allowance included in accrued expenses on our balance sheet. Actual
amounts may differ from these estimates and such differences are recognized as an adjustment to net
sales in the period they are identified.
Income Taxes. Our effective income tax rate and the tax bases of assets and liabilities are
based on estimates of taxes which will ultimately be payable. Deferred taxes are recorded to give
recognition to temporary differences between the tax bases of assets or liabilities and their
reported amounts in the financial statements. Valuation allowances are established when it is
deemed, more likely than not, that the benefit of deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Goodwill and acquired intangible assets. The purchase method of accounting for business
combinations requires us to make use of estimates and judgments to allocate the purchase price paid
for acquisitions to the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets.
Goodwill is tested for impairment annually, or when a possible impairment is indicated, using the
fair value based test prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The impairment test requires us to compare the fair value of
business reporting units to carrying value, including goodwill. We primarily use an income
approach (which considers the present value of future cash flows) in combination with a market
approach (which considers what other purchasers in the marketplace have paid for similar
businesses) to determine fair value. Future cash flows typically include operating cash flows for
the business for five years and an estimated terminal value. Management judgment is required in
the estimation of future operating results and to determine the appropriate terminal values.
Future operating results and terminal values could differ from the estimates and could require a
provision for impairment in a future period.
Allowance for accounts receivable. We provide an allowance for estimated uncollectible
accounts receivable balances based on historical experience and the aging of the related accounts
receivable. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an
impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.
Revenue recognition. Sales of products and related costs of products sold are recognized when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, shipment has been made, title passes, the price is
fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Service revenue, including
freight, ripening, storage, bagging and palletization charges, is recorded when services are
performed and sales of the related products are delivered.
16
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain items from our consolidated statements of income,
expressed as percentages of our total net sales, for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended October 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Net sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Gross margins |
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
Operating income |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
Interest Income |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Interest Expense |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Other income, net |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Net income |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
Net Sales
We believe that the fundamentals for our products continue to be favorable. Government census
studies continue to indicate a shift in the demographics of the U.S. population in which larger
portions of the population descend from a Hispanic origin. Avocados are considered a staple item
purchased by Hispanic consumers and their acceptance as part of American cuisine continues to spur
demand for our products. We anticipate avocado products will further penetrate the United States
marketplace driven by growth in the Hispanic community and general acceptance in American cuisine.
As the largest marketer of avocado products in the United States, we believe that we are well
positioned to leverage this trend and to grow all segments of our business. Additionally, we also
believe that avocados and avocado based products will further penetrate other marketplaces that we
currently operate in, as interest in avocados continues to expand.
Sales of products and related costs of products sold are recognized when persuasive evidence
of an arrangement exists, shipment has been made, title passes, the price is fixed or determinable
and collectibility is reasonably assured. Service revenue, including freight, ripening, storage,
bagging and palletization charges, is recorded when services are performed and sales of the related
products are delivered. We provide for sales returns and promotional allowances at the time of
shipment, based on our experience. The following table summarizes our net sales by business
segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh products |
|
$ |
236,889 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
$ |
230,289 |
|
|
|
(7.4 |
)% |
|
$ |
248,562 |
|
Processed products |
|
|
37,021 |
|
|
|
29.7 |
% |
|
|
28,533 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
25,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
273,910 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
$ |
258,822 |
|
|
|
(5.6 |
)% |
|
$ |
274,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh products |
|
|
86.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
89.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90.6 |
% |
Processed products |
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales for the year ended October 31, 2006, when compared to 2005, increased by
approximately $15.1 million, or 5.8%, principally as a result of an increase in both our fresh
products and processed products segments. The increase in sales for both segments was primarily
driven by a significant increase in total pounds sold.
Net sales generated by Fresh products segment are significantly impacted by the availability
of Chilean and Mexican grown avocados in the U.S. markets. In November 2004, the USDA published a
rule allowing Hass avocado imports from Mexico into all 50 states year round (up from 31 states for
only a six month period), except for California, Florida, and Hawaii. We expect the restriction on
such states to be lifted in February 2007. For the remaining 47 states, however, Mexico was able
to deliver its fruit for all of fiscal 2005. The implementation of this rule resulted in a
significant increase in the sale of Mexican sourced fruit during fiscal 2005.
The following tables set forth sales by product category, freight and other charges and sales
incentives, by segment (dollars in thousands):
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended October 31, 2006 |
|
|
Year ended October 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
Fresh |
|
|
Processed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh |
|
|
Processed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
products |
|
|
products |
|
|
Total |
|
|
products |
|
|
products |
|
|
Total |
|
Third-party sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California avocados |
|
$ |
140,995 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
140,995 |
|
|
$ |
104,481 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
104,481 |
|
Imported avocados |
|
|
51,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,211 |
|
|
|
81,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,756 |
|
Papayas |
|
|
4,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,811 |
|
|
|
6,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,251 |
|
Specialities and tropicals |
|
|
9,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,724 |
|
|
|
13,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,777 |
|
Processed food service |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,021 |
|
|
|
34,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,307 |
|
|
|
28,307 |
|
Processed retail and club |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,454 |
|
|
|
10,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,766 |
|
|
|
6,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fruit and product sales
to third-parties |
|
|
206,741 |
|
|
|
44,475 |
|
|
|
251,216 |
|
|
|
206,265 |
|
|
|
35,073 |
|
|
|
241,338 |
|
Freight and other charges |
|
|
30,156 |
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
30,793 |
|
|
|
24,129 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
24,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross sales to third-parties |
|
|
236,897 |
|
|
|
45,112 |
|
|
|
282,009 |
|
|
|
230,394 |
|
|
|
35,331 |
|
|
|
265,725 |
|
Less sales incentives |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(8,091 |
) |
|
|
(8,099 |
) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(6,798 |
) |
|
|
(6,903 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales to third-parties |
|
|
236,889 |
|
|
|
37,021 |
|
|
|
273,910 |
|
|
|
230,289 |
|
|
|
28,533 |
|
|
|
258,822 |
|
Intercompany sales |
|
|
9,532 |
|
|
|
6,227 |
|
|
|
15,759 |
|
|
|
15,850 |
|
|
|
6,166 |
|
|
|
22,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
246,421 |
|
|
$ |
43,248 |
|
|
|
289,669 |
|
|
$ |
246,139 |
|
|
$ |
34,699 |
|
|
|
280,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany sales eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,016 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
273,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
258,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended October 31, 2005 |
|
|
Year ended October 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
Fresh |
|
|
Processed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh |
|
|
Processed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
products |
|
|
products |
|
|
Total |
|
|
products |
|
|
products |
|
|
Total |
|
Third-party sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California avocados |
|
$ |
104,481 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
104,481 |
|
|
$ |
150,159 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
150,159 |
|
Imported avocados |
|
|
81,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,756 |
|
|
|
54,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,589 |
|
Papayas |
|
|
6,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,251 |
|
|
|
6,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,846 |
|
Specialities and tropicals |
|
|
13,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,777 |
|
|
|
14,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,233 |
|
Processed food service |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,307 |
|
|
|
28,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,352 |
|
|
|
27,352 |
|
Processed retail and club |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,766 |
|
|
|
6,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,285 |
|
|
|
4,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fruit and product sales
to third-parties |
|
|
206,265 |
|
|
|
35,073 |
|
|
|
241,338 |
|
|
|
225,827 |
|
|
|
31,637 |
|
|
|
257,464 |
|
Freight and other charges |
|
|
24,129 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
24,387 |
|
|
|
22,914 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
23,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross sales to third-parties |
|
|
230,394 |
|
|
|
35,331 |
|
|
|
265,725 |
|
|
|
248,741 |
|
|
|
32,171 |
|
|
|
280,912 |
|
Less sales incentives |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(6,798 |
) |
|
|
(6,903 |
) |
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
(6,515 |
) |
|
|
(6,694 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales to third-parties |
|
|
230,289 |
|
|
|
28,533 |
|
|
|
258,822 |
|
|
|
248,562 |
|
|
|
25,656 |
|
|
|
274,218 |
|
Intercompany sales |
|
|
15,850 |
|
|
|
6,166 |
|
|
|
22,016 |
|
|
|
9,347 |
|
|
|
7,093 |
|
|
|
16,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
246,139 |
|
|
$ |
34,699 |
|
|
|
280,838 |
|
|
$ |
257,909 |
|
|
$ |
32,749 |
|
|
|
290,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany sales eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,016 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,440 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
258,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
274,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales to third parties by segment exclude value-added services billed by our Uruapan
packinghouse, Uruapan processing plant and Mexicali processing plant to the parent company. All
intercompany sales are eliminated in our consolidated results of operations.
Fresh Products
Net sales delivered by the business increased by approximately $6.6 million, or 2.9%, from
fiscal 2005 to 2006. This increase is primarily related to an increase in California avocados
sales, partially offset by a decrease in Mexican and Chilean avocado sales.
Sales of California sourced avocados increased $36.5 million for fiscal 2006, when compared to
the same prior period. This increase was primarily related a 108.1% increase in pounds of avocados
sold, partially offset by a decrease in our average selling prices. This increase in pounds sold
was consistent with the expected increase in the overall harvest of the California avocado crop for
the 2005/2006 season. Our market share of California avocados remained consistent at 35.6% for the
year ended October 31, 2006, compared to 34.4% for the same period in the prior year. Based on
estimates generated from the California Avocado Commission, we expect the California avocado crop
for the 2006/2007 season to be substantially smaller than the 2005/2006 crop.
For fiscal year 2006, average selling prices, on a per carton basis, for California avocados
were 35.6% lower when compared to the same prior year period. This pricing structure primarily
reflects the impact of a larger California avocado harvest, as well as a 7.0% increase in the sale
of grade two Hass avocados in proportion to grade one Hass avocados sales. Grade two Hass avocados
generally sell for significantly less than grade one Hass avocados. For fiscal year 2007, we
believe that the demand for California avocados will remain strong in the U.S. marketplace, and, as
a result, such is expected to have a positive impact on sales prices. California avocados are
primarily sold in the U.S. marketplace.
Sales of Mexican sourced avocados decreased $13.0 million for fiscal year 2006, when compared
to the same prior year period. This decrease was primarily related to a 19.7% decrease in pounds
of Mexican avocados sold, due primarily to the large California crop discussed above. Our average
selling prices, on a per carton basis, of Mexican avocados experienced a marginal decrease of 3.9%
for fiscal 2006 when compared to the same prior period.
Sales of Chilean sourced avocados decreased $13.6 million for fiscal year 2006, when compared
to the same prior year period. This decrease was primarily related to a 67.7% decrease in pounds
of Chilean avocados sold. This decrease was primarily related to
18
the size of the Chilean avocado crop, as well as the timing of the delivery to the United
States. Our average selling prices, on a per carton basis, of Chilean avocados experienced a
marginal increase of 4.0% for fiscal 2006 when compared to the same prior period.
Mexican and Chilean grown avocados are primarily sold in the U.S., Japanese, and/or European
marketplace. We anticipate that sales of Mexican grown avocados will increase in fiscal 2007
primarily as a result of the smaller California avocado crop discussed above. We are unable to
predict, however, the impact related to the USDA published rule that will allow Hass avocado
imports from Mexico into all 50 states (up from 47 states) effective February 2007. In any case,
we intend to leverage our position as the largest packer of Mexican grown avocados for export
markets to improve the overall performance of these sales.
Sales of papayas decreased $1.4 million for fiscal year 2006, when compared to the same prior
year period. This decrease was primarily related to a 38.6% decrease in the volume of papaya fruit
sold. This decrease was primarily related to adverse weather conditions negatively affecting the
current year papaya crop. Such decrease, however, was partially offset by an increase in average
selling prices of papayas, on a per carton basis, which increased approximately 44.5% when compared
to the same prior year period. We attribute some of this increase in average selling prices to
significantly fewer pounds sold in the U.S. marketplace. We anticipate our papaya results to
increase in fiscal 2007, as we expect an increase in the related papaya crop.
Net sales delivered by the business decreased by approximately $18.3 million, or 7.4%, from
fiscal 2004 to 2005. This decrease is primarily related to a decrease in California avocados
sales, partially offset by an increase in Mexican and Chilean avocado sales.
Sales of California sourced avocados decreased $49.9 million for fiscal 2005, when compared to
the same prior period. This decrease was primarily related a 31.3% decrease in pounds of avocados
sold, partially offset by an increase in our average selling prices. This decrease in pounds sold
was consistent with the expected decrease in the overall harvest of the California avocado crop for
the 2004/2005 season. Our market share of California avocados remained consistent at 34.4% for the
year ended October 31, 2005, compared to 34.7% for the same period in the prior year.
For fiscal year 2005, average selling prices, on a per carton basis, for California avocados
were 6.7% higher when compared to the same prior year period. This pricing structure primarily
reflected the impact of a smaller California avocado harvest, partially offset by an increase in
foreign-sourced fruit in the U.S. marketplace.
Sales of Mexican sourced avocados increased $24.7 million for fiscal year 2005, when compared
to the same prior year period. This increase was primarily related to a 62.8% increase in pounds
of Mexican avocados sold. This increase was primarily related to the smaller California crop
discussed above, as well as the USDA published rule that allowed Hass avocado imports from Mexico
into 47 U.S. states, up from 31 U.S. states, effective February 2005. Pricing during fiscal 2005
was stable when compared to fiscal 2004.
Sales of Chilean sourced avocados increased $6.1 million for fiscal year 2005, when compared
to the same prior year period. This increase was primarily related to a 65.7% increase in pounds
of Chilean avocados sold. This increase was primarily related to the size of the Chilean avocado
crop. Pricing during fiscal 2005 was stable when compared to fiscal 2004.
In October 2002, the USDA announced the creation of a Hass Avocado Board to promote the sale
of Hass variety avocados in the U.S. marketplace. This board provides a basis for a unified
funding of promotional activities based on an assessment on all avocados sold in the U.S.
marketplace, including imported and California grown fruit. The California Avocado Commission,
which receives its funding from California avocado growers, has historically shouldered the
promotional and advertising costs supporting avocado sales. We believe that the incremental
funding of promotional and advertising programs in the U.S. will, in the long term, positively
impact average selling prices and will favorably impact our California avocado and international
avocado businesses. During fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, on behalf of avocado growers, we remitted
approximately $1.7 million, $1.5 million and $2.9 million to the California Avocado Commission.
During fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, we remitted approximately $4.7 million, $2.4 million and $3.3
million to the Hass Avocado Board.
Processed Products
Net sales increased by approximately $8.5 million, or 29.7% for fiscal 2006, when compared to
the same prior period. The increase in net sales is primarily attributable to an increase of 4.9
million pounds of product sold, or 31.1%. Such increase was partially offset, however, by a
decrease in the net selling price totaling $0.02 per product pound sold, or 1.1%. During fiscal
year 2006, the increase in pounds sold primarily relates to an increase in the sale of our
high-pressure guacamole product, which increased approximately 37% when compared to the same prior
year period. The decrease in our net average selling price primarily relates to a change in our
product mix.
Net sales
increased by approximately $2.9 million, or 11.2% for fiscal
2005, when compared to the same prior year period. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase of 2.3
19
million pounds of product sold, or 17.4%, net of a decrease in sales incentives and promotions
paid, totaling $0.07 per pound of product sold, or 14.3%. Such increase, however, was partially
offset by a decrease in the sales price per product pound sold of $0.09, or 4.7%. During fiscal
year 2005, the increase in pounds sold primarily related to an increase in the sale of our
high-pressure guacamole product, which increased 56.2% when compared to the same prior year period.
The decrease in our average selling price and sales incentives and promotional activities paid
primarily related to a change in our product mix.
During fiscal year 2006, we primarily operated one high-pressure line designed to manufacture
processed avocado products that are not frozen (guacamole) in Uruapan. This machine ran at about
80% capacity during fiscal 2006. We anticipate that we will operate such high-pressure machine at
a similar capacity during fiscal year 2007. We presently own another, much smaller, high-pressure
machine, also located in Uruapan, that was used occasionally during fiscal 2006. We anticipate
trading such smaller machine in for credit towards another large high-pressure machine (similar to
the large machine that is currently in use in Uruapan), once we receive the second high-pressure
machine. This second large high-pressure machine was ordered in July 2006 and is expected to be
received during our second fiscal quarter of 2007. Utilizing avocado pulp and chunks, these
high-pressure machines allow us to deliver fresh guacamole to retail and food service customers.
Sales of our high-pressure product totaled approximately $13.9 million and $8.7 million for fiscal
years 2006 and 2005.
Gross Margins
The following table summarizes our gross margins and gross profit percentages by business
segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Gross Margins: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh products |
|
$ |
18,673 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
$ |
17,071 |
|
|
|
(22.6 |
)% |
|
$ |
22,060 |
|
Processed products |
|
|
10,598 |
|
|
|
127.3 |
% |
|
|
4,663 |
|
|
|
39.4 |
% |
|
|
3,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross margins |
|
$ |
29,271 |
|
|
|
34.7 |
% |
|
$ |
21,734 |
|
|
|
(14.4 |
)% |
|
$ |
25,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit percentages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh products |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
Processed products |
|
|
28.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.0 |
% |
Consolidated |
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
Our cost of goods sold consists predominantly of fruit costs, packing materials, freight and
handling, labor and overhead (including depreciation) associated with preparing food products, and
other direct expenses pertaining to products sold. Consolidated gross margin, as a percent of
sales, increased 2.3% for fiscal year 2006 when compared to fiscal year 2005. This increase was
principally attributable to increased profitability in fresh products segment, as well as our
processed product segment. Consolidated gross margin, as a percent of sales, decreased 0.9% for
fiscal year 2005 when compared to fiscal year 2004. This decrease was principally attributable to
decreased profitability in our fresh products segment, partially offset by increased profitability
in our processed product segment.
Gross margins and gross profit percentages related to California avocados are largely
dependent on production yields achieved at our packinghouses, current market prices of avocados,
and the volume of avocados packed. The increase in our gross margin percentage during fiscal year
2006 was primarily related to a significant increase in pounds of fruit sold, partially offset by
an increase in the cost of fruit. During fiscal year 2006, when compared to fiscal year 2005, we
experienced a 108.1% increase in pounds of avocados sold. This had the effect of decreasing our
per pound costs, which, as a result, positively impacted gross margins.
The decrease in our gross margin percentage during fiscal year 2005 was primarily related to a
significant decrease in pounds of fruit sold. During fiscal year 2005, when compared to fiscal
year 2004, we experienced a 31.3% decrease in pounds of avocados sold. This had the effect of
increasing our per pound costs, which, as a result, negatively impacted gross margins. Such higher
per pound cost was partially offset, however, by an increase in our packing and marketing fee
(which is charged to cover our costs and a profit).
The gross margin and gross profit percentage for consignment sales, including primarily
Chilean avocados, as well as Hawaiian grown papayas, is dependent on the volume of fruit we handle
and the competitiveness of the returns that we provide to third-party packers. The gross margin we
earn is generally based on a commission agreed to with each packer. Accordingly, the gross margin
results for these products are a function of the volume handled and the competitiveness of the
sales prices that we realize. Although we generally do not take legal title to such avocados and
perishable products, we do assume responsibilities (principally assuming credit risk, inventory
loss and delivery risk, and limited pricing risk) that are consistent with acting as a principal in
the transaction. Accordingly, our results of operations include sales and cost of sales from the
sale of avocados and perishable products procured under consignment arrangements. For fiscal year
2006, 2005, and 2004, we generated gross margins of $1.2 million, $1.7 million, and $1.8 million
from the sale of fresh produce products that were packed by third parties.
20
Our business with Mexican growers differs in that we operate a packinghouse in Mexico and
purchase avocados directly from the field. Alternatively, we may also purchase Mexican avocados
directly from co-packers located in Mexico as well. In either case, the gross margin and gross
profit percentages generated by our Mexican operations are significantly impacted by the volume of
avocados handled by our packinghouse and the cost of the fruit. During fiscal year 2006, our gross
margins generated from the sale of Mexican avocados decreased from approximately $3.8 million in
fiscal year 2005 to $0.8 million in fiscal year 2006. Such decrease is primarily related to both
the significant decrease in the volume of Mexican avocados sold, totaling 19.7% (primarily related
to the large California crop discussed above), as well as an increase in Mexican fruit costs.
Collectively, these items contributed to a higher per pound cost, which negatively affected gross
margins.
During fiscal year 2005, our gross margins generated from the sale of Mexican avocados
increased from approximately $1.5 million in fiscal year 2004 to $3.8 million in fiscal year 2005.
We did not experience a significant fluctuation in our gross margin percentage for fiscal 2005 as
compared to fiscal 2004 related to our Mexican operations.
Gross margins and gross profit percentages for our processed products business are largely
dependent on the pricing of our final product and the cost of avocados used in preparing guacamole.
During fiscal year 2006, the processed products gross profit percentages increased primarily as a
result of lower fruit costs and increases in total pounds produced, both of which had the effect of
reducing our per pound costs. During fiscal year 2005, the processed products gross profit
percentages increased primarily as a result of efficiencies related to the relocation of production
from Santa Paula, California and Mexicali, Mexico to our newly acquired facility in Uruapan,
Mexico. Such efficiencies include the elimination of duplicative overhead, as well as lower
production costs. Additionally, our processed product segment experienced lower fruit costs. Such
improvements, however, were partially offset by an increase in the sale of products that generate a
lower gross margin then those sold in the prior year.
Selling, General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
19,954 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
$ |
18,588 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
% |
|
$ |
15,920 |
|
Percentage of net sales |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses include costs of marketing and advertising, sales
expenses, and other general and administrative costs. For fiscal year 2006, selling, general and
administrative expenses increased by $1.4 million, or 7.3%, compared to the same period for fiscal
2005. This increase was primarily related to higher corporate costs, including, but not limited
to, costs related to an increase in stock-based compensation (totaling approximately $0.6 million),
an increase in management bonuses (totaling approximately $1.1 million), and an increase in
employee compensation costs (totaling approximately $0.5 million). Such higher corporate costs
were partially offset by a decrease in auditing/Sarbanes-Oxley costs (totaling approximately $0.2
million), a decrease in bad debt expense (totaling approximately $0.5 million), and a decrease in
corporate moving expenses (totaling approximately $0.3 million).
For fiscal year 2005, selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $2.7 million,
or 16.8%, compared to the same period for fiscal 2004. This increase was primarily related to
higher corporate costs, including, but not limited to, costs related to implementing provisions
required under section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (totaling approximately $2.2 million), an
increase in bad debt expense (totaling approximately $0.5 million), and corporate moving expenses
(totaling approximately $0.4 million). Such higher corporate costs were partially offset by a
decrease in employee compensation costs (totaling approximately $0.7 million).
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Interest income |
|
$ |
356 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
$ |
348 |
|
|
|
(10.3 |
)% |
|
$ |
388 |
|
Percentage of net sales |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Interest income is primarily generated from overnight investments, loans to growers, and our
notes receivable from shareholders. During fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004, interest income
includes interest accrued on notes receivable from directors and officers of approximately $0.2
million for each year presented.
21
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(943 |
) |
|
|
136.3 |
% |
|
$ |
(399 |
) |
|
|
504.5 |
% |
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
Percentage of net sales |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Interest expense is primarily generated from our short-term borrowings as well as our term
loan agreement with Farm Credit West, PCA. The increase in interest expense is primarily related
to the non-collateralized term loan agreement with Farm Credit West, PCA that we entered into in
July 2005 to finance the purchase of our Limoneira Stock. Pursuant to such agreement, we borrowed
$13.0 million, which is to be repaid in 10 annual installments of $1.3 million. Such annual
installments began July 2006 and continue through July 2015. Interest is paid monthly, in arrears,
and began in August 2005, and will continue through the life of the loan. Such loan bears interest
at a fixed rate of 5.70%.
Other Income, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Other income, net |
|
$ |
599 |
|
|
|
(75.1 |
)% |
|
$ |
2,408 |
|
|
|
1,443.6 |
% |
|
$ |
156 |
|
Percentage of net sales |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Other income, net includes dividend income, as well as certain other transactions that are
outside of the course of normal operations. During fiscal 2006 and 2005, we received $0.4 million
and $0.2 million as dividend income from Limoneira. During fiscal year 2005, other income, net
includes the gain on the sale of our corporate facility totaling approximately $1.7 million.
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2004 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
3,620 |
|
|
|
66.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,181 |
|
|
|
(38.9 |
)% |
|
$ |
3,567 |
|
Percentage of income before
provision for income taxes |
|
|
38.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.5 |
% |
The effective income tax rate for fiscal year 2006 and 2005 is higher than the federal
statutory rate principally due to state taxes. Our effective income tax rate decreased from 39.6%
in fiscal year 2005 to 38.5% in fiscal year 2006 primarily as a result of a favorable decrease in
our foreign tax rates during fiscal year 2006 when compared to fiscal year 2005. Our effective
income tax rate increased from 36.5% in fiscal year 2004 to 39.6% in fiscal year 2005 primarily as
a result of an unfavorable increase in our foreign tax rates during fiscal year 2005 when compared
to fiscal year 2004.
22
Quarterly Results of Operations
The following table presents our operating results for each of the eight fiscal quarters in
the period ended October 31, 2006. The information for each of these quarters is derived from our
unaudited interim financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report. In our opinion, all necessary
adjustments, which consist only of normal and recurring accruals, have been included to fairly
present our unaudited quarterly results. The California crop is highly seasonal and is
characterized by crop volume and price changes. Historically, we receive and sell a substantially
lesser number of California avocados in our first fiscal quarter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
Oct. 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
Apr. 30, |
|
|
Jan. 31, |
|
|
Oct. 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
Apr. 30, |
|
|
Jan. 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Statement of Operations Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
76,880 |
|
|
$ |
78,954 |
|
|
$ |
67,429 |
|
|
$ |
50,647 |
|
|
$ |
62,246 |
|
|
$ |
88,699 |
|
|
$ |
60,206 |
|
|
$ |
47,671 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
69,896 |
|
|
|
68,738 |
|
|
|
58,768 |
|
|
|
47,237 |
|
|
|
58,013 |
|
|
|
79,505 |
|
|
|
53,851 |
|
|
|
45,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
6,984 |
|
|
|
10,216 |
|
|
|
8,661 |
|
|
|
3,410 |
|
|
|
4,233 |
|
|
|
9,194 |
|
|
|
6,355 |
|
|
|
1,952 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
5,163 |
|
|
|
5,284 |
|
|
|
5,063 |
|
|
|
4,444 |
|
|
|
4,943 |
|
|
|
4,825 |
|
|
|
4,307 |
|
|
|
4,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
|
|
3,598 |
|
|
|
(1,034 |
) |
|
|
(710 |
) |
|
|
4,369 |
|
|
|
2,048 |
|
|
|
(2,561 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
1,909 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision (benefit)
for income taxes |
|
|
2,113 |
|
|
|
4,796 |
|
|
|
3,608 |
|
|
|
(1,109 |
) |
|
|
(497 |
) |
|
|
4,522 |
|
|
|
3,957 |
|
|
|
(2,479 |
) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1,603 |
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
(932 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,338 |
|
|
$ |
2,926 |
|
|
$ |
2,189 |
|
|
$ |
(665 |
) |
|
$ |
(517 |
) |
|
$ |
2,919 |
|
|
$ |
2,467 |
|
|
$ |
(1,547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
Number of shares used in per share
computation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
14,292 |
|
|
|
14,171 |
|
|
|
14,282 |
|
|
|
14,352 |
|
|
|
14,371 |
|
|
|
14,171 |
|
|
|
13,507 |
|
|
|
13,507 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
14,319 |
|
|
|
14,237 |
|
|
|
14,343 |
|
|
|
14,352 |
|
|
|
14,371 |
|
|
|
14,237 |
|
|
|
13,580 |
|
|
|
13,507 |
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Operating activities for fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004 provided cash flows of $7.8 million, $5.6
million, and $4.5 million. Fiscal year 2006 operating cash flows reflect our net income of $5.8
million, net noncash charges (depreciation and amortization, income from subsidiary, loss on
disposal of fixed assets, and stock compensation expense) of $2.7 million and a net increase in the
non-cash components of our working capital of approximately $0.6 million.
Fiscal year 2006 decreases in operating cash flows, caused by working capital changes, include
an increase in accounts receivable of $5.0 million, an increase in prepaid expenses and other
assets of $2.0 million, an increase in income tax receivable of $1.2 million, an increase in
inventory of $0.5 million, and an increase in advance to suppliers of $0.3 million, partially
offset by an increase in payable to growers of $4.6 million, an increase in trade accounts payable
and accrued expenses of $2.9 million and a net decrease in deferred income taxes totaling $0.9
million.
Increases in our accounts receivable balance as of October 31, 2006, when compared to October
31, 2005, primarily reflect a significantly higher volume of California avocado sales recorded in
the month of October 2006, as compared to October 2005. Similarly, the amounts payable to our
growers also reflects the increase in the volume of California avocados received in the month of
October 2006, as compared to October 2005. These volume level fluctuations are consistent with the
harvests experienced in the related years. Additionally, the increase in our prepaid expenses and
other assets as of October 31, 2006, when compared to October 31, 2005, is primarily related to
advances made pursuant to our Grower Development Program. The increase in our income tax
receivable is primarily related to estimated payments made in fiscal 2006, as well as overpayments
of taxes made in the prior year that were credited during fiscal 2006.
Increases in our trade accounts payable and accrued expenses as of October 31, 2006, when
compared to October 31, 2005, primarily reflect accruals for bonuses to employees, additional
accruals for vendors used in the ordinary course of California business, as well as accruals
related to purchased fruit.
Cash used in investing activities was $4.7 million, $11.9 million, and $8.5 million for fiscal
years 2006, 2005, and 2004. Fiscal year 2006 cash flows used in investing activities include
capital expenditures of $4.5 million, principally related to the construction of coolers for our
ProRipeVIP avocado ripening program, payments for Aweta AFS technology and equipment, and the
acquisition of avocado bins.
Cash used in financing activities was $4.2 million, and $0.7 million for fiscal years 2006 and
2004, while cash provided by financing activities was $6.9 million for fiscal year 2005. Cash used
during fiscal year 2006 primarily includes the payment of a
23
dividend totaling $4.6 million, a payment related to our long-term obligation of $1.3 million,
as well as a $1.2 million payment to retire 120,000 shares of our common stock. These cash usages
were partially offset, however, by proceeds from our short-term borrowings totaling $2.4 million.
Our principal sources of liquidity are our existing cash reserves, cash generated from
operations and amounts available for borrowing under our existing credit facilities. Cash and cash
equivalents as of October 31, 2006 and 2005 totaled $0.1 million and $1.1 million. Our working
capital at October 31, 2006 was $12.0 million compared to $17.6 million at October 31, 2005. The
overall working capital decrease primarily reflects additional short-term borrowings, as well as
additional accrued expenses and trade accounts payable.
We believe that cash flows from operations and available credit facilities will be sufficient
to satisfy our future capital expenditures, grower recruitment efforts, working capital and other
financing requirements. We will continue to evaluate grower recruitment opportunities and
exclusivity arrangements with food service companies to fuel growth in each of our business
segments. In October 2006, we renewed and extended one of our short-term, non-collateralized,
revolving credit facilities. Our two credit facilities now expire in February 2010 and April 2008
and are with separate banks. Under the terms of these agreements, we are advanced funds for
working capital purposes. Total credit available under the combined short-term borrowing
agreements was $24 million, with a weighted-average interest rate of 6.2% and 4.8% at October 31,
2006 and 2005. Under these credit facilities, we had $3.8 million and $1.4 million outstanding as
of October 31, 2006 and 2005. The credit facilities contain various financial covenants, the most
significant relating to working capital, tangible net worth (as defined), and Earnings Before
Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) (as defined). We were in compliance with
all such covenants at October 31, 2006, except for the working capital covenants with which we
obtained appropriate waivers.
The following table summarizes contractual obligations pursuant to which we are required to make
cash payments. The information is presented as of our fiscal year ended October 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
Less than 1 year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
4-5 years |
|
|
More than 5 years |
|
Long-term debt obligations
(including interest) |
|
$ |
12,381 |
|
|
$ |
1,382 |
|
|
$ |
4,128 |
|
|
$ |
2,748 |
|
|
$ |
4,123 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
3,804 |
|
|
|
3,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plan |
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
Operating lease commitments |
|
|
5,670 |
|
|
|
1,279 |
|
|
|
1,638 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
22,269 |
|
|
$ |
6,512 |
|
|
$ |
5,907 |
|
|
$ |
3,588 |
|
|
$ |
6,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The California avocado industry is subject to a state marketing order whereby handlers
are required to collect assessments from the growers and remit such assessments to the California
Avocado Commission (CAC). The assessments are primarily for advertising and promotions. The
amount of the assessment is based on the dollars paid to the growers for their fruit, and, as a
result, is not determinable until the value of the payments to the growers has been calculated.
With similar precision, amounts remitted to the Hass Avocado Board (HAB)
in connection with their assessment program (see Item 7 for
further discussion), are likewise not determinable until the fruit is actually
delivered to us. HAB assessments are primarily used to fund
marketing, research, and promotion efforts.
We have commitments for capital expenditures totaling approximately $1.1 million as of October
31, 2006.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
24
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes
receivable from shareholders, payable to growers, accounts payable, current borrowings pursuant to
our credit facilities with financial institutions, and long-term, fixed-rate obligations. All of
our financial instruments are entered into during the normal course of operations and have not been
acquired for trading purposes. The table below summarizes interest rate sensitive financial
instruments and presents principal cash flows in U.S. dollars, which is our reporting currency, and
weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates, as of October 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(All amounts in thousands) |
|
Expected maturity date October 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
Fair Value |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (1) |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
Accounts receivable (1) |
|
|
24,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,202 |
|
|
|
24,202 |
|
Notes receivable from shareholders (2) |
|
|
2,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,430 |
|
|
|
2,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable to growers (1) |
|
$ |
6,334 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,334 |
|
|
$ |
6,334 |
|
Accounts payable (1) |
|
|
4,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,046 |
|
|
|
4,046 |
|
Current borrowings pursuant to credit
facilities (1) |
|
|
3,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,804 |
|
|
|
3,804 |
|
Fixed-rate long-term obligations (3) |
|
|
1,308 |
|
|
|
1,306 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
11,714 |
|
|
|
10,768 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We believe the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable,
payable to growers, accounts payable, and current borrowings pursuant to credit facilities
approximate their fair value due to the short maturity of these financial instruments. |
|
(2) |
|
Notes receivable from shareholders bear interest at 7.0%. We believe that a portfolio
of loans with a similar risk profile would currently yield a return of 9.25%. We project
the impact of an increase or decrease in interest rates of 100 basis points would result in
a change of fair value of approximately $40,000. |
|
(3) |
|
Fixed-rate long-term obligations bear interest rates ranging from 3.3% to 5.7% with a
weighted-average interest rate of 5.7%. We believe that loans with a similar risk profile
would currently yield a return of 7.7%. We project the impact of an increase or decrease
in interest rates of 100 basis points would result in a change of fair value of
approximately $434,000. |
We were not a party to any derivative instruments during the fiscal year. It is currently
our intent not to use derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes. Additionally, we
do not use any hedging or forward contracts to offset market volatility.
Our Mexican-based operations transact business in Mexican pesos. Funds are transferred by our
corporate office to Mexico on a weekly basis to satisfy domestic cash needs. Consequently, the spot
rate for the Mexican peso has a moderate impact on our operating results. However, we do not
believe that this impact is sufficient to warrant the use of derivative instruments to hedge the
fluctuation in the Mexican peso. Total foreign currency gains and losses for each of the three
years in the period ended October 31, 2006 do not exceed $0.1 million.
25
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
1,133 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances
of $1,833 (2006) and $2,688 (2005) |
|
|
24,202 |
|
|
|
19,253 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
10,569 |
|
|
|
10,096 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
4,934 |
|
|
|
5,879 |
|
Advances to suppliers |
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
1,141 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
2,268 |
|
|
|
893 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
|
2,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
45,777 |
|
|
|
41,046 |
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
|
|
19,908 |
|
|
|
16,897 |
|
Investment in Limoneira |
|
|
33,879 |
|
|
|
45,634 |
|
Investment in Maui Fresh, LLC |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
3,591 |
|
|
|
3,591 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
4,110 |
|
|
|
1,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
107,494 |
|
|
$ |
108,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable to growers |
|
$ |
6,334 |
|
|
$ |
1,753 |
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
|
4,046 |
|
|
|
1,892 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
13,689 |
|
|
|
12,482 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
3,804 |
|
|
|
1,424 |
|
Dividend payable |
|
|
4,573 |
|
|
|
4,564 |
|
Current portion of long-term obligations |
|
|
1,308 |
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
33,754 |
|
|
|
23,428 |
|
Long-term liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term obligations, less current portion |
|
|
10,406 |
|
|
|
11,719 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,391 |
|
|
|
8,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
14,797 |
|
|
|
20,308 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock ($0.001 par value, 100,000 shares
authorized; 14,293 and 14,362 shares outstanding
at October 31, 2006 and 2005) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
37,109 |
|
|
|
37,240 |
|
Notes receivable from shareholders |
|
|
(2,430 |
) |
|
|
(2,636 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
6,293 |
|
|
|
13,386 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
17,957 |
|
|
|
16,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
58,943 |
|
|
|
64,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
107,494 |
|
|
$ |
108,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
26
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
273,910 |
|
|
$ |
258,822 |
|
|
$ |
274,218 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
244,639 |
|
|
|
237,088 |
|
|
|
248,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
29,271 |
|
|
|
21,734 |
|
|
|
25,404 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
19,954 |
|
|
|
18,588 |
|
|
|
15,920 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
9,317 |
|
|
|
3,146 |
|
|
|
9,299 |
|
Equity in earnings from Maui Fresh, LLC |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
|
(399 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
2,408 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
9,408 |
|
|
|
5,503 |
|
|
|
9,777 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
3,620 |
|
|
|
2,181 |
|
|
|
3,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,788 |
|
|
$ |
3,322 |
|
|
$ |
6,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares used in per share computation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
14,304 |
|
|
|
13,892 |
|
|
|
13,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
14,354 |
|
|
|
13,985 |
|
|
|
13,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
27
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(All amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,788 |
|
|
$ |
3,322 |
|
|
$ |
6,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period |
|
|
(11,755 |
) |
|
|
22,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit related to items of other
comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
4,662 |
|
|
|
(8,798 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
(7,093 |
) |
|
|
13,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,305 |
) |
|
$ |
16,708 |
|
|
$ |
6,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
28
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Receivable |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
From |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, October 31, 2003 |
|
|
12,930 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
24,727 |
|
|
$ |
(3,563 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,970 |
|
|
$ |
37,147 |
|
Purchase acquisition |
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,050 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
Collections on shareholder notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
680 |
|
Dividend declared to shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,196 |
) |
|
|
(4,196 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,210 |
|
|
|
6,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, October 31, 2004 |
|
|
13,507 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
28,822 |
|
|
|
(2,883 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,984 |
|
|
|
43,937 |
|
Exercise of stock options and
income tax benefit of $59 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
334 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
Issuance of stock to Limoneira |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
9,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Unrealized gain on Limoneira investment,
net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,386 |
|
Retirement of common stock |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1,999 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
Collections on shareholder notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247 |
|
Dividend declared to shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,564 |
) |
|
|
(4,564 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, October 31, 2005 |
|
|
14,362 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
37,240 |
|
|
|
(2,636 |
) |
|
|
13,386 |
|
|
|
16,742 |
|
|
|
64,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options and
income tax benefit of $146 |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
403 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
666 |
|
Unrealized loss on Limoneira investment,
net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,093 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,093 |
) |
Retirement of common stock |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,200 |
) |
Collections on shareholder notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206 |
|
Dividend declared to shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,573 |
) |
|
|
(4,573 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,788 |
|
|
|
5,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, October 31, 2006 |
|
|
14,293 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
37,109 |
|
|
$ |
(2,430 |
) |
|
$ |
6,293 |
|
|
$ |
17,957 |
|
|
$ |
58,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
29
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended October 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,788 |
|
|
$ |
3,322 |
|
|
$ |
6,210 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,035 |
|
|
|
2,862 |
|
|
|
2,648 |
|
Provision for losses on accounts receivable |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Income from Maui Fresh, LLC |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of property, plant, and equipment |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(1,668 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Effect on cash of changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(4,963 |
) |
|
|
1,403 |
|
|
|
(4,596 |
) |
Inventories, net |
|
|
(473 |
) |
|
|
1,279 |
|
|
|
(3,354 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(1,969 |
) |
|
|
(723 |
) |
|
|
2,798 |
|
Advances to suppliers |
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
1,272 |
|
|
|
(1,789 |
) |
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
(1,229 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(803 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
(1,925 |
) |
|
|
(320 |
) |
Payable to growers |
|
|
4,581 |
|
|
|
(4,036 |
) |
|
|
2,343 |
|
Trade accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
2,923 |
|
|
|
3,254 |
|
|
|
1,303 |
|
Income tax payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
7,819 |
|
|
|
5,568 |
|
|
|
4,460 |
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct costs of acquisition of Maui Fresh International, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
Acquisitions of property, plant, and equipment |
|
|
(4,513 |
) |
|
|
(1,874 |
) |
|
|
(8,409 |
) |
Cash settlement of the acquisition of Limoneira stock, net of our common stock issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment
in Maui Fresh, LLC |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of building |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(4,663 |
) |
|
|
(11,941 |
) |
|
|
(8,474 |
) |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend paid to shareholders |
|
|
(4,564 |
) |
|
|
(4,052 |
) |
|
|
(3,376 |
) |
Proceeds from (repayments of) short-term borrowings, net |
|
|
2,380 |
|
|
|
(576 |
) |
|
|
2,000 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term obligations |
|
|
(1,318 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
Retirement of common stock |
|
|
(1,200 |
) |
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from collection of shareholder notes receivable |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(4,239 |
) |
|
|
6,870 |
|
|
|
(725 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1,083 |
) |
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
(4,739 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
5,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
1,133 |
|
|
$ |
636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
943 |
|
|
$ |
399 |
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
4,091 |
|
|
$ |
3,875 |
|
|
$ |
4,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash Investing and Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax receivable increase related to stock option exercise |
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Declared dividends payable |
|
$ |
4,573 |
|
|
$ |
4,564 |
|
|
$ |
4,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of our common stock in Limoneira transaction |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress included in trade accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
438 |
|
|
$ |
396 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) |
|
$ |
(11,755 |
) |
|
$ |
22,184 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In November 2003, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common shares of Maui Fresh
International, Inc. for 576,924 shares of the Companys common stock, valued at $4.05 million, plus
acquisition costs of $65,000. See Note 1 for further explanation. The following table summarizes
the estimated fair values of the non-cash assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of
acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2004 |
|
Fixed assets |
|
$ |
114 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
3,526 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-cash assets acquired |
|
|
4,507 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
110 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities assumed |
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net non-cash assets acquired |
|
$ |
4,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
30
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Description of the business
Business
Calavo Growers, Inc. (Calavo, the Company, we, us or our) procures and markets avocados and
other perishable commodities and prepares and distributes processed avocado products. Our
expertise in marketing and distributing avocados, processed avocados, and other perishable foods
allows us to deliver a wide array of fresh and processed food products to food distributors,
produce wholesalers, supermarkets, and restaurants on a worldwide basis. Through our three
operating facilities in southern California, our distribution center in Texas, and our two
facilities in Mexico, we sort and pack avocados procured in California and Mexico and prepare
processed avocado products. Additionally, we procure avocados internationally, principally from
Mexico, Chile, and the Dominican Republic, and distribute other perishable foods, such as Hawaiian
grown papayas. During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, we combined our California avocados and
international avocados and perishable food products reporting segments. As a result, we now report
our operations in two business segments: (1) fresh products and (2) processed products. See
footnote 11 for further explanation.
2. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Calavo Growers, Inc. and our
wholly owned subsidiaries, Calavo Foods, Inc. Calavo de Mexico S.A. de C.V. Calavo Foods de Mexico
S.A. de C.V. and Maui Fresh International, Inc. (Maui). All intercompany accounts and transactions
have been eliminated.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid financial instruments purchased with an original maturity date
of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents
approximate their fair values.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is computed on a weighted-average
basis, which approximates the first-in, first-out method; market is based upon estimated
replacement costs. Costs included in inventory primarily include the following: fruit, picking
and hauling, overhead, labor, materials and freight.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated over their estimated useful
lives using the straight-line method. Leasehold improvements are stated at cost and amortized over
the lesser of their estimated useful lives or the term of the lease, using the straight-line
method. Useful lives are as follows: buildings and improvements 7 to 50 years; leasehold
improvements the lesser of the term of the lease or 7 years; equipment 7 to 25 years;
information systems hardware and software 3 to 15 years. Significant repairs and maintenance
that increase the value or extend the useful life of our fixed asset are capitalized. Replaced
units are written off. Ordinary maintenance and repairs are charged to expense.
We capitalize software development costs for internal use in accordance with Statement of
Position 98-1, Accounting for Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use
(SOP 98-1). Capitalization of software development costs begins in the application development
stage and ends when the asset is placed into service. We amortize such costs using the
straight-line basis over estimated useful lives. The net book value of capitalized computer
software costs was $1.5 million and $1.3 million as of October 31, 2006 and 2005 and the related
depreciation expense was $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2006
and 2005.
Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets
The purchase method of accounting for business combinations requires us to make use of
estimates and judgments to allocate the purchase price paid for acquisitions to the fair value of
the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually,
or when a possible impairment is indicated, using the fair value based test prescribed by Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The
impairment test requires us to compare the fair
31
value of business reporting units to carrying value, including goodwill. We primarily use an
income approach (which considers the present value of future cash flows) in combination with a
market approach (which considers what other purchasers in the marketplace have paid for similar
businesses) to determine fair value. Future cash flows typically include operating cash flows for
the business for three to five years and an estimated terminal value. Management judgment is
required in the estimation of future operating results and to determine the appropriate terminal
values. Future operating results and terminal values could differ from the estimates and could
require a provision for impairment in a future period. We performed our annual assessment of
goodwill and determined that no impairment existed as of October 31, 2006.
Included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are the
following intangible assets: customer-related intangibles of $590,000 (accumulated amortization of
$324,000 at October 31, 2006), brand name intangibles of $275,000 and other identified intangibles
totaling $2,000 (accumulated amortization of $2,000 at October 31, 2006). The customer-related
intangibles are being amortized over five years. The intangible asset related to the brand name
currently has an indefinite remaining useful life and, as a result, is not currently subject to
amortization. We performed our annual assessment of the brand name intangible and determined that
no impairment existed as of October 31, 2006. We anticipate recording amortization expense related
to customer-related intangibles of approximately $119,000 per annum from fiscal 2007 and fiscal
2008, with the remaining amortization expense of approximately $28,000 recorded in fiscal 2009.
Long-lived Assets
Long-lived assets, including fixed assets and intangible assets (other than goodwill), are
continually monitored and are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of any such asset may not be recoverable. The determination of
recoverability is based on an estimate of undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use
of an asset and its eventual disposition. The estimate of undiscounted cash flows is based upon,
among other things, certain assumptions about future operating performance, growth rates and other
factors. Estimates of undiscounted cash flows may differ from actual cash flows due to, among
other things, technological changes, economic conditions, changes to the business model or changes
in operating performance. If the sum of the undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less
then the carrying value, an impairment loss will be recognized, measured as the amount by which the
carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset. We have evaluated our long-lived assets and
determined that no impairment existed as of October 31, 2006.
Investments
We account for non-marketable investments using the equity method of accounting if the
investment gives us the ability to exercise significant influence over, but not control, an
investee. Significant influence generally exists when we have an ownership interest representing
between 20% and 50% of the voting stock of the investee. Under the equity method of accounting,
investments are stated at initial cost and are adjusted for subsequent additional investments and
our proportionate share of earnings or losses and distributions. Additional investments by other
parties in the investee, if any, will result in a reduction in our ownership interest, and the
resulting gain or loss will be recorded in our consolidated statements of income. See Note 16.
Marketable Securities
We account for marketable securities in accordance with provisions of SFAS No. 115, Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (SFAS 115). SFAS 115 addresses the
accounting and reporting for investments in fixed maturity securities and for equity securities
with readily determinable fair values. Our marketable securities consist of our investment in
Limoneira stock (see Note 12). These securities are carried at fair value as determined from
quoted market prices. The estimated fair value, cost, and gross unrealized gain related to such
investment was $33.9 million, $23.5 million and $10.4 million as of October 31, 2006. The
estimated fair value, cost, and gross unrealized gain related to such investment was $45.7 million,
$23.5 million and $22.2 million as of October 31, 2005.
Advances to Suppliers
We advance funds to third-party growers primarily in Chile and Mexico for various farming
needs. Typically, we obtain collateral (i.e. fruit, fixed assets, etc.) that approximates the
value at risk, prior to making such advances. We continuously evaluate the ability of these
growers to repay advances in order to evaluate the possible need to record an allowance. No such
allowance was required at October 31, 2006, nor October 31, 2005.
32
Accrued Expenses
Included in accrued expenses at October 31, 2006 are un-vouchered receipts and management
bonuses of approximately $2.3 million and $1.0 million. Included in accrued expenses at October
31, 2005 are un-vouchered receipts of $1.0 million and no management bonus accrual.
Revenue Recognition
Sales of products and related costs of products sold are recognized when persuasive evidence
of an arrangement exists, shipment has been made, title passes, the price is fixed or determinable
and collectibility is reasonably assured. Service revenue, including freight, ripening, storage,
bagging and palletization charges, is recorded when services are performed and sales of the related
products are delivered.
Promotional Allowances
We provide for promotional allowances at the time of sale, based on our historical experience.
Our estimates are generally based on evaluating the average length of time between the product
shipment date and the date on which we pay the customer the promotional allowance. The product of
this lag factor and our historical promotional allowance payment rate is the basis for the
promotional allowance included in accrued expenses on our balance sheet. Actual amounts may differ
from these estimates and such differences are recognized as an adjustment to net sales in the
period they are identified.
Allowance for Accounts Receivable
We provide an allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts receivable balances based on
historical experience and the aging of the related accounts receivable.
Consignment Arrangements
We enter into consignment arrangements with avocado growers and packers located outside of the
United States and growers of certain perishable products in the United States. Although we
generally do not take legal title to avocados and perishable products, we do assume
responsibilities (principally assuming credit risk, inventory loss and delivery risk, and limited
pricing risk) that are consistent with acting as a principal in the transaction. Accordingly, the
accompanying financial statements include sales and cost of sales from the sale of avocados and
perishable products procured under consignment arrangements. Amounts recorded for each of the
fiscal years ended October 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 in the financial statements pursuant to
consignment arrangements are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
10,127 |
|
|
$ |
27,171 |
|
|
$ |
27,346 |
|
Cost of Sales |
|
|
8,943 |
|
|
|
25,456 |
|
|
|
25,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin |
|
$ |
1,184 |
|
|
$ |
1,715 |
|
|
$ |
1,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising Expense
Advertising costs are expensed when incurred. Such costs in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004 were
approximately $0.4 million, $0.3 million, and $0.2 million.
Other income, net
Included in other income, net is dividend income totaling $0.4 million and $0.2 million for
fiscal years 2006 and 2005. We did not have significant dividend income for fiscal year 2004.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Among
the significant estimates affecting the financial statements are those related to valuation
allowances for accounts receivable, goodwill, grower advances, inventories, long-lived assets,
valuation of and estimated useful lives of identifiable intangible assets, stock-based
compensation, promotional allowances and income taxes. On an ongoing basis,
33
management reviews its estimates based upon currently available information. Actual results
could differ materially from those estimates.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes under the provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
This statement requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future
consequences of events that have been recognized in our consolidated financial statements or tax
returns. Measurement of the deferred items is based on enacted tax laws. In the event the future
consequences of differences between financial reporting bases and tax bases of our assets and
liabilities result in a deferred tax asset, SFAS No. 109 requires an evaluation of the probability
of being able to realize the future benefits indicated by such asset. A valuation
allowance related to a deferred tax asset is recorded when it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Basic and Diluted Net Income per Share
Basic earnings per share is calculated using the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding during the period without consideration of the dilutive effect of stock options. The
basic weighted-average number of common shares outstanding was 14,304,000, 13,892,000, and
13,497,000 for fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated
using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period after
consideration of the dilutive effect of stock options, which were 50,000, 93,000, and 85,000 for
fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004. There were no anti-dilutive options for fiscal years 2006, 2005
and 2004.
Stock-Based Compensation
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. This pronouncement
amends SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS No. 123(R) requires that companies account for
awards of equity instruments issued to employees under the fair value method of accounting and
recognize such amounts in their statements of operations. We adopted SFAS No. 123(R) on November
1, 2005 using the modified prospective method and, accordingly, have not restated the consolidated
statements of operations for prior interim periods or fiscal years. Under SFAS No. 123(R), we are
required to measure compensation cost for all stock-based awards at fair value on the date of grant
and recognize compensation expense in our consolidated statements of operations over the service
period that the awards are expected to vest.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we accounted for employee stock-based compensation
using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, as permitted by SFAS No.
123 and SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure. Under
the intrinsic value method, the difference between the market price on the date of grant and the
exercise price is charged to the statement of operations over the vesting period. Prior to the
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we recognized compensation cost only for stock options issued with
exercise prices set below market prices on the date of grant and provided the necessary pro forma
disclosures required under SFAS No. 123.
During the year ended October 31, 2005 and 2004, we recognized $84,000 and $50,000 of
compensation expense with respect to stock option awards pursuant to APB 25, which was charged to
the consolidated statement of operations. For the years ended October 31, 2005 and 2004, had
stock-based compensation been accounted for based on the estimated grant date fair values, as
defined by SFAS No. 123, the Companys net income and net income per share would have been the
following pro forma amounts (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
3,322 |
|
|
$ |
6,210 |
|
Add: Total stock-based compensation
expense determined under APB 25 and related
interpretations, net of tax effects |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation
expense determined under fair value based
method for all awards, net of tax effects |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
3,319 |
|
|
$ |
6,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net income per share, as reported: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share, pro forma: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
The fair value of the options granted in fiscal year 2005 and 2004 has been estimated at the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes and lattice-based option pricing model with the following
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
27.6 |
% |
|
|
26.9 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
Expected life (years) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Weighted-average fair value of options granted |
|
$ |
1.65 |
|
|
$ |
3.01 |
|
In December 2003, our Board of Directors approved the issuance of options to acquire a total
of 50,000 shares of our common stock to two members of our Board of Directors. Each option to
acquire 25,000 shares vests in substantially equal installments over a three-year period, has an
exercise price of $7.00 per share, and has a term of five years from the grant date. The market
price of our common stock at the grant date was $10.01. In December 2005, however, these stock
option agreements were modified to shorten the option terms, as defined. Such modifications were
contemplated primarily as a result of Section 409A of the tax code and did not result in a
significant change in fair value.
Under SFAS No. 123(R), we now record in our consolidated statements of operations (i)
compensation cost for options granted, modified, repurchased or cancelled on or after November 1,
2005 under the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) and (ii) compensation cost for the unvested portion of
options granted prior to November 1, 2005 over their remaining vesting periods using the amounts
previously measured under SFAS No. 123 for pro forma disclosure purposes.
In August 2005, our Board of Directors approved the issuance of options to acquire a total of
400,000 shares of our common stock to various employees of the Company. The options vest if the
closing price of our common stock is at least $11.00 per share at any time throughout the life of
the option. At no time, however, may any options vest within one year from the date of grant.
Additionally, such options have an exercise price of $9.10 per share and a term of 5 years from the
grant date. The market price of our common stock at the grant date was $9.10. In April 2006, the
price of our common stock reached $11/per share. Therefore, all 400,000 options related to our
stock option grant that took place in August 2005 vested in August 2006 (for those persons still
employed). The achievement of this market condition resulted in a decrease in the initial,
estimated derived service period. As a result, we recorded total stock-based compensation expense
related to this stock option grant of $616,000 during the year ended October 31, 2006. During the
year ended October 31, 2006, we recognized total stock-based compensation expense of $666,000 for
stock options in our consolidated statement of operations.
The value of each option award that contains a market condition is estimated using a
lattice-based option valuation model, while all other option awards are valued using the
Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model. We primarily consider the following assumptions when
using these models: (1) expected volatility, (2) expected dividends, (3) expected term and (4)
risk-free rate. Such models also consider the intrinsic value in the estimation of fair value of
the option award. Forfeitures are estimated when recognizing compensation expense, and the
estimate of forfeitures will be adjusted over the requisite service period to the extent that
actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Changes in estimated
forfeitures will be recognized through a cumulative catch-up adjustment in the period of change and
will also impact the amount of compensation expense to be recognized in future periods.
There were no options granted during the year ended October 31, 2006.
The Black-Scholes-Merton and lattice-based option valuation models were developed for use in
estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. Because options held by our directors and employees have characteristics
significantly different from those of traded options, in our opinion, the existing models do not
necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of these options.
Foreign Currency Translation and Remeasurement
Our foreign operations are subject to exchange rate fluctuations and foreign currency
transaction costs. The functional currency of our foreign subsidiaries is the United States
dollar. As a result, monetary assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at
35
exchange rates as of the balance sheet date and non-monetary assets, liabilities and equity
are translated at historical rates. Sales and expenses are translated using a weighted-average
exchange rate for the period. Gains and losses resulting from those remeasurements are included in
income. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are also recognized
currently in income. Total foreign currency gains and losses for each of the three years ended
October 31, 2006 do not exceed $0.1 million.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We believe that the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes
receivable from shareholders, and accounts payable approximates fair value based on either their
short-term nature or on terms currently available to the Company in
financial markets. We believe that our fixed-rate long-term
obligations have a fair value of approximately $10.8 million as
of October 31, 2006, with a corresponding carrying value of
approximately $11.7 million.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We do not presently engage in derivative or hedging activities. In addition, we have reviewed
agreements and contracts and have determined that we have no derivative instruments, nor do any of
our agreements and contracts contain embedded derivative instruments, as of October 31, 2006.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) 154, Accounting
Changes and Error Corrections, which replaces APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and SFAS No.
3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. SFAS No. 154 applies to all
voluntary changes in accounting principles and requires retrospective application (a term defined
by the statement) to prior periods financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine
the effect of a change. It also applies to changes required by an accounting pronouncement that
does not include specific transition provisions. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes
and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. We will adopt
SFAS No. 154 as of the beginning of fiscal 2007 and do not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 154
will have a material impact on our financial condition of results of operations.
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial
Instruments-an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140. SFAS No. 155 permits fair value
remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that
otherwise would require bifurcation, clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips
are not subject to the requirements of SFAS No. 133, establishes a requirement to evaluate
interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives
or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation,
clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded
derivatives, and amends SFAS No. 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose
entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other
than another derivative financial instrument. SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial
instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year that begins
after September 15, 2006. We will adopt SFAS No. 155 on November 1, 2006 and do not expect that
the adoption will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). This interpretation clarifies the
application of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, by defining a criterion than an
individual tax position must meet for any part of the benefit of that position to be recognized in
an enterprises financial statements and also provides guidance on measurement, derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, but earlier adoption is
permitted. We will adopt FIN 48 no later than November 1, 2007. We are currently assessing the
impact the adoption of FIN 48 will have on our financial position and results of operations.
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) No. 108 on Quantifying Misstatements. SAB No. 108 requires companies to use both a balance
sheet and an income statement approach when quantifying and evaluating the materiality of a
misstatement, and contains guidance on correcting errors under the dual approach. SAB No. 108 also
provides transition guidance for correcting errors existing in prior years. SAB No. 108 is
effective for annual financial statements covering the first fiscal year ending after November 15,
2006, with earlier application encouraged. We do not believe that the adoption of SAB 108 will
have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles,
clarifies the definition of fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS
No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. However, the application of SFAS No. 157
may change current practice for some entities. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. We will adopt SFAS No. 157 in the first quarter of
36
fiscal 2009. We are currently assessing the impact the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on
our financial position and results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and
132(R). SFAS No. 158 requires company plan sponsors to display the net over- or under-funded
position of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability, with any unrecognized
prior service costs, transition obligations or actuarial gains/losses reported as a component of
other comprehensive income in shareholders equity. SFAS No. 158 is effective for fiscal years
ending after December 15, 2006. We will adopt SFAS No. 158 as of the end of fiscal 2007. We are
currently assessing the impact the adoption of SFAS No. 158 will have on our financial position and
results of operations.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as all changes in a companys net assets, except
changes resulting from transactions with shareholders. For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006,
other comprehensive loss includes the unrealized loss on our Limoneira investment totaling $7.1
million, net of income taxes. Limoneiras stock price at
October 31, 2006 equaled $196 per share. For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005, other comprehensive
income includes the unrealized gain on our Limoneira investment totaling $13.4, net of income
taxes. Limoneiras stock price at
October 31, 2005 equaled $264 per share. There was no significant difference between comprehensive income and net income for the
fiscal year ended October 31, 2004.
3. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Fresh fruit |
|
$ |
4,961 |
|
|
$ |
3,525 |
|
Packing supplies and ingredients |
|
|
2,380 |
|
|
|
2,015 |
|
Finished processed foods |
|
|
3,228 |
|
|
|
4,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,569 |
|
|
$ |
10,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold for fiscal years 2005 and 2004 include inventory write-downs of $0.1
million, $0.3 million. Write-downs in fiscal 2005 primarily related to a reduction in the cost of
pulp used in certain processed avocado products. Write-downs in fiscal year 2004 primarily related
to improper handling of product, which we believe related to a subcontractors error. We did not
have any write-downs in fiscal 2006.
We assess the recoverability of inventories through an ongoing review of inventory levels in
relation to sales and forecasts, and product marketing plans. When the inventory on hand, at the
time of the review, exceeds the foreseeable demand, the value of inventory that is not expected to
be sold is written down. The amount of the write-down is the excess of historical cost over
estimated realizable value (generally zero). Once established, these write-downs are considered
permanent adjustments to the cost basis of the excess inventory.
The assessment of the recoverability of inventories and the amounts of any write-downs are
based on currently available information and assumptions about future demand and market conditions.
Demand for processed avocado products may fluctuate significantly over time, and actual demand and
market conditions may be more or less favorable than our projections. In the event that actual
demand is lower than originally projected, additional inventory write-downs may be required.
We may retain and make available for sale some or all of the inventories which have been
written down. In the event that actual demand is higher than originally projected, we may be able
to sell a portion of these inventories in the future. We generally scrap inventories which have
been written down and are identified as obsolete.
37
4. Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
947 |
|
|
$ |
952 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
13,840 |
|
|
|
13,611 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
31,793 |
|
|
|
28,889 |
|
Information systems Hardware and software |
|
|
4,324 |
|
|
|
3,997 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
2,841 |
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,916 |
|
|
|
49,010 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(34,008 |
) |
|
|
(32,113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,908 |
|
|
$ |
16,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In March 2005, we completed the sale of our corporate headquarters building for $3.4 million.
This transaction resulted in a pre-tax gain on sale of approximately $1.7 million, which is
included in other income, net. In conjunction with such sale, we relocated our corporate offices
to Santa Paula, California in March 2005. Total expenses related to such relocation approximated
$0.4 million. Depreciation expense was $1.9 million, $2.7 million and $2.6 million for fiscal
years 2006, 2005, and 2004.
5. Other Assets
During 1999, we established a Grower Development Program whereby funds can be advanced to
growers in exchange for their commitment to deliver a minimum volume of avocados on an annual
basis. These commitments to deliver fruit generally extend over a multi-year period. During
fiscal 2006 and as of October 31, 2006, we advanced $3.3 million ($1.2 million was paid in cash,
the remainder via receivable restructuring) to certain growers. Advances are not repaid and are
amortized to cost of goods sold over the term of the related agreements, up to a maximum of
approximately 11 years. The financial statements for fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004 include a
charge of approximately $298,000, $322,000 and $322,000 representing the amortization of these
advances. During fiscal 2005, no amounts were advanced pursuant to this program and $0.3 million
was included in other assets as of October 31, 2005.
6. Short-Term Borrowings
In October 2006, we renewed and extended one of our short-term, non-collateralized, revolving
credit facilities. Our two credit facilities now expire in February 2010 and April 2008 and are
with separate banks. Under the terms of these agreements, we are advanced funds for working
capital purposes. Total credit available under the combined short-term borrowing agreements was
$24 million, with a weighted-average interest rate of 6.2% and 4.8% at October 31, 2006 and 2005.
Under these credit facilities, we had $3.8 million and $1.4 million outstanding as of October 31,
2006 and 2005. The credit facilities contain various financial covenants, the most significant
relating to working capital, tangible net worth (as defined), and Earnings Before Interest, Taxes,
Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) (as defined). We were in compliance with all such covenants
at October 31, 2006, except for the working capital covenants with which we obtained appropriate
waivers.
7. Employee Benefit Plans
We sponsor two defined contribution retirement plans for salaried and hourly employees.
Expenses for these plans approximated $502,000, $399,000, and $409,000 for fiscal years 2006, 2005
and 2004, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying
financial statements.
We also sponsor a non-qualified defined benefit plan for two retired executives. Pension
expenses, net of actuarial gains, approximated $46,000 for the year ended October 31, 2006.
Pension expenses and actuarial losses approximated $65,000 and $49,000 for the years ended October
31, 2005, and 2004. These amounts are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in
the accompanying financial statements.
38
Components of the change in projected benefit obligation for fiscal year ends consist of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Change in projected benefit obligation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year |
|
$ |
510 |
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Actuarial loss (gain) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at end of year (unfunded) |
|
$ |
414 |
|
|
$ |
510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a reconciliation of the unfunded status of the plans at fiscal year ends
included in accrued expenses (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Projected benefit obligation |
|
$ |
414 |
|
|
$ |
510 |
|
Unrecognized net (gain) loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded pension liabilities |
|
$ |
414 |
|
|
$ |
510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant assumptions used in the determination of pension expense consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Discount rate on projected benefit obligation |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
8. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments and guarantees
We lease facilities and certain equipment under non cancelable operating leases expiring at
various dates through 2021. We are committed to make minimum cash payments under these agreements
as of October 31, 2006 as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
$ |
1,279 |
|
2008 |
|
|
585 |
|
2009 |
|
|
547 |
|
2010 |
|
|
506 |
|
2011 |
|
|
381 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
2,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
In August 2006, we entered into an operating lease agreement with Columbia New Jersey
Commodore Industrial, LLC to rent approximately 30,000 square feet of building space in Swedesboro,
New Jersey. This lease enables us to not only invest in our ProRipeVIPTM avocado
ripening program, but also expand our refrigeration and storage capabilities. The lease has a term
of approximately 15 years and includes scheduled rent increases. Pursuant to FASB Technical
Bulletin 85-3, our straight-line rent expense for such lease will approximate $13,000 per month for
the duration of such lease. This facility commenced operations during the first quarter of fiscal
2007.
Total rent expense amounted to approximately $1.5 million, $1.2 million and $1.1 million for
the years ended October 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. Rent to Limoneira, for our corporate office,
amounted to approximately $0.2 million and $0.1 million for fiscal year 2006 and 2005. We are
committed to rent our corporate facility through fiscal 2015 at an annual rental of $0.2 million
per annum. See footnote 12 for further explanation.
We indemnify our directors and have the power to indemnify each of our officers, employees and
other agents, to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law. The maximum amount of potential
future payments under such indemnifications is not determinable. No amounts have been accrued in
the accompanying financial statements.
We have commitments for capital expenditures totaling approximately $1.1 million as of October
31, 2006.
39
Litigation
We are currently under examination by the Mexican tax authorities (Hacienda) for the tax year
ended December 31, 2000. During the first quarter of fiscal 2005, we received an assessment
totaling approximately $2.0 million from Hacienda related to the amount of income at our Mexican
subsidiary. Based primarily on discussions with legal counsel and the evaluation of our claim, we
believe that Haciendas position has no merit and that the Company will prevail. Accordingly, no
amounts have been provided in the financial statements as of October 31, 2006. We pledged our
processed products building located in Uruapan, Michoacan, Mexico as collateral to the Hacienda in
regards to this assessment.
We are also involved in litigation arising in the ordinary course of our business that we do
not believe will have a material adverse impact on our financial statements.
9. Related-Party Transactions
We sell papayas procured from an entity owned by the Chairman of our Board of Directors and
CEO. Sales of papayas amounted to approximately $4,822,000,
$6,251,000, and $6,846,000 for the years ended
October 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, resulting in gross margins of
approximately $285,000, $510,000, and $864,000. Net
amounts due to this entity approximated $213,000 and $79,000 at October 31, 2006, and 2005.
Certain members of our Board of Directors market avocados through Calavo pursuant to our
customary marketing agreements. During the years ended
October 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the aggregate
amount of avocados procured from entities owned or controlled by members of our Board of Directors,
was $17.2 million, $5.2 million, and $4.7 million. Accounts payable to these Board members were $0.6 million and
$0.2 million as of October 31, 2006 and 2005.
In August 2005, we repurchased 200,000 shares of our common stock at an average price per
share of $10.00 from the estate of a deceased former member of our Board of Directors. In December
2005, we repurchased another 120,000 shares of our common stock at an average price per share of
$10.00 from the same estate.
See Note 12 for discussion related to our investment in Limoneira. During fiscal 2006 and
2005, we received $0.4 million and $0.2 million as dividend income from Limoneira.
10. Income Taxes
The income tax provision consists of the following for the years ended October 31 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
2,423 |
|
|
$ |
3,046 |
|
|
$ |
3,018 |
|
State |
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current |
|
|
3,084 |
|
|
|
4,106 |
|
|
|
3,887 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
(1,925 |
) |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax provision |
|
$ |
3,620 |
|
|
$ |
2,181 |
|
|
$ |
3,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At October 31, 2006 and 2005, gross deferred tax assets totaled approximately $2.9 million and
$3.1 million, while gross deferred tax liabilities totaled approximately $4.9 million and $9.1
million. Deferred income taxes reflect the net of temporary differences between the carrying
amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and income tax purposes.
40
Significant components of our deferred taxes as of October 31, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Allowances for accounts receivable |
|
$ |
1,779 |
|
|
$ |
2,065 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
State taxes |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
|
2,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment |
|
|
(541 |
) |
|
|
217 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(282 |
) |
Unrealized Gain, Limoneira investment |
|
|
(4,136 |
) |
|
|
(8,798 |
) |
Retirement benefits |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred income taxes |
|
$ |
(4,391 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,589 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the significant differences between the federal statutory income tax rate
and the effective income tax rate on pretax income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Federal statutory tax rate |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
State taxes, net of federal effects |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Foreign income taxes greater (less) than U.S. |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Benefit of lower federal tax brackets |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We intend to reinvest our accumulated foreign earnings, which approximated $3.3 million at
October 31, 2006, indefinitely. As a result, we have not provided any deferred income taxes on
such unremitted earnings.
For fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004, income before income taxes related to domestic
operations was approximately $8.9 million, $4.8 million, and $9.0 million. For fiscal years 2006,
2005 and 2004, income before income taxes related to foreign operations was approximately $0.5
million, $0.7 million and $0.8 million.
11. Segment Information
During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, we examined our California avocados and
international avocados and perishable food products reporting segments. We concluded that these
two reporting segments have similar economic characteristics, production processes, customers and
distribution methods. Therefore, in accordance with the aggregation criteria of FASB Statement No.
131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, we combined these two
operating segments into one reportable segment, fresh products. As a result, we now report our
operations in two different business segments: (1) fresh products and (2) processed products.
These two business segments are presented based on how information is used by our president to
measure performance and allocate resources. The fresh products segment includes all operations
that involve the distribution of avocados grown both inside and outside of California, as well as
the distribution of other non-processed, perishable food products. The processed products segment
represents all operations related to the purchase, manufacturing, and distribution of processed
avocado products. Additionally, selling, general and administrative expenses and other income, net
are no longer charged directly, nor allocated to, a specific product line. These items are now
evaluated by our president only in aggregate. We do not allocate assets, or specifically identify
them to, our operating segments. Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the
current period presentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh |
|
|
Processed |
|
|
Inter-segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
products |
|
|
products |
|
|
eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(All amounts are presented in thousands) |
|
Year ended October 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
246,421 |
|
|
$ |
43,248 |
|
|
$ |
(15,759 |
) |
|
$ |
273,910 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
227,748 |
|
|
|
32,650 |
|
|
|
(15,759 |
) |
|
|
244,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
$ |
18,673 |
|
|
$ |
10,598 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
29,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh |
|
|
Processed |
|
|
Inter-segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
products |
|
|
products |
|
|
eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(All amounts are presented in thousands) |
|
Year ended October 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
246,139 |
|
|
$ |
34,699 |
|
|
$ |
(22,016 |
) |
|
$ |
258,822 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
229,068 |
|
|
|
30,036 |
|
|
|
(22,016 |
) |
|
|
237,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
$ |
17,071 |
|
|
$ |
4,663 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
21,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended October 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
257,909 |
|
|
$ |
32,749 |
|
|
$ |
(16,440 |
) |
|
$ |
274,218 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
235,849 |
|
|
|
29,405 |
|
|
|
(16,440 |
) |
|
|
248,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
$ |
22,060 |
|
|
$ |
3,344 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth sales by product category, by segment (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended October 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Fresh |
|
|
Processed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
products |
|
|
products |
|
|
Total |
|
Third-party sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California avocados |
|
$ |
140,995 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
140,995 |
|
Imported avocados |
|
|
51,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,211 |
|
Papayas |
|
|
4,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,811 |
|
Specialities and tropicals |
|
|
9,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,724 |
|
Processed food service |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,021 |
|
|
|
34,021 |
|
Processed retail and club |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,454 |
|
|
|
10,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fruit and product sales to third-parties |
|
|
206,741 |
|
|
|
44,475 |
|
|
|
251,216 |
|
Freight and other charges |
|
|
30,156 |
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
30,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total third-party sales |
|
|
236,897 |
|
|
|
45,112 |
|
|
|
282,009 |
|
Less sales incentives |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(8,091 |
) |
|
|
(8,099 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales to third-parties |
|
|
236,889 |
|
|
|
37,021 |
|
|
|
273,910 |
|
Intercompany sales |
|
|
9,532 |
|
|
|
6,227 |
|
|
|
15,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales before eliminations |
|
$ |
246,421 |
|
|
$ |
43,248 |
|
|
|
289,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany sales eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
273,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended October 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
Fresh |
|
|
Processed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
products |
|
|
products |
|
|
Total |
|
Third-party sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California avocados |
|
$ |
104,481 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
104,481 |
|
Imported avocados |
|
|
81,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,756 |
|
Papayas |
|
|
6,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,251 |
|
Specialities and tropicals |
|
|
13,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,777 |
|
Processed food service |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,307 |
|
|
|
28,307 |
|
Processed retail and club |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,766 |
|
|
|
6,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fruit and product sales to third-parties |
|
|
206,265 |
|
|
|
35,073 |
|
|
|
241,338 |
|
Freight and other charges |
|
|
24,129 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
24,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total third-party sales |
|
|
230,394 |
|
|
|
35,331 |
|
|
|
265,725 |
|
Less sales incentives |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(6,798 |
) |
|
|
(6,903 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales to third-parties |
|
|
230,289 |
|
|
|
28,533 |
|
|
|
258,822 |
|
Intercompany sales |
|
|
15,850 |
|
|
|
6,166 |
|
|
|
22,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales before eliminations |
|
$ |
246,139 |
|
|
$ |
34,699 |
|
|
|
280,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany sales eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,016 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
258,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended October 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
Fresh |
|
|
Processed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
Products |
|
|
Total |
|
Third-party sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California avocados |
|
$ |
150,159 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
150,159 |
|
Imported avocados |
|
|
54,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,589 |
|
Papayas |
|
|
6,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,846 |
|
Specialities and tropicals |
|
|
14,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,233 |
|
Processed food service |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,352 |
|
|
|
27,352 |
|
Processed retail and club |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,285 |
|
|
|
4,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fruit and product sales to third-parties |
|
|
225,827 |
|
|
|
31,637 |
|
|
|
257,464 |
|
Freight and other charges |
|
|
22,914 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
23,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total third-party sales |
|
|
248,741 |
|
|
|
32,171 |
|
|
|
280,912 |
|
Less sales incentives |
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
(6,515 |
) |
|
|
(6,694 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales to third-parties |
|
|
248,562 |
|
|
|
25,656 |
|
|
|
274,218 |
|
Intercompany sales |
|
|
9,347 |
|
|
|
7,093 |
|
|
|
16,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales before eliminations |
|
$ |
257,909 |
|
|
$ |
32,749 |
|
|
|
290,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany sales eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,440 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
274,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets attributed to geographic areas as of October 31 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
Mexico |
|
Consolidated |
2006 |
|
$ |
50,014 |
|
|
$ |
11,703 |
|
|
$ |
61,717 |
|
2005 |
|
$ |
55,587 |
|
|
$ |
11,849 |
|
|
$ |
67,436 |
|
Sales to customers outside the United States were approximately $13.8 million, $15.9 million
and $16.2 million for the three years ended October 31, 2006.
12. Investment in Limoneira Company
In order to increase our market share of California avocados and increase synergies within the
marketplace, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with Limoneira Company (Limoneira) in June
2005. Pursuant to such agreement, we acquired approximately 15.1% of Limoneiras outstanding
common stock for $23.45 million and Limoneira acquired approximately 6.9% of our outstanding common
stock for $10 million. The transaction was settled by a net cash payment by us of $13.45 million.
Additionally, such agreement also provided for: (1) Calavo to lease office space from Limoneira in
Santa Paula, California for a period of 10 years at an initial annual gross rental of approximately
$0.2 million (subject to annual CPI increases, as defined), (2) Calavo to market Limoneiras
avocados and (3) Calavo and Limoneira to use good faith reasonable efforts to maximize avocado
packing efficiencies for both parties by consolidating their fruit packing operations. Various
opportunities are currently being considered, including the use of existing packing facilities, an
investment in existing vacant facilities, and/or an investment in a new consolidated facility for
both parties.
As a result of the ownership percentage acquired in Limoneira, we recognize only dividends
received from Limoneira as income. Such investment is reported at fair value at the balance sheet
date. Fair value is determined based on quoted market prices. Unrealized gains and losses related
to such investment are reported in other comprehensive income. Based on the overall state of the
stock market, the availability of buyers for the shares when we want to sell, and other
restrictions, at any point in time the amounts ultimately realized upon liquidation of these
securities may be significantly different than the carrying value.
43
13. Long-Term Obligations
Long-term obligations at fiscal year ends consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Farm Credit West, PCA |
|
$ |
11,700 |
|
|
$ |
13,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,714 |
|
|
|
13,032 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
(1,308 |
) |
|
|
(1,313 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,406 |
|
|
$ |
11,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In July 2005, we entered into a non-collateralized term loan agreement with Farm Credit West,
PCA to finance the purchase of our Limoneira Stock. Pursuant to such agreement, we borrowed $13.0
million, which is to be repaid in 10 annual installments of $1.3 million. Such annual installments
began July 2006 and continue through July 2015. Interest is paid monthly, in arrears, and began in
August 2005, and will continue through the life of the loan. Such loan bears interest at a fixed
rate of 5.70%.
Such loan
contains various financial covenants, the most significant relating
to working capital, tangible net worth (as
defined), and Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and
Amortization (EBITDA) (as defined). We were in compliance with all
such covenants at October 31, 2006, except for the working
capital covenants with which we obtained appropriate waivers.
At October 31, 2006, annual debt payments are scheduled as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Year ending October 31: |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
$ |
1,308 |
|
2008 |
|
|
1,306 |
|
2009 |
|
|
1,300 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,300 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,300 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
14. Stock-Based Compensation
In November 2001, our Board of Directors approved two stock-based compensation plans.
The Directors Stock Option Plan
Participation in the directors stock option plan is limited to members of our Board of
Directors. The plan makes available to the Board of Directors, or a plan administrator, the right
to grant options to purchase up to 3,000,000 shares of common stock. In connection with the
adoption of the plan, the Board of Directors approved an award of fully vested options to purchase
1,240,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share. We anticipate
terminating this plan during fiscal 2007. Outstanding options would not be impacted by such
termination.
In January 2002, members of our Board of Directors elected to exercise options to purchase
approximately 1,005,000 shares of common stock. The exercise price was paid by delivery of
full-recourse promissory notes with a face value of $4,789,000 and by cash payments of
approximately $236,000. These notes and the related security agreements provide, among other
things, that each director pledge as collateral the shares acquired upon exercise of the stock
option, as well as additional shares of common stock held by the directors with a value equal to
10% of the loan amount, if the exercise price was paid by means of a full-recourse note. The
notes, which bear interest at 7% per annum, provide for annual interest payments with a final
principal payment due March 1, 2007. Directors will be allowed to withdraw shares from the pledged
pool of common stock prior to repayment of their notes, as long as the fair value of the remaining
pledged shares is at least equal to 120% of the outstanding note balance. The notes have been
presented as a reduction of shareholders equity as of October 31, 2006 and October 31, 2005.
In December 2003, our Board of Directors approved the issuance of options to acquire a total
of 50,000 shares of our common stock to two members of our Board of Directors. Each option to
acquire 25,000 shares vests in substantially equal installments over a three-year period, has an
exercise price of $7.00 per share, and has a term of five years from the grant date. The market
price of our common stock at the grant date was $10.01. In December 2005, the related stock option
agreements were modified to shorten the option terms, as defined. Such modifications were
contemplated primarily as a result of Section 409A of the tax code. During the
44
year ended October 31, 2006 and 2005, we recognized approximately $50,000 of compensation
expense with respect to these stock option awards.
A summary of stock option activity follows (in thousands, except for per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
Outstanding at October 31, 2005 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
$ |
6.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
$ |
5.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at October 31, 2006 |
|
|
49 |
|
|
$ |
7.00 |
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at October 31, 2006 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
$ |
7.00 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average remaining life of such outstanding options is 2.14 years and the total
intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended October 31, 2006 was $0.2 million. At
October 31, 2006, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to such unvested stock options
awards was approximately $8,000, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining period of
two months. The total fair value of shares vested during the year ended October 31, 2006 was
approximately $163,000.
The Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The employee stock purchase plan was approved by our Board of Directors and shareholders.
Participation in the employee stock purchase plan is limited to employees. The plan provides the
Board of Directors, or a plan administrator, the right to make available up to 2,000,000 shares of
common stock at a price not less than fair market value. In March 2002, the Board of Directors
awarded selected employees the opportunity to purchase up to 474,000 shares of common stock at
$7.00 per share, the closing price of our common stock on the date prior to the grant. The plan
also permits us to advance all or some of the purchase price of the purchased stock to the employee
upon the execution of a full-recourse note at prevailing interest rates. These awards expired in
April 2002, with 84 participating employees electing to purchase approximately 279,000 shares.
The purchase price was paid by delivery of full-recourse promissory notes with a face value of
$1,352,000 and by cash payments of approximately $600,000. These notes and the related security
agreements provide, among other things, that each employee pledge as collateral the shares
acquired. The notes, which bear interest at 7% per annum, provide for annual interest and
principal payments for a period of two to four years. As of October 31, 2006, all outstanding note
balances have been paid in full.
The 2005 Stock Incentive Plan
The 2005 Stock Incentive Plan of Calavo Growers, Inc. (the 2005 Plan) was approved by our
Board of Directors and shareholders. The 2005 Plan authorizes the granting of the following types
of awards to persons who are employees, officers, consultants, advisors, or directors of Calavo
Growers, Inc. or any of its affiliates:
|
|
Incentive stock options that are intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, and the regulations thereunder; |
|
|
|
Non-qualified stock options that are not intended to be incentive stock options; and |
|
|
|
Shares of common stock that are subject to specified restrictions |
Subject to the adjustment provisions of the 2005 Plan that are applicable in the event of a
stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split or similar transaction, up to 2,500,000 shares of
common stock may be issued under the 2005 Plan and no person shall be granted awards under the 2005
Plan during any 12-month period that cover more then 500,000 shares of common stock.
In August 2005, our Board of Directors approved the issuance of options to acquire a total of
400,000 shares of our common stock to various employees of the Company. As discussed in footnote
2, these options vested in August 2006. See footnote 2 for further explanation. These options
have an exercise price of $9.10 per share and a term of 5 years from the grant date. The market
price of our common stock at the grant date was $9.10. During the year ended October 31, 2006,
9,000 options have been forfeited, and the total intrinsic value of options outstanding was $0.3
million. No options have been exercised as of October 31, 2006.
15. Dividends
In January 2007, we paid a $0.32 per share dividend in the aggregate amount of $4.6 million to
shareholders of record on December 15, 2006. In January 2006, we paid a $0.32 per share dividend
in the aggregate amount of $4.6 million to shareholders of record on December 15, 2005.
45
16. Joint Venture in Maui Fresh International, LLC
In August 2006, we entered into a joint venture agreement with San Rafael Distributing (SRD)
for the purpose of the wholesale marketing, sale and distribution of fresh produce from the
existing location of SRD at the Los Angeles Wholesale Produce Market (Terminal Market), located in
Los Angeles, California. Such joint venture operates under the name of Maui Fresh International,
LLC (Maui Fresh LLC) and commenced operations in August 2006. SRD and Calavo each have an equal
one-half ownership interest in Maui Fresh, but SRD shall have overall management responsibility for
the operations of Maui Fresh at the Terminal Market. Therefore, pursuant to Accounting Principles
Board (ABP) 18 and Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 03-16, we believe that our level of economic
influence is that of significant. As such, we will use the equity method to account for our
investment.
Contributions of Calavo to Maui Fresh included the following: (1) the licensing of certain
trademarks to Maui Fresh, (2) the transfer and assignment of its existing customer accounts at the
Terminal Market to Maui Fresh, (3) to provide sufficient staffing, as defined, and (4) to deposit
the sum of approximately $0.2 million to provide for the initial working capital for Maui Fresh.
Contributions of SRD to Maui Fresh included the following: (1) to transfer all property owned
by SRD and located on the Terminal Market premises to Maui Fresh, (2) transfer all existing
customer accounts at the Terminal Market to Maui Fresh, (3) SRD has overall management
responsibility for the operations of Maui Fresh at the Terminal Market, and (4) to provide certain
staffing, as defined. Additionally, SRD has contributed, via both cash and non-cash items, amounts
that approximated Calavos contribution.
Commencing on the first anniversary of this agreement and continuing thereafter during the
term of the agreement, Calavo shall have the unconditional right, but not the obligation, to
purchase the one-half interest in Maui Fresh owned by SRD at a purchase price to be determined
pursuant to the agreement. The term of the agreement is for five years, which may be extended, or
terminated early, as defined. As of October 31, 2006, we have advanced Maui Fresh approximately
$0.4 million for working capital purposes. These advances were made at our own discretion.
46
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Calavo Growers, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Calavo Growers, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of October 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of
income, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended.
Our audit also included the 2006 financial statement schedule listed at Item 15(a)(2). These
financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our
audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Calavo Growers, Inc. and subsidiaries at October
31, 2006, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then
ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the
related 2006 financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set
forth therein.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, Calavo Growers, Inc. changed
its method of accounting for Share-Based Payments in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004) on November 1, 2005.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Calavo Growers Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting as of October 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission and our report dated January 15, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Woodland Hills, California
January 15, 2007
47
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Calavo Growers, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Calavo Growers, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of October 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of
income, comprehensive income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the
period ended October 31, 2005. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed at
Item 15(a)(2) as of October 31, 2005 and October 31, 2004 and for each of the two years in the
period ended October 31, 2005. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of the Company and subsidiaries as of October 31, 2005,
and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period
ended October 31, 2005, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule as of October
31, 2005 and 2004 and for each of the two years in the period ended October 31, 2005, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Los Angeles, California
January 31, 2006
48
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of October 31, 2006.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision
and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this report based on the
framework set forth in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework
set forth in Internal Control Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal
control over financial reporting was effective as of October 31, 2006. Our managements assessment
of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2006 has
been audited by Ernst and Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their report which is included herein.
49
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Calavo Growers, Inc.:
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Calavo Growers, Inc. maintained effective internal
control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (the COSO criteria). Calavo Growers, Inc.s management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
managements assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately
and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have
a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or
that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that Calavo Growers, Inc. maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Calavo Growers, Inc. maintained, in
all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2006,
based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Calavo Growers, Inc. as of
October 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income (loss),
shareholders equity and cash flows for the year then ended of Calavo Growers, Inc. and our report
dated January 15, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Woodland Hills, California
January 15, 2007
50
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
ended October 31, 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
PART III
Certain information required by Part III is omitted from this Annual Report because we will
file a definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to Regulation 14A
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Proxy Statement), not later than 120 days after the
end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report, and the applicable information included in
the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Information regarding our executive officers is set forth under Executive Officers in Part
I., Item 4 of this Annual Report.
The remaining information required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by
reference to the sections of the Proxy Statement entitled Election of Directors and Audit
Committee.
Information required by Item 405 of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference to the
section of the Proxy Statement entitled Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.
We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees.
A copy of the code of ethics is posted on our Internet site at http://www.calavo.com. In the
event that we make any amendment to, or grant any waiver of, a provision of the code of ethics that
applies to our principal executive officer or principal financial officer and that requires
disclosure under applicable SEC rules, we intend to disclose such amendment or waiver and the
reasons for the amendment or waiver on our Internet site.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Information required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference to the
sections of the Proxy Statement entitled Executive Compensation and Directors Compensation.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Information required by Items 201(d) and 403 of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by
reference to the sections of the Proxy Statement entitled Equity Compensation Plan Information
and Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
51
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the section of
the Proxy Statement entitled Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
Item 14. Principal Accountants Fees and Services
Information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the section of the
Proxy Statement entitled Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) (1) Financial Statements
The following consolidated financial statements as of October 31, 2006 and 2005 and for each
of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2006 are included herewith:
Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Income, Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Consolidated Statements of
Shareholders Equity, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Report of Ernst & Young LLP,
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, and Report of Deloitte & Touche LLP,
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
(2) Supplemental Schedules
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
All other schedules have been omitted since the required information is not present in
amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the required information
is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
(3) Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization dated as of
February 20, 2001 between Calavo Growers, Inc. and Calavo
Growers of California.1 |
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of November 7, 2003
Among Calavo Growers, Inc., Calavo Acquisition, Inc., Maui Fresh
International, Inc. and Arthur J. Bruno, Robert J. Bruno and Javier J. Badillo7 |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of Calavo Growers, Inc. 1 |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Calavo Growers, Inc.3 |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Form of Marketing Agreement for Calavo Growers, Inc.8 |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Marketing Agreement dated as of April 1, 1996 between
Tropical Hawaiian Products, Inc., a Hawaiian corporation,
and Calavo Growers of California. 1 |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of June 1, 2005, between
Limoneira Company and Calavo Growers, Inc.4 |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Lease Agreement dated as of November 21, 1997, between Tede
S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation, and Calavo de Mexico,
S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation, including attached Guaranty
of Calavo Growers of California dated December 16, 1996.1 |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Lease agreement dated as of February 15, 2005, between Limoneira
Company and Calavo Growers, Inc.4 |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Standstill agreement dated June 1, 2005, between Limoneira
Company and Calavo Growers, Inc.4 |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Standstill agreement dated June 1, 2005 between Calavo Growers, Inc.
And Limoneira Company4 |
52
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
10.8
|
|
Term Loan Agreement dated July 1, 2005, between Farm Credit
West, PCA, and Calavo Growers, Inc.5 |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
2005 Stock Incentive Plan Of Calavo Growers, Inc.6 |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Calavo Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement dated
March 11, 1989 between Egidio Carbone, Jr. and Calavo
Growers of California. 1 |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Amendment to the Calavo Growers of California Supplemental
Executive Retirement Agreement dated November 9, 1993
Between Egidio Carbone, Jr. and Calavo Growers of California. 1 |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
2001 Stock Option Plan for Directors.2 |
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
2001 Stock Purchase Plan for Officers and Employees.2 |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Line of Credit Agreement between Farm Credit West, PCA and Calavo
Growers, Inc., dated October 5, 2006 |
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Business Loan Agreement between Bank of America, N.A. and Calavo
Growers, Inc., dated January 30, 200412 |
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Renewal Notice for Business Loan Agreement, dated January 30, 2004,
Between Bank of America and Calavo Growers, Inc., dated November 18, 20059 |
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement11 |
|
|
|
16
|
|
Letter re change in certifying accountant10 |
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of Calavo Growers, Inc. 1 |
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP. |
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e)
or Rule 15d-15(e) |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e)
or Rule 15d-15(e) |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Periodic Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Previously filed on April 24, 2001 as an exhibit to the Registrants Registration Statement
on Form S-4, File No. 333-59418, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
2 |
|
Previously filed on December 18, 2001 as an exhibit to the Registrants Registration
Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-75378, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
3 |
|
Previously filed on December 19, 2002 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
4 |
|
Previously filed on June 9, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10Q and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
5 |
|
Previously filed on September 9, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10Q and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
6 |
|
Previously filed on March 21, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Definitive Proxy
Statement on Form DEF14A and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
7 |
|
Previously filed on January 23, 2004 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10K and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
8 |
|
Previously filed on January 28, 2003 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10K and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
9 |
|
Previously filed on February 1, 2006 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10K and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10 |
|
Previously filed on July 3, 2006 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 8-K and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
11 |
|
Previously filed on September 11, 2006 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10Q and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
12 |
|
Previously filed on January 15, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10K and incorporated herein by reference. |
(b) Exhibits
See subsection (a) (3) above.
(c) Financial Statement Schedules
See subsection (a) (1) and (2) above.
53
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized, on January 15, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CALAVO GROWERS, INC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Lecil E. Cole |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lecil E. Cole |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and President |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below on January 15, 2007 by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities indicated:
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
|
|
/s/ Lecil E. Cole
Lecil E. Cole
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors,
Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
/s/ Arthur J. Bruno
Arthur J. Bruno
|
|
Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and Corporate Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
/s/ James E. Snyder
James E. Snyder
|
|
Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
/s/ Donald M. Sanders
Donald M. Sanders
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
/s/ Fred J. Ferrazzano
Fred J. Ferrazzano
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
/s/ John M. Hunt
John M. Hunt
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
/s/ George H. Barnes
George H. Barnes
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
/s/ J. Link Leavens
J. Link Leavens
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
/s/ Alva V. Snider
Alva V. Snider
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
/s/ Michael D. Hause
Michael D. Hause
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
/s/ Dorcas H. McFarlane
Dorcas H. McFarlane
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
/s/ Egidio Carbone, Jr
Egidio Carbone, Jr
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
/s/ Alan Van Wagner
Alan Van Wagner
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
/s/ Harold Edwards
Harold Edwards
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
/s/ Scott Van Der Kar
Scott Van Der Kar
|
|
Director |
54
SCHEDULE II
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year |
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
ended |
|
beginning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
end |
|
|
October 31: |
|
of year |
|
Additions(1) |
|
Deductions(2) |
|
of year |
Allowance for customer deductions |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
659 |
|
|
$ |
3,817 |
|
|
$ |
3,454 |
|
|
$ |
1,022 |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
6,791 |
|
|
|
5,663 |
|
|
|
2,150 |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2,150 |
|
|
|
5,147 |
|
|
|
5,952 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Charged to net sales (customer deductions) or costs and expenses (doubtful accounts). |
|
(2) |
|
Write-off of assets or collection of previously written-off assets |
55
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization dated as of
February 20, 2001 between Calavo Growers, Inc. and Calavo
Growers of California.1 |
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of November 7, 2003
Among Calavo Growers, Inc., Calavo Acquisition, Inc., Maui Fresh
International, Inc. and Arthur J. Bruno, Robert J. Bruno and Javier J. Badillo7 |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of Calavo Growers, Inc. 1 |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Calavo Growers, Inc.3 |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Form of Marketing Agreement for Calavo Growers, Inc.8 |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Marketing Agreement dated as of April 1, 1996 between
Tropical Hawaiian Products, Inc., a Hawaiian corporation,
and Calavo Growers of California. 1 |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of June 1, 2005, between
Limoneira Company and Calavo Growers, Inc.4 |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Lease Agreement dated as of November 21, 1997, between Tede
S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation, and Calavo de Mexico,
S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation, including attached Guaranty
of Calavo Growers of California dated December 16, 1996.1 |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Lease agreement dated as of February 15, 2005, between Limoneira
Company and Calavo Growers, Inc.4 |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Standstill agreement dated June 1, 2005, between Limoneira
Company and Calavo Growers, Inc.4 |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Standstill agreement dated June 1, 2005 between Calavo Growers, Inc.
And Limoneira Company4 |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Term Loan Agreement dated July 1, 2005, between Farm Credit
West, PCA, and Calavo Growers, Inc.5 |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
2005 Stock Incentive Plan Of Calavo Growers, Inc.6 |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Calavo Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement dated
March 11, 1989 between Egidio Carbone, Jr. and Calavo
Growers of California. 1 |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Amendment to the Calavo Growers of California Supplemental
Executive Retirement Agreement dated November 9, 1993
Between Egidio Carbone, Jr. and Calavo Growers of California. 1 |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
2001 Stock Option Plan for Directors.2 |
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
2001 Stock Purchase Plan for Officers and Employees.2 |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Line of Credit Agreement between Farm Credit West, PCA and Calavo
Growers, Inc., dated October 5, 2006 |
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Business Loan Agreement between Bank of America, N.A. and Calavo
Growers, Inc., dated January 30, 200412 |
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Renewal Notice for Business Loan Agreement, dated January 30, 2004,
Between Bank of America and Calavo Growers, Inc., dated November 18, 20059 |
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement11 |
|
|
|
16
|
|
Letter re change in certifying accountant10 |
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of Calavo Growers, Inc. 1 |
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP. |
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e)
or Rule 15d-15(e) |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e)
or Rule 15d-15(e) |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Periodic Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Previously filed on April 24, 2001 as an exhibit to the Registrants Registration Statement
on Form S-4, File No. 333-59418, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
2 |
|
Previously filed on December 18, 2001 as an exhibit to the Registrants Registration
Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-75378, and incorporated herein by reference. |
56
|
|
|
3 |
|
Previously filed on December 19, 2002 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
4 |
|
Previously filed on June 9, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10Q and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
5 |
|
Previously filed on September 9, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10Q and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
6 |
|
Previously filed on March 21, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Definitive Proxy
Statement on Form DEF14A and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
7 |
|
Previously filed on January 23, 2004 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10K and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
8 |
|
Previously filed on January 28, 2003 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10K and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
9 |
|
Previously filed on February 1, 2006 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10K and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10 |
|
Previously filed on July 3, 2006 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 8-K and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
11 |
|
Previously filed on September 11, 2006 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10Q and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
12 |
|
Previously filed on January 15, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10K and incorporated herein by reference. |
57