Central Federal Corporation 10KSB
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-KSB
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the transition period from
to |
Commission File Number: 0-25045
CENTRAL FEDERAL CORPORATION.
(Name of Small Business Issuer in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
34-1877137
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
2923 Smith Road, Fairlawn, Ohio
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
44333
(Zip Code) |
(330) 666-7979
(Issuers Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
(Title of Class)
Check if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act. o
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B
contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of the registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of
this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12(b)-2 of the
Exchange Act). YES o NO þ
The registrants revenues for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 were $9.6 million.
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity of the registrant held by
non-affiliates as of March 15, 2006 was $28,830,000 based upon the closing price as reported on the
Nasdaq® Capital Market for that date.
As of March 15, 2006, there were 4,543,662 shares of the registrants Common Stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants Rule 14a-3(b) Annual Report to Shareholders for its fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005 and its Proxy Statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on
May 18, 2006, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) on
March 30, 2006, are incorporated herein by reference into Parts II and III, respectively, of this
Form 10-KSB.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check One): YES o NO þ
Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-KSB contains forward-looking statements which may be identified by the use of such
words as may, believe, expect, anticipate, should, plan, estimate, predict,
continue and potential or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Examples
of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to our
financial condition, results of operations and business that are subject to various factors which
could cause actual results to differ materially from these estimates. These factors include, but
are not limited to (i) general and local economic conditions, (ii) changes in interest rates,
deposit flows, demand for mortgages and other loans, real estate values and competition, (iii)
changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines, (iv) changes in legislation or
regulation; and (v) other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors
affecting our operations, pricing, products and services.
Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this Form 10-KSB and in any other public statements
we make may turn out to be wrong. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or
by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Consequently, no forward-looking statement can be
guaranteed. We do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of
this Annual Report or to conform these statements to actual results.
PART I
Item 1 Description of Business
General
Central Federal Corporation (the Company), formerly known as Grand Central Financial Corp., was
organized as a Delaware corporation in September 1998 as the holding company for CFBank, a
community-oriented savings institution which was originally organized in 1892, formerly known as
Central Federal Savings and Loan Association of Wellsville and more recently as Central Federal
Bank, in connection with CFBanks conversion from a mutual to stock form of organization. As used
herein, the terms we, us, our and the Company refer to Central Federal Corporation and its
subsidiaries, unless the context indicates to the contrary. As a savings and loan holding company,
we are subject to regulation by the Office of Thrift Supervision (the OTS). In January 2006, the
Company successfully completed the offering of 2.3 million shares of common stock at a purchase
price of $7.00 per share raising additional capital of approximately $14.5 million after offering
expenses and underwriting commissions. The proceeds from this offering provide the Company with a
larger capital base to take advantage of opportunities to execute its growth strategy and will be
used for general corporate purposes. Reserve Mortgage Services, Inc. (Reserve), a wholly owned
subsidiary of CFBank from October 2004 until May 12, 2005 when it was merged into CFBank, was
acquired in October 2004 to expand our mortgage services business. Central Federal Capital Trust I
(the Trust), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, was formed in 2003 to raise additional
funding for the Company. Under accounting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation No. 46, as revised in December 2003, the Trust is not consolidated with the Company.
Accordingly, the Company does not report the securities issued by the Trust as liabilities, and
instead reports as liabilities the subordinated debentures issued by the Company and held by the
Trust. Currently, we do not transact any material business other than through CFBank and the Trust.
At December 31, 2005, assets totaled $173.0 million and stockholders equity totaled $16.1
million.
3
CFBank is a community-oriented financial institution offering a variety of financial services to
meet the needs of the communities we serve. We attract deposits from the general public and uses
such deposits, together with borrowings and other funds, primarily to originate commercial and
commercial real estate loans, single-family and multi-family residential mortgage loans and home
equity lines of credit. We also invest in consumer loans, construction and land loans and
securities. In 2003, we began originating more commercial, commercial real estate and multi-family
mortgage loans than in the past as part of our expansion into business financial services.
Revenues are derived principally from the generation of interest and fees on loans originated and,
to a lesser extent, interest and dividends on securities. Our primary sources of funds are retail
savings deposits and certificates of deposit and, to a lesser extent, brokered certificates of
deposit, principal and interest payments on loans and securities, Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)
advances and other borrowings and proceeds from the sale of loans. Our principal market area for
customer loans and deposits includes the following Ohio counties: Summit County through an office
in Fairlawn, Ohio; Franklin County through an office in Columbus, Ohio; and Columbiana County
through offices in Calcutta and Wellsville, Ohio. A residential mortgage origination office is
located in Akron, Ohio. We originate commercial and conventional real estate loans and business
loans throughout Ohio.
Market Area and Competition
Our primary market area is a competitive market for financial services and we face competition both
in making loans and in attracting deposits. Direct competition comes from a number of financial
institutions operating in our market area, many with a statewide or regional presence, and in some
cases, a national presence. Many of these financial institutions are significantly larger and have
greater financial resources than us. Competition for loans and deposits comes from savings
institutions, mortgage banking companies, commercial banks, credit unions, brokerage firms and
insurance companies.
Lending Activities
Loan Portfolio Composition. The loan portfolio consists primarily of mortgage loans secured by
single-family and multi-family residences and commercial real estate loans. At December 31, 2005,
gross loans receivable totaled $125.7 million. Commercial, commercial real estate and multi-family
mortgage loans totaled $72.5 million and represented 57.7% of the gross loan portfolio at December
31, 2005 compared to 48.3% at December 31, 2004 and 17.8% at December 31, 2003. The increase in
the percentage of commercial, commercial real estate and multi-family mortgage loans in the
portfolio was a result of the growth strategy implemented in 2003 to expand into business financial
services. Single-family residential mortgage loans totaled $23.6 million and represented 18.8% of
total gross loans at year-end 2005 compared to $41.4 million or 37.9% of total gross loan at
year-end 2004. The decline in single-family residential loans was due to a securitization of $18.6
million of these loans in June 2005. The remainder of the portfolio consisted of consumer loans,
which totaled $29.5 million, or 23.5% of gross loans receivable at year-end 2005 and included $8.8
million in home equity lines of credit which were purchased in 2005. At year-end 2005, 23.3% of
the loan portfolio had fixed rates, compared to 32.8% at year-end 2004 and 55.7% at year-end 2003.
The decline in the percentage of fixed rate loans in the portfolio was a result of growth in
commercial, commercial real estate and multi-family mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit
in 2004 and 2005, which are predominantly adjustable rate loans.
The types of loans originated are subject to federal and state law and regulations. Interest rates
charged on loans are affected by the demand for such loans, the supply of money available for
lending purposes and the rates offered by competitors. In turn, these factors are affected by,
among other things, economic conditions, fiscal policies of the federal government, monetary
policies of the Federal Reserve Board and legislative tax policies.
4
The following table sets forth the composition of the loan portfolio in dollar amounts and as a
percentage of the portfolio at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate mortgage loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family |
|
$ |
23,627 |
|
|
|
18.81 |
% |
|
$ |
41,450 |
|
|
|
37.94 |
% |
|
$ |
34,810 |
|
|
|
59.58 |
% |
Multi-family |
|
|
30,206 |
|
|
|
24.04 |
% |
|
|
25,602 |
|
|
|
23.43 |
% |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
2.14 |
% |
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
1,127 |
|
|
|
1.03 |
% |
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
% |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
25,937 |
|
|
|
20.64 |
% |
|
|
20,105 |
|
|
|
18.40 |
% |
|
|
5,040 |
|
|
|
8.63 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate
mortgage loans |
|
|
79,770 |
|
|
|
63.49 |
% |
|
|
88,284 |
|
|
|
80.80 |
% |
|
|
41,710 |
|
|
|
71.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
% |
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
0.61 |
% |
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
1.72 |
% |
Home equity lines of credit |
|
|
23,852 |
|
|
|
18.98 |
% |
|
|
5,928 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
% |
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
|
2.81 |
% |
Automobile |
|
|
4,237 |
|
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
6,735 |
|
|
|
6.16 |
% |
|
|
9,292 |
|
|
|
15.90 |
% |
Other |
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
% |
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
% |
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
29,540 |
|
|
|
23.50 |
% |
|
|
13,952 |
|
|
|
12.77 |
% |
|
|
12,598 |
|
|
|
21.56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
16,347 |
|
|
|
13.01 |
% |
|
|
7,030 |
|
|
|
6.43 |
% |
|
|
4,116 |
|
|
|
7.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans receivable |
|
|
125,657 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
109,266 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
58,424 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred loan fees |
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(1,495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(978 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(415 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net |
|
$ |
124,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
108,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
58,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Maturity. The following table shows the remaining contractual maturity of the loan
portfolio at December 31, 2005. Demand loans and other loans having no stated schedule of
repayments or no stated maturity are reported as due within one year. The table does not include
potential prepayments or scheduled principal amortization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Receivable |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amounts due: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year |
|
$ |
5,364 |
|
|
$ |
2,218 |
|
|
$ |
11,044 |
|
|
$ |
18,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After one year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than one year to three years |
|
|
5,404 |
|
|
|
2,178 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
7,944 |
|
More than three years to five
years |
|
|
4,554 |
|
|
|
3,606 |
|
|
|
2,088 |
|
|
|
10,248 |
|
More than five years to 10 years |
|
|
27,490 |
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
30,010 |
|
More than 10 years to 15 years |
|
|
15,308 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
1,221 |
|
|
|
16,567 |
|
More than 15 years |
|
|
21,650 |
|
|
|
20,255 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
42,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total due after 2006 |
|
|
74,406 |
|
|
|
27,322 |
|
|
|
5,303 |
|
|
|
107,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amount due |
|
$ |
79,770 |
|
|
$ |
29,540 |
|
|
$ |
16,347 |
|
|
$ |
125,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
The following table sets forth at December 31, 2005, the dollar amount of total loans receivable
contractually due after December 31, 2006, and whether such loans have fixed interest rates or
adjustable interest rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
Adjustable |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Real estate mortgage loans |
|
$ |
18,030 |
|
|
$ |
56,376 |
|
|
$ |
74,406 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
5,023 |
|
|
|
22,299 |
|
|
|
27,322 |
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
1,719 |
|
|
|
3,584 |
|
|
|
5,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
24,772 |
|
|
$ |
82,259 |
|
|
$ |
107,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Origination of Loans. Lending activities are conducted through our offices. In 2003, we began
originating commercial, commercial real estate and multi-family mortgage loans to take advantage of
opportunities for expansion into business financial services and growth in the Fairlawn and
Columbus, Ohio markets. These loans are predominantly adjustable rate loans. A majority of our
single-family mortgage loan originations are fixed-rate loans. Current originations of long-term
fixed-rate single-family mortgages are generally sold rather than retained in portfolio. Although
the decision to sell current single-family mortgage originations rather than retain the loans in
portfolio has resulted in declining single-family loan portfolio balances and lower earnings from
that portfolio in the near term, it protects future profitability, and we believe it is not prudent
to retain these long-term, fixed-rate loans and subject our performance to the interest rate risk
and reduced future earnings associated with a rise in interest rates. In a transaction with
Freddie Mac in the second quarter of 2005, we securitized single-family residential mortgage loans
held in our portfolio with an outstanding principal balance of $18.6 million, reducing
single-family mortgage loan balances. The securitization increased liquidity as the securities
retained are readily marketable, eliminated credit risk on the loans and reduced CFBanks
risk-based capital requirement. Although we currently expect that most of the long-term fixed-rate
mortgage loan originations will continue to be sold on a servicing-released basis, a portion of the
loans may be retained for portfolio within our interest rate risk and profitability guidelines. We
also emphasize the origination of home equity lines of credit.
Single-Family Mortgage Lending. A significant lending activity has been the origination of
permanent conventional mortgage loans secured by single-family residences located in our primary
market area. We currently sell substantially all of the fixed-rate single-family mortgage loans
that we originate on a servicing released basis. Prior to 2004, servicing rights were generally
retained on loans sold. Most single-family mortgage loans are underwritten according to Freddie
Mac guidelines. Loan originations are obtained from our loan officers and their contacts with the
local real estate industry, existing or past customers, and members of the local communities. At
December 31, 2005, single-family mortgage loans totaled $23.6 million, or 18.8% of total loans, of
which $8.7 million, or 36.8% were fixed-rate loans.
Our policy is to originate single-family residential mortgage loans in amounts up to 80% of the
appraised value of the property securing the loan and up to 95% of the appraised value if private
mortgage insurance is obtained. Mortgage loans generally include due-on-sale clauses which provide
us with the contractual right to deem the loan immediately due and payable in the event the
borrower transfers ownership of the property without our consent. Due-on-sale clauses are an
important means of adjusting the rates on the
6
fixed-rate mortgage loan portfolio, and we exercise our rights under these clauses. The
single-family mortgage loan originations are generally for terms to maturity of up to 30 years.
We offer several adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) loan programs with terms of up to 30 years and
interest rates that adjust with a maximum adjustment limitation of 2.0% per year and a 6.0%
lifetime cap. The interest rate adjustments on ARM loans currently offered are indexed to a
variety of established indices and these loans do not provide for initial deep discount interest
rates or for negative amortization.
The volume and types of single-family ARM loans originated have been affected by such market
factors as the level of interest rates, consumer preferences, competition and the availability of
funds. In recent years, demand for single-family ARM loans in our primary market area has been
weak due to the low interest rate environment and consumer preference for fixed-rate loans.
Consequently, in recent years our origination of ARM loans on single-family residential properties
has not been significant as compared to our origination of fixed-rate loans. However, as a result
of managements strategy to sell current long-term fixed-rate loan production, ARM loans represent
a larger percentage of the portfolio. At December 31, 2005, $14.9 million, or 63.2% of the
single-family mortgage loan portfolio had adjustable rates, compared to 52.8% at December 31, 2004
and 43.4% at December 31, 2003.
Commercial and Multi-Family Real Estate Lending. Beginning in 2003, we expanded into business
financial services and positioned ourselves for growth in the Fairlawn and Columbus, Ohio markets
and, as a result, originations of commercial real estate and multi-family residential mortgage
loans increased significantly. Commercial real estate and multi-family residential mortgage loans
totaled $56.1 million at December 31, 2005 or 44.7% of gross loans, an increase of $10.4 million or
22.8% from $45.7 million or 41.8% of gross loans at December 31, 2004 and an increase of $49.8
million compared to $6.3 million or 10.8% of gross loans receivable at December 31, 2003. We
anticipate that commercial real estate and multi-family residential mortgage lending activities
will continue to grow in the future.
We originate commercial real estate loans that are secured by properties used for business
purposes, such as manufacturing facilities, office buildings or retail facilities. Commercial real
estate and multi-family residential mortgage loans are secured by properties generally located in
our primary market area. Underwriting policies provide that commercial real estate and
multi-family residential mortgage loans may be made in amounts up to 85% of the appraised value of
the property. In underwriting commercial real estate and multi-family residential mortgage loans,
we consider the appraisal value and net operating income of the property, the debt service ratio
and the property owners financial strength, expertise and credit history.
Commercial real estate and multi-family residential mortgage loans are generally considered to
involve a greater degree of risk than single-family residential mortgage loans. Because payments
on loans secured by commercial real estate and multi-family properties are dependent on successful
operation or management of the properties, repayment of such loans may be subject to a greater
extent to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. We seek to minimize these
risks through underwriting policies which require such loans to be qualified at origination on the
basis of the propertys income and debt coverage ratio and the financial strength of the owners.
Commercial Lending. Expansion into business financial services in 2003 also resulted in increased
originations of commercial loans. Commercial loans totaled $16.3 million, or 13.0% of gross loans
at December 31, 2005, an increase of $9.3 million or 132.5% from $7.0 million or 6.4% of gross
loans at December 31, 2004, and an increase of $12.2 million compared to $4.1 million, or 7.1% of
gross loans at December 31, 2003. We anticipate that commercial lending activities will continue
to grow in the future.
We make commercial business loans primarily to small businesses that are generally secured by
business equipment, inventory, accounts receivable and other business assets. In underwriting
commercial loans,
7
we consider the net operating income of the company, the debt service ratio and the financial
strength, expertise and credit history of the owners.
Commercial loans are generally considered to involve a greater degree of risk than loans secured by
real estate. Because payments on commercial loans are dependent on successful operation of the
business enterprise, repayment of such loans may be subject to a greater extent to adverse
conditions in the economy. We seek to minimize these risks through underwriting policies which
require such loans to be qualified at origination on the basis of the enterprises income and debt
coverage ratio and the financial strength of the owners.
Construction and Land Lending. To a lesser extent, we originate construction and land development
loans to contractors and individuals in our primary market areas. Construction loans are made to
finance the construction of owner-occupied single-family residential properties and individual
properties built by developers for future sale. Construction loans to individuals are fixed or
adjustable-rate loans which may convert to permanent loans with maturities of up to 30 years.
Policies provide that construction loans may be made in amounts up to 80% of the appraised value of
the property for construction of single-family residences, and an independent appraisal of the
property is required. Loan proceeds are disbursed in increments as construction progresses and as
inspections warrant and regular inspections are required to monitor the progress of construction.
Land loans are determined on an individual basis, but generally they do not exceed 75% of the
actual cost or current appraised value of the property, whichever is less.
Construction and land financing is considered to involve a higher degree of credit risk than
long-term financing on improved, owner-occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan
is dependent largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the propertys value at
completion of construction or development compared to the estimated cost (including interest) of
construction. If the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, we may be confronted with a
project, when completed, having a value which is insufficient to assure full repayment.
Consumer and Other Lending. The consumer loan portfolio generally consists of home equity lines of
credit, automobile loans, home equity and home improvement loans and loans secured by deposits. At
December 31, 2005, the consumer loan portfolio totaled $29.5 million, or 23.5% of gross loans
receivable.
Home equity lines of credit comprise the majority of consumer loan balances and totaled $23.9
million at December 31, 2005. We offer a variable rate home equity line of credit with rates
adjusting monthly at up to 2% above the prime rate of interest as disclosed in The Wall Street
Journal. The amount of the line is based on the borrowers income and equity in the home. When
combined with the balance of the prior mortgage liens, these lines may not exceed 100% of the
appraised value of the property at the time of the loan commitment. These loans are secured by a
subordinate lien on the underlying real estate.
Prior to 2003, we were in the business of making indirect automobile loans and loans secured by
automobiles totaled $9.3 million or 15.9% of total loans at year-end 2003. We no longer originate
indirect automobile loans and make few direct automobile loans. As a result, automobile loans
totaled $4.2 million or 3.4% of total loans at December 31, 2005.
Delinquencies and Classified Assets. The Board of Directors monitors the status of all delinquent
loans thirty days or more past due, past due statistics and trends for all loans monthly.
Procedures with respect to resolving delinquencies vary depending on the nature and type of the
loan and period of delinquency. In general, we make every effort, consistent with safety and
soundness principles, to work with the borrower to have the loan brought current. If the loan is
not brought current, it then becomes necessary to repossess collateral and/or take legal action.
8
Federal regulations and CFBanks asset classification policy require use of an internal asset
classification system as a means of reporting and monitoring assets. We have incorporated the OTS
internal asset classifications as a part of our credit monitoring system. In accordance with
regulations, problem assets are classified as substandard, doubtful or loss and the
classifications are subject to review by the OTS. An asset is considered substandard under the
regulations if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the
obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. An asset considered doubtful under the regulations
has all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified substandard with the added characteristic
that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing
facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. Assets considered loss under
the regulations are those considered uncollectible and having so little value that their
continuance as assets without the establishment of a specific loss allowance is not warranted.
Assets are required to be designated special mention when they posses weaknesses but do not
currently expose the insured institution to sufficient risk to warrant classification in one of
these categories. In order to more closely monitor credit risk as we employ our growth strategy in
business financial services, we have developed internal loan review procedures and a credit grading
system for commercial, commercial real estate and multi-family mortgage loans, and also utilize an
independent, external firm for loan review annually.
At December 31, 2005, no assets were designated as special mention; $816,000 in assets were
classified as substandard, 98% of which were single-family mortgage loans; and no assets were
classified as doubtful or loss.
9
The following table sets forth information concerning delinquent loans in dollar amounts and as a
percentage of the total loan portfolio. The amounts presented represent the total remaining
principal balances of the loans rather than the actual payment amounts which are overdue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
60-89 Days |
|
|
90 Days or More |
|
|
60-89 Days |
|
|
90 Days or More |
|
|
60-89 Days |
|
|
90 Days or More |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Balance of |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Balance of |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Balance of |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Balance of |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
800 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
$ |
714 |
|
Multi-family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity loans and
lines
of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Unsecured lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total delinquent loans |
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
800 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
199 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
286 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
$ |
741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delinquent loans as a
percent of total loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.28 |
% |
|
|
|
The table does not include delinquent loans less than 60 days past due. At December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
total loans past due 30 to 59 days totaled $479,000, $549,000 and $481,000, respectively. |
10
Nonperforming Assets. The following table contains information regarding nonperforming loans,
real estate owned (REO) and other repossessed assets. At December 31, 2005, nonperforming loans
totaled $800,000. CFBanks policy is to stop accruing interest on loans 90 days or more past due
and set up reserves for all previously accrued interest. At December 31, 2005, the amount of
additional interest income that would have been recognized on nonaccrual loans if such loans had
continued to perform in accordance with their contractual terms was approximately $45,000. At
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, there were no impaired loans or troubled debt restructurings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family real estate |
|
$ |
800 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
714 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(1) |
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
741 |
|
Real estate owned (REO) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
Other repossessed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets(2) |
|
$ |
800 |
|
|
$ |
418 |
|
|
$ |
934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans to total loans |
|
|
0.64 |
% |
|
|
0.26 |
% |
|
|
1.28 |
% |
Nonperforming assets to total assets |
|
|
0.46 |
% |
|
|
0.24 |
% |
|
|
0.87 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total nonaccrual loans equal total nonperforming loans. |
|
(2) |
|
Nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming loans (and impaired loans),
other repossessed assets and REO. |
Allowance for Loan Losses. Management analyzes the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses
regularly through reviews of the performance of the loan portfolio considering economic conditions,
changes in interest rates and the effect of such changes on real estate values and changes in the
composition of the loan portfolio. Such evaluation, which includes a review of all loans for which
full collectibility may not be reasonably assured, considers, among other matters, the estimated
fair value of the underlying collateral, economic conditions, historical loan loss experience,
changes in the size and growth of the loan portfolio and other factors that warrant recognition in
providing for an adequate loan loss allowance. The allowance for loan losses is established
through a provision for loan losses based on managements evaluation of the risk in its loan
portfolio. Various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of the examination process,
periodically review the allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require additional provisions
for loan losses based upon information available at the time of the review. At December 31, 2005,
the allowance for loan losses totaled 1.19% of total loans as compared to 0.90% at December 31,
2004.
The OTS, in conjunction with the other federal banking agencies, has adopted an interagency policy
statement on the allowance for loan and lease losses. The policy statement provides guidance for
financial institutions on both the responsibilities of management for the assessment and
establishment of adequate allowances in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
and guidance for banking agency examiners to use in evaluating the allowances. The policy
statement requires that institutions have effective systems and controls to identify, monitor and
address asset quality problems; that management analyze all significant factors that affect the
collectibility of the portfolio in a reasonable manner; and that management establish acceptable
allowance evaluation processes that meet the objectives set forth in the policy statement. CFBank
adopted an Allowance for Loan Losses Policy
11
designed to provide a thorough, disciplined and consistently applied process that incorporates
managements current judgments about the credit quality of the loan portfolio into determination of
the allowance for loan losses in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and
supervisory guidance. Management believes that an adequate allowance for loan losses has been
established. However, actual losses are dependent upon future events and, as such, further
additions to the level of allowances for estimated loan losses may become necessary.
The following table sets forth activity in the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period |
|
$ |
978 |
|
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
$ |
361 |
|
Charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family real estate |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Recoveries on loans previously charged off: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family real estate |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses, end of period |
|
$ |
1,495 |
|
|
$ |
978 |
|
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans |
|
|
1.19 |
% |
|
|
.90 |
% |
|
|
.71 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans |
|
|
186.88 |
% |
|
|
341.96 |
% |
|
|
56.01 |
% |
Net charge-offs to the allowance for losses |
|
|
10.50 |
% |
|
|
8.49 |
% |
|
|
11.57 |
% |
Net charge-offs to average loans |
|
|
.14 |
% |
|
|
.10 |
% |
|
|
.08 |
% |
Expansion into business financial services and the significant growth in commercial,
commercial real estate and multi-family mortgage loans in 2004 and 2005 required an increase in the
provision and allowance for loan losses related to these loan types. The provision for loan losses
totaled $674,000 in 2005 and $646,000 in 2004, compared to $102,000 in 2003. At December 31, 2005,
the allowance for commercial, commercial real estate and multi-family mortgage loans totaled $1.3
million, an increase of $456,000 from $862,000 at December 31, 2004 and an increase of $1.2 million
from $100,000 at December 31, 2003 as these loan types grew from 17.8% of the total loan portfolio
at year-end 2003 to 48.3% at year-end 2004 and to 57.7% at year-end 2005. These loans tend to be
larger balance, higher risk loans and, as a result, 88.2% of the allowance was allocated to these
loan types at December 31, 2005.
12
The following table sets forth the allowance for loan losses in each of the categories listed at
the dates indicated and the percentage of such amounts to the total allowance and loans in each
category as a percent of total loans. Although the allowance may be allocated to specific loans or
loan types, the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in managements judgment, should
be charged-off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in each |
|
|
in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in each |
|
|
in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in each |
|
|
in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category |
|
|
Category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category |
|
|
Category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category |
|
|
Category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Total |
|
|
to Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Total |
|
|
to Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Total |
|
|
to Total |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Single-family mortgage and
construction loans |
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
% |
|
|
18.81 |
% |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
.41 |
% |
|
|
38.97 |
% |
|
$ |
213 |
|
|
|
51.33 |
% |
|
|
60.62 |
% |
Consumer loans |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
8.03 |
% |
|
|
23.50 |
% |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
11.45 |
% |
|
|
12.77 |
% |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
24.58 |
% |
|
|
21.56 |
% |
Commercial, commercial real
estate and multi-family mortgage
loans |
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
88.16 |
% |
|
|
57.69 |
% |
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
88.14 |
% |
|
|
48.26 |
% |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
24.09 |
% |
|
|
17.82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
1,495 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
978 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
Real Estate Owned
At December 31, 2005, there was no real estate owned. Assets acquired through or instead of loan
foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. If
fair value declines subsequent to foreclosure, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense.
Costs after acquisition are expensed.
Investment Activities
Federally chartered savings institutions have the authority to invest in various types of liquid
assets, including United States Treasury obligations, securities of various federal agencies,
certificates of deposit of insured banks and savings institutions, bankers acceptances and federal
funds. Subject to various restrictions, federally chartered savings institutions may also invest
their assets in commercial paper, municipal bonds, investment-grade corporate debt securities and
mutual funds whose assets conform to the investments that a federally chartered savings institution
is otherwise authorized to make directly.
The investment policy established by the Board of Directors is designed to provide and maintain
liquidity, generate a favorable return on investments without incurring undue interest rate and
credit risk, and complement lending activities. The policy provides authority to invest in United
States Treasury and federal agency securities meeting the policys guidelines, mortgage-backed
securities guaranteed by the U.S. government and agencies thereof, and municipal bonds. To improve
liquidity and eliminate the credit risk associated with mortgages held in our portfolio, we
securitized single-family residential mortgage loans with an outstanding principal balance of $18.6
million in a transaction with Freddie Mac in 2005. The securitization (i) increased liquidity as
the securities retained are readily marketable, (ii) eliminated credit risk on the loans and (iii)
reduced CFBanks risk-based capital requirement. In 2003, also to increase liquidity, all
securities previously classified as held to maturity were transferred to available for sale.
At December 31, 2005, the securities portfolio totaled $30.9 million.
At December 31, 2005, all mortgage-backed securities in the securities portfolio were insured or
guaranteed by Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae. There were no collateralized mortgage obligations that
failed stress testing at December 31, 2005. Management reports high risk mortgage derivatives
testing results to the Board of Directors quarterly, at which time the Board may direct management
to divest any such securities failing any portion of the testing, in accordance with regulations.
14
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the amortized cost and fair value of
securities at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal agency |
|
$ |
6,007 |
|
|
$ |
5,838 |
|
|
$ |
5,018 |
|
|
$ |
4,983 |
|
|
$ |
12,755 |
|
|
$ |
12,759 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
2,020 |
|
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
22,803 |
|
|
|
23,047 |
|
|
|
8,398 |
|
|
|
8,525 |
|
|
|
12,697 |
|
|
|
12,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available for sale |
|
|
30,830 |
|
|
|
30,872 |
|
|
|
13,416 |
|
|
|
13,508 |
|
|
|
26,822 |
|
|
|
27,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains on securities
available for sale |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities |
|
$ |
30,872 |
|
|
$ |
30,872 |
|
|
$ |
13,508 |
|
|
$ |
13,508 |
|
|
$ |
27,126 |
|
|
$ |
27,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
The table below sets forth certain information regarding the carrying value, weighted average
yields and contractual maturities of securities available for sale as of December 31, 2005. Yields
are stated on a fully taxable equivalent basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than One Year to |
|
|
More than Five Years to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year or Less |
|
|
Five Years |
|
|
Ten Years |
|
|
More than Ten Years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal agency |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,838 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,838 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
% |
State and municipal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
% |
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
4.34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
% |
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
5.37 |
% |
|
|
3,263 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
% |
|
|
19,480 |
|
|
|
5.58 |
% |
|
|
23,047 |
|
|
|
5.48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
at fair value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,137 |
|
|
|
3.68 |
% |
|
$ |
4,255 |
|
|
|
4.78 |
% |
|
$ |
19,480 |
|
|
|
5.58 |
% |
|
$ |
30,872 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Sources of Funds
General. Deposits, loan repayments and prepayments, securities maturities and prepayments,
borrowings, proceeds from loan sales and cash flows generated from operations are the primary
sources of funds for use in lending, investing and for other general purposes.
Deposits. CFBank offer a variety of deposit accounts with a range of interest rates and terms
including passbook accounts, savings and club accounts, interest-bearing checking accounts, money
market accounts and certificates of deposit. For the year ended December 31, 2005, certificates of
deposit constituted 50.8% of total average deposits. The term of the certificates of deposit
offered vary from seven days to five years at rates established by management. Specific terms of
an individual account vary according to the type of account, the minimum balance required, the time
period funds must remain on deposit and the interest rate, among other factors. The flow of
deposits is influenced significantly by general economic conditions, changes in money market rates,
prevailing interest rates and competition. At December 31, 2005, certificate accounts maturing in
less than one year totaled $48.1 million. Most of these accounts are expected to be reinvested and
we do not believe that there are any material risks associated with the respective maturities of
these certificates. Deposits are obtained predominantly from the areas in which CFBank offices are
located, and brokered deposits are accepted. At December 31, 2005, brokered deposits totaled $13.0
million. We rely primarily on a willingness to pay market-competitive interest rates to attract
and retain these deposits. Accordingly, rates offered by competing financial institutions affect
our ability to attract and retain deposits.
Certificate accounts in amounts of $100,000 or more totaled $25.8 million at December 31, 2005,
maturing as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Maturity Period |
|
Amount |
|
|
Average Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Three months or less |
|
$ |
6,876 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
% |
Over 3 through 6 months |
|
|
3,143 |
|
|
|
4.16 |
% |
Over 6 through 12 months |
|
|
8,368 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
% |
Over 12 months |
|
|
7,415 |
|
|
|
3.93 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
25,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
The following table sets forth the distribution of average deposit account balances for the periods
indicated and the weighted average interest rates on each category of deposits presented. Averages
for the periods presented are based on month-end balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest-bearing checking accounts |
|
$ |
11,321 |
|
|
|
9.59 |
% |
|
|
1.26 |
% |
|
$ |
11,602 |
|
|
|
13.82 |
% |
|
|
.58 |
% |
|
$ |
8,463 |
|
|
|
11.25 |
% |
|
|
.86 |
% |
Money market accounts |
|
|
23,202 |
|
|
|
19.65 |
% |
|
|
3.01 |
% |
|
|
10,688 |
|
|
|
12.73 |
% |
|
|
2.34 |
% |
|
|
7,843 |
|
|
|
10.43 |
% |
|
|
1.40 |
% |
Savings accounts |
|
|
16,121 |
|
|
|
13.65 |
% |
|
|
.61 |
% |
|
|
18,730 |
|
|
|
22.30 |
% |
|
|
.57 |
% |
|
|
18,373 |
|
|
|
24.43 |
% |
|
|
.82 |
% |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
59,957 |
|
|
|
50.78 |
% |
|
|
3.14 |
% |
|
|
39,285 |
|
|
|
46.78 |
% |
|
|
2.57 |
% |
|
|
38,761 |
|
|
|
51.52 |
% |
|
|
3.24 |
% |
Noninterest-bearing deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
|
7,471 |
|
|
|
6.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,674 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,781 |
|
|
|
2.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average deposits |
|
$ |
118,072 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
2.55 |
% |
|
$ |
83,979 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
1.79 |
% |
|
$ |
75,221 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
2.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents by various rate categories, the amount of certificate accounts
outstanding at the dates indicated and the periods to maturity of the certificate accounts
outstanding at December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period to Maturity from December 31, 2005 |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One to |
|
|
Two to |
|
|
Over |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
Two |
|
|
Three |
|
|
Three |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Certificate accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 to 1.99% |
|
$ |
4,270 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,273 |
|
|
$ |
11,847 |
|
|
$ |
8,148 |
|
2.00 to 2.99% |
|
|
3,973 |
|
|
|
3,800 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,850 |
|
|
|
17,555 |
|
|
|
10,123 |
|
3.00 to 3.99% |
|
|
15,487 |
|
|
|
3,744 |
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
21,376 |
|
|
|
9,984 |
|
|
|
11,221 |
|
4.00 to 4.99% |
|
|
23,805 |
|
|
|
7,906 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
2,560 |
|
|
|
34,676 |
|
|
|
6,273 |
|
|
|
6,152 |
|
5.00 to 5.99% |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
6.00% and above |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total certificate
accounts |
|
$ |
47,977 |
|
|
$ |
15,463 |
|
|
$ |
1,592 |
|
|
$ |
3,595 |
|
|
$ |
68,627 |
|
|
$ |
46,324 |
|
|
$ |
36,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Borrowings. FHLB advances are used as an alternative to retail deposits to fund operations as
part of our operating strategy. The advances are collateralized primarily by certain mortgage
loans, home equity lines of credit, commercial real estate loans and mortgage-backed securities and
secondarily by investment in capital stock of the FHLB. FHLB advances are made pursuant to several
credit programs, each of which has its own interest rate and range of maturities. The maximum
amount that the FHLB will advance to member institutions fluctuates from time to time in accordance
with the policies of the FHLB.
A revolving line of credit with an unaffiliated bank acquired in the Reserve acquisition in 2004
provided financing primarily for single-family mortgage loan originations and was collateralized by
loan sales proceeds receivable. This line of credit was repaid and closed in 2005.
In 2003, we formed the Trust, which issued $5.0 million of 3 month LIBOR plus 2.85% floating rate
trust preferred securities as part of a pooled offering of such securities. We issued $5,155 of
subordinated debentures to the Trust in exchange for ownership of all of the common stock of the
Trust and the proceeds of the preferred securities sold by the Trust. The subordinated debentures
mature on December 30, 2033 and we may redeem the subordinated debentures, in whole or in part, at
par, any time after December 30, 2008. We have the option to defer interest payments on the
subordinated debentures from time to time for a period not to exceed five consecutive years.
Under FASB Interpretation No. 46, as revised in December 2003, the Trust is not consolidated with
the Company. Accordingly, we do not report the securities issued by the Trust as liabilities, and
instead report the subordinated debentures issued by the Company and held by the Trust as
liabilities.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding borrowed funds at or for the periods
ended on the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
FHLB advances and other borrowings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance outstanding |
|
$ |
24,860 |
|
|
$ |
31,265 |
|
|
$ |
12,192 |
|
Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end
during the period |
|
|
47,062 |
|
|
|
48,574 |
|
|
|
16,542 |
|
Balance outstanding at end of period |
|
|
28,150 |
|
|
|
48,574 |
|
|
|
12,655 |
|
Weighted average interest rate during the period |
|
|
3.62 |
% |
|
|
2.28 |
% |
|
|
5.59 |
% |
Weighted average interest rate at end of period |
|
|
4.25 |
% |
|
|
2.76 |
% |
|
|
2.28 |
% |
Subsidiary Activities
As of December 31, 2005, we maintained CFBank and the Trust as wholly owned subsidiaries.
Personnel
As of December 31, 2005, we had 52 full-time and two part-time employees.
19
Regulation and Supervision
General. CFBank is a federally-chartered savings association. It is subject to regulation,
examination and supervision by the OTS and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as its
deposit insurer. CFBank is a member of the Savings Association Insurance Fund (SAIF), and its
deposit accounts are insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC. All the deposit premiums paid by
CFBank to the FDIC for deposit insurance are currently paid to the SAIF. CFBank also is a member
of the FHLB of Cincinnati, which is one of the 12 regional FHLBs. CFBank must file reports with the
OTS concerning its activities and financial condition, and must obtain regulatory approvals prior
to entering into certain transactions, such as mergers with, or acquisitions of, other depository
institutions. The OTS conducts periodic examinations to assess CFBanks compliance with various
regulatory requirements. This regulation and supervision establishes a comprehensive framework of
activities in which a savings association can engage and is intended primarily for the protection
of the insurance fund and depositors. As a savings and loan holding company, we must file certain
reports with, and otherwise comply with, the rules and regulations of the OTS and, with respect to
federal securities laws, of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission).
The OTS and the FDIC have significant discretion in connection with their supervisory and
enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to the
classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory
purposes. Any change in such policies, whether by the OTS, the FDIC, the Commission or the United
States Congress, could have a material adverse impact on the Company, CFBank and our operations and
shareholders. The following discussion is intended to be a summary of the material statutes and
regulations applicable to savings associations and their holding companies, but it does not purport
to be a comprehensive description of all such statutes and regulations.
Regulation of Federal Savings Associations
Business Activities. CFBank derives its lending and investment powers from the Home Owners Loan
Act, as amended (HOLA), and OTS regulations. Under these laws and regulations, CFBank may invest
in mortgage loans secured by residential and commercial real estate, commercial and consumer loans,
certain types of debt securities and certain other assets. CFBank may also establish service
corporations that may engage in activities not otherwise permissible for CFBank, including certain
real estate equity investments and securities and insurance brokerage activities. CFBanks
authority to invest in certain types of loans or other investments is limited by federal law.
Loans to One Borrower. CFBank is generally subject to the same limits on loans to one borrower as
is a national bank. With specified exceptions, CFBanks total loans or extensions of credit to a
single borrower cannot exceed 15% of CFBanks unimpaired capital and surplus, which does not
include accumulated other comprehensive income. CFBank may lend additional amounts up to 10% of
its unimpaired capital and surplus which does not include accumulated other comprehensive income,
if the loans or extensions of credit are fully-secured by readily marketable collateral. CFBank
currently complies with applicable loans-to-one-borrower limitations.
QTL Test. The HOLA requires that CFBank, as a savings association, comply with the qualified
thrift lender (QTL) test. Under the QTL test, CFBank is required to maintain at least 65% of its
portfolio assets in certain qualified thrift investments for at least nine months of the most
recent twelve-month period. Portfolio assets means, in general, CFBanks total assets less the
sum of (i) specified liquid assets up to 20% of total assets, (ii) goodwill and other intangible
assets and (iii) the value of property used to conduct CFBanks business. CFBank may also satisfy
the QTL test by qualifying as a domestic building and loan
20
association as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). CFBank
met the QTL test at December 31, 2005 and in each of the prior 12 months, and, therefore, qualified
as a thrift lender. If CFBank fails the QTL test, it must either operate under certain
restrictions on its activities or convert to a national bank charter.
Capital Requirements. The OTS regulations require savings associations to meet three minimum
capital standards: (i) a tangible capital ratio requirement of 1.5% of total assets as adjusted
under the OTS regulations; (ii) a leverage ratio requirement of 3.0% of core capital to such
adjusted total assets, if a savings association has been assigned the highest composite rating of 1
under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System; and (iii) a risk-based capital ratio
requirement of 8.0% of core and supplementary capital to total risk-based assets. The minimum
leverage capital ratio for any other depository institution that does not have a composite rating
of 1 will be 4%, unless a higher leverage capital ratio is warranted by the particular
circumstances or risk profile of the depository institution. In determining the amount of
risk-weighted assets for purposes of the risk-based capital requirement, a savings association must
compute its risk-based assets by multiplying its assets and certain off-balance sheet items by risk
weights, which range from 0% for cash and obligations issued by the United States Government or its
agencies to 100% for consumer and commercial loans, as assigned by the OTS capital regulation based
on the risks found by the OTS to be inherent in the type of asset.
Tangible capital is defined, generally, as common shareholders equity (including retained
earnings), certain non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock and related earnings, minority
interests in equity accounts of fully consolidated subsidiaries, less intangibles (other than
certain mortgage servicing rights), and investments in and loans to subsidiaries engaged in
activities not permissible for a national bank. Core capital is defined similarly to tangible
capital, but core capital also includes certain qualifying supervisory goodwill and certain
purchased credit card relationships. Supplementary capital currently includes cumulative and other
preferred stock, mandatory convertible debt securities, subordinated debt and intermediate
preferred stock and the allowance for loan and lease losses. In addition, up to 45% of unrealized
gains on available-for-sale equity securities with a readily determinable fair value may be
included in tier 2 capital. The allowance for loan and lease losses includable in supplementary
capital is limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets, and the amount of supplementary
capital that may be included as total capital cannot exceed the amount of core capital. At
December 31, 2005, CFBank met each of its capital requirements, in each case on a fully phased-in
basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess |
|
Capital |
|
|
Actual |
|
Required |
|
(Deficiency) |
|
Actual |
|
Required |
|
|
Capital |
|
Capital |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Percent |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Tangible |
|
$ |
11,717 |
|
|
$ |
2,554 |
|
|
$ |
9,163 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core (Leverage) |
|
|
11,717 |
|
|
|
6,811 |
|
|
|
4,906 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-based |
|
|
13,212 |
|
|
|
10,454 |
|
|
|
2,758 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
Capital Distributions. The OTS imposes various restrictions or requirements on the ability of
CFBank to make capital distributions, including cash dividends. A savings institution that is the
subsidiary of a savings and loan holding company must file a notice with the OTS at least 30 days
before making a capital distribution. CFBank must file an application for prior approval if the
total amount of its capital distributions, including the proposed distribution, for the applicable
calendar year would exceed an
21
amount equal to CFBanks net income for that year plus CFBanks
retained net income for the previous
two years. The OTS may disapprove of a notice of application if (i) CFBank would be
undercapitalized following the distribution, (ii) the proposed capital distribution would raise
safety and soundness concerns or (iii) the capital distribution would violate a prohibition
contained in any statute, regulation, or agreement. The Companys ability to pay dividends,
service debt obligations and repurchase common stock is dependent upon receipt of dividend payments
from CFBank.
Branching. Subject to certain limitations, HOLA and OTS regulations permit federally chartered
savings associations to establish branches in any State of the United States. The authority to
establish such a branch is available (i) in States that expressly authorize branches of savings
associations located in another State and (ii) to an association that qualifies as a domestic
building and loan association under the Code, which imposes qualification requirements similar to
those for a qualified thrift lender under HOLA. See " QTL Test. The authority for a federal
savings association to establish an interstate branch network would facilitate a geographic
diversification of the associations activities. This authority under HOLA and OTS regulations
preempts any State law purporting to regulate branching by federal savings associations.
Community Reinvestment. Under the Community Reinvestment Act (the CRA), as implemented by OTS
regulations, a savings association has a continuing and affirmative obligation consistent with its
safe and sound operation to help meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low- and
moderate-income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or
programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an institutions discretion to develop the
types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community,
consistent with the CRA. The CRA requires the OTS, in connection with its examination of a savings
association, to assess the associations record of meeting the credit needs of its community and to
take such record into account in its evaluation of certain applications by the association. The
CRA also requires each institution to publicly disclose its CRA rating.
The CRA regulations establish an assessment system that bases an associations rating on its actual
performance in meeting community needs. In particular, the assessment system focuses on three
tests: (i) a lending test, to evaluate the institutions record of making loans in its assessment
areas; (ii) an investment test, to evaluate the institutions record of investing in community
development projects, affordable housing and programs benefiting low- or moderate-income
individuals and businesses; and (iii) a service test, to evaluate the institutions delivery of
services through its branches, ATMs and other offices.
Transactions with Related Parties. CFBanks authority to engage in transactions with its
affiliates is limited by the OTS regulations and by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve
Act (the FRA). In general, these transactions must be on terms which are as favorable to CFBank as
comparable transactions with non-affiliates. In addition, certain types of these transactions are
restricted to an aggregate percentage of CFBanks capital. Collateral in specified amounts must
usually be provided by affiliates in order to receive loans from CFBank. In addition, the OTS
regulations prohibit a savings association from lending to any affiliates that engages in
activities not permissible for bank holding companies and from purchasing the securities of any
affiliate, other than a subsidiary.
Effective April 1, 2003, the Federal Reserve Board (the FRB) rescinded its interpretations of
Sections 23A and 23B of the FRA and replaced these interpretations with Regulation W. In addition,
Regulation W makes various changes to existing law regarding Sections 23A and 23B, including
expanding the definition of what constitutes an affiliate subject to Sections 23A and 23B and
exempting certain subsidiaries of state-chartered banks from the restrictions of Sections 23A and
23B. Under Regulation W, all transactions entered into on or before December 12, 2002, which
either became subject to Sections
22
23A and 23B solely because of Regulation W, and all transactions
covered by Sections 23A and 23B, the
treatment of which will change solely because of Regulation W, became subject to Regulation W on
July 1, 2003. All other covered affiliate transactions became subject to Regulation W on April 1,
2003. The Federal Reserve Board expects each depository institution that is subject to Sections
23A and 23B to implement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with Regulation W.
CFBanks authority to extend credit to its directors, executive officers and 10% shareholders, as
well as to entities controlled by such persons, is currently governed by the requirements of
Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the FRA and Regulation O of the Federal Reserve Board. Among other
things, these provisions require that extensions of credit to insiders: (i) be made on terms that
are substantially the same as, and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less
stringent than, those prevailing for comparable transactions with unaffiliated persons and that do
not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features; and (ii)
not exceed certain limitations on the amount of credit extended to such persons, individually and
in the aggregate, which limits are based, in part, on the amount of CFBanks capital. The
regulations allow small discounts on fees on residential mortgages for directors, officers and
employees. In addition, extensions for credit in excess of certain limits must be approved by
CFBanks Board of Directors.
Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act prohibits the extension of personal loans to directors and
executive officers of issuers. The prohibition, however, does not apply to mortgages advanced by
an insured depository institution, such as CFBank, which are subject to the insider lending
restrictions of Section 22(h) of the FRA.
Enforcement. The OTS has primary enforcement responsibility over savings associations, including
CFBank. This enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money
penalties, to issue cease and desist orders and to remove directors and officers. In general,
these enforcement actions may be initiated in response to violations of laws and regulations and to
unsafe or unsound practices.
Standards for Safety and Soundness. Under federal law, the OTS has adopted a set of guidelines
prescribing safety and soundness standards. These guidelines establish general standards relating
to internal controls and information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit
underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, asset quality, earnings standards,
compensation, fees and benefits. In general, the guidelines require appropriate systems and
practices to identify and manage the risks and exposures specified in the guidelines. In addition,
the OTS adopted regulations that authorize, but do not require, the OTS to order an institution
that has been given notice that it is not satisfying these safety and soundness standards to submit
a compliance plan. If, after being notified, an institution fails to submit an acceptable plan of
compliance or fails in any material respect to implement an accepted plan, the OTS must issue an
order directing action to correct the deficiency and may issue an order directing other actions of
the types to which an undercapitalized association is subject under the prompt corrective action
provisions of federal law. If an institution fails to comply with such an order, the OTS may seek
to enforce such order in judicial proceedings and to impose civil money penalties.
Real Estate Lending Standards. The OTS and the other federal banking agencies adopted regulations
to prescribe standards for extensions of credit that (i) are secured by real estate or (ii) are
made for the purpose of financing the construction of improvements on real estate. The OTS
regulations require each savings association to establish and maintain written internal real estate
lending standards that are consistent with safe and sound banking practices and appropriate to the
size of the association and the nature and scope of its real estate lending activities. The
standards also must be consistent with accompanying OTS guidelines, which include loan-to-value
ratios for the different types of real estate loans. Associations are also permitted to make a
limited amount of loans that do not conform to the
23
proposed loan-to-value limitations so long as
such exceptions are reviewed and justified appropriately.
The guidelines also list a number of lending situations in which exceptions to the loan-to-value
standards are justified.
Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action. Under the OTS prompt corrective action regulations, the OTS is
required to take certain, and is authorized to take other, supervisory actions against
undercapitalized savings associations. For this purpose, a savings association would be placed in
one of the following four categories based on the associations capital: (i) well-capitalized; (ii)
adequately capitalized; (iii) undercapitalized; or (iv) critically undercapitalized.
At December 31, 2005, CFBank met the criteria for being considered well-capitalized. When
appropriate, the OTS can require corrective action by a savings association holding company under
the prompt corrective action provision of federal law.
Insurance of Deposit Accounts. CFBank is a member of the SAIF. Under federal law, the FDIC
established a risk based assessment system for determining the deposit insurance assessments to be
paid by insured depository institutions. Under the assessment system, the FDIC assigns an
institution to one of three capital categories based on the institutions financial information as
of the quarter ending three months before the beginning of the assessment period. An institutions
assessment rate depends on the capital category and supervisory category to which it is assigned.
Under the regulation, there are nine risk assessment classifications (i.e., combinations of capital
groups and supervisory subgroups) to which different assessment rates are applied. Assessment
rates currently range from 0.0% of deposits for an institution in the highest category (i.e.,
well-capitalized and financially sound, with no more than a few minor weaknesses) to 0.27% of
deposits for an institution in the lowest category (i.e., undercapitalized and substantial
supervisory concern). The FDIC is authorized to raise the assessment rates as necessary to
maintain the required reserve ratio of 1.25%.
In addition, all FDIC-insured institutions are required to pay assessments to the FDIC at an annual
rate of approximately 0.0168% of insured deposits to fund interest payments on bonds issued by the
Financing Corporation, an agency of the federal government established to recapitalize the
predecessor to the Bank Insurance Fund. These assessments will continue until the Financing
Corporation bonds mature in 2017.
Federal Home Loan Bank System. CFBank is a member of the FHLB of Cincinnati, which is one of the
regional FHLBs composing the FHLB System. Each FHLB provides a central credit facility primarily
for its member institutions: (i) the greater of $1,000 or 0.20% of the members mortgage-related
assets; and (ii) 4.50% of the dollar amount of any outstanding advances under such members
advances, collateral pledge and security agreement with the FHLB. CFBank, as a member of the FHLB
of Cincinnati is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the FHLB of Cincinnati in
an amount at least equal to 0.12% of the total assets of CFBank. CFBank is also required to own
activity based stock, which is based on 4.45% of CFBanks outstanding advances. These percentages
are subject to change by the FHLB. CFBank was in compliance with this requirement with an
investment in FHLB of Cincinnati stock at December 31, 2005 of $2.7 million. Any advances from a
FHLB must be secured by specified types of collateral, and all long-term advances may be obtained
only for the purpose of providing funds for residential housing finance.
The FHLBs are required to provide funds for the resolution of insolvent thrifts and to contribute
funds for affordable housing programs. These requirements could reduce the amount of earnings that
the FHLBs can pay as dividends to their members and could also result in the FHLBs imposing a
higher rate of interest on advances to their members. If dividends were reduced, or interest on
future FHLB advances increased, CFBanks net interest income would be affected. Under the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the GLB Act), membership in the FHLB is now voluntary for all
federally-chartered savings associations,
24
such as CFBank. The GLB Act also replaces the existing
redeemable stock structure of the FHLB
System with a capital structure that requires each FHLB to meet a leverage limit and a risk-based
permanent capital requirement. Two classes of stock are authorized: Class A (redeemable on
six-month notice) and Class B (redeemable on five-year notice).
Federal Reserve System. CFBank is subject to provisions of the FRA and the FRBs regulations
pursuant to which depositary institutions may be required to maintain non-interest-earning reserves
against their deposit accounts and certain other liabilities. Currently, reserves must be
maintained against transaction accounts (primarily NOW and regular checking accounts). The FRB
regulations generally require that reserves be maintained in the amount of 3.0% of the aggregate of
transaction accounts up to $42.1 million. The amount of aggregate transaction accounts in excess
of $42.1 million are currently subject to a reserve ratio of 10.0%. The FRB regulations currently
exempt $6.0 million of otherwise reservable balances from the reserve requirements, which exemption
is adjusted by the FRB at the end of each year. CFBank is in compliance with the foregoing reserve
requirements. Because required reserves must be maintained in the form of vault cash, a non
interest-bearing account at a Federal Reserve Bank, or a pass-through account as defined by the
FRB, the effect of this reserve requirement is to reduce CFBanks interest-earning assets. The
balances maintained to meet the reserve requirements imposed by the FRB may be used to satisfy
liquidity requirements imposed by the OTS. FHLB System members are also authorized to borrow from
the Federal Reserve discount window, but FRB regulations require such institutions to exhaust all
FHLB sources before borrowing from a Federal Reserve Bank.
Privacy Regulations. The OTS has published final regulations implementing the privacy protection
provisions of the GLB Act. The new regulations generally require that CFBank disclose its privacy
policy, including identifying with whom it shares a customers non-public personal information,
to any customer at the time of establishing the customer relationship and annually thereafter. In
addition, CFBank is required to provide its customers with the ability to opt-out of having their
personal information shared with unaffiliated third parties and not to disclose account numbers or
access codes to non-affiliated third parties for marketing purposes. CFBank currently has a
privacy protection policy in place and believes that such policy is in compliance with the
regulations.
The USA PATRIOT Act. CFBank is subject to the USA PATRIOT Act, which gives the federal government
new powers to address terrorist threats through enhanced domestic security measures, expanded
surveillance powers, increased information sharing and broadened anti-money laundering
requirements. By way of amendments to the Bank Secrecy Act, Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act takes
measures intended to encourage information sharing among bank regulatory agencies and law
enforcement bodies. Further, certain provisions of Title III impose affirmative obligations on a
broad range of financial institutions, including banks, thrifts, brokers, dealers, credit unions,
money transfer agents and parties registered under the Commodity Exchange Act. Among other
requirements, Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act imposes the following requirements with respect to
financial institutions:
|
|
|
Pursuant to Section 352, all financial institutions must establish anti-money laundering
programs that include, at minimum: (i) internal policies, procedures, and controls; (ii)
specific designation of an anti-money laundering compliance officer; (iii) ongoing employee
training programs; and (iv) an independent audit function to test the anti-money laundering
program. |
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to Section 326, on May 9, 2003, the Secretary of the Department of Treasury, in
conjunction with other bank regulators, issued Joint Final Rules that provide for minimum
standards with respect to customer identification and verification. These rules became
effective on October 1, 2003. |
25
|
|
|
Pursuant to Section 312 financial institutions that establish, maintain, administer, or
manage private banking accounts or correspondent accounts in the United States for
non-United States
persons or their representatives (including foreign individuals visiting the United States)
must establish appropriate, specific and, where necessary, enhanced due diligence policies,
procedures and controls designed to detect and report money laundering. Effective December
25, 2001, financial institutions are prohibited from establishing, maintaining,
administering or managing correspondent accounts for foreign shell banks (foreign banks that
do not have a physical presence in any country), and such institutions are subject to
certain record keeping obligations with respect to correspondent accounts of foreign banks.
Bank regulators are directed to consider a holding companys effectiveness in combating
money laundering when ruling on FRA and Bank Merger Act applications. |
Holding Company Regulation
Central Federal Corporation is a savings and loan holding company regulated by the OTS and, as
such, is registered with and subject to OTS examination and supervision, as well as certain
reporting requirements. In addition, the OTS has enforcement authority over the holding company
and any of our non-savings institution subsidiaries. Among other things, this authority permits
the OTS to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a serious risk to the
financial safety, soundness or stability of a subsidiary savings institution. Unlike bank holding
companies, federal savings and loan holding companies are not subject to any regulatory capital
requirements or to supervision by the Federal Reserve System.
Permissible Activities of Central Federal Corporation. Because we acquired CFBank prior to May 4,
1999, we are permitted to engage in the following non-financial activities under the GLB Act: (i)
furnishing or performing management services for a savings institution subsidiary; (ii) conducting
an insurance agency or escrow business; (iii) holding, managing or liquidating assets owned or
acquired from a savings institution subsidiary; (iv) holding or managing properties used or
occupied by a savings institution subsidiary; (v) acting as trustee under a deed of trust; (vi) any
other activity (a) that the FRB, by regulation, has determined to be permissible for bank holding
companies under Section 4(c) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (the BHC Act), unless the
Director of the OTS, by regulation, prohibits or limits any such activity for savings and loan
holding companies, or (b) in which multiple savings and loan holding companies were authorized by
regulation to directly engage in on March 5, 1987; (vii) purchasing, holding, or disposing of stock
acquired in connection with a qualified stock issuance if the purchase of such stock by such
holding company is approved by the Director of the OTS; and (viii) any activity permissible for
financial holding companies under section 4(k) of the BHC Act.
Permissible activities which are deemed to be financial in nature or incidental thereto under
section 4(k) of the BHC Act include: (i) lending, exchanging, transferring, investing for others or
safeguarding money or securities; (ii) insurance activities or providing and issuing annuities, and
acting as principal, agent or broker; (iii) financial, investment or economic advisory services;
(iv) issuing or selling instruments representing interests in pools of assets that a bank is
permitted to hold directly; (v) underwriting, dealing in or making a market in securities; (vi)
activities previously determined by the FRB to be closely related to banking; (vii) activities that
bank holding companies are permitted to engage in outside of the United States; and (viii)
portfolio investments made by an insurance company.
Restrictions Applicable to All Savings and Loan Holding Companies. Federal law prohibits a savings
and loan holding company, including us, directly or indirectly, from acquiring: (i) control (as
defined under HOLA) of another savings institution (or a holding company parent) without prior OTS
approval; (ii) through merger, consolidation or purchase of assets, another savings institution or
a holding company thereof, or acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of such institution
(or a holding company)
26
without prior OTS approval; or (iii) control of any depository institution
not insured by the FDIC (except
through a merger with and into the holding companys savings institution subsidiary that is
approved by the OTS).
A savings and loan holding company may not acquire as a separate subsidiary an insured institution
that has a principal office outside of the state where the principal office of its subsidiary
institution is located, except (i) in the case of certain emergency acquisitions approved by the
FDIC, (ii) if such holding company controls a savings institution subsidiary that operated a home
or branch office in such additional state as of March 5, 1987 or (iii) if the laws of the state in
which the savings institution to be acquired is located specifically authorize a savings
institution chartered by that state to be acquired by a savings institution chartered by the state
where the acquiring savings institution or savings and loan holding company is located or by a
holding company that controls such a state-chartered association.
If the savings institution subsidiary of a federal mutual holding company fails to meet the QTL
test set forth in Section 10(m) of the HOLA and regulations of the OTS, the holding company must
register with the FRB as a bank holding company under the BHC Act within one year of the savings
institutions failure to so qualify.
Prohibitions Against Tying Arrangements. Federal savings banks are subject to the prohibitions of
12 U.S.C. § 1972 on certain tying arrangements. A depository institution is prohibited, subject to
some exceptions, from extending credit to or offering any other service, or fixing or varying the
consideration for such extension of credit or service, on the condition that the customer obtain
some additional service from the institution or its affiliates or not obtain services of a
competitor of the institution.
Federal Securities Laws. Our common stock is registered with the SEC under Section 12(g) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and, accordingly, we are
subject to information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions, and other
requirements under the Exchange Act.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. As a public company, we are subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley Act), which implements a broad range of corporate governance and accounting
measures for public companies designed to promote honesty and transparency in corporate America and
better protect investors from corporate wrongdoing. The Sarbanes-Oxley Acts principal legislation
and the derivative regulation and rule making promulgated by the SEC includes: (i) the creation of
an independent accounting oversight board; (ii) auditor independence provisions that restrict
non-audit services that accountants may provide to their audit clients; (iii) additional corporate
governance and responsibility measures, including the requirement that the principal executive
officer and principal financial officer certify financial statements; (iv) a requirement that
companies establish and maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting and that a
companys management provide an annual report regarding its assessment of the effectiveness of such
internal control over financial reporting to its independent accountants and that such accountants
provide an attestation report with respect to managements assessment of the effectiveness of the
companys internal control over financial reporting; (v) the forfeiture of bonuses or other
incentive-based compensation and profits from the sale of the companys securities by directors and
senior officers in the twelve month period following initial publication of any financial
statements that later require restatement; (vi) an increase in the oversight of, and enhancement of
certain requirements relating to audit committees of public companies and how they interact with
independent auditors; (vii) the requirement that audit committee members must be independent and
are absolutely barred from accepting consulting, advisory or other compensatory fees from the
issuer; (viii) the requirement that companies disclose whether at least one member of the audit
committee is a financial expert (as such term is defined by the SEC) and if not, why not; (ix)
expanded disclosure requirements for corporate insiders, including accelerated reporting of stock
transactions by insiders and a prohibition on insider trading during pension blackout periods; (x)
a prohibition on
27
personal loans to directors and officers, except certain loans made by insured
financial institutions; (xi)
disclosure of a code of ethics and the requirement of filing of a Form 8-K for a change or waiver
of such code; (xii) mandatory disclosure by analysts of potential conflicts of interest; and (xiii)
a range of enhanced penalties for fraud and other violations.
Compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the regulations promulgated there under may have a
material impact on our results of operations and financial condition, as the internal control rules
become applicable to non-accelerated filers in 2007.
Quotation on Nasdaq®. Our common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq® Capital Market. In order to
maintain such quotation, we are subject to certain corporate governance requirements, including:
(i) a majority of our Board of Directors must be composed of independent directors; (ii) we are
required to have an audit committee composed of at least three directors, each of whom is an
independent director, as such term is defined by both the rules of the National Association of
Securities Dealers (NASD) and by Exchange Act regulations; (iii) our nominating committee and
compensation committee must also be composed entirely of independent directors; and (iv) each of
our audit committee and nominating committee must have a publicly available written charter.
Federal and State Taxation
Federal Taxation
General. We report income on a calendar year, consolidated basis using the accrual method of
accounting, and we are subject to federal income taxation in the same manner as other corporations,
with some exceptions discussed below. The following discussion of tax matters is intended only as
a summary and does not purport to be a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to the
Company and CFBank. We are subject to a maximum federal income tax rate of 34% for 2005.
Distributions. Under the 1996 Act, if CFBank makes non-dividend distributions to the holding
company, such distributions will be considered to have been made from CFBanks unrecaptured tax bad
debt reserves (including the balance of its reserves as of December 31, 1987) to the extent
thereof, and then from CFBanks supplemental reserve for losses on loans, to the extent thereof,
and an amount based on the amount distributed (but not in excess of the amount of such reserves)
will be included in CFBanks taxable income. Non-dividend distributions include distributions in
excess of CFBanks current and accumulated earnings and profits, as calculated for federal income
tax purposes, distributions in redemption of stock, and distributions in partial or complete
liquidation.
Dividends paid out of CFBanks current or accumulated earnings and profits will not be so included
in CFBanks taxable income. At year-end 2005, CFBank had no accumulated earnings and profits.
The amount of additional taxable income triggered by a non-dividend distribution is an amount that,
when reduced by the tax attributable to the income, is equal to the amount of the distribution.
Thus, if CFBank makes a non-dividend distribution to the holding company, approximately one and
one-half times the amount of such distribution (but not in excess of the amount of such reserves)
would be includable in income for federal income tax purposes, assuming a 34% federal corporate
income tax rate. CFBank does not intend to pay dividends that would result in a recapture of any
portion of its bad debt reserves.
Ohio Taxation
We are subject to the Ohio corporate franchise tax, which, as applied to the holding company, is a
tax measured by both net earnings and net worth. In general, the tax liability is the greater of
5.1% on the
28
first $50,000 of computed Ohio taxable income and 8.5% of computed Ohio taxable income
in excess of
$50,000 or 0.4% times of taxable net worth. Under these alternative measures of computing tax
liability, complex formulas determine the jurisdictions to which total net income and total net
worth are apportioned or allocated. The minimum tax is $50 per year, and maximum tax liability as
measured by net worth is limited to $150,000 per year.
A special litter tax also applies to all corporations, including the holding company, subject to
the Ohio corporate franchise tax. This litter tax does not apply to financial institutions. If
the franchise tax is paid on the net income basis, the litter tax is equal to 0.11% of the first
$50,000 of computed Ohio taxable income and 0.22% of computed Ohio taxable income in excess of
$50,000. If the franchise tax is paid on the net worth basis, the litter tax is equal to 0.014%
times taxable net worth.
Certain holding companies, such as Central Federal Corporation, will qualify for complete exemption
from the net worth tax if certain conditions are met. The holding company will most likely meet
these conditions, and thus, calculate its Ohio franchise tax on the net income basis.
CFBank is a financial institution for State of Ohio tax purposes. As such, it is subject to the
Ohio corporate franchise tax on financial institutions, which is imposed annually at a rate of
1.3% of CFBanks apportioned book net worth, determined in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, less any statutory deduction. As a financial institution, CFBank is not
subject to any tax based upon net income or net profits imposed by the State of Ohio.
Delaware Taxation
As a Delaware holding company not earning income in Delaware, we are exempted from Delaware
corporate income tax but are required to file an annual report with and pay an annual franchise tax
to the State of Delaware.
Available Information
Our
website address is www.CFBankonline.com. We make available free of charge through our website
our annual report on Form 10-KSB, quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB, current reports on Form 8-K and
any amendments to these reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such
reports with the Commission. These reports can be found on our website under the caption CF News
and Links Investor Relations SEC Filings. Investors also can obtain copies of our filings
from the Commissions website at www.sec.gov.
29
|
|
|
Item 2 Description of Property |
We conduct our business through five offices located in Summit, Columbiana, and Franklin Counties,
Ohio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
Property or |
|
|
Leased |
|
Leased |
|
Date of |
|
Leasehold |
|
|
or |
|
or |
|
Lease |
|
Improvements at |
Location |
|
Owned |
|
Acquired |
|
Expiration |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Administrative/Home Office: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2923 Smith Rd |
|
Leased |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
$ |
396 |
|
Fairlawn, Ohio 44333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branch Offices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
601 Main Street |
|
Owned |
|
|
1989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
712 |
|
Wellsville, Ohio 43968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49028 Foulks Drive |
|
Owned |
|
|
1979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304 |
|
East Liverpool, Ohio 43920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4249 Easton Way, Suite 125 |
|
Leased |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Columbus, Ohio 43219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Mortgage Origination Office: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1730 Akron-Peninsula Rd |
|
Leased |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Akron, Ohio 44313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We may, from time to time, be involved in various legal proceedings in the normal course of
business. Periodically, there have been various claims and lawsuits involving CFBank, such as
claims to enforce liens, condemnation proceedings on properties in which CFBank holds security
interests, claims involving the making and servicing of real property loans and other issues
incident to our business.
In December 2005, CFBank terminated the Richard J. ODonnell, President of Reserve. The former
President filed a request for arbitration against CFBank and contends that CFBank owes him $600,000
for breaching an employment agreement between him and CFBank by discharging him without just cause.
CFBank responded by denying that it breached the employment agreement in that CFBank had just
cause to discharge him for flagrant misconduct and malfeasance, alleging causes of action for
breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of duty of loyalty. The arbitration is in
the discovery stage and the outcome cannot be determined at this time. Mr. ODonnell owned 5.5% of
the Companys outstanding shares at the time the dispute arose. In January 2006, the Company
issued 2.3 million shares of its common stock in a public stock offering and, as a result of the
increase in the number of outstanding shares, Mr. ODonnells ownership has been reduced to 2.7%.
30
We are not a party to any other pending legal proceeding that management believes would have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition or operations, if decided adversely to us.
No tax shelter penalty was assessed against the Company or any of our subsidiaries by the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) in fiscal year 2005 or at any other time, in connection with any transaction
deemed by the IRS to be abusive or to have a significant tax avoidance purpose.
|
|
|
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
None.
PART II
|
|
|
Item 5 Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Small Business Issuer Purchases
of Equity Securities |
The market information required by Item 201(a), the stockholders information required by Item
201(b) and the dividend information required by Item 201(c) of Regulation S-B is incorporated by
reference to our 2005 Annual Report to shareholders distributed to shareholders and furnished to
the Commission under Rule 14a-3(b) of the Exchange Act; the information appears under the caption
Market Prices and Dividends Declared on page 18 and in Note 18 Capital Requirements and
Restrictions on Retained Earnings at page 41 therein, respectively.
The equity compensation plan information required by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-B is set forth
herein under Part III, Item 11, Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters.
The information required by Item 701 of Regulation S-B with respect to our sales of unregistered
securities during fiscal 2003 has been reported previously in filings made with the Commission.
We did not purchase any of our equity securities requiring disclosure under Item 703 of Regulation
S-B.
|
|
|
Item 6 Managements Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation |
Information required by Item 303 of Regulation S-B is incorporated by reference to our 2005 Annual
Report to shareholders distributed to shareholders and furnished to the Commission under Rule
14a-3(b) of the Exchange Act; the information appears under the caption Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations at page 4 therein.
|
|
|
Item 7 Financial Statements |
The consolidated financial statements required by Item 310(a) of Regulation S-B are incorporated by
reference to our 2005 Annual Report to shareholders distributed to shareholders and furnished to
the Commission under Rules 14a-3(b) and (c) of the Exchange Act; the financial statements appear
under the caption Financial Statements at page 19 therein and include the following:
31
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
Item 8 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure |
None.
|
|
|
Item 8A Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures
that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure based closely on the definition of disclosure
controls and procedures in Rule 13a-14(c). Management, with the participation of our principal
executive and financial officers, has evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such
evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as
of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording,
processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by
us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting. We made no significant changes in our
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to
the date of the completion of the evaluation of those controls by our principal executive officer
and principal financial officer.
|
|
|
Item 8B Other Information |
None.
32
PART III
|
|
|
Item 9 Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance with Section 16(a)
of the Exchange Act |
Directors. Information required by Item 401 of Regulation S-B with respect to our directors and
committees of the Board of Directors is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement
for our 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the Commission on March 30, 2006, under the
caption PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age at |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
Position held with the Company |
Name |
|
2005 |
|
and/or Subsidiaries |
David C. Vernon (1)
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
Chairman, Company and CFBank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark S. Allio (2)
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Vice-Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer, Company;
Vice-Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, CFBank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond E. Heh
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
President and Chief Operating
Officer, CFBank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Parker MacDonell
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Regional President Columbus, CFBank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloise L. Mackus
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary, Company and
CFBank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy M. OBrien
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
Senior Vice President Mortgage
Operations, CFBank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Therese A. Liutkus
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer, Company and CFBank |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Vernon held this position thru December 31, 2005, after which time he assumed the role of
Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company and CFBank. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Allio held these positions thru December 31, 2005, after which time he assumed the role of
Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company and CFBank. |
David C. Vernon was Chairman of the Board of the Company and CFBank at December 31, 2005. He
served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Chief Executive Officer of
CFBank from January 2003 until January 31, 2005. He has worked for more than 40 years in banking in
our markets. He founded Summit Bank in Akron in 1991, which operated successfully until its
acquisition by FirstFederal Financial Services Corp. in 1997. Mr. Vernon held previous leadership
positions with the
33
Firestone Bank and Bank One Akron NA. On January 1, 2006, he retired as Chairman
and assumed the role of Vice-Chairman of the Company and CFBank.
Mark S. Allio, Vice-Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Central Federal and
Vice-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CFBank since February 1, 2005, has more than 29 years
of banking and banking-related experience, including service as President and Chief Executive
Officer of Rock Bank in Livonia, Michigan, an affiliate of Quicken Loans, Inc. from April 2003 to
December 2004. He was previously President of Third Federal Savings, MHC in Cleveland, Ohio, a
multi-billion dollar thrift holding company from January 2000 to December 2002 and Chief Financial
Officer of Third Federal from 1988 thru 1999. On January 1, 2006, Mr. Allio assumed the role of
Chairman of the Company and CFBank.
Raymond E. Heh, President and Chief Operating Officer, joined CFBank in June 2003. Formerly, Mr.
Heh held numerous positions at Bank One Akron NA including Chairman, President and CEO. He was
with Bank One Akron NA for 18 years and has over 40 years of experience in the commercial banking
industry. Mr. Heh is a graduate of The Pennsylvania State University.
R. Parker MacDonell, Regional President Columbus, joined CFBank in May 2003. Mr. MacDonell is a
third generation Ohio banker with 18 years of commercial banking experience. He is a former Senior
Vice President of Bank One Columbus NA, a position he held for three years during his 15 year
tenure with Bank One. He is a graduate of Dartmouth College and received his masters degree from
Yale University.
Eloise L. Mackus is Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company and CFBank.
Prior to joining us in July 2003, Ms. Mackus practiced in law firms in Connecticut and Ohio and
was the Vice President and General Manager of International Markets for The J. M. Smucker Company.
Ms. Mackus completed a bachelors degree at Calvin College and a juris doctorate at The University
of Akron School of Law.
Timothy M. OBrien is Senior Vice President Mortgage Operations of CF Bank. Prior to joining us
in August 2005, Mr. OBrien was Director of Asset & Risk Management at DeepGreen Financial and
Senior Vice President at Greystone Funding Corporation. Mr. OBrien has 12 years of banking
experience concentrating in commercial, residential and consumer product lines. He received a
bachelors degree in Business Administration from the University of Toledo in 1988.
Therese A. Liutkus joined the Company and CFBank as Chief Financial Officer in November 2003.
Prior to that time, Ms. Liutkus was Chief Financial Officer of First Place Financial Corp. and
First Place Bank for six years and she has more than 20 years of banking experience. Ms. Liutkus
is a certified public accountant and has a bachelors degree in accounting from Cleveland State
University.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. Information required by Item 405 of Regulation
S-B is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2006 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders filed with the Commission on March 30, 2006, under the caption ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
ABOUT DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.
Copies of Section 16 reports, Forms 3, 4 and 5, are available on our website, www.CFBankonline.com
under the caption CF News and Links Investor Relations Section 16 Filings.
Code of Ethics. We have adopted a code of ethics, our Financial Code of Ethics, which meets the
requirements of Item 406 of Regulation S-B and applies to our principal executive officer,
principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. Since our inception in 1998, we have
had a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (Code of Conduct). We require all directors, officers
and other employees
34
to adhere to the Code of Conduct in addressing the legal and ethical issues
encountered in conducting their work. The Code of Conduct requires that our employees avoid
conflicts of interest, comply with all
laws and other legal requirements, conduct business in an honest and ethical manner and otherwise
act with integrity and in the Companys best interest. The Financial Code of Ethics and
the Code of Conduct are available on our website, www.CFBankonline.com under the caption CF News
and Links Investor Relations Corporate Governance.
|
|
|
Item 10 Executive Compensation |
Information required by Item 402 of Regulation S-B is incorporated by reference to our definitive
Proxy Statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the Commission on March 30,
2006, under the caption EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
|
|
|
Item 11 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. Information required by Item 403
of Regulation S-B is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for the 2006
Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the Commission on March 30, 2006, under the caption
STOCK OWNERSHIP.
Related Stockholder Matters Equity Compensation Plan Information. The following table sets forth
information about Company common stock that may be issued upon exercise of options, warrants and
rights under all of the Companys equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
Securities to be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Issued Upon |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Available for |
|
|
|
Exercise of |
|
|
Exercise Price of |
|
|
Future Issuance |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
under Equity |
|
|
|
Options, Warrants |
|
|
Options, Warrants |
|
|
Compensation |
|
Plan Category |
|
and Rights |
|
|
and Rights |
|
|
Plans |
|
Equity compensation
plans approved by
shareholders |
|
|
290,872 |
|
|
$ |
11.32 |
|
|
|
22,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation
plans not approved
by shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
290,872 |
|
|
$ |
11.32 |
|
|
|
22,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Part II, Item 7, Financial Statements, Notes 1 and 17, for a description of the principal
provisions of our equity compensation plans. The information required by Item 7 is incorporated by
reference to our 2005 Annual Report to shareholders distributed to shareholders and furnished to
the Commission under Rules 14a-3(b) and (c) of the Exchange Act; the financial statements appear
under the caption Financial Statements at page 19 therein.
35
|
|
|
Item 12 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
Information required by Item 404 of Regulation S-B is incorporated by reference to our definitive
Proxy Statement for our 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the Commission on March 30,
2006,
under the caption ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions.
See Exhibit Index at page 38 of this report on Form 10-KSB.
|
|
|
Item 14 Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
Information required by Item 9(e) of Schedule 14A pursuant to this Item 14 is incorporated by
reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with
the Commission on March 30, 2006, under the caption PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS.
36
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CENTRAL FEDERAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark S. Allio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark S. Allio |
|
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 30, 2006 |
|
|
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on
behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark S. Allio
Mark S. Allio
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
March 30, 2006 |
(principal executive officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Therese Ann Liutkus
Therese Ann Liutkus, CPA
|
|
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
March 30, 2006 |
(principal accounting
and financial officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David C. Vernon
David C. Vernon
|
|
Vice-Chairman of the Board
|
|
March 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jeffrey W. Aldrich
Jeffrey W. Aldrich
|
|
Director
|
|
March 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Thomas P. Ash
Thomas P. Ash
|
|
Director
|
|
March 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William R. Downing
William R. Downing
|
|
Director
|
|
March 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gerry W. Grace
Gerry W. Grace
|
|
Director
|
|
March 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jerry F. Whitmer
Jerry F. Whitmer
|
|
Director
|
|
March 30, 2006 |
37
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
the registrants Registration Statement on Form SB-2 No. 333-64089 filed with the Commission
on September 23, 1998) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the registrant (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to the registrants Registration Statement on Form S-2 No. 333-129315 filed with
the Commission on October 28, 2005) |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to
the registrants Registration Statement on Form S-2 No. 333-129315 filed with the Commission
on October 28, 2005) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Form of Stock Certificate of Central Federal Corporation (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.0 to the registrants Registration Statement on Form SB-2 No. 333-64089 filed with
the Commission on September 23, 1998) |
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
Salary Continuation Agreement between CFBank and David C. Vernon (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrants Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004, filed with the Commission on March 30, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
Employment Agreement between CFBank and Richard J. ODonnell (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the registrants Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004, filed with the Commission on March 30, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.3*
|
|
Employment Agreement between the registrant and David C. Vernon (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrants Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2003, filed with the Commission on March 30, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.4*
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement between the registrant and David C. Vernon (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the registrants Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, filed with the Commission on March 30, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.5*
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement between CFBank and David C. Vernon (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the registrants Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004, filed with the Commission on March 30, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.6*
|
|
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement between the registrant and David C. Vernon
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the registrants Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Commission on March 30, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.7*
|
|
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement between CFBank and David C. Vernon (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the registrants Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004, filed with the Commission on March 30, 2005) |
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings |
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
Annual Report to Security Holders for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant |
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of the Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
* Management contract or compensation plan or arrangement identified pursuant to
Item 13 of Form 10-KSB |
38