Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2008
Commission file number 0-15886
The Navigators Group, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Delaware   13-3138397
     
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
     
One Penn Plaza, New York, New York   10119
     
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
(212) 244-2333
 
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
 
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer þ    Accelerated filer o    Non-accelerated filer   o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company o 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of common shares outstanding as of April 21, 2008 was 16,798,542.
 
 

 

 


 

THE NAVIGATORS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
         
    Page No.  
 
       
       
 
       
       
 
       
    3  
 
       
    4  
 
       
    5  
 
       
    6  
 
       
    7  
 
       
    8  
 
       
    18  
 
       
    61  
 
       
    61  
 
       
       
 
       
    61  
 
       
    61  
 
       
    62  
 
       
    62  
 
       
    62  
 
       
    62  
 
       
    62  
 
       
    63  
 
       
    64  
 
       
 Exhibit 10-1
 Exhibit 11-1
 Exhibit 31-1
 Exhibit 31-2
 Exhibit 32-1
 Exhibit 32-2

 

2


Table of Contents

Part 1. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
THE NAVIGATORS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
($ in thousands, except share data)
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2008     2007  
    (Unaudited)        
ASSETS
               
Investments and cash:
               
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, at fair value
(amortized cost: 2008, $1,554,999; 2007, $1,508,489)
  $ 1,570,971     $ 1,522,320  
Equity securities, available-for-sale, at fair value
(cost: 2008, $65,309; 2007, $65,492)
    59,688       67,240  
Short-term investments, at fair value
    171,447       170,685  
Cash
    12,810       7,056  
 
           
Total investments and cash
    1,814,916       1,767,301  
 
           
 
               
Premiums in course of collection
    198,494       163,081  
Commissions receivable
    272       2,381  
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
    188,223       188,961  
Reinsurance receivable on paid losses
    74,183       94,818  
Reinsurance receivable on unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
    776,767       801,461  
Net deferred income tax benefit
    31,260       29,249  
Deferred policy acquisition costs
    53,450       51,895  
Accrued investment income
    15,867       15,605  
Goodwill and other intangible assets
    8,087       8,084  
Other assets
    20,756       20,935  
 
           
 
               
Total assets
  $ 3,182,275     $ 3,143,771  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Liabilities:
               
Reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses
  $ 1,661,556     $ 1,648,764  
Unearned premium
    500,663       469,481  
Reinsurance balances payable
    139,331       161,829  
Senior notes
    123,702       123,673  
Federal income tax payable
    18,965       10,868  
Payable for securities purchased
    1,939        
Accounts payable and other liabilities
    59,242       67,050  
 
           
Total liabilities
    2,505,398       2,481,665  
 
           
 
               
Stockholders’ equity:
               
Preferred stock, $.10 par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares, none issued
           
Common stock, $.10 par value, shares authorized: 50,000,000 at 3/31/08 and
12/31/07; issued and outstanding: 16,798,542 (net of Treasury stock) at 3/31/08 and 16,873,094 at 12/31/07
    1,693       1,687  
Additional paid-in capital
    294,146       291,616  
Retained earnings
    378,334       355,084  
Treasury stock, at cost (136,026 shares at 3/31/08)
    (7,321 )      
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    10,025       13,719  
 
           
Total stockholders’ equity
    676,877       662,106  
 
           
 
               
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 3,182,275     $ 3,143,771  
 
           
See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

THE NAVIGATORS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
($ and shares in thousands, except net income per share)
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2008     2007  
    (Unaudited)  
 
               
Gross written premium
  $ 287,146     $ 300,861  
 
           
Revenues:
               
Net written premium
  $ 187,722     $ 173,019  
(Increase) in unearned premium
    (31,982 )     (33,973 )
 
           
Net earned premium
    155,740       139,046  
Commission income
    261       408  
Net investment income
    18,838       16,216  
Net realized capital gains (losses)
    (76 )     201  
Other income (expense)
    11       (71 )
 
           
Total revenues
    174,774       155,800  
 
           
 
               
Operating expenses:
               
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred
    88,420       81,192  
Commission expense
    20,948       17,099  
Other operating expenses
    29,756       26,289  
Interest expense
    2,217       2,215  
 
           
Total operating expenses
    141,341       126,795  
 
           
 
               
Income before income tax expense
    33,433       29,005  
 
           
 
               
Income tax expense (benefit):
               
Current
    10,306       9,276  
Deferred
    (123 )     57  
 
           
Total income tax expense
    10,183       9,333  
 
           
 
               
Net income
  $ 23,250     $ 19,672  
 
           
 
               
Net income per common share:
               
Basic
  $ 1.38     $ 1.17  
Diluted
  $ 1.36     $ 1.17  
 
               
Average common shares outstanding:
               
Basic
    16,862       16,756  
Diluted
    17,052       16,884  
See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

THE NAVIGATORS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
($ in thousands)
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2008     2007  
    (Unaudited)  
Preferred Stock
               
Balance at beginning and end of period
  $     $  
 
           
 
               
Common stock
               
Balance at beginning of year
  $ 1,687     $ 1,674  
Shares issued under stock plans
    6       4  
 
           
Balance at end of period
  $ 1,693     $ 1,678  
 
           
 
               
Additional paid-in capital
               
Balance at beginning of year
  $ 291,616     $ 286,732  
Shares issued under stock plans
    2,530       1,747  
 
           
Balance at end of period
  $ 294,146     $ 288,479  
 
           
 
               
Retained earnings
               
Balance at beginning of year
  $ 355,084     $ 259,464  
Net income
    23,250       19,672  
 
           
Balance at end of period
  $ 378,334     $ 279,136  
 
           
 
               
Treasury stock, at cost
               
Balance at beginning of year
  $     $  
Treasury stock acquired
    (7,321 )      
 
           
Balance at end of period
  $ (7,321 )   $  
 
           
 
               
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
               
Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities, net of tax
               
Balance at beginning of year
  $ 10,186     $ 849  
Change in period
    (3,412 )     1,496  
 
           
Balance at end of period
    6,774       2,345  
 
           
Cumulative translation adjustments, net of tax
               
Balance at beginning of year
    3,533       2,624  
Net adjustment for period
    (282 )     105  
 
           
Balance at end of period
    3,251       2,729  
 
           
Balance at end of period
  $ 10,025     $ 5,074  
 
           
 
               
Total stockholders’ equity at end of period
  $ 676,877     $ 574,367  
 
           
See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

THE NAVIGATORS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
($ in thousands)
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2008     2007  
    (Unaudited)  
 
               
Net income
  $ 23,250     $ 19,672  
 
           
Other comprehensive income:
               
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on securities, net of tax expense (benefit) of ($1,813) and $771 in 2008 and 2007, respectively(1)
    (3,412 )     1,496  
Change in foreign currency translation gains, net of tax expense (benefit) of ($151) and $56 in 2008 and 2007, respectively
    (282 )     105  
 
           
Other comprehensive income
    (3,694 )     1,601  
 
           
 
               
Comprehensive income
  $ 19,556     $ 21,273  
 
           
 
               
(1) Disclosure of reclassification amount, net of tax:
               
 
               
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period
  $ (3,461 )   $ 1,625  
Less: reclassification adjustment for net realized capital gains (losses) included in net income
    (49 )     129  
 
           
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on securities
  $ (3,412 )   $ 1,496  
 
           
See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.

 

6


Table of Contents

THE NAVIGATORS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
($ in thousands)
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2008     2007  
    (Unaudited)  
Operating activities:
               
Net income
  $ 23,250     $ 19,672  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
               
Depreciation & amortization
    1,222       703  
Net deferred income tax expense (benefit)
    (123 )     57  
Net realized capital (gains) losses
    76       (201 )
Changes in assets and liabilities:
               
Reinsurance receivable on paid and unpaid losses and LAE
    45,418       18,344  
Reserve for losses and LAE
    12,577       (3,699 )
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
    776       (19,719 )
Unearned premium
    31,035       53,426  
Premiums in course of collection
    (35,297 )     (61,862 )
Commissions receivable
    2,109       298  
Deferred policy acquisition costs
    (1,546 )     (11,884 )
Accrued investment income
    (262 )     (290 )
Reinsurance balances payable
    (22,525 )     8,347  
Federal income tax
    8,076       7,400  
Other
    (5,134 )     9,486  
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    59,652       20,078  
 
           
 
               
Investing activities:
               
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale
               
Redemptions and maturities
    35,146       50,738  
Sales
    20,644       55,680  
Purchases
    (103,436 )     (174,445 )
Equity securities, available-for-sale
               
Sales
    5,514       4,464  
Purchases
    (5,595 )     (11,877 )
Change in payable for securities
    1,974       8,863  
Net change in short-term investments
    (647 )     47,079  
Purchase of property and equipment
    (1,072 )     (1,898 )
 
           
Net cash (used in) investing activities
    (47,472 )     (21,396 )
 
           
 
               
Financing activities:
               
Purchase of treasury stock
    (7,321 )      
Proceeds of stock issued from employee stock purchase plan
    356       301  
Proceeds of stock issued from exercise of stock options
    540       241  
 
           
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    (6,425 )     542  
 
           
 
               
Effect of exchange rate changes on foreign currency cash
    (1 )      
 
           
Increase (decrease) in cash
    5,754       (776 )
Cash at beginning of year
    7,056       2,404  
 
           
Cash at end of period
  $ 12,810     $ 1,628  
 
           
 
               
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
               
Federal, state and local income tax paid
  $ 2,728     $ 1,712  
Interest paid
           
Issuance of stock to directors
    200       181  
See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.

 

7


Table of Contents

THE NAVIGATORS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Accounting Policies
The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements are unaudited but reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to provide a fair statement of the results of The Navigators Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries for the interim periods presented on the basis of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP” or “U.S. GAAP”). All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. The terms “we”, “us”, “our” and “the Company” as used herein are used to mean The Navigators Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires. The term “Parent” or “Parent Company” are used to mean The Navigators Group, Inc. without its subsidiaries. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes contained in the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain amounts for the prior year have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.
Note 2. Reinsurance Ceded
The Company’s ceded earned premiums were $100.0 million and $107.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company’s ceded incurred losses were $21.7 million and $63.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Note 3. Segment Information
The Company’s subsidiaries are primarily engaged in the underwriting and management of property and casualty insurance.
The Company classifies its business into two underwriting segments consisting of the Insurance Companies and the Lloyd’s Operations, which are separately managed, and a Corporate segment. Segment data for each of the two underwriting segments include allocations of revenues and expenses of the Navigators Agencies’ and the Parent Company’s expenses and related income tax amounts.
We evaluate the performance of each segment based on its underwriting and net income results. The Insurance Companies’ and the Lloyd’s Operations’ results are measured by taking into account net earned premium, net losses and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”), commission expense, other operating expenses, commission income and other income or expense. The Corporate segment consists of the Parent Company’s investment income, interest expense and the related tax effect. Each segment maintains its own investments, on which it earns income and realizes capital gains or losses. Our underwriting performance is evaluated separately from the performance of our investment portfolios.
The Insurance Companies consist of Navigators Insurance Company, including its U.K. Branch, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Navigators Specialty Insurance Company. They are primarily engaged in underwriting marine insurance and related lines of business, professional liability insurance, specialty lines of business including contractors general liability insurance, commercial and personal umbrella and primary and excess casualty businesses, and middle markets business consisting of general liability, commercial automobile liability and property insurance for a variety of commercial middle markets businesses.

 

8


Table of Contents

Navigators Specialty Insurance Company underwrites specialty and professional liability insurance on an excess and surplus lines basis fully reinsured by Navigators Insurance Company. The Lloyd’s Operations primarily underwrite marine and related lines of business along with professional liability insurance, European property business and construction coverages for onshore energy business at Lloyd’s of London (“Lloyd’s”) through Lloyd’s Syndicate 1221 (“Syndicate 1221”). Our Lloyd’s Operations include Navigators Underwriting Agency Ltd. (“NUAL”), a Lloyd’s underwriting agency which manages Syndicate 1221. We participate in the capacity of Syndicate 1221 through two wholly-owned Lloyd’s corporate members. The Navigators Agencies are underwriting management companies which produce, manage and underwrite insurance and reinsurance for the Company.
The Insurance Companies’ and the Lloyd’s Operations’ underwriting results are measured based on underwriting profit or loss and the related combined ratio, which are both non-GAAP measures of underwriting profitability. Underwriting profit or loss is calculated from net earned premium, less the sum of net losses and LAE, commission expense, other operating expenses and commission income and other income (expense). The combined ratio is derived by dividing the sum of net losses and LAE, commission expense, other operating expenses and commission income and other income (expense) by net earned premium. A combined ratio of less than 100% indicates an underwriting profit and over 100% indicates an underwriting loss.

 

9


Table of Contents

Financial data by segment for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended March 31, 2008  
    Insurance     Lloyd’s              
    Companies     Operations     Corporate     Total  
    ($ in thousands)  
 
                               
Gross written premium
  $ 191,596     $ 95,550             $ 287,146  
Net written premium
    124,310       63,412               187,722  
 
                               
Net earned premium
    112,246       43,494               155,740  
Net losses and LAE
    (67,356 )     (21,064 )             (88,420 )
Commission expense
    (12,948 )     (8,000 )             (20,948 )
Other operating expenses
    (22,148 )     (7,608 )             (29,756 )
Commission income and other income (expense)
    258       14               272  
 
                         
 
                               
Underwriting profit
    10,052       6,836               16,888  
 
                               
Net investment income
    15,465       2,982     $ 391       18,838  
Net realized capital gains (losses)
    (102 )     26             (76 )
Interest expense
                (2,217 )     (2,217 )
 
                       
Income (loss) before income taxes
    25,415       9,844       (1,826 )     33,433  
 
                               
Income tax expense (benefit)
    7,370       3,452       (639 )     10,183  
 
                       
Net income (loss)
  $ 18,045     $ 6,392     $ (1,187 )   $ 23,250  
 
                       
 
                               
Identifiable assets (1)
  $ 2,356,343     $ 756,100     $ 69,520     $ 3,182,275  
 
                       
 
                               
Loss and LAE ratio
    60.0 %     48.4 %             56.8 %
Commission expense ratio
    11.5 %     18.4 %             13.5 %
Other operating expense ratio (2)
    19.5 %     17.5 %             18.9 %
 
                       
Combined ratio
    91.0 %     84.3 %             89.2 %
 
                       
     
(1)  
Includes inter-segment transactions causing the row not to crossfoot.
 
(2)  
Includes other operating expenses and commission income and other income (expense).

 

10


Table of Contents

                         
    Three Months Ended March 31, 2008  
    Insurance     Lloyd’s        
    Companies     Operations     Total  
    ($ in thousands)  
 
                       
Gross written premium:
                       
Marine & Energy
  $ 82,535     $ 74,953     $ 157,488  
Specialty
    78,882             78,882  
Professional Liability
    19,287       10,670       29,957  
Middle Markets
    8,014             8,014  
Property/Other
    2,878       9,927       12,805  
 
                 
Total
  $ 191,596     $ 95,550     $ 287,146  
 
                 
 
                       
Net written premium:
                       
Marine & Energy
  $ 49,671     $ 52,502     $ 102,173  
Specialty
    53,944             53,944  
Professional Liability
    11,733       6,792       18,525  
Middle Markets
    6,526             6,526  
Property/Other
    2,436       4,118       6,554  
 
                 
Total
  $ 124,310     $ 63,412     $ 187,722  
 
                 
 
                       
Net earned premium:
                       
Marine & Energy
  $ 33,226     $ 33,992     $ 67,218  
Specialty
    56,669             56,669  
Professional Liability
    14,073       5,959       20,032  
Middle Markets
    5,697             5,697  
Property/Other
    2,581       3,543       6,124  
 
                 
Total
  $ 112,246     $ 43,494     $ 155,740  
 
                 

 

11


Table of Contents

                                 
    Three Months Ended March 31, 2007  
    Insurance     Lloyd’s                
    Companies     Operations     Corporate     Total  
    ($ in thousands)  
 
                               
Gross written premium
  $ 208,874     $ 91,987             $ 300,861  
Net written premium
    122,048       50,971               173,019  
 
                               
Net earned premium
    101,812       37,234               139,046  
Net losses and LAE
    (61,340 )     (19,852 )             (81,192 )
Commission expense
    (11,083 )     (6,016 )             (17,099 )
Other operating expenses
    (18,769 )     (7,520 )             (26,289 )
Commission income and other income (expense)
    489       (152 )             337  
 
                         
 
                               
Underwriting profit
    11,109       3,694               14,803  
 
                               
Net investment income
    13,654       2,151     $ 411       16,216  
Net realized capital gains (losses)
    243       (42 )           201  
Interest expense
                (2,215 )     (2,215 )
 
                       
Income (loss) before income taxes
    25,006       5,803       (1,804 )     29,005  
 
                               
Income tax expense (benefit)
    7,911       2,054       (632 )     9,333  
 
                       
Net income (loss)
  $ 17,095     $ 3,749     $ (1,172 )   $ 19,672  
 
                       
 
                               
Identifiable assets (1)
  $ 2,166,439     $ 822,689     $ 65,240     $ 3,065,861  
 
                       
 
                               
Loss and LAE ratio
    60.2 %     53.3 %             58.4 %
Commission expense ratio
    10.9 %     16.2 %             12.3 %
Other operating expense ratio (2)
    18.0 %     20.6 %             18.7 %
 
                         
Combined ratio
    89.1 %     90.1 %             89.4 %
 
                         
     
(1)  
Includes inter-segment transactions causing the row not to crossfoot.
 
(2)  
Includes other operating expenses and commission income and other income (expense).

 

12


Table of Contents

                         
    Three Months Ended March 31, 2007  
    Insurance     Lloyd’s        
    Companies     Operations     Total  
    ($ in thousands)  
 
                       
Gross written premium:
                       
Marine & Energy
  $ 86,856     $ 77,679     $ 164,535  
Specialty
    89,416             89,416  
Professional Liability
    20,482       5,478       25,960  
Middle Markets
    6,304             6,304  
Property/Other
    5,816       8,830       14,646  
 
                 
Total
  $ 208,874     $ 91,987     $ 300,861  
 
                 
 
                       
Net written premium:
                       
Marine & Energy
  $ 45,736     $ 45,488     $ 91,224  
Specialty
    54,585             54,585  
Professional Liability
    12,192       3,383       15,575  
Middle Markets
    3,969             3,969  
Property/Other
    5,566       2,100       7,666  
 
                 
Total
  $ 122,048     $ 50,971     $ 173,019  
 
                 
 
                       
Net earned premium:
                       
Marine & Energy
  $ 33,490     $ 32,341     $ 65,831  
Specialty
    49,042             49,042  
Professional Liability
    13,037       2,957       15,994  
Middle Markets
    4,570             4,570  
Property/Other
    1,673       1,936       3,609  
 
                 
Total
  $ 101,812     $ 37,234     $ 139,046  
 
                 
The Insurance Companies’ net earned premium includes $14.7 million and $15.4 million of net earned premium from the U.K. Branch for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Note 4. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income encompasses net income, net unrealized capital gains and losses on available for sale securities, and foreign currency translation adjustments, all of which are net of tax. Please refer to the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, included herein, for the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and of comprehensive income (loss), respectively.
Note 5. Stock-Based Compensation
Stock based compensation is expensed as stock awards granted under the Company’s stock plans vest with the expense being included in other operating expenses for the periods indicated. The amounts charged to expense for stock-based compensation were $1.9 million and $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The Company expensed $41,000 and $35,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, related to its Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

 

13


Table of Contents

In addition, $50,000 was expensed in each of the three month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 for stock issued annually to non-employee directors as part of their directors’ compensation for serving on the Company’s Board of Directors.
Note 6. Application of New Accounting Standards
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 141(R), Business Combinations, which requires most identifiable assets, liabilities, non-controlling interests, and goodwill acquired in a business combination to be recorded at full fair value. Under SFAS 141(R), all business combinations will be accounted for by applying the acquisition method (referred to as the purchase method in SFAS 141, Business Combinations). SFAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and is to be applied to business combinations occurring after the effective date. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 141(R) to have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, which requires noncontrolling interests (previously referred to as minority interests) to be treated as a separate component of equity, not as a liability or other item outside of permanent equity. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 160 to have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
Note 7. Syndicate 1221
We record our pro rata share of Syndicate 1221’s assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, after making adjustments to convert Lloyd’s accounting to U.S. GAAP. The most significant U.S. GAAP adjustments relate to income recognition. Our participation in Lloyd’s Syndicate 1221 is represented by and recorded as our proportionate share of the underlying assets and liabilities and results of operations of the syndicate, since (a) we hold an undivided interest in each asset, (b) we are proportionately liable for each liability and (c) Syndicate 1221 is not a separate legal entity.
Lloyd’s presents its results on an underwriting year basis, generally closing each underwriting year after three years. We make estimates for each underwriting year and timely accrue the expected results. Our Lloyd’s Operations included in the consolidated financial statements represent our participation in Syndicate 1221.
Syndicate 1221’s stamp capacity is £123.0 million ($243.4 million) in 2008 compared to £140.0 million ($280.2 million) in 2007. Stamp capacity is a measure of the amount of premium a Lloyd’s syndicate is authorized to write based on a business plan approved by the Council of Lloyd’s. Syndicate 1221’s capacity is expressed net of commission (as is standard at Lloyd’s). The Syndicate 1221 premium recorded in the Company’s financial statements is gross of commission. Navigators provides 100% of Syndicate 1221’s capacity for the 2008 and 2007 underwriting years through Navigators Corporate Underwriters Ltd. in 2008 and through Millennium Underwriting Ltd. and Navigators Corporate Underwriters Ltd. in 2007. The Lloyd’s Operations included in the consolidated financial statements represent the Company’s participation in Syndicate 1221.
The Company provides letters of credit to Lloyd’s to support its Syndicate 1221 capacity. If the Company increases its participation or if Lloyd’s changes the capital requirements, the Company may be required to supply additional letters of credit or other collateral acceptable to Lloyd’s, or reduce the capacity of Syndicate 1221. The letters of credit are provided through a credit facility with a consortium of banks which expires March 31, 2009. If the banks decide not to renew the credit facility, the Company will need to find other sources to provide the letters of credit or other collateral in order to continue to participate in Syndicate 1221. The bank facility is collateralized by all of the common stock of Navigators Insurance Company.

 

14


Table of Contents

Note 8. Income Taxes
We are subject to the tax regulations of the United States and foreign countries in which we operate. The Company files a consolidated federal tax return, which includes all domestic subsidiaries and the U.K. Branch. The income from the foreign operations is designated as either U.S. connected income or non-U.S. connected income. Lloyd’s is required to pay U.S. income tax on U.S. connected income written by Lloyd’s syndicates. Lloyd’s and the IRS have entered into an agreement whereby the amount of tax due on U.S. connected income is calculated by Lloyd’s and remitted directly to the IRS. These amounts are then charged to the corporate members in proportion to their participation in the relevant syndicates. The Company’s corporate members are subject to this agreement and will receive United Kingdom (“U.K.”) tax credits for any U.S. income tax incurred up to the U.K. income tax charged on the U.S. connected income. The non-U.S. connected insurance income would generally constitute taxable income under the Subpart F income section of the Internal Revenue Code since less than 50% of Syndicate 1221’s premium is derived within the U.K. and would therefore be subject to U.S. taxation when the Lloyd’s year of account closes. Taxes are accrued at a 35% rate on our foreign source insurance income and foreign tax credits, where available, are utilized to offset U.S. tax as permitted. The Company’s effective tax rate for Syndicate 1221 taxable income could substantially exceed 35% to the extent the Company is unable to offset U.S. taxes paid under Subpart F tax regulations with U.K. tax credits on future underwriting year distributions. U.S. taxes are not accrued on the earnings of the Company’s foreign agencies as these earnings are not subject to the Subpart F tax regulations. These earnings are subject to taxes under U.K. tax regulations at a 30% rate. We have not provided for U.S. deferred income taxes on the undistributed earnings of our non-U.S. subsidiaries since these earnings are intended to be permanently reinvested in our non-U.S. subsidiaries. A finance bill was enacted in the U.K. on July 19, 2007 that reduces the U.K. corporate tax rate from 30% to 28% effective April 1, 2008. The effect of such tax rate change was not material to the Company’s financial statements.
 A tax benefit taken in the tax return but not in the financial statements is known as an ‘unrecognized tax benefit’. The Company had no unrecognized tax benefits at either March 31, 2008 or March 31, 2007 and does not anticipate any significant unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months. The Company is currently not under examination by any major U.S. or foreign tax authority and is generally subject to U.S. Federal, state, local, or foreign tax examinations by tax authorities for years 2004 and subsequent. The Company’s policy is to record interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits to income tax expense. The Company did not incur any interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits for the three month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
The Company had state and local deferred tax assets amounting to potential future tax benefits of $7.6 million and $6.3 million at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Included in the deferred tax assets are net operating loss carryforwards of $1.6 million and $2.5 million at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. A valuation allowance was established for the full amount of these potential future tax benefits due to the uncertainty associated with their realization. The Company’s state and local tax carryforwards at March 31, 2008 expire in 2025.
Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies
(a) The Company is not a party to, or the subject of, any material pending legal proceedings that depart from the routine litigation incidental to the kinds of business it conducts.
(b) Whenever a member of Lloyd’s is unable to pay its debts to policyholders, such debts may be payable by the Lloyd’s Central Fund. If Lloyd’s determines that the Central Fund needs to be increased, it has the power to assess premium levies on current Lloyd’s members up to 3% of a member’s underwriting capacity in any one year. The Company does not believe that any assessment is likely in the foreseeable future and has not provided any allowance for such an assessment. However, based on the Company’s 2008 capacity at Lloyd’s of £123 million, the March 31, 2008 exchange rate of £1 equals $1.99 and assuming the maximum 3% assessment, the Company would be assessed approximately $7.3 million.

 

15


Table of Contents

Note 10. Senior Notes due May 1, 2016
On April 17, 2006, the Company completed a public debt offering of $125 million principal amount of 7% senior unsecured notes due May 1, 2016 (the “Senior Notes”) and received net proceeds of $123.5 million. The interest payment dates on the Senior Notes are each May 1 and November 1. The effective interest rate related to the Senior Notes, based on the proceeds net of discount and all issuance costs, approximates 7.17%. The interest expense on the Senior Notes was $2.2 million for the first three months of both 2008 and 2007. The fair value of the Senior Notes, based on quoted market prices, was $120.7 million and $126.7 million at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
The Senior Notes, the Company’s only senior unsecured obligation, will rank equally with future senior unsecured indebtedness. The Company may redeem the Senior Notes at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part, at a “make-whole” redemption price. The terms of the Senior Notes contain various restrictive business and financial covenants typical for debt obligations of this type, including limitations on mergers, liens and dispositions of the common stock of certain subsidiaries. As of March 31, 2008, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants.
Note 11. Fair Value Measurements SFAS 157 and SFAS 159
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements, which was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2008. SFAS 157 defines fair value, expands disclosure requirements around fair value and specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the input to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s market assumptions. These two types of inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:
   
Level 1 – Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
 
   
Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets.
 
   
Level 3 – Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.
This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value.

 

16


Table of Contents

The following table presents, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, the Company’s fixed maturities, equity securities and short-term investments that are measured at fair value at March 31, 2008:
                                 
    Quoted Prices     Significant              
    In Active     Other     Significant        
    Markets for     Observable     Unobservable        
    Identical Assets     Inputs     Inputs        
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  
    ($ in thousands)  
 
                               
Fixed maturities
  $ 188,291     $ 1,380,607     $ 2,073     $ 1,570,971  
Equities securities
    54,030       5,658             59,688  
Short-term investments
    28,664       142,783             171,447  
 
                       
Total
  $ 270,985     $ 1,529,048     $ 2,073     $ 1,802,106  
 
                       
The securities classified as Level 3 in the above table consist of three structured securities rated AAA/Aaa by Standard and Poor’s (“S&P”) and Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”), respectively, with unobservable inputs included in the Company’s fixed maturities portfolio for which price quotes from brokers were used to indicate fair value. The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for all investments measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs during the quarter ended March 31, 2008:
         
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31, 2008  
    ($ in thousands)  
 
Level 3 investments as of January 1, 2008
  $ 2,603  
Unrealized net gains included in other comprehensive income (loss)
    17  
Purchases, sales, paydowns and amortization
    (153 )
Transfer to Level 2
    (394 )
 
     
Level 3 investments as of March 31, 2008
  $ 2,073  
 
     
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. SFAS 159 provides on an instrument-by-instrument basis for most financial assets and liabilities to be reported at with changes in fair value reported in earnings. The Company adopted SFAS 159 on January 1, 2008 and did not elect to apply fair value accounting to any financial instruments with future changes in value reported in earnings.
Note 12. Share Repurchases
In October, 2007 the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a stock repurchase program for up to $30 million of the Company’s common stock. Purchases may be made from time to time at prevailing prices in open market or privately negotiated transactions through December 31, 2008. The timing and amount of purchases under the program will depend on a variety of factors, including the trading price of the stock, market conditions and corporate and regulatory considerations. There were no purchases made in the 2007 fourth quarter. During the first quarter of 2008, the Company purchased 136,026 shares of its common stock in the open market at an average cost of $53.82 per share which approximates $7.3 million in total. There is approximately $22.7 million remaining to be used in the stock repurchase program.

 

17


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Note on Forward-Looking Statements
Some of the statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are ‘‘forward-looking statements’’ as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in or incorporated by reference in this Quarterly Report are forward-looking statements. Whenever used in this report, the words “estimate”, “expect”, “believe”, “may”, “will”, “intend”, “continue” or similar expressions or their negative are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are derived from information that we currently have and assumptions that we make. We cannot assure that anticipated results will be achieved, since actual results may differ materially because of both known and unknown risks and uncertainties which we face. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the factors discussed in the ‘‘Risk Factors’’ section of our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K as well as:
   
the effects of domestic and foreign economic conditions, and conditions which affect the market for property and casualty insurance;
 
   
changes in the laws, rules and regulations which apply to our insurance companies;
 
   
the effects of emerging claim and coverage issues on our business, including adverse judicial or regulatory decisions and rulings;
 
   
the effects of competition from banks and other insurers and the trend toward self-insurance;
 
   
risks that we face in entering new markets and diversifying the products and services we offer;
 
   
unexpected turnover of our professional staff;
 
   
changing legal and social trends and inherent uncertainties in the loss estimation process that can adversely impact the adequacy of loss reserves and the allowance for reinsurance recoverables, including our estimates relating to ultimate asbestos liabilities and related reinsurance recoverables;
 
   
risks inherent in the collection of reinsurance recoverable amounts from our reinsurers over many years into the future based on the reinsurers’ financial ability and intent to meet such obligations to the Company;
 
   
risks associated with our continuing ability to obtain reinsurance covering our exposures at appropriate prices and/or in sufficient amounts and the related recoverability of our reinsured losses;
 
   
weather-related events and other catastrophes (including acts of terrorism) impacting our insureds and/or reinsurers, including, without limitation, the impact of Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma and the possibility that our estimates of losses from Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma will prove to be materially inaccurate;
 
   
our ability to attain adequate prices, obtain new business and retain existing business consistent with our expectations and to successfully implement our business strategy during “soft” as well as “hard” markets;
 
   
our ability to maintain or improve our ratings to avoid the possibility of downgrades in our claims-paying and financial strength ratings significantly adversely affecting us, including reducing the number of insurance policies we write generally, or causing clients who require an insurer with a certain rating level to use higher-rated insurers;

 

18


Table of Contents

   
the inability of our internal control framework to provide absolute assurance that all incidents of fraud or unintended material errors will be detected and prevented;
 
   
changes in accounting principles or policies or in our application of such accounting principles or policies;
 
   
the risk that our investment portfolio suffers reduced returns or investment losses which could reduce our profitability; and
 
   
other risks that we identify in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including without limitation the risks described under the caption “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, any forward-looking events discussed in this Form 10-Q may not occur. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their respective dates.
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations contained herein should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes which appear elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. It contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see “Note on Forward-Looking Statements” for more information. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed below and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.
Overview
We are an international insurance holding company focusing on specialty products for niches within the overall property/casualty insurance market. The Company’s underwriting segments consist of insurance company operations and operations at Lloyd’s of London. Our largest product line and most long-standing area of specialization is ocean marine insurance. We have also developed specialty niches in professional liability insurance and in specialty liability insurance primarily consisting of contractors liability and primary and excess liability coverages. We conduct operations through our Insurance Companies and our Lloyd’s Operations. The Insurance Companies consist of Navigators Insurance Company, which includes our U.K. Branch, and Navigators Specialty Insurance Company, which underwrites specialty and professional liability insurance on an excess and surplus lines basis fully reinsured by Navigators Insurance Company. Our Lloyd’s Operations include NUAL, a wholly-owned Lloyd’s underwriting agency which manages Syndicate 1221. Our Lloyd’s Operations primarily underwrite marine and related lines of business along with professional liability insurance, European property business and construction coverages for onshore energy business at Lloyd’s through Syndicate 1221. We participate in the capacity of Syndicate 1221 through our wholly-owned Lloyd’s corporate member (utilized two wholly-owned Lloyd’s corporate members prior to the 2008 underwriting year).
While management takes into consideration a wide range of factors in planning the Company’s business strategy and evaluating results of operations, there are certain factors that management believes are fundamental to understanding how the Company is managed. First, underwriting profit is consistently emphasized as a primary goal, above premium growth. Management’s assessment of our trends and potential growth in underwriting profit is the dominant factor in its decisions with respect to whether or not to expand a business line, enter into a new niche, product or territory or, conversely, to contract capacity in any business line. In addition, management focuses on managing the costs of our operations. Management believes that careful monitoring of the costs of existing operations and assessment of costs of potential growth opportunities are important to our profitability. Access to capital also has a significant impact on management’s outlook for our operations. The Insurance Companies’ operations and ability to grow their business and take advantage of market opportunities are particularly constrained by regulatory capital requirements and rating agency assessments of capital adequacy.

 

19


Table of Contents

The discussions that follow include tables, which contain both our consolidated and segment operating results for the three month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007. In presenting our financial results we have discussed our performance with reference to underwriting profit or loss and the related combined ratio, both of which are non-GAAP measures of underwriting profitability. We consider such measures, which may be defined differently by other companies, to be important in the understanding of our overall results of operations. Underwriting profit or loss is calculated from net earned premium, less the sum of net losses and LAE, commission expense, other operating expenses and commission income and other income (expense). The combined ratio is derived by dividing the sum of net losses and LAE, commission expense, other operating expenses and commission income and other income (expense) by net earned premiums. A combined ratio of less than 100% indicates an underwriting profit and over 100% indicates an underwriting loss.
Although not a financial measure, management’s decisions are also greatly influenced by access to specialized underwriting and claims expertise in our lines of business. We have chosen to operate in specialty niches with certain common characteristics which we believe provide us with the opportunity to use our technical underwriting expertise in order to realize underwriting profit. As a result, we have focused on underserved markets for businesses characterized by higher severity and lower frequency of loss where we believe our intellectual capital and financial strength bring meaningful value. In contrast, we have avoided niches that we believe have a high frequency of loss activity and/or are subject to a high level of regulatory requirements, such as workers compensation and personal automobile insurance, because we do not believe our technical expertise is of as much value in these types of businesses. Examples of niches that have the characteristics we look for include bluewater hull which provides coverage for physical damage to, for example, highly valued cruise ships, and directors and officers liability insurance (“D&O”) which covers litigation exposure of a corporation’s directors and officers. These types of exposures require substantial technical expertise. We attempt to mitigate the financial impact of severe claims on our results by conservative and detailed underwriting, prudent use of reinsurance and a balanced portfolio of risks.
Our revenue is primarily comprised of premiums and investment income. The Insurance Companies derive their premiums primarily from business written by the Navigators Agencies, which are wholly-owned insurance underwriting agencies of the Company. The Lloyd’s Operations derive their premiums from business written by NUAL. Beginning in 2006, The Navigators Agencies produce and manage business almost exclusively for the Insurance Companies and are reimbursed for actual costs. NUAL is reimbursed for its actual costs and, where applicable, profit commissions on the business produced for Syndicate 1221.
From 2003 through 2006, we experienced generally beneficial market changes in our lines of business. As a result of several large industry losses in the second quarter of 2001, the marine insurance market began to experience diminished capacity and rate increases, initially in the offshore energy line of business. The marine rate increases began to level off in 2004 and into 2005. As a result of the substantial insurance industry losses resulting from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, the marine insurance market experienced diminished capacity and rate increases through the end of 2006, particularly for the offshore energy risks located in the Gulf of Mexico. Since the end of 2006, competitive market conditions have returned as available capacity has increased. The average renewal premium rates for our Insurance Companies’ marine business decreased approximately 0.7% for the 2008 first quarter, including offshore energy average renewal premium rates which decreased approximately 5.6%. The average renewal premium rates for our Lloyd’s Operations marine business decreased approximately 4.0% for the 2008 first quarter including offshore energy average renewal premium rates which decreased approximately 9.5%. We expect continuing overall declines in 2008 pricing for marine lines of business, including offshore energy, as additional capacity continues to re-enter the marine market.

 

20


Table of Contents

Specialty liability losses in 2001 to 2003, particularly for the contractors liability business, also resulted in diminished capacity in the market in which we compete, as many former competitors who lacked the expertise to selectively underwrite this business have been forced to withdraw from the market resulting in average renewal premium rate increases of approximately 13% in 2004 and 49% in 2003. This was followed by a slight decline in rates of approximately 1% in 2005. The 2006 year average renewal premium rates for the contractors liability business declined approximately 6%, primarily due to additional competition in the marketplace. This decline continued into 2007 with average renewal premium rates declining approximately 10.7%. The average renewal premium rates for the contractors liability business declined approximately 9.3% in the 2008 first quarter. We expect competitive conditions to continue during 2008 resulting in continuing declines in pricing for contractors liability and excess liability business.
In the professional liability market, the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, together with financial and accounting scandals at publicly traded corporations and the increased frequency of securities-related class action litigation, has led to heightened interest in professional liability insurance generally. Average professional liability average renewal premium rates decreased approximately 6.6% in 2007 compared to relatively level average renewal premium rates in 2006 and 2005 after decreasing approximately 3% in 2004 which followed substantial average renewal premium rate increases in 2003 and 2002, particularly for D&O insurance. The 2007 D&O insurance average renewal premium rates decreased approximately 7.9% following decreases of approximately 1.7% in 2006, 2.3% 2005 and 9.5% in 2004. The average renewal premium rates for the professional liability business declined approximately 5.6% in the 2008 first quarter, including D&O insurance average renewal premium rates which declined approximately 4.4%. We anticipate continuing declines in 2008 pricing given the overall favorable industry underwriting results since 2002 for the professional liability lines of business.
Our business is cyclical and influenced by many factors. These factors include price competition, economic conditions, interest rates, weather-related events and other catastrophes including natural and man-made disasters (for example hurricanes and terrorism), state regulations, court decisions and changes in the law. The incidence and severity of catastrophes are inherently unpredictable. Although we will attempt to manage our exposure to such events, the frequency and severity of catastrophic events could exceed our estimates, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. Additionally, because our insurance products must be priced, and premiums charged, before costs have fully developed, our liabilities are required to be estimated and recorded in recognition of future loss and settlement obligations. Due to the inherent uncertainty in estimating these liabilities, we cannot assure you that our actual liabilities will not exceed our recorded amounts.
Catastrophe Risk Management
Our Insurance Companies and Lloyd’s Operations have exposure to losses caused by hurricanes and other natural and man-made catastrophic events. The frequency and severity of catastrophes are unpredictable.
The extent of losses from a catastrophe is a function of both the total amount of insured exposure in an area affected by the event and the severity of the event. We continually assess our concentration of underwriting exposures in catastrophe exposed areas globally and attempt to manage this exposure through individual risk selection and through the purchase of reinsurance. We also use modeling and concentration management tools that allow us to better monitor and control our accumulations of potential losses from catastrophe exposures. Despite these efforts, there remains uncertainty about the characteristics, timing and extent of insured losses given the nature of catastrophes. The occurrence of one or more severe catastrophic events could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
The Company has significant catastrophe exposures throughout the world. The largest catastrophe exposure results from hurricane damage to offshore energy risks in the Gulf of Mexico. Based on an assessment made through the end of the 2008 first quarter and taking into account the 2008 reinsurance structure, the Company believes that its estimated probable maximum pre-tax gross and net loss exposure in a so-called or theoretical one in two hundred and fifty year hurricane event in the Gulf of Mexico would approximate $221 million and $32 million, respectively, including the cost of reinsurance reinstatement premiums. There are a number of significant assumptions and related variables related to such an estimate including the size, force and path of the hurricane, the various types of the insured risks exposed to the event at the time the event occurs and the estimated costs or damages incurred for each insured risk. There can be no assurances that the gross and net loss amounts that the Company could incur in such an event or in any hurricanes that may occur in the Gulf of Mexico would not be materially higher than the estimates discussed above given the significant uncertainties with respect to such an estimate.

 

21


Table of Contents

The occurrence of large loss events could reduce the reinsurance coverage that is available to us and could weaken the financial condition of our reinsurers, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Although the reinsurance agreements make the reinsurers liable to us to the extent the risk is transferred or ceded to the reinsurer, ceded reinsurance arrangements do not eliminate our obligation to pay claims to our policyholders. Accordingly, we bear credit risk with respect to our reinsurers. Specifically, our reinsurers may not pay claims made by us on a timely basis, or they may not pay some or all of these claims. Either of these events would increase our costs and could have a material adverse effect on our business. We are required to pay the losses even if a reinsurer fails to meet its obligations under the reinsurance agreement.
Critical Accounting Policies
It is important to understand our accounting policies in order to understand our financial statements. Management considers certain of these policies to be critical to the presentation of the financial results, since they require management to make significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and related disclosures at the financial reporting date and throughout the reporting period. Certain of the estimates result from judgments that can be subjective and complex and consequently actual results may differ from these estimates, which would be reflected in future periods.
Our most critical accounting policies involve the reporting of the reserves for losses and LAE (including losses that have occurred but were not reported to us by the financial reporting date), reinsurance recoverables, written and unearned premium, the recoverability of deferred tax assets, the impairment of invested assets, accounting for Lloyd’s results and the translation of foreign currencies.
Reserves for Losses and LAE. Reserves for losses and LAE represent an estimate of the expected cost of the ultimate settlement and administration of losses, based on facts and circumstances then known. Actuarial methodologies are employed to assist in establishing such estimates and include judgments relative to estimates of future claims severity and frequency, length of time to develop to ultimate, judicial theories of liability and other third party factors which are often beyond our control. Due to the inherent uncertainty associated with the reserving process, the ultimate liability may be different from the original estimate. Such estimates are regularly reviewed and updated and any resulting adjustments are included in the current year’s results.
Reinsurance Recoverables. The most significant reinsurance recoverables are established for the portion of the loss reserves that are ceded to reinsurers. Reinsurance recoverables are determined based upon the terms and conditions of reinsurance contracts which could be subject to interpretations that differ from our own based on judicial theories of liability. In addition, we bear credit risk with respect to our reinsurers which can be significant considering that certain of the reserves remain outstanding for an extended period of time. We are required to pay losses even if a reinsurer fails to meet its obligations under the applicable reinsurance agreement.
Written and Unearned Premium. Written premium is recorded based on the insurance policies that have been reported to us and the policies that have been written by agents and brokers but not yet reported to us. We must estimate the amount of written premium not yet reported based on judgments relative to current and historical trends of the business being written. Such estimates are regularly reviewed and updated and any resulting adjustments are included in the current year’s results. An unearned premium reserve is established to reflect the unexpired portion of each policy at the financial reporting date.

 

22


Table of Contents

Substantially all of our business is placed through agents and brokers. Since the vast majority of the Company’s gross written premium is primary or direct as opposed to assumed, the delays in reporting assumed premium generally do not have a significant effect on the Company’s financial statements, since we record estimates for both unreported direct and assumed premium. We also record the ceded portion of the estimated gross written premium and related acquisition costs. The earned gross, ceded and net premiums are calculated based on our earning methodology which is generally pro-rata over the policy period. Losses are also recorded in relation to the earned premium. The estimate for losses incurred on the estimated premium is based on an actuarial calculation consistent with the methodology used to determine incurred but not reported loss reserves for reported premiums.
The portion of the Company’s premium that is estimated is mostly for the marine business written by our U.K. Branch and Lloyd’s Operations. We generally do not experience any significant backlog in processing premiums. Such premium estimates are generally based on submission data received from agents and brokers and recorded when the insurance policy or reinsurance contract is written or bound. The estimates are regularly reviewed and updated taking into account the premium received to date versus the estimate and the age of the estimate. To the extent that the actual premium varies from the estimates, the difference, along with the related loss reserves and underwriting expenses, is recorded in current operations.
Deferred Tax Assets. We apply the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes whereby deferred assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized.
Impairment of Invested Assets. Impairment of invested assets results in a charge to operations when a market decline below cost is other-than-temporary. Management regularly reviews our fixed maturity and equity securities portfolios to evaluate the necessity of recording impairment losses for other-than-temporary declines in the fair value of investments. In general, we focus our attention on those securities whose market value was less than 80% of their cost or amortized cost, as appropriate, for six or more consecutive months. Factors considered in evaluating potential impairment include, but are not limited to, the current fair value as compared to cost or amortized cost of the security, as appropriate, the length of time the investment has been below cost or amortized cost and by how much, our intent and ability to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in value, specific credit issues related to the issuer and current economic conditions. Other-than-temporary impairment losses result in a permanent reduction of the cost basis of the underlying investment. Significant changes in the factors we consider when evaluating investments for impairment losses could result in a significant change in impairment losses reported in the consolidated financial statements.
As mentioned above, the Company considers its intent and ability to hold a security until the value recovers as part of the process of evaluating whether a security’s unrealized loss represents an other-than- temporary decline. The Company’s ability to hold such securities is supported by sufficient cash flow from its operations and from maturities within its investment portfolio in order to meet its claims payment and other disbursement obligations arising from its underwriting operations without selling such investments. With respect to securities where the decline in value is determined to be temporary and the security’s value is not written down, a subsequent decision may be made to sell that security and realize a loss. Subsequent decisions on security sales are made within the context of overall risk monitoring, changing information, market conditions and assessing value relative to other comparable securities. Management of the Company’s investment portfolio is outsourced to third party investment managers. While these investment managers may, at a given point in time, believe that the preferred course of action is to hold securities with unrealized losses that are considered temporary until such losses are recovered, the dynamic nature of the portfolio management may result in a subsequent decision to sell the security and realize the loss, based upon a change in market and other factors described above. The Company believes that subsequent decisions to sell such securities are consistent with the classification of the Company’s portfolio as available for sale.
Investment managers are required to notify management of rating agency downgrades of securities in their portfolios as well as any potential investment valuation issues at the end of each quarter. Investment managers are also required to notify management to the extent the investment manager is contemplating a transaction or transactions that may result in a realized loss above a certain threshold. Additionally, investment managers are required to notify management if they are contemplating a transaction or transactions that may result in any realized loss up until a certain period beyond the close of a quarterly accounting period.

 

23


Table of Contents

Accounting for Lloyd’s Results. We record our pro rata share of Syndicate 1221’s assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, after making adjustments to convert Lloyd’s accounting to U.S. GAAP. The most significant GAAP adjustments relate to income recognition. Lloyd’s syndicates determine underwriting results by year of account at the end of three years. We record adjustments to recognize underwriting results as incurred, including the expected ultimate cost of losses incurred. These adjustments to losses are based on actuarial analysis of syndicate accounts, including forecasts of expected ultimate losses provided by the syndicate. At the end of the Lloyd’s three-year period for determining underwriting results for an account year, the syndicate will close the account year by reinsuring outstanding claims on that account year with the participants for the next underwriting year. The amount to close an underwriting year into the next year is referred to as the reinsurance to close (“RITC”). The RITC transaction, recorded in the fourth quarter, does not result in any gain or loss.
Translation of Foreign Currencies. Financial statements of subsidiaries expressed in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with SFAS 52, Foreign Currency Translation, issued by the FASB. Under SFAS 52, functional currency assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars using period end rates of exchange and the related translation adjustments are recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Statement of income amounts expressed in functional currencies are translated using average exchange rates.
Realized gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are recorded in other income (expense) in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
Results of Operations
The following is a discussion and analysis of our consolidated and segment results of operations for the three month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007. Earnings per share data is presented on a per diluted share basis.
Effective in 2008, the Company has reclassified certain of its business for this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The inland marine business, formerly included in other business, is now included in marine business. Middle markets business, formerly included in the specialty business, is now broken out separately. Underwriting data for prior periods has been reclassified to reflect these changes.
Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $23.3 million or $1.36 per share compared to $19.7 million or $1.17 per share for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Included in these results were net realized capital gains (losses) of nil per share and $0.01 per share for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The combined ratios, which consist of the sum of the loss and LAE ratio and the expense ratio for each period, for the 2008 and 2007 first quarters were 89.2% and 89.4%, respectively. The combined ratio for the 2008 first quarter was reduced by 8.8 loss ratio points for net loss reserve redundancies relating to prior periods of $13.7 million or $0.52 per share. The combined ratio for the 2007 first quarter was reduced by 4.9 loss ratio points for net loss reserve redundancies relating to prior periods of $6.8 million or $0.26 per share. The net paid loss and LAE ratio for the 2008 first quarter was 32.7% compared to 31.3% for the 2007 first quarter.
Cash flow from operations was $59.7 million for the 2008 first quarter compared to $20.1 million for the comparable period in 2007. The positive cash flow contributed to the growth in invested assets and net investment income.

 

24


Table of Contents

Consolidated stockholders’ equity increased 2.2% to $676.9 million or $40.29 per share at March 31, 2008 compared to $662.1 million or $39.24 per share at December 31, 2007. The increase was primarily due to net income of $23.3 million for the first three months of 2008.
Revenues. Gross written premium decreased 4.6% to $287.1 million in the first quarter of 2008 from $300.9 million in the first quarter of 2007. The decrease in the 2008 gross written premium generally reflects a softening market.
The average premium rate increases or decreases as noted elsewhere in this document for the marine, specialty and professional liability businesses are calculated primarily by comparing premium amounts on policies that have renewed. The premiums are judgmentally adjusted for exposure factors when deemed significant and sometimes represent an aggregation of several lines of business. The rate change calculations provide an indicated pricing trend and are not meant to be a precise analysis of the numerous factors that affect premium rates or the adequacy of such rates to cover all underwriting costs and generate an underwriting profit. The calculation can also be affected quarter by quarter depending on the particular policies and the number of policies that renew during that period. Due to market conditions, these rate changes may or may not apply to new business which generally would be more competitively priced compared to renewal business.

 

25


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth our gross and net written premium and net earned premium by segment and line of business for the periods indicated:
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended March 31,  
    2008     2007  
    Gross             Net     Net     Gross             Net     Net  
    Written             Written     Earned     Written             Written     Earned  
    Premium     %     Premium     Premium     Premium     %     Premium     Premium  
    ($ in thousands)  
Insurance Companies:
                                                               
Marine
  $ 82,535       28.7 %   $ 49,671     $ 33,226     $ 86,856       28.9 %   $ 45,736     $ 33,490  
Specialty
    78,882       27.5 %     53,944       56,669       89,416       29.7 %     54,585       49,042  
Professional Liability
    19,287       6.7 %     11,733       14,073       20,482       6.8 %     12,192       13,037  
Middle Markets
    8,014       2.8 %     6,526       5,697       6,304       2.1 %     3,969       4,570  
Property/Other
    2,878       1.0 %     2,436       2,581       5,816       1.9 %     5,566       1,673  
 
                                               
Insurance Companies Total
    191,596       66.7 %     124,310       112,246       208,874       69.4 %     122,048       101,812  
 
                                               
Lloyd’s Operations:
                                                               
Marine
    74,953       26.1 %     52,502       33,992       77,679       25.8 %     45,488       32,341  
Professional Liability
    10,670       3.7 %     6,792       5,959       5,478       1.8 %     3,383       2,957  
Other
    9,927       3.5 %     4,118       3,543       8,830       3.0 %     2,100       1,936  
 
                                               
Lloyd’s Operations Total
    95,550       33.3 %     63,412       43,494       91,987       30.6 %     50,971       37,234  
 
                                               
Intercompany elimination
                                               
 
                                               
Total
  $ 287,146       100.0 %   $ 187,722     $ 155,740     $ 300,861       100.0 %   $ 173,019     $ 139,046  
 
                                               

 

26


Table of Contents

Gross Written Premium
Insurance Companies’ Gross Written Premium
Marine Premium. The gross written premium for the first three months of 2008 and 2007 consisted of the following:
                 
    2008     2007  
 
               
Marine liability
    31 %     30 %
P&I
    14 %     13 %
Offshore energy
    13 %     17 %
Cargo
    10 %     9 %
Transport
    8 %     8 %
Inland marine
    7 %     3 %
Other
    6 %     7 %
Bluewater hull
    6 %     7 %
Craft/Fishing vessel
    5 %     6 %
 
           
Total
    100 %     100 %
 
           
The marine gross written premium for the 2008 first quarter decreased 5.0% compared to the same period in 2007 reflecting flattening or declining premium in several classes of business due to increased competitive market conditions. The average renewal premium rates during the 2008 first quarter decreased 0.7%. We expect continuing overall declines in 2008 pricing for marine lines of business, including offshore energy, as additional capacity continues to re-enter the marine market.
Specialty Premium. The gross written premium for the first three months of 2008 and 2007 consisted of the following:
                 
    2008     2007  
 
               
Construction liability
    50 %     50 %
Commercial umbrella
    21 %     18 %
Programs
    13 %     10 %
Primary E&S
    11 %     14 %
Personal umbrella
    3 %     3 %
Liquor liability
    2 %     1 %
Other
    0 %     4 %
 
           
Total
    100 %     100 %
 
           
The specialty gross written premium for the 2008 first quarter decreased 11.8% compared to the same period in 2007 due primarily to weakening economic conditions that have reduced demand for contractors liability insurance. The average renewal premium rates decreased by approximately 9.3% for the contractors liability business in the 2008 first quarter. The recent premium rate decreases for the contractors liability business and generally for the specialty lines of business are reflective of softening market conditions which are expected to continue throughout 2008.

 

27


Table of Contents

Professional Liability Premium. The gross written premium for the first three months of 2008 and 2007 consisted of the following:
                 
    2008     2007  
 
               
D&O (public and private)
    57 %     60 %
Lawyers and other professionals
    38 %     33 %
Architects and engineers
    5 %     7 %
 
           
Total
    100 %     100 %
 
           
The professional liability gross written premium for the 2008 first quarter decreased 5.8% compared to the same period in 2007. The average renewal premium rates for the professional liability business including D&O renewal premium rates decreased by approximately 5.6% in the 2008 first quarter. We anticipate continuing declines in 2008 pricing given the overall favorable industry underwriting results since 2002 for the professional liability lines of business.
Middle Markets Premium. Middle markets premium consists of general liability, auto liability and property insurance for a variety of commercial middle markets businesses engaged in contracting, light manufacturing, garage services, hospitality and real estate.
Despite the softening market conditions, the gross written premium increased 27.1% for the first three months of 2008 due to geographic and product diversification and consisted of the following:
                 
    2008     2007  
 
               
General liability
    49 %     55 %
Commercial automobile liability
    38 %     32 %
Property
    13 %     13 %
 
           
Total
    100 %     100 %
 
           
Property/Other Premium. Property/Other premium includes European property business written by the U.K. Branch beginning in 2006 and run-off business.
Lloyd’s Operations’ Gross Written Premium
We have provided 100% of Syndicate 1221’s stamp capacity since 2006. Stamp capacity is a measure of the amount of premium a Lloyd’s syndicate is authorized to write based on a business plan approved by the Council of Lloyd’s. Syndicate 1221’s stamp capacity is £123.0 million ($243.4 million) in 2008 compared to £140.0 million ($280.2 million) in 2007.
The Lloyd’s Operations gross written premium for the 2008 first quarter increased 3.9% compared to the same period in 2007 reflecting continued expansion in the professional liability book of business partially offset by a decline in marine and energy business due to weakening market conditions.

 

28


Table of Contents

Marine Premium. The gross written premium for the first three months of 2008 and 2007 consisted of the following:
                 
    2008     2007  
 
               
Marine liability
    37 %     27 %
Cargo and specie
    31 %     38 %
Assumed reinsurance
    12 %     12 %
Offshore energy
    10 %     18 %
Hull
    6 %     4 %
Other
    4 %     1 %
 
           
Total
    100 %     100 %
 
           
The marine gross written premium for the 2008 first quarter decreased 3.5% compared to the same period in 2007. The decrease was due to the flattening or declining premium in several classes of business due to increased competitive market conditions. The average renewal premium rates decreased approximately 4.0% for the 2008 first quarter. We expect continuing overall declines in 2008 pricing for marine lines of business, including offshore energy, as additional capacity continues to re-enter the marine market.
Professional Liability Premium. The gross written premium for the first three months of 2008 and 2007 consisted of the following:
                 
    2008     2007  
 
               
E&O
    78 %     68 %
D&O (public and private)
    22 %     32 %
 
           
Total
    100 %     100 %
 
           
Syndicate 1221 commenced writing professional liability business during the second quarter of 2005. The 2008 first quarter gross written premium increased 94.7%, compared to the same period in 2007, due to continued expansion and geographic diversification of the business.
Property/Other Premium. Property/Other premium consists of gross written premium for European property business, engineering and construction business which provides coverage for construction projects including machinery, equipment and loss of use due to delays and of premium for onshore energy business which principally focuses on the oil and gas, chemical and petrochemical industries with coverages primarily for property damage and business interruption.
Ceded Written Premium. In the ordinary course of business, we reinsure certain insurance risks with unaffiliated insurance companies for the purpose of limiting our maximum loss exposure, protecting against catastrophic losses, and maintaining desired ratios of net premiums written to statutory surplus. The relationship of ceded to written premium varies based upon the types of business written and whether the business is written by the Insurance Companies or the Lloyd’s Operations.

 

29


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth our ceded written premium by segment and major line of business for the periods indicated:
                                 
    Three Months Ended March 31  
    2008     2007  
            % of             % of  
    Ceded     Gross     Ceded     Gross  
    Written     Written     Written     Written  
    Premium     Premium     Premium     Premium  
    ($ in thousands)  
 
                               
Insurance Companies:
                               
Marine
  $ 32,864       39.8 %   $ 41,120       47.3 %
Specialty
    24,938       31.6 %     34,831       39.0 %
Professional Liability
    7,554       39.2 %     8,290       40.5 %
Middle Markets
    1,488       18.6 %     2,335       37.0 %
Property/Other
    442       15.4 %     250       4.3 %
 
                       
Subtotal
    67,286       35.1 %     86,826       41.6 %
 
                       
 
                               
Lloyd’s Operations:
                               
Marine
    22,451       30.0 %     32,191       41.4 %
Professional Liability
    3,878       36.3 %     2,095       38.2 %
Property/Other
    5,809       58.5 %     6,730       76.2 %
 
                       
Subtotal
    32,138       33.6 %     41,016       44.6 %
 
                       
 
                               
Total
  $ 99,424       34.6 %   $ 127,842       42.5 %
 
                       
The ratios of total ceded written premium to gross written premium in the 2008 and 2007 first quarters were 34.6% and 42.5%, respectively. The decrease in the ratio of ceded written premium to gross written premium for the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 was due to a combination of the following factors:
 
Restructuring of the marine quota share treaties for the Insurance Companies and the Lloyd’s Operations resulting in a large reduction in ceded premium.
 
 
An increased retention from $0.5 million to $1.0 million effective April 1, 2007 for the contractors liability business which reduced the amount of premium ceded.
 
 
The elimination of a 5% reinsurer participation in our Syndicate 1221 2008 stamp capacity.
Net Written Premium. Net written premium increased 8.5% in the 2008 first quarter, compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to retaining more of our business as discussed above.
Net Earned Premium. Net earned premium, which generally lags the increase in net written premium, increased 12.0% in the 2008 first quarter compared to the same period in 2007, as a result of the increased net written premium discussed above.

 

30


Table of Contents

Commission Income. Commission income from unaffiliated business decreased 36.0% in the 2008 first quarter compared to the same period in 2007. Beginning with the 2006 underwriting year, there are no longer any marine pool unaffiliated insurance companies with the elimination of the marine pool and no longer any unaffiliated participants at Syndicate 1221 with the purchase of the minority interest. Any profit commission would therefore result from the run-off of underwriting years prior to 2006.
Net Investment Income. Net investment income increased 16.2% in the 2008 first quarter compared to the same period in 2007, due primarily to the increase in invested assets as a result of the positive cash flow from operations somewhat offset by a modest decline in the portfolio’s book yield.
Net Realized Capital Gains and Losses. Pre-tax net income included $0.08 million of net realized capital losses for the 2008 first quarter compared to $0.2 million of net realized capital gains for the 2007 first quarter. On an after-tax basis, the 2008 first quarter net realized capital loss was $0.00 per share compared to a net realized capital gain of $0.1 million or $0.01 per share for the 2007 first quarter.
Other Income/(Expense). Other income/(expense) for the first quarters of 2008 and 2007 consisted primarily of foreign exchange gains and losses from our Lloyd’s Operations and inspection fees related to our specialty insurance business.
Operating Expenses
Net Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses Incurred. The ratios of net losses and LAE incurred to net earned premium (loss ratios) for the 2008 and 2007 first quarters were 56.8% and 58.4%, respectively. The 2008 first quarter loss ratio was favorably impacted by 8.8 loss ratio points resulting from the $13.7 million net redundancy of prior year loss reserves. The 2007 first quarter loss ratio was favorably impacted by 4.9 loss ratio points resulting from the $6.8 million net redundancy of prior year loss reserves.
The 2008 first quarter losses incurred include 2008 accident year losses of $7.2 million for two marine insurance claims in the Insurance Companies: a liability loss for the sinking of a fishing vessel and a hull loss for fire damage to a fishing vessel. The Lloyd’s Operations property book also incurred $0.9 million of 2008 first quarter flood losses in Selsey, England. Such losses increased the 2008 first quarter loss ratio by 5.2 loss ratio points.
With the recording of gross losses, the Company assesses its reinsurance coverage, potential receivables, and the recoverability of the receivables. Losses incurred on business recently written are primarily covered by reinsurance agreements written by companies with whom the Company is currently doing reinsurance business and whose credit the Company continues to assess in the normal course of business.

 

31


Table of Contents

As illustrated in the following table, our overall reinsurance recoverable amounts for paid and unpaid losses have declined during the 2008 first quarter as the Company continues to bill and collect its recoverables for Hurricanes Katrina and Rita loss payments and retains more of its business:
                         
    March 31,     December 31,        
    2008     2007     Change  
    ($ in thousands)  
Reinsurance recoverables:
                       
Paid losses
  $ 74,183     $ 94,818     $ (20,635 )
Unpaid losses and LAE reserves
    776,767       801,461       (24,694 )
 
                 
Total
  $ 850,950     $ 896,279     $ (45,329 )
 
                 
The following table sets forth gross reserves for losses and LAE reduced for reinsurance recoverable on such amounts resulting in net loss and LAE reserves (a non-GAAP measure reconciled in the following table) for the periods indicated:
                         
    March 31,     December 31,        
    2008     2007     Change  
    ($ in thousands)        
 
Gross reserves for losses and LAE
  $ 1,661,556     $ 1,648,764       0.8 %
Less: Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and LAE reserves
    776,767       801,461       -3.1 %
 
                   
Net loss and LAE reserves
  $ 884,789     $ 847,303       4.4 %
 
                   

 

32


Table of Contents

The following tables set forth our net reported loss and LAE reserves and net IBNR reserves (a non-GAAP measure reconciled above) by segment and line of business for the periods indicated:
                                 
    March 31, 2008  
    Net     Net     Total     % of IBNR  
    Reported     IBNR     Net Loss     to Total Net  
    Reserves     Reserves     Reserves     Loss Reserves  
    ($ in thousands)        
 
                               
Insurance Companies:
                               
Marine
  $ 103,002     $ 103,627     $ 206,629       50.2 %
Specialty
                               
Construction Liability
    41,362       214,979       256,341       83.9 %
All other liability
    22,231       60,716       82,947       73.2 %
 
                         
Total Specialty
    63,593       275,695       339,288       81.3 %
 
                         
 
                               
Professional Liability
    23,195       53,278       76,473       69.7 %
Middle Markets
    10,936       12,339       23,275       53.0 %
Property/Other
    12,422       10,787       23,209       46.5 %
 
                         
 
                               
Total Insurance Companies
    213,148       455,726       668,874       68.1 %
 
                         
 
                               
Lloyd’s Operations:
                               
Marine
    95,940       87,360       183,300       47.7 %
Other
    10,222       22,393       32,615       68.7 %
 
                         
 
                               
Total Lloyd’s Operations
    106,162       109,753       215,915       50.8 %
 
                         
 
                               
Total Company
  $ 319,310     $ 565,479     $ 884,789       63.9 %
 
                         

 

33


Table of Contents

                                 
    December 31, 2007  
    Net     Net     Total     % of IBNR  
    Reported     IBNR     Net Loss     to Total Net  
    Reserves     Reserves     Reserves     Loss Reserves  
    ($ in thousands)        
 
                               
Insurance Companies:
                               
Marine
  $ 93,467     $ 103,500     $ 196,967       52.5 %
Specialty
                               
Construction Liability
    36,137       213,453       249,590       85.5 %
All other liability
    17,139       55,032       72,171       76.3 %
 
                         
Total Specialty
    53,276       268,485       321,761       83.4 %
 
                         
 
                               
Professional Liability
    20,335       50,584       70,919       71.3 %
Middle Markets
    11,469       10,329       21,798       47.4 %
Property/Other
    12,790       11,446       24,236       47.2 %
 
                         
 
                               
Total Insurance Companies
    191,337       444,344       635,681       69.9 %
 
                         
 
                               
Lloyd’s Operations:
                               
Marine
    89,957       93,069       183,026       50.9 %
Other
    7,485       21,111       28,596       73.8 %
 
                         
 
                               
Total Lloyd’s Operations
    97,442       114,180       211,622       54.0 %
 
                         
 
                               
Total Company
  $ 288,779     $ 558,524     $ 847,303       65.9 %
 
                         
At March 31, 2008, the IBNR loss reserve was $565.5 million or 63.9% of our total loss reserves compared to $558.5 million or 65.9% at December 31, 2007.
The increase in net loss reserves in all active lines of business is generally a reflection of the growth in net premium volume over the last three years coupled with a changing mix of business to longer tail lines of business such as the specialty lines of business (construction defect, commercial excess, primary excess and personal umbrella), professional liability lines of business and marine liability and transport business in ocean marine. These products, which typically have a longer settlement period compared to the mix of business the Company has historically written, are becoming larger components of our overall business.
Our reserving practices and the establishment of any particular reserve reflect management’s judgment concerning sound financial practice and do not represent any admission of liability with respect to any claims made against us. No assurance can be given that actual claims made and related payments will not be in excess of the amounts reserved. During the loss settlement period, it often becomes necessary to refine and adjust the estimates of liability on a claim either upward or downward. Even after such adjustments, ultimate liability may exceed or be less than the revised estimates.
There are a number of factors that could cause actual losses and loss adjustment expenses to differ materially from the amount that we have reserved for losses and loss adjustment expenses.

 

34


Table of Contents

The process of establishing loss reserves is complex and imprecise as it must take into account many variables that are subject to the outcome of future events. As a result, informed subjective judgments as to our ultimate exposure to losses are an integral component of our loss reserving process.
The Company’s actuaries generally calculate the IBNR loss reserves for each line of business by underwriting year for major products using standard actuarial methodologies which are projection or extrapolation techniques. This process requires the substantial use of informed judgment and is inherently uncertain.
There are instances in which facts and circumstances require a deviation from the general process described above. Two such instances relate to the IBNR loss reserve processes for our asbestos exposures and our Hurricanes Katrina and Rita losses, where extrapolation techniques are not applied, except in a limited way, given the unique nature of hurricane losses and limited population of marine excess policies with potential asbestos exposures. In such circumstances, inventories of the policy limits exposed to losses coupled with reported losses are analyzed and evaluated principally by claims personnel and underwriters to establish IBNR loss reserves.
Asbestos Liability. Our exposure to asbestos liability principally stems from marine liability insurance written on an occurrence basis during the mid-1980s. In general, our participation on such risks is in the excess layers, which requires the underlying coverage to be exhausted prior to coverage being triggered in our layer. In many instances we are one of many insurers who participate in the defense and ultimate settlement of these claims, and we are generally a minor participant in the overall insurance coverage and settlement.
The reserves for asbestos exposures at March 31, 2008 are for: (i) one large settled claim for excess insurance policy limits exposed to a class action suit against an insured involved in the manufacturing or distribution of asbestos products being paid over several years (two other large settled claims were fully paid in 2007); (ii) other insureds not directly involved in the manufacturing or distribution of asbestos products, but that have more than incidental asbestos exposure for their purchase or use of products that contained asbestos; and (iii) attritional asbestos claims that could be expected to occur over time. Substantially all of our asbestos liability reserves are included in our marine loss reserves.
The Company believes that there are no remaining known claims where it would suffer a material loss as a result of excess policy limits being exposed to class action suits for insureds involved in the manufacturing or distribution of asbestos products. There can be no assurances, however, that material loss development may not arise in the future from existing asbestos claims or new claims given the evolving and complex legal environment that may directly impact the outcome of the asbestos exposures of our insureds.

 

35


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth our gross and net loss and LAE reserves for our asbestos exposures for the periods indicated:
                 
    Three Months Ended     Year Ended  
    March 31, 2008     December 31, 2007  
    ($ in thousands)  
 
               
Gross of Reinsurance
               
Beginning gross reserves
  $ 23,194     $ 37,171  
Incurred losses & LAE
    121       (780 )
Calendar year payments
    35       13,197  
 
           
Ending gross reserves
  $ 23,280     $ 23,194  
 
           
 
               
Gross case loss reserves
  $ 16,101     $ 16,014  
Gross IBNR loss reserves
    7,179       7,180  
 
           
Ending gross reserves
  $ 23,280     $ 23,194  
 
           
 
               
Net of Reinsurance
               
Beginning net reserves
  $ 16,717     $ 21,381  
Incurred losses & LAE
    106       1,779  
Calendar year payments
    27       6,443  
 
           
Ending net reserves
  $ 16,796     $ 16,717  
 
           
 
               
Net case loss reserves
  $ 9,794     $ 9,715  
Net IBNR loss reserves
    7,002       7,002  
 
           
Ending net reserves
  $ 16,796     $ 16,717  
 
           
To the extent the Company incurs additional gross loss development for its historic asbestos exposure the Company’s allowance for uncollectible reinsurance would increase for the reinsurers that are insolvent, in run-off or otherwise no longer active in the reinsurance business. The Company continues to believe that it will be able to collect reinsurance on the gross portion of its historic gross asbestos exposure in the above table. Gross or net loss development for asbestos exposure was not significant in the three months ended March 31, 2008 or 2007.
At March 31, 2008, the ceded asbestos paid and unpaid recoverables were $10.0 million compared to $10.5 million at December 31, 2007.
Loss reserves for environmental losses generally consist of oil spill claims on marine liability policies written in the ordinary course of business. Net loss reserves for such exposures are included in our marine loss reserves and are not separately identified.
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. During the 2005 third quarter, the Company recorded gross and net loss estimates of $471 million and $22.3 million, respectively, exclusive of $14.5 million for the cost of excess of loss reinstatement premiums related to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

 

36


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth our gross and net loss and LAE reserves, incurred loss and LAE, and payments for Hurricanes Katrina and Rita for the periods indicated:
                 
    Three Months Ended     Year Ended  
    March 31, 2008     December 31, 2007  
    ($ in thousands)  
 
               
Gross of Reinsurance
               
Beginning gross reserves
  $ 141,831     $ 319,230  
Incurred loss & LAE
    0       (29,349 )
Calendar year payments
    5,837       148,050  
 
           
Ending gross reserves
  $ 135,994     $ 141,831  
 
           
 
               
Gross case loss reserves
  $ 89,032     $ 94,959  
Gross IBNR loss reserves
    46,962       46,872  
 
           
Ending gross reserves
  $ 135,994     $ 141,831  
 
           
 
               
Net of Reinsurance
               
Beginning net reserves
  $ 4,519     $ 10,003  
Incurred loss & LAE
    (5 )     (1,909 )
Calendar year payments
    (35 )     3,575  
 
           
Ending net reserves
  $ 4,549     $ 4,519  
 
           
 
               
Net case loss reserves
  $ 592     $ 646  
Net IBNR loss reserves
    3,957       3,873  
 
           
Ending net reserves
  $ 4,549     $ 4,519  
 
           
Approximately $145.3 million and $167.7 million of paid and unpaid losses at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, were due from reinsurers as a result of the losses from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

 

37


Table of Contents

Professional Liability Subprime Exposure. The following table sets forth reported claims and notices of potential claims, the average gross and net limits by policy and the average amount where our policy attaches related to subprime exposure for our professional liability business at March 31, 2008. The Company’s management believes that the reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses are adequate to cover the ultimate costs for such loss contingencies related to subprime exposure for the professional liability business.
                                 
    Number     Average     Average     Average  
    of     Gross     Net     Excess  
    Claims (1)     Limit     Limit (2)     Attachment  
    ($ in thousands)  
Primary:
                               
D&O Securities/Other Claims
        $     $          
 
                               
Excess:
                               
D&O Securities Claims
    4       7,500       4,500     $ 37,500  
D&O Side A Securities Claims
    2       5,000       3,500       137,500  
Other Claims
    2       10,000       5,500       35,000  
 
                         
 
                               
Subtotal/Average
    8       7,500       4,500          
 
                         
 
                               
Total
    8     $ 7,500     $ 4,500          
 
                         
     
(1)  
Claims include all professional liability policies written by the Insurance Companies. There are no reported claims or notices of potential claims reported for the Lloyd’s Operations. All policies are claims made. Defense costs are included within the limits of liability. There were no new claims or notices of potential claims reported for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
 
(2)  
Amounts are net of reinsurance.
Prior Year Reserve Redundancies/Deficiencies
As part of our regular review of prior reserves, the Company’s actuaries may determine, based on their judgment, that certain assumptions made in the reserving process in prior years may need to be revised to reflect various factors, likely including the availability of additional information. Based on their reserve analyses, our actuaries may make corresponding reserve adjustments.
Prior year reserve redundancies of $13.7 million and $6.8 million, net of reinsurance, were recorded in the first quarters 2008 and 2007, respectively, as discussed below. The relevant factors that may have a significant impact on the establishment and adjustment of loss and LAE reserves can vary by line of business and from period to period.

 

38


Table of Contents

The segment and line of business breakdowns of prior period net reserve deficiencies (redundancies) were as follows:
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,     March 31,  
    2008     2007  
    ($ in thousands)  
 
               
Insurance Companies:
               
Marine
  $ (300 )   $ (1,500 )
Specialty
    (7,300 )     (2,200 )
Professional Liability
    (300 )     (2,000 )
Middle Markets
    1,200        
Property/Other
    (1,800 )      
 
           
Subtotal Insurance Companies
    (8,500 )     (5,700 )
Lloyd’s Operations
    (5,180 )     (1,100 )
 
           
Total
  $ (13,680 )   $ (6,800 )
 
           
Following is a discussion of relevant factors impacting our 2008 loss reserves:
The Insurance Companies recorded $0.3 million of prior year savings for marine business comprised of $2.5 million of favorable development in marine liability business from 2006 and prior years offset by adverse loss development of $2.2 million from other lines of business of which $1.7 million was for cargo losses consisting mostly of loss activity related to three cargo claims.
The Insurance Companies recorded $7.3 million of prior year savings for specialty business comprised of $8.9 million of favorable development in construction liability business due to favorable loss trends for business written in 2003 to 2006, $2.3 million of favorable development for personal umbrella business written in 2007, offset by adverse loss development of $3.3 million from discontinued business and $0.6 million from program business written in 2007 and 2006.
The Insurance Companies recorded $1.2 million of net prior year deficiencies for middle markets business principally for business written in 2004 and 2003 of which $0.5 million was for one large claim on a policy written in 2003.
The Insurance Companies recorded $1.8 million of prior year savings for run-off business, included in property/other in the above table, principally due to the lack of loss activity for aviation and space business discontinued in 1999.
The Lloyd’s Operations recorded $5.2 million of prior year savings mostly emanating from refinements to the actuarial methodology employed to project ultimate loss estimates by line of business. The methodology employed in the 2008 first quarter separately determined ultimate losses on a gross and ceded basis to establish net IBNR estimates. Prior methodology used net loss amounts to determine such estimates. The net results of the 2008 first quarter analysis was to reduce ultimate loss estimates by approximately $9.7 million for short tail classes of business mostly related to 2005 and prior years (cargo $3.2 million, energy $4.6 million, reinsurance $2.1 million, offset by $0.2 million of loss development for other lines of business). Such prior year savings were offset by strengthening reserves of approximately $4.5 million for business written in 2007 and 2006 for liability business ($2.3 million) and energy business ($2.1 million) and various other classes of business ($0.1 million). Such strengthening has taken into effect the changes in the reinsurance program for increased net retentions that have occurred in 2007 and 2006 compared to prior years.

 

39


Table of Contents

Our management believes that the estimates for the reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses are adequate to cover the ultimate cost of losses and loss adjustment expenses on reported and unreported claims. However, it is possible that the ultimate liability may exceed or be less than such estimates. To the extent that reserves are deficient or redundant, the amount of such deficiency or redundancy is treated as a charge or credit to earnings in the period in which the deficiency or redundancy is identified. We continue to review all of our loss reserves, including our asbestos reserves and Hurricanes Katrina and Rita reserves, on a regular basis.
Commission Expense. Commission expense paid to unaffiliated brokers and agents is generally based on a percentage of the gross written premium and is reduced by ceding commissions the Company may receive on the ceded written premium. Commissions are generally deferred and recorded as deferred policy acquisition costs to the extent that they relate to unearned premium. The percentage of commission expense to net earned premiums in the 2008 first quarter was 13.5% compared to 12.3% for the comparable period in 2007. The increase is attributable to greater retentions, particularly on our marine quota share treaties, which have reduced the ceding commission benefit.
Other Operating Expenses. The 13% increase in other operating expenses in the 2008 first quarter compared to the same period in 2007 was attributable primarily to employee-related expenses resulting from expansion of the business and investments in technology to support this growth.
Income Taxes. The income tax expense was $10.2 million and $9.3 million for the first quarters of 2008 and 2007, respectively, resulting in effective tax rates of 30.5% and 32.2%, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate is less than 35% due to permanent differences between book and tax return income, with the most significant item being tax exempt interest. The effective tax rate on net investment income was 26.4% for the 2008 first quarter compared to 28.4% for the comparable 2007 period. As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the net deferred Federal, foreign, state and local tax assets were $31.3 million and $29.2 million, respectively.
We are subject to the tax regulations of the United States and foreign countries in which we operate. The Company files a consolidated federal tax return, which includes all domestic subsidiaries and the U.K. Branch. The income from the foreign operations is designated as either U.S. connected income or non-U.S. connected income. Lloyd’s is required to pay U.S. income tax on U.S. connected income written by Lloyd’s syndicates. Lloyd’s and the IRS have entered into an agreement whereby the amount of tax due on U.S. connected income is calculated by Lloyd’s and remitted directly to the IRS. These amounts are then charged to the corporate members in proportion to their participation in the relevant syndicates. The Company’s corporate members are subject to this agreement and will receive U.K. tax credits for any U.S. income tax incurred up to the U.K. income tax charged on the U.S. income. The non-U.S. connected insurance income would generally constitute taxable income under the Subpart F income section of the Internal Revenue Code since less than 50% of the Company’s premium is derived within the U.K. and would therefore be subject to U.S. taxation when the Lloyd’s year of account closes. Taxes are accrued at a 35% rate on our foreign source insurance income and foreign tax credits, where available, are utilized to offset U.S. tax as permitted. The Company’s effective tax rate for Syndicate 1221 taxable income could substantially exceed 35% to the extent the Company is unable to offset U.S. taxes paid under Subpart F tax regulations with U.K. tax credits on future underwriting year distributions. U.S. taxes are not accrued on the earnings of the Company’s foreign agencies as these earnings are not subject to the Subpart F tax regulations. These earnings are subject to taxes under U.K. tax regulations at a 30% rate. A finance bill was enacted in the U.K. on July 19, 2007 that reduces the U.K. corporate tax rate from 30% to 28% effective April 1, 2008. The effect of such tax rate change was not material to the Company’s financial statements.
We have not provided for U.S. deferred income taxes on the undistributed earnings of approximately $52 million of our non-U.S. subsidiaries since these earnings are intended to be permanently reinvested in the foreign subsidiaries. However, in the future, if such earnings were distributed to the Company, taxes of approximately $3.6 million would be payable on such undistributed earnings and would be reflected in the tax provision for the year in which these earnings are no longer intended to be permanently reinvested in the foreign subsidiary assuming all foreign tax credits are realized.

 

40


Table of Contents

The Company had net state and local deferred tax assets amounting to potential future tax benefits of $7.6 million and $6.3 million at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Included in the deferred tax assets are net operating loss carryforwards of $1.6 million and $2.5 million at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. A valuation allowance was established for the full amount of these potential future tax benefits due to the uncertainty associated with their realization. The Company’s state and local tax carryforwards at March 31, 2008 expire in 2025.
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”), an interpretation of SFAS 109. FIN 48, which became effective in 2007, establishes the threshold for recognizing the benefits of tax-return positions in the financial statements as more-likely-than-not to be sustained by the taxing authorities, and prescribes a measurement methodology for those positions meeting the recognition threshold. The Company’s adoption of FIN 48 at January 1, 2007 did not have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
Segment Information
The Company’s subsidiaries are primarily engaged in the underwriting and management of property and casualty insurance.
The Company classifies its business into two underwriting segments consisting of the Insurance Companies and the Lloyd’s Operations, which are separately managed, and a Corporate segment. Segment data for each of the two underwriting segments include allocations of revenues and expenses of the Navigators Agencies and the Parent Company’s expenses and related income tax amounts.
We evaluate the performance of each segment based on its underwriting and net income results. The Insurance Companies’ and the Lloyd’s Operations’ results are measured by taking into account net earned premium, net losses and loss adjustment expenses, commission expense, other operating expenses and commission income and other income (expense). The Corporate segment consists of the Parent Company’s investment income, interest expense and the related tax effect. Each segment also maintains its own investments, on which it earns income and realizes capital gains or losses. Our underwriting performance is evaluated separately from the performance of our investment portfolios.
Following are the financial results of the Company’s two underwriting segments.
Insurance Companies
The Insurance Companies consist of Navigators Insurance Company, including its U.K. Branch, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Navigators Specialty Insurance Company. Navigators Insurance Company is our largest insurance subsidiary and has been active since 1983. It is primarily engaged in underwriting marine insurance and related lines of business, professional liability insurance, specialty lines of business including contractors general liability insurance, commercial and personal umbrella and primary and excess casualty businesses, and middle markets business consisting of general liability, commercial automobile liability and property insurance for a variety of commercial middle markets businesses. Navigators Specialty Insurance Company which began operations in 1990, underwrites specialty and professional liability insurance on an excess and surplus lines basis fully reinsured by Navigators Insurance Company. The Navigators Agencies produce business for the Insurance Companies.

 

41


Table of Contents

Following are the results of operations for the Insurance Companies for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007:
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2008     2007  
    ($ in thousands)  
 
               
Gross written premium
  $ 191,596     $ 208,874  
Net written premium
    124,310       122,048  
 
               
Net earned premium
    112,246       101,812  
Net losses and LAE
    (67,356 )     (61,340 )
Commission expense
    (12,948 )     (11,083 )
Other operating expenses
    (22,148 )     (18,769 )
Commission income and other income (expense)
    258       489  
 
           
 
               
Underwriting profit
    10,052       11,109  
 
               
Net investment income
    15,465       13,654  
Net realized capital gains (losses)
    (102 )     243  
 
           
Income before income taxes
    25,415       25,006  
 
               
Income tax expense
    7,370       7,911  
 
           
Net income
  $ 18,045     $ 17,095  
 
           
 
               
Loss and LAE ratio
    60.0 %     60.2 %
Commission expense ratio
    11.5 %     10.9 %
Other operating expense ratio (1)
    19.5 %     18.0 %
 
           
Combined ratio
    91.0 %     89.1 %
 
           
     
(1)  
Includes other operating expenses and commission income and other income (expense).

 

42


Table of Contents

Following are the underwriting results of the Insurance Companies for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007:
                                                         
    Three Months Ended March 31, 2008  
    ($ in thousands)  
    Net     Losses                                
    Earned     and LAE     Underwriting     Underwriting     Loss     Expense     Combined  
    Premium     Incurred     Expenses     Profit/(Loss)     Ratio     Ratio     Ratio  
 
                                                       
Marine & Energy
  $ 33,226     $ 24,371     $ 11,062     $ (2,207 )     73.4 %     33.3 %     106.7 %
Specialty
    56,669       29,480       15,498       11,691       52.0 %     27.3 %     79.3 %
Professional Liability
    14,073       8,905       5,098       70       63.3 %     36.2 %     99.5 %
Middle Markets
    5,697       4,284       1,989       (576 )     75.2 %     34.8 %     110.0 %
Property/Other
    2,581       316       1,191       1,074       12.2 %     46.1 %     58.3 %
 
                                         
Total
  $ 112,246     $ 67,356     $ 34,838     $ 10,052       60.0 %     31.0 %     91.0 %
 
                                         
                                                         
    Three Months Ended March 31, 2007  
    ($ in thousands)  
    Net     Losses                                
    Earned     and LAE     Underwriting     Underwriting     Loss     Expense     Combined  
    Premium     Incurred     Expenses     Profit/(Loss)     Ratio     Ratio     Ratio  
 
                                                       
Marine & Energy
  $ 33,490     $ 20,323     $ 7,773     $ 5,394       60.7 %     23.2 %     83.9 %
Specialty
    49,042       29,026       14,879       5,137       59.2 %     30.3 %     89.5 %
Professional Liability
    13,037       8,484       4,323       230       65.1 %     33.1 %     98.2 %
Middle Markets
    4,570       2,740       1,613       217       60.0 %     35.3 %     95.3 %
Property/Other
    1,673       767       775       131     NM     NM     NM  
 
                                         
Total
  $ 101,812     $ 61,340     $ 29,363     $ 11,109       60.2 %     28.9 %     89.1 %
 
                                         
Net earned premium of the Insurance Companies increased 10% in the 2008 first quarter compared to the same period in 2007 reflecting increased retention of the business written.
Underwriting results generally reflect the favorable industry market conditions over the last three to four years (excluding the losses from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita) coupled with satisfactory loss trends in the aforementioned periods. The 2008 first quarter loss ratio was favorably impacted by prior period loss reserve redundancies of $8.5 million or 7.6 loss ratio points. The 2007 first quarter loss ratio was favorably impacted by prior period loss reserve redundancies of $5.7 million or 5.6 loss ratio points.
The approximate annualized pre-tax yields on the Insurance Companies’ investment portfolio, excluding net realized capital gains and losses, were 4.4% for the 2008 first quarter compared to 4.5% for the comparable 2007 period. The average duration of the Insurance Companies’ invested assets at March 31, 2008 was 4.7 years compared to 4.5 years at March 31, 2007. Net investment income increased in the 2008 first quarter compared to the same period in 2007 primarily due to the investment of new funds from cash flow, partially offset by a slight decrease in yields.

 

43


Table of Contents

Lloyd’s Operations
The Lloyd’s Operations consist of NUAL, which manages Syndicate 1221, Millennium Underwriting Ltd. and Navigators Corporate Underwriters Ltd. Both Millennium Underwriting Ltd. and Navigators Corporate Underwriters Ltd. are Lloyd’s corporate members with limited liability and provide capacity to Syndicate 1221. NUAL owns Navigators Underwriting Ltd., an underwriting managing agency with its principal office in Manchester, England, which underwrites cargo and engineering business for Syndicate 1221. In January 2005, we formed Navigators NV in Antwerp, Belgium, a wholly-owned subsidiary of NUAL. Navigators NV produces transport liability, cargo and marine liability premium on behalf of Syndicate 1221. The Lloyd’s Operations and Navigators Management (UK) Limited, a Navigators Agency which produces business for the U.K. Branch, are subsidiaries of Navigators Holdings (UK) Limited located in the United Kingdom.
Syndicate 1221’s stamp capacity is £123.0 million ($243.4 million) in 2008 compared to £140.0 million ($280.2 million) in 2007. Stamp capacity is a measure of the amount of premium a Lloyd’s syndicate is authorized to write as determined by the Council of Lloyd’s. Syndicate 1221’s stamp capacity is expressed net of commission (as is standard at Lloyd’s). The Syndicate 1221 premium recorded in the Company’s financial statements is gross of commission. Navigators provides 100% of Syndicate 1221’s capacity for the 2008 and 2007 underwriting years through Navigators Corporate Underwriters Ltd. in 2008 and through Millennium Underwriting Ltd. and Navigators Corporate Underwriters Ltd. in 2007.
Lloyd’s presents its results on an underwriting year basis, generally closing each underwriting year after three years. We make estimates for each underwriting year and timely accrue the expected results. Our Lloyd’s Operations included in the consolidated financial statements represent our participation in Syndicate 1221.
Lloyd’s syndicates report the amounts of premiums, claims, and expenses recorded in an underwriting account for a particular year to the companies or individuals that participate in the syndicates. The syndicates generally keep accounts open for three years. Traditionally, three years have been necessary to report substantially all premiums associated with an underwriting year and to report most related claims, although claims may remain unsettled after the underwriting year is closed. A Lloyd’s syndicate typically closes an underwriting year by reinsuring outstanding claims on that underwriting year with the participants for the next underwriting year. The ceding participants pay the assuming participants an amount based on the unearned premiums and outstanding claims in the underwriting year at the date of the assumption. Our participation in Syndicate 1221 is represented by and recorded as our proportionate share of the underlying assets and liabilities and results of operations of the syndicate since (i) we hold an undivided interest in each asset, (ii) we are proportionately liable for each liability and (iii) Syndicate 1221 is not a separate legal entity. At Lloyd’s, the amount to close an underwriting year into the next year is referred to as the reinsurance to close (“RITC”) transaction. The RITC amounts represent the transfer of the assets and liabilities from the participants of a closing underwriting year to the participants of the next underwriting year. To the extent our participation in the syndicate changes, the RITC amounts vary accordingly. The RITC transaction, recorded in the fourth quarter, does not result in any gain or loss. We provide letters of credit to Lloyd’s to support our participation in Syndicate 1221’s stamp capacity as discussed below under the caption Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Whenever a member of Lloyd’s is unable to pay its debts to policyholders, such debts may be payable by the Lloyd’s Central Fund. If Lloyd’s determines that the Central Fund needs to be increased, it has the power to assess premium levies on current Lloyd’s members up to 3% of a member’s underwriting capacity in any one year. The Company does not believe that any assessment is likely in the foreseeable future and has not provided any allowance for such an assessment.

 

44


Table of Contents

Following are the results of operations of the Lloyd’s Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007:
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2008     2007  
    ($ in thousands)  
 
               
Gross written premium
  $ 95,550     $ 91,987  
Net written premium
    63,412       50,971  
 
               
Net earned premium
    43,494       37,234  
Net losses and LAE
    (21,064 )     (19,852 )
Commission expense
    (8,000 )     (6,016 )
Other operating expenses
    (7,608 )     (7,520 )
Commission income and other income (expense)
    14       (152 )
 
           
 
               
Underwriting profit
    6,836       3,694  
 
               
Net investment income
    2,982       2,151  
Net realized capital gains (losses)
    26       (42 )
 
           
Income before income taxes
    9,844       5,803  
 
Income tax expense
    3,452       2,054  
 
           
Net income
  $ 6,392     $ 3,749  
 
           
 
               
Loss and LAE ratio
    48.4 %     53.3 %
Commission expense ratio
    18.4 %     16.2 %
Other operating expense ratio (1)
    17.5 %     20.6 %
 
           
Combined ratio
    84.3 %     90.1 %
 
           
     
(1)  
Includes other operating expenses and commission income and other income (expense).
The Lloyd’s Operations have been experiencing business expansion coupled with improving underwriting results as a result of the generally favorable market conditions for marine and energy business from late 2001 through 2003, and continuing to a lesser extent in 2004. Marine and energy premium rate increases occurred in 2005 and continued into 2006 following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, particularly in the offshore energy business, while the average renewal premium rates in 2007 decreased approximately 1.2% for the marine and energy business and decreased approximately 3.4% in our professional liability business. The average renewal premium rates for the first three months of 2008 decreased approximately 4.0% for the marine and energy business and decreased approximately 2.9% for the professional liability business.
The 2008 earnings in the Lloyd’s Operations reflect the continued favorable loss development trends. The 2008 first quarter loss ratio was favorably impacted by prior period loss reserve redundancies of $5.2 million or 11.9 loss ratio points. The 2007 first quarter loss ratio was favorably impacted by prior period loss reserve redundancies of $1.1 million or 3.0 loss ratio points.
The approximate annualized pre-tax yields on the Lloyd’s Operations investment portfolio, excluding net realized capital gains and losses, were 3.7% for the 2008 first quarter compared to 3.6% for the comparable 2007 period. The average duration of our Lloyd’s Operations invested assets at March 31, 2008 was 1.5 years compared to 1.6 years at March 31, 2007. The increase in the Lloyd’s Operations net investment income is reflective of the increased investment portfolio primarily due to positive cash flow and to the slight increase in the yield. Such yields are net of interest credits to certain reinsurers for funds withheld by our Lloyd’s Operations.

 

45


Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions
There have been no material changes in the information concerning off-balance sheet transactions as stated in the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
There have been no material changes in the operating lease or capital lease information concerning contractual obligations as stated in the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Total reserves for losses and LAE were $1.7 billion at March 31, 2008 compared to $1.6 billion at December 31, 2007. There were no significant changes in the Company’s lines of business or claims handling that would create a material change in the percentage relationship of the projected payments by period to the total reserves.
The following table sets forth our contractual obligations with respect to the 7% senior unsecured notes due May 1, 2016 discussed in the Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements, included herein:
                                         
    Payments Due by Period  
            Less than                     More than  
    Total     1 Year     1-3 Years     3-5 Years     5 Years  
    ($ in thousands)  
 
                                       
7% Senior Notes
  $ 199,375     $ 8,750     $ 17,500     $ 17,500     $ 155,625  
 
                             
Investments
The objective of the Company’s investment policy, guidelines and strategy is to maximize total investment return in the context of preserving and enhancing shareholder value and statutory surplus of the Insurance Companies. Secondarily, an important consideration is to optimize the after-tax book income.
The investments are managed by outside professional fixed-income and equity portfolio managers. The Company seeks to achieve its investment objectives by investing in cash equivalents and money market funds, municipal bonds, U.S. Government bonds, U.S. Government agency guaranteed and non-guaranteed securities, corporate bonds, mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities and common and preferred stocks. Our investment guidelines require that the amount of the consolidated fixed income portfolio rated below “A-” but no lower than “BBB-” by Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) or below “A3” but no lower than “Baa3” by Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) shall not exceed 10% of the total fixed income and short-term investments. Securities rated below “BBB-” by S&P or below “Baa3” by Moody’s combined with any other investments not specifically permitted under the investment guidelines, can not exceed 5% of consolidated stockholders’ equity. Investments in equity securities that are actively traded on major U.S. stock exchanges can not exceed 20% of consolidated stockholders’ equity. Our investment guidelines prohibit investments in derivatives other than as a hedge against foreign currency exposures or the writing of covered call options on the equity portfolio.
The Insurance Companies’ investments are subject to the oversight of their respective Board of Directors and our Finance Committee. The investment portfolio and the performance of the investment managers are reviewed quarterly. These investments must comply with the insurance laws of New York State, the domiciliary state of Navigators Insurance Company and Navigators Specialty Insurance Company. These laws prescribe the type, quality and concentration of investments which may be made by insurance companies. In general, these laws permit investments, within specified limits and subject to certain qualifications, in Federal, state and municipal obligations, corporate bonds, preferred stocks, common stocks, mortgages and real estate.

 

46


Table of Contents

The Lloyd’s Operations’ investments are subject to the oversight of the Board of Directors and the Investment Committee of NUAL, as well as the Company’s Board of Directors and Finance Committee. These investments must comply with the rules and regulations imposed by Lloyd’s and by certain overseas regulators. The investment portfolio and the performance of the investment managers are reviewed quarterly.
At March 31, 2008, the average quality of the investment portfolio as rated by S&P and Moody’s was AA/Aa with an average duration of 4.2 years. All of the Company’s mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities are rated AAA/Aaa by S&P and Moody’s, respectively, except for four asset-backed securities approximating $5.3 million, three of which are rated A-/A3 and one rated BBB-/Baa3. The Company does not own any collateralized debt obligations (CDO’s), collateralized loan obligations (CLO’s) or asset backed commercial paper.
At March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, all fixed-maturity and equity securities held by us were classified as available-for-sale.
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157 which defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. SFAS 157, among other things, requires the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. A hierarchy of valuation techniques is specified in SFAS 157 based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect market data obtained from investment managers or brokers. These two types of inputs have created the following fair value hierarchy:
   
Level 1 – Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. Examples are listed equity and fixed income securities traded on an exchange. Treasury securities would generally be considered level 1.
 
   
Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets. Examples are ABS and MBS securities which are similar to other ABS or MBS securities observed in the market.
 
   
Level 3 – Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable. An example would be a private placement with minimal liquidity.
All fixed maturities, short-term investments and equity securities are carried at fair value. All prices for our fixed maturities, short-term investments and equity securities valued as level 1 or level 2 in the SFAS 157 fair value hierarchy are received from independent pricing services. Prices for any securities derived from level 3 criteria in the fair value hierarchy are developed by one of our outside investment managers.

 

47


Table of Contents

The following table presents, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, the Company’s fixed maturities, equity securities and short-term investments that are measured at fair value at March 31, 2008:
                                 
    Quoted Prices     Significant              
    In Active     Other     Significant        
    Markets for     Observable     Unobservable        
    Identical Assets     Inputs     Inputs        
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  
    ($ in thousands)  
 
                               
Fixed maturities
  $ 188,291     $ 1,380,607     $ 2,073     $ 1,570,971  
Equities securities
    54,030       5,658             59,688  
Short-term investments
    28,664       142,783             171,447  
 
                       
Total
  $ 270,985     $ 1,529,048     $ 2,073     $ 1,802,106  
 
                       
The securities classified as Level 3 in the above table consist of three structured securities rated AAA/Aaa by S&P and Moody’s, respectively, with unobservable inputs included in the Company’s fixed maturities portfolio for which price quotes from brokers were used to indicate fair value. The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for all investments measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs during the quarter ended March 31, 2008:
         
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31, 2008  
    ($ in thousands)  
 
       
Level 3 investments as of January 1, 2008
  $ 2,603  
Unrealized net gains included in other comprehensive income (loss)
    17  
Purchases, sales, paydowns and amortization
    (153 )
Transfer to Level 2
    (394 )
 
     
Level 3 investments as of March 31, 2008
  $ 2,073  
 
     

 

48


Table of Contents

The following tables set forth our cash and investments as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007:
                                 
            Gross     Gross     Cost or  
    Fair     Unrealized     Unrealized     Amortized  
March 31, 2008   Value     Gains     (Losses)     Cost  
    ($ in thousands)  
Fixed maturities:
                               
 
                               
U.S. Government Treasury Bonds, GNMAs and foreign government bonds
  $ 247,946     $ 11,885     $ (101 )   $ 236,162  
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
    572,056       9,224       (2,708 )     565,540  
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities:
                               
Non-guaranteed government agency bonds
    34,802       872             33,930  
Mortgage-backed securities
    228,621       3,940       (114 )     224,795  
Collateralized mortgage obligations
    124,946       698       (6,107 )     130,355  
Asset-backed securities
    58,786       817       (266 )     58,235  
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
    111,458       132       (2,348 )     113,674  
 
                       
Subtotal
    558,613       6,459       (8,835 )     560,989  
Corporate bonds
    192,356       3,555       (3,507 )     192,308  
 
                       
 
                               
Total fixed maturities
    1,570,971       31,123       (15,151 )     1,554,999  
 
                       
 
                               
Equity securities — common stocks
    59,688       3,699       (9,320 )     65,309  
 
                               
Cash
    12,810                   12,810  
 
                               
Short-term investments
    171,447                   171,447  
 
                       
 
                               
Total
  $ 1,814,916     $ 34,822     $ (24,471 )   $ 1,804,565  
 
                       
                                 
            Gross     Gross     Cost or  
    Fair     Unrealized     Unrealized     Amortized  
December 31, 2007   Value     Gains     (Losses)     Cost  
    ($ in thousands)  
Fixed maturities:
                               
 
                               
U.S. Government Treasury Bonds, GNMAs and foreign government bonds
  $ 234,375     $ 5,724     $ (337 )   $ 228,988  
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
    515,883       7,050       (657 )     509,490  
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities:
                               
Non-guaranteed government agency bonds
    29,818       342       (4 )     29,480  
Mortgage-backed securities
    232,869       1,824       (479 )     231,524  
Collateralized mortgage obligations
    134,899       524       (823 )     135,198  
Asset-backed securities
    64,352       533       (79 )     63,898  
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
    113,488       544       (1,031 )     113,975  
 
                       
Subtotal
    575,426       3,767       (2,416 )     574,075  
Corporate bonds
    196,636       2,504       (1,804 )     195,936  
 
                       
 
                               
Total fixed maturities
    1,522,320       19,045       (5,214 )     1,508,489  
 
                       
 
                               
Equity securities — common stocks
    67,240       6,452       (4,704 )     65,492  
 
                               
Cash
    7,056                   7,056  
 
                               
Short-term investments
    170,685                   170,685  
 
                       
 
                               
Total
  $ 1,767,301     $ 25,497     $ (9,918 )   $ 1,751,722  
 
                       

 

49


Table of Contents

We analyze our mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities by credit quality of the underlying collateral distinguishing between the securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) which are Federal government sponsored entities, and the non-FNMA and FHLMC securities broken out by prime, Alt-A and subprime collateral. The securities issued by FNMA and FHLMC are guaranteed by each respective entity but are not guaranteed by the Federal government.
Prime collateral consists of mortgages or other collateral from the most creditworthy borrowers. Alt-A collateral consists of mortgages or other collateral from borrowers which have a risk potential that is greater than prime but less than subprime. The subprime collateral consists of mortgages or other collateral from borrowers with low credit ratings. Such subprime and Alt-A categories are as defined by S&P.
At March 31, 2008, the Company owned two asset-backed securities approximating $0.4 million with subprime mortgage exposures. The securities are rated AAA/Aaa by S&P and Moody’s, respectively, and have an effective maturity of 0.7 years. In addition, the Company owned eleven collateralized mortgage obligations approximating $18.5 million classified as Alt-A which is a credit category between prime and subprime. The Alt-A bonds, also rated AAA/Aaa, have an effective maturity of 2.2 years. Such subprime and Alt-A categories are as defined by S&P. The Company is receiving principal and/or interest payments on all of these securities and believes such amounts are fully collectible.
The following tables set forth our mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, and asset-backed securities by those issued by FNMA and FHLMC and the quality category (prime, Alt-A and subprime) for all other such investments at March 31, 2008:
                                 
            Gross     Gross     Cost or  
    Fair     Unrealized     Unrealized     Amortized  
    Value     Gains     (Losses)     Cost  
Mortgage-backed securities:
                               
FNMA
  $ 170,909     $ 3,028     $ (96 )   $ 167,977  
FHLMC
    57,712       912       (18 )     56,818  
Prime
                       
Alt-A
                       
Subprime
                       
 
                       
Total
  $ 228,621     $ 3,940     $ (114 )   $ 224,795  
 
                       
                                 
            Gross     Gross     Cost or  
    Fair     Unrealized     Unrealized     Amortized  
    Value     Gains     (Losses)     Cost  
Collateralized mortgage obligations:
                               
GNMA
  $ 517     $ 9     $     $ 508  
FNMA
    10,836       261             10,575  
FHLMC
    13,062       373             12,689  
Prime
    82,013       55       (4,451 )     86,409  
Alt-A
    18,518             (1,656 )     20,174  
Subprime
                       
 
                       
Total
  $ 124,946     $ 698     $ (6,107 )   $ 130,355  
 
                       

 

50


Table of Contents

                                 
            Gross     Gross     Cost or  
    Fair     Unrealized     Unrealized     Amortized  
    Value     Gains     (Losses)     Cost  
Asset-backed securities:
                               
GNMA
  $ 2,880     $ 182     $     $ 2,698  
FNMA
                       
FHLMC
                       
Prime
    55,528       635       (235 )     55,128  
Alt-A
                       
Subprime
    378             (31 )     409  
 
                       
Total
  $ 58,786     $ 817     $ (266 )   $ 58,235  
 
                       
The commercial mortgage-backed securities are all rated AAA by S&P or Aaa by Moody’s.
The following table shows the amount and percentage of the Company’s fixed maturities and short-term investments at fair value at March 31, 2008 by S&P credit rating or, if an S&P rating is not available, the equivalent Moody’s rating:
                     
                Percent  
Rating               to  
Description   Rating   Amount     Total  
    ($ in thousands)  
 
                   
Extremely Strong
  AAA   $ 1,236,946       71 %
Very Strong
  AA     243,905       14 %
Strong
  A     191,639       11 %
Adequate
  BBB     69,688       4 %
Speculative
  BB & below     240       0 %
Not Rated
  NR           0 %
 
               
Total
  AA(1)   $ 1,742,418       100 %
 
               
     
(1)  
Weighted average quality rating.

 

51


Table of Contents

The Company owns securities credit enhanced by financial guarantors. The following tables set forth the amount of credit enhanced securities in the fixed maturities portfolio by category at March 31, 2008, identify the amount insured by each financial guarantor and identify the average underlying credit rating of such credit enhanced securities.
                                 
            Gross     Gross     Cost or  
    Fair     Unrealized     Unrealized     Amortized  
    Value     Gains     (Losses)     Cost  
    ($ in thousands)  
Credit enhanced securities:
                               
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
  $ 318,022     $ 4,885     $ (1,529 )   $ 314,666  
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
    10,879       2       (250 )     11,127  
Corporate bonds
    2,174       12       (29 )     2,191  
 
                       
Total
  $ 331,075     $ 4,899     $ (1,808 )   $ 327,984  
 
                       
                                         
                                    Average  
            Gross     Gross     Cost or     Underlying  
    Fair     Unrealized     Unrealized     Amortized     Credit  
    Value     Gains     (Losses)     Cost     Rating  
    ($ in thousands)        
Financial guarantors:
                                       
AMBAC
  $ 65,878     $ 809     $ (561 )   $ 65,630       A+  
Assured Guaranty LTD
    3,952       20             3,932       A  
FGIC
    64,190       788       (232 )     63,634     AA-
Financial Security Assurance
    79,470       1,791       (270 )     77,949       A+  
MBIA
    98,456       1,379       (578 )     97,655     AA-
Radian Group, Inc
    7,702       98       (41 )     7,645     AA-
XL Capital
    11,427       14       (126 )     11,539       A  
 
                             
Total
  $ 331,075     $ 4,899     $ (1,808 )   $ 327,984     AA-
 
                             
The average underlying credit rating by bond insurer of the insured securities rated by S&P or Moody’s if such securities did not have the credit enhancing insurance is included in the “Underlying Credit Rating” column in the above table. This average rating includes $22 million of prerefunded municipal bonds which have an implied rating of AAA but are not otherwise rated by S&P or Moody’s. Such average ratings exclude a total of 40 credit enhanced securities approximating $29 million that do not have an underlying rating consisting of 20 municipal bonds approximating $16 million, 16 asset-backed securities approximating $11 million and 4 corporate bonds approximating $2 million.
If all or some of the companies providing the credit enhancing insurance were no longer viable entities, management believes that the credit enhanced securities are of sufficient quality to not default, or if some of the securities did default, they would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. However, since the ratings would be reduced, it is likely that the market values would decrease to reflect such lower ratings.

 

52


Table of Contents

We regularly review our fixed maturity and equity securities portfolios to evaluate the necessity of recording impairment losses for other-than-temporary declines in the fair value of investments. In general, we focus our attention on those securities whose market value was less than 80% of their cost or amortized cost, as appropriate, for six or more consecutive months. Other factors considered in evaluating potential impairment include the current fair value as compared to cost or amortized cost, as appropriate, our intent and ability to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in value, specific credit issues related to the issuer and current economic conditions.
As mentioned above, the Company considers its intent and ability to hold a security until the value recovers as part of the process of evaluating whether a security’s unrealized loss represents an other-than-temporary decline. The Company’s ability to hold such securities is supported by sufficient cash flow from its operations and from maturities within its investment portfolio in order to meet its claims payment and other disbursement obligations arising from its underwriting operations without selling such investments. With respect to securities where the decline in value is determined to be temporary and the security’s value is not written down, a subsequent decision may be made to sell that security and realize a loss. Subsequent decisions on security sales are made within the context of overall risk monitoring, changing information, market conditions and assessing value relative to other comparable securities. Management of the Company’s investment portfolio is outsourced to third party investment managers. While these investment managers may, at a given point in time, believe that the preferred course of action is to hold securities with unrealized losses that are considered temporary until such losses are recovered, the dynamic nature of the portfolio management may result in a subsequent decision to sell the security and realize the loss, based upon a change in market and other factors described above. The Company believes that subsequent decisions to sell such securities are consistent with the classification of the Company’s portfolio as available for sale.

 

53


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes all securities in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, showing the aggregate fair value and gross unrealized loss by the length of time those securities have continuously been in an unrealized loss position:
                                 
    March 31, 2008     December 31, 2007  
    Fair     Gross
Unrealized
    Fair     Gross
Unrealized
 
    Value     Loss     Value     Loss  
    ($ in thousands)  
 
                               
Fixed Maturities:
                               
U.S. Government Treasury Bonds, GNMAs and foreign government bonds
                               
0-6 Months
  $ 2,179     $ 4     $ 4,119     $ 32  
7-12 Months
                       
> 12 Months
    6,470       97       19,587       305  
 
                       
Subtotal
    8,649       101       23,706       337  
 
                       
 
                               
States, municipalities and political subdivisions
                               
0-6 Months
    116,402       1,990       21,853       67  
7-12 Months
    9,175       327       6,045       115  
> 12 Months
    13,256       391       69,671       475  
 
                       
Subtotal
    138,833       2,708       97,569       657  
 
                       
 
                               
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities (excluding GNMAs)
                               
0-6 Months
    121,619       4,657       61,388       515  
7-12 Months
    18,110       1,730       48,496       423  
> 12 Months
    80,960       2,448       121,798       1,478  
 
                       
Subtotal
    220,689       8,835       231,682       2,416  
 
                       
 
                               
Corporate bonds
                               
0-6 Months
    34,229       1,089       20,722       255  
7-12 Months
    15,169       1,452       25,520       974  
> 12 Months
    18,291       966       38,865       575  
 
                       
Subtotal
    67,689       3,507       85,107       1,804  
 
                       
 
                               
Total Fixed Maturities
  $ 435,860     $ 15,151     $ 438,064     $ 5,214  
 
                       
 
                               
Equity securities - common stocks
                               
0-6 Months
  $ 28,106     $ 5,413     $ 26,257     $ 3,494  
7-12 Months
    7,314       3,664       4,153       1,209  
> 12 Months
    523       243       53       1  
 
                       
 
                               
Total Equity Securities
  $ 35,943     $ 9,320     $ 30,463     $ 4,704  
 
                       

 

54


Table of Contents

We analyze the unrealized losses quarterly to determine if any are other-than-temporary. The above unrealized losses have been determined to be temporary and resulted from changes in market conditions.
When a security in our investment portfolio has an unrealized loss that is deemed to be other-than-temporary, we write the security down to fair value through a charge to operations. Significant changes in the factors we consider when evaluating investments for impairment losses could result in a significant change in impairment losses reported in the consolidated financial statements. There were no impairment losses recorded in our fixed maturity or equity securities portfolios in the first quarters of 2008 or 2007.
The following table shows the composition by National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) rating and the generally equivalent S&P and Moody’s ratings of the fixed maturity securities in our portfolio with gross unrealized losses at March 31, 2008. Not all of the securities are rated by S&P and/or Moody’s.
                                         
            Gross        
    Equivalent   Equivalent   Unrealized Loss     Fair Value  
NAIC   S&P   Moody’s           Percent             Percent  
Rating   Rating   Rating   Amount     to Total     Amount     to Total  
            ($ in thousands)  
 
                                       
1
  AAA/AA/A   Aaa/Aa/A   $ 13,648       90 %   $ 405,776       93 %
2
  BBB   Baa     1,492       10 %     29,844       7 %
3
  BB   Ba     11       0 %     240       0 %
4
  B   B                        
5
  CCC or lower   Caa or lower                        
6
  N/A   N/A                        
 
                               
 
      Total       $ 15,151       100 %   $ 435,860       100 %
 
                               
At March 31, 2008, the gross unrealized losses in the table directly above are related to fixed maturity securities that are rated investment grade, which is defined as a security having an NAIC rating of 1 or 2, an S&P rating of “BBB-” or higher, or a Moody’s rating of “Baa3” or higher, except for $0.2 million which is rated BB/Ba. Unrealized losses on investment grade securities principally relate to changes in interest rates or changes in sector-related credit spreads since the securities were acquired. Any such unrealized losses are recognized in income, if the securities are sold, or if the decline in fair value is deemed other-than-temporary.

 

55


Table of Contents

The scheduled maturity by the number of years until maturity for fixed maturity securities with unrealized losses at March 31, 2008 are shown in the following table:
                                 
    Gross        
    Unrealized Loss     Fair Value  
            Percent             Percent  
    Amount     to Total     Amount     to Total  
    ($ in thousands)  
 
                               
Due in one year or less
  $ 33       0 %   $ 7,594       2 %
Due after one year through five years
    797       5 %     23,372       5 %
Due after five years through ten years
    2,027       13 %     65,823       15 %
Due after ten years
    3,459       23 %     118,382       27 %
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
    8,835       59 %     220,689       51 %
 
                       
 
                               
Total fixed income securities
  $ 15,151       100 %   $ 435,860       100 %
 
                       
Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Due to the periodic repayment of principal, the aggregate amount of mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities are estimated to have an effective maturity of approximately 4.6 years.
Our realized capital gains and losses for the periods indicated were as follows:
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2008     2007  
    ($ in thousands)  
 
               
Fixed maturities:
               
Gains
  $ 197     $ 450  
(Losses)
    (9 )     (438 )
 
           
 
    188       12  
 
           
 
               
Equity securities:
               
Gains
    263       250  
(Losses)
    (527 )     (61 )
 
           
 
    (264 )     189  
 
           
 
               
Net realized capital gains (losses)
  $ (76 )   $ 201  
 
           

 

56


Table of Contents

The following table details realized losses in excess of $250,000 from sales and impairments during the first three months of 2008 and 2007 and the related circumstances giving rise to the loss:
                                                         
                                                    # of Months  
                                                    Unrealized Loss  
                                            Net     Exceeded 20%  
    Date of     Proceeds     Loss on             Holdings at     Unrealized     of Cost or  
Description   Sale     from Sale     Sale     Impairment     March 31, 2008     Loss     Amortized Cost  
    ($ in thousands)  
 
                                                       
Three months ended:
                                                       
March 31, 2008:
                                                   
None
                                                       
March 31, 2007:
                                                       
TIPS (1)
    3/31/2007     $ 5,823     $ (335 )                        
     
(1)  
Treasury inflation protection securities (TIPS) were sold during the 2007 first quarters due to the widening breakeven yield spread between TIPS and Treasuries.
Reinsurance Recoverables
We utilize reinsurance principally to reduce our exposure on individual risks, to protect against catastrophic losses, and to stabilize loss ratios and underwriting results. Although reinsurance makes the reinsurer liable to us to the extent the risk is transferred or ceded to the reinsurer, ceded reinsurance arrangements do not eliminate our obligation to pay claims to our policyholders. Accordingly, we bear credit risk with respect to our reinsurers. Specifically, our reinsurers may not pay claims made by us on a timely basis, or they may not pay some or all of these claims. Either of these events would increase our costs and could have a material adverse effect on our business. We are required to pay the losses even if the reinsurer fails to meet its obligations under the reinsurance agreement.
We are protected by various treaty and facultative reinsurance agreements. Our exposure to credit risk from any one reinsurer is managed through diversification by reinsuring with a number of different reinsurers, principally in the United States and European reinsurance markets. To meet our standards of acceptability, when the reinsurance is placed, a reinsurer generally must have an A.M. Best Company and/or S&P rating of “A” or better, or equivalent financial strength if not rated, plus at least $250 million in policyholders’ surplus. Our Reinsurance Security Committee, which is part of our Enterprise Risk Management Reinsurance Sub-Committee, monitors the financial strength of our reinsurers and the related reinsurance receivables and periodically reviews the list of acceptable reinsurers. The reinsurance is placed either directly by us or through reinsurance intermediaries. The reinsurance intermediaries are compensated by the reinsurers.
Approximately $145.3 million and $167.7 million of the reinsurance recoverables for paid and unpaid losses at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, were due from reinsurers as a result of the losses from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
The Company continues to periodically monitor the financial condition and ongoing activities of its reinsurers, in order to assess the adequacy of its allowance for uncollectible reinsurance.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash flows from operations were $59.7 million and $20.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The positive operating cash flow was primarily due to the increase in net written premium, collected investment income, decrease in reinsurance recoverable on paid losses and fewer paid losses relating to the Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Operating cash flow was used primarily to acquire additional investment assets.

 

57


Table of Contents

Investments and cash increased to $1.81 billion at March 31, 2008 from $1.77 billion at December 31, 2007. The increase was due to the positive cash flow from operations. Net investment income was $18.8 million and $16.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The approximate annualized pre-tax yields of the investment portfolio, excluding net realized capital gains and losses, were 4.2% and 4.4% for the 2008 and 2007 first quarters, respectively.
At March 31, 2008, the weighted average rating of our fixed maturity investments was “AA” by Standard & Poor’s and “Aa” by Moody’s. We believe that we have limited exposure to credit risk since the entire fixed maturity investment portfolio, except for $0.2 million, consists of investment grade bonds. At March 31, 2008, our portfolio had an average maturity of 5.5 years and duration of 4.2 years. Management continually monitors the composition and cash flow of the investment portfolio in order to maintain the appropriate levels of liquidity in an effort to ensure our ability to satisfy claims.
The Company has a credit facility provided through a consortium of banks. The credit facility was amended in February 2007 to increase the letters of credit available under the facility from $115 million to $180 million and to increase the line of credit under the facility from $10 million to $20 million. Also, the expiration of the credit facility was extended from June 30, 2007 to March 31, 2009. If, at that time, the bank consortium does not renew the credit facility, we will need to find other sources to provide the letters of credit or other collateral required to continue our participation in Syndicate 1221. The credit facility, which is denominated in U.S. dollars, is utilized primarily by Navigators Corporate Underwriters Ltd. and Millennium Underwriting Ltd. to fund our participation in Syndicate 1221 which is denominated in British pounds. At March 31, 2008, letters of credit with an aggregate face amount of $106.9 million were issued under the credit facility. The line of credit was unused at March 31, 2008.
As a result of the amendment, the cost of the letter of credit portion of the credit facility was reduced to 0.75% from 1.00% for the issued letters of credit and to 0.10% from 0.125% for the unutilized portion of the letter of credit facility. The cost of the line of credit portion of the credit facility was also reduced to 0.75% from 1.00% over the Company’s choice of LIBOR or prime for the utilized portion and to 0.10% from 0.125% for the unutilized portion.
The credit facility is collateralized by all of the common stock of Navigators Insurance Company. The credit agreement contains covenants common to transactions of this type, including restrictions on indebtedness and liens, limitations on dividends, stock buy backs, mergers and the sale of assets, and requirements to maintain certain consolidated tangible net worth, statutory surplus and other financial ratios. No dividends have been declared or paid by the Company through March 31, 2008. We were in compliance with all covenants at March 31, 2008.
Our reinsurance has been placed with various U.S. and foreign insurance companies and with selected syndicates at Lloyd’s. Pursuant to the implementation of Lloyd’s Plan of Reconstruction and Renewal, a portion of our recoverables are now reinsured by Equitas (a separate United Kingdom authorized reinsurance company established to reinsure outstanding liabilities of all Lloyd’s members for all risks written in the 1992 or prior years of account).
Time lags do occur in the normal course of business between the time gross loss reserves are paid by the Company and the time such gross paid losses are billed and collected from reinsurers. Reinsurance recoverable amounts related to those gross loss reserves at March 31, 2008 are anticipated to be billed and collected over the next several years as the gross loss reserves are paid by the Company.
Generally, for pro-rata or quota share reinsurers, including pool participants, the Company issues quarterly settlement statements for premiums less commissions and paid loss activity, which are expected to be settled by the end of the subsequent quarter. The Company has the ability to issue “cash calls” requiring such reinsurers to pay losses whenever paid loss activity for a claim ceded to a particular reinsurance treaty exceeds a predetermined amount (generally $1.0 million) as set forth in the pro-rata treaty. For the Insurance Companies, cash calls must generally be paid within 30 calendar days. There is generally no specific settlement period for the Lloyd’s Operations cash call provisions, but such billings are usually paid within 45 calendar days.

 

58


Table of Contents

Generally, for excess of loss reinsurers the Company pays monthly or quarterly deposit premiums based on the estimated subject premiums over the contract period (usually one year) which are subsequently adjusted based on actual premiums determined after the expiration of the applicable reinsurance treaty. Paid losses subject to excess of loss recoveries are generally billed as they occur and are usually settled by reinsurers within 30 calendar days for the Insurance Companies and 30 business days for the Lloyd’s Operations.
The Company sometimes withholds funds from reinsurers and may apply ceded loss billings against such funds in accordance with the applicable reinsurance agreements.
At March 31, 2008, ceded asbestos paid and unpaid recoverables were $10.0 million compared to $10.5 million at December 31, 2007. Of such amounts at March 31, 2008, $5.9 million was due from Equitas. The Company generally experiences significant collection delays for a large portion of reinsurance recoverable amounts for asbestos losses given that certain reinsurers are in run-off or otherwise no longer active in the reinsurance business. Such circumstances are considered in the Company’s ongoing assessment of such reinsurance recoverables.
The Company believes that it has adequately managed its cash flow requirements related to reinsurance recoveries from its positive cash flows and the use of available short-term funds when applicable. However, there can be no assurances that the Company will be able to continue to adequately manage such recoveries in the future or that collection disputes or reinsurer insolvencies will not arise that could materially increase the collection time lags or result in recoverable write-offs causing additional incurred losses and liquidity constraints to the Company. The payment of gross claims and related collections from reinsurers with respect to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita could significantly impact the Company’s liquidity needs. However, we expect to continue to pay these hurricane losses over a period of years from cash flow and, if needed, short-term investments and expect to collect our paid reinsurance recoverables generally under the terms described above.
We believe that the cash flow generated by the operating activities of our subsidiaries will provide sufficient funds for us to meet our liquidity needs over the next twelve months. Beyond the next twelve months, cash flow available to us may be influenced by a variety of factors, including general economic conditions and conditions in the insurance and reinsurance markets, as well as fluctuations from year to year in claims experience.
Our capital resources consist of funds deployed or available to be deployed to support our business operations. At March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, our capital resources were as follows:
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2008     2007  
    ($ in thousands)  
 
               
Senior debt
  $ 123,702     $ 123,673  
Stockholders’ equity
    676,877       662,106  
 
           
Total capitalization
  $ 800,579     $ 785,779  
 
           
Ratio of debt to total capitalization
    15.5 %     15.7 %
 
           
The increase in stockholders’ equity in 2008 was primarily due to 2008 first quarter net income offset by treasury stock purchases and a decline in accumulated other comprehensive income.

 

59


Table of Contents

We monitor our capital adequacy to support our business on a regular basis. The future capital requirements of our business will depend on many factors, including our ability to write new business successfully and to establish premium rates and reserves at levels sufficient to cover losses. Our ability to underwrite is largely dependent upon the quality of our claims paying and financial strength ratings as evaluated by independent rating agencies. In particular, we require (1) sufficient capital to maintain our financial strength ratings, as issued by several ratings agencies, at a level considered necessary by management to enable our Insurance Companies to compete, (2) sufficient capital to enable our Insurance Companies to meet the capital adequacy tests performed by statutory agencies in the United States and the United Kingdom and (3) letters of credit and other forms of collateral that are necessary to support the business plan of our Lloyd’s Operations.
As part of our capital management program, we may seek to raise additional capital or may seek to return capital to our shareholders through share repurchases, cash dividends or other methods (or a combination of such methods). Any such determination will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will be dependent upon our profits, financial requirements and other factors, including legal restrictions, rating agency requirements, credit facility limitations and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant.
In October, 2007 the Board of Directors adopted a stock repurchase program for up to $30 million of the Company’s common stock. Purchases may be made from time to time at prevailing prices in open market or privately negotiated transactions through December 31, 2008. The timing and amount of purchases under the program will depend on a variety of factors, including the trading price of the stock, market conditions and corporate and regulatory considerations. Through March 31, 2008, we have purchased 136,026 shares of our common stock at a total cost of $7.3 million.
We primarily rely upon dividends from our subsidiaries to meet our Parent Company’s obligations. Since the issuance of the senior debt in April 2006, the Parent Company’s cash obligations primarily consist of semi-annual interest payments of $4.4 million. Going forward, the interest payments and any stock repurchases will be made from a combination of funds currently at the Parent Company, dividends from its subsidiaries and the $20 million line of credit. The dividends have historically been paid by Navigators Insurance Company. Based on the December 31, 2007 surplus of Navigators Insurance Company, the approximate remaining maximum amount available at March 31, 2008 for the payment of dividends by Navigators Insurance Company during 2008 without prior regulatory approval was $52.9 million. Navigators Insurance Company declared and paid a $5.0 million dividend to the Parent Company in the first quarter of 2008.

 

60


Table of Contents

Condensed Parent Company balance sheets as of March 31, 2008 (unaudited) and December 31, 2007 are shown in the table below:
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2008     2007  
    ($ in thousands)  
 
               
Cash and investments
  $ 43,102     $ 44,146  
Investments in subsidiaries
    751,212       735,351  
Goodwill and other intangible assets
    2,534       2,534  
Other assets
    8,238       6,821  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 805,086     $ 788,852  
 
           
 
               
Accounts payable and other liabilities
  $ 861       1,615  
Accrued interest payable
    3,646       1,458  
7% Senior Notes due May 1, 2016
    123,702       123,673  
 
           
Total liabilities
    128,209       126,746  
 
           
 
               
Stockholders’ equity
    676,877       662,106  
 
           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 805,086     $ 788,852  
 
           
At March 31, 2008, approximately $5.2 million of investments are held in a tax escrow account on behalf of Navigators Insurance Company until the two-year tax loss carryback period expires.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
There have been no material changes in the information concerning market risk as stated in the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
  (a)  
The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. Based on such evaluation, such officers have concluded that as of the end of such period the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in identifying, on a timely basis, material information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act.
 
  (b)  
There have been no changes during our first fiscal quarter in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Part II — Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is not a party to, or the subject of, any material pending legal proceedings that depart from the routine litigation incidental to the kinds of business it conducts.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from the risk factors as previously disclosed in the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

61


Table of Contents

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
In October, 2007 the Board of Directors adopted a stock repurchase program for up to $30 million of the Company’s common stock. Purchases may be made from time to time at prevailing prices in open market or privately negotiated transactions through December 31, 2008. The timing and amount of purchases under the program will depend on a variety of factors, including the trading price of the stock, market conditions and corporate and regulatory considerations.
The following table summarizes the Company’s purchases of its common stock for the 2008 first quarter:
($ in thousands, except per share)
                                 
                    Number of        
                    Shares     Dollar Value  
    Total             Purchased     of Shares that  
    Number     Average     Under Publicly     May Yet Be  
    of Shares     Cost Paid     Announced     Purchased Under  
    Purchased     Per Share     Program     the Program (1)  
 
                               
January 2008
                    $ 30,000  
February 2008
    30,202     $ 54.66       30,202     $ 28,349  
March 2008
    105,824     $ 53.58       105,824     $ 22,679  
 
                           
Total
    136,026     $ 53.82       136,026          
 
                           
     
(1)  
Balance as of the end of the month indicated.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submissions of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
         
Exhibit No.   Description of Exhibit    
   
 
   
10-1  
Paul J. Malvasio Letter Agreement and Retirement Agreement
  *
11-1  
Statement re Computation of Per Share Earnings
  *
31-1  
Certification of CEO per Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
  *
31-2  
Certification of CFO per Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
  *
32-1  
Certification of CEO per Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (This exhibit is intended to be furnished in accordance with Regulation S-K item 601(b)(32)(ii) and shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference).
  *
32-2  
Certification of CFO per Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (This exhibit is intended to be furnished in accordance with Regulation S-K item 601(b)(32)(ii) and shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference).
  *
     
*  
Included herein.

 

62


Table of Contents

SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  The Navigators Group, Inc.
            (Registrant)
 
 
Date: April 30, 2008  /s/ Paul J. Malvasio    
  Paul J. Malvasio   
  Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer 
 

 

63


Table of Contents

         
INDEX OF EXHIBITS
         
Exhibit No.   Description of Exhibit    
   
 
   
10-1  
Paul J. Malvasio Letter Agreement and Retirement Agreement
  *
11-1  
Statement re Computation of Per Share Earnings
  *
31-1  
Certification of CEO per Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
  *
31-2  
Certification of CFO per Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
  *
32-1  
Certification of CEO per Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (This exhibit is intended to be furnished in accordance with Regulation S-K item 601(b)(32)(ii) and shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference).
  *
32-2  
Certification of CFO per Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (This exhibit is intended to be furnished in accordance with Regulation S-K item 601(b)(32)(ii) and shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference).
  *
 
 
*  
Included herein.

 

64